WEBVTT - Haun Ventures Founder & CEO Katie Haun

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Hello, good, how are you. It's so great to see.

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for doing this. What do you

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think about all the sleeves getting into crypto? I think

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that that. I think it was more last hear um.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You think it's kind of a way of it passed. No,

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. But I think it's like any

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>time that. Frankly, it's when a lot of other people

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>get into crypto. Write other audiences too. It's once in

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the news a lot and when does that happen a

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of times when the prices are going out? Hi everyone,

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to this edition of Bloomberg Studio one point. Oh,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited about our guest today. She started her

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>career as a federal prosecutor, going after gangs and the

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>mob before being handed her most consequential assignment, taking down bitcoin.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Katie Han soon realized this new technology was much more

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>than a tool used by criminals. She dove deep and

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>became a crypto convert, swapping her prosecutor hat for a

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>board seat at coin Base and became the first female

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>general partner at the venture capital firm and recent Horowitz. Han,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>now a prolific crypto investor, recently launched her own fund

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with one and a half billion dollars to deploy. It's

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the largest fund ever raised by a Soul investor. Here's

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with the CEO and founder of Han Ventures,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Katie Han. Katie, it's so great to have you. Great

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to be back here in the studio with you. Emily,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with a vibe check. Okay, what

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>state of the crypto cycle are we in right now?

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It was hot and then it got pretty cold. Well,

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>look Emily zooming back. Because I've been in crypto for

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a decade, if you can believe it, We've seen crypto

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be really hot and then all of a sudden not

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>um and so we've seen this before. However, I think

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's a little bit different now

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is with each new cryptocycle, more and more people come

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>into it, and so it's more and more pronounced each cycle,

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and I would push back on it's not I think

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what area of the ecosystem you're looking at.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We think developers think crypto and Web three is still

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>really hot. I am seeing a lot less of those

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to make it hashtags. I'm seeing a

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lot less of them too, although I am spending less

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>time on Twitter, so maybe that's why. Well, but with

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>each cycle there are there are new acronyms. What hasn't

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>happened is a crypto winter in the midst of kind

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of really serious global macro conditions. So we have inflation

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of record highs for our generation and in our

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>lifetime UM, and then we have also a war that's

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>broken out in the Ukraine, and we have a number

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of other factors going on here, so that's very different.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>There was some serious carnage out there, Sausius Luna three hours.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>What's been your takeaways from I don't want to sit

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>here and tell you that algorithmic stable coins are bad,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>because I actually think they're really interesting UM. However, I

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>think what happened is you had UM in this case.

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Luna and Tara. You know that was an

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic stable coin UM that was getting pretty widespread adoption

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>UM relative to what the tech could do. I didn't

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>realize you spent your teenaged years living in Egypt and

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>learning Arabic. Tell me about your upbringing. I was always uprooted. UM.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>My dad worked for a large company and we were

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>always moving. Just when I would get comfortable in one space.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think, actually that's pretty important if you fast

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>toward and look at my career. Um, I'm comfortable being

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in uncomfortable situations, you know. I was. I didn't know

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot about venture when I got into it initially. Um,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know a lot about crypto when I got

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>into it initially, And I was okay asking questions. I

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was okay not knowing the local acronyms or a nomenclature

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of a particular field. And I'm you know, I'm taken

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>right back to my teenagers in Cairo, moving from Houston,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas one day to downtown Mahdi in Cairo the next day.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You studied law. I did you clerked for Supreme Court

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Justice Anthony Kennedy? Right? You became a federal prosecutor. You

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>were taking on prison gangs and the mafia. That must

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have taken a really thick skin, And I was doing

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it at um. And now, if I kind of take

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a step back, and you I think that happens at

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>different points in your career, Like WHOA if I would

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>have analyzed that a little more at the time, And

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of in some ways glad I didn't. I

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just dove right in because I found it fascinating. There

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was a human aspect to it and people's stories, and

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I felt like those stories mattered. So I was drawn

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to criminal law and became a federal prosecutor, and I

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>did cases involving violent crime, but then really mistrying cases,

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>being back in the courtroom, being before the grand jury.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the prosecutor you would see on TV going to

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>try those murder case is doing those two hour closing argument.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And so moved out here to California indict

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at the largest prison gang in the world at the time.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>UM outlaw, motorcycle gangs, hostage taking. Bank robberies are bank robberies.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>There was really not a kind of criminal case. By

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that point in my career I hadn't done. And it

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>was right around that time two twelve one of my

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bosses came in and said, let's have that same energy

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that you brought to those gang cases, to those murder cases,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and let's go ahead and have you investigate this new

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>criminal technology that we really need to look into and

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly shut this down. So you created the first cryptocurrency,

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>how would you describe it? Fortunately, several of us in

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the government realized at the time it's not possible, also

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>not desirable, because bitcoin is not an entity. It's not

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a person um right, it's a protocol, And it would

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be like saying, let's go shut down cash, let's go

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>shut down the Internet. It's not possible. Probably wouldn't be

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a good idea either. And I was using crypto and

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>techno allergies like the bitcoin blockchain, because that's all it existed.

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Then this is to actually uncover criminal activity. So I

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't think that that technology was bad. Frankly, it was

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a tool that helped me uncover the various activity. And

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it was a step level function improvement

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>better then compliance by banks. I'll just go ahead and

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>say it. That's a little bit controversial, but I had

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>spent a decade subpoenaing large financial institutions and five times

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>out of ten didn't get back what I needed. One

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>case I worked on and people always say, oh, you

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>shot down the silk road. What actually happened. I was

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>looking into something completely not having to do with anything

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>at all of the silk road and came across some

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what looked to be some kind of odd activity, and

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that a couple of federal agents on

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Silk Road test force out of Washington, d C.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Were croaked. And that is the case that I ended

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>up in dibting and I ended up prosecuting those agents

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sin they both went to prison. So that's the aspect

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of what the Silk Road case that I worked on.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I would never never have been able to uncover that

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>criminal activity by those agents because they were federal agents,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they knew how to cover their tracks. Had they not

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>used bitcoin blockchain, right that, so that technology right there,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>if they had just used wires or cash or bank wires,

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we would never have uncovered that. So you became kind

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of a crypto convert after this. You joined the board

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of coin base very early on. How did you in

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>coin Base and Brian Armstrong come together. I hosted UM

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>an event here in San Francisco at the Federal Reserve Bank,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and I believe it was there that it wasn't just Brian.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot of what I'll call legitimate actors

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and crypto who wanted to usher in this new UM wave,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this new ecosystem UM. And then we brought together the

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>heads of all kinds of agencies really in an effort

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of talk about building bridges. You know, the

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>government and the crypto industry. We're never going to see

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>eye eye on a lot of things, but we did

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>think there were some commonalities. Coin Based is a company

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that has suffered. They've been losing share, the valuation of

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the public markets has plummeted. Why do you think that

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is and how do you think it can be fixed? Yeah, well,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think again a few things. It's tied to one,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a large aspect of coin BASAs business now of course,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>as trading revenue, and that's down when prices are down,

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the company has been very transparent about

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that long before going public. I mean also, if you

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>look at its S one, it's specifically identifies that um

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and just how volatile crypto cycles are. So I think

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's part of it. It's judged, you know, by public

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>markets as a technology stock or as a financial services company.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I think it's both. I think it's

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not just a financial services company. I think it's so

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>much more. I think it's really a portal to this

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>whole new ecosystem. You are also on the board of

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>openc until recently, Uh, there's an insider trading situation or

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>accusation going on. Their coin Base has also had employees

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>accused of insider trading. How much is this happening within

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto companies and within the industry and how big a

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>problem is? I think crypto is under the microscope. So

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where you have a case, two cases, three cases in

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto ecosystem, which now is a trillion dollar industry um,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think multi billion approaching trillion dollar industry, UM, You're

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>always going to be able to find examples like that.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to make too much out of

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a handful of cases. That said, the company, coin Base

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>opency take these things incredibly seriously. Along with your position

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>at coin Base, you became a partner at one of

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the most story venture capital firms and Silicon valiant, that

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is Andres and Horowitz. What was your experience at a

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>sixteen Z like there. I met Chris Dixon, and I

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>met Ben Horowitz, and I met Mark Andreison, and I

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>had worked with them for just about a year, maybe

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit over when they asked me to come

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and co run their crypto funds at Andreas and Hearts. Again,

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I jumped at that chance, and I think, really that

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the fact that, as I've said before, things

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>are hell yes or there are no. And it was

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a hell yes for me. So Andrewson Harwars is the

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of place where if you make partner, you don't leave.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>How did Mark and Ben respond when you said, I

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>want to leave to start a crypto fund of my own.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>As you might know, Emily, Um, they're an anchor. Uh,

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>They're an anchor check into my fund. And I'm very

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>grateful for that. You know, Mark and Chris and folks

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like them are also personal LPs um. So I felt

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>very supported um when I shared that decision. Um. And

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I will say that it was not running away from

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Anderson Harts. It was running to another opportunity. And you know,

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>crypto is not what do they say, It's not a

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>spectator sport. It's like you're in it, excuse very young.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's seven, it's global, and it's hustle and at this

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's a trade off. It's a life trade off.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>And at this point in my career and in my life,

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>if I was going to continue to make that trade off,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to do it and do it in

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a way that was really true to me. So you

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>struck out on your own to launch on ventures. What

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>gave you the courage to do that? What was the

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>spark that like the fire? Yeah, that got you to say,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I need to do this and do this now. Sure.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>What I set out to do was to continue to

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>invest in this ecosystem that I think is so broad.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.119
<v Speaker 1>That decision was very purposeful and the timing was very purposeful.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>We have an early stage fund that does seed stage,

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Series A, even Series B, and then we have what

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we call an acceleration fund, which is it's not a

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>growth fund, it's a crypto growth fund, and I think

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>those are different things. But later stage it might be

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto publics um certain kinds of public tokens were set

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>up to hold tokens to participate in the token ecosystem

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>or later stage companies. I mean, you know there are

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>now several crypto many crypto unicorns. Space has become really competitive.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Even though you say, um, you know, crypto has had

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>its kind of ups and downs. The thing is a

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in some of those last cycles have

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>seen the kind of venture style returns that can be

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>had in crypto, and so you've had a lot of

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>new funds enter space. And that's driven up competition. So

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>what differentiates on ventures then from you know, all of

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>these other crypto funds or even the more traditional venture

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>capitalists like Couentries and Horowitz or Schekoia they also have

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>crypto funds. Well, I think a lot of traditional venture

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>capital funds now have crypto funds. It used to just

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>be like a regulatory designation. It was like, are you

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>an r i A, which is registered investment advisor. I

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>would say for crypto founders today, um, it's not enough

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to just be an r i A. Right they frankly,

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if a lot of them care

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a regulatory designation. What crypto founders today want to

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>know is do you live in breath crypto? Do you

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>inhale the discords? Are you part of the community, do

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you participate in governance? Are you going to be um

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>staking these kind of crypto verbs um out there? And

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're not really in this space full time, I

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's very hard to run a successful crypto fund.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a hedge fund component, so we're not

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sitting here buying and trading and selling. Um that's a

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund. Star sure, and there are crypto hedge funds. Um,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not one. We're making seven to ten yere bets.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Just how hard is it to launch a crypto fund

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>from scratch? You know it's hard, but it's not impossible,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and we not have a crystal ball. I don't know.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't predict cycles, but I knew that we were

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in a cycle where you saw so much forever an

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>excitement around the space. And I already talked about what

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>makes us different. But I think one thing also is

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>we are a nimble strike force. We don't fish in

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the same pond we have the crypto natives. We have

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a fish and execution. We have operators, seasoned operators who

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>really know how to stick the landing. And I think

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that's reflected on our culture. I would say the only

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that's changed in our strategy as a result of

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the market correction is really more of a focus on

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>early stage. But we still have our late stage fund

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and when we see valuations, which I think we'll still

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>see correct um spoiler, I think we'll continue to see

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>some corrections and um, so we might deploy our later

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>stage fund a little bit more slowly. It might not

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>be on an even cadence and that's okay. Long term,

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>our strategy hasn't changed. Long term, We're committed to this space.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think valuations are going to correct?

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just I can't give you a one

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>size fits all answer because crypto is not a monolith.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>You have some crypto companies that really follow more of

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an enterprise sas business model. You have others that are

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>layer one protocols UM. You have still others that are

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer facing applications. And I think one of the things

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing right now is the infrastructure layer, and that's

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>where we're spending a lot of our time, by the way,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and we think more and more use cases will come

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about when the infrastructure layers in place. UM So, my

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>own view is we are not rushing to deploy. We're

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly not getting caught up. Do you get VC try

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>not to avoid that. You know, Look, I think it's

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>very easy to get into that mindset, right. It's because

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a competitive sport. It's a competitive space, and I

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>think I'd be lying if I said that that doesn't

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>influence anyone. I try to what I do, and I

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think I do differently is I try to take stock

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of that Oh, that's the foam of mentality kicking in.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>That's bad um. Again, you don't want to over correct, though.

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>What we look for is we look for amazing founders.

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if I think valuations will correct. If

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there are amazing founders, there's a huge tam We also

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>look for what's your regulatory plan if you're launching a token,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>what's your plan to comply with the law. What's your

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>plan for security? By the way, we've seen a lot

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of hacks in the space. We want to really dive

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in there and make sure that the founders have been

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about especially if they're custoding customer funds, keeping those

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>funds secure. If it's a cross chain bridge, what are

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the exploits? Have you changed your strategy at all given

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the downturn? Have you backed out of any deals? Are

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>decided not to do certain deals because the conditions have changed?

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't you raise the fund We have decided not to

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>do certain deals. We've never backed out of a deal.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We have decided not to do a few deals because

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we think that pricing was ahead of progress, candidly, and

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we might have been wrong about that, Emily, we might

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>have been wrong about that. But I think if we

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>were wrong not to do a couple of deals, um

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>better that we might have been right, because if we

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>were wrong about that, I think we can find a

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>way to still invest in those projects later. Well, one

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm here is that a lot of dry powder

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>has just stacked up because all these funds raised a

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. You raised what what? What was the

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest fund ever for a single person, not just a

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>woman anyone. Are you confident you're gonna have to a

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>place to put all that money? I am, But if

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a place to put it, I'm not

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>just going to go willing nearly deploy it. One of

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that we told our LPs, even during the

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>period when we raised our fund, which was when Crypto

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was undeniably still on a bull run, we said that

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be pretty steadfast sticking to it,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to your deployment cycle. Um. And you know, I think

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's changed is that might have lengthened. Um.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It certainly hasn't shortened, But we will again we have

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We feel very good that we have the capital to

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>back greet teams when we see them. What about n

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>f T s and are you concerned about the declining demand.

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We are going to increasingly live in a digital world,

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and I happen to think that if you live in

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a dual world, you're going to want to own digital goods.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>In that world, you're not just going to be satisfied

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to rent them, which is what we do now. We

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>buy our content from walled gardens without digital scarcity, which

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is what n f T s unlock. You don't really

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>own anything. You're subject to the whims of a platform.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think n f T s and digitally scarce

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>goods fundamentally change that. I think you'll see n f

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>T s back again. Um, but we are spending a

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of time in the infrastructure layer, like I tell you,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>zero knowledge, technologies, scalability. We think of that as like

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the plumbing. If you think of the fiber optic cables,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>remember you couldn't have had YouTube and Netflix with dial up.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't have streamed content. The same is true of

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto use cases. We think that there will be a

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of new use cases unlocked when the infrastructure is there,

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>when it's more efficient, when it's more user friendly, and

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>so we're spending a lot of our time there. President

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>buying issues. This Crypto Executive Order, there a number of

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>ports that are coming to What do you want to

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>see from the administration when it comes to regulation and

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>are you optimistic that we will get there? Yeah, we

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were so delighted to see that executive order. This is

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not something you should normally be delighted about. But why

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we were is because it was to us a real

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>recognition that this is the US government saying this field

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't going anywhere. This field is growing, is growing so

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>much that we are going to direct every single agency

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the federal government to come up with a plan. Here.

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we take a step forward, but

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>then you see, you know, we're a big government, we're

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a big system. We have states, we have local entities.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So we take a step forward with the EO, and

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>then we take some steps back sometimes too. And I

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think what I UM see as crypto founders are confused

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>by that. They're starting to think, well, I could go

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to this jurisdiction where there's a single regulator and you

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have fifty states with different rules. It's the U.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>S Government that needs to start taking stock of the

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that right now, Emily in China, UM there's a

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a billion e c N y wallets, a

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a billion. Um. We're still talking about whether

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>there should be a government central bank digital currency. We're

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>still studying that. So you think we're going to fall

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>behind the United I think we already are falling behind behind.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We're falling behind. What are the dangers of falling behind

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>China and the rest of the world. This is years ahead,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want people to take a headline and say, oh,

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the US dollar will be you know, no

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>longer the global currency reserve, global currency. I'm not saying

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that now. But fast forward decades and if you no

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>longer need to use the dollar because you have an alternative, Um,

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a real problem. What would we use instead? Well,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are going to be stable coins

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that people who have access to a smartphone

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>will use. There is a demand for it. We saw

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>two year of your growth with stable coins, so people

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are clearly liking the idea of this. Now again, there

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>have been some spectacular failures too, but not all stable

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>coins are created the same. But I think the important

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is that we really do need to not quahtion innovation.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of how Gary Gensler, the chair

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC, and how he's approaching it. One of

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that I hear from founders is that they're

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>very confused because they get told come in, register, just

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>come in and talk to us. But you have the

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>one company who has done the ultimate act of going

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in and registering coin based filed and s one UM

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and still, you know, there's a lot of saber rattling

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>still going on. I think, UM, And again, I don't

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>want to single out the sec um, you know, and

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to suggest that anything they're doing is bad.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I do think though, that right now there's a lot

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of confusion, and one of the pieces of confusion stems

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that you know, and it started with

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the I c oh mania back in what twenty I

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>can't even remember which year now, where the SEC was

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>very loud about securities. A lot of them were securities.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But the space has changed, and so to still view

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it through the I c O lens when so much

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>has happened over the last five years in the space, UM,

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a miss stake. What do you have

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that the skeptics out there who just don't

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>believe in the future of WHIM three and don't see

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>where this is going. I would say, don't judge the

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>current state of innovation by the end state of innovation.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I hear from a lot of these skeptics, and by

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm friends with a lot of these skeptics too.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't only want to live in a crypto bubble.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>They want to see the use cases, especially if they're

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>not technical. Well, when am I going to use it?

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>What will I use it for? And I think one

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's not appreciated is how quickly the

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure here is catching up. And once you have kind

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of once you have really scalable blockchains that can handle

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>um a lot of thoroughput on are very efficient. I

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think that unlocks a whole lot of use cases. People

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>are spending more time on screens. That curve is up

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>into the right, whether we like it or not, that

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is the future. I mean, those who have kids know

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that kids spend more time online. They want digital things too,

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think to dismiss it, it is a bit generational.

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I do find not always, but is a bit generational.

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to kids about being able to have

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>money online they instantly get that concept. They're comfortable not

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>having to hold something in their hand to think it

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>has value. Take us to the end state. Do Google

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon and Facebook and Apple still exists? I believe

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they will still exist. I mean it depends what you

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about when you talk about the end state. I

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that you know, I think for decades

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>those companies will still be around. But the important thing is,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I think this new ecosystem is going to represent a

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge to them. I do think that those entities, um,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>decentralized forces are coming and we'll cut into those entities

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>profits and revenues. So we have a little rapid fire section.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>If you could belong to any alt coin tribe, gosh, um,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there is no way I'm answering that because I will

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>get trolled on Twitter by every other al coin tribe. Um,

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a crypto maximalist. I'm a crypto max Alright, we'll

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not picking one book or podcast you're binging now, Hey,

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I yes, I am. Oh gosh, I'm benching on

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>wheat crash. Something that brings you simple joy, you know,

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I love and I've missed

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>being away from this summer is swimming. I just love

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I find like some of my best thoughts come to

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>me while I'm moving. Career philosophy, Yeah, do a job

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>where you know fifty of the job and we're're gonna

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>learn fifty percent of the job. Um. Again, that goes

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>back to no growth in the comfort zone, No comfort

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in the growth zone. Studio one Point I was produced

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>by Lauren Ellis and edited by Matthew Soto. I'm Emily Chang,

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>your host and executive producer. If you like us, please

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>leave a review and check out our library of shows

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with the biggest influencers in tech and media, including recent

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>episodes with Alphabet and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Amazon CEO

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Andy Jassi, YouTube CEO Susan Wachitzki, and more. Thanks for listening.