WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Trump Inauguration, Davos preview, Tariff Threat

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead to what Donald Trump's campaign promises will

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>mean for the US economy once he's sworn in. I'm

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hetger in London, where we're looking ahead to

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in DeVos.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Christner looking at how China is gearing up

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 4>for the incoming Trump administration.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven to three year, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Syrias,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 5>Good day to you.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with the

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>inauguration of Donald Trump as President of the US, because

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>he officially takes office for the second time on Monday.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>For more on what Trump two point zero means for

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the US economy and geopolitics in general. We're joined by

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Joe Matthew Bloomberg Balance of Power co hosts. Well, Joe,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>mm hmm, Well, let's start with what Donald Trump has

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 2>promised to do on day one of his new administration.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>A lineup of executive orders. What are we going to see?

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a long list, Tom, get your sharpy out,

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 6>because he's going to be pushing a lot of paper,

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 6>it sounds like, and you're right. We'll have the inaugural,

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 6>The process will last a few hours. They have the

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 6>parade and so forth, and then Donald Trump moves into

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 6>the Oval office, and he's made a lot of promises

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 6>for day one. It's a little bit difficult to really

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 6>predict exactly what will be involved in those couple of hours,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 6>but we know there will be a series of executive

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 6>orders eos as they call them here, maybe even exceeding

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 6>one hundred of them. Tom. They'll be aimed at the border.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 6>We've certainly heard that from Donald Trump on the campaign

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 6>trail and since the election. The President elect is promising

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 6>to shut down the border in his words, and there

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 6>is a lot of talk in Washington a lot of

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 6>reporting that he will invoke Title forty two, that covid

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 6>era rule that was used to close the border in

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 6>his first term, something that the Biden administration lifted. There

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 6>could be executive orders on mass deportation, of course, something

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 6>that we've heard a lot about. As he says on

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 6>day one, whether it takes effect on day one, we'll see.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 6>But beyond that, we could see maybe some things reversing

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 6>some Biden rules and laws potentially that were passed. They

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 6>want to strip back at least components for instance of

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 6>the IRA the Inflation Reduction Act. And then let's remember

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 6>the war in Ukraine. To Donald Trump had said all

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 6>through the campaign that on day one he could do

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 6>this in the first day, basically with one phone call,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 6>get them both in a room, and he could get

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 6>it done to end the war in Ukraine, which would

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 6>be remarkable. I'm not sure we should expect that, but

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 6>I would expect to see paper on that and potentially

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 6>announcement of a meeting with Vladimir Putin.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's a full full house, that's one day. Yeah,

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that's right, right. Well, you know, Trump is walking into

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good economy. We saw just last week resilient spending.

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 2>During December, we have a very solid job market, wages up,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 2>but conversely stubbornly high inflation. The housing market very troubled.

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't know when we're going to get

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>out of that. Rates are above seven percent now, a

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of income equality, inequality. So what do you think

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump is planning? How will he address those issues?

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's interesting.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 6>We were listening to Scott Besson, his pick for Treasury Secretary,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 6>in his confirmation hearing just a couple of days ago,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 6>and he's going to be the one carrying the message

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 6>on a lot of this. And we've had a chance

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 6>to talk with Scott Bessen, so we do have a

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 6>sense of what Donald Trump wants to do. And it

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 6>begins with, by the way, going back to day one,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 6>this is going to be likely another executive order where

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump says drill, baby, drill. That literally his approach

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 6>to inflation is to get to energy prices. He's had

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 6>a promise to increase specifically crude oil in terms of

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 6>supplies by three million barrels a day, but overall he says, drill, baby, drill,

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 6>will lower energy cost by half. That's a tall order

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 6>and it would likely require a weakened economy to see

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 6>oil and gas prices fall by fifty percent. But he

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 6>sees that with energy being the feed stock for our economy,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 6>as the conduit to lower inflation. Whether that is a

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 6>real plan, whether it works has yet to be seen,

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 6>because we also know that Donald Trump wants to make

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 6>permanent the so called Trump tax cuts from twenty seventeen,

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 6>and couple that with across the board tariffs. Now, when

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 6>you put that whole picture together, Scott Bessett would say

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 6>that that mosaic is the antidote to inflation. When you

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 6>take each one in a vacuum, most economists would tell

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 6>you that they are potentially inflationary. And the economists that

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 6>we have spoken with have been very skeptical of this plan.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 6>We're going to find out tom in real time whether

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 6>it works.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, especially those tariffs. And you know, he campaigned on

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>punishing tariffs ten to twenty percent, our biggest trading partners,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Canada and Mexico sixty percent more. You know on imports

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>from China. Has that softened? I mean there are reports

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 2>of maybe a slower rollout than ramping up.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 6>That's right, and that was a bloomberg scoop. By the way,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 6>interesting when you're running, how the language changes when you're governing.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 6>It's a different world sometimes when you're dealing with the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 6>realities and you have world leaders on the phone. We

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 6>certainly know what the reaction has been from Canada, very

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 6>different reaction from Mexico. China's a different matter, and our

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 6>of course, our European allies are too. Everyone's been on

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 6>the phone with mar A Lago, if not actually traveling

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 6>there in person to talk about this. And yes, it

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.239
<v Speaker 6>does seem like there could be a phasing, if you will,

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 6>maybe a couple percent at a time in tariffs, if

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 6>that's what Donald Trump wants to do. The confusion will

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 6>be for the Federal Reserve. How do you forecast anything

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 6>in a world like that, not knowing where tariffs will

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 6>be month to month, quarter to quarter when you start

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 6>fact in the impact it will have on the economy.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of the Federal Reserve in his last administration,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>very critical the person he appointed, Jerome Powell, that's right.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you think his tenor do you think what he

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 2>does is going to change? In his Trump two point zero.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 6>It might be even more aggressive. Keep your eyes on truth,

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 6>social and Twitter or whatever platform he decides. You know,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 6>we used to wake up every morning to see what

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 6>the policy was based on what was tweeted at two am.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 6>That may well be the case now. The aforementioned Scott Bessen,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 6>his likely Treasury Secretary, is the one who floated the

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 6>idea of a shadow FED share, which would potentially kneecap

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 6>the current FED share. I'm not sure that's something that

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 6>would happen, and I'm not sure that Donald Trump will

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 6>have the influence he wants to have on j. Powell,

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 6>but he is certainly going to be a vocal member

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 6>of the chorus here when it comes to interest rates.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh you bet our thanks to Joe Matthew Bloomberg Balance

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>of Power co hosts, and a lot to look forward

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to this coming week. We move next to corporate earning

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>from the streaming giant Netflix out on Tuesday for more

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>on how that company has been impacted by new content

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's foray into live sports. Were joined by Getha

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 2>raganathin Bloomberg Intelligence analyst on US Media. Well, Githa, Well,

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>let me just start with the results that you expect

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to see for the fourth quarter from Netflix.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 8>Sure, Tom, so this is actually going to be, you know,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 8>in many ways, kind of a very you know, significant

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 8>quarter for Netflix. And I say that because this is

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 8>the very last time in their history that they will

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 8>be reporting subscriber metrics. So it makes it kind of

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 8>special because as you know, you know, Netflix is really

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 8>a subscriber story. I think they're actually going to have

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 8>an extremely strong quarter. They're pricing in one of their

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 8>best content cycles. You know, they have had huge pieces

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 8>of content, a lot of them actually sports related, that

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 8>have performed extremely well, and so we think that that

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 8>will be a huge driver of subscriber ads during the quarter.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 8>So consensus right now is close to nine million, nine

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 8>million new subscribers. We're thinking it'll actually go well into

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 8>the double digits, maybe closer to about eleven or twelve

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 8>million subscribers. But again, remember this is the last time

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 8>that they're reporting subscribers, so investors are definitely going to

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 8>focus on what the next big thing will be. So

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 8>what are the other metrics that we need to focus

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 8>on going forward?

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>So up to double digits. It was five million in

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the third quarter, and this could double that new subscribers.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you see a lot of that signing up because

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>of the ad supported tier or the paid sharing tier.

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, absolutely, I think the ad supported tier definitely is

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 8>accounting for a lot of those new signups. Netflix actually

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 8>did give us a statistic in the third quarter. They

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 8>said that it accounts for about fifty percent of all

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 8>of the new signups in the markets where that option

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 8>is available. So it's definitely, I think a pretty big

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 8>success story for Netflix. And of course the paid sharing initiative,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 8>which is you know, cracking down on password sharing, has

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 8>obviously been responsible for you know, the thirty million new

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 8>subscriber ads that we've seen so far, you know, in

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.479
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty four. So definitely both those have been huge contributors.

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 8>But then I think the biggest piece really is is

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 8>the content. Every Time you have huge pieces of content,

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 8>whether it's you know, Mike Tyson versus Jake Paul, whether

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 8>it's the NFL games or even you know, the second

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 8>season of Squid Game, which is by far their most

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 8>watched television series ever, you know, those are all going

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 8>to be huge drivers of subscriber acquisition.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about that live sports strategy. A lot

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>of glitches on that fight you mentioned Tyson Jake Paul,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>but it looks like Netflix figured out what went wrong

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in time for those NFL games on Christmas Day, right.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 8>Oh, absolutely so, yes, lots of glitches in their you know,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 8>first big I guess live events for a but they

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 8>have figured it out. You're absolutely right, because remember it's

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 8>not just the NFL games on Christmas Day. They've also

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 8>been streaming WWE content starting January. So we've already had

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 8>two Mondays where you've had kind of Netflix takeover, you know,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 8>the raw programming, and it's gone off I would say

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 8>fairly well without a glitch. So they definitely have it

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 8>figured out from a technology perspective, and just kind of

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 8>thinking of, you know, the viewership and the numbers we've saw.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 8>We saw some really really strong numbers. So for the

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 8>Tyson Paul match, for instance, there were sixty million households

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 8>across the globe that streamed that event, so close to

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 8>almost one hundred and ten million viewers. You know, that's

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 8>kind of comparable to the reach of broadcast television. And

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 8>then if you take the NFL games, you know, they

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 8>reported about twenty six point five million viewers for each

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 8>of those games, which is exactly what it was on

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 8>broadcast television last year. So they've kind of proved that

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 8>they can replicate the same model, the TV model on

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 8>a streaming platform.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, Netflix already has that deal that WWE deal with

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 2>TKO Group, and it looks like they're in the running

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to secure another of TKO's properties, Ultimate Fighting Championship Ball

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>right now on ESPN ESPN Plus. How important would that

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>be for Netflix or is it just the next step

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for them?

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 8>It could be very important, Tom, and it definitely is

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 8>the next step. I mean, remember, ultimately they are looking

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 8>to build this business, and the new metrics that are

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 8>going to be really important for them now that subscribers,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 8>the number of subscribers is going away, is really going

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 8>to be revenue growth. So the two numbers that I

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 8>think investors are going to now be hyper focused on

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 8>is are they posting you know, double digit revenue growth,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 8>so ten plus percent revenue growth, and are they posting

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 8>strong operating income growth? So the number again that we're

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 8>looking for is twenty percent plus operating income growth. And

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 8>for that it's really important that they have these type

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 8>of events in order to kind of drive that buzz,

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 8>in order to drive you know, subscriber numbers. But more

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 8>importantly for them, advertising is going to become a bigger

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 8>chunk of revenue, and they need to have live events

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 8>to appeal to advertisers, and so I absolutely think that

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 8>they're going to go after it. We already know that

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 8>UFC is demanding something like a doubling of its current

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 8>rights fees from ESPN, so we'll see how that goes.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 8>But I think Netflix will definitely want to go after

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 8>that as well.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's big, and is there any talk of price hikes?

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 8>So we have actually been expecting price hikes for quite

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 8>a while now, so they haven't done anything for over

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 8>two years, which is really uncharacteristic for Netflix. So a

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 8>price hike I would definitely say is overdue in the US,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 8>at least on the standard plan, which right now costs

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 8>fifteen dollars and fifty cents. It's still a little bit

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 8>of a wait and watch, but they haven't mentioned anything,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 8>but we definitely think it is something that's going to

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 8>happen in twenty twenty five.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Well we'll look for that. Q four earning from Netflix

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 2>out this Tuesday are thanks to get the raganathin Bloomberg

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Analysts on US Media and coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>day Break weekend, we'll look ahead to the annual meeting

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>of the World Economic Forum in Davos. I'm Tom Busby

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and this is bloom This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 2>later in our program a look at whether incoming President

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump will make good on his threats regarding China.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>But first, leaders from across the globe descending on the

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>sleepy Swiss mountain resort of Davos for the annual meeting

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of the World Economic Forum this week. It's where the

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 2>world's most powerful meet to address the pressing issues of

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the day, and this year, conflict is at the top

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of the agenda, with war anxiety racking the nerves of

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>expert surveyed ahead of discussions for more. Let's go to

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 2>London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak, Europe anchor Caroline Hepgar.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 3>State based armed conflict is the biggest worry for this year.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>That's according to the World Economic Forums twenty twenty five

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Global Risks Report, which has been released head of the

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>organization's elite gathering in Davos. The findings provide the mood

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 3>music for an event where world leaders mingle with business

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 3>executives among a total tally of some three thousand participants.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>But that grim assessment of global security evident in the

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>report suggests that any sense of safety provided by the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>thousands of Swiss police and military personnel patrolling in freezing

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 3>temperatures outside can't be taken for granted. Elsewhere, worries about

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical instability are followed by concerns about extreme weather events

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and the prevalence of misinformation and disinformation. So it looks

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 3>like it's going to be a pretty somber gathering with

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>some serious issues brought to the table. I've been speaking

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg's Jumana Bisecchi about what else we can expect

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 3>from Davos twenty twenty five.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, you talk about dusting off my warm clothes, they'll

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 9>definitely to does stuff my warm clothes coming from Dubai.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 9>But look that the World Economic Forum's most well known events.

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 9>It's an annual meeting that takes place in the Swiss Alps.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 9>Typically it's a forum for debate, for dialogue, to discuss

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 9>some of the biggest issues of the day and to

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 9>think about some of the solutions to these problems. So

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 9>every year they set a theme. The theme for this

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 9>year is a call for Collaboration in the Intelligent Age.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 9>That is the title of this year's forum, and I

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 9>think the clue is in the title. On one hand,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of excitement about this intelligent age, the

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 9>huge technological advances the world is witnessing, like artificial intelligence,

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 9>smart energy solutions. But then also that word collaboration is

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 9>perhaps and not to the fact that some of the

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 9>world's existing multilateral order has broken down because of rising

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 9>geopolitical tensions, a fracturing of global chest, fragmentation, and the

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 9>climate crisis.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 3>There's always so much attention on the guest list on

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>who turns up to the World Economic Forum, as well

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>as what they say, who do you think is going

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to be there? What leaders are confirmed?

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, typically you see a fair share of world leaders,

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 9>business leaders, academics, even heads of NGOs and celebrities actually

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 9>tend to come to Davos. And for that reason it's

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 9>been criticized as becoming a bit of a talking shop

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 9>for the top one percent of the world's elites. But

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 9>this year, what we do know is Donald Trump, So

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 9>the new US President, who steps into office on Monday,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 9>will actually be delivering a virtual speech on Thursday via

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 9>a live video link, so that will be widely awaited.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 9>Urslaer van de Lyon will be there, the President of

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 9>the European Commission, even the Vice Premier of China will

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 9>be attending. Olaf Schultz, who's facing his fair share of

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 9>domestic issues, will also be attending interestingly, and el Frederick Merz,

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 9>who is the opposition candidate into the Journal elections, will

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 9>also be attending Davos, so you've got to think about

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 9>the type of audience that he's targeting. There have you

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 9>and me. Lay will be attending Argentinian President writing on

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 9>a high after a quite successful year of instituting economic reforms,

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 9>and then from the Middle East you have the Prime

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 9>Minister of the Palestinian National Authority, which will be interesting

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 9>given the latest developments. You also have the Prime Minister

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 9>and Minister of Foreign Affairs from the State of Qatar.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 9>And then beyond that, Zelenski will be attending President of Ukraine,

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 9>so a bit of a mixed bag and people from

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 9>all around the world will be there.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 3>But then does that imply that there'll be much discussion

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>about war and invotes in terms of creating pace any

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>precedent for.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 9>That, Absolutely, there isn't a precedent for sure historically.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 3>But war will be.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 9>The top of agenda this year, and every year into

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 9>the event they put out a top Risks report, and

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 9>this year war is actually the top worry on the

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 9>list of things that experts have been flagging as potential

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 9>risks into twenty twenty five. So state based armed conflict

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 9>is the most pressing immediate concern given what it tumultuous

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 9>year twenty twenty four was, not just in terms of

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 9>the many elections that took place, but of course in

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 9>terms of the many conflicts that are taking place around

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 9>the world and the ongoing conflict of course between Ukraine

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 9>and Russia, but perhaps slightly more positive steps with the

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 9>announcement of that ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Although also extreme weather events were singled out as a

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 3>concern for WEF participants and this is perhaps are ushering

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 3>in quite a new era in terms of the global

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 3>economy and views on climate change.

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely, and so you mentioned the global economy. We

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 9>F Into these events, they typically put out the risk report,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 9>but then they also put out the economic outlook for

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty five, fifty six percent of the economists surveyed

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 9>expect weaker global economic conditions, again weighed down by concerns

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 9>of fragmentation, economic fragmentation, the rise in protectionism it spells

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 9>by potentially, of course, the new US administration, rising debt,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 9>and political uncertainty. And then to add to that over

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 9>the medium term horizon, the risks from emanating from the

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 9>climate crisis always feature on the medium term and long

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 9>term concerns that come up in these reports. And this

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 9>is a year where we've spoken about this is one

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 9>of the hottest years on records. In fact, it was

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 9>actually the hottest year on records, and we're still looking

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 9>at the devastation caused by, say, the wildfires in La

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 9>Lots of those events have been happening with increasing amount

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 9>of frequency and with increasing intensity one and will continue

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 9>to be one of the pertinent issues discussed at the

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 9>World Economic Forum.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 3>My thanks to Bloomberg's humount of BISECI. So the risks

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 3>associated with global conflict are set to take center stage

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 3>in DeVos in the next few days. With interstate relationships

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 3>being so pivotal this year, will diplomacy be crucial. Katherine Ashton,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 3>the former EU Foreign Affairs chief, has been speaking to

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 3>us about how countries can understand each other better. This year,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>she's been speaking to Blomberg's Farci Laqua.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 10>I think we've had some sort of messages. We know

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 10>that he's very interested in playing a role in stopping wars.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 10>Let's put it simply that, of course applies to what's

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 10>happening in Ukraine. But the relationship with Putin is not straightforward,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 10>and President Putin does not do what other people tell

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 10>him to do. So I see a sense that they

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 10>might be moving away from suggesting that can be done

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 10>very quickly. And he's obviously going to get a lot

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 10>of pressure within Congress as well from Ukraine not to

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 10>just give this away, not to be somebody who seemed

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 10>to be in Putin's sad And then we've seen some

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 10>extraordinary statements about Greenland and so on. But you know,

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 10>he's the master of getting the headline. He's the master

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 10>of saying something or not saying something. In the case

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 10>of would you use military force against Greenland? You know,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 10>the idea that he and Denmark are going to war

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 10>doesn't seem realistic, But by not saying that it's set

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.239
<v Speaker 10>off our whole set of issues, and it feels like

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 10>these are almost a little bit of a distraction from

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 10>the main elements for the foreign policy that he's going

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 10>to have to put in place, of which China is

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 10>clearly going to be key, but also what he wants

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 10>to do on Ukraine, Russia and of course in the

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 10>Middle East too.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 5>You've spent your whole career actually dealing with either unreadable

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 5>or treaty personalities, foreign of course stage people. What's the

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 5>right way of dealing with Donald Trump right now?

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 10>I spent quite a bit of time with some of

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 10>his foreign policy people in what we now call Trump One,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 10>and that was really interesting because it's a combination of

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 10>people who've got years of experience. I may disagree with

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 10>them on how they do something, but you can see

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 10>the sense of direction. I think this time we'll see

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 10>things slightly differently. It will be much more I think

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 10>clear early on where he's trying to get to it,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 10>and a lot of his work will be domestic, so

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 10>on foreign policy issues, what I would say to anybody

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 10>is listen to what he says, because he says what

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 10>he means at that point, and he often continues to

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 10>mean it. Look at what the realistic elements of what

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 10>he's saying are, and that's especially going to be important

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 10>as everybody gets very nervous about tariffs, but also finding

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 10>ways that you can build the foreign policy commitments, for

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 10>example with NATO. I don't think that he'll pull out

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 10>of nature, but I think he is going to pressure

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 10>for more money to be spent by European countries. And

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 10>to be fair to him, he's been incredibly successful in

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 10>achieving what previous presidents have failed to do, which is

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 10>getting European countries to pay more.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 5>There's the added complexity of Elon Musk. He's an advisor

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 5>of Donald Trump. We understand he'll have an office in

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 5>the White House close to the White House, and he's

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 5>attacking including you know, the Prime Minister, but he's attacking

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 5>foreign actors. He's supporting some, for example, of the far

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 5>right in Germany. What's the right way to deal with him.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 10>Well, he's obviously going to be an important player in

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 10>the Trump administration, at least for now. Whether he will

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 10>decide to stay long term will partly depend, I think

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 10>on where his other interests lack. I always think with

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 10>anyone who is playing in a key role, you have

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 10>to look at what their motivation might be. And I

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 10>think for mister Musk, he's primarily a businessman, and so

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 10>some of the things that he's saying are I think

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 10>relevant to how he sees not just his business, but

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 10>the world he's in, whether it's artificial intelligence, robotic space

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 10>and so on, as being really important. So when he

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 10>says to NASA, you shouldn't focus on the Moon, you

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 10>should focus on Mars, that's a fair point from his perspective,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 10>you know. So some of this is about business, other

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 10>I think will be about his own opinions.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 5>What's the right way of the UK in dealing with this.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 10>We've always had that sort of bridge effect really that

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 10>the relationship with the US is a long term, ongoing

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 10>special relationship that I think the outgoing US ambassador described

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 10>as the essential relationship, and they'll be very keen to

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 10>keep that, but to keep it within a framework that

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 10>actually means we're going to be economically benefiting, politically benefiting.

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 10>So there'll be a big move too to work with

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 10>colleagues in NATO on defense security and I think with Europe,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 10>and there's a whole raft of staff that from defense

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 10>and security right the way through to environmental climate change

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 10>and so on, where there is a lot of what

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 10>you might call common cause to be made that will

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 10>be different to America's direction of travels, certainly under the president.

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 10>Where the business chooses a different path is another thing.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 10>So it'll be about a balancing act. And I think

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 10>the only way you can approach you is to stay calm,

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 10>keep moving, do the stuff behind the scenes, because I'm

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 10>a huge believer that most of it happens behind the

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 10>scenes that we never see and shouldn't see, and not

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 10>get too distressed or kind of turned away from your

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 10>objectives because of what's happening that seems to be incredibly newsworthy,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 10>but actually it's just a lot of rhetoric that's going

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 10>on in the background.

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>That was the former EU Foreign Affairs chief Katherine Ashton

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 3>speaking too Fancy in Laquat on Bloomberg Television. Now we

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 3>will have full coverage over the World Economic Forums and

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 3>your meeting in Devils live on Bloomberg Radio and TV.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hepge here in London and you can catch

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 3>us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak. You at beginning

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 3>at six am in London. That's one am on Wall Street.

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Tom, thank you, Caroline, And coming up on Bloomberg day

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Break Weekend and look at what a Donald Trump presidency

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>will mean for US China relations. I'm Tom Busby and

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York with

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>his swearing in. Right around the corner, will Donald Trump

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 2>made good on his campaign threats toward China once he

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>takes office. For a closer look, let's get to the

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 2>host of the Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 4>Tom, let's start with a recollection. It was back in

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 4>October when then Republican nominee Donald Trump sat down with

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg News editor in chief John Micklethwaite. Here's part of

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 4>that conversation.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 11>I told them, and I said it publicly, They're not

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 11>going to sell one car into the United States. I said,

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 11>if I run this country, if I'm going to be

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 11>president of this country, I'm going to put a one

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 11>hundred two hundred two thousand percent triff. They're not going

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 11>to sell one car into the United state, because we're

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 11>not going to destroy our country. Right. So, because I

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 11>know you're an anti tariff guy, but I'm the exact opposite.

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 11>If I had there is no other way I could

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 11>have stopped there, other than what am I gonna do

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 11>negotiating with Mexico, which you're not going to get anything

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 11>from them. I said, I'm gonna put a one hundred,

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 11>two hundred or three hundred. I'm going to put the

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 11>highest tariff in history, meaning I'm going to stop them

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 11>from ever selling a current.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 12>And that says Trump. I let you give your example.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 12>You talked a lot about tariffs. You look at the

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 12>American economy. Forty million jobs rely on trade. It counts

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 12>for twenty seven percent of GDP. If you cut that off,

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 12>that's also going to effect on many many business people here.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 12>Tariffs also have another side. Isn't that something that you

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 12>have to acknowledge? You could be plunging America into the

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 12>biggest trade war since Smoothall, But you're gonna stop. You're

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 12>gonna there are tariffs already.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 8>There are riffs.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 11>All you have to do is build your plant in

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 11>the United States and you don't have any tariffs.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 12>People, there's a lot of places, a lot of places

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 12>like this they rely there, a lot of jobs that

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 12>rely on foreigners coming here. You're going to basically stop

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 12>trade with China. You're talking about sixty percent trade on that,

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 12>sixty perent tariffs on that. You're talking, as you said,

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 12>one hundred two hundred percent all things you don't really like.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 12>You're also talking about twenty ten to twenty percent tariffs

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 12>on the rest of the world. That is going to

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 12>have a serious effect on the overall economy. And yes,

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 12>you're going to find some people who were gained from

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 12>individual tariffs. The overall effect could be massive.

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 11>I agree, it's going to have a massive effect, positive effect.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 4>That's Donald Trump there, in conversation with Bloomberg News editor

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 4>in chief John Micklethwaite. Now, mister Trump's hardline approach to

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 4>China is no secret. He is vowed to be tough

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and enact hefty tariffs. Now those rates could potentially be

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 4>as high as sixty percent, and the President elect is

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 4>likely to maintain strict export controls on AI related technology

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to prevent China's access. Curiously, Trump has touted a friendly

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 4>relationship with Chinese President Chi Jinping, and Trump is also

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 4>taken a laissez fair stance on Taiwan. So how he

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 4>is Beijing preparing for a second Trump administration. To help

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 4>explore that, I'm joined now by John lu Bloomberg, Executive

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 4>editor for Greater China. John joining from our studios in Beijing.

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for making time. I'm sure it's

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 4>been busy for you, as it has been for US stateside.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 4>So leaders in China know Trump. John, they've dealt with

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 4>him before. I'm curious to get your take on how

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 4>things may change in the years ahead.

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 7>I think that there is a familiar aity with Trump.

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 7>I think the question is how will he roll out

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 7>some of these promises that he has made during the campaign,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 7>the sixty percent tariffs that you talked about already. I

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 7>think there is a preparation in Beijing. We see that

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to new laws in terms of how

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 7>the government can limit exports of key medals, other technologies

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 7>such as battery technologies. I think that is a sign

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 7>of the Chinese government ready to punch back if and

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 7>when the Trump administration does punch.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting that they use that metaphor because I'm wondering

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 4>whether this is going to be a fight or whether

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be kind of more of a negotiation

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>where they're looking both sides are looking to strike deals.

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 7>I think there's a broad thinking in Beijing that Trump

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 7>is less ideologically driven and more driven by the desire

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 7>to get a deal. And if that is the assumption,

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 7>then I think a lot of these tariffs, a lot

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 7>of this tough talk is a negotiating tactic to try

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 7>and improve the position that Trump is in when he

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 7>goes to the table, when he sits across from Cijiping

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 7>and they try and hash out a deal.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Marco Rubio has been nominated to be Secretary of State,

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 4>and back in twenty twenty one, he authored the Weager

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Forced Labor Prevention Act. And do you expect human rights

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 4>to be at all a part of the conversation between

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Beijin and Washington.

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 7>I think mister Rubio many of his positions are different

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 7>from those the President Trump has, and I think it'll

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 7>one of the many interesting things to watch is how

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 7>that works itself out. I do think that as far

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 7>as humor rights go, if it does strengthen Trump's hand

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 7>at the negotiating table, I think they will be a

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 7>factor whether or not that is, humor rights is something

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 7>that he's not willing to negotiate on. I don't think

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 7>that they are. And so if you were to give

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 7>up some of these issues that Rubio finds to be

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 7>core in his view of American policy, then that will

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 7>be very interesting how it plays out.

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting because we have seen that China has already

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 4>begun to reposition itself in other parts of Southeast Asia,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 4>in Latin America, even in the Mid East in recent years,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 4>and I'm wondering whether that's preemptive, that there's already a

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 4>feeling that they're going to have to reduce maybe reliance

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 4>on the United States to a great degree.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 7>I think partly it is that. Partly it is China

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 7>trying to make sure it has access to other markets

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 7>if it's going to be shut out of the United States.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 7>The other part of that, actually, I think is, you know,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 7>as we've seen already with Trump's promises of tariffs against Canada,

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 7>against Mexico, the issues that he has with NATO, that

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 7>during the Trump administration there's a lot of fractiousness between

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 7>the United States and its allies, and that actually gives

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 7>China a chance to make friends abroad that may not

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 7>have been there under the Biden administration.

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting too, because the Biden administration, I think we

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 4>can agree, took a multilateral approach in dealing with China

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 4>in a way that during the first Trump administration it

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 4>was more unilateral. Will that change in your view going forward?

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 7>I would expect President Trump to continue you to act

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 7>in a very America first way, right. I think he's

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 7>made that very clear. I think the Chinese, having seen

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 7>what the first administration did in terms of American allies,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 7>I think the Chinese see and opportunity to strengthen their

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 7>relationships in Asia, in Europe, and other locations around the world.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 7>If Trump is going to be fighting tariff wars left

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 7>and right.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 4>We can debate the state of the Chinese economy, whether

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 4>or not a bottom has kind of been put in

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 4>and things are beginning to improve. One of the powerhouses

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 4>clearly has been the export part of the Chinese economy.

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Tariffs obviously would threaten that. Is that a major concern

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 4>on the part of leaders in China.

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 7>I think is definitely a major concern for Beijing. There's

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 7>a lot of worry that if tariff's coming right away,

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 7>it really SAPs the ability of the export engine to

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 7>help prop up economic growth here at home. That that

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 7>will result in things getting much much more difficult for

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 7>Hiding Ping and his government to try to work out.

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 7>They will have less time. I mean, the push right

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 7>now is Beijing is trying to retune the economy so

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 7>that it's more dependent on consumption. The problem is the

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 7>consumer is not spending, and if they don't have exports,

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 7>it's not going to give them as much time as

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 7>they would like to try and fix that.

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Pulce.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So, having said that, is the position in China a

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 4>little bit more vulnerable right now? And is the Trump administration,

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 4>the incoming Trump administration aware of that to the degree

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 4>that it would seek to take advantage of that vulnerability.

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 7>I think the Trump administration, I would have to imagine,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 7>is aware of the situation that China finds itself in economically,

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 7>and the domestic economy being weak puts China at a

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 7>more of a disadvantage when it comes to negotiations. At

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 7>the same time, I think China realizes that, but it

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 7>also has some bottom lines that it's not going to

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 7>cross these red lines, that it's not going to to

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 7>give up things we talked about Taiwan before sovereignty issues.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 7>They're not going to undermine those issues to get a

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 7>better trade deal.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 4>What about access to high technology? I indicated earlier that

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 4>it's likely that Trump would maintain the level of export

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 4>controls that were put in place by the Biden administration,

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 4>which is essentially keeping China's access to certain components for

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 4>AI kind of restricted in a major way, and that

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 4>may be holding back the development of certain technologies in China.

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Is this something that Beijing is expecting when it comes

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 4>to areas of artificial intelligence, whether it's kind of software

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 4>or whether it's hardware like a chip.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 7>I think this is an area that's a little more unclear.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 7>The Biden administration has made it very crystal clear they've

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 7>got this small yard, high fence approach to China policy

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 7>limiting Chinese access to technology. Trump during the campaign, when

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 7>he's talked about it's been much more about trade, about

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 7>the trade surplus. He has not had as much of

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 7>an emphasis on technology. For example, he's in support of

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 7>allowing TikTok to stay. Obviously he would like to see

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 7>it in American hands, not in Chinese hands. But it

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 7>just sort of shows there's a slight difference when it

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 7>comes to technology, and so I think the interesting question

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 7>is when a negotiation happens, how likely would it be

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 7>that Trump might compromise on technology access in exchange for

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.760
<v Speaker 7>more Chinese buying of American agriculture, for example.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to high technology, and I'm thinking in

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 4>particular of advanced semiconductors, it's all about Taiwan semi. We

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 4>know that when it comes to the US being able

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 4>to support through arm sales the government in Taiwan. Is

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 4>that something that you believe that Trump administration will continue

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 4>as happened during the Bidy administration or will we see

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 4>a shift and that slightly.

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 7>I think it's most likely going to continue. I think

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 7>it'll continue because you have people like Marco Rubio who

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 7>will be at the State Department and they will continue

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 7>to support those actions arm cells to Taiwan to help

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 7>Taiwan defend itself against any potential aggression that might come

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 7>from China. But I think it's also very clear that

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.919
<v Speaker 7>Trump is much less interventionist when it comes to using

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 7>American military power abroad, and so that makes it a

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 7>much more nuanced relationship, and it makes it much more

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 7>difficult for Taiwan to try and figure out how much

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 7>they can depend on Washington if things get hairy.

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 4>What about the relationship that China has with Russia right now,

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking about how that's impacted war in Ukraine. Trump

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 4>has said that he would like to end that conflict.

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you believe that China will play any type of

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 4>role in that.

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 7>I think the key players in this are Kiev in Moscow. Certainly.

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 7>I think the Chinese would very very much like the

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 7>war to end. It has been a big detriment to

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 7>the Chinese relationship with Europe and in Chinese relationship with

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 7>lots of other countries who see this aggression from Russia

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 7>and are themselves fearful. I think if China any role

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 7>that China can play on getting a piece still done,

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 7>it will do that, although I do not think they

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 7>are willing to exert overwhelming pressure on Russia to come

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 7>to the table.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 4>John, we'll leave it there. Thank you so much for

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 4>helping us a preview what relations may look like between

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Beijing and Washington under a second Trump administration. John Liu,

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 4>their executive editor for Greater China, joining from our studios

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 4>in Beijing. I'm Doug Chrisner, and you can catch us

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 4>weekdays here for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available wherever

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 4>you get your podcast. Tom, thank you Doug.

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg day

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five am

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas and

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the news you need to start your day. I'm Tom Busby.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Top stories and global business headlines are

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:04.959
<v Speaker 2>coming up right now.