WEBVTT - Does Technology Make Us Worse Drivers?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works, Hey brain

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Stuff lorn volg bomb here. As some automotive safety experts

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have long suspected, recent studies show that the more technology

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>we have in our cars, the worse we drive, and

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>that includes cars, infottainment systems, and active safety systems. The

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>American Automobile Association, or Triple A, sponsored a study that

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>confirms how distracted drivers get. The study was conducted by

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>researchers from the University of Utah and released in October.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It rated thirty different vehicles infottainment systems on their potential

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>to distract drivers. The study found that navigation systems were

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the most demanding distractions, and that tuning the radio and

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>programming the navigation took driver's eyes off the road longer

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>than making a phone call or texting. But overall, all

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>infottainment tasks calling or dialing, texting, tuning the radio, or

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>programming the navigation were associated with higher levels of cognitive demand.

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The Triple A research supports the findings of a University

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of Michigan study released last summer. This study is sponsored

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>by an automaker, was designed to find out how drivers

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>were using the automaker's blind spot warning system Overwhelmingly, the

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>researchers found people driving cars with blind spot detection systems

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>tended to change lanes without ever checking for traffic on

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 1>their own. These two studies identify two main problems. First

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that using some safety technology distracts drivers more, and second

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that drivers use safety systems as a primary source of

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>input rather than as a backup. This all hints at

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a third problem that automakers are racing to develop these

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>types of technology, and some are less cautious than others. Combined,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>these factors add up to a lot more drivers paying

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot less attention on the road. We spoke with

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Van Tassel, manager of driver training programs at the

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Triple A. He explained the new technologies are sort of

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a double edged sword. If they work properly and drivers

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>use them properly, there is a net safety benefit. If

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work properly or the driver changes his or

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>her behavior, there will be a net loss of safety.

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shows traffic

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>deaths increased from ten by two point six percent per

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million miles driven, but those deaths weren't due

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to distracted driving. Fatalities caused by distracted driving were actually

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>decreased by more than two percent, but the rise in

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>drivers not paying attention on the road is still a problem.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, many drivers have access to some type of

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 1>autonomous driving technology, usually marketed as active safety systems, including

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>blind spot monitoring, self park or park assistance, dynamic cruise control,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which automatically follows the car in front at a safe distance,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>slowing down and speeding up is necessary, lane keep assist,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>which senses when a car drifts out of its lane

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and helps the driver get back on track. Forward collision

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>warning with emergency braking, which senses when a car gets

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>too close to the car in front of it and

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>automatically applies the brakes, and systems that scan for obstacles

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>such as pedestrian in large animals and cyclists, often combined

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with again automatic emergency braking. It's easy to imagine that

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the more of these systems are found in any given car,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the less that a car's driver will believe it's necessary

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to the road. And here's where the

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>line gets blurred. Active safety systems are supposed to be

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a backup to a driver's skills to step in if

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the driver should make an error. Yet autonomous and self

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>driving car technology implies by its very name that the

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>driver won't really have to do anything behind the wheel.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Another issue is that most of these systems are still

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively new and have only recently begun to show up

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on affordable mainstream cars. That means a lot of consumers

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to use them. Yet. Further complicating matters

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is that there is no consistency enforced or voluntary among

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the auto manufacturers, so these systems can operate very differently

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>between brands and models. Eventually, a true self driving car

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>will use all of these systems and more, networked together

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to ensure the car never comes too close to neighbor, traffic,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>or other obstacles. However, even then, and certainly now, drivers

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are still supposed to remain in control of their vehicle.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Since many drivers already show too much confidence in active

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>safety systems, some safety experts worry that it will be

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to convince people to pay attention to the road

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in an even more autonomous vehicle. Experts suggest that standardizing

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>technology terminology will help consumers understand what they're buying and

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>how it really works, and further that auto manufacturers should

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>work with dealers to make sure that information is getting

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>across to their buyers. Van Tassel of Triple A maintains

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately the responsibility lies with the driver. He said,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you should know what your vehicle systems will do and

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>what they won't do. You're the one taking the vehicle

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on the road, so you need to be the one

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>who steps up and initiates that. As for the original

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>question of whether our driving skills are deteriorating, Vantassele is

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit more optimistic. He points out that drivers now

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>need to learn how to use twenty or more new

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>kinds of technology, so in a sense, our skill sets

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are expanding. In the future, traditional driving skills may no

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>longer be necessary, but fully autonomous cars are still a

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>long way off. For the time being, drivers should be

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>ever more vigilant and ensure they're using self driving technology

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as intended. Today's episode was written by Shery's Through It

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and produced by Tristan McNeil. For more on this and

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of other distracting topics, visit our home planet, how

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com.