WEBVTT - How small is an electron?

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, or hey, you're a visual artist, so I have

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a question for you about how you visualize things. Well,

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thank you for calling me an artist.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Cartoonist don't usually get that kind of respect. But do

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you mean can I draw my answer? Yeah, maybe when

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we upgrade this podcast to a YouTube channel, But until then,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>here's my question. What is the biggest distance that you

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can visualize that you can sort of see in your mind? Well,

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think anything bigger than the distance between my bed

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and the fridge feels like an infinity. I guess maybe

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like the biggest distance that I can wrap my head

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>around would be maybe like the size of the solar system,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like I think I have a intuitive sense

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, but maybe anything bigger it just kind of

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>blows my mind. All right, So then turn it around.

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>What is the small all this distance that you can visualize?

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Probably the width of a thinly sliced banana. Feels like

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should have had a snack before we did

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>today's podcast. I am Rhammad, cartoonists and the creator of

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>PhD comments. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't eat bananas no matter how then you slice

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>them really you're anti banana like you avoid them. I'm

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>anti bananite, yes on the air. I didn't know that.

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, how do we even get along all

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>these years? I don't know if we I can continue

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>doing this with you anymore. So if you if you

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>get him in a salad, you picked them out or something.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>How far puts banana in a salad? What are you

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about? You were offending salads? How far this is

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>anti bananas? Goes go? Daniel, Well, let's see, if I

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was dying of starvation next to banana tree, I would

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>eat some bananas. I'll put it that way. I would.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I see. Oh man, you don't know what you're missing.

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But for those of you who are not anti banana,

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome to this podcast. Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a production of Our Heart Radio, and banana lovers and

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>banana haters are all welcome on this podcast because we

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>only the lovers, because we all share the love of

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe and the mystery is and the incredible cosmic

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>questions like how can anybody stand to eat a banana? No? Like?

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>How big is our universe? And does it all make sense?

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Should ever rebody Daniel that bananas are part of the universe.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>If you love the universe, technically you love bananas. But

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome to our podcast, in which we do try to

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>explore everything around us, including bananas and other delicious or

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>non delicious items, and explore lane how it all works

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. Yeah, we try to think about the bigness

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, the limits of space and planets and stars,

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>but we also like to talk about the small things

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in life and in the universe, and and sometimes it

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>really stretches your mind right to sort of sort of

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in one conversation think about how big the universe is

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and how also how small things are. Yeah, and we

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>try to take you on a tour of the sort

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of current thinking of scientists. How do scientists think about

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? How do they fit the whole universe in

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>their brains? Or what do they visualize when they think

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about the inside of a black hole? Or how do

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists think about the very very tiny What does a

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>particle look like inside the mind of a party goal physicist? Yeah,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we know that the universe is made

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>out of tiny little particles, and we like to say

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tiny little particles. But I guess you don't often think

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about it, what tiny really means. Yeah, we do this

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot when we think about the quantum realm. We

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>try to sort of use the ideas we have from

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>our everyday experience and apply them to particles, apply them

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to these tiny little bits so that we can make

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>sense of them, because you know, you can't see these

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>things directly, so you have to sort of build a

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>mental picture, and we try to talk about how they

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have mass and charge, and we even give them you know,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>labor and spin and other sorts of things that were

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>familiar with from our world. But you have to wonder, like,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how well does that really work? Is it really relevant

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>or is the quantum realm just totally alien and we

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>will never really get our minds around it. Yeah, I

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>thought we had already decided that everything looks like Lego

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>pieces down at the fundamental level. They don't look like

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>little blocks with circles that say Lego on them. Well,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to do a test. You know, if you

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>step on them and they cause you great pain, then

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they definitely are the shape of Lego pieces. I think

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they make round legos too. Now finally to save parents,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this is all we can do as

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>humans is we can take the ideas we are familiar

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with and we can try to map them down to

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the quantum realm to think about this. Yeah, and sometimes

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>that intuition kind of fails, right, or it breaks down

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>when you get down to that quantum realm, that quantum level, right,

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>our ideas of what something is, or how solid something is,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>or what shape it has, and it all sort of

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>breaks down into kind of mathematical goop right down at

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the quantum. I think it has a little bit more

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>substance than mathematical GOOPI gloop, but really it's a bit

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>more No, it's a bit more poetic than mathematical sometimes

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because well, we try to draw connections, like we talk

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about quantum spin, and we fully admit that these particles

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>are not actually spinning, but they're doing something that is

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>very much like spin. It has a lot of similar characteristics,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and so we draw this analogy. And I think this

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most beautiful things about physics, is

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to describe the unknown in terms of the known.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's what languages, that's what art is, that's

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what that's what it means to explore the universe is

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>to express it in a way that we can understand it,

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and so that's all we can do. Yeah, are you

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>saying you don't understand google Goog? I'm saying googly groop

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>suggests some lack of understanding or nonsense, whereas in its

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>place there are some elegant intellectual structures to guide your mind.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I see, you know, potato, potato again, theoretical structures, googly goog,

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all, it's all, you know, different names. But so

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>to the other podcast, we thought we would take a

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>trip down to that quantum level and kind of think

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>about a particular, you know, object that I think we're

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>all familiar with, and to sort of challenge our understanding

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of what it looks like and what shape it has

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, what size it has down at the

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum realm. And this is something that I have struggled

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with as a particle physicist, just trying to visualize, just

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to conceptualize it. How do I put this in

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>my mind? How do I think about this so I

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>can get some intuition right? And so today we'll be

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>tackling the question how big is an electron? Or how

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>small is an electron? Oh? Man, is this another potato

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>po typle thing. It's big and small depending on which

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>country here. The representatives of the Electron Union prefer to

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>be called big rather than small. Oh, I see, But

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what does the electron itself prefer? Does it see itself

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as a as a big or a little? Interview with

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>an Electron speculative fiction novel by J H winner of

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Price in literature and physics at the same time.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you know, electrons are everywhere. They're one of

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the three fundamental particles that make up everything that we are,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that you are, That planets and stars and galaxies and

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>dust are made out of um. And so it's an

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>important particle. And it makes yourself phone work, which without

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>which you would probably not be listening to this podcast. Yeah,

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and it sort of sits at the frontier of particle physics.

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Our goal is to explain everything in the universe in

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of the smallest bits and pieces, the tiniest, roundest

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>lego pieces anywhere, And as far as we know, these

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are the smallest bits. And so we wonder, like, is

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it made of something smaller? How small is this thing? Anyway? Yeah,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the size of an electron? I guess that's a

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>question we haven't really talked about before. We just sort

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of talked about electron and what they can do and

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what they do, and we know they're small. But I

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>guess the question here is how small it is? Or

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>how big is it? Not? How big isn't it? Yeah,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>And like with many of these mappings to the quantum realm,

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure you're going to be dissatisfied with the

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>answer because did you misname something again? Is it not

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>really called? Is it like an electron? Not really an electron? Well,

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give away the end there, you'll

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>have to stick around for another half hour. Well, this

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is a question that, as always, we were wondering how

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>many people out there had thought about or wondered about

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and what they knew about the answer to this question. So,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as usual, Daniel went out there into the wilderness of

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the streets of Irvine, California and ask people how big

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they thought an electron is. I like the way you

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>make it sound dangerous, like I'm hacking my way through

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the jungle. I think talking to perfect strangers, it sounds

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>terrified to me. Well, here's what people had to say.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But before you hear these answers, think to yourself, what

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>would you guess is the size of an electron? Very small?

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, like a couple of billion Adams can fit

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on a period in in a book, So an electron

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is Chillian quadrillion. I don't know. Sudden thinkers like small,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like smaller than that. Best guys like like a hundred

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of a nanometer ten to the minus sixteen. Well, I

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>guess it's when it's a way function falls off? Is

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>one over eight or something like that? Is that how

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we want to call it? What's thirteen point six e

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>v s and nanometers that it does red stuff? So

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple d nanometers? Let's doing that? Also, no idea,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>best es not that big tend to the negative on

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>all eleven or twelve or something like that. Like all right,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>some pretty I feel like, pretty educated answers, Like some

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>people were talking about electron volts even I like the

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who says smaller than a centimeter, like yeah, that's

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's true, yes and also correct, Yes, it's definitely correct. Um. No,

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't make fun of these people. They are giving

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>us their time, their and their energy, and so it's

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fun just to just to know what people have in

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>their minds. And I think one of the common answers

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is like, tend to the mind is a pretty big number.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, know I thought they were pretty I guess

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you're at a at a university, so maybe a lot

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>of these folks just think in physics or something. But um,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you ask me, I don't know if

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I would guess with exact figures or units. Well it's

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting because if you ask me, I don't know what

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say. It's a tricky question. Even what is

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the meaning of the question, Like what does it mean

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for the electron to have a side? Is? So it's complicated.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So someone interviewed on you on the street and ask

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you this question, you'd be like, let's sit down for

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours, let me pull out my white board,

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for asking that question. And you see the

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>panic in their eyes. I've been waiting all my life

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for perfect strangers. They would feign a phone call and

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>run away quickly. All right, Well, let's get into the

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to answer this question. And I guess the first

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>thing is is that you're telling me is that this

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is even Um, it's kind of almost a philosophical question.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like a tricky question in itself to ask what

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is the size of an electron? Yeah, And you have

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to be really careful about what you're doing. When you're

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>asking a question that you're used to asking about macroscopic

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff and then applying that to microscopic stuff, you have

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be really careful about what you mean and what

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly it is you're trying to learn. You know, like

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>when we think about a ball moving through space, we

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can talk about its velocity. Cool, But when you want

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the velocity of an electron, it's more

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>complicated because it doesn't have like the same kind of

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>half and so it's philosophy changes, and sometimes you can

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>know it, sometimes it's unknown, and so you know, there's

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>an analogy you can make there, but you have to

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be careful about exactly what you're asking. And the same

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>is true when you ask about the size of something

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>super duper tiny, right, and and especially when you ask

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about the size of a single thing, right, Like what

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>is it? What does it even mean to ask about

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the size of anything? Is it like how much space

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you occupy? Is it like the my longest dimension? Is

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it the distance between you know, one and one side

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of me to the other side of me. I think

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that's it. I think it's the distance between your edges.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And so you have a size if you have edges

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that don't touch, right, if you have if there's a

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning to like there being a left of view and

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 1>a right of view, and your size is the distance

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>between them. You know, we have a meter stick, how

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>big is it? Well, the left side is one meter

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>from the right side. So that's sort of makes sense, right,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And this this all sounds, you know, obvious, but it's

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be important when we get to the quantum

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>realm to be thinking about it in the same same

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of set of ideas. Right, Yeah, I guess you've

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>got to think about what makes it a thing and

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>when is it stopped being a thing? And then then

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you calculate kind of the distance between the edges of

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>what is and what is not a thing. Yeah, And

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so you answer the question like what a size mean, Well,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>it's the distance between the edges and that immediately, but

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see you to the other question, what is

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the edge, Like what is the edge of a meter

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>stick or the edge of a banana? How do you

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>define where that stops? And that's not so easy. Oh man,

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you just make me imagine it endless banana and I

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>salivated a little bit. That's a whole universe to you,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>right there. Man, maybe the whole universe is just one banana.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We are all just banana nos in a banana. We

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>should start that in the restaurant. You know, Olive Garden

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has the endless bowl of salad, endless bread stick. We

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>can we can start selling the endless banana. But anyways,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so where is the edge of the banana? Right? You

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>would think, oh, I'm looking at it, I can tell

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>where it stops. And you either you poke it or

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking at it. It sort of gives you

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a sense for like where the edges. It doesn't have

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a fuzzy edge, like it stops the all the atoms

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that make up the banana are kind of stuck together,

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and at some point there aren't any more of the

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>atoms that make up the banana. Yeah, although, if you're

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>zooming close enough right, everything that's not an absolute zero

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is has a bit of a fuzzy edge, you know,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like boiling off atoms. Like the reason you can

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>smell banana is that there are volatile molecules on it

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that are always leaving and so zooming close enough, and

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a bit of a fuzzy edge there. But

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>still you can like take a stick and you can

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>poke the banana with your tiny stick and you can ask, like,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>when does the banana give me resistance? Or is the

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>edge of it is sort of like, you know, where

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is it push back? Okay, so that that would be

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the edge of like an object microscopic option you're saying.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>It has to do with when it no longer interacts

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with you in the same way as the rest of

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the banana. Yeah, And there's an important idea there, I think,

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>which is it's not where the stuff of the banana ends,

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's where the bananas forces push back. Because you know,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the banana itself is mostly made of these we'll talk

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>about in a minute, but time much smaller particles, and

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff of the banana, the thing that gives it

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>its volume is the forces. Right, If there were no

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>forces between these particles, they will collapse to a much

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller pile. Like you just made a pile of all

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the atoms inside the banana, it would be almost invisible.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Most of that volume comes from them spacing each other.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Out by the forces. So it's really the forces, the

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing back that gives the banana it's volume and therefore

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>its size. I see, you wouldn't measure it as between

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the center of the rightmost atom of the banana to

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the center of the leftmost atom of the banana. You

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>would be you would extend that a little bit to

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>include like when that atom starts pushing back another adom

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that tries to poke through the banana. Precisely because if

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you bring your stick nearby, then the farthest, the most

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>extreme atom and your stick is not going to touch

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus of that atom in your banana. They're going

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to push against each other before they touch. And so

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think of sort of the edge of

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the banana is that force field that sort of protects

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it from you know, external forces. Okay, so you're saying,

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as a physicist, you would define the size of something

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>as as the edges of it, and the edges you

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>would define is when they start pushing other things from

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going through it. Yeah, So really it's more about interactions

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>than it is about matter itself and particle physics, we

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think a lot about particles and forces, matter and interactions.

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the size of something really depends more

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on its interactions then on the stuff that's inside of it.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And that makes sense because if you want to know

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the size of something, you want to know it for

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a reason usually right, like you want to see if

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the banana fits inside of a special you know, banana

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>carrying case that you aren't designing. You need to know,

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, not when the set where the centers of

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the atoms are, but you want to know, you know,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if you can fit the banana inside the case. That's

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly it. But it already raises some problems, like what

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>if you had a blob of dark batter the shape

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of a banana, how big is it? Well, if you

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can't really interact with it, if you could like put

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>your finger through it, then you know, does that mean

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's a banana shaped and blob of dark batter

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is smaller? It doesn't have a size maybe even boy. Yeah,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so it gets it gets tricky pretty quickly. This thing,

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>which which we thought was simple is actually turns out

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of subtle. Yeah, it's feel back the

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>answer to this question and also get into how big

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an atom is, and then we'll get into how big

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>an electron it is. But first let's take a quick break,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, Daniel. So it seems like the question of

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>how big something is is kind of fuzzy in itself,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe a good way to kind of tackle

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it is to start with the next level down from

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a banana, which is like how big is a is

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the atoms in the in the banana. So

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>remember that we decided that if we're going to talk

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about the size of the atom, we're not going to

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ask where is the stuff inside of it? We're gonna

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>ask where does it push back when it's poked? And

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure that out, it's helpful to sort of imagine

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole pile of atoms packed together. Here you have

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you like imagine the banana is sort of like a crystal.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like closely packed atoms of the banana.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>And here it's determined again by the interaction between them,

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Like how closely packed are they depends on how much

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they resist being squeezed together. And in this case, for

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>an atom, it's you know, for banana. For other stuff,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's pretty small. It's like you know, fifty

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to a couple hundred trillions of a meter. Is what

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how you you would define how big anatom is. Yeah,

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's like this the separation between the center of one

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>atom and the center of another atom. Depending on the material,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and different things can sort of pack more tightly together

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>than other things. Like hydrogen, you can squeeze it down

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to like thirty trillions of an atom between protons. But

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're packing lead together, for example, it's almost two

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>d trillions of a meter between sort of the centers

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of the nuclei. I say, it's it's like if you're

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to measure the size of a bunch of marbles.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You would stick him in a container and see how

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>many you can sort of cramp together, and that kind

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of tells you the size of each marble. Yeah, the

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>distance between the centers of the marbles. There you pack

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>them as closely as you can, and then you measure

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the distance between the centers of the marbles. Is that

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>actually sort of because you know, when I think of

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an atom, I think of like, um, you know, like

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the popular culture drawing of an atom, which is like,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, little balls in the center and then electrons

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>flying around in orbit. You know, you know, and I

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>know that you know, they're actually like electron clouds. But

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>even the clouds have sort of a size, right, they're

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>drawn as little balloons that stick out of this center.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Is the size is the packing size that you're talking about,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like how many you can crime in banana, the same

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>as the size of those like electron clouds. Yeah, it's

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>very closely connected. And for a reason, those electrons are

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason that the atoms don't pack more closely together,

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Like you bring two hydrogen atoms near each other. It's

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the electron clouds that determine how closely they get together

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>because they form like a covalent bond and make an

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>H two or something like that. And so it's those

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>electrons that determine the interactions between the atoms and determine

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>their spacing. And it's when those two things start overlapping,

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is when they can no longer really get closer together. So, yeah,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the size of the electron cloud is very closely connected

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to the size of the atom. It really is what

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>defines it. They're always interacting, right, no matter how far

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>apart there are, Like if I had a hydrogen atom

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>here and you had a hydrogen atom and Jupiter. Technically

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of repelling each other, right or and or

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>attracting each other or not. They definitely do feel each other.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You're write the the extent of the electromagnetic force is infinite,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>So there are electrons in Alpha Centaur that are pulling

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on you or pushing on you, or depending on whatever

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, technically touching you. Right, you're being touched by

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>an alpha centaur right now. I just got chills down

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>my spine a little bit to the left. Please, yes,

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Crash that is that I've had. Yeah, well

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a tricky concept. You're right. If we're going to

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>define size by sort of how you were responding when

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you get poked, then you're right. You're being constantly poked

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>by everything in the universe. Well, even the stuff like

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a build B zillion nine years away. Yeah, it is everything.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Everything in the universe is feeling you. Although you know

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a time delay there, so the stuff in Alpha

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Centauri is only feeling. Stuff is feeling where we were

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago as a separate issue. So my

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>size depends on time as well. Jeez. But you know,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>those those things are pretty negligible, and so you can

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think about like when these things really have an effect

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you probe if you shot an electron at um

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hi'd gin atom, when would it deflect the electron? And

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if you shot you know, a meter to the right,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't change the path of the electron really at all.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It would, but just it would be very little, It

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>would be very little bit negligible. But then when you

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, hit it right on, then it's going to

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>bounce right back. And and so you can use that

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to sort of get a sense for what is the

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>meaningful sort of charge radius of a particle. And you're right,

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's there's no crisp edge there. So there's a small

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>complication there also because it turns out that the size

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of something depends on not just what you poke it with,

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>but how hard you poke it. Like, if you poke

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>an atom very gently, it'll seem bigger because you'll notice

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>smaller deflections further away. If you poke it very hard,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>it will actually seem smaller because you'll overpower the electrons

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and the outside and only see the nucleus on the inside.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no point at which it goes to zero though,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you're right, right, yeah, So it's it's kind of fuzzy

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and maybe kind of arbitrary, but you're saying, it's like

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>when when you would actually fee you the force of

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that electron, that's when maybe you would say, all right,

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of impinging on it, which means it's sort

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of bumping up against it. Mm hmm, And it's not

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>totally arbitrary. Like when you squeeze atoms together, they settle

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in at a certain distance from each other, so that

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>totally tells you what the equilibrium location is for for

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the distance between atoms, and that I think is a

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>reasonable way to define the size. But you know, you're right,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about, like what am my meaning

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>by size in this context? In this other context? This

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>basic thing we think about like should be obvious to

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about is it turns out to have a lot

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of wrinkles to it, all right, So that's kind of

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 1>how you would define an atom is when it starts

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to push back another atom, and how much when you

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>crow them inside of a box, you know, what's the

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>natural spacing that they have between them? And it's you're

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>saying sort of related to those electron clouds, which is

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.719
<v Speaker 1>how kind of how far away the electron goes from

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the nuclei right, Okay, so that's a that's an atom um.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But I guess it gets strict when you talk about

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>individual particles. So let's go down one more level to

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the proton inside of the nucleus. How big? How how

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>big would you say a proton is? This is a

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>wonderful question. And you know, if you're breaking open the atom,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're shooting electrons at the atom, it's going to

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>get repelled by the electrons on the outside of it.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you give them enough energy, then they can

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of penetrate through there, and then you can start

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to probe the proton inside there, and you can ask, like,

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>how big is this thing? And so we do that exactly.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>We shoot electrons at protons or hydrogen atoms or or

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter if the electron is there anymore,

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>because the probe we're shooting with has so much energy,

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and we see where does it bounce back and where

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>does it sort of stop bouncing back, and that gives

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>us a sense for how big the proton is, and

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so we actually have a number for that. But it's

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>tricky because the proton is also made out of things

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>inside of it, sort of like the atom itself. It is.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Protons are made of smaller bits that are slashing around

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>inside of it. Those are the corks. But remember that

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to define the size of an object, the

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>proton this case, not by where the stuff is inside it,

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but where it pushes back. And the corks hang out

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>together and push back against the other protons. So if

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we use our definition, it's the distance between the protons

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.479
<v Speaker 1>that's going to determine the size of the protons. And

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that's connected, of course to how the corks are arranged,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>how they're happy to be inside the proton. The proton

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like a cork atom. I See if

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>they were comfortable being a mile apart, you know, like

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if you try to split it more than a mile

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or squish the more of them out, they would prefer

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a mile up apart from each other. Now,

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you would say the size of those two electron at

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>courts is about a mile. So the size of the

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>proton that's that's made up of those corks, yeah, it

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>would be about a mile. But you know, we have

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>nuclei and they have got protons and neutrons inside of them,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and each one is like its own little particle. They

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>get squeezed together, but they hang out. They keep their

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>own little particle nature, and so it's just like packing

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>marbles together. You can ask about like the distance between

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the center of one proton and another, or a proton

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and a neutron. That's what we think of as the

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>size of the proton. How much can you pack in

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the quarts that are inside of the proton? Yeah, and

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a really crazy number. That's like one quadrillionth of

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a meter. It's a really small number. Uh. And that's

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>smaller than a nanometer for sure. It's smaller than a

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>centimeter as well. It's smaller than a mile apparently as well. Um,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's pretty small. That's pretty small. Yeah, Like, how

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how big is that in relation to like the size

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of an atom. Well, an atom is you know, like

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ten to a hundred ish um trillionth of a meter,

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is one quadrillionth of a meter, So it's

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like one ten thousands or one hundred thousands the size

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of an atom. So it's very small compared to the atom.

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Bare to the electron radius, the proton is super tiny. Okay,

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>wait wait, so um, we have an atom and how

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>about the just the nucleus of the atom. How close

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>together are those protons and neutrons in the nucleus packed together?

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are very tightly packed together. And and again remember

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's because that's sort of how the size of the

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>proton is determined. It's like how do those things cluster together?

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>And so the size of like if you have the

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>nucleus of an atom with you know, a hundred protons

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and neutrons in it, it's not that much bigger than

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>one protonomy. It's like packing above those marbles together. So

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be ordered magnitude quadrilliants of a meter.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, so the new And that's why they say,

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>like the anatom is mostly empty space because you know

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what you would say is the size of it. Actually

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus is like this tiny little bit of it inside. Yeah.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And the way that they probe this is two different ways.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>One is they shoot an electron at proton. But sometimes

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>also they just look at an atom. They just watch

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>an atom sitting there. It's got a proton and an

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>electron and the electron is whizzing all around. And sometimes

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this is super weird. Sometimes the electron goes inside the proton,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like in a quantum mechanical way, or like it actually

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>goes through what's the difference quantum mechanics is reality, dude, um,

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Like if you were to you know, I mean, like

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were to open the true Dinger's box and

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you would you would suddenly find it inside of the news. Yeah,

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the electron in one of its states has non zero

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>probability density to be inside the proton. And when this happens,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like partially cancels some of the charge

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>pull of this thing because you have the electron now

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>inside the positive atom and then it escapes. But depending

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>on the size of the proton it escaped, this happens

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more or less often, so you can measure like how

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>often the electron is inside the proton, and that tells

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you how big the proton is, because the bigger the

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>proton is, the more often this happens. So this is

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>another way we sort of get a sense for how

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>big is the proton. I see, using like probability, like

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you throw a bunch of darts at it, only sometimes

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you hit hit the proton. Then that sort of tells

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you the size. Yeah, exactly, And that's actually the most

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>sensitive test. Basically using the hydrogen's own electron, like pass

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it through the proton and give you a sense for

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>how big it is. It's crazy. Well, all right, so

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a proton is about you're seeing one ten thousands of

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the size of a typical atom. That's pretty small, because

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty small. So alright, so let's get there. Let's

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>get down now to the last level, which is how

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>big is an electron? And I imagine that's going to

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>be even smaller, but we'll get into that, but first

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:45.239
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break, all right, Daniel. So now

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we're down to one of the fundamental particles, the electron,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're asking the question how big is it? Or

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>how small isn't it? Or how big isn't it? Amount

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of negatives here, um and so, And I guess what

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking going to talk about. It sort of applies

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to quarts as well, right, because we're now talking about

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>single particles, not like clusters of particles. Yeah, and remember

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that our theory is very hierarchical. We start with matter,

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and then we go to molecules, from molecules to atoms,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>from atoms to protons and electrons, and then to quarks

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and electrons, and we're sort of have shells inside shells

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>inside shells, and so this is sort of our current

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>level of knowledge, and we can ask like, are these

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>particles that we see, um, are they the smallest possible thing?

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Or is it possible there's something else inside them? So

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you're right there, quarks and electrons are sort of as

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>far as we've gone, and so in some sense, asking

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>how big are they is asking are they the end?

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they the tiniest, smallest possible thing? Or they possibly

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.239
<v Speaker 1>made of something smaller? Oh? I see, because if you

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>can split them, that means there's something smaller inside. I

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>guess that's pretty obvious. And that's for you. That sounds

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>deep and it is deep, but it's also kind of obvious,

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like if you can break it into smaller pieces, then

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.239
<v Speaker 1>it's there were made of something else. As far as

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we know, quarks and electrons are not yet made of

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>something smaller. But that doesn't tell you necessarily how big

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they are. Right, they could be the smallest possible thing

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and still have a finite size. Right they could be um,

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the legos of the universe. Lego. Yeah, it could be

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the smallest lego you can have, but um, that can

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be smaller, smaller, big, that could be smaller big, And

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating when you learn a number about the universe. Like,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say we somehow proved that quirks and electrons are

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>not made of anything smaller. They have the smallest lego blocks,

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and we measured their size, Then we'd we'd know something

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really deep and basic about the universe, like it's made

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of legos this size, and you have to wonder, like, well,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.239
<v Speaker 1>why that size and not something else? What does that

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you about the universe to know that fundamental fact? Yeah?

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Did you know there are legos that are smaller than

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the single unit lego? What? Like you you would think

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the smallest lego is just like one square with one

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>circle on it, right by saying people have smashed the

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>legos together and make some legos covered the constituent pieces

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and legos. No, yeah, they make uh this is kind

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of weird but uh probably not consequential. But um, they

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>make smaller pieces. It makes pieces that fit inside of

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole that some of the single circle lego pieces

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have inside. Oh my god, you have just violated the

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>standard model of legos. Noble price. Please you've got the

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>prize from that one. Anyways, Um, so, yeah, so let's

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about how big an electron Isn't let's use that

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as our single particle example. And does it even make

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.479
<v Speaker 1>sense to talk about the size of a single particle, Daniel,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to talk about the size of a single

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>particle if you haven't measured the stuff inside of it.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Because we've talked about the size of atoms and protons

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>based on like how happy this stuff inside of it

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is to be next near each other, like how closely

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>does it pack? So for a fundamental particle you have

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to go back to like the poking it and be like, well,

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if I poked an electron with a stick, where were

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>pushed back? But that's sort of unsatisfying to me. Couldn't

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can't I just you know, pack a bunch of electrons

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in a in a glass jar and see, wouldn't that

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me sort of the size of it, Like how

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.719
<v Speaker 1>comfortable an electron is to another electron or to a proton.

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that sort of tell you this sort of the size,

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just like we did with the marbles and the atoms. Yeah,

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a really fun experiment. I want to

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>take like a gas of pure electrons and squeeze it

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>down together and see what happens. The problem is that

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not like a clear answer, like the heart do

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you squeeze the closer they get together, it's not like

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>an equilibrium like with protons or with atoms, because these

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>are all just negatively charged particles. There's no chill state

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where they're like, hey, you're there, I'm here. All is good,

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and so instead you want to like take them and

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like poke them, like, well, if you poke them with

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>an electron, then they bounce back for sure, But what

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>if you poke them with neutrinos then they don't bounce

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>back at all, Or what if you poke them with

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dark matter? Then they don't bounce back, And so you're

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.959
<v Speaker 1>back to this like fuzziness of like you know, if

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it depends on how it's pushing back, then it depends

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on what you're poking it with. And then size isn't

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>something that's like inherent to the object. It's about the interaction,

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which means it depends also on the thing you're interacting

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it with, which is so frustrating. Oh, I see what

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. Like if I had a cloud of electrons,

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you could maybe talk about where the cloud is, and

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.879
<v Speaker 1>where the cloud isn't, where the electors are and where

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there aren't. But with one single electron, it's hard to

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>say where it ends. It's hard to say where it ends,

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like is there a left side to the electron and

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the right side to the electron? Are those things even

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing? Because it depends on what you you're

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to touch it with, right, Like, if you're trying

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to touch it with another electron, it would maybe repel

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at a certain distance, But if you try to poke

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it with a proton, then it would maybe attract at

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a different distance. Yeah, well not so much electron versus proton,

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because they both feel the electromagnetism. But what if you

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>used a different force, if you use like the weak

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force, or if you used you know, gravity, or

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>if you used electromagnetism, is them than the size that

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you would get from electron is different. And we're turning

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to a neutrino. An electron has those eyes. It doesn't like,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, Like the neutrino doesn't care. A neutrino

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>would pass through a cloud of electrons and have a

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>much lower chance of interacting than another electron would, like

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't even know it's there, yeah, or dark matter, right,

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>pokeing a pile of electrons with a stick of dark matter,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get almost no interactions, or maybe no interactions.

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't even know about dark matter. And this is

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem. It makes sense to define size in terms

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of interactions, like where is something pushed back, But it

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>also is troublesome because then it depends on what you're

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing on it with. So that's kind of a problem

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in defining the size of an electron because it depends

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on what you poke it with. So then we try

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>something else. We say, well, let's think about it like

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanically, Like we've talked about where the electron is,

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's defined by like it's quantum mechanical wave function,

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know you were talking about like those balloon

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>shapes where the electron is. You know, it's the sort

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of the most you can localize an electron, Like what's

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the size of that quantum packet? You want to think

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about it like as a tiny quantum object. That's like

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>another way to try to grapple with it because their

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>probability curves right, Like you know where the cloud is

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>fuzzy tells you that the probability that the electron is

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 1>there is small, but where the cloud is kind of thick,

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it tells you that there's a high probability that the

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>electron is there. But that doesn't really give you any

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>insight because that size can be almost anything. It depends

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the uncertainty principle. If you know almost nothing about

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the velocity of the momentum of the electron, then you

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>can know exactly where it is, which means it has

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>like zero that quantum mechanical packets zero with And on

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the flip side, if you know everything about its velocity,

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>then it's packet is infinitely wide, like exists everywhere in

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the universe simultaneously have like a universe sized electron. So

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's intellectually not that satisfying either. But what if you

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>assume an electron is just standing still, like when you're

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to measure your kid how all they are and it's

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>impossible because they keep moving. But what if you can

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.280
<v Speaker 1>get it to stand still? Oh wouldn't what would that happen?

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you be able to then get a pretty accurate size.

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're measuring the velocity of the particle, you're getting

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>it to stand still has no velocity, and you say

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it has zero velocity, then it has infinite size because

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't know the product. Remember the product of the

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>position and momentum uncertainty has to equal a certain number.

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're narrowing down the speed of the

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>electron really really well, that means you don't know anything

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>about where it is. It's an infinite plane. Wave size

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is only distance, whereas you know in particle physics, distance

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of intertwined with time as well in velocity.

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But then on the flip side, if you say I

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>don't care at all about how fast it is, I

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to know where it is, then you can

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>localize it as much as you want. You can make

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it infinitely narrow. And so that also doesn't give you

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>any sense of like the size of the electron. So

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:01.959
<v Speaker 1>strike to we can can use poking or are quantum mathematics.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean that the electron has no size,

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's impossible to define the size of an electron.

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It kind of does currently. I mean in our theory,

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the way we actually use it is we assume the

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>electron has no size at all, It has zero volume.

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That it's just like a point in space. The left

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>is the right, the top is the bottom, the back

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 1>is the front. There's no extent to it at all.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of mathematically and and because of all the

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>things we just talked about, I guess that that's true. Yeah,

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't measure the size of an electron. It doesn't

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>make any sense to think about it. Yeah, in our theories,

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we just put zero because we assume that there's nothing there.

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>We have no way to really see the size of

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the electron. But you know, we do continue to try.

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>We do smash particles at the electron, hoping that we'll

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>see a break open, hoping that we'll see other little

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>particles come out of it. But I guess getting back

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>to the size of the electron itself, um, I mean,

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like it has no size because it's it's

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not a mile wide, Like, would you even say that

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the electron is all electrons are a mile mile wide?

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to say for the size of

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the electron, you know, And that's why I predicted, I

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think correctly, that you'd be unsatisfied with Oh my god,

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not really you can't tell the future, can Yeah, well,

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I can in this case, like I think the way

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think about it currently is as a point, But

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I also know that that makes no sense because like,

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you have something that has mass but has

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>no volume because then has infinite density, which is nonsense,

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>right is it? Electrons have mass, they have mass, and

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they have charge, Like where does that charge go? Where

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is it in the electron if it has no volume.

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>We're just used to thinking about stuff as having sizes

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>having volume, So to imagine that the basic building box

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe themselves are of zero volume is really weird.

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But I guess maybe you know that that's the theory

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 1>of it. But practically speaking, I mean, we can talk

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>about what's what's practical to you and me is like

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic forces, right, you know, And it doesn't make sense

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of neutrinos are dark matter, but kind of

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what's practical electromagnetic forces? And so couldn't we sort of

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe give a practical size to the electron because of that,

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like like what's the closest to electrons in one atom?

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>How close can they get to electrons in another atom?

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that give you a general size? Yeah, and we've

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>done that we like pounded electrons near each other and

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.240
<v Speaker 1>try to get them as close together as possible, And

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so far we haven't found a limit, Like, there's no

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>point at which the electrons will not get closer to

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>each other. And so far we've gotten down about ten

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to the minus twenty meters. And you do that by

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>shooting really high energy electrons at other electrons and try

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to get them really close together. So that's as far

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>as we could tell. We can't tell the difference between

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the electrons have no volume, and they have some volume

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that's smaller than ten to the minus twenty. We can't

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference. So far. They look like their point like,

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but we have some sort of limited resolution there in

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>our ability to probe. So what happens if I the

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>whole universe was just like a proton and an electron,

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess the electron would orbit the proton. That's what

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen is. Yeah, The size the hydrogen comes from their interactions. Right,

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Most of the volume of all the stuff in the

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>universe comes from the interactions, not from any actual volume

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>of the particles that make them up. All right, Well,

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you're right, this is very unsatisfying. Anim Well, that's satisfying

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to me that at least I was right about that.

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's a it's a really fun puzzle because I

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting to try to grapple with the quantum

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>realm and try to understand what are the limits of

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>our ability to map these concepts size and mass and

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>charge and velocity down to these tiny particles that, in

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the end are the reality, are the truth about our universe. Yeah,

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's interesting how, you know, you sort

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of put it that it's all about the interactions, you know,

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to think about an electron not having

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like a surface or you know, an st where it's

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>no longer an electron, And it all sort of depends

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>on what you're trying to look at it with, you know,

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're trying to look at it with neutrinos,

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>then you wouldn't see anything at all. Yeah, But if

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you looked at it with the electrons, it would feel

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like a certain size maybe. Yeah. And this is connected

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>to some of the other puzzles we talked about, like

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>does the electron actually spin? We know that it's either

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a point, in which case it doesn't make sense for

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it to spin like a point literally cannot spin, or

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's super tiny. But if it's super tiny and

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it has a surface, then it's spinning so fast that

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that surface is moving faster than the speed of light.

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>So at some point, like it doesn't even make sense

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for it to have a non zero size. At some point,

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 1>nothing makes sense, Daniel, life is meaningless, And that's usually

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about forty five minutes into every episode. The incredible thing

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>is that we can understand it at all, That we

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>can take these ideas from our everyday experience of like

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>eating bananas and throwing balls around, and then it can

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>give us any side into the microscopic. You know that,

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>because the microscopic is so weird, so alien, it's incredible

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>it works at all that I even have a job.

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, but that's the thing it was. We don't

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>understand it, but yet at the same time we're able to,

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, predict it and describe it with math. But

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean we understand it, right, That's what understanding is.

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 1>As far as I know, I don't know any deeper

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>level of understanding. When you pass it off to the

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>philosophers and you can ask them, like, you know, what

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>does it mean? Man? But in the end. What we're

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is physicists is just sort of describe

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>accurately the world we see around us, build a model

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in our heads that makes sense, describe all this unknown

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the known. That's that's all the understanding

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>we can hope for. Well, I guess what I mean

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is like at some point we thought the proton was

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a proton, and we had to math to describe it,

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and we thought we understood it. But then then it

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>turned out we that we there was more to the

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>proton than we thought, and we didn't actually understand the proton.

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It was made out of quirks, for example. So I

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like, you know, you have a mathematical di ccription

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, but you don't know if you're really understanding

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it to the fundamental level. And all of these mathematical

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>descriptions they work up to a point. Like your idea

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking about a proton as a fundamental particle as a

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>point particle that mostly works. It works unless you get

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>up to really high energies, energies where you can see

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the proton, because the energies are greater than the

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>bonds that are holding the proton together. And so as

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we keep pushing to higher and higher energies. We're looking

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>deeper and deeper into the real truth the smallest scales

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. And that's what limits how small we

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>can see is the energy with which we probe it.

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's why, like building a bigger super collider would

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>let us maybe see whether the electron had bits inside

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. Yeah, keep funding physics is hey, I'm on message.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If nothing else, keep sending those checks. Please, if you

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have to pick between donating to bananas or fundamental physics,

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know where I stand on that. Bananas, right, because

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bananas are made out of fundamental partners. All right, Well,

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that, And maybe the next time

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.879
<v Speaker 1>you take a bite out of a banana or your

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.479
<v Speaker 1>fruit of choice, maybe think about what it actually means

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to take a bite. I feel like we've thrown everything

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 1>into question now, Daniel, Like, what does it even mean

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to take a bite into When my teeth end and

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when does the banana begin? I don't know, but every

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>banana you've ever eaten is made out of zero volume particles.

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Chew on that and think about it until next week.

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, See you next time. Before you

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>still have a question after listening to all these explanations,

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>please drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you.

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>You can find us at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge That's one Word, or email us at

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Thanks for listening,

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Yeah m