WEBVTT - Boeing to Vote on New Wage Deal

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Affo Cardplaying and Broun Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>One of the names Abigail was talk to us about

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>was Boeing, And we want to figure out are these

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>folks going to be getting back to work because they

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>need planes to come off, you know the line, they

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>need the cash flow, they need to get.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Folks back to work.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson covers all of the aerospace, all the defense,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and all the airlines for Bloomberg Intelligence. So, George, it

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>seems like the union's representatives have agreed to a deal

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>with Boeing. What do you think the actual workers are

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>going to do when they vote?

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>So, I think we're getting closer.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think what thirty five percent is the increase

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 5>over four years. Still, I think subs some of the

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 5>other union agreements we've seen in the marketplace.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 4>You know what, like the port workers.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 5>But I would note that Textron had a similar strike

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 5>by its machinists out in Wichita, Kansas. I'm not sure

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 5>if you get through they're very often Paul were aware

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 5>of that, but they just came back to they agreed

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 5>to come back to work. It was kind of a

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 5>sub thirty percent increase over four years. So my guess is,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 5>you know that the shore workers probably or the port

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 5>workers probably set the high end of the of the

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 5>mark these Wichita machinists for Textra and probably set the

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 5>lower end. Boeing probably lived somewhere in the middle of

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 5>the thirty five.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Sounds about right.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Workers have been out on strike for about a month now, right,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 5>So my guess is that finances are probably starting to look.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Challenge at some of those those household I.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Think Kelly Orperg, you know, pulled out the Hey, we're

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 5>gonna raise twenty five billion dollars in cash and we're

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 5>ready to go the distance. So I think those combinations

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 5>and then throwing some of the four to one K

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 5>money at them, right, there was some plus ups on

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 5>how much they would match the four O one K.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I think some initial.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, incentives on the four to one K. I

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 5>think they're pretty close, although I note that the union

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 5>leadership wouldn't endorse it.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 4>From everything I've read, they they're just.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 5>Passing along this offer from Boeing to the workers, you know,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 5>for for a vote.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 4>My guess is this is pretty close.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 5>I think they might make it here, but I guess

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 5>we'll get we'll get a chance to see by Wednesday,

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 5>you know how cranky the union is and how much

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 5>more they want.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 4>But it seems like it's pretty close.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 6>George, how important is an end to this strike for

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 6>Boeing and just broader sentiment there. I mean, shares are

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 6>down about thirty nine percent you're today, Yeah, it's.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 4>Huge, right.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 5>I think if it doesn't get agreed to, I think

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Boeing almost needs to raise money anyways. I guess it

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 5>might help them decide what amount of cash you.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Need to raise.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, I'm hearing stories that the supply chain still

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 5>building at the rates prior to the strike. You know,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 5>components are stacking up on their you know, on their

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 5>loading docks. I think the longer it goes, the harder

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 5>it is to restart the line. The longer it takes

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 5>to restart the line, and the longer it takes to

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 5>generate cash. And I think Kelly Orpberg would prefer not

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 5>to go to the equity markets for a lot of

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 5>money and prefer not to have to draw down any

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 5>additional debt, not that they've said they would do that

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 5>at this point.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 4>So it's very important for the turnaround.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 5>And again, timing is crucial to keeping the supply chain

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 5>I think healthy and ready to go.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>George talked to us about I know in the past

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you've you know, educated us about the cash and how

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the cash comes.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>In and cash leaves a company like Boeing.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's it's tied pretty tightly to those seven three

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>seven jets leaving the floor.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 3>How quickly can they restart it?

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 2>And where do you think the build modes for that

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>seven thirty seven jet will.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Be and what do they need to be.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so, I mean they need to get that jet

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 5>up into the into the mid forties and fifties.

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to take them, you know.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>I think even if the strike ended today, I think

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 5>they're not going to hit sort of you know, the

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 5>forty ish Their target was thirty eight by the year end.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they're going to hit maybe a forty

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 5>ish level until midyear next year.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>They ought to be.

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Driving up towards towards fifty maybe hopefully by the end

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 5>of next year if this strike ended relatively soon. You know,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 5>by comparison air buses competitor airplane the eight three twenty

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 5>that's being built right now in the mid forties, you know,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 5>they're driving higher into the into the the they hope

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 5>to be driving higher to the mid sixties think over

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 5>the next year. So it hasn't gone as well for

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 5>them as they like, but their competitor product is doing

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 5>much better. This that is the cash cow for the company.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Defense is really you know, back on its heels right

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 5>now because of some of these big fixed price contracts

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 5>they signed that are that are out of water, which

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 5>makes it that much more important to get the seven

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 5>thirty seven rolling off lines. And just I think an

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 5>interesting point of comparison if you look at Poeing's inventory

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 5>level last time we saw it too q eighty five

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars of inventory on their balance sheet. Their competitor

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 5>airbus was in the mid forty level billion dollars, So

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 5>you could tell that's just an example of how bloated

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 5>that inventory level is and how much they can unlock

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 5>as they start to deliver airplanes. But again seven thirty

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 5>seven is the is the key to that, and they

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 5>want to keep market share in that airplane too.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Speaking of market Chare, I did want to get your

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 6>take on how investors are thinking about Boeing. I mean,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 6>of course it's had a really troubled year when we

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 6>think about twenty twenty four, but as you mentioned, they

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 6>have Airbus as a competitor, but not too many competitors

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 6>out there. So how do investors think about this when

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 6>they're thinking about Boeing and its longevity?

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 5>I think some of you know, what you've seen today

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 5>in the stock price gives you a sense investors know

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 5>it's a you know, it's a duopoly. And look, you know,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 5>we've been doing some work recently on the backlogs. And

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 5>if you looked at Airbus's backlog for the competing airplane

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 5>in the A three twenty I was just talking about

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 5>competing to the seven thirty seven.

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, we think it's probably ten years of backlog

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 4>in that airplane right now.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Right so even if you stepped into Airbus's sales office,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure it doesn't go, you know, all the way

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 5>full out for ten years, because there's some airlines that'll

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 5>come in and deliver or sorry, order out for a decade,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 5>but you're probably into the twenty thirties before you get

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 5>that airplane.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 4>So if you when you're.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Thinking about Boeing and you're thinking about the market share

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 5>risks around this, striking the problems they've had, at least

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 5>right now, if you want an airplane Boeing, you know

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>it's probably your best place to buy a narrowbody, single

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 5>aisle airplane, the seven thirty seven. So it's not like

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 5>anybody's walking away with this business while Boeing is having

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 5>their problems. I think investors know that the Chinese are coming,

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, they Comac the C nine one nine that's

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 5>a narrowbody, single aisle airplane like the A three twenty

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 5>seven thirty seven that's just rolling out into fleets in China.

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Now last week looked, I think there was eight or

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 5>ten of them. They don't get the service out of

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 5>them per day that Boeing and Airbus do. They get

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 5>about half, so they're still sort of you know, they're

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 5>still up coming up the learning curve, learning how to

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 5>support that airplane in the marketplace. So that's no replacement yet,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 5>but that will move insize inside China in their fleets

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 5>that's been a very important market for Boeing an airbus,

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 5>and then it'll start to expand into that developing world

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 5>around China. Bowling at Airbus I think would really like

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 5>to get you know, they'd like to build at the

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 5>at the highest rates possible, build their cash flows and

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 5>come out with successor products in the twenty thirties and

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 5>forties that stay ahead of the Chinese and keep them

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 5>from taking significant market share. But again going back to

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 5>your initial question, it's still a two airplane builder world.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 5>We don't see him Braier really getting into this business.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 5>So right now the narrow body the larger air commercial

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 5>aircraft game. So it's really still a two manufacturer business

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 5>and investors know that, and I think that's what, you know,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 5>what's leading to some of the action today.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I can see the fleet aging right before my eyes.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I flew back from Charleston last week, Alex Steele and

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I did, and the seven thirty seven still had like

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the old card reader to get a TV show. I mean,

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that's like twenty year old tech technology.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>So I told I blame George for all that. He's

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 3>got to get these people back to work.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson, Thanks for joining us there. George Ferguson's senior Aerospace,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Defense and Airlines analyzes our go to person and all

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 2>things as it relates to aerospace and airlines. He's a

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence then in Princeton. But it just seems like,

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, you think about I can just see all

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the stuff coming into the Boeing factory

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to make the plane and just sitting there and piling up,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>piling and appiling up because the line, the construction line,

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>that the manufacturing line is not not running.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 6>So and I wonder how many people are still looking

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 6>at what plane they're taking for flights. As you remember

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 6>months back, things were falling apart and people were apprehensive,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 6>they were nervous about getting on Boeing planes. So I'm

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 6>curious how many people are still shopping around when it

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 6>comes to flights there.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 3>I never did that, and I always felt like you did.

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Guilty as charged, okay, because.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I always I feel like the seven thirty seven Max

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>is now the safest plane right because it's gone through

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Testing in review, But I don't know, I mean, it's

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 3>continue to do.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, any of the USA or the Western airlines generally speaking,

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>you know the safety.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 7>Is what it is.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I think we feel pretty good about that.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Right. You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's turn back to the US markets here again.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and p I'm kind of down about five points now,

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>off about one hundred and forty five and nasdak up

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. We check him with Phil Orlando, Federator at Hermes.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>He is our go to guys we think about some

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of these markets. He's a chief US equity market strategist

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and head of the client portfolio group there. Hey, Phil,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you saw this, but Goldman sachs

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>out with the note saying, you know, if you think

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>about the SMP over the next ten years, think about

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>low single digit returns as opposed to what we've seen

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>over the past ten years, which have been much better.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>When you see some a note like that, how do

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>you kind of digest that well?

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, Goldman's probably right, We've had such a phenomenal

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 7>recovery in equities coming out of the depths of the pandemic,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, four years ago, four and a half years ago,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 7>and just over the last year or so, that how

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 7>much of this has borrowed from the returns that you

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 7>might expect over the next decade. So Goldman, you know,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 7>adjusting their capital market assumptions and saying, you know, mid

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 7>single digits over the next ten years probably feels right,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 7>particularly in light of the fact that we're you know,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 7>sitting here with thirty six trillion dollars in federal debt

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 7>and a total debt to GDP ratio of one hundred

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 7>and twenty five percent. Those numbers aren't sustainable, and you've

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 7>got to believe that at some point Washington's going to

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 7>find religion on trying to step away from the sugar

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 7>high that we've seen over the last couple of years,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 7>with all of this massive amount of spending that'll have,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, potentially a deleterious impact on economic growth and

0:11:55.440 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 7>ultimately equity prices. So directionally, I don't disagree with what

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 7>Goldman said. The case for active management, though, is that

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 7>what you want to do, is you want to find

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 7>good firms, good managers, good products that can do better

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 7>than you know, the average. You know, those top quartile

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 7>performers that will you know, will will help you generate

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 7>the returns that you need for your you know, college

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 7>funds or retirement funds or whatever else.

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 6>Well, Phil, let's talk rates. Of course, we just got

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 6>that jumbo rate cut just what felt like yesterday, and

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 6>then here we're turning and we're going to be having

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 6>another meeting in a matter of weeks. What do you

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 6>expect to come out of that meeting? Of course, I know,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 6>as you flag just a month later after that last cut,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing an economy that could be seen as reaccelerating

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 6>and a labor market that has strengthened. What does this

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 6>mean for markets? Do we see a rally continuing after

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 6>this next meeting? And what do you expect from the

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 6>next meeting to come?

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 7>So to take half a step back, we were surprised

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 7>by the pace of the fifty basis point raycut that

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 7>the said gave us in September eighteenth. We think that

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 7>the FED needs to sort of get back to you know,

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 7>that quarter point level November seventh, December eighteenth, and then

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 7>looking out over the next year and a half a

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 7>quarter point cut per quarter, and that would take us

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 7>down to a terminal value of the funds rate, let's

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 7>say by the middle of calendar twenty sixth, at about

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 7>three percent. We think that's a reasonable pace. And then

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 7>to your point, given the seeming reacceleration that we've seen

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 7>in the US economy over the last month or so

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 7>and sort of the sticky nature of inflation, in the

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 7>fact that the labor market in September was actually surprisingly strong.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Raphael Bostik, for one, the president of Atlanta FED, made

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 7>a comment, I guess was last week where he said,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 7>you know what, maybe we should just skip November and

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, come back in December and see where we're at.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 7>So our view is that that the fifty we saw

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 7>in September was probably a little too aggressive, and given

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 7>sort of the tone of the economic data we've seen

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 7>over the last month or so, you know, ratcheting back

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 7>to a more conservative quarter point pace is probably more realistic.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Phil We're just starting to get into the real teeth

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of the earnings season here. What have we seen so

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>far from the big banks that have reported in and

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 2>what do you think the market needs to see earnings

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>wise from the corporate America.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, the earnings haven't been bad. We're probably up four

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 7>percent or so year every year, which is fine. We're

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 7>probably gonna end up beating expectations as we usually do.

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 7>But importantly, the earning season is going to be slower

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 7>than the eleven or twelve percent year on year earnings

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 7>we saw in the second quarter. And I think that's

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 7>consistent with our soft landing thesis. We're not going negative,

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 7>We're just gonna slow down, you know, sort of a

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 7>trend to pace that that's you know, above zero, but

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 7>nowhere near as hot as the double digit pace that

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 7>we you know, we we saw in previous quarters.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 6>So expectations for this earning season are low. Does that

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 6>support a further rally when we're looking at equities more

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 6>broadly coming out of this earning season, Well, you.

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 7>Know, we've seen a backup in treasury yields. From three

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 7>fifty three sixty, we're up to you know, north of

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 7>four to ten. Now, remember, price earnings ratios are inversely

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 7>proportionate with the direction of inflation and interest rates. So

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 7>the backup and yields suggested multiple should price earnings ratio

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 7>should be contracting. Yet the stock market hit another, you know,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 7>all time record high last week. You've got stocks trading,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 7>the S and P trading at a forward multiple north

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 7>of twenty one times on next year's earnings. We're estimating

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 7>two hundred and seventy five dollars for S and P

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 7>next year. Yet the appropriate pe on stocks, given what

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 7>treasury yields are, is probably south of eighteen times earning.

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 7>So you've got a valuation gap right now, you know,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 7>of about twenty percent in round numbers. In my mind,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 7>the market's extraordinarily enthusiastic here. It's looking through and discounting

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 7>very favorable federal reserve behavior, very favorable election results, very

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 7>favorable trajectory of economic roles and inflation. There's a lot

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 7>of enthusiasm built in here that you know, maybe we

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 7>ought to see a little bit of a pullback.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Phil, thanks so much for that. I always

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>appreciate getting your thoughts on these markets.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 3>It's Phil Orlando.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>He's a chief equity market strategist and head of the

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>client portfolio MANAFIT team at Federated Hermes.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Zooming it in there from New York.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten Ami Staring on applecar Playing and broud

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Normal Linda sitting in for Alex Steel. I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 3>We're live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 2>We are streaming live on YouTube as well, so heitover

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to YouTube dot com search Bloomberg Podcast and that's where

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you will find us. Tensions in the Middle East, the

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 2>military conflict in the Middle East still front and center

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>for markets. We like to get some smart internal voices

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 2>as well as external voices. And that brings us to

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>our next guest, Ned Lazarius, Associate Professor of International Affairs

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>at George Washington University, joining us via zoom from Washington, DC. Professor,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us here. I'm just not

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 2>sure what next steps are there in the Middle East.

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.959
<v Speaker 2>I guess one of them is what or how Israel

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 2>will respond to the missile attack on Israel, as well

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>as I guess a potential attack on Netahu's home.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Where are we in that discussion?

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, you're quite right, this is a multi front war

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 8>now with active multiple active fronts, with Israeli troops fighting

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 8>in Gaza for over a year now, fighting on the

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 8>ground in southern Lebanon, as well as continuing airstrikes north

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 8>to the Dahia neighborhood of Beirutz, which is the Hesbalah stronghold.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 8>We are still seeing missiles fired from Iraq from Yemen

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 8>from around the region, and we are waiting to see

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 8>what will be the Israeli response to the massive, second

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 8>massive Israel sorry Iranian missile barrage on Israel. We also,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 8>as you know, there was a recent leak of potential

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 8>Israeli target plans that was leaked from the United States.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 8>I believe there's now a secret meeting going on or

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 8>top secret meeting going on in Congress to discuss what

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 8>happened and try to identify the source that seems to

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 8>have leaked to the telegram social media Israeli planned that

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 8>were shared with the United States, and it's possible that

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 8>that source has more documents that may come to light

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 8>as well, so that may throw a wrench in Israeli plans.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 8>If the plans that were leaked are accurate, It's all

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 8>unclear as has been the case throughout this war. The

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 8>only things that seem to be well known or that

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 8>Israel intends to strike back at Iran, that there has

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 8>been a tremendous amount of coordination and discussion with the

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 8>United States, given the sensitivity of our electoral calendar, with

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 8>our election coming up in just over two weeks.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, as you mentioned, we do have a presidential election

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 6>in just a matter of weeks. In the US is

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 6>hopeful for a cease fire before then, and it's been

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 6>reported that the Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln is said

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 6>to visit Israel among other countries in the area starting today,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 6>and this one his eleventh visit in the region since

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 6>last October. Can you speak a bit more about how

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 6>the US is playing a role.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 8>Blincoln is headed there almost Hochstein, the President's Special envoy,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 8>who has been back and forth between Lebanon, Israel, and

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 8>Washington for months is there again this week. They're making

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 8>every effort to i think, at least keep it from

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 8>spiraling further out of control and to try and manage

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 8>Israel's responses in line with US interests. But they certainly

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 8>cannot control events, as we've seen events there, you know,

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 8>are beyond anyone's control, and even include surprises such as

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 8>the killing of Hamas leader Yehia Sinoar less than a

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 8>week ago, who was killed by Israeli regular infantry troops

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 8>who did not know that it was him. And this

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 8>is a massively important event which may eventually help turn

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 8>the course of the war. I do not expect a

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 8>ceasefire before the US election. There is just simply too

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 8>much going on. It's too escalated of a conflict at

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 8>the moment. As you said, we were waiting for Israel's

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 8>response to the Iranian attack. It is possible, not unthinkable,

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 8>that Israel would delay until after the US election, but

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 8>I would say that that seems less likely, and once

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 8>Israel responds, then there will be an Iranian response. So

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 8>a ceasefire, a total ceasefire on all the fronts, is

0:21:55.720 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 8>not in evidence, and I think the probably the Biden

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 8>administration is aware of that and is making every effort

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 8>to keep this from against spiling out of control or

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 8>escalating in a way that is contrary to US interests.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 8>The US has set up a special air defense battery,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 8>the Thaad Missile Battery, which Secretary of Defense Austin has

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 8>announced is now on the ground in Israel. He didn't

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 8>say whether it's operational, but obviously that's the plan, and

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 8>I assume that it will be shortly and that's to

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 8>help defend against further Iranian missile attacks.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 2>What are the end games for Israel now? Just in

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a year, it's gone from the initial strategy of neutralized

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>hamas and get the hostages back to I.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Don't know what it is now.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Have they articulated what their endgame is here on this

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>much broader front.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think there are two levels to this. So

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 8>one is the Israeli defense establishment, the state, the broader strategy,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 8>and one is the prime minister, Prime Minister Nataniao, who

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 8>has his own political interests which may well be guiding

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 8>some of his decisions and often put him at odds

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 8>with his own defense establishment. I think that the in

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 8>terms of the broader Israeli interest, I think that right

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 8>now Israel has been on the offensive. After many months

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 8>when it seemed that victory was you know, a ridiculous

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 8>idea and that you know, things were not going well

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 8>from an Israeli military point of view, Israel has been

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 8>on the offensive. It's dealt severe blows to Hasbalah and

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 8>to Hamas, and it has, you know, with help from

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 8>the United States and regional allies, absorbed two massive Iranian attacks.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 8>Israel has killed you know, the leaders of Hamas Hasbola.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 8>So this has actually been, from an Israeli military point

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 8>of view, the most productive period of the war. And

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 8>I think that a goal is really to damage Hezbollah

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 8>and Hamas as much as possible before the US election.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 8>I do think that they're sensitive to our role calendar

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 8>and looking at that and thinking that after that election

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 8>they may need to recalibrate, so they're trying to get

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 8>all the blows in they can before that.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, all right, Ned, thank you so much for joining us.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Ned Lazarus, Associate Professor of International Affairs at George Washington University,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>giving us the latest out of the Middle East, a broadening.

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Conflict that we've witnessed over the past twelve months ago.

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Normal Linda sitting in for Alex steel On Paul Sweeneyer

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. We are

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 2>streaming live on YouTube as well, so hitover YouTube dot

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Com search Bloomberg Live Radio.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Our next guest.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>It's been trialing all over the place Dubai Berlin, so

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna get some fresh color about what's going on

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>in Global Wall Street. And Barry joins us. She is

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the founder and managing partner of Thread Needle. Joining us

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Dubai A

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 2>bunch of technology people.

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 3>What were you doing in Dubai?

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, it was the world's biggest tech and investor startup conference,

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 9>unbelievable scale, six hundred six hundred six and a half

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 9>thousand companies, two hundred thousand tech executives and really leading

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the conversations around AI is at hype?

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 9>Where are we in terms of cybersecurity and applications of AI? So, Paul,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 9>it was just a really interesting way of seeing where

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 9>the energy around tech is going, and more specifically in

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 9>the rest of the world, not just us entrepreneurs, but

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 9>really getting a sense, what's the Middle East doing, what's

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 9>Asia doing, and how is policy and government action meeting the.

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 6>Private Sticking with tech, you're focus on the private side.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 6>I know you mentioned and recently invested in the software

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 6>business that's focused on streamline contractor assessments. When they come

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 6>to your house, I'll put in new HVAC systems. What

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 6>are you seeing there? Can you talk a bit more

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 6>about that?

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 7>Sure?

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, Laura, I look at the tech sector a lot

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 9>and talk about stocks out here at Bloomberg, and I've

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 9>recently been getting wired with the rallies that if I

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 9>thought that it was getting a little thin in terms

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 9>of the air out there valuation wise, it's even more so,

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 9>even more the case over the last couple of weeks,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 9>and so I've been looking a lot more at these

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 9>sort of niche software as service businesses where people like

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 9>the service Nows of the world, which is terrific company

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 9>but extremely expensive. If you look at the multiples in

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 9>that business right now, where that could be the choir

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 9>of choice as it looks to roll up some of

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 9>these niche businesses. So that's the kind of place I'm

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 9>looking at HVAC. I'm a believer that there's a big

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 9>CAPEX replacement cycle coming as you know, global warming continues,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 9>and those kinds of businesses I think will win over

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 9>the long term.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>So and at this tech conference in Dubai, talk to

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 2>us about kind of the discussion around regulation, because you know,

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 2>just historically the last fifty years, you is how to

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 2>relatively light touch on regulating the tech industry, and one

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 2>can say that was maybe the reason why tech while

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley is Silicon Valley, can't say that about Europe

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 2>broadly defined. How do they think about the next wave

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 2>of technology to the Europeans today or maybe other parts

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>of the world Asia, Do they think differently about regulatory control?

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 9>I think quite differently. I think there's a core part

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 9>of commonality though, and I think the core part of

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 9>commonality is looking at how technology is going to impact

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 9>national security. I think if you look at that specific point,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 9>the US, Europe, the Middle East, Asia are all aligned,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 9>which is trying to make sure that tech flourishes but

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 9>doesn't pose as much of the risk that we fear

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 9>when it comes to national security. That being said, you're

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 9>right that EU has been leaning in in terms of

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 9>AI regulation. What I saw in the United Arab Emirates

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 9>and what I've seen in Singapore two actually is quite different,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 9>and it's less about regulation and it's more about government

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 9>partnership with the private sector. In both of those nations,

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 9>there's a really concerted effort by government aidencies to spend

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 9>their money with startups and to take the risk on

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 9>businesses that otherwise don't yet necessarily have the credibility of

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 9>the track record to win those government contracts of their

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 9>own volition, and they're leaning in to try and take them.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 9>They will take some of the tech risk, but will

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 9>enable them to flourish as a result that I haven't

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 9>seen quite so much in the US.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 6>How are you thinking about energy and secular consumer growth?

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 6>But what's the play there? I mean, let's talk sotout

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 6>East Asia, well.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 9>Southeast Asia. I find really fascinating and this really goes back,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 9>Nora to some time I spent in Singapore, in Taiwan

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 9>and in Korea towards the end of last year, and

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 9>there's been the secular shift in those nations where the

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 9>middle class is rising and rising. You know, we've talked

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 9>so much about the rise of the Chinese middle class

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 9>consumer over the last twenty years. If you now look

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 9>at these other Asian markets. You're seeing that happening with

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 9>a plumb as well. And one of the key things

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 9>that's so fascinating there is this particular demographic is really

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 9>hungry for homegrown brands, and they're really hungry for homegrown

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 9>travel and homegrown experiences. And so that I think is

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 9>a little bit different where you saw the Chinese consumer

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 9>hungry for Western brands, right, So, I think that shift

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 9>for local and that shift for regional is a little

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 9>bit different and provides opportunity.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I know, you invest both in public securities and private securities.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>One could argue that public valuations are maybe too expensive

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 2>for some people, so they're trying to look for opportunities

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>in private. How do you think about valuations in public

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>versus private, particularly in the tech sector.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 9>I do think that the public market at this point

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 9>is throftly. I think it's been that way for a while.

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 9>I think there are some really specific companies that have

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 9>got great secular tailwinds. I think those interesting places for tech.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 9>But this rising tide has lifted all tech shifts. Has

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 9>been quite worrying to me for a while. When I

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 9>look at the private sector, whether it's in tech or

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 9>it's sort of tech adjacent industries trying to adopt tech

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 9>more quickly than before. I've been a long time private investor,

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 9>and we haven't seen the pace, specifically of private equity

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 9>activity I think, come back quite as much as we

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 9>thought it would in twenty twenty four. That I think

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 9>in twenty twenty five will change, and I think we're

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 9>going to see more of a shift towards private market activity.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 9>I personally see more value there now than I do

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 9>in the public markets, and so I think that's an

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 9>interesting place to play in the next eighteen to twenty

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 9>four months.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 6>What sectors are you favoring right now.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 9>I've always been a fannuner of business services, and I've

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 9>always liked companies that have had really good opportunity to

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 9>play the outsourcing wave now. In Pau's question on tech,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 9>the kinds of software businesses I like are outsourced solutions,

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 9>whether it's things like Salesforce or palow outer networks right

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 9>these are domain experts using tech to enable companies to

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 9>outsource their non core competencies. I like that too in

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 9>traditional businesses. I like that in terms of things like

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 9>uniform outsourcing businesses like Centils, which have tended to do

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 9>well really sort of no matter the macro environment. Those

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 9>are the kinds of places I've enjoyed looking at now.

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 3>So I also know you were in your notes that

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 3>you were in Berlin for the World Department Store Summit. Yeah. Hey,

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know there was such a but I'm glad

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that there is.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so I guess we're talking retail of the consumer,

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>all that type of stuff.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 3>What are some of your takeaways from that event?

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 9>You know it was the energy in Europe was really sad,

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.959
<v Speaker 9>to be honest, Paul, at that particular time, and Germany

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 9>in particular. Not all parts of Europe polacy are the same.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 9>But the European consumer market domestically, it's been hit by

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 9>continued inflation.

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 9>We've seen the fact of that in the sense we've

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 9>seen more aggressive rate cuts happening from the ECB than

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 9>we've seen here. We have seen consumer sentiment over there

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 9>slow down much more dramatically than in other places, and

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 9>we've seen the absence of the tourists from traditionally core

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 9>markets like Russia, like the Middle East, like China. For Europe.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 9>When you look at the consumer though, again in other places,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 9>and it's fascinating. MasterCards is really interesting presentation with some

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 9>great data on where they're seeing international tourists travel and

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 9>where they're spending their money once they get there. And

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 9>again it's the Asian tourists from Korea, from Taiwan, from

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 9>Malaysia out there spending their money causing some really interesting

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 9>patents and growth. Also from the United Arab Emirates, from

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 9>Saudi Arabia, from Kutur, you know, the Middle East. Also,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 9>the consumer seems to be very robust at the moment.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 6>How would you compare that to here in the US

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 6>when we think about consumer activity.

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, I think the US, Nora, I look

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 9>at that and I never cease to be amazed at

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 9>how bifurcated the consumers in the US, where you've got

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 9>the middle you know, the sort of upper a quartile

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 9>and beyond of the middle class in the US actually

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 9>doing very well. Right. They've continued to see their net

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 9>worth increase, They've continued to see asset inflation support their

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 9>consumer habits. You see that in terms of credit cards spending.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 9>You see that in terms of certain parts of niche

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 9>specialty retail holding up a lot better. Where I actually

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 9>see a difference this time. You know, if you go

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 9>look at back at prior cycles, places like the dollar

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 9>stores or the national visions of the world tended to

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 9>do really well. And so when we weren't so sure

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 9>here it looked like the consumer sentiment was beginning to break.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 9>At the end of last year, I started to buy

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 9>those stocks, looking at history and saying, oh, I've seen

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 9>this before. I was wrong. By the way, those names

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 9>have actually done very poorly. They're not serving lower income

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 9>demographic with the same success as they used to, and

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 9>I think that just shows how compressed that demographic is.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 9>It also shows how their spending habits are changing. And

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 9>so I do worry that that bifurcation has got implications

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 9>that haven't yet shaken out in terms of the success

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 9>of certain kinds of retail here.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about opportunities just geographically maybe US

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 2>versus Europe versus Asia, and absolutely different growth rate's, probably

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 2>different valuation parameters. Where are you guys finding the most

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 2>opportunities these days?

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, I just also in this sort of this bias

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 9>of coming back from the sort of global tour, I

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 9>do like businesses that have got really international exposure to

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 9>some of those markets. We've talked about the high growth

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 9>parts of the Middle East and Asia, but I do

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 9>like them where they've got the US halo of quality

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 9>and transparency and visibility around them. So two areas where

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 9>I've tried to lean into. One's a little bit more controversial.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Ups.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 9>I like logistics businesses. We've been in a freight procession.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 9>I did buy FedEx on that fifteen percent dip that

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 9>we saw, and I think ups it's one of the

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 9>world's biggest logistics companies. It does have exposure to a

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 9>Chinese recovery, it's going through its restructuring. I like that

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 9>global exposure, and I hope at least that we've come

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 9>to a bit of a stabilization in the decline of

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 9>the domestic business we've seen with Amazon compression, it took

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 9>up the United States postal office. The other one, I

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 9>would say back nor to your question earlier around what

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 9>am I seeing in terms of different consumer patterns. One

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 9>thing that is consistent globally about the consumer is they're

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 9>looking for experiences. They really are leaning into spending more

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 9>and more experiences, disproportionately more so than stuff. And so

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 9>a company that I like that's leaning into this is Hilton.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 9>Hilton I think has got you know, some valuation upside.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 9>It's an asset light business. The streets upgraded some of

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 9>its price outlooks. What I like about Hilton is they've

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 9>really gotten the message on the rise on some of

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 9>these markets like Bahrain for example, like other parts of Asia.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 9>And you know, one hundred and sixty five properties opened

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 9>under the banner in Q two. More is coming or

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 9>see the full run rate effect that in twenty twenty five.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 9>And again, those regional middle class consumers are hungry to

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 9>stay at quality properties and they want to do it locally.

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 3>And thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate it.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Love getting your global view and coming back from some

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>of your recent travels. And Berry, she's a founder and

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>managing partner at Thread Needle. Joining us live here in

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio level.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, normal, Linda sitting in for Alex steel On

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Paul Swiney. You're live here on our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>We're streaming live on YouTube as well. A great Bloomberg

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Opinion column piece out today by mister Tim O'Brien. Trump

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 2>goes all in on discord. Will voters follow him? Fascinating question.

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Tim O'Brien joins his senior executive editor Bloomberg Opinion joins

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 2>us here on a Bloomberg Interactive Brokers student. The world

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 2>knows what former President Donald Trump is. He is not

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 2>going to change for anyone. Will he have the same

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 2>support that he had or to pass several cycles I e.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Seventy five million people voting for him? He can count

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 2>on that, Kenny.

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 10>I think he probably can. I mean, I think you know,

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 10>the issues from the beginning has always been that middle swath.

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 10>I'm saying nothing original here, but independent and moderate voters

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 10>in the Swing States again to decide who the next

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 10>president is.

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 8>I think.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, when we think about Trump supporter is what

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 6>differences have you seen in terms of those who rally

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 6>behind him in this campaign versus previously? Have you seen

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 6>more of an influx of individuals that are coming in

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 6>and you.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 10>Know, we're really struck. Where it really struck me is

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 10>when I was at the RNC in Milwaukee, and you know,

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 10>Trump's base hates the media, they hate critics, and it's

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 10>generally a pretty hostile environment. I've been to other Trump

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 10>rallies and events, and at the RNC there was much

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 10>less of that. It was they were writing very high

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 10>at the time because they'd arrived. They were no longer

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 10>the outsiders storming the gates. They have acquired power and

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 10>are fairly certain how they want to now use it.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 10>And so I think there's more a sense of a

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 10>rival and certainty among his supporters about what they'll do

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 10>with the mandate he has given them. And I think that,

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, in my perspective, that's a dangerous thing. So

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a profoundly anti democratic and intolerant movement.

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>What's happened to the GOP, the Republican Party that my

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 2>father grew up with since World War Two and that

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I grew up with, is that gone forever?

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 10>You know, I grew up in the Midwest around traditional

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 10>Republicans and traditional defined by you know, I think people

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 10>who believed in judicial restraint, robust national security, fiscal probity,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 10>et cetera, et cetera. And I think those are all

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 10>wonky bread and but are policy issues that have been

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 10>replaced by movement culture issues defined around gender, race. I

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 10>think avoidance and engagement with the outside world beyond the

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 10>borders of the United States, and and and paranoia about

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 10>the other. And it's it's proven to be a very

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 10>effective path to power, So I think it's going to

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 10>be with us for some time.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 6>I mean, can you speak to what aspects of what

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 6>Trump stands for speaks to certain pockets of the Republican community,

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 6>whether that be the affluent and finances well, I.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 10>Mean I think there are you know, like both within

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 10>both parties. There are multifaceted members of both, you know,

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 10>both parties. I think for working class Republicans, Trump is

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 10>a guardian and against demographic and economic changes that they

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 10>feel threatens their well being and their standing in the

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 10>world socially and economically. I think are affluent Republicans, there's

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 10>always been this idea that taxes wind up being pickpocketing

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 10>more than anything else, because they don't need the help

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 10>from the government that other members of society. Do You

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 10>can have a debate around the virtues of that argument,

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 10>but I think that's where they stand, and to a

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 10>certain extent, I think they're willing to digest anything Trump

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 10>says or does as long as he does that for them.

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 2>So there is some concern there of I think some

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>note out there in society that if former President Trump

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 2>were to win again in this November, how he'll perform

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>he'll behave once in office, and there are some concerns

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and fears about that behap behavior. How do you think

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 2>that is as a risk perhaps.

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean, you know, I've never believed that Donald

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 10>Trump is a strategist. I think it's a mistake to

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 10>have the word strategy in the same sentence with.

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 3>As his name.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 10>But I think that he is a profoundly emotional and

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 10>this frankly sensationalistic man, and he prides himself in that

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 10>kind of emotional connection with his voters. And he's clearly

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 10>been on a revenge tour. You don't have to be

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 10>particularly insightful to know what he's planning on doing. He

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 10>wants to weaponize the Department of Justice and the military

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 10>against perceived enemies American citizens and critics. That is against

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 10>the Constitution and is against the standards we've all lived with.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 10>I think he is intent on doing that. I think

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 10>he wants to withdraw the US from the world, whether

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 10>that's in East Asia, in the Middle East, or in

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 10>Eastern Europe, and I think that that poses threats for

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 10>national security.

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 6>Have you noticed any differences in terms of tolerance in

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 6>this election as we think about the controversy that comes

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 6>out of rhetoric from Trump. Have you noticed that people

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 6>have become a bit more tolerant of some of the

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 6>controversial things that he says, and they may have been before.

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, what I think is that this has always

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 10>been with us. You know, this is a country that

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 10>was founded in a revolution. We fought a civil war

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 10>to preserve the unity of the country. We have had

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:55.760
<v Speaker 10>all sorts of historical grotesqueries against indigenous people's, slaves, women,

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 10>et cetera, et cetera, and have tried to work those out.

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 10>It's one of the strengths in the United States is

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 10>that we've tried to work through those differences. Few countries

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 10>globally been able to. But I think all of the

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 10>animosities and ugly thoughts that attend to those moments have

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 10>always been with us, and I think the difference in

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 10>the Trump moment is it's been made transparent by social media,

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 10>and he's made it okay for us to entertain the

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 10>worst angels round nature. And I think that he's challenging

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 10>us to really examine what the United States is about

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 10>and where we want to take it.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 3>Tim, thanks so much for joining us.

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate it.

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Tim O'Brien, he's a senior executive editor for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 2>He's got a wonderful piece out on the Bloomberg terminal today.

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 2>You can also get it at Bloomberg dot com. That's out

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 2>there as well. As we approach I guess fifteen days to.

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 3>The election, so for some of us that can't come

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 3>too soon. I kind of like for shorter periods.

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a you know, European.

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 6>Style Last race.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, kind of pretty interesting.

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and right

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen live

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 3>Nor of Linda.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 2>She's sitting in for Alex steel On Paul Sweeney. We're

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 2>live here in a Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio streaming live on.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 3>YouTube as well. An EF.

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>We love our folks at Bloomberg n EF because they

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 2>are the team within Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 2>energy transition.

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 3>So they are go to folks here.

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Chris Ganomski Joints is here at lead nuclear analyst for

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>bn EF. Hey, Chris, talk to us about nuclear here

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 2>because I'm seeing your first note here blooming away. For

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the first time since two thousand and seven, there are

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>no nuclear reactors under construction in the US. Wow, talk

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 2>to us about where we are with that technology, because

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's got to be part of the

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 2>transition somehow.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 11>You know, think about a football team or a basketball

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 11>team and you're sitting your best player on the bench,

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 11>and there's a lot of issues with regards to nuclear energy,

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 11>but it is a very, very robust technology that can

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 11>provide the twenty four to seven type of base load

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 11>power that many customers are looking for and interested in having.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 11>We are, for the first time since two thousand and

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 11>seven without a reactor under construction, which is very, very discouraging,

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 11>especially in the context of the fact that China has

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 11>got something like twenty seven to twenty eight reactors under

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 11>construction and Russia is building twenty two or twenty three

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 11>reactors around the world in six different countries. So what

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 11>has happened to the US nuclear industry. We've kind of

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 11>dropped the ball on large reactor construction. And there's a

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 11>lot of hope and a lot of cheerleading that some

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 11>of these advanced reactors are being developed by a whole

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 11>slew of companies will carry the day and provide an

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 11>alternative nuclear solution.

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 6>Talk us through just how long it takes to license

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 6>and build a lot of these large reactors.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 11>So though the AP one thousand that was built in

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 11>Vogel at a budget a cost of thirty four billion dollars,

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 11>it took about fifteen years to license and build, and

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 11>that's quite a long period of time. What utility executive

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 11>is going to look around and says, listen, let me

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 11>grab another one of these and spend that type of

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 11>cash and wait that long, especially since the new technologies

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 11>intermittent renewables are coming on and they provide an alternatives

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 11>and there's a lot of change in the utility industry

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 11>and the electric power industry, and hence it becomes a

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 11>pretty risky proposition to place a bet billions of dollars

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 11>for a technology that's not going to come and return

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 11>investment for several different years. And there's several examples not

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 11>only in the US, but also in Europe where this

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 11>is going on.

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Some of these smaller modular reactors that we hear about,

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 2>that kind of seems like a reasonable solution to me.

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to build this monster, you know, generator.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I do something smaller for maybe you know, much lower cost,

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 2>presumably cheaper all the kind of stuff.

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, the question is that we anticipate that those reactors

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 11>may be more expensive on a per kilowide basis, but

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 11>the risk that they present to a utility executive deciding

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 11>to invest this technology is less. You can build them sequentiously,

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 11>sequentially so that you get a cash flow after the

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 11>first one is up and running and now you're building

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 11>the second one, as opposed to waiting the many years

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:40.879
<v Speaker 11>to get that. We anticipate that licensing and building an

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 11>SMR will take about five to six years. Two years

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 11>in the licensing process and three or four years optimistically

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 11>for construction. We don't anticipate any of these advanced reactors

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 11>coming online in North America until twenty thirty.

0:45:58.040 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 6>How does this compare internationally?

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, the US is a leader in the development of

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:10.760
<v Speaker 11>advanced reactors and SMRs. There's only two SMRs that operate

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 11>around the world, one in China, one in Russia, and

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 11>only two under construction, one in China and allegedly in Russia.

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 11>They're supposed to break around soon. We have a very

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 11>interesting development in Wyoming with terror Power developing or replacing

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 11>a coal plant with an advanced reactor, which is very,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 11>very exciting. But they have not received a construction permit

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 11>for that reactor yet and they're still doing preliminary work,

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 11>and we anticipate that coming online around the twenty thirties.

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 2>What's the feeling within the halls of Congress about this

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 2>power source? Is there any support for nuclear power or

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 2>is ideologically divided or where are we on this?

0:46:56.800 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 11>It's certainly changing from being very very questionable and very

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 11>very nervous about it to be more accepting of the

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 11>technology because they realize the certain advantages of nuclear power.

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 11>I live in a solar powered house in California. I

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 11>get all of my electricity from solar energy. But when

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 11>you think about empowering a large city or so, you

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 11>need something more than just intermittent renewables. Renewables are very

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 11>good solution for part of the problem, but they're not

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 11>a solution for the entire problem. So to displace some

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.479
<v Speaker 11>of the fossil fuel that we see being used now,

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 11>we need to have a clean, carbon free source of

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 11>nuclear power. SMRs have greater flexibility, easier to bring online,

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 11>and hopefully they'll have a role to play in the future.

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's talk about AI. We think about data centers

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 6>and the demands there, and when we think about nuclear

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 6>supplying these data centers. I know you mentioned that this

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.839
<v Speaker 6>should be a pretty much a post twenty thirty phenomenon,

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 6>apart from the revival of Three Mile Island by twenty

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty eight. Can you talk a bit more about that, Yes.

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 11>I'd be There are several studies that suggest that there's

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 11>a tremendous demand growth for nuclear power between now and

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:16.839
<v Speaker 11>twenty thirty. There are some questions will that growth continue

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 11>after twenty thirty or will plateau for a while. I

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:23.399
<v Speaker 11>wish I could say that there'll be a solution from

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 11>the advanced nuclear community before twenty thirty. But if it is,

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 11>it's just going to be first of a kind, one

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 11>or two reactors, and the challenge is developing a supply

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 11>chain that can deliver a fleet of these advanced reactors

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 11>to really respond to the growing demand for electricity from

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 11>the data centers.

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Chris, thank you so much for joining us. Chris Kadomski.

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 2>He is the lead nuclear analyst for b NFBNF. They

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 2>are the team within Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 2>energy transition.

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 3>They do great, great work.

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 2>They have extraordinary data, a lot of proprietary data for

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 2>the BNF folks as well.

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal