WEBVTT - Tesla’s Sales Fall but Investor Support Stays Strong

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is alive from coast to coast, with Caroline

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York and ever though in San Francisco, this.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's global sales drop in the second quarter, but shares

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 3>pop his investors look to a robotaxi future.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Plus, fox Conn asks hundreds of Chinese engineers to return

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 4>home from its iPhone factories in India, a blow to

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Apple's manufacturing push in the country.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 3>A Microsoft to slash another nine thousand staff to streamline

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>its teams. It's the second major wave of layoffs this year.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 4>But first we check in on these markets, which the

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 4>equity benchmark in tech.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 5>Then as that one hundred shun it really does manage to.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Shrug off the cell off we see in the bond

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 4>market right here, right now, up five ten percent the

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 4>data coming in on US jobs week, But does that

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 4>mean that we could see yet further fed stimulus baked

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 4>back in this market? We're up sixteen percent as technique

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 4>to the charge today ed, let's get.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Right to Tesla shares up almost four percent off session

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>highs three hundred and eighty four thousand, one hundred and

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>twenty two vehicles delivered by Tesla in the second quarter. Now,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>technically that came in below consensus, Caroline, However, we did

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 3>see expectations get reset in recent days.

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this came in above.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>The lowest level of expectations. It does leave Tesla with

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 3>some work to do in calendar twenty five if it

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 3>wants to catch up and have some growth in the year.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to it.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's do that with being most Craigshell Craig, just

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 4>how big a hole does Tesla have to climb itself

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 4>out of to post any sort of growth for twenty

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty five.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 6>It's a big number of about one hundred and ten thousand vehicles,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 6>which for a company of Tesla's size is pretty substantial. This,

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 6>this is a pret remarkable move for the shares, just

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 6>considering you know, how how low the consensus you know,

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 6>estimate for this company is. It's come down really substantially

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 6>over over those even just in the last few weeks.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 6>Uh and and just you know, sort of how this

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 6>company has been viewed right as one where you know,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 6>it was counted on for so long as as a

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 6>growth company, and we've sort of, you know, slowly but

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 6>surely very much reset And yet the investor, you know,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 6>bases is willing to stick with this valuation that is

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 6>is pretty rich relative not only to other car companies,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 6>but even you know, big tech tech peers.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 3>So this is global deliveries data. It doesn't distinguish by geography.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>It does break out by model line, and of course

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Model Y and Model three make up the bulk of

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 3>those deliveries. That said Craig, we did get data out

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>of China for the month of June overnight from the

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Chinese consumer a passenger car association. Is there any read

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 3>across that you can tell us about that market?

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 6>I think it's maybe consistent with this hope if you're

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 6>an investor, that maybe we've hit bottom right where we

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 6>saw you know, every month leading up to June, you know,

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 6>shipments out of Tesla's factory in Shanghai were down and

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 6>to have you know, just the slightest bit of an

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 6>increase in June, less than one percent, but still you know,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 6>in the green instead of in the red. You know,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 6>you count that as a win and maybe hope that

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 6>this is a matter of a turning point. And we've also,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 6>of course, you know, seen just in the last few

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 6>days ed you've reported along with some of our colleagues

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 6>that there's been a change in management, right, and so

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 6>perhaps there's a sort of you know, bet that the

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 6>sort of bottom has been set here. Musk Is is

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 6>going to take control of sales in US and Europe,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 6>and maybe that marks a sort of change in the trend.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Bloombeck's create who leads our global coverage of the

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>auto industry out of London. Thank you so much. Let's

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>get the investor take on Testa sales data and bringing

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Gene Monster, managing partner and co founder a deep water

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>asset management. So we're in this situation, Jane, and you've

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>written about this a lot right where we almost just

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 3>look past the quarterly delivery data if you hold the

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>bullish fesis that long term, it's a world where Tesla

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>operates a proprietary robotaxi ride hailing service. Take that and

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>interpret the data of this morning, please.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 7>So I think Craig really summed it up about this

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 7>shift in investor's psychology and it impacts how we think

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 7>about the delivery numbers today. So if we rewind four

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 7>years ago, the expectation was about twenty thirty Tesla would

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 7>be producing about ten million vehicles per year. They're going

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 7>to do about one point seven million this year, and

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 7>those expectations now are that they're probably going to do

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 7>somewhere between two or three million. And I think that

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 7>the consensus numbers today at the core of what's important

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 7>is that if they can just stick around like two

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 7>million deliveries a year, that would be about ten x

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 7>more deliveries than what weimo is going to be putting

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 7>on the road for their autonomy. And so this is

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 7>not all those of course, two million will go into

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 7>a robotaxi fleet, but all of those whill have opportunities

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 7>for Tesla to sell this very high margin full self

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 7>driving software, whether it's through a one hundred dollars description

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 7>a month or through eight thousand dollars up front. And

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 7>so ed I think that the context around delivery, of course,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 7>is in relation to what's going on in autonomy. I

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 7>do that is the bigger story. You've done a great

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 7>job of framing that in today. Do you just want

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 7>to make a couple points that are important because investors

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 7>do still care about deliveries. A couple important points. First,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 7>as Craig talked about, we're at the bottom here down

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 7>fourteen percent deliveries, it's going to be down ten probably

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 7>flatish in the December quarter. Something else is that the

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 7>sunsetting of these tax it's going to boost the deliveries.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that they could could surprise to the upside.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 7>Based on my sensitivity, they probably can be up three

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 7>percent in December. The street kind of a flatish, But

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 7>any of that good news of this pull forward because

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 7>of the sunsetting, the US tax credit will probably be

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 7>dismissed by investors. And when you put all this together,

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 7>there's just a lot of noise around the delivery number.

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 7>And what's most important is what happens in the weeks

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 7>ahead in terms of Austin and going to another city

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 7>like that is really what this The investment case around

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 7>Tesla has boiled down to.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 4>But Gene the cash cow, the money that's funded all

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 4>of the focus on AI and what progresses robotaxi and

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 4>autonomous has been the ability to sell cars is two million.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Therefore enough from your perspective going forward to finance this

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 4>and could it not be eroded yet further if there's

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 4>more withering of brand elon.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 7>So right now they have thirty seven billion in cash

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 7>and equivalents and if they do one point six to

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 7>one point seven million cars, they're probably going to burn

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 7>and continue to invest in autonomy, invest in new production

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 7>of a lower, more affordable vehicle. They're probably going to

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 7>end the year somewhere between thirty three and thirty five billion,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 7>this kind of ending. When I say ending the year,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean ending the next four quarters. Over the next

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 7>four quarters, so you're going to see this decline. So, Caroline,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 7>answer your question is that they've got a ton of

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 7>cash and they can weather essentially these lower unit numbers,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 7>and so I think at the core this is a

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 7>very different story. Elin and the last call talked about

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 7>the number of near death experiences the company has and

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 7>that twenty twenty five is going to be a most

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 7>difficult year and we're seeing that in these down fourteen

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 7>percent numbers today. But he also mentioned that we're not

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 7>we don't have this near death experience, and I think

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 7>that that just simply puts back to the cash and

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 7>another perspective around that cash and the tight spot, if

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 7>you will, that Tesla is in right now, is that

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 7>if you take a step back and say that the

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 7>world is going to be autonomous, whether it's robotics, and

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 7>factories or moving people around in vehicles. If you do

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 7>take that approach, then these other competitors need to be

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 7>making investments. And I think that that is one of

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 7>the reasons why Tesla continues to have the support of

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 7>investors is these investors look around to what else is

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 7>out there, and really no one is doing anything besides

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 7>Weimo and some of the things that are going on

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 7>with BYD in China. And so the setup, even with

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 7>a cash burn over the next four quarters, is still

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 7>very favorable in terms of how this story ultimately plays

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 7>out for Tesla.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Gee.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, I was spending a lot of time pouring

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 3>over the China data overnight, the Chinese Passenger Car Association data.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 3>They don't distinguish between domestic sales and export, but there

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 3>was a return to growth there while the market broadly

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 3>across anyv grew.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 2>What did you get from that?

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 7>Kind of a similar takeaway that Craig had is that

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 7>any news is good news. And kind of keep in

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 7>mind too, is that China is fiercely competitive. Bu Idea

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 7>has made huge leaps forwards, and way we kind of

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 7>play that forward is that a comparable Tesla in China

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 7>costs about twenty to thirty percent more than a comparable

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 7>BYD and that's a similar kind of a split as

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 7>buid starts to roll more into Europe. And so when

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 7>we look at these numbers, my sense is that, you know,

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 7>anything around flatish, it feels like I'm cutting the company

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 7>too much slack here. But the reality is is that

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 7>if they can maintain kind of this flatish, I think

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 7>that's a positive.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it an overwhelming negative?

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 8>Though?

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 4>The arguments going on the feud that re erupted between

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 4>Trump and Mask, how much is that an issue?

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 5>Fugiene?

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, at the end of the day, what was missing

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 7>from Trump's comments was, of course he came to after

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 7>the tax credits, he came after what was going on

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 7>with government spending and SpaceX. But what was notably missing

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 7>was any commentary that he was going to slow down

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 7>the adoption of autonomy. And I mean that, of course,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 7>this is what we're talking about. This is the most

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 7>important piece. That's the one lever, that's the critical lever

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 7>for a Tesla investor, very different for SpaceX, but for

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 7>a Tesla investor that they have to look at is

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 7>how is this pace of autonomy going to move? And

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 7>I think One of the reasons why the White House

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 7>did not why President Trump didn't mention that is that

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 7>the concept of physical AI, specifically around robotaxis autonomous vehicles,

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 7>is going to be a signature example of AI in

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 7>the real world that as governments start to be more

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 7>competitive around A I just imagine a world where we

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 7>have robotaxis going wild from Bid and Baydu in China.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 7>They're also in Europe, and they're not available in the US.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 7>I think that would be a bad look for the

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 7>White House. And so when I think about this feud,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm entertained by it. I think cooler heads will prevail.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 7>But most importantly, I think that what is going on

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 7>around AI and physical AI and autonomy is so much

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 7>bigger than any sort of high school feud between Eon

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 7>and Trump.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>In a win for chip makers, President Trump's Big Beautiful

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Bill passed by the Senate would increase the investment tax

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>credit for semiconducting manufacturers, rising to thirty five percent if

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 3>they break new ground in plants before twenty twenty six.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 3>From more, we go out to DC and bloomberz kdie

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Lines Kelly, what do we.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 9>Know, Well, this is really just expanding an incentive that

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 9>already exists thanks to the twenty twenty two Chips Act,

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 9>which set this tax credit at twenty five percent. This legislation, though,

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 9>assuming it passes, would lift that tax credit to thirty

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 9>five percent. There is a time limit as to how

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 9>long chip makers manufacturers will have to take advantage of this.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 9>You have to break ground on new plants in the

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 9>United States by twenty twenty six, so it is a

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 9>limited window here. But what is not limited is actually

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 9>the incentive itself. There is no cap on it, so

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 9>this very well account for the greatest share of incentives

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 9>that any of these individual companies will benefit from. This

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 9>is one area in which you are seeing a win

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 9>for some technology companies, while other tech companies, of course,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 9>are not getting necessarily what they wanted out of this legislation,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 9>specifically those that operate in the AI space. After the

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 9>provision that would have put a moratorium on state regulation

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 9>of AI was shot down in the Senate through an

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 9>amendment that passed ninety nine to one. All of that said,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 9>this incentive or any other elements of this legislation are

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 9>not law yet. Even though it did pass the Senate,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 9>it still has to pass the House. We're going to

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 9>get the first test of whether or not that can

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 9>really happen later on today when a procedural vote the

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 9>so called rule will be brought to the floor. Unclear

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 9>at this time whether or not the rule can pass,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 9>paving the way to final passage of the legislation. House

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 9>Freedom CACUS members right now are signaling they are not supportive,

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 9>but their meeting with President Trump today after meeting with

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.599
<v Speaker 9>the Speaker Mike Johnson earlier this morning, so they'll be

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 9>trying to convince those holdouts to vote, and that's something

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 9>will be one throughout the.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Day, and Trump's focus is to get this done before

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Independence Day July fourth, Kylee, Is there any contention over

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 4>the tech elements of it from lawmakers.

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 5>In the House?

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, there was plenty of contention over the AI measure specifically,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 9>though that was passed in the House legislation. It was

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 9>more of a problem in the Senate where it was

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 9>stripped out. It's not clear whether or not that's going

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 9>to be a deal breaker for any House lawmaker that

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 9>wanted to have that state moratorium in there, but by

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 9>and large, the prevailing issues that the holdouts have with

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 9>this legislation at this point is simply just the cost

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 9>that there's fiscal conservatives who are concerned that the Senate

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 9>pass version of this bill adds even more to the

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 9>deficit and is not fiscally responsible and doesn't cut enough spending.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 9>And it's on those grounds that they're saying, at least

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 9>for right now, they're not in favor of this.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Piece of legislation.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Echoing one nail Musket feels like Bloomby's Kaylee lines, Thanks

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 4>so much. Turning to Apple now, the company was dealt

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 4>a blow from supply of fox Cone after it asked

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of its Chinese staff to return home from its

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 4>iPhone trees in India. This is according to people familiar Now.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 4>No reason for the decision was given, but the move

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 4>comes in growing tensions between Beijing and India's efforts to

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 4>any curb tech exports.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Right now for more opening buds woman joins us.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 4>So, basically, China has seen the fact that manufacturing has

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 4>been moving outside of China into perhaps Vietnamal indeed India,

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 4>and they seem to be trying to curtail it.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 10>Yes, absolutely so, this move would bring back specialized workers,

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 10>which is really one of fox CON's advantages and China's

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 10>advantages in being able to produce certain devices that are

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 10>key to global markets, including of course, Apple's iPhones. Tim

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 10>Cook has said that the reasons for producing iPhones in

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 10>China come down not just to reductions and costs, but

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 10>also the company specialized labor and specialized equipment that resides

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 10>in the country.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>So our sourcing and our reporting told us about the

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 3>impact of the assembly lines in India and the iPhones

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>that are actually made in that market.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Great question.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 10>So our reporting, to be clear, doesn't say that production

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 10>of iPhones in India will be impossible going forward. We

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 10>are reporting also says that the quality of the output

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 10>is not necessarily going to be affected, but the efficiency

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 10>of the assembly line absolutely is likely to be infected,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 10>and that would have an impact on production costs and

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 10>we would assume prices of the final product possibly, which

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 10>is something that Bloomberg is reported on extensively already in

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 10>the months of this trade war has been going on.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, and those Chinese nationals there were also involved in

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 3>the training of other staff.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloombers Dane a Woolman.

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Perplexity.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Could it be at the center of Apple's latest we've

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 4>vamp at the tech Giant looks to use an outside

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 4>AI model to revamp Siri. Bluemag has reported that Apple

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 4>was eyeing a potential bid for Perplexity, acquiring AI talent

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 4>tech potentially here to discuss Dmitri Shivlenko's Perplexity AI chief

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 4>business officer, we go in straight to the chase. Dmitri

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 4>has Apple been in touch about using your own general

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 4>to AI products interweave within.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>SyRI So Perplexity.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 8>We're focused on building AI that is trustworthy and accurate,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 8>and it's no surprise that leading OEMs around the world

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 8>want to make their products better, want to take advantage

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 8>of all these new superpowers we have and have the

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 8>most trustworthy accurate AI as part of their solution.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I wouldn't be good at.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 8>My job if I went around talking about confidential partner conversations,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 8>but really excited to work closely with all kinds of OEMs,

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 8>because trustworthy, accurate AI is going to be a critical

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 8>substrate for how we get value out of our devices.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 4>So what's really interesting is what benchmarks you hold yourself

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 4>to if it's all about trust and accuracy, or if

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 4>it's about metrics.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Such as numbers.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 4>We had of enjoying the Blueberg Tech Summit, but a

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 4>month or so ago talking about how the user base

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 4>in size has been increasing seven or eighteen million search

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 4>queries in just the month of May.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 5>How are you getting onto hitting a billion.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 8>We're building a company that we aspire to make generational,

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 8>and I think it's important to have the right structural

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 8>incentives to earn users trust. Ultimately, the underlying foundation models

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 8>are going to get smarter and more powerful. The scarce resource,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 8>the scarce asset, when you project out in the future,

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 8>is going to be that trust. And so there's things

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 8>we could actually do today to grow faster, monetize quicker

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 8>that would actually potentially.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Erode that trust.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 8>And so it's striking this right balance of playing the

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 8>long game, earning that that that you know, ability to

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 8>be trusted over many decades, while you know, really having

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 8>our growth be driven by users.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the product.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 8>Most people that use perplexity use it because somebody had

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 8>told them they use perplexity, right and Dimitri.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 3>That's what I reflect on when I think about my interactions.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 2>With perplexity, if you call it a query or not,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I kind.

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Of think about time spent in the context that like

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 3>different to Google, I might make a query and stay

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>with it over a number of days. Is that kind

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 3>of data that you can share with us about how

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 3>you see users behaving differently on perplexity?

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it's an interesting you know, we both

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 8>save people a lot of time, right the time safe

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 8>to get knowledge.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 11>But then once.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 8>You realize you can acquire knowledge so efficiently and so quickly,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 8>you want to learn more, right, And so our goal

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 8>is not to like, you know, have you use perplexity

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 8>more hours of the day. We want to empower users

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 8>to tap into their curiosity and learn everything they possibly

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 8>could want to learn. And so it is there's both

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 8>an efficiency metric and then there's kind of expanding that curiosity.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Dmitri.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 3>There are reports in May that you're raising more money

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 3>at a higher evaluation that Excel the venture firm will

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 3>be leading.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 2>What's the status of that? Please?

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we're you know, I won't go get into any

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 8>investment specifics, but it is something that makes my job

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 8>easier is that vcs and investors tend to be some

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 8>of the busiest people in the world, and many of

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 8>them love using perplexity, and so oftentimes, you know, when

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 8>we speak to investors. They know our product very well.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 8>We have a lot of passionate users, broadly in finance,

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 8>because those are sectors where trustworthy, accurate AI. When you're

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 8>making million dollars, ten million dollars, hundred million dollars, billion

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 8>dollar decisions, that's where you really notice the difference of

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 8>a more accurate answer engine, and so that that has

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 8>made our ability to grow through capital, you know, more straightforward.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 4>It feels like vcs are desperate to give you money,

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 4>but it also seems as though plenty of other.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Big tech want to buy into you.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 4>There's been reports that Meta was trying to buy you,

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 4>and indeed Apple you resolute or remaining.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Independent or would you be bought at the right price. We,

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 5>as I.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 8>Said, are building a generational company, so we think of

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 8>the world through the lens of trillions, not billions. We

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 8>also think there's incredible value in remaining independent because that's

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 8>a key way to preserve that trust with our users,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 8>and so we have no plans to sell the company

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 8>and are incredibly excited about, you know, remaining independent for decades.

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>To Dmitriy ser Lenko, perplexed, it's great to have you

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 3>here on Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Let's take a look at

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 4>these markets as we see a rally and then as

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>that one hundred we have close to record his once

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 4>again five ten percent on the upside, even though we

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 4>see a worldwide bond market sell off. We see that

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 4>data coming in from the United States in terms of jobs,

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 4>maybe signaling tomorrow non varm payrolls will show us like

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 4>weakening in the jobs data and could that mean the

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Fed doesn't decut.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 5>We move on to see what's happening underneath the hood.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 4>What leads inn Azzac higher is big names such as Nvidio,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 4>but also Apple at one point seven percent, shaking on

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 4>anxiety that maybe Fox on its suppliers having to shift

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 4>to engineers back to China from India. What does that

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 4>mean for a supply chain? Tesla up four percent? Have

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 4>we seen the worst in terms of sales declin's ed

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 4>We saw those Q two numbers deliveries down thirteen percent,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 4>but the market that braced itself for worse.

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's get back to our top story in Tesla,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the EV maker is facing multiple headwinds, and its numbers

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 3>tell us that story.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie Valdez.

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Street is Director of Industry Insights at Cox Automotive. So

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and eighty four one hundred and twenty two

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>vehicles in the second quarter. The thing about the data

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>is it doesn't distinguish by geography, right, there is some

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 3>monthly data from different jurisdictions around the world, but like,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>go under the hood of the data. What did you

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>learn from the Prince Stephanie.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, I was thinking about we had our

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 12>forecast call last last week, and we were forecasting that

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 12>Tesla would have a.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 11>Twenty one percent year over year decline.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 12>So I think if you look at when the numbers

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 12>start coming in, we'll probably see the numbers the next

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 12>few days. I think the US we're probably going to

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 12>see a larger decline year over year. And once again,

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 12>you know, with Tesla, it's all about having the product, right,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 12>They've had no product other than the cybertruck, so they

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 12>need a new product. And then just globally, just the

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 12>competition from China, whether it's uid Ezeker shall Meet.

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 11>There's lots of competition.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 12>And then as we all know, with the recent those participation,

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 12>Elon has had some polarization both in Europe and the

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 12>US markets.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 11>So I think.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 12>It's going to be critical for Tesla to rebrand themselves

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 12>and really bring some new product. If they can get

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 12>that affordable product launch, that could be a game changer

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 12>for them.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Can they rebrand themselves with Elon taking over control of

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 4>even more so the US and European sales focus too?

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 5>Is that the right sort of rebranding.

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I think it's gonna take a lot of work,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 12>right especially in the US, especially in certain parts of

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 12>the country. In the US, I think it could be done,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 12>but it's gonna have to be very targeted, very strategic,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 12>and it has to be ongoing. It can't be a

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 12>one time thing. But also I think it's all about product,

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 12>right with you think about consumers. If you look at

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 12>the US market, GM has been rolling out evs the

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 12>last couple of years and they're right behind Tesla.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 11>Eating up market share.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 12>So I think it goes back to having kind of

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 12>that whole strategy as a car company, right their car

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 12>company trying to transition into an AI But.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 11>That car business is all about product and the right

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 11>price and the right consumer experience.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 4>But that consumer experience, that product is technology.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Technology at it's very hot Stephanie.

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 4>If we think about how China looks as though it's stabilizing,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 4>many may be thinking that it's because of FSD. Actually

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 4>the wins back some of the focus in China and

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 4>competes against Shaomi with the latest SU seven and competes

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 4>against E BYD.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 5>How important is FSD.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 12>I think it's critical, especially you think about as Tesla

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 12>is trying to become this AI and with their recent

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 12>rowotax unveiling and often it was small scale, but it

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 12>was very important that they actually did launch when they

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 12>said they were And I think it's going to be

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 12>important for them to continue to scale. And I know

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of safety concerns and some regulatory but

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 12>I think it's going to be important for them to

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 12>continue to innovate on their chips, on their dojo to

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 12>really kind of create that competitive molt around AI.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie.

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 3>I use full self driving supervised every single day. I

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 3>do about sixty miles a day. Tesla's approach is get

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 3>in the car and try it, and then you'll see

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the future. Where Testera operates as a ride hailing company

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 3>with robotaxis, is that sales pitch resonating the jump from

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 3>a driver assistant tool to them becoming an uber type player.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 12>I think it's challenging, and you think about just kind

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 12>of when they're a competition. You have Weimo, right, who

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 12>has lots of lots of miles, and I think recently

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 12>we just hit heard Jim Farley say that he thinks

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 12>the Weimo approach is better.

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 11>So I think Tesla has a lot more to prove.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 12>I think their approach can be effective if they're able

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 12>to roll it out and get more miles and overcome

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 12>some of the safety and regulatory concerns.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 3>The idea that Tesla's going to send sell ten million

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 3>vehicles here by the end of the decade seems to

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 3>have change now, right, But within the data there are

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 3>signs that outside of.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>North American Europe they.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Might be getting traction in new markets. Do you have

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 3>any sense of what those new markets are.

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think they're looking at India.

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 12>I think that's another market and some of more of

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 12>these other South American countries.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 11>So I think that's going to be an opportunity for them.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 12>But to your point, it's going to be critical for

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 12>them to look at other options because, as we know,

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 12>China is getting to get to that overcapacity, and so

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 12>they need to find locations to.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 11>Export their evs.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 12>And also, I think with some of the tariffs in

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 12>place between US China, I think it's going to be

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 12>important for them. And then also to continue to increase

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 12>production in Berlin.

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 11>I think that's a smart move as well. I will say, the.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 12>One thing, you know, we've talked about all the headwinds

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 12>Tesla does have, you know, the advantage of having the

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 12>vertical integration, and that's what really gives them up in some.

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 11>Of the other US many factures.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 12>So that's one thing I want to just point out

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 12>that's really something important to remember about Tesla.

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 4>Stephanie Valdez Streat, director of Industry Insights, that Cox Automotive

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 4>wonderful to have your insights. And look, let's return to

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 4>the fact that amid the disappointing sales figures, the recent

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 4>drop in share price too has been painful, but Tesla's

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 4>market cap still dwarfs other automakers. Bloomberg editor in Chief

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 4>emeritus and Bloomberg Opinion columnist Matt Winkler has been writing

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 4>about this in his latest column. Basically, how difficult is

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 4>it to remember what a juggernaut, what a success story

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Tesla is in the face of all the headwinds and

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 4>news articles about Elon Musk right now, Matt.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 13>Pleasure to be with you, and you're quite right. Omitted

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 13>from the prevailing narrative, including everything we just heard, is

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 13>that Tesla still is the world's largest automaker. It's the

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 13>ninth largest public company. It's worth more than the gross

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 13>domestic product of Saudi Arabia, and the top ten automakers

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 13>are just say, seventy five percent, seventy eight percent maybe

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 13>of Tesla's market value, which is more than a trillion dollars.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 13>So that's a really important point to make, which is

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 13>amid all of this doom mongering. Why is it that

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 13>the people with the most at stake, who are the shareholders,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 13>somehow are missing from everybody's story, including this morning when

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 13>the sales were first reported, people thought that was the lead.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 13>The sales are disappointing, and yet the share price is

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 13>up the most since June. So what does this share

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 13>price tell us? It tells us that Tesla is a

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 13>lot more than it's vehicles. It is the autonomous driving,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 13>but it's so many more things other than that. It's robotics,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 13>it's a visionary who wants to get to Mars, and

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 13>he's taking every thing he's got, which is artificial intelligence,

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 13>and applying it to his products. And the shareholders see

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 13>that because the shareholders are constantly looking at the future,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 13>not at the past. And one thing I would say

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 13>about the vehicles. Everybody thinks there's a demand problem, but

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 13>the Model Why was actually refurbished if you like this year,

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 13>which counted for some of the production slippage. The sales

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 13>are way up in Norway, they're way up in Spain,

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 13>so the prevailing narrative really doesn't cut much there. And

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 13>the Model Why We Forget was the best selling vehicle

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 13>in twenty twenty three in the world, the best selling

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 13>vehicle in twenty twenty four in the world, looks like

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 13>it's going to be the best selling ed vehicle in

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty five. So those are all things that are

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 13>missing from the narrative that you've been sharing so far.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Matt. You point out in your opinion piece that, by

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's own description, it's a full stack technology company. I've

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>written a lot about that as well. And the most

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 3>bullish names on the street on the cell side, their

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 3>valuations are predicated on this vision of Robotaxi and Optimus.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 3>But in the here and now the sales are driven

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 3>by the sale of cars to consumers. When does the

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>inflection point come where revenues are derived largely from software?

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would a party right.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 13>Attention to the share price, because you know what motivated

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 13>my colleague Chinpai and I to produce this piece is

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 13>all through this year, headline after headline, story after story

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 13>from everywhere was as we said, bad to worse, and

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 13>yet through it all, everybody is omitting the great parenthetical clause,

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 13>which is Tesla is still worth more than the ten competitors,

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 13>biggest competitors combined. Why is it that Toyota's valuation is

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 13>a fourth of what Tesla is? Why is the general

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 13>motors which you referenced earlier in this program is just

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 13>fifty billion dollars and Tesla's are trillion dollars. And the

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 13>answer is there's a lot more to Tesla that people

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 13>are not looking at, and the best place to go

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 13>is the share price, because the share price tells you

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.479
<v Speaker 13>what the relative value of Tesla is.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Every single day Bloomberg Opinions and Bloomberg's Editor in Chief

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Emeritus Matt Winkler.

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you back on the show. Thank you

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech and you're looking at a live

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>shot of the principal room. Check out the Bloomberg Tech podcast.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 3>You can buy it on the terminal as well as

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Cloud based design platform Figma has filed to go public.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 3>It could be one of the year's biggest initial public offerings.

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to go right to Bloomberg's Katie Ruth. You've

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 3>been tracking this one. Let's get into all the details,

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 3>like what do we know about the ticker, where it

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>will be listed, and just like me last night, I'm

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 3>sure you pulled through the entire regulatory filing.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 2>What do we know?

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Sure?

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So their ticker is fig fig. They're going to

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 14>be on the New York Stock Exchange and sources tell

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 14>me they're aiming to go to debut later this month.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is a long time coming.

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 14>They almost got bought by Adobe in twenty twenty two,

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 14>and then that didn't happen, so they went theo IPO

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 14>rout instead.

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 4>And there is the context that they were almost bought

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 4>by Adobe, but they managed to keep eye on the prize,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 4>keep growing the business independently. Where do we stand in

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 4>terms of the growth of this company?

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 14>Sure, and they recently turned a profit, so they have

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 14>growing revenue and now profit. You know, I think they're

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 14>trying to make themselves seem.

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Like they're AI related.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 14>They recently launched an AI related product. But you know,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 14>they have a lot of design clients and then they

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 14>have a lot of non professional designers using their product,

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, a lot of them outside of the US,

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 14>all around the world, and they're hoping, you know, that

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 14>this will the IPO will continue to raise their profile

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 14>with consumers.

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Most Katie roof all Things IPO for this summer, we

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it. Now from public markets to increasing investment on

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 4>the private side.

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 5>Menture firm AXL.

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Has led an unusually large Series A funding round for

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 4>the startup Campfi, now the AI native enterprise software firm,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 4>recently close to thirty five million dollar financing round. Axcel

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 4>partner Christine Esman is here with us to talk it through.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 4>This is largely I mean surprisingly large for a Series A,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 4>but I feel like our numbers have gone all out

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 4>to whack the minute. General to AI came into the playbook. Christine,

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 4>why have you backed campfi?

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well thanks for having me.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 15>I'm so excited to tell you more about campfire, meetcamfire

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 15>dot com. Campfire is an AI native ERP solution that

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 15>replaces companies like net suite and quick Books. It's tackling

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 15>the super large ERP markets, one of the largest markets

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 15>in software with over a trillion dollars of market cap,

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 15>and Campfires is coming to market with a really.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 3>Fresh approach to the uninitiated ERP enterprise resource planning, which,

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 3>when you say it in full, is not as exciting.

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Why is it exciting, It's super excited.

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 15>It's super exciting. I mean, think about the incumbents.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 5>In this space.

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 15>You have companies like Oracle and into It and SAP

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 15>that have dominated this category for decades. At this point,

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 15>all of those companies were founded decades ago in the.

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 11>Pre AI world.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 15>And when you're actually a user of these solutions, they

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 15>take months to implement, they require consultants, and post implementation,

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 15>they don't really deliver an enjoyable solution for any users who.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 11>Are using those solutions.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 15>And Campfires is taking just a really fresh approach. Maybe

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 15>get a little bit more tangible. Think of you as

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 15>a finance leader and you're trying to do something routine

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 15>like forecast your cash in January, and that might require

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 15>multiple people, manual data entry and all that. Using Campfire,

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 15>you can flip this model on its head, and camp

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 15>Fire enables the user to use natural language to just

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 15>do this and automatically see the insights.

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Christine, the company itself and the people that company are

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 3>super interesting right led by John Glasgow, And I was

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 3>reading earlier in the Week that it's one of these

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 3>companies that from inception moved very fast. You know, within

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 3>nine months or so it had all of this business,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 3>and there's evidence that business is being one from some

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 3>sort of more established scale players. Can you just give

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 3>us some of the data behind what gave you the

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 3>conviction to back them?

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Definitely.

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 15>I mean, in less than two years, this company has

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.280
<v Speaker 15>shipped a fully functioning ERP solution, which is just nothing

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 15>short of remarkable. They have over a dozen companies that

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 15>have moved from Sweek completely, over one hundred that have

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 15>moved from QuickBooks, and that's just absolutely exceptionable, exceptional for

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 15>the stage.

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 11>Of company that they're at. They're also supporting some pretty

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 11>large companies.

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 15>I mean Rutler is what example, They just announced that

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 15>they crossed one hundred million of arr publicly and they're

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 15>relying on campfires as their ERP.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 5>Can I switch to large companies?

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 4>And actually, Christine, of course we know you for late

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 4>stage investment as well as these mighty series A round.

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 5>That you've just delivered to Campfire. We just had Perplexity on.

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 4>We just had Dimitri from Perplexity on and I'm hearing

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 4>we've all seen the reports that accels involved in a

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 4>new funding round for the business.

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Can you talk about it as to whether you are

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 5>looking at the business.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I won't comment on some of our unannounced investments,

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 15>but I think as a firm, we're incredibly bullish on AI.

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 15>We were the first investors in Scale AI, and obviously

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 15>Alex Wing has had a lot of news recently and

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 15>we think super highly of that company, and we can

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 15>and you to think super highly of the future successive

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 15>of Scale. We feel super fortunate to have invested in

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 15>Perplexity in companies like Superbase and Graphite and Cursor and

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 15>other AI companies that.

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 11>Are really defining the next wave of technology.

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.919
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us though about these rather interesting aquahiers shall

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 4>we call them, because we're seeing it time and time

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 4>again in the Generator AI space. Is that a win

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 4>for you when you see Scale AI lose its key founder,

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 4>continuous different business, stripped of certain perhaps future business lines.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Or is that given the scale of the investment that

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 4>a Meta makes or that others have made in certain

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 4>aquahis is that nothing but a good thing from your perspective?

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, Well, Meta made an investment in Scale and the

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 15>company will remain independent and will continue to go on.

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 15>They have incredible privacy regulations in place and a number

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 15>of really phenomenal customers that will continue using Scale, and

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 15>I'm just excited to see what the future has in

0:37:58.480 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 15>store for Scale.

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Christine Estamon, Excel partner. It's great to have you here

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Warner Music it is launching a three hundred million dollar

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 4>cost savings drive in order to free up funds for

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 4>growth initiatives, and the plan will rezelt though in an

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 4>unspecified number of job cuts, according to a regulatory filing. Now,

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the company says almost two thirds of the savings will

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 4>be achieved through job cuts, with the rest coming from

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 4>organizational changes and overhead savings.

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 15>Ed.

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft has initiated its second major wave of job cuts

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 3>this year, laying off about nine thousand workers.

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the company looks to raining costs.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 3>According to a spokesperson, less than four percent of the

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 3>total workforce will be impacted. Bloomberg's Brody Ford joins us

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 3>with the details. So second wave and the rational is

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 3>also pretty clear. Get rid of middle layers of management,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 3>streamlined teams. Give us the size and scope.

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 16>Size and scope is that you know, you here four

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 16>three percent a couple months ago. It doesn't sound like

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 16>that much, but with Microsoft, I mean these are huge

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 16>numbers of employees. We have fifteen thousand people impacted across

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 16>two waves, and there's been other little cuts in addition

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 16>to that. And you know, folks might say Microsoft the

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 16>world's most valuable company. A lot of days, ninety six

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 16>billion in profit, Why are they doing all this? A

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 16>lot of it's that AI spending. Right one day, you're

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 16>spending eighty billion on AI data centers, and you want

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 16>to keep your margins flat. In this case, that's led

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 16>to some cut heads.

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 4>And Brody the view has been, actually, the AI is

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 4>getting so good that it means that they can start

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 4>getting one of engineers AI is doing the job of them,

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 4>But is that really where the cuts come from this

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 4>time round.

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 16>I haven't seen a ton of evidence that there's that

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 16>kind of direct employee replacement, but I think companies certainly

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.879
<v Speaker 16>want to do it, right. I mean, a vendor like Microsoft,

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 16>it is selling it software, telling people, hey, you can

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 16>do more with less. I think we'd be naive to

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 16>think they aren't also a to do that. Internally. We

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 16>saw at the layoffs a couple of months ago disproportionately

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 16>hit software engineers right, and.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 3>The Microsoft spokesperson told us that in this round it

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 3>will be across teams and geographies, but we know from

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 3>our reporting largely witch divisions.

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking like Xbox sales and marketing.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 16>Correct sales and marketing are the really big ones right now,

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 16>and that's because it's the end of the fiscal year

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 16>and you generally don't want to fire salespeople the fourth

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 16>quarter because you're not going to get the results you want.

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 16>And so yeah, we're seeing cuts today that I have

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 16>reason to believe our focus on those sales employees, but

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 16>really cuts across the company, and I think it underscores

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 16>the kind of new reality of the tech market that

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 16>even if you are in one of the most successful companies,

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 16>jobs aren't safe the way they used to be.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Ready for telling it straight, We appreciate it.

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Let's turn now to some of our other key top

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 4>stories today, ed and we've been all over the moves

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to Apple potentially seeing those Chinese engineers

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 4>that Fox gone and senter in having to go back home.

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean for the supply chain? But Tesla

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 4>front and center. You're the man who helps break scoop

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 4>after scoop, we're up four percent because well, the deliveries

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 4>were bad, but not as bad as.

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 3>We're expected, right, deliveries technically misconsensus estimates, but actually the

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of lowest range of the estimates that exceeded, you know,

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 3>expectations really reset. But I think, as Gene Monster told

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 3>us and Bloomberg Opinions Matt Winkler, look past the deliveries

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and think about Tesla as a technology company.

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, while that's what we do right here, the technology,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 4>and that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech, so.

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Much to recap. Don't forget the podcast. You know where

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to find it. It's on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 3>It's online, on apples, Spotify, and on iHeart from San

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Francisco and Caroline's out in London.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg tech.