1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 2: We looked to voices of Washington who could provide not 3 00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:16,439 Speaker 2: only a perspective of a Battle of the Pentagon, but 4 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 2: of the politics of the moment. Patrick McHenry is steeped 5 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:23,439 Speaker 2: in this of the tenth Congressional district in North Carolina. 6 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:28,880 Speaker 2: He is absolutely typical of starting your political career young. 7 00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:31,120 Speaker 2: I think he was ten years old when he won 8 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:34,400 Speaker 2: his first effort in the tenth Congressional district. He's gone 9 00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:38,440 Speaker 2: on to substantial Republican acclaim, including chairman of the House 10 00:00:38,520 --> 00:00:42,800 Speaker 2: Financial Services Committee. He is a Bloomberg committer, a contributor, 11 00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 2: i should say, is a former chair of the House 12 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:50,199 Speaker 2: Financial Finance Committee. Patrick McHenry, thank you so much for 13 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 2: joining us this morning. How divided is the Republican Party? 14 00:00:56,280 --> 00:01:01,880 Speaker 1: Not very The truth is the the President has executed 15 00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 1: a limited, targeted effort here that is fifteen years in 16 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 1: the making, when the Obama administration entered into nuclear negotiations 17 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:16,160 Speaker 1: with Iran in twenty twelve. The culmination of that of 18 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:21,480 Speaker 1: those talks led to today, and in fact, the precipitating matter 19 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:26,839 Speaker 1: here is a reigning proxies that have taken serious action 20 00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:31,479 Speaker 1: against American troops in Iraq and in the Gulf. They 21 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:36,040 Speaker 1: were the funders and in many ways the designers of 22 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 1: the Hamas attack on our ally Israel, and the President 23 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:45,760 Speaker 1: was patient and saw it a negotiated outcome in a 24 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 1: quite measured way, and without the reigning regime coming to 25 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 1: the table with a serious, serious counter So I think 26 00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:02,240 Speaker 1: the politics of this, you're going to have a few 27 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:10,200 Speaker 1: very ideologically viewed, very ideologically opposed to any foreign intervention, 28 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:15,799 Speaker 1: being overwhelmed by most Republicans who want a strong America. 29 00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:20,279 Speaker 1: And the way to ensure strong America is when it's necessary, 30 00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:24,639 Speaker 1: we will punch back with overwhelming force. And I think 31 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:25,720 Speaker 1: that's what we just saw. 32 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,679 Speaker 2: Patrick McHenry and returning to the folks in our four 33 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:33,160 Speaker 2: hours of coverage this morning with the former Congressman Patrick McHenry, 34 00:02:33,520 --> 00:02:37,640 Speaker 2: I find what's absolutely fascinating here and benumbing is Russia 35 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 2: has lost a harbor essentially on the eastern Mediterranean. They've 36 00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 2: lost Syria, maybe they're in the process of losing around 37 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:49,120 Speaker 2: the Foreign Minister of Iran will travel to Moscow. I 38 00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 2: guess explain where you said our relationships now after this 39 00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:57,919 Speaker 2: attack with Russia and with China. 40 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: Well, look, I think they're the ones that are taking 41 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: the greatest note of what happened here, which is not 42 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:10,000 Speaker 1: that this president is against all foreign action, but that 43 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:14,840 Speaker 1: he will be measured, will use force when necessary when 44 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 1: when negotiations end. I think the person that should be 45 00:03:19,880 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 1: most taking note here, as Vladimir Putin. This administration has 46 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:30,320 Speaker 1: wanted and campaigned on a peaceful, negotiated a quote unquote 47 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 1: peaceful negotiated settlement in Ukraine if there is one, and 48 00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:42,240 Speaker 1: it is evident through open source that Russia has gotten 49 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 1: its drone technology that has been effective in the Ukrainian 50 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 1: battlefield from Iran. And that linkage here is quite evident 51 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:56,440 Speaker 1: from that news you just you shared, which is the 52 00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:59,600 Speaker 1: Iran foreign minister is going directly to meet with Putin 53 00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:02,880 Speaker 1: the day after the United States strikes. There is a 54 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:07,120 Speaker 1: concerted effort among our enemies here, and there's a lot 55 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 1: of connectivity between the president's action in the Middle East 56 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:17,400 Speaker 1: and it's you know, it's the Sinews to the Ukrainian battlefield. 57 00:04:17,760 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 3: Patrick, what do you expect to see from a response 58 00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:23,520 Speaker 3: from the Democrats in Congress. There's concerned that a they 59 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:26,920 Speaker 3: weren't consulted. Maybe maybe this was an action the President 60 00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:31,400 Speaker 3: exceeded as his authorizations. But it's tough to argue all 61 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:33,839 Speaker 3: that stuff when it appears to be so successful. What 62 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:35,080 Speaker 3: do you expect from the Democrats. 63 00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 1: Well, look, both parties are divided on the authorization of 64 00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 1: force in Congress. Both parties are have have divisions here 65 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:53,520 Speaker 1: for the effort to review authorizations that date back to 66 00:04:53,560 --> 00:04:56,600 Speaker 1: the Gulf War, to nine to eleven, to our engagement 67 00:04:56,640 --> 00:05:00,919 Speaker 1: in Afghanistan. They've been utilized by both to take action 68 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 1: in very broad ways. There's been efforts in Congress to 69 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 1: have revisions to those authorizations of force, but have not 70 00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 1: been successful in total. And so I think you'll see 71 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 1: that divide in both parties on this. But by and large, 72 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:22,240 Speaker 1: stopping the Ukrainian i'm sorry, the Iranian nuclear program or 73 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:25,479 Speaker 1: slowing it down is a global good. This is why 74 00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:28,880 Speaker 1: you see your Cure Stormer in the UK, a left 75 00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:36,039 Speaker 1: of center Prime Minister of the United Kingdom being supportive. 76 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:38,719 Speaker 1: I think this is an action that the world is 77 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:41,720 Speaker 1: relieved that we have taken. And I think you'll see 78 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 1: that similarly play out with a by and large the 79 00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:50,720 Speaker 1: supermajority of the United States House and Senate, but divisions 80 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:52,080 Speaker 1: within both parties for sure. 81 00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 3: Patrick. Do you see the US military doing follow up 82 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 3: actions here absent any retaliation or are they kind of 83 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 3: in a waiting do you think at this. 84 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:03,720 Speaker 1: Point, I think there was a waiting CIMO. We see 85 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:11,000 Speaker 1: Israel taking action right after our strikes. There's further work 86 00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:17,640 Speaker 1: to be done, obviously to restrain the ringing capabilities for 87 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 1: retaliation against American troops and American assets in the Middle 88 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: East and our allies, and so I think I think 89 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:27,719 Speaker 1: the coordination will continue, and there's evidence that there's coordination 90 00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:31,640 Speaker 1: between US and Israel that there is real and more 91 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:32,840 Speaker 1: effective for both of us. 92 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:37,040 Speaker 2: Frankly, with this event, Congressman Henry, and this goes back 93 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:41,920 Speaker 2: to House Financial Services Committee and frankly Appropriations Committee as well. 94 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:46,760 Speaker 2: What's your experience of funding to the Pentagon after an 95 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:52,160 Speaker 2: event like this? Is this acutely aware need to budget 96 00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:55,680 Speaker 2: the Navy with their reach in the Orens in the 97 00:06:56,240 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 2: Gulf of Aman, or how does the budgeting work after 98 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:01,480 Speaker 2: an event like this? 99 00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:06,880 Speaker 1: Weld Look, I mean the Pentagon budget is massive. It 100 00:07:07,279 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: is a massive budget, so they have broad authorities with ordinance, 101 00:07:11,840 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 1: with munitions, and the President does have broad say here 102 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:20,600 Speaker 1: we heard the Secretary of Defense say that they did 103 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:23,800 Speaker 1: comply with the War Powers Act on informing Congress of 104 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:27,360 Speaker 1: this action. I think we'll hear that from Congressional leaders. 105 00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:30,480 Speaker 1: They'll be pressed on whether or not they were given 106 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:33,920 Speaker 1: the heads up on this in conformance with the law, 107 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: and if they were, I don't think you'll see congressional 108 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 1: action to limit the presence further ability to take action. 109 00:07:41,560 --> 00:07:45,600 Speaker 1: So it's an important balance between the between the branches. Yes, 110 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:50,400 Speaker 1: but the presidential authorities that they're using here are not new, 111 00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:56,200 Speaker 1: not novel, and do have some level of controversy, yes, 112 00:07:56,960 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 1: but have been utilized by both parties of the last 113 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:01,440 Speaker 1: twenty years. 114 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:05,240 Speaker 2: Patrick mccenry, one final question, if we could in your 115 00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 2: Washington and you're a student there, I made a joke 116 00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:10,440 Speaker 2: about it earlier, folks, of his tour of duty. This 117 00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 2: is public service, truly across the span of his adult life. 118 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:18,960 Speaker 2: Patrick mhag henry in the Washington here, I believe in wars, 119 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 2: Democrats and Republicans come together. Can I wish that at 120 00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 2: this moment? 121 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:31,560 Speaker 1: No, because where we are in this process, you have 122 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:36,480 Speaker 1: a partisan reconciliation bill moving through the Senate this week. 123 00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:41,600 Speaker 1: You've had mainly partisan fights outside of one piece of 124 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:47,560 Speaker 1: legislation on digital asseids cryptocurrency. But this week is going 125 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:50,920 Speaker 1: to be a rather partisan week in Washington based off 126 00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 1: of what is on the Senate floor and what is 127 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:59,440 Speaker 1: on that House floor. And so I don't think there'll 128 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,680 Speaker 1: be a Kumba moment. I don't think that's where the 129 00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:04,559 Speaker 1: Democratic base is. But I think what you'll see is 130 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:11,680 Speaker 1: the MAGA based rally to President Trump's cause here almost totality. 131 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 1: And so in one respect, the antagonism from the left 132 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:20,439 Speaker 1: towards a MAGA right on their statements in the election 133 00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:24,439 Speaker 1: that President Trump would bring this great veil of peace 134 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: to the world just by his election was grandiose, outsized, 135 00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:33,800 Speaker 1: and in fact a fiction. But also you're going to 136 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:37,680 Speaker 1: see the left make those MAGA loyalists eat their words 137 00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:41,040 Speaker 1: in the election, and that is so typical of Washington, 138 00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:45,040 Speaker 1: so typical of our politics right now, and that won't 139 00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:50,320 Speaker 1: stop just because of the international action here, unfortunately. 140 00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:53,400 Speaker 2: Patrick McK henry, thank you so much. Bloomberg contribute to 141 00:09:53,400 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 2: the former chair of the House Finance Services Committee for 142 00:09:57,160 --> 00:09:58,240 Speaker 2: the Republican Party