WEBVTT - Can Apple Regain Its Throne? The Battle of Trillion-Dollar Tech Giants

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Earners. What's up.

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 2>You ever walk into a small business and everything just

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 2>works like The checkout is fast, the receipts are digital,

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 2>tipping is a breeze, and you're out the door before

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the line even builds. Odds are they're using Square. We

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>love supporting businesses that run on Square because it just

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>feels seamless. Whether it's a local coffee shop, a vendor

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>at a pop up market, or even one of our

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>merch partners, Square makes it easy for them to take payments,

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>manage inventory, and run their business with confidence, all from

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>one simple system. If you're a business owner or even

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>just thinking about launching something soon, Square is hands down

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the best tools out there to help you start, run,

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and grow. It's not just about payments, it's about giving

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>you time back so you can focus.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>On what matters most Ready.

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 2>To see how Square can transform your business, visit Square

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>dot com backslash go backslash eyl to learn more that

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Square dot com backslash, go backslash eyl. Don't wait, don't hesitate.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's Square handle the back end so you can keep

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>pushing your vision forward. This episode is brought to you

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 2>by P and C Bank, a lot of people think

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>podcasts about work are boring, and sure they definitely can be,

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But understanding of professionals routine shows us how they achieve

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 2>their success little by little, day after day. It's like

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>banking with P and C Bank. It might seem boring

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to save, plan and make calculated decisions with your bank,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>but keeping your money boring is what helps you live

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>or more happily fulfilled life. P and C Bank Brilliantly

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Boring since eighteen sixty five. Brilliantly Boring since eighteen sixty

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>five is a service mark of the PNC Financial Service Group, Inc.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>P and C Bank National Association Member FDIC.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Is there any company that could overtake Apple in third place? O?

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Will Apple take back the number one spot a few years?

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Game? Stop? What's another me?

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Quoting Joe like uh Nicola, I mean.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It depends on what timeframe we're talking.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 4>If we're talking if Apple does not invest into AI

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>or has a significant partnership in four or five years,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a great question. Shit, I can see a glimber

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 4>like so Saudi Aramicco taking it, but I think someone

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>in the AI space could definitely take it, and an

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 4>imperfect world if they don't make an investment. By twenty thirty,

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>I think Apple will be fifth in terms of market cap.

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 4>That's why I keep beating this drum about them needing

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 4>to make a course correction. But where's Meta.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>On the list?

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 5>Meta is number sitting, Meta's number six.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>And the people we're talking about market caps for the

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 3>market cap yep, total market aps. So right now you

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 3>want to the top five market.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 5>So top five ten, Yeah, let's do ten.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>So at ten we got Berkshire Hathaway at a little

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>over one trillion. Taiwan Semi is nine, broad Comments eight,

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>sauya A, Ramico is seven, Meta is six, Google is five,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Amazon is four, Apple is three, Microsoft is two, and

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Nvidio is one.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh. If Apple don't get this together, Google can take that.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I think number four is I mean, it's the obvious, right,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Amazon is trailing it.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>We know what the concerns me.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>There's profit margins, so how much they can reinvest in

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>they in practice the space. That's the only part I'm

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>concerned about. Google's done a great job of well serge

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 4>also being at HELM and being in the office, So.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Like profit margin and I'm glad you said that, because

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>how does profit margint change over the next two to

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>three years when things become all to meate it. For

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>a company that pretty much is making things automated already,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>if they increased automation, what does that do for profit margin?

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 4>That's true, but I think they have hard fixed cost

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>that may be hard to be restructured. I'm not saying

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 4>that it's impossible, but for a company like Google that

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 4>has more like, I think it's easier to engineer the

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 4>profitability a lot faster than Amazon. Amazon is the turtle

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 4>in the race that could win for sure, But in

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>the short term, if Apple does not significantly invest in,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 4>Google continues to do so, Like I pay for that

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 4>suite just to test it. The sweet is amazing, and

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>you know how I felt about Google. And then you know,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 4>they sent you to call and I got a couple

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 4>of texts and they're like, try the sweet out phenomenal.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Theyo is better than anything. And I know everybody that

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>watched the show, Hut Apple, Yeah it is.

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 5>You're not lying.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It is the sweetest phenomenal.

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>So I can see now if they course correct in

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 4>a year or two and have a partnership with Perplexity

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>or a major AI infrastructure company that they will.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Keep that spot or remain higher.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 4>But if they don't, I can see them going to

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 4>fifth and Google taking that spot.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Matters on a tear.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 4>And the thing I can say about Zuckerberg, you can

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 4>say that he may copy or he may lag, but

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't lag for long.

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And he's putting capital.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Behind the AI investment to get them from open ai

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 4>to Meta. You have Apple sitting on enough money to

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>buy Siria cash free and clear, and you won't buy

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 4>an AI company. Why And for everyone who may say this,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 4>stop saying that. I'm talking to people that work in HQ.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 4>They have the same It's the leadership thing. It's not

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 4>that there's not talented people at Apple. It's not that

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 4>there's not talented product creators and product managers.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Is leadership is afraid of what to do.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 4>And it's a great lesson of you can't miss time

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 4>when to invest in the next thing.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Can't do it.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Every year invest fast gets better in terms of production,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 4>sound quality. I'm here, y'all said, I'm still AI gradings, artlings,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 4>all that cool. You have to invest into the project

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 4>to make it better. And I hate it saying it,

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 4>but Apple still has the worst AI product in cerrie,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 4>I can't even when I do market research, I have

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 4>to exit out of ceiri to go to chat GPT

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 4>if I'm going to use voice mode to get an

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 4>actual recantation of what's happening in the market. But you

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 4>have enough money to buy a country continent. It's misplaced

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 4>capital management at best, So.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>So you got to maybe potentially be falling to five

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 2>worst case scenario. Worst case. They're sitting right the three trillion.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 2>We got three companies at three trillion.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>That is pretty amazing, and in videos is not far

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>from four.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Apple couldn't have invested in core.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Weave, Yes, but what would be the productor or a

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>blockchain wallet?

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They could have just integrated something in the Apple wallet

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just for show.

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean they said, we gotta watch, we gotta

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 5>watch this.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 2>The corew situation is interesting because even like Sam, we

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have open ai and obviously and they said if

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>they IPO, that could change things, and I think we

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>all agree with that. But even him now, you know,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 2>recently he's talking about he's looking to go away from

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>in Video's GPUs.

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Smart money, same as Apple went away from Intel. Yeah, yeah,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>same place. But I think the greatest business lesson in

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 4>this as you can. We can talk about it on

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Blackout as well, but you can either focus on beating

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 4>your competition or doing what it's best for your customer.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Amazon traditionally has focused on what is best for the

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>customers that are in the Amazon ecosystem, even if that

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 4>means they are running negative in terms of profitability for

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 4>ten to twenty years. To give you quicker delivery, and

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 4>then the customers will love you so much they'll scale

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the business through.

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>The amplification of their happiness.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 5>But the core, I mean at the core.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we know the e commerce business, but the money

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>maker is the cloud service.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>AWS is a large generator. As you get more AI,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 2>you're going to need more cloud.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely a well timed, great investment into the future.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Right That's why I said, yeah, I agree with you.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Like their CAPEC spend is always pretty high, which obviously

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>brings down to profit margins. But at a certain point

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>they're going to start seeking the benefits of all absolutely investment,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 4>And I think we're getting to that point. We're getting

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>to that point for everyone who asks what would make

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 4>me change my stance on Apple. I still believe in

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 4>it as a company to invest in. It is still there,

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 4>holding into two index. What I would love to see

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 4>is an investment to AI and an investment into blockchain

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 4>and or crypto, and then and an investment into quantum computing.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 4>That would be an investment into the future. Not glass

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 4>lens bullshit for it. And once again you having that

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 4>kerfuffle with Zuckerberg and elon this y'all will fight, y'all

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 4>having MATA has you be on the glasses with the

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Oakley partnership and the one that's coming that I can

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 4>talk about. Wiping down the Google goggles please, and then

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 4>you scrap the ev car.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Once again. You can only reshout when you create? Do

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you create for.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 4>The benefit of your audience? You're thinking about somebody with

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 4>a thousand followers, they don't like you. I think it matters.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 4>What's your source of creation? Is it out of love

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 4>or out of trying to destroy someone else? But what

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 4>do I know it? See you tourist, I love y'all.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Just just some guys on YouTube.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, hit the like button, yes and share and do

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 3>remember thank you to block They are sponsoring fifty off

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and best fest tickets and ten Venda bulls,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 3>first come, first serve, General mission, VIP, Platinum, whatever, Just

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the first one hundred tickets that go into cold block

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>at checkout and the first ten vendor booths that go

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>into cold block at checkout, first come first stir Okay,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>So we have a question from audience participation. They said,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 3>what do you do? What do you use to differentiate

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the difference between a dead chart versus an amazing opportunity.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I wish I was scooping up Robin Hood during that base.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I won't miss it next beer Market.

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. I think the difference between the

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 4>it's not so much as the chart is dead. It's

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 4>if the company is dead or not. So if you

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 4>take a company like Zoom, whom I love to use

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 4>the product, but it's not a great investment.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Or Zillo, if you compare that with robin Hood, which.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Robin Hood I think was attacked because it decentralized investment

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 4>opportunity into the market, and from the beginning they had

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a great fan base, great business, great CEO. Not just

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 4>saying that because he's a friend of the show, but

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I think they had a great business and over time.

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>It will only be so long.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>That you can hold with a great executive and a

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 4>great company down. If you compare that with a Hurts,

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 4>the profit margin is terrible. Executive management is not that great.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 4>They don't really have a lead, they don't have a

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 4>product that people love, and there's no opportunity for gross

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 4>margin or profit margin increases there. I think the difference

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 4>is just knowing a great company from a bad one.

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 4>My rule of thumb has always been, if you have

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 4>to ask is a company good? It's not greatness. You

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:32.599
<v Speaker 4>can't avoid so. But when there are opportunities when a

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 4>company is flat, like how robin Hood was at the

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 4>eleven to fifteen dollars range, I've said it before, you

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 4>want to stack as many shares as you can before

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 4>they take off, saying with Nvidia, saying with AMD, we

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 4>can go to Tesla before Kathy Wood made her proclamation

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 4>on CNBC and they laughter off stage, and then Tesla's

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 4>took off to the upside. If you believe in a

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 4>great company, you should throw as many shares as you

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>can into it. And I've always said you want to

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 4>be in a position minimum to get to one thousand

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 4>ships and then ultimately ten thousand, because at that number

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 4>you can write your own ticket for life for how

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 4>much money you're able to produce out of the market.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 4>So don't look at it so much of a dead chart,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>but as the company.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Dead or not.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean from a technical standpoint, I would

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 2>be looking at the value, right, If you want to

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 2>see where a company's moving or how many people are

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 2>interested in the company, look at the value on How

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I was training on a daily basis, I was trading

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>on a weekly basis. How I was training on a

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 2>monthly basis, I would look at the trends of the can.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Like if you use candlesticks, look at the trends and

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>where they're going. You can see momentum, right. I think

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>that's one thing that people can see, like when they

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 2>just use a singular line. Yeah, it looks pretty preschool.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 2>But if you just put candles on, you start seeing momentum.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>You see green, you see red. You look at which

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 2>way that the momentum is going.

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 6>An illegal alien from Guatemala charged with raping a child

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 6>in Massachusetts. An MS thirteen gang from Al Salvador accused

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 6>of murdering a Texas man of Venezuelan charged with filming

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 6>and selling child pornography in Michigan. These are just some

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 6>of the heinous migrant criminals caught because of President Donald J.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Trump's leadership. I'm Christy Noman, the United States Secretary of

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 6>Homeland Security. Under President Trump, attempted illegal border crossings are

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 6>at the lowest levels ever recorded, and over one hundred

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 6>thousand illegal aliens have been arrested. If you are here illegally,

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 6>your next you will be fined nearly one thousand dollars

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 6>a day, imprisoned, and deported. You will never return. But

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 6>if you register using our CBP home app and leave now,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 6>you could be allowed to return legally. Do what's right.

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 6>Leave now. Under President Trump, America's laws, border and families

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 6>will be protected.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Sponsored by the United States Department of Homeland Security.