Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Oh My Biden and the
Speaker 1: people around him, they're actually calling the shots, are showing
Speaker 1: us with each passing day what they're all about, aren't they.
Speaker 1: This is the very radical left administration that we were
Speaker 1: worried about, and now it's just a question of how
Speaker 1: much damage can they do? How much can we stop
Speaker 1: them before they do irreparable damage to not just the
Speaker 1: economy but to America as we know it. The fundamental
Speaker 1: transformation promised by Obama's now in its third term with
Speaker 1: the Biden administration, and Joe Biden is up for the
Speaker 1: challenge of just being an empty suit, being a puppet
Speaker 1: that has other people directing him to do things all
Speaker 1: the time. But doesn't it also feel like the federal
Speaker 1: government is printing money twenty four to seven. I made
Speaker 1: light of President Biden being the six trillion dollars man
Speaker 1: this past week, but behind that is a real set
Speaker 1: of problems. Did you know that about twenty percent of
Speaker 1: all US dollars were created in twenty twenty. That's a
Speaker 1: staggering statistic. What do you think the effect of all
Speaker 1: those newly printed dollars will be inflation? Maybe right. It
Speaker 1: certainly is not going to lead to the dollar becoming
Speaker 1: more valuable. In the past, people have purchased gold and
Speaker 1: silver as a hedge against inflation and the currency manipulations
Speaker 1: of a central bank. That's because gold and silver have
Speaker 1: increased in value as the purchasing power of the dollar declines.
Speaker 1: Buying real gold and silver, the kind you can actually
Speaker 1: hold in your hands, is a lot easier than you think.
Speaker 1: You can actually have it delivered securely and privately to
Speaker 1: your home. It's just as easy to put real gold
Speaker 1: and silver in your I ray or four oh one
Speaker 1: K two. If you're concerned about the value of the
Speaker 1: dollar continue to decrease, I know I am, and the
Speaker 1: risk of inflation, call the Oxford Gold Group today at
Speaker 1: eight three three six hundred gold. The Oxford Gold Group
Speaker 1: is the industry leader in precious medals. They offer real
Speaker 1: gold and sover for the lowest prices, and they have
Speaker 1: a free precious medals investment guide they can send to you.
Speaker 1: Call the Oxford Gold Group today at eight three three
Speaker 1: six hundred gold. That's eight three three six hundred GLD.
Speaker 1: They'll answer all your questions and send you their precious
Speaker 1: Medals investment Guide. You say it perfectly because what the
Speaker 1: Bide administration wants to do has completely redesigned the United
Speaker 1: States of America in a way that's contrary to the Constitution.
Speaker 1: The unit States was designed so that each state would
Speaker 1: be able to have his own design. Texas is a
Speaker 1: perfect example of why we need to have states be
Speaker 1: different because Texas ranks number one in pretty much every
Speaker 1: economic category. Texas has a governor who understands what's going
Speaker 1: on here. He's got ron de Santist envy, but that's
Speaker 1: a good thing. I want him trying to be a
Speaker 1: competitor for Desantists as the best governor in America right now.
Speaker 1: I want more red state governors to step up. There's
Speaker 1: room for it. An Abbott is speaking truth here about
Speaker 1: how the left wants to fundamentally transform the country. He
Speaker 1: understands that they are undermining some of the most essential
Speaker 1: components of our American experience and American freedom. And yet
Speaker 1: we have also the left saying that all of this,
Speaker 1: all these efforts to push it back, are somehow anti
Speaker 1: anti racism, right, that the left wing project of convincing
Speaker 1: the American people to think first and foremost always about
Speaker 1: their race, and that race has to be an influencing
Speaker 1: factor in all government decisions, in all socioeconomic everything. Race
Speaker 1: has to be taken into account and balanced and judged
Speaker 1: by the woke. That's the whole point of all this, right,
Speaker 1: That's what we're told is necessary. Well, there are some
Speaker 1: people who are fighting back and in the state of Texas,
Speaker 1: in South Lake, which is a suburb I believe it's
Speaker 1: northwest of Dallas, pretty well off suburb, there was a
Speaker 1: victory in the school board election there that's getting some
Speaker 1: national attention now. Usually school board elections are not something
Speaker 1: that you'd start a nationally syndicated radio show with hundreds
Speaker 1: and hundreds of stations across the country on. But this
Speaker 1: matters because I think people have woken up to the fact,
Speaker 1: pardon the expression, that unless we start taking action, we're
Speaker 1: just going to keep losing, and we're losing things in
Speaker 1: our society that are precious for all of us, for
Speaker 1: your children, for your grandchildren. The Marxist left is going
Speaker 1: for it right now. They are actually on the march
Speaker 1: and in power, and they're trying to transform the country,
Speaker 1: and they're doing this through education, they're doing this through
Speaker 1: economic policy, and race as a tool of dividing the
Speaker 1: American people is a central weapon in their arsenal. So
Speaker 1: they're trying to teach kids that this is the way
Speaker 1: the country has to be. You will recall a few
Speaker 1: weeks ago there was Paul Rossi, the math teacher at
Speaker 1: Grace Church, who wrote for the Barry Weiss sub stack.
Speaker 1: Barry Weiss was the opinion editor of The New York Times,
Speaker 1: and she was hired specifically to bring in more diverse voices,
Speaker 1: meaning allow some conservative voices in there, and then she
Speaker 1: was fed to the wolves. But Rossi, who teaches at
Speaker 1: a private school in New York that costs over fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year, wrote this, right now, my school
Speaker 1: is asking me to embrace anti racism training and pedagogy,
Speaker 1: a pedagogy that I believe is deeply harmful to them
Speaker 1: and to any person who seeks to nurture the virtues
Speaker 1: of curiosity, empathy, and understanding. Anti racist training sounds righteous,
Speaker 1: but it is the opposite of truth in advertising. It
Speaker 1: requires teachers like myself to treat students differently on the
Speaker 1: basis of race. Furthermore, in order to maintain a united
Speaker 1: front for our students, teachers at GRACE are directed to
Speaker 1: confine our doubts about this pedagogical framework to conversations with
Speaker 1: an in house office of Community Engagement, for whom every
Speaker 1: significant objection leads to a foregone conclusion. Any doubting students
Speaker 1: are likewise challenged to reframe their views to conform to
Speaker 1: this orthodoxy. End quote. I mean, this is what you
Speaker 1: would have expected in the Soviet Union. This is actually
Speaker 1: Soviet style of argument, where your very doubt is evidence
Speaker 1: of your deficiency. If you don't agree right away, that
Speaker 1: proves your deficiency and therefore you must believe even more.
Speaker 1: Critical race theory is racism around race instead of class,
Speaker 1: meaning economic status. That's what critical race theory is, and
Speaker 1: it is being taught in schools. It's being taught to
Speaker 1: your children. They're they're coming home and they're lecturing their
Speaker 1: parents even about how they don't engage enough with structural
Speaker 1: white supremacy and dismantle it the way that they're supposed to.
Speaker 1: This is madness, but it's very effective. It's brainwashing. Well,
Speaker 1: this school Aboard in South Lake just had a had
Speaker 1: a a win of people who are actually opposed to this,
Speaker 1: and no surprise, the media is just doing everything they
Speaker 1: can to run interference to show this in a way
Speaker 1: that the good guys are the people brainwashing your kids
Speaker 1: with Marxist claptrap. Yeah, that's how the media approaches this.
Speaker 1: The media is disgusting. I mean, the corporate media in
Speaker 1: this country is overwhelmingly the enemy of the American people,
Speaker 1: the enemy of the American experiment. They harm They are harmful.
Speaker 1: They've been harmful during the entirety of the COVID pandemic.
Speaker 1: They are harmful with their lies about Russia collusion. They're
Speaker 1: harmful now as they cheer for people to be locked
Speaker 1: up in solitary confinement for the crime of a so
Speaker 1: called insurrection that in many of these cases were just
Speaker 1: people who were engaged in trespass during a riot, something
Speaker 1: the left does on a regular basis. So, yes, the
Speaker 1: corporate media or in fact the enemy of the American people,
Speaker 1: and we should be honest about that. It's one of
Speaker 1: the best things Donald Trump said out loud, among many things.
Speaker 1: Here's how NBC News reports on this election in Southlake, Texas.
Speaker 1: In bitterly divided election in south Lake. Opponents of anti
Speaker 1: racism education win big. I mean bitterly divided. It's seventy thirty.
Speaker 1: First of all, in a close election. There's a school
Speaker 1: board election, but it wasn't close. And it's only bitterly
Speaker 1: divided because the left wing Marxist or a bunch of lunatics.
Speaker 1: They've been brainwashed and they want to brainwash everybody else.
Speaker 1: And this stuff they say is absurd and contradictory and
Speaker 1: they have no real answers, but they want to get
Speaker 1: at the kids when they're young. Remember at first they
Speaker 1: took over the universities, and we said, oh, well, people
Speaker 1: are crazy in college and then they grow out of it.
Speaker 1: That was our theory. Wrong. No, that's not how it works.
Speaker 1: Four years of Marxist indoctrination, whether it's at Harvard or
Speaker 1: community college, it's all going to end up with the
Speaker 1: same thing, which is a majority of those students realize
Speaker 1: that at some level their status in society is tied
Speaker 1: to these beliefs if they want to be liked and
Speaker 1: elevated and get certain kind of jobs and get hired
Speaker 1: by certain companies. And that's because you've already had now
Speaker 1: a couple of waves, a couple of generations of the
Speaker 1: Marxist shock troops coming out of colleges and universities, and
Speaker 1: now they're in their thirties and forties, and they have
Speaker 1: power and institutions that have a lot of power in
Speaker 1: America like Google and Facebook and Amazon and American Express
Speaker 1: and Delta Airlines and Nike, the woke maybe acts. We thought, oh,
Speaker 1: they'll pay taxes and they'll figure it out. No, they
Speaker 1: moved to blue enclaves, to deep blue cities on the
Speaker 1: coast predominantly or just very blue cities throughout America. And
Speaker 1: they have only like minded friends, and they have like
Speaker 1: minded echo chambers of social media, and they work at
Speaker 1: companies that put out these corporate multiculturalism and diversity statements.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's embarrassing the stuff that's being said by
Speaker 1: these companies. I mean, I played for you last week
Speaker 1: that woman from the CIA who's talking about how she
Speaker 1: doesn't have imposter syndrome any or than she's a cis
Speaker 1: gender Latina female diagnosed with like some kind of anxiety
Speaker 1: disorder or something. But she's earned her place the CIA.
Speaker 1: I mean, the CIA is turning into a has honestly
Speaker 1: been for a long time a jobs program for the
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly mediocre and lazy, and that's the hardest federal agency
Speaker 1: to get into. By far, CIA is the most selective,
Speaker 1: and it's turned into a joke. Ten percent of that
Speaker 1: place are the kind of people that you would want
Speaker 1: working at the CIA, meaning steely eyed, intelligent, hardworking patriots
Speaker 1: who are all about the mission. It's ten percent and
Speaker 1: then it's probably twenty or thirty percent sloth, and then
Speaker 1: the rest are left. The rest are woke. Yes, that's
Speaker 1: what's happened. This is in the intelligence community. Don't you
Speaker 1: see the infiltration all throughout America of people who old
Speaker 1: that the Constitution is essentially a foolish document written by white,
Speaker 1: racist slave holders, so it doesn't really have any any
Speaker 1: moral or ideological pull for them at all. It's not
Speaker 1: some document of political genius that has created the greatest
Speaker 1: society in the history of the world. No, no, it's evil,
Speaker 1: And yes we should have you know, bands on white
Speaker 1: male authors in libraries and replace it with you know,
Speaker 1: LGBTQ female writers of the seventeen and eighteen hundreds or whatever. Right,
Speaker 1: they're just coming up with all this nonsense all the time.
Speaker 1: And we thought, because conservatives focus on what they think matters,
Speaker 1: and the day to day and what is real will
Speaker 1: seed all this ground to the other other side. It's fine,
Speaker 1: let them have Hollywood, let them have academia. Well, now
Speaker 1: they're teaching you're eight year old that maybe he's a girl,
Speaker 1: and if you have a problem with that, you're a bigot.
Speaker 1: And your child is being taught that you are the problem.
Speaker 1: This is America. Now, this is happening all over the place.
Speaker 1: You know, some of you might live in a red
Speaker 1: enough part of the country where you don't think it
Speaker 1: really affects you. Go to your state capital, to go
Speaker 1: to the largest city in your state and tell me
Speaker 1: what's going on with the school district there, and you
Speaker 1: could say, oh, but I'm okay where I am. Really,
Speaker 1: where's population growing the most. I'm not talking about at
Speaker 1: a state level. I'm talking about urban versus rural. The
Speaker 1: cities dominate the politics of states. Whether it's California, Illinois,
Speaker 1: New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, the cities dominate in these places.
Speaker 1: Increasing You're going to see in Texas if they just
Speaker 1: get San Antonio and Dallas and Houston blue enough, they
Speaker 1: think they can flip the state. They're not trying to win,
Speaker 1: you know, the Permian basin. They're not trying to win
Speaker 1: West Texas. The Democrats don't care. They're going for the
Speaker 1: population centers that we see so much of this, and
Speaker 1: I understand the mentality, we just want to live our lives.
Speaker 1: But unless we start getting active, unless the right, conservatives,
Speaker 1: reasonable people mobilize, You've seen what the other side is
Speaker 1: willing to put us through with their absurd lockdowns and
Speaker 1: masked bandates and the hypocrisy. They don't care. Hypocrisy is
Speaker 1: not a criticism that stings the left. They enjoy hypocrisy.
Speaker 1: Hypocrisy means they have the power to force you to
Speaker 1: do things that they won't do, to force you to
Speaker 1: obey rules that they themselves will break. Hypocrisy is one
Speaker 1: of the perks. It shows there that you're under their
Speaker 1: boot heel. They have no problem with it. You can
Speaker 1: cry about hypocrisy all day. They have the power. It's
Speaker 1: like Pompy Magnus in ancient Rome. Do not quote laws
Speaker 1: to men with sword, don't quote hypocrisy to the woke left.
Speaker 1: They don't give a crap. People are figuring this out now.
Speaker 1: You want to stop this, You need the power to
Speaker 1: stop them. We need to identify the problem and take
Speaker 1: it on. And this is the local school board. I
Speaker 1: know it's not sexy. I know it's not you know,
Speaker 1: national level power and all this other stuff. We're always
Speaker 1: so focused on the presidency, every community, every town and
Speaker 1: city and state. There's a fight going on right now
Speaker 1: for who's calling the shots, who's in charge. You all
Speaker 1: have a role to play. Spoke to an English teacher
Speaker 1: from an elite NYC private school. She says colleagues are
Speaker 1: miserable with the new woke regime. Students are the commissars
Speaker 1: shouting about harm and trauma in the presence of any
Speaker 1: book or idea that deviates from the leftist orthodoxy, and
Speaker 1: administrators are scared of them. That was from ka Heimowitz
Speaker 1: at the Manhattan Institute over the weekend. It's amazing, isn't it.
Speaker 1: These these elite prep schools who are just a funnel
Speaker 1: or supposed to be, to the Ivy League, which are
Speaker 1: a funnel to the corporate you know, the corporate boardroom
Speaker 1: of the biggest companies and law firms and Wall Street
Speaker 1: investment banks. And they're all putting out statements that read
Speaker 1: like they were written by Malcolm X. But the people
Speaker 1: running these schools actually sound like Thurston how the third
Speaker 1: when you meet them, I mean, they're in a fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars YO tuition, but they're all, oh, yeah, we're
Speaker 1: all about social justice and all that stuff. Sure, sure
Speaker 1: we are, you know, we're really we're really engaging against
Speaker 1: the white supremacist rhetoric of you know, Shakespeare in our
Speaker 1: literature classes these days. Whatever. So, and we have to
Speaker 1: take this ideology head on. I think that conservatives did
Speaker 1: not take it very seriously a long time. And now
Speaker 1: the brain virus of CRT has spread. It has replicated
Speaker 1: and critical race theory, which is based upon concepts of
Speaker 1: white privilege and microaggression, which are based upon constant, hyper
Speaker 1: sensitive resentment of even the smallest slight that it's not
Speaker 1: clear at all that it's racial. But if you decide
Speaker 1: that everything, every slight you feel is racial, well then
Speaker 1: you create quite a bit of resentment, don't you. And
Speaker 1: you have to buy into all of this. It's fascinating,
Speaker 1: isn't it. We have a country that Left tells us
Speaker 1: is elevating whiteness and white supremacy. But it's curious that
Speaker 1: Asian Americans have a higher household income than white Americans do.
Speaker 1: And in fact, Nigerian Americans they're about a half a
Speaker 1: million of them the United States. Nigerian immigrants the United
Speaker 1: States have a higher income, substantially higher, about fifteen to
Speaker 1: twenty percent more than the average white American household. So
Speaker 1: we have a system, they tell us of white supremacy,
Speaker 1: that is the is the primary reason for disparities in
Speaker 1: socioeconomic status among all groups in the country. And yet
Speaker 1: you have a substantial group of immigrants directly from Africa
Speaker 1: who are outperforming pretty much all groups in this country.
Speaker 1: It's so interesting, is it. You don't hear much about
Speaker 1: that to you, And you know, bless those Nigerians for
Speaker 1: working hard and doing a you know, living the American dream.
Speaker 1: You know, welcome to the American family. I mean a
Speaker 1: lot of them have been here for many years. But
Speaker 1: you get my point. It's it's stunning. You don't have
Speaker 1: any honesty around this from the left. They don't really
Speaker 1: care about that though, just like they don't care about hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: which is why we need to stop. Look, it doesn't
Speaker 1: mean we can't point it out. It's important to point
Speaker 1: out the hypocrisy in so far as it's a reminder
Speaker 1: that our side is right in their side is wrong.
Speaker 1: So I'm not because I'm going to point it out.
Speaker 1: You know, it's important to use it as a tool,
Speaker 1: for example, with lockdowns and mask mandates. One of the
Speaker 1: reasons why we know it's bullcrap is that the people
Speaker 1: who are the strictest about it in the government structure,
Speaker 1: whether it's Gavin Newsummer, Gretchen Whitman or others, they or
Speaker 1: their staffs violate it and are not worried about it
Speaker 1: and expect you to be so worried about it. And
Speaker 1: it's just nonsense. It's absurd. You see that they don't
Speaker 1: mean what they say. So it's important for us to
Speaker 1: remind our own side and anybody who's still open minded
Speaker 1: who's not yet on our side of their hypocrisy. But
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, don't think you will shame the left
Speaker 1: through allegations of hypocrisy into changing their ways. They delight
Speaker 1: in it. It's kind of like the gas lighting they do.
Speaker 1: You know. One of their favorite, one of their favorite tools,
Speaker 1: one of their favorite tactics is to say there's no
Speaker 1: cancel culture, what are even talking about? Just to see
Speaker 1: us all have our heads explode because, I mean, the
Speaker 1: cancel culture is everywhere. We're all living in some state
Speaker 1: of anxiety over it. But you'll if you do, if
Speaker 1: you type in on Google right now, there is no
Speaker 1: cancel culture. You'll see countless think pieces from the left
Speaker 1: quote think pieces about how there's no such thing as
Speaker 1: cancel culture. It's just accountability culture doesn't even exist. And
Speaker 1: they just want to They just want to stop the
Speaker 1: free speech of those who are using speech to punish
Speaker 1: others for speech. I mean, they try to dizzy you
Speaker 1: with illogical and absurd statements, but it works works on
Speaker 1: a lot of people. Now we're just seeing now the
Speaker 1: pushback against this. And here's another example. Governor Ronda Santis
Speaker 1: is signing and executive order today suspending all COVID emergency orders.
Speaker 1: He's also signing a built to limit localized emergency orders,
Speaker 1: which are direct violation of individual liberty. And he's permanently
Speaker 1: banning vaccine passports altogether for COVID nineteen. Name a better governor.
Speaker 1: It is not possible. He is the best governor America,
Speaker 1: and Rondas santists. I'm just gonna say it, folks, he
Speaker 1: should not be anyone's running mate in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: Rohnds Santists should be at the top of the ticket
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. I want Trump to use the
Speaker 1: MAGA movement to push for Descantists, not what are Trump's kids.
Speaker 1: I want rondas Santiss because of the results, because of
Speaker 1: what he's doing for the people of Florida, and also
Speaker 1: the beacon of freedom and salvation he's creating for the
Speaker 1: rest of the country. DC has banned dancing at weddings
Speaker 1: indoor and outdoor. I want you to just think about
Speaker 1: that for a second. Yes, everybody is making Footloose jokes,
Speaker 1: and I will tell you that I've I've stayed away
Speaker 1: from that because I've actually never seen the movie. So
Speaker 1: I've never seen it. Brucer Mark is in a good movie.
Speaker 1: Yes it's a classic. Okay, I've never seen Footloose, but
Speaker 1: I know it's about a town where there's no dancing allowed.
Speaker 1: That's now our nation's capital, Washington, DC banning dancing and
Speaker 1: standing at weddings. At wedding receptions not allowed. Twenty five
Speaker 1: percent capacity or two hundred and fifty people, they're saying,
Speaker 1: but standing and dancing at receptions not allowed. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just the problem with empowering bureaucrats and government
Speaker 1: officials who are leftists, who are authoritarians, is that they
Speaker 1: always think that they have a better idea. They always
Speaker 1: think that they should have more power. They never realize
Speaker 1: that they're not very smart. They lack the humility to
Speaker 1: understand that they're making that policy decisions are always a
Speaker 1: series of trade offs, and so you only should be
Speaker 1: making decisions in areas where you have a compelling government
Speaker 1: interest that is clear, and where you've really weighed the consequences.
Speaker 1: But no, they just want to They just want to
Speaker 1: constantly haul monitor everything. They are the unending busy bodies
Speaker 1: of American life. What are you doing? What are you doing?
Speaker 1: Why are you doing that? Don't do that? Do this,
Speaker 1: don't do that, do this. And it's horrifying, you know,
Speaker 1: And I'm glad that people others have. You know, I've
Speaker 1: been on the anti Fauci train for I mean, I've
Speaker 1: been like the conductor of it for the last year.
Speaker 1: Choo choo, Fouci, You're the worst. I've been telling everybody here.
Speaker 1: I am fouch. You know. I use big words when
Speaker 1: I'm talking about numbers on TV, because then I, you know,
Speaker 1: think that people maybe will think of looking on data
Speaker 1: instead of thinking what will my friends at the Washington
Speaker 1: Post editorial page think about my lady's guidance about mitigation efforts. However,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not the only one who does. This
Speaker 1: guy what's his name, Mark, He's on TikTok Tyler something,
Speaker 1: Tyler Fisher, some guy named Tyler. I just want to
Speaker 1: give him credit. Here's his version of what it's like
Speaker 1: to listen to doctor doctor Faucio off a TikTok play it.
Speaker 1: I'd say, even if you live alone, I would wear
Speaker 1: a mask in the house, especially in the shower, because frankly,
Speaker 1: droplets can make the way through the drain and come
Speaker 1: up through somebody else's toilet, infecting them with COVID through
Speaker 1: the anus. At Bullpark, in two to five to twenty years,
Speaker 1: we can start thinking about considering the idea of pondering
Speaker 1: the thought of conceptualizing the possibility of maybe perhaps reopening
Speaker 1: but probably not. I would avoid having any fun whatsoever
Speaker 1: in the near to far future. Guy's brilliant. I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, I would avoid having any fun. I mean
Speaker 1: that is pretty much or human contact or living your life.
Speaker 1: You know, they're at least one hundred million people in
Speaker 1: America who have had COVID and who are at an
Speaker 1: entirely reasonable risk level. I'm talking about forget about vaccines.
Speaker 1: One hundred million people have had it, at least probably
Speaker 1: more like one hundred and fifty million. But we all
Speaker 1: have to live in fear all the time. We all
Speaker 1: have to. You know, I was forced to obey all
Speaker 1: the stupid, all the dumb ass restrictions on planes in
Speaker 1: New York City, and restaurants and grocery stores in my
Speaker 1: own building and my own lobby still got COVID and
Speaker 1: I lasted a year. So it's not like I was
Speaker 1: being reckless and just trying to get it right. Took me.
Speaker 1: It took me a year to get it, but I
Speaker 1: still got it. But the Fauciites have had a faulty,
Speaker 1: faulty logic all along, and it stretches back to two
Speaker 1: weeks to flatten the curve. It was never going to
Speaker 1: be two weeks to flatten the curve. That doesn't make
Speaker 1: sense for their goal. Their goal was to stop the virus.
Speaker 1: They said. They pretended that we could prevent mass infection
Speaker 1: of this pandemic across the country. That was a fantasy,
Speaker 1: and they didn't weigh out the consequences of what they
Speaker 1: were going to do to all of us in the meantime.
Speaker 1: But they got us to comply. The camel's nose in
Speaker 1: the tent, you know, the beginning, the thin end of
Speaker 1: the wedge was two weeks to flatten the curve for
Speaker 1: hospital capacity. That seemed reasonable. Did we ever? Did we ever?
Speaker 1: Overflow hospital passing in this country never happened, And yet
Speaker 1: that was the big fear of tactic. Remember when they
Speaker 1: told us that we had to have a million ventilators.
Speaker 1: That was what was actually said by I think it
Speaker 1: was Pelosi Cuomo. A million? Does things cost forty or
Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars a unit? You need a trained staff
Speaker 1: of ICU nurses, not even just standard nurses, you need
Speaker 1: ICU trained nurses to run them. And then we found
Speaker 1: out that putting people on the ventilators too early, which
Speaker 1: is what they were doing, and not putting them on
Speaker 1: their stomachs, which they weren't initially doing, led to increased mortality,
Speaker 1: and that for many people, being put on the ventilators
Speaker 1: was a death sentence. Thousands and thousands of people. But
Speaker 1: I understand that was in the early days fog of
Speaker 1: war challenges, didn't know a lot people terrified. Okay, now,
Speaker 1: now we've been in this thing for a year. We've
Speaker 1: seen where they're right, where they're wrong, and they don't
Speaker 1: accept that they were wrong in any This mean they
Speaker 1: have a belief that they've done just a great job.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, No, they've been fantastic on this issue. It's absurd,
Speaker 1: isn't it. But I want you to be prepared while
Speaker 1: they're doing stupid things like banning dancing at weddings, so
Speaker 1: you can be indoors and you can be there for
Speaker 1: hours at a time, But it's dancing that's the problem.
Speaker 1: Mayor Bowser got rid of the outdoor mask mandate in
Speaker 1: DC for a day and then switched it back a
Speaker 1: town I think it's Brookline in Massachusetts, which is you know,
Speaker 1: it's like a bunch of Hillary and Obama voters all
Speaker 1: decided to make one pound in Massachusetts. It's a wealthy
Speaker 1: liberal suburb of Massachusetts. They've decided that even though the
Speaker 1: state no longer has an outdoor mask mandate because of
Speaker 1: the CDC guides. I hate the term guides. This is
Speaker 1: CDC rules. They're rules because all these different political tyrants
Speaker 1: across the country say, oh, the CDC says it, you
Speaker 1: got to do it. Will send men with guns, will
Speaker 1: send state police or local police to drag you out
Speaker 1: of the church because the CDC says so. So let's
Speaker 1: not pretend that the lab coat tyrants are just sharing advice,
Speaker 1: just giving us some of their thoughts. No, the CDC's
Speaker 1: proclamations because we allowed this, have the force of law.
Speaker 1: And it's absurd and it's a nightmare. CDC is full
Speaker 1: of middling morons, that's right. The people that are making
Speaker 1: the policy decisions at the CDC, whether it's a Will
Speaker 1: Lenski or any of the people around her, idiots, horrible judgment,
Speaker 1: maybe knowledgeable about some things, horrible judgment and judge and
Speaker 1: knowledge without judgment. It's still very possible to be a dumbass.
Speaker 1: And I bring you the next phase. You keep thinking,
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people are not you, but
Speaker 1: one keeps thinking, you know, oh, we're just gonna wait
Speaker 1: out there crazy. They can't stay crazy forever. The Fauciites
Speaker 1: will run out of steam with their lunacy. Wrong. I
Speaker 1: bring you what I've been telling you all along Forever covid.
Speaker 1: I wrote a post on Bucksexton dot com, which is
Speaker 1: one of the reasons why I want you to keep
Speaker 1: checking in on that side, because I'm writing for it
Speaker 1: multiple times a week and I've got a team that's
Speaker 1: posting news stories every day. Go to bucksex and dot com.
Speaker 1: You can also listen to my podcast there. But I
Speaker 1: wrote a piece a while ago on get Ready, Get
Speaker 1: Ready for forever covid, and I got fact checked. Officially,
Speaker 1: they banned it on Facebook. They said it was false information.
Speaker 1: Oh really. One of the things that I said that
Speaker 1: they said was false was that wearing a mask outdoors
Speaker 1: is unreasonable for was at low risk. I should have
Speaker 1: specified for the vaccinated, but I shouldn't have because it's
Speaker 1: actually low risk for everybody. And they said that that
Speaker 1: was a fact check. Oh, my judgment can now be
Speaker 1: fact checked. And now the CDC has admitted that. Remember
Speaker 1: they're admitting it now because they have to. It's been
Speaker 1: true all along. It's been stupid. Wearing two masks or
Speaker 1: one mask outside has been dumb all along, not rooted
Speaker 1: in any realistic, fair minded interpretation of the numbers. But
Speaker 1: if you thought this was just going away. I got
Speaker 1: news for you. It's not reaching. This is the New
Speaker 1: York Times piece Reaching herd immunity is unlikely in the US.
Speaker 1: Widely circulating coronavirus variants and persistent hesitancy about vaccines will
Speaker 1: keep the goal out of reach. The virus is here
Speaker 1: to stay. That's that's all in this piece. But vaccinating
Speaker 1: the most vulnerable maybe enough to restore normalcy. So they
Speaker 1: don't want to tell you yet for sure that the
Speaker 1: COVID authoritarians are never actually just going to recede into
Speaker 1: the background and want to have control of your life.
Speaker 1: They're not going to tell you that yet. But they're
Speaker 1: gearing up for this. They're gearing up for it. The
Speaker 1: virus is unlikely to go away, said Rustam Amptia, the
Speaker 1: evolutionary biologist at University of Emory in Atlanta. But we
Speaker 1: want to do all we can to check that it's
Speaker 1: likely to become a mild infection. The virus is going
Speaker 1: to be here forever, folks, is what they're telling you.
Speaker 1: The virus gonna be here forever. So if if we
Speaker 1: continue with this unreasonable event of mentality, that that the
Speaker 1: infections have to be basically zero or you still have
Speaker 1: to keep masking, get ready for it. Even if we
Speaker 1: get out of some masks going on to the summer.
Speaker 1: Come next winter, they're going to say we got a
Speaker 1: mask up again. And if you say why there's so
Speaker 1: little COVID, that seems to say, well, what about the
Speaker 1: flu flu plus covid got a mask up. We've now
Speaker 1: turned into a mask society. I will not I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna tell you this. I will not live in a
Speaker 1: state that allows this madness to continue. I will whatever
Speaker 1: state I live in that I live in New York. Now,
Speaker 1: if they keep doing this, I'm moving. I mean I
Speaker 1: want to move as it is, but I'm absolutely fleeing
Speaker 1: this insanity. These people around New York City, they are
Speaker 1: they are nerve wracked over anxious virtue signaling, seeing and
Speaker 1: worshiping lib idiots. They're all over the place. They'll believe
Speaker 1: anything a doctor Fauci says. And they're so disdainful of
Speaker 1: those of us who are saying, you should get your
Speaker 1: life back, we should have normalcy back, let's go, let's
Speaker 1: do this. They're hateful toward those people because to accept
Speaker 1: that they're right now would be to open up the
Speaker 1: possibility that they've been right for a long time. And
Speaker 1: what does that mean for all the people that have
Speaker 1: masks in their Facebook profile photo, masks as their Twitter avatar.
Speaker 1: That's embarrassing. You can take a look around journalists. There's
Speaker 1: so many of them with them wearing a mask in
Speaker 1: their photo. Why Because it symbols. It's a symbol of
Speaker 1: political allegiance, because it's a giant opportunity for virtue signaling,
Speaker 1: because you're not a trumper. Oh okay, appalling stupidity. And
Speaker 1: they're so surly and smug about it all, aren't they.
Speaker 1: They've been wrong all along. They're just not the maskers,
Speaker 1: the lockdowners, the fauciite, just not nearly as clever as
Speaker 1: they think they are. Get ready, everybody free, a new
Speaker 1: weaponized aggressive in your face in every aspect of your life.
Speaker 1: Internal revenue service. Boy, that's really bringing people together. That's
Speaker 1: a really uniting force for the American people because everyone
Speaker 1: loves the irs. So let's have them in every aspect
Speaker 1: of your life to see if they can squeeze another
Speaker 1: nickel out of your pocket for Joe Biden to spend.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, that's not what this country is all about.
Speaker 1: And so when you look at exactly what's going on here.
Speaker 1: What's going on is that Joe Biden ran as a
Speaker 1: moderate uniter and he is now governing as a Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders Elizabeth Warren way out socialist liberal. And so I'm
Speaker 1: willing to let that take some time for the American people.
Speaker 1: Haven't sink in, Yeah, he is. That's Chris Christie, and
Speaker 1: he's right on this. The Biden that we're getting is
Speaker 1: not the Biden that was offered up in the general election.
Speaker 1: But we should have known that, right I knew it.
Speaker 1: You knew it. But not enough Americans in some places
Speaker 1: figured this out. They went with Biden because he didn't
Speaker 1: represent what the Democrats are all about, because he pretended
Speaker 1: to be a different kind of Democrat. It was all
Speaker 1: a fraud. It's all one bing lie, and now we're
Speaker 1: living with the consequences of it. And if the media
Speaker 1: wasn't so deep in the pocket, I mean, you look
Speaker 1: at the crises that are going on right now, the
Speaker 1: border crisis undeniable, the homicide rise crisis across the country undeniable,
Speaker 1: the continued assault on our most basic individual freedoms because
Speaker 1: of the Fauciite lunacy undeniable. You have all these problems still,
Speaker 1: and yet the way the media talks about Biden, we're
Speaker 1: being led to believe, Oh, everyone's so happy with everyone's
Speaker 1: so optimistic. You know who thinks he's great. Hillary, She's
Speaker 1: still out there, believe it or not. Play four. But
Speaker 1: it wasn't until the pandemic that I think a truly
Speaker 1: working majority of Americans crossing party lines, as we've seen
Speaker 1: because of the approval that Republicans and independent voters are
Speaker 1: giving Biden suddenly understood in a clear way that you
Speaker 1: know what, there's lots of times when we need the government,
Speaker 1: and we've been exposed as lacking in the kind of
Speaker 1: investments and support that we as Americans should be providing
Speaker 1: each other with the government as our partner. And I'm
Speaker 1: thrilled that, you know, President Biden is taking advantage of
Speaker 1: this moment to try to push the agenda as far
Speaker 1: as possible. Puss far as possible. She wanted to be
Speaker 1: your president. She was close. I will always be thankful
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump for saving us from four years of
Speaker 1: that nightmare. But always but she sees what this is.
Speaker 1: This year is when they go for it. Next year
Speaker 1: is when the Democrat Left goes back to twenty twenty
Speaker 1: and pretends it's just good old Grandpa, amtrack Joe here
Speaker 1: and I'm just here bringing people together, and the whole
Speaker 1: pull crap parade starts all over again. I want twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one to be the year of the big small
Speaker 1: business come back. I want small businesses across America to
Speaker 1: have their best year in recorded you know, history and
Speaker 1: recent memory, because they've been through so much with COVID
Speaker 1: and it is possible, you know, even with this Biden
Speaker 1: administration making decisions that it does, it's possible to you know,
Speaker 1: get it going. I mean, you can just bootstrap it
Speaker 1: and local communities support the small businesses and will be
Speaker 1: good to go. But you gotta make smart decisions. And
Speaker 1: one of them is how you handle your HR because
Speaker 1: when running a business, HR issues can kill you. And
Speaker 1: you've got wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations,
Speaker 1: and BAMBI is your solution because otherwise you're going to
Speaker 1: be spanning seventy thousand dollars a year on an HR
Speaker 1: manager salary, that's the average. Well, BAMBI is created specifically
Speaker 1: for small business to help with all this. You get
Speaker 1: a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy and maintain your
Speaker 1: compliance all for just ninety nine dollars a month. With Bamby,
Speaker 1: you can change HR from your biggest liability to your
Speaker 1: biggest strength. Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email,
Speaker 1: or real time chat from onboarding determinations that customize your
Speaker 1: policies to fit your business, and they help you manage
Speaker 1: your employees day to day, all for just ninety nine
Speaker 1: dollars a month, month a month, no hidden fees. Cancel anytime.
Speaker 1: Go to Bamby dot com slash buck right now and
Speaker 1: schedule your free HR audit. That's Bambee dot com slash
Speaker 1: Buck Bamby dot com slash Buck b Ambee and said,
Speaker 1: if you're free HR audit for your small business, it's
Speaker 1: an amazing service, so straightforward and easy to use, could
Speaker 1: save you tens of thousands of dollars. I'll tell you
Speaker 1: it seemed to me to be almost like a out
Speaker 1: of a dis opian novel. You see him there, everyone's vaccinated.
Speaker 1: You have the VP and the speaker behind you know,
Speaker 1: wearing these masks. You hardly have anybody in the chamber. Um.
Speaker 1: It really just sent I think a message that America's
Speaker 1: on its back right now. It didn't exude strength, and
Speaker 1: I think his pedestrian delivery of it. Obviously, you know
Speaker 1: he's he's not the sharpest tool in the toolbox anymore.
Speaker 1: I think that was readily apparents so, so I thought
Speaker 1: it was really sad. To be honest with you, I
Speaker 1: thought it was sad too. But he mentioned that was
Speaker 1: Rohnda Santis, the best governor in America, and he mentioned Dystopia.
Speaker 1: Here's a story you should know about from the from
Speaker 1: the Alaska Watchman newspaper. Paul and Marilyn Hooper, owners of
Speaker 1: homer In and Spa, woke with a start. At nine
Speaker 1: am on April twenty eighth, one a in armed FBI
Speaker 1: agents kicked down their front door in an investigation associated
Speaker 1: with Representative Nancy Pelosi's stolen laptop, which was taken during
Speaker 1: the January sixth siege of the nation's capital. Speaking April
Speaker 1: twenty ninth to Kenai based radio host Bob Bird of
Speaker 1: The Bird's Eye View, Paul recalled that he was alarmed
Speaker 1: and shocked to come out of his bedroom with seven
Speaker 1: guns pointing at him and his wife. It was a
Speaker 1: little alarming. When I turned around the corner. Paul said,
Speaker 1: the first thing to do was start barking out commands. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: the couple was handcuffed and interrogated for the better part
Speaker 1: of three hours before being released. In the end, it
Speaker 1: was a case of mistaken identity. The hoopers were in
Speaker 1: DC for the rally with President Trump on January sixth,
Speaker 1: but they never came close to entering the capital, and
Speaker 1: they certainly never took Pelosi's laptop. It appears the FBI
Speaker 1: were most interested in Maryland. They had a photo of
Speaker 1: a woman wearing the same coat as her, with a
Speaker 1: similar hairstyle. The photo was taken from a Capitol building cameras,
Speaker 1: but beyond the hair and the coat, there is little
Speaker 1: similarity between Marilyn and the woman photographed inside the Capitol.
Speaker 1: The entire saga left Hubers disoriented, but determined to better
Speaker 1: understand and defend their personal liberties and those are their
Speaker 1: friends and neighbors. We sat there for the first hour,
Speaker 1: not knowing what's going on. They never offered for us
Speaker 1: to be comfortable. It was harshly done, Paul said. The
Speaker 1: agents ransacked the house and left a huge hole in
Speaker 1: his front door, which they offered to replace. Paul said
Speaker 1: he knew he was innocent of whatever they suspected him
Speaker 1: and his wife of, but it was still pretty confusing.
Speaker 1: After more than an hour, the agents told him the
Speaker 1: raid had to do with the January sixth siege of
Speaker 1: the Capitol. The Hupers were only part of a peaceful
Speaker 1: protest in DC. Paul said they never entered the Capitol
Speaker 1: building and were at least one hundred yards away from
Speaker 1: the entrance. Agents showed Paul a photo of the woman
Speaker 1: who did enter the Capitol and asked if that was
Speaker 1: his wife. They had the same coat on, but the
Speaker 1: face of the woman was quite different from my wife's.
Speaker 1: My wife is much better looking than that, he said.
Speaker 1: While separated from her husband, Marilyn was told while the
Speaker 1: agents were at their home, we're here for Nancy Pelosi's laptop.
Speaker 1: The agents then claimed they had positively identified Marilyn as
Speaker 1: being in the Capitol building and they wanted to know
Speaker 1: who she was working with. Marilyn said she tried to
Speaker 1: be respectful but couldn't help but laugh. I couldn't read
Speaker 1: it fast enough to know what it was. She then
Speaker 1: asked to see a warrant and was told that she
Speaker 1: would get to see it Later, when repeatedly told she
Speaker 1: was the woman of the photo, Marilyn responded by saying,
Speaker 1: I'd like to know how I split myself in two
Speaker 1: locations because I didn't know I had this power. The
Speaker 1: first photo agent showed her was very fuzzy. Then they
Speaker 1: showed her a photo of the woman's face. She said, Oh,
Speaker 1: that's obviously not me. Why didn't you show me that photo?
Speaker 1: To start with, the woman in the photo has detached
Speaker 1: ear lobes. Maryland's are attached. Plus the woman was wearing
Speaker 1: a sweater that Marilyn said, you quote couldn't pay me
Speaker 1: to wear. Stormtroopers of the FBI friends sent to kick
Speaker 1: in someone's door in Alaska for the crime of being
Speaker 1: present in DC during a major protest that had a
Speaker 1: portion of it turn into a riot. The FBI sent
Speaker 1: seven agents, guns drawn to their home in Alaska. This
Speaker 1: is what tyrant bullcrap looks like. Oh yeah, Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: Oh the insurrection, Oh they're all cry or the insurrection
Speaker 1: they're gonna overthrow the government? Bull crap. It was a
Speaker 1: stupid riot where people overwhelmingly were guilty of trespass and
Speaker 1: destruction of property. No one killed any police officers that day.
Speaker 1: Let's look at the facts. The only person killed was
Speaker 1: Ashley Babbitt, whose family's now bringing suit against the Capol
Speaker 1: Hill Police. And here's a prediction the federal judge, probably
Speaker 1: an Obama appointee that you'll get in DC, in the
Speaker 1: DC Circuit Cord will dismiss the complaint immediately as soon
Speaker 1: as it comes before him or her, guaranteed, friends, guaranteed.
Speaker 1: This is what tyranny looks like. This is what it
Speaker 1: feels like. The politically disfavored, with no actual crime committed,
Speaker 1: but vaguely associated with the possibility of somebody else who
Speaker 1: did a crime, have men with guns kicking in their
Speaker 1: door at six am, guns drawn on them for what
Speaker 1: the real answer to that question. First of all, these
Speaker 1: FBI agents should be ashamed, ashamed wherever they are across
Speaker 1: the country. You're a race agents. I worked for the CIA,
Speaker 1: I know the mission. You're a disgrace. You should resign
Speaker 1: instead of doing the dirty work being the Praetorian Guard
Speaker 1: or this Biden administration. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Speaker 1: But you know good benefits and you know we get
Speaker 1: our paycheck, and you know we lock up people for
Speaker 1: gun violations. And other things too. You know, sure, it's
Speaker 1: not worth it, not worth it to be a part
Speaker 1: of the Biden Stazi. Find other work, at least join
Speaker 1: you know, local law and for us where you feel
Speaker 1: like you have some some buffer against this kind of
Speaker 1: overt politicization. I mean, the photo didn't even look like
Speaker 1: this woman at all. They went in and they kicked
Speaker 1: in her door. That you're gonna tell me? They oh,
Speaker 1: because they're so dangerous, they're a part of the insurrection.
Speaker 1: They're not cartel hit men. They could have called them
Speaker 1: and said, Hi, we're with the FBI. We think you
Speaker 1: would you come down and talk to us. They could
Speaker 1: have then gotten a lawyer and said sure, showed up,
Speaker 1: been like, that's not me. End The story could have
Speaker 1: taken ten minutes. Didn't want to do that because they
Speaker 1: want to send a message. And the message they're sending
Speaker 1: you have to understand. They don't care that she's not
Speaker 1: the person. This is an opportunity to send the message
Speaker 1: that if you were even present supporting Trump, we might
Speaker 1: come and kick in your door too. We'll see what
Speaker 1: the Biden folks feel like doing. I want to tell
Speaker 1: you about a man named Yuri and Alexandrovich Bezmanov. You
Speaker 1: aren't known as Yuri Bezmanov. Okay. So he was a
Speaker 1: Soviet journalist for Ria Novosti, and he was a KGB
Speaker 1: informant as well, and then he defected to care Canada,
Speaker 1: and he has a series of interviews after he defected
Speaker 1: in the seventies where he talks about what the Soviets,
Speaker 1: which really have to remember the Soviets were the primary
Speaker 1: Marxist state for fifty fifty or sixty years, and what
Speaker 1: he talks about is the way that and this is
Speaker 1: based on KGB theory and their approach to undermining what
Speaker 1: we think of as Western and American civilization. What are
Speaker 1: the ways they'd go about it? And conservatives occasionally share
Speaker 1: these on social media and because it really resonates and
Speaker 1: you hear so much of and remember he was saying
Speaker 1: this stuff in the seventies. I mean, here we are
Speaker 1: now fifty years later, and you're hearing a guy who
Speaker 1: came over to America or came over to Canada, but
Speaker 1: then was giving interviews in America, fled to the West
Speaker 1: and really understands Marxist infiltration and undermining of Western society
Speaker 1: from the inside out. He was a part of it,
Speaker 1: and he tried to warn America about what was coming
Speaker 1: and what the Marxists were planning. And remember, the Communist
Speaker 1: Party USA and communist parties all throughout Europe and Canada
Speaker 1: were supplying information and support of all kinds to the
Speaker 1: Kremlin for decades during the Soviet era. So we did
Speaker 1: have Communist penetrations not only of our government, but just
Speaker 1: of our overall society. And if you're wanting to read
Speaker 1: a series of essays by former communists, including Robert Wright
Speaker 1: here in America, read The God That Failed, which is
Speaker 1: just a fantastic collection of essays because it shows people
Speaker 1: that became and their intellectuals. They're all their writers and
Speaker 1: journalists who were Marxists. They thought they could create a
Speaker 1: utopianistic future in their own whether it's in Italy or
Speaker 1: France or America. But then the closer they got to
Speaker 1: actual Marxism and the people involved it, the more they
Speaker 1: realized this is a godless and heinous and destructive ideology
Speaker 1: that is contradictory to that contravenes human nature, Judeo Christian morality,
Speaker 1: and Western civilization by its very essence. Here is is
Speaker 1: back in the seventies. Here is Yuri Besmanov warning America.
Speaker 1: The first part that I want to play for your
Speaker 1: play one. Most of the people who graduated in sixties
Speaker 1: drops all. You can see, most of the people who
Speaker 1: graduated in sixties drop outs or hulf baked intellectuals, are
Speaker 1: now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business,
Speaker 1: muss media, educational system. You are stuckling them. You cannot
Speaker 1: get rid of them. They are contemned their program to
Speaker 1: think and react to certain stimulate in a certain pattern.
Speaker 1: You cannot change their mind. Even if you expose them
Speaker 1: to authentic information, even if you've proved that white is
Speaker 1: white and black is black, you still cannot change the
Speaker 1: basic perception and the logical behavior. In other words, these people,
Speaker 1: the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get
Speaker 1: rid society of these people, you have you need another
Speaker 1: twenty or fifteen years to educate a new generation of
Speaker 1: patriotically minded and a common common sense people who would
Speaker 1: be acting in favor and in the interests of the
Speaker 1: United States society. So he's talking about exactly what we've
Speaker 1: seen happen, but now we're on the third generation of it. Right,
Speaker 1: So he said, Oh, the sixties and seventies, the Marxist,
Speaker 1: the Leftist have have infiltrated your institutions. So they burrowed in.
Speaker 1: They didn't yet control them. Harvard, you know, IBM, these
Speaker 1: places were not run by Marxists in the seventies, but
Speaker 1: but the Marxist got a toe hold a beachhead. They
Speaker 1: established the beginnings of what would become a full fledged
Speaker 1: It very much like a virus, you know, the first
Speaker 1: viral particles of Marxism had gotten into because they understand
Speaker 1: this was the strategy. It wasn't an accident. They got
Speaker 1: into these institutions and then, just like a virus that
Speaker 1: seeks to overtake the host entirely, to replicate itself all
Speaker 1: the way. You know, a parasite generally doesn't want to
Speaker 1: kill the host. A virus can spread so quickly that
Speaker 1: it doesn't care if it kills the host. It wants
Speaker 1: to overtake the body entirely. If you you know, if
Speaker 1: you're immune system isn't strong enough, it'll absolutely overtake it.
Speaker 1: Whereas a parasite is generally set up so that it
Speaker 1: can continue to feed off of you, but you don't die.
Speaker 1: The virus of Marxism infiltrated important institutions in America, and
Speaker 1: those people are lost to patriotism, constitutionalism, Western civilization, Judeo
Speaker 1: Christian values. They're brainwashed and they've that it's central to
Speaker 1: their identity. Doesn't this sound like all the leftists you
Speaker 1: know today, whether they're on MSNBC or they live next
Speaker 1: door to you, their leftism there there Bernie Sandersism or
Speaker 1: Kamala Biden love and their double triple masking outside and
Speaker 1: their wokeness and putting pronouns in their bio on LinkedIn
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. Doesn't it remind you of what
Speaker 1: he's exactly saying here about leftists who are always extreme
Speaker 1: and unwavering. They are fundamentalists in Marxist ideology. Instead of
Speaker 1: having a fundamentalist belief in scripture or God or Allah
Speaker 1: or whatever, they have a fundamentalist belief in Karl Marx's
Speaker 1: view of society. And the only change now is that
Speaker 1: we've because initially the Marxist and this is important, the
Speaker 1: Soviets made huge gains in Western civilization. They made huge
Speaker 1: gains in America and France and Britain. They had the
Speaker 1: Cambridge five, the Spiring, they had alger I mean the
Speaker 1: alger Has worked for them, but really showed us. You know,
Speaker 1: there was more than just that they Whittaker Chambers exposed
Speaker 1: alger Has anyway, they had. They had all this momentum
Speaker 1: because of the belief after the Great Depression that capitalism
Speaker 1: had failed. And so the failure of capitalism was a huge,
Speaker 1: a huge calling card for the Marxist It was a
Speaker 1: huge win for them. They say, see, societies that are
Speaker 1: built around free markets and individual ingenuity and the rewards
Speaker 1: of the market are failures. Let's do Marxism. It'll be
Speaker 1: better now. Then we ran with Marxist societies in the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union and other places for fifty years and it
Speaker 1: all fell apart because the capitalist, free market based societies
Speaker 1: had freedom and happiness and wealth and dignity, and the
Speaker 1: Marxist societies were totalitarian hellholes overwhelmingly. So what do they
Speaker 1: do now. We'll have to find a new basis of
Speaker 1: division and envy and friction within a society. And they
Speaker 1: do it based upon racial division. And that's what's going
Speaker 1: on here in America, as well as a lot of
Speaker 1: class division. Two. But racial division has become the primary
Speaker 1: rule of the Marxists. There are people who use this
Speaker 1: to their own ends and do so recklessly, and you know,
Speaker 1: in a way that's tremendously damaging to our society, and
Speaker 1: they don't care. And they infiltrated the institutions in the
Speaker 1: sixties and seventies. They then pushed out the capitalist, constitutionalist,
Speaker 1: traditionalist Americans. In the eighties and nineties, the era of
Speaker 1: political correctness, right, they started pushing out people like my
Speaker 1: mentor at Amer's College had learchies kicked out of the
Speaker 1: political science building, had to go to the admin building
Speaker 1: because his colleagues hated him so much. He had been
Speaker 1: at the school for forty years, pariah in his own institution.
Speaker 1: And then you get into the two thousands, the Obama
Speaker 1: administration and wokeness, the end stage of the radical infiltration
Speaker 1: and then political correctness takeover of our institutions. That's what
Speaker 1: you're seeing play too. And yet these people who've been
Speaker 1: programmed and as you say, in place, and who are
Speaker 1: favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept, these are
Speaker 1: the very people who would be marked for extermination in
Speaker 1: this most of them. Yet simply because the psychological shock
Speaker 1: when when they will see in future, what the what
Speaker 1: the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice,
Speaker 1: obviously they will revolve, They will they will be very unhappy,
Speaker 1: frustrated people, and the Marxist Leninist region does not tolerate
Speaker 1: these people. They obviously they will join the links of
Speaker 1: dissenters dissidents. Unlike in present United States, they will be
Speaker 1: not place for dissent in future Marxist Leninists America. Here
Speaker 1: you can you can get popular like Daniel Ellsberg and
Speaker 1: Field feel each like Jane Fonda for being dissident, for
Speaker 1: criticizing your pentagon in huture. These people will be simply
Speaker 1: squashed like Colchis, Secretary of Mayorchis. One of the areas
Speaker 1: of particular concern is unaccompanied minors at the border who
Speaker 1: are being allowed to stay in this country. There was
Speaker 1: a record in March in terms of crossings from that group.
Speaker 1: Was it also a record in April? Do you know
Speaker 1: that yet? And are you seeing any evidence that your
Speaker 1: message of do not come is making a difference. We
Speaker 1: made a very important decision that we would not continue
Speaker 1: to expel unaccompanied children as the Trump administration did in
Speaker 1: late March. You are corrected. Numbers were extraordinarily high, and
Speaker 1: we had over five thousand and seven hundred young children
Speaker 1: unaccompanied children in the custody of the Border Patrol. Now
Speaker 1: as of yesterday we had under seven hundred. It's an
Speaker 1: extraordinary achievement and it speaks of the commitment and capabilities
Speaker 1: of the men and women of the Department of Homeland
Speaker 1: Security and the team work with Health and Human Services.
Speaker 1: But mister secretary, you have addressing the needs of children.
Speaker 1: Does that reflect a reduction in the number of people
Speaker 1: coming over the border or just an increase in how
Speaker 1: quickly you can move people out of your custody into
Speaker 1: Health and Human Services custody and then the sponsors. So
Speaker 1: we don't have the April numbers yet, we should have
Speaker 1: those cumulatively within a day or two. The numbers remain high.
Speaker 1: Whether they are as high as March is yet undetermined.
Speaker 1: Majorchis here of DHS. A secretary trying to play a
Speaker 1: game with the American people, doesn't want you to know
Speaker 1: what's really going on here because he says, Oh, they're
Speaker 1: moving people out of Border Patrol custody, the unaccompanied miners
Speaker 1: out of border patrol custody at such a great pace.
Speaker 1: They're just handing them over to h J custody and
Speaker 1: then they sit in HJS custody and are then distributed
Speaker 1: all across the United States. This is dealing with the
Speaker 1: border crisis. We've got Congressman Andy Biggs with us now
Speaker 1: from the great state of Arizona. Congressman, great to have you,
Speaker 1: Great to be with you. Buck. Look, you you have
Speaker 1: a whole lot of border in your home state that
Speaker 1: we need to be looking at as well. A lot
Speaker 1: of illegal crossing is going on there. I just I
Speaker 1: think that people if they if they listen to what
Speaker 1: DHS is MAYORCHUS is saying, gear can start to understand
Speaker 1: that the Biden administration doesn't view the illegal crossing as
Speaker 1: a crisis. They're just looking to process it better. Now,
Speaker 1: that's exactly That is exactly right, Bud. They this is
Speaker 1: what an open border looks like. The campaign for an
Speaker 1: open border, it's what they want. They're doing things like
Speaker 1: in southern Arizona they just built a you know, I
Speaker 1: think it was thirty five million dollar sout sided facility
Speaker 1: so they can keep people. So they can because they
Speaker 1: have no place to put them. There's so many people
Speaker 1: coming across there's no place to put them, and they
Speaker 1: don't want to hold them, and they're not allowed to
Speaker 1: hold them, quite frankly, under the law. So what they
Speaker 1: want to do is facilitate the logistic arm of the
Speaker 1: cartel by transporting these people throughout the United States wherever
Speaker 1: they want to go. Congress and Biggs, what do you
Speaker 1: expect is going to happen over the next let's say
Speaker 1: sixty to ninety days at our southern border. There will
Speaker 1: be nothing that happens from the Biden administration. It's going
Speaker 1: to continue coming. There might be some slight slow down
Speaker 1: once temperatures hit one hundred ten, one hundred and fifteen
Speaker 1: degrees during the daytime here, that might slow down a
Speaker 1: little bit, and then it'll rev back up towards the
Speaker 1: end of summer, you know, late August, September, get going again.
Speaker 1: But what you will see is more in humanity because
Speaker 1: more people will continue to die because crossing the borders
Speaker 1: and the rugged terrain of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, California
Speaker 1: and northern Mexico and those heats, and with the cartel,
Speaker 1: they which they just leave people behind by the way,
Speaker 1: so they don't care if they live or die. They've
Speaker 1: got their money and that's that's the way that's going
Speaker 1: to work. But there's this this surge will continue. Congressman
Speaker 1: Andy Biggs from Arizona with us. Now, you know, Congressman,
Speaker 1: I've you've been one of the few from the very
Speaker 1: beginning in elected office who's at least been willing to question.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's Senator Rand Paul. There are a few,
Speaker 1: but questions some of what I termed the Faucii consensus.
Speaker 1: Now we're seeing news articles in places like The New
Speaker 1: York Times raising the possibility of forever COVID, that this
Speaker 1: is just going to be something that we have to
Speaker 1: control with measures that we've been using all along because
Speaker 1: we're not going to reach true herd immunity. Well what
Speaker 1: do you say to that? It? And how is your
Speaker 1: state dealing with this? Well, you know, what can you say?
Speaker 1: I mean, Buck, I've been saying, oh, along, this is
Speaker 1: a control maneuver, not a public health maneuver. And uh,
Speaker 1: just last week when we had the President's speech and
Speaker 1: I'm on the floor, I have a road to myself.
Speaker 1: It's absurd, and I'm looking across there's there's Democrats with
Speaker 1: roast themselves fifteen feet away from anybody contrary to even
Speaker 1: see these sidelines, and they were in double masks. So
Speaker 1: it's a control issue as much as anything. How Arizona
Speaker 1: has done, it's you know, I would give it a c.
Speaker 1: I mean, we could have done so much better. In
Speaker 1: my opinion, I felt early on I was arguing that
Speaker 1: we should be taking care of the most vulnerable. We
Speaker 1: knew early on Buck that the most vulnerable were the seniors,
Speaker 1: and we knew that people with communities. We didn't do
Speaker 1: real great at that, and it took us a long time.
Speaker 1: And for a state whose economy was just on fire,
Speaker 1: we didn't get hurt as bad as other states, but
Speaker 1: it could have done a lot better. And we still
Speaker 1: have a lot of unemployment, a lot of businesses have
Speaker 1: been lost, and and we've got a lot of we've
Speaker 1: got some school districts that are still won't open up.
Speaker 1: And where are you with with mask mandates at the
Speaker 1: state level. We don't have a mask mandate at the
Speaker 1: state level. Um, it's it's always been local. And so
Speaker 1: you've got the liberal enclaves of Flagstaff and Tucson and Phoenix.
Speaker 1: City of Phoenix, they're still mandating mask. But all of
Speaker 1: the suburbs have basically pulled it off. And I've been
Speaker 1: into a lot of stores and stuff the last week,
Speaker 1: and now there's no masks. Some stores are still requiring masks.
Speaker 1: But that's a private property decision. I get it, and
Speaker 1: I'll respect it, but it still seems stupid to me.
Speaker 1: We're speaking of Congressman Annie Biggs from Arizona. Congressman, did
Speaker 1: you did you see this new story out of out
Speaker 1: of Alaska about the couple that had seven FBI agents
Speaker 1: with guns drawn kicking their front door and because they
Speaker 1: thought that one of the women looked like a woman
Speaker 1: who was in the Capitol building and they think that
Speaker 1: maybe that woman who it doesn't look anything apparently really
Speaker 1: like this woman anyway, stole Nancy Pelosi's laptop. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, the law enforcement makes decisions all the time
Speaker 1: about how to handle situations depending on the threat the
Speaker 1: vulnerability officers. I mean this to me is this is
Speaker 1: straight up intimidation. I mean, I've worked with law enforcement before,
Speaker 1: I know how these decisions go down. There's absolutely no
Speaker 1: reasonable justification for sending in an armed team of seven
Speaker 1: guys to make an arrest like this. No, I did
Speaker 1: see the article. I actually I didn't see just one article.
Speaker 1: It was so intriguing to me. I went and read
Speaker 1: everything I could about outrageous. I looked at the pictures
Speaker 1: side by side comparisons, and my view, no comparison at all,
Speaker 1: especially when the lady in Alaska it takes off her mask,
Speaker 1: doesn't even look like that the lady in the capital.
Speaker 1: This is intimidation, but it's consistent. And this is this
Speaker 1: is one of the things I've been doing research on,
Speaker 1: is what's happened to people who've been burning down Portland
Speaker 1: and writing Portland for a year, or we're in the
Speaker 1: chop Zone or Chaz in Seattle, in Minneapolis. How many
Speaker 1: are how many are actually prosecuted and versus people who
Speaker 1: went into the capital who didn't do anything more than
Speaker 1: there was criminal trestpath. It shouldn't have been there. And
Speaker 1: I'm not justifying what they did, but we've put all
Speaker 1: of the resources of the federal government to go after
Speaker 1: those people, and then you get these crazy things like
Speaker 1: what happened in Alaska. And this is intimidation, and it's
Speaker 1: intimidation of the right. And that's why this narrative from
Speaker 1: the left that it was an insurrection and that our
Speaker 1: country is full of white nationalist and domestic terrorists. It
Speaker 1: is the wrong way to govern. It's meant to intimidate,
Speaker 1: and you throw it with everything you and I were
Speaker 1: just talking about with control because of the COVID and
Speaker 1: and it's it's a very disturbing trend in this country
Speaker 1: to see this. I mean Roger Stone, I mean, the guy,
Speaker 1: how old is Roger Stone. They're gonna they're gonna and
Speaker 1: circle him with swat teams all over the place, dozens
Speaker 1: of guys with long guns at five o'clock in them all. Yeah, absurd.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's that's the intimidation that we see from
Speaker 1: from lawn forcement that doesn't have to be there, really
Speaker 1: doesn't have to be there. That my guess is that
Speaker 1: lady would have just come in if you would have said, hey, please,
Speaker 1: please come on and talk to us. She comes in.
Speaker 1: You see, she's not the right lady. Way away you
Speaker 1: let her go. Speaking of Congressman Andy Biggs of Arizona
Speaker 1: and Congressman m do you think that we are seeing
Speaker 1: the backlash beginning, at least to the extreme woke agenda
Speaker 1: of the left. You know, I think you are. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's first of all, you give Tim Scott because because
Speaker 1: he did a great job basically countermanding one of the
Speaker 1: biggest spokes in the wheel of wokeism, and that's the
Speaker 1: racist trope that's out there. And he says we're not
Speaker 1: a racist country. He immediately required because he said that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden admitted wasn't racist. Kamala Harris admits it's not racist.
Speaker 1: So so you sense that you're starting to sense this tide,
Speaker 1: maybe trim. People are sick of this. People are sick
Speaker 1: of the political correct culture that doesn't allow you to
Speaker 1: say what's on your mind. I don't care if you
Speaker 1: if you think on a raging idiot, I disagree with you.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, but you can be allowed to
Speaker 1: say that. And regardless of of my ability to call
Speaker 1: on whatever protected status that I think I might have.
Speaker 1: I mean this is people are getting tired of it,
Speaker 1: and you're going to see it. If these corporations continue
Speaker 1: to go this way, you're going to actually see people
Speaker 1: get sick of it. They're they're going to quit shopping there,
Speaker 1: They're gonna quit supporting these folks. Is there anything you
Speaker 1: think you can do? I know you're in the you're
Speaker 1: in the house minority right now, But is anything that
Speaker 1: can be done now or perhaps in the mid terms,
Speaker 1: assuming Republicans can take back the House with things like this.
Speaker 1: This is a CNN piece I wanted to ask you about.
Speaker 1: The Biden administration is considering using outside private firms to
Speaker 1: track extremist chatter by Americans online, an effort that would
Speaker 1: expand the government's ability to gather intel. Uh. Biden team
Speaker 1: may partner with private firms to survey or suspected domestic terrorists.
Speaker 1: And there's a big photo of the Capitol Hill riot
Speaker 1: on January sixth with this story. Uh, this should send
Speaker 1: a chill down a lot of people's spines. Oh my goodness,
Speaker 1: Yes we're talking. Uh. This this is the move to
Speaker 1: the ultimate control that fascist tyranny wants, and that's that's
Speaker 1: what they would want to do. Yeah, there are things
Speaker 1: we can do. Um, first of all, you can defund.
Speaker 1: You can we control the funding, so you could defund
Speaker 1: this to make sure it doesn't happen. We're going to
Speaker 1: need special interests law firms are going to have to
Speaker 1: go after them. Look they are we know there's already
Speaker 1: abuse of the finds A program. Why do they need
Speaker 1: to get a private firm. How about the USPS, the
Speaker 1: Postal Service, Uh, spying on people? Uh you know, when
Speaker 1: will it end? And Americans have got to say enough's enough.
Speaker 1: Congress has got to say enough enough. At some point,
Speaker 1: even my Democrat colleagues have got to join us and
Speaker 1: say you can't do that. You've got to stop that.
Speaker 1: Let's that kind of special force, basically a privatized special
Speaker 1: force to go and just be spying on you. We're
Speaker 1: all going to have to go to a super encryption
Speaker 1: to prevent that. Congressman, any bigs of Arizona. Congressman, always
Speaker 1: appreciate you joining us here in the freedom of Thanks
Speaker 1: so much for joining. Yeah, thanks Bud. Let's keep fighting
Speaker 1: for freedom together. Man, you know it. He said, among
Speaker 1: other things, America isn't racist, is it. No. I don't
Speaker 1: think the American people are racist, but I think after
Speaker 1: four hundred years, African Americans have been left in a
Speaker 1: position where they are so far behind the eight ball
Speaker 1: in terms of education and health, in terms of opportunity.
Speaker 1: I don't think America is racist, but I think the
Speaker 1: overhang from all of the Jim Crow and before that
Speaker 1: slavery have had a cost. Or we have to deal
Speaker 1: with it. Ah, it's not that Americans are racist, it's
Speaker 1: that our system is racist. But isn't our system comprised
Speaker 1: of Americans? You know? They always use this, really this
Speaker 1: framework because it allows them to create a moral imperative
Speaker 1: for action and really create a moral high ground for
Speaker 1: themselves without actually disparaging the American people overall. But it
Speaker 1: seems to me to be quite disingenuous. You either believe
Speaker 1: that there's a racist system, which means that people are
Speaker 1: engaged in acts of racism. Right, we don't have some
Speaker 1: sterile bureaucracy without individuals involved, or we don't have some
Speaker 1: market place run by machinery where there aren't human beings
Speaker 1: making the decisions. Right, where is this institutional racism? Tell
Speaker 1: me where it exists? And then I'll start to point
Speaker 1: to people and say, okay, who's being racist in that.
Speaker 1: You don't get to have it both ways. You can't
Speaker 1: lecture us about a racist system but then pretend that
Speaker 1: there are no racists in fact making the decisions in
Speaker 1: those systems. But this is the contradiction that they insist on,
Speaker 1: and so speaking of the system this essential to the
Speaker 1: democrat ploy these days. But Jill, Jill Biden. The first lady.
Speaker 1: You know, she's miss education because she has a PhD
Speaker 1: from University of Delaware in education, which is yeah, I'm sure.
Speaker 1: I believe her thesis was on like getting more minorities
Speaker 1: to be in community college or something like that, you know,
Speaker 1: not exactly a dissertation an astrophysics. But anyway, she doctor
Speaker 1: Jill Biden. I'm sorry, no, no, And some of you
Speaker 1: point out, you say, I call him doctor Gorka. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's because I like him and he's my buddy. I
Speaker 1: call him doctor g But yes, it is generally my
Speaker 1: preference that you call people with a medical degree doctor.
Speaker 1: I think that PhDs can be called professor, but I
Speaker 1: do not believe that they should be called doctor. And
Speaker 1: I think it's pretentious to ask otherwise. Anyway, here is
Speaker 1: unless you're doctor g because then you're a great patriot
Speaker 1: and you're awesome. Here is Jill Biden on the calling
Speaker 1: on teachers unions to allow schools to reopen play fifteen.
Speaker 1: As an educator, there's been some vocal opposition, especially from
Speaker 1: teachers unions, to this idea that the teacher should be
Speaker 1: forced back into the classrooms this fall, regardless of vaccinations. Well,
Speaker 1: what do you say, I mean, what's your message to educators?
Speaker 1: Is it time to get back in the classroom this
Speaker 1: fall no matter what? Well, I think it depends on
Speaker 1: you know, we're following the science and what the CDC says,
Speaker 1: and so each district is different, and so I think
Speaker 1: we have to listen to the experts and the science,
Speaker 1: and then the districts have to decide. But we know
Speaker 1: this time that's been lost in terms of learning, especially
Speaker 1: in communities of color, especially kids, poor kids who haven't
Speaker 1: been in classrooms, who don't have access to high speed internet.
Speaker 1: Just the mental stress, the toll is taken on these children.
Speaker 1: How could we justify not returning to in person learning. Well,
Speaker 1: I am concerned about the lost learning, but I do
Speaker 1: think we have an opportunity now to make things better.
Speaker 1: Just Cowardice can't be a democrat and absorb the key unions. Mmmm,
Speaker 1: So kids suffer and she doesn't care. You know, the
Speaker 1: markets are at all time highs in some sectors. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's been a lot of rise in the stock market
Speaker 1: of the last twelve months despite the pandemic, and a
Speaker 1: lot of areas have recovered and there's still tons of
Speaker 1: money to be made. You just got to know where
Speaker 1: to be and how to be there. That's why I
Speaker 1: want you to learn about my friends at Carnivore Trading.
Speaker 1: They send me real time text messages all throughout the
Speaker 1: day telling me exactly what they're doing in the market,
Speaker 1: and then I mirror their moves. And here's why Carnivore
Speaker 1: has spotted several key indicators that make them think the
Speaker 1: market could be still on the verge of historic gains,
Speaker 1: but in certain sectors that a lot of Wall Street
Speaker 1: experts aren't paying attention to. Carnivore Trading is an elite
Speaker 1: squad of strategists who influence major Wall Street investors. And
Speaker 1: when you subscribe to Carnivore like I do, you receive
Speaker 1: real time text alerts right to your phone of explosive
Speaker 1: trades there making for their elite clients. You can then
Speaker 1: mirror their trades with your discount broker. That's what I do,
Speaker 1: or you could pass, But why pass their trades? Routinely
Speaker 1: crush the SNP five hundred. They guarantee you'll earn five
Speaker 1: times your monthly subscription or double your money back five
Speaker 1: x your monthly subscription just by mirroring their trades. So simple.
Speaker 1: You have your discount broker, whatever money you're comfortable trading,
Speaker 1: and reember. You know, be conservative about this, but you
Speaker 1: want to grow it right. Carnivore Trading will send you
Speaker 1: text message alerts we're getting into x y z stock,
Speaker 1: we're getting into this or that, and then you can
Speaker 1: just do it yourself and get those gains going. The
Speaker 1: market is on the verge of a massive upswing. Get
Speaker 1: off the sidelines and mirror Carnivores Trades today. Right now,
Speaker 1: you'll get two weeks free. Visit get our trades dot
Speaker 1: com and use promo code buck. That's get our Trades
Speaker 1: dot Com promo code buck. See website for guarantee terms
Speaker 1: and conditions. Pass performance not a guarantee of future earnings.
Speaker 1: HARSANYI time. You all know what that means. Our buddy,
Speaker 1: David Harsani with us from National Review. Just go to
Speaker 1: National Review dot com for us latest. He's a senior writer.
Speaker 1: They're always putting out insightful stuff. David, thanks for being
Speaker 1: with us, Always a pleasure. Thanks for having me. Let's
Speaker 1: start with spending. I'm concerned here because you can see
Speaker 1: the in the tank corporate media doing everything that they
Speaker 1: possibly conceivably can to make it seem like spending six trillion,
Speaker 1: no big deal, and it's very popular, David, It's very probable.
Speaker 1: So they're really two components here. There's the way the
Speaker 1: media is presenting this Biden plan, and I think the
Speaker 1: spending and the tax stuff he will actually get. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think a lot of this is gonna get done
Speaker 1: as opposed to like gun bands and that's all the
Speaker 1: usual liberal malarchy. But I do think that on taxes
Speaker 1: it's going to happen through reconciliation. On spending, they'll get
Speaker 1: some of this through because they'll lard it in with
Speaker 1: a must pass bill at some point. Right, So what
Speaker 1: do we need to know here? Let's start with the media. Well,
Speaker 1: how how is it possible that they can consider themselves
Speaker 1: journalists when what they're really doing is running the press
Speaker 1: shop for the Biden administration. Yeah, I mean, I would
Speaker 1: say the vast majority they're occasional good reporters. But because
Speaker 1: there is no real incentive to be a good reporter anymore,
Speaker 1: it doesn't get you ahead. What gets you ahead as
Speaker 1: being a reporter for the Democratic Party, and that, as
Speaker 1: you mentioned, I mean, every it's not just about a
Speaker 1: line that's misleading or a line that's biased. It's about
Speaker 1: the entire focus and framing of issues which are done
Speaker 1: in a liberal manner. So it's just today you have
Speaker 1: the Infrastructure Bill, which is just this gigantic bill, which
Speaker 1: I think seven percent of actually goes to the things
Speaker 1: that people regard as a real infrastructure, roads, bridges, whatever.
Speaker 1: There's a big story in the Washington Post about how
Speaker 1: Biden is willing to compromise on the bill and pass
Speaker 1: a peace smell to get Republican votes. Now, why so
Speaker 1: you see how this works. They simply say this is
Speaker 1: an emergency, we must pass this. They circumvent debate about
Speaker 1: whether it's even needed or not, and then when Republicans
Speaker 1: don't compromise, they'll say that Republicans just want to bring
Speaker 1: down the president. They don't want to move forward. This
Speaker 1: never happens in the reverse, right, you don't have a
Speaker 1: Donald Trump saying let's cut taxes and then everyone talking
Speaker 1: about how it's needed, and then when will Democrats, you know,
Speaker 1: come come around and meet him halfway? That never happens.
Speaker 1: So that's just one way in which they do it.
Speaker 1: And then you know, they diminish what's in the bills.
Speaker 1: Like you said, no one really understands what's in the
Speaker 1: infrastructure bill. They just hear the word infrastructure, or hear
Speaker 1: the word energy, or hear the word COVID, and they
Speaker 1: don't learn enough about it. So of course when you
Speaker 1: pull them like it's push polling, basically, they're going to say, yes,
Speaker 1: I like it. Now we also have I mean, you
Speaker 1: mentioned the way that we skip the whole part about
Speaker 1: do we need this, which which I would think would
Speaker 1: actually be pretty important when you're talking about spending a
Speaker 1: few trillion dollars, right, I would think that that's that's
Speaker 1: something that we could all we should all be able
Speaker 1: to grate, well, can we be sure about this before
Speaker 1: we do it? But we always hear about our crumbling
Speaker 1: roads and bridges, And you know, I know some folks
Speaker 1: who I have a friend who works on the work
Speaker 1: and the investment banking side, for example, on industrials and
Speaker 1: dealt with a lot of you know, companies that will
Speaker 1: lease a toll road or build an airport or all
Speaker 1: these kinds of things. And I mean, yeah, sure, you're
Speaker 1: driving through a major city, they're gonna be potholes. But
Speaker 1: there's always I think that people's perceptions of the crumbling
Speaker 1: roads and bridges is at least right now exaggerated, like
Speaker 1: where we're led to believe that America has bad infrastructure
Speaker 1: as a national That doesn't mean there aren't places that
Speaker 1: need better infrastructure. But you know, how should we gauge this? Well,
Speaker 1: when people think about infrastructure and bad infrastructure, they think
Speaker 1: about the pothole they go over, and not the thousand
Speaker 1: miles of pristine road that they might drive in an
Speaker 1: interstate highway. You know, I guess this is an unpopular opinion,
Speaker 1: but I think our infrastructure is actually in very good shape.
Speaker 1: There are places that need help, but it's not like
Speaker 1: we don't spend money. That's what people think. We don't
Speaker 1: spend money on highways, and we spend hundreds of billions.
Speaker 1: I forgot the number is six hundred billion. When you
Speaker 1: incorporate local, you know, state and national money spent on infrastructure,
Speaker 1: how much do we want to spend every year? So
Speaker 1: that's the first thing. Secondly, when you say infrastructure, I say,
Speaker 1: we're talking about bridge they're not crumbling, but they're talking
Speaker 1: about like retrofitting buildings to you know, green energy or
Speaker 1: you know whatever. Now, I don't want my tax dollar
Speaker 1: going to retrofit buildings that are perfectly fine, that use
Speaker 1: natural gas or whatever to take you know, solar energy.
Speaker 1: I don't want to do that, and that to me
Speaker 1: is not necessary infrastructure. And I think if you really
Speaker 1: broke it down for the American people, there would be
Speaker 1: a lot of debate. And of course these bills are
Speaker 1: always larded up with like union bailouts, you know, and
Speaker 1: other things of that nature, so people don't really understand
Speaker 1: what's in them. And that's that's I think the first problem.
Speaker 1: The media is here to supposedly here to inform us,
Speaker 1: but that's not happening. We're speaking to David Harsani. He
Speaker 1: is a senior writer at National Review dot com. And David,
Speaker 1: when when we were looking at the Biden administration, when
Speaker 1: when conservatives were trying to figure out how this back
Speaker 1: during the election, how this was going to shake out,
Speaker 1: people would bring up, well, they'd say, at least it
Speaker 1: wouldn't be a Bernie administration because Bernie is, whether openly
Speaker 1: or not effectively, a believer in MMT modern monetary theory,
Speaker 1: which is in shorthand you spend whatever money as the
Speaker 1: government you want to spend on whatever you want to
Speaker 1: spend it on, and then you just deal with whatever happened,
Speaker 1: Like if there's inflation, you just deal with it. That's
Speaker 1: really the basis of the theory. And that was that
Speaker 1: was for some people a troubling thought. Oh, we have Biden.
Speaker 1: How far are we from that? I mean, when you're
Speaker 1: talking about adding six trillion dollars to the already what
Speaker 1: is it, four trillion dollars give or take of of
Speaker 1: almost automatic federal spending, that feels like a lot of money. Well,
Speaker 1: we're there already. Who cares? I mean, really, once you
Speaker 1: get past a few trillion, it's just so abstract to people.
Speaker 1: I think we're already there. They you know a lot
Speaker 1: of folks think we just spend whatever you want, and
Speaker 1: you know they'll never have to answer for it now,
Speaker 1: you know. It's interesting that you mentioned and I think
Speaker 1: Bernie is more dangerous as a person in his ideology
Speaker 1: than Biden. I don't think really has any kind of
Speaker 1: ideology other than more people wherever the Democratic Party is,
Speaker 1: when wherever he is, you know, at the time. But
Speaker 1: here's the thing. It's obviously more dangerous. And you have
Speaker 1: someone who is seen as a moderate of some sort
Speaker 1: trying to pass bills like this because people just make
Speaker 1: the assumption that he wouldn't want to do anything too radical,
Speaker 1: which is ridiculous because these are more radical in size
Speaker 1: and many times as sort of policy even than perhaps
Speaker 1: any administration since we are maybe even more in some sense.
Speaker 1: So in many ways he's more dangerous than Bernie. And
Speaker 1: I'm not going to say he's personally more radical than
Speaker 1: a Marxist open Marxists, but you know he might get
Speaker 1: more through so David. One part of this, then, that
Speaker 1: I do think we need to start to address, is
Speaker 1: if people don't feel like there's downside to federal spending,
Speaker 1: they're just going to be okay with this. I mean,
Speaker 1: I know, ideologically conservatives, we've been trained, you know, we
Speaker 1: also think, wait a second, you know, what would Milton
Speaker 1: Friedman say? And like what would Friedrich Kayaks say? And
Speaker 1: and we go back to some of these these foundational
Speaker 1: thinkers and economists for what for modern conservatism in America?
Speaker 1: But unless there's actually a pain point here, it feels
Speaker 1: like we keep going. So do you think there's a
Speaker 1: way to either explain the pain points to people or
Speaker 1: are we just waiting to see, Hey, let's give it
Speaker 1: a shot and maybe things start to really crap out
Speaker 1: with the economy. Well, one of the problems I think
Speaker 1: is that we've had Republican president spending a lot of
Speaker 1: money as well, so it becomes an issue of hypocrisy
Speaker 1: for many of these Republicans. And secondly, you know, we
Speaker 1: haven't felt pain like you say, so I think people
Speaker 1: are kind of like you know, the concerned about the
Speaker 1: deficit or debt is over overdone. I don't know how
Speaker 1: to how to change that, but at some point I
Speaker 1: think there will be pain. It just can't go on
Speaker 1: this way, and we've seen it occasionally happen in Europe already.
Speaker 1: But I think you know that'll you know, at some
Speaker 1: point people are gonna have to pay for this, and
Speaker 1: I don't know how to convince them otherwise. I do
Speaker 1: think people get a little bit, We'll get a little
Speaker 1: bit nervous when things are getting better, and things are
Speaker 1: already better about all of the spending, So we'll see
Speaker 1: how that goes. I think when you see mansion and
Speaker 1: cinema worried, it's saying they're worried about spending. I think
Speaker 1: that's because probably the center of America would get start
Speaker 1: to be concerned about that much spending as well, or
Speaker 1: at least maybe that's my hope. You know, you're in DC,
Speaker 1: I'm here in New York City, and we both have
Speaker 1: these arbitrary rules about COVID that are still speaking things
Speaker 1: getting better, that are still in effect. I gotta get
Speaker 1: you to just tell me what. I'm sure you have
Speaker 1: some liberal neighbors and friends in DC because you're you're
Speaker 1: surrounded by you know, lunatics, and as I am in
Speaker 1: New York, the dancing band at weddings. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is it's like they can't be serious, but they are serious.
Speaker 1: There's everything I'd say with New York restaurants now still
Speaker 1: have a six foot distancing rule. This is just idiotic
Speaker 1: at this point. Yeah. I mean it's funny because I'm
Speaker 1: now following CDC instructions and not wearing a mask outside,
Speaker 1: but others aren't. Like I'm pro science now, you know,
Speaker 1: and they're binacular and they're not. I don't know, the
Speaker 1: people are still walking around with masks outside in the heat,
Speaker 1: doublele masking up. I don't even know what to say
Speaker 1: to those people. There is just zero scientific evidence for
Speaker 1: what they're doing. There's little scientific evidence that anyone needs
Speaker 1: to be wearing a mask once they're vaccinated, and they
Speaker 1: still do it. I feel like maybe people like to
Speaker 1: be told what to do, they like to be controlled,
Speaker 1: they like to be I don't know. I mean, by
Speaker 1: the other day said it was patriotic right to wear
Speaker 1: a mask. I just you know, the guy doesn't think
Speaker 1: the Constitution is a patriotic but he thinks as patriotic.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't really know how to deal with that.
Speaker 1: So in the end, I think that hurts them, though.
Speaker 1: I think that most Americans, in most places in Florida
Speaker 1: and Texas and probably in most places in California, don't
Speaker 1: view the world that way. And uh, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: there'll be a backlash to it, I hope. So. Speaking
Speaker 1: of David Harsani of National Review, check out his latest
Speaker 1: pieces at National Review dot com. And just on on wokeness,
Speaker 1: you know, you have people finally starting to realize that
Speaker 1: they have to do something about the teaching of critical
Speaker 1: race theory in schools. You had this big win for
Speaker 1: the school district in south Lake, which is a very
Speaker 1: upscale suburb of Dallas, and you had people who were
Speaker 1: opposed to critical race theory who won the school board elections,
Speaker 1: and so now gonna they're gonna eliminate critical race theory
Speaker 1: from the curriculum. There. I mean critical race theory. I've
Speaker 1: actually read a fairman. I did my college thesis on
Speaker 1: critical race theory when I was an undergrad, So this
Speaker 1: brings me back to the old days. It's really just
Speaker 1: incoherent babble when you get down to it. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's all sort of self contradictory nonsense that's meant to
Speaker 1: just create a changing power dynamic, and it's Marxism based
Speaker 1: on race instead of class. But I do feel like
Speaker 1: people realize if you're a conservative thinking that you can
Speaker 1: just you know, get off the grade and homeschool and
Speaker 1: they're still coming for you. So you got to engage. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and part of the engagement has to be I hate
Speaker 1: to say this works sense so lefty, but educating people
Speaker 1: about it. Because I saw a story today NBC News,
Speaker 1: or maybe it was a royal I forget said Republicans
Speaker 1: are opposed to anti racism educational programs. You know, people
Speaker 1: have to understand that it is critical race theory is racist,
Speaker 1: at least I believe it is, and try to let
Speaker 1: it and I think parents learn when when their kids
Speaker 1: are subjected to it, But but people who aren't don't
Speaker 1: really understand how sort of despicable and Unamerican it really is.
Speaker 1: So I think that's part of part of what what
Speaker 1: we need to do because the media, again it keeps
Speaker 1: calling it anti racist, you know, educational programs, which is
Speaker 1: just simply, at the very least, a lot more complicated
Speaker 1: than that. David Harsani of National Review, everybody go check
Speaker 1: out nahview dot com. David, great to have you man,
Speaker 1: Thanks so much. Thank you. The spending that's been proposed
Speaker 1: in the Job's Plan and the Family's Plan, it comes
Speaker 1: into effect once the economy is back on track, and
Speaker 1: the spending from the rescue plan that's coming into force
Speaker 1: and helping us get on track. After that stimulus is spent,
Speaker 1: it's spread at quite evenly over eight toteen years, so
Speaker 1: the boosted demand is moderate, and the Federal Reserve has
Speaker 1: the tools to address inflation should it arise. We will
Speaker 1: monitor it that very carefully. We're proposing that the spending
Speaker 1: be paid for, and I don't believe that inflation will
Speaker 1: be an issue, but if it becomes an issue, we
Speaker 1: have tools to address it. These are historic investments that
Speaker 1: we need to make our economy productive and fair. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's one of the most powerful people in the world, really,
Speaker 1: Janet Yellen, So somebody who has a tremendous influence on
Speaker 1: what's going on with the American economy. Not impressed, but
Speaker 1: you probably already knew that. And she's saying that. I'm
Speaker 1: always curious. They say, we got to spend whatever we
Speaker 1: need to spend, but it needs to be paid for.
Speaker 1: Why why not just spend it? You know what I mean? Well,
Speaker 1: because well, what will happen if we don't pay for it? Oh,
Speaker 1: you mean that you can spend too much money and
Speaker 1: bad things, like the federal government can spend too much money,
Speaker 1: and bad things will happen. They only concede it insofar
Speaker 1: as as it justifies tax increases. That there's a bad
Speaker 1: that there's a downside of this. Right, nothing else is
Speaker 1: to be taken into account, nothing else really matters. Oh
Speaker 1: that they have tools to control inflation, Good luck with that.
Speaker 1: Once inflation kicks in, it reeks havoc on an economy,
Speaker 1: causes all kinds of problems. And remember what it was
Speaker 1: like when you had inflation in the seventies and the
Speaker 1: gas lines that. Look, I'm not saying that's going to happen,
Speaker 1: but this idea that the Democrats can control inflation, to
Speaker 1: me is just come on, Really they believe it. Though
Speaker 1: they believe it, you know, we're doing We're just doing
Speaker 1: quasi modern monetary theory. That's all We're just we're not
Speaker 1: calling it that, but we're doing a semi modern monetary
Speaker 1: theory approach. Oh, one more thing I want to get
Speaker 1: to before we get into our role call. We got
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney was booed by the Utah Goop recently and
Speaker 1: Senator College was very upset. Play five. I was appalled
Speaker 1: at Mitt Romney has an outstanding senator who serves his state.
Speaker 1: In our country, Well, we've Republicans need to remember that
Speaker 1: we are united by fundamental principles such as a belief
Speaker 1: in personal responsibility, individual freedom, opportunity, free markets, a strong
Speaker 1: national defense. Those are the principles said unite us. We
Speaker 1: are not a party that is led by just one person.
Speaker 1: There are many a prominent upcoming younger men and women
Speaker 1: in our party who hold great promise for leading us.
Speaker 1: And I think that all of us who abide by
Speaker 1: those principles. Should remember Ronald Dragan's admonition to Republicans that
Speaker 1: the person who agrees with you seventy or eighty percent
Speaker 1: of the time is your friend, not your enemy. Yeah. Whatever,
Speaker 1: Susan Galia, you know that Romney is it, Hey, Susan
Speaker 1: Collins of my Pelosi is very similar. But look, Mitt
Speaker 1: Romney stood with the other side. Okay. Mitt Romney stood
Speaker 1: with the other side at key moments to trash, you know,
Speaker 1: to trash Republicans for the benefit of psycho leftists. All right.
Speaker 1: Mid Romney marched with BLM, which is a movement that,
Speaker 1: while it tries to tries to cloak itself in a
Speaker 1: moral superiority, is based upon the lie that cops routinely
Speaker 1: kill unarmed black men and suffer no consequences for it,
Speaker 1: and that this is the result of a systemic racism
Speaker 1: that nobody can really define. Mit Romney voted to impeach
Speaker 1: the President United States, the second impeachment trial in a year,
Speaker 1: because the psycho left wouldn't accept that Donald Trump won
Speaker 1: the first election. Mid Romney betrayed his team. He's a
Speaker 1: turn coat, so he deserves all the score and approbrium
Speaker 1: that he receives, and that's where it is. All right,
Speaker 1: that's the truth. So but Susan Collins, look, we'll just
Speaker 1: take her as a vote on some Republican things when
Speaker 1: we can. But I mean she's about as as politically wishy,
Speaker 1: washy and worthless as anybody with an arm next to
Speaker 1: their name can be. The show ain't over yet, folks.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call producer Mark, what's going on? Man?
Speaker 1: How are you? Let's tell us about the things I
Speaker 1: didn't realize the Sweetest Chef started hosting the boxex and show.
Speaker 1: But Rugger producer Mark likes the fish and the chips
Speaker 1: and the things Ugger. That was the Swedish recipe went
Speaker 1: with not meatballs, rout balls. Yeah I get it, bish,
Speaker 1: Yeah right, all right. I messed up my regional cuisines.
Speaker 1: Fair point, fair point. How is your weekend, buddy? Just
Speaker 1: a lot of taking my possessions and putting it in
Speaker 1: cardboard boxes. I mean, you talk about moving, Can I
Speaker 1: just say like you're being sent Yeah, it's through a
Speaker 1: gulag to break rocks in Siberia. I don't think it's
Speaker 1: that bad. Well you don't think it's probably because you
Speaker 1: hire somebody to pack all your things for you if
Speaker 1: I had to take a guess. Oh, excuse me, sir.
Speaker 1: I will have you know that I did an intercity
Speaker 1: move with a U haul and nobody but mine own
Speaker 1: two hands a few years ago, all right, literally packed
Speaker 1: and moved and drove and unpacked solo. Yes, I almost
Speaker 1: had a heart attack and my back hurt for a month,
Speaker 1: but that's not the point. Legitimately shocked by that. Well,
Speaker 1: but I'm just gonna point out you are a single man.
Speaker 1: If you had been living with a snow princess at
Speaker 1: the time, and maybe we're engaged or married, you would
Speaker 1: have crap everywhere. That's what happens when you get married
Speaker 1: and give you stuff. Yeah, I had, like single man
Speaker 1: moving stuff like this. This is years ago. I had
Speaker 1: a mattress, a desk, a chair, and a TV. I
Speaker 1: think that's all I had, Like and some clothes in
Speaker 1: Duffel bags. That's what I had. That's why any person
Speaker 1: in a relationship will tell you that moving is the
Speaker 1: worst thing in the world. It is the worst adult responsibility.
Speaker 1: I know, I'm only twenty eight years old. I'm not
Speaker 1: exactly a fully grown adult to most people. But of
Speaker 1: all the adult responsibilities I've taken on since becoming one.
Speaker 1: This is the worst. Indeed, indeed, well, we wish you
Speaker 1: all the best, producer, Mark, It's gonna be okay. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be okay. You're gonna make it through. I hope,
Speaker 1: so thank you. All right, let's get to it. Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com, slash Buck Sexton or Team buck at iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com. All right, let's get to it. Danny Hey
Speaker 1: Buck big fan here, fellow New York are living in
Speaker 1: the same neighborhood with my girlfriend and dogs. Actually met
Speaker 1: you last year while grocery shopping. All right, thanks Danny,
Speaker 1: that's great. I remember just wondering how you're dealing with
Speaker 1: the insane cultural and political climate, the blatant double standard
Speaker 1: with the media towards conservatives, in the state of amnesia
Speaker 1: that plagues this country. I can't get the events of
Speaker 1: last year out of my head. Just finding hope and
Speaker 1: knowing I'm not the only one in this leftist cesspool
Speaker 1: of a city that is more than bothered by the insanity.
Speaker 1: Thanks for You're doing well, Dannity. Great to know I'm
Speaker 1: not totally alone here in midtown. Slash Hell's Kitchen aptly
Speaker 1: named I might add, because yeah, it's it's crazy out
Speaker 1: there right now. Man, all these people walk around with
Speaker 1: the mask down. The latest you're seeing is people saying, well,
Speaker 1: what's the big deal, what's the big deal. It's like
Speaker 1: when they say this, are they morons? I don't wear
Speaker 1: a stupid mask over my face. It's uncomfortable, it's constantly annoying,
Speaker 1: it's anxiety producing. It is a big deal. I really
Speaker 1: want to tell these people to go bleep themselves. Oh
Speaker 1: it's not a big deal, it's just wear it anyway. No,
Speaker 1: it is a big deal. And you lunatic lib psychopaths
Speaker 1: acted like it was gonna save all of our lives
Speaker 1: if we didn't aunt didn't work. But you know now
Speaker 1: now they're oh, it's the bat like work a mask.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be it's gonna be ninety degrees in New York,
Speaker 1: steamy and smelly this summer. People who are still running
Speaker 1: around with masks on outside total morons. It's just so
Speaker 1: much that out there. Any Danny's you can tell I
Speaker 1: get fired up at this anyway. Best to you with
Speaker 1: your girlfriend and the cute dog. God bless you if
Speaker 1: you see me again in the grocery store. Please come
Speaker 1: over and say hi. You know, I'll let's say, you know,
Speaker 1: get you a rotisserie chicken or something. All right, ted,
Speaker 1: This is where I get hungry, prousing marks. So I
Speaker 1: start just throwing in random food references, start giving out
Speaker 1: peeple rotissrie chickens that he wants. Who says hello to
Speaker 1: you at a grocery store. I mean it's kind of
Speaker 1: a rare thing in New York, so, you know, but
Speaker 1: I mean I could give out you know, this is
Speaker 1: like a the team Buck specially, Hey you see me, baby,
Speaker 1: if we're in a grocery store, babe, I could buy
Speaker 1: you a roast chicken. You know. So I mean it works.
Speaker 1: I'm sure somebody would be thrilled to get a roast chicken.
Speaker 1: But still, if someone see if someone sees me in
Speaker 1: mind neghborhood and they say, hey, Buck, you know, I
Speaker 1: think I could probably get them a roast chicken. I'm
Speaker 1: just putting out there. Maybe maybe a ham sandwich extra
Speaker 1: mayo too, because that's the kind of guy I am.
Speaker 1: I'm to challenge anyone in New York City who finds
Speaker 1: you in a grocery store to ask you for a
Speaker 1: roast history chicken goes down. Well, see if it happens,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna put it on social media. I'll tell everybody
Speaker 1: about the roast chicken incident. But remember you should be
Speaker 1: getting your roast chicken from mointhbox dot com slash buck,
Speaker 1: because that's where I make my roast chicken. So there's that. Ah,
Speaker 1: let's see here. Oh oh no, sorry, Ted. First, hey Buck,
Speaker 1: my twenty year old son is interested in your former occupation.
Speaker 1: Do you have any suggestions or recommendation semplify? Uh? Yeah, Ted,
Speaker 1: I would tell him, don't do it. And I know
Speaker 1: that's probably not what you'd want to hear. But I
Speaker 1: think the intelligence community is it has gone down a
Speaker 1: very bad path. I think it's overrun with leftists. I think, well,
Speaker 1: but no, you know what, let me retract that for
Speaker 1: a second. If we don't put good people like your
Speaker 1: son in there, which's never going to get better. So
Speaker 1: let me retract what I said. I would tell him
Speaker 1: just apply online, believe it or not. That's how you
Speaker 1: can get any intelligence community. There's an online application process,
Speaker 1: and I would just say, be prepared for showing up
Speaker 1: to a place that is so bureaucratic it it'll melt
Speaker 1: your brain cells and be prepared to be in a
Speaker 1: place that is overrun with multicultural and diversity and inclusion
Speaker 1: stuff all the time, and where leftists who are idealogues
Speaker 1: call the shots, but they protect themselves. They cloak themselves
Speaker 1: as civil servants, non partisan civil servants, but they're not.
Speaker 1: They're leftists. Not everyone in the CIA, not every the
Speaker 1: intellience community is a leftist. A lot of them are,
Speaker 1: and a lot of the very senior p balar. So
Speaker 1: that's what I would say, ted, that's the advice that
Speaker 1: I can give of this, But I'm sorry. I wish
Speaker 1: I could tell you, Oh, it's awesome. And look, I
Speaker 1: didn't stay, and I didn't stay for a reason. I
Speaker 1: didn't hate it when I was there. I enjoyed my
Speaker 1: time at the CIA, all things considered. But I was
Speaker 1: also there during a very special time when there was
Speaker 1: a clear there was a clear reason for the CIA
Speaker 1: to be doing what it did, which was the fight
Speaker 1: against al Qaeda and the global jihadists. So that was meaning,
Speaker 1: that was a meaningful mission set I meaningful to do
Speaker 1: the do you what do you think they're doing? Now?
Speaker 1: It's a lot of just pushing useless analysis around that
Speaker 1: a lot of really just it's just busy work, man,
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you the truth. So much of it
Speaker 1: busy work, all right, Al, the reason the left can
Speaker 1: get away with rating Rudy Giuliani's house is because the
Speaker 1: media covers for the and the GOP will fail to
Speaker 1: raise sufficient hell about it. Al's that's true. Unfortunate, what
Speaker 1: you're saying is true. They will basically get away with
Speaker 1: raiding Rudy Juliani's house. They're not go There's not going
Speaker 1: to be any prosecutor or any FBI agents who are
Speaker 1: censured or fired or anything for this. They abuse their
Speaker 1: discretion for political purposes, and this is something you saw
Speaker 1: with all the Russia collusion stuff. This is it's a
Speaker 1: very important thing to remember that Democrats abuse discretion when
Speaker 1: they are in positions of power, because it's very hard
Speaker 1: to hold somebody accountable when really it's just they're not
Speaker 1: acting in good faith, essentially being a jerk when you're
Speaker 1: a prosecutor and you know, treating people badly, but within
Speaker 1: the realm of what you can do is not enough
Speaker 1: for there to be sanctions or consequences for those individuals.
Speaker 1: So you know, it's it's a little bit like, well
Speaker 1: you see this with you know, it's up to the
Speaker 1: discretion of the of law enforcement. Are they going to
Speaker 1: call you and tell you to come in and surrender
Speaker 1: yourself or do they send, you know, a swat team
Speaker 1: to kick in your door at four am, guns drawn,
Speaker 1: terrify you and your wife, throw you on the floor,
Speaker 1: handcuff you, and then bring you in. It's really up
Speaker 1: to their discretion. And what we see is they use
Speaker 1: the maximum possible force and humiliation and fear that they
Speaker 1: can do within the law against their political enemies on
Speaker 1: the left. That's how they do it. And there's very
Speaker 1: little that we have as a way to push back
Speaker 1: against that. Very little. Indeed, all right, let's see Jim
Speaker 1: buck shields high. I know you like Rond Santist run
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. I like him a lot too.
Speaker 1: He's doing a great job. But do you think he
Speaker 1: can get seventy five million votes? I know Trump can
Speaker 1: maybe a Trump de Santist ticket. Jim, I love you,
Speaker 1: big guy, and I thank you for listening to this show.
Speaker 1: And what I'm gonna say may not be something you
Speaker 1: agree with, and that's cool because I tell you what
Speaker 1: I really think. Trump wants seventy five million votes. He
Speaker 1: lost to Joe Biden. Okay, we need to remember that
Speaker 1: he lost as an incumbent president to Joe Biden. Now
Speaker 1: I get that we can have all this. Oh, but
Speaker 1: they change the rules and you could tell me about
Speaker 1: your concerns about you know, the validity of the counsel
Speaker 1: or whatever bidens president MP is not. Trump lost, right,
Speaker 1: So so for all the you know, it is like
Speaker 1: we're going up to the refs after the game. You know,
Speaker 1: after the super Bowl, you can say the refs were
Speaker 1: paid off, but we haven't been able to prove it.
Speaker 1: And the other team has the Lombardi Trophy. So it's
Speaker 1: a little bit like you're telling me, well, the next
Speaker 1: time around, we should run the exact same team against
Speaker 1: that other team. Well, he lost and that's why. And
Speaker 1: I know people, you know we I think the conservatives
Speaker 1: haven't really come to grips with this yet. He lost
Speaker 1: by six million in the popular but you know, he
Speaker 1: lost in a half a dozen states. And I know
Speaker 1: that you can say the pandemic and a lot of things,
Speaker 1: but why would we think Trump would win the next
Speaker 1: time around? And when you add into this the post
Speaker 1: post election Trump was the biggest mistakes of his presidency
Speaker 1: post election, meaning post twenty twenty election, the way the
Speaker 1: media would run with a January sixth insurrection and everything
Speaker 1: against him. No, I think Desantists is a far Descantist
Speaker 1: is younger. No, Trump's gonna be seventy eight years old, folks.
Speaker 1: I don't just say this about Biden. I try to
Speaker 1: be consistent. That's too old to be president. Too old.
Speaker 1: It's too old for Biden. It'd be too old for Trump.
Speaker 1: Trump can put behind Desantists or some other candidate. Maybe
Speaker 1: I'm not. I'm not wedded to De Santis as an idea.
Speaker 1: Trump can put the apparatus behind him and we'd have
Speaker 1: something really special. And I think that's the move. I
Speaker 1: think that's the way forward, past the Maga torch to
Speaker 1: the next, you know, to the next person, and preferably
Speaker 1: somebody liked Desantists who understands governance a little bit better
Speaker 1: than Trump does. Look, we're gonna be honest about this
Speaker 1: wall didn't get build, folks. Obamacare fully repealed and replaced.
Speaker 1: You know, tax cuts great, that's going away. Regulation cuts great,
Speaker 1: they're coming. They've come back. Judges fantastic again. I'm thankful
Speaker 1: for the good things that Trump did, for the movement
Speaker 1: for the truth about the media. But I'm trying to
Speaker 1: be very clear eyed about this because I don't want
Speaker 1: to have to live through four more years well of
Speaker 1: what would be a comal administration. And that's what we
Speaker 1: get if we have the wrong candidate the wrong cities.
Speaker 1: But that's a long way out. And al I'm sorry, Jim.
Speaker 1: You could be right and I could be wrong, But
Speaker 1: I do think we have to remember Biden is president
Speaker 1: because he already beat Trump. We'd have to have a
Speaker 1: very compelling reason to think that I had to head
Speaker 1: matchup again would go our way. Otherwise we'll have repeat surprise.
Speaker 1: Otherwise we'll have you know, Oh, what do you mean?
Speaker 1: I thought you know Trump and the you know No. No,
Speaker 1: we have to be very honest about what happened. All Right.
Speaker 1: The future of the country hangs on our honesty with
Speaker 1: that issue. All right, roll call continuing. We got Darryl Hey,
Speaker 1: producer Markinbuck trapped here in the northwestern suburbs of Chicago.
Speaker 1: The lockdown is endless, and a lot of the blame
Speaker 1: goes to the people of the state. This is nowhere
Speaker 1: more clearly illustrated than the compliant outdoor mask wearers. I
Speaker 1: go on Erin's Weekly and my personal barometer of how
Speaker 1: far we are from a normal life is observing the
Speaker 1: people who wear their mask from their cars into the
Speaker 1: store and from the store into their cars. I make
Speaker 1: it a point to put my mask on the last
Speaker 1: possible moment before entering a store, and to remove it
Speaker 1: immediately upon exit. From the start of the mask tyranny.
Speaker 1: I have observed other shoppers every week, and is continually
Speaker 1: dejecting to see that ninety five percent of them do
Speaker 1: not chafe against the mask and do not strive to
Speaker 1: wear it only when necessary. No, the vast majority or
Speaker 1: mass up the whole way from car to store and back.
Speaker 1: The compliant here have become too easily accustomed to the
Speaker 1: government's yoke, and they have no will to show that
Speaker 1: they have any resistance to it in any small way.
Speaker 1: That is in Blue Illinois a last state of broken people.
Speaker 1: My wife and I have lived our entire lives here,
Speaker 1: but there's no fixing this lack of backbone. We're out
Speaker 1: of here as soon as we can escape. Shields high. Yeah, Darrel,
Speaker 1: I hear you. You know you got you got sheep
Speaker 1: all over the place, these leftist sheep. I listened to Faucci.
Speaker 1: I listen to this sciente. Yeah, Fauci's a moron, they believe,
Speaker 1: because he uses a big word here or there or somewhere,
Speaker 1: you know, a diminution of the ascendancy of the case
Speaker 1: data of the PCA. Yeah, people are impressed by that stupidity.
Speaker 1: I hear you, Daryl. I think everybody should be should
Speaker 1: be cursing the masks and saying that this is, you know,
Speaker 1: as dumb as anything we've ever been forced to do,
Speaker 1: and it does bother me. I'm supposed to wear a
Speaker 1: mask on the treadmill in the gym every time I
Speaker 1: go in there. All right, this matters a lot. This
Speaker 1: isn't just like, oh, you know what about a foreign
Speaker 1: policy and what's going on with the run. This matters
Speaker 1: right now. This matters every day, Rick, Right, Actually, Rick,
Speaker 1: you know what, let's save that one for tomorrow, Mark,
Speaker 1: because I want to get into it and we're not
Speaker 1: going to have time to finish it for today. Please
Speaker 1: do pass the buck. Tell somebody about the Bucks Exton show,
Speaker 1: share the podcast with them directly, text them, email them.
Speaker 1: Oh and also I'm speaking if you're in New York
Speaker 1: City the Metropolitan Republican Club. I'm speaking this Thursday at
Speaker 1: seven pm the Metropolitan Republican Club in New York City,
Speaker 1: so please come listen to me. There's an event of
Speaker 1: Facebook tickets and stuff. You can get it. Metropolitan Republican
Speaker 1: Club of New York, Shields High