WEBVTT - WTF Happened To Actress Tara Reid?

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that folks, it is Wednesday, November twenty sixth. What

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the actual hell is going on with Tara Reid? Welcome

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to this episode of Amy and TJ. There's so many

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>ways to try to say what is going on with her?

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>We have to start with the possibility that she is

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the victim of a crime, right, Shall we start with that?

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because authorities did confirm late yesterday that Tara Reid

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>has filed a police report regarding an incident she says

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>she suffered over the weekend in Chicago, and they confirmed

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that they are investigating.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that is one hundred percent and all of

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that is legit. Now we hear that, and we hear

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>those details. That is a real story about a real

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>potential crime. The reasons questions are being asked, Robes is

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>because the details you just gave of our company by

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>some pretty damning, damaging videos.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Correct. So we'll start with what terror Reid says happened.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>She was in Chicago. She was there, I believe she was.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what she was signing, but she was

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>in some sort of signing ceremony for an appearance at

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the Chicago Sports Spectacular event. So she was there and

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>she says she went down to the hotel bar around

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>ten thirty pm on Saturday night, and she says she

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>woke up eight hours later in the hospital. But there

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of eyewitness reports and there is a

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of bystander video, and soon we will most likely

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>have or at least the hotel and police will be

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>able to review surveillance video on top of that. But

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 2>she believes that she was drugged. She believes that someone

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>slipped some sort of foreign substance in her drink. When

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>she took a break, she said she had only had

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 2>one glass of wine. She said she met somebody at

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the bar. They kind of hit it off, and they

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>decided to go smoke a cigarette. So she said she

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 2>left her drink unattended at the bar, and when she

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>came back from the smoke break, there was a napkin

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>over it, which she did not put on it, and

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 2>she says that because I guess she feels like that

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>was suspicious. But then she took the napkin off and

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>finished her one glass of wine. That's all she says

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 2>she had that evening.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that's the story that she tells. The story

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that we see that doesn't match the story she tells,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is the part about her just having one glass of wine.

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>What we see of the person in the video, That

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>person did not just have one glass of wine. They

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>either had many mini glasses of wine or hey had

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>ingested a drug. That person was not okay correct.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>So either someone slipped something to her, or she's not

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>telling the truth about how much alcohol she consumed, or

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 2>she could have been on something else. Who knows. I mean,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know certain even if it was a verifiable

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>prescription drug, sometimes they don't mix well with even a

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>glass of wine. Or maybe there was some marijuana, like

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>who knows. Only Tara Reid actually knows. But she is

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>claiming she is the victim of a crime. She actually

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>went so far as to say, thank god it happened

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>in a public space and I wasn't raped, because she

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>really feels like she was she was targeted. And she

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that in this hotel lobby there were YouTubers that

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>were recording things, and she said when she came up

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>to the bar, she already had a weird energy or

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>felt like things were off a bit, and so she

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't directly point the finger at these YouTubers, but she

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>suggested that perhaps the she was implying that perhaps someone

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>slipped something her drink so that they could take videos

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of her and upload it to YouTube.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so the video we see rooms the h I

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the full video we both seen.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 2>We have seen it.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>That's out there. It starts out. It appears she's sitting

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in maybe a couch like a lounge Aerreya. I didn't

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>see a bar in the video.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>At that point. I think she was already so in

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>such bad shape that they were trying to First they

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 2>were trying to get her just back up to her room,

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I believe, but then they ended up having to call paramedics.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 1>So this is where the video picks up. I'm seeing

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>this lounge area, yes, and they're trying to get her

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in a wheelchair wheelchair to the point I think two

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>security guys. They're getting frustrated, one in particular because Tara

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Reid and is this the guy she met? Because there

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was some guy trying to help her.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I believe. I mean it seems as though because she

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.679
<v Speaker 2>said she got chummy with this guy and they exchanged

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 2>numbers and so he there you do see this man

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>who's not a security guard or not a paramedic or

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>AMT worker trying to help her get into this chair.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So there was a little back and forth between that guy,

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that stranger and the security guy who gets frustrated and

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>annoyed with him and say, hey, we're gonna have a

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>problem if you touch me again. So it was a

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of a tense and frustrating at least moment for

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the security guys. They I mean, she just wouldn't sit up.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't get her to sit in the chair to

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>where she almost just kept her body as a plank

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>or she kept sliding out of it as they tried

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to wheel her across the lobby.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And she was yelling, yelling, but she was speaking loudly

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and she was slurring her words, and one of the

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>bystanders said, she was saying, you don't know who I am.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm famous, I'm an actress. So it's hard. You know,

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what a drug slipped into your drink

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>would would, what the impact or what the effect it

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 2>would be on you. But it did. Like if you

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 2>were just looking at this video, you would just think, Wow,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>girl had way too much to drink. And we've all

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>seen people like this at the bar, like it's sadly

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>a common scene at one o'clock in the morning at

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a hotel lobby on a Saturday night. That is what

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this was.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>She also said again, that's what we wrecked. Now, we

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure we are not suggesting this. We're

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>taking her at every bit of her word. But if

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you are looking at the video and we hadn't told

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you the backstory, you would just say, wow, that person's

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>wasted exactly exactly.

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So she claims her timeline is a little off. So

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 2>she actually when she got back, first of all, she

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 2>did file the police report, and we'll get into what

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 2>police had to say about all of this in just

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a moment. But she decided to go on to TMZ

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and talk to Harvey Levin, and she actually gave a

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>very specific timeline, saying she went down to the bar

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>around ten thirty, and she says she was in the

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 2>hospital by midnight. That timeline is already off because you

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 2>can actually see the timing of the videos. She was

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>being loaded into an ambulance right around on one am,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 2>So there's an hour and a half discrepancy about so

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 2>one glass of wine. She needs it to be a

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>short timeline to fit that narrative if she just had

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>one glass of wine.

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh so wait a minute, so the timing is off.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll help me with that math again. So she appears

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>she's she was there longer. Yeah, she thought, that's what.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's where it's a little confusing, because it was

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 2>ten thirty when she went down there, and she's and

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>then she said she did take a smoke break. You

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 2>know how long was the smoke break? I don't know.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>She went outside with this man.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Where are we getting the ten thirty?

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>That is where she she said, I went down to

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the bar at ten thirty pm. But we don't know

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>what she was doing beforehand. We don't know where she

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>was beforehand. We don't know if she was drinking anything

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>or eating anything. We don't know anything leading up to

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>when she came down to the bar at ten thirty.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>And so yes, this is it is questionable. And you

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>could see the skepticism from Harvey Levin because he really

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>got specific and asked her a lot of questions. And

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>he asked her, Okay, so what did they say at

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the hospital. You went to the hospital, what happened? Obviously,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>you go in in a state like that, you would presume,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I would assume that you'd have. He asked her, did

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>they test your blood alcohol level? She said, I don't know.

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>He said, did they test you for any unknown substance?

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. But then she said they told me

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>I was drugged. Yes, and so he was. So the

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>obvious follow up is, okay, so the hospital, doctors, nurses, whomever,

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>someone at the hospital told you you were drugged. What

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>drug did they say you had in your system?

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Did she use the word vague?

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 2>She did. She said they were vague with her, and

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>he said, well, what happened? And she's like, I didn't ask.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>And that is where you lose me. If you are

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>waking up in a hospital disoriented, you don't know how

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 2>you got there. The last thing you remember is having

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>one glass of wine. You wake up and that someone

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 2>tells me I've been drugged. The first question out of

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 2>my mind is what did I get drugged with? What

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>is in my system? What did you find? And we

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>also know it takes a while sometimes for toxicology reports

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to come back blood alcohol. I don't know how quickly

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 2>they can come up with that, but I think pretty quickly.

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a cop can figure it out.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 2>On the street with the breathalyzer. Yes, but like if

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>they're taking a blood alcohol test, maybe it takes a

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>day or two. But the point being is she was

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>in the hospital. This is going to be documented. I

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 2>would imagine that they would have taken a vial of

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>blood or something to test her, would you not.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But she went to the hospital. Yeah, we saw her

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>wheeled out. Yeah.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she was in a stretcher because first they tried

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the wheelchair. That didn't work so well, so they had

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to go and actually literally strap her into a stretcher

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>because she was flailing. She was she was she didn't

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of strength in her to fight, but

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 2>she was resisting being put into the wheelchair and resisting

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 2>getting onto that stretcher and being loaded into that ambulance.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So this this is a tough one because she is

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 2>absolutely pointing the finger at someone else doing her wrong.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>And she has said that all she did was have

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>one glass of wine.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and everything she says might be true. I think

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>if she had another, like a prescription drug in her

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>system and this happened, I think she would let us

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>know and explain that. Again, it's a mystery. Is this

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a danger? Did someone out there actually try to drug Terry.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That is a big deal. It is who who is

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy? I mean, that's the only suspect that is possible.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, I'm using the word suspect. I want to

0:10:59.360 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>be clear here.

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>But he was with her. See that's the thing. The

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>guy who the guy who you see in the video,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 2>that guy actually went out with her to smoke. So

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 2>she's saying someone who was there at the bar while

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 2>she was gone and left her drink, that someone while

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>she was out with this guy smoking must have put

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>something in her glass. And yes, she actually specifically said

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>because you asked about the vague, she specifically said that

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>they were vague when she asked. So that doesn't also

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of sense. I don't. I can't imagine

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 2>a nurse or a doctor being vague about what they

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>found is wrong with you. That doesn't make any.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Sense to me. And this was about a five minute

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>or so interview that they posted it. It's worth a

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>watch if you do get a chance. But robe, they

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>can solve this crime pretty quickly, this potential crime pretty quickly.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a camera all over the place in any hotel,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lobby and bar, and you don't you think the Double

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Tree and their corporate office demanded to see that video

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>immediately so they can come out and say, Hey, there

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was nobody running around our hotel drugging our guests.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>That's the last kind of pr that hotel wants to

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 2>have something happened like that to someone with a name

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>like Tara Reid, as famous as she is, to have

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>some criminal act happened to her under their watch, at

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 2>their bar, at their hotel. So yes, they will have

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 2>every incentive to fully investigate this. And when we come back,

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 2>we're going to tell you what police had to say.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll tell you what now Tara Reid's own spokesperson has

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 2>to say. And of course we have to point out

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the fact that this is a young lady who has

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>had substance abuse issues and has struggled with sobriety in

0:12:51.000 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 2>the past. Continuing our conversation about what happened, what may

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>have happened in that hotel lobby in a Chicago airport hotel,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the DoubleTree Hotel just outside of Chicago near O'Hare, where

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Tara Reid says she was drugged. She says someone put

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>something in her drink that led to this video that

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>is now everywhere. It's a tough video to watch. I

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>can't imagine. I was thinking if I were her and

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the next day and you see, I mean it's it's

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean it it is. I don't even want to

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 2>say humiliating, but it is like she was not in

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>control of her body. She was not in control of

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>her mind or her words or any that. She was

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>completely out of it. And she says it isn't her fault.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>She had one glass of wine. This had nothing to

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 2>do with anything she did wrong, but it should be

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 2>noted in two thousand and eight, cause I had to

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>go back and look, I couldn't remember. I remember she

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 2>had some stuff, sense abuse issues, but she reportedly got sober.

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 2>She spent a ninety day she had a ninety day

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 2>rehab stant in Malibu, And there's a quote from her

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and nine saying, rehab saved my life.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Before I used to think about tomorrow and I hated it.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Now I can't wait because I am clean and sober,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>and I am excited. And look, I don't know what

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 2>anyone's individual path to or through sobriety means. Does that

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>mean that you can have a glass of wine every

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>now and then. I don't know. Everyone has different ways

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>of addressing what sobriety means. Harvey Levin even asked her like,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>have you been California sober? Meaning do you take marijuana products?

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe and not drink so much. He was just trying

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 2>to feel her out, because it did seem as though,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 2>even in the interview that maybe she was. She didn't

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 2>come off as somebody who was fully in control of

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>her faculties. And maybe she's dealing with the aftermath of

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>everything she's been through and she's been traumatized, as her

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>spokesperson said, so, but if you watch the interview, this

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like a young woman who is sharp and rested,

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's questionable, I guess, just in terms of her

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>demeanor and her speech seemed a little off.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember, I can't remember how long after the

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.359
<v Speaker 1>incident was the interview.

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So this happened Saturday night, she was in the hospital.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>On Sunday, she actually went on and did this signing,

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the signing ceremony or whatever she was doing. Her agent

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 2>came and got her from the hospital, and she says

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>they went to the event that she had agreed to

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>do that she was employed to do and then went

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>home on Sunday. She talked to Harvey the next day.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it was within less than forty eight hours.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>O who no, I thought she was feeling So it could.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Like, yes, it absolutely, but this is not when you

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>see the interview, it's a little concerning.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The part the thing about the Mexican woman in the hospital.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>We did mention it go well. She said, as she

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>was describing basically how disoriented she was in the hospital,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 2>she said she didn't know where she was, and she

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>said there was a woman, oh ye who was over

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>her or looking over her in the room, and she

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>was Mexican and she wasn't speaking English. And she said,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 2>at one point I thought I was in Mexico. She

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>was saying that, I think to say, see, I was

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 2>completely in an altered state, but it ended up coming

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>off a little differently. So she was trying to explain

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>how out of it she was. So here is what

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>police have had to say, and this is I guess

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the area. I'm not as familiar with Chicago suburbs, but

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the Rosemont area. So the Rosemont Public Safety Department understands

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the severity of the allegations being reported and are committed

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>to investigating this incident fully. At this point, we are

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 2>in communication with the hotel to gather as much video

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>surveillance as possible. As this incident has just been reported

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>and is still open, no further information is available at

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>this time. And you said this right away. They have

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>so many cameras. If anyone put anything in her drink,

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>it will be you will see it.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>There is a camera on that drink from the time

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>she receives it until she gets in a ambulance. Absolutely so,

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess she don't suggest maybe the bartender

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>put something in her drink. I've been sure they got

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>an eye on the bartender as well. They should be

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>able to wrap this up pretty quickly.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 2>That in addition to whatever the hospital tests would show.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm again, I mean, I don't know again

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>as a standard operating procedure, but I would think it

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 2>would be someone comes in in that state, you have

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 2>to make sure they're okay, you have to make sure

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a life threatening substance in them. You

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 2>have to do some sort of test to say, what

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>is this poor girl dealing with?

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Okay, I don't know, but she told us that

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they did.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they were vague about what it was that

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 2>they told her she was drug So look, now you've

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 2>got hospital tests that we will or at least police

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>will be received. I don't think we will. There's some

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>privacy issues there, but police will know.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Can they get that? Well, this is a crime, and.

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>She reported it and she's asked for it to be investigated.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 2>So that is happening. And her spokesperson said this, and

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 2>this I believe was after she was on TMZ. She

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 2>as in Tara is cooperating fully with the investigation. Tara

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>is recovering and asks for privacy during this traumatic time.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>She also urges everyone to be careful, watch your drinks

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and never leave them unattended unattended, as this can happen

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to anyone.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>She's standing by that story, I mean, but right now

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>she's putting it out there as a belief MM because

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.239
<v Speaker 1>she has no evidence of what she's saying, and she

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to prove anything to us. If that's what

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>she believes, that's fine. But when you follow a police report,

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>now you have to produce.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Evidence, and it's a crime to file a false police report.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So now she has to This is a just thing.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>We could just let it go if she was just

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>doing this and didn't get police involved. Now it's a Syria,

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a criminal matter.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Correct, And you know, when she was talking to TMZ,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 2>they asked her if she had filed a police report,

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and at that point she was like, well, I think

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to, and then she did. So it is

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 2>official and the investigation is ongoing, and we will be

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 2>sure to follow this story and let you know what develops.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>But we're glad she's okay. We hope she's doing better.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 2>We hope that she, if anything, doesn't leave for drink unattended.

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>That's something that I told my daughters from the moment

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 2>they started going out when I wasn't with them. Always

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>always keep your drink with you.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't. This is crazy. My mother taught me

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this about my milk carton in elementary school. If you

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>ever walk away from it or turn your back on

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it and do not drink it, she.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Told me, that's amazing. Again, we're not just talking about

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>alcoholic beverages. You're talking so to coffee whatever.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But for women going out like that, that.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Is a like I have chills just thinking about it.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 2>That is a like that is it? You never you

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 2>always have a wing woman, you never go home alone,

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>you never walk alone, and you always keep your drink

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So, if nothing else, maybe this is a moment of

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a reminder around the holidays. If nothing else, this is

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>making that point. But yes, and the napkin was a peculiar,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>peculiar detail to me, that's something that a bartender would

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>do if you noticed somebody's drinks and think you're going to.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Come back, yeah, in a way. If that is the case,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>that would seem as though he was protecting her drink, yeah,

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 2>from any possible substance. So we shall see. But in

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, everyone, thank you for listening to us. We

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>always appreciate you. I'm Amy Roebuck alongside TJ. Holmes. We'll

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 2>talk to you soon. Two two