WEBVTT - Peloton Plunges, Nvidia Set to Report & Huawei's Secret Chip Network

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Vallet, Nbon.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heide and Bloomberg's Wilter Quarters in New York

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>at Amed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 2>Coming up full earnings coverage ahead of course, as Palatine

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>plunges after issuing pretty disappointing forecast, will.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Break down the numbers.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Plus we push ahead to earnings out after the bell

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>from chip giant Nvidia. Does the AI rally have staying power?

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of semiconductors, look, we're looking at the communications

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>giant Huawei, maybe building a secret network of chip fabrications

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 2>center across China. We'll bring you the y from our

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's c said, but first there, let's check in on

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 2>these markets. Because well, even though we've got anxiety, it

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 2>feels as though a short squeeze in the bond market

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is helping lift the tech stocks high. We're looking at

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>more than one point six, we said, let's call it

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>on the Nasdaq. On the upside, there is still much

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>hope on the earning still to come, even though some

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 2>of those earnings are about to dive into We're looking

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty ugly. I'm looking at a two year yeeld being

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 2>squeezed higher. Therefore the boring costs come down nine basis

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>points almost ten. We're seeing it across the entire curve,

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 2>and you're seeing it across the entire world. You're seeing

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>really bonbuying across in the UK and Europe. Here in

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the US as well, many feeling that basically we've been

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>some technical elements at play here. We've been soling off

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>so hard, so fast, and some ugly data when you're

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at the PMI data certainly slowing in Europe. Seeing

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>weakness here in the US means maybe that bad news

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>is good news at least on the day we're seeing

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the Golden Dragon China Index. Of course, this is a

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Naska Golden Dragon.

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Just shining like that.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually, there has been buying in the Chinese names as well,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 2>even after we've seen such a selloff on the CSI

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>three hundred, for example, at the training at the lowest.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Since November, we've been on a look at what's happening

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the world a bitcoin look. We're mid

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>this macro picture of bad news being good news. The

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>dollar is selling off as many feel that perhaps the

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Fed can't tighten into that sort of moon music. Dollar

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 2>goes lower, Bitcoin goes up five percentage point end, but

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>go into the micro The earnings.

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the big story and video expectations incredibly high. What

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 3>we're forecasting is top line growth sixty five percent to

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 3>eleven billion dollars in the fiscal second quarter. Institution investors

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>want even more. They're looking for twelve billion dollars of

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 3>sales data center the majority of that. Does the AI

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 3>story have staying power? Is there still demand for the

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 3>H one hundreds? What about the GH two hundred, the

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>next gen GPU with greater memory capacity? How does that

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 3>drive the story for in video for the rest of

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 3>the year. Options market pricing a ten percent swing. This

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is almost four percent of the s and P five hundred.

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>It is more than thirty percent of the nazdette one

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 3>hundreds rally year to date. We care and we cannot

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 3>wait for these earnings after the bell. The others end

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>of the scale, opposite story is Peloton. The sock at

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>a record low after it's fiscal fourth quarter earnings. It's

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>guiding for the fiscal first quarter revenue of six hundred million,

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>way below expectations even at the high end of its

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 3>given range. The story in the quarter gone well, the

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 3>seat Post issue a recall seven hundred and fifty thousand.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>People say, yeah, I do want a new seat post

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>that was way above what Peloton expected. Subscribers hit past

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 3>subscribers lost in the quarter twenty nine thousand. The story

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>of Peloton going from a hardware maker to a subscription

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and software based provider is unraveling a little bit. Let's

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>get more on these Peloton earnings. I'm ringing in Schwetter

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Cojuria everquaisi Alyss. Schweeder has an inline rating on the

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>stock and a ten dollars price target Sweda. What worried

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 3>you most about what you heard from Peloton?

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks for having me ed. It's always great to

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 5>be on. There are a few things. One is a Peloton.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 6>It's clear.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 5>It is clear that they are having some potentially structural

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 5>issues in terms of being their.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 6>Ability to sell more hardware.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 5>The fundamental question for Peloton remains whether there are already

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 5>enough number of households and.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 6>Owners for fitness equipment already.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 5>And the reason why I say that is because yes,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 5>it was a seasonally soft quarter, but they also changed pricing.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 6>On their hardware.

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 5>They've also been marketing against it and Peloton is a

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 5>very well known brand, and yet they came in below expectations.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 5>Understood that the seat recall did not help their brand,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 5>Imagine did not help in terms of the pausing of

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 5>the subscription, So that fundamental question is in play in

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 5>terms of the sustainability of top line growth. The second

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 5>thing is profitability, even on Ibida. The Ibida for the

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 5>coorting quarter came in low expectations and their guidance also

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 5>is below where the street was for first fiscal quarter.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 5>That said, they guide it to positive free cashule in

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 5>the back half of the next criscal year, and partly

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 5>it is because they are going to be leaning into

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 5>the holiday quarter. What this tells us is it is

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 5>very difficult to drive top line growth.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 6>As well as show meaningful.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 5>Expansion in the bottom line, and for this company, this

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 5>balance is going to be the biggest challenge. How are

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 5>they going to show sustainable positive free cash flow and

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 5>at the same time drive top line growth And we're

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 5>seeing that they're having challenges already.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>So what's the answer?

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, pm A comital market saying I like the

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>ton of phrase. They should bear hug their loyalists. Basically,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>be smaller, be healthier, be more niche should we remind

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 2>ourselves that this isn't a mass market player.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 6>I would agree with that.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we had a tactical underperform into the print

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 5>for that reason, because we thought that profitability for the

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 5>quarter is going to be in question and that that

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 5>came true. And I think that at this point that

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 5>I would somewhat agree with that. Now the question is

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 5>can Peloton be a standalone company for the foreseeable future?

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Is this something that can last as a standalone company?

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 5>And I would argue that it may not. I mean,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 5>the pot as soon as they get to positive free

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 5>cash on a sustainable basis with some sort of modestly

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 5>higher top line growth, people the company may be looking

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 5>for acquisition targets.

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Schweter, your ten dollar price target, your inline rating on

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the stock is in review. After the numbers, do you

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>assess this company as a technology company or does it

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 3>just make fitness equipment?

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 5>With vary As the CEO, I would have to say,

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 5>they're they're pivoting to a technology company.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 6>And the reason why you say.

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 5>That is because they are managing the company. The leadership

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 5>team is managing the company as a technology company with

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 5>a great focus on the subscription piece.

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 6>It is clear that that's what the intrinsic value of

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 6>the company is.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 5>The retention of the subscribers is high, intrinsically high still

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 5>even though the term was sequentially higher in the quarter.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 6>But that's where that's where the value of the company is.

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 5>And the companies is actually focusing on the subscription piece.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 6>And some of the examples are.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 5>That they are allowing the three tiers of the subscription

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.799
<v Speaker 5>there they have several hundreds of thousands of monthly active

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 5>users for the free subscription tier. They are also expanding

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 5>those tiers into different price points. They're focusing more and

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 5>their ability to enter these households at a lower price point.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>I think that that's their focus. The question is whether

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 5>it's going to work or not.

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 2>That's the question. Shwerda Kasharia, we want to thank you

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>shout up because understand you're on vacation and you've come

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>on to discuss all of this, diggest the numbers and.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Give it to our audience.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate it.

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Great to stick with you. I mean, let's get on though,

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>because we've got other earnings that are all important for

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the direction of the entire market at this stage. And

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>VideA the chip company of course front and center when

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>it comes to this AI frenzy and it's our ending tonight.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>We've been talking about it all week me Meg Intelligence

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 2>senior semiconductor analyst Kanjunzman who's here with us, and so

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>much baked in people raising their price targets into these numbers.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we're going to see the sort of

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 2>sixty five percent increase in revenue the market's anticipating.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>I do think there's a high confidence we see that number,

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 7>and the primary driver of that is going to be

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 7>their data center segment and driven by the A one

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 7>hundreds and h one hundred hardware systems. Remember, data center

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 7>is estimated to almost double on a year over a

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 7>year basis and add about not of fifteen billion dollars

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 7>to a company that did twenty seven billion last year.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 7>There could be some addition from the gaming, but it's

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 7>primarily going to come from the data center segment.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>You know you're coming at this from the Bloomberg Intelligence

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>analysis perspective, right. The story is, does the AI momentum

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>have staying power. So what do you need to hear

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 3>from Nvidia to believe that, you know, the hyperscalers and

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the LLLM developers and everyone else continues to buy into

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 3>AI for the rest of the year and beyond.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, look, since the last running call, we have

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 7>seen a lot of demand strength signals that the demand

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 7>is there and rising. The two key things we want

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 7>to hear is can they ship to the demand and

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 7>are they able to get successfully their additional supply here?

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 7>And also a validation on visibility and backlog orders going

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 7>into the next year.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think for me, Caroline, the big question

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 3>as well is technology leadership. You know we've covered on

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>the show. AMD has its own offering in the GPOs

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>GPUCPU hybrid space. Intel wants a piece of the pie.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I wonder how they maintain their leadership.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>It does come down to market dynamics here Conngenta and

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>really it's felt like in videos the only game in town.

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Just look at it's trillion dollar market valuation when it

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>comes on bets and AI, is it or are other

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>players playing catch up here?

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 7>When look at the most fastest growing market right now

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 7>in semiconductors, so definitely other players are trying to get

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 7>a piece of it and are playing catch up. We

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 7>don't expect Nvidia to lose its leadership anytime soon, but

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 7>I think there's definitely room for other players to grab

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 7>a piece of pie, which is again a huge pie,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 7>and a small percentage could add in the order of

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 7>billions of dollars to their revenues.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 3>When the bar is high, and when the stakes are high,

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 3>there's always room for disappointment. How worried are you about

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 3>the supply issue at TSMC being able to hand over

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>enough chips.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 7>I think, look, the supply is definitely going to be,

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 7>like I said, a key factor going into today's call,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 7>in the near term. I'm not as worried because the

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 7>company seems confident that they've garnered enough supply to meet

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 7>at least the guided numbers, which are driven by them.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 7>I would definitely like to see if they can meet

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 7>the long term, especially the twenty twenty four numbers, and

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 7>gather supply for that.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 3>You remind us of something very important that the guided

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>numbers did come from the company, and that's why that

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>note from City about institutional investors seeing even greater upline

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>growth is worth bearing in mind. Conjent Siavani the Bloomberg

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence thank you time for talking tech first Up. India

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>is now the first country to land a spacecraft near

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 3>the Moon's south pole. The Chandrayan three launched last month

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 3>and is carrying a rover now tasks of analyzing the

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>chemical makeup of the Moon's surface. Russia recently tried to

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 3>land in the same area but crashed into the Moon

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>following an engine malfunction. And foreign investors are selling off

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 3>China's blue chip stocks, extending the streak of outflows over

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the course of thirteen days, the longest on record. Data

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.239
<v Speaker 3>track by Bloomberg found that investors have offloaded the equivalent

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 3>of ten point seven billion dollars between August seventh and eighteen.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Some of the stocks most sold include solar company lang

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Gee Ev, maker byd and medical supply maker Mindre And.

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of which, telecommunications giant Huawei may be building a

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>secret network of chip fabrication centers across China. That's according

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Semiconductor Industry Association, the leading global trade group

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 3>for chips. Huawei has been blacklisted by the US Department

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>of Commerce amid tensions with China and a shadow chips

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing network will allow the company to skirt those US sanctions.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 8>Caroline.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be digging into that story so much

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 2>a little bit later in the show, but for here

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and now, let's just talk about a meeting that's going on.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>It's the SEC perhaps imposing new requirements on hedge funds,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>on private equity firms to disclose fees, which is aimed

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 2>at impacting, of course, investors helping them. We'll see what

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the market makes of it, but we mention Ali basych

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 2>Is here. And ultimately, why are venture capital companies that

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 2>we talk about a lot from this show, like Andresen

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Horowitz worried about these new rules?

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 9>Andresen Horowitz and remember, you have to think about these

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 9>other funds like Tiger Global and d One that had

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 9>been traditional headfunds moving more into the private equity structure,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 9>venture capital structures.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 6>What they're initially concerned.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 9>About is straightforward, very much new rules for a seventeen

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 9>trillion dollar industry that had not based this much disclosure

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 9>or scrutiny before. But the industry has ballooned quite meaningfully.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 9>I will also say, even though they're concerned about these

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 9>new rules, one of which involves sidecar vehicles, and these

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 9>are preferential treatment which often apply to large investors that

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 9>tend to co invest and do all sorts of other

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 9>deals with them. The SEC is trying to level the

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 9>playing field in terms of fee structures. Now, importantly, there

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 9>have already been large wins for the investment industry when

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 9>it comes to the rules as they have been put

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 9>out today. When you look at the open meeting, they

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 9>are still very much discussing these rules.

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 3>But the Commission is.

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 9>Made out of five members, in which three of them

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 9>are democratic expected to vote in favor of these rules.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 9>Where the industry has already won is this idea of

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 9>a grandfathering provision, so existing agreements with investors.

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Will continue to live on.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 6>So this will be for.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 9>New investors and new agreements that are being made. There's

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 9>also an idea here of indemnification. There is a worry

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 9>that the standard of negligence would also be made more strict,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 9>which would, in theory, according to industry participants, restrict certain

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 9>forms of risk taking because it would be easier to

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 9>sue your investment advisor. There's another thing I want to

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 9>pull up here, let's pull up a screen here from

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 9>pangaeas Terry Haynes, who's already weigh in with a lot

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 9>of doubt. Remember, the MFA has already said it could

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 9>potentially sue within two weeks. But then Terry Haynes also

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 9>believes that the SEC gets stopped in its tracks and

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 9>will ultimately get shut down in its venture here because

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 9>the courts may put this plan on hold and the

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 9>court lower courts won't be convinced that the SEC would

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 9>be likely to prevail on appeal.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of.

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 9>Doubt on how much these rules see.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 3>The light of day.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But certainly it is.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 9>A moment of tension between these private funds and their

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 9>main regulators.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Who lies on how much transparency ultimately investors get Shanani Us,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>we thank you so much for the breakdown. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be talking to the CEO of Financial

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Platform Ramp. This is the company securing some three hundred

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>million dollars an additional funding and time is going to

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 2>do with us from New York, from San Francisco.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 4>This is booting bag technology.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Time now for work shifting is where we look at

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the changing landscape of the labor market amid some advances

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>in technology, and today we're focused on how corporate legal departments, well,

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>they're tentatively embracing artificial intelligence by harnessing AI to do

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the grunt work on tasks like reviewing simple contracts in

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>house counsel that can reduce the time and the money

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>of course needed.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 4>To perform those tasks to a fraction of what would

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 4>be needed by humans.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>But since generator of AI is new, the industry is

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>navigating critical questions around the security and the quality of

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the data.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 3>So slowly, slowly we go.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, let's look at another way in which work has

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>shifted and maybe got a little bit cheaper for you,

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>because financial services platform RAMPS just raised three hundred million

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars for a total valuation of five point eight billion.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>We spoke with one of the investors, Keith Roboy of

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Founder's Fund, who had some thoughts on well AI more

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 2>broadly in the space stick listen, and.

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 10>Some of these technologies are disruptive, and they disrupt incumbents

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 10>and their powers, and some actually enabling cumbents to get stronger.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 10>AI is most likely going to generate more power for

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 10>large tech, large market tech companies not really be a substitute,

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 10>and if there is a substitute, it's probably going to

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 10>be open AI, which we've investigated.

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, he's also invested in RAMP, and RAMP CEO Eric

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Lyman is here on the back of his fundraise, and

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to start on AI, even though that's

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>where Keith was going at that point. But we're going

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to go on this environment for fundraising. You've got it,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you've got the money, but you have significantly cut your valuation.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Why do that?

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Why was it just you.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Needed the money in the here and the now.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 11>This was an opportunistic raise really for us. We were

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 11>approached by our investors who were excited by the extraordinary

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 11>growth we announced that we were. The fact we reach

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 11>over three hundred million dollars in annualized revenue less than

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 11>three and a half years from the launch for products

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 11>where the fastest ever. And really it's just about investing customers.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 11>Most of our competitors and most of the industry are

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 11>spending less on their customer experience. Ramp's purpose is to

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 11>help our customers' businesses be more profitably, more efficient with

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 11>every dollar spent, and we view this as an extraordinary

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 11>opportunity to increase not only our balance sheet, but also

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 11>increase the pace at which we can invest in innovations

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 11>for our customers. So we're super excited to do this.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>Eric on the three hundred million in annualized revenue. There

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 3>will be lots of founders watching this show who may

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 3>be able to raise opportunistically as you put it, or

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 3>face you know, unfavorable terms. How much emphasis did investors

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>put on that metric and what other metrics did they

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 3>want to see from you before they signed off on

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the round.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 11>Of course, I mean, I think for most investors it's

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 11>a simple proposition. Is this a large market? Are you

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 11>building a product that can serve an extraordinary number of customers?

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 11>Is to structurally great business? And last, is this a

0:17:55.960 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 11>product that customers love? For us, what made the raise

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 11>simple was first the growth of the business. Since the

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 11>last raised, transaction volume on RAMS platform is increased by

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 11>a factor of over six into the tens of billions

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 11>of dollars per year. We are the number one rated

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 11>spend management platform in the United States, and we believe

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 11>there's no better deal in business. We help the average

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 11>business save three and a half percent per year on

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 11>their expenses from corporate cards, expense management to accounting automation,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 11>and I think investors were really excited for the prospects

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 11>of RAMP taking on what has been a pretty sleepy

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 11>industry classically.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>How do you take it on with this three hundred million?

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Is it more about marketing spend? Is it organic growth?

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it inorganic and purchasing.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's two sets of things. First, it's that customer experience.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 11>So at the time of the last raise, we had

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 11>saved all time for customers one hundred million dollars. Now

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.479
<v Speaker 11>that figures over six hundred million dollars in over eight

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 11>and a half million hours of work. And we've done

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 11>that by launching into new verticals. When we last launched,

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 11>we were only a corporate card with expense management. We're

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 11>now the fastest growing accounts payable platform in the US

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 11>recently spend in a procurement, travel and the like. So

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 11>some of this is making the experience better for the

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 11>average customer, and some of this is reaching more businesses.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 11>The number of businesses that use RAMP today number over

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 11>fifteen thousand, whether that's small businesses to leading publicly traded companies,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 11>and so a lot of this really is expanding and

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 11>taking market share.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Eric, your pitch is that incentives are aligned, right, what's

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 3>good for your customers is good for you and what's

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 3>good for the advice versa. Does that sound too good

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 3>to be true?

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 11>You know, we think aligned businesses and customer obsessed businesses win.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 11>I think for too long, this was an industry where

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 11>if you were a bank you could move money and

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 11>if you weren't you couldn't. And as the world went

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 11>from no phones the flip phones, iPhones, your credit card

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 11>never got better. And I think ramps growth really is

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 11>a reflection of our end alignment really is with the

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 11>winning recipe. Helping customers spend less we think, in the

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 11>long run will allow us to grow faster as we have,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 11>will allow our businesses to be more more profitable and

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 11>long term enduring, which we also think makes for a

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 11>better bottom line, not just for customers but for RAMP

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 11>as well.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting Keith was sort of saying, look, this is

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a moment where companies have to get more realistic about

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>what they're worth about valuations. You've clearly done that and

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 2>taken it on in this opportunistic fashion. What are the

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 2>other headaches for you? Though in this macro environment, is

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>it talent?

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Is it?

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, just continuing to get more clarity on why

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.719
<v Speaker 2>this economy goes. How do you ensure that you can

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>grow the business in a mindful manner right now?

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's a really great question, and in part this

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 11>is exactly why we're so excited. You know, I think

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 11>that this is an uncertain rate environment. You know, this

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 11>is one of the fastest rise in interest rates really

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 11>in forty years. And to have additional capital to almost

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 11>double the balance sheet and be able to invest deeply

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 11>no matter the nature of the market, was super excited.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 11>I think to your point, so many other firms are

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 11>hiring less many or doing reductions in force. So many

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 11>other firms are making the customer experience worse in order

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 11>to shore at margins. And for us, as much as

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 11>we've grown, we truly believe we have ninety nine percent

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 11>plus of the market to go. Fifteen thousand businesses a

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 11>lot of businesses, but there's millions of businesses that could

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 11>be using ramp.

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Eric one word answer, Do you need more sales reps

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>or more engineers?

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 12>Well?

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 11>Both?

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Both? All right? Right, conditioning one word, no, it was

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 3>you met my condition three hundred million dollars round a

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 3>down round, but it still sounds like you guys are

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>in growth mode. Thank you very much. Okay, welcome back

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to bloombog Technology. Ed Ludlow here in San Francisco.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hein in New York, and let's check in

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on these markets because actually we're growing higher. We're managing

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to shake off some of the anxiety because today bad

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>news is good news. Today we saw the economic data

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>coming from the US and notably from Europe, those pmis

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>just looking. But does that mean that central banks have

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to pull back on their focus on inflation we're seeing

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 2>and that's that one hundred and one point four percent

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 2>the two year yields sinking dramatically, and in fact, we're

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>seeing bon yields pulled down across the curve and across

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the globe. We're downline basis points. This is many A

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 2>talking about a short squeeze. How far, how fast we've

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>already run up in terms of boring costs. Bitcoin up

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>one point nine percent, almost two percent higher on the day,

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six thousand, three hundred. As we see the dollar

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>week and moving on and look at some individual names

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 2>that were so important to this market. Today Peloton twenty four,

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean a quarter of its market capitalization wiped out

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 2>because they are losing sales, they're losing subscriptions, and they're

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>not turning around this business quickly enough. Doesn't we need

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to become once again more niche.

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 4>We're down.

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing Netflix so on the higher side, Netflix tiving

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 2>a great day as we see some particular data coming

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 2>from Antenna, saying it looks as though we're still seeing

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 2>subscriptions added in the United States as we see that

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 2>cracked down on passwords, and in Vidia it's up two

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 2>point three percent. This has been of a rollercoaster over

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the last few days. Ed as we look towards the

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>all important earnings after this bill, bell can we draw

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I've hire in terms of revenue by some sixty five percent,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 2>but they're some of the public new traded companies.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 8>We're talking about it though.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Now mega day in public markets. That's so many headlines

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 3>in private markets and money being raised. Cell therapy contract

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>manufacturer Solaris has raised two hundred and fifty five million

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>from investors to build a high tech plant over in

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>New Jersey, which is an important US hub for pharmaceutical

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>industry production and research. Joining us here in San Francisco

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 3>is Fabian girling House, co founder and CEO of Solaris.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 3>So this business is South San Francisco based. But you've

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 3>raised a ton of cash to build a very high tech, robotic,

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 3>software driven plant in New Jersey.

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 8>Why New Jersey, that's correct.

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 12>New Jersey is a hub for biopharmaceutical manufacturing in the US,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 12>so it's natural next up before expanding to Europe and

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 12>ultimately to Asia. So delighted to announce that today we

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 12>raised a two hundred and fifty five million dollar blockbuster.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 12>Is seriously to accelerate access to life saving cell therapies.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 8>That's where we're up to at Solaris.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 12>By deploying our fully automated self a manufacturing platform, the

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 12>cell Shuttle, in smart factories around the globe to meet

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 12>total patient demands.

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 3>The idea is that if you are, for example, Bristol,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 3>one of the people or companies in your round developing

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>a cell therapy, you can scale up, help them take

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 3>it from a research driven project to a commercial project.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 3>How does it work?

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 8>That's exactly right. Let's take a look at the problem.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 12>First, cell therapies are a breakthrough in modern medicine that

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 12>have proven their potential to cure very aggressive diseases that

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 12>were previously untreatable. We've actually seen children with very aggressive

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 12>types of blood cancers get cured the cancer free ten

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 12>years later. But right now, self aber manufacturing with manual

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 12>conventional methods is expensive, failure prone, and impossible to scale.

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 12>So that limits access and as a result, patients are

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 12>dying on the weightlist. Let me make this really real

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 12>and imagine. Imagine that your child has cancer and there

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 12>is an FDA approved cell therapy on the market that

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 12>could most likely would cure your child. Yet your kids

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 12>still dies because the patients are unable to access these

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 12>cell therapies because of the manufacturing bottleneck.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 8>That's the problem that we're solving.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot, Caroline. That is a reality that no

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 3>one wants to imagine that if Fabian makes a good

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 3>point FDA approval, there's regulatory risk in this.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, emotive Fabian is what you're sparking there, But to reality,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>regulatory approval is necessary.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 4>What are the risks around that?

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Because that could deeply hold back the way in which

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>your business grows.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely so, the Celciattle platform that we've developed is actually

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 12>not a medical device, so doesn't need to go through

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 12>its own clinical trials before it can be used. What

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 12>does need FDA approval are the clinical trials by the sponsors.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 12>That is to say, the buyer to companies. The farmer

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 12>company is our clients, and our IDMO business actually supports

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 12>them through this process with regulatory support.

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I'm sure that to grease the wheels and

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 2>people wanting to come back and use your technology, they're

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 2>going to have to see some regulatory approval. So still

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>some lines of things that you can't control. What you

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 2>can control, though, is how you market yourself, not just

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>as you say in the US and New Jersey, but

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 2>also worldwide. You just mentioned Europe and Asia. We're exactly

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 2>looking there.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so locations aren't finalized in Europe and Asia, but

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 12>as we mentioned, we just announced that we're opening up

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 12>the world's first IDMO smart factory in Bridgewater, New Jersey.

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 12>That's a site with one hundred and eighteen thousand square

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 12>feet that's about the size of two football fields, filled

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 12>with robots, all manufacturing cures for cancer and fully automated fashion.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 12>We're actually deploying up to fifty cell shuttles in there.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 12>That'll get us up to about a forty thousand cell

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 12>therapy doses produced per year.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 8>And just to put.

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 12>That into perspective for you, that's about ten times as

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 12>many cell therapy doses produced out of a facility of

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 12>the size compared with manual conventional cell dimnufacturing methods by

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 12>conventional CDMOS, so tenx in productivity. How are we achieving

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 12>this Well, We've designed, built tested a fully automated robotic

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 12>cell manufacturing solution called the cell Shuttle. The cell Shuttle

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 12>is about the size of an Amazon truck. Inside you've

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 12>got about two robots and then it combines the functionality

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 12>of about one hundred different bench top instruments in one machine.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 12>Net effect, it brings down the cost of manufacturing and

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 12>the labor. We're actually bringing down labor and facility size

0:27:58.640 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 12>by about ninety percent.

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 8>So what that means, I.

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 12>Said, with a facility of the same size and the

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 12>same workforce, we can actually produce ten times as many

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 12>cell therapy doses per year compared with conventional manufacturing approaches.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 3>So you've not selected a site for a third US

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>plan or a European site, but you're looking.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 12>We've got two sites in the US at this point.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 12>We've got the site in South San Francisco where based

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 12>for pre clin caproscity development clinical manufacturing, and then the

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 12>New Jersey side for clinical and commercial scale manufacturing. And

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 12>as the next step, we're going to open up a

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 12>site in Europe in twenty twenty four and then thereafter.

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 8>To go to Asia as well well.

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 3>When you do announce that site, you can come back

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Technology and tell Caroline and I take you

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 3>up on a baby and you mentioned a lot of

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 3>big numbers. One you didn't mention was your company's valuation.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Two hundred and fifty five million for a Series C

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>is a lot of money a unicorn, at least at

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>this stage.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 8>It's a fair question.

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 12>Respectfully, we're still a private company, so we're not disclosing

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 12>the precise valuation. What I can tell you is that

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 12>this is a massive round with a massive step up

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 12>in valuation.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 8>So while everybody else in this market.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 12>Seems to be raising either flat rounds or down rounds,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 12>we raised at a massive step up in valuation, so

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 12>we're very happy with the result. On top of that,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 12>it's a blockbuster round. Two hundred and fifty five million dollars.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 12>That's more money than other companies have raised in their IPO.

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 12>So we're very proud of this result and I think

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 12>it certainly reflects the excitement and the confidence in the

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 12>investor community for what we've built already, the speed with

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 12>what with which we've built the cell Shuttle platform, and

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 12>the future strategy, the plans for what's to come, as

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 12>well as the data that we've produced and published on

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 12>our website.

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 8>Today.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, RAMP had raised three hundred millions, so

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>slightly pipping you to the post, but it is still

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a phenomenal amount of money, Fabian, and clearly your optimism

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>is there. Let's look at who invested in new co

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 2>disruptive technology. He's the vcarm of Coke Industries. Of course,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>we've also got some individuals and most notably you've got

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>some sort of strategic investors. Can you talk to us

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about the likes of Bristol mask Wi like,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>are they customers future customers as well as being backers?

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely so.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 12>As you mentioned, our round was led by Coco Shoptive Technologies,

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 12>with new investors participating, specifically DFJ growth in Bloomberg's family Office,

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 12>Willett Advisors and Bristol Myers Squip, and then we had

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 12>really strong participation from our insiders as well, notably Eclipse,

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 12>ABC and Dasheng.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 8>I'm very grateful for all of their support. On Bristol

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 8>Mayo squib.

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 12>As you mentioned Global Pharmaceutical Company, a self therapy leader,

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 12>We're very proud to have them as an investor in

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 12>this round, and we're certainly also working with them on

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 12>the corporate partnership. So more news to come in the

0:30:57.760 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 12>near future.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Here just to point out in my called Bloomberg, the

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 3>founder majority owner at Bloomberg LP is of course the

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 3>parent company of Bloomberg Media and Bloomberg Television. Final question

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 3>from me, and I want to go back to what

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Caroline was asking you. If your research stage customers don't

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 3>get those FDA approvals, you can't ramp up the commercial

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 3>stage of output. You know, how how do you make

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>sure that that process does happen.

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 12>That's it's a really good point. So in most cases

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 12>there's a clinical trial required. There's one exception when when

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 12>a drug is already FDA approved on the market, it

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 12>already has FDA approval.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 8>So then if you if.

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 12>We stick exactly to the process that does farming company

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 12>is running internally today and we just switch out the

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 12>underlying manufacturing platform to the cell shuttle. In principle that

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 12>does not necessitate a new clinical trial, but we can

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 12>move into manufacturing directly.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 8>So there are there are shortcuts.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, great to have some time with you. Thanks

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 2>for bringing the enthusiasm the drive. Fabian gelling House course,

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>co founder and CEO Ofcillaris. There wean while coming up

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>look in an effort to skirt us restriction, Huawei maybe

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>secretly building a network of semiconductive production. We'll have more

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 2>on the warning against the blacklisted company and how the

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration may take action.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's go.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>More global as well and focus on India for a moment.

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Snap As we head Spray, we're just seeing it not

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>barely moving, but the parent company of Snapchat is appointing

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>a former Google executive to lead its India operations, and

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of course it's striving to become a more major social

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 2>media force there and a key growth market. The company

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>also announced a new localized organizational structure for the region

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and the teams and those are going to be charge

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of content. They're going to be in charge of the

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 2>creator ecosystems, and they're all going to be reporting to

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the new exec who's Pulvit Trevedi from New York as

0:32:53.160 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Ruber Technology.

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 3>We want to return to a story that we mentioned

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>earlier about Huawei. A trade group is warning that the

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 3>telecommunications company might be secretly building a network for chips

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 3>production in an effort to skirt US curbs and more.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in the reporter who broke that story, Blue Besi,

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 3>inking with me on set in San Francisco. This is

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 3>not straightforward explained the basics of what you found last year.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>As we know, sorry not last year.

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 13>Huawei has essentially been blacklisted by the US government. It's

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 13>very difficult for US based companies to supply them with technology, and.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Most important among that is.

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 13>Basically cutting Huawei off from its supply of chips. And

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 13>what this report says, and the backs up some reporting

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 13>that we've done earlier, is that really Huawei is trying

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 13>to go to do a DIY effort to build a

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 13>local network that can replace that overseas supply of these

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 13>crucial components which will keep it in business, keep it

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 13>able to make these telecommunications systems its primary business.

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So basically it uses other companies other names to

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 2>try and get equipment that otherwise it wouldn't be able

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 2>to get hold of. Ian who's been shining a light

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 2>on all of this. How have you managed to realize

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 2>this is occurring?

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean, we originally broke the news that one

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 13>of these Chinese companies was in fact connected to Uahwei.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 13>That was a fact, took effectively a shell company using

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 13>government money buying US and other equipment to continue Huawei's

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 13>ability to get these components, and the US Department of

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 13>Commerce went on to blacklist that company. And now what

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 13>we've found is more industry information and got a reaction

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 13>out of the US government that's said it wasn't just

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 13>that particular company, it was other companies as well that

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 13>are indeed.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Already on the blacklist.

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 13>They've continued or they've stockpiled US equipment other foreign equipment

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 13>to stay in production. And they are, in fact, even

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 13>though the name doesn't say so, supplying Huawei with some

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 13>of the components, or attempting to supply Huawei with some

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 13>of the components that it needs.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>KYC.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>You know your customer, boy, it must be hard for

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these companies right now.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean there's where does the burden of proof lie?

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 13>Where does the investigation lie? And it's a complicated process.

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 13>Tracing individual chip shipments and things like that is next

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 13>to impossible. Where is a tighter area of focus is

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 13>that some of these chip making pieces of equipment are

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 13>worth tens of millions of dollars, even hundreds of million dollars,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 13>So obviously there aren't as.

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Many of those.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 13>They're an easier thing to track where they're going, who's

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 13>using them, and what they're using them for. Nonetheless, because

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 13>regulations are evolving and are being effectively tightened, this is

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 13>a kind of a moving process.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I just want to point out that Huawei p XW

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 3>for Gen, Ginhoa, the other companies identified by the SIA

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 3>and reported by Bloomberg did not respond to requests for comment.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 3>You notice that you noted that in your prior reporting.

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 3>The BIS then acted based on that prior reporting. What

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 3>have they said in response to this latest article.

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 13>I when we put that in our story and they said, look,

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 13>we're not surprised that Chinese government money is going into

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 13>efforts to try to keep for this enterprise underway.

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>If we perceived this to be a threat to national security.

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 13>We will take the action required to firophrase what they said,

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 13>and obviously that implies that we might say more restrictions Ian.

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>It's an amazing piece of reporting. Thank you very much.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 2>With your colleague w Wu from in Taiwan, Bloomberg's inking

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 2>pacts of breaking it down. Meanwhile, we are some more

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 2>breaking news for you. We work now Courses understand a

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of stress on the business. It's running up advisors

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 2>again for help on a restructuring struggling with a really

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 2>heavy debt load. Of course some poor financial performances that

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 2>have come to light of late, and of course earlier

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 2>this month they told investors there's substantial doubt about its

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 2>ability to stay in business. It wants to avoid Chapter

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.479
<v Speaker 2>eleven bankruptcy filing AIRD, it wants to restructure its debts

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 2>outside of court. So understanding that they've hired real estate

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 2>advisor Hilco Global once again, it's tapping the consultant Alvarez

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>and Marcel, and they've re engaged law firm Kirkland and Ellis. Basically,

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>they need to kind of reduce and get out of

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 2>some of some very expensive leases in their more expensive markets.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The company is saying to us at the moment, they're

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>investing their product offerings and taking it necessary steps to

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.959
<v Speaker 2>reduce rent and tendancy costs. We're off by sixteen percent,

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's a penny stock air yep company.

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 3>We continue to track and its future.

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Now for today's going viral, we're watching what's trending online,

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 2>and today it is the release of the latest Star

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Wars series on Disney Plus. I guess the first and

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the second episode of been dropped for ahsoka in debuted

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 2>on the streaming platform last night. Ed I know you're

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a Star Wars ma'am. Did you watch it?

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Did you like it?

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely watched episode one. I for went episode two.

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I saved it for later in the week. But it's

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 3>just incredible to see on everything from x to Instagram

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 3>to Google trends people talking about ah Soca. You know,

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a really highly anticipated next spin off from the

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Star Wars universe.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And kind of some emotion around it, right one of

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 2>the lead characters. No spoilers about any of what's happening

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>inside the episodes, but on externally, they actually lost a

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 2>key character died suddenly in Italy over the or an Ithaca.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 4>I believe it was.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so never any spoilers in bluembog technology. But Ray Stevenson,

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 3>who played one of the villains or plays one of

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the villains in the Ahsoca series, did pass away in

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>May of this year after production had rapped, and there

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 3>was a tribute to him, which loads of people have

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 3>talked about on social media. And when I posted X

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 3>that I was going to be watching it, actually quite

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 3>a few people replied and said, you know, it's a

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 3>nice moment for Ray Stevenson, who has a lot of

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 3>fans out there.

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, certainly does. Meanwhile, I mean we're going to dive

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:21.919
<v Speaker 2>into what's happening more broadly in Hollywood right now.

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all of this because the focus of Hollywood right

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 3>now is Studios released the details of their contract proposal

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 3>to the film's industry screenwriters. It's the latest and their

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 3>bid to end a month long strike that stalled production

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and delayed new releases across the entertainment industry. That is

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 3>why we are so focused right now on the content slate.

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 3>We're going to bring in Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw, who leads

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 3>our screen time coverage Lucas, you've tracked this day by day.

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 3>What is the latest on these negotiations, and the latest

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 3>is not good.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 14>I would say, you know, there have been a resumption

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 14>in conversations. Between the resumption conversations between the Hollywood studios

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 14>and screenwriters and the you know, they had gone quiet

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 14>during that period that was seen.

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 3>As as a positive.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 14>The fact that the studios chose to voice their proposal

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 14>and then kind of bring on counterfire from the w

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 14>GA is a sign that they're really struggling to find

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 14>common ground on a couple of big issues.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what was it the writers gilber America was really

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 2>faring back.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there was being told, there being.

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Lectured, and ultimately it feels as though there's no meeting

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 2>in the minds here ultimately about the profitability the take

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.959
<v Speaker 2>home money from a lot of these studios and what's

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 2>ultimately getting into the hands of the writers here.

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 14>I mean it's tricky because the studios did come to

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 14>the writers with a fairly substantial proposal.

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, they changed their offer on a number of fronts.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 14>But there are a couple of key sticking points, one

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 14>of which is sort of this share in upside and

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 14>another of which is this idea of having a minimum

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 14>number of writers in a room. The studios are saying,

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 14>why can't that be up to the showrunner, the person

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 14>in charge of the show, But the writers want the

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 14>studios to promise that, and honestly.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 3>It reflects a little bit of a lack of trust.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 14>Between some of the writer's members and right, I should say,

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 14>among different members of the guild.

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, we'd reported that Ted Sarandos, the Netflix co CEO,

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and Bob Iger, the Disney CEO, had come in to

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 3>play a role, but it sounds like it's not helped

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 3>very much. Bloombols luc Is sure, thank you for the

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 3>latest on that.

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Carro, I mean fascinating as that continues to unfold and

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the technology angle that is at play here as well

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 2>with AI and what that means for the future of

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 2>work within the industry. I'm sad to say that that

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 2>does it for this edition of Bluebog Technology though.

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the big one after market in Vidia fiscal second

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 3>quarter earnings twenty four hours from now, you and I

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 3>will go big on it once again. But we have

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 3>had a lot in the show so you can recap.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to check out the podcast wherever you get

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 3>your podcasts on the Bloomberg platforms, but also on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 3>and iHeart My goodness, what a week has been so

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 3>far from San Francisco and over in New York. This

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Technology.