WEBVTT - Bloomberg Bonus Episode: Apple and Intel Earnings

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Tim

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Stenovak on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to get to some earnings because we're seeing

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 3>some stocks move here in the aftermarket. Intel shares they

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>are right now up about two percent. This is as

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 3>we got in terms of some of the big headlines

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>from Intel C's first quarter. Justin gross margin of thirty

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>six percent, that's below with the Street was forecasting of

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>about thirty nine point three percent. Go back to the

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter, the last quarter revenues that was a beat

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 3>fourteen point twenty six billion versus an estimate of thirteen

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>point eighty one billion. And again talking about first quarter revenue,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 3>some forecasts here a bit of a range eleven point

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 3>seven billion to twelve point seven billion, and that Tim

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 3>compares with the street estimate of twelve point eighty five billion.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>But again right now we're seeing Intel up about two percent.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I know they also talked about in terms of some

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>spending right and I think basically saying they will not

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>be spending speculatively. So I feel like some of that

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 3>plays to maybe some of the commentary we've had about

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the AI spend maybe a rethink this past week.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Reminder too, they're also looking for a new CEO at

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 2>this point to take up for patkel Singer who left

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>at the end of last year. For more, let's go

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>to Jackie Doavolos. She's in our San Francisco bureau. She's

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>been following this company and these numbers closely. Jackie, how

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 2>is the turnaround going?

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's the question everyone wants to know. The key

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 4>uncertainty here is who's taking over the company. You had

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>some guidance from the CFO as to how the next

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 4>quarter is going to look like, but not so much

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>guidance on who's going to be taking the reins. And

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the big point of uncertainty. And if

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>you look at shares, it's kind of a tepid response

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>considering how much uncertainty is swirling around the company right now.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>But to your point, Carol, I think some of that

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 4>optimism is coming in through the comments around spend. As

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, the former CEO, Pat gal Singer was ousted

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 4>just last month, and big part of the reason for

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 4>that was this ordinate amount of spending that the board

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 4>perceived to be a drag on the company's performance. Now,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 4>we might not know who might be taking over, but

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 4>what we do know is that next quarter they're looking

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 4>at revenue of about eleven point seven to twelve point

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 4>seven billion dollars. That's below estimates, but perhaps some of

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>that optimism from the fact that they beat pretty well

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 4>on their revenue figures for the fourth quarter is coming through.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting just looking through to some of the

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 3>reporting from Ouroni and King of course, who follows the

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 3>chips sector, and saying that you know, again, what you

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 3>guys were just talking about investors in analyst waiting for

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the appointment of a new leader who will determine Intel's future.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a big question. The company's outsource manufacturing

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 3>push will not see meaningful revenue from silicon customers until

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty seven. For now, the bulk of outside sales

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>will come from packing works. So we're getting a little

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 3>bit more in terms of the business here, Tim. But again,

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the stock, as Jackie mentioned, just pulling it up again

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>here in the aftermarket, and the stock right now just

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>up about one point two percent here. But it's not

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>selling off, which is interesting.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's been a lot of selling off of

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the last few years with Intel to you know, when

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>you zoom out, of course, Jackie, the data center business

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 2>certainly facing competition from Nvidia and AMD their core business

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>PC processors. How is demand there, how's competition there?

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, we got some comments from the CFO who said

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>that competitive dynamics is a big reason why we're seeing

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a weaker forecast. He also cited the

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>macro uncertainties and of course seasonal weakness. But when we

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 4>go back to those competitive dynamics, who is the competition

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>and tim You're absolutely right, those AI accelerators are the

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 4>big question for investors. Can they get in here and compete?

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Obviously with the gold standard coming from Nvidia, it's going

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 4>to take a lot of work and investment to really

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>chip away there. But in the meantime they're also facing

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>competition from their bread and butter in that processing personal

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 4>computer processing unit. You have AMD really coming in, and

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 4>then of course on the outsourcing manufacturing site, Taiwan Semiconductors

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 4>is also a pretty big player now, so they're kind

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 4>of facing this competition from all ends. Even you know,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>as we look at AI being this big opportunity for

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 4>pretty much every tech player out there. Intel has really

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 4>been struggling to make a name for themselves in the space.

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 3>Just to rehash, Intel shares folks in the aftermarket up

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 3>about one point three percent. Going to the first quarter

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 3>forecast seeing revenue of eleven point seven billion to twelve

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>point seven billion. The estimate on the street is twelve

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 3>point eighty five billion, so above that. Also in terms

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 3>of forecasts, he's an adjusted EPs of just flat. Estimate

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>is for eight cents. He's a justin gross margin of

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty six percent. That's a miss too. Estimate is thirty

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>nine point three percent. Go back to the fourth quarter

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and their current quarter sales and profit forcat asked falling

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 3>short of analyst projections. But if we go back to

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter fourteen point two six billion, that's the

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>revenue that's down seven point four percent year over year.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>The estimate on the street was thirteen point eight billion.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>But again the key thing as we're talking about, you know,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>not yet having any update on a permanent CEO. The

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 3>interim co CEO David Sisner saying our first quarter one

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>or quarter one outlook, I should say, reflects seasonal weakness

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>magnified by macro uncertainties. Further inventory digestion, and competitive dynamics.

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Jackie sounds like a super full plate. We know it's

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>been a full plate for Intel, but it still is.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a reminder at least that it still is.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 4>One hundred percent. And as we look to the conference

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 4>call with analysts, the big question is going to be

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 4>not just an update for leadership, but also in this interim,

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 4>what's the game plan here, because now that you're seeing

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of spend really being scrutinized after the deep Seek

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 4>drama earlier this week, it's sort of effect those who

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 4>might have been perhaps exempt from that kind of scrutiny

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 4>before these open you know, AI, other AI developer kind

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 4>of players out there, and so obviously this is nothing

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 4>new for Intel, but of course I think that might

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 4>be you know, some of the guidance that they want

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 4>this this conservative spend, What does that mean, How does

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 4>it look like in practice at a time when it

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.239
<v Speaker 4>is going to take investment to really kind of break

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>into this AI space. Another thing that we'll be looking

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 4>out for in the conference call, it's just any more

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 4>guidance around what the company plans to do to perhaps

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 4>offset some of the weaknesses in its bread and butter

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 4>business in these personal computers. You know, what, what does

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 4>it plan to do about this kind of new competition

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 4>coming from Taiwan Semiconductors. I think That's what I'm going

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 4>to be looking out for in the upcoming call.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I think what still surprises me, Jackie is this is

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>a company that has no full time CEO, and you

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>had Pat Gelslinger out earlier this week. We talked about

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 2>this with Ian King tweeting that he was buying shares

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of Nvidia during the down during the decline of Nvidia

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, he wrote about that on LinkedIn, and it

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>was surprising to see that I'm not, you know, here

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to talk about Gelsinger. What I am wondering from you

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>about is what are analysts saying about the type of

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>leader who could come in and turn this company around? Like,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>who are the names? Do we have names that are

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>being thrown around at this point? Do we have a timeline,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>what do we know?

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there's too much that we do know

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>other than you know, the big point of scrutiny has

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 4>been spend and if you're going to bring in a

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 4>leader that can kind of articulate a new vision for

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.119
<v Speaker 4>the company still kind of, you know, bring it something

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 4>that's forward looking, that is not going to be predicated

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 4>on a plan that is going to take, you know,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 4>five to ten years to pan out, because I think

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 4>what investors want to see is what can we do

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 4>with what we have now? And you know, obviously a

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 4>pet Elsinger didn't get to live out his full five

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>year plan, but you know, he did put in in

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 4>place a solid foundation that I think a new CEO

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 4>can can work with. So some of the notes that

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 4>we've been seeing from the street include, you know, what

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 4>can be done with what foundation currently exists?

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Because it's not nothing.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, some solid investments have been made, some good

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 4>inroads have been made, but I think it's just a

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>matter of kind of that conservative spend how far can

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 4>that take them?

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Hey, all right, Jackie, thank you so much. Jackie Devallas,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News Tech reporter joining us with the latest on Intel.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 3>Keeping a watch on it as it moves up just

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the aftermarket. Do you want to

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>mention KLA Corp. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment company up about four

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent in the aftermarket following its earnings,

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>looking at what the company has to say, second quarter

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>adjusted gross margins sixty one point seven percent, slightly better

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 3>than the street expected third quarter adjusted gross margin, so

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 3>looking towards the current quarter sixty one to sixty three percent.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Also talking about third quarter revenue, they're looking for two

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>point eighty five to three point fifteen million billion, excuse me,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 3>and that is better than the street expected. So that

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 3>explains where you're seeing this stock up. Do not go anywhere.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Apple to come in just a moment. The earnings continuing

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 3>to come out. We are awaiting Apple, which is set

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 3>to report in just about seven minutes at the bottom

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 3>of the hour four to thirty pm Wall Street time,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 3>So as soon as they cross, we will bring them

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to you. A reminder of the company. We'll report for

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the quarter despite some head wind stepping from China, the

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 3>slow rollout of in house AI future features. So there's

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot coming at us when it comes to Apple

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>in particular, a lot coming at us when it comes

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 3>to the whole tech sector. This week, Angela Zino is

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 3>senior equeritly alyist over at CFRAA. He joins us from

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 3>New York City. Angelo, I do want to start with

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Intel because they just came out certainly a big part

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 3>of the semi second, but they're also going through, of course,

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 3>some changes, waiting for a new CEO, new leader, a

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 3>new way forward. Initial thoughts on Intel.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, now, thanks for having me.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 6>So, you know, you kind of look at the results overall,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 6>and I would say they were okay. I mean, as

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 6>far as the results were concerned, I think earnings about

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 6>thirteen cents, sales were down seven percent, roughly kind of

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 6>in line where we were expecting. I think as far

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 6>as the guidance is concerned, it was definitely on the

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 6>lighter side of things, but you know, nothing abysmal, nothing

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 6>like we've seen in past quarters where they've kind of

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 6>missed by a much wider margin. So as far as

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of the results are concerned, I think it was

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 6>perfectly fine, you know, within kind of you know, segments wise.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 6>I think the client computing group, which is kind of

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 6>more their their PC business was down about nine percent,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 6>and when you kind of look at their data center

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 6>business down about three percent. Again, I mean, it was

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 6>kind of where we had expected largely. So yeah, I

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 6>mean I think it's one of those situations where this

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 6>company is kind of just kind of going through the motions,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 6>and we're just kind of waiting to see kind of

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 6>who that next CEO is going to be and what

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 6>they have to say on the call as far as

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 6>kind of cost cutting this concern here in the intermediate term, I.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Could have asked you the same question I'm going to

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>ask you Angelo anytime over the last three years, where

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>is Intel in its turnaround?

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's it's a it's a tough one because, yeah,

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 6>there they continue to have to kind of restart in

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 6>terms of you know, where they're at, I mean you

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 6>and and it's typically because of the fact that they

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 6>haven't really kind of given you know, the existing leadership team,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, enough time to kind of you know, watch

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 6>their vision to really come to fruition.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 5>I think right now where we're looking at is you know,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 5>you need you need a new CEO.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>I think when you kind of look at their core business,

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 6>it's really kind of under attack. Right on the PC

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 6>side of things. You hear things like you know, ARM

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 6>looking to take half the half the market. On that

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 6>side of things, you got got the kind of greater

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 6>competitive pressure.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 5>Going on there.

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 6>You kind of look on the data center side of things,

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 6>they don't have the right offerings there. I mean, CPUs

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 6>are kind of a thing of the past at this

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 6>point in time, and you've got you know these you know,

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 6>these hyperscalers out there kind of rolling out their own

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 6>CPU offerings. So it is it is a very difficult

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 6>time for Intel at this point in time. There's really

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of no direction. You need that direction. So the

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 6>faster you get a CEO.

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 5>The better.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Again, this is kind of almost a race to the bottom,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 6>it seems like right now in terms of kind of

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 6>continue to continuing to course as their revenue trajectory continues

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 6>to go down. I think really kind of if I'm

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 6>looking at this company, it's all about how they can

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 6>execute on the foundry side of things right now. If

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 6>you're thinking about a turnaround going into the second half

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 6>of the year, I mean, you've got eighteen A that's

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 6>that's kind of been long awaited and hyped up panther Laics,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 6>it's supposed to ramp here in the second half of

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 6>the year. We want to see kind of what kind

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 6>of customers like, you know, start ramping on that side

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 6>of things. You're not going to have a major hyperscaler

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 6>out there all of a sudden just give business to Intel,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 6>they need to kind of execute on that side of things.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 6>So that's where we're at right now. I think they

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 6>need to start show some sort of promise on the

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 6>foundry side of things, and hopefully they can kind of

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 6>gain some momentum from there.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I got to tell you, I get these emails on

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the terminal when stories are read at like a high rate,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>those read spikes. People want to know about Apple. It

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 2>says that to Apple that our live blog on Apple

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Carol is already hitting a red spike before those numbers

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>come out. We're expecting those numbers in just about two minutes. Angelo, China,

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>is that the biggest concern? We saw some downgrades the

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>early part of this year.

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean it seems like, you know, when you

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of look here over the last couple of years,

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 6>January just hasn't been a good month for Apple, and

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 6>you know, you can kind of say maybe a part

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 6>of that is seasonality and what have you. I think

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 6>obviously the other issue is you kind of look over

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 6>the last two three years, the competitive pressures have.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Definitely escalated out in China.

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Huawei has become you know, a real threat

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 6>again at the high end of the market, and you know,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 6>we kind of want to know what's going on with China.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 6>It's somewhat of a black box at this point in time,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 6>and you kind of look at some of the sell

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 6>through numbers that have been posted, you know, specifically by

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese government here late in the year.

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 5>The numbers don't look good.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 6>And I think most people realize that most investors are

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 6>kind of going into these numbers knowing that China or

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 6>expecting that China is not going to be good. The

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 6>question is how bad is it? You know, we are

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 6>we kind of going to have to deal with some

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 6>sort of excess inventoryous situation where they're going to start

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 6>discounting more than we expect and it's going to, you know,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 6>look like an ugly March Quarter in terms of the guidance,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 6>I think that's at this point what we're looking at.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 6>But in terms of the biggest risk kind of going

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 6>into the print here and as far as the March

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 6>Quarter is concerned, it's absolutely China. And we also know

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 6>as far as the March Quarter guidance is concerned, it's

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 6>going to be someone on the weaker side of things

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 6>because of the four X uncertainties, you.

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Know, Angela. We're just about forty seconds away from those

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Apple earnings. Stocks down about five percent. We know it's

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 3>been lagging some of it's tech brethren. If you will,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>question is kind of what's next for Apple? What could

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>they say today that might give some indication of what's next.

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 3>They've started to give some clues. Just got about twenty

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 3>seconds here.

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 6>I think the hope is that you get a better

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 6>than fear type number really on China. I think that's

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of the big thing. And then of course on

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 6>the services side of things, you want to make sure

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 6>that that's running on all cylinders. We're going to hopefully

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 6>continue to get double digit growth. And I think if

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 6>you can kind of get you know, those two kind

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 6>of things running, I think that should be enough as

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 6>far as kind of where the stock is at and

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 6>the pullback that we've seen.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, folks, we're talking with Angelo's, you know, senior

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>equity analyst over at CFR Research. He's going to stay

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 3>with us as we get ready for those Apple earnings

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>and they are crossing. So let's go through some of

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the numbers. First quarter revenue one hundred and twenty four

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 3>point three billion. That is just a hair better than

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>what the street was expecting. One hundred and twenty four

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>point one billion is what the street was looking for.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Products revenue ninety seven point ninety six billion, that's up

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 3>about one point six percent year over year. Ten that's

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit light. Ninety eight point zero two billion.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>You break it down. iPhone, the all important iPhone number,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 3>sixty nine point fourteen billion, that is down year over year.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Estimate was for seventy one point zero four billion.

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>And then you keep going down at China revenue, big

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>miss there, estimates for twenty one point six billion dollars

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that came in at eighteen point five to one billion dollars. Wearables,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>home and accessories coming in just shy of estimates. MAC

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>revenue coming in above estimates, iPad revenue coming in above estimates.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>First quarter products revenue coming in shi of estimates. But Carol,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>what we're talking about right now, iPhone revenue coming in

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>light sixty nine point one four billion versus estimates of

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>seventy one billion, and that China number significantly lower than

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>analysts one to see coming in at eighteen point five

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to one billion.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Apple also maintaining its cash dividend of twenty five cents

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>a share. I should say the stock has been bouncing

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 3>around in the aftermarket. We've seen it up about one percent.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Right now, it's just up about six tenths of a

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 3>percent of half a percent. Angelo Zeno come on in

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>initial thoughts on the first headlines off of this earnings release.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I think this is kind of a

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 6>situation where, you know, execution was I think as good

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 6>as you could have asked for. I mean, as far

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 6>as the top line is concerned, roughly in line. I

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 6>think the expectation again was about you know, one hundred

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 6>and twenty four billion, so you're looking at what was

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 6>it maybe three point eight percent or close to four

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 6>percent growth, let's call it, as far as kind of

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 6>on a year of a year growth rate. And I mean,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 6>I think Tim kind of highlighted the iPhone numbers were

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 6>definitely a disappointment and the China numbers, so it's definitely

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 6>a China iPhone problem as far as the quarter is concerned,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 6>and why we missed. And again, the expectations going into

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 6>the quarter was it was going to be a challenge,

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 6>and the fact that they had been able to kind

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 6>of navigate and still meet the numbers despite those issues,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 6>I think kind of helps maybe do you risk the

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 6>stock at least when you kind of look at the

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 6>numbers this quarter. I mean, we'll see what the March

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 6>quarter guidance is going to look like. But my guess

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 6>is you're going to continue to see the further weakness

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 6>on the China iPhone side of things.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Angelo, how much of the iPhone miss can you attribute

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 2>to China? Is is the iPhone miss just a result

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 2>of China?

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 6>It seems like it, to be honest with you, just

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 6>kind of giving just given the high level numbers that

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm hearing from you, it just seems like the weakness is.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Really kind of you know, all China.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 6>And you know, my guess is, you know, Western markets

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 6>probably held up much better what held up as as to.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 5>Be expected, and and you know, we kind.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Of saw, you know, some pronounced weakness on the China

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 6>side of things, and again not a surprise because a

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 6>lot of the sell through numbers that had you know,

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 6>come out from China, you know, was looking you know,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 6>essentially it was kind of pointing towards double digit declines

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 6>out of kind of the eye phone business. So that's

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 6>essentially what you've got. So it's it's pretty brutal, but

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 6>not necessarily a complete surprise given some of the indications

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 6>we got going into the numbers.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, the three bright spots, iPad, MAC, and services.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 3>The iPad and MAC. The year over year services is

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 3>at an all time record. What's interesting too, all time

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>revenue record too as well, one hundred and twenty four

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 3>point three billion and narrowly beating Wall Street estimates. Again,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a huge miss for China when it comes to Apple

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 3>eighteen point five billion versus twenty one point six billion

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 3>that Wall Street expected, and a big miss for the

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 3>iPhone sixty nine point one billion dollars versus seventy one

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars expected. And you know, initial reaction Angelo in

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of the share price. Initially we saw pop and

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 3>then we saw the stock move down just down to

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 3>here a hare at this point, you know, a lot

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 3>of when we talk about Apple is we are saying

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 3>what's the next big thing? Right and certainly if the

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 3>iPhone is you know, certainly shoring business a still a

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>very big business. But maybe some questions about China growth

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>going forward. But where do you want to see the

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.239
<v Speaker 3>company move into? Where are the new opportunities in your

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>view for Apple.

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, listen, I think, you know, we need

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 6>to continue to see good growth on the services side

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 6>of things, and then to continue to innovate and come

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 6>out with new offerings on the services side of things.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 6>And I think that business will naturally continue to grow

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 6>due to a number of factors. But you know, as

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 6>far as kind of what we're looking for here over

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 6>the next couple of quarters, I don't think you should

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 6>forget about Apple Intelligence. I think that's still a very

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 6>important part of this story. We've kind of seen the

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 6>first two trunches of Apple Intelligence really roll out. The

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 6>first trunch well, you know, was really a non event.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 6>I actually think, you know, and I have the iPhone sixteen.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 6>I actually really liked let a number of the other

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 6>upgrades on the second trunch out there. I mean, I

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 6>use kind of visual intelligence all the time. Not crazy

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 6>about gen moji's and what have you, but you know,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 6>I think there were a number of decent features out there,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 6>specifically on the visual intelligence ide thinks I think Grounds

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 6>was great. I think the chat, GPT and integration is

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 6>super helpful for someone that just kind of you know,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 6>looking to do stuff, you know, on the fly on

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 6>their phone. So I just don't think the consumer is

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 6>well aware of it obviously, and we're still at a

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 6>point where you know, most of kind of the installed

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 6>base doesn't have access or even knows about Apple Apple

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 6>Intelligence at this point in time. We'll get kind of

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 6>the the third you know, trunch here in the coming months,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's really going to help in terms

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 6>of the serie integration and what Apple can kind of

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 6>demonstrate across kind of the app store and what have you.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 6>And then you know, clearly, you know, we kind of

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 6>want to see how that reflects across the rest of

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 6>the ecosystem as they kind of throw this out internationally,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 6>what kind of partnerships they can kind of announce out

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 6>in China. Does that make a difference in China in

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 6>terms of kind of helping the demand outlook, because I

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 6>do think a big problem with with Apple right now

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 6>in China is the fact that they don't have AI

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 6>capabilities where you know, obviously they're they're China peers do

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 6>don't have a full device out there where their peers do.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 6>And hopefully, you know, we see something on the foldable

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 6>side of things here over the next kind of two years,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 6>So you know, where I'd like to see them go

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 6>is kind of, you know, start evolving their ecosystem where

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 6>they could find some success, at least in China, because

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 6>at this point in time, you know, what they've got

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 6>in terms of their offering in China is just not

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 6>going to.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Cut it all right, Going to leave it on that note,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Angela's you know, he's senior equity analyst at CFR Research

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 3>joining us in New York City. Do you want to

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>mention Tim Cook? In the earnings release and the statement

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>called it the company's best quarter ever at Apple. He

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>also said, through the power of Apple Silicon, we're unlocking

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 3>new possibilities for our users with Apple Intelligence, which makes

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 3>apps and experiences even better and more personal. We're excited

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>that Apple Intelligence will be available and even more languages

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 3>this April. So Tim is certainly choosing to highlight that

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>we should point out. Apple shares though after an initial

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>pop right after the earnings release here in the aftermarket,

0:22:58.760 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 3>are now pretty much flat.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no mention of China in that statement, which certainly

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 2>will be a focus of investors on that call when

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>it does begin in just a few minutes. It's certainly

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a focus for Caroline High. She's a Bloomberg Technology co host.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>She joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Two big misses today Caroline highphone revenue coming in about

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars shi of estimates, and then greater China

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>revenue coming in about three billion dollars shi of estimates.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 2>Does Apple need to change its strategy in China? Or

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 2>do investors need to adjust their expectations about China?

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 7>Do we need to get more comfortable with their selling

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 7>fewer phones but in a higher average selling price. And

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 7>I think that's perhaps where they're trying to educate people towards.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that in China?

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 5>Is that everywhere?

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean it.

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 7>Feels like everywhere, but we do still have the slightly

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 7>cheaper phones that are available in the US, but we

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 7>don't have the rampant sort of competition that you do

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 7>have with a Huawei and with some of the local

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 7>operators that are in China that are just managing to

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 7>produce far more sophisticateated phones and a much lower price point.

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 7>And also there's some national patriotic fervor that's going on

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 7>and wanting to buy your locally made phones. So they

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 7>have been educating us and I think counterpoint research. For example,

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 7>front run the fact that they're going to have had

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 7>a dismal general amount sold eighteen percent rejection they thought

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 7>in terms of phone sold, But if the average selling

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 7>price is picking up, you're not going to be hurting

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 7>quite so bad. But look, ultimately we've seen it's a

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 7>big miss. They're growing in every region outside of China,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 7>and even the America's Japan was pretty good, but really

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 7>China has been that real weak point, and we have

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 7>to perhaps see that the company is just going to

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.719
<v Speaker 7>try and retrain us to think about them as a

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 7>services company, as an Apple Intelligence company. And look, with

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 7>iPhones missing as well, maybe we have to start to

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 7>think is this really always going to be the juggernaut

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 7>we thought it was?

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 3>What about Apple Intelligence? Right? We have certainly heard so

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 3>much from the company, Tim Cook singling it out also

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 3>on the release and in a statement, So how is

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the world thinking about Apple Intelligence and its opportunities?

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what what that's far?

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, of course I want to have fun in

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 7>a Gen Moji, but ultimately I'm going to be upgrading

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 7>my phone for that. No, I probably have gone ungraded

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 7>to an iPhone sixteen because my darn camera is broken

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 7>and I want to get a better camera, and I

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 7>want to get a slimmer phone. But I wouldn't have

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 7>gone for it for Apple Intelligence largely because look, I

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 7>can integrate Google and to upgrade there and have it

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 7>magicing my emails and making life a little bit more

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 7>sophisticated there, and compared to Samsung, it is not able

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 7>to innovate in the way that Samsung's adapted to Alphabet's

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 7>offering Open Ai. Though, I think the winning formula for

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Apple Intelligence going forward is that it hasn't spent billions

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 7>on its own large language model. It's gone in bed

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 7>with open Ai, and open Ai is probably gonna have

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 7>to get a lot cheaper because of what's happening with Deeze.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Caroline h Have you been watching Severance?

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I haven't.

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Well, I'm.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Too busy on the jacket, holl the day of the Jackal.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a huge investment by Apple, huge marketing, push

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>services revenue a bright spot for the company. Yes, coming

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 2>in at twenty six point three four billion dollars, it's

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>for twenty six point one billion. I bring up Severance

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 2>because that's part of the services category. This is a

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 2>high margin business for Apple, the services social TVs TVs.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>But the services category. Yeah, does does services growth and

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>strength ever offset weakness in China or for MyPhone? Well?

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 7>I think it's interesting. Then the new COFO who has

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 7>just taken on the role. He's a long time Apple executive,

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 7>but he's just taken on the role in January, is

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 7>really talking up about sort of the installed base, because

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 7>that's where they want you to think the amount of

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 7>max iPads phones that we all own. They say that

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 7>we now have an installed base of active devices that

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 7>reached an all time high across all products and geographic segments.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 7>Suddenly the services bigot wheel just flies. And then when

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 7>you're getting into payments, when you're getting into interoperability, of course,

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 7>services just becomes ever more necessary.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>For I mean, I probably pay Apple more each year

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 2>between between the memory.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what about the app store?

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 7>I do wonder with some regulatory perspective, we heard it

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 7>from Microsoft yesterday, Well was it Meta yesterday talk.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Singling out EU.

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 7>But how much are they going to have to change

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 7>the business model when it comes to the revenue They

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 7>can just skim away from an app store when it

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 7>think about how it's treating its own consumers and whether

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 7>we're being fairly treated across the world.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what do you want to know and what

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 3>do you want to hear from them?

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>On the car?

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Is it just China or is it other things?

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, what is your next big innovation? Is it

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about the home?

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 7>Because look, the Vision Pro looks cute, but are we

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 7>all spending thousands on it? No, it hasn't been the

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 7>R and D winner for them this yet, but it

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 7>might have spin offs when they can tell about how

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 7>much they've iterated there to bring it to what they're

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 7>going to do with the home, the video screens, the robotics.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 7>We're going to see how they can become evanmore integrale.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 7>We need another winning product. It wasn't cars, the Vision Pro,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 7>not yet, But what about twenty twenty five is some

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 7>new unleashed hardware.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm amazer not more entrenched in the home. I mean,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I know in my home it's such an Apple household,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 3>but it's not.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We're a Google home household.

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 3>We are too. We are too, and so I'm kind

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of amazed that they have kind of waited so long

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 3>to get into the home market.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would be certainly that would be an interesting

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 2>product category from them. What about something more akin to

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 2>metas glasses that we spoke about yesterday, and if they

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>were to come out with something that is less vision

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>pro oculous and more sort of like low profile Rabia,

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 2>because that.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Was the irritation for many.

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 7>Was it the fact that you've basically got a huge battery,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 7>we connected to you and it just.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So harding around.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 7>The tried and tested formula of Apple is let everyone

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 7>else play and then you come in and win the

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 7>day with something beautiful sneak and everyone jumps on board.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 7>So maybe that is the winning formula for the home

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 7>and when it will be for glasses and they'll start

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 7>to dabble in.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tim Cook's got nice pair of glasses.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 7>I wonder if he wants to start making them and

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 7>we suit you down to the ground, Tim, But I

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 7>do think that they do. They're always going to be

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 7>slightly slower off the mark. Then come and bring in

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 7>what it. They haven't got a foldable phone yet. Look,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 7>Samsung has plenty on the market. Everyone's been wanting to

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 7>get a smaller form factor. They're just waiting until they

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 7>can perfect. So you don't get a crease in it.

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 7>So I do wonder whether it's gonna take a little

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 7>bit of time.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, we have talked with Mark I guess about

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>just how the overall market here in the United States

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 3>is so overweighted to some of these big tech companies.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 3>And I am curious though they are important, right when

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 3>you look at kind of the numbers that they bring in,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 3>how twenty four million, I mean, it's just extraordinary, even

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 3>when we say right, maybe right, it's extraordinary. So how

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 3>are you thinking about this week of some of these

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>big tech names and the results that we've had.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 7>Thing they've done all right, considering Monday and the deep

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 7>seeky whiplash that we had, and I thought the spend.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Would be so much more under consideration.

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 7>But I think Satia, even though Microsoft saw a big

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 7>hit today, Satia managed to sort of thread the needle

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 7>that look, we're already offering our one on on our foundry,

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 7>IAI foundry, come to us find the best models. We'll

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 7>also be able to we have our issue as supply,

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 7>we've got to continue to invest. So they managed to

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 7>vindicate a spending. I think Meta did a phenomenal job

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 7>of just talking up with such pompous, like grandiose ideas that.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Won everyone over.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 7>You know, musted the same, the fact that actually the

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 7>numbers look pretty ugly. But he's so optimistic about Optimist,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 7>he's so optimistic about FSD that we managed to be

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 7>blindsided by the idea that actually the plans are there,

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 7>the money is being well spent, and we're still committed

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 7>to these companies. So ultimately, I think they've managed to

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 7>navigate a pretty rocky period Apple. The fact that it's

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 7>flat Microsoft's been really the only real pain point here.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 7>St Micro had another problem ever in Europe as well.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 7>I look towards Alphabet and Amazon. Can they vindicate the

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 7>amounts of money that they're going to have to save.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to put words in Mark Umman's mouth,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 2>but he spent plenty of time over the last few

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 2>months on our program really criticizing Apple for.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Its AI is and it's analysts.

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 7>He loves to criticize the analyst.

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 2>AI and you know, a question about slow rolling AI

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and to what extent this actually is something that's not

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>just incremental but is actually meaningful. When do we start

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to see Apple intelligence really flourish.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 7>I think they're signaling it signaling in the even the

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 7>press release saying that more languages are coming in April,

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 7>we will be making it further integrated. It's also interesting

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 7>when they bring these things without us even knowing, like

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 7>the news that they brought starlink and the fact that

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 7>we can now use with it, they just hide in

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 7>these little operating system grades.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So example, publicly acknowledge that, I know Mark Grimman reported

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 2>that it was.

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 5>Going to happen.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 7>I think T Mobile CEO came on and talked about it,

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 7>and it's just that ultimately they do slow roll. They

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 7>don't perhaps they realize that they need to speak to

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 7>the investor.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Base about intelligence.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 7>They're going to talk about how they're really managing to

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 7>infuse it in a more seamless manner. But to you

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 7>and I as a consumer, I think they just don't

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 7>want to stress test it too much. They want to

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 7>slowly have us naturally absorbing it and making our life

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 7>simpler and simpler. But thus far, like a little summari

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 7>of my email hasn't changed my life.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 5>All that much.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. I just want to remind everybody that we

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 3>do see Apple shares fluctuating in the aftermarket. Apple as

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 3>our Mark German Reports posted sales that were slightly better

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 3>than analysts estimated, even as the iPhone and sales in

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>China were weaker than anticipated. Caroline, just talking about that

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>revenue number, it did rise four percent to one hundred

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and twenty four point three billion in the fiscal first quarter.

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Analysts had estimated one hundred and twenty four point one, so,

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, coming in just a hair better than what

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the street was forecasting. But again concerns over China and

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Apples struggling there stacks up about four tenths of a

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 3>percent here in the aftermarket. Yeah, I just think, you know,

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting to see after what a crazy week that

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 3>we've seen. I feel like with technology that the stock

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>is just kind of flat.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we priced it in, and remember great point, it

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 7>was kind of beaten up running into this. We'd had

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 7>five analyst downgrades right in the last month or so,

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 7>and unlike in Nvidia that has zero cells, there have

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 7>been a few creeping into Apples, So I think people

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 7>had started to price in the China weakness.

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly made the point to.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 7>Like all the going to sell us cheaper price points

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 7>they are, according to Mark Gumman, going to be focusing

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 7>on the iPhone SE, which is the cheaper around five

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 7>hundred dollars offering that's going to come in April March.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 7>Maybe that's going to pull more people perhaps away from

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 7>the Samsung's and the Android offerings. Maybe we get the cheaper,

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 7>lower end Airpod's making a dent. But all of this

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 7>I think had just been guided. We knew that Apple

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 7>was going to have a terrible time in China, and

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 7>Apple Intelligences isn't there yet, and people have really been

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 7>complaining about the latest os, like use cases, the way

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 7>in which the phone just doesn't feel as slick.

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>As it used to.

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to start hearing more chatter about Tim

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Cook and a succession plan. We've been talking a lot

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>about Intel and what Intel does post Gal Singer, and.

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They've got some big issues they do.

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Tim Cook has been an Apple since nineteen ninety eight,

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>he's been CEO since twenty eleven.

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 5>What's the succession plan?

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 7>And they've just had a CFO come into the MITS

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 7>who's been trained up from within. I don't think anyone

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 7>feels that Tim's going anywhere soon. He navigates the first

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration so swiftly and seamlessly worked well to be

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 7>able to protect his business that of course is so

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 7>dependent on China, not just from a selling perspective, but

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 7>it's more from a production perspective. What do tarifs mean

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 7>for him? So I think in this next administration can't

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 7>I wouldn't ever bet that he's going to hand over

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 7>the baton anytime soon. But I think that is a

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 7>key question that people are gonna be asking who from

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 7>within has been groomed up, because.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Remember they lost a lot of talent as well.

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 7>Johnny E's left, and a lot of people seem to

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 7>move from the engineering the product development side of things.

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 3>All right, fascinating stuff, Caroline, thank you again. Second day

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 3>like making anyways sense of all the big tech earnings.

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 3>As we said, Caroline Hyde is co host of Bloomberg

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Technology on Bloomberg TV. Catch It. They'll continue coverage of

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 3>all the earnings this week. That'll be at eleven am

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street time tomorrow on Bloomberg TV. Right now, tim

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Apple shares just down about one quarter of one percent.