WEBVTT - The Six Simple Machines

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tex Stuff from dot

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>com and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland and

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>today I am joined in the studio by Mr Joe McCormick.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Hi Joe, Hi there everybody. How are you doing, Joe?

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing just fine today. I've enjoyed a nice lunch

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that we had provided for use in the office today. Yes,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we we ate too many tatos to this day. Yeah,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to things past, but today we're going to talk

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about things way past. We're talking about some of the

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>earliest machines ever, the simplest machines. And this is due

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to a little listener mail. Now. This comes to us

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from Kyle via Facebook, and Kyle wrote, have you all

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>ever done a podcast on the six classical simple machines?

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>If not, that might make for an interesting topic. Oh

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember these from school? I do too, is accept

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember them? What were they? There was the toaster,

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>there was the what the electric camera? Yeah, I think

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure the A T M was on their right,

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 1>that's way up there. Yeah, and uh I think uh,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think perpetual motion. That was one. It was really simple.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It just kept going simple and it also know as

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the clock. Yes, yeah, yeah, no, of course, the six

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>simple machines are far simpler than that, but they are

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>really important. They they form the basis of a lot

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the machines that we use today, and ultimately, most importantly,

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they make work easier. Work is hard, work is hard.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Work is hard to explain unless you're a physics teacher

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and you do it all the time. But it has

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>been many, many years since I took a course in physics,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and while I still understand and appreciate simple machines and

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the concepts of work and force and this sort of thing,

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it behooved me to do a quick refresher course before

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>doing this podcast. We'll share your knowledge with us. Jonathan,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, So work is force acting on an object

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of motion. Uh. And so you could

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>think of it in the equation of force times distance

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>equals work. All right. Uh. So this is why we

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>we express work in units of force and time, such

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as a Newton meter and a newton. Since this raises

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the next question, a Newton is the amount of force

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>required to accelerate one of mass at one per second squared.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So these are the basic units we're talking about, although

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll also be talking about pound foot as a means

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of unit of measurement because we're in America and we

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>use antiquated systems of units in our measurements, then we

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>can't understand how to use this funky you know, metric

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>system approach or or the standard unit approach. Okay, but

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, how is work different from force? So

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>force is an agent that results in accelerating or deforming

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>an object. So if you want to get an object

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to start moving, you have to apply force to it.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want to punch a hole in a wall,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to apply force to it. But work is

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the force acting on that object in the direction of motion.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's it's a it's it encompasses more than

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just the force. Okay. So if I pushed a wheelbarrow

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty ft over a certain period of time, that would

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be work, right, But your actual pushing against the wheelbarrow

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>itself its force. So you know, it's it's kind of

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a perspective thing in a way. But it's very important

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>when you start talking about how much how much work

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and actual task is versus the amount of force that

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to do to accomplish that task. Okay, and

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>so machines in the simplest way, are something that helps

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>us do work easier. Right, Yeah, so that we either

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have to do the work with less force or uh really,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>machines can change the dynamics of force and distance in

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting ways, and sometimes it's ways that might seem counterintuitive

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. Will definitely talk about something that seems counterintuitive,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>at least the fort when I first thought of it, it

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it was counterintuitive when we get to h levers, which

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert are actually one of the six. But at

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>any rate, Yeah, it means that we don't have to

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>exert as much energy when we are trying to accomplish

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>this task, the specific type of work, whatever that might be.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And that was really important. I mean, obviously in early,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the earlier days of humanity, you know, we spent most

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of our effort just trying to make sure we weren't dying,

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and anything that would save us that kind of effort

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>meant that we could we could reserve more energy for

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>very important things like running away. It's a big one. Yeah,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but then you rate. So there are four main ways

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that machines make work easier, and the first is that

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he can increase the magnitude of a force, so they

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially amplify the amount of force being applied to an

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>object or system. So you are are exerting a certain

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>force upon a machine, the machine amplifies that force applied

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to whatever the load is. That's usually what we call

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the the thing that you're having the machine act upon,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and it amplifies that force so that the load is

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>is experiencing more force being exerted upon it than you

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>are putting into the machine. Okay, so in early humanity terms,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you might think of this as something like an ax right, yeah,

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that would be one, uh you know, any or a ramp,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>just a simple ramp, because you would you would be

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>exerting less force to move the object as if you wanted,

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say you wanted to move an object, uh to

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a allege that's ten ft above ground hole and if

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you were to actually just lift that object physically, it

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>would require a certain amount of force on your side.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you used a ramp, it would decrease, especially

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a very long, gradually sloped ramp, it would decrease the

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of force you needed to get the thing moving.

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It would just increase the amount of distance you would

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have to travel to get it to where it needs

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to go. We'll talk more about that in a bit.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, I guess an ax would actually involve

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>more than one kind of simple machine because it has

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>an inclined plane or a wedge on it. Yeah, I

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thought so, maybe what I should have said would be

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a club, a club that would magnify force, right, Yeah. Yeah.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>There's also the the idea of transferring a force from

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>one place to another. Machines that allow us to apply

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a force in one place the forces transferred to another place.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So uh, this can be uh, we'll get into some

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 1>examples a little bit later. There's also changing the direction

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of the force, where you may have to apply a

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>force in one direction and it's being exerted in another

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>classic example this would be a lever or a pulley

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>where you know the classic lever where I might like it.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>With a classic leaver, I pushed down on one side,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the other side goes up, so I'm actually pushing the

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>opposite direction of where the force is being applied. Yeah.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Then there's also the increasing the distance or speed of

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a force, which is a pretty simple concept. Uh. And

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the one that to me was the most counterintuitive.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>When we get to leavers, but I want to save

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that for when we get there. And of course, a

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>combination of machines can create a wide array of effects.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk about some compound machines, which are uh,

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's obviously two or more simple machines put

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>together to make something more complex. Okay, well, one of

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>these simple machines has got to be the wheel, right, well,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the wheel and axle to be to be specific. But yes,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess without an axle, a wheel isn't not as useful,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>no it you know, they're essentially POGs. Yeah, you could

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>push it a little bit and then you'd have to

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>keep putting it back under the thing. Yeah. In fact,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly how early humans were moving large weights. They

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>would have a collection of logs and they would lay

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>those out on the ground. They place a heavy weight

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>on top of the logs. They pushed the heavy weight.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>The heavy weight would roll across the tops of those logs.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But that would mean that you get closer to the edge, right,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you're the the end of the object. We get closer

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to the last remaining log in the front. You would

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have to pick up the logs in the back, run around,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>put them down in front of everything. Was not the

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>most efficient means of getting a heavy weight from point

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>A to point B. I bet that was a fun job. Yeah.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And now, granted, when all you're trying to do is

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>build a megalithic structure to sacrifice humans on. Well, and

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. The people who were building said megalithic

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>structures often time was not something they were really that

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Yeah, but at any rate, Um, if you're

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>looking at the wheel and axel, we believe that was

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>invented sometime around thirty five hundred BC E. Yeah, the

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>earliest evidence actually comes from thirty two hundred from Sumerian artifacts.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And also it appears to have been independently invented in

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>China around d BC. Okay, so not shared from the Sumerians,

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but different people came up with the same idea. Yes,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that seems to be the case. There are some

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>people who suggest that no, there was one common ancestor

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for all wheel and axles, and that that then proliferated

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>across the rest of the world. But uh, the research

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I read suggested that in fact it did appear independently,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of cool. So this allows for obviously

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>much easier travel and transportation. Right, it reduces the friction

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>that you would experience when you're pushing something against the ground.

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>That makes a lot of sense because I can imagine

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the most common work problems in the ancient

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>world was just getting stuff from one place to another,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>and it probably wasn't all is megalithic structure, materials, you know,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>moving a giant stone, just moving your supplies. You've got

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>foods you've collected or foraged, You've got you know, tools

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>or building materials you want to take with you. How

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>do you get them from one place to another? I mean,

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>if all you've got is you can carry them on

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>your back, right, you might build a sledge or something

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so that now you have some sort of animal that's

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>pulling it. But that's not very efficient. It's very slow going,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course if you hit any terrain that's not

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>conducive to such vehicles, then you're really stuck, literally in

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>some cases. So yeah, the wheel reduces friction, right, that's

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the big thing it does in this In this use.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>There's another use for the wheel and axle that we'll

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a second. But when you attach it

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to something like a cart and you have an axle

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and wheel set up there. Then the wheels turning reduces

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the friction that you experience when you're pushing this against

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and it reduces the amount of force you

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>need to use to get this thing moving. Um. It's

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty simple concept. And there are two different

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>really you know types of wheel and axles. There's the

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>type of wheel and axle where the wheel can move

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>freely around the axles. The axle remains stationary in respect

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to the wheel. The wheel just rotates around the axle.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the fixed that that that one would

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>be fixed to the frame of the cart, so the

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>axle is fixed and the wheel moved. And then they're

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>also the type where the axle turns along with the wheel. Uh.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And it has to be in some sort of bearing

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that will hold on and allow it this turning motion.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think what would be the advantages and

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>disadvantages of each. So if you have free moving wheels,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>each wheel can move independently, um. But if you have

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>wheels attached directly to the axles, then the wheels on

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>each end of one axele have to move together, which

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at cars. Yeah, you know, if

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if all of our cars had each wheel moving independ

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>lian some actually do have some four wheel independent drive. Uh,

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>then that's different than if they're all working together in concert,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will, and so, yeah, I mean they're they're

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>different use cases and there are different advantages and disadvantages. Uh.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>The important thing to remember is that this simple machine

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things that helped revolutionize humanity and

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>keep humanity alive and allowing it to thrive. Um. Obviously,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise we just wouldn't get our stuff to where it

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>needs to be. It would be tough. Uh. So another

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do with the wheel and axle besides,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, attach it to a vehicle and have it

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>moved through. Uh. The The wheel and axel has a

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>multiplying force aspect to it, so the force around the axle.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Think of the axle is kind of like a small

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>cylinder in the center of a larger cylinder, the larger

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one being the wheel and the small one being the axle.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>The rotational force around that small cylinder is greater than

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the rotational force on the outer cylinder, but the distance

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>traveled on the outer cylinder is greater than the distance

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>traveled in the inner cylinder. Okay, Now, what that means

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for us is that you can use a wheel as

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a means of like a crank or uh, you know,

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a valve, something along those lines, and you can apply

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a small amount of force to the outside of that wheel.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>The force being experienced on the axle part is much greater.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you have something that normally would be fairly

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>tough to turn, if you have a large enough wheel,

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it starts to become easier and easier to turn it,

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>which is why you start seeing things like those giant

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>wheel like um uh handles for things like the heavy

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>doors and submarines, things like that. So, yeah, that it

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>allows you to move much heavier machinery or gears or

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever using a small amount, relatively small amount of rotational

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>force on a larger surface, and the multiplication of that

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>force is what gives you the ability to do a

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of work. Yeah, I can see that. In like, say,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the at the helm of an old ship, you would

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have a very large wheel. I'm sure it took a

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of force to move the rudder of the ships.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Having a larger wheel probably made it easier. I'm glad

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you brought that up. I'm glad you brought up the

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wheel because or the helm obviously, because that that will

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>allow us to talk about some interesting different types of machines,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>not just the wheel, but our next machine, the lever,

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>because before the helm, before the wheel of a ship,

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>which really didn't come about until the really the late

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century. Yeah, yeah, you see those wheels on ships.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are all modern inventions. In the long run, the

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>classic way of controlling a ship was with a tiller,

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>which was more like a lever. So a tiller is

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially it's a it's a lever that comes out, you

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>hold onto the end. You make small adjustments on one side,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but because the way the lever is adjusted, it makes

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>larger changes with the rudder of the ship. The helm

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of a ship involves a lot of other parts. It's

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>really a compound um machine ultimately, because you've got the wheel,

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got some pulley systems that connect the wheel to

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the rudder. It's pretty cool. So I'm glad you brought

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it up. Well, you know, if you look at a

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>wheel like that as uh, something that allows you to

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>apply force over a greater distance to create more force

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on a shorter distance. In the middle. It's kind of

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like some types of levers, like, for example, a torque wringe. Right,

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you if you have a wrench and you

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have a bolt that you know it's really it's really sorry,

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be a nut, I guess a nut, and

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it is really hard to loosen. It takes a lot

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of force to do it. You can do it by

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>having a longer handle on your wrench. The longer the handle,

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the easier it is to get that thing loosened. Right,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And you have to travel a greater distance, uh, in

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a circle, in a circle right for you to get

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that that nut to go one complete rotation. But it's

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>far easier as far as the amount of force supplied.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I like that you pronounce it lever and I pronounce

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it lever. It's gonna get really interesting when we're talking

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about leverage. So the data data, Yeah, this is the

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>device that gives us a leverage, and which is really

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>how I would say it. I don't know why I

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>say lever, but then I say leverage. I just don't.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's you know, it's just because that song

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty Ways to Love your lever. Okay, never mind,

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you love them and then you love them. So remember that,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Like we were saying, work equals force times distance, and

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like Joe was just pointing out, if you increase the distance,

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that means you you can decrease the amount of force

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to do the same amount of work, right, or you

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>could increase the amount of force and decrease the amount

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of distance and get the same amount of work. It's

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>those two factors that determine the amount of work that's done.

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So using a lever, we can change that amount of

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>force applied. Uh. And the law of the lever proposed

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>by Archimedes you may have heard of him, is that

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>quote magnitudes are an equilibrium at distances reciprocally proportional to

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>their weights. End quote. That clears everything up, but it's

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially what we're talking about. So what are the basic

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>parts of a lever? You've got, uh, Your the lever

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>itself is the side that you apply the force to. Yeah. Yeah,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got something that it typically has to

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>rest against at some point along the beam. You think

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the beam as the full length of whatever the

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>lever is. The fulcrum is the pivot point that it

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>rests against that you you use to help UH apply

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>force to whatever the output side is typically speaking, and

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>UH the way this works as to spending on what

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>side is longer, that's going to travel more distance and

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and apply less force. So if you have a weight

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and you put the short side of a beam under

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that weight, and then you've got a fulcrum there, and

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>then the long side of the beam is the one

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that you push down on. You have to push further

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to make the weight go up the distance you wanted

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to go, but you're using less force than you would

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>if you were to just lift the weight up bodily

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>straight up. So we thought this would be easier to

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>understand with an example. So imagine that you've got a

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty pound weight. I'm just gonna do a little bit

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of metrics here, just at the beginning, and then I apologize.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>You're just gonna have to use conversions to convert everything

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>over because I didn't do it for everything. But if

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about fifty pounds, that's about twenty two point

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sevens and you want to lift it up two ft,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>which is about point six meters. To do this, you

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>have to do a hundred pound feet of work or

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five point six new meters of work, because

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>again it's force times distance, So you'd have the fifty

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>pounds of weight times the two feet and that gets

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the hundred pound foot work. Now, if you used a

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lever that was twenty ft long on one side and

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>then ten feet on the other side, So so the

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>side that you're going to apply force two is twice

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as long, and you've got a fulcrum that's just uh

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's one ft tall. It would be half the amount

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of force you would need to lift that load than before. Um,

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, it's it's much easier. And of

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>course if you were to extend the lever longer, it

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>would be less and less force, but you have to

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>travel greater distances to get it up the two feet

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that you want. This is why you have the famous

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>possibly apocryphal quote, uh that our committees said that he said,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if he had a lever long enough, you could move

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. I guess that's probably true. Yeah, I guess, well, no,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't probably using it would depend It would depend

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on what the lever or lever was made of, wouldn't

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it Because as at a certain point when you're trying

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to move things of great enough mass are taking enough

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>force to move, you'd reach the breaking point of your lever,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you. Well, yeah, I mean if you had something

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that was that long, unless it had incredible strength, it would, uh,

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it would break under its own weight. Carbon nanotubes. Yeah,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly that's how we you know, that's that's a

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>forward thinking answer right there. So leavers change the direction

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>or they can change the direction of an applied force,

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>but depends upon the input and output output forces relative

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to the fulcrum. And there are three classes of levers.

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>So the one we just talked about that example, the

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you got the it's it's like the seesaw looking type

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of lever. That's a the first class style of lever. Okay,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So one side of the seesaw is longer than the

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>other side. You can use the longer side to lift

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>heavier loads. And it also changes the direction of the

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>applied force. That's one of the one of the elements

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. The second ass it's more like a wheelbarrow,

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>which involves two simple machines. You have the wheel and axle,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but you also have levers. The handles act as levers. Now,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>in that case, the fulcrumb is on one end of

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the entire beam. Think of the handles as a beam.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So the fulcrumb in this case, the wheel is weigh

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on one end. Then you have the load, which is

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>actually little load that's inside the wheelbarrow. Then you have

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the handles the input that you create. So it's different

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from the seesaw right, where you would have the fulcrum

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>in the center. Now you have the fulcrum on the end,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then the load, and then you lifting it this one

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>instead of reversing the direction of the force, it's the

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>same direction right, because you're lifting up on a wheelbarrow,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>handles and it and it lifts the load up as well.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's different from uh, the first class of leavers.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>The third class is the one that seems the most

0:21:55.480 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive if you first think about it. So would the

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>flat end of a crowbar be a second class lever

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>because they're what you're doing is you don't have the

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>full crumb in the middle. You're you're pressing the end

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>against the inside of the door frame, say, and then

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further towards the end you're holding is

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>what's mashing against the door, and you're using it to

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>pry like a prying action seems like second class levers.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It is, and of course if you were to turn

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the crow bar around to use the curved end be

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a first class just like a Claude hammer would be

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>as well. Here's a Claude hammer to remove nails. Uh

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's a great example. Third class levers are the

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>ones to me that are the most counterintuitive. Um they

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have the fulcrum at one end, then you have the

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>input force, then you have the output force. So you

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>know when the wheelbarrow example, we've got input force on

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>one end, then output in the middle, then the fulcrum

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in this case fulcrum input output and you might think,

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, what the how does that even work?

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't sound like and why would you want to

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>use that? Because if you use, if you use this

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of lever, it has what we call an ideal

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanical advantage of less than one ideal mechanical advantage. This

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is what's telling you how how how much it's helping

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you in the sense of how much force you have

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to apply versus the force that you're getting out of

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>This too for the issue of making work right. So

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>here you're you're actually at a loss yeah, and you

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>might wonder, well, why would you want to do that,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is that you are that output forces

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>actually applied over a greater distance. So it's kind of

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the reverse of what we were talking about earlier about

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>how with the wheel, when you have the greater distance,

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to apply less force, but you get more distance.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>In this case, you have to apply more forced down

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at the input, but you're getting greater distance at the output,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>which is really useful if you're up to bat. A

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>baseball bat is a third class lever, so this would

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>be like my club example earlier exactly, that's essentially a

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>third class leaver or a first class bunk on the head.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh So anyway, yeah, very interesting. Some of the some

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of this to me is counterintuitive. I'm sure to some

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>people are like, this all makes perfect sense. I don't

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>know what you're talking about with counterintuitive. But I remember

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the first time I read about they were using a

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>hockey stick as a an example of a third class

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>leaver from one of the sources. I was looking over

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, I'm from Georgia. That example means nothing

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to me. And then they said baseball band, Like okay,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>now I understand what you're saying. Next, we have another

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>simple machine, the inclined plane. It is so inclined it's

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the simplest of all simple machines. Perhaps it's it's definitely,

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's essentially a ramp, you know, that's

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>really what is So when you want to move, when

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to move a load from one elevation to

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a different elevation and it's too heavy to just lift,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a ramp can often help out. It decreases the amount

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of force you need to get the load to that height,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but it increases the distance you must travel in order

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to do so. So when we were talking earlier about

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the wheels and the logs, and you know this this

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>concept of how much time is it going to take

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to do this? Uh, the pyramids were built by moving

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>these enormous blocks of stone up very long ramps to

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>get to their their various elevations, because the blocks of

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>stone are far too heavy to just lift and put

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>them in place. Wow. I think for a long time

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know how they were built, right, Yeah, No,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of speculation about how it actually happened.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>But as it turns out, the ramp method is the

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>one that was used to. You know, if you build

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the ramp out long enough, then you decrease that force

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to make it more manageable. But you do have to

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>make the ramp longer and longer to increase that mechanical advantage. Right,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That does mean you have to travel further and further.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense because you know, you just intuitively understand

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that a short ramp is going to be much more steep,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and that steepness is going to make make it so

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that you have to apply more force to get whatever

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the load is up that ramp that you're familiar with.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>This in simple walking terms, I mean you take fewer

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>steps going up a short steep incline to the same

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>altitude versus a very long, slow, gradual slope to an

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>equal altitude, but you but it's still you know, easier

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the long, slow way. You're still doing the same

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of work overall, because again it's force times distance,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but you're doing less force per unit of walking, so

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like it's as exhausting unless the ramp

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>is so long as to make the journey intolerably long,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which could be a possibility if you have enough space,

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but infinite ramp that's a good band name. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that just just be a jam band,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>play those like incredibly long jam sessions that don't ever

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. But yeah, if you were to take that

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>same weight we were talking about that fifty pound weight

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we were mentioning earlier, we have a ramp that's two

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>ft tall and four ft long. It'll take half the

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of force needed to get it moving over twice

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the distance of just lifting it up those two feet,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>so again saves you the force needed to move this thing. Uh.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Then making that ramp longer would decrease the steepness and

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the force needed to move the weight even further, but

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it would increase the distance at the same time. And

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>now we start getting into some of the the advanced

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>simple machines. The ones we've named so far are really

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, most people argue this is the the furthest

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you can break down a simple machine. The other ones

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>have some elements to them that are similar to the

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>previous ones, like the pulley, which is kind of similar

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to levers and also to wheel and axle. I feel like, maybe,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of all the simple machines, I encounter a pulley, the

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>least often in my life, at least at least visibly. Yeah, right,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>so pully, maybe if I were a sailor, yeah we

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>we You probably know what a pulley looks like. Um,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, you've got like a grooved wheel that's suspended

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>within a frame, can spin freely within that frame. You

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>feed a rope through it, or line through it if

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>you're a sailor. Uh. And this allows you to change

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the direction of force, but it doesn't change the amount

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of force you need to move awight all by itself.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So so changing the direction of force, even if you're

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>not adding force can be very useful because, as everyone knows,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier to pull down on something using your

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>body weight and gravity to advantage than it is to

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>push up with the same force. Right. So, and I

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>should clarify when I say this, I'm really talking about

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a suspen ended pulley from like a beam or some

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>other stationary object. And the weight you want doesn't have

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a pulley attached to it, because you could attach a

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>pulley to the weight and then tie one end off

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>to something like a beam and you could hold the

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>other end, in which case it doesn't reverse the direction

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of the force. Right, you are pulling up, but it

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>reduces the amount of force you need to lift the weight.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you if you do it that way, where

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the beam is holding one end of the rope and

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're holding the other end of the rope, you're reducing

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the amount of force, but you're not changing the direction. If,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, the beam is holding the pulley

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and the rope is just attached to a weight, you're

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>reversing the direction, but you're not reducing the amount of force. Um.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But I bet there is a way to reduce the

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of force. Yeah, you just gotta add more police.

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's say we put how how many you got, Joe?

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard of block and tackle? All right? First,

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go with the simplest approach, where we have

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>two pullice. Let's say you have one pulley attack matched

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to a stationary thing like a beam hanging from the roof, right,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a second pulley that's attached to

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the weight that you plan on moving. You tie one

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>end of your line off onto the beam or even

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>onto that that first pulley that we're talking about, feed

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the line down through the pulley that's attached to the weight,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>feed that line up through the pulley that's attached to

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the beam, and then you finally hold the other end.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>You pull down, and now the weight has been reduced

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of force you need, or at least the

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>perceivable weight you feel. The amount of force you need

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to move that weight has been reduced a half. But

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to move twice as you have to pull

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>twice as far, twice as much rope to move it

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the distance that you want to go. So, in other words,

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if you want the symmetry of physics is beautiful, So

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have lifted that two feet, you

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>have to pull four ft of rope, all right, But

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you could add more pulleys and this would decrease the

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of force further while increasing the amount of instance more.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.239
<v Speaker 1>You would actually have to have longer rope obviously, if

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you started to add lots and lots of of pulleys

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and you had a full block and tackle system. But

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this would allow you to move incredible weights using a

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>relatively small amount of force. You would just have to

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be willing to pull lots of rope in order to

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do it, or line all all of the sailors who

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>listen are just singing. There's such a rube saying rope.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe they don't like the word rope. It's

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's line. It's not rope, it's line on a ship. Yeah,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I spent a little, tiny, tiny amount of time on

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a ship and I got I got corrected so many times. Well,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we should have a face off between geometris, geometrs, geometricians,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>geo geometris, geometry, geometry stars. I think, yeah, I think

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of geometry as trickery, so I I my vote goes

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to the geometric stars, geometry teachers, and sailors, and they

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can argue about lines. I knew some geometry teachers who

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>could definitely take on some sailors in their time. Okay,

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do another one. All right, sure, what what

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do? The screw? The simple machine? Right? Yes,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I am so, if I'm not mistaken. The screw is

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>basically just an inclined plane in a particular configuration. Yeah,

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it's an inclined plane that is wrapped around the core

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of something like a like a shaft. Do you take

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a shaft, you put an inclined plane and you spiral

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it around the shaft and you get a screw and uh,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>screws can it's a tiny circular ramp. Yeah, And that

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>circular part is what's really important, because it means that

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you apply a rotational force to the screw, it

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>provides a linear force along the length of the shaft

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that is greater than the force you use to turn

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the screw in the first place. Uh. This of course

0:32:55.880 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is dependent upon the pitch. The pitch the pitch and

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>screws is. The description is that it's the distance between

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the treads. So the the sections of the ramp, the

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>closer together they are, the greater the ideal mechanical advantage.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is the mechanical advantages dependent upon the

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>length of the inclined plane the ramp to the length

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the shaft. So if the treads are closer together,

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that means if you were to untwirl this, the ramp

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>would be much much much longer because the cram more

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of it along the length of the screw. Yeah, that

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So yeah, that's like having that longer, slower

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>gradient of ramp up to the summit, right exactly. Yeah,

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting to think of it that way, but yeah,

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the treads are closer together, it's going to exert a

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>greater force when you turn this this. These of course,

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have been really useful in lots of different uh applications,

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>everything from you know, just securing something to the wall,

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, because it has a great holding force that

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>way to lifting things our comedies, screw was a way

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of drawing water out, which was kind of cool. Um.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's an interesting simple machine, and it's

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>something that if you were to look at, like you

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>go to a hardware store and you look at a

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>bunch of screws, you wouldn't necessarily think this is a machine, right.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You think of it as a tool or or you know,

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just something that you need. But it actually is one

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of the simple machines. And only is it one of

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the simple machines, but like we're pointing out, it's a

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>simple machine that's made up of an even simpler machine,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of cool. Um. Yeah, it's an interesting,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>uh piece of machinery, if you if you will. And

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the earliest evidence of screws come from Greece. Uh so

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they were actually one of the later simple machines to

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>arrive on the scene and the grand scheme of things

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>comedies had had a screwed. Yeah, yeah, that was the

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>one that drew water up. Yeah, the water the water

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>screw Yep, it's really cool. If you've never seen any

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>illustrations of that, you should look it up. Our comedies

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>screw is pretty cool. I think we talked out it,

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and we did a tech stuff podcast ages ago about

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>our comedes, and I'm pretty sure we talked about our

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 1>community screw. We we spent a lot of that time.

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>That was a Crisp Palette episode, and we've been a

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of that time talking about some of the crazy

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>inventions attributed to our commedes, perhaps apocryphal e Like the

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>claw that reaches out of the city walls and grab ships.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>That was one of them. Yeah. Alright, so let's talk

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>about the last of the simple machines. Yet another application

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of the ramp, right, Yeah, this is the wedge. So

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a wedge is essentially two inclined ramps that are against

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>each other to create this wedge shape. And uh, they

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>can be used to do a couple of different things.

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>They can be driven beneath a weight to lift it up.

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So this would be you know, a wedge that you

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 1>would you would put the end of it under the weight,

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and you would apply force to the the flat end

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of the wedge, the back end, the butt end of it,

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and that would end up pushing the weight upward because

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of the the design of the wedge, or you could

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>use it to be destructive. So, Jonathan, I have a

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>question for you as away Joe. Have you ever split

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wood with a mall? I want split wood with Darth mall. No,

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious now, no lightsaber jokes. Have you ever split

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>wood with a mall? I have not. I've only split

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>wood with axes, which are not necessarily easy tools to

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>use for that purpose. Well, a splitting mall is. It's

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>hard work, but man, it is a really satisfying feeling.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So imagine it's sort of like an ax. Uh. It

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of a combination of an ax and

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a sledge hammer. If you can imagine that it's a

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>long handle and then at the end of the handle

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you have this bulky heavy head that is basically a

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wedge on one end and then a sledge hammer on

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the other. Just I think to increase the weight basically,

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and the wedge doesn't even necessarily have to be that sharp.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it usually isn't. The one I used wasn't

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>very sharp, but because of the weight, it was a

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>one hit splitter. So you'd put a log segment out

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and you'd hit it once and it would just cleave apart,

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty impressive. Yeah. Oh man, it it felt

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.919
<v Speaker 1>good to do, but it got tiring after a while. Yeah,

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>And see you can see that there's some like within

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the mall. There are two machines here at work. Right,

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>You've got the lever as far as the handle, that's

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>what's allowing you to apply leverage when you're doing your swing,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the wedge, which is doing the

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>actual splitting. So the wedge, what it's doing is it's

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>applying that downward force and changing the direction of that

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>forced to outward. Yeah, so that's why you when you

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>hit the log, that outward force splits the log apart,

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's really cool. I try doing the same thing

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.439
<v Speaker 1>with acess, which you can do, but it takes more effort, yeah,

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>because the axe head probably just doesn't heavy enough that. Yeah,

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, you're using so you have to take

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.439
<v Speaker 1>up some of the four that normally would have been

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>taken care of by the the tool itself. It's pretty cool.

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I've never done that now. Uh it's yeah, give it

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a shot sometimes. All right, next time I'm out in

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the woods and I'm just thinking, you know what I

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>need to do, it's just split get your hands on

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the mall. You know, my family actually called it a maddic.

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I had to look it up and figure out that

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong about what a mattock was. A matic

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>is a thing with a differently oriented head. It's kind

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a pick axe got you. But that was

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.479
<v Speaker 1>just how your family referred to it. It was a mall.

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I have determined now, So yeah, these are that's the

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the last of the six simple ones. But then

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:44.959
<v Speaker 1>there are also other machines that we can talk about,

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>compound machines. I mentioned those earlier. These are the machines

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that combined two or more simple ones. Ship's home is

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples. We've already talked about. Wheelbarrow was

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>another one we talked about. Scissors would be a great

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>example because with scissors, you've got a pair of wedges.

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Those would be the blades of the scissors, and you

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lever. The handle that you hold would be

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a lever the fulcrum would be the center that that

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>binds them together. Uh, and so that's what allows you

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to use scissors. Compound machines have more moving parts than

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>simple machines, but that's not necessarily a good thing overall,

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>because the more parts you have, the more you have

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to overcome friction. If you add lots and lots of

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>different parts, that friction could be very difficult to overcome

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and it could end up generating a lot of heat,

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>which is why very complex machines like a car engine

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>require coolens and lubricants in order for them to continue

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to work properly. Um. That means there's also a loss

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and efficiency. However, the compound machines have greater mechanical advantage.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You actually multiply the problem. You multiply the mechanical advantage

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of each of the individual um simple machines within the

0:39:55.160 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>compound machine to determine what its mechanical advantages. So as

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>long as every single simple machine in your compound machine

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>has that ideal mechanical advantage of greater than one, the

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>more you add, the greater mechanical advantage the compound machine has,

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and thus we get to the Roobe Goldberg device. Yeah,

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>what what's it has? Like a goldfish that operates a

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>magnifying glass that burns a rope and yeah, exactly, and

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>then you get an okay go video out of it.

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Not all those would be simple machines, I don't think

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the magnifying glass, but even some of those would be

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>compound machines. That would be a collection of simple machines.

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But there you go. That's the collection of simple machines

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and what they do and why they're important. Um, it's

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it was fun to look back at this, even though,

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like again, this is something that any of our listeners

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>who are still in school, they may be rolling their

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes for the whole thing because they're thinking they've already

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>learned all this stuff and that this is repetitive. But

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for those of us who graduated a long time ago

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps have not kept up with physics the way

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we might have wanted to. I loved physics when I

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was a kid. It was one of my favorite, m

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite subjects in school. I wish I had appreciated science

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>more when I was in school. I didn't. I didn't

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>really come to love science until after I was out

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of school, and then I wished I could go back

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and and treat it with the respect it deserves. Out

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of all the sciences, uh, classical physics was the one

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that appealed to me most because it was the one

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that made sense to me because it was it was

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the physics of the world that I could observe around me,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and I loved it. I just I understood it and

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I took to it. Not so much with the biology

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and chemistry as it terms. I mean I I did well,

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but they were harder. They were harder to learn for me.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, anyway, this was a lot of fun to

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at. If you guys have any

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 1>questions comments things like that, then I recommend you right

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in my addresses tech stuff at how stuffworks dot com

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>or dropped me a line on Twitter or Facebook or Tumblr.

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.399
<v Speaker 1>The handle of all three is tech stuff hsw Joe.

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Where can they find you orr work? Well, you can

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>go to fw thinking dot com where I am one

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of the hosts along with Jonathan and Lauren Bogelbaum, of

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Forward Thinking podcast. I also write for the videos

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that Jonathan does there with with great skill and success

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and charisma and charm. Oh I thought you were talking

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 1>about your own writing abilities right, with great skill and

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>success and and and shiny nous of head. There's incredible

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>modesty going on as well. You can also check out

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the how Stuff Works YouTube page to see plenty of

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the videos I write I write per how Stuff Works

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>video yep, and you also appear in them occasionally occasionally. Yeah,

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. The the Hot Sauce Guy is still my

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite appearance by Joe mcformance so far. Um, but there

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have been some really good ones, So go check that

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>out and we will talk to you again. Really for

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more on this and bathands of other topics. Because it

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>has to works, dot com is chas