WEBVTT - Mark Bergen on Apple's Threat to the Online Ad Industry

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Locks podcast.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy remember in

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>like the two thousands or like the financial crisis and

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone you can barely remember last year but go on,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and everyone said, oh, it's such a tragedy. People could

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>have been curing cancer, but then they were spending their

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>time coming up with like more and more complex derivatives.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>And then I feel like for the tens that more too.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>All the smart people could have been curring cancer, but

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they spent their time getting more ads onto like tiny

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>phone screens and stuff like that. This is the whole

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like software sucking up the entire economy idea. But yes,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I do remember that criticism. There was a lot of

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>thought that went into how to best advertise on the Internet,

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I think we had an episode at

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>one point about how the Internet was actually powered purely

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>by that's right, No, I mean it more or less

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>seems to be. I mean, I guess people do pay

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for something. But it also feels like that era both

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of from a macro standpoint and maybe a micro

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>standpoint is coming to a close again again another decade

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>pivot because we have seen a lot of these Internet

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>mega companies like meaningfully start to slow growth. The business

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>models aren't firing on all cylinders as they want to are.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>And then just sort of like tech in general from

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>macro reasons, uh, seems to be it had better days, right.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates are going up and so a lot of

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the valuations of big tech companies are coming down. But

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>also to the business model point, I think this is

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting because initially, you know, we talked about very smart

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>people going to tech firms and venture capital and spending

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mental energy. They're trying to figure out

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the business model. But to some extent, it feels like

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the easy gains are kind of behind us, right. It

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was you create a product, you get everyone on your

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>particular platform or using your product or whatever, and then

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you make a bunch of money. And now it feels

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like things are changing absolutely. I mean, look at a

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>company like um Facebook for example, is just this. You know,

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they're really having to work for it, like their their

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>their model is stressed right now, and there's the rise

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok and so forth. Every one of these companies,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, to some extent, after creating a decade

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of like the best money vacuuming up machines that were

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>ever created are not like they kind of have to

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>really work for it now, yeah, and come up with,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say, more creative strategies. And one of the things

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen recently is something from Apple right. And so

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the stories is that Apple has this incredible

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>position in the ecosystem because so many people own an

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>iPhone and they pull out the first thing they interact

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with is the iPhone to get to the internet. And

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of power over these other companies

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know what shows up on that

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>iPhone and how right, and and they're having to be

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>more creative and making money off of those products. Right.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>The iPhone is getting more technologically advanced. You don't have

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to necessarily buy one every year. People are holding onto

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>them for longer. So how do you rest more money

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>out of that particular customer base. Such a tragedy. Companies

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are having trouble resting more money out of their customer base.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>What a terrible situation. Anyway, that further Ado, I want

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk more about online advertising this world, the challenges

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>all these companies are facing. We're going to be speaking

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with our colleague Mark Bergen. He's a reporter here at

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and he is the author of a recently published book,

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Comment Subscribe Inside YouTube's chaotic rise to world domination.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So Mark, thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and congratulations on the book. Thanks so much, Thanks for

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>having me so First of all, why a book about YouTube? Now?

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Why don't wait? Why did you do this project? Yeah?

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is this kind of a sleeping giant and social

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>media it's someone described it as like this iceberg that

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>no one ever really talks about as much for a

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>variety of reasons. I see YouTube as both the past

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and now future of social media. And it was the

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>first company to pay online broadcasters and invented the creator economy.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And now we're seeing with TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitch, you name,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it are all moving in this direction. Social media is

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>no longer your friends and family and your acquaintances. It

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>is influencers, It is celebrity. It is a game built

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>around in commerce. Uh. And this is a world that

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that YouTube very much creative. Should we be telling Odd

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Lots listeners to like, come in and subscribe other podcasts

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that an effective called action. All right, everyone like comment

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe on all thoughts wherever you find it. Okay,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>but you well, but we were talking in the intro

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>about this idea that the sort of like easy gains

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are over for social media, and it is true. We've

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>seen all these new issues also come up, like anti

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>trust when it comes to Facebook and Google, um, content

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>regulation when it comes to YouTube. Who should be the

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>arbiters of what's true and what isn't? Are the easy

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 1>days over for social media? I think? I mean YouTube's

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>business has grown tremendously, uh and and part of it

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>was because they really didn't kind of lock into their

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>commercial success until so we only the only data we

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have available is beginning in seventeen there as business but

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I was around eight billion last year. It was close

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to uh, pretty phenomenal growth. They just took off their

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic um when the viewership numbers and we're all

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>stuck at home watching there were studios, how them studios

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>were shut down, like YouTube became the default media aesthetic

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know a lot of kids, a lot

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of you know, yoga videos, just the hours of just exploded. Um.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But that the business has been crippled I think you

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>could make the argument more by Apple's changes than by

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>any any regular from this far. Alright, let's jump right

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>into it. So Apple, they say, oh, we're the defenders

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of privacy, and now I always get these alerts on

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>my phone. It's like, do you still want to be

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting information to that app? It looks like maybe you

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't rethought this or something, which I imagine is not

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>great for those apps when I click now. Yeah. I

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>mean there were people in in Google and Facebook less

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so at Google, but they will gripe privately. Facebook started

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to do it publicly, like Apple is now building out

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>a search advertising business. They're starting to hire more people

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like they have. This is a really savvy move. They

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>marketed themselves as the privacy first company. They have restricted

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>online cookies on iPhones and like kneecapped a lot of

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>potential digital rivals. I think the one way to look

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 1>at it is, you know this is they are making

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the They are driving this, this forced movement towards less

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>behavioral and targeted advertising, this sort of foundation for the

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Internet economy of the last two decades. The cynical view

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is that they have found a pretty effective way to

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>build out a competing business to Google without the world

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really knowing it. Well, Okay, so first of all, if

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you talk to Apple about this, they will say it's

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>about privacy concerns. If you talk to their competitors like

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube or Facebook, they will probably say, this is a

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>revenue grap How are you thinking about it? And what

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>are the sort of like clues or evidence on either side. Yeah.

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Google is a really interesting test case. It

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>has this um friend of me relationship with Apple. They

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>are competitors, certainly in obviously in smartphone markets, Google's kind

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of got after them a lot around an iPhone, but

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in their prime Google's primary business of search advertising, like

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Apples an extraordinarily convenient partner because for a long time

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Google has been the default search engine for Apple,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and now that it's a subject of an Apartment of

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Justice antitrust case. Uh. I think this is the chief

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why Facebook meta has been graping very publicly about

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>what Apple has been doing, and you haven't heard a

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>peep from Google. Uh. And in part because their search

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>business is less affected like search business, search ads in

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>general are less reliant on the kind of third party cookies. YouTube, however,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is heavily reliant on the fact that they want to, like,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they can serve much better and higher priced ads if

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they know all the videos that you've watched, all the

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>other websites you visited, you know, all the sort of

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>granularity that this, this entire complex machinery of online advertising

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is built upon. So can we actually take a step

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>back and can you maybe explain exactly how the market

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>operated before Apple's big switch, because this is not something

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that I am entirely familiar with, other than as Joe mentioned,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, suddenly you get all these notices on your

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>phone saying do you want to opt into data track? Yeah,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it it is. I think we're markedly similar

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>to sort of financial markets in it's like complexity and opacity.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Um Like there are effectively like two sided markets right

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>there by side and the sell side where you have

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, publishers that are out there, like have a

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of online real estate and that's everything from Bloomberg

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com in the New York Times to like very

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>popular mobile apps that that and snapchat Twitter right like

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has real estate and and and then there are

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of marketers that want to get in front

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of consumers. Google has the machinery on both sides, like

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they own both sides of the market, UM and Google

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has is the world's biggest digital advertising company. They have

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>been for for decades now. The sort of primary way

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that public online publishers have monetized with Google AdSense. UH

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that basically ad Sense is the same exact model on YouTube,

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just taken over to video. So it is the world's

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:41.479
<v Speaker 1>biggest online video advertising service by far UH and effectively

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is a very easy and increasingly automated system where if

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a marketer, I'm PNG PNGG spends you know, millions

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of dollars and billions of dollars of marketing. I'm gonna

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go to Google and I'm gonna kind of give them

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a chunk of money effectively goes through a bunch of

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ad agencies, and then Google kind of allocate that based

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on you know, we're going to get this into search

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in front of people whenever they type a keyword, We're

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna put this on display to put on the Bloomberg

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dot coms of the world, and we're gonna allocate this

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to to video, knowing that we can actually reach in

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>this very hyper targeted way the consumers we want to

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>reach other speculators who might be the equivalent of a

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund or trading desk cool by ad inventory just

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on the assumption that they can flip it and sell

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it for more than what that person was selling. I

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>even heard of that one. There's certainly like all sorts

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of middlemen in the industry, and you know there are

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>time in the era. I'm sure that still happens. But

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>I used to go to all these advertising conferences and

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, all sorts of ad tech companies that you know,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they've asked him what they do, and it's just you

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand where they sit in the stack. Right,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>There's just like all sorts of complexities and and they're

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>programmatic advertising companies that just do one thing on mobile.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And there was Bluetooth advertising was a big hot where

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you could actually like serve an add to a consumer

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>right when they're in front of the coal gate at

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the aisle. Like this was, I mean, this was we're

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>moving towards this world. And certainly before Apple stepped in

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of of incredible like they're geo fencing be able to

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>get your cell your data and know your exact location

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and push alerts and um, I mean this is why

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's under so much privacy and antitrust scrutiny is because

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it became quickly invasive and incredibly unregulated. So can you

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to us maybe about like how important data targeting

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or targeting of an audience actually is, because I think

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we hear these things like oh, it's it makes it

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>harder for advertisers if they're not able to track your data.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Why is so important? And like, can you maybe give

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.599
<v Speaker 1>us some numbers around how valuable a targeted ad is

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>versus an untargeted one. I don't even know if untargeted

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.359
<v Speaker 1>ads exist on the Internet. Yeah, well, and just on

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>to sort of add on to Tracy's question, like, let's

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>say I go to golf dot com. Yeah, okay, the

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ads that I get, like, how much is it he's

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on golf but dot com he probably wants to be

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about golf as opposed to ads that I get that

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know the last ten sites I went to

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is like pets dot com or and so my like,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>how valuable is it for golf dot com to be

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>able to know that? I also like pett I mean,

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>there there's all sorts of open and unsolved questions about

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the value and x like precision of online advertising. The

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>classic example is like you go and you buy a

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>pair of sneakers, and then all you see are as

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for the same exact sneakers, Like it's following you around

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the internet, right, So I just bought these? Why do

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you like the world's biggest tech companies that supposedly know

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot about you, Like, can't solve that one pair

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of sneakers? I do, but I definitely don't need a second,

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>uh stove, Yeah, I mean I think that to a

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>certain extent. The like the you know, YouTube is a

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting example in part like they have they built

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>this very a fantastic targeting model where they can like

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>show an add to a viewer. You mentioned, like if

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you watch about the golf channels, right, like you're if

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you're an advertiser, you're going to probably want to get

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in front of that you know, if you're if you're

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>selling golf gear clubs, you want to get in front

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>of that person that's watching all the YouTube videos. They

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have this feature, I'm sure, the skippable ad format, which

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is a major part of their success. It was because

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the consumers actually watching this, because they

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't click the skip button that's worth a lot more money.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And if Nike runs an ad that didn't skip, Adidas

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to want to pay more in in this

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>automated bidding system. And this is like Google Search kind

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of works really well with scarcity to where it's like

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>they can drive up the cost per per mill or

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>cost per click um pretty high in these scarce markets. Well,

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>let's go back then to the Apple situation directly prior

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to this policy change. What was an iPhone user giving

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to various apps when they use them and when did

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the policy change and what are they getting now from

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>those users? Yeah, I mean some of it is is

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>really hard to trace. But you know, in if I

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was an iPhone user and I'm using maybe like a

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Chrome or even safari um, You're getting a lot of

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>background data and like there's a lot of ad companies

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you've probably never heard of, or like serving a cookie

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on you on your um uh, your mobile browsing some

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. There are there are companies that have like

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>invented ways to do um deep linking between when you

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bounce from an app to the web. Right, this is

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this has always been Google's fear of Apple in some ways.

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that Apple is only if your only experience on

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone is just moving from app to app, right,

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Like that is you're you're no longer going through the

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>turnstile of the Internet, which is Google. Um, so certainly

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of data about the websites you visited, how long

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you link, like, what you click on all those sort

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of signals. Is my understanding is like that with now

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that they've kind of fully eliminated third party cookies, and

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Google is has said they're doing the same for Chrome,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>which is they own the crumb browser. Um it is

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>actually this Google has pushed that timeline back several years

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think now as they say, um and so the

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like basically like these third party sites that do the tracking, uh,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>will not you effectively will not be able to know um,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>your Internet history of like what you know if you

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>visit golf dot com and then you got to ESPN.

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>ESPN doesn't know that you lived at the golf dot com. Right.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ESPN might just sees you as a sports fan. They

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see you as like a golf fanatic. What scope

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do companies have to sort of bypass Apples restrictions on this,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Like is there a lot of leeway to still somehow

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>track people even if they've opted out. This is I'm

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not an expert. Google and face Book have both sort

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of invented these machine learning models that can like walk

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in backwards right kind of exactly. They both have different

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like jargon e names for the for the services, but

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>effectively that's it, like, Oh, we're gonna, uh, we're gonna

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>put you in a group of people. I'm gonna keep

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going back to this golf example. We're gonna put you

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in a group of We don't know that that you,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe are are actually visiting this, but we know that

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there's enough like golf fans doing this activity or using

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this app, and so we can approximate. I mean, the

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the real issue here is that there's Google and Facebook.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have been in a duopoli in this

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>world for a very long time. That is the third.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>The actual challenger now is Amazon, right, Like certainly not

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a small company like Amazon's as business has grown tremendously

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in the past few years. Uh, and they're less threatened

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>by this because they also it's all in house. Right,

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's business is based on like the activity on on

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon properties. Um, so that's one way that that that

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>companies have got around it. The big push also that

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>all the platforms, you see how much of ad tech

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>companies have pivoted towards commerce, e commerce, especially during the pandemic.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth and for listeners. I don't even

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>golf and I don't have a pet, so I don't

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>know why I use those examples. I just needed to

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>get that out of there. The ad is that I

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>have been getting on Instagram lately have been absolute garbage.

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>The worst target in Is that true? Okay? Because the

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>ads that I've been getting on Instagram because I I

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>experimented with this, because I got really interested. I was like,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>where are they getting this info from? It seems to

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>be coming in through Google. It's like if you do

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a Google search, it shows up on Instagram. Yeah, there's

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the one that they always have the debunk, which is

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>like if you're talking micro right. I tried that too. Yeah,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>my husband and I did baby carriages or not having

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a baby, but just as an experiment to see like

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>what would show up? Nothing if you talk about them

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in front of Alexa, But if you Google search for it,

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>they show up on Instagram. I mean Google, weird. Google

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for a long time we kept trying to keep They

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>had like a state in church and state separation from

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like search and rest of display. Internet started changing, uh

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and and um. In part that was just about a

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>financial concert, like they wanted to give more data that

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>they add tech industry. It was just a bigger growth.

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But for a long time at least they said, and

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and and people I've talked to the early days like

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have this almost religious belief that like you're searching, I mean,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, Google has our most intimate data, right, like

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the things we're searching for, we tell Google things that

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't tell our spouses is going to write like

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and so like that search data is incredibly valuable

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to a marketer if they're you know, trying and selling

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceuticals or lawyers, right, Like those kind of those are

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the industries that typically have incredibly high search ads because

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>there are people that are really in demand for for

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a particular thing. Instagram is I mean Facebook, because you know,

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's so funny. People talk about how crappy the add

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>qualities are. And yet like there as business certainly has

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>been suffering because of Apples changes, but it's still that right,

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But like the one of the two kings of the industry. Well,

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>then talk about what we've seen specifically. So when you

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>say okay there, because this is the core of the

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>whole thing when we talk about their businesses has started

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to suffer because of the policy changes that Apple has made.

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>What are we seeing concretely in terms of how it's

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>spilling over? Yeah, I mean, like the dollars. I think

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>some of this was, you know the fact that they're

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like macroeconomic factors, and for marketing, there's the war in

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and there's just the pandemic in general. But but

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in part you know, if you're an advertiser, in your

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>choices are between say like television or Billboard ad and

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. The argument for online has always been like

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that there's a joke about TV like I

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>don't you put your ad up there? And you have

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>no idea who's watching necessarily? And um, that's just sort

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of like brand advertising, right and and um in the

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>industry there's brand and there's direct response. In the direct

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>response as are the one where you want people to

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>make it an immediate action, like you want them to

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>install an app, buy a thing. Um. This so this

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is you know, Apple's changes have made it much more

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do that, and so there's they're getting you know,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>there have to be more reliant on on brand advertising

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that sort of contextual Just just to be clear, do

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we know like have they put a dollar amount or

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook put it amount on there? Actually and I don't

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have it off the top of my head. Um. I mean,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>their market cap has taken a huge it and some

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of it is regulation, but have they really been regulated? Yeah,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just there's kind of just the specter of regulation.

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not like Congress hasn't gone after Um. The only

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>real big tech regulation and I talked about in the

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>book is the FTC went after YouTube for illegally targeting

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>kids with with collecting data on children under thirteen. Um.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And and that's another area where like there's this whole

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>online academy that then unregulated and and you know you're

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to collect data on children under thirteen, yet

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies have done that. I mean, we

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know the numbers for YouTube, in part because they

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>don't share their financial data. But what was what was

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>meant as market drop valuation dropping the test? I don't know,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but definitely I'll just say this I'm not. Let's say,

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>actually the stock went from around three six one sixty

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and the market cap at the peak of was about

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one point six trillion, and now it's Facebook, So then okay,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of that roughly half a trillion dollar market cap. Has

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>anyone made an attempt to say how much can we

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ascribe this to Apple and the change that change in

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the online Facebook's business is primarily mobile advertising UM and iPhones,

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and there was a new stat I think recently that

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they're now that they just lead probably Android in the US,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the most popular UH system. Apple has historictly been UH

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Apple phones just to make a lot more money

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>per user than Android phones do. And so we can

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>assume that Facebook makes a lot more money on on

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>iPhones than on Android, and so that is the bulk

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of their busines this and I think it's you could say,

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>like a significant impact. So you mentioned antitrust a number

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of times, and also the sensitivity of like Google complaining

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about what Apple is doing, given that they have a

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>slightly different relationship with Apple than something like Meta, and

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>also given that they're under um antitrust scrutiny themselves. But

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances that we do get some sort

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of antitrust action when it comes to Apple and their

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>transparency push, because it seems like it seems a little difficult.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>It's like, on the one hand, well, you you know,

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>you own the product, you're making it a waltz garden,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you're cutting people off from it. But on the other hand,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you say you're doing it for privacy reasons. Right, that

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>should sound good to regulators. Right. They've had more Apples,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly him we're pressure around the app store and the

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>accusation that they're running on like an app store monopoly

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or or and that you know, if you own an iPhone,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you be're basically like Apple is the gatekeeper. Um and

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and and I think there's digital advertising, and there's certainly

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>companies in the advertising space to complain about that, like Apple,

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>one movement from Cupertino has single handed that like has

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>huge ripple effects for this multi billion dollar digital advertising world.

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that as Furries, I understand, Apple has faced

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>some in Congress and the epic lawsuit the creators of

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Fortnite is sued. Apple also sued Google, but they've really

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>gone after Apple. Um about this is about app in

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>store app fees for for Fortnite games. I think that,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like for Google's case, the most likely outcome from any

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>antitrust might be to kneecap some of their attack and

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and like the way the digital advertised worms, So what

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>about for small businesses that I mean, this is the

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>argument in favor of like hyper targeted advertising. That's like

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I can get like, are you looking for a new

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>dentist in the east village or Chief Lightening or something

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like that could we have hyper targets? Oh my god,

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>how did they know I need a Chief White? I'm

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 1>doing video for odd lots now I'm doing I need

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Chief Lightening. You hear about these complaints, but sometimes you

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>can't tell if it's like astroid turf, like some group

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook like may have like encouraged like how real

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is this? For the companies, they were able to find

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a model because they're really good at, like, you know,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>finding their exact potential customers and Facebook. Part of the

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>success of Facebook and Google has been the long tail,

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like the mom and pop advertisers. Facebook has leaned into

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this a lot as a response to Google as well.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>They're going to as office and Congress and saying like,

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>why are you trying to hurt small businesses right, and

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like that might be a compelling argument. Um, certainly it

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>has politically like for a P and G, like everyone

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to buy laundry detergent or something, right, but

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>its so for them, I don't know if they need

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>as hyper targeting as like yeah, I mean like P

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and G level, they basically operated as like a they'd

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>like and they have all these agencies that effectively operates

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>consultancies and like they're looking at spread like they're running

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>as with spreadsheets and algorithms and like moving the numbers

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>around and so yes, Um, I think that is somewhat compelling.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Um the fact that there and probably going to continue

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to like they know the argument that that Facebook and

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Google will make despite these changes around we lose some

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of our our targeting and richness. Um, the audience is

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>still here like like relative this has been Like YouTube's

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>argument for for over a decade now is like compared

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to television, there are so many more people and someone

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>where hours spent on YouTube and that the amount of

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>money marketing dollars spent on television is not proportionate. Like

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>if you need, if you're like want to, if you

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>want to challenge and there's been some challenger brands in CpG, right,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>like the challenge the real smart challenger brands will like

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>be where the kids are and we'll be like get

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in front of the audience on digital and do like

0:25:55.520 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>sponsored content deals and and like can lean into digital advertising.

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>That's that's effectively worked, right, Like these companies have grown

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because that argument has worked and money is moving over

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>from TV to the Internet. What exactly is Apple searching

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>advertising business? Like there's an Apple search engine? Right? Like

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what exactly are we talk about when we say Apples

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>really Like, I mean there is their Siri, which is

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>an Apple search engine in some ways, right, Um, there's

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the app store, which I think is that's where the

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>expect like if you look at the Tea leaves on

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>where they're hiring and putting resources it is to run

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>like effectively like a search advertising business in the store. Yeah,

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Like you want to promote um, I don't know, like

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you're searching for like Uber and lifts, Like I want

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to like spend money to be up the top result

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>when you search for Uber and then people are going

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to click on lift. Right, So what's the sort of

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like game plan from the facebooks of the world or

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube's of the world, Like what can they do

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to actually try to offset this? And I guess a

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>very extreme example, but you know, could I don't know,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>could Facebook like launch its own phone or something like

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if the idea is to get as close to a

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>customer as possible. Well this, I mean Google has like

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm got a pixel Google Pixel in front of me,

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in part because it's a company I cover and and

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Google pickels. Pixel was a response because like they Google

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>has Android open source software model. They give away their

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>software for free to Samsung and like a galaxy of

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>pun intended a galaxy of handset makers um and that

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they like for a long time. Like Google was like, okay,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>these will be rivals to Apple, and it hasn't really

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>happened in Apple, like I said, has just premium, like

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>people spend more money on iPhones. And then I think

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Google saw in part they're investing in Pixel because they

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>saw this world. They're like, oh, our digital advertising model

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is not going to last for a long time. We

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>need to own and operate the actual hardware. We reported

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on this quite a bit. Facebook has tried several times,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like I mean their company is now pivoting towards

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>like I think Mark Zuckerberg's bet is that we're going

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to stick a phone in our face and he's going

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to own that right and like, so that's there. They've

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>renamed the company meta, like Facebook's existential crisis has always

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>been like Google and Apple owned the operating systems where

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>they make the most of their money. And so the

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>movement the metaverses Facebook will why are we even recording

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this altogether at a studio? We could be like the

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Google and YouTube and and the rest of social media

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is commerce, like pushing commerce pretty aggressively. Um, and this

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like I think more ways to purchase directly, buy

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>something directly on Instagram, for instance, UM, buy something directly

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in a YouTube video, Like I think they're running into

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like the the uncanny valley of how much do you

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>want social media to look like the home shopping network?

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But the YouTube and part of the reason I wrote

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this book because it really fascinating, like they've built up

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the millions. There are about two million, over two million

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>creators that make money on YouTube. That number is actually

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>down from when the company had to make it a

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit harder, but that's a lot of that's just

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole economy. So many of them are now

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>comfortable because the uh because of it's been harder and

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>increasingly harder to make money and then to make now

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with with Apple's changes higher ad rates online. So they're

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>moving towards and you can if you watch enough YouTube,

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you like a lot of them have sponsored content deals,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>right or they're just like trying to sell their merch

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and their merchandise like tabs and they're looking in the

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>channel I think there are they're experimenting TikTok because also

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>moving in commerce like that is a direct response to

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple into privacy regulation, um cutting out, carving out the

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>like the profitability of about online ads, so you know,

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>just less big picture. Did it feel like this is

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of you know, Tracy mentioned like if I

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>don't remember when we did it three or four years ago,

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>someone came on and talked to us about the extent

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to which the entire Internet is all adds And does

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it feel like the does this feel like a turning point?

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Because then and I don't want to even like talk

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about I don't even want to say the say the word,

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but like web three and this idea like there's gonna

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>be like something else that's like we have to like

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>buy coins. I'm actually surprised we've made it like no ads,

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we just like buy coins from market and reason in

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>order the internet like that, Like is that is this

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a turning point? Is that the the possibility of web three nowithstanding,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Like the criticism of the in Reasons of the world

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is like, look at this, this economy we built around

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>them advertising is not the world we want. And like

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I was sharing an anecdote from the book,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know YouTube started like a decade ago.

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube was not making money. It was it was unprofitable

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>um and they had they they were trying to after

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, They're like, Okay, we need to make

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>money from this thing. And there was an ads manager

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>who gave a presentation on stage about how they were

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do it, and Sergey Brenn, who this is

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not confirmed, but Sergey Brandon, my reporting brand is a

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>founder of Google Worth, one of the world's wealthiest men,

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>largely based on a search advertising business, made a joke

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>about how you know how the YouTube ads were like

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>he interrupted the speech being like ha ha, Like YouTube

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ads are interruptive disruptive and we five point seven billion.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But like the founders of Google have never at that point,

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the founders have like notoriously never loved advertising as a

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>business model, like it has clearly been successful for them,

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Like they will make a descript like a lot of

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>them will be like search ads, search ads, You're delivering

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a thing that you really want and the rest of

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the ad is kind of icky, and like there's a

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sense it's this weird irony and the fact that they're

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest online advertising company and yet a lot of

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>people that work they're like don't love this. It's kind

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of sleazy market Like people in marketing names. I think

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they think of it as like old economy, right, like

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ad sales absolutely true, and so web web three whatever.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that you can the sort of case

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>inside Silicon Valley is like here's a chance for us

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to reinvent ourselves. In Google's history, like in the past decade,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been just trying to find a business that's not

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>reliant on as cloud computing is the main one. You know,

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube has subscriptions, there's YouTube TV, there's common Like they

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have been always searching for ways to move past this

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>um in part for all the reasons we talked about,

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in part because they don't love it, uh And but

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, like you know, YouTube was once

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's competing with Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney on original programming

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and subscriptions, they mostly dropped out there, like let these

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>companies like bury themselves competing for subscribers, and We're just

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna continue to dominate a pretty good, marching heavy business

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 1>even after after changes like on I askin remains a

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty successful business in Google's testament for that. Mark Bergen,

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>congrats on the book, and thank you so much for

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>coming on the podcast. Thanks for having me. So. I

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really interesting, Joe, and the whole transparency

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pushed by Apple was not something that was really on

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>my radar other than I sort of like clocked it

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit when I was using my phone, but

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't a thought of the impact on other businesses.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting what Mark was saying about

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea that for a lot of these big tech companies,

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like they want to get away from the business of

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>ad sales. And it feels like that almost from inception,

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like there's almost an aversion to anything to do with

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>media from the tech companies, even though ultimately they're in

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the business of selling media, right, Like, no one actually

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a content producer, at least YouTube does it.

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Um And when you you know, this idea of actually

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>having to go out and sell ads, like it does

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>seem kind of old fashioned. It does. And I remember

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that too, because when like Google came on

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the scene, it's like this sort of wow factor. It's

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like there's magical money machine because you tell the computer

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking for and then that's the most amazing

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>form of ads. But then then a few years later

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and they probably have like whole teams internally dedicated to

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>like taking ad sales buyers from Procter and Gamble to

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the US Open or like taking them out for wine

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Is like, man, this is like this is

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of like old school. This doesn't seem very techy

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to me. Yeah, And I guess my other big takeaway

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>from that conversation is we should be telling people to like,

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>comment and subscribe, right, We should definitely be telling people

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to like, comment and subscribe, So please do that. Uh,

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening, you know, just one other thing, you know,

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it always seems and Mark was talking about like the

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the incredible ecosystem of ad tech companies and

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how there's like nine middlemen, right, And I've always thought

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>there was an interesting and I asked that question about speculators,

0:34:54.640 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like there's the interesting analogy between online ads and financial markets,

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas you might find an edge at some point like oh,

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>this capacity space is really cheap here, or I found

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a really cheap way to get in front of these

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>high dollar clients, and then everyone discovers it arbitrage really quickly.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's like and then the search for the new one,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you think, why is there this's like endless

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>parade of ad tech companies and it's like everyone like

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to find that ORB. But look, if data is

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna be harder to come by, that's gonna people are

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to really put into more work. Yeah, and

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>then the question is what is the new edge? Because

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>people got so into targeted advertising, like what comes next?

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't talk about like tech business a lot.

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should talk about because it's just there's so

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, these companies are obviously so important in our

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>entire life. For many many years, we haven't really had

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 1>to talk about tech business. The share prices they just

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>went up. They just went up. But uh yeah, Now

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is is the future is like

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to use the internet. We got to buy a coin

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>from from Jeris in Horwan's all right on that happy note.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there? Okay.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway, and I'm Joe Wisn't Though. You can follow

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest on Twitter,

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Mark Bergen, He's at m h Bergen, and check out

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 1>his new book Like Comments. Subscribe inside YouTube's chaotic rise

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to world domination. Follow our producer Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Armine and check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>under the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening.