WEBVTT - Saxo’s ‘Outrageous’ Prediction? Gold Will Top $3,000 in 2023

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, John, hello again. We did a trailer for this

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast a little while ago in which I told all

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>our loyal listeners not get excited about hearing from you

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>all the time, because I wasn't gonna let you on

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>very often. But there's been protests, and I think, actually,

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be on for almost every episode. We're

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have a little chat before we get into

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the meat of me talking to our guests. So so

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's nice, that's good. I'm glad that the

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Pitchfort building more booksually the bloom Bed building. What favorite

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>good about it too. Now, listen, this is our favorite

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>time of year, you and I. We've been working together

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>a long time and December always says something really special

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about it for us, Which is it? This is the

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>time of year, It's the season for forecasts. That's when

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>people start telling us what they think is going to

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>happen next year, and we can make fun of them,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which really works, doesn't it. Yeah, it's basically the S

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and P will go up by seven s, devotake whatever it,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and not bail last year. And we have the particular

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>joy of looking at the forecast they made last year

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and comparing it to what really happened. Yeah, and it's

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>always wrong, always wrong. That will come onto more of that,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and when we get into the meat of the podcast,

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I say, without without excellent guests today. But one of

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the things that people are starting doing is talking about

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>their surprise predictions for next year, things you don't think

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>will happen, that they think will happen. And very often

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at those, no thing, well, I wouldn't really

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>surprise me at all. So one of the banks to

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>come up with standard charge will come out with one

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this week, which is that over the next year the

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin may fall to five thou dollars. And

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that a given? That surprised me with that surprise? You? No,

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean not at all. I mean I think one

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things with these surprise predictions is though usually

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>things that kind of mainstream analyst feels an attain a

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>bit controversial because it's a place move that it goes

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>beyond seven of the way, and that's basically anything other

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>than that would be a surprise. But yeah, I mean,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>black coin form five thousan dollars isn't isn't I wouldn't say,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But like kind of we out there, I mean, zero

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>would be a surprise, but only because of the time frame.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Zero within two or three years wouldn't be a surprise,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>will be a surprise because of the time frame. I mean,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I still I know that me and you slightly kind

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of don't entirely. And that's when I still think backcoin

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>has got some kind of potential. But think think, but

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's very, very, very manor um because

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really too complicated to you. You've been on Twitter

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>asking people for explanations, and you know what they say.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>They say, educate yourself, and then they send me reading

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>this and I read all those books. In fact, I

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>recommended those books to you in the first place. And

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>reading those books didn't get me any further. It was

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>understanding what the use case is. And people keep telling me,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>you know that at the very very worst, even if

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody else used at all, it will be continued to

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be used by the criminal community, and that possibly work

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>because you can only laun the money out of the

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>black economy if you can laundrip via something that people

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the non black economy use. And if we don't

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>use bitcoing, then criminals can't use bit going because they

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>can't launder it from their world to our world. Well, yeah,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>because you know that anyone who's using missing something. No, no,

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that'st thing you are really. I mean,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know that anyone who's using a bitcoin or

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>ramp as a criminal, which is quite checking. You know.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the way that I guess, like, I don't know

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>who's going to sue you for that, but someone's going to.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't labeled anyone specifically. What would happen next year

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's going to think is surprised. Isn't going to

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>be a surprise to here? I actually think that, I mean,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's all this is a very important one. But I

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the UK is going to go in

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a devastating resisation. Nicely, thing is going to end up

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 1>being a fairly kind of good place to have put

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>your money this year when everyone was parany king about it.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But it can be a good place to put your

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>money and still have a devastating recession. These things aren't

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 1>necessarily match. I mean, we've written so many times over

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the years that there's no correlation between GDP and stock

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>market performance that I mean, it's not going to do

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the GDP. But I still think that Britain is going

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to do better than everyone expects. I'm concerned because I

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 1>have this horrible feeling that mild might be the new transitory. Well,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I know it's jacky, it's chicky. My gut feeling is

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be as bad as people

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be. Um. I to think the

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>energy prices are probably going to come down more than

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>people expect. So it's actually kind of a believe or not.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of an optimistic upside one. But that is

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that is going out there on the limb for me,

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not I'm gonna naturally bearish listen as you

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>should know that I'm looking at John disapprovingly at the moment. Honestly,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm weathering, literally weathering here. John. Thank you so much

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for coming on and talking again, and listeners, I think

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna hear from again next tweet unless you get fined.

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Marin Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>who know the markets explain the markets. I'm there in

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.239
<v Speaker 1>some st web this week. A conversation with Saxo Banks

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>chief investment Officer Stean Jacobson, who joins with the banks

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ten outrageous predictions for twenty three. He does this every year,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of outrageous stuff. We've just had a John's outrageous

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>predictions for next year, which relatively positive. However, I started

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Stean with a look back at their

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>predictions for this year and how they panned out. I

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's one of the better years. Although, as as

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you were well know, we actually don't set out trying

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to be right about anything. It's it's it's more a

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation story and more sort of a perspective of the

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>fat tales. But yeah, I think the one that probably

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>cost the most money for the average investor is the

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>prediction that there would be a face plant, and matter,

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we can safely say that one came through.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Can we say that the young abandoned the platforms in

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>protest against their mining of personal information for profit? Can

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we say that? Or can we just say the share

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>price fell a lot where we can certainly say that later?

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think as as you are as experienced as

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I am in doing this, it's uh not always that

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you get either the direction or the in result right.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes you get the results right, and sometimes you

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>get the arguments, right, But I think what we were

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to say last year was that a lot of

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>people would be abandoning matter, and certainly in the Investor

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>did abandoned matter. And I also think to a lot

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of extent, the point that young people don't want to

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>be part of it has shown up in of course,

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>if nothing else, in the meta space, which was supposed

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to be populated by young people coming onto this virtual world.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think the young people like me and maybe

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk for you as well, is figuring out that

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the reality the real world is hard in our uh,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>then also having to navigate a virtual world is probably

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much in the present conditions. It's

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true, neither of my children or on Facebook. So

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>there you go. You win that one. What about the

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>first one you had last year, the planned and fossil

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fuels gets a rain check. I mean, it's not formal,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the putting a rain check on that plan, But it's

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely happening, isn't it. It's definitely happening, and it's uh.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's become even more relevant today than it

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was last year, in the sense that if you think

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about what twenty three really meant of course Ukraine War

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was the starting point and to a last extent, a

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>acceleration of the trench in place. Uh. You know, one

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>year ago Germany had its free tier approach, which was

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to export to China, uh, depending on very low energy

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>price from Russia and not having to pay off for

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>its military. I would say all of those things has changed.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But what has really changed in particularly in Germany, of course,

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is a party like the Green Party of Protest moving

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the energy space, is now fully on board on

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>reopening nuclear power and on the case which is and

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the case globally that energy and re energy

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sourcing has become a number one priority for every single

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>government around the world. So I think it's pretty faith

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, at a bare minimum that fossil energy is

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>still part of the solution. I don't think the green

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>movement on the green voteness of the situation has disappeared.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in terms of the latest cup that

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>we are anywhere closer to getting the results we want.

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But certainly we all know, we all know now that

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we we need to think about energy as a strategic resource. Okay, well,

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that's two major successes. What of the others I think

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I will have maybe not an A plus, but we

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>will have a B plus for calling inflation to the

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>level that we called it. I think we put in

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a unimaginable at the time level of if I'm not mistaken,

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve um fifteen, fifteen, Yeah, no, fifteen, US inflation reaches

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>above fifteen cent home wage price spiral um. But in

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that that might not have happened this year, but it

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>could easily happen next year. Yeah. And and the reason

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for the fifteen percent was really that was four was

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to peak in the nineteen seventies, So we were trying

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to outdo whatever happened in the nineteen seventies. And I think,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>as you rightly allude to, I still think the game

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is on. Of course, the market right now, what whether

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at break even, two, five, ten, or thirties,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they all think that it's going to to thirty five.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Just as a side note, I think it's interesting whatever

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>happens in the next thirty years. Apparently the market has

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>dictated that inflation will be a two and thirty five

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>two point thirty five basis point two undred thirty five

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>basis points inflation. But that's interesting in itself. But no,

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in any shape of form that the

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation story is over yet. It's interesting. It's real anchoring,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. That's just everyone thinking, well, it'll go back

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to where it was. It's very much pious confirmation. But

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's a true reflection of central banks

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>unimaginative models. The models is outdated, The model is not

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>working with real time data, is not working with a

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bottom up analysis. Is all macro, and we both know

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that macro is very good dinner conversation, but it's very

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to predict. And I think they have remained with

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this transitory going back to normal all by itself. Apparently

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>my energy is going to solve yourself. Supply change is

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>going to solve yourself. Degol obsiation is going to solve yourself.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And another note, I'm very pleased that everything just solve yourself.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a great strategy. I would be

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>through the fould happen, wouldn't you certainly preferred? But I'm not.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I have not I don't have enough hair to actually

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>believe the things solved themselves. I do think they need

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>some actionable and and and some good things to come

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>out of it. As as I know. What I do

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a solution to this, and this

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, the energy crisis, the level of

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>energy has forced ourselves to at least start considering that

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to live in a productive society. I don't

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's fully transparent in politics, but I think it's

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>very transparent when I talk to companies at a company level.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>They all understand that the margin in terms of into

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>prices growing up, and the only way to counter that

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>will be more productivity, which means better education, better products,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>better services. Do think that ultimately the higher prices will

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>lead to lower prices, but driven by productivity, not by hoping,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not by praying, and certainly not by waiting. I think

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the most optimistic thing I've heard anyone. Yeah, given her,

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>given her, bad productivity has been for so long, it's

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting the idea that productivity could be bad. Low productivity

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>could be a function of energy being too cheap and

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>too abundant. I mean, that's what people offer say about

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>labor costs and labor in the UK in particular, if

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a too much available of labor to lower price,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you inhibit your own productivity gains the same idea or

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a journalist in of all places. Estonia asked me a

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>great question earlier this year. He said, okay, stay enough

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gave If I gave you a magic one, what would

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you do with it? I think you're being a banker.

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>He expected me to say, turn everything into gold. But

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>right then, and they're there, they're right there. In a moment,

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually realized that what I would want was that

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the marginal cost of energy would go to zero. That

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>would facilitate desalinational water, vertical farming at scale. It would

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>increase the computer powerability, will improve the ability of you know,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>longevity and the like. So I think, if you think

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>about it in that context of productivity, what is holding

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>us back is actually the high level of energy prices

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and as the present non actionable, the non plan on

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>dealing with this is driving the margin price of energy up,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>which means that, as you say, we are challenged on productivity.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But the solution clearly is to get closer to a

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>multi approach on energy, more basic investment, more basic research,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and think about you know, as a as an analog.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we had the COVID starting, people was

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about three, four or five years before the vactually

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would be available, but throwing enough money added open sourcing

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it and then you may in the number one priority

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>created that productivity in vaccine. I don't see why we

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>cannot do the same about energy, because clearly it is

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>punitive to the consumers, is punity to the voters, and

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, is actually changing as we already discussed the

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>energy security mix up, but also the way we think

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>about society, and and and then the final note here,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think is important one. I don't know where

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you're realized there's but of all assets which is traded

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world are intangibles. So only ten percent after

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>world's ass are tangibles. And I think you and I

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>both know that energy SIT's intendable, uh you electricity, grid networks,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's intangibles. Your logistics, your last mild delivery is intangible.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So what the world needs it's more tangible assets. More

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>tangible assets translating into more real economy assets. And as

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we grow that, we will also massively grow with the productivity.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's my back of an envelope. Two minutes macro

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>talk and protitivity. Okay, I'm going to make a quick

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>challenge here on the vaccine that half the people who

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to this will make which is that Yeah, I know,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's trying to develop another vaccines. It's just

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that we cancel the regulatary environment around most vaccines. If

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you cut the regular environment in place, surely would have

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>taken just as long as any old vaccine. And then

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at I don't think the vaccine works right, And then

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you have the full audience. But we'll leave that one, then,

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>shall we um? Let me ask you one more question

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on on on last year's one of the ones I

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like to find interesting with new hypersonic tech, drive space

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>race and the new Cold war. And you haven't mentioned

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that as being one of the ones that that you

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>would give yourself a B plus it. But there is

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely a Cold war at least going on in space,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't that. And the hypersonic webon was activated by the

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Russians and and and everybody else. So yeah, that is

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe not a B, but then a a C C

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>plus at least, but close to a B. Yeah. And

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I listened to a talk the other day that told

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>me that we didn't really really have to worry about

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>energy anymore because the cost of energy is effectively going

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to zero because we will be harvesting solar energy in space.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So that sounded nice. That's another optimistic mode. This is

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>turning into be a very It almost become one of

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>these coach sessions where people get uplifted and see the

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>future better. Shall we take care of that by moving

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>onto next year's predictions. Yeah, we can kill that quite quickly,

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>next year's outrageous predictions. Um, and you title the whole

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>thing the war anomy. So anyone who's feeling optimistic or

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of woman fuzzy from what we've been talking about

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so fast stop right now. The whole thing is called

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the war economy. We just took through a little bit

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by that. Yes, so, as we have

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>found that creating our rag of prediction has become more

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult because competing with the real world is very difficult,

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we sort of try to embed a red threat through

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the the different years version of the outrage prediction. This

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>one comes with the side title of being the war economy.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And what we mean by the war economy is that

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if you think about what is going on politically, this

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>serves to the activation of the bigger public hand which

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we got used to undercovered and which certainly politician likes

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to continue the backloading of actionable budget cards as you

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>see in the UK budget. The constant waiting for better times,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>are constantly waiting for inflation to come down is very

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>much what you see during war periods all the way

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>back to you know, three before christ there's been limitation

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on commodities, that's been price caps, that's been sourcing basically

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the government or the military dictating which resources, which energy groups,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which people in society are more important to savee God,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the they are uh the upkeep of both the constitutional

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but also the border. So we think it's probably much

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>easier to analyze what's going on in the world from

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>from sort of a war economy. And we are not

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>saying the world is at World War three or anything.

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We're saying if you think about it on the as

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you you indicate it yourself. If we talk about the

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>war in space, if we talk about the war going

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on daily in terms of the Internet and and and

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and the darknet for sure, and what goes on in

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>those activities. I don't think I really want to know

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, but I'm pretty sure it's not a

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>nice place. And I think the deglobalization has been accelerated.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>What we've seen is the two biggest political initiatives in

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the world right now is on the US side, the

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Chips Act, which is basically about re shoring technology and

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>work and and and security back to the US, and

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of China is the dual circlar The dual

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>circle is really about reducing the export dependency going to

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the domestic economy. And both of these of course placed

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to not only the deglobalization but also the the increase

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in alliance of being created. The new alliance in the

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>world is between China and Russia, energy coming from Russia

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and technology going the other way out. So so all

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of these are bilateral cheating military priorities over what we

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about before, productivity equality and certainly also the green

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>agenda has been lost a little bit in this race. Okay,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So here we are and what is obviously well to

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you anyway, I think to be as well not going

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a disinflation re environment for some time. Um,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you haven't gotten here a specific outrageous prediction on inflation,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>but lots of the of the predictions kind of hang

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>around that area. So one is that gold rockets to

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars. The central banks fail on on inflation mandate,

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and we've we've slightly talked about why the central banks

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>will fail on their inflation mandate because their target is

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>very random in their midles are rubbish. Um, but is

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there a reason why that will send gold to three

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars For people who don't believe in golds and

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation heads, of which there there are many, well, then

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we just let them read history, right. It's one of

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the I would argue if you're an asset manager, and

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I presume this show talks to a lot of people

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>either manage their own many or managed on behalf and

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>other people. I think if you're on a pot for

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>you today in sterling or euro dollars, you also need

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to run it in gold because that is your true

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>purchasing power. So it's really not about inflation, is more

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about your maintaining your purchasing power. But what will catapult

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>gold to a higher level, of course, is all of

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the failings that we talked about, but maturely that the

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>world continues as I indicated early on, to believe that

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation is going back to two to two and a

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent, and that is as I said, to five

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ten and thirty year forward dictated by the market says

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be a two thirty five. I

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>find that naive in a deglobalization world where we want

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>to prior to strategy, we want to prioritize military, we

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>want to prioritize keeping security at home, and we don't

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>want to do reshoring. I don't necessarily understand why I

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>know these things should be deflationary at a bare minimum,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't even understand why that could get us back

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to where we were before. That would mean that that

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>will be you know, physical impulse when things closed down,

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it will mean that that will not be printing the money.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think the market has a very naive attitude

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to the forward looking indicators. And I think this year,

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>at least for me as a trader and as a

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as a chief, Investments has told me that the market

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>has no transparency in terms of predicting inflation at all.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work for them two years ago, it didn't

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>work one year ago, and it's not working now. So

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>for me, it is more about you know, sensing and

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>talking to companies see what is reported in terms of

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>marching squeeze, and that process is much slower than the

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>market likes. But what all of our goal will be

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the refuge in the world where we also have competing currencies.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we're going to come to a minute. But

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the more outrageous things we're making claims on

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>this year is, of course that's going to be an

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>alternative to the to the mighty dollar, and that the

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 1>basement that will happen to the dollar. Yeah, we'll come

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>back to that in a tick. And one of the

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>other things that you say when you talk about inflation

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is that a good amount of inflation next year will

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be driven by China backing away from zero COVID policy

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and possibly been coming out within new vaccine, and the

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>protests that we've seen recently in China suggest they may

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be closer to pivoting away from zero COVID than than

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we might have thought even a few weeks ago. Yeah,

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I find it so much surprising, and I I shouldn't

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>do but deem myself to be something of a China expert,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>having a great expulsure both work wise and and and

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and and in terms of ownership with my company to them,

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's pretty clear that they cannot reverse course back

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to a total lockdown. The twenty measures already placed seems

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to be extended, and it seems like the battle right

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>now is really between the local government what not wanting

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to actually translate what the Central Committee is saying. And

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>this is merely because we are, of course in a

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>face in China where a lot of political local leaders

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>are outgoing and they don't want to take the responsibility.

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>They want to leave that job to the incoming new

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>caters that comes in. And I needs to see territory.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think there is a bit of logistic which

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is the back burning, back on the back burner what

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>happened at a part of Congress. But I think, as

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you rightly say, I think it is almost inevitable they

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>need to move to a higher genda because of course,

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the short comings on the short side in

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in China is obviously creating timman in jobs a year

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>has been very difficult to use unemployees going through the roof.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that if you're central planned economy,

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You restart the economy, you loosen up what we've seen

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on the property sector and and ultimately that stock market

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is a closed circuit. There is no external balance, uh

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and open account against the outside world, so that market

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is just purely manipulated to to reflect what what the

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>central party wants to to telegraph to you. Okay, So

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>here we are with inflation much higher than anyone exactly

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>miracles expects. And then number seven and this I think,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>if I mean, I think it's it's actually quite likely.

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of thing that will really freak everybody out.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Widespread price controls introduced the camp official inflation. And I

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>assume you meaning in most Western economies. Yeah, you know,

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, UK has had this history before, in the nineties,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies, price control boards and the likes. We've

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>seen it during World Wars. We've seen as I said before,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it even among the Roman emperors before that

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they dictate the price caps. And price caps is politically opportune,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but of course it doesn't reduce the underlying problem, which

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't have enough great capacity. It is

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not able to actually secure a new investment. It certainly

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>will not increase the amount of basic research that happens.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's not opening up all the venues, which is

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the solution. Instead, they will cap the prices,

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>but they will increase the underlying demand and they will

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>probably and I think from a number of companies that

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>sits in the space of saving energy, they feel that

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right now all of the policy measures embedded into future

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>policies is about making marginally cheaper energy and not about

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>reducing the consumption that we do today. And I think

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a story that will certainly change in twenty three. Yeah,

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you would say that we may see something like a

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>new national Board for Prices and incomes being established in

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the UK and the U s I mean, someone incredibly

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies, I wondered you and were given given the

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>existence already of wind full taxes and the like, can

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you see any possibility of the UK returning to dividend controls?

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember the days of dividend controls, when companies weren't allowed

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay or dividends were limited. Is that is that enough?

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Another possibility? I asked, just because one of the great

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>attractions of the UK market is it's yield, you know,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>very significantly higher than yield and where else double that

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>at the US, etcetera. If that's at risk, we should worry,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean, you are already doing it. And

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you if you are wind full taxes on utilities, you

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>are pricing out their ability to pay the dividend and

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be be a force of a stable portfolio in terms

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of s allocations. So absolutely there will be on intensive

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>consequences with it. So I think everything is on the

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>table basically because you know, think about what's transpired in

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the UK. First you had you know, elssive fair budget

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and now you have an overly rigid tightening of the

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the budgetary and mind you it's backload, but the

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>intention is to create a very fiscal tight monetary policy.

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you put that up against what it's need

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, which is to create new jobs, is

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to invest more in infrastructure, is to make sure that

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the health sexor get revitalized. Not necessarily by throwing more money,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it was certainly making it better, work better, more and less.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The red tape and the likes and and the whole

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last ten years of trying to put

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Londoners against the rest of the UK needs to stop.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's one country, one nation that needs to

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and and which historically has been very good at coming

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>through crisis is but right now the temptation for political

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>side will be to go back to the nineties and sixties,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies. I would not be surprised to see

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that the ultimate course of action here is to devalue

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Stirling massively and proactively in order to get some competitives

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>back in in that space. And and part of that

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>will probably come with a increase price control, because you

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want that important inflation to to flare up again

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>in in the UK economy. But I think you know

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the UK is now what we call a six seven

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>eight economy. They have six percent deficit on the current account,

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>seven percent budget deficit and eight percent inflation at a

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>best of times, right, I mean this, this is the

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>worst tecker in the world in terms of Western economy.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So in the UK and particularly I'm very in nervous

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>about these pist controls. Well, I think we're doing a

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>brilliant job of moving away from optimism. Thank you Stein.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's appreciate it, shall we. We want to number eight

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>um lots of people OPEC and China and India. They

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>walk out of the I m F and they agreed

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to trade with a new reserve asset. They give up

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>on the dollar it's happening, is that it's it's again

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one of these things that the way it's frame it's

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it's slightly outrageous, but the underlying micro trend is absolutely

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Uh. And I think, um, you know again,

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Russia has played at both a positive and negative lesson

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for for a number of countries outside the Western world,

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is that you can be uh, you can

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>see punity of action in terms of access the dollar,

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>funding and ovall to the international monetary system. And and

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people saying, if if China is the

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest import of oil in the world, whide don't they

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and Russia and Brazil and and to some extent engineer

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>imposts side as well, why don't they have a closed

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>system off using a bothering or basket like currency as

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>someone we suggest, and and through that way reduce the

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>dependency on the US centric monetary policy and also of

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>course the the ability to practically move money in and

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the system. We know Russia gave up on

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>using dollars was it three four years ago already? Uh?

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And we have seen Saudi Arabia astarney certainly after after

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they're very close relagship with Trump, but in the in

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Barney stration has been on a on a cold

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>path in terms of diplomatic negotiations between the two countries,

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and they are increasingly of course again also exporting the

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>other way out. Quitar and the likes and and Angy

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>on the outside feels that they have and probably rightly

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>so they need to play a bigger role and and

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>need to play above their waight um in terms of

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the impact. So I don't think that's unlike the You

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>can contest whether i'm IF is going to break down.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think the reason we use the IMF is

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>also we wanted to signal that we think that the

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the supernational institution is very, very damaged by what's been

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>going on since two thousand and eight, two US and nine.

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone uphold I MF or even the

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>u N today as an institution with integrity and a

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>way forward for the world. I think there are a

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, at least in the political spectrum, but

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>also among you know, people who wants to to be

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as you as you talk about being positive to sees

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>these at more of a hindrance than the than the

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>neccelerator of progress these days, because they have been backed

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>down in conventional thinking in terms of the the c

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>RT carbonimation, in terms of the international health plans, in

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the security of establishing some monitary system. My

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>slight worry here, Steen is that all so far, most

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the ones we've talked about, it does seem all

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>too plausible, either very likely or underway already. And there's

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>another one here that that I also think is all

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>too plausible in a good way. By the way, over

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the next years and l'st number ten, tax haven band

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>kills private equity, that new taxes are introduced that really

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>do as well the beginning of the end of the

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>private equity industry, and in particular that in the US

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully in the UK as well, at the carried interest,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that is tax does capital gains at the moment ends

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up being taxed. There's ordinary income which would push a

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of the participants are in it for the carry out. No, yeah,

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but but you do you also understand it's it's quite

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a controversial call, obviously, because private equity is very much

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>an intrinsic part of institution. Port forward is very much

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>part of family offices. But what we're trying to say

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is that if if you and I am actually very positive,

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we can get to that ultimately. But but the absolutely

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we promise the the cliffhanger is we are going to

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be positive ultimately. But but if you want to think

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of a world that works better, a world that is

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>more productive, we need to stop making it. Uh. We

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>need to stop allowing that people do things for tax reasons.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>People should do things for productivity reason. They should do

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it to be part of the solution, not being part

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. And a lot of people in a

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>private the space will say, I look at how many

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>jobs we have created, how many jobs we do support

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>by doing this. But I would argue, and I can't

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>counterprove that I enaciate or form, but I will argue

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the capital argut too. Care of that. Before private equity existed,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>private equity, you know, has grown outside its scope in

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense that privately is supposed to be these investment

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that us very which is very difficult to put onto

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the public marketplace, and then there's a better protected, better

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>grown inside a private sphere of high risk capital. But

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>these days they just pretty much sells companies to each other.

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think there is a number of bad examples

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of how the deals has been driven by tax events,

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not by by the the willingness or even to to

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to do a better job or create jobs or doing something.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think in a world where we already started

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on a minimum tax in a CD, it's not unlike

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the ou city also go to full full lengths. It says, uh,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to have a philosophic discussion about why is

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there countries in the world which only businesses two a vortex. Yeah,

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And if we were going to have a conversation about

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>private equity and the way private equity works, would we

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>also need to have a conversation about the way public

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>markets work and the volume of regulation that appears to

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>put people off wanting to be fully listed, and the

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rims and rims of rings of it,

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and the constant transparency that is required, which isn't theory good,

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>but which a lot of companies use as their reason

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for sticking private rather than going public. I agree. And

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're really seeing indirectly, and sorry if I or

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>interpret your what you said here, but but you know,

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's private equity, among other things, has made it so

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>complicated and the amount of loops you have to jump

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>through in order to to make a public market is

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>no longer about having a great idea of securing capital

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for it. You need to look at the tech structure,

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>You need to look at the governance. You need to

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you know where does the money come from,

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>where is it happening. So I think it's also to

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>make things easier for the world. Let's break it down

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to what it is. It's capital. Stock market is as

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a popping market that racist capital for the industry and

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is primarily used for that we as investors go invested

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in and take the risk of doing it. It's no

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>longer about where we paid tax, is no longer about

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>what what what our starting point is from a tax situation.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Benefit is actually because we want to buy into a

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>company who is part of the solution, which is productive

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and which is making money for its investors. So I

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's self fulfilling that if we reduce the

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>complexity of taxes, we also reduce the complexity of doing

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I P O S and introduction and going into the

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>public space. Do you think if that would also involve

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about E s G overlays and E s

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>G related regulations. Again, I think E s G has

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of merit to it, but it's no one

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>un you and I know, it's not defined by any

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>accounting board. It's not something specific. It is a very loose,

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>loose definition which everyone wants to be on board on.

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you went through all the company

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>listening foods, you know, S and P five, none of

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>them can do e ees n G. A few of

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>them could do, a lot of them wants to do,

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>some of them can do S, and pretty much none

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of them do G in the classic sense of it.

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean Meja is a great example of a company

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>which the complexity of the governance is worse than Hong

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Kong listing. Right, So it's um, yeah, we need we

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>need to slim down the the red tape. But slimming

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>down the red tape also means the rules needs to

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be clear. Yeah, slim it down, make it clear and

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>make it easier. Okay, there's one in here that I

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with you on at all, and I think

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>is unbelievably unlikely, And I think you've just put in

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to tease some of us, right, which is number five.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>A country agrees to ban or meat production by twenty thirty,

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you think, yeah, do you think that's possible. As you

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>can probably tell, I didn't come up with that one,

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>but I did not know. In the Netherlands, we know

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we had we do keep reading about the sort of

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:55.439
<v Speaker 1>bizarre business of the government compulsory purchasing farms in order

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to get closer to meeting their their climate change targets, etcetera.

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But it still seems a little that But I see,

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, it really depends on on on your perspective here,

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because as the Sharon who wrote the piece rights, it's

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>if you think about if you really want to reduce

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your too emission and going to a carp in neutrality,

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you need to do things two things. You need to

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>account for what you import one thing, and secondly we

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>need to address the fact that agriculture and the feed

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>start that we produce is a huge chunk of the

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>total to you or two emission that we do do.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's unlikely a country that being

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Sweden on the evilence is something similar, over the course

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of the next three or five years come up with

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a plan which it could start like something no no

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>meat is served in the public sector. Then ultimately it

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes you know, either with the high tax or or

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>marginally changing. But I think if again, I don't know

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the edge of your children, but when I talk to

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>my children and their friends or whatever, I mean, this

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>whole plant based thing is is real. It is something

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>that they want to achieve, even partly some of it

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is for health reason or some of the parties for

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the for the carbon emission part of it. But but

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that in a world that loves wokeness

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>and being politically correct, and in a world where I

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which is one of my actual forecasts, where government's intervention

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and regulation is going to increase, not decrease, I think

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very likely what happened. So I have to disagree

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>on the probability, but I'm probably, to be honest between privately,

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>between you and me, I'm probably at a you know,

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>thirty to four likelihood, not at sixty to seventy. But

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but if you last young people on my team, they

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are probably a sixty. I have to tell you that

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this conversation isn't just between you and me exactly, but

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I know it's interesting. I mean, you know, I agree

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>with you that when you talk to young people this

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is what you hear that they won't go plant based

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>plant based, and that they worry about agriculture and the environment,

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But on the other hand, we know very

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>well that most of the applied based meat substitutes simply

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>aren't selling almost to eat them. It's much easier to

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about being plant based than to actually eat that

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>heavily processed mark correct. But part part of that is

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>also technology not going through. I mean, as I'm told,

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you can have artificially generated chicken and the likes, and

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the price to market is too expensive right now,

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's again, as for usual, just waiting for

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>technology to make a breakthrough. And you're right that it's

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very much a product. It's it's a vision

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>shorter of products, basically, right, it's a vision short of

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a product that is exactly right. And I have actually

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>spoken to several of the companies that make this kind

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of lab grown meat or attempting to make lab grown

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>meat recently, and you know, I told it's very effective,

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>just insanely expensive. But then I have this sort of

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>strange worry about it. If I wonder if if you

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would share that when you look at say vegetables that

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a growing hydroponically, everyone still says that tomato grown in

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>soil still has a completely different taste and nutritional breakup

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to make up to a tomato grow purely and water,

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because soil contains magic, big, bigger parts on fine, I

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>want to believe that, I want to believe that you know,

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the way we farmed have some validity. But what's interesting,

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you something that right now the Danish

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we had an election, then we haven't formed a government,

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but a big chunk of the parliamentary conversation going on

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>right now is exactly on how to treat the aguaculture sector.

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And then which is of course is a it's a

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>big export component. So basically what is the sort of

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Social Democratic Party in the left leaning party wants

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to make the h the aguaculture sector more accountable and

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>at a bareminhum have a plan to reduce the CEO two.

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So maybe maybe the answer to our Christian is one

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>technology and a vision with more products. But it's also

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that as agriculture is forced to reduce is

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>CEO two footprint, the availability and the scale of being

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>able to actually feed the world becomes smaller, so we

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.919
<v Speaker 1>actual you need and it's driven towards this plan base,

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>not because it's nice and it's it's vogue, simply because

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the world needs it to do. Don't forget this whole

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>fertilizer crisis. I'm sure you've done some stuff and that

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as well that we had there is, you know, being

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a pipe fline fire. I know for a fact that

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when you increase fertilizers by ten percent, you get ten

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>percent more growth. Right now, the world is operating at

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>sixties off the fertilizer that they normally use, which means

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that the the you know, everything equal and when you

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>come into the next season, there is a potential that

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we come up short in terms of the the the

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the number of products that we can use out of

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the agriculture productor Yeah, but I suppose what we must

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>do is about we want positive listeners any second hour

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>missing positive. They have one more negative thing, which is

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that my concern would be with agriculture that we make

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the mistake that we made with energy of jumping the

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>gun and thinking that we have technology in place for

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a transition before we do and ending up with not

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>quite enough of the thing that we were you need

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely valid point, and that is the whole theme of

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the war economy, that you prioritize some action without actually

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>following up with the tangibles, so to speak. Okay, right

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:19.919
<v Speaker 1>here we go stein the optimism go go yeah. So

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>in the market, as you know, there's a saying where

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>if you need lower prices, you need higher prices. And

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look back at twenty two and

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>look into twenty three, I think to some extent, the

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian did us a favor. I think the energy agenda

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and to talk about energy and the replaceing of energy

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and the revitalization of the nuclear power sector has moved

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>more in the last six months than it moved in

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years. I think there is now a

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>political platform to stand on to understand better and to

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>mitigate some of the shortcomings that you just pointed out.

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>In the agriculture space, we talked about merely the fact

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have great aspirations, but we don't have to

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>have we don't even have the physical intrastructure to deliver

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on that aspiration in terms of green transformation, and certainly

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not under a world where the monetary policy is tired

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and exhausted and where the handoff will be to fiscal

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and as we push on the fiscal we will move

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>into more constraints shown by by this analogy to the

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>war economy. But what I'm saying here is, and I

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>go back to that what I wanted to point out earlier,

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.919
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the tenable assets in the world,

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they constitute less than ten percent of the value. But

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine that we need more military spending. We need better infrastructure,

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>better internet, better points, we need better energy grids, we

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 1>need to do carbon cabling instead of aluminum cabling. If

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we move to that, we will of course go through

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a period of sunken cost and initial investments. But what

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>comes under the other side is a massive increase in

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>productivity because I think the problem with the world over

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and under this uh, this subject of of dealing with

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>crisis for increasing dead levels and pretending that's no inflation

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ary impact, has gone. That that is that needs to

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be gone, because if it's not, we're going to go

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the old ways two point three five inflation forever.

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, cost the capital being low. But right now,

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Goldman Sax last week came out of report

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>that the average working cost of capital in the US

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>has moved for six hundre basis to bor into eight

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>d basis. Point, so understand this, and and we are

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>now an environment where to actually borrow money and be

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>profitable on the project you want to start up, you

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>need to have a return on eight percent. That same

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>threshold list than twenty four months ago was close to zero.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So we created a massive amount of capital investments and

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>projects that had no in goal, no productivity embedded into it.

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was really about the amount of via balls.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think when I go to universities, when I

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>went to business school universities over the last year, they

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>all tell me they just don't want to They just

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>want to do an app and make a hundred million dollars.

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I think when I go to university in business school

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the two years from now, they want to be in

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses that are part of the solution. And it's not

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be because we want to. Is not because

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we plan it, but simply we need to find productivity

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to reduce inflation. And when we get the productivity, we

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>also get the new amounts of jobs. We also get

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>better social balance, and we get governments that it's again

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>then able to not not not feel like they are

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>skating on ice, but they really are having a firm

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>grip on the stomach and daring in the car properly.

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So for me, the next five years, ten years is

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be the most productive, most interesting years in

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>my career. And it's been a very long career already,

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>simply because we are in the worst situation we've ever been.

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>We are met by constraint after constraint. But as we

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are met by constraint, the ingenuity and the ability of

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>both business and the microstructure to step up despite the

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>heavy hand of government will be massive, in my opinion, fantastic.

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>So the rising cost of capital is a very good thing.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me and I agree with you. By the way,

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>let me just ask you quickly, what is it that

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you suggest to young people that they study now, or

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that what careers they go into. I'm always telling them

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to go into the fossil field industry because nobody else

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>is and they'll make a fortune. What are you telling them?

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>They look horrified. They look horrified, And then I try

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and explain that, you know, we need this stuff. It's

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. We're going to need it for a

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>decade to come. Someone someone's got to get it out

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ground, and you might as well do it properly.

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You've been teaching me. I pretend to know about the future,

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but one thing I am certain about is that the

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tangible world will be significantly lasher ten years from now.

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.359
<v Speaker 1>So my advice to any person in the world who

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 1>wants to be about solution is to find a job

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 1>or educate yourself in is in what I called the

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>tangible world. In the real world, this dream about creating

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>platform scared being Amazon to deliver your underwear with the

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>drone one day early is not going to solve any issues.

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But addressing the apprenticeships shortest that we have the skills

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of operating a machine, the skills of operating awater system,

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the skills of operating environmental issues, and all this is

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be part of solution. The money is going

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to be made, the job security is going to be

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in the tangible world, not at the intangible world. So

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to some extent that that of course also entails mining

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and fossile and all these asset groups. And then I

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a huge reality wake up

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>because when people start to focus on what is solutions

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of non solution, then it will change. And I

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>give you a great example from the scanning a Wan world. So,

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>after the two thousand and eight two tho nine crisis,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest union then Mike, the medical union, decided, and

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting. They decided they were no longer in

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the business of keeping jobs, but they were in the

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>business of creating jobs. In the following ten years, the

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>metal units in Denmark not only had the highest marginal

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>increase in salaries, but also had the highest productivity. So

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes it is as simply as that, as

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>changing the world from one where we're trying to save

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.959
<v Speaker 1>god what we had yesterday and moving towards the world

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>where we are changing the world to creating more jobs,

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.839
<v Speaker 1>less inequality, less carbon footprint, but also a world where

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there are more reality and less virtuality. Steve, thank you

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us today. That was absolutely fascinating.

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And now we know what our children should do. Children

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 1>study engineering, and we know what we've got to look

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>forward to. When I hugely appreciated it, and I have

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a horrible feeling, or are a good feeling that quite

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your predictions this year are going to

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 1>come true, if not in twent three, but suddenly over

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the next five years. Thank you for joining us, Thank

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. Thank you everybody for listening to

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this week Marion Talks Money. We'll be back next week.

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime. If you like our show, and I'm

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure you must do after that conversation, please head

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on over to Apple Podcasts or wherever it is that

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcast, rate us, review us only well obviously,

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to us. This episode was hosted by me

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Marion Sumset Web. It was produced by Summer Sadi, Editing

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and sound designed by Blake Maple's Special thanks to Stein

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacobson and don't forget to sign up as well to

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>my colleague John's topics newsletter Money Distilled when lots of

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>things that we have discussed today will be discussed again.

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>The link is in this show notes. Stein talked to

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you again next year. Thanks so much,