WEBVTT - Week 11 projections, picks, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guest did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. Hey, Hey, welcome into the Fantasy Best Friend Forever.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Notice no Greg Sussman, so s Frank sample here. You

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have to come back with Metallica in show because obviously

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna sing without Greek Sessman. I would, but

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>for the song I'm not gonna go ahead and do that.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna wonder, you know who's still an infra

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Grek Susman today. Well, that's a great question. It is

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a very very special guest here, Elliot Chris, sports product

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>manager for the Quant Edge. Follow them on Twitter at

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>E L I O T c R I S T

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Elliot Chris the Quant Edge. Make sure you visit them.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They have Advanced Analytics DFS advice, Betting advice. I have

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a betting tool that's thirty six and nineteen against the

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>spread since his debut, Elliott, what's going on? In? What's

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>going on? I'm pumped to be here. I'm I'm really

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>excited that we get to talk football this week. I'll

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>do my best to be your best friend. Uh, well,

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you know we'll start right there. If you want to

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be my best friend, you have to answer this question correctly.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you like better between Metallica and Dave Matthews

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>band Metallica? For sure, it's got to be Well, that's

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the correct answer obviously. I mean you see

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>he hears Enter Sandman coming into the show. So we're

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all already off to a great start here. You know,

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sousman is a big Dave Matthews band fan. He

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>likes you know, top forty hits. We we attract because

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>we're complete opposites. So we've already got that out of

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the way. I appreciate that you you said that very

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly too. I will mention Elliott, I'm I got a

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of like a fanboy thing going on too,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>because you helped me throughout the uh, the NFL draft process.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I would listen to your podcast, the Draft Daily podcast

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>back then, uh this past year, you know, listening to

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>your advice about guys like se Kwon Barkley, Sam Donald

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the draft. So that was a lot

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of great stuff. I remember you saying actually on the

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>st Kwon Barkley podcast that you wouldn't be surprised if

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he went one overall and fantasy and he's he's come

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>close to that. I mean he's not Todd Gurley, but

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he's pretty damn close. Yeah, he's had that amazing floor

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>weekend and week out. The only thing that stopped him

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>from being Todd Gurley is the touchdown equity, And honestly,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line and scheme is killing him. You know

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>if if they use they use him, but they don't

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>use him properly, like even a lot of his flare outs,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>for example, he's he's catching the ball eight ten yards

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>behind the line of scrimmage. That's gonna really hurt his

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to have those big plays. Well, when we saw

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>him on Monday Night Football against the forty nine side, note, NFL,

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>please stop putting the Giants on Monday Night football. But

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>when when we saw him and they got him on

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker in space, they even had him on two

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>linebackers and he crushed them and got a forty yard

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>game down the field. I think that we're seeing Barkley's talent.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>He's running behind a bad offensive line and he still

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>has a twenty plus point weekly floor. Uh. The game

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Eagles where he got the touchdowns, he looked

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like a superhuman and I think that's kind of what

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>he is as a talent. Absolutely, And I think a

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>common team that we're gonna see this week just from

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a DFS per sex perspective season long as well, all

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>these top tier running backs really not named Alvin Kamara

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's going up against the Eagles, but I mean

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>still Alvin Kamar. He's matchup proof. We know that all

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>these top tier running backs have phenomenal matchups this week.

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think in DFS cash game plays, we're gonna

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of people, you know, trending towards using

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>two of those top tier running backs and then really

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>probably loading up at the mid tier for wide receivers.

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see if we can point out some of

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>those mid tier wide receivers throughout the show here that

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>people can pair up with their high priced running backs.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump right in because we got a lot of

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>games to preview here. Elliott Carolina Panthers at the Detroit

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Lions up first, Detroit home Dogs four point Dogs at home,

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and a half game total. Obviously, Christian McCaffrey,

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the must start here, will say that the Lions run

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>defense has played better better since Snax Harrison arrived there.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you wouldn't realize it, but that's how bad

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they were beforehand. They have played better with Snax Harrison.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>CMC obviously still a must start, Cam Newton, and then

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I will also throw Kenny Gallady in that discussion as

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a must start because as of right now, it doesn't

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>look like Marvin Jones is going to be able to go.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't practiced all week long dealing with that knee injury.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, how do you feel about Kenny g Is

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>he one of these mid tier wide receivers this week

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be looking at in cash and do you

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>trust him as a I don't know. Let's see top

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty wide receiver this week. I do trust him as

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty wide receiver. I do trust him in

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>cash and I think he's He's basically a must play

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>if Marvin Jones is out. It's one of those situations

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>where who else are they going to throw the ball to.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can talk about theoretic potentially in the

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>slot against Captain Marylin having a potentially solid role, But

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kenny Golladay is already seeing forty three percent

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the air yards and um so the last couple

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of weeks since Golden Tate's gone, he's but Marvin Jones

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and Golden Tate not being there are going to open

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>up sixty percent of the air yards and fifty of

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the targets. And you know, Kenny Golladay can beat Brad Berry,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>he can beat Jackson with his size. I think the

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Lions going home is going to be terrific for them.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Right now people are down on them, but you know,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Gallady has got a real good shot to see thirty

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>percent of the workload in this game, and at his

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>price in DFS, I don't know how you get away

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>from home in cash. Yeah, and especially look if you

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't been season long too, I think you try and

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>get him in there the best you could. We just

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>saw with the Steelers did against the Carolina Panthers last

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>day night on Thursday. Football completely annihilated them. That was

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks in part two Antonio Brown, Juju Smith Schuster having

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>big games. So I don't think that the Panthers secondary

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is great by any means. They're not bad. They're like

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack, but they could definitely be beat

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>by teams. And we see Kenny Golladay coming off that

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>career high thirteen targets from a week ago. So I'm

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'm in on Kenny Golladay. I have a

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>few cash line ups already were again I'm paying up

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>high at the running back position, and then I'm trying

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to find some of these mid tier wide receivers. I

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think Kenny Golladay is one of those guys. Elliot, I'll

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bring up carry On Johnson real quick. He played seventy

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps last week, really proving that he's game

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>flow proof. I have him as my RB fifteen this week.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that a little bit too aggressive? I say game

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>flow proof now because like they got blown out last week,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>he still had a phenomenal game. He rushed for a touchdown,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he called a touchdown, and what I really like about

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>his usage is that they tried to use Legarrett blunt

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>down near to go on. He failed twice. The third

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>time they went to carry on Johnson, he punched it in.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>That tells me that coaching staff should start to have

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>more faith in carry On Johnson. But again it's Matt

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Patricia that's out there, so we'll see if that continues

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to roll. Uh. Your confident carry On Johnson this week? Correct?

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I am confident in carry On Johnson. The assumption of

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>rational coaching is probably the thing that gets us fantasy

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>players in the most. But le Garret Blood has been

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>bad as a goal line back for multiple years now.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think last year he was the least efficient runner

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line. He's just he has that

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>stigma about him that he's great inside the five. He's

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>not anymore. He's he's about his wash as any player

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Theo Redick is more of a wide

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver at this point. You know, he's played the most

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>snaps he's played the last couple of weeks. But he's

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on the field with carry On Johnson, you know Johnson.

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Barretts did a study this this offseason and showed

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that snaps were the most correlated statistic to running back

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy wins, and Johnson snaps continue to trend upwards. I

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think they'll He's going to continue to get more and

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more involved in this game. And you know, I think

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's he's a fantastic talent. And as long as

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 1>he continues to get the opportunity and stays on the field,

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, no Marvin Jones, They're gonna get him the

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ball a lot, and that volume puts him in play

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>as the top fifteen running back this week for sure.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I like this man. Elliot agrees with me. We're on

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the same page. So far, we got metallically carry on

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Johnson going. I like this, Let's keep it going. I

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>will throw the Panthers dst out there. That one of

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorite streams this week. I don't think that they

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are a talented group by any means, Like they're not.

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the Panthers defense from years ago where they're

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like an elite defense. But Stafford has been sacked sixteen

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>times over his last over the last two weeks, so

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's opportunity for for sacks, for obviously

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>turnovers here for the Panthers, Ellie, I'll just throw these

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two out real quickly for you. Devin Funches to me,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a sneaky wide receiver. Three. I know Darius Slay

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's expected to return in this game, but

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the lines have allowed ten touchdowns to wide receivers over

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>their last five games. And then on the other side,

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if Marvin Jones is out, is t J Jones sneaky

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to you or you're just completely avoiding that. So I'll

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>start with the funcious question. I think that if Slay

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is out, I'll be on Funches pretty heavily. If Slag

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is in, I don't know if I'll have much funcious

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>um that. I always have trouble trusting Cam Newton weapons.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, one times that of a good game, but

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he can't really support more than one based off his

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>play style. I trust McCaffrey more in this spot, even

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olson against the Lions with tight ends. So font

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is probably not a guy for me this week. I

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>hope he can remain best friends. But with with with

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>t J. Jones, I don't hate it. It's just a

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>situation where I think I'd much rather get to Golladay,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Riddick or carry on Johnson, and at that point, I

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I want to go to the fourth

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>option on a Lions team that's been struggling to move

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball fair enough. Cincinnati Bengals at the Baltimore Ravens,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore minus three and a half right now, no game

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>total on the board, because again, even as now it's

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's r G three, it's Lamar Jackson, we

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just got some news that they expect this to be.

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna mix and match these guys. I don't know

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Flaco was gonna play in this game. I

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>doubt that he does. So it looks like we could get,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, one series r G three, one series Lamar Jackson,

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>which really kind of rose this whole game for a loop.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that I'm hoping that it doesn't change

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Elliott here is Alex Collins, because look, I was in

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex Collins truth thor before the season. Admittedly, I was

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>very high on Alex Collins, and I knew what I

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>was getting myself into. I knew that there was a

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>chance that you know, Buck Allen was going to be

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>involved here. They obviously go out and trade for Time Montgomery,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>his touches haven't been all that and they've been consistent,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but they just haven't been consistently high what we want

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>them to be. Look, I'm praying to the old gods

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and the new that we can get fifteen plus touches

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup for Alex Collins because Cincinnati's allowing the

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth most rushing yards per game this year running backs.

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>They're allowing the fifth highous yards per carry the running backs.

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Everybody on the Bengals defense is questionable. Right now? Are

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you as excited about Alex Collins this week or do

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you think he's gonna end up being too chalky? Uh?

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Does the quarterback situation? Were you too much when it

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to Alex Collins? I'm very excited? What say you? Yeah?

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I really want Jackson to play as much as possible

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>if I'm an Alex Connin Collins owner or want to

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>play him in DFS. This year, with Lamar Jackson on

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the field, the Ravens are averaging four point eight two

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Without Lamar Jackson on the field, they're

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>averaging three point one eight yards per carry. You know,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>teams respect and fear him as a runner so much

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that they just leave wide open running lanes for Alex

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Collins to kind of hit hit the hall and have

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton of open field, and we know his open

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>field ability. I really like Collins this week. He's too

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>cheap on on draft kings, especially at DRED. The Bengals

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned are just a disaster, kind a four point

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>nine eight yards per carry percent success right against plus

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about eight targets per game to running backs. I think

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>if we see Jackson or Griffin, they're gonna I mean

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>even Griffin has a running ability as well. I think

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Collins is very much in play. And if Lamar Jackson

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>does get the starting nod, which I and I well,

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the report changes every single day what

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.239
<v Speaker 1>it might be. Uh, as soon as we get that

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that update, probably eleven thirty on Sunday morning, we will

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>know who the starter is and it will impact Alex Collins.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm definitely very interested in him this week. So

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to you want Lamar Jackson in for the

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>rush game oddly, but it's gonna affect the Pets game. Uh.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, Um, he has upside. I think he has potential.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>To me, he's still very raw as a passer. I'll

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>go as far as to say, you know, Robert Griffin

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the third might even be a more talented passer at

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>this level. It doesn't mean that Lamar Jackson can't get

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>there eventually. I think he could. But um, again, this

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is a good matchup for all Ravens players because the

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals defense this had been so bad even when

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and they fired Terrell Austin their defensive coordinators. So who

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at anybody here for the Ravens pass

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>catchers because you know the Bengals are beat up? Uh?

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it John Brown? Is it Michael Crabtree. I think

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a toss up. I mean, one of

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>these guys might be able to pop off for for

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like a GPP tournament perspective for dfs, but season long,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know who to trust from this

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>group right now. Yeah, it's one of those situations where

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>you want to try to figure out how to get

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a Ravens receiver in there because of the matchup. But

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not something I feel particularly good about. John Brown

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is too cheap, and if Robert Griffin ends up as

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the starter of the one thing I think he does exceptionally, well,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>let's throw a deep ball, and we know that that's

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>John Brown's game. I ultimately, though, I think the Ravens

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are gonna rely on their defense and running game in

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>this game, and I don't want to be overexposed to

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this one. So if if you, if you're I, I

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>really think Alex Collins is the strongest play and maybe

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>sprinkling some John Brown and tournaments because whenever you have

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>an A dot as high as he does, he's always

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>liable to break off. You know, he can have three

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>catches for Hunter twenty yards and two touchdowns. He's that

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of player. And he's cheap this week and he's

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have much ownership. So that's a GPP special

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>right there. But you know, I don't feel great about

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>any Ravens with backup quarterbacks without any you know, ability

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to look at how these guys have performed together in

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the past. Let's move over to the Cincinnati Bengal side

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of things real quick. Joe Mixing seems like he might

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have reaggravated knee injury this week. He did practice in

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>full on Friday, so we're expecting to go I'm worried.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about him in this matchup. The Ravens have

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>been very stout against the run this year. Uh, and

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's without A J. Green. It's you know, how are

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>they moving the football down the field? So Bill Mixing, Look,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>if I haven't been season long, I'm still gonna play him.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I think he's high in RB two because he's still

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the volume. But I will will say in

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>cash I'm scared of I mean in DFS, I'm scared

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>off of him for sure. Uh even in like GPP,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like contrarian, I'm not gonna do it because I'm completely

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>worried about Joe Mixon. Um for Tyler Boyd? Are you

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>too scared off the match up here? And the fact

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know the what we just saw last week

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>against the Saints in a great matchup, he wasn't being

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>able to do much. Is that a correlation with A. J.

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Green not being on the field him getting more coverage?

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you are you shying away from Tyler Boyd this week? Yeah?

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna play Tyler Boyd in DFS at all.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>He's too expensive for this matchup. And you know he

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>still ran most of his routes out of the slot

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>last week and got to face off against p J.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Williams Andy Dalton still didn't do much with him. And

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he Dalton splits without a J Green or horrendous, and

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he Daalant splits without Tyler are horrendous. I think he's

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>really a product of his weapons as much as anyone

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. And that Ravens defense at home especially,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just not something I want to attack. So I

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think I'll just completely fade the Bengals, and I think

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens defense is actually a pretty strong play in

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>DFS this week. Real quick, we got about two minutes

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>before were our first break here Dallas Cowboys at the

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons inside the Dome at Atlanta, Favored by three

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half right now forty eight and a half

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>game total. The most starts in this game obviously Ezekiel Elliott,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, Julio Jones. Matt Ryan arguably playing better ball

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>than in his m v P season, obviously gets the

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>fast track now inside the Dome. He's actually played better

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>at home this year. That's to the surprise of nobody. Um,

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I like, you know, I have cash lineups already where

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I have Ezekie Elliott. He's one of the uh one

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of these top tier running backs that I'm looking to

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pay up for here. The Falcons struggle against past catching

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs every single season, and we just saw Zeke

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty big game out of the past game

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Eagles. I want to mention to

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Marii Cooper because I like him a lot. He's sixty

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>six hundred dollars on FANDEL. I think he's one of

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>these mid tier wide receivers that I'm looking at target here.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons have been beat up by wide receivers this year.

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>He has a twenty six percent targets share with the

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys since he's joined them. And if I like a

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Marii Cooper, I like Dak Prescott man. I think he's

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a good stream for season long. There's six teams on

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a buy. I might go as far as to say

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that I'll use Dak Prescott and cash and get Is

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that crazy, Elliott? No? I think, especially on draft kings,

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>he's far too cheap at The Falcons are giving up

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>about seven points per game two quarterbacks this year, on

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>top of the fact that they've struggled to stop rushing

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks along five point eight yards per carried. That's getting

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about five plus carries a game three rushing touchdowns in

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>his last four games. Plus the Mark Cooper edition is

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>huge for him. He actually someone on the outside. You know.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He also gets to dump it down to Zeke while

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Dion Jones is back. That that Falcons past defense funnels

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>targets to running backs, and Zeke in the open field

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on passes from Dak can do wonders for Dak Prescott's ceiling.

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Dak, Zeke Amari Cooper are all fantastic. And

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the fast track in the dome with the Falcons.

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>This has becoming the new Age Saints team. I mean,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the Saints are still a speak too, but the Facies

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are given up. All right, Ellie, We're gonna hit the

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>break here, we come back. We are going to continue

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>previewing as many of these games. Hospital believe Elliot is

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a Jets fan as well. Maybe I'll get the opportunity

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk to him about that. Um, even if you

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hear, I'm gonna Tennessee best friends forever, Elliot.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris frank Stamp will be back right after your daily

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>rohdo dot Com Optimizer in minutes building optimized line up

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>for cash games and turneys learned from the game's best

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily roado dot com. Welcome back to

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Best Friends Forever on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Look,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's not gonna be Metallica, give me some eighties

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>nineties dance house music. Man Like, I'm all over the

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 1>place in a rap, hip hop whatever it is. But man,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I love me some house and uh, some house, some

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 1>dance music. Elliott to agree on that too. I mean,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like it, like, I'm not gonna hold

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that against you. That that's completely fun. My music selection

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't be talked about on air. It's it's not

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the most popular thing among people. My girlfriend says,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I have the musical taste of a sixteen year old girl.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So I just said that on and that's not out there.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, nineties music typically is it isn't my thing

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 1>you all right, So your girlfriend says that you have

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the musical of a six six year old girl. I mean,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you probably would get along with Greg Susman. We might

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have to do another show with Greg Sussman around. We'll

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>get Elliott Christoph because you know, a lot of people

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>have said the same thing about Greg is that you know,

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>his musical taste reminds them of you know someone who

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a girl in high school, junior high school,

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. Elliot, let's continue going on here.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot more games to get into. Houston

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Sexons at Washington, Washington three point home dogs forty two

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>point total in this one. Uh. I think the loan

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>must start in this game is probably DeAndre Hopkins. And

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've seen The Best Friends Forever

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>before or if you watch the Fantasy Sports Network, but

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>something that's very popular around here saying that we have

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Lamar Miller is that Lamar Miller sucks.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>He's not good, but we know that he's going to

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to get volume. I don't think he's in play

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>for dfs UM with six teams on a buy, would

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you trust him as a low nd RB two for

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>season long purposes? Season long? I think buys are kicking

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on people this week, so I think that you're probably

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>stuck playing Lamar Miller. I agree with you that he's

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>not particularly good. It's not a great matchup, but the

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>volume is gonna be there. Since Watson's injury, he hasn't

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>thrown over twenty five times and there's Foreman still not back.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>So Miller is gonna get a lot of volume. And

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what you're looking for, especially this there's

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>not like a ton of guys on the waiver wire

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that you could pick up. You know, you're probably looking

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at a Josh Adams best case scenario. So I think

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Miller startable in season long this week for sure. I

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think another theme this week is that we have some

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty talented quarterbacks with if he matchups like they're not great.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the quarterbacks this week. DeShawn Watson is

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously UH facing Washington this week. There's only a forty

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>two point game total, so they're not expecting this to

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be a shootout. I don't know what his ceiling could be.

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>This matchup is it, you know, to fifty and two

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and he adds in some rushing production, but there's also

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>right behind him. In my ranks. I have Trabinsky against Minnesota,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not a great matchup, but Trabinsky has been getting it done.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>And then Big Ben on the road at Jacksonville. So

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's another common theme this week. We have

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>talented quarterbacks, but they have some pretty tough matchups. So

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Watson, is he a fade for you? Yeah? I

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>won't play him in DFS. I think the way I

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>want to get my exposure to Shaun Watson is DeAndre Hopkins.

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Without Will Fuller on the field this year, Hopkins is

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing thirty seven percent of the targets. Yes, Demarus Thomas

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>is now their first game with Demarus Thomas. DeAndre Hopkins

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>saw fifty percent of the air yards and fifty percent

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of the targets. I mean he's going to get all

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the looks. And Washington runs predominantly zone coverage, and that's

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>what he's been by far and away best against this year.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So far against zone, he's caught twenty five thirty one

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>targets for two touchdowns. He's a drink thirteen point seven

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>yards per target, and has a one forty point three

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver ratings. So I expect him to see the

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>ball early and often in this one and dominate all

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>either one of these corners and the zone coverage. And

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's seventy nine, especially on DraftKings. At that volume,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's in cash consideration and I think he's a big

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>time GPP play this week Adrian Peterson, I, you know,

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I make the rundown. I haven't written out as a

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>black RB two kind of reminds me a lot of

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the other running back on the other side, it's Lamar Miller.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I trust Adrian Peterson a little bit more for season long.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not a great matchup on either side. They're

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not expecting a lot of points in this one. But

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, what Washington's gonna try and do is

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna try and play ball control. They're gonna try

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and play defense. And how they're gonna do that is

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna turn and hand the ball into the stomach

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of Adrian Peterson fifteen to twenty times. So because of volume,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>he's in play as an RB two. Don't necessarily like

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>him for DFS this week. Jordan read weird season. He's

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>finally staying healthy, but he's not doing much. I know

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've they've made a concerted effort to limit his snaps,

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>which obviously has limited his his upside, his target share.

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention Kiki QT just because, look, he's questionable. Uh.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>They rested him before the bye. They gave him the

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>by to get this hamstring healthy. Washington has struggled recently

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>against slot wide receivers and we saw in those in

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the In a two games sample where he was healthy

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with Shawn Watson had fifteen targets against the COLTI had

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>seven targets against the Cowboys. So if you're in a

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pinch and Kiki QT is active, I think he's sneaky

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in this week. Uh, sneaky this week four PPR with

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>six teams on a bye. But again, make sure that

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's active before you get him in there. The Pittsburgh

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Steelers at the Jacksonville Jaguars Jacksonville five point home dogs,

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a forty seven point game total. Here the mustard options. Obviously,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>James Conner dealing with the concussion hasn't been cleared, but

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I I expect him to go in this one. I've

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>been practicing fully all week. Antonio Brown matchup proof. We

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>know that UM Jacksonville's defense hasn't necessarily been the same

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, Elliott. They've allowed twenty plus points five games

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Now, um, I am looking at Juju

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith Schuster again, another one of these mid tier players.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>He's closer to high price than mid tier. But I

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's a sneaky DFS play. I think he's a

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>more contrarian too, because people are gonna see, oh, Jacksonville,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they have this image of Jacksonville from

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. But I think the way to the target

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville is actually in the slot. We just saw ju

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Do have a big game last week against the Panthers.

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you on Juju Smith Houster this week? I get

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the logic for sure, because that's exactly where you do

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>want to attack to Jacksonville Jaguars with the tight ends

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and with the slot receivers. So I think he's in play.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think in general this game it's uh, stack a

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ball as a Concharan stack right. James Conner is too

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>cheap for net historically has dominated the Steelers for about

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>three yards and five touchdowns in the two games last year.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown has gotten the better of Jalen Ramsey before. Uh.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I I think that this this game is interesting, but

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in general, I you know, and I can't get away

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>from the stigma that the Steelers are on the road

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at one PM, and I think the Jaguars are gonna

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>get up for this game. Um, so I'm not. I

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>probably want like one off exposure in this game. James

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Conner certainly on my radar. Judice Smith Schuster is in play.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Brown is as cheap as you'll ever see him, and

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>four nets gonna get a monster workload. But I don't

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>know if I want to go crazy on this game.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact that you mentioned Leonard four Nett

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because obviously, again people see the tough match up here

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>against the pittforgh Steelers. They've been very tough against the

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>run all year. But coming off a game where he

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>had twenty nine touches, uh not not really the smartest

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>thing from a coaching perspective, but you can't really put

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>smart coaching and Jacksonville Jaguars altogether. But look, twenty nine touches.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't deny that kind of volume. I've had a

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of people asking me questions about him from a

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>season long perspective this week. If a guy's getting twenty

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>five plus touches, I mean he's a borderline RB one

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>for me, I don't really care about the matchup, so

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting Leonard four Nett in there. We could talk

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>about the next you know, the Jaguars wide receivers, but

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers defense has actually played much better as of late.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Deed Westbrook did have ten targets last week. Um, I

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>guess he's the guy if you want to go to

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>one like Dante Moncrief is gonna Uh, he's gonna, He's

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the outside here. He's got he's got

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a tough match up here in this one against Joe Hayden.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that I want to do anything

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Jags wide receivers. Um, do you agree with that,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Elliott or? I mean, if there's if you have to

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>choose one, who would it be? I guess I would

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>choose d D. West Broke, But I would choose I

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>would choose pass, you know what I mean? I would

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be like, it's the season long thing. I don't think

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>guys the past catchers for the Jaguars are really in

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>TFS consideration this week. I think there's too many guys

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in that price range that are better place. I have

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a season long team where I'm Actually I'm getting killed

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>by the by this week. I have Kenyan Drake on

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a buy, not that he's been good by any means,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but I have Julian Edelman on a by, so I

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>actually have to plug in Dante Moncrief. Don't feel great

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>about it at all, but there's like no one else

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in the waiver ward here. Again. Don't feel great about

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars passing attack, but we do trust Leonard four

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Net regardless of the matchup Tampa Bay Bucks at the

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants here, Giants at home, two point favorites,

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty two point game total. Here, most starts obviously say

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Barkley, Odell Beckham. Uh. Everyone wants to target playing

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>against the Tampa Bay Bucks defense. And with that, I

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you is Eli Manning streamable this week?

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Because I see people talking about a common theme that

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about here on the show Fantasy Best Friends

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Forever is we don't like using bad players even if

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>they're in good matchups. And I mean Eli Manning is

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>does it get much worse than Eli Manning? He is

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a bad quarterback in a great matchup against Tampa Bay

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And I see a lot of people talking about him

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>as a potential streamable quarterback for season long and a

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>very cheap DFS play. Are you doing the Eli Manning thing, Elliott,

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll get my Eli Manning exposure through Odell back. I'll

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>come and say Kwon Barkley, since those are the only

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>two guys he's probably gonna throw too anyway. Um, But

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I think about Eli Manning like he's fifty and on

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>other weeks that might be in consideration. But I think

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott at fifty two hundred has a higher floor

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and a higher ceiling than Eli Manning does, and I

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>really struggle to pivot off him. Even Marcus Mariota for

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred dollars more, I think I would prefer

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to play over Eli Manning. And then you get two

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>guys like Carson Wentz, Drew Brees, and Matt Ryan, who

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I think are all much stronger plays. And I once

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I get that many quarterbacks and they're they're guys in

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>his price range, I start to lose a lot of

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>interest in Eli Manning. But you mentioned Odell Beckham. You

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>know of the are yards the last four weeks averaging

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>over seventeen yards per catch the last three weeks hasn't

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>seen a game this year with less than nine targets,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and going up against the Bucks or the worst team

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>in the league, against opponents number one wide receivers, I

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think he could absolutely destroy this Buccaneers team this week.

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, a hunter plus yards a touchdown, and

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where most of Eli Mannings production will

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>come from. So I'm happy to just have Odell and

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>no Eli this week. At this time, we want to

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>thank our Pursuit viewers for checking in. We'll see you

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>again at same time, same place next week. Continuing on

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>in this game with the Tampa Bay Bucks and the

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants. You know, I had Mike Evans as

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a I have a question mark after him as a

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>must start because he's been in consistent. He dropped a

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week. Ryan Fitzpatrick, It's so hard to tell

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on a weekly basis. I don't know that there's any

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a reason as to who they're going to throw

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball to on a weekly basis. I mean, last

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>week to quiz, Rogers had eight receptions and a hundred yards.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I know that they were playing catch up in that game,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but Chris Godwin was over a hundred yards receiving, and

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>then you get Adam Humphreys fifty yards, Mike Evans fifty yards. O. J.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Howard was nowhere to be fine. Is there any rhyme

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or reason to the Bucks pass catchers right now? And

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>do you still consider Mike Evans a must start in

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>season long? I think he's a must starting season long

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.959
<v Speaker 1>just because of the amount of targets he's seen with

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick this season. Now. I even the game against

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers where he had one catch for sixteen yards,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>he still had ten targets. He's seen about Fitzpatrick's targets

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, So I think he's a must start for

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>season long, even in DFS. He's cheap and no one's

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be beyond him this week, and he's gonna be

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going up against uh Genorris Jenkins, who the shell of himself,

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and B W. Webb. I think de Sean Jackson's interesting

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this week because he's been getting about a hundred twenty

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>eight yards per game the last four games, and we

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>know Ryan Fitzpatrick and he have had a pretty good connection.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in general, the Bucks just haven't has

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>many web into any team in the NFL, and they

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>rotate snaps. I mean Godwin and Jackson kind of split

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that wide receiver two roll o j Howard Cameron Bray.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You know Howard has monster weeks, but it often is

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on four to five targets where he ends up with

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>eight yards and two touchdowns. Just because of how talented

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>he is. There's almost too many mouse defeat to trust

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>any individual player outside of Mike Evans in this game.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a weird spot for Ryan Fitzpatrick too.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>We know that he's gonna get the volume he's gonna throw.

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>He could throw for a lot of yards, but he

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>could also turn the ball over a ton. I think

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a low floor here as well, kind of similar

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blake Bortles. It seems like at any point within

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a game, Ryan Fitzpatrick could be bens for Jamis Winston,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>which has just been like a quarterback carousel all season

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>long for the Tampa Bay Bucks. So I have Ryan

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick as my fifteenth ranked quarterback this week, but I'm

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about moving him behind guys like Markets Mariota and

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott just because I feel much better about those

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>matchups and the way that those guys are playing. Uh

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with that. Do you like Mariota and

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Dak overfits this week or are you still gonna trust

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the volume of fits magic? No. I like Dak especially

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Ryan Fitzpatrick, and I like Marryott over him

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. The thing with Ryan Fitzpatrick is, while he's

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>been good this year, oftentimes it comes in garbage time

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>where the other team are blowing them out. I do

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not trust the New York Giants to blow another team.

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>How I don't think that they're gonna get up twenty

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one points like they did against the Carolina Panthers, or

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like the Pittsburgh Steelers did to the Bucks, or you know,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the shootout with the Saints game. You know, I think

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of more of an anomaly than the

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>regular the norm. So I I like Dak and Marriott

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than Ryan Fitzpatrick. And I think your

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>point about he could be bench at any point in time.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, people rip on Jamis Winston from making terrible decisions,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but Ryan Fitzpatrick is not far behind him. Throwing bonehead

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>interception after bonehead interception. Uh, what seems like every week?

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>What's crazy? Right? Fitzpatrick is just like a ten to

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen year old, older version of Jameis Winston. They're kind

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the same guy like. They both throw it for

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards. They make bone headed passes, they

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>throw interceptions as well. Also within this game. I just

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>want to throw this out there. Sterling Shepard. I think

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a solid wide receiver three. This week. Tampa Bay

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>struggles against the slot. Look, Tampa Bay travels against everybody,

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we know that, but specifically against the slot. They've been

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>burned a lot this year. So well. I don't like

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning all that much. I think Sterling Shepard might

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to surprise some people this week as a

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three. Elliott. We've continuously talked about Mariotta. We've

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we brought him up multiple times already as a streaming

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback this week. That's the game I want to go

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to next. The Titans at the Colts Indie at home

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, a one point favorite, forty nine point game total.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>In this one, I think the must start here is

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously Andrew Luck. It seems like every single week he's

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing for three four touchdowns. Look, he's allowed to throw

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns. We know that, um and and if we

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like Andrew Luck this week, I think we gotta like

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton right. It seems to be matched up

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with Malcolm Butler here, and Butler has just been shredded.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to another podcast, CBS Sports Fantasy Football

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Today to do a great job, and they brought up,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think people realize this, the Titans have

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>been great against tight ends this year because opposing teams

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.479
<v Speaker 1>don't need to throw to the tight end against the Titans.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>They just they're getting torched by outside wide receivers. So

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's where teams are opting to throw the football. And

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>then maybe, you know, maybe the Titans aren't all that

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>great against the tight end. And you know, the Colts

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>have you know, two of the best ones right now

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and the game like Jack Doyle and Eric Ebron are

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>doing wonders for fantasy purpose. So give me your take

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Colts passing attack and this one. Are you

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on t Y Hilton? Do you expect Malcolm Butler to

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>be on him as well? If so? Um, do you

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Colts tight ends here? Because it's kind of

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a meeting of worlds here because the Titans have been

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>great against the tight end and the Colts have a

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>league leading sixteen touchdowns with their tight ends. So I

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think the interesting thing is that the Titans actually used

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a Door Jackson a lot on Josh Gordon in the

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>second half, and they started to shadow him some, and

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when Gordon's production fell off a cliff. I think

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that Dory matches up really well with t Y Hillen,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So if they're gonna do that, I don't love t

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Y Hillen. If Malcolm Butler says ty Hilton, I love

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton. So um. It's a little bit of

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>assumption of rational coaching that I think a DORI will

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>spend more time on Hilton and more time going forward

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on the top receivers because Butler has been so bad,

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and that that drops my interest in Hilton a little bit.

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>The thing about Luck is he's so good. He's spreading

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball around so much. Hilton leads a team with

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a twenty percent target share in the last four weeks,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but no one has more than that. Uh Doyle and

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Ebron Doyle. Ebron seems to get the red zone work.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Doyle kind of gets the between the twenties work. Everyone

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>loves to say never Julio. I like to say never Doyle.

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He's just a guy that's not particularly interesting to me.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know you can play naked luck

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>mo Ali Cox, Eric Swill like he uses everybody. But

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>your point about the Titans being really good against tight ends,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very valid. I think their defense in

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>general is pretty underrated. Um, I like luck in this one,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. I actually like this game to

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>go under, and I know it's a more popular game

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to stack, but I'm I'm less interested in this game

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of other people are from a DFS perspective.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You think it's a really really interesting GA game. I

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>might be with you on that. Under the forty nine

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>point total right here, because again, the Titans defense is

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're underappreciated right now. They've played well this year.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we get this shootout type performance

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that people are expecting. You know, that doesn't mean that

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Andrew lux stand still can't be viable because he can

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>still throw for three and two. That's fine, but maybe

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have the three four touchdown upside that we've

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>seen before. And Mariota on the other side, again, like

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the passing volume is never gonna be a huge thing

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for Mariota but if he gives you, you know, to

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty and two with you know, thirty forty rushing yards,

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that's already you know, being close to a top twelve

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>or quarterback this week. So you don't need monster numbers

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>out of these guys for them to pay off for you.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention um on the other side of

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the football, the Tennessee Titans, Dion Lewis nineteen plus touches

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and three straight games. Uh. You know, it seems like

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a direct correlation here between their offense coming around

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and then Corey Davis. He's one of those mid tier

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. I like, uh, if we're paying up for

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>running backs, Ellie, we have about thirty seconds left before

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the break. Um, who do you like on the Titans

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.959
<v Speaker 1>side of football outside of Mariota. I love Dian Lewis,

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the culture allowing ten targets per game to running backs

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned, the nineteen touch floor. Uh. I think

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a great time to go back to him after

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he posted his chalk and Corey Davis man, as long

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as he continues to see thirty percent of the offense,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he's very intriguing. The only question is Mariotta's total volume

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not he can sustain Davis is you know,

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>high touch, high target volume. Yeah, I'm look, Corey Davis

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>coming off a big game against New England Patriots. Like

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we constantly hear about the targets share for Corey Davis,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty one percent target share UM. Target share could be

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>misleading at times because he has seventy seven targets, but

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>again that's because Mark Mariota doesn't throw the ball all

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that much. Overall, I think the Titans offense moving in

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. Mariota is getting healthy, They're starting to

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>get acclimated under matt Lefloura as well. So I'm buying

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in here. I like Mariota. I'm with you on Dean Lewis.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Corey David is one of these midsier options.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>He's a wide receiver two for me, that to be.

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back right after this. Fantasy Best Friends Forever.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network. If you're someone that needs fantasy

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you covered. When you download the n T S Y

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>every single day right through the weekend. Be sure to

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to our weekend warriors like College Football Today. Welcome

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to College Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update. They called me

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy Jesus in this league is never short of

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>exciting at i f L and so much more. Download

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes and

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Google play Store now and keep the best fantasy experts

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>right in your pocket all day long and all week long.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Fantasy Best Friends Forever, The only

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>place where one of the co hosts, Greg Sussman doesn't

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>know the song for whom the Bell Tolls by Metallica.

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is this guy living under a rock you

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can tell you every single song that Dave Matthews Band

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>ever made. He doesn't know for whom the Bell Tolls

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>by Metallica. I'm appalled. I'm a polled. Want to be

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Try Daily rodo dot com

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for free this Thanksgiving. That's right, free advice from fantasy millionaires,

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>free free f R E E, free daily fantasy projections,

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and free access to everything you need to dominate NFL dfs.

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Thanksgiving, don't be a turkey. Head over to daily

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>rodo dot com and enter the promo code t G

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 1>eight teen to access your free five day trial. That's

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>daily Rodo dot Com promo code t G eight teen. Also,

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're sticking around on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network,

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to know what's coming up next for the rest

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of the day. One PM we got our guys the

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Frenzy, Corey Parson, Chris Ventura. Actually this read

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm seeing says that Chris venture changed his name

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to Chris Ventura. Maybe maybe the pet detective Chris Ventura.

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>And then we have Jim Day the Fantasy tazzt Uh.

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Two pm we have to replay of Roto Experts in

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the Morning. Three PM replay of Fantasy Sports Today. Four

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>PM Game Time Decisions with Redheat and Rage, Gamemorenci and

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Cam Stewart. Six PM Game Time Decision Show changes into

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Lineup Block where they get you ready for DFS. They're

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>probably talking about some NBA, some NFL for this weekend

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. Seven PM you've got Scout Fantasy Sports with

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Adam Ronus Elliott. Let's get back into these games. We've

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>got a few more here, Denver Broncos at the last,

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Chargers, Chargers at Home. Seven point favorites

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>forty six and a half game total. I always kind

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of get weary when I see these big spreads, But like,

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the game total isn't that big, Like forty six and

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a half charges still favored by seven. I think the

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Broncos could keep this game closer. Must starts for me obviously,

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon, Emmanuel Sanders, Keenan Allen. I know that Keenan

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Allen has actually kind of struggled in his career against Denver,

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but mind you, that was one when they were the

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 1>no fly zone that had to keep sleeping all these guys.

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen trending into right direction. I certainly trust him

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 1>for season long. UM, it'll be depending on I haven't

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>really looked into his price on Daily this week. Are

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you on Keenan Allen this week? As like a contraining player,

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You're just you're not on this game. I'm probably not

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna touch anything that has to do with Philip rivers

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in a division game. UM. One of our writers this

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>year to start the year to the study on Philip

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>rivers and in division games and saw that his numbers

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>are basically worse than Josh McCown in his career when

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he plays interdivision games. So uh, that's reflected in Keenan

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Allen's performance. As you mentioned those Denver numbers, never gotten

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>over seventy three yards in his five career games against

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. Those were much better Broncos teams. They do

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>still have Chris Harris and Allen runs the majority of

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>his routes in the slot, So it's not a game

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm particularly excited to attack outside of Melvin Gordon, who,

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, is in an absolute fantastic spot and

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those guys that you want to pay

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>up for in DFS this week. I like Courtland Sutton

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season, maybe in the right

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup low end wide receiver three for season long purposes,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if he's playing on the outside, you

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>know Sanders plays a lot in the slot. You know

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they moved their wide receivers around, but Courtland Sutton on

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the outside could see a lot of Casey Hayward in

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. So I might be a little bit weary

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of of Courtland Sutton this week, not sure how much

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>upside he has. Elliott Royce Freeman expected back, was dealing

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with an ankle injury. How much does that affect Philip

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay because it seems like in the games where Royce

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Freeman was out, Philip Lindsay was getting this eighteen to

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty touch workload. I don't I just don't know that

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we can trust that same workload with Royce Freeman bag.

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably closer to that fourteen the sixteen

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>touch workload from a season long perspective or even a

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>daily I don't know if you like him in daily,

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna assume not. But from a season long perspective,

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is Philip Lindsay still in that RB two discussion. I

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's closer to an RB three this week, especially

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.439
<v Speaker 1>with Bosa looking like he's gonna play in this game.

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>You know that that the run defense is using the

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>t que UH injury tools split the the difference with

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Joey Bosa on the field, They imp sorry improved across

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the board in every single category with Joey Bosa, especially

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in run defense. So I don't love it. And you

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the touch count going down for Lindsay, the snap

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>count's gonna go down for him as well. You know,

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>when Freeman was healthy, these guys weren't playing more than

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. It's gonna cut Lindsay's red zone carries in half.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I I just think that this this Broncos backfields kind

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of an avoid as long as three guys are gonna

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of this the snaps. Yeah, I'm closer

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to you. I think he's more so in the flex

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>discussion this week than RB two. See a lot of

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>people ranking Philip Lindsay as an RB two this week.

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit scared off that I heard you

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned they're one of those one of those tools that

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you have over at the quant edge Um. Can you

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>tell us more about that, because I see people taking

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>screenshots and tweeting about the splits tools that you have

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>over on the website. You know, I saw someone tweet

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>out the difference in the Cowboys offense since Marie Cooper

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has come over. It was a really really interesting tool.

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You want to tell us more about that, Elliott. Yeah,

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>So we have an injury tool where you can take

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.959
<v Speaker 1>any player on any team off the field and see

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>how his team has performed. You know, you can compare

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like a Mariy Cooper is a great example. You can

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>see how the team's explosive past plays have done you

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>can also do it by any individual fantasy players. So

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we can see how it's impacted Zeke's workload, we can

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>see how it's impacted doax yards per tempt. We can

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>then see how it's impacted Colby Colby's Ley's target share.

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>So and we have that for offensive lineman too. So

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, Lane Johnson's back for the Eagles this week.

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>We can put Lane Johnson on the field and see

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.399
<v Speaker 1>how that impacts every player and the team. You can

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 1>take any defensive player off the team. I mentioned Joey Bosa.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>You can see how that impacts something like sack percentage,

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>explosive past percentage, yards per carry, yards per tempt. So

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's a fantastic tool where everything's done

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>by snap too. So a guy like a J. Green Mrs.

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Last week hadn't missed a game since two thousand and sixteen.

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>We actually had a fair amount of snaps where he

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't on the field and could say, yes, Tyler Boyd's

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>still gonna run in the slot. Always routes in the slot.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, when when Green isn't on the field, he's

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>still running eighty percent of his routes in the slot.

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So you can you can gain an edge by getting

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all this information broken down and by snap as opposed

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people do it by game and

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>really find out a lot of information you can't get

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else other than the quant edge dot com. We're

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to talk off the year because you might, uh,

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll be we'll be in touch because I gotta I

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>am actually very interested in uh in finding out more

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>about this. I know you guys got a lot of

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>cool things going on over there. As for Corey Parson

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Fantasy football Frenzy coming up next, uh, they're

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 1>more of like, you know, don't don't step on my lawn.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They're not really analytics guys, but well, you know you guys,

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know you guys already know what you're gonna get

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>from those guys at uh at one pm up next

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Fantasy football Frenzy. Oakland Raiders at Arizona Cardinals. Here. Wow,

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>what a game. I'm surprised they didn't didn't put this

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>game on Monday Night Football this week after getting the

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners and Giants last week. Um Arizona favored by five.

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I never thought I'd say that this season there favored

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>by five in a game they are home forty one

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>point total. Look, the must starts are David Johnson. I

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>think the Cardinals defense doesn't play. I think Cardinals defense

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>can be very chalky for DFS. Um fits back to

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>back games with double digit targets here, but hasn't necessarily

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>put up big numbers. I am. I imagine you don't

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have much going on in this game. I will say

0:43:57.600 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>from a season long perspective, I think Doug Martin's a

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sneaky lex play just because the Cardinals have been not

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>great against the run and he has seen fifteen touches

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>per games since Marshawn Lynch went down with the injury.

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything on this game? Elliott ah Man,

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this game is brutal. Uh. David Johnson since Byron Left,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which has become the offensive coordinator, Byron Left, which has

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>recognized that David Johnson is good and should get the football. Uh,

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna save the analytical talk there. That's just a

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. Uh. You mentioned the Arizona defense. I think

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they are better season long start than DFS just because

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of ownership. Ricky Seals Jones has been heavily involved in

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the offense since Byron left, which took out took over,

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned the fact that the Cardinals are five

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>point favorite, which is insane. The t qu A betting

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 1>tool that you mentioned earlier is thirty six and nineteen

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 1>against the spread. Their favorite, the favorite bed of the

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>week is the Arizona Cardinals. They think this line should

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>be nine and a half. That's how bad. That's how

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>bad the analytics Oakland Raiders are. Wow, you heard it here.

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals should be nine and a half point favorites

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at home against Okland Raiders. Look, it's hard to argue it.

0:44:58.200 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The Oakland Raiders have laid down. I mean their season

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is over. John Drewden obviously playing for the future, and

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what everyone's killing John Drewden, I understand training

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>away Kalil mac is dumb. You know what you're getting

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>yourself into coming into the year. You know what your

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>personnel was. But think about it from his perspective, over

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years, the guy has five first

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>round picks and then in over the next two seasons. Again, um,

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>he's he's getting himself set up for Las Vegas. He

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care about Oakland right now. So while it sucks

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for Raiders fans and for the black hole. Right now,

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>John Gruden, John Gruden knows what he's doing. Um, I

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>truly believe that Philadelphia Eagles at the New Orleans Saints.

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Saints eight point favorites here, fifties six point game total. Look,

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you're starting, Breeze, You're starting tomorrow. You're starting Michael Thomas.

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Carson Wentz they must start in the spot.

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:46.240
<v Speaker 1>He's you know, he's getting uh, he's getting eight points

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>here on the road in the Dome, there's gonna be

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points scored. Zach Er. It's coming off

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a game with sixteen targets. You don't need me to

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you to start Zacher's. He's in your lineup, very

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>high price on DFS, but tight ends a crapshoot, So

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:58.919
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to pay up for him, I don't

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>mind it. I've think there are two Eagles things that

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:03.879
<v Speaker 1>we should tackle here real quick, Elliott, are you doing

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the Josh Adams thing? Because I see a lot of

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>people talking him up. I know he's been great on

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a yards per carry basis. It's just Doug Peterson is

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>going to run a committee. It's what he's done. I

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>mean every single year he runs a committee. I just

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't see why it's gonna change now, and especially

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>in a bad matchup against the Saints. Like, I'm not

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>really on Josh Adams at all. And then what are

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>your expectations for Golden Tate? We gotta report that he's

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be more acclimated this week in the offense.

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't really understand why he wasn't last week. They

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>had a whole bye week to get him involved. So

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys get him or Cooper. They had a bye

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 1>week and they've got him involved, you know, his first

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.240
<v Speaker 1>two games. Why couldn't the Saint Why couldn't the Eagles

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get Golden Tate involved last week? It's just kind of

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a weird situation for me. So how do you feel

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.359
<v Speaker 1>about Josh Adams and Golden Tate for the Eagles. I'm

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>not doing the Josh Adams thinks either. I get it

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in DFS because he's so cheap and it's the highest

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>total game and you want exposure to it. But I

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like every week we talk up in the Eagles

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>running back like, oh, it's gonna get the workhorse load,

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and every week no running back plays more the snap,

0:46:59.880 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm good on that, and like you mentioned that

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Saints run defense is the thing I want to avoid,

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like the plague, I think this is gonna be a

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>past final game, or the Saints put a lot of

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:09.919
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the Eagles and the Eagles have to throw

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I think Golden Tates and play especially if

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they can they run him a lot in the slot

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.839
<v Speaker 1>this week against p J Williams, who despite the fact

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that a one defensive Player of the Week is about

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as bad of a corner as you you can get,

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and Nelson Aguilar is pretty sneaky and GPPs is just

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>real cheap exposure. If Marshawn Lattimower can take away Alshan

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey and the Saints have been amazing against tight ends

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.919
<v Speaker 1>this year, if they forced the ball to Golden Tate

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and Nelson Aguilar, maybe Aguilar kind of pops a real

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>low ownership to a high total game. So I I

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>like the Tate Aglar but I'm off Josh Adams with that.

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna sign off YouTube for now. Up next you

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>get The Fantasy Football Frenzy with Corey Parson, Chris Ventura,

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and Jim Day. If you're listening, on podcast. Make sure

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>you rate, review and subscribe. We would appreciate it very much.

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings at the Chicago Bears Sunday Night football here

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bears two and a half point home favorites, forty

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>four and a half point game total. Here, must start.

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have Mit Strabisky ranks as a must

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>start right now because you look at it from a

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 1>season long perspective. What he's done this season. I believe

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he's QB seven, QB eight. He's getting it done on

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the ground right now, rushing the football as well. So look,

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he has an immense ceiling the Vikings defense.

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, they've they've kind of bounced back ever since

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Rams where they just, I mean

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the Rams were able to do whatever they want. Um,

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So we'll start on the Bear side of things. Trabinsky,

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>uh Tarik Cohen, Jordan Howard. I think Jordan Howard from

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a season long perspective, I'm out on him this week.

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm not gonna do that. He's a touchdown

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>dependent flex option for me at best. You know, you

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>look at his game log, he's giving you forty fifty

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe sixty yards Max, I think Tarik Cohen

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 1>and Trabiski are in play. What do you think, Elliott? Yeah,

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Trabinsky has got that rushing flora that's just so fantastic

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking for every week. So as long as

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he continues to use his legs, I think he's very

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>much in play. Uh. He's been one of the best

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy players this year, tered Cohen. As long as they

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>keep targeting him seven times a game, I mean, that's

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>real value at the running back position. He's getting a

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver workload plus about seven to ten carries a game.

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I'm completely off Jordan Howard, no interest.

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The big question for the Bears in this game is

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they've beat up on a lot of

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:27.279
<v Speaker 1>real bad teams. They've played the Patriots that was their

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>one good one. But the Vikings are probably the best

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>defense they've played in a long time. So it'll be

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:34.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting like to see how they step up to

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>better competition on the other side of the football. Obviously,

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins look at the Bears defense has played well.

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings offensive line is not great. We all know that,

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so he's gonna likely be under darrest Kirk kirk Cousin

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:50.319
<v Speaker 1>is not one of the best quarterbacks under pressure. We've

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>seen that before. But I think given the weapons he

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>has from a season long perspective, he you know, he's

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just outside my top twelve. Um, I don't think you're

0:49:58.080 --> 0:49:59.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna use him in daily this week. Yes he has

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a I'm feeling yes he has Stefon Diggs, but feeling, um,

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Stefen Diggs if you own him in season long, I'm

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.919
<v Speaker 1>getting him back in there. And then Dalvin Cook we saw,

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, they meant um that that game before the

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>by they said he'll be in for about you know,

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:16.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty snaps. He ended up playing you know, over fifty

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps in that game and broke that long

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy yard run where his hamstring didn't flare up. So

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a bad match up against the Bears,

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>but uh, season long, I'm not worried about Dalvin Cook.

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting him in there. And DFS, I don't. Are

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 1>you Are you in on Dvin Car Are you in

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on any of the Vikings From a DFS perspective, Um,

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>probably not. I I get the Cook play though, because

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he'll be contrarian and as long as you continue to

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.800
<v Speaker 1>see that amount of potential volume and we know his upside,

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really intriguing from a GPP standpoint. But

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in general, this is one of those games I'm more

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>excited for the football than I am from a betting

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 1>or DFS perspective, and I think that makes a lot

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of sense. Kansas City Chiefs at Los Angeles Rams Monday

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and Night Football. The slobber Knocker Rams three and a

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites. We know this game was supposed to

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be played in Mexico City, but due to field conditions,

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they moved this game back to Los Angeles. Sixty three

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half point game total, highest game total in

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>NFL history. I have in all caps here on the rundown.

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Start everybody. What is it that simple, elliot? Are we

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really starting everybody? I think the guys who were kind

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of fringe plays are. Sammy Watkins is a wide receiver too.

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 1>He's been banged up, he's been a little bit boom

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>er bust. But given the total in this game, I

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just think, look, everyone expects it to be a shootout

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's gonna be a lot of back and forth

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>so season long. I'm getting Sammy Watkins in my lineup. Um,

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about what are your expectations

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>for Josh Reynolds now filling in for Cooper Cup. We

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:47.280
<v Speaker 1>know he was on the field a lot when Cooper

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Cup went down, but only saw a ten percent of

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the target share, did have a game with two touchdowns.

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What are your expectations for Josh Reynolds? Are you doing

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:56.720
<v Speaker 1>anything with the Rams tight ends even from a season

0:51:56.719 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 1>long perspective with six teams on a buy and is

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>is there anything else in this game that you'd like

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to cover? And this game is gonna be everything from

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective, fan perspective, I don't know if you

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>could ask for more. I'm with you. I think Sammy

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Watkins is a wide receiver too, but in DFL. Like

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of glad this game isn't on the main

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 1>slate because you would just have to put six guys

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in and hope you you've got some something else right,

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I like Sammy Watkins Josh Reynolds. I

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>think the thing that's really intriguing about him is that

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the Rams like to use him around the goal line

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and they get him red zone targets, and I think

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that if you're gonna have a game with the highest

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 1>total in NFL history and he's gonna be on the

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>field for eighty percent of snaps, he's the cheap exposure

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to the game. But if I had to pick a

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end, it would be Gerald Everett. But golf doesn't

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>really like using the tight ends. But Everett is more involved,

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>even somewhat as a slot receiver with no cup. But

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you just you're you're playing everybody in this game. This

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>game is gonna be I think it's gonna live up

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>to the hype. I don't even it's crazy that it's

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the highest over under and I don't know how you

0:52:56.920 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 1>bet the under in this game. But I you know,

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm all in on everybody in this one. So Elliott,

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know I I brought people up. We talked about

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams and the Chiefs game. It's gonna be fun.

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And now I gotta tear everybody down. From my knowledge,

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you are a Jets fan, correct, Oh yeah, we're gonna

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about this high. Look, we only got about a

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>minute left, So I'm just gonna ask you. I know

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you do a lot for the NFL Draft. What have

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you seen from Sam Donald? Is it as bass at

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it seemed because it seems like, look, the guy has

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>no help. The play calling has been terrible. And do

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you think Levian Bill actually lands in New York. I

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 1>do think Levian Bell lands in New York. I'm not

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>super excited about it, but this team has a hundred

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>million dollars to spend. It needs to make a splash there,

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 1>So I I think Bell lands there. And I think

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing about Sam Donald is he's got He's shown

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 1>flashes this year and that's what I'm looking for. He's

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>got no offensive line, no weapons, bad light falling, and

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chance for him to develop into

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:53.839
<v Speaker 1>someone really good. And I'm not worried about them. It's

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Elliott Chris fall him on Twitter at Elliott Chris. Make

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sure you go check out the quant Age dot Com.

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week. Fantasy Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network