WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: February 14, 2025

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Jim Bianco of Bianco

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Research is watching ten year bonyields and writes the following.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>If rates are steady, then ten year bonields should continue

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>sideways before heading above five percent, and the curve will steepen.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 2>Jim joins us now for more. Jim Bianco, I want

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>to go to a quote from Michael Hartner Bank for

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>America and get your thoughts on this take this morning,

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>we say hot three percent USCPI January is a blessing

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in disguise for both bonds and starks. Michael and the

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>team go on to say rising inflation means Trump must

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>go small, not big. On terraff and immigration in the

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>coming months to avoid fanning a second wave of inflation. Jim,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>would you agree with that sake, No.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I would not. I mean, we all know the phrases.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>You're supposed to take Trump seriously, but not literally. And

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that's what I think we've seen in the market in

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty four hours. They're torturing themselves to basically,

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, micro read what Trump has said, but take

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 3>them seriously. He intends on doing tariffs, and we are

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>going to get tariffs, and they're going to come. And

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 3>as much as we want to try and talk ourselves

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 3>out of it, they are coming later this year. And

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I might add markets get things wrong all the time.

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>It convinced itself in January twenty twenty COVID wasn't going

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>to be anything, and it was.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 4>It convinced itself in August.

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Of twenty twenty that, you know, the young carry trade

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 3>unwined was the biggest deal we've ever seen, and it wasn't.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>So it gets things wrong a lot. And take Trump seriously.

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Aside, Jim, With that in mind, as you look at

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 2>bonds and stocks, and you look at stocks, clothes to

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>old time highs and bond yields near the low end

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of the range for the year so far.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think is more vulnerable, Oh, I think

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the bond market is probably more vulnerable at this point.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>The hot CPI number, I think is still a tell

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>that the at least at a minimum, the road to

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>two percent is now. You know, we've been talking about

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 3>the last mile for two years, and we're probably going

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to have to talk about it for another two years

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>before we get there to two percent.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 4>That we've got sticky inflation.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 3>And if we've got sticky inflation, the Fed is probably

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>going to be done raising cutting rates, if not maybe

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 3>one more this year, although I think they might be

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>done for the year, meaning that the funds rate is

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 3>still going to end the year with a four handle

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 3>on it, even with one more cut. And if the

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 3>yield curve continues to steep in and we see some

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of normalization of the curve, which we've been seeing

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>for the last several months, that means that you could

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>be pushing the tenure yield above five percent sometime later

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 4>And I still think that that's in the cards.

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Jim, when you take a step back, it feels like

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a numbing and ironment. There

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is so much noise you have. On one hand, about

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>three days ago, we were talking about that inflationary risk,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and you would have had a lot of compatriots talking

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>about five percent treasure yields. At the same time, you

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>got inflation data that looked bad on the surface, but

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people got enough comfort from the individual details to say, actually,

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this means that disinflation is intact. How do you strip

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>out the noise and have conviction about inflation call and

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of expectations getting truly unmoored.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think if you look at the way that

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 3>the markets have been trading, and if you say start

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>with the stock market, the S ANDP is at the

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 3>higher end of a range.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 4>It's been since two weeks after the election.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 3>It's been trading in about a fifty eight hundred to

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>sixty one hundred range for like I said, over two months,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's just at the top end of the range.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>And the same thing has been happening with the bond

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>market too. On November fifteenth, we're four to fifty, we're

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>four fifty three. We ended the year at four fifty six.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of noise and the markets move

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 3>around a lot. Yesterday was a big individual day in

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the stock market, but the trend is still sideway, and

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>that says that that's still a market that is has

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>little convictioners unsure of where to go next. So it

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>sees all the news and it's not really reacting to

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 3>it other than having big days here or there, but

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>moving sideways.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think ultimately it's going to give a way too.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>There's going to be terrifts, there's going to be a

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit more inflation, and interest rates are going to

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 3>go higher.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim, when you talk about the inflationary impulse, are you

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>really attributing that to policy or do you see something

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the internals of the data that a lot of

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>people are just dismissing as highlighting some sort of pressure

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that everyone is closing their eyes to.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 4>No, I see something in the data.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Every time we have a financial crisis or recession, and

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.559
<v Speaker 3>we had both in twenty twenty, the economy changes. Change

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>is not worse, it's not dystopian. The big change that

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>happened in the economy coming out of twenty twenty.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Was remote work.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Over a quarter of the country is now doing remote work,

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 3>and we know what Jamie Diamond's attitude about that is

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 3>from a couple of days ago.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't like it at all.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>It is here, it is not going away, and that

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>is a fundamental change not only to the.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Way we work, but also to the way we live

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 4>our lives.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that is building excess pressures on

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>prices and leaving us with higher inflation, not eight ten

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>or Zimbabwe inflation, but more like three to four percent inflation.

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 4>And core CPI just finished it's forty fifth month in

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 4>a row above.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 3>Three percent, So we've been seeing that kind of pressure,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>although we continue to try and tell ourselves that no

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 3>we're going to go back to two percent. That you

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>know we're going to return, as Jpal says, to a

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>pre pandemic environment, the cycle changed.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 4>We're in a different cycle right now.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Jim, I just love to quickly get your thoughts before

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>we end on what you actually think is going on

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 5>with tariffs, because you say the market should be taking

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 5>Trump seriously and they didn't. But he didn't actually sign

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 5>anything formidable yesterday. It's an investigation into these countries. There

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 5>was not a single tar iff placed yesterday. And my

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 5>read is he's a negotiating mode to get some sort

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 5>of concessions, especially out of the European Union. Would you

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 5>not agree with that?

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I think tariffs are leverage, and I think they are

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 3>big leverage. And I think that when it comes to

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>negotiating with our partners, whether it's Canada, Mexico or the

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 3>European Union, Trump holds more cards than they do, and

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that these tariffs are a threat and he

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 3>wants something else. Now, in the case of Europe, I

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 3>think what he wants is he wants more security arrangements.

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>He wants them to spend five percent of their budget

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 3>on a defense and he even said yesterday he wants them,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 3>when they're spending five percent of their budget on defense,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>to buy.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 4>More stuff from defense makers in the United States.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think that all of this is more leverage

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>than an external revenue service to raise revenues. I think

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 3>he wants some of that too, but I think it's

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>really about negotiating and we need to understand that that's

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>what he's trying to do.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Jim Grid's kickoff this morning with you. I am

0:06:53.279 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>freciate it. Jim Pianco at Biancout Research Pit, a chair

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of Academy Securities, saying maybe we need to squeeze some shorts.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 2>But I suspect we're going to see tariff related headlines

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>to spook the market as early as the next week.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Pet Joined, just now for more, Pete, good morning, it's

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>good morning. Yeah, what happened yesterday? Should we start there?

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 7>I feel like it wasn't really Donald Trump speaking. I

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 7>feel like he got sucked into his advised advisors to

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 7>come up with this very mellow message. Right, if you

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 7>think about Trumpets, We're gonna take over Greenland.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 6>Canada should be the fifty first state.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 7>Right, there's no nuances about well, Quebec doesn't like Ontario.

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 7>He's always very aggressive, even on the initial set of tariff.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 7>So I feel like the rest of the world's kind

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 7>of like, Okay, what was really said? And I do

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 7>think tariffs resonates with people, trade protection resonates with people.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm not even sure that resonates. So I feel that

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>sometime next week he's going to be like, no one's

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 7>taking this seriously.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to listen to my advisors.

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to go back to being myself and I'm

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 7>going to send a clear message.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to have Potin back in the G seven.

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Russia should be sitting at the table that was restrained

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>version of the president yesterday.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 6>So that was an interesting one.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 7>I think it's again you go back and why Russia

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 7>was brought into the G seven or G eight at

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 7>the time was Okay, maybe if they work with us,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 7>you'll move forward. I think it's a little bit incorrect

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 7>right now because there should be some sort of punishment

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 7>for the invasion, and certainly this is going to send Europe,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, in a tizzy. Right Europe's not gonna be

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 7>comfortable with us at all. Europe's not comfortable with any

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 7>form of peace right now, let alone bringing him back.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 7>So again, I think there's all this friction, and I

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 7>think people have.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 6>Been very when we jump in.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Europe's not comfortable with any kind of peace right now.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you translate that, because that just sends shocking too people.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean?

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 7>I think Europe, much more than US, is very worried

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 7>about If you give Putin an inch, you've given them

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 7>a mile, and that's any sort of a core that

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 7>gives Putin time to you know, take his win, consolidate,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 7>leads him coming back for more than two years down

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 7>the road. That's I think very prevalent within Europe. It's

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 7>a thought that's much more concerning to them, and they

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 7>are sitting there much closer to the front lines, so

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 7>I think their view of a piece is very different

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 7>than ours, which.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Is the reason why a lot of the commentary that

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we hear out of the Earth Union as well as

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>analysts in the United States is this doesn't really move

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the needle further towards some sort of peace agreement that

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is viable and long lasting. You have a lot of

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>generals ed at your firm at Academy Securities. Do they

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>agree or do they think that actually having conversations is

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a really solid step, just like the market seems to imply.

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 7>So we think there is going to be a deal

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 7>done this year. I think whether Europe likes it or not,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 7>it's going to happen. We think that the Russian frozen

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 7>dollar reserves are going to play a big part of that.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 7>So that's going to be the carot and stick right Pudin.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 7>We could try and fight you and keep all these

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 7>dollar reserves, or we can give you some back and

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 7>if you make peace Ukraine, you get a bunch of

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 7>dollar reserves to give up some land and do the rebuilding.

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 6>So I think that's a big part of it.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 7>There'll be some sort of vague path for China or

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 7>sorry for Ukraine to head towards NATO that Pudin probably

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 7>won't believe in, and there's a chance, right if you.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 6>Pull people together. I think most of our generals.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 7>Again, I think one of the more interesting questions we've

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 7>been asked periods, what would you do most as a

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 7>general to ensure peace for the US?

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 6>US like fund the State Department. More so, I think.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 7>Talking and engaging with countries, that's a way to pull

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 7>it together. So I don't know that there's an obvious

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 7>lasting piece, but if you stop the war, you get

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 7>people talking, there's that potential.

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Markets are sniffing this out, and there's a question of

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>how much that is giving sort of a turbo charged

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>effect to some of the optimism that we heard a

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>couple months ago about the euro Maybe things have gotten

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>so bad they can't get any worse.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 6>Do you lean into that?

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just with Europe but also with China

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>that if there is discussion and there is some semblance

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of deal making, then maybe that could actually reignite some

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of the growth in the rest of the world, not

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just the US.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 6>So at the start of the year we are very adamant.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 7>We call the geopolitical opportunities and risk, and I think

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 7>everyone talks about geopolitical risks.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 6>We felt there'd be some sort.

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 7>Of resolution this year in Ukraine, Russia, there'd be some

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 7>sort of resolution with Iran Israel. Those are going to

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 7>be very positive for those regions. I think Germany can

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 7>Actually this might help Germany out of the slump, especially

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 7>if Ukraine's given these dollar reserves to rebuild. Poland I

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 7>think is going to be a huge beneficiary of this.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 7>I think in the next few years you're going to

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 7>see Poland's importance grow more and more. And even when

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 7>Vance talks about pulling troops out of Germany, at least

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 7>in the past Trump administration, it was pulling troops out

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 7>of Germany and putting them in the Baltics, putting them

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 7>in Poland for two reasons. One closer to Russia, so

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 7>more important, and two this goes back to Trump. Having

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 7>a US military base in your country provides huge economic

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 7>benefits to that country. Right, the military spends money, the

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 7>people there spend money. So if Germany's not spending their

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 7>three percent, let's give it to the Baltics who are

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 7>spending their three percent. Let's give it to Poland, who's

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 7>done a lot. So I think there's going to be

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 7>a lot of you know, thought about this and it's

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 7>not simplistic.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that maybe then the long dollar trade

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is crowded because right now what we're seeing is actually

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a push towards the rest of the world. Gets your

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>house in order.

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 7>Yes, So I would say right now the portfolio we're

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 7>recommending people is very contrayan. But we still like despite

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 7>all the friction that we see with China, despite China

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 7>as national security threat number one, FXI and k web

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 7>By thinking you're going to continue to do to well,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 7>they're heavily under owned.

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 6>China's trying to do its own thing.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 7>Trump seems to back off and then periodically I think

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 7>that could explode higher. I like European stocks, and I

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 7>do like the chip makers in the US, but I

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 7>like the ones that can be domestic chip makers. I

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 7>think you're seeing more and more of this. We've been

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>talking about it since day one of Trump. He wants

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 7>a domestic chip industry. We need to be able to

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 7>make chips. That's going to be part of national security.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that's just starting to take off. And we've

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 7>seen some single stock reactions this week that I think

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 7>are just the beginning of what can come.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 5>Everything you're saying to me, I keep thinking Trump is

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 5>very transactional, this nuance, this idea of pulling troops out

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 5>of Germany, but not to pull them out of Europe,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 5>but put them in the Baltics. Isn't that what the

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Europeans are Going back to Jonathan's point, Trump yesterday saying

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 5>he liked to see Putin back at the table to

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 5>the G eight. Well, Russia was kicked out because of

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 5>annexation illegal annexation of Crimea. At the same time Germany

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 5>was still willing to build Lord Stream too years later.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and one thing I would say, there's I think

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 7>one thing. Europe's getting a little bit ahead of itself.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't think Russia is coming back to deliver cheap

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 7>gas to Germany anytime soon.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 6>I think Russia's really moved on.

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 7>They're like, well, China's going to be a better customer,

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 7>India is going to be a better customer. They're both

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 7>going to be buying fossil fuels for fifty year in

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 7>the future. Germany wakes up every day saying we're not

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 7>going to use fossil fuels ever again, and then uses

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 7>fossil fuels. So I don't think you're going to see this,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, return to what it was. That switch has

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 7>been broken. It's not coming back. I think the US

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 7>has a better chance of establishing relationships with this And

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 7>the other thing I think.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 6>You pointed out earlier is tariffs.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Trump is going to be carrot and stick with everyone.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 7>Here's what you get if you behave nicely.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 6>Here's what you know.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 7>And that may work, it may backfire. That's going to

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 7>be the big question.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 5>So right now, what do you think he wants his

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 5>major concessions when it comes to teriffs.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 7>I think he does want something that allows us manufacturing

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 7>to grow, something that makes it easier to build things here.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 7>And of all things we look at, I think the

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 7>one he's most committed to and the one where we

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 7>might get subsidies is the chip industry. I think everything

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 7>else would be nice. I think that's a must have.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 7>And so when you think about must haves, it's the

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 7>chip industry.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>You said, the GI who said it would be the GI.

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 5>You're thinking Canada gets kicked out because they'll be part

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 5>of the fifty first state, so.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Then it's still the G seven.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 4>Just stand up in minded.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 6>I know that's what you're thinking.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 5>If you said it to me yesterday.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 2>The pressure was building into these comforts again on Canada yesterday,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't it.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 6>What's that all about?

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 7>I think again that's why I found what he says

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 7>about Canada, for example, versus what he did on your

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 7>global tariffs so interesting. So if you're Canada in Mexico

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 7>right now or even some extent China, you're still facing

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 7>the first round of tariffs and your fentanyl negotiations. Then

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 7>you got slapped with twenty five percent on aluminum steel,

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 7>and now there's this vague talk about reciprocals and what

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 7>are you even negotiating now? I think his message was

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 7>too muddled yesterday. I think markets took it comfortably because Okay,

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 7>this isn't going anywhere. I think that's where he gets

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 7>disappointed in the next few days, when people don't show

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 7>up to kiss the ring, don't come saying, hey, President Trump,

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 7>what do.

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 6>We need to do?

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 7>And that's when I think he ups the rhetoric because

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 7>he does want people to come to the table. I

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 7>just don't think yesterday's message brings people to the table.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Right now, the marcut's not taking a seriously, that's for Showupay,

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 2>it's going to say as a wis pit a chair

0:14:49.280 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that academy, let's get you to I love Oshatagas who

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 2>joins us now, Janet, I think a tough question. What

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>do you say to clients at the moment? Who asks you, Jeanette,

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>what do you think is going to happen on April first?

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>What'd you tell them?

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 6>So?

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 8>I think the one thing that we've noticed is that

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 8>it is important to have a difference between tariffs on

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 8>China and tariffs on the rest of the world. We

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 8>have noticed that Trump has proposed tariffs several times and

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 8>in the beginning for four weeks of his administration, but

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 8>only the tariffs on China the additional ten percent, have

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 8>actually gone into effect. Everything else seems to be up

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 8>for negotiation. So we did have Canada and Mexico already negotiate,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 8>We had Columbia already negotiate. They're setting up a timeframe

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 8>saying you have basically until April first to start making

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 8>some offers. Obviously, you had Prime Minister Mody coming into

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 8>Washington yesterday. He came ready to offer some things to

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 8>Trump to try to fix that reciprocal trade relationship with

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 8>the US. And also the fact that these tariffs were

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 8>announced while jd. Vance is in Europe for the Munich

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 8>Security Conference is also important to try to say Europe,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 8>you need to do something to change the relationship with

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 8>the United States.

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, Janette, we do have the head of the European

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Parliament Trade Committee saying that they're willing to lower the

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 5>tariff when it comes to autos. What else could Europe

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 5>give the United States in terms of concessions in these negotiations.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 8>So I think definitely the autos has been a thorn

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 8>in Trump's side for quite some time. So getting that

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 8>rate down from ten percent to closer to two point

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 8>five and matching the US rate would be quite important. Obviously,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 8>US l G has also been really important during the

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 8>entire Ukraine conflict. I think that Trump is definitely looking

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 8>for Europe to buy and more US LERG and then

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 8>also defense. So I think one of the things that

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 8>plays into Trump talking about lowering US defense spending is

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 8>also having other countries, including India, including Europe, buy more

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 8>US defense products and equipment, and so that I think

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 8>also kind of goes into this piece where they're trying

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 8>to get Europe to pay more for its own defense

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 8>and be less reliant on the United States, but still

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 8>purchase more things from the U States.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Jane, We've been speculating about some of these proposals for

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a while. What specifically did we learn yesterday from a

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>proposal that was really light in details.

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 8>So I think the point is is that this could

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 8>also be One of the things that I thought was

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 8>very interesting is that Trump did say this might be

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 8>somewhat of a replacement for his universal tariff that he

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 8>proposed to do a ten percent tariff on all countries.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 8>This is a way that they have a new trade

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 8>law that they're using. It's not busy, it's an old

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 8>trade law that hasn't been used, but that's where they're

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 8>looking to actually apply this. But it's saying that this

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 8>is also more of a one on one basis, saying

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 8>that whatever that country's tariff rate on the US is,

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 8>if they lower it, that is an ability to avoid

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 8>the tariffs or to change other non tariff barriers that

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 8>are impeding US trade. So it shows that there's actually

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 8>a lot of room for negotiation for changes to avoid

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 8>these terraffs from going into effect, and also shows that

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 8>it could be done a more one on one basis

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 8>rather than a broad universal tariff. I think Trump is

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 8>really trying to focus on countries with which the US

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 8>has large trade deficits. Those are countries like China, Mexico, Vietnam, Japan,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 8>South Korea, Thailand. Those are really probably where he's going

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 8>to be focused India as well, actually, but those are

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 8>whereas going to be focused on, and then he can

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 8>kind of move on to other countries. But I think

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 8>that is kind of what we saw is a little

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 8>bit of a change there where you see it could

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 8>be a little bit less broad in the sense of

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 8>going after the entire all imports coming into the United States,

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 8>but also still shows that there is this room for negotiation.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, Marcus are taking this as an idea that

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe this president doesn't want tariffs for tariff's sake to

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>raise money. Do you think it's fair to discount that

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point?

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 8>So I think he does want tariffs for the revenue purposes, obviously,

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 8>the Congress does have to pass a large text bill.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 8>Congress is not going to legislate on tariffs, but having

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 8>that revenue come into the treasury is certainly something that

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 8>he could point to to say that this is not

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 8>going to cost as much as it has been perceived,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 8>especially when we're looking at the deficit concerns, particularly coming

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 8>out of the House Conservatives. But I do also think

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 8>that it's not that he wants to necessarily have terariffs

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 8>in place just to have terarifs in place. He wants changes.

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 8>He wants other countries to make changes that are more

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 8>beneficial to the United States, saying repeatedly that he thinks

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 8>that the US has been treated poorly, and I think

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 8>that is more ultimately his goal.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Jenette appreciate the update. Thank you Janeto as statiguus joining

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>us around the time. Well, Lindsay, pix a stainful. A

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of headwinds have held bad the consumer consumer

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 2>centima we've seen that be hit in the last month

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 2>or so. Is it hurting spending?

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, clearly, I think this number really starts to poke

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 9>some of the holes into the thesis that we see

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 9>this ongoing resilience of the consumer. Now, broadly speaking, we

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 9>continue to see the consumer spend in the marketplace on

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 9>goods and services, but it's that loss of momentum. It's

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 9>that second derivative decline of the consumer slowing the pace

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 9>of still positive expenditures. Now, Lisa, as you pointed out,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 9>a lot of this weakness is offset by earlier upward

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 9>revisions to prior months. That being said, they're clearly still

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 9>challenges facing the consumer in this environment of higher prices,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 9>higher borrowing costs, the resumption of student debt payments. There's

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 9>still a lot of challenges facing the average American and

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 9>the average household balance shape.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're whipsawd in terms of a narrative

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>every day. One day it's weakness that potentially could be

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest headwind to the market this year. The other

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be inflationary in an upwoard growth shock.

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 6>Which is it, well, I think it goes together.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 9>I think inflation is one of the biggest challenges that

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing way on consumers at this point. As consumers

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 9>are forced to face this burden of elevated prices as

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 9>they have been for years, that's going to continue to

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 9>erode their ability to spend in the marketplace. Now we've

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 9>seen consumers turn to many of these one off scenarios

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 9>by now pay later turning to credit cards with balances

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 9>over now one point two trillion dollars. But as that

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 9>burden continues to increase, that's going to ameliorate their ability

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 9>to find these additional supplements to continue to spend at

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 9>this pace. So we've gone from double digit spending down

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 9>to eight, down to six. We're now averaging just under

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 9>three percent since the start of twenty twenty three. That's

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 9>still indicative of a solid two percent GDP pace, but

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 9>if we slow further from here, that could start to

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 9>add to the momentum of a stagflation storyline.

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So the pushback that we get from the stagflation fears

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is if you actually look at the data inside of

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the inflation metrics, it's not that bad, and

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's steadily disinflationary, and it really just matters core PCEE,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, and everything else is just noise. Do

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you agree.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 9>I think we've seen a lot of improvement from earlier

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 9>peak levels. I don't want to throw cold water on

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 9>the improvement that we've seen, but we are not in

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 9>a clear disinflationary environment at this point as of last year,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 9>a lot of noise, a lot of volatility in the metrics,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 9>and more recently we've seen not just a move sideways,

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 9>but upward acceleration for four consecutive months in the PPI

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 9>and the CPI and some of the core metrics. The

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 9>supercore CPI housing alone double the two percent target. So

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 9>with that acceleration, we expect the PC and the core

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 9>PC to remain closer to two and a half percent,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 9>which still perpetuates the concern then of choking off upside

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 9>potential for growth.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We're dominated by headlines about policy changes that could be

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>coming down the pike, and we are awaiting a discussion

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>from JD. Vance And I'm wondering, from your perspective, how

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>quickly some of what's being discussed percolate into the economic

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>data and backdrop that you're seeing.

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, it can certainly add to the uncertainty in the marketplace.

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 9>It can add to the uncertainty we see in consumer confidence,

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 9>and I think that was in good part behind that

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 9>drop that we saw at the start of the year.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 9>But in terms of filtering into the actual price data

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 9>that I think will be extended out probably about six

0:22:56.040 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 9>months or so because businesses have already responded in anticipate

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 9>of those tariffs, of those higher prices, so a lot

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 9>of that inventory build has already been taken into account.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 9>So we're not going to see that filter into the

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 9>price metrics for some time, but again it will continue

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 9>to cause near term volatility and uncertainty.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Lindsay, it's great to catch up with you, as always,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 2>very Lindsaypix of there as Steve Fuller. This is the

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics, angiopolitics.

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>You can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV weekday

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 2>mornings from six am to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen,

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and as always, on the bloom Blog terminal and the

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app