WEBVTT - House Democrats Consider Demanding Biden Withdraw From Race

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.159
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>broun Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Back to the top story. In some breaking news that

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>we continue to cover, dozens of Democratic lawmakers are considering

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>signing a letter demanding President Joe Biden withdraw from the race.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 2>A senior party official said as panic mounts that he'll

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>cost them control of Congress. This exclusive report coming just

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>in the last ten minutes from Billy House and Eric Wasason.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Billy is Bloomberg News congressional reporter. He joins us from

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 2>our Washington DC bureau right now, Billy, the calls for

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 2>Biden to step aside are growing increasingly louder. This time though,

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>it's coming from lawmakers who are concerned about Congress.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 3>What did you learn?

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a draft letter that's prepared for signing, has

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 4>not been sent out, but it is being circulated from

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 4>safe seat democrats. These are Democrats from traditionally safe seats,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 4>non competitive areas. This underscores that it's just not people

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 4>worried about losing their elections who are concerned about Biden

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 4>staying on the ticket, but those who likely will be

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 4>re elected and concerned about the state of Congress as

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 4>a way to put a break on perhaps a Trump presidency.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 3>Billy, this is such an unusual situation. Obviously, I can't

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>ever remember in my many years on this planet of

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the House Democrats actually moving against a president like this.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Do we have any sense of who will be the

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>signers of this letter? I mean, could it be a

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Nancy Pelosi type of person to actually sign on to this?

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I think it's far more likely to be a senior

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Democratic lawmakers, again from safe seats, who are concerned about

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 4>status on committees on legislation and on ability to block

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 4>the White House Trump White House from ramming through things.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 4>These are probably veteran lawmakers, and the question is will

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 4>they pull the trigger and actually send this letter, and

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 4>or will something else happen to prevent that?

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Billy?

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Is the concern here that that Trump will become president

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and that Republicans will control Congress?

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Also?

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Is this a last ditch effort at this point to

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>have a Congress that is not in the same party

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>as the president?

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, the concern is that both the Senate and the

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 4>House would fall because of a Biden candidacy, that that

0:02:55.120 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>would derail down ballot candidacies, and the fact that Democrats

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 4>are fearful of a White House and Congress totally dominated

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>by Republicans running this country.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I wonder you mentioned, well they really pull

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the trigger? I mean, is them leaking this news to

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>you sort of enough to get that message across to Biden?

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's part of the plan, is just

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 3>to make it clear to Biden that this is something

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 3>they're willing to do.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 4>Could be the case, but we do know that Biden's

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 4>hearing some of these concerns. In fact, he called a

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>House Minority leader, King Jeffries for a second time yesterday

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 4>for a very what was described as a very personal talk,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 4>very private talk, and the House Democrats, a group of

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 4>them got together for some legislative discussion yesterday, but that

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 4>devolved into a fear fest, panicky gripe session about what

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 4>happened if Biden sticks around?

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, so what happens if he doesn't, though, that's I

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>think a big question as well. There's no as Mike mentioned,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>that hasn't happened in our lifetimes that this late in

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a candidacy, a president sitting president has decided not to continue,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 2>or even a presumptive nominee has decided not to continue.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>You go back to nineteen sixty eight and Lyndon Johnson,

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>but that was back in March when he decided not

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to pursue the presidency, was before the primaries. Billy, what

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>happens if he were to step aside?

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's the big question. Of course, Hubert Humphrey didn't

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 4>farewell back in sixty eight when Johnson withdrew late in

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the game. They are all kinds of scenarios and nobody

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 4>really knows for sure whether Kamala Harris, the vice president,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 4>would simply be the choice, or there would be an

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 4>open convention, or what exactly would happen. And that's or

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 4>whether it would actually be a boost for Democrats to

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 4>drop Biden this late in the game.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, Billy, what a tremendous scoop on this letter potentially

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 3>from House Democrats. How do you see it all playing out?

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your guess is as good as anyone's is.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 3>This kind of looked like the last straw for Biden.

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>This type of thing happening.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 4>It's really hard to tell, but I would suspect he has,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 4>and others have suggested that he really has just a

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 4>matter of days to turn this around with performances at

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>public events or an interview on ABC. But this pressure

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>on him is moving faster than many many expected, and

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>people are now talking just days for him to do

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 4>something dramatically to show that he's fit and ready to

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 4>stay on board with this campaign.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Billy, what did you see shift in recent days? Because

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>as soon as the debate ended and everybody realized it

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>was a political catastrophe for the sitting president, you did

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of folks come out with what seemed

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>like the very manicured statements, including Foreign President Obama, who

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>worked closely with Biden for eight years, and others as well,

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of mounting this defensive that seemed very coordinated. But

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>something shifted in recent days.

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, whether something.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 4>Shifted or something didn't happen that they had asked to happen.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, certainly the White House and the Biden campaign

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 4>and the President himself had been asking Democrats to keep

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 4>their powder dry in terms of calls for him to withdraw,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to give him time to show that was that shaky

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 4>debate performance was not really the best picture of where

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 4>he and how he can perform. But instead of really

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 4>coming out forcefully in these few days, he asked, he

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 4>has not done that.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Billy, We're gonna let you run because I know

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you are super busy. Once again, this breaking news just

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>happening just before the noon hour. Just in the last

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty minutes, Billy House and Eric Wasason reporting that House

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Democrats are considering demanding that Biden withdraw from the race.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Billy House is Bloomberg News Congressional reporter joining us from Washington, DC.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Outo with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 5>So funny story. Yesterday, Tim and I do a simul

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 5>cast together. I'm on TV, he's on radio, and we

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 5>do a simulcast. I'm at the closing bell and we're

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 5>talking about Paramount, and Tim.

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Says, I say, well, more news in Paramount yesterday because

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>there were a couple reports that there were some bidders circling,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and I said, when is this story just going to die?

0:07:58.880 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>When is this going to be done?

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 5>And then literally like two and a half seconds later,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 5>there is a headline that said sky Dance and Paramount

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 5>have been talking for a deal.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>A deal.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought Skydance was out, so did we.

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 5>And apparently now they have a preliminary agreement. So it's

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 5>so confusing. Luckily, Keitha Rongganathan Bloomberg Intelligence US media analyst

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 5>can help us. Keitha, what is happening?

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thank you so much for having me, Alex and Tim. Yeah,

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 6>it's it's not over until it's over. And this this movie.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 6>We've seen this movie now play out so many times.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 6>But yes, sky Dance is back. It looks like they

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 6>have amended some of the terms of the deal agreement

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 6>with Paramount. Remember they had been in this very very

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 6>long drawn out negotiating process. We're talking almost six seven months,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 6>and then right when they were at the finish line

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.599
<v Speaker 6>somewhere in mid June, you know, Sherry Redstone basically just

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 6>walked away, you know, from the entire deal. But I

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 6>think now they're back, and I think the one big

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 6>thing that Sherry Redstone was kind of looking for, which

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 6>she seems to have gotten, is slightly better in terms

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 6>of the amount of cash that she's going to get paid,

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 6>So I think previously it was about one point seven billion,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 6>now it's one point seven five billion. But I think

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 6>more importantly is that she is getting stronger indemnification languages

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 6>language in the deal agreement, which basically protects her from

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 6>any potential lawsuits. That's something that she has been pretty

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 6>worried about because remember the sky Dance steal basically favors

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 6>her over everybody else, so that is obviously breeding ground

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 6>for a lot of litigation. And the one thing I

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 6>think that is going to work for skuy Dance and

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 6>David Ellison is that there is no longer this requirement

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 6>for the majority of the minority shareholder approval, which was

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 6>kind of a non starter for David Ellison. So I

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 6>think she has said that, Okay, we don't need that anymore.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 6>So that's where we stand right now. We're really not

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 6>sure about, you know, if there are any deal sweeteners

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 6>for the Class B shareholders or what else is happening

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the other deal terms.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a very complicated deal, and it's also

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>given the dual class share structure makes it even more complicated. Kita,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering who gets what lay it out for us?

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 2>Because we know David Allison, who's we should notice, the

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>son of Larry Allison. He's a film producer, he's certainly

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>interested in the studio business. But who gets what if

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 2>this deal were to go through?

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I think what is going to happen is, obviously,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 6>as you said, this is an extremely convoluted, complex process.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 6>So in stage one of this deal, it's a multi

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 6>step deal. In stage one, what is going to happen

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 6>is Skydance is basically going to acquire National Amusements. Now,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 6>National Amusements is the parent company of Paramount.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm just getting out the white board to make

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a diagram here.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Actually that's a good idea.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, it holds about eighty percent of the voting

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 6>stock for Paramount. So they're going to go ahead and

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 6>do that transaction first, and then once that's in place,

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 6>then they're actually Paramount is going to merge with sky Dance,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 6>so it becomes one whole combined entity. And then obviously,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 6>right now you have this really kind of funny structure

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 6>at the paramount, So they've basically fired their previous CEO,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 6>Bob Backash, and now they have kind of this three

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 6>headed CEO, so they have three different division chiefs who

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 6>are heading the company as kind of the stop gap arrangement.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 6>So I think the plan is once David Ellison takes control,

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 6>he's going to have Jeff Shell run the whole thing.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 6>And remember Jeff Shell used to run NBC, so he's

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 6>extremely familiar with the media business. So that is kind

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 6>of the tentative plan. But again we'll have to say.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 6>And I think the reason why Sherry Redstone prefers the

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 6>sky Dance plan to let's say, the Sony Apollo plan,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 6>which actually gave better financial terms to the rest of

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 6>the shareholders, was because they were really looking to sell

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the assets and only keep the studio.

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>I think what Skydance has promised Sherry is that they

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 6>will keep the company pretty much intact before they start

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 6>looking to kind of dispose of assets. And I think

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 6>that was very important for Sherry and kind of her

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 6>preserve her her family's legacy.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 5>So one key point though, was the majority of the

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 5>minority of the voting shares won't have to vote on

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 5>this deal. How are the majority of the minority voting

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 5>shareholders going to feel about that?

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 6>Not good? And that's been the feeling all true, right

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 6>because this was Sherry Redstone basically having her payday at

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 6>the expense of everybody else, and so they have been threatening.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, Mario Gabelli especially has been extremely vocal about this.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 6>He has been threatening litigation. He said, don't go down

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 6>this path with sky Dance because I'm definitely going to

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 6>sue you. Everybody else is going to sue you as well.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 6>So you know, obviously they do not like this, which

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 6>is why you know sky Dance was kind of putting

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 6>in all of these different deal sweeteners for the Class

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 6>B shareholders, even for the Class A shareholders. But again,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 6>I think Shary Redstone, especially when you know about three

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 6>weeks ago when she said no, was again scared of

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 6>all the litigation that was going to come her way.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 6>And I think the other thing that has happened Alex

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 6>over the past few days is, you know, the regulatory environment.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 6>I think there's a whole different perspective of what might

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 6>happen in Washington right now. So I think initially we

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 6>were kind of looking at a regulatory process that was

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 6>going to be extremely difficult for these companies across the

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 6>finish line. If you have a Trump administration, that whole

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 6>climate definitely changes. It eases things up. It's pro consolidation.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 6>So I think maybe that these companies are looking at

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 6>it from that perspective as well.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. I mean, that's a big bet to make

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>ahead of an election where a lot can still happen.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I think many people would argue, Gita, this is I

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 2>don't have to tell you this, and I don't have

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to tell much of our audience this. But media is

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>a tough business right now, and I'm wondering what makes

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 2>these assets attractive to this buyer. We're in an environment

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>where we're seeing traditional linear TV just completely fall apart.

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>The movie business is being taken on by the it's

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 2>not even fair to call them upstarts, but the streamers,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the legacy companies are trying to adapt to become streamers,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>with very mixed success. I think it's fair to say,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>what are the attractive parts of Paramount's business.

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so definitely not the TV networks. I mean one

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 6>could argue that.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Survivor is still awesome. Okay, let's just put it

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 5>out there. You know how I feel about this, KEITHA.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, CBS I was I was going to say,

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 6>CBS is actually the one crown jewel in the whole

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Paramount TV portfolio. And obviously that has you know, Survivor,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 6>that has all of the NFL, all of the sports, right,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 6>it has a pretty pretty robust news lineup, so you know,

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to sports and news which CBS has,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 6>they're actually in a good place. It's the rest of

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 6>the Paramount and the Viacom cable networks that are really

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 6>not in such a good place, which is you know, Nickelodeon,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 6>Comedy Central, you know, MTV, VH one, all of these

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 6>other channels which are general entertainment channels which have basically

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 6>been exposed to the most rapid kind of deterioration in

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 6>terms of audiences. So obviously that part of the business,

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm not really sure who would really want. Maybe Warner

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Brothers Discovery, maybe they see that there's you know, they

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 6>could potentially be some kind of synergies there. But again

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 6>sky Dance, I know has not you know, is not

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 6>obviously very excited about that. The one ascid that sky

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Dance is definitely very excited about is the studio. And

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 6>remember they've had a long history with Paramount. I mean

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 6>they've financed so many of the movies, whether you know

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 6>it's Transformers or Mission Impossible.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So they did the New Top Gun too.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 6>H Yeah, Okay, New Top Gun as well. So they've

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 6>had a long history with Cherry Redstone with the Paramount

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 6>studio business. And remember, at the end of the day,

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 6>content is king and they know that. And you know,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 6>whether the Paramount plus streaming service works or not, I mean,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 6>this content is still valuable and they could sell it

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 6>to Amazon, they could sell a lot of this content

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 6>to Netflix. They're already doing some deals. But again, the

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 6>content is definitely valuable, and there is definitely this arms

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 6>race for content. So you know, I think they definitely

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 6>want the content production piece of it. Again, You're absolutely

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 6>right that the TV networks is going to be a

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 6>little bit hard, But I think that's what Cherry Redstone

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 6>also realizes, and she realizes that the longer this process

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 6>kind of drags out, the less and less valuable those

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 6>assets are going to be.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 5>Do we think that Paramount stands a chance? Like what, Okay,

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 5>let's just say this actually happens, what's your time frame, Like,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 5>let's give them a year, six months?

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 6>You mean as a standalone company.

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like until you say, okay, this deal is a

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 5>success or the deal was not a success.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, oh okay, okay. So once the deal actually goes through, Yeah,

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 6>I think you know, it would take at least about

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 6>twelve to eighteen months to kind of get the whole

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 6>integration done and to kind of figure out what the

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 6>path forward would be. So yeah, I think it would,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 6>you know. And we're also kind of looking at this

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 6>broader media landscape also, Alex, in terms of what could

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 6>happen in terms of other deals, right what is going

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 6>to happen with Warner Brothers, Discovery, what's going to happen

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 6>with Peacock and NBC? And there probably is a whole

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 6>wave of consolidation coming. It's just that the regulatory climate

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 6>right now looks extremely difficult.

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 5>All right, Githa, We really appreciate it. We appreciate you

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 5>and all these circumstances. Either on Nathan Bloomberg, intelligence US

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 5>media analyst. Yeah, I don't have Tim knows this about me.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm a big survivor. I didn't know that about it

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 5>and yeah, well we got into it when I had

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 5>a concussion in November, and then my family and I

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 5>we have like joint surveyor survivor family night. We talk

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 5>about it and we learn things.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like a whole It's like Season in the thirties.

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 5>We Big Bong No. Forty six maybe for we Big

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Bong all over. We're currently watching I think season thirty six.

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 5>We kind of just go where we feel. And then yeah,

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 5>it's a guilty secret that I have that I apparently

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 5>share with all of radio.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Effo, Cardplay and enroun

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 2>If you go to our EA d go on the

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg terminal, you can see the most red stories over

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 2>the last eight hours, over the last one hour. You

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>can play around with it. And one thing that you're

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>seeing right now is the most red story in the

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 2>last eight hours is JP Morgan's Kalanovic to exit amid

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 2>string of poor stock calls. We're very lucky to have

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 2>it with us.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>This morning.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Alexandra Semenova. She is Bloomberg Equities reporter and she's here

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 2>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. This was huge news.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations on the scoop. It's got a green bee or

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>black b in a green circle on the terminal, which

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>means it's a Bloomberg exclusive. You were the first to

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>report about this huge news happening. What's going on?

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, thank you guys for having me on. So obviously

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 7>pretty significant that one of the most prominent forecasters on

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 7>Wall Street is leaving JP Morgan. He's been at the

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 7>firm for nineteen years. He most recently has become known

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 7>for being one of the few remaining contrarions on Wall Street,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 7>sticking with his s and P five hundred target of

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 7>forty two one hundred. That's a drop of more than

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent from where we are now before the year ends,

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 7>and it's been a bit of a challenging run for

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 7>him over the last three years. In twenty twenty two,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 7>he was bullish through much of the route that we experienced.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 7>Last year, he stayed bearish even as the SMP five

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 7>hundred rows twenty four percent, and then of course this

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 7>year he's kind of stuck with that call in the

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 7>face of the rally, so, you know, I mean, it's

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 7>always a tough job to try to predict the market,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 7>but especially when you're in a very prominent position like

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 7>that and making calls as a face of JP Morgan's

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 7>research team.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, Alexandra, what I find interesting about Marko Klanovich

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 3>is he was one of the first strategists who sort

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 3>of looked at how some of the big quant funds

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>were trading and their influence on the market. You know,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 3>most strategists look at, you know, what they expect earnings

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 3>per share to do what they expect for you know,

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 3>interest rates, that sort of thing. He really got in

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 3>the weeds on, you know, your volatility targeting hedge funds

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>and momentum tracing CTA funds. What exactly in his thinking

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 3>was led him to believe that we're due for this

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 3>bearish turn this year.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, as you point out, Mike, the guy's brilliant.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 7>He has a PhD in physics. You know, he has

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 7>obviously been very focused on the quantitative aspect of you know,

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 7>all of this. He's been talking a lot over the

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 7>last few years about you know, very low volatility and

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 7>how that's been an issue for market. So that has

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 7>definitely been part of his call recently. You know, he

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 7>is saying that a lot of people are you know,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 7>too optimistic given the macroeconomic backdrop. He says that we're

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 7>at the end of this business cycle that with sustained

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 7>higher rates, it's going to be very difficult to achieve

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 7>the growth that appears to be priced into equity markets.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 7>And he was just you know, insisting that eventually we

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 7>will get that drop that he's calling for.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 2>So if I go to your biopage, just see all

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the stories that you've written in recent days, and you

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 2>have to scroll a lot because you've written so many stories.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>You have an interview with David Kelly JP Morgan Asset

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Management of JP Morgan Asset Management, and his call that

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 2>he shared with you was polar opposite of Marco Kolonovic's call.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 2>These two guys work at the same firm, they're making

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>different calls, they're out there in public. How does that

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>relationship work? How does it work that they're they're not

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of espousing the same thing. Is it is that

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>hard for employees there, like, help me understand how that works?

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so that's been really really interesting. So technically it

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 7>is really you know, a good thing to have different

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 7>views under one roof of diversity of opinion. But it

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 7>feels like, you know, it's been more pronounced over the

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 7>past two years as a lot of people are struggling

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 7>to predict what will happen, and it's certainly been pronounced.

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 7>To JP Morgan, they're trading desk actually led by Andrew Tyler.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 7>They're very bullish. Andrew Tyler has said that his outlook

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 7>doesn't depend on it interest straight cuts, that the economy

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 7>is good, that earnings are strong, and you know, the

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 7>equity run can continue. And then of course at JP

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 7>Morgan Asset Management, David Kelly also very constructive on equities.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 7>He does say that he doesn't really like the mag seven.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 7>He says, stay away from the top ten stocks if

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 7>you're a long term in investors. He wants to you know,

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 7>he recommends avoiding some of what he thinks is froth

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 7>forming at the top, but he overall does think that

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 7>you know, maybe things will broaden out and that so

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 7>far equities can chug along. So very different views from Klanovic.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a true it's not unusual for there

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to be sort of turnover in these chief market strategist

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 3>roles at the big banks.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a hard job right now, a very

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 2>hard job.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 7>I don't envy anyone who's doing it.

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I always compared to like, you know, forecasting the weather

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>on the year's eve of twenty twenty seven or something

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 3>like that. It's an incredibly difficult job. But you know,

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Klanovitch was such a brand name. How did you sort

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 3>of catch on that he was leaving the firm? I mean,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>is there any drama there? Do we really know what's

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>going on as far as why he's leaving.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, you know, very interesting. Interestingly, some sources have

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 7>told me that he wasn't at their recent conference in Paris,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 7>and then JPM Morgan did have a webinar for their

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 7>mediar outlook and he did not participate in that. So

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 7>definitely can sense some of the pressure going on perhaps

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 7>internally ahead of this news and ahead of this announcement

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 7>and to you know, to that point, now dubrothco lekos Bujas,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 7>who was the chief equity strategy he is moving on

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 7>to take on Kolonovix's roles chief market strategist and Hussain Malik,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 7>who was co head of Global research with Kolonivik, will

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 7>now be the sole head of Global Research. So a

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 7>lot of moves going on on the research team there overall.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I want to remind everyone of some breaking news

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>that we've been covering over the last hour or so.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 2>The drumbeat of pressure on President Joe Biden to drop

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 2>out of the presidential race intensified on Wednesday with a

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 2>bombshell report in The New York Times that he had

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>conceded to an ally that he might have to abandon

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 2>his re election bid if he was unable to turn

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 2>around public opinion in the coming days. The White House

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and Biden's campaign quickly denied the report, but time is

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 2>running out for the beleaguered president to convince anxious Democratic officials, donors,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and voters that he remains viable in his efforts to

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>keep former President Donald Trump from returning to office. We're

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to have coverage of this developing story

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>as more information does break. Alex, I just want to

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 2>end with you and sort of get the last word

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>here as to what we know about next moves for Marco.

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 6>We know what is he what is he going to

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 6>be working on.

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 7>Unclear what the next move will be, very keen to

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 7>find out, but it is very common for strategists at

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 7>these banks to sometimes move on to open up their

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 7>own research shops. The most recent example that comes to

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 7>mind is Adam Parker, who was chief US equity strategist

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 7>for Morgan Stanley. He is now running his own firm,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 7>Trivariate Research, so a lot of that could happen. Will

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 7>definitely stay on top of whatever his next move might be.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Tom Lee. Tom Lee was the head of equity the

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 3>chap Morgan too.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>And he's been in the news a ton lately. Yeah,

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>this is what the market needs, is for the I

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>think I saw on oddline.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, fifteen thousand by the end of twenty three.

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so quite a bit.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Alex Simonova, Bloomberg News Equities reporter here in our Bloomberg

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Interactive Broker's studio. Check out her story. It is the

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>most read in the last eight hours on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's get to the ISM services. As Charlie was

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 5>just saying, you had a yields dropping after IM Services

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 5>coming at a four year low. Steve Miller, IM Services

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 5>chair joins us in Fort Worth, Texas. Hey Steve, what

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 5>is happening?

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 3>Hi?

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 8>Hi, good morning Alex.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it was.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 8>It was a surprise for sure. We saw, you know,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 8>three of the sub indexes dropping from from last month

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 8>and and we think that's what well, that's definitely what

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 8>drove the overall the overall rating down. The only the

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 8>business activity new orders and employment. We're in contracting territory,

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 8>the supplier delivery state and expansion territory. But with a

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 8>small drop, how.

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Do you explain it? I mean, we we get the numbers,

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 2>we have the data in front of us. As you mentioned, surprise,

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>lowest in four years. How do you explain it?

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, what we saw from you know, so two months

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 8>ago we saw a contraction reading and then last month

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 8>we saw I'd bump up, hoping that that was a

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 8>return to growth. But what we saw was real estate

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 8>rental and leasing returned to negative, transportation and warehousing returned

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 8>to negative, and h and we saw mining consistent negative,

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 8>and information and wholesale trade also swapped from from growth

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 8>to contraction. So we saw a pretty significant shift from

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 8>from many companies in the growth mode to atraction.

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 5>So is this is this like bad news like processionary

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 5>harbinger thing or is this just a softening like what

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 5>what's the read ahead?

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so one of the things that we saw in

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 8>the numbers was was a continuing commentary on costs being high,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 8>but we saw some backing off of the rate of increase.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 8>So I'm so, you know, we're hoping that this is

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 8>this is a blip. And and from the overall commentary,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 8>there was a bit of a mix in terms of

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 8>positive of sustained business kind of meeting plan. So it

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 8>didn't seem like a shock from the overall commentary, but

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 8>it certainly wasn't good news.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what I'm trying to Is it good news

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 2>for the FED?

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Though?

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 8>You know it kind of the down up down that

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 8>we saw this month, in the last two months, I

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 8>certainly give some credence to the FED and saying you know,

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 8>let's look at things for a little while, make sure

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 8>that we're seeing that stabilization before rate cuts.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Just one more question, then the consumer. Does this show

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 5>that the consumer is slowing and buying less stuff?

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, we saw.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 8>Retail trade for the second month in a row in

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 8>contraction mode, and then wholesale trade went from went from

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 8>expansion to contraction mode from last month to this month.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 8>So I would say, yes, all.

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, Steve, we're gonna have to leave it there. Thanks

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining us. Steve Miller is ISM Services Chair.

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 2>He joins us from Fort Worth, Texas. Once again June,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 2>us ISM Services falling to forty eight point eight below

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 2>all estimates.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thehar Radio tune in, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg Journal