WEBVTT - All the President's Men (Archive)

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys putting.

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>On here today?

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:09.319
<v Speaker 4>No, look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Out of Robert Redford on our minds, of course, with

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 5>his recent passing and the top five Robert Redford movies

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 5>lists that we're both working on for our upcoming show.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Fair to say, All the President's Men is a lock

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 5>for that list. It's definitely not one we have to

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 5>do homework on because we recently talked about it on

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 5>the show. Just a couple of years ago. We did

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 5>in All the President's Men review as part of our

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 5>seven from seventy six Best Year Ever series.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>And it happens to be one of those movies that

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>even for that review, I may not have needed to

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>rewatch it because I probably have seen it about one

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred times, or certainly scenes from it. I love the

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>movie that much. But I do remember rewatching it for

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>that conversation, because of course I would, and like all

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>of those sacred cow conversations, any kind of revisit, you

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>see new things every time, and I remember digging into

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>some scenes in particular. It was a very rewarding rewatch

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>hopefully it was a rewarding listen then and will be now.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>That seven from seventy six series was a good one.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Taxi Driver Network, Rocky. We saw a

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>movie that I think we both watched for the first time,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>car Wash Barbara Coppoles Harlan County, USA, was one that

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I had seen many times before, or at least multiple times,

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>but we had to include it in another new one.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Shantel Ackerman's News from Home. So a great series, and

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>All the President's Men was a cornerstone of it. We

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>hope you enjoy this conversation, and we remind you that

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the Film Spotting Archive access to it is just one

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of the benefits you get as a member of the

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>film Spotting Family. You can learn more about that at

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>film Spotting family dot com. From February twenty twenty one,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>here is That's seven from seventy sixth review of All

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the President's.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 6>Men, Hi, Adam and Josh. This is Amy from Germantown

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 6>with a few rambling thoughts about All the President's Men.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 6>When Merk Peltz died in two thousand and eight, and

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 6>everyone said deep Throat died, but for me, the death

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 6>of Deep throat was just last month with the passing

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 6>of Hal Holbrook. I'm always thinking of him. In that

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 6>dimly led cigarette, Smokey look tensely trying to keep Robert

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 6>Redford focus.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Si Gritty said, don concentrate on sigrette. You'll miss the overall.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>The letter, the letter that destroyed the muskie candidates, the

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 3>conneclar Did that come from inside the work? You're missing

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the overall?

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 4>What overall?

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>They were riding a musket Look who got destroyed.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 6>It's such a great performance in a film that's jam

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 6>packed with them. Can't asked how much do I have

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 6>to know about Watergate? And I said none, because it's

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 6>not a movie about water Date. It's a movie about

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 6>journalism and grit and the grind and oh oh boy

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 6>to Woodward and Bernstein, grind, I mean the newsroom is

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 6>noisy and conversations are convoluted and truth is elusive. And

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 6>I am mesmerized by Hoffmann and Medford. I mean we

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 6>sort of accidentally trip into their story and they trip

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 6>into their partnership, and we root for them. We want

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 6>them to find something, We want them to find anything,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 6>and we empathize as they drive and make phone calls

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 6>and call and drive. I mean they feel like they

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 6>really relive in those cluttered desks and that they're really

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 6>irritated by the noise. From that first bang of the

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 6>typewriter keys to the final drone of the teletype, you

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 6>just know you're watching something special. Thanks for letting your

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 6>ramble in.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Bye, Thank you, Amy. Josh My prompt to you about

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the sixth highest Growl film with seventy six, which also

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>earned eight Oscar nominations, including Best Picture, winning four of them,

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>and did for journalism school what Top Gun would do

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>ten years later for naval recruits. My prompt to you

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>was going to be simply to challenge you to spot

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the lie. Give me one part of Amy's litany of

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>praise that you take issue with. But I do have

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>one other thing on my mind. Eight months ago, we

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>discussed a classic movie on this show that came out

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>ten months prior to Alan Pocula's All the President's Men

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and also garnered a Best Picture nomination, Steven Spielberg's Jaws.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>The review was due to Jaws celebrating its forty fifth anniversary,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>but we had no idea going in just how relevant

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the killer shark movie featuring a dangerous huckster mayor and

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 2>citizens who almost literally on Fourth of July weekend, choose

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>liberty over the warnings of experts, would turn out to

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>be in June twenty twenty, in contrast, we decided to

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>start this seven from seventy six series with All the

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 2>President's Men precisely because of its timeliness. A movie about

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the investmentgation and cover up that led to a president

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>resigning in disgrace seemed all too perfect to consider the

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>same week the Senate is about to take up an

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 2>impeachment trial. Sadly, we're also talking about All the Presidents Men.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The same week we learned of the passing of How Hulbrook,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 2>who plays Bob Woodwards, connected contact known as Deep Throat Jaws,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the most well made thrillers ever, didn't seem timely,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 2>and terrifyingly was All the President's Men couldn't be more timely? Yet,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a single comment or reflection in my

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>notes that could be construed as political, only comments about

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the craft. What about you?

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, let me fill in the gap at him. Okay, No,

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean I'm not going to make this as political

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 5>as Jaws. Wow, was that a cathartic review that was

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 5>so much fun? I think it's because, yeah, as watching it,

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 5>All the President's Men largely takes place in a different

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 5>timeframe from where we're at right now. You know, all

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 5>the stuff we're about to get into in real life

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 5>in the next week or so comes after the movie,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 5>after the credits roll. This is kind of the lead

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 5>up to it is what we're seeing here. And also

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 5>they're very different scandals. You know, they're very different atrocities,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 5>let's say, committed against democracy. So I don't think there

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 5>are quite as many one to one comparisons. At the

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 5>same time, watching it, you know, you do realize in

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 5>both cases the levels of obfuscation that are at play

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 5>in something like this where you recognize that the malfeasance

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 5>starts at the very top and is directed from the

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 5>very top, but how many layers of protection there are

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 5>put in place? Maybe more so in the time of

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 5>All the President's Men. That's what they have to kind

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 5>of investigate their way through, right, is to get to

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 5>the top and maybe the you know, the maddening thing

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 5>about our current situation is that it's so clearly coming

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 5>from the top down. I mean, there is video recorded.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 5>Anytime you say to an insurrectionist, we love you, I

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 5>think you've got your evidence. So there's a distinction there

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 5>as well. So yeah, I think this isn't quite as

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 5>one to one politically. Maybe the phrase the scene that

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 5>we started out with also has some resonance not very

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 5>bright guys at the top of the show. I mean,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 5>anytime Adam, the remaining member of your cabinet is the

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 5>my pillow guy, I think we can also say, yeah,

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 5>not very bright guys. But sure, here's another point of

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 5>comparison between the two eras. There are very bright enablers,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 5>and that is what is scarier than you know, clearly

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 5>scarier than my pillow. Goofball, and you see that this

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 5>is something else that Woodward and Bernstein have to investigate

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 5>their way through, implicate and prove the participation of are

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 5>the enablers, and that we've seen has also a factor

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 5>of our current situation. So yeah, I think there are

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 5>some parallels, inevitably, maybe not as strong as we thought,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 5>probably not as strong as Jaws. It's not what I

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 5>came away from this movie with, for sure. The first

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 5>thing I came away from this revisit was just a high,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 5>as you said, Adam, about journalism, just like a giddy

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 5>high about the craft that is that work, the work

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 5>of journalism, and the craft of all the President's men

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 5>to depict and capture it.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I had that same giddy high, though less about journalism

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and more about filmmaking. This is just one of those movies.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>No matter how many times I see it, I recognize

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>how much I love deep in my bones. And it

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 2>has nothing to do with nostalgia. This isn't about when

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 2>I saw this movie or how I saw it. It's

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 2>not about my relationship really even to the subject matter.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about an almost famous type situation here.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 2>For me, I am just so pleased with the storytelling,

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 2>which in this case is synonymous with the filmmaking, to

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 2>the point where I almost literally can't keep a smile

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>off my face, and I feel a charge because of

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>every choice that is being made. And I'll give one

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 2>other example real quick. You know this, I've tweeted about

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>it before. It just seems that once a year I'll

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>end up putting the Departed on a movie I really

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>loved and I think I had as the second best

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>movie of that year. But it wasn't necessarily a movie

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I saw at the time and said, oh, this is,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, Pantheon level Scorsese. But there it is on Netflix,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and Josh, whenever I just kind of need a movie

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>on in the background, I just kind of want something

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to distract me maybe occasionally, to take my mind off

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>whatever I'm working on. And inevitably with that movie, I

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>do get lost in it. And I had that moment

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 2>with The Departed just this past Saturday, and every time

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>it happens, annually Sarah will walk in the room and

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 2>she'll shake her because I look like an idiot sitting

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>there with a goofy grin plastered on my face and

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 2>a quick sidebar. Anybody who bemoans that movie winning Best

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Picture like it was a lifetime achievement for Scorsese. Sorry,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>couldn't disagree more. Nevertheless, All the President's Men, despite being

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the antithesis of The Departed in so many ways, except

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 2>it is, Josh, if you think about it, a movie

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>as well that's about organized crime and corruption. It's obviously

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the way less ostentatious and in your face, it's way more.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>All the Resident Men is deliberately paced. There's no use

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of music or similar use of music on the soundtrack,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's the exact same experience for me. I love

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 2>every single moment of the writing, of the performances, and

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of the direction. And of course this is where the

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>filmmaking then crosses over into journalism. This is the ultimate

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>procedural procedural in the truest sense. This is a movie

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>that is just about the work, and there are so

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>many examples we could list. But even going back to

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>your political comparison, we don't really get to ever know

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>or really even see Richard Nixon as a character in

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 2>this movie. Right except for that very beginning, which I

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>had actually somehow forgotten about. I could have sworn all

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the presidents meant, which I just saw in the past year.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Actually with my kids, I could have sworn it open

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>just with the heist, you know, the lights going on,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the cop finding the door. But we do get that

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>little prelude with Nixon giving the State of the Union address,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 2>But otherwise we only get Nixon information as it relates

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 2>to the post, as it relates to this story these

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>journalists are following. There's no real wider philosophical conversations about

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 2>politics or the media, and if there are any conversations

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that skew close to it. It's always in the context

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of what the post is doing and how it affects

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>them and the choices they're making, and even that opening

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 2>proper the burglars just going about their work methodically. It's

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 2>all rendered very pragmatically, right. I Pakula doesn't lean into

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>the suspense or kind of the coolness of the heightst

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 2>like so many movies do. Here again, there's no music

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 2>underneath it to live in it up even the way

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it's foiled. That security guard just doing his job just

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 2>happens to walk in the door, notices a door is unlocked,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 2>finds it suspicious that there's some tape over it. And

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I like even that the cops who ultimately arrest the

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>burglars don't want to do it, like they're off going

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 2>on some other job and they're playing closed detectives, but

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>they're closer to the Watergate and they end up doing it.

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 2>This is obvious to say, but just think about how

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 2>much of the running time of all the Presidents Men

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>is about doing the work of journalism, chasing leads, chasing threads,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 2>sitting at desks, making phone call after phone call after

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>phone call, being in the car knocking on doors, just

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>relentlessly pursuing any bit of information they can and having

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>to secure a certain number of confirmations right before they

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>can run a story. There's just this process to it all,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and we'll get more into the actual craft of it

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>and Gordon Willis's cinematography later, I think. But the sheer

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>number of shots sitting at desks in the newsroom that

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 2>showcase the entire newsroom, all the buzzing in the background,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the chatter amongst reporters and editors, the phone calls, the typing,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 2>it all reinforces it and finally, Josh, to get back

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>to what you were saying. In terms of the enablers,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>there is obvious brilliance in William Goldman's screenplay, and somehow

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>it really wasn't until this time that I recognized just

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>how simple it is. And Sophie, my daughter, rewatched this

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>movie with me. She loves the movie now too, And

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>of course she doesn't have as much of a historical

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>relationship to Nixon or Watergate or this film. She doesn't

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>know who Haldeman is or Erlickman is, and all the

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>names and the different threads these reporters are chasing kind

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of lose her a little bit, and I get it,

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But when you really break it down, this whole movie

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 2>is just about them trying to determine the five names

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>who controlled the slush fund, because if they can do that,

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and if one of those five names happens to work

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 2>in the White House, happen to report right to the president,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 2>then that's it. That's that's everything. That's what breaks this

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>whole thing wide open, And if you really do follow

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>it from start to finish, that's all they're ever doing.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not like they're off on a bunch of different

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>tangents trying to take down President Nixon and all of

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>his corruption. They're just trying to determine how checks from

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the committee to re elect the president got in the

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>hands of Watergate burglars, and it just so happens it

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>goes all the way up to the president.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I don't think it's the movie's goal to be

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 5>able to help you trace the line all the way directly.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 5>This is not a newspaper report. It's a dramatization of

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 5>the report, which seems obvious to say, but I think

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 5>you need to make that distinction because you could come

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 5>away from all the President's men disappointed if you didn't

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 5>have a full understanding of Watergate. I don't think it

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 5>necessarily gives you that. It gives you, as you're saying,

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 5>the broad strokes, the goals of Woodward and Bernstein, and

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 5>crucially how they went about doing their job. I mean

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 5>you could say that Goldman's screenplay kind of you know,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 5>that last meeting with deep Throat just kind of unravels

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 5>everything for them in a way we don't really see

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 5>right that comes out in all in the montage of

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 5>the ensuing newspaper articles, so we don't see the final

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 5>threads being drawn together. Again, that's not the purpose of

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 5>the movie. So thinking of you smiling while watching this,

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 5>my exact same experience, just sitting there, started smiling very

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 5>soon into it, chuckling at moments. Here's a moment and

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 5>this goes back to how it was sort of a

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 5>journalism high for me. When Woodward is on the phone

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 5>and to my last point, I don't remember exactly who

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 5>this was, but he hears the guy say, I know

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 5>I shouldn't be telling you this.

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>That's it, and it's just like it's one of the

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>greatest moments. I love movie.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 5>His face but also just I let out a yeah,

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, and that is let me be clear about this, Adam.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 5>I was never an investigative journalist, okay, but I did

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 5>do my share of real reporting at the beginning of

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 5>my career. Kind of the deal with the devil I

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 5>had to make when I went to my local town

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 5>newspaper said I want to write movie reviews. You don't

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 5>have movie reviews, don't you desperately need movie reviews? And

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 5>the editor was like, yeah, sure, kid, but you know what,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 5>You're gonna have to go cover the local school board

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 5>for me first, then I'll let you write a movie review.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 5>So one school board meeting, one movie review. That guy

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 5>his name was rich Parmonar. He's no longer with us,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 5>but he was like basically the Ben Bradley of weekly

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 5>suburban newspapers. I mean he was so over school, so intense.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 5>To him, A story about like water rates was Watergate,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean it was it was high stakes in his mind.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 5>So anyway, that's kind of where I spent a year

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 5>or two doing that stuff, making the phone calls, getting

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 5>hung up on, knocking on enough doors to you know,

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 5>get exactly what you needed. And it was never in

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 5>my block, like I knew how to do that, and

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 5>I could do it. I wasn't as passionate about it

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 5>as I was about movies, obviously, but just remembering those

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 5>experiences and going on to work in larger newsrooms where

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 5>there were real reporters two deaths over and I could

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 5>hear them making those calls to bigger politicians and knowing

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 5>what was going on. It was such a thrill to

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 5>be re immersed in that. And I think a part

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 5>of it is just the fact that and here we

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 5>can move to the craft. It's so tactile, it's so

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 5>carefully observed, it's so knowing, and it's so analog. I mean,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 5>I think it is crucial that this movie came out

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 5>and is capturing a time that was pre digital for

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 5>the most part, because it really just emphasized not that

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 5>it's necessarily quote unquote easier to do this kind of

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 5>work now, but you've got a lot more tools and

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 5>there are a lot more resources then having to go

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 5>into the you know, here's another thing that I just

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 5>chuckled that when Wood where it has to go down

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 5>to the library and pull out the phone books, the

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 5>actual phone books.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And I actually said to Sophie, have you ever actually

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>even used a phone book exactly?

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 5>And that was part of the work, that was part

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 5>of the job. So yeah, this is just such a

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 5>joy to watch. And speaking of the newsroom, here's where

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 5>you're right in how you describe all the President's men

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 5>as being restrained in terms of filmmaking and not flashy.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 5>But this is a movie that uses multiple split diopter shots.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, we're going to get there, and most of.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Them are of Woodward just working on the phone. I

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 5>think there's one of him in a phone booth as well,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 5>a payphone booth outside, but most of them are at

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 5>his desk, and then he's in focus in the foreground,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 5>and then in the background is that newsroom in focus,

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 5>the people, the other phones, the piles of paper on

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 5>the desks. And for me, that not only provided this

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 5>tactile context I'm talking about, but it also captured the

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 5>laser focus you got to have if you're on deadline,

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 5>just absolute laser focus. There might be a bigger story

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 5>going on behind you. And I think there is a

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 5>split diapter shot where I don't remember exactly what it is,

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 5>but everyone else in the newsroom is gathered around a television.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 5>That story at that point was probably bigger than the

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 5>one Wouldward was working on. But for him, it doesn't matter.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 5>Your story, the one that's due in twenty minutes is

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 5>the biggest story of your life. And the split diapter

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 5>shot captures that intensity in just an amazing way that

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 5>is not flashy but so crucial.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 2>And I know there are people out there listening right

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 2>now who probably work in newsrooms and are journalists, and

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 2>maybe they will completely contradict me on this, but it

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>occurs to me, Josh, that as you talk about the

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 2>analog world of all the President's men, I wonder how

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>different the Washington Post newsroom in nineteen seventy two and

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy four was compared to the Washington Post newsroom now,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a world in which we're all texting all the time,

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>in which we're communicating even in the office when we're

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a few feet from each other via Slack some other platform.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 2>So that all ties back to me to another aspect

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 2>of the craft here, which is how sensory it is

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 2>and the use of sound. And let's go ahead and

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>give credit. I didn't know this until I looked it

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>up today. It won the Oscar for Best Sound Mixing

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen seventy seven. Arthur planted do Se Dick. Alexander

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>less fresholts, what a remarkable job with this movie, because

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 2>all it does is just kind of hum in the background,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>sometimes more noticeable than others, but it's always there, just

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>adding tension. You're leaning in to hear it. Those sounds

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 2>evoke the anxiety the characters are feeling. I'm thinking even

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 2>of like the sounds in the courtroom when Woodward goes

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and he's bugging the guy, the lawyer, who says, it

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 2>just got really there. It's so great.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 6>Excuse me, what is your name?

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Bob Woodward in the Washington Post.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Mark them, Markham, mark them. Are you hearing connection with

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 4>the Water Bay burglary?

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 6>I'm not here?

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, clearly I am here.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 3>It only as an individual, were not as the attorney

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 3>of record.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 7>Who is.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Mister Starkey?

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 7>Do you have any whatever you.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Want you don't have to get from him. I have

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 4>nothing more to say.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>The way they shoot the moments when the judge is

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>talking and when the burglars come before him is from

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 2>their point of view, so we can't really hear what's

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 2>being said. It's not like a traditional kind of courtroom

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 2>movie shot. So again we just kind of hear the

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 2>process play out. We hear those courtroom sounds, the sounds

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 2>of the burglars going about their work. Like I mentioned earlier,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the slips of paper at the Library of Congress. As

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 2>the camera you know, elevates and we see them overhead

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and we see how kind of diminished they are by

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the scope of this and the work. But you hear

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>very prominently in the soundtrack every slip of paper that

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>they are going through, even in the parking garage. Not

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>only are you so attuned, of course to any sounds,

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 2>because you become as paranoid as deep throat and Woodward are.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>There's also a great moment coming out of that Library

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 2>of Congress scene, and we could just spend the whole

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 2>review talking about moments like this, but there is as

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 2>that camera elevates up this kind of droning sound, it

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>starts to feel like the pressure is mounting a little bit.

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of ominous. And then we see them emerge

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>from the door, I mean, they pull the cars. The

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 2>music stops, it cuts immediately, and it just makes you

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>feel instantly like they've emerged from some kind of hibernation, right,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>or they've been lost to the world searching down this

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 2>lead and they couldn't find it, and in that moment

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 2>they erupt from the door. But it's it's just subtle

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>moments like that with the sound design to make this

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>movie so special.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 5>That first example you gave of the courtroom, which comes

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 5>fairly early on Woodward, seeing the defendants line up and

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 5>not being able to hear them. That's a great journalistic

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 5>detail too, because he grabs his notepad, he knows he

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 5>needs this, he desperately needs this. He turns his head

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 5>to hear it, he can't. And that was another thing

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 5>that was like just such a flashback whenever you were

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 5>there and someone was speaking and that was your one

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 5>shot to get the information you needed, and it captures

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 5>that desperation so well. The sound of the movie, though, Adam,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 5>the defining sound of all the President's men, the typewriters,

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 5>of course, and that is, you know, just that is

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 5>a suspense thing too. You almost don't need a soundtrack

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 5>of music soundtrack in this film because when people are typing,

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 5>the speed with which they're typing captures all the suspense

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.239
<v Speaker 5>and the momentum that you need, and we get that

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 5>so many times here, and that's a marker of the

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 5>eras when you were talking about what does the Post

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 5>newsroom look like now compared to that, I mean, that's

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 5>a key turning point is when the typewriters left the

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 5>room and the weekly I worked at had them. When

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 5>I went to a bigger paper just a year or

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 5>two later didn't have them. And it was a bigger newsroom,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 5>but it was a quieter one. So that goes back

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 5>to the idea of sound design. And that's just so

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 5>defining when I think of All the President's Men? Is

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 5>that clacking in the background.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned one of these already. I think there

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 2>are two, at least two just magical scenes and All

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the President's Men. One that I'm sure has been and

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 2>will continue to be studied in film school and one

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>that probably has been overlooked, but to me is almost

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>as brilliant, and I'll start with that one. They actually

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 2>follow each other in the movie. The one that is

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>less obvious is the editors meeting. There's two of them,

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>where Bradley and the other section editors are going through

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the rundown of what articles they've got. They're deciding how

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 2>they're going to lay out the paper, what the top

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>stories are going to be. And the first one is

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>an extended one. And there is something about it, Josh,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the cross talk, you know, the overlapping

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>dialogue there, the camaraderie that they have, the ease that

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the actors that the men in that scene have with

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>each other.

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I was having launch at the San Suit Si this

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>White House guy, a good one. A pro came up

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and asked, what is this Watergate compulsion with you?

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Gompulsion?

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sorry this.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Is I said, well, we think it's important. And he said,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's so goddamn important, now they're Woodward and Burnstack.

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Now what do you expect you to say from the

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>White House? You're doing a great job. Why do you

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ask what he's really state?

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I truly think it's a masterclass of performance and film directing,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>because watching it, I feel as if they did somehow

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 2>without trying to ape a documentary style. There's nothing about

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>it that is suggesting it's a documentary, and yet it

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 2>feels to me like what it almost surely could have

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.479
<v Speaker 2>been like if they had dropped a camera back into

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that newsroom and I don't know how you get that.

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you can suggest that sense of

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 2>a shared experience among those people without probably at minimum

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of rehearsal. Right, But even with all that rehearsal,

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 2>you still got to pull it off. And it blows

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>me away every time I watch it.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 5>Honestly, It's got to be one of the two opposite directions, right,

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 5>it's got to be just extreme rehearsal to the point

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 5>of them being able to do it in their sleep

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 5>and then just going out and doing it, or it's

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 5>got to be like, here's what we want you guys

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 5>to talk about where we need to get to in

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 5>this scene. Have at it and it's completely improvised. Now,

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 5>I think it's probably closer to the former than the latter,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 5>given what we know about the film. But still, yeah,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 5>it's just an astonishing example of realism. And every performance

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 5>is like that, you know. I mean you could say

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 5>that maybe the one perform that stands out a little

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 5>bit to this regard is Hoffman's as Bernstein, But it's

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 5>hard to say that because Bernstein is supposed to be

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 5>kind of a jumpy guy, right, He's it's part of

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 5>his character that makes him seem a little less quote

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:18.479
<v Speaker 5>unquote realistic. But Redford is so naturalistic here, just so

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 5>at ease in this every guy reporters skin that you

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 5>forget how good looking he is because he kind of

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 5>he manages to to like play that down without you know,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 5>playing a part where he needs like makeup or to

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 5>look slovenly or anything. He just comes across as this

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 5>guy who wants to do his job. Part of it

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 5>is maybe the impatience he shows as Woodward too, that

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 5>I think is like he's not trying to be a

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 5>dream about he has no time for chit chat when

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 5>he's on the phone, you know where where's Bernstein's more

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 5>of a cajoler. That's kind of his style is let's

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 5>be friends. I'm going to get this information out of you.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 5>And Woodward is like, I'm going to be persistent. I'm

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 5>just going to keep at it, go at until I

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 5>get that tidbit that I need. But it is just

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 5>such a naturalistic performance by Redford that I think is

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 5>a hallmark really of almost every other performance in the film.

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the other magic scene I was going to

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about here is probably Redford's best showcase in the

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>entire film. You already mention the key moment in terms

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of him just praying to himself that the guy on

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the other end of the line will actually finish the

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 2>sentence after saying I probably shouldn't say this. But it's

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 2>also that split diopter scene, the most noticeable one that

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you were referencing, and you said, Josh that there's stuff

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>happening in the background that is probably more important. But

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason why Pakula and Gordon willis give this

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>scene and that moment the attention it deserves because this

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>is where it does all converge and the story that

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 2>justifies the whole movie finally take shape. So for people

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 2>who know and this is another case where you can

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of connect Jaws to all the President's men, right

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 2>in terms of a famous use of a split diopter,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 2>not that there aren't other many examples in cinema history,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 2>but a diapter shot simply kind of gives you the

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>best of both worlds in terms of shallow focus and

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 2>deep focus. Instead of lighting it in a way and

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>shooting it so that you see everything that's happening in

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the newsroom, it forces you as a viewer to still

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>stay focused on what's in the foreground. So in this case,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>on the right side of the frame, even though it's

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of at a slant, you're just looking at Redford

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>pretty much in medium close up. Everything behind him is

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 2>out of focus, but everything that's to the left of

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the frame behind Redford is in sharp focus just like

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>he is. That's because of the diopter, and people do

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>all kind of surround this TV. At one point, it's

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the press conference announcing that Eagleton is bowing out of

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the VP race. So this is the big news and

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>all of the real commotion occurs at the very moment.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Kenneth Dalberg answers the phone.

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Could I please mister Dalberg. Kenneth Dalberg, Yes, this is

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Bob Woodward of the Washington Post.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of filmmaking, it's such a great trick

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 2>because it simultaneously as a viewer, distracts you, which then

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 2>forces you to pay further attention to what Woodward is

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>doing to experience.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Focus your experience in his distraction.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>That's it. So you have to keep your focus on him.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>You have to keep your focus on Dalberg just like

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Woodward does. And in some ways I think it's kind

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 2>of a little bit of a joke on the audience,

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 2>because politics, of course, in America, the real issue is

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're always distracted. The media is always distracted by

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the horse race, the gas, the personal failings, and not

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the corruption that might be actually occurring right in front

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of your face. This whole scene actually vividly portrays that, right,

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 2>because everybody in the newsroom is going crazy about Eagleton

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 2>having to bow out this kind of scandal surrounding him,

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 2>but the undoing of the presidency is happening in the

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 2>moment Kenneth Dalberg says those words, and then the masterstroke

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 2>of just so subtly reducing that depth of the shot,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>focusing inch by inch even more on Woodward until we

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>are finally on him and close up. It's a six

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 2>minute scene. It plays out over the course of six minutes,

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 2>one long take. As you suggested, Redford is so brilliant,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and if the writing is brilliant, it catches you so

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 2>off guard, even the Dalberg line where he says, I've

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>just been through a terrible ordeal.

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 4>My neighbor's wife has been kidnapped.

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, how do you think your check got into Barker's accounts?

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 2>He just keeps up keeps his eye on the prize.

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 2>He's not going to be distracted there. And then when

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Dalberg hangs up and he calls Clark McGregor for a quote,

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>You've got that other great Goldman bent, which maybe came

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>from the book, where MacGregor says, I if you print that,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 2>our relationship will be over, and Woodward says, sir, we

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 2>have no relationship. There's just these lines like that that

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>really keep you on your toes and keep you laughing,

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>and you mention Redford's kind of impatience. There's an urgency

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to it. He just keeps saying, well, what do you

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>think it could be? He's trying to keep Dalberg on

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the line, him talking, and it eventually does pay off.

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And that moment when he says it, I know I

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be telling you this. Redford's muttering to himself and

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 2>closing his eyes. Just the ultimate please God moment really

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>is remarkable. And there are other subtle acting moments too.

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>When Dalberg says, stands, that's the moment that it now

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>connects to the president, and at that very moment, Redford

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 2>just kind of subtly looks up, you know, maybe just

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>for a second, he looked down at his notes, and

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>now when he says stands, he looks up and it's

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>almost as if the camera had done a slow tilt

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 2>in that moment. Only Redford does it for us where

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 2>we go, okay, we now recognize fully the magnitude of

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 2>this situation. And again that's why I think this moment

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>gets this treatment in the movie, because up to this

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 2>point they've come from the Library of Congress, they made

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 2>all these phone calls, they're hitting every dead end, they

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 2>don't seem to have a story. And it's only when

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Dalberg says that that then everything comes together. So, of course,

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>from a filmmaking point of view, Pekola heightens the intensity

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.239
<v Speaker 2>of it and the focus of it for us as

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 2>viewers as well. Like I said, it's six minutes long,

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>but it's got to be one of the most effective,

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 2>but at the same time modest long takes in cinema,

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>because it barely even registers as a long take because

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of all that activity in the foreground and the background,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the bouncing between calls, the way it draws you to

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 2>what is being said and the consequences of those revelations

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>is what keeps it from being about the Breva cinema

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that it actually is.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 5>There's another moment that works similarly without that level of breva,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.959
<v Speaker 5>even different techniques, but it works similarly. It involves Hoffmann. Interestingly,

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 5>it's a red herring as opposed to this, you know

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 5>gold moment, and that is when Bernstein is on the

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 5>phone trying to get one of those confirmations. You know

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 5>that Bradley keeps telling them they need multiple confirmations. Bernstein

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 5>bristles at this, but he's doing the work. He's calling

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 5>this guy on deadline needs a confirmation. The guy won't

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 5>name the name, but so Bernstein lets out this this game.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 4>Look, I'm gonna count to ten. All right, if there's

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 4>any reason we should hold on the story, hang up

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 4>the phone before I get to ten. If the story's

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 4>all right, you'll just be on the phone after I

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 4>get to ten, all right, hang up right, that's right,

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 4>you got it straight, all right, I'm gonna start counting, okay,

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 4>well all right, yeah, okay, I'm counting one.

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 5>You know you're confused. That's the point. What are you

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 5>trying to do here? But we think, okay, the other

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 5>guy understands. We're gonna find out now if this gets

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 5>confirmed and Bernstein starts counting to ten, and what what

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 5>do we do here? No fancy camera work, no editing,

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 5>stay right on Hoffman's face as he counts from one

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 5>to ten. Now, you could, you know, cut away to

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 5>create suspense. You could cut away to something else going

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 5>on the newsroom and knowing that we as an audience,

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 5>we just want to get back to that countdown, Come

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 5>on and elongate it, you know, between the counts of

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 5>two and three, give us a couple of seconds of

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 5>some other business so that we're impatient. And when we

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 5>get back, we're still on three, and we're like, come on, no,

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 5>that's not the choice. Nothing fancier than setting on this

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 5>medium shot again of Bernstein's face as he's counting, waiting

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 5>till we get to ten. And that's just an example

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 5>of the restraint that all the presidents men also knows

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 5>how to employ when necessary. Kind of gear shifting here,

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 5>give us different, you know, ways of feeling that tension,

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 5>feeling that suspense so it doesn't become overbearing or wear

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 5>us out, keep us on our toes. And in this moment,

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 5>it's by just being very simple and straightforward.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and maybe it's because i'd seen the movie enough

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 2>times I did grasp. As confusing as it is the

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 2>way Bernstein explains it, I was aware that if he

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 2>got to ten and the guy was still on the line,

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 2>then that's good news for Bernstein. Sure what happens then.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 2>What happens then is as he's counting slowly but with

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>some pace, you know, you're realizing the stakes.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, all right, yep, okay, I'm counting one, two, three, four.

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Every time he counts, he's getting closer to what he wants,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 2>right to what he wants. Yeah, right, So then that

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 2>urgency builds in you as well as a viewer. I

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 2>was hyper aware of that this time. And we've talked

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about how good Redford is here. I

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 2>think Hoffman is equally good. You're right, in a very

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 2>different kind of performance. There are so many good ones here.

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 2>But we've got to say something about Jason Robarts. Is

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Ben Bradley?

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>All right? Hey, what do you guys want?

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 4>The GAO reports do out the morning and Nixon's renomination, Hey, shitouts,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Now that's two weeks from now. It's just the early

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 4>responsible to Congress. There is no way a White House

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 4>can control the investigation. There's a source of a general

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 4>accounting that tells us that there's a whole rat snut

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 4>civility going on over creek, like what like a slush phone,

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of thousands of dollars of unaccounted for care, hundreds

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 4>of thousands of dollars Any comment from creep, Yeah, unavailable

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 4>for comment. They're not talking. But what else beside the money?

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Where's the goddamn story?

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Probably my favorite performance, I mean really, I mean the

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 5>most enjoyable, the most enjoyable.

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>The most enjoyable. And and how about the way he introduced.

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 5>Jay ratio to line to gold Lined Robards has it

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 5>by a mile?

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's it's it's one to one exactly. That's why

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 2>there's there is no ratio. That's how good this performance is,

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 2>and how good the writing is. How about the way

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 2>he's even introduced just kind of classical Hollywood filmmaking, where

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 2>we only hear about Ben Bradley, we only see him

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 2>in his office talking to other reporters. This is where

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 2>the sound comes into play, where we can't hear what

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>they're saying, which builds a little bit of suspense around him,

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of mystery. And then when he finally

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 2>does come out and converse with our heroes as he

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 2>takes the red pen to their story. I think that's

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the moment where we see him walk over, and it's

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>one of those great tracking shots through the newsroom. The

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 2>camera is kind of just at a slight low angle,

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>which gives him a little bit more even gravitas than

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 2>he already has. And then that moment where he says

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to bury it inside, and Hoffman gets so mad and

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Robarts just turns his head and gives him a stern look. Oh,

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 2>and you see, you see Hoffman like a seven year

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 2>old boy just realize what he's done and get instantly quiet.

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's beyond one to one ratio because each look

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 5>he gives in this movie is gold as well. He

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 5>doesn't even a dialogue, and now he gives a couple

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 5>of those stairs, those hard stairs, which is basically like,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 5>this conversation has been over before you even started talking.

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 5>This is what he's telling about.

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, and the way the movie takes note and the

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>way we then take note as viewers of his mood

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and his reaction in response to things. When he says

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 2>something like where's the goddamn story? You see that that's

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 2>the first time we've actually seen Bradley get Matt. It's

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 2>been building to that because he's been in a lot

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of conversations that we've been part of, like those editors

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 2>meetings where we know that he's starting to finally feel

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 2>some heat. Woodward and Bernstein don't fully understand that, but

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>he's starting to feel it, and it comes out just

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 2>an expression of anger like that, the tone of his voice.

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's not messing around. And in those moments

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 2>they cut to Woodward and Bernstein's faces and it's where

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 2>they recognize that he's not messing around. Something has changed.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 2>The tenor of this has completely changed the scene at

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 2>the end, the whole thing about get in the bath

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 2>fifteen minutes, you screw up again, I'm going to get angry.

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what's better writing than that? And better delivery

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 2>of lines in all of movies? And I'll give you

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 2>another one, even though there's probably ten more. The ken

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Clawsen phone call when ken Clawson realizes what he's done

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 2>and realizes the hole he's in and calls Ben Bradley

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:11.280
<v Speaker 2>to try to straighten it out. Yeah, and Robards plays

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 2>it like he knows exactly what ken Clawson is up to.

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>He knows he's got him, he knows he can use

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 2>this against him to get the information that he wants.

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And the smile when he says ken as he picks

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 2>up the phone is just like he can't wait to

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 2>give Clawson a little dig and manipulate him. It is

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 2>truly one of my favorite performances ever, and thankfully it

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>God damn.

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 4>And what is somebody gonna go on the record in

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 4>his story?

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 3>You guys are about to write a story that says

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the former Attorney General, the highest ranking law enforcement officer

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 3>in this country, is a crook.

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 4>Just be sure you're right.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's a thrill. We should also probably say a

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 5>few words about Holbrook with his passing and you know,

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 5>one of the things that jumped out at me. I

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.720
<v Speaker 5>mentioned this to you already, but why is he younger

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 5>than I remembered? You know, I think of Holbrook as

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 5>this you know, older actor with the white hair and

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 5>his even his face here is just so young. That

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 5>jumped out at me. But also the key to this

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 5>performance as deep throat is all for me in that

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 5>final conversation, because what he's doing in the in the

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 5>previous ones very effective, you know, in terms of leading

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 5>us on and tantalizing, not giving us too much, just

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 5>as he's not giving Woodword too much and playing that

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 5>cool but also mysterious. But it's that last conversation where

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 5>he goes from this mesmerizing mystery man to a guy

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 5>who's scared.

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Specific how high him. You're a fine enough for yourself.

0:41:54.200 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't like newspapers, I don't care for innings, attitute

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and shoutow on us. It creeps slush fun that financed

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the red We've just about got that nailed down. I

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know how to change cabs.

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 5>That's when, you know, we start to realize, as Woodward does,

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 5>the level of what is at stake here, not just

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 5>for this story, but for the nation, for the for

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 5>democracy really. And it's that little shift that Holbrook gives

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 5>in the performance for the final scene that is building

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 5>on everything he did in the previous scenes, but also

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 5>doing something just slightly but crucially different.

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Another great supporting performance in this movie that offers similarly

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 2>wonderful moments. Jane Alexander, the former secretary to Hugh Sloan,

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 2>who they finally do cajole into talking to them and

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 2>giving them a lot of good information. The look she

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 2>gives when her sister offers and Stein coffee, that's great, Like,

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.760
<v Speaker 2>what are you doing? I'm so trying to avoid every

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.720
<v Speaker 2>part of this, and you just asked him to stay

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and basically guaranteed he's gonna be here five to ten minutes.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 2>And she's just so vulnerable and so scared. But she's

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 2>also clearly indignant.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.439
<v Speaker 7>I thought it was all legal. I mean, I guess

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 7>I did until after the break in, when I remember Gordon.

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Got so much of it.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 7>This is mister Liddy. It's also rotten. It's getting worse.

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:34.800
<v Speaker 7>And the only one I care about is Hugh Sloan.

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 7>His wife was going to leave him if he didn't

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.479
<v Speaker 7>stand up and do what was right, so he quit.

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering if Hugh Sloan was being set up now

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 4>as a fall guy for John Mitchell, what do you think.

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 7>If you guys could get John Mitchell, that would be

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 7>you see the backbone?

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>You see the backbone, see that immediately and so again.

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 2>To balance that complexity as an actress, it is really

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing. But I think this whole discussion has been

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 2>straight out of Wichita Kansas. So we're going to wrap

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 2>it up the first film in our seven from seventy

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 2>six series. I don't know if we've decided what the

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 2>next film is, but as we are talking about movies

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 2>from nineteen seventy six, you can guarantee it will be

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 2>a good one. All the President's Men is available to

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>rent on demand on most platforms. If you agree or

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 2>disagree with our takes, you can email us feedback at

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 2>filmspotting dot net. Josh, a Pantheon movie has now been discussed,

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 2>not many of them, but has been discussed in full

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 2>here on film spot I.

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 5>Don't know, maybe we should do more Pantheon discussions.

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 2>That seven from seventy six series, plus eight for eighty four,

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Josh nine from ninety nine. We talked about six from

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven, didn't get to it. We may have to

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 2>revive this series. Maybe we could go the other way.

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 2>We don't have to keep going back in time. But

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 2>all of those are available in the Film Spotting Archive.

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 2>You get access to that as a Film Spotting Family member.

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 2>We think all of our members and if you would

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 2>like to join, you can learn more about doing that

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 2>at Filmspotting Family dot com. Thanks for listening.

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 3>The fine.

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Film spotting as listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.919
<v Speaker 2>at film spottingfamily dot com and get access to ad

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and, for

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the first time, all in one place, the entire film

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 2>spotting archive going back to two thousand and five. That's

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 2>a film spotting Family dot com panically