WEBVTT - BUY/SELL, TNF Preview, Injury Updates 

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading this podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>listen live, be sure to download the I Heart Radio

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Thanks for

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>listening and enjoyed the show, and listen to me. This

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is the Fantasy Football Best Friends Forever Show. Start listening

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to us or suffer the consequences. Listen do didn't? Yeah?

0:00:45.920 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Now as welcome your bye from right subsp your co host,

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>five Guy Fake Prete Brick step Fall br co host

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and five eleven from nor Why ladies and tunlemen r

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and wait that we will get you inside Studio thirty four.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs. He's Frank Stample, Here's y Eric Young,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and I am Greg Sauceman, all back together in studio today.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Zakas of Inside Injuries will join us with the

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>latest update on te Kwon Barkley, t Y Hilton, and

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of quarterbacks, including both in Buffalo and in Chicago. Frank,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening man? Happy Thursday to you? Excited four week

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>five to start off tonight should be a really good

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>game as well, Seattle Seahawks Los Angeles Rams will preview

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that later on in the show, or we could do

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it right now either way, whatever you want to do.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But on a lot of Fantasy viable players in this

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>matchup two. I mean, this is a big game tonight,

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. I just we'll do it later on. I'm

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just saying in general, they're like, just it's just a

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>general statement. There are a lot of Fantasy Vible players,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Fantasy Vible players like last week with

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Eagels and Packers, are a lot of Fantasy viable players.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully we get a game as good as that one,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>because that was a phenomenal game last week. That was

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a fun one. That was a fun one. What's happening, man,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's another day, guys. Hockey is underway and you guys

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>don't care. But that means that my remote control will

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be getting a good bashing tonight. So it's gonna be.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be. It's gonna be a tough goal, but

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna fight through it because I'm a champion. We

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>also have MLB playoffs tonight as well, so we will

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>also be pounding. I do not care, all right, is

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>what it is? It look, best friends don't have to

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>agree on everything, that's right. We don't gonna poor e

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>wise remote? Man, how many remotes do you go through

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a year? You are, I'm usually good at four or

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>five funny to make him a lot better nowadays you've

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>got a common your old day. I actually I believe

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you why when he says it too, I'm just saying,

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's you know it's true. That's funny. I

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have an interesting conundrum about tonight. We'll get in the

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>game later on, like I said, but so I have

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff is my quarterback, and I was like, oh, man,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>do I play him tonight? And it's not a great matchup.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's on the road. He's much worse on the road

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>than he isn't home defense isn't what it once was. Though.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I also have like Jimmy G and can go with

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy G Cleveland Monday night, nice Monday night at a

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>quarterback I can wait on like this is great. And

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I did something that kind of angle would really I

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>killed me for Frank, you looked at your opponent's team.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I looked at my opponent's team and I saw that

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>his top wide receiver it's Brandon Cooks. And I was like,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I want to make sure whatever Brandon

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Cooks gets points, I'm getting points now. I'm sorry Jared

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Goff tonight. Yeah, I mean personally, I have Jared Goff

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>rank higre than Jimmy Garoppolo from the get go. So

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't just start him based on my opponent having

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks, but I will start him based on what

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are telling me. And um, I'm gonna go

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with your over Jimmy Garoppolo. Fantastic. So you made the

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>right decision, but for the wrong reasons, Greig, it doesn't

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>matter how I get there. Process doesn't matter. Is the

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>results over process? Guy? Absolute? Freaking are we? Probably more

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>people should be all the results over process? We we

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we probably should be. Who cares how we get there?

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>As long as we win? Hey, you know what last

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>week I said, Miles Sanders was a great play. It wasn't.

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the Eagles running backs were a great play

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>process results. Do you feel right about that? I do

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>feel good that one of the Eagles running backs went off.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I wish that it was Miles Sanders. I don't

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>own Sanders anywhere, but I think that the logic in

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, using the Eagles running backs against the Packers

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday night was good logic. Just so happens that, uh,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Doug Peterson is the coach of the Philadelphia Eagles, So uh,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a you know, half and half.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 1>You know you got it right technically, but you didn't.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>This is weird. Let me start off today's show with

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a non injury related news. But we are we talked

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about yesterday. I think, e y, it's worth getting back

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>into today. And that's the fun Diggs, right, because the

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fun Diggs. Someone's brewin in Minnesota. We saw a sweets

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago, Frank we were shorts and him

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Feeling asking for a trade, just the fond Digs asking

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for a trade. Every answer that this guy gives this

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>question like, hey, why do you miss practice yesterday? I

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>had a cold. You're a professional athlete. I can't imagine

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a cold. It's not even going to work. No, no,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely not. Uh. I mean it's it's a it's a

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>poor excuse. There's obviously where there's smoke, there's fire, and

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean a little bit. You gotta understand the frustration there.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>This isn't an all star wide receiver playing with Adam Feeling.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Another All star wide receiver, and they're just not throwing

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball. And when they are, kirk Cousins has been

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>rancid this year. He has not been good um with it.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Their ability to run the ball. You thought that it

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>would just make throwing the ball easier, but that doesn't

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to be the thing. Minnesota is really struggling to

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball, getting their their wide receivers going at all,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and and being stefon Diggs and and not being targeted,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and on being thrown to a few times a game.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be frustrating. This isn't the first time

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a Diva likewide receiver. It's not the last

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>time we'll see this either in the NFL. But these

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are super talented. Man. They want to get the ball,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>understand it. And look, you could say what you want

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about Adam Feeling. He probably shouldn't have made those comments publicly.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Should have done it, you know, behind closed doors. Talked

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to uh kirk Cousins himself, talked to the offensive coordinator himself.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately he's not wrong. Everything he said in that

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>postgame interview was right. You're not going to be able

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball against every team, and especially against

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears, you have to be able to adapt.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Even when you're league leading rusher Dalvin Cook is only

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing for thirty five yards, you have to do something

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>differently and you have to be able to adjust. I mean,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he was right and everything that he said, he just

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have said it publicly. So I understand these guys

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>are frustrated, but you know, if they were winning while

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just running the football all the time, nobody would be

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>saying a single thing. Greg It all comes down to winning.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So they're losing and at the same time they're trying

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to run the football. But if they were winning, nobody

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>would be saying anything no doubt and all is right

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world when you win. But I don't know

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is Steven Diggs being like the diva wide receivers,

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>ain't throwing me in the damn ball right like he didn't.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling was the one that came out as it passed.

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We got passed the ball a little bit. Stefon Diggs

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>finally scores a touchdown this past week and finally gets

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>involved in the officers over a hundred yards silver hundred

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>yards receiving me exactly, but he he can't excelt it.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>He's signed the contract, right, he's he's there, he got

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>his money. I get it, but he can't excel it.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not even that. He's screaming and throw me the

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>damn balls, Adam, and he was like, we need to

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>open on the offense. In general, Minnesota, it's stuck in

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the fifties. Yere looks that's the way that they want

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to go down with the ship, right, Mike Zimmer. He

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to coach defense, he wants to run the football.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>They want to be a smash mouth football team, which

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is weird because they're paying Kirk Cousins all this money.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I still kind of think Diggs has like a deeva

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thing going on, but we'll save that for the other side. Greg.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break. We'll get more into this conversation

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more here on THEFS Daily Rhodo dot

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just give you premier advice. We play every day, all

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry leading

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimizer in minutes, building optimize line up for

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>cash games and turneys learned from the game's best DFS

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>players joined Daily Rodo dot Com Tap with you, dff

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>no A little bit less hair, righty, Sam, Well, you're

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>like Sospan year as well, one of the alienist divine

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Diggs a little bit and Adam Feeling and the vices

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they take all the New York Giants League story. You're

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>revolving around the Giants. Isn't the return of Golden Tape

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this week? Frank? But Barkley didn't officially practice Wednesday or Thursday.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But he's running, he's cutting, he's jumping, not running at

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>full speed, but he's coming back sooner rather than later.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>He spent on that money on Wayne Goldman that I apologize,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>But listen, Takoon Barkley. I don't think he plays Sunday.

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been I'm very honest with you. I don't think

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he pays next week either, because it's a Thursday night game.

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>You got a full ten days off after that, and

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll be back week seven. That's the four week timetable

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he was given initially. I think that's the most likely scenario.

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this comes down to how foolish the New

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>York Giants organization really wants to be Do they really

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think that they can compete this year? Because they won

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the last two games and they're really that excited about

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones. You have to be realistic with yourself because, ay,

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you'd be rushing back, your superstar running back to go

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>up against the Vikings and Patriots, two games you're probably

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to win. I mean, maybe they have a

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>chance against the Vikings, but against the Patriots on Thursday

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>night football, that's probably not going to happen. So you

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have to be realistic with yourself, and ultimately they should

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>probably go down the route that you're saying, Greg and

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, give him until I guess that would be

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Week seven because he would have all that extra time

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>after the Thursday night football game. But everyone has seen

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the video, or if you haven't, go on Twitter. I

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's circulating right now. Where he's he's running,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, not at full speed, but he's he's cutting,

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he's jumping, he's doing things. I mean, there's a chance

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that this guy is just you know, the next this

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>generation's version of Adrian Peterson, and he's just this crazy

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>athlete that can recover from injuries at a reckless pace,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's also a chance that he can re injure

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>himself by coming back too quickly. So there are a

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of things going on right now. But obviously, if

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you own Sae Kwon Barkley and he plays, you're gonna

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get him in your wine up. But you know, what

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>do you do with Wayne Gelman right now? Try and

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>trade him to the Sae Kwon Barkley owner. But outside

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>of that, I mean, there's not really much else you're

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna do because you can't really train it for anything

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>else right now, Greg, it's you know, your window to

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sell Wayne Goldman is pretty much gone. And I love

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially Saguon Barkley also probably gone. Yeah, And and this

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is why those those questions are so hard to answer.

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Right people ask us questions about trying to trade for

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Sae Kwon Barkley when an injury first occurs, trying to

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>trade for Tyreek Hill when an injury first occurs. I mean,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>we can really only go by the timetables that were

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>given and the information that we're given by you know,

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people who study the injury analysis. Right like, we're gonna

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have Virginia on the show today, we can really only

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>go based on what we're told, Greg. So you know,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for all the people that asked last week, oh, well,

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>should I try and trade sake Kwon Barkley for a

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>late season surge, we told you know, because at the

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>time we thought that that was the right answer. I mean,

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't find me a person who didn't think that

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that was the right answer. So there are a lot

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of moving parts when it comes to injury optimism, especially

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in a contact sports like fantasy football. Greg, absolutely, you

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>have to um everything is not as easy as it

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>appears for us to predict ultimately, and when it comes

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to Kuon Barkley, he's super human and get that for

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like two weeks kind of crazy when we thought he

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>could be done for the entire season. We'll get more

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in Sable Martin when we talked to Virginia zakas in

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But Frank and anyway, it is our Thursday,

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>which means not our leftover segment where we take a

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the leftovers. I just forgot I

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't tell them downstairs to play said, yeah, it's perfectly

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>fine left over. Yeah, So some of the leftovers for

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>today on the waiver wire. Include someone I picked up

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning, e Y in a fantasy league that we're

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>all in together, the pit league, and that's Keyshaw Johnson

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Arizona Cardinals. Christian Kirk may not play here

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday. I heard reports he's out, He's not out, whatever,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. He's gonna play this week, which means

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Keishawn Johnson could see an increase in snaps. You know

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that Larry Fitzgerald isn't a good spot against Cincinnati's thinking

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.599
<v Speaker 1>can be said um for on the other side, for

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd and Tyler Eifford, everyone's talking abou Aud and Tate.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>No one's really talking about Keshan Johnson. Should they be

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and should we pick him up? Y? Yeah? I feel

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like he's a good flex at the roady is is

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that offense? I mean me included, it's it's been pretty

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>disappointing so far. It hasn't been what I thought it

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to be what a lot of people thought

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be. Um And the the other

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>thing he gains it fantasy wise is they spread the

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ball all over the place. There. I read a stat

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a couple of couple of weeks

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ago that they've lined up, I think thirty more in

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>four wide receivers set than the entire league combined. So

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think about that, more than thirty one other teams combined.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>So there's always four receivers plus on the field and

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, so it's a it's a dart throw. Fitzgerald,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, is the only guy you can really trust.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But if Kurt doesn't play, Keejohn Johnson could see a bump.

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And they also said that any Isabella will play on

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the outside, and that's a guy that has all of

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the intangibles, but we haven't seen it yet out of

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>them this year. Yeah, I agree with what Uy saying.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I want exposure to this offense because

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>there's so much play volume and they throw the ball

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot. They have the third highest past percentage in

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL right now. If Christian Kirk is out, I

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>think Keyshawn Johnson sees an uptick in snaps. But the

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>truth remains Gregg that last week, Trent Shirtfield, Yes you

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>know that Trent Shutfield played eighty four percent of the

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>snaps while Keyshawn Johnson only played fifty seven percent. So

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>has Trent Shurfield really leap frogs Keyshan Johnson at this point.

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It's something to pay attention to, you know, how they

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>line up this week, their snap percentage as well. But

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if Christian Kirk is not there, Christian Kirk is currently

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>leading this team with of the target share if he's

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not out there with a team that likes to passed

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball this much and going up against the Bengals defense,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a good matchup. Ke Shan Johnson is sneaky,

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>uh And I like the name that you brought up to,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Andy Isabella. I mean, this is someone that they were

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>really excited about drafting him earlier. I believe it was

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>either the second or the third round in the NFL draft.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a smaller fellow, but he's extremely quick and he's

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>got really good hands as well. So pay attention to

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Andy Isabella as well. In deeper leaves. Kind of feels

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like now I feels like the fantasy community is waiting

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for Andy Isabella to to break out a bit. I

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we're just higher on him than the

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Arson Cardinals are. He's running what like fifth most out

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the wide receiver at the moment. Yeah, he has

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not really seen much game action, if any so far

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think they've used them a little bit

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on special teams. So there's clearly something that he's not

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>doing right, like either not picking up the playbook or

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>not running the right routes right away. But they pulled

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>him off the draft board in the NFL draft, so

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there's something that they like about him. It just hasn't

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>come to fruition yet. Greg, absolutely, So we will see. Um.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We will see if any Zabella this Sunday I could

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>get in the mix with the Arizona Cardinals. Uh. Speaking

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of Auto Tate, he is not part of our leftovers

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because he got kind of in just before. Um. This

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is where the buzzer on Tuesday night before people put

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in their waivers, the news about John Ross being injured.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>How injured he was. I spent in my budget on

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Autumn Tate last night in an NFFC league that was

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty roster spots. Is that a mistake? Greg? Probably? The

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>backup bid was dollars. So I'm kind of kicking myself

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because originally I had a hundred and twenty two and

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I bumped it up to two hundred and twenty two

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because I really needed him I needed wide receivers in

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this league. The NFFC format is deeper Tony roster spots

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is not as many free agents, so I really needed

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>him and I was aggressive on him. Give you another

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>name that way we ought to picking up in gs

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>t e Y. That was your guy, ke QT on

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire in a lot of places. We talked

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about him a bit in the Waiver Wire show on Tuesday.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's out there in a lot of leaves. Can

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He still has not expected to play this week, And

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a spot and you guys can can jump

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in here as well. That I think that Texans get right,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Atlanta has been really primed to allow big plays.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins, will Fuller and potentially k QT could really

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>get right this week. If Qt is out there, Eric,

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are you picking them up? Look, if you need wide

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>receiver help that then that's a guy that could do it. That.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>The Texans haven't been what everyone thought they were going

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. I mean, I don't think there was many

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>people that weren't. That wasn't taking DeShawn Watson in the

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>top five quarterbacks. He has not uh delivered on that um.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The running back situations confusing Duke Johnson goes there and

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you think it's gonna be a big deal. And Kiki

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Qt was the training camp darling until he hurt his ankle. Uh.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping once he came back he would be

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>more figured in, But I mean he's basically done completely nothing.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I've dropped him in almost every league I

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>had him in, and listen, I had him in probably

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of my team's huge disappointment. But I'll be keeping an

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>eye on him. If he's somebody that you need or

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have room, wouldn't be a bad stash. If

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Kenny still is gonna miss some weeks, he could resolidify

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>himself as the slot guy there. Yeah, I think it's

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a deeper ad right now if you're desperate for a

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, especially in this spot going up against the Falcons,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who have allowed five receiving touchdowns to wide receivers over

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks, so their defense is completely getting shredded.

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a big get right spot for DeAndre

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins if you could still try and buy him right now.

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying to buy him in basically every league

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in. You know, people are still holding onto

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>his name value and that's the right way to approach

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it if you own DeAndre Hopkins. But on the other side,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to acquire him. I think it's a big

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>week for Will Fuller as well. Those guys are just

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>playing so many more snaps than Kiki QT. I'm also

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>holding out hope on Duke Johnson. You know, his snap

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>percentage went up last week, played six of the snaps

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on a perk touch basis, severely outperforming Carlos Hido was

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>tweeting tweeting about this earlier in the week, drink, I

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what else Duke Johnson asked due to earn

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more touches, but I'm hoping that this is the week

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 1>that that actually happens. So a lot to pay attention

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to Duke versus Kiki QT. But I think it's a

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>big get, right spot. You're right, Greg, for both t

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>hop and Will Fuller. When we come back here on

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>the VFS, were joining Virginia Zakis of Inside Injury. She

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>helped us break down what we know about these quarterbacks

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on Markley and Morris the Ground Daily Rhodo dot Com

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't just

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>give you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now Daily Rhodos dot Com optimize

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that in minutes, building, optimize line. I'm for cash games

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and Turney's learned from the game's best DFS players joined

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roado dot com. Back with you here on the

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>bff S. E y around, Franks around and now also around.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It's our favorite doctor in charge Virginias. What's happen in Virginia?

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Guys has a gun? What's going on? It's going fantastically back,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>especially with the news that set Kwon Barkley already cutting,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>already running. Things look good for se Kwon Barkley. Let's

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>say you, No, he's looking a lot better than I

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>expected him to right now. But I think we still

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>need to slow down a little bit here. Um. He

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was officially listed as a d n P yesterday. I

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>think that's what's gonna happen again today. Um, even though

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he was out there on the field running through some drills. Um,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we're still showing that his ankle is going to take

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>around six weeks to fully heal. Um. I think if

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>he returns this weekend. His injury risk is sitting above

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent right now, which is incredibly high. UM. He

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>looked like he was still favoring that right ankle and

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the clips I watched from practice yesterday and today.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So he really should not play this weekend, even though

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they're still leaving the door obin for him to be active.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>UM really needs a minimum of four weeks. He's going

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be high risk until he hits that six week mark.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>UM still pretty concerned about him, but it is looking

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna very easily beat that. You know, six

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to eight week timeline wouldn't be the first time we've

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>seen a running back just returned from an injury way

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>too quickly. Adrian Peterson has done it in the past

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. But don't drop your Wayne Goldman shares, because

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as you heard from Virginia, he could be at a

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent chance of re injury if we if he

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>does play as soon as he is trying to get

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>back on the field, So pay attention to that. Virginia.

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about Davantae Adams. I am

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>heavily invested in Davante Adams this season had him as

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>my wide receiver one coming into the season. Fun fact,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>greg I heard the fantasy tash Jim Day talking about

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams throughout the Fantasy Football frenzy and he described

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the injury as quote, it's turf it's a toe, so

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta be turf toe. So what can you tell

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>me about turf toe here, Virginia. Do we expect Ivanta

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Adams to play this week? And if he does manage

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to suit up, you know what, you know, how healthy

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is he actually going to be? Yeah, so we do

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think Adam's injury is turf toe. UM. All turf toe,

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as though, is a sprain to the main joint in

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the big toe. Very important for a wide receiver because

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing off to start a route, getting off the line,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>quickly changing direction, all of those movements start with the

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>big toe. So it can be very painful to play

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>through and it's very easy to aggravate. Um. The best

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>comparison we have is A J. Green last year. Now,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>his seems like a much more serious case of turf toe,

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's something he battled in the past. So I'm

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not trying to scare you quite like you know, Green

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>last year. But it is still something to watch. I

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's going to play this week. Um. He

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice yesterday and he's not practicing again today. UM.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like the m r I was relatively clean,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but did still show a little bit of damage to

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the toe. UM. Based on all of that, we are

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>giving him a five week optimal recovery time. I don't

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>think he's actually gonna miss that much time, but it's

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna take him around five weeks for that toe to

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>fully heal, and if he returns in the next week

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>or two, he's going to continue to push back that

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>healthy to return date because it's not going to fully

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>heal within the five weeks because he's not going to

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>have enough rest. So if he does suit up this

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>week or next, he's at a very very high risk

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of re injury. UM. And that includes either aggravating his

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>turf toe or suffering a compensatory injury. Greggy, this is

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a tough situation too, because from my perspective right as

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a Davante Adams owner, like I don't want him to

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.239
<v Speaker 1>rush back, but you need him, and you know there

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are players that have been able to play through injury

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>not and still put up fantasy numbers. But at the

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>same time, Virginia mentions that risk for re injury when

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Davante Adams. So this is a really,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>really tough situation right now. Adams those play e y.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Who's the biggest benefactor in this packer's office is that

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham is MVS? Is Jono Allison who I saw

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I was picked up in a lot of places this week.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Who is the biggest beneficiary here? For me? I put

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>my money on MVS. Uh, he's going to play on

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the outside. He'll be in on on probably every single down. Um,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Allison could play, but uh on more downs. But he

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is the slot guy and they don't. Uh. They haven't

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>been using the slot as much. Alison hasn't had that

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>many targets this year. He has had some touchdowns. Um,

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but if I was the place of bed, I would

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>go with MBS. This hurts my heart, Greg, You know

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this hurts my heart because I have a lot of

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>shares of Davantae Adams, a lot of money rotting on

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>him as well. So this is a bad situation. You

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>can't even really trade him either because you'd be getting

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>suppressed value. Absolutely totally a Virginia. Zak is from Inside

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Injuries Virginia. Couple of quarterbacks got hurt last week and

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that included Josh Allen, who took a brutal hit, uh,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>really brutal hit from um from a Patriots there, and

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we thought he might have been significantly hurt. He got up,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he actually ran off the locker room by himself. You're like,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, he's a right, never came back. He was

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>throwing yesterday practicing, but he hasn't obviously clear concussion protocol

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>quite yet. What's the deal with Josh Allen? Yeah, so

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he participated in individual drills at practice yesterday, UM, only

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>non contact drills. That tells me that he's in the

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>next to last step of concussion protocol. UM. I'd give

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>him slightly better than a fifty fifty shot at suiting

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>up this weekend. UM. I don't think it's a given

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just because he was out there, but I don't need

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to get in another solid practice today and then hopefully

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>cleared for a full practice tomorrow. UM. As long as

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>his concussion symptoms don't come back, UM, he should be cleared. UM.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But we'll have to keep keep a close eye on

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>him over the next few days. He also does not

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have a history of concussions, which is good, but he

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>does have some other injuries to his name, um, including

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a UCL sprain last year and multiple clavical fractures, so

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>those shouldn't come into play here. Good thing that there's

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>no pass concussions, but um, we still needn't need to

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>watch him closely over the next few days. That's Josh Allen.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We gotta just wait, wait this out a little bit.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>We have to figure out will he cleared a protocol.

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem overly significant, thankfully, the Bills do have

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a bye coming out after this week. Maybe a little

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more cautious, Frankie, Yeah, and it's it's not the

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>same type of injury, but it's a similar situation to

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Robinsky who's dealing with this left shoulder injury, not

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to his throwing shoulder. Actually saw a funny tweet where

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>someone said, well, he doesn't have any throwing shoulders when

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Mitchell Robinsky. But ultimately, they have a

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>bye in week six, so they can hold Trabisky out

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this week they're playing in London against the Oakland Raiders,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and then he can return in week seven, so Virginia.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys have on Mitchell Robinsky. I seen him,

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>probably more so on the doubtful side of things. Is

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that what the algorithm is saying as well? Yep, I

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>don't see any way he plays this weekend, but our

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>algorithm is actually showing that he can fairly safely return

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to the field in around three weeks. I'm gonna take

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>closer to or to five weeks for that slight labor

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and tear to heal. But you know, the good news

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is the m r I showed that it wasn't anything

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>too severe, so therefore it should be able to heal

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>on its own without surgery. Um. It's always possible in

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the off season he'll have a little clean up procedure

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>on his shoulder, But for right now, I don't think

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to be concerned about surgery. UM. And the

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>bye week is actually coming in a good time, so

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised if we see him UM

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>right after that. His injury risk is high right now

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if he plays this weekend, UM, not only because he

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>could cause more damage to his left shoulder, but it

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>could affect his play a little bit because he could

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid hits to that left side or falling

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>on his left side, which puts the rest of his

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>body at risk. But I think if he waits it

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>out three weeks, he should be good to go. Well,

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 1>your super Flex owners out there, make sure you pick

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>up Chase Daniel if you were depending on Trabisky. I

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know it's been a really rough star for Trabisky, but

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty good matchup for Chase Daniel going up against this

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders defense as well, So just keep that in mind.

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect your Bisky this week, Greig. I also wouldn't.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So that brings me once again over to you, e y,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who would you rather start super Flex League? If Josh

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Allen doesn't play and Drew Whisky doesn't play, would you

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>rather start Matt Barkley? Would you rather start Chase Daniel?

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna probably go Daniel here. Um, the Titans defense

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty decent. Uh, And that's like I'm flying

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the colors. Everyone knows, But I mean the truth is,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the defense has been pretty good. Uh. Daniel looked decent,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, he looked he looked pretty decent

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and it'll be interesting to see. Um. The Chicago Bears

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>offense with I feel like Daniel is probably a better

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>thrower than Drue Whisky, which isn't is just absolutely insane

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to say out loud, being high they took him in

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the draft, But yeah, Daniel would be my bet there.

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I also agree with Chase Daniel. I just I think

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>they can just utilize three coen much like they did

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>last week and dump it and dump it and dump

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>it all game long. We continue on here with viginiaza

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Is from Inside Injuries in Virginia. Let me move on

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and let me get to Pittsburgh where James Connor hurt

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>his ankle in this game on Sunday night or Monday

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>night rather and says he's fine, I'm good, but you

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>know it's now two four weeks he's hurt. There's ankle.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of Jalen Samuel on Monday night. How's

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>James Connor's ankle looking? Um? So we missed practice yesterday

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and never good to see a guy start off the

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>week with a miss practice. Um, we don't know his

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>participation yet today, but if he misses another practice today,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I will definitely be very concerned about him. Um, he's

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a high injury risk right now. He was actually already

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>an elevated injury risk because he previously injured his knee

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>this year. Um, and he has a history of an

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 1>m c L tear and suffered a high ankle sprain

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>last season. UM. I'm not sure if it's the same

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>ankle as the one that's currently injured or not. But

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of injuries over the last two seasons,

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>so definitely concerned about him, especially these lower body injuries.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>They're now piling up, So if he does play, he's

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be a high injury risk. Those ligaments and

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>his ankles are stretched out, which means he's much more

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to rolling that ankle again. Um. You know, it

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>could be like a Lashawn McCoy situation where he plays

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but he isn't able to finish the game. So I

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be pretty risky to play him this weekend. UM,

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>best us knowing as history as that he tries to

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>play through it, but he's not going to be And

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that is all part of the reason why I wanted

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to spend a decent amount of fab on Jalen Samuel

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was this week if he was available in your league, Virginia,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about another running back dealing

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with an ankle injury. That's Marlon Mack and I just

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>saw the practice report is that he did not practice

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>again today on Thursday dealing with this ankle injury. Expected

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to play against the Kansas City Chiefs, which is a

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.239
<v Speaker 1>good matchup for running backs on the ground. But if

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not good to go, uh and the Colts, you know,

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>getting as many points as they are, we could be

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at Niheim Hines is a pretty good flex option.

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, what, what do you guys have on

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack? Do you expect him to play this week?

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I know he's been dealing with a ton of injuries

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, and he does have an extensive

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>injury history as well. Yep, this situation is pretty similar

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to James Conner Um last season he had multiple hamstring

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>injuries that forced him to miss time and then also

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>foot and ankle injuries that he tried to play through

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>UM and wasn't always that successful. So definitely concerned that

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he's starting off the week with two miss practices. UM.

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's actually a decent shot that he suits

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.239
<v Speaker 1>up because again that's what he tried to do last year.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the time he played through injuries when

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he really shouldn't have. UM caused his injuries to linger

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and lead to other injuries. Those foot and ankle ones

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 1>last season were definitely related, So I'm very concerned about him.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>He was already a high injury risk even before picking

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>up this injury last week. UM, now it's even higher.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Hovering around his health performance factor is also poor, so

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's going to play very well if

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>he is active. Um It's just hard for a running

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>back to cut and run full speed if they're dealing

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with an ankle injury. So I'm definitely concerned about him.

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Penning into this weekend, Zack Is. We appreciate the time,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as we do each and every week, follow him at

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Inside Injuries Virginia. Have a great weekend. We'll talk to

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you next week, so good luck. All right when we

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>come back Thursday night football, we'll get into that. Seattle

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and Los Angeles would be a good game tonight. Uh

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from the link, Yes, that's also the lord able to

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>link from the link in Seattle. Stick around. Who are

0:30:57.840 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we playing who evening and who are we predicting to win?

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Tell you next daily Rhodo Dot com learned from the

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Rodo dot Com Optimizer in minutes

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>building optimized line up for cash games and turneys learned

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily rodo dot com.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back here on the b f S

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanville, Eric Young and I and you're ready for

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night Football tonight Seahawks and Rams. Not that any

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>leftovers to get into from this week on the waiver wire,

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we said it all along my great waiver wire, reaching

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>much what the one of the one of the players

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody I mentioned that you were during the bring navn

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham. He could be out there and given what

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we heard about Davante Adams is injury, e y, Jimmy

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Graham maybe somebody worth picking up. Yeah, for sure. I

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>mean we saw at the end of the game when

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>when Adams went out that that would look like the

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>number one target for Aaron Rodgers. Uh, Jimmy Graham is

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>still a huge red zone target. He's not definitely not

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a fleet of foot anymore. It was never super fast,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he it looks like he's running in molasses,

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he's still a massive human being that

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>can box people out and go up and get the ball,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>so that that he's definitely in tight end, He's definitely

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy to play. HEAVN ranks does a top twelve

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end as of now. It's a pretty good matchup

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Cowboys. They've allowed the tenth most

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing tight end so far this year.

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>They allowed a monster game to Evan and Graham in

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Week one as well. I heard Jim Day talking about

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this during the Fantasy Football Frenzy that so far it's

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>been a small sample size, but whenever Davantae Adams has

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>been off the field so far this season, Jimmy Graham's

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>target share goes up. His target share and had the

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>red zone goes up massively as well. So uh, Aaron

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers said he wants to get Jimmy Graham more involved.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what he tried to do last week on

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night. Craig absolutely now speaking on Thursday Night Thursday Tonight,

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams and Seahawks kick off a lot of sports on

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>tonight with the NHL and MLB, and of course NFL

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to go Rams. Frankie started this game as a

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>small favorite since that opened on Sunday night. There now

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a few points underdog. Why is that? I don't know, man,

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was asking you about this and it's

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a tough call right now. I think you know people

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are looking at you know, Jared Goffe's career numbers on

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the road, and the fact that this Rams team hasn't

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>played as well away from Los Angeles, and the fact

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that Seattle does have a legitimate home field advantage. When

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw that this line has moved three and a

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>half points, I asked you, is there an injury that

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I miss? Is there's something going on because normally you

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>don't see a line move that much unless you know

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>there was like an injury to a quarterback or something.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever reason, Jared Goff has not played as

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>well this year. I've read a few things about him

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that teams are starting to do more of what the

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Pats did in the Super Bowl, where they kind of

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>show one defense up until when Sean McVeigh is out

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>of Jared Goff's ear and then they kind of change

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>everything else up. Uh, And we know that Jared Goff

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>basically leans a lot on Sean McVeigh in order to um,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, get the offense going and get the right

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>play and get everything lined up. And you know, when

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have Sean mcveih and is here, Greg, he's

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>basically a deer in the headlights. And we saw that

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>last week where you turn the ball over four times.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's really that home field advantage

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that Jared Goff has not played as

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>well away from Los Angeles so far in his career.

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That's That's the only thing that I could think of.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Jared Goff, we mentioned him earlier. Where do

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you have him ranked, Maggy? I know you have him

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead Jimmy Garoppolo. Where do you have him ranked in general?

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I have him ranked at QB fourteen as of now,

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>one spot behind Jacoby Brucette, one spot ahead of Andy Dalton,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins and Jimmy Garoppolo. Yeah, so he's not not

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a QB one for He's not a lot to start

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>this week now, No, he's not a lot to start

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>or and he saying Jacoby Brisette is ahead of who

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>else has right at him? I have Dak Prescott just

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him, Aaron Rodgers, Philip Riverters, Kyler Murray, Tom Brady,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston. So not really any names that you would

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>expect to be on the waiver wire. The only one

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>really that I would pick up and stream over him

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is Jacoby Brissette going up against the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They're huge underdogs, the liven Point underdogs as of now.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>And see why Hilton actually practiced today, So that would

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>be a huge booths for Jacoby Brissette as well, because

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>they well, go see if Jcoby percent go check it out. Greg,

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>you see what you can find? E Why what can

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we expect tonight? When it comes to Todd Gurley And

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>there's when fantasy owners have been frustrated and you're trying

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to understand the usage. Malcolm Brown's user has gone down,

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but girly doesn't look the same. I was talking to

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>game Moorenci earlier today and gave was like, hey, the

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>over under for a rushing yards were talked early to

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Night's fifty eight, Like this is what it's come to you?

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect that Gurly tonight against Seattle. From me,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this has got feel, but my gut has been pretty

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>good to me. I think that Todd Gurley shows up

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>here and people being frustrated, like, I mean, you didn't

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>take him in the first round, you took him in

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the second or third round. I mean, he's been pretty serviceable.

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it has anything to do with him.

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And I've been saying that all year. The interior of

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this offensive line is not the same. They're getting pushed

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>around if you watch football or at all or know

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>anything about it, which I'm not claiming to do, but

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I do watch a lot of it. But if you watch,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they're just being pushed around. Um, they ran a lot

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of zone runs and Bill Belichick wrote the game plan,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>said put five linemen on the ice and on the

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on the field and put him in zone. So there

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are no outside zone runs for Todd Gurley right now.

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>But you saw last week they started throwing him the ball.

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>This guy is a freak athlete, arthritic knee athlete, arthritic

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>knee or not. Tonight will be a coming out party

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for Todd Gurley, and uh, we'll be talking about him

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot next week. That's what I believe, and actually

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>with you on this one. I wasn't in on Todd

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Gurley coming into the year, but I think that he

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>actually could have some success tonight. Basically for the way

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's been used recently. He's played at least seventy

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps each of the past two weeks and

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>since Week two on Greg. I know, the Week one

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we all saw Malcolm Brown scored the two touchdowns inside

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the red zone and we all freaked out. Since Week two,

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley has eleven red zone opportunities while Malcolm Brown

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>only has three, so they really have gone back to

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. It's not the greatest matchup in terms of

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry alloud Seattle allowing just three point nine

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>five yards per carry. They've limited players like David Johnson,

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>James Conner, and Alvin Kamara on the ground, but they

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have allowed a ton of receptions. They've allowed at least

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>eight receptions to each of David Johnson and Camara each

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of the past two weeks. So I think Gurley could

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>get involved in the past game again this week, coming

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>off a game where he had eleven targets last week.

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if Gurley can get involved you. As you mentioned,

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Jarry God not the same at home as he is away.

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna need all the help he can get, especially

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>o those near and intermediate passage, which where a guy

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like Cooper Cup comes in righte the Rams wide receivers

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this week. Frankie, Yeah, I would still rank Cooper Cup.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I have him inside my top six or seven.

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He's just been money this year, you know, and it's

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy because he's only eight or nine months removed from

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that a c L surgery, but has such a rapport

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with Jared Goff that you have to continue to trust

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup. Actually like Brandon Cooks a little bit more

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>over Robert Woods tonight starting Jared Goff, just because just

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the matchup the corners that they're going to see,

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a better matchup for Brandon Cooks tonight overall Um

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and then going up against Trey Flowers that is the

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.959
<v Speaker 1>secondary of the Seattle Seahawks. I still like Robert Woods

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to have all three of these guys ranked inside of

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>my top twenty. But that's how I would rank it.

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It would be Coop Cup, then it would be Cooks,

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it would be Woods for me um and

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at the Seattle defense, they only allowed

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty five passing yards and like middle of the pack

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and fantasy points allowed to two quarterbacks so far this year, Greg,

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't really faced the toughest composition. It's been

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph, It's been Teddy Bridgewater. Uh. You know, it

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 1>was the game that Drew Brees left and Kyler Murray

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>last week, and that often is struggling as well. So

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the Seahawks defense is very good.

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that their numbers look better than they are

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't really faced tough competition. Al Right, fair,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:10.399
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, and let me go to the other side.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me go to Seattle and ey, even though we

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>will dizzy guy all year long. You this touchdown street

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>going right now. I know a lot of people are

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to touchdown regression. J J Zacharyastan mean one of

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>them earlier on on the Vandel hurry up this week?

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Will dis Lee's run continue tonight? I believe there's a

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>good possibility. Like look at tight End is a waste land.

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>It's been a waste land for three years. And if

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're the kind of person that can sit Will Disley,

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then then more power to you. But I wouldn't be

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting him. Um. He's obviously a big part of this offense.

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>He's obviously it looks like he's the number one red

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>zone guy um and and Russell Wilson trusts him. At

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the start of last year, he came out gangbusters when

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>nobody including me, had any idea who he was. Uh,

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and showed up with then got that injury and disappeared

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and was you know, probably undrafted most leagues this year

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>unless you played with me. I took him everywhere. Yeah,

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I like Will dis Lee as well. Just look at

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>his usage the past couple of weeks without Nick Vannette.

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>This past week, snapp percentage went up to seventy nine percent.

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You've seen at least seven targets in each of the

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>past two games. I mean you could probably count on

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>three fingers how many tight ends you can expect to

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>get seven plus targets on a given week, and Will

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Displee has got exactly that each of the past two weeks.

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:27.399
<v Speaker 1>He is third on the team with six red zone

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>targets as well. Uh. And it also helps when Russell

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is talking you up. I don't know if you

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the lode from Russell Wilson earlier in the week,

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>but he said you Will Dislee is gonna be really,

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>really good for a long time. So he has the

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>respect the trust of Russell Wilson and that's half the battle.

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>So where is he ranked this week for you? Frank?

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have to pull up the tight end rankings,

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>which I can do for you right now. I have

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>him ranked as my tight end seven on the week. Beautiful,

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>take that top ten tight end. Let's go. Yeah, so

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>good news coming around for you here, Greggy. I do

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like will dis Lee, the Rams have been good against

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. I mean the thing is, ben see points

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>against for tight ends is really based on who you

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>go up against, right, Like, if you go up against

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that use the tight end, like, of course your

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers are gonna be skewed. If you face the Arizona Cardinals,

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say, I mean they don't use the tight ends.

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So using fantasy points against for tight ends, uh is

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is tough. It's really tough to use that data. So honestly,

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>when I'm ranking tight ends, I just want to look

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>at guys who are being used the most in their

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>offenses being used in the red zone and Will dis

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Lee is one of those tight ends right now, Well,

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 1>just Lee one of those tight ends you're interview, be

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the one, the one guy that's on there at that position.

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>It's will digitally makes your life a lot easier at

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position. Tonight for Seattle, you have Tyler

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Locke in his familiar role. Are you using Dktcalf? I

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have them outside of my top thirty six tonight. I

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a there's a range of outcomes

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>where tonight turns into a shootout and we just get

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points back and forth here. But ultimately

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think the Rams, coming off that

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>tough loss against Tampa Bay, that they kind of want

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to slow this game down. They want to use a

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of girly and we know on the other side

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's what the Seattle Seahawks want to do with

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>their core as well. I still do like Tyler Lockett

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup. We just saw Chris god went into

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>slot score three touchdowns last week against the Ram, so

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I like lock It, But personally playing on the outside

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>for Metcalf, you know he's probably gonna see either keep

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to leave or Marcus Peters. I probably get away from

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>him this week. EWE, let me go over to you

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>when it goes to Chris Carson, where Chris Carson had

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 1>those fumbling issues and he Carrol said, hey, we're not

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna let it to find him, and they played him unbelievable.

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Amount had a good game this past Sunday with shot.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Penny is expected to be active tonight. I don't even

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>believe he's on the injury report. What kind of split

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>do you expect between these two if at all? I

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think this is Carson spot. I mean, he's going to

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. They're going to trust him. Penny will

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>spell him when he's tired and and change the pace

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>things like that. But Carson is definitely the guy there.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Carol loves him. Uh, the players love him. I mean,

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if you watch this guy run like he is just

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not afraid, he's not afraid of contact. He invites it.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you, like if I was a

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>football player standing on the sidelines and I'm seeing this

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>guy smash into everything that moves and and fight for

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>every yard. That's that's Uh, that's a good teammate to

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>have on your team. So look, at all. All running

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>backs have the ability to fumble. Um, they've all fumbled before.

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>He had a couple of bad ones and they were

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>all in a row, so it was very glaring. But

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>he didn't fumble last week. Uh, and he looked great.

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, Carson Carson's the man there and uh,

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to me, he's probably a top ten running back this week. Yeah,

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I have him as my RB seven on the week.

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm right there in lockstep with E. Why you

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>look at Chris Carson's usage. He's had at least fifteen

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 1>carries in every game He's He's averaging almost four targets

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>per game as well. And its Los Angeles Rams defense

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just allowed two rushing touchdowns last week to both Ronald

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Peyton Barber. They have allowed five rushing touchdowns

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to running backs in four games so far this season,

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>allowing the eighth most fantasy points to opposing running backs.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think Chris Carson is in a really, really

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>good spot tonight, Greig, all right, you were for tonight, Frank,

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>between the Rams and the Seahawks. I am going to

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>say that the Rams winness game. I will also take

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. I don't think you're far off. I'll go

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>with seventeen the Rams over the Seahawks. Eric, Yeah, I'm

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go Rams over the Seahawks in this one. I don't.

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like the Rams are gonna show up.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>That that's what I believe. I think Jared Goff is

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get right. I think the They're gonna spread

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball around and make it hard to know where

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going. Cooper Cup has another good game, and Todd

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Gurley uh is the m v P of of the

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>game tonight. Right, Todd Gurley, he break out game for Eric.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>He says, uh that you believe also that the Rams

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is gonna rely on Gurley really try to play ball

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>control to night in Seattle. I saw his player prop

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is only fifty eight rushing yards too. It seems really

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>low for me when it comes to Todd Gurley. I

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:50.399
<v Speaker 1>like some of his receiving props as well. I haven't

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>seen the number on Chris Carson, but I do you

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>know if I like Chris Carson as a top ten

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>running back tonight you can place wagers on either his

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>over on his rushing yardage prop or for him it's

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>or a touchdown. And I think either one of those

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>will come to fruition. All right, So there you have it.

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>The predictions for Sarson minus one tend to score touchdown tonight,

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley plus one oh five. All right, there you go.

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are done for tonight. It's gonna be

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a fun night as e Y watches NHL. Frank and

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I watched baseball. Hopefully we watch the NFL as well.

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun day of sports this evening. Tomorrow we

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>do all of our best best for the Weekendi we'll

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>go around the league and all the fantasy goodness that

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to know. He's Erk Young, He's Frank Stanfell,

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg Sosman. We'll do it all again tomorrow. We

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>hope Daily Rhodo dot com learned from the game's best

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice. We

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>play every day, all major sports, all year round. We

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 1>never stop. Industry leading DBS tools and custom projections, and

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>now the Daily Roado dot Com optimize that in minutes building,

0:45:57.560 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>optimize line up for cash games, and turn me from

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the game's best df best players joined Daily Roado dot com.

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So what did I happen? What did Here's what you

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>missed on the BFPS and interesting conundrum about tonight. We'll

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get into the game later on, like I said, but

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so have Jared Goff is my quarterback, and I was like,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>oh man, do I play him tonight? And it's not

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup. It's on the road. He's much worse

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on the road than he isn't home defense isn't what

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it once was. Though I also have like Jimmy g

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Agle with Jimmy g Cleveland Monday Night, nice Monday night

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 1>at a quarterback I can wait on like this is great.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.359
<v Speaker 1>And I did something that kind of angle would really

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I killed me for Frank, you looked at your opponent's team.

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I looked at my opponent's team and I saw that

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>his top wide receiver it's Brandon Cooks. And I was like,

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I want to make sure whatever Brandon

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Cooks cans points, I'm getting points. Now. I'm starring Jared

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Goff to night. Personally, I have Jared Goff ranked higher

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>than Jimmy Garoppolo from the get go, so I wouldn't

0:46:57.160 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just start him based on my opponent having Brandon Cooks.

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>But I will start hitting based on what the numbers

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are telling me. And um, I'm gonna go with jerikof

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 1>over Jimmy Garoppolo. Fantastic. So you made the right decision,

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 1>but for the wrong reasons. Greig, it doesn't matter how

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I get there, process doesn't matter. There is a results

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>over process, guy, Absolutely freaking are we probably more people

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 1>should be all the results over process? We we We

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>probably should be. Who cares how we get there? As

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>long as we win? Hey, you know what, last week

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I said, Miles Sanders was a great play. It wasn't.

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the Eagles running backs were a great play.

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Process over results. Do you feel right about that? I

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>do feel good that one of the Eagles running backs

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>went off. Obviously I wish that it was Miles Sanders.

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't own Sanders anywhere, but I think that the

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>logic in you know, using the Eagles running backs against

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the Packers last Thursday night was good logic. Just so

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>happens that, uh, Doug Peterson is the coach of the

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. So uh, it's kind of like a you know,

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>half and half. You know you got it right technically,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but you didn't just weird. Let me start off today

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>show with a not injury related news, but we saw

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>we talked about yesterday. I think, e y, it's we're

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>getting back into today. And that's the fun Diggs, right,

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because the fun Diggs. Someone's bruin in Minnesota. We saw

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a sweets cool of days ago. Frank we were shorts.

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>That 'm feeling asking for a trade, just the fond

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Diggs asking for a trade. Every answer that this guy

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gives this question, like, hey, why do you miss practice yesterday?

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I had a cold. You're a professional athlete. I can't

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>imagine a cold. It's not even going to work. No, No,

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely not. Uh. I mean it's it's a it's a

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>poor excuse. There's obviously where there's smoke, there's fire, and

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean a little bit. You gotta understand the frustration there.

0:48:37.080 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>This isn't an All Star wide receiver playing with Adam

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Feeling another all Star wide receiver, and they're just not

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball. And when they are, Kirk Cousins has

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>been rancid this year. He has not been good um

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with it. Their ability to run the ball. You thought

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that it would just make throwing the ball easier, but

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem to be the thing. Minnesota is really

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:00.879
<v Speaker 1>struggling to throw the ball. Getting their wide receivers going

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at all, and and being Steffion Diggs, and and not

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 1>being targeted, and only being thrown to a few times

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a game has got to be frustrating.