WEBVTT - Michael Arougheti Talks Tariffs, China

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back, we are here at the Milken Global Conference.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 2>Join now by Aris Management CEO Michael Arraghetti. Thank you

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 2>for joining us here on sech Good to see again.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot of conversation going on. We have to start

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>with tariffs. I mean, it's kind of taking up all.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>The you heard of the room these days.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of the strategy that you're seeing

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>from the administration and how you as an investor react

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>to it.

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look, we try to stay above the politics and

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>just think about where the market served going and how

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 3>it affects capital flows in our business. I think the

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>good news, generally from an Ari's perspective, is the businesses

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>that we invest in tend to be middle market service

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 3>companies that have their customer base in local currency, local markets.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>So we don't really invest in a lot of companies

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 3>that make things or have to grapple with supply chain

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 3>issues or tariffs. So I think in terms of the

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 3>first order impacts, we're pretty unaffected. Obviously, the longer that

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 3>these trade and balances go on and the trade wark

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 3>goes on, it affects everybody just in terms of the

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>economic impact and that's what we're keeping.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>An eye out for.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>But so far we're just kind of in a weight

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 3>and see mode, and hopefully we'll get some information next

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 3>week or two that'll give some people some clarity, a lot.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Of weight and see going around. What about the difference

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that you see between smaller and middle sized companies and

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the larger ones. There's a lot of concerns that there

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>will be a disproportionate impact to the changes in policy

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>for those middle sized companies.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not sure I agree with that.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>The reality is most middle market companies are insulated from

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 3>some of the large cross.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Border impacts of the tariffs.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>And I could craft an argument that they're actually more

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 3>protected in some respects from some of the issues that

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 3>we're grappling with. That being said, if we start to

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>head into a recessionary environment, they'll bear the brunt of it.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>So again, it could break either way, and we're just

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>going to have to react to what the market gives us.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of the relationship that is changing

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>between the two world economics superpowers, the US and China.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course, a lot of investors have looked more and

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>more to China, to Asia more largely but of course

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the tear of escalation has not been helpful to that movement.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that there's some reversal there that will

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>happen in the future.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Look, we invest money on behalf of institutions and individual

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>investors all over the globe. We have a large business

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 3>in the Asia Pacific region. You know, part of our

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 3>business is benefiting in terms of people allocating to other

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 3>regions of the world where we have capability and capacity.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Our industrial logistics business is actually benefiting from some of

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the changes we're seeing around the global supply chain, near

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>shoring and reshoring and China plus one. So there's always

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be puts in takes. The reality is is

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>very few investors US dollar investors have been investing into

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the China market it over the last many years, so

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>we're not really seeing that significant amount of disruption.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting at a time where a lot

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of people are looking around and seeing capital kind of frozen,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>you've actually raised a significant amount in places like private credit.

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you think you're doing differently here and what

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>does it mean for your ability to bring in more

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 2>interest from investors for the rest of the year.

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we were fortunate last year we had a record

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 3>year fundraising. We pulled in about ninety three billion dollars

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>of new aum this first quarter, we just had earnings yesterday.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>We added another twenty billion dollars to the dry powder pile.

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>We have about one hundred and forty five billion dollars

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to invest I think what we're doing differently from a

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 3>positioning standpoint is number one, we have a broad, diversified

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>global business. So I just think that we're giving investors

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of choice as to where they want to

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 3>play and what risks.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>They want to take.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>As probably one of the pioneers or leaders in private credit,

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>we're one of the few managers that actually has a

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 3>track record that go those you know, back twenty thirty

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>years where people can see how we've performed through cycles.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And then, as we often talk with investors, if you.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Look at our private credit strategies today, broadly across real

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 3>assets in corporate we're generating twelve to fifteen percent rates

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>of return right now, So on a relative value basis,

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I think with this amount of uncertainty on the forward

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>path of earnings valuations, I think most investors are just

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>finding it frankly easier, you know, to take shelter in

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the credit markets and make those kind of load of

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 3>mid teens returns without having to worry about that equity

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>risk premium.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what's fueling that return? Is it because rates have

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>remained higher?

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately, yes, it's clearly a reflection of the base rate environment.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Rates are now starting to drift down, as everybody knows.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>But as they are and concerns about economic weakness are

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 3>seeping in, credit spreads are starting to widen out. So

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>while rates are coming down, I think people felt the

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>asset class was going to be much more rate sensitive

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>than it actually is because we're making up for that

0:04:58.640 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 3>reduction with credit spreads.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>As I talked to you and your peers, I can't

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>help but think that there might be actually around the

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>corner in the wake of some of this turmoil, a

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>goals and opportunity that's forming to deploy larger and larger dollars.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Given how much valuations have corrected, What does that opportunity

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>look like?

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think we now having been in business for

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 3>thirty years, have seen that we actually have grown faster

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 3>through periods of dislocation. So the fastest growth we ever

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>had was through the GFC In terms of our profitability

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and our aum second was through the COVID pandemic, and

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 3>that's a combination of just the unique structures that we

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>manage the capabilities that we have.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So typically whenever we have voll.

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 3>To markets or dislocation, it creates opportunity. What's unique about

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 3>this moment is the amount of investments that have already

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 3>been made in the private markets at high valuations that

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>were reflecting the lower rate environment is of a magnitude

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that we haven't seen before. And so the resolution, if

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>you will, of all of the those assets that need

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to reset basis, we think is going to be a

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>massive opportunity in places like secondaries, opportunistic credit, opportunistic real estate.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>So you know, around the halls of areas are actually

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>quite excited about the future.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 2>So secondaries is a good place to dive in for

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>a moment here because you are seeing a lot of

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 2>limited partners looking to sell. Some of that is their

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>own liquidity concerns that we're hearing about, but also, Mike,

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the private equity industry has been holding onto assets for years.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The IPO window has not opened in a meaningful way.

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.799
<v Speaker 2>This was supposed to be the big year didn't happen,

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>not really yet. M and A also pretty stalled. What

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 2>does that mean for the private equity industry? Can they

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 2>keep borrowing to keep the party going?

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they can.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean the financial incentives in private equity are aligned

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 3>to long term equity value creation, and that may require

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 3>holding these assets for longer. There's a real tension in

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the market now from limited partners who want to see

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>a return of capital before reinvesting. But the opportunities for

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 3>liquidity have gotten much more innovative and creative and complex.

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a private equity GP.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Today, the entire market there's about three plus trillion dollars

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 3>of private equity invested. Sixty percent of that private equity

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>is four and a half years older or more. There's

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 3>about a trillion dollars of equity that has not been invested,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and so the challenge that the private equity industry is

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>facing is do I take my trillion dollars and invest

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 3>it into this new market where there's probably good opportunity,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 3>or do I use it to support valuation and growth

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>in the existing portfolio. But you can't do both, and

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 3>that's where secondaries comes in. So we're seeing significant demand

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 3>from the GP community as well as the LP community

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 3>to kind of figure out how to recapture some of

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>that three trillion and get it back to investors.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>So you had to describe that tension between investors and

0:07:58.320 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>their private asset firms.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>What is it? I'm not sure there's a tension.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I actually think that most sophisticated LPs, which is largely

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 3>all of them, understand the world that we live in,

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think that they want to see assets

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>getting monetized at valuations that don't reflect the intrinsic value.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 3>That being said, they want to participate in this new vintage,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and so if there's a tension, it's really how do

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I capture this wonderful opportunity set that you just referred

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to without compromising value creation and existing portfolio and not

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>just a dialogue. You know, and gps and LPs are

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 3>all going to be in a different place depending on

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 3>their liquidity or the age of their portfolio or franking

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.359
<v Speaker 3>the performance of the underlying portfolio.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Certainly the topic of the day and areas is right

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of it.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Mike, we have to leave it there.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>We thank you so much for joining us here on

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>set that is Mike Arraghetti, of course, the CEO of

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>ares here at the Milk and Bubble Institute