WEBVTT - Coinbase CEO Weighs In and Twilio Launches CustomerAI

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where innovation, money and power Collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>We're standing by for a special conversation with the coinbas

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>CEO Brian Armstrong.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 4>Interesting you did and how far do you think you're

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 4>going to have to go here?

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, this was not unexpected. You know, we've been

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 5>in discussion with the SEC for a long long time,

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 5>even going back.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 6>To before we were a public company.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 5>We started sharing with them how we operate our business,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 5>how we list assets on the platform, how we think

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 5>about our staking program, and through a large number of

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 5>allogs back and forth, they allowed us to become a

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 5>public company. You know, we had many discussions with them

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 5>in the last year when their tones started to change

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 5>and they started to come to us with more questions

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 5>about the business.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 6>So we were very forthcoming.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 5>We met with them probably thirty times over the last year,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 5>and we started to kind of ask them for feedback

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 5>and we said, you know, we would like there to

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 5>be a robust market in the US to trade crypto securities.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Of the thousand plus assets we've reviewed today, we've rejected

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 5>ninety percent of them, the ones we we believer our commodities.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 5>What feedback do you have for this for us? How

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 5>can we come in and register? How can we work together?

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 5>And unfortunately we were met with silence. We really got

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 5>no feedback in those thirty meetings. The first meeting where

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 5>they were scheduled to come and give us feedback, they

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 5>canceled it a few days before that, and then we

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 5>got a wells notice a few days after that.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 6>So it's really unfortunate.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 5>We work with regulators all over the world, other regulators

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.559
<v Speaker 5>here in the US. I think I'm a reasonable person

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 5>to get along with. But unfortunately the SEC and you know,

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 5>this chair has taken a regulation by enforcement approach instead

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 5>of creating a clear rule book in the US that

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 5>can allow this industry to be built in a safe

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 5>and trusted way.

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 4>You know, when was the last time you personally met

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 4>with Gary Gensler and what did you say?

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 5>So, when he first came in as the chair, I

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 5>flew out to New York. I reached out to him.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 5>Our team has reached out. I tried to make an

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 5>effort to connect with him in person, because that's what

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 5>I try to do whenever a new regulator kind of

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 5>comes in. Unfortunately, we were not able to connect at

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 5>that time. I'm not sure why we couldn't get on

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 5>his calendar, and we followed up a few times in

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 5>the year after that. We eventually got a meeting that

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 5>was virtual. You know, it may have been COVID related

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 5>or something like that, but we were able to get

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 5>a virtual meeting. But unfortunately, it was frankly like a

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 5>pretty icy reception. I would say, you know, we sort

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 5>of came in hat in hand and said, hey, Chair Gensler,

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 5>you know you've asked people to come in and register respectfully,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 5>we're here to register. What would you like us to do?

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 5>What process would you like us to go through? And

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 5>his response was, you know, talk to your lawyer. I'm

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 5>not here to advise you. And that was kind of

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 5>how the conversation started.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 6>And so and at that point, you know, we realized

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 6>there was a gap.

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, we felt like this was an important technology

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 5>that we felt needed to be built in a safe

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 5>and trusted way here in the US, in a way

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 5>that consumers were protected, and I don't know what his

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 5>motivations or you know, his personal views were, but it

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 5>didn't seem like he was on the same page.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 4>So what does this mean for you if the government

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 4>cracks down so hard on crypto on coinbase SEC? Does

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 4>coinbase exist in five years?

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely? We do.

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 5>And I want to make an important point, which is

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 5>that the SEC chair may have a certain point of view,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 5>but that's not representative of the whole US government.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 6>In fact, quite the opposite.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 5>I would say the SEC chair is as a bit

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 5>of a really an outlier here kind of in the

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 5>US government. So when I meet with members of Congress,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 5>I think the broad consensus probably amongst eighty percent of

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 5>people I talked to both sides of the aisle, it's

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 5>a pretty it's a pretty reasonable view they have, which is,

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 5>we don't know exactly what this technology is going to become,

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 5>but we're seeing every other major financial hub in the

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 5>world move towards clear legislation. We need to make sure

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 5>that this innovation happens in the US in a way

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 5>that again, let's just protect consumers. Let's apply some basic

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 5>good ideas around AMLKYC and audited financial statements and make

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 5>sure there's no wash trading let's create a clear market

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 5>structure where you know, businesses can understand which is CFTC, SEC,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 5>who should they talk to about which types of assets?

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 5>So Congress is recognizing this, and the White House is

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 6>Actually, the Biden.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Administration put out in an executive order about a year

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 5>ago kind of asking all the branches of government to

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 5>sort of say, get your act together on crypto. We

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 5>don't there's some risks, but there's some real important opportunities

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 5>with this technology.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 6>Let's create a clear regulatory framework.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Will you fight this all the way to the Supreme Court?

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you think you'll have to? And do you have

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 4>the financial resources to do that?

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? So, even if this takes some time, you know,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 6>that's okay.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 5>We've so in Q one we were adjusted a bit

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 5>of positive as a company, even in the depth of

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 5>this crypto bear market, if you want to call it that.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 5>We have over five billion dollars a balance on the

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 5>balance sheet, right So, and frankly, even though that this

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 5>complaint came in from the SEC, it's really business as

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 5>usual today.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 5>We're continuing to trade the assets that we have on

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 5>our platform.

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, we trade over two hundred assets on our platform.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 5>The sec complaint mentioned just thirteen of them, so a

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 5>relatively small percentage of the assets we trade. We also

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 5>have business overseas in other countries. We arrive a lot

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 5>of revenue from other sources that are not related to

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>trading feed So you know, coinbase is well capitalized and

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 5>adjusted a bit a positive and Q one, I think

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 5>we're going to be fine going to court. In fact,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 5>it's a relatively small portion of our company that you know,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 5>we have a great legal team, policy team, et cetera

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 5>that's working on this. And what I really want, you know,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 5>ninety ninety five percent of the company to be focused

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 5>on is just building great products for our customers and

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 5>making sure we don't lose.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 6>Sight of that.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 5>And so this is a very serious matter that I'm

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 5>going to work on with a couple of our executives,

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 5>But really the vast majority of the company needs to

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 5>keep building because that's how this technology is going to

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 5>ultimately benefit a billion people hopefully.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 4>How long does the regulatory overhang last? The reality is

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 4>this could take many, many months. And do you think

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 4>that your investors might lose some faith or even your

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 4>customers while you go through this?

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, look This is not a new concept, right,

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 5>There's been lots of discussion. The SEC has had rhetoric

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 5>around this for several years that I think has influenced

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 5>the market. And so the investors in coinbase are comfortable

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 5>with that if they're because it's all public, right and

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 5>it's not like some secret thing that's being revealed, and

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 5>I think they're taking a long term view that Coinbase

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 5>is a very different company.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 6>We're kind of an end of one, right.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 5>We're really the only company that was based here in

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 5>the US that went public that has audited financial statements

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 5>that's taken a compliance first approach. You know, even in

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 5>this recent SEC complaint by the way that came out yesterday,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 5>it was unfortunate they sort of did it back to

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 5>back with another complaint that went out there, and you

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 5>know that may have been intentional to try to conflate

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the two, but I think people are smarter than that

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 5>and they recognize that. You know, this complaint against Coinbase,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 5>there were no allegations, no allegations of misappropriation of customer funds,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 5>There was no allegations of wash trading. You know, myself

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 5>and the executive team were not named personally. It's really

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 5>debating this more technical legal question of are some of

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 5>these assets commodities or are they securities? And I think

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 5>that's something the court will have to decide to sort

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 5>of get some legal press, some case law out there

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 5>which will ultimately benefit us, because that's what we've been

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 5>asking the sec for for a long time, is how

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 5>do we get more clarity? So if we need to

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 5>go to the courts to do it, it's not our

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 5>first choice. We'd rather the regular had just published a

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 5>clear rule book. But if they're not going to do that,

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 5>the courts are there in the US to available ourselves

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 5>of So part.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Of this was about securities being registered or not in

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 4>terms of how they're listed on your exchange, But part

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 4>of this was about staking also, So staking obviously is

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 4>becoming a more important part of the crypto ecosystem. Do

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 4>you plan, based on how the regulators are treating staking

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 4>to wind down your staking service?

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 5>No, we're not going to wind down our staking service. Again,

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 5>as these court cases play out, it's really business as usual.

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 6>We're going to continue to operate that.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, snake staking only represents about three percent of

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 5>our net revenue, but it is a it's a very

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 5>important function in the crypto community, and it serves an

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 5>important part of these decentralized blockchains. And I guess I

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 5>should mention also that you know, coin basis staking product

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 5>is architected and built in a way to be compliant,

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 5>and we've actually think it's materially different than some of

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 5>the other ones out there which have been called staking.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 5>And so yeah, we're going to continue to operate our

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 5>staking business.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 4>So if users wanted their funds back in the staking

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 4>service at this point in time, does coinbase have the

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 4>ability to service that at scale in case that there

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 4>is a larger run on the staking business.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So you know, staking is really something that's a

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 5>decentralized part part of these decentralized protocols. So Coinbase is

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 5>really just you know, it's a pass through mechanism. We're

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 5>helping people access these decentralized protocols. So some of the

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 5>decentralized protocols have, for instance, like a lock up period

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 5>of you know, some number of days when you initiate

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 5>the withdrawal request, and so we're just making that kind

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 5>of information available to the customer. But it's yeah, you know,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 5>all the the funds are there back to one to

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 5>one that when you're when you're staking something, it's being

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 5>pledged into these these decentralized protocols, and we actually don't

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 5>even have the ability to you know, move it somewhere

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 5>else at that point. It's we're just giving people access

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 5>to these decentralized protocols.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 4>So the business face withdrawals, does that have a material

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 4>impact on Ethereum's price? And how does cliinbase prepare for

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 4>something like that? What do you mean is there kind

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 4>of a broader run that you have to be prepared for.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, okay, so in our business, we're we're not

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 5>a bank, right, we don't do fraction reserve, and so

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 5>there's not really this concept of a run, right, all

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 5>the all the funds are there back to one to one,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 5>and you don't have to take our word for it.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, are as a public company, we have auditors

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 5>Deloitte in this case, who's gone in and verified all

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 5>of that. You can kind of confirm it in our

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 5>financial statement. So you know, if people want to withdraw funds,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 5>they one hundred percent of it is there.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 6>There's no such thing as a run.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Really, So how do you answer the question of you know,

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 4>on one hand, there is sec that is, you know,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 4>causing a big overhand in terms of both you guys

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and the industry. On the other hand, just financially, you know,

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 4>rates are higher in the United States, people are more

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 4>inclined to keep their money in a bank. Why should

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 4>they keep their money with you?

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, what's interesting in crypto there's been the evolution of

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 5>something called stable coins, right, and so we're actually in

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>consort with another company in Circle in the space. We've

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 5>we've created a USD coin, which is the second largest

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 5>stable coin out there. And as you've mentioned, interest rates

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 5>in this environment, that's been both a good source of

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 5>revenue for US, but it's also something that we've passed

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 5>along to customers, so customers can actually earn rewards on

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 5>USDC and get access to some of these higher interestrate environments.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Brought a question not just about coinbase, but about the industry.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 4>As you know, more regulatory enforcement actions come to the forefront,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 4>how much of an overhang do you think that will

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 4>have on crypto pricing.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's hard for me to say.

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 5>It was actually kind of surprising yesterday with this complaint

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 5>that came out, crypto was up, which I would not

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 5>have expected.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 6>So I don't know what to make of that.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if it means that people knew something

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 5>was coming but they expected it to be worse than

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 5>it actually was, or if they just felt that, you know,

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 5>they're they're still a believer in it or something. But

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, I don't try to predict what's going to

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>happen in these markets. You know, we don't operate ahead

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 5>fund or anything like that. We just want to provide

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 5>a good service to our customers around the exchange and

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 5>all the products we offer.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Before I let you go, I want to ask about

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 4>not crypto, I want to ask about artificial intelligence. Even

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 4>talking about it all day as a crypto entrepreneur, how do.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 6>You see AI?

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you see it as a competing factor in terms

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 4>of dollars going towards technology? Do you see dovetailing with

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>your industry at all?

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 5>AI is certainly one of those couple really important technology

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 5>trends that the US needs to get right, along with crypto,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 5>and I think we're seeing a similar question start to

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 5>happen in Congress along with crypto is like, hey, how

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 5>should this be regulated so it can be done in

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 5>a safe, trusted way? I do think there's a couple

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 5>interesting intersections between AI and crypto. One of them is that,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, in the world of AI, there you know,

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 5>it's so easy to mass generate things, whether it's a

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 5>news article or images, and so the provenance of those

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 5>and the authenticity of it can be a little bit

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 5>hard to figure out.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 6>And in a world of crypto.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 5>One of the great things about crypto, you know, with

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 5>NFTs and whatnot, you can actually have a digital signature

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 5>that proves, you know, this was issued by Bloomberg or

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 5>by Brian Armstrong or whoever. So I think it could

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 5>be useful to track the provenance of creative works, whether

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 5>that's text, audio, video, et cetera. The other thing that

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 5>might be interesting is that a lot of these these

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, bots or autonomous agents in the AI sphere,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 5>they're going to need to go get things done in

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 5>the world. Right people are already using them to sort

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 5>of say, hey, order my groceries, or you know, maybe

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 5>build this website and spin up this server. And so

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 5>they're going to need financial money. They're gonna need money

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 5>to go do things in the world, these these AI agents,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 5>and so I think that actually in the future you're

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 5>probably gonna see a lot of cryptotransaction happening between AI

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 5>agents or AI and various businesses around the world because

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 5>crypto is kind of the native money of the Internet.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 6>The Internet.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Internet is global, it's decentralized, every country, everybody in the

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 5>world can participate in it, and so it wouldn't really

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 5>make sense to use you know, the dollar or the

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 5>euro in a truly global context. If you you know

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 5>what you want to be country agnostic. So I think

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 5>AI will use crypto more.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 4>How much are you actually working on that future?

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 5>So our we're not trying to build something that is

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 5>allowing bots to like transact in crypto at the moment,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 5>but what we are doing is we're building good infrastructure,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, picks and shovels, if you will. So with

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 5>coinbased cloud, for instance, we're making our APIs around how

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 5>crypto is stored and transacted and commerce happens, and we're

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 5>just exposing those kind of like Amazon Web services, but

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 5>to any business that wants to integrate it. So I

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 5>suspect more businesses will integrate that over time, and some

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 5>of those may use AI. We're also using AI in

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 5>our business in a.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 6>Few other ways.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we use it a lot for fraud prevention,

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, and unfortunately we get people signing up putting

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 5>in stolen credentials and things like that, and so we've

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 5>developed a lot of really good machine learning to detect that,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we're occasionally we're testling it in a

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 5>few other areas too, just like around Actually, like you know,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 5>our design teams they'll sometimes look at mid Journey or

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 5>Dolly and sort of generate an interface using ANI at least, like,

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, show me five ideas for what an interface

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 5>might look like to do remittances in crypto or for

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 5>content creators to have a direct relationship with their audience,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 5>and what with the interface for that. And AI is

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 5>just like a great assistant, you know, it doesn't. I

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 5>don't think AI really is taking people's jobs. It's taking

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 5>tasks off their plates, largely to make their jobs more efficient.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 5>And so having like a you know, a research assistant

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 5>or someone like that, you know, a tutor or a

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 5>mentor or a therapist whatever, everybody can have one of

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 5>these paired with them, and I think it'll just make

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 5>humans more productive.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Ran We're out of time, but thank you so much

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 4>for your time. As for taking our questions.

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you you are watching Bloomberg Technology. That was a

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>conversation with the coinbased CEO, Brian Armstrong at Bloomberg Invests

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Let's bring in Bloomberg Katie Greifeld out

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>in New York. It's kind of app some of the

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>headlines coming out of that conversation.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Katie, What were the key takeaways for you?

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 7>It was really interesting to hear a little bit more color,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more insight on what Coinbase's sort of communication,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 7>what the relationship with the SEC has been. It was

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 7>really interesting to hear from Armstrong saying that basically the

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 7>SEC's tone has changed in the past year, that Coinbase

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 7>went to the agency multiple times, was met with silence,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>and as a result, here we are today and we

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 7>knew that they've been critical of.

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 3>The SEC's approach.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 7>Obviously, we got that statement yesterday basically criticizing what they

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 7>call this reliance on enforcement, regulation by enforcement, and we

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 7>heard more of that today from Armstrong himself.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>As a reminder to our audience.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>The SEC sued both Coinbase and binances US operations this week,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.359
<v Speaker 2>essentially accusing them of peddling on registered securities.

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 3>What was interesting, Katie.

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>On stage, Brian Armstrong referenced that other suit away from

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Coinbase without naming it, and said that to his mind,

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the sec was trying to conflate the two and

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>what did you make of that?

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he really tried to draw that line between these

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 7>two cases. Obviously, we've been talking about them in the

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 7>same bread since I think it was what less than

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 7>twenty four hours that separated those lawsuits. But Armstrong said

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 7>that in Coinbase's case, there were no allegations of misappropriation

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 7>of funds, no wash trading, There weren't any executives named.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's important because when you think about Binance,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 7>it's a lawsuit against Binance and also against Chang ben

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 7>Jao of course, the CEO of Binance. That's not the

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 7>case when it comes to coinbas. As Armstrong described it,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 7>this is really about sort of a legal sort of

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 7>definition of securities. That's the common thread between these two lawsuits,

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 7>basically what is a security? But in terms of the

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 7>Binance allegations, they go.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 2>Much deeper, some more headlines crossing the Bloomberg terminal in

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 2>wide ranging conversation, really Bloomberg, Nali bassecle also asking about

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>AI and Armstrong saying that Coinbase is using AI in

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the field of fraud prevention.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 3>For example.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>He put a lot of emphasis on this idea that

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Coinbase is a public company and therefore it is audited,

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 2>and so the SEC if it wanted to, could go

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 2>and look under the hood, so to speak.

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 7>That's the interesting thing I mean with Binance. Of course,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 7>Binance doesn't have headquarters.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 3>It's a much.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 7>Different case than Coinbase, which is a US public company.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 7>It listed in twenty twenty one, again a public company,

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 7>and the fact that we're seeing this lawsuit come against

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 7>them after it was allowed to go public has definitely

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 7>raised a few eyebrows among my sources. But wrapping it

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 7>into the Aicon conversation, very interesting to hear that you know,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 7>they do see opportunity there. I would imagine that Coinbase

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 7>is a little big busy with this legal fight, but

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 7>sees opportunity there as well.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to draw a causal link, but interesting

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>to look at the shares. We're off session highs, but

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>tick by tick we kind of pushed higher throughout that conversation.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I notice on the Bloomberg there are buyers out there

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>for this name right, Kathy Wood being one of them.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 3>The usual suspects.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Kathy would adding to her coin based stick across

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 7>ARC's fund. The biggest stake, of course, was added to

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 7>in the Arc Innovation ETF. That's her largest ETF.

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 6>And this is sort of.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 7>Hermo you know, by her favorite names when they're dipping,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 7>and that's what she's been doing in coinbase over the

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 7>past year. So unsurprising to see that trading update overnight

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 7>that they also added yesterday on what was what a

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent draw down. It makes sense when you follow

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 7>her strategy, I.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 8>Want to go broader for a moment.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 9>Interestingly, Mike Novograts, of course, the Galaxy Digital talking about

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 9>the SEC is going to take some time. The legal

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 9>overhang remains, but three quarters of the crypto market is

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 9>still for play in the US. He's saying, Look, the

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 9>SEC is not mentioning Bitcoin eighth stable coins.

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 8>What are flows like? What ultimately is this doing to sentiment?

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, the question I keep getting is why isn't bitcoin

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 7>reacting more? I mean, Bitcoin is still hanging around levels

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 7>that it's been hanging around for the past several weeks,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 7>even though again the two largest exchanges have been sued

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 7>at this point, but it really comes down to I mean,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 7>who's left. We know that retail sort of the marginal

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 7>retail player was flushed out a while ago. You're left

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 7>with sort of these true believers who have been holding

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 7>it for a long time, and that continues to be

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 7>the case. I mean, I track ETFs very closely, both

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 7>globally and in the US, and globally when you look

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 7>at sort of these ETPs that can actually physically hold Bitcoin,

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 7>there's not too much movement in or out because again,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 7>that marginal player has already been flushed out.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 9>And I like that you say global, because this ends

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 9>up becoming a global arbitrage story in a way, in

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.719
<v Speaker 9>terms of where you base companies, where talent flows. Are

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 9>you hearing about basically a loss of time in the

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 9>US to the Middle East, Dubai getting its regulatory act together,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 9>Hong Kong for example, even the UK A little.

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's the thing. I mean, you listen to US

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 7>crypto advocates in the US, and that's sort of the

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 7>argument that they make that basically the agencies are scaring

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 7>away talent, they're scaring away innovation two overseas, and we

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 7>know that certain regions, certain countries have been trying to

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 7>attract that talent. Dubai in particular. Whether that actually happens

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 7>remains to be seen, or maybe some of the people

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 7>who were in crypto pivot maybe to AI, maybe to

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 7>web three. But that's an open question and it's definitely

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 7>a big question.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 6>In the industry.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 9>Katie Greifeld, great to have you with instant analysis. We

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 9>thank her for expertise across crypto. Meanwhile, when I was

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 9>check in on the market, it's another key area of

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 9>expertise at Katie. Of course she's across asset reporter. We

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 9>want to go across asset for you for a moment,

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 9>because well, overall we've seen a little bit of sentiment

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 9>shift once again, tech ticking down, we're off by seven

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 9>tens of percent. We're more worried about interest rates. We're

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 9>more worried about where the Fed goes. Canada a surprise

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 9>rate hike over there. We see the dollar lower versus

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 9>the Canadian dollar, the loonies that's known down three tenths

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 9>of a percent, but notable that Still, we've got to

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 9>look to the Fed the ECB next week. What will

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 9>they do in terms of trying to do this awkward

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 9>balancing act growth on the one hand and inflation on

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 9>the other.

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 8>The two year yield goes up eleven basis points.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 9>Is basically the market prices in that the rate hikes

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 9>are not done yet.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 8>Sure, there might be a pause in June d but

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 8>what about July.

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 9>And just quickly looking what's happening in terms of bitcoin,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 9>because you know it is our risk asset of choice

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 9>when it comes to the tech world, and we're currently

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 9>off by some two percentage points as well, even though

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 9>overall the dollar hadn't been showing so much strength today

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 9>twenty six thousand.

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>As we're at right, there are other news items in

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 2>the world of technology that are the making moves in markets.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Keeping a close eye on Tesla, up for a ninth

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 2>straight session, longest streak of gain since February twenty twenty one.

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 2>The news being the US Treasury Department is saying that

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>all Model three variants are eligible for the full seventy

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 2>five hundred dollars tax credit. Netflix off session highs, but

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 2>have been up as much as five percent. Two names

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 2>at least raising price targets on the store Wells Fargo

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 2>and JP Morgan that stopped touching its highest level since

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 2>February twenty twenty two, and Warner Brothers Discovery tackling the

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 2>debt issue by offering a five hundred million dollar tender

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that stock up five percent. Take a look at Coinbase.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Coinbase have been hired. That conversation between Shnalie

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Bassak and the CEO, Brian Armstrong one of many interviews

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>he's done out inforced responding to the sec suit against them.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Hired by two point seven percent, but off session high

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 2>is interesting the kind of pushback that he gave during

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>that interview, and we will recap later in the hour.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 9>Carric Well and meanwhile, we got so much more coming

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 9>up and well still the private world of technology, Reddit

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 9>reducing its workforce as part of its planstory structural operations

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 9>and promote growth. Will have the details when we return.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 9>Listen Bloomberg. It's time now for talking tech. First up

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 9>at Lisa mal CEO of Michael Dell's Family Office, says

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 9>she's looking to diversify her portfolio. The FIRMDFO Management, set

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 9>to absorb an influx of cash and stop once Broadcom

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 9>does eventually close on its purchase of VM where it's

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 9>still with regulators in Europe. I sat down with while

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 9>at the Bloomberg U Voices event, where she shared her

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 9>thought process behind her investments.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 10>What I have been grappling with is we have this

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 10>impending major liquidity event, and so how should we be

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 10>committing capital today? How do we size our investments today?

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 9>Dell, VMware's largest shareholder, has a thirty six perstake stake in.

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 8>The shares, of course.

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 9>Meanwhile, European chipmaker stem Micro and China's son An are

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 9>planning a three point two billion dollar joint venture to

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 9>build chips fabrication plants in southwest, China's most popular city.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 9>It's part of an effort to tap into China's growing

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 9>market for electric vehicles, but look counters the EUS pushed

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 9>to localize chip production.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 8>Production is expected to begin in the fourth quarter of

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five. Plus let's talk.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 9>About a private company now, Reddit planning to cut five

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 9>percent of its workforce, or roughly ninety positions. This is

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 9>according to staff memo from the CEO, Steve Huffman, and

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 9>it was seen by Bloomberg. The online discussion platform is

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 9>also scaling back it's hiring plans. Granite now joins a

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 9>slew of technology companies that have turned to layoffs in

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 9>order to cut costs boof profitability and and of course

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 9>this is an important one to think about, as this

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 9>was a darling that was expected to go public. Maybe

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 9>I helped reopen what has been a frozen IPO market,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 9>but they've got to show well profitability over just growth

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 9>at all costs.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we reported this story out twenty four hours ago,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and when I was reading the memo from Steve Huffman,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the CEO, to staff, it jumps out that this isn't

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 2>an action taken because of hardship in their business environment,

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 2>but because they basically looked at it and said, you know,

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 2>we can achieve break even next year. Of course they

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>fared for an IPO in late twenty twenty one, Carro,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>We haven't heard much about that since then. I would

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>point out one thing, smaller company two thousand people, so

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 2>five percent is about ninety jobs, which is never pleasant

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to talk about layoffs in the technology industry.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 9>It's not, but it does, as you say, sort of

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 9>feel small when we think of the one hundreds of

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 9>thousands of people who lost their jobs thus far from

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 9>big tech from some of the other companies. Ultimately, though,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 9>it's about the way in which you manage and way

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 9>in which you tell people that this is one and

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 9>done or not sprinkling on a continued basis, because otherwise

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 9>it hits morale, right.

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it hits morale.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know, Huffman addressed that in the memo that

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 2>we saw, basically saying that this will impact many people

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>who have been at that company for a very long time,

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>but one that seems to be weathering the storm. And

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>as we write in the Bloomberg story, they were a holdout.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's taken them until this point of twenty

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty three to an act layoffs when many others had

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>done the depth of them at the end of last year.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 9>Well, we've got a lot to talk about when it

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 9>comes to companies having to think about profitability over growth

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 9>and indeed perhaps doing some tie ups to inject more

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 9>growth when it comes to AI at least.

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I met Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 8>And I'm Karlyine Hyed in New York.

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 9>Let's check in on these markets once again, end because look,

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 9>we are seeing more risk aversion when it comes to

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 9>big tech remember this has been the album former on

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 9>the year. Today we'll pull back almost a percentage point

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 9>in the MASTAC, so we're hitting further low as it

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 9>feels across the main benchmark or reasoning. It's about where

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 9>the Federal Reserve goes next. It's about tackling inflation. It's

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 9>about whether or not we have another hyke come July.

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 9>That's what the market is pricing in on the bond

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 9>market at least.

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 8>Two year, five year.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 9>That belly of the curve as well, moving thirteen fourteen

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.959
<v Speaker 9>basis points higher as we start to price in what

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 9>the Fed could do. And indeed this is a global perspective.

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 9>We've seen a surprise move from Canada today, the Canadian

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 9>looney going higher versus the US dollar as we get

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 9>that hike to tackle inflation, we look to the ECB

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 9>next week, and of course the Fed. I'm looking at

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 9>Bitcoin currently under pressure, off by two point four percent.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 8>A lot of regulatory overhang here at the moment.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Ed, let's get to our next story.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Carry Twilio and Google Cloud just announce an expansion of

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>their partnership to bring google Cloud Generative AI to Twilio's

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>customer engagement products. The idea to improve experiences for millions

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 2>of venues. Is Twilio CEO Jeff Lawson joins us. Now, Jeff,

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 2>this is interesting because I think over the history of

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>your company, you've worked with Google Cloud closely. Just explain

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.959
<v Speaker 2>in real terms what any of that actually means if

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you're a Twilio customer, what do you get access to

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 2>with this generative AI tool.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, specifically, this Google partnership is a new partnership to

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>help bring generative AI and predictive AI into the contact center.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So by combining Twilio's Flex Contact center product with Google's CCAI,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we can now automate a wide variety of interactions in

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>over thirty languages to prove real time, intelligent automated interactions

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to customers. So, for example, Toyota Connected is one of

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>our customers. There are millions of Toyota and Lexus vehicles

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road where if you hit the button and say,

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to ask for directions for example,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a completely automated experience power by Tulio Flex and

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Google CCAI integrated together to provide that complete automation. And

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this is just part of Tulio's newly announced customer AI

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>initiative that we announced yesterday, and customer AI is really

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of all these new capabilities of generative and

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>predictive AI in combining that with the customer journey, and

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>every company has this journey as a customer progresses through

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sales marketing service inside the product that companies are trying

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to connect together to create a cohesive and relevant experience

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for those customers. And what Tuilio can do is bring

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>generative and predictive AI to the table to help connect

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>each one of those experiences on the segment profiles that

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we have living inside of Tilo about each one of

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>those customers. And so we're really excited to get this

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>out there into the market this week.

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 9>How are you ensuring that people feel comfortable as and

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 9>when they're being serviced with so much more well effect

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 9>people worrying about their data, wondering about how companies are

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 9>owning it. How are you ensuring that this isn't going

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 9>to yes, bring productivity but also a lot of pushback

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 9>at the same time.

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and people should be concerned about privacy and data

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>security as well as the effect of large language models

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and AI on many of our experiences and That's why

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we have first of all, only partnered with data or

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>partnered with AI companies, so language model companies that are

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>going to preserve the privacy and integrity of our customer's

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>data and their customers privacy. Second is using that data

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>only in the context of that one customer in order

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to make that experience better. Now we are all accustomed

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to this as a net positive as customers and companies

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>who do it well. Think about Amazon or Google. Amazon

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>homepage are very different because Amazon uses all the data

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they have about us, like what we clicked on, what

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we scrolled past, what we bought, what we didn't buy,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to make that product better. And what we're

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing is now every company out there, because of privacy,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to actually take their own first party data, so

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that stream of data about what do people click on,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what do they buy, what do they not buy, and

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>turn it into insights about that customer that then can

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>make them smarter and provide a better product and customer experience.

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's what TOIL is providing to companies.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 9>What's interesting ED is, of course, amid what is a

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 9>macro environment that is cloudy to say the least, a

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 9>lot of companies are out there talking about AI effectiveness

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 9>and actually feels like quite a busy space. It's got

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 9>to be about the actual underlying technology here.

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Ed, That's the question I have, Jeff, Like I get

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the Google Cloud relationship, it's long standing. When you build

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.959
<v Speaker 2>the product into your existing platform, where does the underlying

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>technology come from? Is the foundation model from Google itself

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and what they've been working on the broad company was

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 2>their at temptation to go to open AI and build

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 2>something on top of GPT three point five or four.

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, Google is the first of several partners that we

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are working with, and we'll be announcing more over time.

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, look, there are going to be

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the right models for the right use cases. The one

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>common thread among every vendor that we are working with

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that we are only going to work

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>with vendors and models where we can control the flow

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of data and where we can ensure that data remains

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>belonging to our customers, which is the most important thing.

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And look, I think every large language model vendor, I

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think every AI vendor out there realizes that businesses are

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>going to want to control this. They need safety and

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>security around these models, and they need a human in

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the loop for most of these use cases to make

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that as the AI is doing greater and greater workloads,

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we've got great checks and balances on the work that

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. And so that's what Twilio and I think

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>many other software and service companies are doing to go

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>create viable products out of the raw capabilities of a

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>language model.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 9>I reference that, Jeff, that in amongst all of these innovations,

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 9>new product launches, partnerships, is a macro environment that is tougher.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 9>It's been tough to your company in terms of market cap,

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 9>in terms of share price. I'm sure you got push

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 9>back and say I don't look at the share price,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 9>but ultimately your investors do. And I know that there's

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 9>someone thinking about activist investors at the moment, as perhaps

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 9>some of the control that you've had ultimately in voting

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 9>rights seeps away a little.

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 8>How are you tackling that at the moment, Jeff.

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, Look, we've always been a company that is looking

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at the interests of our shareholders and operating the company

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in the interest of our shareholders by talking to the

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>shareholders and understanding what they want. So during the era

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of low cost of capital, for the last decade, we

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>ran the company to grow the top line, to build

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>our market share, and I'm really proud of the company

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've built in terms of a four billion dollar

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>revenue run rate company during that period of time. Now

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we're in a different environment. Now we're an environment where

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we take that market leadership position that we're in, that

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>large customer base that we're in, and turn it into

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a profit generating machine. And that's exactly what we've been doing.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really proud of the fact that of the

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>last two quarters we have taken a company that has

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>never historically generated a consistent profit because that wasn't the goal,

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to now generating more than ten percent non gap operating

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>margin in Q one, And so I think we are

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to those investors and taking substantive actions to respond

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to the changing needs of investors based on the changing

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>needs of the macro environment and interest rate.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Jeff, specifically, the information reported that you're talking to Legion partners.

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 3>What is the update on that?

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 2>And I notice in the proxy materials published yesterday, the

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 2>first four slides outlined the structure effectiveness track record of

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the management. That's an unusual thing to do. Why did

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>you do that well.

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>We talked to all of our investors frequently and right.

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>We get a lot of opinions, we get a lot

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of points of view, and so it's just a regular

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.959
<v Speaker 1>part of talking to our investors understanding their points of view.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Regarding the disclosures we made yesterday, we just wanted to

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>fight a little bit of I think, you know, misinformation

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>or lack of one standing of some of our decisions

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about how our compensation model has worked as we head

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>into the proxy modeing season.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 9>We want to thank you so much for spending some

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 9>time with us talking us all through business model, new applications.

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 8>And focus on AI.

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 9>The TWITTERO CEO Jeff Wilson, thanks, and let's just return

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 9>to what's happening over a Bluebug invest today because billinais

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 9>Stan Drachimiller says he expects that AI guess what it's

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 9>here to stay, and then he interspates owning in video

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 9>shares for a little while longer. He spoke with our

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 9>very own Shanali Bassak at the summit in New York

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 9>earlier today.

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 11>The ais have sort of dominated the long portfolio for

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 11>five or six months.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 6>If it's as big as I think it is.

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 11>In Vidio is something we're going to want to own

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 11>for at least two or three years, not for ten

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 11>months and maybe longer.

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 9>Meanwhile, we've got a little bit of breaking news, Amazon

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 9>planning an AD tier for prime video streaming service. So

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 9>as we've seen with the likes of Disney, as you've

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 9>seen in Netflix, now Amazon two.

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 8>That's all according to the Wall Street Journals.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 9>So more to come on Amazon, also more to come

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 9>on Generator AI and indeed investing. We've got so much

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 9>more with Saffi Ventures, Kathy Gao, that's next. This is Bloomberg.

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 9>Guess what we're talking about next, Generator of AI. Of course,

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 9>we are what everyone wants to discuss, and many feel

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 9>that this is truly a platform shift or well maybe

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 9>take the other side of the coin. You think it's

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 9>hype A's dissected or with VC Spotlight Now Kathy Gow's

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 9>with us partner at Saffi a Ventures, and I can

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 9>only imagine how many inbounds you have at the moment

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 9>suggesting that they.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 8>Are AI or from their ury root in their cause.

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 9>How are you diciphering which company is truly artificial intelligence

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 9>amplified or those.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 8>That are kind of getting on the bandwagon.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 12>Kathy, Well, thanks so much for having me back, and

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 12>great question, Caroline. This is a question that we think

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 12>about constantly. I would say the fundamental principles of investing

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 12>haven't really changed. Right at the core, We're still looking

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 12>for companies that are solving a very specific problem and

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 12>have a point of view on their right to win.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 12>So that could mean owning a very specific and valuable

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 12>workflow for the end user. It could also mean having

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 12>access to and interacting with proprietary and valuable data. But

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 12>a company should have a point of view. And there

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 12>are companies out there that have a thin layer of

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 12>application on top of commoditized infrastructure. For us, those would

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 12>not be companies that we'd be excited to invest in.

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 12>I think another very interesting thing that we have to

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 12>think about as investors is in what situations does it

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 12>make sense for an existing company to add in AI

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.919
<v Speaker 12>features into their product and platform. So a great exam

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 12>sample of this is, you know many of us use

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 12>Gmail or Outlook. We can pop up in our email

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 12>and use auto complete or auto generate to help us

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 12>respond to emails. So that's an example of an existing

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 12>platform integrating folding an aim.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>That's tangible, right, Like I was at Google Io. I

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 2>saw the demo, but Google already owns that, right. And

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 2>so you have all these startups out there in the field,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and the thing that I want to ask you is

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 2>how confident are you that any of them will ever

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 2>make money? You know one example character AI. We had

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Normaghazier on the show a few weeks ago, and it

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of seems like an afterthought. That's alarm bells for

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 2>a VC, isn't it?

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely well, I would say this.

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 12>At Sapphire Adventures, we are building our prepared mind to

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 12>be ready to invest in AI, and I think it's

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 12>going to be a tremendous opportunity for vcs in the

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 12>next three to five years. That being said, it's very

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 12>very new today, right. We want to take some time

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 12>to see how this plays out. If you think back

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 12>to previous technological fundamental platform shifts, the ultimate winners may

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 12>not have been the companies that came out of the

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 12>first wave. And I think of Google right that came

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 12>after Alta Vista and Yahoo, and I think of Facebook

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 12>who came after MySpace and Friends to So for us,

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 12>it's all about learning about the current environment and the

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 12>market and watching what's going to happen and being prepared

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 12>to invest when the timing fields right.

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Earlier in your career, you were looking at China. I

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 2>know it's an air you've thought about, how face is

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 2>the competition between the entrepreneurs here in the United States

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 2>and what entrepreneurs in China are doing. You know, as

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a VC, how do you navigate that field?

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 12>I would say AI is certainly a very very competitive field,

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 12>but I think it's a mistake to only look at

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 12>it as US versus China. It's really a global dynamic.

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 12>The reason companies all over the world are investing in

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 12>AI is because the tremendous potential for AI to transform

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 12>possibly every industry out there. Right, And maybe this is

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 12>me putting on my optimistic hat, but I do think

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 12>that global solutions, global collaboration is what is needed, because

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 12>ultimately AI does have the potential to solve problems in healthcare,

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 12>in climate change. These are problems that transcend national borders, you.

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Know, Caroline.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 2>The story of the week in this industry was Sequoia

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.479
<v Speaker 2>splitting into three, right, and one of the rationales being

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that they can have a unit focused on China because

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 2>there is opportunity in China, there's entrepreneurs, and there's support

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 2>from the government.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, but they can't seemingly manage to do that from

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 9>a globally coordinated manner with the back office that serves

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 9>all three. And to that point, Kathy, how how global

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 9>can you be as a venture fund right now? How

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 9>much you able to navigate these geopolitical headwinds.

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 12>That's a great question, Caroline, And I gotta tell you,

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 12>I'm closely watching what is happening with Sequoia. You know,

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 12>the news is relatively new, so I can't speculate on

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 12>what is happening in Sequoia, but the moves they have

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 12>made will for sure impact the venture capital industry. And

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 12>what Sequoia has publicly said already, which is managing a

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 12>global organization is difficult, right. You have to consider portfolio conflict,

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 12>portfolio conflicts not just in the US, but multiple geographies.

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 12>It is, in fact, very very difficult to handle. And

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 12>sequoia solution to break the firm up into three separate

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 12>entities is just one solution. But I'm very curious to

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 12>see if other large global venture capital firms who are

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 12>also investing in other countries follow suit or come up

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 12>with other creative strategies.

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Saphar Adventures, Kafi Gowa is so good to have you

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 2>back on the program after all these months.

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for your time.

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 11>I do believe, unlike crypto, I think AI is real.

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 11>It's probably it could be as transformative as the Internet.

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 11>It's a huge thing.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Stanley Druckamiler earlier at Bloomberg invest Let's get more on

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 2>crypto send it over to Bloomberg. Shnali Bassek and Coinbase

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 2>CEO Brian Armstrong.

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Shnali, thank you, Ed.

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 4>And Brian, thank you for joining us. You've had a

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 4>very intense twenty four hours. When you look at what

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the charges the SEC has brought forth against Coinbase, how

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 4>long do you think it will take to fight it,

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 4>especially when you have your chief legal officer telling me

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 4>last night that you would go all the way to

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court if you have to if necessary.

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:46.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, we don't know exactly how long this

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 5>court case will take, but I do think it's a

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 5>really important opportunity for us, as you know, the leader

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 5>in the US, to go get some clarity for this

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 5>industry and for America so that we make sure that

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 5>this techlogy is built here and it doesn't get pushed

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 5>off shore where.

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 6>Customers can get harmed.

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 5>I think if you just if you go back in

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 5>time a little bit, you know, back to twenty twenty one.

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 5>We had a number of discussions with the SEC about

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 5>becoming a public company and they allowed us to become

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 5>a public company with full knowledge of how we list

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 5>assets and how we operate our staking program. And it really,

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, wasn't until a year later or so that

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 5>they started to have more questions.

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 6>We very thoughtfully engage with them.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 5>I think we met with them thirty times over the

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 5>last year, explaining every aspect of our business. We came

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 5>in hat in hand and said, how do we register?

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 5>We want to register. You know, we even acquired a

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 5>broker dealer license which is still dormant.

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 6>We haven't found a way to activate it.

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 5>We formally petitioned them for more clarity around the rules,

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 5>and we frankly were met with silence. And so unfortunately

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 5>they decided to pursue this policy of regulation by enforcement.

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 5>We've got the Wells notice and now the complaint is

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 5>officially here, and so this is a difficult moment for

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 5>not only the industry, but also for America. We need

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 5>to make sure we get a clear book so this

0:43:58.360 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 5>this technology can be built here.

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 4>There a point at what you call it quits in

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.399
<v Speaker 4>the United States, given how hard regulators are coming down

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 4>on the industry.

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 6>No, we're not going anywhere.

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I started this company in the US because

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 5>not only is it a big market, there's there's rule

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 5>of law here, right, you know, we have to follow

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 5>the rule of law. So does the SEC and everybody.

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 5>And so luckily, if we're not getting a clear rule

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 5>book from the SEC, we have the opportunity to avail

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 5>ourselves of the court and we'll start to get some

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 5>case law created, regardless of what the outcome of the

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 5>case is. Honestly, it's a step towards more clarity. The

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 5>other big opportunity we have is really for Congress to

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 5>step in here and act. And I think there's a

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 5>lot of interest in Congress. We saw a bill come

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 5>out last week from you know, mckenry and Thompson sort

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 5>of clarifying Okay, this is the role of the CFTC

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 5>and the SEC, and let's have some good consumer protections

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 5>and what about stable coins? And so I think there's

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 5>a broad recognition within Congress that the US is going

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 5>to get left behind if they don't start to create

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 5>some regulatory clarity because the UK, you know, Hong Kong, Singapore,

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 5>the UAE, these are all saying we want.

0:44:58.000 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 6>To be crypto and Web three hubs.

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 5>We have clear rule books, Come here and build your business,

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 5>and the US is at risk of being left behind.

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 4>What happens while things are so unclear? Is there a

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 4>chance here that you start to lose customers or even

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 4>banking partners? Here you have JP Morgan, Cross River, all

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 4>these other more traditional financial institutions that.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 3>You've worked with.

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Do they start to freeze up when the government does

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 4>not have clear rules?

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, so far, we haven't seen any risk of that happening.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 5>I think all of our partners have been very thoughtful

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 5>working with us.

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:27.240
<v Speaker 6>We've been very.

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Transparent with them, and I think they're frankly waiting to

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 5>see what the outcome of some of these cases are

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 5>too and how does the US get to a path

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 5>of more clarity, Whether that's with the CFTC stepping in

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 5>in some role, Congress, the court case, you know, maybe

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 5>the elections in twenty twenty four change this as well.

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 5>So Our partners have been really great to work with,

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:47.919
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we're a leading company in the US.

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:48.760
<v Speaker 6>We're not going anywhere.

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Elections in twenty twenty four. Do some of these pressures

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 4>on the industry potentially go away with a potential changing

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 4>in administration.

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 5>It's possible, yes, I mean I do think that, you know,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 5>the chair in the SEC here is a bit of

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 5>an outlier frankly in the US government. You know, as

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned previously, Congress has seems very interested in crafting

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 5>legislation here. The Biden administration actually put out in an

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 5>executive order a year ago or so saying, you know,

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 5>we recognize the potential of this technology, and we want

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 5>to make sure the risks are mitigated. You know, they

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 5>asked the branches of government to go introduce this. We're

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 5>also seeing some of the presidential candidates already for next

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 5>year kind of start to talk about their stances on

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 5>crypto and how they want to accept crypto as you know,

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 5>for donations, and how it should be regulated. So I

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 5>actually think there's a good chance this becomes, you know,

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 5>a relevant issue in the twenty twenty four elections.

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, with that said, this could be an overhaul

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 4>overhang for a while here when we look at how

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 4>long that this could play out, not just for you,

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 4>but the whole industry. What does this mean for crypto

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 4>prices overall? Do you think that it's spooking some investors

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 4>away in your conversations with the big institutions.

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, yesterday this news came out and surprised me.

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, crypto was up that day.

0:46:56.719 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 5>I you know, I think what's what I interpret from

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 5>this is that the SEC's rhetoric on this has been

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 5>clear for a year or two now, and they've been

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 5>making lots of statements, and so I think if there

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 5>is an overhang, it's probably already been there for a while.

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think anybody was surprised by this news

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 5>that came out of because the Wells notice came before it,

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 5>and the rhetoric was there before that. So our investors

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 5>are they're long term believers in this technology. I think

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 5>they're looking at it as an opportunity. Frankly, you know,

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 5>if others are fearful, it's probably an.

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 6>Interesting buying opportunity for them.

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 5>But they're excited about this as one of the three

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 5>or four major technology trends happening in the world, and

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 5>I think they, you know, smart investors recognize that the

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 5>US is not going to sit on the sidelines.

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 6>This is too important with technology.

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 4>Ran, thank you so much for your time and for

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 4>joining us on the back of such important news for

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 4>the industry.

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Add back to you the EMOTIONALI Bassett with Brian Armstrong,

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:48.919
<v Speaker 2>CEO of coinbas Thank you so much.

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 8>Caroline, Well times run out.

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 9>That does it for this edition of Bloembag Technology.

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 8>What a well win tet.

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and don't forget you can recap that well wind

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the podcast the pod. Check it out Apple, Spotify, iHeart

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:05.880
<v Speaker 3>From SF from New York. This is Bloomberg