Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Shoe podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts team. Welcome to the Freedom Hut. Monday,
Speaker 1: October third edition of the program. We have Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: the Vice president, saying that the relief efforts in Florida
Speaker 1: after Hurricane Ian reeked havoc will be based on equity
Speaker 1: at some level. And oh my people are rightly unhappy
Speaker 1: about hearing that. Plus there of course trying to blame
Speaker 1: rohnd to Santists say that he didn't evacuate fast enough.
Speaker 1: This just is rooted in no reality other than Democrats
Speaker 1: fearing to Santists politically and trying to do everything they
Speaker 1: can to tarnish him. Plus Gavin Newsom out in California
Speaker 1: now has a bill in place that will allow doctors
Speaker 1: to lose their licenses for COVID misinformation. And what is
Speaker 1: the situation right now in Ukraine? And what risks is
Speaker 1: the United States running with all this? Oh and the
Speaker 1: craziest masking policy ever, by the way, I'll probably talk
Speaker 1: about that after Gavin Newsom or among the craziest. I
Speaker 1: can't say they'll craziest because people that still mask. I mean,
Speaker 1: how much crazier can you get than that? We get
Speaker 1: into it in a second, but if you've ever thought
Speaker 1: about being a real estate investor, I want you to
Speaker 1: listen up. There are people that can help you do
Speaker 1: it the right way, that can help you build up
Speaker 1: your real est state portfolio over time. So it can
Speaker 1: be a big part of your retirement. It can be
Speaker 1: a big part of getting income and producing economic security
Speaker 1: for you. But you gotta know how to do it.
Speaker 1: That's where Done for Your Real Estate comes in. I
Speaker 1: had never even bought a house to live in before,
Speaker 1: never mind as an investment. I met the Done for
Speaker 1: Your Real Estate founders years ago, sat down with them.
Speaker 1: They told me what they do, and I said, I
Speaker 1: want to be a client. I've been a client now
Speaker 1: it Done for Your Real Estate since twenty nineteen, and
Speaker 1: my brothers are clients. I've brought many friends into the
Speaker 1: Done for Your Real Estate fold. I'm telling you they
Speaker 1: do a great job. They take you start to finish
Speaker 1: from the real estate investment process, from picking the house,
Speaker 1: getting the loan, getting a tenant in place, and management company,
Speaker 1: all of it, and they work with you at every
Speaker 1: stage of the process. Go to done for you Buck
Speaker 1: dot com to see how this works. Again, that's done
Speaker 1: for you, Buck dot com. Real estate friends, you know
Speaker 1: inflation all this stuff. Rents go up. When inflation goes up,
Speaker 1: you get a good house in a good neighborhood. You're
Speaker 1: going to build up equity over time. Done for you,
Speaker 1: Buck dot com to see how this works. That's done
Speaker 1: for you, Buck dot com. All right. There is obviously
Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of destruction in the wake of Hurricane Ian.
Speaker 1: It's been terrible for the state of Florida. It really
Speaker 1: hit hard at the Fort Myers area and particularly those
Speaker 1: some of those Barrier islands right next to Fort Myers
Speaker 1: Beach have been nearly washed away. We've got to get
Speaker 1: as much resource, as much in the way of resources
Speaker 1: as possible to help the people who are there, and
Speaker 1: that should be the entire focus. But the Democrats, because
Speaker 1: we aren't a political cycle right now, we're an election cycle,
Speaker 1: they can't wait, they can't hold back and say, you
Speaker 1: know what, we're just gonna work on the relief effort
Speaker 1: without politicizing it right away. They're already going after RHND
Speaker 1: DE Santis. But they're politicizing it even more than that
Speaker 1: by Kamala Harris coming out and saying that the hurricane
Speaker 1: relief efforts are going to be rooted this was the quote,
Speaker 1: rooted in equity. We have to address this in a
Speaker 1: way that is about giving resources based on equity understanding
Speaker 1: that we fight for equality, but we also need to
Speaker 1: fight for equity understanding and not everyone starts out at
Speaker 1: the same place. And if we want people to be
Speaker 1: in an equal place, sometimes we have to take into
Speaker 1: account those disparities and do that work. I mean, what
Speaker 1: is she really saying. What are we talking about here?
Speaker 1: A policy that advantages some over others when it comes
Speaker 1: to hurricane relief, based on skin color, based on ethnicity,
Speaker 1: based on gender identity. What is she really saying here?
Speaker 1: But you see all the Democrats in positions of power.
Speaker 1: Now that is true. Unfortune corporate America as well, is
Speaker 1: that equity is a phrase that they used to tell
Speaker 1: everybody what side of the political aisle they're on and
Speaker 1: that they're a good person. You just say equity as
Speaker 1: a means of signaling to everybody what your beliefs are
Speaker 1: and what kind of a person you are. You don't
Speaker 1: actually think, well, what does this mean in this instance? Right,
Speaker 1: equity is effectively a term used to denote racial justice.
Speaker 1: Racial justice, and that means equality of ends, not a
Speaker 1: quality of opportunity. That is what equity actually means. How
Speaker 1: does that apply to a hurricane relief situation? Well, when
Speaker 1: Kamala was asked about this by reporters, she did not
Speaker 1: have much to say about it. You didn't say anything
Speaker 1: about it. Now, this is I just want to know.
Speaker 1: I don't even think that Kamala really believed that they'd
Speaker 1: be able to do equity based hurricane relief. It's just
Speaker 1: that she knows everything has to be through this prism.
Speaker 1: She was really giving you a mindset, or rather a
Speaker 1: window into the democrat mindset. Everything has to be rooted
Speaker 1: around equity. Right, If a meteor was going to strike
Speaker 1: planet Earth and erase all existence, our preparations for that
Speaker 1: would need to be rooted around equity. You know, some
Speaker 1: people are going to be hit more than others by
Speaker 1: the meteor that kills all life on the planet because
Speaker 1: you know equity. This is the mindset. It makes no sense,
Speaker 1: but that's not surprising when you understand what the philosophy
Speaker 1: is behind it and they also have gone after Ronda Santis.
Speaker 1: This was entirely to say it's predictable is actually not
Speaker 1: even fully true. We predicted it. I predicted it last week.
Speaker 1: I was like, they're gonna go after De Santis right away,
Speaker 1: right away, even though this is a guy who there's
Speaker 1: photos you can see thousands and thousands of first responders, aircraft, trucks, boats,
Speaker 1: you know, shallow draft vessels all lined up, all going,
Speaker 1: all getting people resource. It doesn't matter Santis doing a
Speaker 1: bad job because they hate him. You know, Orange Man
Speaker 1: Bad was what they said about Trump, and that was
Speaker 1: their mentality about Trump, and now it's you know, De
Speaker 1: Santists is worse than Orange Man Bad, which is how
Speaker 1: is that even possible? Orange Man Bad was the worst
Speaker 1: person in the history of the universe. They told us
Speaker 1: it's all hysteria, it's all childish nonsense, but there are
Speaker 1: very real political implications from it. As you know, they
Speaker 1: went after Desantist. They said that the evacuation out of
Speaker 1: Lee County was not fast enough. People had days and
Speaker 1: days of warning that it was coming to the general
Speaker 1: area of the west coast of Florida. Here is how
Speaker 1: Rhonda Santists dealt with this question, which is clearly meant
Speaker 1: to put him on the defensive, to suggest that for
Speaker 1: some reason, he didn't give enough warning about where the
Speaker 1: hurricane was going to go. Why do you stand behind
Speaker 1: Lee County's decision to not have that mandatory evacuation until
Speaker 1: the day before the storm? Well, did you where was
Speaker 1: your industry station when the storm hit? Were you guys
Speaker 1: in Lee County? No, you were in Tampa. So that's
Speaker 1: you know, they were following the weather track and they
Speaker 1: had to make decisions based on that. But you know,
Speaker 1: seventy two hours they weren't even in the cone. Forty
Speaker 1: eight hours they were on the periphery. So you got
Speaker 1: to make the decisions the best you can. I think
Speaker 1: part of it was so much attention was paid to
Speaker 1: Tampa that I think a lot of them probably thought
Speaker 1: that they wouldn't get the worst of it, so, you know,
Speaker 1: they but they did, and I think it's it's easy
Speaker 1: to second guess them, But they were ready for the
Speaker 1: whole time and made that call when when they were
Speaker 1: justifiable to do so. Now that's, of course what you
Speaker 1: get from Rond descends the recitation of fact and the
Speaker 1: truth of what went on here. But the media is
Speaker 1: still going to keep going with this. Every day they're
Speaker 1: going to do this, Oh, we're going to tell you
Speaker 1: how many fatalities, how much destruction there was. That's of
Speaker 1: course reporting, and that this is a serious national story
Speaker 1: that needs a lot of attention. But then they'll always
Speaker 1: connected right away to it's Rhonda Santas's fault. There was
Speaker 1: a terrible storm, a really worse than a century storm
Speaker 1: that hit Florida, and it's Rhoda Santas's fault. Now that's unfair,
Speaker 1: it's irrational, But look at what Democrats have to run
Speaker 1: on right now. Everything is trending toward Republicans and all
Speaker 1: the key races. Democrats look like they are about to
Speaker 1: get tossed out of power. So we shall see what
Speaker 1: else they're willing to do here. But DeSantis is up
Speaker 1: for reelection against Charlie Chris, who's a joke. But you know,
Speaker 1: here we are, and they're going to do everything they
Speaker 1: can to try to make it as tight as possible
Speaker 1: so that there's no sense of having a mandate given
Speaker 1: by the voters, a mandate given by the voters of Florida,
Speaker 1: mandate given by the voters of New York of Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: of Georgia, any of these states. It's where there are
Speaker 1: critical elections that are going to be underway here. Democrats
Speaker 1: obviously want to win them, but even if they can't
Speaker 1: win them, they want to keep it a narrow, a
Speaker 1: narrow margin of victories so they can say, see, we're
Speaker 1: not terrible. We're not ruining cities and destroying the economy
Speaker 1: and kicking the border wide open. We're not doing that
Speaker 1: word where people like us. That's what the Democrats want
Speaker 1: to believe, at least that is that is where they
Speaker 1: are on all this. Gavin Newsom has this bill that
Speaker 1: is going to go after doctors licenses if they spread
Speaker 1: COVID misinformation. Newsom signed it. Okay, this is remarkable intrusion
Speaker 1: on the First Amendment and it's also a remarkably disgusting
Speaker 1: overreach from this guy. Is really a hair gel tyrant.
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy Newsom is bad news, folks. He's
Speaker 1: got all, you know, whatever is the most disconnected from reality,
Speaker 1: but fashionable elitist position on anything. That is what Avenuesom
Speaker 1: house nothing. This is the guy who shows up when
Speaker 1: all the Amazon thousands and thousands of looted robbed Amazon
Speaker 1: packages are at the railway in Los Angeles and he's like,
Speaker 1: woh wow, who's in charge here? You are, your jackass,
Speaker 1: But he's such a such a slimy and disingenuous fraud.
Speaker 1: But governor of the biggest state in the country has
Speaker 1: aspirations even beyond that. We'll get into it in just
Speaker 1: a moment here. Preborn pregnancy clinics are doing incredibly important work.
Speaker 1: As you know, there is a huge movement now under
Speaker 1: way to try to enshrine abortion rights into every state
Speaker 1: in the country, to make abortion more feasible, more accessible,
Speaker 1: paid for by you, even after Rovi Wade was overturned finally,
Speaker 1: So we are in a fight for life every day,
Speaker 1: and especially in a lot of these blue states. The
Speaker 1: best way to save lives is to help mothers connect
Speaker 1: with their unborn, their preborn babies, and that's where the
Speaker 1: preborn pregnancy clinics come in. You know, a lot of
Speaker 1: things you can give money to that are really that
Speaker 1: are worthwhile causes will help people. This is something where
Speaker 1: you can give money and actually save a life or
Speaker 1: save many lives. That's exactly what preborn does. The majority
Speaker 1: of the time, when a woman meets her baby over ultrasound,
Speaker 1: she will choose life, and by positioning their clinics in
Speaker 1: states over fifty percent of abortions occur. Preborn has rescued
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of babies lives. Your help is needed
Speaker 1: now more than ever, and it's urgent. Please donate today.
Speaker 1: One uldrasound is just twenty eight dollars, and one hundred
Speaker 1: and forty dollars helps to rescue five babies lives. Think
Speaker 1: about this, you know, whenever we reach the end of
Speaker 1: our days, you can sit there and think, there are
Speaker 1: some lives that I saved here in this process. There
Speaker 1: are some lives that I helped come into being. What
Speaker 1: could be more beautiful? What could be more powerful than that?
Speaker 1: Donate right now. Dial pound two five zero from your
Speaker 1: cell phone and say the keyword baby. That's pound two
Speaker 1: five zero and say the word baby. They'll connect you
Speaker 1: with someone at Preborn who can tell you about what
Speaker 1: you're doing, what's going on here, and they'll receive your donation.
Speaker 1: It is so important. Or you can go to their
Speaker 1: website if you prefer a preborn dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: That's preborn dot com slash buck. Let's help us organization
Speaker 1: and itsmission to save forty thousand lives. So Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: signed a bill that is going to police COVID misinformation
Speaker 1: among doctors. Think about this, I mean this, This gives
Speaker 1: you a window into how crazy these people really are. Okay,
Speaker 1: what a bunch of authoritarian maniacs the Democrats are. They
Speaker 1: were wrong about everything with COVID. They were wrong about
Speaker 1: how masking was gonna stop it, bring the curve down,
Speaker 1: it's gonna stop the virus. Double masking idiotic. The shots
Speaker 1: were gonna stop the spread? Not true and not even
Speaker 1: really effective at all in preventing people from getting super
Speaker 1: sick or even dying of COVID if you actually look
Speaker 1: at the long term data. I mean, and this is
Speaker 1: the problem. Well, what are we talking about? Two shots
Speaker 1: or five shots? Now? The two shots definitely not very
Speaker 1: effective at stopping hospitalization and death if affected, if having
Speaker 1: any efficacy. But the five shots even still not very
Speaker 1: good and doesn't stop the virus from spreading. So what
Speaker 1: the heck is going on here? They were wrong. What
Speaker 1: you were told a year ago about COVID was wrong
Speaker 1: by doctors, including doctor Fauci and all these others. What
Speaker 1: you were told is wrong. So was that misinformation. Oh no,
Speaker 1: if it comes from the false scientific consensus, which is
Speaker 1: evolving all the time, if it comes from the so
Speaker 1: called consensus of the CDC and the Biden administration, then
Speaker 1: it's fine. It doesn't matter that it was wrong. It's disgraceful.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, this is from a Mercury News signed a
Speaker 1: bill that will subject doctors to discipline and suspension for
Speaker 1: spreading misinformation about the COVID nineteen pandemic to patients. And
Speaker 1: this is AB twenty ninety eight and it was co
Speaker 1: sponsored by the California Medical Association. These medical associations, by
Speaker 1: the way, commies, the you know, American Academy of Pediatrics
Speaker 1: or whatever with the children in school, totally wrong on that,
Speaker 1: totally abandoned kids. You know, the collectivist doctors are just
Speaker 1: as bad as all the other collectivists, don't you See.
Speaker 1: This is one thing people have learned during this pandemic
Speaker 1: that just because somebody has an MD one doesn't mean
Speaker 1: they're smart or have good judgment. And two they're still
Speaker 1: subject to the exact same politicization as you know, some
Speaker 1: other lunatic Nancy Pelosi donor right, I mean, they're they're
Speaker 1: not they're not operating from some Oh well, I went
Speaker 1: to medical school, so I'm not willing to abuse state
Speaker 1: authority in the ends of whatever my ideology of the moment,
Speaker 1: the current thing may be. It's awful. It's appalling what
Speaker 1: has gone on here in California. The lockdowns of schools,
Speaker 1: the shutdown of restaurants, all of it just for what
Speaker 1: stop the virus? No, it didn't. No one really thinks that. Now,
Speaker 1: come on, no one really believes it's stopped the virus.
Speaker 1: So what was it all about. What was the point
Speaker 1: of it? It was an exercise and raw power. And
Speaker 1: you know what they want to do now. They want
Speaker 1: to protect themselves from people coming forward, doctors coming forward
Speaker 1: looking at the data and saying, hey, guys, we got
Speaker 1: this really wrong. Hey I'm a cardiologist and I've looked
Speaker 1: at the milecard dietis data. For example, someone could come
Speaker 1: forward and say this and it's really bad. Folks. They
Speaker 1: made you take these shots. They told you there were
Speaker 1: no side effects, and they were actually really bad side effects.
Speaker 1: They just lied to you about it. Ah. But by
Speaker 1: putting out there that they will take your license, your
Speaker 1: livelihood away from you, it shuts this all down. Don't
Speaker 1: you see the politics at work here? The Democrats pushed
Speaker 1: all this stuff. Joe Biden said, if you won't get
Speaker 1: the shot, you're a monster. People should get fired from
Speaker 1: their jobs. They fired thousands of people from their jobs
Speaker 1: across the country for failure to vaccine. They fired National
Speaker 1: Guard members, they fired police officers, firefighters, nurses for not
Speaker 1: getting a shot that they didn't need and that didn't
Speaker 1: work the way that they insisted it would. And now
Speaker 1: they want a police disinformation among doctors. Oh you know
Speaker 1: what this is. They're just trying to delay the realization
Speaker 1: of the scam. They're trying to prevent people from recognizing.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, look what they have done to us. And
Speaker 1: they told us the whole time that they were the
Speaker 1: good people. They knew what they were doing, and if
Speaker 1: you stood up and had a different opinion, doctor or
Speaker 1: no doctor or not, they crushed you. So now they
Speaker 1: know the numbers are not on their side. They know
Speaker 1: that effectively, this was the biggest health policy error committed
Speaker 1: in history, certainly in modern history. They might as well
Speaker 1: have been walking around with bowls of leeches saying, you know,
Speaker 1: we will take your blood and that will cure you,
Speaker 1: just like they did in the Middle Ages, right, they
Speaker 1: might as well have done that in terms of mask
Speaker 1: and it was all crap. But they don't want you
Speaker 1: to realize that because then the people like me who
Speaker 1: from the very beginning we're saying, hold on, this doesn't
Speaker 1: make sense. Hold On, that's not true. I was right,
Speaker 1: they were wrong. Maybe you should listen to me. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you're watching this, listen to this podcast, you know
Speaker 1: that already. But I'm just saying, genuinely, maybe Boom should
Speaker 1: listen to people like me who were right about everything
Speaker 1: with COVID basically, and not for the people who are
Speaker 1: morons about everything with COVID. Ah. Yeah, no, the see,
Speaker 1: there's politics and power at work here, which is why
Speaker 1: they're trying to silence doctors in California, at least by
Speaker 1: threatening their licenses for speaking out against the madness of
Speaker 1: their COVID policies and all the stuff that they did.
Speaker 1: It was. It's appalling. So I don't speak about Russia
Speaker 1: and Ukraine that often on the show, but I've got
Speaker 1: to tell you, first of all, here is John Kirby
Speaker 1: speaking about Putin's because Putin's been making straight up nuclear threats,
Speaker 1: saying the US set a precedent by using them in Japan.
Speaker 1: I mean Putin is out there, He's not saber rattling,
Speaker 1: he's nuclear weapon rattling. Okay, and this is the response
Speaker 1: from from John Kirby. We're watching this as closely as
Speaker 1: we can, and we've seen nothing that would make us
Speaker 1: change our strategic deterrent posture. So I think, you know, look,
Speaker 1: we take these threats seriously as we must, and we
Speaker 1: have since the beginning of this war, because it was
Speaker 1: very early on when Vladimir Putin was using a bellicost
Speaker 1: nuclear rhetoric. So we have been taken it seriously for
Speaker 1: quite some time. Again, nothing that would cause us to
Speaker 1: change our strategic deterrent posture this time. So now he
Speaker 1: was the former Pentagon spokesperson. I think he's retired now
Speaker 1: does TV stuff at you know, Rear Admiral Kirby. Okay,
Speaker 1: So people are talking about nuke threats here, just don't
Speaker 1: understand this. People are really having to analyze what are
Speaker 1: the chances of Vladimir Putin deciding to use a tackle
Speaker 1: nuclear weapon? And to this I always say, okay, well,
Speaker 1: what's let's just start with it. Forget about assumptions let's
Speaker 1: look at reality. Forget about what the smart the smart
Speaker 1: people like the smart people on COVID. The smart people say,
Speaker 1: let's let's flick at what's happening. The Ukrainian military is
Speaker 1: well equipped and a serious fighting force because of the
Speaker 1: billions and billions of dollars. Yes, the Ukrainians are first off,
Speaker 1: it was they're willing to stand and fight. But second
Speaker 1: the billions and billions of dollars of weaponry and material
Speaker 1: that have been given to them by the West. So
Speaker 1: they're fighting against Russia here successfully. Now taking background, the
Speaker 1: Russians are on their back heels. That's going on right now.
Speaker 1: They've just declared an annexation of certain territory. And what
Speaker 1: happens if the Russians keep losing ground and the Ukrainians
Speaker 1: make their way back into that seized Ukrainian territory, including
Speaker 1: of the dawn Bass region, which has been under Russian
Speaker 1: domination now for about seven and eight years. What is
Speaker 1: Putin going to do then? What if he decides, you
Speaker 1: know what, I'm just gonna as a real marker here,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna find where the greatest concentration of Ukrainian forces
Speaker 1: is a sort of a marker of future intent and
Speaker 1: he and he set off a tactical nuclear weapon. He
Speaker 1: fired one and a hidden area. And let's say there
Speaker 1: were you know, tens of thousands of Ukrainian military and
Speaker 1: civilian casualties from that that low yield, the small scale
Speaker 1: nuclear strike, right, this wouldn't be ICBMs hitting cities. It's
Speaker 1: a horrible thing to think about. But what happens, What
Speaker 1: happens if he does that, We're going to increase the
Speaker 1: sanctions on him. Okay, are we going to enter the
Speaker 1: war full scale on the Ukrainian side and say we're
Speaker 1: gonna help the Ukrainians? Now kick you out? Because once
Speaker 1: he does it, there's clearly then then we know, once
Speaker 1: you cross that rubicon, we know that he'll do it again.
Speaker 1: So what happens beyond that the answers, we don't know.
Speaker 1: But we're playing with very dangerous possibilities here in the West,
Speaker 1: and it feels like no one's taking this seriously. Now.
Speaker 1: I know, they say, oh, Putin's trying I understand he's
Speaker 1: a bad guy. He's trying to get the West to
Speaker 1: back down, and you know that is likely the case,
Speaker 1: But I mean, look, who's in charge of the country.
Speaker 1: Look at Joe Biden this even if you told me
Speaker 1: we have a a ten or a twenty percent chance,
Speaker 1: which is what I would say, probably ten percent, you know,
Speaker 1: not that you can really ever give real odds on
Speaker 1: these things, but that's in my head. It's a ten
Speaker 1: percent chance that Putin would fire a nuke if Ukrainian
Speaker 1: forces stay on the offensive and keep taking back territory,
Speaker 1: that's a big deal. That's a big problem if that
Speaker 1: were you know, ten percent is not likely, but it's possible.
Speaker 1: And what would we do in response to it? You
Speaker 1: have people that are saying we're closer to the usage
Speaker 1: of nuclear force than at any time we've seen since
Speaker 1: the Cuban missile crisis. And do you get that sense
Speaker 1: of urgency and seriousness from the Biden administration that they
Speaker 1: know how to handle this. I am deeply concerned about
Speaker 1: where this is going. Where does this end? Are we
Speaker 1: just going to say, okay, well, as soon as every
Speaker 1: Russian is out of Ukraine, then we'll find then it's over.
Speaker 1: It's going to mean a lot. You know, the Russians
Speaker 1: have taken thousands and thousands of casualties, They've taken more
Speaker 1: casualties in the last year than they did in numerous
Speaker 1: other major conflicts that they have waged in the past.
Speaker 1: I mean, you got to go back to like World
Speaker 1: War Two for the Russians. Two have and obviously they're
Speaker 1: they lost millions and millions of soldiers. But remember that's
Speaker 1: there's a mentality here Soviet Union did. The Russians will
Speaker 1: lose a lot of their own people. You think they're
Speaker 1: not willing to lose a lot of the other guys,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't think the American policy community, especially
Speaker 1: at the Biden Biden's an idiot. I mean, he's just
Speaker 1: not a smart man. I don't think he understands the
Speaker 1: Russian mindset about this at all. I certainly don't trust
Speaker 1: that he has some strategic vision that will be useful
Speaker 1: about dealing with all of this. I think that he's
Speaker 1: an imbecile. And I think that people are playing with
Speaker 1: nuclear war here and this is what we're up against.
Speaker 1: And I am you know, I am not a I'm
Speaker 1: not a pessimist. I'm not a sky has fallen kind
Speaker 1: of a guy. I don't think this is going to happen,
Speaker 1: but I do think we need to be much more
Speaker 1: attuned to this possibility. Of a major escalation with regard
Speaker 1: to Russia, and it deserves our attention, it deserves our
Speaker 1: our focus. All right. So I know that's it's a
Speaker 1: bit intense, and I'm probably spend more time in a tomorrow,
Speaker 1: but I did think it's important to bring up and
Speaker 1: then something that's not important but just goes to show
Speaker 1: you just how crazy it is. So you all know
Speaker 1: I went to Amherst College or some of you know that.
Speaker 1: A lot of you probably don't. You don't care no
Speaker 1: at why I really. I feel like people used to
Speaker 1: care a lot more twenty years ago, but I ever
Speaker 1: went to college and now they realize it's all kind
Speaker 1: of a scam and a joke and doesn't really matter.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people get in because you know,
Speaker 1: they get in because they're there's a diversity contingent. There's
Speaker 1: the athletes, there's the rich mommy and daddy, there's you know,
Speaker 1: there's a million different ways that people get into these schools. Right,
Speaker 1: So doesn't mean you're smart. No, So if it doesn't
Speaker 1: mean you're smart, who really cares? Go where you want
Speaker 1: to go? That's what I always tell people to. Now
Speaker 1: ask me the girl, should I go to Amherst. I'm like, honestly, no,
Speaker 1: it's cold and small and there's not much to do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're smart professors in good classes. And is it was
Speaker 1: it considered an elite school somewhat? Yeah? Sure, but whatever,
Speaker 1: No one really, No one's ever like cool, you went
Speaker 1: to Hammerston to give you this amazing job. Didn't happen,
Speaker 1: so who cares. But Amherst has quite a policy good
Speaker 1: place because it's run by psycho libs. Where this I
Speaker 1: checked in. The Clay actually gave me the tip about this.
Speaker 1: They have a policy now where in the classroom if
Speaker 1: one they were going to do an anonymous ballot in
Speaker 1: every class the first day of the year. Okay, every
Speaker 1: single class you go to, and if one person in
Speaker 1: the class wants masking, everybody has to mask the whole semester,
Speaker 1: including the professor. So let's say you've got a class.
Speaker 1: A lot of some of the Amher's classes where thirty
Speaker 1: forty people. They're pretty small. So if you're in a
Speaker 1: classroom with forty other students and a professor, you all
Speaker 1: write in yes or no for should we wear masks?
Speaker 1: If one person out of forty wants masks, everybody has
Speaker 1: to mask. But see, this is really this has been
Speaker 1: the mentality all along. You have to cater to the
Speaker 1: neuroses and to the emotional disorders of the mask maniacs.
Speaker 1: This has been the truth all along, and they can't
Speaker 1: let it go at Amherst College. I think you'll see
Speaker 1: this in some other places too. But this, this is
Speaker 1: really the mo most, the most common mask policy I've
Speaker 1: ever seen. You know, it's like they're having the Soviet,
Speaker 1: the actual Soviet little councils with Soviet means, decide whether
Speaker 1: or not there should be masking. So good job, comrades
Speaker 1: up at Amherst. Thanks for hanging and talk to you tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Shield's High