1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Dog Chrisner. President 3 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:17,639 Speaker 2: Trump has moved quickly to impose new tariffs after the 4 00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:20,640 Speaker 2: Supreme Court struck down the legal basis for his tariffs 5 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:25,479 Speaker 2: under emergency powers. He's put in place global tariffs under 6 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 2: section one twenty two of the Trade Deck of nineteen 7 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:31,920 Speaker 2: seventy four. So the rate is fifteen percent, but these 8 00:00:31,960 --> 00:00:34,800 Speaker 2: tariffs are limited to one hundred and fifty days. Kind 9 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:38,400 Speaker 2: of underscores just how central tariff policy is to the 10 00:00:38,440 --> 00:00:42,200 Speaker 2: President's agenda. For a closer look, I'm joined by Carol Schleife. 11 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:45,560 Speaker 2: Carol is the chief market strategist at BEMO Private Wealth. 12 00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:49,280 Speaker 2: Carol joins us from Los Angeles. Thank you for being here. 13 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:52,159 Speaker 2: I think we can agree that the decision by the 14 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:55,960 Speaker 2: Supreme Court wasn't surprising, but I'm wondering about the level 15 00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 2: of uncertainty. Now do you have a sense of that? 16 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 3: Piece of it depends on the size of business. The 17 00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:07,240 Speaker 3: small medium sized businesses are scratching their head trying to 18 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:10,000 Speaker 3: figure out what to do because first we had ten percent, 19 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 3: then we had fifteen percent. It's only good for one 20 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 3: hundred and fifty days, and actually it expires the day 21 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:20,280 Speaker 3: that Congress goes on recess. On the one hand, you know, 22 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:23,840 Speaker 3: these small medium sized businesses would benefit greatly from being 23 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,880 Speaker 3: able to get some refund, especially if the administration would 24 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 3: turn around and say, okay, we'll pay some refund, because 25 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:35,119 Speaker 3: that gives them the opportunity then to turn around and 26 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 3: pass some of that refund back to clients in terms 27 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:42,000 Speaker 3: of either holding prices steady or not increasing them because 28 00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:44,199 Speaker 3: they're at the point where they might have to increase them. 29 00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:48,360 Speaker 3: I think bottom line, it does increase the uncertainty and 30 00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:54,560 Speaker 3: the short run here. I think initially most businesses were 31 00:01:54,640 --> 00:02:00,960 Speaker 3: pretty relieved is probably the wrong word, but gratified if 32 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 3: you will, that the Supreme Court did come down and say, look, 33 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:09,960 Speaker 3: countrywide tariffs are not doable. But it does make the 34 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 3: administration go search out other particular industries and such in 35 00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 3: terms of it does have alternative methods. And we know 36 00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:21,840 Speaker 3: we've said all along, as everybody has said all along, 37 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:25,800 Speaker 3: that President Trump really likes tariffs and he's been on 38 00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:28,560 Speaker 3: that theme for decades, and so we're gonna have some 39 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 3: level of tariffs that goes on. But it really is 40 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:35,840 Speaker 3: tougher for businesses. I was hopeful that they'd get a 41 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 3: little more clarity. But all that said, it's really still 42 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 3: important to remember that maximum uncertainty was probably April second 43 00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 3: last year, and yet companies did okay anyway, They actually 44 00:02:52,639 --> 00:02:54,800 Speaker 3: did better than okay when you look at GDP and 45 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:58,640 Speaker 3: where earnings came in and broadly that way. But yeah, 46 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 3: it would be nice for business if they had some 47 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:07,200 Speaker 3: level of certainty. You've even got countries pushing back now 48 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 3: in terms of India stepping back and saying that they're 49 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:16,400 Speaker 3: going to reassess things before before coming to do trade 50 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:19,400 Speaker 3: negotiation to finish up the trade negotiations, so we'll see. 51 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:22,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, the same is true for Europe. The EU's top 52 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:26,160 Speaker 2: trade chief basically saying that he will propose freezing the 53 00:03:26,280 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 2: ratification of the trade deal with the US until the 54 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 2: Trump administration kind of offers some clarity. One of the 55 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:36,080 Speaker 2: things that I'm wondering about though, because if you look 56 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 2: at what the court had to say in its decision, 57 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:43,440 Speaker 2: the power of Congress really is an issue here, and 58 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 2: obviously if a tariff is attacks, then that is the 59 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:48,640 Speaker 2: purview of Congress. Now we know we have the State 60 00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:51,760 Speaker 2: of the Union coming up Tuesday, And I'm wondering whether 61 00:03:51,800 --> 00:03:54,000 Speaker 2: you think that Trump will use this as an opportunity 62 00:03:54,720 --> 00:04:00,320 Speaker 2: to pressure Congress into codifying something with rest back to 63 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:02,960 Speaker 2: tariffs that has more of a bite and maybe could 64 00:04:02,960 --> 00:04:03,720 Speaker 2: be more lasting. 65 00:04:05,080 --> 00:04:08,640 Speaker 3: I think he'll try. I am not certain I would 66 00:04:08,800 --> 00:04:12,200 Speaker 3: put it as very successful, especially because you've already had 67 00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 3: you know, you've had Congress start to push back on 68 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:22,080 Speaker 3: some of that, with the House making the commentary around 69 00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:25,400 Speaker 3: the Canadian tariffs and things like that, and because I 70 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,920 Speaker 3: think a lot of the Congress folks are hearing from 71 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:32,839 Speaker 3: their constituents that they don't like tariffs. They understand that tariffs, 72 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:36,559 Speaker 3: in the long run, our attacks on individuals, even if 73 00:04:36,880 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 3: the suppliers pay have paid part of it, because they've 74 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 3: worked some of these deals through by and large, no 75 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,159 Speaker 3: matter who you look at. You know, there have been 76 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 3: not just the New York Fed's analysis last week, but 77 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:55,000 Speaker 3: there have been multiple other analysis that show the bulk 78 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:58,040 Speaker 3: of who pays it is the consumer and or the 79 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 3: America the US business, and those folks are speaking to 80 00:05:03,040 --> 00:05:07,560 Speaker 3: their Congress people saying, don't you dare codify anything that 81 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,160 Speaker 3: gives the president power to tax more. So I think 82 00:05:11,200 --> 00:05:15,440 Speaker 3: he can try and I'm sure he will, but I'm 83 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 3: not sure it'll go very far with in congress. 84 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:20,760 Speaker 2: Maybe we can talk a little bit about earnings. We've 85 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:24,680 Speaker 2: got some key results due this week. In Vidia right 86 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:27,520 Speaker 2: at the top of the list. Obviously, you've been tracking 87 00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:31,039 Speaker 2: a lot of the narrative around AI disruption in markets, 88 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:35,479 Speaker 2: particularly in certain sectors like wealth management software obviously a 89 00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:38,520 Speaker 2: big one. Where are you right now and looking at 90 00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 2: a company like in Vidia and what it may say 91 00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,920 Speaker 2: about where we are in this AI cycle right now? 92 00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:48,560 Speaker 3: Well, I think a couple of things on AI, and 93 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:51,120 Speaker 3: we've been saying this from any quarters that you know, 94 00:05:51,240 --> 00:05:56,360 Speaker 3: sooner or later the spend was going to need to taper, because, 95 00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:59,039 Speaker 3: I mean a lot of people forget some of my 96 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:02,440 Speaker 3: conductors are cyclical industry. I mean people are acting like 97 00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:06,919 Speaker 3: they're not like their long term but for decades semiconductors 98 00:06:06,920 --> 00:06:09,479 Speaker 3: have been a cyclical industries, So sooner or later that's 99 00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:13,280 Speaker 3: kind of taper. On the other hand, I actually I 100 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:17,640 Speaker 3: started the week at a women in Manufacturing conference in Florida, 101 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:19,840 Speaker 3: and I went to the same conference a year ago 102 00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:23,640 Speaker 3: in the same timing, and I was really struck at 103 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 3: how far along many of these manufacturing companies are in 104 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 3: deploying AI, robotics, lots of other things. It's not just AI, 105 00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:37,200 Speaker 3: it's also autonomous vehicles in the factories, it's robotics in 106 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 3: the factories, and they're very far along in deploying that, 107 00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:44,239 Speaker 3: and so I think that helps a lot of different 108 00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:47,279 Speaker 3: use cases and things, so that it's not just about 109 00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:50,720 Speaker 3: the EI data center build, it's not just about in 110 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:55,279 Speaker 3: videos earnings. It's about broader use and the fact that 111 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:59,920 Speaker 3: we've got stronger productivity that predates a lot of this, 112 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:02,760 Speaker 3: but it's really starting to accelerate and there's a chance 113 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:06,120 Speaker 3: that you continue to see even more of that. Now 114 00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:09,440 Speaker 3: that said, we don't think it's going to do a way. 115 00:07:09,760 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 3: It's not like regulated industries like wealth management or insurance 116 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:18,640 Speaker 3: or real estate or anything else can just ditch all 117 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 3: of their regulated processes and start deploying chat GPT by 118 00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 3: the end of the week. Because it's not like we 119 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 3: can upload client information into those things. There's a lot 120 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:31,920 Speaker 3: of stuff that has to happen, and so I think 121 00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 3: AI as an amplifier and not a job replacer is 122 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:42,120 Speaker 3: a key thematic that comes to these companies are looking 123 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:45,240 Speaker 3: for employees who will roll up their sleeves, figure out 124 00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 3: how to use AI to make existing processes better. It 125 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:54,840 Speaker 3: requires employees to think differently and behave differently, and maybe 126 00:07:54,920 --> 00:07:57,280 Speaker 3: have a different set of skill sets where they're willing 127 00:07:57,320 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 3: to lean into a lot more strategic thinking, a lot 128 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:07,400 Speaker 3: a lot of clients, service sorts of things. There's I 129 00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 3: think AI doesn't replace employees. It amplifies what they do 130 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:15,240 Speaker 3: and maybe changes the tenor of what they do. 131 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:17,800 Speaker 2: You know what you just described there has been happening 132 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 2: in China for quite some time. Before I let you go, Carol, 133 00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:24,720 Speaker 2: I want to ask about opportunities offshore. I know we 134 00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:29,760 Speaker 2: started the conversation with reference to this US tariff policy, 135 00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:34,040 Speaker 2: but I'm wondering whether you're seeing opportunities offshore, particularly in 136 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 2: the Asia Pacific. 137 00:08:36,480 --> 00:08:40,920 Speaker 3: Yeah. We are all around the globe actually, and in 138 00:08:41,040 --> 00:08:44,760 Speaker 3: terms of you did have international courses that outperformed the 139 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:48,400 Speaker 3: US markets last year. You had Aquay up for over 140 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:52,560 Speaker 3: twenty percent for I think the third year running. And 141 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:54,920 Speaker 3: so there are a lot of opportunities. And it's interesting 142 00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:56,920 Speaker 3: because if you look at like the World Bank and 143 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:59,960 Speaker 3: IMF numbers, they will tell you that global trade actions 144 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:06,400 Speaker 3: increase less. You're despite all of the trade machinations going 145 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:08,840 Speaker 3: on with tariffs coming out of the US, and so 146 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:13,200 Speaker 3: I think those opportunities continue, particularly because in Southeast Asia 147 00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:17,560 Speaker 3: you've got you know, Japan and the recent elections, and 148 00:09:17,679 --> 00:09:21,680 Speaker 3: part of that was predicated on increasing fiscal spend. You've 149 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:26,119 Speaker 3: got China that's been rumored for ages to be increasing 150 00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:31,199 Speaker 3: domestic fiscal policy to get their consumer markets rolling again. 151 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:34,480 Speaker 3: You've got increased defense spend all around the globe, including 152 00:09:36,280 --> 00:09:40,960 Speaker 3: Japan at record levels posts World War Two. You've got Germany, 153 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:44,920 Speaker 3: so there's a lot of infrastructure and spend in general, 154 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:48,880 Speaker 3: there's a lot of trade that's rearranging itself. And that's 155 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 3: all constructive because it means business is happening. It's happening 156 00:09:52,160 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 3: in different places. It's more difficult for investors to keep 157 00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:59,679 Speaker 3: track of. But it's a great environment for active managers 158 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:04,560 Speaker 3: and non US or global managers and long short hedge funds. 159 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:07,720 Speaker 3: It's you got to do the work, but it's a 160 00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:08,800 Speaker 3: great environment for it. 161 00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:11,240 Speaker 2: Okay, Carol, we'll leave it there, Thank you so very much. 162 00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 2: Carol Schlife is the chief market strategist at BEMO Private 163 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:18,200 Speaker 2: Wealth on the road and joining us from Los Angeles 164 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:28,080 Speaker 2: today here on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Welcome back to 165 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:31,560 Speaker 2: the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Prisner. So, as you know, 166 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:35,680 Speaker 2: the Trump administration is keeping US tariffs in place even 167 00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:38,760 Speaker 2: after the Supreme Court struck down the legal basis for 168 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 2: those tariffs enacted under emergency powers. So global tariffs are 169 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,640 Speaker 2: now in place. They have been put there under Section 170 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 2: one twenty two of the Trade Act of nineteen seventy four. 171 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:53,240 Speaker 2: That rate is fifteen percent. Here's the thing, these tariffs 172 00:10:53,240 --> 00:10:56,280 Speaker 2: are limited to one hundred and fifty days now. At 173 00:10:56,280 --> 00:10:59,199 Speaker 2: the same time, the Trump administration said the trade deals 174 00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:03,440 Speaker 2: made with the EU, Japan, and South Korea will remain 175 00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:07,320 Speaker 2: in place. Even so, Europe's trade chief said he'll propose 176 00:11:07,480 --> 00:11:11,160 Speaker 2: freezing the ratification of a trade deal until the Trump 177 00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:16,240 Speaker 2: administration clarifies its policy. Meantime, in India, officials cited similar 178 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:19,840 Speaker 2: reasons for postponing talks in the US this week on 179 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:24,480 Speaker 2: finalizing an interim trade agreement. So where does this leave China. Well, 180 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 2: that's where we begin our conversation with Sean Stein. Shawn 181 00:11:28,040 --> 00:11:30,959 Speaker 2: is president at the US China Business Council, and he 182 00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:34,199 Speaker 2: spoke with Bloomberg TV host Avril Hong and Sherry on. 183 00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:36,440 Speaker 4: I think the most important thing is that for China 184 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 4: this is really a bit of a win. And that's 185 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:42,720 Speaker 4: because under the rubric that the President has set to 186 00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 4: replace his IVA teriffs, it's potentially a ten percent or 187 00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:47,439 Speaker 4: a fifteen percent. 188 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:48,400 Speaker 5: Global search arge. 189 00:11:48,520 --> 00:11:51,760 Speaker 4: So overall, what that means is it means that once 190 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:54,880 Speaker 4: those go into effect, then the overall teriff rate for 191 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:59,679 Speaker 4: most Chinese goods is lower than it was before. And so, 192 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:02,480 Speaker 4: unlike with the EU, where it creates a lot of uncertainty, 193 00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:06,760 Speaker 4: in the case of China, it means that the terms 194 00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:09,080 Speaker 4: are now much more favorable to China than they were 195 00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:12,079 Speaker 4: just before. And remember, if you think about the magnitude 196 00:12:12,120 --> 00:12:15,360 Speaker 4: of this, you know, if the surcharge is ten percent 197 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 4: compared to where it was before, that's you know, potentially 198 00:12:19,559 --> 00:12:22,200 Speaker 4: one hundred billion dollars on a one hundred million dollars 199 00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:26,599 Speaker 4: for every billion dollars of trade that's affected. So the 200 00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 4: cost reduction is really substantially lower. So it's a win 201 00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:30,400 Speaker 4: for China. 202 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:36,000 Speaker 1: Well, they see it as a win, given that also 203 00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 1: it causes a lot of uncertainty. I mean, just trying 204 00:12:38,559 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: to decipher whether this is a ten percent tariff for 205 00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:44,760 Speaker 1: a fifteen percent tariff. How does this compare with fentanyl 206 00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:48,559 Speaker 1: tariffs most favored nations and other countries as well. 207 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:49,800 Speaker 5: Okay, that's a great question. 208 00:12:49,920 --> 00:12:53,760 Speaker 4: So unlike most countries, the terriff situation on China before 209 00:12:53,760 --> 00:12:56,600 Speaker 4: the Supreme Court ruling was really pretty complex. They had 210 00:12:56,679 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 4: the baseline MFN rate, which was a few percent. They 211 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:02,320 Speaker 4: had the three ho one Section three oh one tariff 212 00:13:02,400 --> 00:13:06,600 Speaker 4: rates from Trump one point zero and from the Biden administration, 213 00:13:06,960 --> 00:13:09,400 Speaker 4: which were about twenty five percent. Then on top of 214 00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 4: that they had ten percent fentanyl tariffs and now ten 215 00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,920 Speaker 4: percent tariffs for reciprocal tariffs. So the part that's in 216 00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:19,560 Speaker 4: play because the Supreme Court's ruling are just those last two, 217 00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 4: the fentanyl tariffs and the reciprocal tariffs. So those today 218 00:13:23,600 --> 00:13:26,720 Speaker 4: have fallen to zero, but when they go into effector 219 00:13:26,760 --> 00:13:30,200 Speaker 4: with the new surcharge under Section one two too, whether 220 00:13:30,200 --> 00:13:32,840 Speaker 4: it's ten percent or fifteen percent, that's still going to 221 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:34,359 Speaker 4: be a substantial reduction. 222 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:35,400 Speaker 5: From where they were before. 223 00:13:35,520 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 4: So the NFN rate won't change, the three on one 224 00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:41,240 Speaker 4: rates won't change, but the other tariffs will be lower 225 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:44,160 Speaker 4: once those go into effect under either Sinnario ten percent 226 00:13:44,240 --> 00:13:45,000 Speaker 4: or fifteen percent. 227 00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:47,280 Speaker 5: So yeah, China we'll see that as a win. 228 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:53,920 Speaker 6: And to your point, I suppose is also the idea 229 00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:57,439 Speaker 6: that the Supreme Court striking down these terraffs also means 230 00:13:57,520 --> 00:14:00,360 Speaker 6: does let's leave it for the US present it in? 231 00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 6: I mean, what does that mean for the contours of 232 00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:08,240 Speaker 6: the gathering between the two leaders laid March into early April. 233 00:14:09,160 --> 00:14:12,040 Speaker 4: That is such an important question. I'm glad you asked that. 234 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:16,440 Speaker 4: And so leverage in a negotiation only really matters if 235 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:19,040 Speaker 4: one side has got more leverage than the other side. 236 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:22,040 Speaker 4: If both sides have leverage, the effect is much more 237 00:14:22,080 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 4: ambiguous or it tends to cancel the other side out. 238 00:14:25,440 --> 00:14:26,280 Speaker 5: So where we've. 239 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:29,040 Speaker 4: Been is that you may remember that after Liberation Day 240 00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:32,800 Speaker 4: last year, when the US raised tariffs unilaterally on China, 241 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 4: China responded tariff for tariff. They went toe to toe 242 00:14:36,240 --> 00:14:38,320 Speaker 4: with the United States, and that's how we got into 243 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 4: this escalatory spiral, you know, of triple digit tariffs, which 244 00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 4: didn't serve either country's interest. And then you may remember that, 245 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:50,080 Speaker 4: you know, despite the posturing, the US blinked first and 246 00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:52,520 Speaker 4: asked China to go meet them in Geneva so they 247 00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:56,560 Speaker 4: could reduce those so Ever, since Geneva tariffs have really 248 00:14:56,600 --> 00:14:59,800 Speaker 4: lost most of their edge as leverage for the United 249 00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:02,040 Speaker 4: Stas States. And so if you look at that as 250 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 4: the first truce in the US China trade war of 251 00:15:05,680 --> 00:15:08,920 Speaker 4: twenty twenty five, or of trump two point zero tariffs, 252 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:10,560 Speaker 4: then that was a front on that war. 253 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 5: There was foughts to. 254 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:15,240 Speaker 4: A standstill, and then the trade war moved to other areas, 255 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:18,080 Speaker 4: things like export controls and sanctions. 256 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:19,360 Speaker 5: And this is a case. 257 00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 4: Where also both sides have demonstrated they've got potentially significant 258 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 4: leverage over the other and they've largely foughts to a standstill. 259 00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:32,680 Speaker 4: Most notably, China has played the rare Earth's card, which 260 00:15:32,760 --> 00:15:35,840 Speaker 4: not only hurt industry in the United States but also 261 00:15:36,720 --> 00:15:39,040 Speaker 4: around the world. And so this is a case where 262 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:43,120 Speaker 4: the US absolutely has leverage, but the Chinese have counter leverage. 263 00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:45,840 Speaker 4: So what that sets us up for is a meeting 264 00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:50,160 Speaker 4: in Beijing in maybe less than forty days where the 265 00:15:50,160 --> 00:15:52,360 Speaker 4: two presidents are not going to be able to use 266 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:54,960 Speaker 4: that leverage. And that means ideally, this will be a 267 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:58,360 Speaker 4: situation where both sides have to focus on what would 268 00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:02,880 Speaker 4: be a win for both countries, and as you've implied previously, 269 00:16:03,080 --> 00:16:05,440 Speaker 4: what would be the biggest win for both countries is 270 00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 4: to bring some predictability to the business and investment climate, 271 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:11,440 Speaker 4: so companies know how to invest them, they know how 272 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 4: to plan. Where we've been for the last year has 273 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:18,520 Speaker 4: been the constant instability and predictability has meant that investment 274 00:16:18,520 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 4: decisions have gone un made. It's meant the US has 275 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 4: lost manufacturing jobs every month since Liberation Day. So this 276 00:16:25,480 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 4: potentially will bring a chance to bring some much needed 277 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:32,960 Speaker 4: stability into this relationship. 278 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:34,160 Speaker 5: That'll be the biggest outcome. 279 00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:38,320 Speaker 1: The Trumpet administration has not necessarily even said who he's 280 00:16:38,360 --> 00:16:42,400 Speaker 1: taking from the business community to China. So how well 281 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:46,760 Speaker 1: is the administration preparing for that state visit into Beijing? 282 00:16:46,920 --> 00:16:49,800 Speaker 1: And what would your members like to see being achieved 283 00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:53,880 Speaker 1: in order to bring some more ceignty to the relationship. 284 00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:55,640 Speaker 5: Yeah, this has been shocking. 285 00:16:55,680 --> 00:16:59,800 Speaker 4: I was just in Beijing before the holiday and meeting 286 00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:02,440 Speaker 4: at meeting after meeting. What bled into all of those 287 00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:07,000 Speaker 4: from Chinese officials was a mix of somewhere between being 288 00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:11,880 Speaker 4: irritated and being apoplectic at the US not preparing for 289 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:15,320 Speaker 4: this visit. Normally, when you've got a presidential visit, planning 290 00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:18,840 Speaker 4: starts months in advance. By now, the two sides should 291 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:22,600 Speaker 4: be having regular calls, they should have exchange lists of deliverables, 292 00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:25,320 Speaker 4: they should have planned out the actual physical mechanics of 293 00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 4: the visit, but none of that has happened. And so 294 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:31,520 Speaker 4: it just shows that on the US side, the US 295 00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:34,159 Speaker 4: side hasn't done its homework yet to decide what it 296 00:17:34,240 --> 00:17:37,080 Speaker 4: wants out of this trip, and the longer they wait, 297 00:17:37,320 --> 00:17:40,880 Speaker 4: the harder than becomes to deliver real deliverables. They could 298 00:17:40,920 --> 00:17:44,320 Speaker 4: help us competitiveness for the US economy. But you also 299 00:17:44,400 --> 00:17:46,520 Speaker 4: hit it one other thing that I think is really important, 300 00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:49,320 Speaker 4: and as if we look at the President's other trips, 301 00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:53,240 Speaker 4: he's always taken CEOs with him because business is what's 302 00:17:53,280 --> 00:17:55,840 Speaker 4: on his mind and that's what he's been focused on. 303 00:17:55,920 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 4: That's especially true with China. But even now as of Friday, 304 00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 4: they haven't decided if they want CEOs to go on 305 00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:06,399 Speaker 4: this trip, much less started to extend invitations. So for 306 00:18:06,440 --> 00:18:08,720 Speaker 4: a trip that's less than forty days away, we don't 307 00:18:08,760 --> 00:18:11,320 Speaker 4: have a single CEO that knows if he or she 308 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 4: is going to be invited. But that just is I 309 00:18:14,520 --> 00:18:17,680 Speaker 4: think sort of emblematic of the administration not having really 310 00:18:17,720 --> 00:18:19,879 Speaker 4: done its homework on this visit yet. 311 00:18:20,359 --> 00:18:22,400 Speaker 5: If I can ad just one more thing that I. 312 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:25,199 Speaker 4: Think is really important to frame this visit, and that is, 313 00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 4: you know, China is a country that takes protocol extraordinarily seriously, 314 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:33,760 Speaker 4: much more than most countries that I've dealt with around 315 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:37,000 Speaker 4: the world, and I think in this case it's important 316 00:18:37,040 --> 00:18:40,800 Speaker 4: because the Chinese recognized three levels of state level visit 317 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:44,159 Speaker 4: or of leader level visits, and so you've got working 318 00:18:44,240 --> 00:18:47,520 Speaker 4: level visits where a state leader will come and have 319 00:18:47,560 --> 00:18:50,880 Speaker 4: official meetings. They have official visits where you have which 320 00:18:50,920 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 4: are much larger with more protocol. This is, for example, 321 00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:57,480 Speaker 4: like Kirs Starber's visit from the UK just a few 322 00:18:57,480 --> 00:19:00,400 Speaker 4: weeks ago, that was an official visit. But Trump's visit 323 00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:03,919 Speaker 4: both sides have announced it's a state visit, and that 324 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:07,000 Speaker 4: takes everything up to eleven. It takes everything up much 325 00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:10,240 Speaker 4: higher on the protocol front. And so you know, as 326 00:19:10,359 --> 00:19:12,600 Speaker 4: part of that, there's the state dinner in the Great 327 00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:15,679 Speaker 4: Hall of the People that could involve hundreds of people, 328 00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:18,560 Speaker 4: and if President Trump shows up with a delegation of five, 329 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:20,960 Speaker 4: then that just doesn't work out protocol wise. 330 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:22,119 Speaker 5: And you can understand. 331 00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:26,359 Speaker 6: Why Sonya Raiser the point about how the state level 332 00:19:26,680 --> 00:19:29,840 Speaker 6: meeting is going to also perhaps raise the stakes. I mean, 333 00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 6: could you talk a bit more so about the extent 334 00:19:33,119 --> 00:19:37,560 Speaker 6: in which there will be clarity for businesses as they 335 00:19:37,560 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 6: have to adjust in the meantime their investment, they're hiring 336 00:19:42,040 --> 00:19:43,159 Speaker 6: decisions as well. 337 00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:47,879 Speaker 4: Yeah, so that's what everyone's hoping for, right, What is 338 00:19:47,920 --> 00:19:49,120 Speaker 4: the US one out of the trip. 339 00:19:49,600 --> 00:19:52,320 Speaker 5: The US wants some access to markets. 340 00:19:52,320 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 4: It wants to sell aviation, it wants to sell airplanes, 341 00:19:55,640 --> 00:19:58,760 Speaker 4: it wants to sell agriculture and maybe some other things. 342 00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:02,840 Speaker 4: And what business is pressing the administration to do is 343 00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:05,520 Speaker 4: what it hasn't yet done, and that's to talk about 344 00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:08,920 Speaker 4: the long standing market access issues, the long standing non 345 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:14,199 Speaker 4: tariff barriers that discriminate against American products, American exports, and American. 346 00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 5: Business in China. And so that's what American business is 347 00:20:17,040 --> 00:20:17,560 Speaker 5: looking for. 348 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:20,399 Speaker 4: And then what American business is looking for and what 349 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,159 Speaker 4: the Chinese are looking for again is a stable and 350 00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 4: predictable business climate so companies can plan. So if we're 351 00:20:29,560 --> 00:20:31,360 Speaker 4: talking about what the level of tariffs will be coming 352 00:20:31,400 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 4: into the United States, you know, the administration wants to 353 00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:38,359 Speaker 4: emphasize manufacturing in the US, but remember what does the 354 00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 4: US import from China. It imports final goods like say 355 00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:44,520 Speaker 4: television sets, but it also imports a huge number of 356 00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:48,120 Speaker 4: intermediate goods, things that go into American manufacturing and. 357 00:20:48,080 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 5: Power American factories. 358 00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 4: And tell me know in the long term what that's 359 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:54,920 Speaker 4: going to cost, how do you build a new factory 360 00:20:54,920 --> 00:20:57,240 Speaker 4: and how do you price that in. So until we 361 00:20:57,280 --> 00:21:00,760 Speaker 4: get stability, jobs will continue to hemmer from the United 362 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:02,920 Speaker 4: States because it's just impossible to invest. 363 00:21:03,160 --> 00:21:06,560 Speaker 2: That was Seawan Stein, president at the US China Business Council, 364 00:21:06,840 --> 00:21:09,920 Speaker 2: speaking with Bloomberg TV host Sherry On in April Hong, 365 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:13,560 Speaker 2: bringing you their conversation here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. 366 00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:19,600 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak 367 00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:23,159 Speaker 2: Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at the story 368 00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:27,560 Speaker 2: shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You 369 00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:31,719 Speaker 2: can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, 370 00:21:31,840 --> 00:21:34,840 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for 371 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:38,480 Speaker 2: insight on the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore 372 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:42,639 Speaker 2: and Australia. I'm Doug Prisoner and this is Bloomberg