WEBVTT - Kohl’s Skyrockets as Stock Becomes Traders’ Latest Meme Darling 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Holes their shares surge as much as one hundred and

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>five percent in early trading. Now there's shares, well, they're

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 2>about thirty six percent. It's just a record move. A

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of mentions by retail traders on social media. Let's

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>bring in someone who knows a little bit more about this.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Mary Ross Gilbert. She's Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>equity analyst covering all things retail. So Mary, can you

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>tell us is this a meme stock?

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's acting like a memestock, that's for sure, Lisa.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>And as you pointed out, it was on social media,

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>it looked like midday yesterday there was a post saying

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>showing a Bloomberg chart and showing the short interest and

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the number of shares or the

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>shares borrowed versus the total float, it was about forty

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 3>nine percent, which is pretty high. And it's near a

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>historic high at least over the last couple of years,

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>and so the post sort of circled that and then

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>it identified and noted, hey, how can you be short

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>this stock and sleep well at night? And then apparently

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 3>that kind of triggered other posts throughout I guess into

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the evening yesterday, and so of course in pre market,

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, we saw the share surge, as you pointed out,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 3>over two hundred over one hundred percent, and you know

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 3>yesterday the stock was up about eight percent. We saw

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 3>retail stocks on the move yesterday as well, and so

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>it could be you know, as one of your earlier

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 3>commendators commendators discussed, you know, with such a strong market overall,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>this is a sector that has been beaten down largely

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>with tariffs and then of course with execution issues. When

0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Coals, Mary, has a company said anything either at last

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.279
<v Speaker 4>evening or today in response to the stock movement?

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not, there is There are no releases from the company.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, is this something? I mean, what are

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>you hearing from you know, the clients that you talked to,

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>institutional investors that you talked to, how are they are

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 4>they selling into this? What are they doing.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not hearing anyone discussing exactly what their activity is,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>but you can imagine that there's probably a fair amount

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>of hedge funds involved. And so when you think about it,

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 3>the company is highly levered. They have bonds, and hedge

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>funds typically will take a position, let's say, in certain bonds,

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>and then they'll go short the stock. So I think

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>we do have some some of that activity and that's

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>how they're positioned. And of course, you know there could

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 3>have been a short squeeze that was triggered with this activity.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 3>This is usually what we'll see in a situation like this,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's kind of what we're seeing in

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>the activity and the shares.

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>And Mary before all of this news came out, How

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>was the stock doing before?

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 4>How is Cole's performing before all this?

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's been atrocious. I mean, this spot is so

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>you can look at three years, two years, five years,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>year to date, and the stock has been off significantly

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 3>and that's due to falling revenues. I mean, if you

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 3>look at the revenues over the last few years, it's

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>down over two billion dollars. And really, when you look

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>at the core business it's down even more. And that's

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>even with adding you know, one point eight billion in

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>revenues from so fora So it shows that there is

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>trouble in the core business. And of course they've rotated

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>through several CEOs and they're on an interim CEO as

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>they hunt for a permanent their fifth CEO and just

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>over two years.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, geez all right, Mary, that's that explains it all.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Mary Roskilbert, thank you so much for joining us. Mary Roskilbert.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 4>There's the retailers for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based out there

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 4>in our Los Angeles euro.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>General Motors. That's where we went to get to it

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>took a big hit from President Trump's tariffs. Are you

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 2>ready for this, Paul Okay? One point one billion dollar

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>profit hit. So what kind of impact is that going

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>to have for the company. Well, we want to hear

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 2>from the expert about all this, So let's find out,

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and let's go to David Wells. He's Bloomberg Detroit bureau chief.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 2>He's joining us live from Detroit. So, David, were you

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>surprised with that figure one point one billion dollars? I mean,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>we heard from Stalantis too, kind of saying something similar yesterday.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>No, not surprised at all. GM said they were going

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 5>to take a four to five billion dollar hit, or

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 5>that they had forty five billion dollars in exposure this

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 5>year to tariffs and then they would only be able

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 5>to offset about thirty percent of it, and the measures

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 5>they're using talk set that you really won't see to

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 5>the second half. I thought there would be a pretty

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 5>big hit to it. I don't think the street was

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 5>surprised either, because the forecast for GM's earnings were for

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 5>a pretty big drop off of the second quarter of

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 5>last year. Already, GM did better than that because they

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 5>did have some things, better profits in China than we

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 5>saw a year ago and better sales in the US

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 5>that helped them. But overall, a pretty tough quarter, and

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 5>it really shows that the car companies are going to

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 5>have a tough time getting anything close to pre tariff

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 5>profits going forward, because there's just no easy way to

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 5>get around them.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, is what we're to take away from

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 4>the Stalantis numbers yesterday and the GM numbers today is

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 4>that the autumn manufacturers, for whatever reason, maybe they're just

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>not able to or they chose not to pass along

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 4>the bulk of their cost increases to consumers. Is at

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 4>a policy or is that just an economic reality?

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 5>It's an economic reality. And look Stoantis has a lot

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 5>of other issues. You know, they're going to do some

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 5>pretty heavy restructuring, which they talked about yesterday. But look,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 5>we're at a period right now. We're interest rates are

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 5>at pretty high levels. You have historically not record but

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 5>pretty close to record new vehicle prices in the US

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 5>right now, average monthly payment well over seven hundred hours

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 5>a month. We have a record number of people I

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 5>think paying more than one thousand dollars a month for

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 5>their monthly payment. Cars are expensive, so you know, you

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 5>can go out there and say, hey, I'm going to

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 5>pass this tariff cost on to consumers or even some

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 5>of it, but if consumers don't pay it, then you

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 5>just lose the sales. And you haven't seen huge price increases,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 5>You've seen small and you've seen companies sneak in, you know,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 5>some bigger fees for transporting the vehicle for example, things

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 5>like that. But it's just not they just don't really

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 5>have the ability to push in big price increases to

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 5>you know, to pass on. In GM's case, a billion

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 5>dollars worth of tariffs in a quarter.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just terrors. What else affected profits for GM?

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how's their inventory for electric vehicles?

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 5>They built that up in the quarter, and since the

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 5>vehicles lose money, they have to count for that. That

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 5>that them I think it was six hundred million dollars

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 5>in the quarter they had three hundred million. Because they've

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 5>had a big engine recalls, they've had higher warranty costs.

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't just because of that recall. They've had other

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 5>issues and they're working on that. Some of it. Some

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 5>of these quality issues you're seeing that are costing companies

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 5>more in warranty and recall type costs are all the

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 5>software that goes into electric vehicles. These are kind of

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 5>first times out with new software, new infotainment systems, power

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 5>management systems in these vehicles, and it's just tough for

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 5>them to go out there and not be buggy, right,

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, think about how many times there's something on

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 5>your smartphone that you know needs an update, and fixing

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 5>that with the cars is often more expensive. So some

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 5>of it was related to that. And actually, you know,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 5>they saw pricing go down with some of their fleet customers.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of competition out there for the for

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 5>the corporate and fleet business, and they actually saw some

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 5>downward price pressure there too, and that cost them a

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 5>couple one hundred million dollars. So a lot of things

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 5>in the quarter that pushed profits down. But tariffs are

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 5>the real story.

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Here, David. You're out there in Detroit. You live and

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>breathe this stuff every day. What's the feeling in Detroit

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 4>as it relates to this evolution to evs? And how

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 4>will the tariff and the tariff impact on profitability? Is

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 4>that going to slow this down even more? Do you think?

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I do?

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 5>I think everything that Trump administration is doing is really

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 5>going to slow the ev transition. First of all, you know,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 5>the obvious one is there. It comes September, they're going

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 5>to be getting rid of the seventy five hundred dollars

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 5>tax break for qualifying electric vehicles. But you know, with tariffs,

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 5>you've got battery components, electronic components, wiring harnesses. There's more

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 5>wiring in an EV than in a conventional vehicle. All

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 5>that stuff adds to the cost of vehicles that already

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 5>lose money. Some of them are actually built overseas. In

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.599
<v Speaker 5>the case of Hyundai, they make some of theirs overseas.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>GM makes a couple of it's evs in Mexico. They

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 5>do qualify for US MCA, but there are still some

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 5>parts component tariffs that they can be hit with on

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 5>some of these vehicles.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 4>And so.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 5>You add costs to vehicles that are already pretty expensive,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 5>and you can't pass it on. If you do, even

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 5>fewer people will buy them. Companies may have less incentive

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 5>to build and sell them if they lose even more

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 5>money on these, So that's going to hurt as well.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 5>And then, of course Trump's rhetoric for people who are

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 5>politically right of center and pretty far right is that

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, evs are a dumb purchase and they don't

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 5>work for you, and I think that hurts sales as well.

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 5>So all of this is just not good for the

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 5>momentum that EV's had in the US before Trump got

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>in office.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, David, last month, the company said it would

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>shift some production to the US from Mexico. So what

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>other changes can we expect to see from the company,

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 2>like in the last minute or so we have left.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think you'll see them try to bring more parts,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 5>more of the parts they buy into the US, so

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 5>they'll be encouraging their suppliers to do what they're doing.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Will just move some production to the United States, and

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 5>that'll take time, and you know, you may see them

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 5>make some more production related news. What they've done is

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 5>pretty big, So I'm not anticipating any big announcements. But

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, as they look at this and they find

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 5>other ways to do it, you might see more vehicles,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 5>more parts built here in the US.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, David Wells, Bloomberg, Detroit ber Chief

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 2>talking about GM earnings and so much more.

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 4>I think GM right here. If you go GM Equity,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 4>FA just brings up the financial statements. Their net income

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 4>margin is five percent. Ok, that's it. They got like

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 4>no margin, no profit margin. Anything goes wrong for these

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 4>auto companies and they get screwed.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>You always say I never understand the auto company.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to, just don't get it. And oh,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 4>by the way, my top line splat. I mean, you know,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 4>I just it's a high margin. You will make up

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 4>a volume. I guess it's one of those business So

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 4>it's just a tough, tough business. And then you throw

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 4>on top of the TIFFs and then oh, by the way,

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 4>I have to change my entire industry that I built

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>up over the last hundred years to go electric. Yeah,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm invest in that. Yeah, I don't know.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>We got a shift production us to Mexico. It's never

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>ending from them.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>And we're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm Lisa Matteo alongside

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney, and we are in the thick of earning

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>season right among those companies today, one of them, Coca Cola,

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>beat on second quarter sales growth, profit. But it's another

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>headline that's getting some attention. They are launching a new

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>coke product that's made with cane sugar. So here to

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>tell us more about it is Candida Jay is Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Senior consumer products Analysts, Kenneth, thanks for joining us here

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>from Princeton. How much of an impact did the President

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>have on this decision from Coke?

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Hi, Lisa. Well, it's hard to say, but it

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 6>certainly is in sync with what Coca Cola has been

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 6>doing for a long time, and that is keeping its

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 6>pulse on what the consumer wants to do. It has

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of assets at its disposal, and a cane

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 6>sugar product is not novel to Coca Cola. I mean,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 6>it's produced it in the US largely more more outside

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 6>of the US, but in the US on a selected basis,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 6>So it's really just going to expand that. It may

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 6>have been prompted to a degree by the President's tweets

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 6>or whatever, but it's certainly in sync. Like I said,

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, there's a there's an audience out there that

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 6>prefers sugar based as opposed to high fructose cornci based

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 6>full calorie sodas, and they're going to play into that.

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 6>Most likely, it's going to be a brand Coke extension,

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 6>and it's going to be sell at a premium price

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 6>in selected markets to give it an aura of exclusivity.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm guessing to command those prices and so just theys

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 6>a little more excitement. It's it's one of many things

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 6>Coke is doing now on the innovation front.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>So from Coca Cola's economic perspective, do they care which

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 4>ingredient they use?

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, it depends, Paul, it depends if they can capture

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 6>the premium price they're going to you know, price it

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 6>at Kine. Shugar costs more than high frucos corns here.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, a corn is a heavily, heavily subsidized crop

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 6>in the US. They built their supply chain around HFCs

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 6>because of that, and most consumers early, you know, they

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 6>don't really notice the difference. Some do, but buy and large.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 6>You know, they've grown that franchise very well. But I

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 6>guess you know some tourists that go to Mexico and

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 6>they taste the sugar cane sugar coke down the air

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 6>and they say, you know what, this is really good,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 6>and they want to capture the same experience in the US.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to Chipotle today and they do offer the

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Mexican zoda there.

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 7>Can I give you the history of high fructose corn syrup.

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 7>It was in the nineteen seventies, with high inflation and

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 7>high sugar prices. President Nixon said, do something about this,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 7>and this guy said, well, we can make a sugary

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 7>tasting stuff from corn from American farmers and US high

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 7>fructose corn syrup, which most doctors say is like poison

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 7>to your system. There we go, thank.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Don taker with the value added there. Let me ask,

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 4>let me shift gears here. What is a ZIN patch?

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 6>A Zin patch? Do you want to patch it? I

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 6>think they made a pouch pouch. Zin pouch is a pouch,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's it's an oral tobacco product. Actually, Zin

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 6>doesn't even contain tobacco. It's a synthetic product. Its lads

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 6>with nicotine that is a facsimile for tobacco, which a

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 6>lot of people will say causes harm, and a lot

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 6>of people are right. So this is a product that

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, people can get their nicotine buzz in a

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, hands off kind of way, doesn't emit smoke,

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 6>doesn't offend your neighbor that you're working with, and it's

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 6>done really really well. So those are really the Zin

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 6>pouches that are doing really well.

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I thought it was Zinfindel. The line that's

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 4>no kidding, No, I that pouch so but I mean

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 4>it's it's big enough a business can that Philip mars

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 4>would would call it out.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, it is in it's about eight percent of

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 6>the sales, I believe at this point. But it's growing,

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, a twenty thirty percent rate, as opposed cigarettes

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 6>which are flat, if not down. But you know, Icoas

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 6>is their smoke free device segment, which is doing very well.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 6>But if the low large numbers at some point, that's

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 6>going to slow and Zen is filling the gap. They

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 6>keep the overall volumes in a positive trend. They price

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.239
<v Speaker 6>these things very high. There's not a lot of competition

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 6>in this space. So you know, one of the things

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 6>investors would say about the world of tobacco, because it's

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 6>so consolidated, they can pass on a very high pricing

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 6>and that's what really drives a top line and you

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 6>know the cash flows and so on. And Zen plays very,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 6>very very well into that model.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And how does it fair as far as we're hear

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>about e cigarettes vaping things like that, how has Philip

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Marris been doing competing with this category.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 6>So they have a product called viv which is their

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 6>e vapor product as opposed to what they call heat

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 6>not burn, which has actual tobacco in it, and they

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 6>would say as a more appealing alternative for smokers who

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 6>are trying to quit. It's a lower margin product. It's

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 6>kind of seen by Philip Morris as a kind of

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 6>an entry level product. If for those who are trying

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 6>to move away from combustible cigarettes, they can turn to

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 6>e cigarettes a low cost method, and their hope is that,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, even though it's a low margin product, their

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 6>hope is that they can get that consumer maybe some

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 6>at some point to trade up to their heat not

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 6>burn product, which is, you know, a more profitable product

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 6>for them.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, good stuff. I mean I learned about the

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 4>zin pouch today. How about it's not Zinfindel. Okay, all right,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 4>very good, so good stuff there, Ken Shay, thanks so much.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Ken covers all those consumer products at companies for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate getting a few minutes of this time.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Lis MITTEO, Paul Sweety, We're live here on Bloomberg Interactive

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Broker Studio. Let's talk about Lockheed Martin. Put out some

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 4>numbers disappointing here, took some losses here. Let's break it

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 4>down with will Lee Aerospace and Defense channels for Bloomberg Intelligence. Well,

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Lockheed Martin, I mean, they just do everything. What happened

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 4>in the quarter.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So, I mean if you look at the quarter

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 8>of the performance was modeled by this hefty one point

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 8>six billion dollars chart on program losses and then another

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 8>one hundred sixty nine million of other charges. There was

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 8>the end gap right off. I think that was around

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 8>like sixty sixty six.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's go back to the big one one point six billion,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:14.239
<v Speaker 4>So what's that for?

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 8>So out that one point six nine hundred and fifty

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 8>million is for for a classified aeronautics.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Program, so they can't tell us.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 6>They can't tell us what it is.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 8>But if it's something that big and it's been going on,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 8>and in fourth quarter they also recorded another four hundred

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 8>and forty million dollars or four hundred and seventy seven stop.

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Doing that program, then I don't know what they could

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 4>tell you, but then they have to kill you.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, given that it's a huge program and they're taking

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 8>over a billion dollars of charges, what could possibly be

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 8>so important so big and most likely is the A

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 8>name six generation ISR. What's IRR Intelligence surveillance reconstants, So

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 8>think of as the replacement for the SR seventy SRC.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Now we're talking SR seventy one to Okay, So.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 8>If you think about in that respect, Bowen has the

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 8>F forty seven, that's the sixth generator, sixth generation of

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 8>fighter jet. That's going to be the biggest sixth generation program.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 8>Navy wants their own sixth generation, the FAXX. I think

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 8>that Northrope has the inside tractor. When that given that

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 8>Dood doesn't want to make the same mistake that I

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 8>made with F thirty five, given lot UH with F

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 8>three five F twenty two, given Lockie both control of

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 8>the fifth generation fighters, so they break up into multiple

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 8>defense contractors and have more resilient industrial base. So in

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 8>that with that mindset, Bowen has F forty seven UH,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 8>Northrope pass the FAXX, and Lockie could potentially have the

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 8>sixth generation reconnaissance aircraft.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>So what all those numbers that my son would be

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>having a field day with this conversation right now. He

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 2>is so into this is this typical of defense contracting environment?

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean growth is marginal there, you were mentoring a

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 2>number of numbers before.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 8>Is this typical? I mean to this large extent, this

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 8>is sort of unusual. I mean they've locky teased that

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 8>they were going to they were looking at additional charges

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 8>after the quarter. They didn't mention or indicate how large

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 8>that magnitude was. So this sort of caught the street

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 8>by surprise the size of it. But I mean, I

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 8>think it just shows that this is a key program

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 8>that's that's going to keep going for But even if

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 8>you just strip out all the charges from the quarter

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 8>and you look at the underlying performance, the performance actually

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 8>was not bad. In second quarter, Aeron ONLYYX grew seven

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 8>percent on high F thirty five volumes and the F

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 8>thirty five, and they also took up the the prop

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 8>a cumulative profit booking rates on the F thirty five

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 8>in the quarter, and the Missile and fire control segment

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 8>it grew eleven percent on strong demand on tactical and

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 8>strike missiles. So you're talking about the jazzm the JASM

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 8>air to service missile, the Lorasm anti ship missiles, and

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 8>the gimblers that are used on the High Mars those

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 8>are those are rockets that we've been sending over to

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 8>Ukraine are.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 4>So I'm looking at the comps. They're all trading up

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 4>on the year. Defense contractors stocks are doing great this year,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 4>with the exception of Lockey Martin it's down eleven percent

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 4>year to date. What helpout that well?

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the biggest headwind is the F thirty five

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 8>you have F thirty five is the news you have

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 8>talks of why do we need to have F thirty five?

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 8>In the fiscal twenty six budget requests the Air Force.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 8>The Air Force cut the number of F thirty fives

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 8>to twenty four and that's down from forty four, So

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 8>across the board, I think that's the biggest headwind on

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 8>Lockie and the fact that you're not seeing you're not

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 8>seeing that more. You're you're seeing flat revenues and no

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 8>real margin improvement. So I think those are the two

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 8>big headwinds.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can you get into that a little bit more

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 2>like RTX Corp North or Grumman, Like, what are they

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>doing better? That that that lockade isn't well.

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 8>I mean our stuff with north by their lever to

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 8>the b TOY one program and the Sentinel. So with

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 8>the b TY one, you're here in talks of the

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 8>Air Force looking to accelerate production and more quantities. And

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 8>that program right now is in this e M D

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 8>phase Engine Engineering Manufacturing development. So think of as sort

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 8>of this is still in the development low rate production phase,

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 8>but then it's going to transition to a production phase,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 8>and when it goes to a production phase, you can

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 8>see potentially higher quantities. At Northrop talk to that on

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 8>their earnings called this morning saying that we're in discussions

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 8>with the Air Force and if we increase the production rate,

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 8>we might have to take additional we might have to

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 8>make additional investments, which means I had went to to earnings.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 8>But at the same time they could potentially realize profit

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 8>on these low rate initial production lots and not to

0:22:55.119 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 8>exceed subsequent follower production, whereas before they were expecting no

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 8>profits on the l RIP phase and some profit on

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 8>the next NTE phase.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 4>All Right, it just seems like it's good to be

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 4>in the defense business. It seems like, you know, we

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 4>spend money on the defense ear in and you're at Lockey.

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Martin had a tough day today. It is down six percent.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 4>LMT is the ticker will Thanks so much for joining

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 4>us A will Lee Aerospace Defense sanels for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 4>breaking down the LMT data here.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal