1 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane jay Ley. 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:27,159 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. We 5 00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:31,360 Speaker 1: begin our study with Jeffrey Rosenberg of Black Rock. Jeff, 6 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:36,120 Speaker 1: you know, well the squishiness of how we measure labor 7 00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:41,080 Speaker 1: dynamics in America. When you dive into this analysis for 8 00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:45,199 Speaker 1: your market analysis, what will you search for in this 9 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 1: shocking report. Well, it is a surprise, and certainly the 10 00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:51,839 Speaker 1: market was looking for much weaker numbers. And you know, 11 00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 1: we're all kind of diving into the details here, but 12 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:57,440 Speaker 1: the message just appears to be about the pace of 13 00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:01,920 Speaker 1: returning workers relative to the pay of additional layoffs. And 14 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:04,600 Speaker 1: that's a that's a that's a clear positive trend that 15 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 1: the opening up in the economy across the various states 16 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:12,839 Speaker 1: had been better than what everyone is expecting to see 17 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:15,000 Speaker 1: out of this report. The other thing that you're seeing 18 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 1: here is is the big distributional shift that we saw 19 00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:23,760 Speaker 1: in April, where we saw a kind of a surprising 20 00:01:23,880 --> 00:01:27,600 Speaker 1: or perverse increase in average hourly earnings. That's because you 21 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:33,199 Speaker 1: had the biggest impact from the lower worker wage coming out. 22 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:36,280 Speaker 1: You're seeing that reverse, and so that's another testament that 23 00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 1: people are getting back to work. People are returning to work, 24 00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:43,200 Speaker 1: and and the people who are harmed the most that 25 00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 1: really dragged down the overall payroll reports and and and 26 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:51,120 Speaker 1: perversely pushed up average hourly earnings. You're seeing that reverse 27 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:53,920 Speaker 1: as well. So this is clearly a good sign that 28 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 1: the market that kind of been telling you for a 29 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:57,720 Speaker 1: while that we're getting back to work. Well, there's no 30 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:00,040 Speaker 1: question the markets have been leading to this kind and 31 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:02,800 Speaker 1: a shock report. But when you look at the social 32 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 1: unrest in America, Jeff Rosenberg, is this a surprise in 33 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 1: a sense of labor stability for a small part of 34 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:17,760 Speaker 1: America that's employable versus everybody else? You mentioned distributions. What's 35 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:21,839 Speaker 1: the barbell of our labor economy right now? What we've 36 00:02:21,880 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 1: seen that for a while in terms of up until 37 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 1: the coronavirus crisis, this had been a labor market that 38 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 1: was benefiting the distributional aspects, meaning it was a very 39 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:35,960 Speaker 1: tight labor market. And so you saw the biggest gains 40 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:40,400 Speaker 1: coming from the lower end of the labor pool. All 41 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:44,840 Speaker 1: of that was turned upside down by the coronavirus crisis 42 00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:49,720 Speaker 1: in that it had a disproportional impact where you can't 43 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:53,920 Speaker 1: simply move the job online, when you can't move to 44 00:02:54,120 --> 00:02:59,919 Speaker 1: remote working. That's in many areas of service employment, retail employment, 45 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: things that you had to shut down for coronavirus had 46 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:07,320 Speaker 1: the biggest impact, and that that turned on its head 47 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:09,760 Speaker 1: what had been a very strong labor market. I think 48 00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 1: what we see coming out of this report is really, 49 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: you know, some signs that as we return, we might 50 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:21,399 Speaker 1: we're certainly going to ease the pressure relative to the 51 00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 1: extreme of no work at all. The question will remain 52 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 1: what comes back, How far back do we get and 53 00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,120 Speaker 1: how long has it taken. Despite the optimism of the 54 00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: markets and today, there's still the case here that we 55 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:40,560 Speaker 1: have had some permanent losses of employers, some permanent losses 56 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 1: that are not going to come back, and that will 57 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 1: that will be a little bit of a darker cloud today. 58 00:03:44,720 --> 00:03:47,440 Speaker 1: It'll probably be more of the optimism, but we've got 59 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:49,920 Speaker 1: to keep in mind here that that we did see 60 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 1: some real scarring. Jeff, I just want to sit on 61 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 1: this moment for a minute. This is absolutely stunning for 62 00:03:56,040 --> 00:04:00,360 Speaker 1: all the right reasons, A huge upside surprise that nobody 63 00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:04,520 Speaker 1: was anywhere near estimating in our survey. What's the risk 64 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 1: care now for you, Jeff, then that we extrapolate this out, 65 00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:12,040 Speaker 1: this improvement, this rate have changed too far, far too much. Well, 66 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:15,520 Speaker 1: you know, you know the risk is in my markets, 67 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:20,159 Speaker 1: in in the bond markets here were really at a 68 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 1: loss for how to think about what what are the 69 00:04:23,320 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 1: levels of yields? And and and the issue here on 70 00:04:26,839 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 1: the levels of yields is that it's really about the 71 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 1: FED saying supporting market functioning in space of an epic 72 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 1: increase in issuance. And so the supplied demand uncertainty, well, 73 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,160 Speaker 1: we have more certainty on the amount of supply that's coming, 74 00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 1: we have less certainty about how much the FED is 75 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:48,280 Speaker 1: going to be willing to support that. And so when 76 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:52,360 Speaker 1: you add to this kind of this momentum around growth 77 00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:58,040 Speaker 1: and increasing yields, it creates a huge uncertainty around the 78 00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:01,880 Speaker 1: shape of the curve, the pay yield curve steepening, What 79 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:04,680 Speaker 1: exactly is the yield curve shape that the FED is 80 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:06,680 Speaker 1: gonna want to see. We're gonna pivot that into that 81 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:09,479 Speaker 1: next week when we talk about the f m C meeting, 82 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 1: but the markets are really uh challenged to figure out 83 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:16,840 Speaker 1: what is the right level of yields because it's not 84 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:20,960 Speaker 1: driven solely by these economic fundamentals like the payroll report 85 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:24,599 Speaker 1: would have done in years gone on past, because we 86 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 1: have this historic well it's really analogous to World War 87 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: two history, but but relative to our modern experiences to 88 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 1: historic change in the Fed's operation with regards to well, 89 00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:39,479 Speaker 1: we're talking about which is yield curve controls and what 90 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:42,159 Speaker 1: are the levels around that? Jeff, we're speaking with Jeff 91 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:44,400 Speaker 1: Rozenberg of Black Rock, and I should just note right 92 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: now we are seeing futures rising substantially a new leg 93 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 1: higher with the SMPT future is now up one point 94 00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:56,359 Speaker 1: six percent. Longer dated yields also ripping higher off this report, 95 00:05:56,440 --> 00:06:00,799 Speaker 1: currently ten year yields at zero point nine three two percent. 96 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 1: So people are can question the accuracy of these numbers, 97 00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:06,680 Speaker 1: but what you're getting in markets is at first to 98 00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:10,159 Speaker 1: hesitance and then a pile on Jeff, as people expect 99 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:14,400 Speaker 1: this to portend good news. Can we just really go 100 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:17,440 Speaker 1: over the fact that this does not cohere with the 101 00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:20,839 Speaker 1: continuing claims and the jobless reports that we're getting out 102 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:24,400 Speaker 1: of state and federal agencies over the past few weeks. 103 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:28,719 Speaker 1: There is a skepticism that one has to have when 104 00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:31,760 Speaker 1: looking at these numbers. Can you explain that to us, Jeff, 105 00:06:31,800 --> 00:06:35,360 Speaker 1: how much confidence can we have that this accurately portrays 106 00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:38,240 Speaker 1: the picture on the ground. Well, first, one way to 107 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,480 Speaker 1: sort of ascertain the uncertainty is just look at the 108 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 1: spread of market expectations going going into the to the report, right, 109 00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 1: So nobody had it on the positive side, but even 110 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:53,360 Speaker 1: within the negative side, you had you know, minus two 111 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 1: and a half millions of minus eight and a half million. 112 00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:58,640 Speaker 1: I mean, we are in uncharted territory. So when you 113 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 1: look at kind of the traditional tools that we use 114 00:07:01,000 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 1: to predict you know, the plus or minus two hundred 115 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:07,120 Speaker 1: thousand in the payroll report, you know you can you 116 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 1: can map those pretty clearly to the high frequency data 117 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:13,559 Speaker 1: that you get ahead of the paywall report. In this case, 118 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:19,360 Speaker 1: we're really out of a toolkit to to to know 119 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:22,080 Speaker 1: how to do that forecast at all. And so it 120 00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:26,400 Speaker 1: is possible that the positive number here is reflecting some 121 00:07:26,560 --> 00:07:30,640 Speaker 1: things in terms of the data, the data calculation. I 122 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 1: don't have the response rate at least the April response 123 00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 1: rate had been in um in the historical averages, so 124 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:41,680 Speaker 1: that probably isn't isn't complained here, but it's we're we're 125 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 1: really just an uncharted territory for knowing how to address 126 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 1: these issues. And so what we're really capturing is the 127 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:51,480 Speaker 1: inability to forecast what returning to work and what the 128 00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 1: pace of returning to work is, and the distributional aspects 129 00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:57,920 Speaker 1: that we're talking about trying to aggregate up at one 130 00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:03,560 Speaker 1: number across states level impacts that are highly disparate, very 131 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 1: hard to to model that into forecast that. I think 132 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:09,040 Speaker 1: that that's what we're seeing here in terms of the 133 00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:12,440 Speaker 1: surprise relative to the economic forecast. This this is why 134 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:15,120 Speaker 1: we love to have Jeffrey Rosenberg on, folks. I can't 135 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:18,920 Speaker 1: convey to you the importance of the three sentences Jeffrey 136 00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:22,080 Speaker 1: Rosenberg just stated there. If you're joining us, uh, just 137 00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: now are simulcast worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Television, I'm Bloomberg Radio. 138 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:29,160 Speaker 1: We welcome all of you. I'm not going to give 139 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 1: you all of statistics because, as Jeff says, I don't 140 00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:34,640 Speaker 1: think the statistics here matter. All you need to know is, 141 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:39,599 Speaker 1: once again, the markets out front away from the gloom 142 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:43,400 Speaker 1: and these are shocking and difficult statistics, but nowhere near 143 00:08:43,480 --> 00:08:47,360 Speaker 1: the gloom that was expected before this report. Jeffrey, I 144 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:50,199 Speaker 1: want to go into your Carnegie Melon mathematics. There, you've 145 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:54,680 Speaker 1: used twice the word distributional. I totally agree with you 146 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 1: that good people, and I mean this folks, good people 147 00:08:59,240 --> 00:09:05,880 Speaker 1: are trying to take blended, broad below statistics and aggregate 148 00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:11,400 Speaker 1: them up to a single reportable unemployment rate. Jeff even 149 00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:15,160 Speaker 1: in good conditions, that's impossible. How impossible is that to 150 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:20,079 Speaker 1: do right now? Well, it's particularly challenged right now because 151 00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 1: you have the um a shock that is outside of 152 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:30,360 Speaker 1: anything we've seen. So remember how these forecast models are 153 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:35,160 Speaker 1: built there, they're built off of historical information. They're they're 154 00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:38,959 Speaker 1: built off of models that have some kind of intuition 155 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:43,600 Speaker 1: around how normal economic behaviors respond and and so you're 156 00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:46,640 Speaker 1: really cast a drift to try to try to do 157 00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 1: that forecast. You're trying to pull in high frequency data. 158 00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:57,120 Speaker 1: But again, because of the very specific, differentiated nature of 159 00:09:57,160 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 1: how we're reopening the economy, think about what this labor 160 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:04,000 Speaker 1: ward represents, right It's it's total non form payroll across 161 00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:07,559 Speaker 1: the entirety of the US yet look at the differences 162 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 1: and how states have reacted. So to really kind of 163 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:14,199 Speaker 1: build that model correctly, you'd have to have state level 164 00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:17,280 Speaker 1: models filled with state level data, and and that just 165 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:20,320 Speaker 1: doesn't exist yet. And that's part of the challenge and 166 00:10:20,400 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 1: part of the explanation I think, for for why you 167 00:10:22,679 --> 00:10:25,640 Speaker 1: had first such a wide band and how this numbers 168 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:28,959 Speaker 1: come outside even that very wide band. To the positive side, 169 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:31,599 Speaker 1: I'll tell you, folks, this is what Bloomberg Surveillance is 170 00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:35,600 Speaker 1: all about. To go from Randall Krassner to David blanche Flower, 171 00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:38,640 Speaker 1: Tom Porcelia thought was brilliant, and then just to get 172 00:10:38,720 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 1: lucky and have Jeff Rosenberg with us at this time 173 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:47,319 Speaker 1: to really explain the noise around this voluminous wall of statistics. 174 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,640 Speaker 1: It's going to be fascinating to see how this is 175 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:55,320 Speaker 1: vamped by the pro economists and by the political voices 176 00:10:55,880 --> 00:11:02,679 Speaker 1: in the coming hours. Most radian Tom Kanan what we're 177 00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:06,120 Speaker 1: gonna do here, because this is totally unfair to Tiffty Wilding, 178 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 1: She and every other frontline economists are going to go, folks, 179 00:11:10,440 --> 00:11:12,280 Speaker 1: and you know, the media and I'm as guilty of 180 00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:15,640 Speaker 1: this is anyone we signed like three statistics and if 181 00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:20,280 Speaker 1: we're sophisticated, Paul well side a fourth, they're looking at 182 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 1: like statistics trying to get a matrix of feeling for 183 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:27,280 Speaker 1: the American labor economy activity. And I really want to 184 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:29,440 Speaker 1: shout out to zero heads. You's got a great summary 185 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:33,720 Speaker 1: going on right now with the revisions job losses of 186 00:11:33,800 --> 00:11:38,040 Speaker 1: average six point five million per month over the past 187 00:11:38,280 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 1: three months. I mean, is this a point where you 188 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 1: take this monthly study and you smooth it out to 189 00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:49,280 Speaker 1: a moving average. Do you take it as a one 190 00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 1: off the discard or do you take it and climb 191 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:57,920 Speaker 1: on board optimism? Well, um, I mean I think you 192 00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:00,439 Speaker 1: have to look at this report as tell I knew 193 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:04,440 Speaker 1: that we could be you know, the probability that work. 194 00:12:04,679 --> 00:12:08,160 Speaker 1: You know, we're recovering faster than maybe many people expected. 195 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:11,440 Speaker 1: Um is maybe a higher probability than we saw before. 196 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:13,440 Speaker 1: You know. So I think that there's always been a 197 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 1: lot of caution around the things which people can you know, 198 00:12:16,600 --> 00:12:19,720 Speaker 1: the labor market can kind of efficiently reallocate once people 199 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:22,800 Speaker 1: are laid off, Will those people become long term unemployed? 200 00:12:22,840 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: Will they be able to get hired back? I think 201 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:27,960 Speaker 1: what this report tells us is that maybe more of 202 00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:30,800 Speaker 1: those people than we thought, and more quickly than we thought, 203 00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:33,360 Speaker 1: will actually be hired back. You know, I think that. 204 00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:35,760 Speaker 1: I think one thing that you know, that that does 205 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:37,720 Speaker 1: some out of this is that some of the things 206 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:41,080 Speaker 1: that the programs that the government has implemented, like the 207 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:44,439 Speaker 1: payroll protection programs, you know, maybe those things are working 208 00:12:44,440 --> 00:12:46,640 Speaker 1: a lot better than we thought. So that program actually 209 00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:50,600 Speaker 1: incentifies this business is to rehire back people, um, you know, 210 00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:52,720 Speaker 1: so they can get loans from the government that ultimately 211 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:56,199 Speaker 1: will become grant And so I think this report suggested 212 00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:59,480 Speaker 1: those kinds of policies and maybe are are much more 213 00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:03,360 Speaker 1: impact fold and that maybe many people thought. So. Tiffany, 214 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:04,920 Speaker 1: how do you kind of square? I guess what I'm 215 00:13:04,960 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: trying to do is kind of square the job's claims 216 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:09,360 Speaker 1: numbers that we've seen over the last you know, four 217 00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:11,720 Speaker 1: or five, six weeks with this number we saw today, 218 00:13:11,800 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 1: is it the moderation of jobs claims? Does that explain 219 00:13:16,200 --> 00:13:18,520 Speaker 1: the fact that we added two and a half million 220 00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:22,800 Speaker 1: jobs versus the consensus of losing seven and a half million. Yeah, 221 00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:24,679 Speaker 1: I mean, I think that's a really good question. I mean, 222 00:13:24,679 --> 00:13:25,720 Speaker 1: so I think you have to be a little bit 223 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:30,160 Speaker 1: careful about the initial claims numbers because many people will 224 00:13:30,640 --> 00:13:33,400 Speaker 1: they'll apply, they might apply more than once, we might 225 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 1: get rejected. But those numbers can actually be um inflated. 226 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 1: But if it wasn't continuing claim still we had a 227 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:43,840 Speaker 1: pretty big increase in continuing claims um you know, certainly 228 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:46,679 Speaker 1: not as much as at last month. But that actually 229 00:13:46,760 --> 00:13:51,000 Speaker 1: underscores how how good this report was because the fact 230 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:52,880 Speaker 1: that are you know, around three million people if you 231 00:13:52,960 --> 00:13:56,040 Speaker 1: just look at the state continuing claims numbers, actually lost 232 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:59,520 Speaker 1: their jobs. The fact that this number, this number is 233 00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:02,760 Speaker 1: a net were it suggested all three million people had 234 00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:06,240 Speaker 1: to gain employment, um, you know, to get to get that, 235 00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 1: you know, the total change and then to be positive 236 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: is furlough in your textbooks? I mean, or what we're 237 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:17,440 Speaker 1: arguing about here is people that were laid off. Their 238 00:14:17,600 --> 00:14:23,080 Speaker 1: statistic they they created claims whatever. But business really meant 239 00:14:23,080 --> 00:14:27,560 Speaker 1: it when they said this new word furlough. A lot 240 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,920 Speaker 1: of people were laid off or fired who weren't laid 241 00:14:30,920 --> 00:14:34,920 Speaker 1: off or fired. They were furloughed. I can't spell it, 242 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:41,800 Speaker 1: but there it is furloughed. Tiffany, what's furlough mean to PIMCO? Yeah, 243 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:44,240 Speaker 1: I think that's true and you. And I think one 244 00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 1: thing is that the labor the Labor Department reports and 245 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 1: the questions that are asked don't really properly capture furloughs. Um. 246 00:14:51,080 --> 00:14:54,120 Speaker 1: So the kind of rules around the surveys are if 247 00:14:54,160 --> 00:14:57,360 Speaker 1: you if you weren't paid, whether you were on furlough 248 00:14:57,480 --> 00:14:58,880 Speaker 1: or not, but you weren't paid, you're going to be 249 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:03,320 Speaker 1: counted as unemployed wid. So many of those unemployed workers, 250 00:15:03,360 --> 00:15:04,840 Speaker 1: you know, could have been on furlough, they could have 251 00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 1: still been receiving benefits, and they could have still been 252 00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 1: very connected to their employers, um you know, but they 253 00:15:11,360 --> 00:15:15,600 Speaker 1: would think, I think we're seeing we're seeing some of 254 00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:19,200 Speaker 1: that in this report as well, Paul. I can't tell 255 00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:22,120 Speaker 1: you how unusual this is if you're just joining as folks, 256 00:15:22,440 --> 00:15:25,120 Speaker 1: Paul Sweeney and Tom Keene trying to piece together the 257 00:15:25,280 --> 00:15:30,160 Speaker 1: oddest labor report in my umpteen years of doing this, 258 00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:33,720 Speaker 1: and folks, there's been some you know, real emotion over 259 00:15:33,760 --> 00:15:37,400 Speaker 1: the years around certain events like September eleventh of two 260 00:15:37,440 --> 00:15:41,400 Speaker 1: thousand one, and you know, other moments like the financial crisis, Paul, 261 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:44,360 Speaker 1: But this is I just really want to underscore to people. 262 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:47,320 Speaker 1: I don't want to hear a lot of certitude right now, Paul, 263 00:15:47,680 --> 00:15:50,680 Speaker 1: I just want to see adults like Tiffany wilding to 264 00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:58,080 Speaker 1: the romantic analysis that nobody sees on television. Exactly right. So, Tiffany, 265 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:01,840 Speaker 1: what do you think this report will mean to the 266 00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:06,440 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve? Well, I mean, obviously, no one wants to 267 00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:09,120 Speaker 1: overreact to anyone report, um, and you have it has 268 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:12,040 Speaker 1: to be taken into broader context. I mean, the unemployment rate, 269 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: you know, obviously surprised consensus, and I think the Bloomberg 270 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 1: consisers went around you clearly a big surprise to that. 271 00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:22,520 Speaker 1: But it's still a thirteenth percent, which is very high historically. Um. 272 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:26,280 Speaker 1: So there there's still a lot of question around the recovery. UM. 273 00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 1: I just think that, you know, the good news is 274 00:16:28,840 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: is that maybe we're you know, the at least the 275 00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:32,960 Speaker 1: labor market isn't sinking into the depths and week that 276 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:37,640 Speaker 1: we previously expected. So I think, you know the including 277 00:16:39,200 --> 00:16:40,880 Speaker 1: you know what. I don't mean to cut off, Tiffanty, 278 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:42,680 Speaker 1: but I'm all riled up here after the week we 279 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:45,040 Speaker 1: had in New York. I mean, I know you're out 280 00:16:45,040 --> 00:16:49,800 Speaker 1: of Newport Beach over a peanut Colada enjoyed the view Tiffany. 281 00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:51,880 Speaker 1: You know, come on, it has been a week of 282 00:16:52,040 --> 00:16:55,960 Speaker 1: historic unrest. There's a twelve foot high fence that Attorney 283 00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:59,440 Speaker 1: bar has around, you know, the broader White House. Margaret 284 00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:02,600 Speaker 1: Brennan and viewing Attorney bar on Face the Nation. You'll 285 00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:06,879 Speaker 1: hear that on Bloomberg Radio Sunday afternoon. Tiffany, come on, 286 00:17:07,080 --> 00:17:11,439 Speaker 1: we're not measuring America. I think we're measuring like jobs 287 00:17:11,440 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: at Boeing, jobs at Bloomberg, jobs at Pimple. Okay, great. 288 00:17:15,560 --> 00:17:20,240 Speaker 1: Are we capturing the unemployed the sort of employee I 289 00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:24,760 Speaker 1: hate this phrase, Paul three to one, the gig economy. 290 00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:28,400 Speaker 1: Are we measuring at Tiffany? Yeah, I mean I think 291 00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:31,719 Speaker 1: there's some question around the instance which you do in 292 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:35,399 Speaker 1: these surveys. That's absolutely true, and I know that on 293 00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:39,440 Speaker 1: on claim that's just seen the pandemic from Graham claims, 294 00:17:39,680 --> 00:17:41,959 Speaker 1: which were a part of the Cares Act, which we're 295 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:44,800 Speaker 1: basically geared towards the gig economy because many of them 296 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:49,080 Speaker 1: don't um they can't get the usual unemploment claims from 297 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:52,240 Speaker 1: states they're not eligible. Those kinds of claims actually shot 298 00:17:52,320 --> 00:17:54,560 Speaker 1: up quite a bit during the month. You know, I 299 00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:57,199 Speaker 1: think the household survey. Actually maybe these a little bit 300 00:17:57,240 --> 00:17:59,399 Speaker 1: better of a job. Although you know it's difficult to 301 00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:01,160 Speaker 1: know how much they captured. The gave economy to house 302 00:18:01,280 --> 00:18:04,320 Speaker 1: as the capture that and the household survey was also 303 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:06,680 Speaker 1: pretty good. I mean, there's nothing really that you can 304 00:18:07,240 --> 00:18:08,840 Speaker 1: um you know, you can stay in terms of the 305 00:18:08,920 --> 00:18:11,240 Speaker 1: surprise at least that it was bad about this report 306 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:15,280 Speaker 1: to participation ratey on the household survey and and Harold 307 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:19,880 Speaker 1: employment also increased quite a bit terrific Worctivity World, thank 308 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:23,280 Speaker 1: you so much, greatly appreciated with pimco. Uh this morning. 309 00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:30,159 Speaker 1: You know, the extraordinary number we saw today out of 310 00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:32,920 Speaker 1: the jobs. You know we're talking about consensus a twenty 311 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:36,400 Speaker 1: unemployment rate. The actual number came in about thirteen point 312 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:40,880 Speaker 1: so much much better than expected. Prom Us, Well, it's 313 00:18:40,880 --> 00:18:44,960 Speaker 1: a massive victory. Left, I mean, rick Oddonna, they killed it. 314 00:18:45,359 --> 00:18:47,359 Speaker 1: Now did they get it to the single point to 315 00:18:47,480 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: decimal point? We expect that from rick O Donna, but 316 00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:57,480 Speaker 1: maybe not. They nailed the directional call, Paul, they nailed it. Unfortunately, 317 00:18:57,480 --> 00:19:01,440 Speaker 1: have Yelena Shiltieva joining us from Bloomber Economics. Delena, thanks 318 00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:03,880 Speaker 1: so much for joining us. You know, just a shocking 319 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:08,960 Speaker 1: number this morning. What's your key takeaway here? I'm worried 320 00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 1: that this you know, victory lap and better than you 321 00:19:13,840 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 1: know expected statistics on payrolls will make authorities think that 322 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:23,120 Speaker 1: we the crisis is over and it's not. Look at 323 00:19:23,119 --> 00:19:27,280 Speaker 1: the wage income growth and the gap between the trends, 324 00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:32,880 Speaker 1: the pre crisis trend and income growth after the crisis hit. 325 00:19:33,359 --> 00:19:37,760 Speaker 1: It's still a significantly wide gap, which need to be 326 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:44,360 Speaker 1: supported by additional income coming from a jobless benefit. I 327 00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:49,359 Speaker 1: think that this these numbers will just simply say, Okay, 328 00:19:49,400 --> 00:19:53,639 Speaker 1: everything is fine, everything is fixed, whereas the additional systeal 329 00:19:53,720 --> 00:19:56,159 Speaker 1: measures may be needed in the second half of the 330 00:19:56,240 --> 00:20:01,159 Speaker 1: year to support that awning gap between wage growth and 331 00:20:01,240 --> 00:20:04,040 Speaker 1: the pre crisis trend. Elena, how do you how do 332 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:06,280 Speaker 1: you square some of these childish claims numbers that we've 333 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:08,159 Speaker 1: seen over the last five six weeks, which had just 334 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:12,200 Speaker 1: been staggeringly bad on the downside, with kind of the 335 00:20:12,280 --> 00:20:14,480 Speaker 1: number we saw today, which two and a half million 336 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 1: jobs added. I think a lot of it has to 337 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 1: do with this UH, you know, augmented UH claims program 338 00:20:25,040 --> 00:20:29,320 Speaker 1: that that doesn't cover payrol employees, so a lot of 339 00:20:29,359 --> 00:20:32,399 Speaker 1: people are still unemployed and uh, you know, yes, we 340 00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:36,359 Speaker 1: did see an improvement in the unemployment rate still double digit, 341 00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:40,720 Speaker 1: you know, thirteen point three percent is way above the level. Okay, 342 00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:44,080 Speaker 1: so during the great procession as you do, you nail it. Okay, 343 00:20:44,080 --> 00:20:46,000 Speaker 1: you go right to the mystery here, which is a 344 00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:50,600 Speaker 1: gig workers is self employed? That big plugged hole that 345 00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:53,960 Speaker 1: we have to fill in here from the data release today, 346 00:20:54,280 --> 00:20:59,320 Speaker 1: Can our listeners easily figure out that whole that gap 347 00:20:59,480 --> 00:21:05,600 Speaker 1: of people not counted, the unaccountable within this report. I 348 00:21:05,640 --> 00:21:08,560 Speaker 1: think what we need to look at really going forward 349 00:21:08,880 --> 00:21:12,720 Speaker 1: to kind of gauge the strength of the recovery is 350 00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:17,840 Speaker 1: growth in incomes, growth in aggregate hours work. Because if 351 00:21:17,880 --> 00:21:20,439 Speaker 1: you look at the two months combined, we now have 352 00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,359 Speaker 1: two months of data for the second quarter, the aggregate 353 00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 1: hours are still declining at annualized, which means the GDP 354 00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:36,040 Speaker 1: report will still be absolutely uh terrible, you know, but 355 00:21:36,320 --> 00:21:39,400 Speaker 1: we will need time. We will need months and months 356 00:21:39,440 --> 00:21:42,360 Speaker 1: to get back to the level where we were. Elena, 357 00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:43,879 Speaker 1: I know, you know you were late coming to us 358 00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:45,280 Speaker 1: because you're on the phone with the President of the 359 00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:47,800 Speaker 1: United States. He's going to get out there, Elena, He's 360 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: gonna be all mental about what a great report that says, 361 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:53,760 Speaker 1: as would any other president, I'm not picking on President Trump. 362 00:21:54,119 --> 00:21:56,439 Speaker 1: What would you say to the president, what would be 363 00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:00,640 Speaker 1: your advice on getting to the report after this one? 364 00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:06,040 Speaker 1: I would point out exactly to what I was saying before, 365 00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:12,080 Speaker 1: that the wage statistics are still looking very terrible. Yes, 366 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:14,320 Speaker 1: you know, we did see a rebound and it was 367 00:22:14,520 --> 00:22:19,560 Speaker 1: natural given that you know, uh, businesses are going back 368 00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:24,400 Speaker 1: and we're listening the lockdown measures. But the gap between 369 00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:28,879 Speaker 1: where we were and the wealth of people before the 370 00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:32,639 Speaker 1: crisis and right now these are two different things. So 371 00:22:32,760 --> 00:22:37,080 Speaker 1: just real quickly, Elena, just thinking about this. What's you 372 00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:39,639 Speaker 1: when you plug this kind of jobs number into your model? 373 00:22:39,680 --> 00:22:41,439 Speaker 1: What's your GDP out look for the remainder of the year. 374 00:22:41,440 --> 00:22:44,680 Speaker 1: How do you think this is gonna play? So I 375 00:22:45,440 --> 00:22:50,119 Speaker 1: think this actually, this report is still consistent with our 376 00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:54,639 Speaker 1: projections for thirty seven percent decline in GDT in the 377 00:22:54,720 --> 00:23:00,320 Speaker 1: second quarter, but perhaps maybe a slightly better rebound in 378 00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:03,800 Speaker 1: the third and the fourth quarter of the year. It 379 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:08,320 Speaker 1: was it will still be a tremendous decline in GDP 380 00:23:08,440 --> 00:23:12,159 Speaker 1: for the years a whole. Elena, congratulations to you at 381 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:17,480 Speaker 1: our Bloomberg Economics team. You absolutely nailed the directional life 382 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:21,399 Speaker 1: isn't so gloomy gloomy call over the last week or so, 383 00:23:21,480 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 1: you guys just nailed it that it would be better 384 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:30,520 Speaker 1: than a good report. Every day we focus on COVID nineteen. 385 00:23:30,680 --> 00:23:33,080 Speaker 1: We try and track it with One of the experts 386 00:23:33,359 --> 00:23:36,359 Speaker 1: in this joining us now is Andrew Pekosh, virologist and 387 00:23:36,440 --> 00:23:41,680 Speaker 1: Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health professor, Professor Podkash. 388 00:23:41,840 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 1: Thanks so much for joining us. When you look at 389 00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:46,840 Speaker 1: some of the vaccine trials that we've seen, how are 390 00:23:46,880 --> 00:23:51,120 Speaker 1: the antibodies and the antibody testing actually developing. Can they 391 00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:54,840 Speaker 1: be used to make sure that we have a safer vaccine? Yeah? 392 00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:58,800 Speaker 1: Thanks for progressing UM at a very nice pace When 393 00:23:58,840 --> 00:24:01,560 Speaker 1: it comes to some of the vaccine trials, studies are 394 00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:05,159 Speaker 1: moving forward into their second phase, which is oftentimes the 395 00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:07,879 Speaker 1: phase that we really start to get signs of whether 396 00:24:07,960 --> 00:24:11,560 Speaker 1: vaccines have the potential to be efficacious or work well 397 00:24:11,560 --> 00:24:14,840 Speaker 1: in the population. I think in addition to that, there 398 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:18,080 Speaker 1: have been a few studies that have started using just 399 00:24:18,320 --> 00:24:23,400 Speaker 1: antibodies as a therapy, so vaccines induced antibodies UM. Some 400 00:24:23,440 --> 00:24:25,960 Speaker 1: companies have actually jumped to the fact of giving people 401 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:30,919 Speaker 1: those antibodies directly in terms of treatment, and those studies 402 00:24:30,920 --> 00:24:33,480 Speaker 1: are also moving forward, UM, and have shown some good 403 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:37,360 Speaker 1: promise initially. So UM, from the side of your immune response, UM, 404 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: there's been there's been continued good progress towards towards seeing 405 00:24:41,760 --> 00:24:45,119 Speaker 1: whether or not we have some good future treatments for this. 406 00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:48,720 Speaker 1: Are we losening public health restrictions in a good way? 407 00:24:48,760 --> 00:24:51,240 Speaker 1: Are we able to contact trace of people that may 408 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:54,320 Speaker 1: fall ill again to make sure that it's contained. Yeah, 409 00:24:54,359 --> 00:24:59,120 Speaker 1: that's a great question. UM. You know there are mixed results, UM, 410 00:24:59,160 --> 00:25:02,119 Speaker 1: I would say, And you look across particularly the United States. 411 00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:04,480 Speaker 1: There are some states that are doing a good job 412 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:09,919 Speaker 1: in terms of keeping cases level. UM, while they're loosening restrictions, 413 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:12,240 Speaker 1: there are a few states where you're starting to see 414 00:25:12,240 --> 00:25:14,879 Speaker 1: little upticks in terms of the numbers of cases that 415 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:19,679 Speaker 1: are there. UM. Everything comes down to being um good 416 00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:23,400 Speaker 1: about identifying cases and then being able to track those 417 00:25:23,480 --> 00:25:26,960 Speaker 1: cases so that the people who are coming in contact 418 00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:31,199 Speaker 1: with those individuals can be identified and isolated. That's the 419 00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:33,399 Speaker 1: phase that we're moving into now as we try to 420 00:25:33,440 --> 00:25:37,200 Speaker 1: expand our economy. UM. Loosen public health restrictions can still 421 00:25:37,240 --> 00:25:39,560 Speaker 1: keep the virus down so states are gonna have to 422 00:25:39,640 --> 00:25:43,280 Speaker 1: be very very UM proactive, monitor how they're doing in 423 00:25:43,320 --> 00:25:49,080 Speaker 1: that and really work towards um optimizing those contact identification 424 00:25:49,200 --> 00:25:53,159 Speaker 1: testing and contact tracing strategies for these rollouts to be 425 00:25:53,359 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 1: uh able to be sustained. Well, contact tracing really work. 426 00:25:56,960 --> 00:25:59,159 Speaker 1: Is there a better way that than just, you know, 427 00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:02,680 Speaker 1: simply reopening the economy and actually seeing the number of 428 00:26:03,080 --> 00:26:06,480 Speaker 1: deaths to try and track where it is. Yeah, you know, 429 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:08,840 Speaker 1: we're going to have to really change the way that 430 00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:12,919 Speaker 1: we're approaching our our day and day out life, the 431 00:26:13,080 --> 00:26:17,240 Speaker 1: social distancing mask, wearing various other things in terms of 432 00:26:17,600 --> 00:26:20,399 Speaker 1: living crowds and places. These are going to be the 433 00:26:20,440 --> 00:26:22,000 Speaker 1: things that we're going to have to deal with for 434 00:26:22,040 --> 00:26:25,879 Speaker 1: the next you know, at least six months to if 435 00:26:25,960 --> 00:26:28,800 Speaker 1: not a year or more UM to make sure that 436 00:26:28,840 --> 00:26:32,399 Speaker 1: we're keeping this virus down and not seeing these surge 437 00:26:32,400 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 1: of cases that so many parts of the country saw. 438 00:26:34,760 --> 00:26:38,080 Speaker 1: Um you know this spring when the virus first made 439 00:26:38,119 --> 00:26:41,639 Speaker 1: its way across the United States, Um, Andrew, what do 440 00:26:41,680 --> 00:26:44,680 Speaker 1: we know about antibodies? So are antibodies you know, something 441 00:26:44,720 --> 00:26:48,399 Speaker 1: that actually protects you against being reinfected or for the 442 00:26:48,480 --> 00:26:51,520 Speaker 1: moment to do these tests only truth that you've had 443 00:26:51,560 --> 00:26:57,760 Speaker 1: COVID nineteen. Yeah, So, um, another great question. There's two 444 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:00,399 Speaker 1: parts to this. We're learning more and more about the 445 00:27:00,440 --> 00:27:04,160 Speaker 1: antibody responses that are being induced by infection, and there's 446 00:27:04,160 --> 00:27:06,760 Speaker 1: some good results coming from that showing that people are 447 00:27:06,880 --> 00:27:10,960 Speaker 1: generating what we believe our protective responses after infection. Now, 448 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:13,120 Speaker 1: the important thing to note though, is that the tests 449 00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 1: are a bit more limited in what they tell you. 450 00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:19,199 Speaker 1: The tests can tell you if you've been infected, but 451 00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:23,359 Speaker 1: they can't tell you if they have these protective antibody levels, 452 00:27:23,359 --> 00:27:25,320 Speaker 1: at least it's not the tests that are around right now. 453 00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:28,960 Speaker 1: So what has to be very careful about the antibody testing, 454 00:27:29,400 --> 00:27:31,720 Speaker 1: which of course is increasing across the country as it 455 00:27:31,760 --> 00:27:34,800 Speaker 1: becomes more available. It tells you if you've been exposed, 456 00:27:35,080 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 1: but it doesn't necessarily tell you at this point in 457 00:27:37,520 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 1: time whether you're protected from reinfection. So does it make 458 00:27:42,080 --> 00:27:44,960 Speaker 1: sense to to, you know, get tested one time, but 459 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:49,160 Speaker 1: then also wait for more sophisticated antibody testing. Will will 460 00:27:49,200 --> 00:27:51,399 Speaker 1: these come out to actually be able to tell you 461 00:27:51,440 --> 00:27:55,400 Speaker 1: if you're protected from the virus and for how long? Yeah? 462 00:27:55,520 --> 00:27:57,359 Speaker 1: I think there will be There is a there is 463 00:27:57,400 --> 00:28:01,199 Speaker 1: a hope that once we really identify what arm of 464 00:28:01,320 --> 00:28:05,200 Speaker 1: the antibody responses are are providing the protection of people, 465 00:28:05,440 --> 00:28:08,159 Speaker 1: that the test can then be fine tuned so that 466 00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:10,920 Speaker 1: we're asked answering both of those questions, have you been 467 00:28:10,920 --> 00:28:14,280 Speaker 1: exposed and are you protected? At the same time, it's 468 00:28:14,320 --> 00:28:15,719 Speaker 1: going to take a little bit of time for us 469 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:19,240 Speaker 1: to to come up with those tests simply because we 470 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:21,640 Speaker 1: have to wait and make sure that the people who 471 00:28:21,640 --> 00:28:25,040 Speaker 1: have been infected have these immune responses for longer periods 472 00:28:25,040 --> 00:28:28,840 Speaker 1: of time. Some things can be moved forward quickly. Um, 473 00:28:28,880 --> 00:28:32,520 Speaker 1: we have two other things, such as understanding if you're 474 00:28:32,520 --> 00:28:37,080 Speaker 1: still protected from infections six months after you've been infected. Um, 475 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:40,120 Speaker 1: just take time, which is kind of the obvious thing there, 476 00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:42,240 Speaker 1: but it really does take some time for us to 477 00:28:42,320 --> 00:28:45,920 Speaker 1: really understand the full length of protection that's induced by infection. 478 00:28:47,400 --> 00:28:50,200 Speaker 1: And how much do we understand about certain communities, you know, 479 00:28:50,280 --> 00:28:54,200 Speaker 1: and also certain countries have been affected more than others. 480 00:28:54,520 --> 00:28:56,360 Speaker 1: Is it just the spreading of the virus and some 481 00:28:56,520 --> 00:28:59,080 Speaker 1: of the social distancing put in place, or is there 482 00:28:59,320 --> 00:29:02,760 Speaker 1: a much deep are in concerning response that could be 483 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:06,920 Speaker 1: linked to genetics. So um, those are the studies that 484 00:29:06,960 --> 00:29:10,040 Speaker 1: are still in place right now. We've got population studies 485 00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:13,960 Speaker 1: going on. We certainly know that there are parts of 486 00:29:13,960 --> 00:29:18,080 Speaker 1: the population that seem to be more susceptible to severe 487 00:29:18,080 --> 00:29:25,080 Speaker 1: disease UM. Separating out socioeconomic factors from genetic factors is 488 00:29:25,120 --> 00:29:28,960 Speaker 1: something that is really a high priority level UM. We've 489 00:29:28,960 --> 00:29:30,680 Speaker 1: had a lot of unrest this week in terms of 490 00:29:30,760 --> 00:29:33,040 Speaker 1: racial tensions, and certainly one of the things that we've 491 00:29:33,080 --> 00:29:37,080 Speaker 1: noticed in the US is that UM minority populations, urban 492 00:29:37,120 --> 00:29:40,640 Speaker 1: populations seem to be UM much more strongly hit by 493 00:29:40,680 --> 00:29:44,200 Speaker 1: the virus than other populations. UM. We also know the elderly, 494 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:46,680 Speaker 1: and in fact, there's many much data suggesting that men 495 00:29:46,720 --> 00:29:50,240 Speaker 1: are more susceptible to severe disease UM than the rest 496 00:29:50,240 --> 00:29:53,080 Speaker 1: of the population. So there are a lot of factors 497 00:29:53,120 --> 00:29:56,640 Speaker 1: that are coming out from the data these days that 498 00:29:56,720 --> 00:30:00,240 Speaker 1: merit more investigation. The US just today is the looking 499 00:30:00,280 --> 00:30:04,800 Speaker 1: for additional demographic information on COVID nineteen infected patients, so 500 00:30:04,840 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 1: that can really sort of target and understand UM the 501 00:30:08,160 --> 00:30:12,960 Speaker 1: subpopulations that are being affected by severe disease. So there's 502 00:30:12,960 --> 00:30:14,680 Speaker 1: still a lot to learn, but the data is coming 503 00:30:14,720 --> 00:30:17,160 Speaker 1: in and we're collecting the data in ways there are 504 00:30:17,160 --> 00:30:19,720 Speaker 1: going to allow us to really identify these high risk 505 00:30:19,760 --> 00:30:22,440 Speaker 1: populations and get at the reasons why they're at risk, 506 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:26,760 Speaker 1: and it really quickly. Is a second wave likely over 507 00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:31,560 Speaker 1: the winter time? Is it you know, seasonal? Yeah, so 508 00:30:31,960 --> 00:30:34,720 Speaker 1: it's looking more and more like you know, there is 509 00:30:34,800 --> 00:30:38,200 Speaker 1: some seasonality to this virus. UM. Right now, we're going 510 00:30:38,200 --> 00:30:41,320 Speaker 1: to continue to see cases. There's so many people that 511 00:30:41,480 --> 00:30:44,520 Speaker 1: have no immunity to this virus that it's relatively easy 512 00:30:44,560 --> 00:30:48,800 Speaker 1: for the virus to find people who can infect Right now, UM, 513 00:30:48,880 --> 00:30:53,360 Speaker 1: once we moved back inside, once humidity and temperature drops, UM, 514 00:30:53,400 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 1: we expect that there are going to be a surge 515 00:30:55,400 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 1: of cases very similar to what we saw and perhaps 516 00:30:58,360 --> 00:31:01,280 Speaker 1: in the two thousand and nine each one in one pandemic, 517 00:31:01,600 --> 00:31:04,000 Speaker 1: where the virus sort of stammered over the summer and 518 00:31:04,040 --> 00:31:09,360 Speaker 1: then UMS caused a strong surge of cases in the fall. 519 00:31:10,040 --> 00:31:12,720 Speaker 1: We hope to be much more prepared for that UM 520 00:31:12,720 --> 00:31:16,480 Speaker 1: and be able to deal with that much more better. Andrew, 521 00:31:16,520 --> 00:31:18,280 Speaker 1: thank you so much for your time. Andrew Peckosh is 522 00:31:18,280 --> 00:31:20,240 Speaker 1: there and be sure to check out v r us 523 00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:23,640 Speaker 1: go on the Bloomberg for the latest information. Thanks for 524 00:31:23,720 --> 00:31:28,080 Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to 525 00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:34,000 Speaker 1: interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. 526 00:31:34,560 --> 00:31:37,880 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You 527 00:31:37,920 --> 00:31:41,320 Speaker 1: can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio