WEBVTT - Bill Schnee

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bob Left Sets podcast.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is a producer engineer, Billie Bill. What's

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping you busy these days?

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, basically the same old thing, maybe not quite in

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the same way and certainly not quite as much, but

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, especially mixing, which is my favorite aspect of engineering.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So what kind of stuff you're mixing these days?

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've just done the singles for Steve Percaro from Toto,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 2>which he's got with a record company. They seem to

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>be promoting it pretty well, whatever that means on social

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>media at least. It's definitely not the same old game.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>But and there's a new band, I'll call it a band.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It's with a guy out of Chicago named Joe Vanna

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and he's got quite a few Well Michael o'martian, you know,

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the great producer, he and I started together in nineteen

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven or eight. He's in the band. And I

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>love that they're calling it a band, considering no two

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 2>people ever played in the same room at the same time.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>But I'm getting ready to start that mixing that and

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 2>they've sent me the rough mixes and it's really good.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So what's the appeal of mixing for you.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Just you know, it's what started it off. I suppose

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>once I decided to engineer the creative aspect of putting

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the elements together and making it come out of a

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>couple of speakers so that it moves me, which hopefully

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>will move the listeners.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, are you still working out of your own studio?

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You're working out of your home.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you can't beat them, you join them. And

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I had a big studio in Los

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Angeles for thirty five years, and when people started building

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 2>studios in La not a lot of them. This is

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>back when it cost you know, at least one hundred

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and fifty two hundred thousand to build a minimal studio.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, before the digital revolution, there was all the

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>studios got together to get those outlawed because they were

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>messing with whatever they are so so and I remember

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 2>at the time thinking, you know, I know it's in

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the house, but I kind of like getting up in

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the morning, going to work at the studio and then

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 2>coming home at night and going to bed. Now, I

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of like getting up at six thirty and mixing

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>in my underwear.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>So what'd you do with your studio that you owned.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I basically I sold it basically to the studio next door.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And all the equipment in there.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>What happened to that. I took it with me and

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I've been parsing it off, so to speak. I've been

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>selling it off as I don't need it anymore. But

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of very ESO custom equipment. It

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>was a very unique studio in that regard, including the

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>console that we built from scratch and those we are

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 2>now have a gentleman here that has a company. He

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>builds pre amps and microphones and so on, and he's

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>actually taking my pre amps two at a time and

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>putting him in a package and we're repurposing those that

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>way and all of the I had a huge collection

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>of vintage microphones and I've been selling those off as well.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what do you actually have in your house

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and how much of that is from your old studio.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>What I have in the house. So when digital came out,

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely hated it. I didn't think sixteen forty four

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to one on the technical side, I didn't think that

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>sounded very good, and I still don't. But I've done

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>everything I can over the year. Of course, we've gotten better.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>We've learned a lot about filtering and sampling rates and

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 2>all different things, so that we're in much better shape

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>with digital than we were in the early eighties. But

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 2>I did have in my studio a very technical homemade

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, from a guy named Josh Flori at

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>JCF Audio. So what I have now is I come

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>out of pro tools twenty four wide, and those go

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 2>into sixteen custom made by Josh, sixteen transistor DTA a's

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 2>and eight tube DTA a's and then that gets summed

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 2>in a very simple analog summer with no amplifiers and

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>goes into a patch pay where I can put any

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>one of one, two, three, four, five, seven, seven analogue compressors.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 2>So I keep as much at the point between the tube,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>especially the tube DTA a and and the tube compressors.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I keep as much of the old school as I can.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, why are some transistors and why are some tubes

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in the d DA A.

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I learned early on in my career that there's a

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>special there's a special bond between tubes and transducers, either

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>microphones or speakers and in and uh so when it

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 2>came to the digital life, we live in now, I

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 2>thought that having a tube DTA A would give me

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>something and which it really does. It's a you know,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's a much warmer, richer even though the

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 2>frequency response is essentially the same as the transistor ones,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a warmer, richer sound. So that works great on

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 2>anything acoustic, anything you know, from a piano to voices

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and even electric bass, which tubes do a nice thing

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>on base. So that's the basic reason.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you have tubes and transistors, when would you

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>use transistors.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, the transistors in general, transistors are faster, meaning they

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the sound is quicker. They don't. Tubes react

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 2>a little slower. Tubes are a little rich, definitely a

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>little richer, but the transistors are definitely faster. And so

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 2>in fact, in fact, I'll remember I did a short

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 2>stint at CBS as an engineer, and I noticed that

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 2>the old school engineers that were all fifteen years younger

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>than I am. Now, all the old school engineers were

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>using that a tube mic called the U sixty seven,

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 2>and young three young guys were using the eighty seven.

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>The sixty seven was two and the eighty seven was

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the new transistor one. And I asked the older engineers,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>why do you guys use that. He said, well, Neiman

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>came over from Germany with the eighty seven. They were

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 2>so excited for us to try it, and they left

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>it with us, and then they asked for a report

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a month later, and we told them. They called us

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>and we told them, you know, we just liked the

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>sound of the sixty seven better, and they said, what

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>do you mean. He said, well, it's just kind of

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the eighty seven was kind of harsh. And they said, no, no,

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't understand. Transistors are very very fast. You're hearing

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>for the first time what's really on the floor. And

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>whereas they were correct that the transistors were faster, I

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know that anything. Do you really hear what's on

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the floor. It's really a bat matter of whatever sounds,

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, whatever's euphonic to the guy doing the work.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>And so they said, okay, but we're going to continue

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to use the old one because we just think it

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>sounds better.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you wrote a book, Chairman of the Board, Recording

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the Soundtrack of a Generation. You go in that book

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>about using different mics for different situations, some ribbon something.

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us a little bit more about that.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I didn't know you were going to be so

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>tech today. Fun. Well, yeah, there's you know, within the

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>basic let's say put it down to three basic types

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>of microphones condenser, dynamic, and ribbon and not. You know,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a matter I think as you learn, as an

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>engineer learns what the palette can do, the different colors

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that different microphones can do, you try things out, maybe

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 2>what you've seen someone or maybe you try it yourself.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I did a lot of experimenting my early years myself.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>And nothing's worse than trying something and you can't and

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>you're in the middle of a session now and you

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 2>can't change it. But oh that's not as good as

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>what I used last week at all. But you don't

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>make that mistake again anyway. Within each of the those types,

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's obviously a lot of different models of

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 2>each of those types, and you just you know, have

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to have to figure what works. There's you know, dynamics

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>will take level you can put them in, you know,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 2>in high level situations and they won't crumble. Condensers, some

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 2>of them, a lot of them, almost most of them

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>can't take the same kind of level, but they have

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a more extended frequency response, you hear a wider sound

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>from a frequency standpoint. Ribbons are great usually most of

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>them are good with level also, and they have a

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>unique kind of sound that's tough to describe between those

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 2>other two. You just have to experience, I mean, hear

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>it to know it.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So, before you started selling microphones, how many did you own?

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I don't even know. I couldn't tell you. I mean,

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>if there's any tech people listening, I had nine two,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>fifty one, five and forty nine six and fifties eight, eight,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>fifty four's, ten fifty six's, seven fifty threes in that

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Noman old Noyman range, the fifty range. I am a

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>huge fan of them, so it was a pretty big collection.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, another thing you mentioned in your book is you know,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I read Mike Campbell's book and he's talking about working

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jimmy Ivan and Shelley Yakis taking a week to

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>get drum sounds. You said that a you worked faster,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you got drum sounds faster. What was your style different

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in how did you make different from the people who

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>were spending so much time or was it just a

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>matter of they were on their own journey.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I came up. The first studio I got a

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 2>job in was a very not a very good studio.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 2>It had egg cartons on the wall for sound absorption.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It had one wall between the studio and the control room,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>one piece of glass, one door, and it was just stereo.

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>It was only you only had two condenser i'll call

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 2>them professional microphones. And the great news about that was

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you I got to learn mixing immediately. It wasn't a

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 2>matter of starting out like most guys you know in

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the last sixty years have with fifty five years anyway,

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I have with the multi channel you know, tape recorder,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and then taking as much time as you want to mix.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So when everything was two track, they're playing, you're mixing,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>and the mix is done. And so what was the question,

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm off it. The question is Viking drums? Oh so

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 2>one when I started on my own with the experimentation,

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I had met Glenn Johns who has a very unique

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>micing for drums with basically three mics, one on the kick,

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>one overhead directly overhead, and one off to the side

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>equal distant from the overhead to the snare, so that

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>when you put them left and right the snare is

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 2>in the center, and I loved the size that he

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>would get, but I didn't like the sound of the

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>snare without a snare mic. So I started somewhere in there,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and I was people that trained me were all the

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>old school people that you know it starts, you know,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 2>because when everything was stereo, there wasn't all the equipment

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 2>and all the equalizers. You know, it was basically a

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>professional console had just tone controls, a top end boost

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>or cut, and a blow end ten thousand cycle, one

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred cycle. So the idea was you picked the microphone

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>for the sound. You learned about mike placement because that

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>can change the sound dramatically. You put, if you don't

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>like the sound, you change the position of the mic,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>or you change the mic or both. And that, you know,

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that's what you had to you had to rely on

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 2>to get the sound that you wanted. So then came

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Elton John and I loved him as an artist, and

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>there was no question when I heard the early drum

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>sounds that were done in a studio called Trident by

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>some very good engineers that they were using a lot

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 2>of EQ a lot of microphones. There was a mic

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>on every drum and a lot of equalization. You could

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 2>hear it. My joke at the time was the snare

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 2>sound on some of those records was it wasn't the

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 2>sound of a stick hitting a snare, it was the

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 2>sound of a stick hitting an equalizer. Because that's what

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 2>I heard. That's what I heard first, was that equalization.

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 2>But there was something about all that I really liked,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and so to incorporate that into what I was doing

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and came up with my own version of it. As

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 2>to the speed that you're talking about some people, yeah,

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>because I came up in an era where you know,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 2>everything was live or even went to four track mostly live.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you had to move fast. Now obviously things

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>changed and you had a lot more multi track, and

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you had bigger budget, big budgets than you could take

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>more time. But I can't do it. I get bored

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>very easily. I like my creativity works when I'm moving fast.

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I move fast and everything, and so I wanted to

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to I couldn't. Let's put it this way, I couldn't

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>do what some of these people do, spending you know,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of time on it. I mean I trained

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a guy initially named Jack Puig who's gone on to

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>have a big career of his own, and he got

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the best drums in my studio that anyone did.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>But it was we're talking a day making a high hat,

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>getting a high hat sound. I couldn't do that to myself,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>let alone to the drummer, and it was it was

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>a band, a real band, and so you know, they

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't mind so much. But you know, I grew up

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 2>working with studio musicians, and you know they got You've

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 2>got minutes to get the drum sound and let's get going.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's your career and all these things about Mike Polaceman,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>has it been trial and error? Or to what degree

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have you had people who've instructed you mentor types?

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Basically, well, the initial I'll give you a brief history

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>of me. So I my parents moved to southern California

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>senior year of high school, and I was a very

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 2>shy person, so I didn't make many friends, but I

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>did make it with a couple of guys that were

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 2>starting a band, and I played different instruments, but I said,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>how about an organ? The English Movement was out and

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>several bands had used an organ, and so we started

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>our band, and funny enough, we thought we wrote some

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty good songs and we made some demos and one

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 2>of the kid's mothers knew someone who knew someone that

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>was in the business. That guy was Gary Usher. He

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 2>was friends with the Wilson family, the Beach Boy family,

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and actually wanted to be in the Beach Boys, but

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't make it, but he did write two of the

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Beach Boys big hits in My Room in four oh nine.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>He wrote with Brian and he had a deal now

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>with Decca Records, and so we got a meeting with him,

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 2>went in and he heard I mean, we sent him

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the tape and he liked it. So he said, come

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>in for a meeting and he said he really liked it,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and he thought one of the songs was a hit,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>and he signed us. Uh. We recorded the initials recordings

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 2>at Capitol Studio B, and he brought in a guitarist

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 2>to augment the band. Our guitar player wasn't that good, uh,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 2>and that his name was Richie Podler, and he was

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>an outstanding musician. He just he just passed away recently.

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>He was an outstanding musician and as it turns out,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 2>a phenomenal producer. And engineer as well, and I we

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>got dropped. You know, in those days, it was called

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a singles deal. They signed us for four singles we've made.

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 2>We did four songs and they put him out and

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 2>if anything hit, you ran in and cut six more

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 2>and then you had an album. So there was no

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>La Teens album. And I always chuckle at that that

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Decker Records, who passed on the Beatles, signed the l

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 2>A Teams. And it's not so much that, not so

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 2>much that they signed the l A Teams, but what

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of longevity were they were they hoping for? You know,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I was six seventeen years old. What did I know

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>about longevity? But anyway, so when we got dropped, I

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>went over to Richie Podler's studio and told him the

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>sad news, and he said, oh, you guys were really good. Here.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I've got a good connection. I can get you a

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>record deal. On my word, go see this guy Mike Curb.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 2>He's going to go places. And indeed, Mike Curb has

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 2>gone to incredible places. But he signed us to our

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 2>second recording contract and we went in to work with Richie. Now,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>when we worked with Gary Usher at Capitol and actually

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Western and two of the best studios in LA still

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to this day, if Capitol will reopen. You know, they

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 2>were fancy at the time, albeit three track, but that's

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>all there was nineteen sixty five. And now we went

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 2>into Richie's studio, which was much funkier, a little homemade

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 2>console and whatnot, and you know, not the cleanest place.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 2>But I came in for the first playback. We went

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out and did a made a track, came in for

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the first playback, and I remember like it was yesterday,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>looking up at the speakers while while a two track

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 2>basic track was playing, and I heard, and maybe more importantly,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 2>felt something in what I was hearing out of the

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 2>band that I had never heard or felt at those

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>other great studios, and I knew it had to be

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 2>what Richie was doing. And when the song was over,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I literally pointed at all the equipment and said, can

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 2>you teach me how to do this? And he said, no,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm teaching this guy, Bill Cooper, go out and do

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>another take. We got to get a better take. But

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>that was the moment that sealed in my mind what

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I would do, as it turns out, once I got

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>away from my father. But you can relate to this.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 2>My father was a Jewish doctor, so you know what

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 2>that means. And I told him, no, Dad, I'm not

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be a doctor. Well, then a lawyer, I

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know. In fact, In fact, I did start law

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 2>school at Loyola on the part time program when I

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 2>was working for Richie. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>But I couldn't. I got the grades and the second

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>semester started and they were all season of B. I'd

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 2>been faking it because I didn't have time to do

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the reading, go to class and do sessions. Anyway, after

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>that first aha moment where I want, I want to

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 2>know how to do that, because that was like magic

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>to make the band sound and feel something so different

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 2>than what I'd heard in those other great studios. So

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I went off to that studio I described earlier with

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the egg cartons on the wall and got my start

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>learning there and where my left brain and right brain

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 2>met in the middle. Engineering came very very quickly. I

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 2>was very fortunate to meet someone who was an engineer

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>that was very patient and heard what I was recording

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 2>in that studio and thought that I had some real talent.

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>And he was working in another studio, and I was

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I was back in college at this point, and I

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 2>went over every night after school and would ask him,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>just nail him with question after question after question until

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>he couldn't take it anymore, and he would say, all right, enough,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, go home, I'll see you tomorrow. But engineering

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 2>came very quickly, and so had we had upgraded that

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Mickey Mouse studio a bit. Still wasn't what I would

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>call really professional, but it was closer, and I started

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>doing some work that there was an engineer that worked

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 2>for Richie Podler that was quitting the business. He was

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 2>going to move back to Florida. And we're tug boats.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what that has to do with engineering,

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>but anyway, I said, do you think Richie and This

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>would hire me? And he said, well he should because

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 2>he'd heard all of what I was doing. And I said, well,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 2>let's bug him. And so for two months. I don't

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>know how many times Tommy, the other engineer ever bugged him,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 2>but I bugged him like crazy for two solid months,

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 2>and finally he wouldn't answer my calls a lot of

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 2>the time because he knew why I was calling. I

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 2>went over to corner him one day, and I said,

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, just give me a shot. That's all I'm

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 2>asking for. See, I'm telling you now, I don't blame

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 2>him because it only been like two and a half

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>years since I had that aha moment where I didn't

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I barely knew what an equalizer from a limiter was.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So here I am by now that studio American Recording

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>was the hottest rock studio in Los Angeles. His biggest

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>client was a guy named Gabriel Meckler who produced Three

0:22:54.119 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 2>dog Nights first album and Steppenwolf's first album. And so

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Richie was really kicking it. But I begged him to

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 2>give me a shot, and finally he said, all right,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a demo session tomorrow morning. Come in and do that.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Tell me what you know, let's see what you can do.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>So I went in. The demo sessions were like for publishers,

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 2>where songwriter would come in, record four tracks, four new songs,

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>put vocals on him, quick mixes, and go out the door.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>And then they would go make acetate little one off

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>records that they would send to different artists or record

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>companies to try to get their songs placed. So they

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>were just demos, and he felt comfortable, comfortable leaving me

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>with that. So I did that for screen Gems Lester

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Sills Company and I and I called him that you

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>know that afternoon. I said, well, they said, well, they

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>said you were great. I said, okay, what now? He said, well,

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow morning there's a different company, come in and do

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 2>their same thing. Okay. So I went and did that,

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 2>called him the afternoon, same thing. Okay. Now he said,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 2>all right, come tomorrow night and record three dog night. Okay,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>what now? What sense that makes? I have no idea.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 2>This was his biggest client and he throws this kid in.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it. Scared to death. I went in

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the next night. Both the producer and the band were

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 2>really nice, sweet to me, and I cut a track

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 2>with him and called Richie the next day and I said,

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 2>what did Gabriel say? He said, you were great? Okay,

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>what now? He said, come tonight, do it again. Okay.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I went in and cut a second track next morning,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 2>same thing, all right. Third night, I'm in with the

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>band and the guitar player, Mike alsoon the guitar player

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 2>wanted a guitar effect, and I'm sure that from the

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 2>first album that Richie engineered that he knew that Richie

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 2>could do anything with the guitar and so, and I'm

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>being a keyboard player. I didn't know how to get

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 2>any of those effects. So I had to call Richie

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and he came down and finished the session. That was

0:24:57.960 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the end of me tracking on that album. But I

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 2>did do overdubs, and most importantly, I got in that

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 2>room every chance I could to watch Richie because he

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 2>really was an unbelievably brilliant engineer, and that's what pushed

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 2>me off.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back a chapter. You get involved with Bike Kurb.

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who's ever involved with Bike Kerb could never get

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out of his tentacles. Whereas you say, hey, a couple

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of sides and that was it. There are people might go,

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you still owe me two more albums this

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and that. What was your experience with bike CERB. Was

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it as clean as it what you said just now

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and in the book?

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, basically it was. It was because you know what

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>happened was Richie started. We cut one track, one track

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 2>that day that I had my AHA moment, and then Richie,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, I said, Okay, when do we come back?

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>He said, it'll be a few days. I kept calling.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Finally he said, Mike and I are on the outside.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Don't think I'm going to be able to work with you.

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>And so I went to Mike Curb to his office,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 2>which at that time was down on Sunset. It was

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Sidewalk Productions Curb Sidewalk. Yeah, and the office consisted of

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 2>his sister Carol. That was it. And I said, well

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>what do we do now? And we're sitting there in

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the office and I remember and what a cheeky little

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>kid I was, because you know, he started making a

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>suggestion of some kind. I said, maybe I could produce us,

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 2>and he said we could try that. He had his

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>own studio, so he said, yeah, go ahead and try it. Meanwhile,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 2>when we got dropped from Decca, our drummer, our drummer's

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 2>father made him quit the band and get a real job,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>and so I said, we don't have a drummer, and

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>he said, well, the engineer in my studio is a

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>really good drummer. And I said, and he can play

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the drums. And engineer, oh, yeah, it's possible. It'll be fine.

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 2>And so we went in did that. Cute stories about

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that in the book, But the bottom line is everything

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>fell apart with the band, and and because he had

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>next to nothing literally invested in us, there were no

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>there were no tentacles to get wrapped around. So it

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 2>was it was basically a short and sweet relationship.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Although you did interact with Mike. Did he know anything

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>about music? Did you have the sense he was going

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to go somewhere? What? How did he come across back then?

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I had no idea he knew anything about music.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>He didn't talk in musical terms. Uh, now I'm going

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 2>by what my meant. My mentor, Richie Podler said the

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>reason they broke up was Richie was doing all the

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>work and Mike was getting all the credit slash money,

0:27:55.160 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 2>and Richie demanded that he get credit and or you know,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>points for the work he was doing, and Mike refused.

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 2>That's Richie's story. I'm sure Mike has a different one.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I will say, however, that in those early years when

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 2>I was able to talk Richie, when he allowed me

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to start working there, a couple of the producers quote

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 2>unquote that I worked with were very much like that.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 2>They found out that I was very musical and I

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>basically was doing more producing than they were, and they

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>got all the credit. So there was a bit more

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 2>of that back then. As you know, the business was

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of transforming, because you know, in the fifties and sixties,

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the producer most often worked at the record company, and

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>it was about you know, finding maybe finding songs, and

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>then getting the arranger and the studio and putting it

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>all together and there was your record. There were exceptions,

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>but that was the bulk of what went on back then.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>And so as we're transitioning into i'll call it rock

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 2>air for lack of anything else, as multi track, and

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 2>ultimately engineering would become a lot more part of the

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>production process than just capturing what was going on live

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>in the studio. This had this transformation brought in different

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>kinds of producers, and unfortunately a lot of them were,

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 2>as I said, kind of that's what they did. So

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I have no first hand experience about Mike in that regard.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Your father, who wanted you to be a professional, did

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>he ever ultimately respect what you did.

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Put it to you this way. Two years before he died,

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I had I had two Grammy nominations and maybe eight

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>or ten No, No, six or eight gold records, and

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>he literally sat me down and said, Bill, when are

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you going to get a real job. And I looked

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 2>him and I looked at him and I said, Dad,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I found my job. It's something I love doing.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm good at it, and I've already had

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 2>some success. I really want to do this. No, you

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>can't trust it as a profession. You know a lot

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>about that. So he was old school, you know, old

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>school guy from Austria, and what can I say? He

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was self made guy and very bright and from what

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I hear, a very good surgeon. He went to NYU

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 2>undergrad and then went to France actually because it was

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 2>cheaper for med school, came back and opened up his

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>practice on Long Island. World War two came and government

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>said we need you, and so they put him at

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Ford or to California, where he put something like twenty

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>six hundred servicemen back to other And when the war

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>was over, he was he'd had it with medicine. So

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 2>he took a couple of classes in business and got

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>into administrative medicine, managing a clinic or hospital or something.

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And how about your mother? Was she supportive?

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? She was. Everything Billy does is great, So yeah,

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 2>she was very supportive. But you know, The funny thing

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 2>about that is only since the book, since the book,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and the people that write me having read the book,

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 2>it may sound silly, I don't know of it. I mean,

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I figured it out halfway through writing the book. I

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>just lived my life, you know, and I went from

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 2>this project to that project. And I knew I'd worked

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of big people. I knew I had

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of awards and all that stuff, but it

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't coalesce into something that I could actually be proud of.

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>And about halfway through writing the book, and since writing

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the book, the people that write me, some of the

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>stories I'm told just are amazing to me that the

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>music pop music, R and B music and whatnot meant

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>so so, so so much to so many people. And

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm especially tickled by the professionals. I've got two aerospace

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 2>engineers in Florida that I communicate with, the head of

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>legal for Coca Cola. I communicate with him and he

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 2>actually went to Atlanta and had lunch with him once.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I always used to joke that when I

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 2>tell that about my dad, and I say, if I

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>ever go to a psychiatrist, I'm sure that's where it

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>will start. Well, funny enough, I've never thought about it

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that way, but I kind of did it in reverse

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 2>when all these people started telling me how much what

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I did meant to them, because I didn't get that

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>from my father. So that was cool.

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Also peeped picture of the music scene in LA

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when the La teens are forming. You know, at that

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>point in Los Angeles there were a lot of independent labels.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot happening. Was that palpable to everybody

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>living in the Los Angeles area? Were people music crazy

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>or it was just something you were into? What was

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the scene like?

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, as I've learned after becoming professional and

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>going back and you know, listening to the records back

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>then with a new light and so on. You know,

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>we were just we were in a suburb of LA

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 2>doing our own little thing, and you know, we had

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>really we did a Battle of the bands and were

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>shocked to death. We didn't win, but in Hollywood, amazing

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the things you remember, the hurts. But I have to say,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 2>we weren't aware of anything really of what was going on.

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>We were just were doing our own little thing and

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 2>it happened to work out kind of good.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're working for Richie put Alore and you're doing

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>some sessions. What's the next step after that?

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 2>The next step is Richie took over producing. After that

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>second Three Dog Night album, he took over producing Three

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Dog Night and he actually produced the lion's share of

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the hits for them through the seventies into the eighties,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and he took over Steppenwolf and now he was, you know,

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a year and a half, two years into it, he's

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 2>really popular, and so he's getting all kinds of offers.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And I went to him and I said, Richie, I

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 2>got a great idea. Let's close the studio to outside clients.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, groups are going to be hitting you up.

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 2>They already are you funnel them to me and get

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>my production career going, and you know, they signed to

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 2>your production company. And he loved that idea. He said

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 2>that that's great, we'll do it. And so he signed

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a band and gave him to me, and I went

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 2>in and cut one track with them. They were called

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 2>The Realm, and they and then Richie started a See

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 2>in those days, I should back up. In those days,

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in the studios they were a lot of them were

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 2>basically divided to a day client and a night client,

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>so quite often that's what it would be. You'd have

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 2>to reset up every night if you were the night client,

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 2>if you had a long booking. So he was starting

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a three dog I mean a Steppenwolf album, and he

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to have to tear down, so he said,

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're going to have to take a break

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 2>till I get all my tracks done. Well, you know

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 2>that one week turned into two weeks, turned into I

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know how many, and funny enough, his production company

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 2>was only paying me when I was in the studio,

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 2>so I said, I'm going to have to go independent, Richie,

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and he said, fine, go go. So that's when I

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 2>went off on my own, and which was frightening for me,

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 2>because he his studio, he knew what he was doing,

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and I did. I just copied everything he did in

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 2>terms of micing and so on. And I tried doing

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 2>that when I went into the first studio I went

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to and the second, and even though they had brand new,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>beautiful consoles and you know, newer speakers and newer this

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 2>and newer that, I couldn't get anything close to the

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 2>sound that I got at his studio. And that's when

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 2>my experimentation started full bore. So I'm I'm humping along.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 2>And so that's by the way. Right before I left

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Richie's was when I had started law school to shut

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>my dad up, and so I'm independent. When when the

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 2>second semester starts and I said, you know, I quit

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 2>my band. I quit college for two and a half

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 2>years to chase my band. What I'm going to do

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>is quit law school for a year and a half

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 2>and see if engineering, producing whatever can support me. So

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>that's what I was doing the best best I could.

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 2>And I did get one one record company. It was

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 2>one of my clients that I did all the work

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>for had managed to get a job at a record

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 2>company and he I found a gospel a black gospel group,

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and he let me do four sides with him. We

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 2>put them out. There was no hits, but we so

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 2>here I am and was a little over a year.

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 2>It's about time to register for the fall, and I'm thinking,

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty much thinking I've got to go back and

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 2>get the degree. Shut him up. Maybe he's right, Look,

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 2>this isn't working. I mean, I'm making a living, but

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. And so I'm mixing one day and

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the girl in front buzzes in and by myself, and

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 2>she buzzes in on the phone and says, Clive Davis

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>on one for you, and I'm going b blah blah

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah whah. I picked up the phone very nervously. Hello,

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Hi Bill, Clive Davis, I said Hi. He said, Joel

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>still tells me that you are a very good musician

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and engineer. Oh thank you. He said, what do you

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 2>want to do with your life? And I said, well,

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 2>I would love to do music, but and I was

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 2>starting to say but my dad wants me to and

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 2>he said, wait, wait, stop, I went to law school.

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 2>You don't need to go to law school if you

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 2>want to do music, you know. And I said yeah,

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>but and basically he took the butt away. He said,

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 2>what if I let you? What if I sign you

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and let you give you a chance to produce? And

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I said, well that works. I'll try that for sure.

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 2>And so the first thing, the first thing I did

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 2>was actually with Joel again, with me basically doing the

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 2>lion's share of the work. And it was a group

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 2>called Sweat Hoog and we funny enough, we got lucky,

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and the first single was a hit, not big one,

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 2>so I think in the high twenties or something, low thirties,

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. And but that that led led the way,

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 2>that's what and that's what got the ball rolling higher

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and faster.

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you worked with Clive, he did you a solid,

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he gave you the gig. But what was your experience

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>working for Clive to the degree even interacted with.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Him very very good, And not just because he gave

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 2>me that shot, Because I mean all of my dealings

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>with him throughout the years have all been have all

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 2>been good. Did I agree with everything he said or

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do. No, we all have our opinions, but

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 2>we're not all, you know, the chairman of the board,

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of the head of the company and whatever whatever. And

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 2>I so but everything that all of my in those

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 2>early years, I learned a lot from him. You know,

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 2>he leaned you know, he was seeing what the kid

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 2>could do, and it was really great. One funny one

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 2>funny story is I think the very first thing he

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>gave me to do was Boz Skaggs, who I would

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 2>later go on to produce Boz Skags. It was his

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 2>first album for CBS, and again Glenn Johns had produced it,

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and there was a single and you know, in those days,

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 2>especially AM radio, We're talking nineteen seventy AM radio was

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 2>the playlist had to be. You know, they varied, but

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>it was like, you know, three minutes and thirty seconds

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and blah blah blah. So he said, I need a

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 2>radio edit on this song. See what you can come

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>up with. So I made the edit. He loved it.

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 2>And then the next year was when Glenn came to

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 2>America to master Who's Next Who album And that's when

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I met him at the mastering lab where I'm mastered

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 2>and where Glenn mastered, and I was very nervous meeting

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 2>him for the first time, and I said, you know,

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm the guy that did the radio edit on we

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>were always sweethearts. And he looked at me in his

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 2>typical dry voice and said, oh, you're the idiot that

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 2>mucked it all up. And then he broke right away

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 2>and said, I'm just kidding. It was a good edit.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 2>And of course, now to him, I would have said,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 2>your darn right, it was a good edit. But right

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 2>then I went, thank you.

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So how long did you work for CBS and what

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>did you do there other than boz guys.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So from there one Sweat, Hog Hit. So went

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 2>to New York to do Blood, Sweat and Tears, the

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 2>new Blood album after which is new Blood because David

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Clayton Thomas, the great singer in those first couple of albums,

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 2>had left the band and they wanted to record near

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 2>their houses. So we recorded a studio and at New

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>York and we cut like five tracks, and then the

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 2>plan was we went into the city to record vocals

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 2>with the new singer, who I hadn't met, and so

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 2>we showed up one night and waited and waited, and

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of course no cell phones and everyone's trying to find him,

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't show And the next day they called

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.720
<v Speaker 2>me in the hotel and said, well, we got a problem.

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>We just found out he's an alcoholic and he's on

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 2>a binge. So we got to find a new singer.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 2>So okay, So, knowing that that was going to take

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>a long time, called Clive and said, I don't know

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>what to do. He said, well, come back, I'll find

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 2>something funny enough Steve Tyrell. After they found a new singer,

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 2>Steve Tyrell, who many years later I would do it

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 2>mix all of his records was took over and finished

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that new Blood album. One of the many tie ins

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 2>with people from the beginning to the end. That's kind

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 2>of neat. So I came back to LA and he said, okay,

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 2>White Trash. I said, oh great, you know that'll be great.

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I said, who, do I talk to Edgar? And he

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 2>said no, actually Edgar has left White Trash, but the singer,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the great singer, Jerry Lacroix, is still there. So okay.

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 2>So I met with Jerry. We started talking production ideas.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>He played me the songs he had written, and he

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 2>was not a big writer on Edgar's album, and I

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't care for his songs. So I got some songs

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't care for the songs I did. So

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I got started and it was just an uphill battle.

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't working, and one of the guys in his

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 2>band really wanted to produce the band, and I called

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Clive and said, you know, I don't think I can

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 2>work on that. You know, you're going to have to

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 2>figure out it's kind of a scene here and he said, okay,

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 2>all right. So that was that and before now you

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:14.479
<v Speaker 2>can imagine here I thought I was. I thought, oh boy,

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 2>my big break well. Sweat Hog broke up after the

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 2>first album, Sweat Hog breaks up, Blood, Sweat and Tears,

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 2>we can't finish the album, and now White Trash isn't working.

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Every time. It was maybe my dad's right, that's all

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, Maybe my dad's right. And CBS had a

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 2>very strange policy studios at the time. It was very, very,

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 2>very very that's three varies, I'll give it four varies.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Strange policy from their union, and the union rules were

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that nobody but a union engineer could touch the console

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and okay, and so in the meantime. The other strange

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 2>thing they did. They had a big section I don't remember,

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 2>but about nine ten engineers, but only one assistant engineer.

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 2>And so what they did was if you weren't working

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 2>either mixing or recording, book to record or mix, they

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 2>put you as a second on a session, which was

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of weird because one day you could be recording

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 2>some huge artist and the next week you're engineering an

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 2>assistant engineer on a demo. Very strange, but whatever. Anyway,

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I was sitting around with nobody calling me to mix,

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>and so they were trying to be respectful, you know,

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Clive had told them about me and the

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>plans that he had for me, so they didn't let

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.280
<v Speaker 2>me work. But some of the young guys were really

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 2>upset about the fact that I was sitting around not

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 2>doing anything. See, I had been I had been an

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 2>independent engineer, as I mentioned earlier, one of the first

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 2>in LA and I didn't think it was a tremendous

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 2>amount of money, but it was more more than you

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 2>could make working for the CBS. So Clive I told

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>him about that problem, and they hired me at top scale.

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And so the young guys were very perturbed about that,

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:15.879
<v Speaker 2>needless to say, and in fact, I'll never forget when

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm the night manager took me around. They put me

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 2>on the night shift. First, took me around to meet

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 2>whoever was there working. And I went into the break

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 2>room and here are the three young guys and one

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of them, you know, he introduces me. That guy introduces me,

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and the one guy looks at him says, are you

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.959
<v Speaker 2>a cop? And I said, no, I'm not a cop.

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And I had been told that they were trying to

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 2>get them fired because they knew they were doing drugs,

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:44.720
<v Speaker 2>well pot anyway. And so later when I became friends

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 2>with that guy. I said, do you think if there

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 2>was a cop being hired that they would hire him

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 2>at top scale? They'd hire some guy that, you know,

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>mealy mouth guy that sat in the back of the

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 2>room and did nothing. You know, you must have been high.

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it. So they put me in to

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>shut those young guys up. They put me in as

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 2>a second on a Barbara Streisand session with Richard Perry producing,

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm just there running the tape machine and you know,

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 2>doing whatever the engineer wants. And after about five days

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 2>in the studio, and I never asked him why, I know,

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>I had a You may know, I had a very

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 2>long and prosperous relationship for both of us with Richard Perry,

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of very very big albums. But for some reason,

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 2>after five days of recording, he turned to the engineer

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and said, I want to build an engineer tomorrow. And

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 2>the engineer wasn't too happy about that. He hadn't done

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 2>anything wrong as far as I knew. But that's when

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I started, you know, with basically with Richard, and also

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 2>when I started realizing what engineering could be. Because here

0:47:55.280 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I was sitting with a holding a fader, hold a

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 2>knob that fifty feet away is a microphone that this

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable singer is emoting into. And one of my first

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 2>titles for the book was going to be best seat

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 2>in the House, because boy, when you're doing that, you

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 2>have the best seat in the house, a seat that

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:20.800
<v Speaker 2>might include swearing even sometimes. But no, Barbara didn't swear.

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember Barbera swearing. But she and I hit

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 2>it off really really well, and had hadn't have a

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 2>great relationship. I worked with her over the years, and

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I may not be the only one, but I'm the

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 2>only engineer that I know of that's worked with Barbara

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 2>any excuse me, any amount of time that I have

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 2>to say, I never had a problem with her. You know,

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 2>she's very demanding, she's extremely intelligent. She is demanding. But

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 2>i've other than other than on a live orchestra session,

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 2>she didn't like her headphone mix. I had to work

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 2>work that out a little bit. You know, there's a

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of pressure. You know, I realized that she's sitting

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 2>there with eighty pieces out there, and she has to

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 2>give a performance and so on, so I understand a little.

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:14.280
<v Speaker 2>But I got her headphones together and everything was fine. Anyway,

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 2>what happened is people like Richard Perry that wanted to

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 2>touch the controls. He wanted to ride the faders, and

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 2>some of the engineers would report him to the union

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 2>and so they would come in and you know, bark

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 2>at Richard. And he wasn't the only one, but Clive

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 2>was getting other people that wanted to be able to,

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, touch I don't know that any of them

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to engineer necessarily, but just to be able to,

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, touch the faders if they wanted to play

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 2>with the balances. And so he went to the union

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and said, you need to change that rule and they,

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure, with all the pride they had, they went, well,

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to And he said, you don't understand.

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't let you in your rule affect my creative

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 2>creativity in my record company. I have to be able

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 2>to hire people that I want and if they won't

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 2>work because of your union rule, that that's not going

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:16.959
<v Speaker 2>to work. And they said, we're sorry, and he said,

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 2>one more time, I'm closing the studios if you don't

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 2>change your rule. He closed the studios, but I don't

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 2>know how many people out of work, just a snap

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and who can blame him? I have to say, you know,

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 2>like I said, the business was definitely changing. And uh,

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 2>you know obviously right after that the engineer producer became

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 2>a thing in England and here, uh and you know

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't going to work and they didn't, you know,

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:54.760
<v Speaker 2>they didn't change with the times.

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Richard's he says, he wants you to engineer. There

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>must have been something that Tree inspired, something that you

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>did that he wanted you.

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 2>If I knew, Bob, i'd tell you. I promise I have,

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think of it my time. Back then

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:20.360
<v Speaker 2>we were in Studio A, and the tape machine was

0:51:20.400 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 2>in like this secondary room, no walls, been a secondary

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.479
<v Speaker 2>room off to the left of the control room where

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, he can see me and I can see him.

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, you could you know, throw a tennis ball

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.279
<v Speaker 2>and hit him in the head. But you know, and

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I was, I was so shy, and you know, I

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:41.359
<v Speaker 2>wasn't scared to run the tape machine or anything. But

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that, I said. Maybe he asked me

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a couple of questions and I answered them the way

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 2>he liked. I don't know, I have no idea, like

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I said, considering how many hours, days, weeks, months, years

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I spent in a control room with him. I'm really

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 2>sorry I never asked him what was it that made

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 2>you want to give me a shot at the first chair?

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 2>But I never did it.

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So now you're behind the board with Richard.

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Ay.

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 1>How sophisticated is the board at that point? And what

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:18.720
<v Speaker 1>does he tell you to do or not to do? Well?

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 2>He he was trying to figure every he you know,

0:52:22.239 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 2>he was pretty young in his career, he was, yeah,

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 2>he and he was still learning things about about recording.

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So he didn't know what a compressor did or a

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:39.800
<v Speaker 2>limitter did, but he knew equalizers made things brighter or

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 2>duller or basier or whatever. But I remember, I don't

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 2>remember him even turning those. The main thing he wanted

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 2>to do was, well, the thing was playing. He wanted to,

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, pull the piano. Rather than tell the engineer

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 2>what to do, he wanted to just do it, you know,

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 2>so he started That's what he would do, is just

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 2>start playing with the balance on a play back. And

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 2>and not all the time either, but uh, you know,

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.919
<v Speaker 2>basically though, he would trance, you know, he would give

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 2>me his whatever thoughts he had on what to do,

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and I would do them. He was he was very eloquent.

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>What was his special sauce? You work with a number

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of producers, what was special about him vis a vis

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>somebody else?

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh, let's see where do I start? I guess I

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 2>start with a great song, since, especially if he's if

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 2>he's finding songs for an artist, like he did obviously

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 2>for Barbara or the Pointer sisters. He found, you know,

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 2>all the songs for their illustrious career. He gave them.

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 2>He worked best that way. He didn't work as well

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 2>with single artists. I remember I'm independent now and he's

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 2>in England doing the No Secrets album, your Sylvaine album

0:53:56.960 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 2>with Carl Simon, and he still thought of me. He

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 2>knew that I was this guy that came from Richie

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Podler's rock studio. So and I had done rock, produced

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 2>rock stuff, or tried to when when I was at CBS.

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 2>So that's how he thought of me. So he recorded

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the album and mixed all but two songs in England

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:21.400
<v Speaker 2>with Robin Cable, and he called me and said, there's

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm coming back and next week I want you to

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 2>get a studio. There's two rock songs. That I want

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you to mix and I said okay, and so he

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:36.720
<v Speaker 2>that's what I did. And he was late for this session,

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 2>as he always was, but Carly was on time the

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 2>first mixing session and she we got She we hit

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 2>it off right away, with her telling me what a

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 2>it was a nightmare. I've never I've never screamed at

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 2>anyone before I had to. I was I had to

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 2>go and get sedatives in England. I said, really said, yeah,

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 2>he was you. He's so stubborn. She's just going through

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.839
<v Speaker 2>all this, you know. Wow. In fact, I remember when

0:55:05.880 --> 0:55:10.480
<v Speaker 2>we mastered that record, she was dating James Taylor and

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 2>James went outside, I think, for a cigarette and I

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 2>went out to talk to him while Doug Sax was

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:20.720
<v Speaker 2>mastering the album and he was sitting there and he said,

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 2>I told him. I said, you know, she said it

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 2>was really rough on her. And he said, oh my gosh,

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 2>I'll never let her work with him again. And of

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 2>course you know how that works with success. And now

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 2>maybe we can make another exception or two or three.

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, so yeah. But then so Richard, I mixed

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the two rock songs, and Richard, always looking for something better,

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 2>said why don't we try and mix on this song.

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, and that came out great, and yeah, I

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:54.760
<v Speaker 2>mixed the whole album over.

0:55:56.280 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But ultimately he went with Keybles mix of your

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Sylvain correct.

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I promised myself I would I would forgive

0:56:08.239 --> 0:56:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Doug for doing this, for he was because of Doug

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Sachs and what it was. I thought my mix was

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:24.280
<v Speaker 2>better in every way, and Doug did until one time.

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I see about the fourth time he's listening to it.

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Initially he said, oh, yeah, this is really good, and

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 2>then he noticed that before every chorus when Jim Gordon,

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the drummer starts off with Clouds in my Coffee, that

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 2>there's starts with the bass drum going to the toms.

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:44.879
<v Speaker 2>That the bass trum that was the only the bass

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:47.799
<v Speaker 2>drum on my mix was a little bit softer than

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 2>it was on Robin's. And it's the kind of thing

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 2>I promise you that the compression on both AM and

0:56:55.360 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 2>FM radio would more than have taken up and stated

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 2>for But as soon as he showed that to Richard,

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 2>that's all it took. So he went with the mix

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:08.759
<v Speaker 2>and it is what it is, and it am there.

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's say I listened you know you're close to it.

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But if the average person, not completely unsophisticated but not

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a pro, listen to your mix or the single mix

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that went out, how different were they?

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Well? How do I put that in words? Mine? Certainly,

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 2>not Night and Day. Certainly not night and day. There's

0:57:39.840 --> 0:57:42.480
<v Speaker 2>some guitars in there that mine were a little louder

0:57:43.160 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 2>that when I hear it that because they're down they weren't.

0:57:47.040 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know the compression would have done that

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:53.360
<v Speaker 2>because the only thing playing before every chorus is that

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 2>drum and her voice. And even though even though she's

0:57:57.400 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 2>louder in every mix than the drum, it would have

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 2>caught it. It would have pulled her to that and

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the drum would have come up. But like the guitars,

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the things that I like about my mix better very

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to this day when I hear it on the radio. Yeah,

0:58:12.840 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the things I know was better about mine.

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that I'd have to hear it again

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to remember to hear them back to back.

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You remember, okay, you track the Barber Streiss in the album.

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Then when it comes to mixing some of it, some

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, okay, Then what happens when it comes to mixing.

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Again. The album was halfway done when I got involved,

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and some of it was already mixed by the other

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 2>engineer and whatnot. But the songs that we finished, I mixed,

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think just about half of them. And that I

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 2>had heard people had told me about working with Richard

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 2>what it was like on the previous album, which is

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the album that that put Barbara in the modern era,

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 2>out of you know, out of her Broadway stuff. They said,

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 2>they said that, you know, they talked about the maniacal

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 2>ways of Richard, and they said, for instance, that he kept,

0:59:20.200 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 2>whether it was he or Barbara or both, they kept

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 2>an orchestra till one in the morning, which they went

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:31.240
<v Speaker 2>into overtime. It was at seven o'clock start. They went

0:59:31.280 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 2>into overtime at ten oh one. And I don't know

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 2>when Golden Times started back then, but you know, those

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:41.480
<v Speaker 2>musicians made a lot of money. You know, they're also

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 2>not the kind of musicians that are used to playing

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 2>that long, that hard, but my orchestra, but they kept

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 2>them there. So the mixing, another thing I had heard

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 2>is that he'll do lots and lots of mixes, and

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:59.120
<v Speaker 2>indeed he did lots and lots of mixes. The only

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 2>thing in the mix he he insistent on riding the

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:06.640
<v Speaker 2>vocal and that would stay till till whenever. The last

1:00:06.640 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 2>thing I did with him was he always rode the vocal,

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>which drove me a little crazy because I like to

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>ride the vocal. You know, I'm really big on the vocalist.

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I really try to protect them and put them in

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the best light always because that's that's what they live by.

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>And not that he didn't do a good job, but

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>it was just frustrating for me with the track because

1:00:28.480 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of usually the vocalist following the track, leading

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the track, albeit but following the track. So here I

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>am with the track following him. But we did okay.

1:00:38.640 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So other than riding the vocal, you do a mix

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of complaints would he have? What would

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>he want redone? What would you want change?

1:00:49.200 --> 1:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh? He was famous for finding anything and everything. You

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>know up you know, it starts with you know, maybe

1:00:57.200 --> 1:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the congas are too loud, Okay, turn the congress down. Maybe.

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, when we started with like with

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Barbara and uh and no Secrets for sure, uh. And

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the next album with her, I think there

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>was no automation. It was definitely every time you're mixing,

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>you mist and that was I love doing that. I

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>loved it. In fact, when we finally got moving fader automation,

1:01:27.400 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>where you would move the faders and it went into

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a computer and then the computer would play back your

1:01:32.360 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 2>moves which you could override. But I had to get

1:01:36.640 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>used to letting the computer help me. I didn't want

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>any help. I wanted to do it all myself. And

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>so anyway he would find, he would find some excuse

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>always and kept doing it. And you never you never

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>were satisfied. You never bore that sounds great, you know,

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>you never got that. It was like he'll he'll go

1:01:59.640 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>listen to it and mastering, and quite often we'll come

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>back and mix it again. In fact, the funny story

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>about that if I can jump ahead, although not that

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>far ahead, is on the Ringo album. Well before that,

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 2>speaking of that maniacal Ways, Jeff Percaro, the great drummer,

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>told me a story about his maniacal ways. This is

1:02:23.160 --> 1:02:28.880
<v Speaker 2>like in nineteen eight, seventy eighty one or something. He said,

1:02:28.920 --> 1:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>we were doing a tracking session and you know, Richard

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>in his usual wake, you know, we did two or

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>three takes, and then they came in and listened, and

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 2>he found something to do, and they went out and

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>did another take or two came in and listened and

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>just one more guys, So they went back out and

1:02:46.360 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>did one more. Jeff said, they came in, they listened

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>to it and everyone's that's the one. And Jeff said,

1:02:53.400 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I turned here and I said, Richard, that's the one,

1:02:55.840 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and he went, yeah, it's really good. But I think

1:02:58.120 --> 1:03:00.800
<v Speaker 2>if we just do no, Richard, you don't understan that

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>is the one we're going with. He said, But just

1:03:04.680 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>what Richard, next song or we leave? And that was it.

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>He threw down the gauntlet. But on the Ringo album

1:03:14.200 --> 1:03:19.400
<v Speaker 2>eight years earlier, something we knew that the song Photograph

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>was going to be the first single, and so Richard

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and here, you know, this was arguably his biggest shot

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>at that time. It was working with all the Beatles,

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and so I knew we were going to mix it

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>several times. So we mixed it and again each time

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>we mix it, it's like, you know, five mixes printed. You know,

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:46.360
<v Speaker 2>who knows how many we did that weren't printed. He

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>goes in the mastering lab and listens to to it.

1:03:49.400 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And he goes, you know, I think if we do

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>this and do that, we went back in. He said, okay,

1:03:54.320 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So we did another group of mixes, went back to

1:03:56.920 --> 1:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the mastering lab, same thing. Okay, we got it. Now,

1:04:01.400 --> 1:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>we got it. But can I just hear that first

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>mixed first day? Yeah? See that was better there. Okay

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>again there's I have to do this by hand. You know,

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it's not like going back like we do today and

1:04:13.240 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the computer has everything exactly where it was. It's you know,

1:04:17.320 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a new mix every time. So back we go,

1:04:22.320 --> 1:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and I thought we had it. We go into the

1:04:25.800 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>mastering lab, play it and he plays them. Doug says, boy,

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I think you got it, Richard, And he said, yeah, Doug,

1:04:32.800 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>it's really good. And he turns to me. But I

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>know that if we just and I interrupted him. I said, Richard, no,

1:04:38.320 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>He said no. What I said, you me and that

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>sixteen track tape will never be in the same room

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 2>at the same time again. If you want it mixed,

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:51.040
<v Speaker 2>get someone else, or I go in alone. Oh funny, Bill,

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I've got Richard. I'm not kidding. And I went in

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>alone and mixed it by myself, as if I didn't

1:04:57.760 --> 1:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>know what he wanted out of it after all those.

1:04:59.680 --> 1:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Times, okay, all those times. Did it make a difference.

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 2>To the studios in my bank account? Of course not,

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, a difference to who. That's the way you

1:05:19.120 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have to answer that question, because that's what we do

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>as creatives. You know, does it make a difference. It

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 2>matters to me. I go through all these gyrations that

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>we spoke about earlier with trying to make digital as

1:05:31.080 --> 1:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>good as I can possibly make it. And I have

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>a friend, an engineer friend who's constantly telling me, is

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>does it really make a difference? And that's what I say.

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>It makes a difference to me. Is it different? Yeah,

1:05:44.480 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>it's that much better. But when I built my studio,

1:05:48.480 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I knew, I mean, that's just how I've always operated.

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I knew that when I built a studio, how do

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I make an incredible studio? Well, this one, this studio,

1:05:57.760 --> 1:06:00.800
<v Speaker 2>they all have the same stuff. They ad mites got headphones,

1:06:00.840 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 2>they got you know, they got what they got. But

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 2>this studio has incredible mics. This studio doesn't have such

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a good headphone system. Bail blah blah. You just got

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to have everything nailed. So that's that's what you tried.

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 2>To do and by by you know, by ten percent

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 2>here and ten percent there, and ten percent here and

1:06:18.440 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>five percent there, and eventually you get up to forty

1:06:22.280 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>five fifty percent. That makes a difference. So today with

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the digital, especially with the way things are recorded, so

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 2>many you know, I get so few sessions that are

1:06:32.560 --> 1:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>done by all professional people. You know, so many people

1:06:36.320 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>are recording. You know, they send it to the bass

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:40.480
<v Speaker 2>player who puts on the bass, and they send it

1:06:40.480 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to the drummer who puts on the drums in his house.

1:06:43.080 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>And some of those are very very good, don't get

1:06:45.000 --> 1:06:48.200
<v Speaker 2>me wrong. Some of them are not very good and whatnot.

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I mean I remember when it started,

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, decades ago, with with people and doing home recording,

1:06:57.080 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and uh, it's just and it doesn't hold it. It's

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>not like it used to be that one engineer primarily

1:07:05.480 --> 1:07:09.360
<v Speaker 2>for most parts, sat through the recording process, the tracking process,

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and the overdubbing process. Now maybe they didn't mix. They

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 2>would send it to somebody that who was known for mixing,

1:07:16.280 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>like myself, and they like that because they get a

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 2>fresh look on it as opposed to the guy that's

1:07:20.960 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>been in the trenches for months doing it. But uh,

1:07:26.160 --> 1:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think it's a it's a worthwhile way

1:07:29.080 --> 1:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>of looking at it. So that's you know, did it

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>make a difference to Richard? It did?

1:07:43.680 --> 1:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me use it because I'm sure Richard was concerned.

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it made a difference in the commercial success.

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>For the most part, And if we're talking about from

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the first time we mixed a song, I won't. I won't. Well,

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>from from the first time he mixed a song to

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the whatever time didn't make a difference. No, probably not.

1:08:07.800 --> 1:08:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Those were all close enough on Richard with me mixing

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>now what I did sometimes and I remember I had

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 2>a friend from the east visiting me, East coast visiting

1:08:18.000 --> 1:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>me once and I think it was David Sanborn album

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and had I had the mix before Richard. You know,

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I would get the mix where I liked it, and

1:08:32.400 --> 1:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Richard would come in and my friend heard it and

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>watched it, watched him destroy it, and uh, and it

1:08:42.040 --> 1:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>wasn't that album, but on another meaning, meaning what we

1:08:45.120 --> 1:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>ended up with wasn't as good as where it started.

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:51.519
<v Speaker 2>And it was one time I can't remember what album,

1:08:51.560 --> 1:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>but there was definitely one time where where I made

1:08:53.960 --> 1:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>him go back and listen to the first mix, Richard.

1:08:56.600 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I want you to hear where I had it when

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you showed up three four hours go. And I played

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>him that first mix, and he goes, you're right, it

1:09:03.960 --> 1:09:08.400
<v Speaker 2>does feel better kind And I said, you know, here's

1:09:08.439 --> 1:09:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the thing, Richard could never think. He the way I've

1:09:13.439 --> 1:09:17.479
<v Speaker 2>said is that I want a mix. It's it's not

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:19.599
<v Speaker 2>a great analogy, but it's the best one I got.

1:09:19.800 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I want a mix to be a beautiful.

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Lush forest.

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:26.479
<v Speaker 2>This forest has all kinds of different trees, and I

1:09:26.520 --> 1:09:28.679
<v Speaker 2>want it when you look at it, just to go, wow,

1:09:28.720 --> 1:09:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that is beautiful. Richard wants to investigate every tree. Is

1:09:33.120 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>that pine tree in the back high enough? Okay, let's

1:09:36.000 --> 1:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>try it higher? You know what? You know? What about

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>this palm tree over here? You know, okay, let's try it.

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:46.080
<v Speaker 2>You'd start playing with all those things, and you got

1:09:46.080 --> 1:09:48.599
<v Speaker 2>all the trees trimmed the way he wants them. And

1:09:48.640 --> 1:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't. But it doesn't feel the same. And you can't.

1:09:51.120 --> 1:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>You don't know why it isn't you know, because how

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:56.600
<v Speaker 2>something feels, it's definitely it's a mix. You know. I

1:09:56.920 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 2>was talking to someone yesterday. Cooking is exactly like mixing.

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:02.679
<v Speaker 2>To me. Unfortunately, I don't have that skill I wish

1:10:02.760 --> 1:10:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I did. I love eating, but I can't put the

1:10:06.120 --> 1:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>ingredients together. But really good chefs know how to put

1:10:10.160 --> 1:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>ingredients together so that when you taste it, you're not analyzing.

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:15.479
<v Speaker 2>It's just, oh my gosh, that's great. And that's what

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I always wanted from Richard, but he couldn't do it.

1:10:18.040 --> 1:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>He just he had to look at every single tree.

1:10:21.240 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>So some albums you tracked but didn't mix, how'd you

1:10:25.600 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>feel about that?

1:10:29.720 --> 1:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, there weren't many, but there were some because of

1:10:34.000 --> 1:10:38.519
<v Speaker 2>scheduling primarily, or like I know on a couple of

1:10:38.600 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Carly's albums where I did some of the recording and

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 2>then he went to New York to work with New

1:10:47.360 --> 1:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>York musicians, or in the third album, her second album,

1:10:52.160 --> 1:10:54.360
<v Speaker 2>she was pregnant because she didn't want to be away

1:10:54.360 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>from home so long, and whatever different reasons. He worked

1:10:57.240 --> 1:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>in New York and there when he had some things going,

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>mixed some of the stuff there, and some of them

1:11:02.200 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 2>I remixed when he came back to LA Some of

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:10.880
<v Speaker 2>them stood. But I mean the answer to your question

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:14.360
<v Speaker 2>is I'm insecure enough that I would want to mix

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the things I recorded just because I don't want to

1:11:17.040 --> 1:11:20.320
<v Speaker 2>hear someone critique me and say, oh, wow, that's the

1:11:20.360 --> 1:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>best Shna could do. I don't know if that ever

1:11:22.760 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 2>happened or not.

1:11:23.400 --> 1:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how about let's say you're mixing and you get

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>an album that has different engineers, different studios. Can you

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>make it all sound of a piece or inherently are

1:11:35.960 --> 1:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>they different?

1:11:38.720 --> 1:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what I was alluding to earlier. No, I mean,

1:11:42.000 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you do the best you can with what you've got,

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, and if you if you're handed something like

1:11:48.800 --> 1:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>like the No Secrets album that Robin Cable did an

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>outstanding job of recording, you know, I just balanced the

1:11:55.920 --> 1:12:01.640
<v Speaker 2>thing up and go with it. And you know, some

1:12:01.680 --> 1:12:04.519
<v Speaker 2>of the other ones. I know, there was one year

1:12:04.680 --> 1:12:08.080
<v Speaker 2>when I was double nominated for Best Engineered Album, and

1:12:08.120 --> 1:12:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think either one deserved to be there. But

1:12:11.240 --> 1:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>that's okay. There's a couple of several albums, three or

1:12:14.240 --> 1:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>four albums that I always thought should have been nominated

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>that weren't. But whatever. But I was double nominated, and

1:12:19.960 --> 1:12:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I remember one of them. It cracked me up because

1:12:23.120 --> 1:12:26.599
<v Speaker 2>it was recorded by the kind of thing you're talking about.

1:12:26.640 --> 1:12:30.280
<v Speaker 2>It was several engineers. They were all professional, but it

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>definitely there was not a cohesive kind of thing. You know.

1:12:35.640 --> 1:12:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of engineers. I've always thought of

1:12:39.120 --> 1:12:42.439
<v Speaker 2>myself as a musician that happens to who learned how

1:12:42.439 --> 1:12:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to engineer, not an engineer that learned how to engineer,

1:12:46.000 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and that's what they want to do. I just it's

1:12:48.280 --> 1:12:51.320
<v Speaker 2>like music. For me. First, it's all about music, and

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>so when you get something that someone else is recorded

1:12:54.000 --> 1:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and you're adding to it, you want to think about

1:12:57.000 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>what's there now as you start to add other things,

1:13:00.000 --> 1:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>things to make it fit in. Richie Podler taught me

1:13:03.200 --> 1:13:06.719
<v Speaker 2>in the beginning that the mix starts with the tracking session.

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>You start right away with the first thing you put down,

1:13:10.120 --> 1:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and then you know, he said, and I've tried to

1:13:13.120 --> 1:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>do it. Every overdub you make, you're putting it where

1:13:16.320 --> 1:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you want it in the mix. You're trying to do that.

1:13:19.479 --> 1:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>The joke with another guy that was like that, Al Schmidt.

1:13:22.520 --> 1:13:24.680
<v Speaker 2>The joke with al Schmidt was if he recorded it,

1:13:24.880 --> 1:13:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you could put all the faders in a straight line

1:13:27.360 --> 1:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and with a ruler put them all up at a

1:13:29.760 --> 1:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>certain level and just push the vocal up a couple

1:13:32.280 --> 1:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>over that and there's your mix, and whereas that's not

1:13:36.439 --> 1:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent accurate, it's not that far from the

1:13:38.640 --> 1:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>truth either. The idea of again of trying to make

1:13:41.720 --> 1:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>the mix as you go. But a lot of times

1:13:43.800 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>some engineers they know the kind of sound they like

1:13:47.000 --> 1:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to get on any instrument and it doesn't fit with

1:13:50.000 --> 1:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>what's going on, but they're going to do what they

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>want to do. I don't know.

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, someone sends you a tape for at this point,

1:13:58.200 --> 1:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it won't be a tape in a file. You put

1:14:00.840 --> 1:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it up. Then how do you build your mix?

1:14:05.680 --> 1:14:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay? For the most I always ask for a rough mix.

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:11.799
<v Speaker 2>I always want to hear what I'm what I'm doing.

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I may if I if I if my initial reaction

1:14:15.160 --> 1:14:18.479
<v Speaker 2>is oh, that's neat, I may want to listen back

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to that while I'm mixing. If it's like I don't

1:14:22.120 --> 1:14:24.479
<v Speaker 2>get it, then that may be the last time I

1:14:24.520 --> 1:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>listened to it. But it depends on the kind of

1:14:28.680 --> 1:14:31.120
<v Speaker 2>song and a lot of different aspects. But for the

1:14:31.160 --> 1:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>most part, if I can generalize after I've listened to

1:14:35.000 --> 1:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the to the rough, I usually start with a drum

1:14:40.360 --> 1:14:43.559
<v Speaker 2>sound that I think is going to make sense, And

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>that depends on you know, how the drums are recorded

1:14:46.280 --> 1:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and what I can do to them for what I think.

1:14:49.000 --> 1:14:51.639
<v Speaker 2>If it's a powerful song and the drums aren't that powerful,

1:14:51.920 --> 1:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll do whatever I can to make them more powerful, uh,

1:14:55.600 --> 1:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing. And and I'll usually build the track,

1:15:01.000 --> 1:15:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, with the bass bass then and then if

1:15:03.880 --> 1:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a guitar song, the guitars, if it's a keyboard song,

1:15:06.200 --> 1:15:09.599
<v Speaker 2>the keyboards, and flush out all that stuff to get

1:15:10.120 --> 1:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a track that feels good to me, and then put

1:15:13.320 --> 1:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>in the vocal and background vocals and then start adjusting

1:15:18.160 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 2>things to surround the vocal and background vocals.

1:15:24.160 --> 1:15:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, my experience in the studio, which is certainly very limited,

1:15:28.600 --> 1:15:33.559
<v Speaker 1>but traditionally the engineer only says yes or if they

1:15:33.600 --> 1:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have a different opinion, it's very mild. They don't stand up.

1:15:37.760 --> 1:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your experience being an engineer vis a v being

1:15:40.960 --> 1:15:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a producer, which you've also done.

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Well before. When I had extremely limited experience going back

1:15:49.720 --> 1:16:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to CBS and Babs, is that I remember, not on

1:16:00.200 --> 1:16:03.639
<v Speaker 2>that first album, but I remember on a subsequent album

1:16:04.000 --> 1:16:07.280
<v Speaker 2>standing up to her and saying, no, you shouldn't do that.

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:09.479
<v Speaker 2>And I said, I wrote that in the book. You know,

1:16:09.520 --> 1:16:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's whatever I said. We had

1:16:12.920 --> 1:16:15.439
<v Speaker 2>hit it off pretty well from the beginning, and I

1:16:15.479 --> 1:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>really enjoyed and I've always enjoyed working with her. But

1:16:18.439 --> 1:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not afraid to tell an artist no if they've

1:16:21.800 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>got if they've gotten us up on a branch and

1:16:25.439 --> 1:16:28.559
<v Speaker 2>they're wanting me to saw it off, so you know,

1:16:28.800 --> 1:16:31.640
<v Speaker 2>tell them no, But you say and here's why. And

1:16:32.760 --> 1:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>most of the time they'll respect that. You know, they

1:16:35.760 --> 1:16:38.479
<v Speaker 2>they've hired you to do a job, and I'm telling

1:16:38.479 --> 1:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you that. You know, if I'm doing my job, I've

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:42.759
<v Speaker 2>got to tell you that I don't think you should

1:16:42.760 --> 1:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>do this, and here's why. So that doesn't have to

1:16:46.080 --> 1:16:51.599
<v Speaker 2>happen that often, but it does happen now. In mixing,

1:16:51.640 --> 1:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>that's a different thing. I've always said I'm not I

1:16:57.320 --> 1:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>have no ego with regard I don't think there's a

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:01.719
<v Speaker 2>proof I don't have any or with regard to mixing.

1:17:01.880 --> 1:17:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I get a mix, I think feels good, you got changes,

1:17:05.200 --> 1:17:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll start making changes. We're not going to lose that

1:17:07.280 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 2>mix anymore these days, especially, I can always go back

1:17:10.520 --> 1:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and pick it up where I left off. But but

1:17:15.960 --> 1:17:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't mind you asking you know, I

1:17:18.880 --> 1:17:21.719
<v Speaker 2>don't think there's anything as one perfect mix and nothing

1:17:21.720 --> 1:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>else works. We talked about that already, and I want

1:17:27.240 --> 1:17:29.519
<v Speaker 2>I want the artist to be happy. As I always said,

1:17:30.040 --> 1:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>their name is in big letters on the front of

1:17:32.360 --> 1:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the album. My name is on little teeny letters on

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the back of the album, if not inside. So I

1:17:38.160 --> 1:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>want them to be happy. And as far as I know,

1:17:40.880 --> 1:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I have very good relationship with everyone I worked with.

1:17:44.600 --> 1:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So for you personally, what was the difference between producing

1:17:48.439 --> 1:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and engineering.

1:17:51.760 --> 1:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Control? I mean, in a word, you know, obviously much

1:17:57.080 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 2>added responsibility producers the person responsible for there once was

1:18:03.520 --> 1:18:06.959
<v Speaker 2>nothing and now there's an album. It was literally produced

1:18:07.280 --> 1:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>from nothing, so you've got a lot more You've got

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot more control, but a lot more pressure on

1:18:14.320 --> 1:18:19.559
<v Speaker 2>all the different pieces. And that's I mean, that's what

1:18:19.600 --> 1:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I love the most. But it just you know, it

1:18:22.920 --> 1:18:27.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't always work. You know, it's a matter of you know,

1:18:27.280 --> 1:18:29.479
<v Speaker 2>both of them, I've always said, both of them are

1:18:29.640 --> 1:18:32.759
<v Speaker 2>servants roles. You're there to serve the artist and their music.

1:18:33.280 --> 1:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the most important thing. So it's not about my way,

1:18:38.520 --> 1:18:42.040
<v Speaker 2>like I have no problem arguing with somebody. But again,

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:45.599
<v Speaker 2>their names on the front, so Okay, if you want

1:18:45.600 --> 1:18:47.160
<v Speaker 2>to do it, we'll do it. But I don't agree.

1:18:48.439 --> 1:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>As a producer, how much did you put your tentacles

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>into the creative end of it? Whereas an engineer is

1:18:56.400 --> 1:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>kneeling the sound, a producer, certainly talking about Richard, be

1:19:00.240 --> 1:19:03.559
<v Speaker 1>selecting the material, but also could say, hey, you need

1:19:03.600 --> 1:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a bridge here, let's flip it out, let's start with

1:19:06.040 --> 1:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a chorus, or you know, to what degree would you

1:19:08.960 --> 1:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>put your hands in there.

1:19:12.280 --> 1:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I've always equated that aspect as as a contractor. A

1:19:19.040 --> 1:19:21.320
<v Speaker 2>guy that comes into paint or fix whatever's on. He

1:19:21.360 --> 1:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>goes into one room and it's perfect, doesn't need anything,

1:19:25.000 --> 1:19:27.160
<v Speaker 2>if paint's good and everything. He walks into the next room.

1:19:27.320 --> 1:19:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh this this needs a paint job for sure. He

1:19:29.720 --> 1:19:31.960
<v Speaker 2>goes in the next room. Oh my gosh, look at it.

1:19:31.960 --> 1:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have to bust open that wall and put

1:19:34.120 --> 1:19:36.800
<v Speaker 2>new drywall in, then mud it, and then we'll paint it.

1:19:37.200 --> 1:19:42.519
<v Speaker 2>You do what's what's required, and that that that varies

1:19:42.760 --> 1:19:45.960
<v Speaker 2>within the same album, sometimes not just from artists to artists,

1:19:46.280 --> 1:19:49.400
<v Speaker 2>but for a group that some people hate Pablo Cruz

1:19:49.600 --> 1:19:56.160
<v Speaker 2>wink wink, that that I produced, for instance, I was

1:19:56.800 --> 1:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the I was much more involved in on the second

1:20:01.000 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 2>album I did with them, which was their fourth album.

1:20:04.120 --> 1:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I was much more involved in the trenches than I

1:20:07.360 --> 1:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>was on the previous album because the previous album, which

1:20:12.320 --> 1:20:13.760
<v Speaker 2>was the one that had what You're Going to Do,

1:20:13.800 --> 1:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>that had the first big hit. They now it was

1:20:17.400 --> 1:20:20.719
<v Speaker 2>like the fourth record was like most artists sophomore record

1:20:20.720 --> 1:20:23.360
<v Speaker 2>if the first record hits, Now they're out on the road,

1:20:24.040 --> 1:20:26.519
<v Speaker 2>they're doing interviews, on and on and on. They don't

1:20:26.560 --> 1:20:28.640
<v Speaker 2>have time to write. So we did a lot of

1:20:28.640 --> 1:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>that writing in the studio, and so there it was.

1:20:33.360 --> 1:20:35.599
<v Speaker 2>I was a lot more involved.

1:20:35.600 --> 1:20:40.559
<v Speaker 1>For instance, Okay, they were in the seventies and certainly

1:20:40.600 --> 1:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, there were people like Richard who were producers.

1:20:45.120 --> 1:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>They came from the musical creative inn and then as

1:20:47.720 --> 1:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the years went by, you had more engineers that became producers,

1:20:53.680 --> 1:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and you were sort of different that you straddled both camps.

1:20:57.960 --> 1:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>But I thought that when the engineers became a producers,

1:21:01.760 --> 1:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them weren't really that creative. They could

1:21:04.960 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>nael the sound, but sometimes you know, when a being

1:21:08.280 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>needed more. Did you any observations.

1:21:10.320 --> 1:21:16.439
<v Speaker 2>There, Well, you know, I don't I'm not going to

1:21:16.520 --> 1:21:19.160
<v Speaker 2>bad mouth any particular people. But yeah, I mean some

1:21:19.200 --> 1:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>people are are better at whatever skills. You know, just

1:21:23.960 --> 1:21:27.400
<v Speaker 2>because someone's a great engineer doesn't mean that he has

1:21:27.479 --> 1:21:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the horsepower on the creative side to help an artist.

1:21:31.800 --> 1:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>So you definitely could see that. And the other The

1:21:35.920 --> 1:21:37.680
<v Speaker 2>other thing is that a lot of times, you know,

1:21:38.160 --> 1:21:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I got to tell you when Clive, when I had

1:21:40.360 --> 1:21:45.759
<v Speaker 2>that first conversation with Clive, my nervous conversation on the phone,

1:21:45.920 --> 1:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, he didn't even believe that engineers should produce.

1:21:49.720 --> 1:21:52.160
<v Speaker 2>He said, look here, you know what you should do

1:21:52.360 --> 1:21:54.640
<v Speaker 2>has come to work for me. As an engineer. You

1:21:54.720 --> 1:21:58.280
<v Speaker 2>work with an artist like Roy Holly did with Simon

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:00.839
<v Speaker 2>and Garfunkel, and then when they fire or their producer,

1:22:00.960 --> 1:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>as they always will, you're in the driver's seat. You

1:22:04.080 --> 1:22:06.920
<v Speaker 2>step into the driver's seat. And I literally said to him, no,

1:22:06.920 --> 1:22:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to do that. That's not what I

1:22:08.960 --> 1:22:11.360
<v Speaker 2>want to do. You know, if I can't make it

1:22:11.400 --> 1:22:14.639
<v Speaker 2>on my own, then I don't make it, period. And

1:22:15.360 --> 1:22:17.559
<v Speaker 2>what can I say? It's funny, I haven't thought of

1:22:17.600 --> 1:22:21.519
<v Speaker 2>that until just now in a long long time that

1:22:21.640 --> 1:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I stood up to him kind of in a way,

1:22:23.400 --> 1:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>and he went with me anyway.

1:22:26.280 --> 1:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So you work with Richard on Barbara Streisian. What do

1:22:30.160 --> 1:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you do after that?

1:22:32.720 --> 1:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, we talked about no secrets, I.

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, no secrets for Electra. So at what point do

1:22:40.479 --> 1:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you stop working for CBS.

1:22:45.520 --> 1:22:50.639
<v Speaker 2>When Clive closed the studio, plain and simple, I think,

1:22:51.720 --> 1:22:57.000
<v Speaker 2>which was yeah, which was actually very good timing because

1:22:57.960 --> 1:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, Richard had done the first Harry Nielsen album,

1:23:01.439 --> 1:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Nielsen Schmielsen in England, and Harry was good friends with

1:23:05.160 --> 1:23:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Ringo and he introduced the two of them and they

1:23:09.720 --> 1:23:14.439
<v Speaker 2>talked then about doing an album someday. And so when

1:23:15.840 --> 1:23:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, Clive has closed the studio and I'm working

1:23:19.120 --> 1:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>independently and whatnot, and then Richard calls me one day

1:23:23.280 --> 1:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and says, I'm going to do an album with Ringo

1:23:25.479 --> 1:23:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and I want you to do it with me the

1:23:26.840 --> 1:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>whole way. And I said, wow, well that sounds like fun,

1:23:32.640 --> 1:23:34.559
<v Speaker 2>and indeed it certainly was.

1:23:35.160 --> 1:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Everybody has their heyday where you don't have enough

1:23:38.840 --> 1:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>time to do all the work that you would like

1:23:42.120 --> 1:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. But at what point do you start you know,

1:23:47.280 --> 1:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you just wait for the phone to ring or do

1:23:49.920 --> 1:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you start working in in order to get jobs?

1:23:54.720 --> 1:23:59.040
<v Speaker 2>No back and Clive one of the things after he

1:23:59.120 --> 1:24:03.160
<v Speaker 2>hired me. One of the things he said a lot

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:05.559
<v Speaker 2>of I've got a lot of different pieces of wisdom

1:24:05.560 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 2>from him, and it's something I'd never thought about. But

1:24:08.479 --> 1:24:10.439
<v Speaker 2>he said, Bill, this is a business of what have

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:14.479
<v Speaker 2>you done lately? The credits mean everything. And that went

1:24:14.560 --> 1:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>with what Richie Peddler had told me, you know, a

1:24:17.360 --> 1:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>year and a half or something before that, when he

1:24:19.960 --> 1:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>said basically the same thing. He said, the credits are

1:24:23.360 --> 1:24:26.719
<v Speaker 2>more important than the money you make on a project,

1:24:26.960 --> 1:24:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the money you're going to spend and it'll be gone,

1:24:29.479 --> 1:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the credit you're going to live with. And Clive modified

1:24:32.560 --> 1:24:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it to say what have you done lately? And so

1:24:37.280 --> 1:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>that was it. It was just, you know, the record

1:24:41.040 --> 1:24:46.920
<v Speaker 2>companies have the golden goose philosophy, and if this guy

1:24:47.000 --> 1:24:50.559
<v Speaker 2>laid golden eggs with this artist, bring him over. Let's

1:24:50.560 --> 1:24:52.880
<v Speaker 2>get him here and have him lay some eggs for us.

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And that goes. It goes for producers, of course, and

1:24:56.720 --> 1:24:59.479
<v Speaker 2>to a less lesser degree, maybe not from the record company,

1:24:59.479 --> 1:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>more from the other producers that making the same observation

1:25:04.920 --> 1:25:14.479
<v Speaker 2>and hiring of an engineer, well.

1:25:14.360 --> 1:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You've been doing it for sixty years, so is it

1:25:18.240 --> 1:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the type of thing where the work has always come

1:25:20.680 --> 1:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to you, or if you had to flush that it

1:25:23.680 --> 1:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>has you haven't had to say, well, you know, I

1:25:25.439 --> 1:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>better network, or I better you know, make relationships, or

1:25:29.280 --> 1:25:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I may call people. What do you got going? It's

1:25:31.600 --> 1:25:32.719
<v Speaker 1>always come to you.

1:25:32.720 --> 1:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>No, it's always come to me. And I made a

1:25:36.080 --> 1:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>big mistake. Well I don't know how big it was,

1:25:39.080 --> 1:25:46.440
<v Speaker 2>but it was when the era of managers for producers

1:25:46.479 --> 1:25:52.839
<v Speaker 2>and engineers started. I remember having a meeting with Michael Austin,

1:25:53.080 --> 1:25:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Mo Austin's son at Warner Ruthers, who was the head

1:25:57.200 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 2>of A and R at that point, about an artist

1:26:00.560 --> 1:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>something for me to produce, and he said, you know what,

1:26:04.720 --> 1:26:06.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't have anything right now. But you know, Bill,

1:26:06.640 --> 1:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't even I don't even pick producers anymore. I call,

1:26:11.720 --> 1:26:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, there were five or four or five at

1:26:14.880 --> 1:26:20.559
<v Speaker 2>that point managers of producers. I call one of them

1:26:20.600 --> 1:26:22.439
<v Speaker 2>and I say, I've got this artist, who do you

1:26:22.439 --> 1:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>think would be good for it? They do my job

1:26:25.280 --> 1:26:28.639
<v Speaker 2>for me. And I met with a couple of them,

1:26:28.680 --> 1:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and I always thought, you know, if I want someone

1:26:31.840 --> 1:26:36.519
<v Speaker 2>to quote represent me, I wanted them to, you know,

1:26:36.640 --> 1:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to represent me. And I didn't like the people. You know,

1:26:39.479 --> 1:26:42.559
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't hit the right ones, I guess or whatever.

1:26:44.040 --> 1:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, do you feel you missed out on any work

1:26:45.960 --> 1:26:46.599
<v Speaker 1>as a result?

1:26:46.600 --> 1:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Thereof absolutely, without question. Like I said at the point

1:26:53.000 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 2>that you know Michael Austin, I'm sure it wasn't the

1:26:55.479 --> 1:26:58.439
<v Speaker 2>only one and I made out of I don't remember

1:26:58.439 --> 1:26:59.880
<v Speaker 2>if I had met with any of them. That may

1:26:59.880 --> 1:27:02.120
<v Speaker 2>have been. That meeting with Michael may have been the

1:27:02.240 --> 1:27:04.400
<v Speaker 2>exact reason I went out and met with a couple,

1:27:05.479 --> 1:27:08.400
<v Speaker 2>but I'm pretty sure that they could. They could have

1:27:08.439 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>done it, They could have got me work.

1:27:11.560 --> 1:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like you had enough work anyway, or

1:27:14.320 --> 1:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is that untrue?

1:27:17.200 --> 1:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I think I think the the heyday

1:27:23.439 --> 1:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>shall we call it, could have lasted longer, that's all.

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:32.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not complaining in any way, shape or form.

1:27:32.120 --> 1:27:35.519
<v Speaker 2>I've had a very rich career, that's for darn shore

1:27:36.720 --> 1:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and still do. I mean, you know, I'm fortunate that

1:27:39.120 --> 1:27:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm seventy eight years old, healthy as I can possibly be.

1:27:42.920 --> 1:27:45.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what the doctors just told me two weeks ago,

1:27:45.720 --> 1:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and had The main thing is which a lot of

1:27:48.360 --> 1:27:51.120
<v Speaker 2>my guys, peers my age don't have. I have all

1:27:51.200 --> 1:27:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the energy and passion for music that I had in

1:27:54.439 --> 1:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty four when we got signed to Decker Records.

1:27:58.280 --> 1:28:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I still there's nothing I'd rather do then, you know,

1:28:01.240 --> 1:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>I noticed something early on in the business about all

1:28:04.240 --> 1:28:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the musicians getting divorces and going on a second marriage.

1:28:08.680 --> 1:28:12.599
<v Speaker 2>And I have I wondered if you know, musicians are

1:28:12.640 --> 1:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>a weird lot and creatives in general, I guess, but

1:28:16.680 --> 1:28:21.640
<v Speaker 2>they you know, it's they're very passionate, you know. We

1:28:21.840 --> 1:28:24.639
<v Speaker 2>I'll put myself in there, We are very passionate about

1:28:24.640 --> 1:28:28.759
<v Speaker 2>what we do. And that to a woman that, for instance,

1:28:29.120 --> 1:28:31.559
<v Speaker 2>grew up with a dad that wore a suit and tie,

1:28:31.920 --> 1:28:36.040
<v Speaker 2>was home at five o'clock every day eating dinner, that

1:28:36.160 --> 1:28:39.519
<v Speaker 2>doesn't always flush well with the guy that will stay

1:28:39.520 --> 1:28:42.280
<v Speaker 2>after work for two hours hanging with his buddy's jamming

1:28:42.479 --> 1:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. And I know I saw that in the

1:28:46.760 --> 1:28:51.320
<v Speaker 2>divorces of a couple of people, for sure. And it's

1:28:51.320 --> 1:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>funny and funny enough. My wife of forty years now,

1:28:56.320 --> 1:29:00.559
<v Speaker 2>my first wife who divorced me, was a musician, so

1:29:00.640 --> 1:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I had nothing to do with that. But my current

1:29:03.200 --> 1:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>wife has had a father that was an oil executive

1:29:08.000 --> 1:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>who was home every day at five o'clock at mowing

1:29:09.880 --> 1:29:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the lawn on the weekends, but she sawned up. I

1:29:13.960 --> 1:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>insisted we had a long engagement. She was in law

1:29:16.200 --> 1:29:19.600
<v Speaker 2>school in Waco. She was at Baylor Law when I

1:29:19.640 --> 1:29:22.599
<v Speaker 2>met her, and I insisted she do her last year

1:29:23.080 --> 1:29:25.559
<v Speaker 2>in la so that she could for a year she

1:29:25.600 --> 1:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>could see the crazy people, the crazy schedule, everything that

1:29:30.000 --> 1:29:33.120
<v Speaker 2>was there. And funny enough, she did her last year

1:29:33.160 --> 1:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>at Loyola where I did my one semester, and I

1:29:37.000 --> 1:29:39.280
<v Speaker 2>went back and sat in the same classrooms a couple

1:29:39.320 --> 1:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>of times to watch a session.

1:29:43.000 --> 1:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So when you would say, hey, I got to work

1:29:47.120 --> 1:29:49.559
<v Speaker 1>for the weekend, what would your wife say?

1:29:51.439 --> 1:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I did my best to make

1:29:54.439 --> 1:29:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the family a priority, so I would do my best.

1:29:58.840 --> 1:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, the the initial the knee jerk is no.

1:30:04.000 --> 1:30:06.439
<v Speaker 2>But if it was something that I really thought that

1:30:06.520 --> 1:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I had to she was very understanding and accommodating, and

1:30:12.439 --> 1:30:14.600
<v Speaker 2>so if the relationship worked beautifully.

1:30:15.400 --> 1:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So the first wife who was a musician, was it

1:30:19.439 --> 1:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the music business and the music business lifestyle they caused

1:30:23.280 --> 1:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the divorce or just like everything, it doesn't necessarily work out.

1:30:28.840 --> 1:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>The latter, for sure had nothing to do with the business.

1:30:32.520 --> 1:30:35.519
<v Speaker 2>She loved the business. In fact, The odd thing was

1:30:36.840 --> 1:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>she said she was divorcing me because she was tired

1:30:38.920 --> 1:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of being missus Bill Schnee. And then as soon as

1:30:42.160 --> 1:30:44.639
<v Speaker 2>we were divorced, she went out and tried to get

1:30:44.640 --> 1:30:48.760
<v Speaker 2>work as a producer with the last name Schnee. So

1:30:48.880 --> 1:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>go figure. I don't know what to say. No, it

1:30:51.040 --> 1:30:52.360
<v Speaker 2>had nothing to do with the business.

1:30:52.960 --> 1:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you work with Richard Barber Skreis in Ringo

1:30:57.360 --> 1:31:02.719
<v Speaker 1>no secrets. How did things other than Richard projects come about?

1:31:05.320 --> 1:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Just what you were talking about earlier? You know, someone

1:31:08.920 --> 1:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>calls me to mix a record. In fact, here's a

1:31:12.760 --> 1:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>funny story. Early on. I'm gonna say, I have to

1:31:17.600 --> 1:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>look up Touch Me in the Morning, whatever you that was.

1:31:21.200 --> 1:31:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm mixing in a studio seventy something, and the girl

1:31:26.320 --> 1:31:28.760
<v Speaker 2>buzzes in and says, there's a phone call for you

1:31:28.800 --> 1:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>online one. I pick it up and goes, hi, Bill,

1:31:31.680 --> 1:31:33.800
<v Speaker 2>this is Michael Master. You may know me if my

1:31:33.960 --> 1:31:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Touch Me in the Morning by Diana Ross that I

1:31:36.000 --> 1:31:40.759
<v Speaker 2>wrote and produced, And I hung up the phone and

1:31:42.160 --> 1:31:44.559
<v Speaker 2>that I was a little wild in my early days,

1:31:44.720 --> 1:31:46.639
<v Speaker 2>and I just thought, if that's the way the guy

1:31:46.680 --> 1:31:49.280
<v Speaker 2>introduced it, if that's for real, I don't know that

1:31:49.320 --> 1:31:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I want to have anything to do with him. But whatever.

1:31:52.320 --> 1:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>So the girl buzzes in and says, evidently you got

1:31:54.720 --> 1:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>cut off, and I said, just take a message, and

1:31:56.960 --> 1:32:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I never called him back. Now, my wife, Sally is

1:32:01.800 --> 1:32:06.559
<v Speaker 2>doing law school at Loyola, finishing her last year at Loyola,

1:32:07.040 --> 1:32:09.679
<v Speaker 2>and I'm in my studio and I get a call

1:32:09.720 --> 1:32:13.559
<v Speaker 2>from Michael Master to mix some songs that he's recorded

1:32:13.600 --> 1:32:16.680
<v Speaker 2>on Peeble Bryson. And he didn't give me the same introduction,

1:32:16.800 --> 1:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>which was a good thing, and so I'm mixing, as

1:32:22.080 --> 1:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>it turns out, the big hit if ever, you're in

1:32:25.240 --> 1:32:29.080
<v Speaker 2>my arms again, and Michael was. He's no longer with us,

1:32:29.120 --> 1:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>but he was, by the way. I don't know if

1:32:31.320 --> 1:32:33.719
<v Speaker 2>you know that name, but he was a Chicago lawyer

1:32:34.000 --> 1:32:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that sat up in his high rise dreaming of making

1:32:37.080 --> 1:32:40.360
<v Speaker 2>music and he realized that dream and did quite well

1:32:42.680 --> 1:32:46.519
<v Speaker 2>and as a songwriter and producer. So anyway, we're mixing

1:32:46.560 --> 1:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the song and Sally would between classes. There was like

1:32:49.840 --> 1:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>a three hour break. Loyola wasn't that far downtown LA

1:32:55.880 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 2>from my studio, so she would come to the studio

1:32:58.360 --> 1:33:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and read or take an apple whatever. So she was

1:33:01.760 --> 1:33:04.559
<v Speaker 2>going back to class and they had met. I had

1:33:04.600 --> 1:33:07.639
<v Speaker 2>introduced them, and she's walking through the studio and Michael says,

1:33:08.160 --> 1:33:09.680
<v Speaker 2>bring her in, bring her in. So I hit the

1:33:09.720 --> 1:33:11.439
<v Speaker 2>talk back and said, can you come in a second.

1:33:11.479 --> 1:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Sally came in. He said, let her sit in your chair.

1:33:14.000 --> 1:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>So she sits in my chair and he said, I

1:33:17.920 --> 1:33:21.719
<v Speaker 2>want to play her the single, you know, average person

1:33:21.840 --> 1:33:24.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing. So he sits. She sits in the

1:33:25.000 --> 1:33:27.719
<v Speaker 2>chair and he's right next to her, and he looks

1:33:27.760 --> 1:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>at her and I say this by she had to

1:33:30.080 --> 1:33:32.519
<v Speaker 2>meet some of the interesting people that we find in

1:33:32.560 --> 1:33:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the record business. And he turns to her and says,

1:33:35.960 --> 1:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>let's actualize our peak experiences. Shall we wait a minute.

1:33:43.160 --> 1:33:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm engaged to this woman, you leave your peak experiences.

1:33:45.880 --> 1:33:49.479
<v Speaker 2>So I pushed play and then he's sitting there and

1:33:49.520 --> 1:33:53.040
<v Speaker 2>she's looking straight ahead and he's right in, you know,

1:33:53.680 --> 1:33:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a foot from her, a foot from her left ear,

1:33:57.439 --> 1:34:00.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at her eyes and mimicking the words. And when

1:34:00.320 --> 1:34:02.040
<v Speaker 2>it got to the chorus, you know, the high point,

1:34:02.040 --> 1:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>he's pointing his finger and raising his shoulders and you know,

1:34:05.000 --> 1:34:08.439
<v Speaker 2>just going, you know, all the emotion you could ever

1:34:08.520 --> 1:34:12.639
<v Speaker 2>ask for. And I'm sure he was very disappointed when

1:34:12.680 --> 1:34:15.920
<v Speaker 2>she was done. She was scared spitless. She'd never seen

1:34:15.960 --> 1:34:18.760
<v Speaker 2>anything like that, and quite frankly, I don't think I

1:34:18.800 --> 1:34:19.240
<v Speaker 2>had either.

1:34:20.280 --> 1:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, So, how'd you end up working with Steely Dan?

1:34:26.720 --> 1:34:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Very good question, and the answer is something that funny

1:34:31.520 --> 1:34:35.160
<v Speaker 2>enough I just found out. So Gary Katz, the producer

1:34:35.160 --> 1:34:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of Steely Dan, calls me one day and says, would

1:34:37.880 --> 1:34:40.519
<v Speaker 2>you like to record the next Steely Dan album? And

1:34:41.040 --> 1:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I said, let me think about it. Yes, actually I

1:34:43.160 --> 1:34:46.840
<v Speaker 2>think that sounds like fun. And I got off the

1:34:46.840 --> 1:34:48.880
<v Speaker 2>phone and I went wait a minute, because a couple

1:34:48.880 --> 1:34:51.840
<v Speaker 2>of my friends, Michael Omarty and Steve Jeff Paccaro, had

1:34:51.880 --> 1:34:54.920
<v Speaker 2>played on the previous albums, and it told me about

1:34:54.960 --> 1:34:58.240
<v Speaker 2>their maniacal ways in the studio, and as I said earlier,

1:34:58.320 --> 1:35:01.679
<v Speaker 2>that's not my jam to go quick and move fast

1:35:01.720 --> 1:35:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and keep things going. And so I was a little

1:35:05.479 --> 1:35:08.519
<v Speaker 2>nervous about it. But what was interesting at the time,

1:35:08.680 --> 1:35:11.240
<v Speaker 2>they never asked me. They just said tell us where

1:35:11.240 --> 1:35:15.760
<v Speaker 2>to go. So I picked a studio that was originally

1:35:15.800 --> 1:35:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Mike Kurbs that I went in for my one time

1:35:19.400 --> 1:35:22.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to produce the La Teens, which had been now

1:35:22.800 --> 1:35:29.479
<v Speaker 2>bought by another group, and was a very good studio,

1:35:29.720 --> 1:35:37.479
<v Speaker 2>excellent studio called Producers Workshop, and I just said, Okay,

1:35:37.520 --> 1:35:40.439
<v Speaker 2>there's a studio in Hollywood Boulevard that I really like

1:35:40.520 --> 1:35:42.760
<v Speaker 2>working in. And as far as I know, they never

1:35:42.800 --> 1:35:46.000
<v Speaker 2>went to visit it or anything. So they just showed it.

1:35:46.400 --> 1:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>They showed up, and we did it. We did what

1:35:49.160 --> 1:35:52.400
<v Speaker 2>we did, and as it turns out, that album was

1:35:52.439 --> 1:35:56.639
<v Speaker 2>different than every album before or after in that they

1:35:56.640 --> 1:36:01.240
<v Speaker 2>did it with entirely studio musicians. I'd used studio musicians

1:36:01.240 --> 1:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>obviously on the previous album or two in with them,

1:36:04.400 --> 1:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>but this was all studio musicians, like Union sessions one o'clock,

1:36:13.160 --> 1:36:19.400
<v Speaker 2>one to four and six to nine and all Union players.

1:36:19.800 --> 1:36:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Larry Carlton, the great guitar player, had done takedown sheets.

1:36:24.240 --> 1:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>The guys had always done a piano bassed demo and

1:36:28.960 --> 1:36:30.840
<v Speaker 2>they would send that to Larry, who would do a

1:36:30.960 --> 1:36:34.280
<v Speaker 2>takedown sheet so of the chords and where things went.

1:36:34.400 --> 1:36:37.519
<v Speaker 2>So the band would hear their demo and go from there,

1:36:38.400 --> 1:36:41.479
<v Speaker 2>and they were just there was a no drug zone.

1:36:41.520 --> 1:36:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that might have been unique, and at least

1:36:43.760 --> 1:36:48.400
<v Speaker 2>for the tracking, which is all I did, and it

1:36:48.439 --> 1:36:51.439
<v Speaker 2>couldn't have gone smoother or better or easier. So I

1:36:51.520 --> 1:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>was completely wrong about all that, but I always wondered

1:36:56.160 --> 1:37:00.800
<v Speaker 2>why they hired me. And so that was for the

1:37:00.840 --> 1:37:04.360
<v Speaker 2>album Asia. So a year and a half ago, I

1:37:04.400 --> 1:37:08.400
<v Speaker 2>guess been almost two years ago now. A company called

1:37:08.400 --> 1:37:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Acoustic Sounds that basically licenses albums puts them on LPs.

1:37:13.640 --> 1:37:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Redid that for Asia at forty five rpm, which takes

1:37:18.320 --> 1:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>two discs instead of one y for forty five rpm. A,

1:37:22.720 --> 1:37:26.040
<v Speaker 2>it sounds better and B when you're on a on

1:37:26.120 --> 1:37:29.320
<v Speaker 2>an LP, when you the closer you get to the label,

1:37:29.520 --> 1:37:32.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a kind of distortion that comes in. It's almost

1:37:32.400 --> 1:37:36.519
<v Speaker 2>completely unavoidable. So this way stays out farther. So they

1:37:36.520 --> 1:37:40.680
<v Speaker 2>do did it at forty five rpm. And and in

1:37:40.720 --> 1:37:44.080
<v Speaker 2>anticipation of that, the owner of the company Acoustic Sounds,

1:37:44.120 --> 1:37:46.360
<v Speaker 2>called and said, I want to do a zoom interview

1:37:46.840 --> 1:37:52.000
<v Speaker 2>with you and Donald and Bernie Grunman who mastered the

1:37:52.040 --> 1:37:55.320
<v Speaker 2>original in the seventies and mastered this forty five version.

1:37:55.680 --> 1:37:58.920
<v Speaker 2>And I said great. So I did the zoom and

1:37:59.000 --> 1:38:02.639
<v Speaker 2>when there was a lull, I said, Donald, there's something

1:38:02.680 --> 1:38:05.479
<v Speaker 2>I've always wanted to ask you. Why did you guys

1:38:05.560 --> 1:38:09.559
<v Speaker 2>hire me to do that record? And he said something like, well,

1:38:09.640 --> 1:38:11.920
<v Speaker 2>we'd heard that you were this guy that got some

1:38:12.000 --> 1:38:15.800
<v Speaker 2>incredible hi fi albums that just sounded incredible, and that's

1:38:15.840 --> 1:38:18.479
<v Speaker 2>what we wanted to do. And I knew right away

1:38:18.520 --> 1:38:24.960
<v Speaker 2>what it was a little history there, the direct to disc.

1:38:25.160 --> 1:38:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how many people are familiar with that,

1:38:27.120 --> 1:38:30.439
<v Speaker 2>are you by any chance? Yes? Familiar with director is? Yeah?

1:38:30.520 --> 1:38:34.320
<v Speaker 2>So directed disc is where you recorded one side of

1:38:34.360 --> 1:38:38.880
<v Speaker 2>an album. As the title says, direct to disc, the

1:38:38.960 --> 1:38:41.760
<v Speaker 2>disc that is that they make on the lays that

1:38:41.800 --> 1:38:45.960
<v Speaker 2>they make the LPs eventually out of. So what you

1:38:46.080 --> 1:38:49.920
<v Speaker 2>don't do is you don't go to analog tape twice,

1:38:50.479 --> 1:38:52.800
<v Speaker 2>first time in the multi track, second time on the

1:38:52.800 --> 1:38:55.400
<v Speaker 2>two track. You only go through the electronics of a

1:38:55.439 --> 1:38:59.360
<v Speaker 2>console once and by saving all of that, the sound

1:38:59.479 --> 1:39:04.400
<v Speaker 2>quality is superb. It's very you know, almost identical to

1:39:04.439 --> 1:39:07.040
<v Speaker 2>what's quote coming through the glass. It's a lot of

1:39:07.120 --> 1:39:13.200
<v Speaker 2>pressure obviously because you're you're recording everything from start to finish,

1:39:13.280 --> 1:39:15.720
<v Speaker 2>and when you when you were mixing from tape or

1:39:15.760 --> 1:39:19.360
<v Speaker 2>these days from a computer, when you pull up the piano,

1:39:19.439 --> 1:39:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it's the exact same piano part, the exact same dynamics.

1:39:22.439 --> 1:39:25.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, everything is identical. It's locked in for life.

1:39:26.040 --> 1:39:29.240
<v Speaker 2>When you're doing this. You know, you do one side

1:39:29.240 --> 1:39:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of an album, takes fifteen minutes. Something from one side

1:39:31.760 --> 1:39:34.559
<v Speaker 2>of the album, you take a twenty minute break, you

1:39:34.560 --> 1:39:37.240
<v Speaker 2>do it again. You think they play identically to what

1:39:37.280 --> 1:39:40.559
<v Speaker 2>they did before. No, you're mixing every time from get go,

1:39:41.120 --> 1:39:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes it you know it. The opening cuts are

1:39:44.200 --> 1:39:48.439
<v Speaker 2>the most dangerous in that regard, But you're the point

1:39:48.479 --> 1:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>being is that you're constantly mixing and there's no relaxing

1:39:51.720 --> 1:39:56.720
<v Speaker 2>for a second, and if somebody makes a mistake, you

1:39:56.720 --> 1:39:59.240
<v Speaker 2>know you're in You're in trouble. At the last song,

1:39:59.360 --> 1:40:01.559
<v Speaker 2>you're in trouble because there's no editing of any kind.

1:40:01.840 --> 1:40:04.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a lathe that cuts into a lacquer master a

1:40:04.800 --> 1:40:08.040
<v Speaker 2>laquer disc, and so there's no stopping. So I had

1:40:08.080 --> 1:40:11.200
<v Speaker 2>engineered Doug Sachs and his partner Lincoln my orga of

1:40:11.240 --> 1:40:13.759
<v Speaker 2>it had the mastering lab that was directly in front

1:40:13.800 --> 1:40:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of this studio. Had done a couple of records of

1:40:18.080 --> 1:40:22.559
<v Speaker 2>Lincoln's music directed disc specifically for that reason because they

1:40:22.600 --> 1:40:27.360
<v Speaker 2>sound so much better. And after the I engineered one,

1:40:27.640 --> 1:40:29.880
<v Speaker 2>and after I engineered it, that was the most fun

1:40:29.920 --> 1:40:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd ever had because theretofore you spent you know, two

1:40:34.479 --> 1:40:38.599
<v Speaker 2>three whatever months six and the Ringo album six solid

1:40:38.640 --> 1:40:41.720
<v Speaker 2>months of working on an album and then mixing and

1:40:42.160 --> 1:40:46.439
<v Speaker 2>then mastering. Here in three days we had an album recorded, mixed,

1:40:46.479 --> 1:40:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and mastered. And so when I went back to normal recording,

1:40:49.320 --> 1:40:53.120
<v Speaker 2>it was like slow slow motion. So I went to

1:40:53.160 --> 1:40:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Doug and asked, I really want to produce an album,

1:40:55.439 --> 1:40:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and I wanted to I want to use a vocalist

1:40:59.600 --> 1:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>and main thing also I wanted to do contemporary, more

1:41:02.240 --> 1:41:05.720
<v Speaker 2>contemporary music than what Lincoln did. And so it took

1:41:05.760 --> 1:41:08.000
<v Speaker 2>me about a week or so to convince Doug to

1:41:08.080 --> 1:41:10.680
<v Speaker 2>let me do it. It took him two months to convince Lincoln.

1:41:10.880 --> 1:41:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Lincoln wasn't going for it. This is not our record label,

1:41:13.600 --> 1:41:15.639
<v Speaker 2>and if we were going to hire someone, why would

1:41:15.680 --> 1:41:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it be a kid? And are you sure he can

1:41:17.240 --> 1:41:19.360
<v Speaker 2>do it? And on and on. I jumped through so

1:41:19.479 --> 1:41:22.439
<v Speaker 2>many hoops, but we got it done. Funny part of

1:41:22.479 --> 1:41:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that is that at that point in time, I'd only

1:41:24.240 --> 1:41:26.200
<v Speaker 2>worked with two artists that I knew could step up

1:41:26.240 --> 1:41:28.360
<v Speaker 2>to the mic on the last song and give a

1:41:28.400 --> 1:41:32.439
<v Speaker 2>real performance. The first one was Barbara Streisan, who at

1:41:32.439 --> 1:41:36.160
<v Speaker 2>that point I had done her three previous albums and

1:41:36.400 --> 1:41:40.519
<v Speaker 2>I called her manager and got very close to this

1:41:40.960 --> 1:41:43.880
<v Speaker 2>go away kid, you're bothering me. He had no time

1:41:43.920 --> 1:41:46.880
<v Speaker 2>for it, and the only other person that I had

1:41:47.000 --> 1:41:50.439
<v Speaker 2>just worked with. I recorded a couple of songs and

1:41:50.800 --> 1:41:55.439
<v Speaker 2>mixed a new artist on Motown named Thelma Houston, who

1:41:55.520 --> 1:41:58.040
<v Speaker 2>had a gorgeous sounding voice and sang like a bird,

1:41:58.640 --> 1:42:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and so I talked to her about it. She loved

1:42:00.880 --> 1:42:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the idea, and I went to Motown and got a

1:42:02.600 --> 1:42:06.840
<v Speaker 2>loan out agreement, and that's what we did, and we did.

1:42:07.320 --> 1:42:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I got the best band. When I look at the

1:42:10.120 --> 1:42:13.639
<v Speaker 2>credits today, it's just it's astounding. That was. You couldn't

1:42:13.640 --> 1:42:16.240
<v Speaker 2>get a better band if you tried in nineteen seventy

1:42:16.280 --> 1:42:21.760
<v Speaker 2>five and did that record and it, yes, it was

1:42:21.800 --> 1:42:25.320
<v Speaker 2>nominated for Best Engineered Album, and yes it was. You know,

1:42:25.360 --> 1:42:27.840
<v Speaker 2>within a year, it was an every high fi store

1:42:27.920 --> 1:42:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in the country. Because the weak link in an audio

1:42:31.120 --> 1:42:33.600
<v Speaker 2>chain is the source. So if you give them a

1:42:33.640 --> 1:42:37.439
<v Speaker 2>better sounding source, their amplifiers sound better, their speakers sound better,

1:42:37.520 --> 1:42:40.680
<v Speaker 2>they just go better. So it was an every high

1:42:40.720 --> 1:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>fi store and it did incredibly well. Well. That's undoubtedly

1:42:47.600 --> 1:42:50.720
<v Speaker 2>what Donald was making reference to when he said we'd

1:42:50.760 --> 1:42:53.599
<v Speaker 2>heard about these records that you had done. I had

1:42:53.600 --> 1:42:56.080
<v Speaker 2>engineered the previous one that Doug did, and now I

1:42:56.240 --> 1:43:01.120
<v Speaker 2>produced and engineered that one. And what's what's really cool

1:43:03.080 --> 1:43:07.439
<v Speaker 2>is that a I found out about why they hired

1:43:07.479 --> 1:43:12.519
<v Speaker 2>me on that. And then this year in April, the

1:43:12.960 --> 1:43:16.519
<v Speaker 2>film of Houston and Pressure Cooker album was entered into

1:43:16.560 --> 1:43:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the National Recording Registry Library by the Library of Congress.

1:43:21.680 --> 1:43:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Only six six hundred and thirty five records that are

1:43:24.920 --> 1:43:27.600
<v Speaker 2>in there, and I have a couple of records I

1:43:27.640 --> 1:43:31.320
<v Speaker 2>engineered that are in there, but including Asia. But I

1:43:31.320 --> 1:43:34.200
<v Speaker 2>couldn't be more proud of this one. And and what

1:43:34.439 --> 1:43:35.280
<v Speaker 2>what's come from it?

1:43:43.040 --> 1:43:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay? Why did you not mix Asia? How'd you feel

1:43:46.680 --> 1:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>about that?

1:43:49.960 --> 1:43:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay? When when we were done with the tracks, they came,

1:43:53.920 --> 1:43:56.559
<v Speaker 2>the boys came to me the last day and they said, okay,

1:43:56.600 --> 1:43:59.000
<v Speaker 2>we're going to go off and do overdubs. It's going

1:43:59.080 --> 1:44:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to be you know, months of you know, experimenting with

1:44:02.720 --> 1:44:04.519
<v Speaker 2>the tracks and seeing what we want to do and

1:44:04.520 --> 1:44:06.680
<v Speaker 2>so on, but we want you to mix it when

1:44:06.720 --> 1:44:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we're done. And I said, guys, don't I don't think

1:44:10.200 --> 1:44:12.400
<v Speaker 2>it would work. And they looked at me and said,

1:44:12.439 --> 1:44:14.519
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean. I said, I have a kind

1:44:14.520 --> 1:44:18.439
<v Speaker 2>of a different mixing style, and I just, you know,

1:44:18.520 --> 1:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I knew that they were microscope people. When you talk

1:44:22.080 --> 1:44:25.320
<v Speaker 2>about trees, I mean, you know they should write the

1:44:25.360 --> 1:44:31.599
<v Speaker 2>book because they and they said, well you'll try, won't you,

1:44:31.600 --> 1:44:34.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of sarcastically, and I said, yes, of course,

1:44:34.240 --> 1:44:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll be glad to. So I think it was about

1:44:36.840 --> 1:44:41.000
<v Speaker 2>five months later they called with the first song that

1:44:41.160 --> 1:44:43.639
<v Speaker 2>was done, even though it turns out it wasn't done,

1:44:44.640 --> 1:44:48.559
<v Speaker 2>but which was Josie When Josie comes home and we

1:44:48.640 --> 1:44:52.280
<v Speaker 2>went into the studio and I got to mix up

1:44:52.280 --> 1:44:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that I felt was really good, and I don't think

1:44:58.320 --> 1:45:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Walter came in, only Gary Cats and Donald came in,

1:45:02.600 --> 1:45:05.439
<v Speaker 2>and you know, Donald listened to it and he said,

1:45:05.800 --> 1:45:09.519
<v Speaker 2>it feels really good. Oh thank you. He said, okay,

1:45:09.560 --> 1:45:14.799
<v Speaker 2>well let's try this there. Okay, now again there's no computer.

1:45:15.240 --> 1:45:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting down. The thing starts. The way I would

1:45:17.960 --> 1:45:20.000
<v Speaker 2>do it back then is I would mark the faders

1:45:20.000 --> 1:45:22.760
<v Speaker 2>on a good starting point and then so I know

1:45:22.840 --> 1:45:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that at least every time I start the mix, it's

1:45:25.960 --> 1:45:28.120
<v Speaker 2>going to have the exact same starting point. Where it

1:45:28.160 --> 1:45:31.040
<v Speaker 2>goes from there is up to my right brain. So

1:45:32.600 --> 1:45:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I tried as he wanted this there and he liked it,

1:45:37.160 --> 1:45:42.400
<v Speaker 2>said maybe we should try that here with that there? Yeah,

1:45:42.479 --> 1:45:46.960
<v Speaker 2>with that there, And so it goes and for an hour,

1:45:47.360 --> 1:45:51.519
<v Speaker 2>two hours, three hours, and finally I think it'd been

1:45:51.800 --> 1:45:54.679
<v Speaker 2>like four hours. I'm worn out. I haven't got it.

1:45:54.720 --> 1:45:58.559
<v Speaker 2>The right brain is asleep. It's on remote control. I can't.

1:45:58.600 --> 1:46:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel anything anymore. And they knew it, and uh,

1:46:03.040 --> 1:46:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and I pushed back from the chair and I said, guys,

1:46:05.760 --> 1:46:10.280
<v Speaker 2>you've got an unbelievable record here, And you know I couldn't.

1:46:10.520 --> 1:46:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't be happier. I wish I could be a

1:46:13.080 --> 1:46:15.519
<v Speaker 2>part of it, but I it just it's not It's

1:46:15.520 --> 1:46:18.120
<v Speaker 2>not going to work for me. And so there I was,

1:46:18.240 --> 1:46:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and my good good friend Elliott Shiner, who had mixed

1:46:21.200 --> 1:46:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the previous record, did a mixed most of that. Al

1:46:25.240 --> 1:46:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Schmidt I think mixed one and and Uh did a

1:46:29.960 --> 1:46:32.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, a wonderful job. I wish I believe me,

1:46:32.720 --> 1:46:33.439
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could have.

1:46:34.400 --> 1:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you were in the studio with them. Walter and

1:46:37.880 --> 1:46:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Donald are really opinionated guys. You know what they want?

1:46:42.000 --> 1:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What did Geary Katz ad?

1:46:48.360 --> 1:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Boy, not much, not much at all it was

1:46:59.720 --> 1:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>he he kept the peace and he kept order, and

1:47:05.680 --> 1:47:10.320
<v Speaker 2>nothing creatively, you know, nothing. It was as you say,

1:47:10.400 --> 1:47:14.240
<v Speaker 2>it was primarily Donald and some walter on with regard

1:47:14.240 --> 1:47:17.599
<v Speaker 2>to talking to the musicians and moving things the way

1:47:17.640 --> 1:47:18.680
<v Speaker 2>they wanted them to go.

1:47:19.560 --> 1:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we live in a as you mentioned earlier, inherently

1:47:23.320 --> 1:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>vinyl is compromised. Yeah, we're in an era of vinyl fetishism.

1:47:28.800 --> 1:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>What is your take on vinyl visa the digital.

1:47:35.479 --> 1:47:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I misheard you or if you

1:47:36.960 --> 1:47:39.880
<v Speaker 2>misunderstood me. I don't look at vinyl as a compromise

1:47:39.920 --> 1:47:40.240
<v Speaker 2>at all.

1:47:40.560 --> 1:47:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me state what I'm stating as supposed putting

1:47:42.720 --> 1:47:46.599
<v Speaker 1>words in your mouth. When one is cutting a vinyl record,

1:47:46.720 --> 1:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to worry about amplitude, You have to worry

1:47:50.960 --> 1:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>about roll off. The more attracts you put on one

1:47:54.320 --> 1:47:56.519
<v Speaker 1>side affects on. You have a different sound on the

1:47:56.600 --> 1:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the groove, different sound on the end of

1:47:58.720 --> 1:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the groove. Lot of those issues that you have in

1:48:02.240 --> 1:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>vinyl it's still music, do not apply to digital. Now

1:48:07.360 --> 1:48:09.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of other things I'll put.

1:48:09.280 --> 1:48:09.840
<v Speaker 2>In the mix.

1:48:10.720 --> 1:48:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all this stuff in the seventies, certainly before that

1:48:13.600 --> 1:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was all cut on tape, So it's analog to begin with,

1:48:17.880 --> 1:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas almost everything today is cut digital. So what kind

1:48:24.720 --> 1:48:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of sense does it make to go from digital to vinyl,

1:48:29.479 --> 1:48:32.840
<v Speaker 1>especially now where you can there you know, there are

1:48:33.040 --> 1:48:37.800
<v Speaker 1>streaming services that are streaming way above CD quality. So

1:48:38.000 --> 1:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>what's your take there on the vinyl explosion?

1:48:43.960 --> 1:48:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so, yes, you point out accurately that vinyl has drawbacks. Well, again,

1:48:53.040 --> 1:48:57.680
<v Speaker 2>analog tape has, in my opinion, more analog tape has

1:48:57.680 --> 1:49:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a sound. It was never a mirror. And the directed

1:49:01.479 --> 1:49:05.880
<v Speaker 2>disc which goes from the console right to the disc

1:49:06.320 --> 1:49:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and you listen to the clarity and reality of that

1:49:10.080 --> 1:49:14.120
<v Speaker 2>compared to two generations of analog tape and then putting

1:49:14.160 --> 1:49:18.840
<v Speaker 2>it on there, it shows that even with its problems,

1:49:20.080 --> 1:49:22.439
<v Speaker 2>disc the disc is more of a mirror than analog

1:49:22.479 --> 1:49:25.920
<v Speaker 2>tape ever was, let alone two generations of it and

1:49:25.960 --> 1:49:31.120
<v Speaker 2>two passes through the console that said today, you know,

1:49:31.880 --> 1:49:35.200
<v Speaker 2>digital is a thing. And it started obviously with artists

1:49:35.800 --> 1:49:38.639
<v Speaker 2>wanting something to sell, primarily I think, you know, I mean,

1:49:38.760 --> 1:49:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember when it was gaining traction. I haven't heard recently,

1:49:42.280 --> 1:49:45.439
<v Speaker 2>but you know, it was like in the beginning they

1:49:45.479 --> 1:49:48.120
<v Speaker 2>were saying that, you know, seventy five percent. I'm sure

1:49:48.120 --> 1:49:51.720
<v Speaker 2>it's gone down some seventy five percent of the albums

1:49:51.760 --> 1:49:55.400
<v Speaker 2>sold at least, especially at gigs. It's just for the

1:49:56.520 --> 1:49:58.519
<v Speaker 2>memory thing. And you know they're never put on a

1:49:58.560 --> 1:50:02.880
<v Speaker 2>turntable and listen to I know that turntables are on

1:50:02.920 --> 1:50:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the rise. I know that more people are doing it now.

1:50:07.200 --> 1:50:12.400
<v Speaker 2>To your question about does it make sense, well, no,

1:50:13.479 --> 1:50:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the way you're asking it, absolutely not. When you can

1:50:17.080 --> 1:50:20.479
<v Speaker 2>hear okay, when you can hear something full range. As

1:50:20.520 --> 1:50:23.519
<v Speaker 2>I said in the beginning of the interview, sixteen forty

1:50:23.520 --> 1:50:26.760
<v Speaker 2>four to one, which is CD equality never sounded good

1:50:26.800 --> 1:50:30.360
<v Speaker 2>to me in nineteen eighty two and still doesn't in

1:50:30.400 --> 1:50:34.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, and it never is going to. So

1:50:35.800 --> 1:50:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the deal is, though today now we can record much

1:50:39.000 --> 1:50:42.479
<v Speaker 2>higher as in ninety six or even one ninety two,

1:50:43.160 --> 1:50:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And when you get up and with those and thirty

1:50:45.800 --> 1:50:51.760
<v Speaker 2>two bits floating as opposed to sixteen bits, when you

1:50:51.800 --> 1:50:55.879
<v Speaker 2>get up there, you're talking about a really with great converter,

1:50:56.400 --> 1:51:03.200
<v Speaker 2>outstanding mirror of what's coming through this class. So you know,

1:51:03.680 --> 1:51:08.040
<v Speaker 2>there's there's very little reason to put it on disc.

1:51:08.320 --> 1:51:10.519
<v Speaker 2>To me, if you can hear it in those now

1:51:10.720 --> 1:51:17.040
<v Speaker 2>hear it in those operatues. But unfortunately most people, you know,

1:51:17.720 --> 1:51:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you most people still don't even record

1:51:19.920 --> 1:51:22.479
<v Speaker 2>it ninety six. They still record it forty eight, which

1:51:22.520 --> 1:51:25.479
<v Speaker 2>is only a NAT's better than forty four to one.

1:51:26.120 --> 1:51:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand it. Discs are cheap, you know. It

1:51:29.439 --> 1:51:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was one thing in nineteen eighty five, when you know

1:51:32.360 --> 1:51:36.240
<v Speaker 2>it costs a fortune to put the the bits on

1:51:36.320 --> 1:51:39.599
<v Speaker 2>a computer, you know, on a hard drive. But today

1:51:39.840 --> 1:51:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you buy a solid state drive with a lifetime supply

1:51:43.200 --> 1:51:47.880
<v Speaker 2>for a few hundred dollars, and what the heck? You know,

1:51:47.920 --> 1:51:53.000
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, why not record higher? I don't get it,

1:51:53.600 --> 1:51:57.479
<v Speaker 2>but so and yes, if you can get it that

1:51:57.560 --> 1:52:00.880
<v Speaker 2>way and then stream it, yeah, you get on title

1:52:01.280 --> 1:52:06.200
<v Speaker 2>you know or co buzz. It sounds quite good. Nothing

1:52:06.240 --> 1:52:10.960
<v Speaker 2>like a CD plus plus one last thing plus plus.

1:52:11.040 --> 1:52:14.400
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is with the CD. The other thing

1:52:14.439 --> 1:52:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that hurt the CD was the fact that we got

1:52:18.400 --> 1:52:22.080
<v Speaker 2>into level wars. Now we've always had level wars. We

1:52:22.160 --> 1:52:25.680
<v Speaker 2>had Level Wars in the fifties with forty fives, in

1:52:25.720 --> 1:52:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the sixties with forty fives. My take on it was

1:52:29.720 --> 1:52:34.439
<v Speaker 2>everyone wanted a hot record. Why so, you know, when

1:52:34.479 --> 1:52:37.000
<v Speaker 2>it played on the radio. You know, it would try

1:52:37.040 --> 1:52:39.840
<v Speaker 2>to get through all the compression and jump a little bit.

1:52:40.360 --> 1:52:42.479
<v Speaker 2>And I used to always say, you know, the guys,

1:52:42.680 --> 1:52:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the promotion guys would go into a local, smaller radio

1:52:46.040 --> 1:52:48.400
<v Speaker 2>station where they're trying to get you know, they were

1:52:48.400 --> 1:52:51.240
<v Speaker 2>going around the country doing this in smaller markets, not

1:52:51.320 --> 1:52:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the big ones, and like Nashville for instance, And you

1:52:55.200 --> 1:52:57.519
<v Speaker 2>know the DJ. They going to see the DJ. He's

1:52:57.520 --> 1:52:59.640
<v Speaker 2>on the air and he's got two turntables and he

1:52:59.680 --> 1:53:01.400
<v Speaker 2>puts on the next single and here's the new one

1:53:01.439 --> 1:53:03.720
<v Speaker 2>from so and so and plays it out to go.

1:53:04.080 --> 1:53:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Then he turns the speakers in the control room off

1:53:06.080 --> 1:53:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and says, what do you got, Oh, this is a

1:53:07.840 --> 1:53:09.960
<v Speaker 2>new single from this listen to it. And he puts

1:53:09.960 --> 1:53:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it on and he's just heard the other single and

1:53:13.000 --> 1:53:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it's not loud. This isn't as loud, it doesn't jump

1:53:15.080 --> 1:53:17.280
<v Speaker 2>out of the speakers. Promotion guy goes back to the

1:53:17.280 --> 1:53:19.240
<v Speaker 2>record company and says, you've got to get it hotter.

1:53:19.320 --> 1:53:21.800
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be hotter. It's not hot enough. So

1:53:21.960 --> 1:53:24.040
<v Speaker 2>we've always had level wars, but when we got into

1:53:24.080 --> 1:53:29.720
<v Speaker 2>the you can only go so far without insane distortion. Well, unfortunately,

1:53:30.760 --> 1:53:34.720
<v Speaker 2>in digital land, you can you can go crazy without

1:53:35.040 --> 1:53:37.559
<v Speaker 2>the same kind of distortion, a different kind of distortion.

1:53:38.080 --> 1:53:42.439
<v Speaker 2>So CDs, because you know, we finally got a medium

1:53:42.640 --> 1:53:46.959
<v Speaker 2>that had one hundred and ten dB level of dynamic

1:53:47.080 --> 1:53:50.000
<v Speaker 2>level and we use the top all but the top

1:53:50.040 --> 1:53:54.040
<v Speaker 2>five to eight percent. It absolutely is stupid, but that's

1:53:54.080 --> 1:53:56.200
<v Speaker 2>how it was, So that's what you were comparing to.

1:53:56.360 --> 1:53:59.479
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, if you get on those streamings, those two

1:53:59.520 --> 1:54:03.200
<v Speaker 2>streamings services, I'm not familiar with Apple what their's was light,

1:54:03.360 --> 1:54:07.040
<v Speaker 2>but where they're actually doing ninety six k's In addition

1:54:07.200 --> 1:54:11.880
<v Speaker 2>to them being higher quality because of being that high,

1:54:12.000 --> 1:54:14.559
<v Speaker 2>they're also not compressed to living death the way the

1:54:14.560 --> 1:54:15.200
<v Speaker 2>CDs were.

1:54:16.600 --> 1:54:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, in terms of yourself monitoring, one thing we know

1:54:22.000 --> 1:54:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is every speaker sounds different. How important were the speakers

1:54:26.920 --> 1:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to you and what do you listen to on playback?

1:54:34.160 --> 1:54:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Well speakers are I'd like to say they're very important.

1:54:39.600 --> 1:54:43.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I started through the seventies, before I

1:54:43.120 --> 1:54:46.680
<v Speaker 2>built my studio, I worked in lots of different studios

1:54:46.800 --> 1:54:52.440
<v Speaker 2>and Doug Sachs, my mastering engineer, said you must mix

1:54:52.520 --> 1:54:54.240
<v Speaker 2>by the meters because I don't know how you can

1:54:54.320 --> 1:54:57.720
<v Speaker 2>relate to these different studios, especially back then when some

1:54:57.760 --> 1:55:04.200
<v Speaker 2>of them just had horrific monitoring, terrible monitoring. But speakers

1:55:04.200 --> 1:55:07.640
<v Speaker 2>are definitely very important, and it's how you relate to

1:55:07.720 --> 1:55:11.360
<v Speaker 2>a speaker. It's one of the most important things. Because

1:55:11.840 --> 1:55:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I've heard good engineers that work with speakers that I

1:55:14.680 --> 1:55:18.440
<v Speaker 2>could never mix on or wouldn't want to. Maybe I

1:55:18.480 --> 1:55:21.720
<v Speaker 2>could would have to. I don't know, and I don't understand,

1:55:21.800 --> 1:55:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and they come out with good mixes everywhere. And that's

1:55:24.920 --> 1:55:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the key, is that you want you want to mix.

1:55:27.720 --> 1:55:31.480
<v Speaker 2>In my early days with Doug, I literally would go

1:55:31.520 --> 1:55:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to hi fi stores where you could go in and

1:55:34.720 --> 1:55:37.400
<v Speaker 2>play something and they had push buttons you may remember that,

1:55:37.400 --> 1:55:40.040
<v Speaker 2>where you could go in and go from this speaker

1:55:40.080 --> 1:55:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to that speaker to this speaker. And it was always

1:55:42.800 --> 1:55:44.560
<v Speaker 2>great to see if all of them were in phase,

1:55:44.960 --> 1:55:47.040
<v Speaker 2>because sometimes one of them here they are trying to

1:55:47.040 --> 1:55:49.800
<v Speaker 2>sell their equipment and the speakers are out of phase.

1:55:49.800 --> 1:55:53.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just a wonderful thing. But I digress anyway, and

1:55:54.200 --> 1:55:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that was very helpful in the beginning to see you

1:55:58.320 --> 1:56:01.200
<v Speaker 2>can't go crazy with that because it'll literally drive you crazy.

1:56:01.480 --> 1:56:04.720
<v Speaker 2>The fact that some speakers could be so incredibly different,

1:56:05.000 --> 1:56:07.280
<v Speaker 2>let alone what room they're in and all of that.

1:56:08.280 --> 1:56:13.920
<v Speaker 2>For me personally, I used Richie Podler monitored on one

1:56:15.720 --> 1:56:19.200
<v Speaker 2>six inch speaker, even in this when we went to stereo,

1:56:20.200 --> 1:56:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and I remember him asking him about that, and he said,

1:56:24.600 --> 1:56:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I mix on one speaker because I want to know

1:56:27.200 --> 1:56:29.600
<v Speaker 2>what it's going to sound like on the radio. And

1:56:29.680 --> 1:56:31.440
<v Speaker 2>he said, if it didn't sound good on the radio,

1:56:31.760 --> 1:56:33.520
<v Speaker 2>no one's going to buy it, so it doesn't matter

1:56:33.520 --> 1:56:37.000
<v Speaker 2>how it sounds anywhere else. And I can't say that

1:56:37.040 --> 1:56:39.760
<v Speaker 2>he was wrong back then. So I started off on

1:56:39.840 --> 1:56:43.480
<v Speaker 2>small speakers before small speakers were a thing. And then

1:56:43.520 --> 1:56:45.640
<v Speaker 2>when most people went to small speakers, there were these

1:56:45.640 --> 1:56:49.480
<v Speaker 2>little teeny cubes. What is that three inch or something

1:56:51.120 --> 1:56:55.720
<v Speaker 2>to it? To that, and you know, I never could

1:56:55.840 --> 1:56:58.760
<v Speaker 2>begin to relate to those because I couldn't hear enough,

1:56:58.840 --> 1:57:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, And it's what's real. I don't know. In fact,

1:57:01.560 --> 1:57:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I remember the greatest thing happened when we when we

1:57:04.160 --> 1:57:07.440
<v Speaker 2>found an AM transmitter where you could put it in

1:57:07.480 --> 1:57:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the studio, park your cars parked in the parking lot.

1:57:10.320 --> 1:57:12.680
<v Speaker 2>The transmitter wouldn't go very far, but it would go

1:57:12.720 --> 1:57:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to the parking lot and you could go out on

1:57:14.640 --> 1:57:18.560
<v Speaker 2>an unused frequency and hear what it sounded like in

1:57:18.600 --> 1:57:22.680
<v Speaker 2>your car, because cars were always important, because that's by

1:57:22.720 --> 1:57:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and large where people heard still is and today it's

1:57:26.320 --> 1:57:29.280
<v Speaker 2>clearly most people don't have a good stereo system. They

1:57:29.320 --> 1:57:32.640
<v Speaker 2>have their cars and that's what goes on. But for

1:57:32.720 --> 1:57:38.000
<v Speaker 2>me personally, I ended up with a Tannoy speaker that

1:57:38.400 --> 1:57:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was given to me by Tannoy. When I listened to it,

1:57:41.560 --> 1:57:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I liked it better than their previous model, which I

1:57:43.720 --> 1:57:46.520
<v Speaker 2>never liked. But I thought the crossover wasn't good, and

1:57:46.560 --> 1:57:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I gave it to Doug Sachs's acoustical I mean not

1:57:50.960 --> 1:57:54.120
<v Speaker 2>electrical engineer to work on a crossover, and he and

1:57:54.200 --> 1:57:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Doug came up with what they called the Mastering Lab

1:57:56.760 --> 1:58:00.720
<v Speaker 2>crossover and had a little made, a little cartage industry

1:58:00.760 --> 1:58:04.320
<v Speaker 2>out of it. And so I've been on those ever

1:58:04.360 --> 1:58:07.480
<v Speaker 2>since twenty something years. It's a ten inch coax.

1:58:08.600 --> 1:58:12.839
<v Speaker 1>In your book, you stress that it's about the music

1:58:13.320 --> 1:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the sound. Can you give us some

1:58:16.680 --> 1:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>practical applications where you have to make that decision?

1:58:22.600 --> 1:58:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I remember having a tough decision early on when

1:58:28.840 --> 1:58:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I was you know, oftentimes, if you have a really

1:58:33.040 --> 1:58:37.000
<v Speaker 2>good band, and I'm talking studio musicians or people that

1:58:37.120 --> 1:58:40.440
<v Speaker 2>haven't lived with the music. Obviously, bands will rehearse when

1:58:40.440 --> 1:58:42.320
<v Speaker 2>they come in and put down how they've been rehearsing it.

1:58:42.360 --> 1:58:44.640
<v Speaker 2>But when you've got guys that are hearing the music

1:58:44.720 --> 1:58:52.000
<v Speaker 2>basically for the first time and whatnot, quite often, quite

1:58:52.000 --> 1:58:55.320
<v Speaker 2>often you may get an incredible take on the very

1:58:55.320 --> 1:58:58.960
<v Speaker 2>first take. Not a lot, I shouldn't say quite often,

1:58:59.680 --> 1:59:04.520
<v Speaker 2>but it can't happen. And I remember a tracking date

1:59:04.840 --> 1:59:10.400
<v Speaker 2>where the first take felt great and I didn't have

1:59:10.480 --> 1:59:14.960
<v Speaker 2>it quite together because, for instance, you know, when you

1:59:14.960 --> 1:59:17.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about getting drum sounds, you can get it, you

1:59:17.480 --> 1:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>can work. That's another thing about why it's so weird

1:59:21.360 --> 1:59:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to me to spend you know, two days a week

1:59:24.120 --> 1:59:27.400
<v Speaker 2>whatever on a drum sound, because all that matters is

1:59:27.440 --> 1:59:30.200
<v Speaker 2>what the sound when the guy's playing the song. And

1:59:30.320 --> 1:59:33.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm I'm okay on the drums. I mean,

1:59:33.160 --> 1:59:35.520
<v Speaker 2>it's not my main instrument, but I can I'm doing

1:59:35.560 --> 1:59:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I do okay. And I remember helping someone. Someone said,

1:59:38.840 --> 1:59:40.680
<v Speaker 2>do you help me get a drum sound before the

1:59:40.800 --> 1:59:43.280
<v Speaker 2>guy's the drum drummer gets here, And I went out

1:59:43.280 --> 1:59:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and played for him. He got it. And then when

1:59:44.960 --> 1:59:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the real heat and it sounded really good. The drum

1:59:47.120 --> 1:59:48.880
<v Speaker 2>sound was great. When the guy got there, he said,

1:59:48.880 --> 1:59:51.560
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't believe it. It sounded totally different. I said, oh yeah,

1:59:51.560 --> 1:59:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I'd believe it. And I've had it where I had

1:59:53.880 --> 1:59:57.120
<v Speaker 2>a one professional drummer, Oh my gosh. Jeff Pacara was

1:59:57.160 --> 2:00:00.440
<v Speaker 2>on a session Boss session I was producing, and Steve

2:00:00.520 --> 2:00:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Jordan was in town, the great drummer, Steve Jordan's, and

2:00:04.200 --> 2:00:07.000
<v Speaker 2>he came in and Jeff, who was always looking to

2:00:07.040 --> 2:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>give anyone and everyone a break, he said, he said,

2:00:10.640 --> 2:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>let Steve try a take, really, And I thought we

2:00:13.320 --> 2:00:16.600
<v Speaker 2>were so close to getting the take really yeah, okay,

2:00:16.760 --> 2:00:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And I knew why. Main reason was because Steve l

2:00:18.960 --> 2:00:21.800
<v Speaker 2>liked that real pinky sound. So he goes out and

2:00:21.880 --> 2:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>destroys the tuning of Jeff's drum to get it up

2:00:24.760 --> 2:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>high pink, and and he tried a couple of takes,

2:00:28.520 --> 2:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and the drum sound was not just the snare, but everything,

2:00:32.240 --> 2:00:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the kick, even the symbols. You know, it's all about

2:00:35.200 --> 2:00:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the dynamics of the four appendages of a drummer. And

2:00:38.880 --> 2:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you know how they're their ears are, you know, are

2:00:42.840 --> 2:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>telling the I guess we'll consider the ears as left

2:00:46.880 --> 2:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>brain how the ears and the left brain are telling

2:00:49.320 --> 2:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the appendages and the and the right. No, the appendages

2:00:52.440 --> 2:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>will be left too, I don't know. Anyway, they're going

2:00:54.800 --> 2:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to tell them how to play what that they think

2:00:57.320 --> 2:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>feels good, and another drummer comes in and it's totally different.

2:01:01.000 --> 2:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>What can you do.

2:01:02.680 --> 2:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, Bill? This has been great. I have a million

2:01:05.040 --> 2:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>more questions, a lot of them technical questions about boards, eques, whatever,

2:01:09.920 --> 2:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to leave it here for now. I

2:01:12.360 --> 2:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you so much for taking this time

2:01:14.600 --> 2:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>with my audience. Oh it's my my pleasure. Until next time.

2:01:20.400 --> 2:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bob left Sex