WEBVTT - 521 | Checking in on Our Breakout Picks for Each Team: American League

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Any Swiss high.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Understanding deep the center field and it's gone, Wow, his

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>first big league swing is gonna be a grand Slam,

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a home line swing.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Good time to look to them solve. Time to audit

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ourselves a little bit here on the call up, we

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are checking in on the breakout predictions for the American

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>League teams. Arm Lton Jack McMullen. We are to have

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all thirty that we did this year is the first

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>time that we did it going into the season where

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>we did breakout picks for a prospect in each organization.

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And when we did that episode, you remember, I was like,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these just really tough. I kind of felt

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.319
<v Speaker 1>like a forced one. It'll be fun to see if

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>those aged well. Some of them did not, and I

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>can acknowledge that a couple that were forced definitely appear

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to be forced in our midway check in, but we're

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of get a pulse, right, We're halfway through

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the minor league and major league season, so a little

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more than halfway through the minor league season. We

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>can check in on the numbers say to this point,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is is it a breakout? Is it valid? Was the

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>prediction right?

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Or is it not?

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And also kind of evaluate what went wrong or right,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the last thing will be if it's not

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy that we picked who is breaking out in

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this system. I'm excited to do it.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be fun, man. Yeah, we can do like

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of a two parter here. We're gonna go team

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 3>by team and we'll start with the American League and

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>then pivot to the National League for part two of this.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like every single like every single thought that

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>we have on the call up immediately turns into like

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a two parter or a three parter. So this is

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>right on par with what we got going. But we'll

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>go AL East, then AL Central, and AL West. And

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I ran you through the names and I was like,

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, I was reading you the names and you

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>were like, Okay, which league did I nail in particular?

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Pretty spread out across the board, and you mentioned there

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>are some that might be flubs, but there are others

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>that it's like, holy smokes, you were on it, like,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>not to spoil it, but Nathan Fluelling with the Rays,

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Devin Fitzgerald with the Nationals, but there could be some

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 3>tweemers as well. So really excited to get into it.

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're on you. It's a you got to

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>give us the thumbs up or thumbs down. Sorry, you're

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the judge.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, on those. We'll start with the guy who is

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>thumbs down unfortunately at this point, but you have to

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 3>judge him a little bit differently. We'll start with the

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Toronto Blue Jays. Your breakout pick was Juan Sanchez, a teenager.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Juan Sanchez an eighteen year old from the Dominican Republic

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>playing a lot of shortstop right now, playing a lot

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 3>of third base as well.

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>In the DSL.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>In fifty six games in twenty twenty five, he had

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 3>an OPS over one thousand, He hit three forty, he

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>had a four to forty OVP, he had eight home runs.

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Then he goes to dun Eden, so he skips the

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Florida Complex League entirely, and he's sitting two thirty six

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>with the six to eighty two OPS in fifty three games.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Walk right has dipped a bit, wrikeouts have climbed a bit,

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>and the power not as prodigious in a low way

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 3>as it was in the DSL. It's tough. He's eighteen

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 3>years old. How do you assess this pick?

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm actually really excited. I'm gonna watch him play tonight.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Jupiter dunninged Ins in town. I'm

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to see uh Montanchez and of course Jojo Parker.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>This is one where I say, wait a little bit,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because it has been better. We actually just mentioned him

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>on the heat sheet with the way that he performed

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple weeks. And this is usually like

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the selective stats thing where like you kind of hope

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that right where he picks up when you're going in

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the game logs of fangrafts fits like a round number

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, oh, hopefully it's the last thirty games,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty one games. This is the classic, like

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>since he's been hitting, he's been hitting this. But he

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>had a multi hit game on on May fifteenth, and

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>since then, Sanchez hitting three seventeen with a one twenty

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus three eleven or sorry, yeah, with a three

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty one OBP and a four sixty seven slug So

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's solid. It's three eleven excuse me, three eleven,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>three sixty one, four sixty seven slash line of one

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to twenty WRC plus, So geez. The pitching in this

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 1>league is terrible. So usually the four to state league

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that slash line would give you a lot better off

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a WRC plus. But point being, he's been a lot

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>better of late kids skipped a level and making the

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>acclamation state side. I think there's still time for this

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a correct pick. But obviously he didn't jump out.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Of the gate.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the way that you'd want to break out prediction

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to jump out.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Got you okay. Next one that we got to talk

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>about here and it pertains to the Baltimore Orioles. You're

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 3>looking really sharp on this one. Joseph's Zurwa, the left

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 3>hander in the Orioles system. Zurwa so far this year

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>has been a very intriguing arm in the oriole system,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>and he's a guy that has climbed to the mid

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>levels of the minor leagues. Twenty two year old second

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>round pick last year at Michigan State, and Zurwa is

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 3>already in double A forty and two thirds innings with

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Hia Frederick at a two to two Erra punched out

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty to ten walks, jumps up to double A Chesapeake

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 3>and in thirty five and two thirds innings. This guy's

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>a two eight erra, no home runs allowed in one

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty batters faced. He's punched out forty six

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>and walked nine. So when you compare or when you

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 3>combine his hi A in double A numbers so far

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>this year, a twenty two year old in his first

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>taste of professional baseball is at seventy six and the

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 3>third innings on June thirtieth, with ninety six punchouts, nineteen walks,

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 3>and two home runs allowed in over three hundred batters faced.

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Is he gonna be the second minor leaguer to one

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred k's after Seth Hernandez.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I'm trying to I was gonna pull

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.679
<v Speaker 1>up the leaderboards and by the way, the Blue Jays

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>breakout pick the one that would have been correct, as

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Sean Keys hit his way from Hya where he wasn't

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>even good last year really to the big league, so

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>should have known. I wish I had the crystal ball

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>on Sean Keys. Really awesome to see him breakout. Jureuah

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit more low hanging fruit, I think

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to a degree, just because of the way that he

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>he threw in spring, but that aways always gonna be

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>baked into this, so I don't think. I think ans

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>in which we'll get to is more of the low

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>hanging fruit Jureoe. I think is was still a pretty

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid pick because of how much better he's been

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>than even I think you would have expected if you

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>were high on him. He really feels like this this

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>year's Quinn Matthews. When what we saw kind of Quinn

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Matthews coming out party in his first full pro season,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>where the stuff ticks up in terms of V Low's up,

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>feel for the secondaries is improved, and the quality of

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the secondaries has improved. And Jurwa similarly, it was like

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>good command low nineties fastball, really good change up. That

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was kind of the story with Quinn Matthews, right, pitchability guy,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll be back end guy. And now Ga you know,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>adds that cutter slider Sharper didn't quite see the Vlow

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>jump as much as Quinn Matthews, but still saw the

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Vlow jump a little bit, and you have this just

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously impressive arsenal all of a sudden across the board

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>and with the pitch ability still married. Now Matthews lost

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that over the last two years, and that's a whole

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>different story. But ZEROA. You really see that that feel

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to pitch with the enhanced stuff resulting in just pure dominance.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, So happy with this pick. No adjustments.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Can't say I would adjust this one. I don't think

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>there's anybody in the osystem, you know, with as much

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>helium as as Surewell, right now.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 3>How about the Yankees? Your pick? Was that your heard

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>so far this year? Heard? He has been alright. If

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not mistaken, I'm pulling up the numbers right now.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 3>If Thatcher heard twenty three year old, he's a form

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>of the former LSU Tiger. Limited to eight starts so

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>far this year, but that youer heard five starts in

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Tampa nineteen inning z walk twelve, did punch out twenty nine.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>It has been a rough go for Thatcher heard, yeah.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Coming off injury, so I maybe I was hoping he'd

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of just lie right through and have the success.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's been a little bit of that

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think acclamation process to just getting back from the

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>injury and coming back from TJ. But I think the

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff is there. He's also pitching at low A, so

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout numbers, it's going to be difficult to fully

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fully assess that because you kind of expect to college

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on with this to be able to overwhelm hitters. But

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>last time out for Herd four and two thirds, one hit,

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>no runs, two walks, ten k's. He's struck out now

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen in his last nine innings, so that is encouraging.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But he's also doing it in a low A as

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a college on, but he's building up, So I obviously

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there's there's probably a better pick in a Yankee system,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I want to kind of go dial

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up right now and see who would have been a

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>better selection. But I think there's a little bit of

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>time still for him to sprint through the finish line.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think enough to quantify as a breakout,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming back from the injury. It just hasn't

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>happened as quickly.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, college arm. You hope that he you know, kind

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of hits the ground running and gets to the upper minors.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 3>But not really going to too well for thatcher Herd

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 3>right now, and again he is in low A as

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>it stands, you got a Yankee pick or not so much.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the bats right now, not great on the

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>bats side. There's always a pitcher, though, like there's always

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher, I feel like that ends up surprising you

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and performing really well. But right now, I mean, I

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a clear cut guy that you'd say

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>relative to expectations, unless I'm forgetting somebody you know, is

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>outright breaking out in this system per se, which is

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be interesting because you know they're gonna want to

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive at the deadline. But yeah, when I look

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>across good players like Elmer's thrown well, I'm Rodriguez is

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>thrown well, Like, I don't think anybody's full fledged, really

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>broken out per se in the system.

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, Uh, you nailed the breakout pick as

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>it pertains to the Tampa Bay Rays. Here, nineteen year

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 3>old catcher Nathan Fluelling was your breakout pick coming into

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the year nineteen year old in a HIGHYA through sixty

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 3>five games, fourteen homers, forty two driven in, hitting two

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 3>sixty with a three to ninety OVP and an eight

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 3>seventy six ops. He is three years younger than the

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 3>league average hitter in HYA. Nineteen years old. This is

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 3>not only the breakout pick of the Rays, this is

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 3>one of the breakout players in Minor League Baseball.

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love this kid, and I felt like from

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what we saw last year, and we've talked about Welling

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on the show now already because of

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the year that he's having, But what we saw from

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>last year as a player that was extremely young as

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a collegiate or as excuse me as a prep catcher

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>going straight to full season ball and handling it the

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 1>way that he did and with the peripherals, the raw

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>power was there, the patience was there, the arm strength

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>behind the dish was there, and that's why I'm like, Okay,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>some of this kid's parts are really impressive. And talking

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to some people around the Rays organization, they all said,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this kid is ahead of his years. Like we love

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the way he goes about his business, and there's more

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>power in there that would always be like the follow

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>up too, And so when you hear that side too,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>when you see the underlying, it was all exciting. He

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>had this kind of big move I've talked about where

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the hands would start by a Sternham and then go

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way like pull all the way back. It

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>was hard at time, and he has completely overhauled that

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>to where now sands are on a more traditional spot,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of sitting up high by his back,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>by his ear, and it's a simple move, and I

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>think he's able to repeat his moves more consistently, be

0:10:58.000 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on time, and get the barrel out a little bit quicker.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And now we're seeing that results in that raw power

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>turn into more game power. He's still nineteen years old,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>so you pair that with the fact that you can

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>develop into an above average catcher and has the makeup

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a good, just solid piece behind the dish.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned being so young for the level. Usually

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what you see with the guys that are really young

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for the level, and this is a generalization, but it's

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>something that like anecdotally, I could tell you I've just

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>seen so so so many times that if I was

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>able to somehow run, the numbers would back it up.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>The younger guys at the level that are even performing

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty well, they are crushing fastballs and maybe the approach

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good, but a lot of times the numbers

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't quite up to par with the secondaries, and it's

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 1>usually just, hey, this is a really talented hitter that's

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>feasting on fastballs and patient enough on the secondaries. You

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>don't usually see eight's across the board, like you see

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with Foelling, eight sixty one ops against fastballs, eight fifty

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>one ops against breaking balls, eight seventy six ops against

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>splitters and changeups. That to me is a hitter that's

0:11:58.040 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just ahead of his years.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Thing the Rays have. It seems like so many guys

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that you can choose from. But Fluelling was the slam

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 3>dunk pick, and you have another slam dunk pick with

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the Boston Red Sox Anthony Ironson. You mentioned a little chalky.

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people like ianson in spring training just

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 3>because of how loud the stuff was, and Ironsen is

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>proving the truthers rights.

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there were doubters, but he's proving his

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 3>truthers rights. Yeah.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>This is oh sorry, go ahead, No, you're good.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 3>In fifty and two thirds innings for ionin across twelve

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>starts between high A and double A, seven starts in

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 3>double as a twenty one year old, he's got a

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>one point oh seventy RRA, six earned runs and fifty

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 3>and two thirds with sixty four punch outs to nineteen walks.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's just he's just too polished, I think for

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>these these hitters, even a double A. He's a cut

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>cut ride guy, and then you have the arsenal that

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>just really works well off of itself in just a

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>vertical tunnel where it's the cut ride fastball, then a

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>cutter below that, and then he'll throw so you know,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a gyro slider below that, and then we'll have the

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>downer curveball below that, and it's just all different speeds

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>and all very difficult to differentiate out of the hand

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>because everything kind of looks like he's coming around it.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Even the fastball, he's kind of coming around it. So

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes hitters can maybe pick it up a

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit because you see him come around the side

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of the ball and say, okay, here comes to breaking

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>ball and you see the spin different. Everything looks like that.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's creating this very difficult tunnel for hitters. And

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>anytime you take a good command guy and you up

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the stuff, it's generally gonna age, you know, or it's

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>generally gonna turn into two quite good results. It's funny

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>now Ianson has become so popular that I actually feel

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>like I skew a little bit lower on him than

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the other in the industry. I took the

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>layup of the breakout. There's just nobody better to pick

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>than Ianson. But at the same time, I do have

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>some concerns, Like the stuff works well off of each other,

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but I do have some concerns about how he can

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>keep lefties at bay with everything still kind of working

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>glove side and the strikeout rate has dipped pretty significantly.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>We're working with small samples at double A, so I

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>think you can do a good job of avoiding barrels

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for the most part because of the tunneling effect and

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>how it can be different difficult to differentiate things out

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of the hand. However, I do think that like there's

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>some normalization to these numbers coming, and there is going

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a challenge, you know. I think, what this

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is the thing with the big leagues too, and you're

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to project these guys up to the big leagues.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>There's more left tened hitters than like ever, and every

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>team has a left e that they can you know,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they can go lefty heavy lineup. What does Ionson do

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>when he's got to see seven Like if you had

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to see the Marlins right now, dude, and they put

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>seven lefties in there, That's where I'm interested to see,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like that's where it's going to be tough, So I

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's a little bit more refinement and execution can

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>help that. But I do think he's more of a

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty to seventy range top one hundred guy and not

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty to forty range like I've seen elsewhere.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Can I give you a take that I've been just

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 3>like it's just kind of been I don't know, stewing

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 3>in my brain for a little bit. I think I

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 3>have a new best pitch in baseball. It's a right

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 3>handed changeup. Like it's it's ridiculous the number of premier

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>lefty bats there are and the number of drastic splits

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>that I see for pitchers as it pertains to right

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>and left. It's like, oh, Lefty's ops nine hundred against him,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>but right he's are ops and six fifty against him.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Why is that? Because the slider's good and the sweeper's good,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 3>and everybody prioritized working on the slider and sweeper instead

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 3>of something to get lefties out, and like it could

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>be a sinker, but very few right handed pitchers, it

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>seems like in Major League Baseball have a feel for

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a change up and it's like a splitter accomplishes it

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>to a certain extent, but if you've got a little

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>armside diver, dude, it's one of the best pitches in

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>baseball right now. I think.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, one the biggest thing I think it's a great

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>point is and it's the cyclical league that we have,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is is that it became in vogue to go sweeper

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>hoppy fastball and like right on right, nightmare right, Like

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be do that. So the only way

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to combat that is to have more lefties against those

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>types of guys. But the other reason why why they

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>did that and like why sweepers became in vogue is

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot easier from pitchers. I've talked to pitching

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>coaches I've talked to like a lot easier to teach

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a sleeper than it is to teach a change up

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and like duh. But even like with everything that we

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have today, it's even more of a gap in terms

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of teachability than you think, like and then we already

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think that it's a huge gap. So like a lot

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of guys, if you already have a little bit of

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to spend it, like they can get you on

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a sweeper pretty quickly, change up not so much. And

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think with how much we push towards that, yeah,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this change up has become even more valuable. And I

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's why we're saying, like Logan web Man, like

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>just on this heater of all heaters right now.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's just crazy. All right, We're gonna get to

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the American League Central in a moment. But before that

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>little woosh heading into the Cleveland Guardian conversation and the

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland Guardian breakout pick for you was a guy that

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 3>seemed like a slam dunk at time, and now it's

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>not a slam dunk. Joey Oke was your pick. Joey

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Oke last year in fifty nine innings, punched out seventy

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>eight guys, and you're sitting here saying, if only he

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 3>walks fewer than six hitters per nine innings. Unfortunately, joey

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Oki went back on his word in thirteen starts in

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>low Way in his age twenty season, joey Oki in

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.479
<v Speaker 3>forty five at a third innings has a six eight era.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Why you ask, because in forty five and a third

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 3>innings he's walked forty two guys. Man, what's gone wrong? Mechanics.

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>It's mechanics. It's such a long arm action. It's so

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>hard for him to time up. And I just he

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>tried to tweak it and whatever, and I think it

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>might have made things worse. Like did you see now

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he looks uncomfortable and mechanical. I've picked this guy twice

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>now to breakout, so I can. I can promise you

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna be picking irons in or excuse me, ice,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna be picking ok next year. I still

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think he has a lot of time and a lot

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of talent, but it's probably going to be more in

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that relief role, right. I mean, they're gonna give him

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>time to like try to figure it out, obviously, But

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I just when you watch him throw and you see

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that long arm action and just some of the erraticness

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>still like trying to time that up with his body,

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>he can get a little bit jumpy. It seems like

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the timing is inconsistent across different like different pitches, and

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you can it's very tangible. So that's where I get

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>even more concerned about the command is when you can

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>really see the timing inconsistencies with the arm and the

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lower body and it's the fastball slider combination could play

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in a bullpen, but even then, like the command's gonna

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>need to get a lot better to even get there.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I was thinking about, like, okay, so who

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>would be then the Guardians breakout prospect per se. What's

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>funny is, you know, we've had Cooper angle as a

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred prospects in previous years, so as recent

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as last year at some point. So I guess he's

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>still the pick though, because he's very Bonds and trip

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Awa and now it's up in the show like he's

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>been so good offensively that the Guardian said, like, let's

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>get you back into left like you're at Clemson again.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's got to be the pick. But

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of pushed away from that because we've

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>always liked him to the point that he was a

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred prospect for us within the last calendar year.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, dude, I mean, Ingle is definitely the pick right now.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>And what they have going in terms of guys that

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 3>are just getting going in their big league career is astounding.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 3>We've been begging for a half decade for line of

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 3>protection for Jose Ramirez. I think longer than that. I

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 3>really think since they traded Lindor, it's like, how are

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>you going to have line of protection? And now de

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>latter Bizana and Ingle are in the fold. It's really

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 3>really fun to watch right now.

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>The other one, real quick is sorry, is Duke or Cassarras.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Cassarus is one of people, well what about him? He's

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a breakup. We had him as a top sixty prospect

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>going into the season and so I and I know

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>there's way higher than everybody else, So we couldn't have

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Cassarras as the breakout guy. However, he's walked more than

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>he's striking out and he's a nine to sixty four

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ohps is an eighteen year old in Loway, so he's

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely breaking out.

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 3>There you go, Royal. Here's what we're going to talk about.

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Warren kel Kanye, who is a nineteen year old who

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 3>is in the Dominican Summer League. He's played fifteen games

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 3>in the DSL, sixty five played appearances. I assume you've

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 3>watched every pitch of one kel Kanye to this point.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>No, but there's not been much reason too. This is

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a bad one. Uh, we'll see. I really liked what

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw from the nine games before he went down

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>with the shoulder injury. He went down with a shoulder

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>injury that flared up multiple times. I I Sharon eventually

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wiped out his season, so I'd imagine there's some residual

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>effects there. But the kids got a sixty five WRC

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>plus and ds i's that's my bad. I still think

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be good, like pretty good. I do think

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it's injury related. However, obviously this is a brutal pick.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>And there's another one where I tried to get a

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>guy in a bounce back from injury, and as you

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>can learn here, like the sometimes you just don't know

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>how long it's going to take some of these young

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>players to bounce back from that injury.

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 3>And I get it. Who would be your royal pick here?

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>If you have one?

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough one because I love the guys that

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they just drafted, and those guys have been good. Uh,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but like those aren't going to be breakouts per se,

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>like Josh Hammond, Like that's a guy that you drafted

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in the in the first round, like of course, or

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like in the early parts of the draft, like of course,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a guy that's performing. I'm trying

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to think. I'm not going to cross like Spencer and

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Nippens has been good, but like, I don't know if

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a breakout. There's no one that's quite jumping. I mean,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I know we're gonna miss some. So like in the comments,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>please let us know who in your mind is breaking out,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>because we can only catch up with so many of

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the systems while we're doing this in real time. But

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say Michael Lombardi. I guess like Michael Lombardi.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Fourteen appearances this year, fifty five and a thirds innings,

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a two four, four yard, eighty six punchies, the walk

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>rates a little bit high, but I mean he's been

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. But he is also a little bit older

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for the level low way, But that's probably the guy

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that's standing out to me, is just like putting up

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>better numbers than I think people would have expected.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was thinking Michael Lombardi, Bill Belichick's GM at

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina, but no different, Michael Lombardi. Good. I love

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 3>it all right. Next squad, John Peck was your pick

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 3>for the Detroit Tigers. John Peck was an unorthodox pick

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>for you because this was a guy that already made

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 3>his way to double eight eerie. Last year, one hundred

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and eighteen games, Peck hit three oh one with a

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>seven ninety two ops, had eleven homers and nineteen backs.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 3>This year looks very similar, hitting Q ninety with an

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 3>eight to sixty OPS, eleven homers, and nineteen bags. The

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>difference is it took him one hundred and eighteen games

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 3>last year, mostly in high eight, to get to eleven

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 3>homers and nineteen bags. Took him sixty games, fifty eight

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 3>of which in Double A to get to eleven homers.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 3>In nineteen. Bags got up to Triple A Toledo for

0:22:58.480 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 3>two games and then got hurt. I saw he's on

0:22:59.960 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the shelf. Do you know what with I do not

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 3>know with the shelf right now, but you asked me.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 3>It was like, is this guy? Is this a fair

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 3>breakout pick? Like? Can you say that he broke out?

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I will give you the The field goal is good,

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 3>I think so. Like the power numbers being that good

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 3>that quickly at a level higher is really impressive.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would. I appreciate that he tweaked his leg.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess the other night, so we'll see how bad

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that is. Yeah, it was. It was one where it's

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like this was a system that was really hard to

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>find a breakout pick. But also I thought, Okay, if

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he hits his way to the big leagues for this

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>team and dominates double A Triple A, like that's probably

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a breakout, or not even dominates just like

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>forty fifty abovely gaverage double A Triple A and get

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to the big leags. I thought that'd be a breakout,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and he might have been on pace to do that,

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately we are going to see a little bit

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of a detour there. I was excited to see what

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>would happen in Triple A and obviously was off to

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a great start with them there. So TBD. But if

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he gets into the big leagues and has some success,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll give it, I'll give it a thumbs up.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But for now, I appreciate the field goals good. I

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of an easier pick too, because he

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>had a really good year last year, but I did

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the rite up which linked

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the episode description, is all the picks here. The

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>big part of it was that I thought there'd be

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>an uptick and slug based on what we saw in

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the second half last year, and like, clearly, if you're

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>matching your home run total and half the games, there's

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a pretty significant uptick and slug. So that part I

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do feel good about.

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Got you, Okay, cool, Let's jump to the Minnesota Twins

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>here and your pick. With the Minnesota Twins unfortunately walked

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 3>six in an inning and two third and then hit

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>the sixty day I l Santiago Castianos with Minnesota Flora

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 3>is yours. H.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's just a push, right, you gotta you

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>just gotta wait and rewrack him.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's to wait and see.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunate the injury there, I Castos because of when we

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>went through this episode too, how advanced the pitch mix

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was for a sixteen year old. We saw a ninety

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>three to ninety five min on hour fastball, five different pitches.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It had above average carry. The sweeper looked good, the

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>change up was already decent feel wise, and he even

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>showed a bridge cutter. So I still think this is

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting pitching prospect that unfortunately throwing hard at

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a young age, Like yeah, you're sitting ninety three ninety

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>five at sixteen, Like sometimes this injury comes up a

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit quicker than maybe it does for some others.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully it comes back, you know, strong and healthy. But

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think clearly that he felt something in that one

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>outing and that was that. So we'll have to wait

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and see. But for Twins fans, I do think this

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>is a good player here that could end up becoming

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty solid arm for them. As it pertains to

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>who the breakout is. Yeah, that's another fun one that

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I they have a lot of guys performing, but it's

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like their top guys are performing.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Trying to think of outside of outside of like their

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 3>top ten prospects for you, like just seems like a

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>very quiet system.

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Henry Mendez, I guess would maybe be that like

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>breakout guy. And it was someone I considered a little

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>bit there, but the the peripherals were never as good.

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 1>But Mendez, you're twenty two years old here has been

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>having like a really nice season. He was really good

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>last year though too. It was a one thirty eight

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus last year at double he was acquired from

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>them the Phillies UH this year thirty games or twenty

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>four games in double A one seventeen WRC plus thirty

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>games in Triple A A one forty two, so that

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>combines to a one thirty one and fifty four games

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>for Mendez is a twenty two year old at the

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>upper levels once turn twenty three until after the season's over,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the pick. But yeah, I think that the

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>good thing with the with the Twin system right now

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the top guys are performing, and like, you

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>just want those guys to stay healthy, and I think

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll feel pretty pretty good.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I dig that. All right, let's go to the White

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Sox here, White Sox parlay vous Francis. Matthias Lacombe was

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 3>your pick for the White Sox here, twenty four year

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 3>old that did go to junior college in the United States.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 3>He was a early to mid round pick in twenty

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, no mid late round pick in twenty three,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 3>twelfth round at a coach Ice College in Arizona. But

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Matthias Lacombe so far this year, what was it late

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 3>start due to injury?

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he started injury.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, made two appearances at the complex. But in twelve appearances,

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 3>spending twenty innings with hy A Winston Salem, twelve hits,

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 3>six runs. That's a two to seventy r Rabit in

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 3>twenty innings, punched out thirty two and walked eight. Too

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 3>early to tell her you feel good about it?

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's looking good. I mean he's got to do it

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for more than twenty innings and yeah, but I mean,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got a guy that's striking out fourteen and a

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>half per nine that's gonna play. I know he's older

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's shortest burts because of the shoulder discomfort started

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the year. But I'm not going to say it's a

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>victory yet. But I think we're for an injury to

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>start the year. I think we're off to a pretty

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>good start now of game setting for him.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I ben all right, Matthias Lacombe, that feels good. Are

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 3>there other big time breakouts in the minor leagues for

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox? They have had a good performing system.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 3>But like a lot of the guys that have been

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 3>performing in the system yet you already knew about, Like yeah,

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Braden Montgomery was never gonna be a breakout,

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 3>but like Nishida making his way to the big leagues,

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 3>that almost feels a little breakout.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, and real quick to one lacomb he's averaging ninety

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>six on the heater, he's touching ninety nine. It's a

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>really like weird kind of short arm, low three quarters release,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and the slider from there is outrageous. You just can't

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>pick it up, and he's flashed, you know, twenty inches

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of horizontal on that. So it's like a sweeper that

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's a little bit more carry, sometimes it's a

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more depth, and it looks like a wipeout

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>pitch for him. So I'm I think Combe's gonna be

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a good relief piece for them. But as it pertains

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to the White Sox, that's a great question. Yeah, there's

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys that are performing pretty well in

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the system that I think you feel pretty good about.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, I do kind of feel like like

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Antonachi was already a guy that I think you felt

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>like was kind of good in a good position to

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>do what he does. I think the breakout is the

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's doing it at the highest level and

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to the degree that he is doing it. But yeah,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's really a clear cut breakout

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for me in this system unless I'm unless I'm missing somebody.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't seem like there's one right now that

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I can that I can see off the top of

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>my head.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you are, So we'll pivot to the

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 3>AL West. And before we do that, one more first

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 3>guy that we got to talk about in the American

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>League Est or in the American League West, weast I

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>thought you said at least was Yeah. First guy with

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the Houston Astros is Ethan Fry. You had Ethan Fry

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 3>as your breakout with the Astros. Fry so far this year,

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty two year old third round pick. Last year out

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of LSU forty seven games at A seven, been fifty

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 3>three ops, got thirteen bags and five homers so far

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 3>for Fry, yeah, not not not good.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, the peripherals were so good last year. I mean

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>he hit the living It was a small sample, but

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he hit the living crap by the ball. Albeit college

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>bat low A. You kind of expect that, but the

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>way that do hitting the ball, I had some concerns

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about how stiff the operation can be, and I think

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of challenged him now more at the even

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just the high A level, breaking balls have just dismantled him.

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>He's hit fastball as well, but five h nine OPS

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>against breaking balls that sixty percent contact right against spin.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.239
<v Speaker 1>The whiff in general is just really weird. It's had

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight percent contact right overall, and then a flatter

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>swing path, which even in the positive wrinkle like was

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>something I was kind of concerned about, but it felt

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like the good was going to outweigh the bad because

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of how hard are you hitting the ball. The contact

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>rates at low way were solid enough, but for the

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>most part this year it's just kind of been a

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>step backwards across the board and as a result, you know,

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we've we've fort seen an eighty five WRC plus another

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>league though, Dude, like seven fifty oh ps is an

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty five WRC plus. Wow, there's something weird going on

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with the base balls. I know JJ Cooper's discussed this

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, like that's just there's some data points

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that are a little bit off with Baseball America.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Something's going on. It's just the these numbers. I'm looking

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at some players that have the same batted ball data

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as the year before and seeing the power up tick,

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like I could be something to justify Peck maybe as

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too, but I don't know. Something something

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>going on. Okay, the offensive numbers.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Are up too much interesting. Okay, the astros, if they

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 3>are buyers, do they have anything?

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean they do, But it's the guys that like

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.479
<v Speaker 1>would have been rejected as breakout picks because they are

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>discernibly their best, like Kevin and David nine. So I

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>pissed pick the guy that they just drafted in the

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>first round. That'd be the laziest thing of all time.

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and that's all the crazy parts, Like are

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you going to trade your your first round pick? Are

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you going to trade your top bi F A guy?

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be kind of nuts. But you

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>never know. With with the Astros, like we talk about

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on the JB Show, like with the way they're kind

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of approaching this, you just don't know. I don't know

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>if there's a clear, clear, clear cut breakout. I liked

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Cole Hurtzwer when I saw him for the first time

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>ever in the Spring Breakout Game, and he's thrown well

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this year. But he's a twenty three year old between

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:32.719
<v Speaker 1>high and double A and as a two five six

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>RA but he's walking thirteen and a half nine, he's

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>striking out thirty one percent. But I don't know if

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you could quantify that as a breakout offensively, Like you

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 1>could shout out Luis Dillon, who is a complex kid

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with one thousand and seventy five ohps through one hundred

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and seven played appearances, But that's kind of where you

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>got to go there. But Dillion does have my attention.

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been he's lashing three ninety eight, four ninety five,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>five eighty. I understand it's the Complex League, but I've been.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some clips of him too. He looks he

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>looks really good for his age. That's probably their guy.

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of the point, like you got to

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the Complex for the breakout performers per se.

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, let's push to the athletics. The athletics

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 3>your breakout pick. Here was a guy by the name

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 3>of Edgar Montero who's still nineteen years old. Native of

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the Dominican Republic, he is a right handed hitting short stop.

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Montero spent two years in the DSL. First year in

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, his age seventeen season, hit two forty

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 3>with a seven to seventy ops three homers. Next year,

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 3>after repeating the DSL three thirteen with a four eighty

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 3>four obp walk sixty times in fifty five games, had

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a ten sixty three OPS, and the home run total

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 3>tripled from three to nine. Now in fifty three games

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 3>as a nineteen year old with low Ay Stockton, he's

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 3>hitting a tick below the Mendoza line at one ninety nine.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 3>He's got four homers and he's punched out ninety times

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in fifty three games. It's a six twenty nine OPS.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 3>This is the one.

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I even had it in the write up.

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this one can pribble up in my face,

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but also it could be good, Like I either in

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the right up I remember talking about in the episode

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>where was, this could either make me look really good

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or really bad. And unfortunately it's the latter, because anytime

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a guy repeating DSL, I'm always gonna take

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that with a grain of sault. But it was such

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a I was something about least Covid with the Marl

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Wines too, right, Like he repeated the DSL, but his

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>numbers were so good and the bad of bal Dada

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was so much better. It's like, oh, that's exciting, and

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>then he's also kind of had a dud, so repeating

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>DSL guys like you got to really take that with

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a grain of assault. But the hard hit rate was

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent, was an average exabossi of ninety mas per hour,

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's really patient. I'm like, okay, this could translate something.

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Could he could have figured something out or he could

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have just figured out how to compete against really bad pitching.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And that seems to be what happened here. And that's

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>where it's very difficult to draw that line. Is you know,

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>you could figure out how to hit DSL pitching and

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>still not have improved that much as a hitter, unfortunately,

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And that's pretty much what happened here. He still has

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time, he's still clearly can move the bat

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly and there's some good tools there. But it's been

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a really, really, really rough season and this is probably

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst picks. I would say, But you know,

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you got to swing for the fences. Sometimes it's okay, you.

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 3>Got a pitching breakout in the A system or is

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 3>it a hitting breakout way and one.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Was so good before he just went down with injury.

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's tj for him. Unfortunately, he

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 1>was like the breakout though he's probably the breakout, even

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>though he was so so good last year, to continue

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it at the upper levels. I don't think anybody was

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>fully expecting that. What's funny is Henry Boltay took a

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>huge step forward last year. I think you could call

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>him the breakout for the way that he has just

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>torched Triple A and then what he's done at the

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>big league level. It was everything just better across the

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>board defensively, bat a ball, data wise, in terms of

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the angles, just getting slightly better. Approach wise, significantly better,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Like he cut a strikeout right by ten percent climbing level,

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's even cut a strikeout rate at the big

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 1>league level compared to where he was at at HIA.

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would say I'll take could probably be the

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pick as well.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 3>I love it all right, we push on to the

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 3>La Angels and this is a hell of a pick

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 3>here by arm Layton. The La Angels, your pick was

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Hayden Alvarez, and Hayden Alvarez has been awesome nineteen year

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 3>old who's spending the full year in Low A. As

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 3>it stands right now, last year was an eight sixty

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 3>five OPS and he got off the complex for twenty games.

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 3>He is leveled up from last year, hitting three eight

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 3>with a four to fifteen OBP and a nine eleven ops.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 3>How is he leveled up? Well, he's already beyond his

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 3>stolen based total from last year, and he had two

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 3>homers and seventy five games a year ago. He's got

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 3>eight homers and seventy games this year. This is a

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>guy that should comfortably be in the top one hundred

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 3>for a while, right, He's.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Got a chance. He's absolutely got a chance. I The

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>thing with him is it's just a very well rounded player. Yeah,

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think when watching him, I think in the

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the thing, because I think that was

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a question for him. I was impressed

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>with how much that's kind of come along and how

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>he's able to kind of get pretty good reads and

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>cover ground with these longer strides because he's a big

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>he's not big, he's longer like big framed I guess

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>six three, one hundred and ninety pounds long limbs, So

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's long strides and he can smoothly cover a fair

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of ground. But the fact that he can get

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to his top speed the way that he does as

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a longer guy, I think is really impressive as well,

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and just seeing the way that the stolen bases have

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>continued to be a huge part of his game. A

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more whift that' scrept into his game. But

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think in exchange for trying to get into more power,

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we had him ranked in the top

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>ten and four the system, I think ever before the season,

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>and then picked as a breakout guy. I think if

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>he can improve against breaking balls, I'll be a guy

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely could be in the top one hundred. And

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this is though the classic what I was talking about

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 1>before Young for the level right, he won't turn twenty

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>until spring training next year, the end of spring training

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>next year, but Young drawing fastballs to the tune of

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 1>one thousand and seventy two ohps, but six thirty six

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>against breaking balls, five eighty six ops against splitters and changeups. However,

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he's chasing those pitches twenty three percent of the time,

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so demolish fastballs, don't expand too much against spin. You

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>can still have a lot of success at low A.

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be the improvement of you know,

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>being able to hit non fastballs. I think that's going

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to come along to see matures. The thing I'm most

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>excited about for him is there's probably room for another

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen pounds a muscle, and that may saw him down

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but how much power could be in

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>there as well. And I still think he'll be able

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to move pretty well because he just clearly has a

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gliding nature to his speed. I'm excited to see what

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can be with him, and I hope they challenge him

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>with Hie soon.

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Two more teams that we got to talk about here,

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 3>and this is a slam dunk. Yes, Nick Becker was

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 3>your pick for the Seattle Mariners and Becker has been awesome.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Surprised he's not in Modesto just yet. But Nick Becker

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 3>in forty one games of the complex so far this

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 3>year in his age nineteen seasons round pick last year

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 3>to don Bosco Prep in New Jersey by the Mariners

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 3>forty one games, hitting right around three hundred, but walked

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven times. In forty one games. It's a two

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 3>ninety two batting average and a four to sixty two OBP.

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 3>This guy's four homers so far this year. He's twenty

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 3>three for twenty five in the stolen based department and

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is again a hat tip to Scott Hunter.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.720
<v Speaker 3>He the best drafter in baseball, and it's not close.

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>He's got to be and well, And I think with

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the big part, I think what really works for him

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the draft, like the draft team, amateur scouting team,

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>really works in lockstep with player development team. And I

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 1>know everybody, but there's different levels of how teams are

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>seamlessly making that transition and allowing those players to be

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>able to make that transition once they joined the organization

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of know exactly what they need to work on,

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like working with their player development folks to identify players

0:39:57.600 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that they feel like they can get more out of

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and for the out inside identifying people. And I remember

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>talking to Justin Toole, like the biggest thing he said

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>about Becker is just how hungry he is for information

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and how eager and how he's kind of like to

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sit at the front of the class type of guy.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And you don't always get that from high school guys,

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>especially early drafted high school guys. So that's the fun part.

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And I alway have the quote when I'm looking at

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the article right now, it was quote from Justin Toole.

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>He's really wiry, big, strong, physical. You can see why

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>our scouts loved him so much, just his athleticism and

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>how he moves. He's gonna need to cut down the

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>whiff a little bit for this to be like a complete,

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>complete w and we'll see how he handles low A.

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But this was always going to be a guy that's

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a project. I think there's fun defensive tools there where

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he can be an above average short sound, he's a

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>plus runner. There's above average to plus power to dream

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>on as well, and it's all just going to come

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>down to the hit tool. But he could be a

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>guy that strikes out thirty percent of the time and

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>still plays every day because of the value that he

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>brings to the table, across the board everywhere else.

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Ye last guy that we got to talk about less

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 3>team that we get to talk about here is the

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Texas Rangers. He's a Tiger. The twenty five year old

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 3>was your pick. He missed all of last year. It

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 3>was TJ. Right, Yeah, you can just I guess chuck

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 3>this year up to yeh DJ. Too early to tell.

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 3>It's only six appearances, four of which and Hya, Yeah, so.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Far we've got ten and a thirds innings twenty k's

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 1>two walks. Yeah, so we're off to a good start here.

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean a bunch of six and two

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>thirds of that was in the complex, probably just bullying kids.

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 3>And then yeah it was fourteen it was fourteen k's

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and two walks and six and two thirds innings of

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the complex.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's just like just literally abusing kids there. And

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>then you go to Hya where just working in short spurts.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just been pretty nasty there as well. Obviously

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>you let up a few runs, but in terms of

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the swing and miss. So wait and see here there's

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>another injury roll of the dice that that we're going with.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is another really fun player that

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>can ultimately I think, be pretty It's it. The heater

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is plus borderline plus plus. And that's the funny thing

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with the complexy these poor kids have to see, like

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a seventy great heater, you're gonna you're gonna be in trouble,

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and the slider off of that he in the Rangers organization.

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a guy that could develop really

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>nicely and end up being one of those later blooming

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, twenty six year old prospects that miss a

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of bats and could be pretty exciting, even if

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it's in a relief role. But I still think this

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is somebody that they hope they can build into a

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of a starter's role.

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Love it.

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think if there's somebody else in the

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Rangers Org Cameron Cowley, by the way, just got the

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a guy we've loved on the show

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>because of I think he's in one of the best,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>most impressive athletes in the minor leagues, can play like

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>every position, absolutely flies, sneaky pop. I think that's a

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>very fun player to add to the big league level

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>for them in pretty dynamic. I thought he should have

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>been taken in the Rule five draft. I believe he wasn't.

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he was protected. I either thought he was definitely

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a slam dunk guy, and if he wasn't, I thought

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking about him as a guy that should

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have been taken in the Rule five, whether it was

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe two years ago or last year, regardless. Excited for Collie.

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a very very fun player there. I'm

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to think if who else could kind of qualify

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as the breakout in this Ranger system before we wrap up.

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 1>But I'm looking right now a lot of ds gets

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>swinging it already for them, but that's usually going to

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be the case early in the year. No one jumping

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>out offensively, by the way, shoutout Arturo disla I've post.

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll post a highlight of him every four or five months.

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to see what his listed heighten waight is

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>real quick. They say six two two forty. That's a

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>complete lie. He is one of the more units. He's

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest units in the minor leagues. So

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>much fun to watch that guy hit. It's pretty funny

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and he will absolutely crush balls. But yeah, I don't know.

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have a specific guy. I think

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Aj Russell. Maybe it would probably be

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the breakoup, but it's only thirty one of the thirds innings.

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Russell has struck out fourteen point two per nine and

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>pitch to a two eight forty ra another ridiculous heater

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Rangers are always gonna have arms.

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Can I throw you Sung June Kim on the complex

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a guy that actually has a chance to do

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 1>two way too. And I don't believe anyone really can.

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 3>But he actually has a chance, and he's got and

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 3>he's got a nine to thirty two ops and thirty

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 3>two games so far this year.

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeap, all right, we'll roll with him too. Kim is fun,

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Kim is fun cool. All right, that'll do it. Thank

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you everybody for listening. We will be talking nationally excited

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>this thing sometime this week. We also have a fun

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 1>interview coming up Andrew Fisher of the Milwaukee Brewers organization

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>this week, and then another one potentially next week as well.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Reminder to follow us on social media accounts. Lists or

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the links are in the episode description. Putting out a

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of stuff on X and on the on Instagram

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and everything in between. And team top prospect lists continue

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to be turned out on Just Baseball dot com as

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we have been focused on that after the last Top

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred update. A lot of draft stuff continuing to

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>come up to We'll probably do a check in on

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that front sometime soon as well. As always, thank you

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Before to talking prospects with you this week.

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>H