1 00:00:11,697 --> 00:00:14,937 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure 2 00:00:14,977 --> 00:00:17,977 Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or 3 00:00:18,017 --> 00:00:21,377 Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, welcome to the Buck 4 00:00:21,377 --> 00:00:25,777 Speaker 1: Brief everybody. We're looking at the Trump Supreme Court oral 5 00:00:26,057 --> 00:00:31,417 Speaker 1: arguments today, and the biggest takeaway, I think Trump had 6 00:00:31,457 --> 00:00:35,777 Speaker 1: a good day. I actually think that Donald Trump's Donald 7 00:00:35,817 --> 00:00:40,617 Speaker 1: Trump's lawyer, Sawyer Sawyer, I think he did a really 8 00:00:40,617 --> 00:00:45,617 Speaker 1: good job. A friend of mine described the Department of 9 00:00:45,777 --> 00:00:51,417 Speaker 1: Justice counselor to the Special Council Dreabin as getting a 10 00:00:51,577 --> 00:00:55,817 Speaker 1: legal wedgie today before the Supreme Court, and I think 11 00:00:55,857 --> 00:00:58,817 Speaker 1: that was very much what happened. 12 00:00:59,017 --> 00:01:03,017 Speaker 2: Let's break down some of this. This is honestly fascinating. 13 00:01:04,297 --> 00:01:07,217 Speaker 1: First of all, before I even get into the merits 14 00:01:07,257 --> 00:01:10,697 Speaker 1: of the arguments, let's understand this. This falls into this 15 00:01:10,737 --> 00:01:14,057 Speaker 1: category of all of the legal scholars who had told 16 00:01:14,057 --> 00:01:20,097 Speaker 1: you previously that the state ballot initiative to or the 17 00:01:20,137 --> 00:01:23,977 Speaker 1: states rather sorry States, kicking Trump off the ballot, that 18 00:01:24,057 --> 00:01:27,217 Speaker 1: was the initiative kicking Trump off the ballot. Colorado and 19 00:01:27,257 --> 00:01:30,617 Speaker 1: Maine both dabbling in this, that that was a serious 20 00:01:30,697 --> 00:01:34,697 Speaker 1: legal argument. They got crushed nine er at the Supreme Court, 21 00:01:34,737 --> 00:01:37,937 Speaker 1: because obviously that would just mean that any state could 22 00:01:37,977 --> 00:01:42,177 Speaker 1: decide to kick any candidate off the ballot and in 23 00:01:42,297 --> 00:01:46,377 Speaker 1: essence be in a position to perhaps deliver deliver the 24 00:01:46,417 --> 00:01:50,577 Speaker 1: presidency to the other side, right or to their own side, 25 00:01:50,657 --> 00:01:54,057 Speaker 1: you know, to get a win. You can't have that, okay, 26 00:01:54,097 --> 00:01:56,537 Speaker 1: you can't have states with no due process just saying 27 00:01:56,577 --> 00:02:00,177 Speaker 1: you're off the ballot because we say so. California would 28 00:02:00,177 --> 00:02:01,977 Speaker 1: just say no Trump on the ballot. Oh, I guess 29 00:02:02,017 --> 00:02:04,577 Speaker 1: you know, well, Biden wi win that anyway. I know 30 00:02:04,617 --> 00:02:07,617 Speaker 1: some of you would be pointing that out. But Pennsylvania 31 00:02:07,817 --> 00:02:09,977 Speaker 1: or Michigan would say no Trump on the ballot, and 32 00:02:10,217 --> 00:02:12,937 Speaker 1: you say, okay, we got a problem here, right, all right? 33 00:02:13,097 --> 00:02:15,577 Speaker 1: So they got the point is they got slapped down 34 00:02:15,657 --> 00:02:18,417 Speaker 1: nine to zero at the Supreme Court. They got slapped 35 00:02:18,417 --> 00:02:21,257 Speaker 1: down nineo at Supreme Court, which means that you even 36 00:02:21,497 --> 00:02:23,537 Speaker 1: when you have Soda Mayor. 37 00:02:24,017 --> 00:02:26,697 Speaker 2: And Kagan going along with it. 38 00:02:27,777 --> 00:02:32,177 Speaker 1: You have a situation where the argument being made is 39 00:02:32,297 --> 00:02:39,057 Speaker 1: so clear that it is irrefutable, undeniable, indisputable. And that 40 00:02:39,217 --> 00:02:40,577 Speaker 1: was the case of State Bounce. Why am I talking 41 00:02:40,577 --> 00:02:43,977 Speaker 1: to state balance, Well, because on the other side of this, 42 00:02:44,097 --> 00:02:48,937 Speaker 1: now we have the presidential immunity debate, and this was 43 00:02:48,977 --> 00:02:50,697 Speaker 1: what was heard today at the Supreme Court, the presidential 44 00:02:50,697 --> 00:02:54,377 Speaker 1: immunity debate. Now, this has been really interesting because the 45 00:02:54,417 --> 00:02:59,537 Speaker 1: courts have never weighed in on this directly before. So 46 00:02:59,617 --> 00:03:04,017 Speaker 1: this is uncharted legal territory and it's really important stuff. 47 00:03:06,377 --> 00:03:08,257 Speaker 1: What you need to know first and foremost is that 48 00:03:08,377 --> 00:03:12,497 Speaker 1: the same legal scholars and experts who are saying experts 49 00:03:12,497 --> 00:03:17,097 Speaker 1: in quotes, who were saying it is a silly argument 50 00:03:18,377 --> 00:03:22,817 Speaker 1: that Trump is making about this Trump's lawyers are making 51 00:03:22,937 --> 00:03:25,937 Speaker 1: that he has immunity for official acts while in office. 52 00:03:26,937 --> 00:03:30,897 Speaker 1: Those same people that said that's preposterous. We're telling you, oh, 53 00:03:30,897 --> 00:03:34,097 Speaker 1: in the States can kick Trump off the ballot, right. 54 00:03:34,257 --> 00:03:35,857 Speaker 2: So they're wrong in a way. 55 00:03:36,057 --> 00:03:38,137 Speaker 1: Well, we'll see what happens with today's argument. I think 56 00:03:38,177 --> 00:03:40,497 Speaker 1: it's going to go Trump's way. But they've already shown 57 00:03:40,537 --> 00:03:42,417 Speaker 1: you in the past how wrong they are and how 58 00:03:42,457 --> 00:03:47,177 Speaker 1: absurd they are, and how poor their legal analysis is. Okay, 59 00:03:47,857 --> 00:03:49,897 Speaker 1: so that's a component of this. 60 00:03:50,897 --> 00:03:55,697 Speaker 2: Then you have as we sort of look at what. 61 00:03:55,697 --> 00:04:02,017 Speaker 1: The details of this dispute get to private versus public acts. 62 00:04:02,017 --> 00:04:03,217 Speaker 2: That's really what is essential. 63 00:04:03,537 --> 00:04:08,657 Speaker 1: The Biden DOJ Special Counsel and I would note that 64 00:04:08,737 --> 00:04:12,137 Speaker 1: this special counsel, I I agree with the former AG 65 00:04:12,857 --> 00:04:20,857 Speaker 1: Meice and former AG Mukasey Amicky Brief, Brief's Ammicky and whatever, 66 00:04:20,977 --> 00:04:27,497 Speaker 1: my Latin's rusty that the special counsel is illegitimate. How 67 00:04:27,537 --> 00:04:30,617 Speaker 1: can you have somebody who they just decide you get 68 00:04:30,617 --> 00:04:36,537 Speaker 1: to go and have this unbelievable power to prosecute anyone anywhere, 69 00:04:36,697 --> 00:04:39,897 Speaker 1: including a presidential candidate and former president, for his acts 70 00:04:39,977 --> 00:04:45,017 Speaker 1: while he was president, without Congress, without a presidential appointment. 71 00:04:45,177 --> 00:04:47,617 Speaker 2: How do you have that? It's absurd. 72 00:04:48,177 --> 00:04:51,937 Speaker 1: So that came up in the oral arguments today from 73 00:04:52,017 --> 00:04:54,697 Speaker 1: saur who, again I think did an excellent Trump's lawyer 74 00:04:54,737 --> 00:04:55,657 Speaker 1: did an excellent job. 75 00:04:55,817 --> 00:04:57,737 Speaker 2: People who said Trump's never going to have any good 76 00:04:57,817 --> 00:05:01,297 Speaker 2: lawyers who will even represent him false. So I did 77 00:05:01,337 --> 00:05:02,297 Speaker 2: a very good job today. 78 00:05:02,817 --> 00:05:09,337 Speaker 1: He was he was totally sharp, and his arguments were incisive, 79 00:05:09,617 --> 00:05:11,977 Speaker 1: and he came ready to play. 80 00:05:12,577 --> 00:05:15,257 Speaker 2: He was good to go. The dreaming guy who's the Biden. 81 00:05:14,977 --> 00:05:18,457 Speaker 1: Deal Jets, I don't know a lot of sort of 82 00:05:18,817 --> 00:05:21,737 Speaker 1: trying to talk around some of the stuff install anyway 83 00:05:22,737 --> 00:05:26,377 Speaker 1: public versus private acts as a president. They're trying to 84 00:05:26,417 --> 00:05:30,857 Speaker 1: say that what Trump did everyone agrees on both sides. 85 00:05:30,897 --> 00:05:33,257 Speaker 1: There's got to be some immunity for a president for 86 00:05:33,337 --> 00:05:36,697 Speaker 1: official acts. And this is effectively what I've been saying 87 00:05:36,697 --> 00:05:41,257 Speaker 1: all along. You know, you can't have a prosecutor, for example, 88 00:05:41,377 --> 00:05:45,657 Speaker 1: or a police officer just being sued or being prosecuted 89 00:05:45,697 --> 00:05:50,257 Speaker 1: for the good faith operations of their job. Right, So 90 00:05:50,857 --> 00:05:54,017 Speaker 1: you can't say, oh, well, this prosecutor made the decision 91 00:05:54,057 --> 00:05:55,897 Speaker 1: to prosecute somebody. We're going to say that he goes 92 00:05:55,937 --> 00:05:59,937 Speaker 1: to prison now because we don't like that decision. Because 93 00:05:59,977 --> 00:06:03,337 Speaker 1: it's within his prerogative to make that determination. It is 94 00:06:03,377 --> 00:06:04,257 Speaker 1: an official act. 95 00:06:05,297 --> 00:06:07,817 Speaker 2: And what the. 96 00:06:07,137 --> 00:06:09,617 Speaker 1: Argument comes down to here is, well, what constitutes for 97 00:06:09,697 --> 00:06:13,657 Speaker 1: a press a public versus a private act. Both sides agree, 98 00:06:13,977 --> 00:06:18,137 Speaker 1: and this is we are establishing critical precedent here. Both 99 00:06:18,177 --> 00:06:23,097 Speaker 1: sides agree that purely private conduct, let's just say a president, 100 00:06:23,737 --> 00:06:29,137 Speaker 1: you know, strangles and murders a secretary in the White House, right, 101 00:06:29,177 --> 00:06:33,377 Speaker 1: one of his aides or something, you have no immunity 102 00:06:33,377 --> 00:06:34,897 Speaker 1: for that. You're going to prison. Okay, that's not a 103 00:06:34,897 --> 00:06:37,777 Speaker 1: presidential act. They both agree on that. So that's a 104 00:06:38,137 --> 00:06:40,337 Speaker 1: believe it or not. That's an important place to start. 105 00:06:41,217 --> 00:06:43,977 Speaker 1: So we know that there is a legal liability that 106 00:06:44,017 --> 00:06:48,817 Speaker 1: even presidents have again for their private acts, meaning no 107 00:06:48,857 --> 00:06:52,577 Speaker 1: one could make an argument. There is no argument to 108 00:06:52,697 --> 00:06:56,097 Speaker 1: be made in a word and world where words have 109 00:06:56,217 --> 00:07:00,257 Speaker 1: meaning that a president, you know, bludgeoning a secretary with 110 00:07:00,337 --> 00:07:02,857 Speaker 1: a candlestick and she bleeds out on the floor of 111 00:07:02,857 --> 00:07:05,577 Speaker 1: the oval office. Oh well, he's the president. That's part 112 00:07:05,617 --> 00:07:07,977 Speaker 1: of his job. Like, no one buys that. Fine, Okay, 113 00:07:07,977 --> 00:07:11,537 Speaker 1: both sides agree, that's good. But then where is the line? 114 00:07:11,777 --> 00:07:15,097 Speaker 1: What is public what is private as an official act? 115 00:07:15,217 --> 00:07:20,297 Speaker 1: That's where it gets really really interesting. And I say 116 00:07:20,337 --> 00:07:25,377 Speaker 1: that is also where we are going to come back 117 00:07:25,377 --> 00:07:26,577 Speaker 1: at a second. I'm going to tell you where that 118 00:07:26,657 --> 00:07:29,017 Speaker 1: line is. You know, this podcast as you know, as 119 00:07:29,057 --> 00:07:30,857 Speaker 1: you can hear right now, it's all about having deep 120 00:07:30,897 --> 00:07:34,337 Speaker 1: dive conversations into topics that have tremendous impact on us 121 00:07:34,337 --> 00:07:36,377 Speaker 1: in the world we live in, and I want to 122 00:07:36,377 --> 00:07:40,857 Speaker 1: bring you insights about politics and culture and what's actually happening. 123 00:07:41,257 --> 00:07:42,737 Speaker 2: I don't really cover the markets. 124 00:07:42,857 --> 00:07:45,337 Speaker 1: I'm not a stock guy, but I know somebody who 125 00:07:45,337 --> 00:07:48,817 Speaker 1: does it phenomenally well, Mark Chakin. Mark worked on Wall 126 00:07:48,817 --> 00:07:51,217 Speaker 1: Street for fifty years, and his time on the street, 127 00:07:51,377 --> 00:07:53,977 Speaker 1: he invented three new indices for the Nasdaq has predicted 128 00:07:54,017 --> 00:07:56,337 Speaker 1: some of the biggest market shifts of the past decade. 129 00:07:56,777 --> 00:07:59,417 Speaker 1: And he says that there's a big turning point coming 130 00:07:59,457 --> 00:08:02,857 Speaker 1: up right now for stocks that are AI involved, that 131 00:08:02,897 --> 00:08:05,977 Speaker 1: AI touches on either directly or indirectly. And he says 132 00:08:06,017 --> 00:08:08,017 Speaker 1: it's a new dawn for US stocks coming up. He 133 00:08:08,017 --> 00:08:09,617 Speaker 1: doesn't want you to miss out on this. It's going 134 00:08:09,697 --> 00:08:12,577 Speaker 1: to happen the next ninety days. Go to twenty twenty 135 00:08:12,657 --> 00:08:18,097 Speaker 1: four aistock dot com. That's twenty twenty four aistock dot com. 136 00:08:18,137 --> 00:08:20,257 Speaker 1: You can watch for free see what he has to say. 137 00:08:20,817 --> 00:08:24,977 Speaker 1: Twenty twenty four aistock dot com paid for by Shaking Analytics. 138 00:08:25,017 --> 00:08:29,057 Speaker 1: All right, so where is the line public private conduct? 139 00:08:29,097 --> 00:08:32,217 Speaker 1: Where is the line for a president? They did ask 140 00:08:32,257 --> 00:08:34,657 Speaker 1: some of the questions we expected them to, like, could 141 00:08:34,737 --> 00:08:38,417 Speaker 1: Bush be prosecuted for lying about WMD or you know, 142 00:08:38,457 --> 00:08:40,777 Speaker 1: for being wrong about WMD whatever, These are the questions 143 00:08:40,817 --> 00:08:45,257 Speaker 1: they were asking. Could Obama be prosecuted for droning an 144 00:08:45,297 --> 00:08:52,017 Speaker 1: American citizen abroad without that person having any due process 145 00:08:52,057 --> 00:08:54,777 Speaker 1: and not being involved in a in an imminent threat 146 00:08:54,817 --> 00:08:57,497 Speaker 1: situation like this wasn't you know a terrorist with a 147 00:08:57,577 --> 00:08:58,857 Speaker 1: gun to somebody's head. 148 00:08:58,817 --> 00:08:59,777 Speaker 2: When they were killed. 149 00:09:00,937 --> 00:09:03,977 Speaker 1: In fact, if you believe the reports, it is a 150 00:09:04,577 --> 00:09:08,937 Speaker 1: it was a US minor abroad as it not yet 151 00:09:09,057 --> 00:09:12,377 Speaker 1: even of of age, who was caught in. 152 00:09:12,337 --> 00:09:13,017 Speaker 2: A drone strike. 153 00:09:13,097 --> 00:09:16,057 Speaker 1: Now that's a you think that's a big deal. Truth 154 00:09:16,177 --> 00:09:19,097 Speaker 1: is Obama. And this is even from the trumplayers. No 155 00:09:19,177 --> 00:09:22,457 Speaker 1: Obama cannot be prosecuted for that. That is an official 156 00:09:22,497 --> 00:09:27,937 Speaker 1: act as commander in chief, right, he is acting overseas 157 00:09:28,057 --> 00:09:31,177 Speaker 1: to deal with an imminent threat against a I should say, 158 00:09:31,217 --> 00:09:34,777 Speaker 1: a proven threat against the United States. And I notice 159 00:09:34,857 --> 00:09:37,857 Speaker 1: all of these arguments are arguments. None of them are 160 00:09:37,937 --> 00:09:41,897 Speaker 1: perfect because then they turn around and say, well, what 161 00:09:42,057 --> 00:09:45,417 Speaker 1: about what about if? And they keep I feel that 162 00:09:45,657 --> 00:09:47,857 Speaker 1: they actually one of the justices. I forget it was, 163 00:09:48,577 --> 00:09:50,657 Speaker 1: but was like, look, I'm not trying to Everyone goes, 164 00:09:50,697 --> 00:09:54,017 Speaker 1: what if Seal Team six, you know what if those 165 00:09:54,057 --> 00:09:57,537 Speaker 1: guys were assigned to assassin. It's like, they're not an 166 00:09:57,537 --> 00:10:02,537 Speaker 1: assassin squad, They're an elite tier one, you know, military 167 00:10:03,417 --> 00:10:05,817 Speaker 1: special operations unit. Right, I just feel but they're always 168 00:10:05,857 --> 00:10:08,137 Speaker 1: no One's ever like, what about what about the greenen 169 00:10:08,177 --> 00:10:10,497 Speaker 1: Berets going in an assassin It's always so what about 170 00:10:10,497 --> 00:10:12,977 Speaker 1: Seal Team six going. And so a justice actually pointed 171 00:10:13,017 --> 00:10:14,937 Speaker 1: out and he said, look, we're not we know Seal 172 00:10:14,977 --> 00:10:17,457 Speaker 1: Team six are not like the assassin squad. But what 173 00:10:17,537 --> 00:10:19,577 Speaker 1: if any military that think it could just be an 174 00:10:19,617 --> 00:10:22,217 Speaker 1: air strike, it could be a drone strike. Okay, what 175 00:10:22,377 --> 00:10:27,857 Speaker 1: if a president ordered a drone strike on another person, 176 00:10:28,257 --> 00:10:32,577 Speaker 1: a US person who was their political rival, would that 177 00:10:32,657 --> 00:10:35,737 Speaker 1: have immunity? And this is where you get to know 178 00:10:37,217 --> 00:10:39,857 Speaker 1: and then you get to the corrupt and criminal purpose. 179 00:10:41,137 --> 00:10:41,537 Speaker 2: Hm. 180 00:10:41,577 --> 00:10:46,137 Speaker 1: Well, if you have corrupt and criminal purpose for the act, 181 00:10:46,417 --> 00:10:48,657 Speaker 1: then the act is not. 182 00:10:48,577 --> 00:10:49,777 Speaker 2: Covered under immunity. 183 00:10:49,897 --> 00:10:52,297 Speaker 1: Again, going back to the argument here, Well, then where 184 00:10:52,337 --> 00:10:55,257 Speaker 1: is the line because for example, if you now we 185 00:10:55,297 --> 00:10:57,737 Speaker 1: get into the into the meat of the Trump situation, 186 00:10:58,417 --> 00:11:02,737 Speaker 1: if you say, you know the president Trump viewed his 187 00:11:02,937 --> 00:11:05,217 Speaker 1: role as president as making sure that there was not 188 00:11:05,377 --> 00:11:11,057 Speaker 1: an illegitimate and therefore illegal certification of an election. If 189 00:11:11,057 --> 00:11:15,697 Speaker 1: he is wrong, but he still does this believing. 190 00:11:15,297 --> 00:11:16,057 Speaker 2: He is correct. 191 00:11:16,097 --> 00:11:21,577 Speaker 1: Does that fall within his presidential powers? And this is 192 00:11:21,777 --> 00:11:23,497 Speaker 1: right at the heart of the argument, because what the 193 00:11:23,577 --> 00:11:27,617 Speaker 1: what the Democrat left anti Trump argument is is well, 194 00:11:27,657 --> 00:11:29,457 Speaker 1: no Trump knew. 195 00:11:29,657 --> 00:11:32,137 Speaker 2: This was not true. 196 00:11:33,697 --> 00:11:39,497 Speaker 1: Now you're getting into if you can effectively divine the mindset. 197 00:11:39,537 --> 00:11:40,097 Speaker 2: You know, he didn't. 198 00:11:40,297 --> 00:11:42,897 Speaker 1: It's not like there was an exchange, an illicit exchange. 199 00:11:42,937 --> 00:11:46,937 Speaker 1: It wasn't a bribery situation, right, It's not like someone 200 00:11:47,017 --> 00:11:49,097 Speaker 1: paid Trump but he was president because bribery is something 201 00:11:49,137 --> 00:11:51,737 Speaker 1: he talked about too. Oh, mister president challenged the election, 202 00:11:51,817 --> 00:11:55,977 Speaker 1: here's here's a billion dollars whatever, you'd say, Well, then 203 00:11:56,017 --> 00:12:01,217 Speaker 1: he has to know he's engaging in illegal conduct with 204 00:12:01,377 --> 00:12:08,577 Speaker 1: an explicitly illegal purpose or clearly illegal purpose to him. 205 00:12:09,097 --> 00:12:10,737 Speaker 1: But you started to get into all the Democrats say 206 00:12:10,777 --> 00:12:13,617 Speaker 1: he knew that it was fake, he knew that he 207 00:12:13,657 --> 00:12:16,097 Speaker 1: was breaking the lawn and the Republican The Trump side 208 00:12:16,097 --> 00:12:19,137 Speaker 1: of it is, well, you can't prove that that hasn't 209 00:12:19,137 --> 00:12:23,617 Speaker 1: been proven. And also being able to even challenge the 210 00:12:23,777 --> 00:12:28,417 Speaker 1: official Act itself, whether it's appointing an ambassador or signing 211 00:12:28,417 --> 00:12:31,417 Speaker 1: a bill that is a punishment that we can't allow 212 00:12:31,417 --> 00:12:34,417 Speaker 1: presidents to go through. So if we determined that it 213 00:12:34,497 --> 00:12:38,657 Speaker 1: is a legitimate official act, but we open up this 214 00:12:38,857 --> 00:12:43,457 Speaker 1: Pandora's box to well, you can still challenge the intent 215 00:12:44,177 --> 00:12:45,737 Speaker 1: behind the official Act. 216 00:12:46,337 --> 00:12:47,257 Speaker 2: Where does that stop? 217 00:12:48,257 --> 00:12:50,577 Speaker 1: And now it's as oh, well, you know the president 218 00:12:51,137 --> 00:12:54,097 Speaker 1: he appointed that ambassador, because that ambassador is going to 219 00:12:54,097 --> 00:12:56,097 Speaker 1: be part of a future coup to overthrow the United 220 00:12:56,137 --> 00:12:59,697 Speaker 1: States government. So now let's prosecute him for that conspiracy 221 00:12:59,817 --> 00:13:01,777 Speaker 1: they talked about this conspiracy and obstruction. 222 00:13:02,617 --> 00:13:04,177 Speaker 2: Conspiracy and obstruction. 223 00:13:03,977 --> 00:13:10,097 Speaker 1: Are very broad, very vague statues, and often really just 224 00:13:10,137 --> 00:13:12,697 Speaker 1: rely on the good faith of the prosecutor to not abuse, 225 00:13:12,737 --> 00:13:15,057 Speaker 1: and clearly they're abusing them against Trump. That's what we 226 00:13:15,137 --> 00:13:17,497 Speaker 1: all that's where this all goes, that's what we all see. 227 00:13:19,777 --> 00:13:26,097 Speaker 1: I think that the anti Trump argument here had a 228 00:13:26,137 --> 00:13:28,577 Speaker 1: bad day. I'm going to tell you where this is going, 229 00:13:28,577 --> 00:13:31,017 Speaker 1: where I think the next steps are in just a moment. 230 00:13:31,417 --> 00:13:33,097 Speaker 1: But I want to speak to my fellow gun owners. 231 00:13:33,137 --> 00:13:34,777 Speaker 1: You know it's time you got introduced to a lot 232 00:13:34,777 --> 00:13:37,177 Speaker 1: of firearms that may be new to you, but you 233 00:13:37,177 --> 00:13:39,657 Speaker 1: know they're made here in America, their top quality at 234 00:13:39,697 --> 00:13:43,897 Speaker 1: an incredible price. Bear Creek Arsenal. Bear Creek Arsenal. It's 235 00:13:43,897 --> 00:13:45,777 Speaker 1: a great story too when you look at the founding 236 00:13:45,817 --> 00:13:49,457 Speaker 1: of this company. Veteran owned and operated gun manufacturer based 237 00:13:49,497 --> 00:13:53,257 Speaker 1: in Sanford, North Carolina. Bear Creek Arsenal makes high quality 238 00:13:53,297 --> 00:13:56,817 Speaker 1: firearms at an incredible everyday value. But the quality you're 239 00:13:56,817 --> 00:14:00,697 Speaker 1: getting here. I mean, the price point is phenomenal. They're offered. 240 00:14:01,337 --> 00:14:03,617 Speaker 1: They're able to offer rather a wide range of premium 241 00:14:03,697 --> 00:14:06,697 Speaker 1: calibers that a fraction of what the competitors do. There's 242 00:14:06,697 --> 00:14:10,177 Speaker 1: no middleman fees. That's how they're passing that savings along 243 00:14:10,257 --> 00:14:14,297 Speaker 1: to you. Their products are precision oriented, perform very well 244 00:14:14,337 --> 00:14:16,537 Speaker 1: at the range or in any situation where you need 245 00:14:16,577 --> 00:14:19,377 Speaker 1: your firearm. Barck Creek Arsenal was founded by engineers with 246 00:14:19,417 --> 00:14:22,497 Speaker 1: over two decades of experience in the firearms industry. I've 247 00:14:22,537 --> 00:14:25,737 Speaker 1: got their BC fifteen model, a bar Creek Arsenal AR 248 00:14:25,777 --> 00:14:29,297 Speaker 1: fifteen model. It is great, got it all ready to rock. 249 00:14:29,337 --> 00:14:32,897 Speaker 1: I've been out at the range with it. It's a fantastic firearm. 250 00:14:32,977 --> 00:14:36,657 Speaker 1: I've also got the Grizzly, which is my nine millimeter pistol. 251 00:14:36,897 --> 00:14:38,377 Speaker 1: One of the things I love about it is that 252 00:14:38,417 --> 00:14:41,057 Speaker 1: it has this excellent groove, you know for my weak hand, 253 00:14:41,097 --> 00:14:44,377 Speaker 1: my left hand, and when I am holding it always 254 00:14:44,377 --> 00:14:47,657 Speaker 1: reminds me when I'm holding my Grizzly from Bear Creek Arsenal, 255 00:14:47,977 --> 00:14:51,417 Speaker 1: make sure I get my left thumb up on the 256 00:14:51,497 --> 00:14:55,697 Speaker 1: slide properly to give me the proper grip it's so 257 00:14:55,737 --> 00:15:00,977 Speaker 1: important with shooting a shooting a pistol, gotta have proper grip. 258 00:15:01,017 --> 00:15:04,457 Speaker 1: And this just this little you can tell, little ergonomics, 259 00:15:04,577 --> 00:15:09,377 Speaker 1: little decision making about Bear Creek Arsenal's firearms make such 260 00:15:09,377 --> 00:15:12,457 Speaker 1: a big difference. Barcreek Arsenal dot com, slash buck. That's 261 00:15:12,497 --> 00:15:15,257 Speaker 1: where I want you to go. Bear Creekarsenal dot com, 262 00:15:15,297 --> 00:15:18,577 Speaker 1: slash buck. Use promo code buck to get ten percent 263 00:15:18,697 --> 00:15:21,817 Speaker 1: off your first order. Bear Creek Arsenal dot com slash buck. 264 00:15:21,897 --> 00:15:24,817 Speaker 1: Use promo code buck for ten percent off. You're gonna 265 00:15:24,817 --> 00:15:26,577 Speaker 1: love this. Go to that website. You're gonna love the 266 00:15:26,617 --> 00:15:30,177 Speaker 1: firearms gear. They got great prices on optics to all 267 00:15:30,257 --> 00:15:31,337 Speaker 1: kinds of stuff knives. 268 00:15:32,417 --> 00:15:33,817 Speaker 2: Where do I think this is going for Trump? 269 00:15:34,017 --> 00:15:37,697 Speaker 1: I think the Supreme Court is going to overrule the 270 00:15:37,697 --> 00:15:40,297 Speaker 1: lower court and send it down with further instructions to 271 00:15:40,457 --> 00:15:44,817 Speaker 1: review it in a specified scope as to what presidential 272 00:15:44,897 --> 00:15:48,337 Speaker 1: powers really are. I think they'll be defining some of 273 00:15:48,377 --> 00:15:52,497 Speaker 1: it in their in their decision. And I think that 274 00:15:52,737 --> 00:15:55,617 Speaker 1: this means that they're not going to be able to 275 00:15:55,737 --> 00:15:58,457 Speaker 1: get this. Well, it's gonna be even harder than to 276 00:15:58,457 --> 00:16:00,617 Speaker 1: get this federal trial, the JA six trial that's what's 277 00:16:00,657 --> 00:16:01,937 Speaker 1: the background of all this. By the way, this is 278 00:16:01,937 --> 00:16:03,337 Speaker 1: all I should have said at the beginning. This is 279 00:16:03,337 --> 00:16:05,537 Speaker 1: all J six trial stuff. I think they're not gonna 280 00:16:05,537 --> 00:16:07,657 Speaker 1: be able to get this if I'm right about the 281 00:16:07,697 --> 00:16:09,417 Speaker 1: Supreme Court's order. I don't think they'll be able to 282 00:16:09,417 --> 00:16:12,657 Speaker 1: get this thing done in time. Although maybe the lower 283 00:16:12,697 --> 00:16:15,217 Speaker 1: courts are going to go into ludacrous speed, which they've 284 00:16:15,217 --> 00:16:17,617 Speaker 1: been doing all along. That's possible, so we shall see. 285 00:16:17,657 --> 00:16:20,457 Speaker 1: But a good day for Trump, a good day for 286 00:16:20,497 --> 00:16:23,817 Speaker 1: the Constitution. I believe we'll see what that decision is 287 00:16:24,697 --> 00:16:25,297 Speaker 1: shield time.