WEBVTT - Labor Is Moving Towards Obsolescence, Henry Kaufman Says

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>with David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>best of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Henry Coffin with us now in our

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven three studios, formerly with Tommon Brothers. He's the

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>author of the book Tectonic Shifts in Financial Markets, People,

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Policies and Institutions. He's the president of Henry Coffman and Company.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Great to see him once again. You uh. The waiting

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>continues here we we we await a decision from the president.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Who will be the next fed Share. Perhaps they'll be

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fed Share Jenny Ellen renewed for a second term, perhaps

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be someone else. What should a president, what

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>should a Treasury secretary? What should a chief of staff

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be considering at this point as they make this to decision,

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as they pick the next FED chair, what what should

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they be considering? Broadly speaking, Well, they want the first

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, have an awareness of the candidates experience. Financial

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>experience is very helpful. Having an academic background in banking, finance,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and economic theory is also extremely helpful. Being able to

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>manage others around the chair, meaning the other members of

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Board of Governors or the f O m C,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>who are usually PhD s. Those people have to be led,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to be managed, to have to be influenced,

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and someone coming from the outside with limited experience will

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have some problems in doing that. Is that the hardest

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to assess in advance. We talk about John Taylor,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the professor at Stanford, with a lot of government experience.

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin worsh It's hard to estimate how somebody will be

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>able to interact with others on the board, or bring

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>them on board, or work with them. How do you

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just begin to to figure out how somebody might do

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with that. Well, some of these people, uh John Taylor,

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, who was Under Secretary of the Treasury, so

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he has had considerable government experience. When you go back

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>through the history of the Federal Reserve chairs, uh. Bill Martin,

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>who was the first prominent one in the postwar period,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>began in nineteen fifty one and served for the longest

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>until nineteen sixty eight. He had been at the Treasury.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>He had been chairman of the New York Stock Exchange.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>He had also been the head of the Exploit Import Bank.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>He had considerable background and knowledge and took a lot

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of courses. On the other hand, Uh. There thereafter you

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>had Author Burns, who was second, who was the chairman

0:02:54.720 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the the Economic Advisors at one time, was an

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>expert on business cycles and saw it. And but nevertheless,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I can recite all of these for you with their

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>background and experience, A good many of them had to

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>check it experience. As chair we have all that experience,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with all that knowledge and managing, they didn't perform as

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>well as they should have. I want to talk one

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>more question the fed that we got to get to

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>extremely important headlines for Global Wall Street and we're honored

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to have you here. Uh. Dr Kaufman, let me reducts

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the question from television earlier. Can John Taylor be a

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>dove or is he so rules bound that we're going

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to be hawk hawk hawk? Uh. The little I know

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about John Taylor, you can only be a dove if

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it fits within his formula, within his formula. Uh. And

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't think there's enough fungibility in the formula or

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>within his Boston speech recently to calm those that worry

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about a restrictive John Taylor, there there is a certain

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>amount that can give within his formula. And as I

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>said to you before, here we are in two thousand seventeen.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The unemployment rate is four and a half but below

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent, and labor compensation hasn't got up.

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that an extraordinary event over the last eight nine years.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>One of our things to talk about here are the

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>headlines in all of global Wall Street. We say good

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>morning to you in London on Radio London, of course,

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in Awakening East Coast and at New York, but truly

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to all of our listeners worldwide. David, why don't you

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>run through these important headlines from the Securities and Exchange Commits.

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>We were speaking with Ben Bayne that last week about

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>what the SEC was considering with regard to these Miffed rules,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting some more clarity on that this morning.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>The SEC is saying it's going to ask for public

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>comments on the market impact of these new MIFED rules.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>The SEC is going to give a thirty month reprieve

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to u S firms on EU research rules. And here

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the annoucement addressing me fed conflict with EU on on

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>payments issues in particular. So those are the main headlines

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>here that we're getting from the Security Exchange Commission in Washington.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Henry Kaufman, with his legendary work and modern work,

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I should say it's Salomon Brothers some years ago, is

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a perfect person to speak about the ft. Had the

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>article yesterday Robin Wigglesworth. Uh, the the idea of Bank

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of America becoming an investment advisor to accept hard dollars,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to accept cash because they've got to worry Bank of America,

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, San Francisco. Uh, the Carolinas has to worry

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>about their London clients. This is a real international issue,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. It is an important issue. But the issue

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>is how do you maintain the independence of research? How

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do you hold research accountable to be always objective? Can

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you have two regimes? A New York regime of compensation

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to the south Side, etcetera, and a separate regime in

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Europe and particularly in the city. I think that's exceedingly difficult,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>really auditorialized, David. But we're going there right now. And

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as I told you, the only way research can be

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>objective in a cell research environment is when the head

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of research sits in the senior management with all the

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>other leaders on executive I'm going to hope that James

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Diamonds listening to this conversation this morning. What is your

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>advice to Mr Diamond? He's got four hundred and twenty

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>two reports and he's got to figure out what to

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do with a dynamic between London and New York. What

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is your advice to Jamie Diamond? I advise is bring

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the head of research into the senior management so that

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he oversees the extent to which objectivity is maintained in analysis.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Because if you sit on top of the other four

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or five, if that who comes up but defended, but

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>come on off of vocal rule and Dodd Frank. The

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Europeans want to police global wall streets intellectual output. That's irrefutable.

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what they want to do, and we see that

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>through MEFO to this is absolutely critical. Do you agree

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Europeans that we should police research or should

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the SEC stand up and say no, we're not going

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to do this longer than the thirty month headline this morning? Well,

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I I would say, research should be policed for its objectivity,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>otherwise it doesn't serve well the client, and it doesn't

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>serve well the institution ultimately, and it will always be

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>then looked at as being sell side research. And the

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>definition of sell side research is to push the product,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to push the item, to push the underwriting, to push

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the sale or the purchase of stock, and the the

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the investor ultimately becomes aware of this very quickly. We'll

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>come back up with you in just a moment. But

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how seismic it change? Do you think this is gonna be?

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>There so much concerned about what it's gonna mean for

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>for jobs and for this part of the economy as well.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>How worried are you about the implementation of these rules? Well,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I I really think, uh, the number of people in

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>research is going to diminish. It's going to diminish, not

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>only because of what you're talking about, but we were

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>we're creating more exchange traded funds. We are at the

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>same time doing much more. We've got much more money

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going into Van Gone and all of the passive investment.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this. Let's come back and talk about this.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>We're honored if Henry Kaufman with us. With these important

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>headlines from the Security and Exchange Commission, they will ask

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for public comments on method. Uh. They don't put it down.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't pump the ball down the street. They go

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the thirty months three zero thirty months reprieved the U

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>S firms on European research rules. I think that's a

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>critical headline and they make clear, uh, Wall Street firms

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>can accept research payments from EU clients. Much more on

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this important issue with Dr Kaufman. I think the doll

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was like twelve points when Henry Kaufman started his career.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Where was the doubt when you walked in the Wall

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Street door? Oh my goodness, I walked into Wall Street

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>door door in January of nineteen sixty two, I walked

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>into Sottomon. It must have been in the hundreds. Hundreds, Yeah,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say the middle. We'll look that up with

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>David Wilson has that statistic available. He has actually memorized. Um.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I sure everybody wants to know that you just celebrated

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>your ninetieth birthday. What is the key to Kaufman longevity?

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>As people know as we go through this, I don't

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>do this, doctor Doom Bologna. You've always been an upbeat

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>guy forgetting about the cliches of another time and space.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>What is the Kaufman longevity formula? Gura and I are

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>taking notes? Well, I suspect it's have good genes. Uh,

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and it sound like a glass come out help me here?

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it like a glass of tomato juice every morning?

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And and stay active, stay active, don't retire. It would

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be one of them. Stay active, David, Why don't you

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>jump in here with Henry Kaufman after these SEC headlines

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>too many other topics. Yeah, we're looking ahead to the

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>CCB meetings. They've been listening to what that policy makers

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have been saying, and I noticed that more and more

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>of them are talking about the role the technology is

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>playing when it comes to productivity and wage growth and

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all of that. As you see what's what's the role

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the technology is playing in the economy, And when you

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the data, that is a very key issue

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>which hasn't been appreciated. There is a tectonic shift occurring

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>actually which I didn't bring out in the book. And

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the and and that's the following. We have seen

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>very little increase in wages in the last eight nine years,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but we seen an extraordinary increase in corporate profits, I bill,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's I believe what is occurring is a great

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>obsolescence in labor, in the value of labor as the

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>result of automation, robots, UH, factories that can be built

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>all over the world rather than in one place, and

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the technological increase that has occurred with such rapidity that

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it is marginalizing labor. Much in the old days, in

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, in the nineteen early sixties, there were unions,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>unions that of course UH got higher wages for their

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>members and they constrained corporate profits somewhat. That has gone here,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really long term social problem. As is

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>widening up occurs. Ask yourself the simple question, has labor

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>compensation remains modest? What kind of corporate pensions going to

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>be there years from down to help in retirements? Well,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>we're there right now, Alicia Mannell up at Boston College,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>has of people not actually justified in their retirement. Within

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>these broader issues is our quest for hard data. You

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are one of the leaders of looking at hard data.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you observe in service and goods inflation? The hard

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>data that can let a set of good central bankers

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>raise rates. Now, I I think, as you know, Mrs

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ms Yell raises the question, and she hasn't got an answer,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>why isn't the inflation rate higher? So here's a policymaker

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at the highest level is highly uncertain for this relatively

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>modest growth in abric compensation. And I it comes from

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:10.359
<v Speaker 1>really the fact that labor is becoming more obsolescent. Robots

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>are replacing labor. Uh. I saw recently a garbage struck.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>In my days, in garbage struck used to be manned

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>by a driver and two men. Now I saw a

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>garbage struck with a driver moving along. There weren't the

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>two men. And what happened there was a crane that

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>picked up the garbage pail, dumped it and put it down.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>As now, in about twenty years there won't even be

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a driver on that on that car. And if you

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to split your imagination far, in twenty

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>five years a lot of taxis will be driven without

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a driver. And this goes on and on. A friend

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of mine who was just in Japan told me of

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a robot walking into a patient's room gives the patient

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a pill if the patient doesn't take the bill, an

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>attendant comes a little and then the robot picks up

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the patient and puts him in a wheelchair. Now this

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is really but in this replacement that's going, well, we've

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>got a circle back. Here's the point. You're ninety years old,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not in a wheelchair. We want to know why. Well,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>let's leave with your Henry caufin with us and what

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>will happen and again uh soon. It is a wonderful book.

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about tectonic shifts in financial markets,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>people policies, and institutions, and I would really emphasize the

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people part of it. It's a beautiful book. You just

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>want to buy the book because it feels so good.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>From Paul Gray McMillan as well. But the real issue here,

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for particularly those of you of a younger vintage, it

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is a beautiful way to get a sense of history

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of where we were and how we got the two

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven in beyond, it's even got a lot on

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Walter Riston, which is a very good thing as well.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry Kaufman, of course for years with Solomon Brothers and

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with an association with Lehman Brothers, which we didn't have

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>time to talk about, but we'll do that another time.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We do uh economics, finance, investment, international relations, we do politics,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and we do our military, and I think, David, we

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>get more misinformation and we struggle more to get informed

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>guests on the military than any other thing we deal with.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we were on a day of Admiral

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>James Travitis with us at Tufts and General Kimmitt comes

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on as a really interesting guy in general with a

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>c f A, an important financial degree. And it's also

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>why we have George Friedman on because he read James

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as a kid. He knows every book, every ship, even worse,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you knows where every boat is. And literally, David, it

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>could be a three hour conversation. Absolutely. George Freeman here

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with us in our eleven three studios in the Earth,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the founder and chairman of Political Future. Let's get to

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that in just a minute. First, let me ask you

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>about the news of the day. We've been following what's

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>been going on in Northern Spain, waiting to hear from

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the president of the region a little bit later about

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the path forward. There could be a call for for

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>new elections there. What do you make of of what's

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>playing out there. Where do you think this is leading to,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not just in Spain, in this region and in Spain,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but in Europe generally? What is it? What is it?

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>What's the message about the integrity or the health of

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the European experiment? Well where this comes from his two

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight. This is the really important part of two

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. I hate to say this the people

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market, but that was a preface. What has

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>happened is that it has created massive inequalities in Europe,

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>failed economies, um a lot of pretense by the elite,

0:16:53.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and now you're seeing fragmentation. Scotland almost seceded from the Okay,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>now Catalonia. These are two three hundred year arrangements that

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>are coming. Apart the Italians, there will be others coming.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>So what we're seeing here is what economic is all about.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>It becomes politics, and it becomes politics where the whole

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're talking about tectonic shifts, Mr Kaufman, this

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is a tectonic shift. We think two thousand and eight

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is over because interest rates are savalizing. Oh no, Catalogna

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>is two thousand eight large. Our politics playing a greater

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>role in the economy in policy than they have in

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the past. I think of just what happened with Brexit,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the U S election, the rise of

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>populism that we saw. When when you look at the economy,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>how big role is politics playing at this point? Well,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy is politics. The tax code, the regulations of

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the political pressures all affected. Uh when things are rolled,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the stable is is feeling that did the markets operate

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>on their own? But historically, I mean, what made the

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Great expansion possible was World War Two and that was

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty political and that's set the stage for a generation

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of growth Vietnam intern I think we should rip up

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the scripture. Dr Kissinger, among others, has talked about the

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>refugee migrant moment in Europe is to be almost transcentry,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to go across centuries of historical experiment, and we've seen

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>recently the politics of Austria, the politics of the Czech Republic.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>How does George Friedman filter not so much the fact

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of migrants and refugees in Europe, but the scale of it,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the amplitude of the last twelve months, and the breathtaking

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>indifference by the elite to the entire process, because from

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a European point of view, the Germans and the German

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>elite were very generous, but they weren't going to live

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in the same neighborhoods with them. The people who wanted

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought the migrants should come in were very kind,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't going to be the ones paying the

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>price of social dislocation and everything else. Like when I

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>moved to the Bronx from Hungary. Uh, everybody was very

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>kind to me, but they weren't living there and it

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>was a tough neighborhood. So the issue here is I

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>came here fifty two, I was wek united. They think

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you are a communist. I mean, was it the enough

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a shift that you were the little kid that was

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a comy because that's how we felt, were the kids

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in fifty six and the debris after that. No, we

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>were afraid of the Puerto Ricans, and we were afraid

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Italians, and we were afraid of Irish and

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they were afraid of us. So when you have immigration,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you have social instability. And so the people who didn't

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>want it were regarded as immoral, you know, you know,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>dark people who don't understand that they're evil. This ripped

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>here of apart. It wasn't the migration, but the manner

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in which the same people have out of Trump we're presented.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So we have a massive split between the elite, who

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>sees themselves as moral judges, and the working class and

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>poorer who see themselves bearing the burden of the generosity

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of the elite. Let me ask you about the negotiations

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>over NAFTA, and we're talking about politics being the economy

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps vice versa. There, what do you make of

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the signaling that we've seen here? You have negotiation teams

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>from these three countries working on rehashing that deal. All

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the while you have one of the three nations set

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of states raising the spectrum terminating the deal. Uh, there's

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some political signaling, if if any, how optimistic are you

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that this process is going to play out? And how

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>destabilizing would it be to have no trade deal for

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>any period of time between these three countries. I'll give

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>one fact. The largest export partner of California is Mexico.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>The card largest export partner of Texas is Mexico. You've

0:20:55.240 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>got the largest Republican, the largest Democratic UH representatives in

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington and the last thing they want is anything that

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>screws up NAFTA. So every doesn't matter what the negotiators do,

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't much matter what the President wants. This

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to be decided ultimately in Congress. Can you

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>say this about tax reform? Can you say the same

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>thing about Texas. It doesn't have that kind of coalition.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have that. It doesn't have California and Texas

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the first and the second largest delegations pulling in others

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>saying basically, we don't want a basic change. Okay, Texas

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>guy other than Austin, Good morning Austin Texas. Good morning,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Mr Dell. Other than Austin, Texas. How many Democrats are

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>left in Texas? Would all be je No? The state? Uh,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>he would devel the state because all the Democrats became Republicans.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>This was always a conservative state. It was a conservative

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>democratic strait, and now it's what it was. Really changed.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It somewhat is the tension between Senator Cruz and Senator Cornyn.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>But the Trump movement itself hasn't changed the safe that much.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>You don't see a shift in the Trump I mean,

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I just saw an MSNBC banner talking about the overnight

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>polling and the president's at new low. And in all

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of that, do you see in your neck of the woods? Uh,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>people walking away from the president or is he still

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had that core base? They don't know what to walk to.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>So the problem that we really have is, Okay, my

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>neighbors in Hayes County, I have problems with Trump. The

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>problem is the system hasn't presented an alternative. The alternative

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is going back to Obama. They really didn't like Obama.

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So in Texas you've got them locked in and the

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>party has marked in very quickly. Here one more question

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>to the Democrats. Have anybody that understands the five sided

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>walls of the Pentagon? Are there any William Cohen or

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>John Carries out there that actually understand you gotta budget

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? Well, I think the basic problem of the

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think tanks in Washington. They're really smart people all work

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the think tanks. The think tanks are funded by various

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>corporate interests there. They're going to put that out. The

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>days when you had independent defense analysts in both parties

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were limited. The best people there you have with the

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>former generals. They're not working for the think tanks. They

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do know the budget, and that's I think one of

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the most smart things that Trump did. He reached down,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>got a group of generals to run it, and they

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>hadn't spend their time at Berking's, in Heritage and everywhere else.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Gideon Rosa's Foreign Affairs magazine leads off with an article

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on Afghanistan. Does George Freeman have an Afghanistan policy? Leave? Look?

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>We can't wait, That's what David Girl's policy is. I mean, look,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we we can't. We can't. We have no strategy, we

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have no goals that are achievable. We are there because

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's harder politically to leave than to stay, So we

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>leave a token number of troops that aren't gonna do anything.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So George Freeman, thank you for letting me monopolize a conversation.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Girls over there doing his taxes while on the gird doctrine.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>The news slow this morning is extraordinary and too short

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to visit with Arthur love At, the former chairman of

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, Arthur I was amazed at the forty eight

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hour news slow of an SEC really saying something about

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the changing of how research gets paid in London. Henry

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Kaufman said this morning there has to be one model.

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree there needs to be one global model

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for research, intellectual and sell side compensation or could Wall

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Street in New York go to loone. I think it

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>would be spectacular if we could have one model, but

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just judging from different cultures, it is unlikely that we

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>will wind up with one model. I think as far

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>as myfort is concerned. The flashpoint obviously are on research payments,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>which ends the practice of asset managers receiving research were

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>free from banks and brokers in return for placing trades

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with them. Now, how are you going to make sure

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that that really holds? And I think the whole question

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the responsibility that goes with becoming an investment advisor,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what the Bank of America Merrill Lynch has done.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that if they go ahead on this, we're

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>going to see all of the major players file as

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>investment advisors and that carries with responsibilities that they've never had.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>To say, exactly a big change or what does this

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>say to you about timing and out the the SEC's

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ability to reckon with what's happening here in just a

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>matter of months this no action relief. Jake Layton says

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the chairman. The SEC designed with input from a range

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of market participants to reduce confusion and operational difficulties. We're

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at thirty months, a period of thirty months during

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>which we could get common from participants in the marketplace.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Why did this happen sooner? Uh? This is such a

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult area and a mistake has implications not just for

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>US markets but for global markets. I think Jay Clayton

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>has done a superb job of responding to many of

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the issues that have UH acted the SEC. And I

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>think he's taking the right steps here because if he miscalculates,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, the implications to global markets conclude great.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I think done exactly what he should do. Arthur, you

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the cultural realities of a transatlantic global Wall Street,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the city, and and the rest is well. One final question,

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if we may in two rushed a morning, there is

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the cultural difference of just stay and American at Barclays,

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a British British British bank. Just think of Premier football, folks.

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Is Jeff Staley's tenure under threat because of the miserable

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>results this morning in the stock down seven? You'd have

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that about any CEO of a company with

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stock performance. I don't know enough about

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the culture, the management culture within the company to say

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. But in these days any

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>company that Joe's results and disappointing such as this, the

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO has got to be very, very careful and look

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>behind Arthur. Thank you so much on short notice this morning,

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and really on it to me an historic day for

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Securities and Exchange Commission honor to speak with their

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>former chairman, Arthur Lovett. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.