WEBVTT - South Korean Chipmakers to Supply OpenAI’s Stargate

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is alive from coast to coast with Caroline

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York and Eva Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up another day, another deal.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Samsung and sk Heiniz forge initial agreements to supply chips

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and other gear to open AI's Stargate projects.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Plus Peloton shares drop after hiking prices and announcing an

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 3>overhaul of its hardware lineup and a new AI system.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>And Google also introduces new Nest branded hardware, including video cameras,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a doorbell, and a compact speaker, as the company advised

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>to integrate AI throughout the smart home.

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Hardware abound. But let's get to the hard fact of

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the day.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to the markets, we are flat on

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the nastat one hundred.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot to digest for investors.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Whether we're looking at weaker jobs data once again signaling

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>weakness that the Federal Reserve might cut rates into.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But will we get of course, the non.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Farm payrolls on Friday, we are amid a government shut down,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>and we will go to that best conferences and when

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>it starts with the leaders of the Democrats in the House.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm looking at gold Spot currently get a.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Record high that anxiety fueling a bid for a haven

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 3>ED But what are you looking at?

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we've got to get out to talk

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>more about what's happening with this shutdown because it's impacting

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>markets right now, including the tech sector. Bloombergs Tyler Kendall

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>is at the White House in DC for more. Sorry, Tyler,

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>explain the basics of where we stand in the shutdown

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and what we're expecting to happen next.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, ED, at this point, we haven't seen any

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 4>side really budge on their main points here. So at

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 4>this point, negotiations are continuing, but the government is shut down,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 4>and we did hear from Republican leadership earlier today, including

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 4>House Speaker Mike Johnson and his words, more pain will

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 4>be inflicted the longer this shutdown goes on. It's our

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 4>understanding that House Republicans will hold a call later today

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 4>with the O and B Director of US Vote about

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 4>the potential for permanent layoffs. This has been a threat

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 4>that has been issued from this White House, essentially as

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 4>an ego shaving tactic.

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 5>In these talks.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>But we should note at this point we haven't actually

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 4>seen the agency's outline plans for permanent firings. As of now,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Republicans are really standing firm behind this idea that they

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 4>want to see what's known as a clean continuing resolution

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 4>that would fund the government until mid November with no

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.399
<v Speaker 4>other provisions attached. The Democrats say they want to see

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>policy changes now, and they all have to do with healthcare.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Really at the heart of this, the chief concern is

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 4>extending those expiring Obamacare premium tax subsidies that are set

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 4>to end at the end of this year. I would

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 4>watch out on that front because we have heard from

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Senate Majority Leader John Thune there could be some room

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 4>for negotiation on that, but the government has to reopen

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 4>first in order for those talks to start.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>We were just showing some live picks of what we

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>expect to be House Democrats in a press conference on

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the shutdown, and Askar said earlier, when it happens, will

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>bring you what you need to know. Bloombers Tyler Kendall

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 2>staying in DC for US, that's kind of the big

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>picture of what's happening in tech markets, but there are

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 2>stories out there that are driving specific moves as well.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at Micron moving pretty much six percent to

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the upside, like it was lower in pre market on

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the news that it's big rivals in memory, sk Heinix

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and Samsung have won the Stargate deal. Do you expect

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it to be up six percent? Well, it is, and

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>then there is tension between the United States and Taiwan.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan pushing back on the idea. There's an agreement here

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 2>that they will push more manufacturing to be on shore

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>in the United States through TSMC. TSMC's usadrs are up

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 2>two percent. We need to get the details.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>There is a through line between these two key stories,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>and Michael Shepherd, as always, can talk us through the

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>nuances and what's happening when it comes to the chip

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>industry and Washington's into play.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So talk us through first and foremost.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>You've got Samsung Shynix of course, basically Asian players winning

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>contracts with Open AI and Stargate. But this is as

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the leadership in Washington and really pushing for more domestic manufacturing.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Just talk us through it.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, when you think think about it, you have to

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 6>look at it in the broader AI context, and for

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration, this would certainly support their goal of

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 6>propelling investment in Stargate in Open Ai, in that big

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 6>data center project that the President heralded at the beginning

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 6>of his term. But there were a few questions left unanswered.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 6>One is the price tag and will this help support

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 6>what is part of a trade deal with South Korea

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 6>that calls for as much as three hundred and fifty

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars in South Korean investment in the US over

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 6>the next several years. Also left unanswered is where all

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 6>of this high bandwidth memory is going to be produced, Caro.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 6>We don't know whether this is going to be made

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 6>in Asia or if they may try to do some

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 6>of this production in the US.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 5>And that is certainly a goal of.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 6>The US and of the Trump administration to onshore more

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 6>of that chip production. And so there may be more

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 6>pressure from the administration on these two companies, on the

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 6>government and SOUL to try to make some more of

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 6>that happen.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Shap headline out of DC Trump's proposed changes to VISA

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 2>rules assailed by the chip industry.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 5>What's the team been reporting on here.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is another cross current that we're seeing here

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 6>in Washington, and that is, namely that for all of

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 6>the push on getting manufacturing on short here. There is

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 6>a tension over the workforce, and we have heard administration

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 6>officials talk about trying to develop the workforce, but the

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 6>industry has outlined a major challenge, and that is simply

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 6>that the country is not producing enough graduates here in

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 6>the US to meet the potential demand of all of

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 6>that manufacturing and data center and AI expansion that is

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 6>projected to happen over the next five years. There is

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 6>an estimated sixty seven thousand job gap according to the

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 6>semiconductor makers. Now, what we're seeing is pushback from chip

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 6>makers against an administration plan the crackdown on the F

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 6>one student visa. This is a key pipeline for talent

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 6>in the tech industry. It is something that they have

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 6>relied on for years. Students currently are able to say

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 6>for an indefinite period as long as they're actively in

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 6>a course of study, but the administration wants to shorten

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 6>that to four years, and industry is saying, look, a

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 6>less friendly approach to immigration will drive away talent to

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 6>other countries that are more welcoming, and it will hurt competition,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 6>one CEO wrote in An unnamed chief executive from a

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 6>semiconductor company wrote in to say that they were deeply

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 6>troubled to see this and that it will harm competitiveness

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 6>for the industry here in the US. And this comes

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 6>as also the administration is raising the fee for H

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 6>onebvs's to one hundred thousand dollars for new applications and

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 6>for chip companies that could mean one hundreds of millions

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 6>of dollars in additional fees. Trying to get all that

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 6>talent here in the US to meet this demand that they.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Have for jobs.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Bluembogs Mike Shechpad with two critical stories out of DC

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and there are several that we didn't touch on. We'll

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>try to throughout the hour. Energy Secretary Chris Wright says

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 2>the US has taken an equity stake in Lithium Americas

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>in a bid to level the competitive playing field with China.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Wright said on the close that the US government will

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>have a five percent stake in the company and a

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>five percent stake in the actual mind all with an

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>exit strategy.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 7>So we did was a creative deal engaged with GM

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 7>and Lithium Americas to find a way to bring more capital,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 7>equity capital into the mine. Yes, for US to take

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.239
<v Speaker 7>an equity stake in the mind and to do those things.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 7>So the mind's going to be viable, economically sound, it's

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 7>not going to be the next Cylindra. And then we

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 7>can advance the loan capital that will help that mind

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 7>get finished.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>And you have creative deals coming from the administration. Let's

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 3>get to the broader tech readA cross therefore with Frea Sincotos,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>your senior market analyst at City Index. Look, we talk

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>about anxiety in the market, we talk about a government shutdown.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>We worry about maybe the push and the pull of

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>trade deals, whether it's with Taiwan, whether it's with South Korea.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And yet videos.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 3>At a record high today, Micron's had a record high today. Fiona,

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>do you just keep on allocating to the ai trade?

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 8>It feels like it's that way. I mean, whilst we

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 8>are seeing pockets of safe haven demand. So obviously we've

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 8>seen goals trading at record high, We've seen the Japanese

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 8>Yenni's strengthening against the US dollar. We're seeing equities still

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 8>remaining very well supported. So I think there is very

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 8>much this sense that particularly tech stocks are still attracting

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 8>a lot of attention because investors want to put their

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 8>money somewhere, and big tech in the US remains a

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 8>solid trade, you know, and we've still got the outlooks,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 8>will be getting more information of that when we get

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 8>into earning season. But it does feel that we've had

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 8>this sort of you know, gradual climb higher that's not

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 8>really letting up, even though there are clearly plenty of

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 8>risks out there, the shutdown of the US government, but

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 8>still those you know, optimism surrounding those fed rate cuts

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 8>is still helping the sector as well.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 3>It is about the macro policy making, whether or not

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 3>we get the jobs data on Friday or not. Fiona,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in Europe because I'm looking at ASML is

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 3>also at one point three percent. Are you getting a

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>pull across to other regions right now?

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 8>Yes? I think there has been, And you know, it's

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 8>quite interesting because I think there was a period just

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 8>recently where Europe was struggling against the US. We were

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 8>seeing the US climbing fresh record highs. We were seeing

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 8>the nasdak Art, we were seeing the s and P

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 8>five hundred up, and yet in Europe we were sort

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 8>of suffering a little bit on down days. But I

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 8>think there is a sense now that that is starting

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 8>to turn around again. As you said, there is that

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 8>sort of pull across that we're getting from the US

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 8>into tech stocks in Europe, which is helping. As far

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 8>as sort of other sectors. There had been a strength

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 8>in defense stocks in Europe, which I think has just

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 8>sort of wound down a little bit. But yeah, as

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 8>far as techook are concerned, we are seeing some encouraging signs. Again.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>A story we did not get to with Bloomberg's Mike

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Shepherd was Taiwan's Vice Premier coming out and saying that

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the country rejects the United States demand for Taiwan to

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>actively help in bringing fifty percent half of semiconductor manufacturing

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>for the US supply base into the United States. This

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>is a sort of part of the negotiation broadly on

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>trade with that nation. But it speaks to other things

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that Caroline outline to you, which is the impact of

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 2>this administration's policy on the technology sector.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of that?

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, I think with this administration, policy is

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 8>very much a central part of how markets are responding

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 8>as to the outlook for stocks and also for sentiment.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 8>As we've talked about, you know, it does feel like

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 8>the a saidministration is having a very active role, as

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 8>we know, in setting out policy and involving themselves in policy,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 8>which is affecting stocks. It's affecting sentiment to a degree.

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 8>But I think also that there is a little bit

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 8>of court and we're not seeing the same rapid, quick

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 8>responses that we used to see at the beginning of

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 8>Trump's administration, where he would make these announcements and we

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 8>would see a big reaction in stock, big reaction in

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 8>the markets. We're seeing more relaxed response, I would say

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 8>to the comments that come out from Trump, although they

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 8>are still there, they're just not making the same impact

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 8>that perhaps they have previously.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Fiona, did technology investors start looking for opportunities in sectors

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and companies where a US government might take a stake.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that does seem to feel like it could be

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 8>the next one to be watching for. You know. I

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 8>think they have been much more pro active in looking

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 8>for stakes as we've had with the lithium deal as well,

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 8>that they are keen to get a foot in and

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 8>perhaps make the US potentially even more competitive than it

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 8>is against peers such as China. So that could be

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 8>the next one to be watching out for.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Peer and a duty signs of a bubble.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 8>I see that we are high value. There are high

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 8>valuations at the moment. I mean that was something that

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 8>was noted by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome pal just a

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 8>few weeks ago. But I think really what we need

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 8>to see is what earnings are going to be telling us.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think there's going to be a lot

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 8>of focus on earning season, on forward guidance. I don't

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 8>think we're in bubble territory, but I do feel that

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 8>we are quite overstretched in some areas. But that doesn't

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 8>mean to say that we necessarily are going to see

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 8>a big collapse here at all. I think there is

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 8>potential for some consolidation. And if we do get okay

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 8>readings from the earnings at the end of this month

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 8>going to November, then I think that could potentially be

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 8>a reasoner catalyst for another like high especially if we're

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 8>seeing the Federal Reserve cutting interest.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Rates further ASML earnings on October fourteenth, how is it

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>earning season already? Fionasencoda from City Index, thank you, We're

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 2>ready coming up why some investors are rethinking their private

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>market play. But we're going to speak with Matt with Eiler,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Wellington Management late stage growth lead. This is where the

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 2>conversation is right now, and as you know, I want

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 2>to talk about debt.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 5>This is momboke tech.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot happening in technology and private markets today

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>from London to LA. Startups are raising money and in

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>some cases, like the UK's n Scale in the former

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 2>quick follow on round around the world, pension fund state

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>back investment firms, venture catalysts are rethinking the private market's playbook.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Matt with Hyler, Wellington Management's late stage growth lead joins

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>us now. Wellington Management has more than nine point six

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in assets under management in the private investment bucket.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I have so much to ask you, but we were

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 2>showing a really well read story on the Bloomberg about

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>any participant in private markets after an era of easy

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>gains is now changing approach. Is that true of you

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and what you're doing in your strategy?

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think for us, similar to what we've seen

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 9>over the last multiple decades is companies are just staying

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 9>private longer, right, and as that happens, then the historic

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 9>returns and public market investors would have gotten as companies

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 9>went public and then appreciating the public market those are

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 9>really only available those returns in the private market as

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 9>those companies continue to grow. So for us, it's more

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 9>of the same, continuing to capitalize on that trend and

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 9>apply the kind of full picture of Wellington, which is

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 9>seeing the public markets and applying that knowledge to the

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 9>private markets.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Matt across infrastructure projects largely relating to AI and m

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and A debt is in the headlines on a daily

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>basis at the moment different types of mechanisms. I'm trying

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>to understand how worried or not private market participants are

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>about the use of debt, Like the CLO market must

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>be like this is great. The m and A market

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>is claiming it's the connective tissue issuance giving life to it,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>but others are saying this is really worrying.

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think the amount of leverage we see

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 9>being deployed as capex expense for AI and all things

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 9>AI continues to increase, I think that the debt service

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 9>for that will be wholly determined by the revenue streams

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 9>that AI in general is creating. And so assuming AI

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 9>continues to deliver on the dream and continues to deliver

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 9>on the revenue forecasts, then I think that that leverage

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 9>in that debt is probably okay. But obviously if the

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 9>secular shift in AI doesn't act result in the revenue

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 9>that people are expecting, then that overleverage will be a challenge.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So what is your base case for whether we meet

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the hype.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 9>I think we believe that AI is a once in

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 9>a decade, maybe once in a generation technology shift, and

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 9>that as a result, a lot of this leverage and

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the death that's put into the system

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 9>actually will be fine.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 5>I would say.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 9>I think our take is really that this trend of

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 9>companies staying private longer does have implications for the availability

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 9>of AI businesses in the public market, which is I

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 9>think a really interesting topic.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's delve into that topic.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 3>If we look at your portfolio, we can see the

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 3>companies that you did back from an early stage and

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 3>well a late stage growth area in the private markets

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and have successfully gone public, most recently Klana, but Airbnb affirm.

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm also thinking about the ones that still haven't gone public. Stripe,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, massive company that many would have thought would

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 3>have gone to IPO and it hasn't as yet. Data

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Bricks just an one hundred billion dollar valuation. When is

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>it likely that the IPO market will open for these companies?

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Is there just too much to be gained from remaining private. Look,

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>we've just had EA return to the private market, so

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 3>that the deal goes through.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think there's two ways to answer your question.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 9>The first way is to say that over the last

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 9>three years we had a historically low period of IPO activity.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 9>You all talk about it on the show all the time.

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 9>Q three there were thirteen venture backed IPOs. Those companies

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 9>raised thirty six billion dollars in the public market or

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 9>have a combined market value of thirty.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Six billion dollars.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 9>That's three thousand percent more than happened last year at

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 9>this time. So the IPO market is absolutely coming back,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 9>and we're starting to see signs so that.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>If the SEC is opened.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 9>If the SEC reopens, that will throw a wrench in

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 9>companies like NAVAN, companies like Ethos, companies like wealth Front

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 9>that have filed their S one and are waiting. The

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 9>SEC is not open for business, so new issuances will

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 9>be down.

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Matt, has your definition of a late stage growth investment

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>changed definitely?

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 9>And it has because companies stay private longer.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>So I know, to be fair, you've said that before,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 2>So I'm trying tounstand, like, what specific company fits your

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 2>profile right now?

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So let's talk about data bricks, which I think

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 9>is a great example. When I started a decade ago

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 9>investing in late stage private companies, the idea that we'd

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 9>be investing in a sixty plus billion dollar now one

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 9>hundred billion dollar private company was really hard to wrap

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 9>my head around. But as companies stay private longer, the

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 9>larger companies are just commanding more market cap in the

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 9>private market.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 5>And that's a big, big.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 9>Change from where things were a decade ago. There was

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 9>no sixty or one hundred billion dollar private companies ten

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 9>years ago. Today we sit and we can count dozen,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 9>probably of them.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is Wellington does well in both scenarios as

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 3>we said, and you've well haven't exited yet Klana because

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Klana goes public, you still hold, but there's a lock

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 3>up situation. Eventually, maybe Wellington on the one point three

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar assets on a management side, starts buying that

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 3>up in.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The public markets.

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 3>But when is it that you decide to exit from

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 3>the late stage growth perspective? Is it always when the

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>lock up expires, how long do you want to ride

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 3>these companies once they do go public?

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 9>For us, we think about holistically as a firm where

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 9>the return characteristics for specific strategy lie and are we

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 9>able to achieve those return objectives? And so oftentimes it

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 9>will happen is one of our companies on the private

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 9>side will go public, we will have generated sufficient return

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 9>to what we underwrite two that may still leave plenty

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 9>of opportunity for the public market side to be buying.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 9>And it's that combination of again, as I said before,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 9>seeing the full picture of here's how they operate in

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 9>the private markets, in how they executed, and here's what

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 9>we believe can happen in the public markets mean that

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 9>although we may be selling out of the private side,

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 9>our one point three trillion on the public side may

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 9>be potentially buying those companies.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 2>And really quick we break the story in July SpaceX

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>at four hundred billion dollars it was a tender secondary

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 2>as a case study with your assets on the management.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Can you even get into something like that at that valuation?

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 9>And at that stage the answer is yes, assuming that

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 9>we think that the return potential is there, and I

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 9>think One of the really interesting trends is companies stay

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 9>private longer. Is really to highlight the fact that perpetually

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 9>private for the vast majority of companies is not a

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 9>thing because the volume of liquidity in the private markets

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 9>is not sufficient to give employees, founders, and investors return

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 9>of capital that they need. The best way to illustrate that,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 9>in my mind, is to point out the fact that

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 9>the entire private market transacts in a year volume that

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 9>equals five business days of trading in the public market.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 9>So all the private universe transacts in just five days

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 9>in the public market. So liquidity in the private markets

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 9>isn't there to stay private forever.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 3>And only for a few really big key names. Matt

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 3>with Hyler a wedding to management. Always fascinating to have

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 3>him on the show.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It is time now talking tech and first up.

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Intel says it remains committed to its plans for building

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 3>out its brawling chip manufacturing plant in Ohio. This after

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 3>US Senator Bernierino pressed the company about delays in the project.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 3>In a statement released, Intel says the Ohio one initiatives quote.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Remain an important part of our long term plans.

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Plus, Apple defended its decision to use open Ai over Elon.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk's Xai in their iPhone software.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 3>This after Xai sued the company in August, alleging favoritism, stifling.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Innovation, and reducing consumer choice.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 3>In a Tuesday court filing, Apple said it's quote widely

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 3>known it plans to partner with other AI chatbots in

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 3>the future. A Meta is said to be acquiring chip

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 3>start up Rebos to strengthen its in house semiconductor effort.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That's according to sources now.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>The move aims to cut Meta's reliance on Nvidia, lower

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 3>AI costs, and support the company's push towards superintelligence.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>There's just so many technology news stories to get in today.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 2>Here's a couple that I'm looking at. Qualcomm allow it

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>by about a percentage point. They said overnight that a

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Delaware court has dismissed Arm's legal challenge again them. You'll

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>remember that the district court was looking at a case

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 2>where ARM had accused Qualcom and its subsidiary Nuvia of

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 2>breaching licensing agreements, and according to Qualcom, that case has

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 2>been thrown out. Although it's not doing anything to support

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the stock now. Reddit is down ten percent on social media,

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>there is some discussion about a drop incitations that Reddit's

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>getting on the open Ai platforms. Our analysts a Bloomberg

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence have also cited that data, saying that it is

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a concern the stock is down ten percent, though we've

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>heard nothing official from either Reddit nor open Ai. And

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're going to continue to look into this one.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But that's the basic logic. It's a data relating to

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the drop incitations that Reddit's getting on open Ai platforms,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and we'll find out more current.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 3>We will in our Let's just talk about a stock

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that has run up in recent days, maybe taking a

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 3>breather today. It's Core Weave. It's winning over Wall Street.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Nearly half of all analysts covering this stock now have

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a buy equivalent rating. That's after the company announced a

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>slew of new business deals, including one.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Just yesterday with Meta.

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Remember now for more meg Equity's reporter come and Renekey

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 3>is here to join us. It was fourteen billion with Meta,

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 3>but they'd already just done an extension with open Ai.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 3>They've been beefing up outside of Microsoft. The analysts the

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 3>notes were suddenly seeing more positive read across.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we've seen a slew of upgrades to buy

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 10>ratings for core Weave. As you said, nearly half of

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 10>all analysts now have a buy equivalent rating. That's up

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 10>from just twenty percent just a few months ago. Now,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 10>Corey went public in March, so you know, analyst ratings

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 10>and coverage sort of trickles in as a company, you know,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 10>goes along its lifetime. But this is really a shift

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 10>in sentiment, and as you said, these deals are making

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 10>Wall Street analysts feel more secure, more bullish about the

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 10>future of the company and that it has a diversified

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 10>revenue stream.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 5>That's not just focused on mistering trades.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>The CEO has done a couple of interviews with Bloomberg

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in the last two weeks, one on TV and one

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>with Brody Ford in the print domain.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 5>But his point's really clear.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Post IPO, he felt they were getting dinged, or at

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 2>least the stock could have gone higher had they demonstrated

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>a diverse customer base.

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 5>Now they are. That's kind of what the market's fixated on, right, Yeah.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>That's really what we're seeing.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 10>It's this idea that the long term, you know, in

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 10>the future, things are going to get better for this company,

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 10>and right now that's really overshadowing sort of some of

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 10>the concerns that more bearish analysts have brought up around

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 10>the level of debt that they have versus the amount

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 10>of revenue that they're bringing in. So it seems like

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 10>a lot of those fears have been quelled, at least

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 10>in the near term. And the other thing that's interesting is,

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, the average price target is bumped up to

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 10>one hundred and forty one dollars. That's the highest so

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 10>far and at least for now. The last time that

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 10>I checked it was above the current stock price. So

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 10>analysts have even been seeing some upside for shares, which

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 10>they weren't for months, you know, when it had this

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 10>huge run up after its IPO.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is competition.

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that n Scale, still private in Europe, has

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 3>just raised a pre Series C, having just days ago

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 3>completed their Series B. All of this speaks to the

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 3>furious nature or trying to get AI compute right now,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 3>and that is what's also helping the wind in call

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Weyse sales, right.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, exactly, it's and I think it's one of the

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 10>first ones to sort of come public and be a

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 10>very well known name in this space, and obviously it

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 10>has these great deals, but it has great partnerships as well.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's been linked with Nvidia Open AI. You

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 10>knows are really the key names in this space.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Branicky always love her reporting me. Thank you.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, Microsoft it's just unveiled new agentic security capabilities to

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 3>its Sentinel platform, hoping to offer a unified security offering

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 3>in this age of AI. We spoke with Microsoft Security

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Corporate Vice President Basio Jakhar about the updates and to

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 3>discuss how AI is actually impacting a new age of cybersecurity.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 11>We're very excited about the superpowers that AI brings for defenders,

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 11>because you're right, we need to use AI for defense

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 11>and it is going to change this asymmetry in the

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 11>threat landscape. This is why we're introducing the Security Store,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 11>because now anyone can build an agent through Security Copilot

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 11>and they can publish it in the Security Store. It

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 11>it enables organizations to quickly discover what agents are available

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 11>to them right in the tools like Defender and Purview

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 11>that Microsoft supports.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 3>How much have you had to beef up talent within

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 3>your know the hiring practices at the moment, because all

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 3>we talk of is talent wars at the moment. Is

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it really faced within the cybersecurity area as well?

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 11>Cybersecurity is a cultural transformation, and as part of Secure

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 11>Future initiative, we've taken a big initiative on skilling and upskilling.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 11>We have a security Academy at Microsoft where we have

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 11>we are training every single employee to learn about how

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 11>to do security in this new age of AI. And

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 11>we also extend that training to our partner ecosystem and

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 11>our customer ecosystem, so we all can learn AI and

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 11>we can learn security together.

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>That was Microsoft Security Corporate Vice President Vasu Jacau, Google

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 2>stop executive in Europe, said the continent should simplify complex

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 2>and conflicting rules on AI and technology. This is Silicon

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Valley's biggest companies gripe about their impacts and their ability

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>to do business.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 5>In the EU.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 2>She spoke with Bloomberg's Francine Lacroix at Bloomberg's Women, Money

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>and Power Conference earlier today.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Listen to this.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 12>I really think it's problematic that we have so much

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 12>regulation that is inconflicable with another. So I am eager

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 12>to engage in my new role.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>With sort of.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 12>I would say industry broadly, because whenever I talked to

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 12>business leaders there's universal frustration. I would say about sixty percent.

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 12>I think of a recent survey of business leaders say

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 12>they'd like simplification of regulation in the European Union. I'd

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 12>like to join arms with other fellow interested parties and

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 12>really advocate for a simpler regime here.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, be sure to catch more of Bloomberg's Women, Money

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and Power conference. Tune in on the terminal live, Go Carot.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 2>What's next coming up?

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>UKAI startup synth Percia is launching video agents. We'll talk

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 3>to the CEO about the tools aimed it making videos

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 3>easier to create and interact with Q your avatar ed

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 3>this is green mag Tech. AI video startup Synthesia is

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>introducing an updated version of its platform. It's three point

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 3>zero the company known for creating AI clones for corporate videos.

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 3>It counts in video Adobe among its backers, and it

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 3>serves eighty percent of the top one hundred companies with

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 3>its video offerings. Cynthesia co founder CEO Victor Riverbelli joins

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>us now. Congratulations on the launch, Victor, what am I

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 3>going to get with three point zero.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit of an overhaul here.

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 13>Thank you so much, thanks for having me on to

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 13>be to be back here. So three point zero is

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 13>a bunch of different things. The main thing is that

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 13>we're evolving video from being kind of a static broadcast format.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 13>Right you recorded once and everybody essentially watched it is

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 13>the exact same version of that video into video that's conversational.

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 13>And we're launching this new product called Video Agents, where

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 13>you're going to be able to create your videos like

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 13>you've always created your videos, but then you can insert

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 13>these agents at different points in your video and they

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 13>can serve different purposes. If you're doing a training video,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 13>for example, you can have an agent that actually checks

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 13>if the person watching the video has understood the content.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 14>If you're doing recruiting.

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 13>For examples, you could have an agent that interviews it's

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 13>a case stunt, a candidate that's kind of on the spot.

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 13>So lose video way for being static to something that's

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 13>much more dynamic and conversational. And then in the wake

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 13>of that, roles and launching a whole bunch of new

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 13>features just make the core product better. So launching a

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 13>new copilot making it easier for people to create video

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 13>in a chat style interface, Launching new avatar technologies where

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 13>you can take and prompt new avatars into exist, and

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 13>you can take the avatart that you already have of

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 13>yourself and you can say, hey, I want to be

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 13>on a boat, I want to be in a corporate office,

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 13>I want to change my outfit, And it cerentually just

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 13>opens up a whole bunch of new creative possibilities.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 3>New possibilities at a time where we're questioning the effectiveness

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 3>of these AI agents and indeed adoption within enterprise.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Factor, just talk to us about how you've been talking

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to your customers.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 3>We've had the MIT report saying ninety five percent of

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 3>pilots aren't working.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>How is it working within your clients?

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.479
<v Speaker 13>We've always had this manager cold utility of a novelty.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 13>You know, We've always said technology is amazing and it's cool.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 13>That of course is what we build our company around.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 13>But Alsomate we have a solved to have to solve

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 13>the problem for them customer, right. I think that the

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 13>MIT reporters is pretty bang on in my own personal experience,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 13>I think that like eighty percent of AI tools so

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 13>they simply just don't work. Fifteen percent of them kind

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 13>of stumble their way there. The last five percent actually work.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 13>When you look at our business and I think the

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 13>kind of numbers that we're delivering, it's very clear that

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 13>our product really truly works. We increased our NR to

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 13>one hundred and forty two percent from up thirteen percent

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 13>from from twelve months ago. We have you know, four

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 13>time to spending, customers pay us small than one hundred

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 13>care that we did twelve months ago. And all these

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 13>things only happen because people actually get bye out of

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 13>the product. Right now, I think what we've discovered at

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 13>some DSA is that as important as the models a

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 13>right like of course, generating the avatars, generating these video

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 13>clips for people is really important. But ultimately it's about

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.479
<v Speaker 13>a workflow. Why do you make a video? You make

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 13>a video because you want to communicate something to someone.

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 13>But we spent the last couple of years building out

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 13>as a platform that helps you with that entire process.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 13>You create the video, you edit it this PowerPoint soft

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 13>style interface, you collaborate with your colleagues, You have content management,

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 13>translation with a publishing platform, with our own video tare

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 13>and so what we've managed to do is to take

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 13>that process and make it as quickly as we can.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 2>You quantified that the market for these tools and gave

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 2>numbers and those that you feel don't work, and we

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 2>as a team can go away and check that math.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 2>But for Synthesia three point zero, do you have some

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 2>benchmarking data that that is evidence of its performance and

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>capability against the large field that is text to video?

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think the way you bench back these things

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 14>depends very much on the use case.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 13>Right If I'm creating a training video, that's a very

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 13>different benchmark down creating a marketing for example. I think

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 13>what we're seeing very clearly, like you know three point zero,

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 13>a lot of these things, we're literally releasing them as

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 13>we go right now, so they haven't been in the

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 13>market for twelve months.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 14>But what we see is.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 13>That if you do training content, for example, engagement is

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 13>increased by thirty percent versus.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 14>Sharing at as normal.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 13>Text's what benchmark is other text to video tools, but

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 13>we're really good at is avatars.

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 14>That's the thing that we deeply care about.

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 13>We're now integrating other models as well, So if you

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 13>want to use vio free in the product, you can

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 13>use that. We're adding a bunch of other models as well.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 13>So I think for us as a company, I don't

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 13>really think it makes sense to benchmarkets against text to

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 13>video tools. You know, for us about the process of

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 13>communicating something to someone, and that goes much deeper than

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 13>just to models themselves.

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 2>This week, the big focus has been on Meta's Vibes

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a funny name, and the reporting that open ai

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>is looking at a video tool in conjunction with being

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a social media platform. You've been on this program and discussed,

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, the risks of AI generated video content in

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 2>social domains.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 5>But what's your reaction to.

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Those two moves by those two players.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 14>I think it's very predictable.

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 13>I'm quoted, you know, I think four or five years

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 13>ago and in a book say that I think by

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty six, ninety five percent of all content and

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 13>incident's going to be AI generated, And I think that's

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 13>that's where we're moving toward style. It feels odd, it

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 13>feels weird. I think that we're going to be watching

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 13>AI generator content. But I think, you know, ultimately will

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 13>care less about how something was produced, will came more

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 13>about the content itself. A lot of the content people

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 13>make with AI today is what most people would call

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 13>slub right. It's not very high quality. It's kind of

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 13>like engagement farming, engagement baiting. But I think they'll eventually

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 13>be replaced by people using these tools to create awesome content.

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 13>There's so many great creators an incident, they'll pick up

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 13>these tools and they'll they'll and they'll use them to

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 13>create great content. As for the big platforms moving into

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 13>this space, I think again highly predictable. These companies ultimately

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 13>make their money off ads, right, and to launch an

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 13>AD in one of these networks, you want that to

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 13>be video in twenty twenty five because that performs way better.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 13>And these platforms they want to offer you the tools

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 13>who make those videos for those ads, right, which is

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 13>exactly like Google owning the platform to create appwords for

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 13>search engine marketing, for example.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 14>I think it's very particularly going to move into this space.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 13>I think also predictable that they're going to offer these

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 13>tools inside their apps. You know, it feels new maybe

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 13>that they're adding AI video, but really they've been doing

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 13>this for six seven years, you know, like putting dog

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 13>gears on yourself with face filters. All this stuff is

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 13>roughly the same technology, right, So I think it's just

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 13>it's just like this of trajectory of you know, more

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 13>and more AI being part of the content creation flows

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 13>both in our personal lives but also very much in

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 13>our in our corporate life.

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 3>And boy am I getting sore to maine videos coming

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 3>my way and the standalone app has been announced just yesterday, Victim.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm interested.

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 3>In your story with at the moment avatars and being

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 3>liked by in video known less. We said that you're

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 3>already back by in video and Adobe. Jensen's just went

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 3>on stage last week in the UK. Thing is going

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 3>to get into your next round? When's that next running

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 3>round happening?

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 13>Time will show you know, we're very appreciative of Jenson

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 13>now in video partnership, and I I think, if anything

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 13>for us as a testament to the fact that we

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 13>drive so much real value for our clients that we're

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 13>way past the kind of demo stage. I think, you know,

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 13>we're all capitalize. We've raised a bunch of funding rounds.

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 13>Who knows where the next one is kind of calm,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 13>but but you know, we we've give you our word

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 13>that he'll get to participate in.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 2>A Victor ripperbelly CEO Synthesia. Great to have you back

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 2>on the show. Thank you. Amazon has overhauled devices, including

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>its Echo and Echo Studio. We spoke with the company's

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>head of Devices and Services, Panels pan A, who says

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the products were built to be showcased in the home

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 2>and could help customers stop glancing at their smartphones.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 15>A lot of times we take out our phone, we

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 15>get distracted. I'm at the dinner table with my kids.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 15>We have this idea that we want to keep our

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 15>phones down right because we want to be present with

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 15>each other. And there's so many times where you pull

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 15>out your phone to answer a question, almost like you

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 15>just said, but now it's just changed, it's completely different.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 5>Just say a like, so have the conversation.

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 15>It's quite literally all the information there and it's conversational.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 15>Not only that she can then get the next thing

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 15>done for you.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mart gum And has written and it's based in

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 2>part on a conversation with you, that Amazon's overhauling its

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 2>device is to take on Apple in this AI era.

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 15>Do you agree with that? I haven't seen it? Can

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 15>I say that? Let me read that article that here's

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 15>what I'd say. We build our products for our customers

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 15>and for people. My whole goal is quite simple. We

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 15>want AI to be useful for people, end of story.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 15>And I think we're building devices to do just that.

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 15>And I do believe they're beautiful. I think they fit

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 15>in the home. I think they're so well thought through

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 15>that when people use these devices d They're going to

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 15>love them. They're just going to love them. I can't

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 15>like this is something. I just want people to get

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 15>their hands on them.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Great conversation.

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Amazon's SVP of Devices and Services, Panaspan a look right

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 3>off the heels that Amazon launch, Google out with its

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 3>new smart devices powered by Gemini AI as being gam

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Bluemag's Dana Woman for more. So, there's doorbells, cameras, there's

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 3>speakers what call you right.

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 16>Right, So there's two cameras in a doorbell and a

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 16>smart speaker, which actually isn't coming out until spring of

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 16>next year, which is going to give Amazon quite the

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 16>head start with its own smart home lineup, which, as

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 16>you noted, was unveiled yesterday.

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>So we have a little bit of competition here on

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 2>our hands team Amazon, then Google. They both seem to

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 2>be making a claim Dana to the home, the AI

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 2>in the home. What's kind of your reflection on the

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 2>last two days of announcements.

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 16>So both companies have the challenge of making exciting devices

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 16>that really are designed to blend into the home. I

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 16>don't think people tend to get as excited about a

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 16>smart video camera or smart doorbell as they would let's

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 16>say a new iPhone. And so both companies have overhauled

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 16>their lineups and both are really staking the future or

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 16>at least the near term future of their ranges on

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 16>artificial intelligence and weaving an AI in a way that

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 16>is useful for consumers. Google, for instance, is saying that

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 16>you can ask if there's a new feature called Ask

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 16>Home where you can literally ask your products. Let's say,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 16>what happened with the vase, and it will sort of

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 16>dial back the footage and tell you why an item

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 16>is misplaced or broken. Let's say, in a really extreme example.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 3>It is about an ecosystem, though, and keeping old uses engaged.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 3>That seems to me why they're saying they speak is

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 3>delayed right, because it is quite a delay until Spring

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:30.959
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six.

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 16>That is the way Google has positioned it. They are

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 16>saying that they are prioritizing current users of the ecosystem,

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 16>many of whom have devices that go back, if not

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 16>a decade, close to a decade, So trying to roll

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 16>out those AI features to as wide of a population

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 16>of devices as possible. And then they say eventually unveiling

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 16>this new and shiny smart speaker that's coming.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Daniel Wilman with the reporting across devices, thank you

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 2>very much. Sticking on the devices front, Peloton is raising

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 2>prices both hardware and membership fees as part of a

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 2>product overhaul. The news sending shares down significantly, although they

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 2>paid some of that decline in the last few minutes

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 2>or so. Our consumer tech reporter Samantha Kelly joins us,

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 2>what do we need to understand here? Kara and I

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 2>are both hardware users of Peloton, we both as subscribers.

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>What's new in our use of this text?

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, so it's a revamp across its entire line. So

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 17>five new products. That's a traditional base level bike, a

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 17>bike plus premium model. There's the tread treadmill, the tread

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 17>plus premium again, and the Row plus. So the big

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 17>differences here are the premium line. All of them really

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 17>get a new swivel screen, which might not sound so exciting,

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.240
<v Speaker 17>but the idea here is you can turn it around

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 17>and it opens you up to doing you know, yoga classes,

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 17>strength classes. The premium line has had this before, and

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 17>now it comes to the base level the premium line.

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 17>What's really kind of special here is the new camera system.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 17>It tracks you, checks your movements, its AI to give

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 17>you personalized custom workouts, really gets to know your your movements,

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 17>gives you PEP talks and counts your reps. And this

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 17>is sort of what the company is banking here on AI.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 17>It is interesting, you know, just following up on Amazon

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.919
<v Speaker 17>and Google infused AI, even Peloton, you wouldn't necessarily think

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 17>there would be an integration here is also embracing AI as.

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Well plotan IQ, and it's kind of meant to be

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 3>like a cross trainer in many ways. The thing is,

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I think you get new people drawn in or is

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 3>it just getting at an eye to upgrade all the time.

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 17>So all the models, even existing ones, can upgrade to

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 17>have this AI system now. But again the premium models

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 17>can have the camera movements, but it's not necessarily something

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 17>you know, you're going to drop thousands of dollars to

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 17>get a new camera system if you have equipment that

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.479
<v Speaker 17>maybe you're not even using right now.

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 17>Definitely to drum up excitement and that is pretty fun.

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I got to try it yesterday.

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 17>It is kind of the Yeah, it's pretty neat. The

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 17>way it works is basically there's like almost like a

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 17>selfie camera and they put you next to a pre

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 17>recorded instructor and you know, I was lifting weights and

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 17>it was caping track of it and it was giving

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 17>me some suggestions and so pretty useful depending on what

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 17>you're looking for.

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 3>It's so interesting though, I'm using Hinge Health when it

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 3>comes to physical therapy, you can just use.

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Your own phone. Yeah, as a camera medicine.

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And so there is going to be this sales pitch

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have to do, is why build it

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 3>into the product?

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Why can't I?

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Now you and I are stuck right so I have

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 2>bike in tread. I think you have bike right in tread,

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So like, okay, we face a choice, but I go

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.439
<v Speaker 2>back to the stock reaction very quickly. Sam Imi Mark

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 2>was on the show earlier this week. It's the latest

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 2>turnaround and investors are selling that.

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, yeah, I mean it's also it's like, are people

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 17>going to actually do this? It's like fifty dollars a

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 17>month they're in. They're increasing the subscriptions also, so five

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 17>extra dollars to even keep you in these classes, and

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 17>that that really adds up. Although Peloton says, you know,

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 17>you can drop forty dollars on a standalone class, so

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 17>maybe it really depends sort.

0:41:58.800 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Of what you're looking for.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 3>So true, forty dollars if you want to go to

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 3>the latest bar class in New York, or you do

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 3>a Peloton Blug's Sam Kelly, I'm glad that you were

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 3>trying it out for us. Meanwhile, that does it for

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 3>this edition a Bloomberg Tech right here from New York

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 3>and coming up in fact in the next hour. You

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 3>don't want to miss our talk with Peloton CEO Peter

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Stern's joining and these new devices.

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to miss it.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Edge that pace, that power, that focus. That's a big interview.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 2>The show had pace, power and focus. Check out the pod.

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it. It's on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 2>It's online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart It's Wednesday. I've

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 2>got a couple more days here in New York. We've

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 2>got a lot more to come in the week. Stay

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 2>with us. This is Bloomberg Tech