WEBVTT - Central Banks Going Too Far With Tightening, Bianco Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. So

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>while I was away at treasury, yields climbed. They had

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>their biggest five days sell off since the November since

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>right after the US election. And to bring in someone

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>who can can tell us, you know, whether this is

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a more protracted bond market route or

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>whether this is just a hiccup in an otherwise low

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>yield environment. We have Jim Bianco, who I am so

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>pleased to speak with. Jim Bianco is president of Bianco Research,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which is based in Chicago. Jim, what is going on here?

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You know? Is this just uh, you know, rates kind

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of normalizing in a a little bit more of a

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>choppy fashion that they have been, or is this the

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>beginning of something bigger? It could be the beginning of

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>something bigger, but I don't think. So let's talk about

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened June, which was not that long ago, uh,

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>just two weeks ago the tenure yield was it two eleven?

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And the next day there was a bunch of central

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>bankers that spoke uh Mark Kearney of the Bank of

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>England and Mario Dragging of the European Central Bank, and

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they hinted that even they might be looking at a

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>period of when they're central bank stimulus of bond buying

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>might end. Remember now that all bonds in the world,

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>and developed market government bonds in the world, one third

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of them are now owned by central banks. So if

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>all the Fed has already stopped buying, if the ECB

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna stop buying, in the Bank of England is

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>going to stop buying. The bond market responded accordingly by

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing a rise in yields a lot. Now we've seen

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the tenure, you'll go up, but your europeanials have gone

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up a lot more. That ten year German Bund is

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at an eighteen month high on that news, So I

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's been the catalyst for it. The problem is

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're assuming, they being central banks, are assuming that

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation is going to kick back up. If it does,

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>then all their hawk ish talk about raising rates is

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>probably justified if it doesn't and these uh and inflation

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>stays low, and for the last several years, that has

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>always been the thing. Inflation confounds by being too much

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lower than everybody thinks. If it stays there, then they

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>might be overtightening and they could be seriously impacting the

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>economy in a negative way. Which way do you fall

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on this? I think that they're going too far. I

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think that inflation is not going to pick up to

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the degree that central banks say it's going to pick up.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>We did a study a couple of weeks ago where

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we looked at uh FED speech and usually when inflation

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>surprises them, they start using the words models and for

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>tasks a lot, meaning that O'll pay no attention to

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>us being wrong. Now the future, according to our model

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and forecast says will be right. They've used the words

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>model and forecast more than they have at any point

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>in the last eight years. So they're really betting that

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to see a rise of inflation, and I

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't see it right now. And if they intend

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>on reducing the balance, she at least the Federal Reserve

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>raising rates more, and we were to get this kind

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of pull back from the e c BE in the

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England, it could be very problematic for the

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>economies because you could wind up tightening to the point

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>where it actually hurts the economy, something we haven't seen

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>yet so far. I'm wondering, Jim, what's your take on

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>whether this bond market sell off happened on thin volume

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was simply a result from a summer market

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of people were out of the office

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>versus uh, people were positioned for this and we're waiting

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>for this, and and and and have been. So the

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>market has gotten so one sided that it can readjust

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly and more violently. Let me make it just an

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>an don't for you about the thin volume. Um JP

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Morgan has reported now that among their high institutional clients

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that they have mobile apps for them to trade and

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>they have now done at trades in excessive a billion

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars with somebody on their phone. So all those traders

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that are summering in the Hampton's over the Fourth of

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>July weekend, they're not in the office, They've got a phone,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>They've got their two buttons away from doing a trade.

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what they have been doing, and so

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't buy the argument that there's there's this thing

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>called thin summer volume. As far as where the where

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets go, as far as the positioning goes in

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, I think it's rather neutral. We look at

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>things like the Commitment of Traders report, which is a

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of open interest, and we see that the ten

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>year UH, the speculators in the ten year contract are

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>very very long, and that's supposed to be bearished. But

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>then we've got the opposite in the ear dollar, and

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>when you add them all up, they're kind of in

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a middling kind of range. So I don't see UH

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>positioning as being they were extreme right now, which suggest

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that this this rise and rates might have a little

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more to run, but not much more, because if

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the if it's going to continue to raise rates without inflation,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is going to start worrying that

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna hurt the economy, and that could be very

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>supportive for interest rates. At what point do you think,

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>for let's say, on the tenure, what yields do you

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>think are going to be attractive enough to bring people

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in buying in bulk. I think to forty would do it.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We're only a couple of asis points away from that

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think that if you see a two

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>point four facts fill in the blank after that, I

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think that people will start getting interested in the bond market. Jim,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know when I when I always speak with you

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>or here hear your voice or read things that you're right,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I always think, Okay, Jim is in Chicago, so he's

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of the steady eddie and all this. You know,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he kind of sees it from a perspective that many

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>people on the coast and so on may not be

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>able to see. And then I of course thought, but

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Chicago was in Illinois, and you know, you've got a problem,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering if you could talk about just the

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>pensions and these problems with the budgets in particularly in Illinois,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and what you think the effects of that are going

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to be in the economy Illinois on the road to ruin?

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>How about that? Um? And unfortunately I'll say that we're

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just further along on that road than everybody else. They

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>all seem to be on it. Um. Real brief, here's

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Illinois problem. They passed the new constitution in nineteen seventy

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Section five of the new Constitution said you cannot change

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a pension plan or any retirement plan that is done

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>by the state, city, or any municipal workers. They've tried

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to amend or I'm sorry, they've tried to change the plans,

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the courts have struck it down because the constitutions says

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you can't change them. So we've got this giant pension

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>problem that cannot be changed short of a constitutional amendment.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I won't go to the the mechanics to that, but

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that a constitutional amendment in Illinois all

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but impossible. So that's the first problem that Illinois has.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The second problem that Illinois has been at that point

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is that they have been raising taxes to try and

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>meet this pension problem. They've been driving people out of

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the state. The state of Illinois has the largest exodus

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of people in the country. The city of Chicago has

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the largest exodus of any major city of people in

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the country. We've just raised the taxes again. The Illinois

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Policy Institute says that, congratulations, Illinois, you've got the highest

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>tax rate in the country. Now, all in tax rate

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in the country. That's gonna drive more people out of

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the state that's going to lower the number of people

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that pay taxes. That's why I mean by Illinois on

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the road to ruin. Now, what fixes this? Well, when

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the Illinois voters decide what they want to be. Do

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they do they want to be a quasi socialist state

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and continue to just raise taxes and raise taxes and

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't care if they drive everybody out, or do

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to correct this by electing politicians that will

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>pass the constitutional amendment to start start fixing this problem.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>The Illinois voters haven't decided yet, and that's why we

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>will remain on the road of ruin until they do

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>decide what they want to do. Thank No, but Jim Bianco,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, as they say, tell us how

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you really feel. No, but Jim Bianco, You're you're highlighting

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so many very pertinent issues, and we want to thank

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you for doing so. Jim Bianco is the president and

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Bianco Research, and yes, he is based

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. There's a holiday coming up, Lisa of Romwitz.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's only happening online though it's ending in the Amazon world,

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's called Amazon Prime Day. And this apparently is

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a moment in Internet experience that people have waited for

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>all year. But we've got someone who has to do

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this for a living, just Hendra Warrel. He is our

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Global Internet and Consumer Electronics Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he joins us from our nine sixty studio in San Francisco.

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Je Tendra, thank you very much for making time for us.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And have you got the countdown clock or something to

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this retail experience? Tell tell people who are not familiar

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with it or whose eyes are rolling into the rhead

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what this is all about. So basically this is a

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>third year that Amazon is doing this. Essentially, what they

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to do is for all their Prime members, make

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, products available, deep discounts so that you know,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>more people are aware of this prime membership service and

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>they attract more Prime members you know long term. Now,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what we have seen last year two years basically every

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>time they have a Prime Day one day, they always

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.359
<v Speaker 1>have like a you know, sales exceeding sort of expectations

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Prime Day, which reflects on the prey guidance

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>being higher than expectations, but also a surgeon prime memberships.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So what you can expect here is deals, more Prime

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>members and um, you know, them selling more Equit devices

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to you this year to Tendra. How big are the

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>discounts and who takes the cut in profits? Does Amazon

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>pass on the cut and profits to the suppliers, the

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>stores that supply uh the goods? Or is it just

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>them taking the hit and taking the loss. See, the

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>goal here is not just chasing sales and profitability on

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this day. The goal here is to broadcast the brand globally, right,

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>so attracting more prime members. So it's it's less to

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>do with profits and more to do it just the acquisition.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, I understand that, I understand that, but I'm

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>wondering if they discount things heavily, right, how does that?

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, are they basically taking a loss with the

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>amount that they're discounting it, or are they just they're

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>discounting it a little bit and they're still on certain

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>categories on certain categories. That would be true. But if

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you actually look at you know, the stuff that they

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>sell the most or or hope to sell the most,

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon's own products, which obviously you know they're taking

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a loss on it as it is, so you know,

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to assume that they would be taking a

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>loss on that. But the goal here is more penetration

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of you know, these devices like Amazon Echo and henceforth,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the more tuned customers are to the whole Amazon ecosystem.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So if I said to the Alexa or the Echo

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>machine in the living room, tell me the dollar amount

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of sales that Amazon does on these days, what would

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the response be? They don't disclose this number. What do

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you think it is? What kind of sales numbers are

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we talking about? So right now we will be probably

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>approaching a billion dollars in gm re because you know,

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>they have thirty hours this year versus twenty four, be

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they have more Prime members. How did they get how

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>did they squeeze those hours? Who did they call to

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>get those extra hours? Well, they also expanded the number

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of countries over here, and they want to make sure

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that you know, all these deals attract as many Prime

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and Echo customers as possible. So, but what's interesting is

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Echo devices, like you have exclusive deals on

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>them as well, and deep discounts on the Echo product

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. So Amazon clearly wants, you know, more and

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>more people to buy these Echo devices and rely more

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>on it so that you know, they stay away from

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>shopping elsewhere. Why don't all retailers do this, have their

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>own holiday, not Black Friday, but have their own holiday

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that they managed to create manufacturing. I mean, Hallmark basically

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>did that for like Mother's Day and Valentine's Day, right,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, why why don't we see more of this?

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because you know what we have seen all

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, it's been reactionary uh stances from

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>other players. So Walmart had something similar last year in

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>response to Prime, but like this year, they are not

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it. But why aren't they doing it? Um? Well,

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe one of the reasons it is probably their

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>discounts are more flexible throughout the year versus Amazon. It's

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit more rigid on that stance. And

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>also they don't have members you know for Prime members

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>as for Prime Member, Prime Member, Prime Days, Prime Members only,

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.239
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have this sort of membership loyalty program

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>going on across the board. And I think that's something

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that they couldn't do. They're buying an annual annuity stream

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and whatever they were, right, I mean, and they just

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>had to figure out a way to finance what they have.

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The stock is up one in a quarter percent. Right now,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon shares trading just under a thousand dollars a share

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars a share for for Amazon. So who who

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:44.479
<v Speaker 1>takes the hit from all this? Walmart? Oh well, Walmart

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>interestingly didn't do it this year, like you know, have

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a reactionary sort of response, but not Walmart as much.

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But like you could see the other source, uh, you

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>know sort of do take a hit from traffic being

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the worded away from them. But it's not about a

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hit one day. It's about it hit on like what

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it means for the next year, you know. So, like

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, they have twenty two million more Prime members

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>now coming into Prime Day versus it was last year,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So more people are attuned to this ecosystem, more likely

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they want to stick to it. It's like a cable company, right,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>They've got more people paying a year. Absolutely believe it's

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely But but what's interesting is that, I mean, it

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really cover your free shipping and all the goods

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you get out of it. So what Amazon wants to

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do is essentially rely more on third party sellers through

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>their Fulfillment by Amazon program uh, to sell it to

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Prime members. So that's how they try to recuperate. Uh

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you know all the costs that or some of the

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>costs at least for now to um to give you

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the free shipping and all these services to tender world.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us and gonna let

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you go and get started to get up your wish

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>list for Amazon Prime to turn as our global Internet

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and consumer Electronics analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence joining us from

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Well, there is a market that isn't covered

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>very much, but is vast and is of great importance

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to really the heart of the U S economy, and

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that is middle market lending. I want to bring in

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Andy Stoyerman. He is head of middle market lending and

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>head of late stage lending for Gallop Capital, its dollars

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>under management based in Chicago. Andy, I want to talk

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about just the state of the market right now, because

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of broadly syndicated loans saw an

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented amount of issuance, and a lot of this was repricing.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>People try Our company is trying to get lower rates

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on their loans. Right now, we're starting to see some

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>softness in the broader, bigger loan market. What about the

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>middle market, The middle market always is immune to what's

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>going on the syndicated market. We do say if they

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have a flu, we get a cold. But middle markets

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>more relationship blending, and our clients really don't have a choice.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't really have a syndicated option, they don't have

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a non syndicated option. So middle market has some spread

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>compression when the large market has spread compression, which is

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>happening now. But we're more immune and we tend to

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be more relationship lending, so clients tend to pick us

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and work with us even when markettions change. What kind

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of how much higher are the rates on these loans?

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Say on average then on broadly syndicated loans, they could

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere from about a hundred to a hundred and

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points. And if you're one of the

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>leader arrangers, you get to keep most of the upfront fees.

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Were in a syndicated market, the investment bank keeps the

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>outfront fees and the retail market takes a very low

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>o I D. So we actually get a premium in

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>our spread because we're the underwriter and holder. I want

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you to just use if you can, the here's the image.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>The image is you have a pet and you have

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to go and you need to let's say, have it

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>cared for, and you get the bill and you just

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are in shock, but you pay it. Can you tell

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>us about that and a loan that you put together

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and how that kind of exemplifies not only your role,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>but specifically the kinds of businesses and the people involved

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in the businesses, the owners, the operators. Sure Golf Capital

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>works with middle market companies in the United States. Middle

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>market companies really are the growth engine. That's where both

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>changes happen because larger companies are kind of too bureaucratic.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We do like the pet space. We found over time

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that people actually like their pets, sometimes more than their children,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll feed their pets better food than they feed

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>their children. So it's actually a pretty recession resistant elements.

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>So we we've worked well. In the vetman, I'm sorry,

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>it's proven to be true. We we could see it.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want you to get the vet care so

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>people bring. Veterinary care is has been recession resistant. We

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have data going back fifteen years when we've done our

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>first Veterinarians have two issues, right, they have issues of

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>scale because they need to kind of grow their business

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have generational change issues, which is how do

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I monetize what I've created? So the private equity market

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>has been great at creating these super companies where they

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>consolidate all the operations get more efficient, so sometimes pricing

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>goes down better care referral sources. But also the owners

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of these businesses actually get to cash out and change

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>their generational wealth. So our company we did was called

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>pet Fet. Pet FETs one of the larger consolidators. And

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this is an example how we did a middle market

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>deal and didn't go syndicated. Seven hundred million dollar facility

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in prior years would have been done the larger syndicated

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>loan market. And just to be just this was this

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>headquartered in in um Uh, Connecticut. Headquartered in Connecticut. But

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but their operations are national and they're building clusters nationally

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and their owned by a pension plan, by a pen

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and plan and other lenders like like ourselves. Well, I

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up on the idea that a pension

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>plan owns this company Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. This I

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting and this is a new development where

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing an increasing number of pensions invest directly in

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>smaller companies in order to capture those higher yields that

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, we're uh north of one percentage point

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>higher than more broadly syndicated loans. Um, how much are

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you seeing this as a trend and is it good

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>or is it bad? So we've seen pension plans in

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>two places. One we've seen them as buyers of businesses

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>where they've decided not to invest in private equity funds

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and pay the carrying the promote to private equity funds

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and they build their own teams. And then we've seen

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>as direct direct lenders where they have huge obligations and

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they see the direct loans that we're making and giving

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to our investors and I'd like to participate, and someone

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have the scale to get their teams together. So there

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are it's a delicate balance into when you say scale

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to get their teams together. Does that mean that they

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are hiring people who are specialists in direct lending to

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>go out on behalf of them and source opportunities or

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>does this mean that uh, they're getting sort of investment

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>thecs together in order to invest. No, they're doing both.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>They actually have full teams, their marketing to the private

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>equity universe as if they were Gollop Capital. So they're

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>out there using their balance sheet, using their pension plan

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and going out and sourcing loans on their own. Does

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this make it difficult for you? You know there, it

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>does make it more difficult, But there is a scale,

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>there is tenures. So Gallop capitalsman in business for twenty years.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It takes a long time to queue. In this business.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that people don't talk about. You

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>have to provide companies that revolvers the lines of credit.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Having that operation is very time consuming, expensive and it's

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a big organization. They tend to do more the junior capital.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Pension plans second lean high yield bonds and tend to

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>buy into our loans, probably more than than to arrange

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and lead themselves because that difficult, real, real quick. Which

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>pension plans have the biggest teams devoted to direct lending

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>um Ontario Teachers was there's a group called PSP. There

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>are there are pension plans all of the United States.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>They're all doing it. They're family offices that are doing

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it too, high net worth individuals and family offices. So

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian market has been one of the largest. If

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at all the Canadian pension plans, they've been

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the most aggressive, you know, really in our market. That

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. They really so they're investing in the United

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>States to fund their future liabilities for their retirees. Yes,

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.719
<v Speaker 1>not our own pension plans. Some invest through us. Well

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what a trend. All right, well done, Thanks very much

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>for being here illuminating an interesting topic. Andy's Storyaman He

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is the head of middle market lending and the head

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of late stage lending. He does it all at Gallup

0:21:53.920 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Capital twenty billion under management based in Chicago. This is Bloomberg. Well,

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in the past week alone, the biggest emerging markets e

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>t F debt e t F I should say, which

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>trades unto the ticker e m B, has lost about

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>one almost one billion dollars of assets through withdrawals. And

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>this comes after many, many weeks of consecutive and record inflows.

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Here to help us understand whether this is the beginning

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of some kind of bigger route with an emerging markets

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>debt is Damien Sassaur. He's are fixed income strategist focus

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>on emerging markets for Bloomberg Intelligence, and he joins us

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg eleven three oh Studios, Damien, thank

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. So we have seen

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this weakness, which is a little bit surprising, simply because

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>there were so many big investors who were saying that

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>right now emerging markets debt is in better shape simply

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>because these economies are doing better and even a bit

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of of of a benchmark rate increase in the US

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>won't really shake it. What's behind the latest weakness and

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of continue, Well, I think the latest weakness, as

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing, it's it's been macro factors, right, I

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>think six of spread movement for the better part of

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the past two years. An emerging market debt is related

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to oil US yields and China China consumption, So you

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>know that explains the bulk of it. I mean, we

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just hiked on June fourteen, and since that point, the

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning that the Federal Reserve raised indust rates again on

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>in June, and since then we have seen this weakness

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>precisely we are we are the Bloomberg Barkley's Emerging market

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>hard currency aggregate benchmark indexes down one point oh five

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>percent since the date of the uh the FED rate hikes.

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So so yeah, look, I mean it's still at five

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>points percent year to date. I mean it rose nine

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>percent last year. So maybe you know, call it what

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you will, you know, um now that um, you know,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe profit taking. Maybe you know you're just seeing people,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the markets are maybe a little bit over extended, etcetera.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>But but look fundamentally, and this is what we look at.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something bigger going on beneath the surface. Right,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got em credit quality degradation, and we have tighter

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>spread perturn of leverage, meaning the spread premiere that creditors

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>require per unit of growth leverage has compressed by thirteen

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>point four percent year to date. So you're just like

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that just to trans so in other words, that a

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>left turn or right. So investors are basically getting much

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>less compensation correct for extra debt that emerging markets companies

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>are building up relative to their income. In other words,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they're becoming more levered and people are accepting less uh

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>less an income. And that's exactly right. You you said

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it perfectly so so um, and it's not uniform, right,

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the level of leverage that is going up

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>an emerging market, it's not going up across the board.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going up across most sectors, although you know, our

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>analysis finds that mining and utility issues leverages actually uh

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the client um and it's not going to up across

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>all regions. In fact, um well, in the Asia Pacific

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>region it's gone up quite considerably, but in Central and

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Europe leverage is actually declining. So you know, it's

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's about these pockets, you know, these idiosyncratic regions

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and countries and sectors and and and and that kind

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of lends you to where you know the opportunities are

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and quite frankly, where the risks are. Let me just

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>try to put this into a picture for myself, Damien,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>because if you were brave enough after the November presidential

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>election to go in and buy e m B, which

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is as we're describing the e t F, that is

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the proxy for how people feel about emerging market debt.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>If you were lucky enough to do that, you would

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>be getting in and around one oh six, and I'm

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>just going to tell you something about June. This is

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of June, emerging debt e t F saw

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the largest weekly inflows in more than four years, adding

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>one point four billions. So that was the beginning of

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>last month. So may be when you're a smart investor

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and you read that and you say, oh, largest weekly

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>inflow in more than four years. I'm getting out. I

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>got in at one oh six, and now I can

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>get out of at one sixteen. Great, thank you. I'll

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>buy it back when it goes to one oh three

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or one thirteen. And Pam, let me just expand on that.

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen billion has found its way into emerging market debt

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>e t F in seventeen, and that's equal to thirty

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of EM debt e t F assets under management.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's an extraordinary number of few that either

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the marketing, the sales, or the actual underlying

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>because how do you even know what's in this? Do

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>most people know what's well? Yeah, well, now, over se

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty four billion in the five largest emerging

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>market that e t F s are U S dollar bonds,

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>right their hard currency emerging market. Um, yeah, but I

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>got right here. Russia is the largest holding in e

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>m B right, you gotta you gotta Russia, Uruguay, poland Peru.

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting how so much of this has also connected

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to politics. Because I was looking at this list that

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you have in the story, which gives a really detailed

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>reckoning for each individual country. Why don't to just share

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>some highlights with of that. Well, I mean Mexico, Turkey

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Well, you know, Mexico is an interesting one.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's start with Russia, right, I mean the

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thing with Russia is, I think you know, people are

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at Russia and they look at emerging markets, and

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>what do you look at? You look at growth, you

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>look at effectively, what is the forward earnings potential of

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the country itself, and sometimes you ignore the basic fundamentals.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Leverage in Russia is low relative to just about any

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>country on the planet, predominantly because it's been sanctioned by

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the U S and the EU, and so it hasn't

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>been able to tap the international capital markets for some time.

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have, but just not not the way

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>you would you would have you would have thought, and

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, so, yeah, I mean they actually have low leverage,

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>but on a forward basis, just extrapolating that out, their

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>growth potential is not nearly what it is or what

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it once was, given the sanctions and given what's going

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>on with geo political risk in Russia. Right, So you know,

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and and let's compare that to Mexico. Our analysis looking

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at spread Perturn finds that Mexico um corporates and quasi

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sovereign issuers are actually being valued well below what their

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>credit rating. Their trip will be. Credit rating now says

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they're actually being valued as a double B. So yeah,

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's great information. Go along, Mexico, watch out if you're

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in Russia. Thanks very much, Damian Sasaur, fixed income strategist,

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:28:50.360 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio