Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us. Write
Speaker 1: down our toll free telephone number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. It's eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: To say that the Supreme Court and justices that you
Speaker 1: thought believed in originalism and that believed in original intent
Speaker 1: would actually have fidelity to that which they said they
Speaker 1: themselves would abide by when most of them went before Congress.
Speaker 1: To not say that I'm disappointed today would be an understatement.
Speaker 1: Let me read you something because if you look back
Speaker 1: at the framers of the fourteenth Amendment, they were very
Speaker 1: clear on this issue of birthright citizenship. You know this
Speaker 1: will not, of course include persons born in the United
Speaker 1: States who are foreigners and aliens. This Supreme Court today
Speaker 1: just abandon original intent. And you know, so so often
Speaker 1: when we go through Supreme Court hearings, you know, all
Speaker 1: of these all of these these justices as they get grilled,
Speaker 1: and usually if you're a conservative, you get abused, like
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas for example. I mean there was a great
Speaker 1: beatdown by Justice Alito. We're gonna have a lot on
Speaker 1: this today. We're gonna have Greg Jared's analysis. We'll have
Speaker 1: Eric Schmidt's analysis, former Attorney General of Missouri. But it's
Speaker 1: very very clear that you know that by virtue of
Speaker 1: natural law and international a citizen of the United States,
Speaker 1: this will not, of course include persons born in the
Speaker 1: United States who are foreigners, aliens who belong to the
Speaker 1: families of ambassadors. And you know, James here to grab
Speaker 1: that if you again, thank you, and so on and
Speaker 1: so forth. It goes on to say, this will not
Speaker 1: include persons born in the US who are foreigners, aliens
Speaker 1: who belonged to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers
Speaker 1: accredited to the government of the United States, and but
Speaker 1: will include every other class of persons. I mean, what
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court has done today is pretty much codify
Speaker 1: into law illegal immigration and rewarding of illegal immigration. Now,
Speaker 1: the President was somewhat subdued in what was somewhat surprising
Speaker 1: to me, and he didn't appear to be letting the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court ruling against him on birthright citizenship Runer's day. Instead,
Speaker 1: the President kind of jumped on truth social to give
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court kudos for its late of other rulings.
Speaker 1: He said the Republican party was treated fairly. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure where that came from. Not exactly trumpiant to me.
Speaker 1: I thought he would be most angry at this decision.
Speaker 1: I know I was only because it goes against the
Speaker 1: original intent of our framers and our founders. Now, The
Speaker 1: New York Times says the Supreme Court's decision on campaign finance,
Speaker 1: for example, gives the GOP a new edge in the midterms.
Speaker 1: I'm not buying any of that. Here's what this issue
Speaker 1: of birthright citizenship really comes down to. If you want
Speaker 1: a bottom line, concise analysis. The cliff noteion version before
Speaker 1: we get to Eric Schmidt and later Greg Jarard or
Speaker 1: Greg Jard and later Eric Schmidt is the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 1: If you look at its text and you look at
Speaker 1: the history, the clause says all persons born or naturalized
Speaker 1: in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof Now
Speaker 1: that's the secure at the time, and you look at
Speaker 1: the writings at the time of the people that put
Speaker 1: this together that then primarily secured citizenship for freed slaves
Speaker 1: in a post Civil war era in America, it excluded
Speaker 1: those not owing full allegiance, children of diplomats and invading armies,
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants who are not fully subject because they violate
Speaker 1: US immigration law. And when I say they're codifying law breaking,
Speaker 1: think about it. The Supreme Court is basically saying, if
Speaker 1: you decide to enter this country illegally, and years ago
Speaker 1: they used the term anchor baby, I'm not to Linda
Speaker 1: they even used that term anymore. I'm not sure. Where
Speaker 1: people would be pregnant and they'd cross our border and
Speaker 1: they'd give birth to a child, then that child quote
Speaker 1: birthright citizenship would automatically be a citizen. Now, the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court precedent that they look to is eighteen ninety eight
Speaker 1: applied to lawful domicile resident aliens for example, in this case,
Speaker 1: Chinese parents legally present. It does not resolve modern illegal
Speaker 1: immigration cases, you know, in any way, shape or form. Now,
Speaker 1: you know, if you look at this anchor baby issue,
Speaker 1: where people would come across the border give birth to
Speaker 1: a child, naturalized citizen, then they could take that child home.
Speaker 1: That child can come back at eighteen and have full
Speaker 1: voting rights, full citizenship, full benefits, just like any other
Speaker 1: citizen in the United States. Now, as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: you know this underminds that consent and the rule of
Speaker 1: law in citizenship should reflect a mutual consent between the
Speaker 1: individual and what the laws of this country are. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not really that. The core argument in this is,
Speaker 1: you know, the Fourteenth amendmentist subject to the jurisdiction thereof clause,
Speaker 1: was never meant for the children of illegal immigrant. It's
Speaker 1: target targeted free the freedom of slaves and illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: owe allegiance to foreign nations and enter in violation of
Speaker 1: US law. So why would you codify why would the
Speaker 1: US Supreme Court codify into law or reward take it
Speaker 1: a step further, you know, institutionalized law breaking people that
Speaker 1: don't respect our laws, our sovereignty, and our borders. You
Speaker 1: know that is not what the Framers clearly intended. And
Speaker 1: you know, once again, for whatever reason, you know, we
Speaker 1: have just one disappointing ruling after another. It tends to
Speaker 1: be the same people every time. Amy Cony Barrett, I
Speaker 1: think has been the biggest disappointment on the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Not far behind her, I would say John Roberts is
Speaker 1: number two, just as Kavanaugh. I have no idea what
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh is coming down on any given decision. And if
Speaker 1: you care about the rule of law, and what this
Speaker 1: argument is in the end, this will reward illegal behavior
Speaker 1: at the expense of legal immigrants and citizens. And why
Speaker 1: we even bother to have, you know, laws as it
Speaker 1: relates to our borders and our sovereignty, et cetera. What
Speaker 1: is the point at this Because it undermines any sense
Speaker 1: of deterrence, All it does is the opposite. It encourages
Speaker 1: people to come here illegally. Now Congress has the power
Speaker 1: to clarify legislate which calls for enforcement. If you know,
Speaker 1: for those people that are out there today talking about
Speaker 1: constitutional amendments, good luck with that argument. I don't think
Speaker 1: that's going to hold up. To get a constitutional amendment.
Speaker 1: That is probably not going to happen in our lifetime.
Speaker 1: So I think that the consequences here are devastating and
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be long term and probably
Speaker 1: the really the only answer to this is to make
Speaker 1: sure we have the most secure borders of anybody. We
Speaker 1: did have the Supreme Court uphold state laws that banned
Speaker 1: biological males from women's sports, which would be a win.
Speaker 1: Now the majority ruled the state bands in Idaho, West
Speaker 1: Virginia don't violate the Constitution or Federal Title ten, which
Speaker 1: prohibits sex discrimination in education, etc. Etc. The ruling applied
Speaker 1: to two separate cases, one where a person was born
Speaker 1: a male but identifies as female. They filed the lawsuit
Speaker 1: against Idaho's first in the nation ban for the opportunity
Speaker 1: to try out for a woman's track team across country
Speaker 1: team at Boise State University. They didn't make the squad.
Speaker 1: In another case, a sixteen year old high school sophomore
Speaker 1: in West Virginia was born male but identifies as female
Speaker 1: and takes puberty blocking medications. In the state issued him
Speaker 1: a birth certificate recognizing his sex as female. Got a
Speaker 1: couple of things right here. The person that that really
Speaker 1: torched the rest of the court was was Sam Alito.
Speaker 1: And you know with this, with this, on all of
Speaker 1: these decisions, I mean, he has really emerged as a
Speaker 1: force of nature. So you know, we'll have to see
Speaker 1: what happens. We'll get reaction, We'll we'll check in with
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, We'll check in with Eric Schmidt, former former
Speaker 1: DA I'm sorry, former AG from Arizona now senator from
Speaker 1: i'm sorry from Missouri, and he'll join us as well.
Speaker 1: I'm fascinated today with something that maybe my staff pointed
Speaker 1: out to me that I should have picked up myself.
Speaker 1: And we have been talking a lot about how these
Speaker 1: are uncharted waters for a midterm election year. We've never
Speaker 1: had a party that not only it puts the most
Speaker 1: radical extreme candidates on the ballot. Graham Platner, We've gone
Speaker 1: over his record exhaustively. Sixth gender Tall Rico God is
Speaker 1: non binary. Tall Rico El sayed, We've got some new
Speaker 1: information on him we'll share with you today. Then, of course,
Speaker 1: these elections that took place in New York last week.
Speaker 1: I mean, of the three people that Mamdani endorsed, and
Speaker 1: again they unseated longtime serving members of Congress, and there's
Speaker 1: New York primary. One of them called for the government
Speaker 1: to seize all means of production, to seize private property,
Speaker 1: to seize people's homes. She has called for police to
Speaker 1: be abolished. She also wants to abolish America's prisons. She
Speaker 1: wants to abolish America's borders. She doesn't want anyone deported,
Speaker 1: not even criminal illegal aliens convicted of rape and a murder.
Speaker 1: This woman a day after October seventh and the massacre
Speaker 1: that took place in Israel, she attended a pro Hamas
Speaker 1: rally in Times Square, New York. You know, she bragged
Speaker 1: about using the American flag to wipe her hands and
Speaker 1: was a key member of a group dedicated to quote
Speaker 1: eradicating America. I mean, these are the people. Now, that's
Speaker 1: just part of the story. She previously referred to white
Speaker 1: women as ugly colonizers during an online online tirade about
Speaker 1: interracial dating. Can you imagine any of these things? Tall
Speaker 1: Rico or Graham Platner or el sayed, campaigning with a
Speaker 1: guy that says America deserved nine to eleven. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's race after race after race. But that's not even
Speaker 1: the biggest part of all this. The biggest part is
Speaker 1: that there's not a single Democrat that is willing to
Speaker 1: stand up and speak out against the rise of radicalism
Speaker 1: in the party. And so I was talking to Linda
Speaker 1: and Ethan earlier before the program today, and you know,
Speaker 1: they kind of put together a list and they said, well,
Speaker 1: you play this stuff all the time and maybe not
Speaker 1: putting it together, but there really has been an evolution
Speaker 1: culminating in what is now uncharted waters in the most
Speaker 1: unpredictable midterm in history. And like we have a montage.
Speaker 1: I'm going to play it for you. And it's Andrew
Speaker 1: Cuomo and it's Gavin Newsom, and it's tell A Rico,
Speaker 1: and it's Buddha Judge and Hassan Piker and congress Woman
Speaker 1: Omar and Black Lives Matter and Beto Bozo and Joy
Speaker 1: Reid and Lewis Farakhon, Jeremiah Wright. These are all people
Speaker 1: we've talked about for years, and we're going to play
Speaker 1: it all. Let's play it here.
Speaker 2: We're not going to make America great again. It was
Speaker 2: never that great.
Speaker 3: I've seen from myself how the original sin of slavery
Speaker 3: weaved white supremacy into our founding documents and principles.
Speaker 4: But the American flag is such a complicated symbol for
Speaker 4: most of us, and in many ways, like Jesus, like
Speaker 4: the cross, it's been co opted and and and in
Speaker 4: some ways it's true meeting has been betrayed.
Speaker 5: Do you think America has ever been truly great? I
Speaker 5: don't believe America has been great for all folks ever,
Speaker 5: even today.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, not Gods, America, God, America.
Speaker 4: I can't celebrate jail fourth.
Speaker 5: I was on Long Island this weekend visiting a really
Speaker 5: dear friend, and I was really disturbed. I saw a
Speaker 5: dozens and dozens of pickup trucks with American flags, which
Speaker 5: you know is also just disturbing because essentially the message
Speaker 5: was clear.
Speaker 4: It was this is my country, making America great again,
Speaker 4: when that past was never as great as advertised.
Speaker 3: Part of the foundation of American My white brother's sisters
Speaker 3: do level fourth of July, it is Independence Day. About
Speaker 3: is barbecue and it's a thing I can promise you
Speaker 3: black folks, we will take that day off. We will
Speaker 3: barbecue because we off with black people that nobody black
Speaker 3: I know is really excited about the Fourth of July.
Speaker 1: We live in a racist, sexist, homophobic, islamophobic, anti Semitic
Speaker 1: country and America.
Speaker 2: America deserved nine to eleven. Dude, I'm saying it totally
Speaker 2: brought it on ourselves. Dude, holy shit, we did.
Speaker 1: We did.
Speaker 2: How is anything I'm saying controversial.
Speaker 5: We live in a country that is sexist and racist
Speaker 5: making America great. It was never great.
Speaker 3: So I'm not gonna say the campire.
Speaker 1: We need to put the American flag down. This country
Speaker 1: was founded on white supremacy, and every single institution and
Speaker 1: structure that we have in our country still reflects the
Speaker 1: legacy of slavery and.
Speaker 2: Just the stuff we have done overseas and now brought
Speaker 2: right back into our home front yards.
Speaker 1: America's chickens coming home keeping the truth. I mean, when
Speaker 1: you think about this, it's insane, but it's been building
Speaker 1: towards it. The difference has been that the average Democrat
Speaker 1: would not go along with it. Now they sit in
Speaker 1: utter silence and fear. All right, when we come back,
Speaker 1: we will get to your calls. Also, Greg Jarrett and
Speaker 1: Eric Schmidt will weigh in on this birthright citizenship disaster
Speaker 1: ruling today and much more. Alec Baldwin's favorite radio talk
Speaker 1: show host is on the air right now, right mister Baldwin's.
Speaker 2: Sean Hennity.
Speaker 1: Now, you know, Linda, just when we think we're done,
Speaker 1: we think we're done with Graham Platner. You know, we
Speaker 1: think we're done with you know El Sayed in Michigan.
Speaker 1: We think we're done with sixth gender tell Rico, we
Speaker 1: think we're done with Grandpa Bernie. By the way, Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: if you get an endorsement from Bernie Sanders, the odds
Speaker 1: of you winning go up exponentially. I mean, that's how
Speaker 1: insane this party has become. That's how much influence he has.
Speaker 1: And when he endorses, usually Elizabeth Warren endorses. So you
Speaker 1: have both of them, and they have been helping in
Speaker 1: all of these races. But again, this now makes this
Speaker 1: these are uncharted waters. Look, I've done this for a
Speaker 1: long time. I've done this for decades. There's never been
Speaker 1: a party that has adopted more extreme positions, more radicalized
Speaker 1: positions than what we're witnessing unfold every single day. Now
Speaker 1: there is a primary tonight, Lynda, are you aware of this?
Speaker 1: Is it melot Kiros? Is that her name? Out of Colorado?
Speaker 1: Here's a quote. We have socialism already, right. It's it's
Speaker 1: in the roads that we drive in, drive on, it's
Speaker 1: in the schools we send our kids to. Oh, if
Speaker 1: that's socialism, how are your kids public schools doing? Because
Speaker 1: we spend more per capita on every child per education
Speaker 1: than any country in the industrialized world, and we have
Speaker 1: the worst results. She says, it's in the fire stations
Speaker 1: we call upon. She says, capitalism is responsible for a
Speaker 1: lot of the degradation that we're seeing in our economy,
Speaker 1: in our democracy, in our climate as well. She also
Speaker 1: has made other comments the only way we get medicare
Speaker 1: for all past is getting rid of the Democrats that
Speaker 1: are actively standing in that way. Now, Hassan Piker, by
Speaker 1: the way, can you isolate that Piker quote of him saying,
Speaker 1: I'll say it, America deserve what happened on nine to eleven,
Speaker 1: because he's also he's out there campaigning with a lot
Speaker 1: of these people, and he's been the guy that's been
Speaker 1: campaigning with Elsayed in Michigan. But this is a guy
Speaker 1: that blamed America for what happened on nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: If you pull up that quote, let me know anyway.
Speaker 1: So this woman now will watch this closely tonight on Hannity.
Speaker 1: But she said in an interview that Kyle Clark that
Speaker 1: the October seventh massacre was the inevitable consequence of apartheid. Now,
Speaker 1: Israel has a population a little less than nine million people.
Speaker 1: Between all of the people murdered that day and raped
Speaker 1: that day, and kidnapped that day, and some people were
Speaker 1: beheaded that day, it would be based on our population,
Speaker 1: the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans in a day.
Speaker 1: And this is the reaction of Now the mamdanis the AOCS,
Speaker 1: the squad, the hate Israel crowd, the anti Semitism. Now
Speaker 1: that is in the halls of Congress. When do they
Speaker 1: ever stand up against the victims of crime. It's pretty remarkable.
Speaker 1: So just like El Sayed, who's running for Senate in
Speaker 1: the state of Michigan against Mike Rodgers, this is this
Speaker 1: lady who's on the ballot today. I think she's what
Speaker 1: twenty nine years old. Is that she ever had a
Speaker 1: real job. I'm not. He's never had a real job.
Speaker 2: No, And she's the east one who says nine to
Speaker 2: eleven is something that we deserve. She also said we
Speaker 2: deserve what happened on October seventh. She's another one.
Speaker 1: She's just like us on Okay, so let's play a
Speaker 1: guy that El Sayed and this this lady. By the way,
Speaker 1: if you're out there voting in Colorado today, this this
Speaker 1: might be the person you're voting for. Listen, this is
Speaker 1: who she's campaigning with.
Speaker 2: America deserved nine to eleven, Dude, I'm staying it. Totally
Speaker 2: brought it on ourselves. Dude, Holy shit, we did we
Speaker 2: did in a video game whatever hypothetically politically we did.
Speaker 1: Man, we did. Holy shit, Like, how is this?
Speaker 2: How is anything I'm staying controversial? Like we fund the
Speaker 2: people who did nine to eleven still to this.
Speaker 1: Day, Why is this guy not condemned by Chuck Schumer?
Speaker 1: I mean, think about that. There are two aspects of this.
Speaker 1: Number One, this is who Democrats are now picking to
Speaker 1: be their candidates. You know, I go, I went through earlier,
Speaker 1: I went through, you know, all the crazy stuff. You know,
Speaker 1: the three candidates endorsed by mam Donnie Ma'm donnie now
Speaker 1: is pretty much the leader of the Democratic Party. I
Speaker 1: don't think there's any other way to put it. And
Speaker 1: one of the people that he endorsed that one last Tuesday,
Speaker 1: you know, has called for the government to seize the
Speaker 1: means of production, to seize private property, to seize people's homes.
Speaker 1: She has called for the police to be completely abolished.
Speaker 1: She wants to abolish America's prisons completely. She wants no
Speaker 1: borders with America. Uh, she doesn't want anybody deported. And
Speaker 1: it gets worse, not even criminally illegal aliens convicted of
Speaker 1: rape and murder. I mean, should we move these people
Speaker 1: convicted of rape and murder that she doesn't want want deported?
Speaker 1: Into her neighborhood or next door to her, or maybe
Speaker 1: she wants to adopt them, and maybe she wants to
Speaker 1: put him up in rent free. The day after October seventh,
Speaker 1: she is in a rally in Times Square, New York.
Speaker 1: That is pro hamas again, the equivalent if you look
Speaker 1: at America's population of forty thousand dead people in a day.
Speaker 1: She bragged about using the American flag to just wipe
Speaker 1: her hands. I mean, and it just goes on and
Speaker 1: on and it doesn't stop, and then we've got more craziness.
Speaker 1: So Gavin Newsom, you know, understands. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: go back to Gavin's history here, Gavin in the beginning,
Speaker 1: remember he was trying to reach out and have conversations
Speaker 1: with conservatives on his podcast. The guy does no work
Speaker 1: at all whatsoever which may actually benefit the people of California.
Speaker 1: He is the laziest, do nothing governor I've ever seen
Speaker 1: in my life, with the worst track record of any
Speaker 1: governor in history. You have the highest poverty rate, you
Speaker 1: have the highest homelessness rate, you have the highest income tax,
Speaker 1: you have the highest sales tax, you have the highest
Speaker 1: gas tax, the worst quality of life. You don't have
Speaker 1: water and fire hydrants, knowing that there are predictable wildfires
Speaker 1: in the in places like the Pacific Palisades, you don't
Speaker 1: have a reservoir that you can tap into to put
Speaker 1: out predictable fires with predictable Santa Ana wins. It's a
Speaker 1: year and a half, it's actually beyond a year and
Speaker 1: a half. And people can't get their building permits. We've
Speaker 1: had people called from the areas saying they have to
Speaker 1: pay insurance on these homes. And you've got full time
Speaker 1: Trump stalker, kind of halftime hand and what do you
Speaker 1: say is a halftime handity stalker. He doesn't like me
Speaker 1: very much. He's a you know, full time podcaster, full
Speaker 1: time ex poster. He writes a book. God only knows
Speaker 1: who bought most of the copies of his book. Then
Speaker 1: he's traveling. He's a world traveler. He's in Davos, he's
Speaker 1: in Germany, where wherever he's he's traveling to. And I
Speaker 1: saw that he was at one of the soccer matches
Speaker 1: I guess on the West Coast, and I'm like, he
Speaker 1: must be working really hard at that soccer match to
Speaker 1: figure out how to get, you know, building permits for
Speaker 1: people in the Pacific Palace SATs. He just doesn't care.
Speaker 1: Never mind people that lectured us about the science of COVID.
Speaker 1: This is a guy caught in the French laundry. This
Speaker 1: is a guy whose own kids went to you know,
Speaker 1: in person learning during COVID, but the rest of the
Speaker 1: state didn't have that luxury because they're not in a
Speaker 1: private school. And now he's calling and seizing on this
Speaker 1: Democratic Party anti billionaire movement. Now he tried to say, okay,
Speaker 1: let's have conversations with conservatives. That didn't work out because
Speaker 1: his party turns more radical, more left every single day.
Speaker 1: So now he's got a turn left because he cares
Speaker 1: about one thing, and that one thing is power. Now
Speaker 1: Gavin is urging a nationwide tax on billionaires in addition
Speaker 1: to hire a state and corporate taxes. Quote, it's time
Speaker 1: for a national billionaires tax and a new social contract.
Speaker 1: Now he's been saying that he doesn't want the wealth
Speaker 1: tax that's going to be on the ballot that will
Speaker 1: be retroactive to January this November in California. But how
Speaker 1: could it be against that on the one hand, and
Speaker 1: then say it's now time for national billionaires tax and
Speaker 1: a new social contract. He said, ten percent of Americans
Speaker 1: own two thirds of the wealth, wages of stagnated, and
Speaker 1: the cost of living is skyrocketed. How about a rising
Speaker 1: tide lifts all boats, Gavin, how about maybe you stop
Speaker 1: taxing people to death out in your state. How about
Speaker 1: you lower the gas tax. How about you lower the
Speaker 1: sales tax. How about you lower the income tax out there?
Speaker 1: By the way, if you make eighty four thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: you're still paying six and a half percent in terms
Speaker 1: of state income tax, on top of the forty percent
Speaker 1: that you're paying for federal income tax. Now you take
Speaker 1: it to New York and the fearless leader of the
Speaker 1: radicalized Democratic Party you got, mom Nami. This was pretty
Speaker 1: stunning to me. Did you see the New York Post
Speaker 1: today by any chance, Linda.
Speaker 4: I saw some of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, did you see the article about Mamdani The Rule?
Speaker 1: The headline is the Rule, No Rule, the second Roost.
Speaker 1: And he's got all these directives to tax quote the rich. Now,
Speaker 1: if you own a condo or a co op in
Speaker 1: New York City with a market value of a million
Speaker 1: dollars or more, Now I know for everybody around the country,
Speaker 1: a million dollars. Sounds like a lot of money. A
Speaker 1: million dollar apartment or co op in New York is maybe,
Speaker 1: if you're lucky, a studio or one bedroom. Is that
Speaker 1: a fair assessment? Yeah, it's not a lot, not in
Speaker 1: the best neighborhood, fair assessment.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: Okay, So if you have that home and it's worth
Speaker 1: a million, he said, one to three family homes with
Speaker 1: a market value of five million or more are now
Speaker 1: used as nine non primary residences. Now, let's say you
Speaker 1: just wanted to invest in a in a place in
Speaker 1: New York that you have your own place, and you
Speaker 1: go there and visit, you have friends there, you want
Speaker 1: to go there occasionally. Okay, who is going to keep
Speaker 1: their condo or their co op in New York and
Speaker 1: pay all that money in taxes? This is what he
Speaker 1: did to Ken Griffin, and he docksed him because he
Speaker 1: owns this penthouse apartment that overlooks Fifth Avenue and he's
Speaker 1: a multi multi billionaire. And then the multi billionaire said,
Speaker 1: screw you. I'm done with you. I'm done with New
Speaker 1: York and the six billion dollars I had allocated to
Speaker 1: spend in New York City for my business I'm not
Speaker 1: going to spend it here. I'm going to spend it
Speaker 1: in the free State of Florida anyway. So I mean,
Speaker 1: for you know, one to three family homes. You know,
Speaker 1: they're putting another percentage. Now, this is a guy that
Speaker 1: also proposed that. Remember, if you look at the death tax,
Speaker 1: the federal death tax is forty percent. The New York
Speaker 1: state death tax is ten percent. My accountants would tell
Speaker 1: me when I lived in New York years ago that
Speaker 1: whatever you do, don't die in New York. And every
Speaker 1: year I did the same thing. I'd look at him
Speaker 1: and I'd say, Okay, I'll talk to God and see
Speaker 1: if I can make a deal with God on that part.
Speaker 1: Thank God, God looked out for me. I'm not dead yet.
Speaker 1: And now Mumdani. So the state of New York gets
Speaker 1: ten percent death tax, the federal government gets what do
Speaker 1: they get forty percent? New York City under Mumdanni wants
Speaker 1: another fifty percent. Now they're going to lower the threshold
Speaker 1: where you begin to get taxed on your estate from
Speaker 1: seven and a half million dollars to seven hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars if you own anything in New York
Speaker 1: for seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars. I promise you
Speaker 1: it's in the worst neighborhood and it's probably a closet.
Speaker 1: Fair description, Linda.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's it's not a lot of money. It doesn't
Speaker 2: go far in New York.
Speaker 1: Doesn't go far in New York. I mean, it sounds crazy.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like, you know, Palm Beach. It's like
Speaker 1: when I tried to tell people Donald Trump's you know,
Speaker 1: mar A Lago estate was worth over a billion, They're like, huh,
Speaker 1: because those are not real numbers for most Americans. All Right,
Speaker 1: when we come back, we'll analyze in great detail the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court I think making a huge mistake on birthright citizenship.
Speaker 1: Greg Jaral will join us later on. Former Attorney General
Speaker 1: now Senator from Missouri, Eric Schmidt, and your calls coming
Speaker 1: up eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program,