1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,400 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. President Trump's lead 6 00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: attorney is trying to explain why he doesn't want the 7 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:28,400 Speaker 1: Commander in chief to testify in the Russia probe. Speaking 8 00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:31,280 Speaker 1: on NBC's Meet the Press, Rudy Giuliani said he doesn't 9 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 1: want President Trump to be stuck in a perjury trap. 10 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:37,240 Speaker 1: And when you tell me that, you know he should 11 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:39,280 Speaker 1: testify because he's going to tell the truth and he 12 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,520 Speaker 1: shouldn't worry. Well, that's so silly because it's somebody's version 13 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 1: of the truth, not the truth. He didn't have a 14 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:48,559 Speaker 1: conversation this truth. I don't mean to go like, I know, 15 00:00:48,720 --> 00:00:52,640 Speaker 1: it isn't truth. Truth isn't truth. Joining us as William Banks, 16 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 1: professor at Syracuse University Law School, Bill, We've talked before 17 00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:00,720 Speaker 1: about Rudy Giuliani's misstatements of law and fact, but I 18 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 1: don't even know where to go with his statement on 19 00:01:03,160 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 1: the truth isn't the truth, and now it's the overwell 20 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 1: comes to mind is one place to go. But you know, 21 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:15,679 Speaker 1: it's certainly the case that the work that's been done 22 00:01:15,680 --> 00:01:18,880 Speaker 1: by Don McGann to testify for what is at seventy 23 00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:24,039 Speaker 1: thirty hours before the Muller team puts President Trump in 24 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:27,680 Speaker 1: an even more difficult position. He's sort of damned if 25 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:31,319 Speaker 1: he does agree to an interview, because he may he 26 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:36,240 Speaker 1: may be contradicting some things that McGann has has said. Uh, 27 00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:39,400 Speaker 1: But he's also damned if he doesn't, because then it's 28 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 1: McGann's version of the events that is going to be 29 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:49,520 Speaker 1: controlling more than likely in Muller's report eventually. So uh, 30 00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:53,760 Speaker 1: always there different versions of events that happened from two 31 00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:56,400 Speaker 1: persons point of view, and the President and McGann may 32 00:01:56,440 --> 00:02:00,560 Speaker 1: have different ones. But the statement that that, uh, that 33 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:03,880 Speaker 1: the truth isn't the truth is not a way to 34 00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 1: try to bring them into one. Uh. Lens Well, And 35 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 1: I wonder if what he was trying to say there 36 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:14,679 Speaker 1: was that there are facts and then you know, I 37 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 1: don't know if he was trying to make a distinction 38 00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:19,240 Speaker 1: there and what's kind of on the spot, but you know, 39 00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 1: there are facts and then there are people's opinions about 40 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,360 Speaker 1: what happened around those facts. That's correct, and of course 41 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:30,120 Speaker 1: he may have a different interpretation. But it seems unlikely 42 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,400 Speaker 1: to me now that the President would decline to speak 43 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 1: to the to the Infant Council, given all the record 44 00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 1: material that McGann has provided them. Let's talk about McGann 45 00:02:42,320 --> 00:02:45,720 Speaker 1: talking to the Special Counsel. A lot was made of 46 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:48,799 Speaker 1: it because of the New York Times story, But does 47 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:53,280 Speaker 1: he really have a choice about testifying to the Independent Council. 48 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 1: I mean, he's representing the White House, not the President, 49 00:02:57,160 --> 00:03:00,639 Speaker 1: that's right. He represents the office, and in that respect, 50 00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:04,200 Speaker 1: he's like any other government employees, So he really didn't 51 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:07,240 Speaker 1: have much of a of a choice. He or through 52 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:11,919 Speaker 1: his counsel, they could have negotiated the terms and conditions 53 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:14,919 Speaker 1: of the interview and the subjects that he felt were 54 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: was appropriate for them to speak to. And it sounds 55 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:21,440 Speaker 1: like he didn't do that because the approach of the 56 00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 1: White House at the time, to Mr Giolanni's predecessors, was 57 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:30,680 Speaker 1: to be h broadly, transparent and open with the Special Counsel. 58 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 1: They would certainly like to walk that back now, but 59 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 1: it's too late. Well, there might not be attorney client 60 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:41,280 Speaker 1: pro furtilage here, but is there any chance that there 61 00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:46,320 Speaker 1: could be executive privilege? Yeah, these questions were you know, 62 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 1: these were litigated, these questions during the Clinton UH scandals 63 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:54,440 Speaker 1: twenty years ago, more than twenty and UH in both 64 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:59,880 Speaker 1: cases on executive privilege and attorney client UH McGann side 65 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:02,280 Speaker 1: would have come out on top. That is, there wasn't 66 00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 1: an executive privilege because of the ongoing investigation that could 67 00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:10,880 Speaker 1: lead to criminal charges. It's a similar scenario that the 68 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:15,680 Speaker 1: Clinton indictment, eventual indictments could have presented that there were 69 00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:20,000 Speaker 1: potential criminal charges from the conduct being investigated, so the 70 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:26,120 Speaker 1: need for the information outweighed any interest in confidentiality or privilege. Bill, 71 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 1: I want to test your memory for a moment, because 72 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:30,799 Speaker 1: I think it's better than mine. But this this morning, 73 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:34,479 Speaker 1: President Trump was tweeting about collusion and how Muller first 74 00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:36,960 Speaker 1: said it was collusion, now he said it was it 75 00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:41,800 Speaker 1: could be obstruction along those lines who first mentioned collusion, 76 00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:45,440 Speaker 1: because as we've discussed before, there is no crime called collusion, 77 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:48,920 Speaker 1: and I don't remember it ever coming from the Muller team, 78 00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:53,520 Speaker 1: which has only dealt in you know, facts, hard facts, 79 00:04:53,520 --> 00:04:57,040 Speaker 1: well facts and law, and as the Muller team knows, 80 00:04:57,080 --> 00:05:00,280 Speaker 1: to a man and woman, there is no such crime 81 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 1: is collusion. There's conspiracy and they know that. Backwards and forwards, 82 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 1: I think we started talking about collusion. Yeah, I think 83 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:12,359 Speaker 1: someone in the Trump group used that phrase originally, but 84 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:14,839 Speaker 1: my memory is not better than yours, June, and I'm 85 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:19,440 Speaker 1: not sure who was. Yeah, well, but you you do. 86 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:24,640 Speaker 1: I'm sure remember back to John Deane and Nixon obviously, 87 00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:27,520 Speaker 1: and uh and so we're so, you know, the president 88 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: is reviving memories of that of all that, well he is, 89 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 1: and you know, I don't think it's fair to to 90 00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:39,679 Speaker 1: equate or even compare, uh Don McGann to John Deane. 91 00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:43,000 Speaker 1: But McGann, you know, he was he was wise enough 92 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:47,080 Speaker 1: and counsel enough to get the advice of counsel before 93 00:05:47,160 --> 00:05:50,240 Speaker 1: he agreed to speak to Mulla, and he was advised 94 00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:53,480 Speaker 1: along the way about the subjects that he should speak 95 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,440 Speaker 1: to and about the depths and clarity of the answers 96 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 1: that he should give. And he's you know, he was 97 00:05:58,360 --> 00:06:02,239 Speaker 1: determined to protect his uh, his own skin here because 98 00:06:02,520 --> 00:06:04,600 Speaker 1: I don't think we would put it beyond the president 99 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:07,800 Speaker 1: to try to place Don McGann in a bad life 100 00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 1: or blame any missteps or legal wrongdoing on on the 101 00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 1: advice of his counsel. I want to change topics a 102 00:06:15,680 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: little here and go to George Papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty 103 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 1: and it's going to be sentenced because the prosecutors, the 104 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:28,239 Speaker 1: Muller prosecutors put in a memo to the court about 105 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,840 Speaker 1: how much how much time he should get, suggesting it 106 00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:36,240 Speaker 1: and it's it's quite stark in their decision or their 107 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:39,960 Speaker 1: opinion that he really did not cooperate with them, and 108 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:45,680 Speaker 1: they didn't recommend a good sentence. They recommended guidelines, right. 109 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 1: I think that is a bit surprising. We were we 110 00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 1: never knew as much about the Papidopolis and aspect of 111 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:56,880 Speaker 1: the investigation on the details concerning it, as we did 112 00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:00,680 Speaker 1: about several other pieces. Sometimes people for got, many of 113 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:07,680 Speaker 1: us forget that it was really the Papadopoulos UH investigation 114 00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 1: that broke open the Russia the Russian inquiry, because people 115 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 1: now associate the beginning of it with the so called 116 00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 1: Steele Do Cia. But Papa was turned evidence or turned 117 00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 1: material over to the UH, to the media and then 118 00:07:26,360 --> 00:07:30,520 Speaker 1: to investigators before the steel issue ever came to light. 119 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 1: The other thing that that surprised me. I had thought 120 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 1: that he please admit a deal with Mueller. But in 121 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 1: the in the memorandum, they say that there wasn't a deal. 122 00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 1: It was just cooperation. Yes, I think that, you know, 123 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 1: they probably were inching toward a deal, but he did 124 00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:50,640 Speaker 1: not give them as much as they felt they needed 125 00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 1: to to get it. So we'll see what his sentence 126 00:07:54,480 --> 00:07:56,720 Speaker 1: turns out to be. All Right, thanks so much, Bill, 127 00:07:56,720 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 1: Always a pleasure. That's William Banks. He's a professor at 128 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:08,960 Speaker 1: Syracuse Unit City Law School. It's day three of jury 129 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:12,320 Speaker 1: deliberations and the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul 130 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:16,040 Speaker 1: Manifort for bank and tax fraud. Speaking to reporters on Friday, 131 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:19,320 Speaker 1: President Trump commented about the trial but declined to say 132 00:08:19,360 --> 00:08:23,720 Speaker 1: whether he would pardon Manifort. I think the whole man 133 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 1: of Port trial is very sad when you look at 134 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:28,800 Speaker 1: what's going on there. I think it's a very sad 135 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: day for our country. He worked for me for a 136 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:34,360 Speaker 1: very short period of time, but you know what, he 137 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,440 Speaker 1: happens to be a very good person. Joining us from 138 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:41,720 Speaker 1: our Bloomberg studios in Washington is Kevin Whitelaw Bloomberg News 139 00:08:41,800 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 1: deputy managing editor. So Kevin the President took to Twitter 140 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 1: again this morning, ratcheting up the attack on Mueller. Where's 141 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:52,840 Speaker 1: the collusion? They made up a phony crime call collusion, 142 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:55,640 Speaker 1: and when there was no collusion, they say there was obstruction. 143 00:08:56,679 --> 00:08:58,679 Speaker 1: What what do you think is going on with this 144 00:08:58,920 --> 00:09:03,360 Speaker 1: ratcheting up of the tax on Mueller day after day? Well, 145 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:05,960 Speaker 1: I mean, I think, you know, this is a continuation 146 00:09:05,960 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 1: of what he's been doing for for weeks now and months. 147 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:09,880 Speaker 1: So at some point, I don't know it. It's a 148 00:09:09,880 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 1: little hard to measure when the temperature goes up or down. Um, 149 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:17,600 Speaker 1: I think the um he clearly feels that he's making 150 00:09:17,679 --> 00:09:20,720 Speaker 1: headway on shaping some public opinion. It sort of keeps 151 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 1: his base short up in theory, and at least so 152 00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:25,480 Speaker 1: is a certain amount of doubt among other other people. 153 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: Opinion polls do suggest that that you know, Mueller's doesn't 154 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 1: have the highest ratings, uh, sort of you know, trust 155 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:34,800 Speaker 1: popularity wise. So so some of these attacks are making 156 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 1: a bit of an impact. Uh. And and he's trying 157 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:40,079 Speaker 1: to prepare the battlefield. I mean, keep in mind, and 158 00:09:40,280 --> 00:09:43,280 Speaker 1: it's not clear that Mueller has the authority to indict 159 00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:47,920 Speaker 1: a sitting president. But so so the biggest risk to 160 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:51,440 Speaker 1: Trump could simply be impeachment, impeachments of political process. So 161 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:55,680 Speaker 1: and you're trying to inoculate yourself against a political threat, 162 00:09:56,400 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 1: you know, sometimes you go on the offensive, and that's 163 00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 1: that's uh, that's what he's doing. What's the over under 164 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:06,640 Speaker 1: on a pardon for Manafort. It's unclear. I mean, you know, 165 00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: I think that um, Trump has enjoyed using the pardon power. 166 00:10:10,920 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 1: Would be pretty decently uncharted territory for for him to 167 00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:16,840 Speaker 1: issue a pardon like this one uncharted territory politically, and 168 00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:18,960 Speaker 1: and I mean, he has the authority to do it, 169 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:23,520 Speaker 1: but the political consequences of it are complicated. Manaford also 170 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:26,319 Speaker 1: faces another trial, so you'd be looking like you're sort 171 00:10:26,360 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 1: of actively undercutting a political investigation in a way he 172 00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:33,560 Speaker 1: hasn't quite done yet. Um. There is also the possibility 173 00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:36,000 Speaker 1: that instead of pardoning him, he could commute a sentence 174 00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 1: after he's sentenced. Um, So that'd be a way to 175 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:41,440 Speaker 1: keep him at jail, but but not quite a full 176 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:44,160 Speaker 1: pardon or obviously, you know, he might he might not 177 00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:47,600 Speaker 1: do anything. We we don't have a good sense of 178 00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:50,160 Speaker 1: of what he's thinking. On that. This is, of course, 179 00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:54,000 Speaker 1: assuming he's convicted, although there are eighteen counts, which I 180 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 1: think explains why the jury is taking a few days 181 00:10:56,120 --> 00:10:58,160 Speaker 1: to to sort of work through them all. Kevin, how 182 00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:01,479 Speaker 1: would a pardon really help the press? Because partning Manafort 183 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 1: means that Manafort can be called before a grand jury 184 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 1: and then he can't take the fifth he has to testify. 185 00:11:06,960 --> 00:11:09,320 Speaker 1: That might be the risk, which is why commuting a 186 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:13,160 Speaker 1: sentence might, um, you know, it might be a more 187 00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:15,560 Speaker 1: attractive way because it could it could make it at 188 00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:19,440 Speaker 1: least more complicated down the line. He we don't really 189 00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 1: know it. I think, you know, to the degree that 190 00:11:21,600 --> 00:11:23,800 Speaker 1: if Manafort was going to cut some kind of a 191 00:11:23,800 --> 00:11:26,400 Speaker 1: deal with prosecutors, he obviously sort of missed his opportunity 192 00:11:26,400 --> 00:11:30,280 Speaker 1: in this trial. So um he could, uh you know, 193 00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:32,559 Speaker 1: I guess still sort of do one down the line, 194 00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:35,920 Speaker 1: but uh uh in terms, you know, in return for 195 00:11:35,960 --> 00:11:38,800 Speaker 1: sentencing relief. It's not clear he even has anything to 196 00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:41,720 Speaker 1: to give. But if if Trump wants to muddy up 197 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 1: the probe, undercut it, you know that he could try 198 00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:48,679 Speaker 1: all kinds of different things. I suppose. Let's shift over 199 00:11:48,760 --> 00:11:54,000 Speaker 1: to Michael Cohen, the president's former attorney personal attorney Fixer, 200 00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 1: according to The New York Times, now under investigation for 201 00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:03,559 Speaker 1: bank fraud and tax fraud around his UM taxi businesses. 202 00:12:03,679 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 1: What's that about? Yes, Well, I think we've known for 203 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 1: a while that that that the prosecutors have been looking 204 00:12:09,640 --> 00:12:12,200 Speaker 1: into loans that he made, uh, that that he got 205 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:16,480 Speaker 1: for his taxi business, that that he probably shouldn't have UM. 206 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:18,960 Speaker 1: And I think he's he's in some pretty serious legal 207 00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 1: jeopardy over those. That's sort of its own thing. I 208 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:24,600 Speaker 1: think it it it. We also know that prosecutors have 209 00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:28,200 Speaker 1: been asking questions about the various payments he helped arrange 210 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,800 Speaker 1: to two women, including Stormy Daniels on behalf of the 211 00:12:30,840 --> 00:12:34,960 Speaker 1: president and others. That's obviously much more significant from a 212 00:12:35,040 --> 00:12:39,640 Speaker 1: sort of political standpoint and from even from a legal standpoint. Uh. 213 00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:41,360 Speaker 1: If if the prosecutors are going there, and I think 214 00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:43,079 Speaker 1: we have less clarity about how far down the line 215 00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:44,960 Speaker 1: they are and trying to do some of those charges 216 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:48,079 Speaker 1: and and where that stands, Uh, it does seem that 217 00:12:48,320 --> 00:12:51,760 Speaker 1: uh Cohen is you know, signaling that he wants he'd 218 00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:54,319 Speaker 1: be interested in trying to make a deal with prosecutors. 219 00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:56,920 Speaker 1: It's not clear they're interested. It's not clear at this 220 00:12:56,960 --> 00:13:00,000 Speaker 1: point whether Cohen even has anything to offer that Pross 221 00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:03,040 Speaker 1: Skeeters actually want. That's that's what's really interesting, is that 222 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:06,080 Speaker 1: he's been sending out these signals. He hired Lannie Davis, 223 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:09,240 Speaker 1: who has also been sending out signals. Seems like, I'll 224 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:11,440 Speaker 1: make a deal. I'll make a deal. But if prosecutors 225 00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:13,360 Speaker 1: want to make a deal, they know how to call 226 00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:15,679 Speaker 1: the his attorney, and his attorney knows how to get 227 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:19,000 Speaker 1: in touch with them. That's exactly right, And it's you know, 228 00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:21,839 Speaker 1: we we don't obviously know whether there's been any conversations, 229 00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:25,280 Speaker 1: but uh, it doesn't seem like it, given that he's 230 00:13:25,280 --> 00:13:28,480 Speaker 1: still signaling it. Remember, they've raided his house, his office, 231 00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:31,720 Speaker 1: his hotel room, so there's a bit of a question 232 00:13:31,760 --> 00:13:33,920 Speaker 1: about what he'd even have to offer them that they 233 00:13:33,960 --> 00:13:36,320 Speaker 1: don't already have if they want to do something. This 234 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:40,200 Speaker 1: case has been separated away from from from Mueller's case, 235 00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 1: so you know, unlike some of the witnesses, a referral 236 00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:45,920 Speaker 1: from Mueller's office was a referral US attorney in the right, 237 00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:49,080 Speaker 1: so right, So it's not clear how, if at all, 238 00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:52,960 Speaker 1: Mueller's case would factor into they're thinking when it comes 239 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:55,079 Speaker 1: to a deal. So even if Cohen had something to 240 00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:58,320 Speaker 1: offer related to Muller's case, you know, st n Y 241 00:13:58,400 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 1: gets to make its own set of decisions and coordination 242 00:14:00,559 --> 00:14:03,719 Speaker 1: with Main Justice about you know what what they what 243 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:06,040 Speaker 1: kind of deal they might Kevin one minute here, but 244 00:14:06,480 --> 00:14:09,280 Speaker 1: Main Justice, I mean, if there's if there's information that 245 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:11,600 Speaker 1: will help the Mueller probe, Mueller will know about it 246 00:14:11,640 --> 00:14:14,080 Speaker 1: if he doesn't know about it already. Yes, I mean 247 00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 1: I think there's there's a fair amount of coordination that 248 00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 1: would go through. But st n wise a decently independent 249 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:20,560 Speaker 1: operation as well, so they've got a fair amount of 250 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:23,480 Speaker 1: room to maneuver when it comes to these things. But yeah, 251 00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: i'd imagine that if they could, if they had something 252 00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:27,400 Speaker 1: related to mother's case, they'd pass it on to Main 253 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:31,440 Speaker 1: Justice and Muller's prosecutors. So that would be a complicated 254 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:33,760 Speaker 1: decision at some point that would probably involve the Deputy 255 00:14:33,760 --> 00:14:38,400 Speaker 1: Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, who's the man overseeing proble. He 256 00:14:38,520 --> 00:14:41,360 Speaker 1: is in the middle of everything, which is why there 257 00:14:41,400 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 1: is so much attention on him. I don't know if 258 00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:45,520 Speaker 1: any Deputy attorney to know we ever knew the name 259 00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: of before even all right, Thanks so much, Kevin. That's 260 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 1: Kevin Whitelaw, Bloomberg News Deputy Managing editor. Thanks for listening 261 00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:55,240 Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and listen 262 00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:58,840 Speaker 1: to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and on bloomberg 263 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:03,640 Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This is Bloomberg. 264 00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:09,640 Speaker 1: H m hm