WEBVTT - Did Shakespeare really write all that stuff?

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and Chuck's on the line. Jerry's here too, and we're

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>about to get jiggy with it. Shakespeare, Can I carve

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out this out of the gate? I guess so. The

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>more we dug into this, you know, I was an

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>English major. We talked very briefly when I was in

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>college about Shakespeare's authorship, and I thought, hey, this would

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be a fun, little, semi easy episode. And the more

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>we dug into it, the more this onion unfolded, This

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>bloom and onion unfolded, Layer by Crispy Delicious Layer. For

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>all of our Australian listeners, that's what we think you

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>guys eat every night, every night. Uh, to the point

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>where I was almost like, you know, is this a

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 1>two parters? I mean, you could probably do a ten

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>part episode on this. Oh yeah, it's so dense. So

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to caveat this for people that know

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot about shakespeare authorship and saying this is a

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty broad overview of the high points of his authorship

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>being questioned, because it is dense. Baby, It's the kind

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing that like, um, extremely intelligent people take on

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as their like lifelong hobby. It's like that, we're like,

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll just bust it out in a few days, It'll

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be fine. Yeah, you know, like how some people are

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like they they research World War two submarine warfare and

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know everything about It's along the same lines, but it's

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>even bigger. There's so many people involved, and each side

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is like, you're so naive to the other. And yes,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's true, like we could, we could turn this into

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a teen part series, but I think we've got a

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>handle on it enough to present it. I feeling okay

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. And then the other thing that sticks out

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, Chuck, is this is one of the few

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>things I've ever I'm across like this that I am

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like truly agnostic about. I do not have an opinion

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. I don't know if I

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>do either. Actually, like it's not like I don't care,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I'm saying, Like, I genuinely can see

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>both sides. And the other thing about it is, the

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>more you dig into it, the more you realize, oh,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>neither side actually has really good evidence to support their claim.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>It's all just they have to get so granular that

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it really quickly, um, goes into the world of conspiracy

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>theories pretty quickly. Yeah. I saw this video of a guy, uh,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>this wonderful gentleman who knows a lot about it, that

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>said like, and here's the golden bullet, which proves once

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and for all, and he made his case and I

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, no no, no, that didn't really prove it

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>once and for all in my opinion, Yeah, for sure,

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because both sides do things like they get into biographical

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>readings where they're trying to find clues within the text

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>or you know, parallels to his life for that kind

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And once that starts, it's like, okay, you

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are you've just completely left the world of objectivity. Yeah. Uh.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So what we're talking about, um, if you haven't guessed

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>by now, is this idea that has been around since

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at least the mid eighteen hundreds maybe before, about the

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>question of whether or not William Shakespeare was the sole

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>author of all of his works. And this is Shakespeare

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>from Stratford on the Avon, like that that gentleman that

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>we know became an actor, uh and you know writer, Uh,

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>whether or not he was the sole author whether or

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>not he was a front for some other authors for

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the works. Some people say he didn't write

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>any of them. Some people said it was various women

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>who weren't allowed to write things at the time. Uh,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there are I saw sixty six candidates over the years

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have been put forward. Oh really, so there there you

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have it. Uh, somewhere between sixty six and eight something

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of I know, we haven't been accused of writing any

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare's work. I don't think so. I didn't come

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>across that in my research. But it's an interesting literary

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if I want to call it

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a mystery, because some people just say, like, no, I mean,

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of course he wrote it, and he was these outsized personalities,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the most famous of the famous are conspiracies are drawn

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to them. Elvis is still alive, Marilyn Monroe was murdered.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Like that happens when you are, you know, one of

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest icons in your field quite often. So some

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>people say that's just that's all that it is. In

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, there's a a lack of biographical documentation

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that he actually did write those plays. And I think

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's also what allows for people to say, you know, well,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>do we really know or that he didn't write them, Like,

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there's just it was a time, you know, in the

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>fift dreids where there in sixteen hundreds, whether it just

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a ton of great preserved information and we're going

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a lot of that. So we do

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>know that William Shakespeare did live. He was from, like

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you said, Stratford on Avon. It was at the time

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>about a two to three day journey from London, about

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred something miles I think, and um, he definitely

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.799
<v Speaker 1>did live. He definitely did exist. That's not a question

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because we do have documentary evidence that this person live

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>from uh fifteen sixty four to sixteen sixteen, about fifty

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.799
<v Speaker 1>two years and depending on when you placed his birthday,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifty two years on the nose, So we know

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he existed. Again, what's an issue what's being questions whether

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that man William Shakespeare from Stratford on Avon, who went

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on to become an actor, who went on to become

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a producer, who worked with the in the Globe theater um,

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>whether he was the author of the plays we consider

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>written by Shakespeare. That's what's that question. Yeah, so like

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he's said, he was a real dude. Uh. He came

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>from a family that was I mean I kind of

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>read it as a little bit in middle class. They

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>certainly were not like upper class nobility types. His father

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>was a was a glover. He wore h hell, I

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>guess he wore gloves too, but he made gloves. Allow

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>me to demonstrate, be pretty weird if he didn't. Uh, okay,

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't even wear his own gloves, but he produces

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>very very fine gloves for well to do people. Um,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>but he did achieve some Um, I guess it worked

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>his way up the social chain a little bit because

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>eventually he would serve as what's sort of like a

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>mayor uh in Stratford. And again, while not nobility like,

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they were fairly well regarded as people. Right, So, um,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for certain, but there's a pretty good

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a much better um chance than not that because

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of his father's position in town, because they had some money.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, they middle class. He um almost certainly

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would have been educated at the grammar school at Stratford.

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So what most people think is that that William Shakespeare

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was educated until about the age of thirteen, and he

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>would have learned things like Latin, he would have learned history. Um,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he would have learned some classic literature. He definitely would

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have been exposed to stuff that whoever wrote Shakespeare's plays

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would would go on to expound on. Um. So he

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely was I I can't say that. That's the thing, Like,

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you really have to be careful what you say about this.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, so he definitely was educated.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that he was. This is all just

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a supposition, but it's a pretty good bat. It's a

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>good supposition that he actually was educated. Yeah, and all this,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the reason that's important is all of this

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes back later, as some people say, proof

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that he may not have written this stuff because like

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>how could it? And one of the main arguments used

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>many times is how could a kid who came from

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>here have known about these military military exploits and the

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Elizabethan Court and all these different languages and all this

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>high falutin stuff that he wrote about. So, uh, it's

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>important to, you know, talk about his education. And it

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>seems like he was likely educated pretty well until thirteen,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I'm not even sure if that's earlier

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>late as far as the time period goes, do you

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>know if that was like kind of generally it for kids,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it was it was in the middle because he could

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have just as easily not been educated at all, right

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, but he also didn't go on to Cambridge

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or Oxford to um to extend his studies, so he

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was in there in the middle. They you think he

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was probably educated, not highly educated, but also not you know, uneducated.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the key, And that if if there was

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>evidence he had not gone to school, I think that

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the anti Shakespeare UM people would have a real like

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>marking their favor. But he has just enough education that

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case like, no, like this guy,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy learned about this stuff already and he could

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>have known about it. And you know, when you had

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>imagination and natural talent, did you come up with Shakespeare conceivably? Yeah? Uh.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He got married to Anne Hathaway. Um, you know, go

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead and insert Anne Hathaway joke there. You know she's

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a real actor, right, sure, Yeah, Devil Wears Pradac and

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Princess Diaries. He was in inception No, No, was she interstellar? Yes,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>she did a stellar job. An interstellar Come on? Uh?

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>They got married, um, when he was quite a bit younger.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>She was twenty six, he was eighteen. She was pregnant,

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>which is probably a little unusual for the time. They

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>had a daughter named Susannah, and then had twins, boy

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and a girl twin. And the boy uh named him Net,

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not Hamlet, but him Net Yeah, which apparently they've never

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>turned up another use of that name in and the

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time proof mhm Uh. He was eleven years

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>old when he died, uh, And that kind of comes

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>into play later on as well. Um. And then there's

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>about a you know, from five to about fifty two,

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's about a seven year gap where we don't know

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot about what was going on with Shakespeare. Uh.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>And then he pops up, which a lot can happen

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in seven years. Again not trying to sway people one

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>way or the other, but you can certainly learn a

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lot in seven years if you have some big life experiences.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>But he pops up in London, and again, as far

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as the record go goes, and you know, keep in mind,

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this record before he was known in

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>his lifetime as an author, was you know, just kind

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of not flimsy, but just not a lot of stuff

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like various little lawsuits and mortgages and sort of banking

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>records and stuff like that, right, yeah, yeah, And and

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>also I mean, like that's that about as much documentation

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as you would be able to come up with on

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>most people. And you could make a case that there's

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>more documentation on Shakespeare than most other people who weren't

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>nobility of his era. And that's that's because there's been

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so much scholarship and study and research into his life

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that they've turned up, you know, as much as they can.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 1>But what they've turned up only amounts to about five

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred different pieces of um documentation of one form or another. Right.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh So one of those pieces of documentation, uh in

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Early On in London is a pamphlet written by Um

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>generally believed to be written by this guy named Robert Green.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>There were some other people that could have possibly written it,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's called Green's Groatsworth of Wit. And there's a

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>line where he references Shakespeare in it, uh in a

0:11:53.760 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>contemporaneous fashion that, right, doesn't matter where he kind of

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>takes a shot out of He says, talks about Shakespeare,

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>says there's an upstart crow. Uh in his own conceit

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the only shake seine in a country, which kind of

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>translates into he kind of thinks he's the only Shakespeare right,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like he thinks he's all that and um, it should

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>be noted also as far as the thievery that in

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Asop's Fables, crows would steal the feathers of others. So

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the people in the um, I don't want to say

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>anti Shakespeare, but the people say that he might not

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have written these things. Says this is a big clue,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and saying that he might have stolen some of these things.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why he's referred to as a crow by this

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>other guy. Yeah. But in that that um, that uh quote,

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he says, the upstart crow is beautified with our feathers,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's a playwright. So the pro Shakespeare people, you

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>call them the pro Stratford group. Um, they suggest that

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what what he's, what Green is talking about is he's

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>he's poking fun at a common actor who is deigning

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to even attempt to write plays, which you know, among

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>playwrights is far more important than acting. Anybody can act,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but it really takes something to to write a play.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>At least that's what they thought at the time, and

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>um that he's taking a shot at him for that. Yeah,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and we should point out that being an actor back

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>then and being a part of the theater was not

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like it is today. It wasn't some uh revered position.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of you know, body plays and common

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>people were into this kind of thing, So it wasn't

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>when he says he was just an actor. That's a

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty big disk, right. So the last thing that we have,

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess, the last documentation, although there's other stuff that's

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>been turned up. They m they did archaeological expeditions on

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>his house. I think his house has been um under

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ownership of a public trust since like the nineteenth century,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and um they've they've carried out archaeological um examination since

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. And they found that he went back and

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>forth between London and Stratford. Um. They so they know

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff about him like that. But as far as like

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>documentation goes, the last piece of documentation we have comes

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen sixteen, which is his will that he wrote

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and then a few months later he died and the

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>last I guess, the last last piece of documentation is

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>his tombstone, which in and of itself is curious because

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>his tombstone contains a curse on it but not his name. Yeah,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the one uh with the quote, Yeah, it's

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a curse. He's saying like, don't dig me up or

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be cursed. Yeah, it's his good friend for

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>jesus sake, forbear to dig the dust and closed here.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Blessed be the man who spares these stones, and cursed

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>be he who moves my bones. Uh. Some people point

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to that as poor writing and saying, well, Shakespeare was

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a great writer, would never written this kind of shabby curse,

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and other people say, like, who said Shakespeare even wrote that?

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Necessarily this This is a good instructive example of like

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of the back and forth between the people, Right,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this is terrible writing. Who said Shakespeare wrote it? And

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>then the anti Shakespeare crew says, well, of course he

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>wrote it, because who else would just not think to

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>put his name on his own tombstone? And the other

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>ones just put their head in their hands and just

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>start crying, and it just goes downhill from there. But

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good example of like the the just

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the people will jump on any single

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that they possibly can and often interpret it one

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>way or the the other. So one thing, one single thing,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>provides evidence for both sides. It's that kind of yeah, totally. UM.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that people point to is the fact that

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know, we we don't have a lot of

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like letters and papers and things like that because his

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>uh family line h ended in six seventy I think

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>uh he had a granddaughter, Elizabeth Barnard, that died without

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>bearing children, So most of his stuff basically lost as

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>far as family possessions and things like that. UM. People

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>do point to the will at times and say, well,

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in his will, you know he leaves certain things, but

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>like there's never any mention of any manuscripts, um. And

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and again this is all like it's a little weird maybe,

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but none of this is proof um. And you know

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>through the personal records that we do have in those

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>five references, like none of them really reference him like

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>manuscripts and him writing things. Right. That's what's most compelling

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to me is that when you put together the um

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>documentation about his life that we know, it's clear he's

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>involved in the theater, he's an actor. We get that.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That's that comes through loud and clear. What doesn't come

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>through isn't documented at all, is him as a writer.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And that that thing about the will, the fact that

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the wills and um and bequeathments

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of other writers of the time, um, you can find

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence that they were writers. They like leave books to

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>other people that um there um they they leave unfinished

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>manuscripts that stay in the family uh for for generations,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and um it is very curious. His will is very curious.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that his personal stuff was just lost

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to history because his granddaughter was the end of the

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>family line, that actually holds up because other um great

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>authors of say the same major of any age. A

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the reason that their personal effects and papers

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are still still around is because their family home was

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>passed down from generation to generation to generation, and there

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was a long enough period of time for the importance

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of that writer to become clear. And so other people

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>came in and said, can we have your great great

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>great grandfather's personal effects, um, because we want to put

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>them in this museum. There's enough time. There wasn't enough time.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There's only seventy years between the death of Shakespeare and

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of his family line, and he didn't become

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>widely popular until the I think middle of the eighteenth century,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so he was kind of a victim of that and that.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But both of those to me provide really good evidence

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for why there is a documentation of his writing. You know, yeah, absolutely,

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and the will and by the way, we uh

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The Atlantic has a great, great, pretty deep dive article

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>as they do on this, which provided a lot of

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the supplementary information that we got, um, but by Elizabeth Winkler,

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>great read UM. One of the things that Winkler points out,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and other people who point out on the will as well,

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like Shakespeare wrote a lot about um music and

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there were three hundred musical terms, and all

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of his plays mentioned of twenty six musical instruments. And

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>like in his will he didn't he didn't even have

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a loot to pass down to anybody um and like

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, didn't have books even like a library that

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to give. And you know, again, this is

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not proof necessarily necessarily of anything, but it's all of

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff has added up over the years to enough

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for people to arise to like get suspicious about it.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I think exactly, you want to take a break a breather,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could call it. Yeah, let's take a

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>let's take a breather, let's take five. Uh. One thing

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that Ed who helped us put this together mentions that

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get your to on it. I didn't

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>really think it had a whole lot to do with it.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>One way or the other was all of the various

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>misspellings of Shakespeare's name over the years. Uh. He would

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>sign it in different ways, he would abbreviate it in

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>different ways. There are documents with I mean, it looks

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen different ways of spelling Shakespeare, everything from shacks

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with an ex peer, uh, two spears and something you

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>would jab somebody with. Uh, It's misspelled all over the place.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And I just kind of took that as you know,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>people misspelled things a lot back then. There weren't you know,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>there weren't necessarily records that you could go look at

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>very easily, so you might just take a guess at

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>how to spell a name and then it was on

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the record. And so I didn't really think that factored

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in much, did you, I didn't. And the impression I

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have is that all the different spellings are easily explained

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.959
<v Speaker 1>away from just the era, Like you just said, and

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>that the people who clamp onto that are actually looking

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>into him just to find like hidden naming and codes

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to So I think, like the different spellings of the

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>names is um, it's about a Yeah, it's about as

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>big a boon doggle as you're gonna find in the

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Shakespeare authorship argument, I think. All right, so

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 1>we'll cast that aside. Well, hold on, before we do,

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out my favorite abbreviation, which one

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, Well, let me look, I bet you I

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>know which one. But go, okay, put it, put it

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>back in the deck. Yeah, it's back in the deck.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay it is WILLM shack P. Yeah, that's the one.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>It stands out pretty blatantly s h A k P.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Check hello Willem. Check. It's not a

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really good hotel check in name, but it's still worth mentioning.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's pretty good. Um. So, like we mentioned

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of what's at the root of a lot of

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>these theories is uh, what ed I think rightly calls elitism,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>which is, how could this guy, even you know, educated

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>up to thirteen, how could he have known about all

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? How could he have known about military exploits.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you read Shakespeare's plays, which if

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you're an English major you have to read a lot

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, there there's a lot going on in these

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plays about a lot of different stuff. He didn't write

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about just kind of one kind of thing. So it

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>implies like a really deep breadth of knowledge about a

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of things, and not just different things as it

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>relates to England, different things, as it relates to entirely

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>different lands, Like think about where a lot of his

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff takes places in Italy. Um And, as far as

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone knows, Shakespeare didn't go to Italy. Although remember there's

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that lost year eight year period they call him the

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Lost Years. It's entirely possible he went to Italy during

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that time. It's also just as possible that he didn't

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>go to Italy during that time. We just don't know.

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But that is something that really stands out. And yes,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there is a tremendous amount of elitism and classicism among

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the um anti Shakespeare group, but I think

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that that is I think that dismisses a lot of

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>their points out of hand, and they do have some

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>really good points. They're not just cranks and crackpots, like

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they have some pretty good evidence. You can make a

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>case at least as good evidence that um as the

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>pro Shakespeare people um. But the upshot of it is

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>really kind of a compliment. They're saying, these plays are

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>so good, that Shakespeare's arguably the greatest writer who ever lived.

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>He has such a crazy imagination, he's so funny, he

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>has such an extensive vocabulary, such an amazing grasp of

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the human condition. Could it really all have been written

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>by this man from at the time the country, who

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was educated up to thirteen, who came from the middle class,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>who may or may not have ever traveled out of England?

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>How is that even possible? Are people born that gifted?

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>That's ultimately if you want to go beyond the classicism

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and the elite. That's really what their argument boils down to. Yeah,

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree. And if you if you don't know a

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of Shakespeare, have never really read a lot yourself,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and you think like you're sort of in that camp,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, this is kind of overrated, Like this guy, No,

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>these plays are brilliant, and uh, there's a reason why

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they still make contemporary movies based on Shakespeare's plays or

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>inspired by Shakespeare's plays. Uh, it's because they were all

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>genuinely brilliant. It was great, great stuff. And what you

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>need is a really good teacher to kind of walk

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you through it because it's it's tough to read. And

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>we had, um, we had some good ones at Georgia

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>University of George. I had one. I can't remember his name. God,

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I can picture him in my head. He was so great.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Probably someone know it was WILLM. Shack shack pe Um.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could remember his name. I bet you

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>someone will write in in the uh mid nineties, who

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the great players harpsichord? Oh? Well no, I had a

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>classics professor who played the harpsichord. Yeah, this was you know,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you had to take Shakespeare one in two. Those were

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the only required English classes as a as an English major,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so that kind of shows the importance. But what he

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>did was he sattised down and we read the plays

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>out loud in class, and after every you know, short bit,

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>he would say, well, here's what's going on, and here's

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what he's saying. Man, you were very lucky. Yeah. And

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>once you once you hear that and you're like, oh,

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>these are very contemporary stories and that's why they still

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>carry such weight today is because they were brilliant stories,

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.239
<v Speaker 1>but stories that were very relatable even now. It's not

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not high falutin stuff. It's just it was written

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>at a time where it seems that way. Yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>because we don't really speak in you know, Renaissance English anymore,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>so it seems it might as well be Greek to us. Um.

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it was intended for common audiences. Like the

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>average person would laugh or cry at those at those plays.

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>And I think also, like really kind of support at

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>your point that four hundred years later, those plays can

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>still make people today laugh and cry like they still

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hold up. I guess what you're saying. And um, have

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you ever heard of Sister Wendy. No, she is, she's

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a nun. I don't believe she's still with us. And

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I think in the nineties she made this series of

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>videos where she just went around the museums around the

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>world and explained paintings to you in a way that

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I would love to find a Sister Wendy of Shakespeare.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's somebody out there, but you could do

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot worse to of killing several hours watching Sister

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Wendy explained paintings because she was she had like a

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>natural gift at just not only understanding what she was

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at, but explaining it really understandably. I love that,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think in Sister Wendy's case and my professor

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>shack By, it's it. It comes from a place of um.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>They have such great admiration and they want to They

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>really want people to understand this stuff. Who might ordinarily

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>go like, well, I don't get it. I don't get

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>paintings like this, or I don't get places like this art.

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh So should we get in speaking of art? Great segue?

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh should we get into this mess of the The

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bust of Shakespeare? Yeah, I mean it's another It's very

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>much like his tombstone, where people are like it means this, No,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I means that, you know. Yeah. So there's a bust

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>an effigy of Shakespeare inside the church there in Stratford.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's been a lot of controversy over this thing

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>because part of it is not necessarily like was he

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the author, although it does play into that, but sort

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of like what what did he look like? And how

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>do we know that's what he looked like? Like? We've

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>all seen the picture. Uh, and there's like this one

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>painting and this one bust, and that's kind of where

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>everything comes from. And some people say this was done

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>after he was dead, like, we really don't know that

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what he looked like. Um, I think just a

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, this professor and expert made a

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty good case that beyond most reasonable doubt that it

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>was actually done. I think she said it was highly likely.

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Professor Orlan said it's highly likely that it was done

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>while he was alive, and that he commissioned it because

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>she thinks she knows who did the bust and that

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that person lived near him and was a regular at

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the globe and kind of put all these clues together.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But other people, some people say it was his dad,

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and not him because of this whole sack of

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>grain argument. Yeah. This so there there was an etching

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that was made of the bust within some period of

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>time after the bust was erected, but before it was altered.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So the bus has definitely been altered. And it looks

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>like one way you can interpret this. This thing at

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, this puffy thing that's that that's at the

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hands of the bust the effigy um as a sack

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of grain. I don't know if it were a sack

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of grain, why anyone would ever presented in that position.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense. And so right, so what

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the the anti Shakespeare, anti Strapford people are saying is like, yeah,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's his dad, It's it's not him um, or if

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it is Shakespeare, he was known for his grain carrying skills,

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not his writing skills. And the pro strap For people

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>are like, don't be ridiculous. This is obviously a pillow,

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and at some point somebody did revise the bus, so

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it is unequivocally a pillow, like there's just no way

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to to mistake it. And it's not so much a

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>pillow as it is like a hand rest for him

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to write on, because he's got a piece of paper

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on it and a quill in his other hand. But

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the the anti Shakespeare people jump on and say, like,

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>see it was altered to fit this um to cover

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>up this conspiracy later on, yeah, exactly, and and that

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>quill has been stolen and replaced I think so many

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>times over the years that now I don't know if

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it currently has the quill or if it has the

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>quill and it's now behind glass. Oh that could that's

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a good way to get around. And I'm not really sure,

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know, that became a you know, obviously it's

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>something you could just snatch of his hand, and you've

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>got Shakespeare's quill on your on your door. Speaking of

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Um being snatched, apparently that curse on his tombst didn't

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>work because they did a scan of it UM on

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the four anniversary of his death and found that at

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>least his skull was missing, if not all of his remains.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh really yeah, and that interesting. So somebody out there

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>has Shakespeare's skull in their personal collection. It's probably Rosenkrantzer Guildenstern. Uh,

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>great Shakespeare joke. There's some people out there that were like,

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. Good. Another thing, as far as evidence goes,

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is UM the first folio, which is I think it

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was the first collection that they put in print of

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all of Shakespeare's plays, including UM eighteen that had never

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>been in print before. And there was a I guess

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it was it a forward written by a guy named

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben Johnson, who was arrival of Shakespeare's He was kind

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of known as a jealous Um sort of argumentative guy,

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but he calls Shakespeare the Swan of Avon and as

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of very laudatory in this forward. But I think

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you found stuff later on where he was kind of

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like I had my fingers crossed the whole time kind of. Yeah.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So the pro Stratford people who believe Shakespeare Shakespeare say, look, man,

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy was known as a rival, a friendly rival,

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but a real rival, really critical, like had biting, biting

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>criticism and sense of humor, and also was not one

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to just be like um to to just bow to

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>no nobility, your privilege, your wealth or status. Right. So

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if this guy is saying that Shakespeare the Swan of Avon,

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 1>which places this man at effort on Avon because Ben

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is calling him that, that proves that Shakespeare was Shakespeare.

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>The anti Shakespeare camp says, like you said, Ben Johnson

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>had his fingers crossed the whole time, and that really

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing was providing cover for this larger,

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially conspiracy of people who actually wore Shakespeare. He was

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>blending his his renown to it. Um. Neither one really

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I mean, unless Ben Johnson had like a

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>complete change of heart. Um, it just doesn't quite add up.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But then also the idea that he he would provide

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that cover for a group of noble people, UM seems

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>unlikely as well too. Yeah, I agree. One of the

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>first public doubters UH in the eight hundreds was a

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>woman named Delia Bacon no relation to Francis Bacon, um,

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>although you may think so, because one person that Delia

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Bacon put forward as one of the authors was Francis Bacon. Uh.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Delia Bacon was an American, was a writer, had a

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of a long life before she got into UM,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of hating Shakespeare. Yeah, hating him, like really didn't

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like Shakespeare and really wanted to prove that he was

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not the author. And um, her idea was that it

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was Francis Bacon, Walter Raleigh, and I think maybe some

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>other people too, who were these very well regarded people

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, philosophy and politics and science, who would

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not have been allowed to put forth these plays and

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>what these plays, what they really were, were not even

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>meant for entertainment or for the stage. They were meant

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of biting criticisms of all kinds of

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>various things that these gentlemen could not put their name

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on Yeah, so there's Yeah, either they couldn't put their

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>name on it because they would be executed, is basically

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>treasonous to the crown because they were, you know, putting

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>forth the idea of social reform and you know, women's

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>rights and all sorts of stuff, taking potshots of the nobility. Um.

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Or there's another theory called the stigma of print that

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was introduced and I think the eighteen seventies, and that

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>was that they just just out of um noble nobility

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>no bless, I guess they wouldn't deign to have their

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff published. It would it would erode their social reputation,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>even accepting the idea that they would be beheaded for treason.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So there are a couple of reasons that that somebody

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>like um Francis Bacon would have to cover up his

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>identity if he were actually Shakespeare. And that same stigma

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of print and um political cover argument gets extended to

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>other people beyond Bacon too. Yeah, and that you know,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>it makes a little bit of sense. Um. As far

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>as Delia Bacon, she was able to talk Ralph Waldo

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Emerson into basically kind of buying her story and he

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>arranged for her sponsorship basically to go to England to

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of research this. Apparently in England she she was

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of on record saying that she didn't research history

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>books or records and things like that. She believed that

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the the proof was sort of in the plays themselves, uh,

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and in the in the text basically like with these clues, um. Apparently,

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>she used to go to Shakespeare's tom a lot and

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and kind of just you know, hang out there and

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>like try to convince the I guess the tomb keeper

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>whoever you know takes care of the cemetery, the keeper, Yeah,

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the crypt keeper. I didn't want to say it to

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>be let In and like almost got in at one

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>point apparently, but I think she got sick and couldn't.

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>And but she thought that the you know, the deep

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>secret was within that tomb. Yeah. She kind of kicked

0:35:55.239 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>off the nuttier um can up of the um questioning

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of of Shakespeare. In addition to kicking off the whole thing,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>she she put like kind of a nutty sheen to it,

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that you could get your answers just

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from reading the plays, that the clues were in there.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>The thing is is Francis Bacon was known to to

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>amuse himself by including you know, hidden codes and messages

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in his writings. So if it was Francis Bacon, that's

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>not that much of a stretch. And supposedly Mark Twain

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and some friends UM did actually turn up. If you

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>read the first folio, there is I guess some series

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of lines that spell out Francisco Bacon. No, it's pretty good.

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's the thing, though, Francis Bacon wrote a

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lot about a lot of stuff, but not a lot

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of fiction and pros or didn't he write no evidence

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that he ever wrote any kind of plays. Did he

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>write that there was this other thing that kind of

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>came along. So Delia Bacon is widely regarded as the

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>person who kicked off the was Shakespeare Shakespeare idea UM,

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But supposedly there was a person who came before her,

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>James Wilmot, who in one sat down to UM write

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a biography of Shakespeare and did all the research in

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>London and Stratford on Avon, and UM was astonished by

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the lack of documentation that Shakespeare had written those plays

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and started to suspect it and that he kicked it off.

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, the anti Shakespeare side has been accused

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of making those documents up, of forging those documents to

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>support Delia Bacon's Francis Bacon theory. Interesting. Yeah, so they

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>weren't discovered until one, which is pretty convenient, and it's

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible that they were just forged. All right, should

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>we take another break here? Yeah, let's all right, we'll

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>take another break. We'll talk a little bit more about

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>whether Shakespeare wrote that stuff. So one more thing about

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Delia Baking before we wrap it up. Like you said,

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>she was a good writer, um, and her exhaustive examination

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the texts of Shakespeare's plays resulted in a six

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>d and twenty page book, The Philosophy of the Plays

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare Unfolded. And Um, she's often credited with with

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>basically pre figuring, if not kicking off, the idea of

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>literary criticism close readings of stuff to find other meanings.

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And she was doing it to expose noble people as Shakespeare.

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>But but she was really good at it, and people said, well, hey,

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should do this for other stuff too. Yeah,

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And like ironically, because she kind of um, I mean,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the various tawdry accounts say she was driven

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to madness. I'm not sure how accurate that is, but

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it did seem like it pretty much consumed her in

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the latter stages of her life, and that her family

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was kind of embarrassed and stuff like that. Right, So

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Francis Bacon was um not the only person put forth.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's probably, as far as like um believers go,

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody who at least rivals, if not eclipses him, and

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be um, the the seventeenth Earl of Oxford,

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Edward de Vere Right. Yeah, I mean there's a whole uh,

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole camp and a whole other and you know,

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>we can't get into this too too much indeed, tale

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>but there's a whole movement that says out of the

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>eight people like we really think it was the seventeenth

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Earl of Oxford. Yeah, there's it's called the oxford Ian

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>theory of Shakespearean authorship, and there is you know, um,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.479
<v Speaker 1>some stuff to it. He was a poet, um, which

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>points out that's so much for the stigma of print um,

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and that also, uh, you can compare his poetry and

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>in like some specific works of poetry to some of

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare's poetry um, and see some real comparisons. But um,

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, the the questions are

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the similarities, and there um, if I'm not mistaken, like

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and that to me it was the sixth Earl of Derby,

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>who has a little more, um, a little more to offer. Really, um,

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there was there was one other thing. So Derby has

0:40:56.400 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his own group, the Derbyites man. This is what I mean.

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It's an onion. It's a Bluemen onion. So there was

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 1>one other thing about Dave that is pretty suspicious. There

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>were two narrative poems that Shakespeare dedicated to a man

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>who was raised in the same household as Davie. And

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>from what anybody could tell, there's no reason Shakespeare would

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>know this person, and why would Shakespeare dedicate two poems.

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So this this noble nobleman he didn't know, um, But

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Davie certainly knew him. He was he was basically raised

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>alongside him like a brother. So that along with the

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>biographical reading, the close reading looking for parallels between Davie's

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>life and Shakespeare's plays are what kind of back up

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Oxfordian theories. Interesting because that Christopher Marlowe is another

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one who was a contemporary and friend of Shakespeare's and

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they collaborated and they influenced one another. And this the

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 1>details around Marlowe's death are uh hinky enough to where

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>some people thought or at least the you know, the

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy is that is that he faked his death because

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna going to be executed by the crown

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and continued to write and then used his friend Billy

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare as a front to continue to get those plays out. Um,

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure about this because I don't know

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that it's just a little far fetched. If you

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>asked me, well, yeah, if and if you're if you're

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>supposing that Marlowe faked his death in order to continue writing,

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you've now got a conspiracy theory wrapped in a conspiracy

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>theory maybe. But it's interesting because you know, marlow is

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty interesting dude in himself. Supposedly he may have

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been a secret agent for the crown. Um, he was

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>an atheist, he was his own playwright. People loved him

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>as a playwright at the time. Um, but he was

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>no Shakespeare Like literally, he's probably the flimsiest person you

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>could attribute um shakespeare writings too, because marlow was gloomy

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and super atheist and and um he was. His plays

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>just didn't have that same kind of humanism and um

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>funniness that Shakespeare's plays had. And also, why wouldn't Marlow

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>just write these plays under his own name? He had

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>no reason to write these plays under different names. Yeah, agreed. Uh,

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there have been people that put forth the idea that

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the there were several different women that might have been

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the real authors because uh, women were not allowed to

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>write plays at the time. Um, eight percent of the

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:39.240
<v Speaker 1>plays written during this time were anonymous and no author

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>was listed. And a lot of people said, hey, a

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of these were written by women and they just

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>couldn't put their name on it. Um. Many of Shakespeare's

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>plays and ideas are very progressive. Um, it's kind of

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a I don't know about flimsy, but

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it kind of demeans Shakespeare a bit to say that like,

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>well had to be a woman because they were so

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>progressive about women like taking a stand, when in fact,

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare seemingly very much thought that way himself, right, Like

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>how could a man write women like this? Come on? Yeah, Um,

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a woman named Mary Sidmund Herbert who has a

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>whole foundation that's trying to prove that she wrote. Um.

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Kind of the worst of the Internet happened about seven

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago when you get these memes that are just

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>full of false stuff and then everyone starts spreading them around.

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh there was a meme when all over social media

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that just had the picture of this black woman and

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>said this is Amelia Bassano. H she really wrote Shakespeare stuff.

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.879
<v Speaker 1>She was not allowed to be a published author because

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>she was a black woman at a time where she

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was suppressed and all this stuff. Um, none of this

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff was true. Um, first of all, she was maybe Moroccan.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>She was definitely not of African descent. Oh I thought

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>she was some Venetian. I saw that she was Moroccan

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and had some Italian in her, so that, yeah, it

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a little sense. But she was definitely not of

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>African descent. Um, she was a published author, So the

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>whole notion that she wasn't allowed to publish things wasn't right.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>She was kind of a well known, uh poet I

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.879
<v Speaker 1>think at the time. So this kind of thing gets

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>passed along the internet and then you know, half the

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>people that see it just say, oh, we'll look at

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that Shakespeare was was It was all written by this

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lady back then. Problems. Yeah, problem solved. And that's just

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>not how it works. One of the other things I

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>saw that um, And I think the people who are

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like Shakespeare as a woman are like, well, okay, if

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>we're if we're starting to question Shakespeare's authorship, we can't

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ignore this whole group of people who had every reason

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to hide their identity as authors of these plays because

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they were women and they weren't do this kind of stuff. Um.

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So there was a critic who in wrote of a

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>um who praised a gentlewoman who was writing some amazing

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>plays and sonnets. And this was the year after Shakespeare

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>pops back up um, after his lost years, and when

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he was starting to write um. But that the critics

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:13.959
<v Speaker 1>said he didn't want to reveal who it was because

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to basically get her in trouble. So

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what some other people kind of look at and say, see,

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare was a woman. Well, I mean, I think I

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>think this theory makes a lot more sense a lot

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of the others, you know, just by this year fact

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that women would not have been allowed to So uh,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe Shakespeare was progressive and decided to be a front

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for these great works. But it reveals a point about

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:43.760
<v Speaker 1>UM being a anti Shakespeare, anti I guess Stratford person

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is you have to part of his You have to

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>explain why somebody would want to fake authorship, would want

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to hide behind Shakespeare's name. Yeah, what do you call that?

0:46:54.360 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>A motive? Yeah, you got means motive, an opportunity. You

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>put those three together, you got your Shakespeare. Well that's

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>what I mean about the maybe women wrote them. I mean,

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there was definite motive there, right exactly. So there was

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>one other thing that happened. I mean a lot of

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff happened over the course of this hundred almost two

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred years now, UM of questioning Shakespeare's authorship Back in

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>seven a UM OX forty and UM Charlton Augburn got

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the UM at least three sitting Supreme Court justices John

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Paul Stevens, William Brennan, and Harry Blackman to hold a

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>mock trial to determine if Shakespeare actually was the author

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare's plays, and they did on c span they

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>had They held like a trial and heard the evidence,

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and Shakespeare had his own attorney arguing for him, and

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>UM it was pretty interesting, but they they it went

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>two to two to one, I think in favor of

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare from Stratford as the author. But they did

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like real research and stuff. It wasn't just like a

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah stunt no, So the Supreme Court justices

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>were kind of taking a tongue in cheek. But I

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>got the impression that Charlton Augburn was like, yes, finally

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 1>going to prove it definitively one way or another, and

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it didn't even fall in his favor. Interesting, Yeah, it

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting what people did in the eighties on c SPAN.

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I got a few more little things here from that

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic article that point to his authorship is being genuine.

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>One is that he had a narrative poem called Venus

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and Adonis that was a very popular poem at the

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>time that was put in print. Uh and it was

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>printed by a gentleman named Richard Field, who apparently went

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to school with him at Stratford. So that's a that's

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good little hint um he was written about

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time, So it's not like he was never

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>known until his death and then all of a sudden

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>became super popular, Like he died a rich man and

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:02.799
<v Speaker 1>was written about with by literary critics UM at the time,

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and and entertainment and play critics, so they were contemporaneous

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:10.760
<v Speaker 1>UM criticisms of his writing while he was still living,

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>which which is a pretty you know, pretty big clue

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that he probably wrote this stuff. That is not proof, no,

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>because those people could be there. They went and saw

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a play by Shakespeare. They didn't mean that they met

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare and talked to Shakespeare about the authorship of the

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>place and leaned up his shoulder while he wrote it. Right. Proof.

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>The other last thing that I saw in the Atlantic

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>article this is the one, or actually this was in

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a this was the Golden bullet from that video was

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare was apparently concerned that, um, his dad's reputation sort

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>of in the family's reputation suffered later in life because

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of financial problems that his dad had, and he really

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kind of restore their name and get a

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>coat of arms made, which is, uh, you could, you know,

0:49:57.960 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>it's like you could be a true gentleman if you

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>had a coat of arms. And apparently it's a really

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 1>long process. They don't just hand him out to anybody.

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You've gotta like have a certain level of achievement to

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>get a coat of arms. So he went through this big,

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 1>long process and had he went all Barry Linden on there.

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, what a movie. Um. He had a couple

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of different men in the Herald's office who defended Shakespeare's

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>right to have a coat of arms because other people

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>were saying, who is this guy? Even like he came

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from not much and he shouldn't have a coat of arms.

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And one of the guys who defended him was a

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>man named William Camden, who this guy in the video

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>referred to as one of the most learned men in

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>all of England. Uh. He was actually Ben Johnson's schoolmaster

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and apparently just knew everything on happening on the literary

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 1>scene inside and out. And in one of his books

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:51.919
<v Speaker 1>he uh it was called the Remains of a Greater History.

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 1>He talks about all the great writers of the time

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and he lists William Shakespeare of Avon Uh in that book.

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So he said, that's the golden bullet. Uh again, if

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it's just a front, it's still in no real proof

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of authorship. No it's not. I mean like this guy

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>could just be playing along lending his his Yeah, that's

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>another one. Too. Like that's the thing, like the anti

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Stratfordians have caused the pro Stratfordians to actually defend their position,

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so, it's kind of revealed that both

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of them are kind of on shaky ground. It's almost

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of belief. Do you want to believe

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that one man was that brilliant and and that talented

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and gifted um or do you can? Can you just

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not believe that? It just doesn't make any sense to you.

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So it was a cabal of noble people who were

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to advance political reform and hiding behind William Shakespeare

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and paying him off with maybe um family crests and

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>money and and fame to to let let them use

0:51:56.440 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>his name as their you know, the playwright. Yeah, also

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:02.760
<v Speaker 1>say like where he was from. There was some regional

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 1>slang that was very specific to where he was from

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that was used. Uh, there was in Taming of the

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Shrew he mentions these Latin phrases that are in specifically

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:17.800
<v Speaker 1>from a Latin book that apparently was known to have

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>been used at his school, at his grammar school in Stratford.

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So again there's all these little hints and clues. All

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of it kind of gave me a headache, right, And

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I was like, can we just like love these plays? Right? Exactly?

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. It's the ultimate point. Let's just love

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the place. People get serious about this though, Yeah, they

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely do. I mean it's pretty interesting and I mean

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it kind of fun to watch from the

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>outside too. Ya Are you got anything else? No, we

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 1>could go on all day, but totally we'd never get anywhere.

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>There's like ten things I'm leaving on the table. So

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 1>we just got to keep moving on, right, all right,

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's keep on keeping on, Chuck. If you want to

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:01.240
<v Speaker 1>know more about Shakespeare and authorship, there is a giant,

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:04.440
<v Speaker 1>gaping rabbit hole you can jump down on the internet

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh say sionar to all of your other pursuits.

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And since I said Sianara, it's time for listener mail.

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this just came in over the wire.

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was kind of funny, uh, from our

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>friends Stephen in Kagoshima, Japan, about eating about eating squid,

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>says love the show fellas reason not to be so

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:33.240
<v Speaker 1>touchy though about eating squid. They are child murdering sea vermin,

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>he said. The reason squid die after they made is

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a survival adaptation, because if not, they would eat the

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>eggs and newly hatched squid from themselves and other squid

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in the spawning areas. Uh, squidly did lee is an

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>infanticidal maniac and should be cooked and eaten, albeit sustainably,

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of course. Uh So that's the argument, is that these

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>squids deserve to be eaten because they would be eating

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 1>themselves if not for this adaptation. So he also says

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 1>telled Josh not to eat uncooked squid. That's not great,

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:16.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, and uh kind regards from Stephen in Kagoshima, Japan,

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a squid haven and a squid inc pasta destination. Stephen,

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that was a really great eye opening email. I may

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>have seen the light. I'm not sure yet. I'll have

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to get back to you, Okay, okay, thank you for

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>responding to that, Stephen. If you want to be like

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Stephen and get in touch with us and send us

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a potentially eye opening email, you can do that. Send

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it off to stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com.

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio.

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:56.920
<v Speaker 1>app Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.