WEBVTT - The FOMC Meeting And Its Impact On Markets

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Today is a big day, obviously,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>FED a day today. It looks like the FED is

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about to give us some more color on how it

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>intends to look at the interest rate structure out there.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I eat raising rates and that's gonna be some That's

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a new environment for a lot of investors out there,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's see how financial advisors are talking to their

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>clients about that. Katerina Simonetti, Senior vice president, Private wealth

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>advisor for Morgan Stanley, joins this. Katerina, thanks so much

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time here. I'm guessing some of your

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>investors really don't have your clients, I mean, don't have

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experience investing in a rising interest rate environment.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling them these days? Matt, thank you

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>for having me on um. I think it's no surprise

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to them that the rates are going up, said has

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>done a pretty good job setting expectations, and look, you know,

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going to be going up, and there

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 1>is zero reason why they shouldn't be. Um, we really

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>should not be as low as they are right now.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And yet there is this perceived fear that when the

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>race are going to be going up, the market somehow

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to pull apart. Is it's not necessarily the case.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Rates should be going up, and we're preparing our clients,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're preparing the investors who were strategically positioning the

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>portfolio in light of the rating late. So what do

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you do with someone who's you know, looking to retire

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in the next decade or two and is worried about

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>putting new cash into the market of these high valuations

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and obviously also into bonds when rates are rising. Well,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>met it's not just the rates themselves, it's also the inflation.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the key of how challenging this environment

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is is that we've never had the inflation ory period

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with the raids of this slow and specifically for the

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in the retirees, the people that are about to start

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>their retirement and are going to be losing their active

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>income and switching into more of a passive situation. You know,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the key is to focus on quality, and you know,

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>when we look at strategic positioning of the portfolios and

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically at certain sectors that you know are a little

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>bit stronger, a little bit more defense than the light

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>of all the challenges that this market present. Our focus

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is on quality and on larger positions large cap for example,

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but not just like large cap growth or large cap value,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.399
<v Speaker 1>but on defensive positions specifically. You know, we're looking very

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>closely at each investments and make sure that the companies

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that we invest in have the earning stability, reasonable valuations,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not overpaying for them. In the most importantly, companies

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with enough pricing power to perform well during this the

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>average challenge and environment. Because while we absolutely are quite

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>positive over the market, there is growth in the US

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that is still strong, that is still going

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to continue is going to be a bumpy right, and

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that's would present so many challenges and were preparing investors

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>for it. So, Katarina, you know, there's I guess a

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a push and pool out there from

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>some investors who really, since the Gray financial crisis, have

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really been successfully invested in the big growth names that

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>have really driven this market, whether it's an Apple or

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon, or or Facebook or something like that. To

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what's really been a good trade over last eighteen or

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty months, which is more of a a cyclical trade

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>if you will, um, maybe even you know, betting a

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the reopening of the global economy. Where

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are you suggesting, uh your clients think about, Well, I

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's all about the balance, right, and it's

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>all about being the resoughtful about the portfolio design. And

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the twenty two and to analyze

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this amazing growth that we have seen uh in the

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>market recently, the especially the year end is generally the

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>good time to kind of just just analyze what happened.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is a perfect time for strategic profit taking

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are some areas, for example, that we're used

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to saying that are extremely aggressive, that performed pretty well,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but they are in fact, you know, showing some some

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>stability and showing some price resilience, and they definitely have

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>role in the portfolio. But this is a good time

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to rebalance, to go back to the drawing board to

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure that all the sectors are properly represented in

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>some sectors that have that positioning into the interlight of

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with the economy. Sectors like financials, like healthcare,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>um inflationary hadgets of such commodities and reads for example, Well,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to ensure that we overweight into the sectors

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that are either positioned well in light of the rising

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>grades or present to be good inflationary head just or

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like healthcare. You know, the the um, the this this

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>healthcare crisis that we're experiencing. You know, this this situation

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic that you know is still going on.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as much as progress are at healthcare

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>companies and you know, are just health care communities making

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this is still something that is going to be lingering

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with us for many years to come. So when we

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>look at this positioning of the portfolios, whether it's fixed income,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's equity, we need to take inflation into consideration,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>the resilience quality and make sure that the portfolio is

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>strong enough to get us through this period of volatility

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that is not over yet. We still have a lot

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of challenges out there. Katerina, thank you so much for

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Love getting your perspective here. As you talk

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to and counsel your clients. Katerina Seminetti, Jesus, Senior Vice president,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth Advisor for Morgan Stanley here, like the rest

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of us, waiting to see what we will hear from

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>our Freederal Reserve the sion in a two pm Wall

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Street time, and and how that will impact markets going forward,

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and how investors should be allocating their capital. Katina deals

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with her Morgan Stanley clients, and I'm sure they have

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of questions, and so we appreciate getting some time

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>from Katerina. We have read on the screen here not

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>much to speak about SMP off about about three tenths

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of one percent. All right, we have a pretty great

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>guest for you right now, Sam City, as president and

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Customers Bank, and they've had a pretty good pandemic. Sam,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at your your stock price, you've gone from twenty

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>bucks basically a share at the end of beginning to

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty bucks a share basically now. And I see that

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>some analysts are even raising your price target, uh tow

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five dollars web Bush, for example. We talked

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to Dan Ives from web Bush a lot um and

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>b Riley has your price target raised to a hundred dollars,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so expecting a lot from customers. Walk us through what

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>makes Customers different than other banks? Sure? Absolutely, Well, Matt

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and Paul, thanks so much for having me. It's a

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to be here. I really appreciate that that introduction.

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, Customers Bank entered the pandemic as a tech forward,

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>organic grower, and I think that's really one of the

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>big things that differentiates us. So in the banking industry,

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not so much to differentiate yourselves on and a

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>reasonably commoditized business, so service and technology are big portions

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. So we started off in the in in

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>March and April of last year by being a big

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>player in the Paycheck Protection Program and that really helped

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>allow us to deliver three thousand plus loans ten billion

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars of PPP funds out. We also earned origination fee,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which really allowed us to build some capital and support

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the future growth of the organization. So being that sort

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of tech forward organic grower um with a very strong

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>digital focus as it is, is really what what Customers

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Bank is today. Sam, what are your clients doing these days?

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>They've just gone through you know, almost two years of

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented disruption to their businesses. Just give us an overall

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of how they're faring. Are they are they trying

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to come back, are they trying to invest in their business,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are they trying to expand? Or are they still cautious?

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so, I think that there's obviously been a little

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a change in stands. Will wait and see

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens with the Fed UH later today, UM, But

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year there was a strong sense of confidence

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>emerging inflation. I think that that concern has turned into

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a little bit of a

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>reality UM sitting where we are today, but overall, the

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>macroeconomics backdrop is strong. There are challenges with supply chain,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>there are challenges with concerns about labor UH and inflation,

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but generally UH, the the sentiment is still positive and

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the that's the importance. We've survived as

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>an economy, the pandemic, and you know, while they're they're

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>arguably could have been too much stimulus as leading to

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>potential non transitory inflation. I think at the end of

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the day, it's it's difficult to um to Monday morning

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with certainty I just want to paint a picture

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for for listeners of where you're coming from, because you

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty impressive resume. Undergrad at Wharton NBA. From Harvard,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you worked at Providence Equity Partners as well as Goldman Sachs.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>You've done real estate focused private equity, You've done blockchain

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>based real payment services. UM, what do you think with

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this experience in finance and on Wall Street,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of something like defy? M so uh.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I like to firstly say, my resume makes me seem

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot stronger uh than I am, but note the

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>less that's that's how my friend. That's very humble of you,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 1>you know. But I think Defied is really a reaction

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to to where we are from number one, the emergence

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of blockchain, because that's really the ledger and the and

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the platform upon which and the infrastructure upon which these

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>decentralized finance concept is is going to be established. I think,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, generally, as you think about if defy it

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is successful in the way that the folks that are

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that are um emerging as as important players and platforms

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>from a decentralist finance perspective, Arguably, centralized finance kee structures

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>methodologies would would change UM and you may see reversion

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>back to a different way of doing business, to traditional

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>forms which are working extremely well. By the way, say

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's why I asked, you know, yesterday I talked

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to Mike Novigrats. He's got a new office UM down

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>by Goldman Sachs and he was most pumped about that.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And it just makes me wonder, UM, what the future

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street looks like? How do you see it?

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You know? UM, At Customers Bank, we we like to

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think that this hybrid approach of human based experienced bankers

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology and a commercial banking sense is the right

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is the right hybrid way to approach the market today.

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think similarly, from an investment banking perspective, you're gonna

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>see very similar trends. There's always going to need be

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a need for for customized advice, for specific advice, and

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for bespoked UM type transactions and service in handholding. It.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be difficult to completely UM, you know,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>change the way that that many businesses need to operate,

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that that that there's a lot of

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses that that have disparate needs and not everything is somotronized. Alright,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>never enough time, Sam, but always great talking to you.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. Sam. To do there's

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>president and CEO of Customers Bank. Check out the stock.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The ticker is CEU b I trades on the New

0:11:55.960 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange. All right, it is FED day today. Um.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>The question is how our investors positioning their portfolios for

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what is likely to be a rising interest rate environment.

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's check out the Brian small Look, Chief investment Officer

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of hood River Capital Management. Brian, thanks so much for

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us once again. You guys at hood River, you

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on small cap growth stocks. Give us a sense

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of how you think small caps are going to perform

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and what's going to be a different interest rate environment.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're constructive on small caps from here, especially after

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>after this ten percent pullback or so we've seen in

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>small caps since oh Macron broke and talks of a

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>FED taper of really heated up here. Valuations have pulled

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>back pretty significantly to where now small cap trades at

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an absolute pe discount on earnings versus the SMP. Usually

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>it's at a premium. The market does have to thread

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the needle here over the next couple of months with

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>rising rates and O Macron, which could kind of put

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a pause on recovery while rates are going up. But

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>after that, we think that earning assessments need to move

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>up and the economy will recover and you want to

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>own stocks and small cat stocks will move up with

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>those earnings revision. Specifically a good river. We're looking for

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a dislocation in of the market fundamentals for that particular company,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>which is what the streets expecting, and we're optimists is

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to find plenty of those opportunities in

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>twent twenty two. So do you expect a big dip

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a correction? Is there is there an opportunity for investors

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy? So yeah, I mean, I think we're kind

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it here. There's going to be continued

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>choppinists over the next month or so. You'll probably see

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a spike in O Macron cases crowd crowding out Delta,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>but thus far the disease looks to be more mild

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>than Delta. We're probably going to have a vaccine ready

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the next days and people are gonna start to

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>look through that. The FED doesn't have much room to

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>raise race it looks like without invarying the curve, but

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the market is basically saying that it's transitory, and that's

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>how we're thinking about it. What are some of the

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sectors that you think investors should be looking at in

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios in two again, given what looks like to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>be a at least for some period of time at

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a rising interest rate environment, So we're overweight, and we've

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>been overweight for the last nine months or so. Cyclical names,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so that would include financials, industrials, consumer stocks, and then

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>also some semi stocks. Valuation is more important in a

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>rising rate environments, particularly in small cup growth um so

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to own names that are cheaper on traditional

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>valuation metrics like price to earnings. A lot of growth

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>investors tend to look at enterprise value two revenues and

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and when you have to discount the terminal value out more,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that can make those stocks riskiers. That's why you've seen

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>software names, for example, pull back a lot and biotech

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>pull back a lot in this environment because in rising

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>rates environments is tougher on those valuations. What do you

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>expect to hear from Jerome Powell today? Do you think

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll get any surprises or does he telegraph everything pretty well?

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>He tends to telegraph everything pretty well, and River were

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not exactly said watching experts were focusing on bombs up,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>stock picking and s pundamentals there. But but my sense

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is that he's had to get track wickers there and

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll just announce an accelerated taper, which I think is

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>what the markets expecting. Is there a risk in your

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>mind as you listen to and read FED Chairman Pale's

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>comments over the last several months, that perhaps he feels

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a little bit behind the curve and maybe needs

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to catch up and maybe maybe more aggressive than the

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>market's discounting. I think that's for sure a risk. He

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>basically acknowledged the fact that he had to take the

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>word transitory out of their vocabulary. And when you talk

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to companies, that's what we're doing every quarter. We're talking

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to foreign companies every quarter. They're seeing real inflation that

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to handle day to day, and there's no

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that that is transitory. So it's not responsible for

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED to handle it that way, and they're gonna

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have to make some adjustments and see how see how

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it pleased, all right? Brian great having on the program.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for joining us. Another Harvard NBA by

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, but I would say more importantly a University

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of Virginia undergrad. He's Oahu. But but he's also a

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>fellow alum of Solomon Brothers like me. Wow. Yeah, the

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>solid team, all right? Excellent. Brian Smallock is the chief

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at hood River Capital Management, talking to us

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>about the future of growth and markets. Enough of this

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>tri state areas stuff out a little bit. Dan Gander

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us CEO of r n C Genter Capital Management

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about his expectations for UM, the FED, the markets,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and the economy. Dan, we had a very strong pp

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I number UM nine point six, nine point seven percent.

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think after a huge CPI number six last week.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Is this gonna push Jerome Powell to be faster with

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>his taper. Well, I think he's in a position that

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he just can't ignore it. I mean, they took an

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>early position that inflation was going to be transitory. I

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>think that they're frankly being honest that that's what they thought.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really know how things were gonna flesh out

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>now with the CPI number, as you mentioned at six,

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>eight with pp I at nine six. You know, we

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>don't have the new PC number, which is one of

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the main things that they look at, the personal consumption

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at spendature index, but that was five percent in October.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>So we're no matter how you look at it, we're

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>running double to triple really where they'd like to be

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at two to three percent. So I know, I don't

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>know how you ignore it. I think it's it's a

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>matter of what do you do about it? And the

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're the tools are there. You know, you

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you finish out the taper even faster, obviously, start to

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>raise FED funds, and we don't you know, certainly don't

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think along with everyone else that we're going to see

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>an increase in rates at this meeting. But you know,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you you look, you're putting some odds on the table. Now.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You could see something as early as the first quarter

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of two or certainly by the second quarter, and up

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>until recently two was off the table. So things are changing, Dan,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>things are changing it. As you mentioned here, how do

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>your clients, how are you positioning your portfolio for what's

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>likely to be, you know, a rising interest rate environment

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future. Well, I think on the equity market,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there's really not much of a change when you when

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you look at it historically of what you're likely to

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>see out of this FED. I mean, when you look

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at it historically, typically when there's a major reversal policy,

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you normally see fifty basis points initially twenty and the

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>same thing when they start lowering rates, it's very very similar.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're gonna see anything more aggressive here.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, you might even are much

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more likely. You're just gonna see a well telegraphed twenty

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>five basis points increase, and they'll do that very steadily.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Now with that, if you look at it again historically

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of FED policy, is that pees generally

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>don't change much. You know, what they were at six

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>months before the FED started the rays and where they

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>are six months after basically that twelve month window, pea

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>stay about the same. So I think the equity market,

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're you know, it will certainly start to

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>buy us more the value stocks. It's going to buy

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>us more the sixical stocks. You know, we're we've already

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>begun tilting more in that direction. You know, the bond

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>markets a different matter altogether. I mean, you're you're gonna

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be very active and what you're doing in

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the bond market, you know, as the as the youal

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>curves already shifted. What do you expect in terms of hikes?

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you said you don't expect this meeting. I

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone does. But um, is the dot plot

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna show to this year? Is their possibility for a

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hawk is surprise? Look, it's always there. And I think

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>that the good thing about Jerome Powell's he's you know,

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not like dealing with green you know, green speak.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean he telegraphs it right out in front. Everything's

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to give the market a lot

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of indication, uh to some degree. Frankly, you know, the

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>market may even breathe a sigh of relief when we

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have that, you know, because the market will take good

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>news bad news. It just doesn't like no news. And

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so this this unknown limbo right now is making people nervous.

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I doubt that we're gonna be see

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to surprise the market. But him well

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>telegraphing in advance that they're going to start with the

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>basis point to increase and FED funds, you know, I

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think is what we're going to see. So Dan, all right,

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the Fed. And again we're gonna get a lot

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>more information later on today. The other aspect there are

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>One of the other aspects that the market tends to

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on is kind of what's coming out of Washington,

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>d c Um. How important is that to you to

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this market or do you think the markets again is

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pricing in some kind of build back better But there's

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>other things to focus on. Well, I think the market

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is definitely pricing it in and the build back better.

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We're look, we're gonna have something now, whether it's a

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar number or a two trillion that really

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is four point two trillion when you take the time

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>limits off. I mean, we're gonna have something that's going

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to come out of that. They're gonna make some kind

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of a deal. But but now, I don't think you're

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna see anything very radical, and the reason being is

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats right now are in trouble. Look the

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>way the numbers stack up now is redistricting. They're gonna

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>lose the House two and so you have a lot

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of people that are midstream that you know, they're they're

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just not going to go hardcore against radical democratic policy

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want to. They don't want to get

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>washed out. So I'm not expecting anything dramatic. You know,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we were probably the biggest thing the market will be

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>concerned about, and that's waning is significant tax increases. But

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's frankly, it's really dropping off. You're

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just you know that that's going down to a whisper

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. So we don't think right now, barring something unforeseen,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>which can always happen, there's going to be a dramatic

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>change of change in policy that will have a significant impact.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks very much for joining us. Dan, always

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>great talking to you. Dan Genter there, who is the

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO as well as the c i O and the

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>chairman of R and C all management. I love. I

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of people have a lot of titles,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>um and I always wonder what else, what else is

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>he hiding? Exactly based in the based in Los Angeles,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we get get getting away from the metro area. So

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great, by the way to have a

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>diversity of views, because if you just stick in the

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street bubble or just in the Tri State area.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>If we include you know, Wall Street, Greenwich and Summit,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't get the viewpoint from the left. From the

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>left coast, I'm not necessarily left, obviously, and it's key

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I think to get Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Gets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three and

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.