Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio act or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shield Time.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt Tuesday, December sixth edition of the program. We
Speaker 1: have a major Supreme Court oral argument on religious freedom
Speaker 1: that also ties in with some legislation that Democrats have
Speaker 1: blocked an amendment on about their Respect for Marriage Act.
Speaker 1: Will discuss why this really matters to the country and
Speaker 1: to all of you in a moment. We'll also talk
Speaker 1: about the five hundred million dollars that have been lost
Speaker 1: to fair evasion in New York City, as in people
Speaker 1: turnstyle jumping and not paying for the subway system. What
Speaker 1: does it take for people to realize that there is
Speaker 1: a plague of lawlessness and a lack of enforcement that
Speaker 1: is a huge, huge problem all across the country and
Speaker 1: needs to change. And it's directly resulting from the Democrat
Speaker 1: ideology that law enforcement is inherently anti social justice, that
Speaker 1: actual justice is antisocial justice. And also Michael Avenati got
Speaker 1: fourteen years in federal prison in addition to the years
Speaker 1: he's already serving. Yeah, the guy that the Democrats loved
Speaker 1: and thought was going to be a presidential candidates. He
Speaker 1: was so amazing. We'll talk about it. Tun of the
Speaker 1: Towers Foundation, my friends, is building It's Due Good Village
Speaker 1: in Lando Lakes, Florida. Tunala the Towers is doing even
Speaker 1: more for their program recipients, and it's all thanks to
Speaker 1: an extraordinary donation of many acres of land and your
Speaker 1: kindness and generosity. It's the first of its kind, a
Speaker 1: community of one hundred and ten homes for the Foundations
Speaker 1: program recipients. Families of fallen first responders, gold star families,
Speaker 1: families of catastrophically injured first responders, and service members, all
Speaker 1: in one community as neighbors, their children playing together and
Speaker 1: growing up together. Loving families being there for one another
Speaker 1: through good times and bad help. America's greatest heroes and
Speaker 1: their families heal together make the Do Good Village the
Speaker 1: first of many communities like it. With every mortgage free home,
Speaker 1: the Foundation makes good on its promise to do good
Speaker 1: and never forget the sacrifices our nation's greatest heroes have
Speaker 1: made for our country and our communities. Donate eleven dollars
Speaker 1: a month to tell the Towers at t twot dot org.
Speaker 1: That's t the number two t dot org. Tell the
Speaker 1: Towers Foundation t twot dot org. They do such absolutely
Speaker 1: incredible important work. Please donate if you can. Three zero
Speaker 1: three creative versus elenis. I think that's how you say it.
Speaker 1: There's a case that was argued at the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: yesterday and it gets into the into the details a bit,
Speaker 1: but I'll give you the brief overview and why this
Speaker 1: really matters in fact, in some ways, I really just
Speaker 1: want to start with where this is all going. There
Speaker 1: is going to be a continued movement and continued pressure
Speaker 1: from the left in this country to make it so
Speaker 1: that there will be no religious objection or exemption or
Speaker 1: anything like that allowable as a function of law when
Speaker 1: it comes to same sex marriage and anything relating to
Speaker 1: same sex marriage across the country. So it's just a
Speaker 1: matter of time before the left is opening up lawsuits
Speaker 1: against Catholic churches, for example, for not doing same sex
Speaker 1: weddings or perhaps not allowing same sex couples to use
Speaker 1: whatever the church even if they're going to use their
Speaker 1: not not have a priest do it. Point is they're
Speaker 1: going to sue all of these all these religious groups.
Speaker 1: They're going to start obviously with the Christian ones and
Speaker 1: then expand from there into submission on this issue that
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what the Bible says, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: what your faith tradition says and believes about marriage as
Speaker 1: an institution. You're going to have to bend ye on
Speaker 1: not just same sex marriage, but whatever else the left
Speaker 1: decides as well. It's it's going to happen. I think
Speaker 1: with the trans Agenda, there's going to be a lot
Speaker 1: of areas where you're seeing this pressure to effectively destroy
Speaker 1: religious freedom entirely. That's what's happening now. It plays out,
Speaker 1: that goal by the left plays out in cases like
Speaker 1: the one that I just mentioned, three or three Creative
Speaker 1: versus Lenny's three or three Creative is it's a woman
Speaker 1: who runs a this is in Colorado, and it's a
Speaker 1: woman who runs a website design and creation company for weddings.
Speaker 1: So if two people are about to get married, they
Speaker 1: want to have that website that says, hey, this is
Speaker 1: where are ceremonies going to be, this is where the
Speaker 1: after party is going to be, and this is you know,
Speaker 1: dress code stuff. Like that she creates the website for you.
Speaker 1: She actually proactively three or three Creatives owner, three or
Speaker 1: three Creative LLC's owner would decided that she wanted to
Speaker 1: have a policy, an upfront policy where she was telling
Speaker 1: people if you are a if you are a same
Speaker 1: sex couple or going to be married as a same
Speaker 1: sex couple, I meaning this woman, would not like to
Speaker 1: be a part of the creation of a website for
Speaker 1: your wedding, but here are links to people who would
Speaker 1: be more than happy to do it. And she brought
Speaker 1: this suit against Colorado because she says, well, I don't
Speaker 1: think I can do that based on Colorado law. And
Speaker 1: so what happened at the oral arguments was that you had,
Speaker 1: first of all, a tremendous hostility from Justices Jackson and
Speaker 1: Soda Mayor to this idea. Effectively, now the left wing position,
Speaker 1: the Democrat position, and increasingly just the mandatory position for
Speaker 1: everybody is any buddy, who doesn't matter if you're if
Speaker 1: you're an Orthodox Jew, if you're a Catholic who actually
Speaker 1: follows the tenets of the Catholic Church, that doesn't matter
Speaker 1: who you are. If you are opposed the left believes
Speaker 1: if you are opposed to in any way same sex marriage,
Speaker 1: you are morally no different than somebody who is opposed
Speaker 1: to interracial marriage. That is, if that's what came across
Speaker 1: the oral arguments. So that then means that the Mormon Church,
Speaker 1: the Catholic Church, the different Jewish faith tradition sex within
Speaker 1: the Jewish faith, you know, Orthodox Jews, Hasidic Jews, that
Speaker 1: because they will not they will not actually conduct same
Speaker 1: sex marriage ceremonies that they are on according to the left,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party, and at least three Supreme Court justices,
Speaker 1: they are on the same moral plane without objection as
Speaker 1: people who oppose racial marriage. This is really what it
Speaker 1: came down to in this case. Now, the pushback on
Speaker 1: this from the well, you could see the conservative justices
Speaker 1: the way they were asking the questions. They're saying that
Speaker 1: the First Amendment and speech rights, specifically compelled speech doctrine
Speaker 1: comes into play. They're saying that creation of a website
Speaker 1: that involves creativity and expression to make it look a
Speaker 1: certain way and put the photos a certain way and
Speaker 1: all the rest of it, that that has protected speech
Speaker 1: and cannot be compelled speech, and that there is essentially
Speaker 1: now in the law after oh burgher Fell, there is
Speaker 1: this carve out for religious religious exemption from same sex marriage.
Speaker 1: So you know, so far we understand a Catholic church
Speaker 1: doesn't have to teach, doesn't have to perform same sex weddings,
Speaker 1: doesn't have to teach an account school that this is
Speaker 1: what should happen, that there should be same sex You
Speaker 1: can think of a lot of different ways that supplies.
Speaker 1: What I'm seeing already is that that's not gonna last.
Speaker 1: And it should have been obvious I think all along.
Speaker 1: But there's no way, given how they'll left use this
Speaker 1: issue that religious tradition is going to be an acceptable
Speaker 1: to them, an acceptable bulwark or blockage, if you will,
Speaker 1: of across the board, essentially treating same sex marriage and
Speaker 1: the need to not just uphold it, but partake in it,
Speaker 1: celebrate it everything that it will be as it would
Speaker 1: be treated the same way that we treat in society, say,
Speaker 1: racial discrimination, right, racial discrimination has been found by every
Speaker 1: major institution America. Racial discript Well, it's interesting because now
Speaker 1: there's positive racial discrimination, although I don't think there's really
Speaker 1: such a thing, but affirmative action, but treating people poorly,
Speaker 1: treating minorities poorly, on the basis of skin color. Everyone
Speaker 1: understands that's immoral, it's wrong, and it's illegal. What we're
Speaker 1: heading toward is treating same sex couples in any way differently.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter if you're a private institution, doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: you're a church. In any way, treating them differently is
Speaker 1: going to be illegal. They if they prevail now, I
Speaker 1: think in this case it'll probably go six three because
Speaker 1: there is still this speech carve out for religious faith,
Speaker 1: and that exists right now, but it's it's on a
Speaker 1: ground that I can tell is already under attack by
Speaker 1: the left, and this is the ultimate aims here they
Speaker 1: will get rid of. They will find a way to
Speaker 1: bring legal challenges and political pressure to get rid of
Speaker 1: any protection for religions and religious people to You're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to be opposed as a matter
Speaker 1: of law of same sex marriage in any capacity as
Speaker 1: a priest, as a deacon, as a rabbi, you name it,
Speaker 1: not going to be allowed. That's where we're heading. I know,
Speaker 1: people say, oh, that's not That is where we're heading
Speaker 1: actually as a society, and that's going to be very interesting.
Speaker 1: Right now, there's still, I think is some desire to
Speaker 1: defend religious freedom the first room. It's still and also
Speaker 1: not have compelled speech, but it's eroding, and it's eroding
Speaker 1: very rapidly if you look at say the last ten years.
Speaker 1: So that's what is underway right now, and I just
Speaker 1: think everyone should be aware of it. However you come
Speaker 1: down on the issue, whether somebody is very much in
Speaker 1: favor of same sex marriage or not, just understand that
Speaker 1: religious obedience to these state dictates is going to be
Speaker 1: This is the future. This is what is going to happen,
Speaker 1: I think unless there's a real movement to push back
Speaker 1: on all of this. So that's how I see this
Speaker 1: all playing out, and that's why that case was some
Speaker 1: And also you see this with the Democrats in the House.
Speaker 1: They're like, no, there's no additional protection for religious or
Speaker 1: conscious protections when it comes to the Respect for Marriage Act,
Speaker 1: which is going to codify same sex marriage as a
Speaker 1: matter of legislation. So it's not just gonna be the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court decision. They're gonna contify as a matter of
Speaker 1: federal law, same sex marriage. But what about religious institutions
Speaker 1: that aren't on board with this? Democrats are saying, no,
Speaker 1: no special protection for them. Why is it. Why do
Speaker 1: you think that the Democrats in the House have already
Speaker 1: said no, no no, we're not going to do that amendment
Speaker 1: because we all know what they want. We all know
Speaker 1: where this is going. Let's talk about done for your
Speaker 1: real estate, my friends. Done for your real Estate is phenomenal.
Speaker 1: They turned me into a real estate investor. I'd never
Speaker 1: bought real estate before, and they took me through every
Speaker 1: step of the process. What area I should think about
Speaker 1: investing in. They take front so many of the numbers,
Speaker 1: They have all these spreadsheets. They got guys, they just
Speaker 1: eat guys, end gals who eat, sleep, and breathe real
Speaker 1: estate in these areas, and they help you pick a
Speaker 1: house to invest in, get some free cash, low going,
Speaker 1: and you build up equity in that house over time.
Speaker 1: Of course, the mortgage gets paid down. It's a really
Speaker 1: good way to become a real estate investor. It's safe, stable, sound,
Speaker 1: taking the long term approach. And that's what you do
Speaker 1: with my friends from Done for your real Estate. It's
Speaker 1: so straightforward and once you get going with them telling
Speaker 1: you you're gonna love it. Gota done for you. Buck
Speaker 1: dot com again, that's done for you, Buck dot Com,
Speaker 1: done for you buck dot com. You can begin your
Speaker 1: real estate investment journey today done for you buck dot com.
Speaker 1: So we have I said we're gonna talk. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to make sure I remember exactly what I said. We're
Speaker 1: going to talk about the religious freedom issue. Oh that's right,
Speaker 1: five hundred million dollars from the subway system in New York.
Speaker 1: Disorder and decay are cumulative in cities. You know this,
Speaker 1: You see it all around you. And this is why
Speaker 1: when there's trash on the streets, when there's vagrants doing
Speaker 1: drugs in broad daylight, often with the total complicity of
Speaker 1: the of the city, of the system, these democrat run
Speaker 1: cities have turned into open air drug markets in a
Speaker 1: lot of ways, Portland's, Los Angeles, Seattle, a lot of them.
Speaker 1: But beyond that, you just recognize when you live in
Speaker 1: these places, say when you're in New York City and
Speaker 1: you go around, you see that there's a sense that
Speaker 1: the criminals can do what they want and there's not
Speaker 1: really consequences for it. Now, I understand that fair evasion
Speaker 1: alone is not a major crime, right, It's it is theft,
Speaker 1: though it's not it's not a you know, it's not
Speaker 1: a speeding ticket, it's theft. It's something where you're deciding
Speaker 1: to take something that is not yours, and in this case,
Speaker 1: theft of services and five hundred million dollars a lot
Speaker 1: of money even by New York City budgetary standards. So
Speaker 1: now they're thinking about coming up with a way to
Speaker 1: make it harder for people to just the turnstyles. But
Speaker 1: I just think that that's not looking at the real issue.
Speaker 1: The real issue is we need to have a society
Speaker 1: where people obey the law. We're becoming a society that
Speaker 1: is increasingly accepting of lawlessness, and that it is really
Speaker 1: scary about where it leads us in the future. I mean,
Speaker 1: that gets ugly fast. That the deterioration of America that
Speaker 1: occurs if you have people who just believe that the
Speaker 1: law is only the law, if they're going to get
Speaker 1: caught and punished in a big way, and that's probably
Speaker 1: not going to happen. Things get really bad if that
Speaker 1: continues on. And I do think this is an outgrowth
Speaker 1: of the same insanity we saw back in like the
Speaker 1: nineteen seventies, where all crime was considered a collective responsibility.
Speaker 1: So the individual who commits the heinous act is it's
Speaker 1: not really that person's fault. They had a bad upbringing.
Speaker 1: Society didn't do enough. The public school system failed them,
Speaker 1: you know, not enough, not enough midnight basketball programs and
Speaker 1: after school arts and crafts or whatever these are. This
Speaker 1: is what we were told that you if you look
Speaker 1: at a criminal, it's not that a person has made
Speaker 1: a decision that should be punished, and that probably means
Speaker 1: that they should be taken out of society so that
Speaker 1: they can't continue to pray upon society in one way
Speaker 1: or another. They get away from that and they say,
Speaker 1: you know what would be so much better if we
Speaker 1: just make it a group responsibility. But if everybody is responsible,
Speaker 1: who if everybody is responsible for what happens, nobody's really responsible, right,
Speaker 1: That's what ends up happening. If everybody if I'm as
Speaker 1: guilty as you are for what some other person does
Speaker 1: in a crime, then there's no accountability whatsoever. And I
Speaker 1: think that is what democrats, I should say, leftists, commies,
Speaker 1: this is ultimately what they want in our society because
Speaker 1: it pulls it all apart. And this really goes to
Speaker 1: the left believes. They believe that if we can tear
Speaker 1: it down society, we can build something new in its place.
Speaker 1: Just kick at the load bearing walls of our civilization
Speaker 1: here in America and bring it all down, and then
Speaker 1: we can build something else that's so much better, something
Speaker 1: that's so fair, something that has no racism, no inequity,
Speaker 1: no misogyny, no anti trans bias. You know, this is
Speaker 1: and where everyone is financially equal, everyone's has equal happiness,
Speaker 1: not just equal outcomes in a general sense, feel equally
Speaker 1: satisfied with life. I mean, this is what This is
Speaker 1: the utopianism that the radicals in our society believe in.
Speaker 1: And this is why the results, what we're seeing day
Speaker 1: to day doesn't matter to them, because if it means
Speaker 1: that we have to tear it all down, it's fine.
Speaker 1: This is why Larry Krausner, for example, how can that
Speaker 1: guy feel good about the job he's doing in Philadelphia.
Speaker 1: He's the district attorney there. Philadelphia has its highest murder
Speaker 1: rate ever last year, and this year it's going to
Speaker 1: be right alongside the highest ever, maybe it'll be the
Speaker 1: runner up year. He's got to feel badly. He's doing
Speaker 1: a horrible job. People are dying because their families are
Speaker 1: being shattered because of it. No, Larry Krausner thinks, no,
Speaker 1: this is what justice demands. More people have to get shot, Yes,
Speaker 1: but that's what justice demands. There's something deeply wrong with
Speaker 1: these individuals, and there's something really off about them, and
Speaker 1: it all comes from their belief and how they view
Speaker 1: the world. Speaking of crime, remember Michael Avanati, Remember Michael Lavanati,
Speaker 1: he was here. Can we can we play the montage
Speaker 1: when this guy was on you know, CNN every five minutes.
Speaker 1: He was on CNN back in the day, like twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. He was on CNN more than Fauci even was.
Speaker 1: Play this. He's Donald Trump's worst nightmare. Michael insistential threat
Speaker 1: to the Trump presidency. Please welcome Attorney Michael Avanatti. You
Speaker 1: got lucky tonight We're back with Attorney Michael Avanati. He's
Speaker 1: at rock Star. I think Michael Avanati for president in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. Looking ahead to twenty twenty, you're currently leading
Speaker 1: the pack among twenty twenty contenders on the Democratic side.
Speaker 1: What do democrats value most? If they decide they value
Speaker 1: a fighter, most people would be foolish to underestimate Michael Labnadi.
Speaker 1: To me, you're like the Holy Spirit Michael Lavnati is
Speaker 1: a beast. He's a beast, and he keeps popping Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and all of his folks in the mouth repeatedly.
Speaker 1: He's a beast. He's also a federal felon who is
Speaker 1: now going to be serving fourteen additional years in federal
Speaker 1: prison for stealing from his clients, which as a lawyer,
Speaker 1: I mean, what a sacrilege that is. You know, and
Speaker 1: people make a lot of lawyer jokes, but usually you know,
Speaker 1: stealing millions from the people you're representing, the people that
Speaker 1: are so you're supposed to be willing to just go
Speaker 1: to the mat to help them, to protect their right,
Speaker 1: to keep them out of prison if need be, do
Speaker 1: everything you can to help the mainke it. But total
Speaker 1: trust and you special legal protections, attorney client privilege and
Speaker 1: you steal from them. What a scumbag. I bring it up, though,
Speaker 1: just because as you can see, they celebrated this guy
Speaker 1: anything to get Trump. Trump's arrangement syndrome was such a
Speaker 1: psychological disorder for so many of the Libs that this
Speaker 1: manifestly grotesque slimeball Avanati. He was on cable news more
Speaker 1: than any other person. I'm not even making this up
Speaker 1: any other person I think for a three month period
Speaker 1: as a guest all the time. And it was over
Speaker 1: a campaign finance thing with Stormy Daniels. Stormy Daniel says
Speaker 1: she had an affair with Donald Trump. Nobody cared. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump said he didn't, but nobody cared really anyway. But
Speaker 1: they paid her off I think one hundred and seventy
Speaker 1: five thousand dollars, and Avanatti was going to use that
Speaker 1: because he said it wasn't listed as a campaign finance thing.
Speaker 1: And the whole thing was just so stupid. But people
Speaker 1: were delusional. They were trained to hate Trump so much
Speaker 1: that no matter how dumb they looked in the process,
Speaker 1: if it meant that, they thought that Trump was going
Speaker 1: to finally get his come up, and so they were
Speaker 1: all about it. They believed in it anyway. So this
Speaker 1: is Democrats get behind. Just remember this. They will put
Speaker 1: people on TV who are that level of scummy. I
Speaker 1: mean the kind of scummy where you're a lawyer who's
Speaker 1: now disbarred and facing almost twenty years in federal prison
Speaker 1: for ripping people off and being an awful person. CNN
Speaker 1: love this guy, Love this guy, because they have no
Speaker 1: honor and no integrity, and that's the way the Left operates.
Speaker 1: Just saying thanks for rolling team. Thanks for also subscribing
Speaker 1: to the Rumble channel. If you're listening on the podcast,
Speaker 1: you're gonna check out the Rumble. Putting up a video
Speaker 1: backdrop tonight. I know it keeps saying we're building this place,
Speaker 1: but there's been some supply chain issues and everything else.
Speaker 1: Putting up a video backdrop tonight, it's gonna be amazing
Speaker 1: when it finally gets up. It's going to look more
Speaker 1: professional in here. So the video part of this is
Speaker 1: going to be more fun. Rumltcom slash Buck Sexton, and
Speaker 1: once we got the video portion up, we're also going
Speaker 1: to start doing our guests, which I know I've been promising.
Speaker 1: The guests will be coming, they'll be joining on audio
Speaker 1: and video, and we're gonna keep building out the Bucks
Speaker 1: actually show from there. So thanks for hanging team Shield
Speaker 1: tie