WEBVTT - Snort Dance Fuck

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen that? That me, that's Ginger Bell

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>getting sucked by a cockroach. No, no, I have to

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have to show it. I'm scared. I'm really scared. Oh

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>my god. It's so much more emotive than I think.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's very romantic, it's very Yeah, this is giving. Like

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Julia robertson Closer, Well, let's talk about Julie Rock. Let's

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about Julia Roberts. No transition needed, Yeah, because this

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is like a virgin and we are going to um

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>give yesterday's pop culture, today's takes. I'm Rosdamu and I'm

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Fran Toronto. Anyone who has listened to this podcast knows

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that Julia Roberts is very important to me personally and

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I as well. She is mother, Um. She also once

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>started in a film called Mother's Day wearing a truly

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>horrible orange wig. And when she's not mother, she is sister,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and when she's not sister she is Auntie. Oh yeah,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I have watched sometimes and said she was so aunt

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for that. She was, she was so second cousin for that. Yeah,

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>she's in She's in Mother's Day, and she's also in Stepmother,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>which I did watch that plane step Mom, step Mom, Yes,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>I did watch that on a plane recently. Very good. Um.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm trying to think back and figure out

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>what my first encounter with the Julia Roberts was, and

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure it was my best friend's wedding, which

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense because my best friend's wedding

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is my favorite Julia Roberts film. It's my favorite romantic comedy.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>It is one of my favorite movies. I would say,

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like top ten. Wow, okay, I um, I'm I honestly

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>only seen it one so I kind of want to

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll pin that and I want to know more

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>about my best friend's wedding. I will say true to

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like the way I grew up. My first Julia Roberts

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>movie was Hook, where she plays tinker Bell. Oh wait,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe Hook was mine too? Really Okay, I just don't

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>think of Hook. It's because the role is so small

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and yet literally she adds something to Tink that no

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one else could. Like, there's a Julian is that like

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is just so specific? Well, she's very sexy in it.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>She's well, okay, so here's the mean, this's a very

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sexualized tinker Bell. You I would okay, So I would

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>actually wager this is like very theoretical just about Julia

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Rolls in general. I would actually say that a Julia role,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's tinker Bell, my best friend's wedding, Aaron Brockovich, whatever,

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is a little less sexy and a little more gorgeous.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Like she has an innocent not innocent. She has a

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>beauty that is quote unquote family friendly or like, she

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>has a beauty that I think fits into so many

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>different narratives, and she's able to get yes, she's able

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to give sex appeal in a way that you know,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>men watching will be like, oh my god, she was

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>so hot, and then people, you know, people that aren't her,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>guys jerking off to Julia Robert. I think that's my point.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>It's like she doesn't give sex. I think I think

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>she gives romance. She's immediately romantic with everything. And it's

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like you wouldn't think of Tinkerbell as a role that

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>would be romantic, and of course the way they wrote

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it and also who they put in it, it's like

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>she's going to bring the love element, like the gorgeous

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>love infatuation, Like yeah, I don't know, but okay, hook

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>my best friend's wedding. What did you latch onto when

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you first watch either of those with Julia Well, I

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do remember thinking, well, I think this is a weird

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>thing about Hook in general, is that I, um like

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the scene where Robin Williams um goes walks the plank

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and the mermaids rescue him and breathe into his mouth.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I found that very erotic as a child erotic, and

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for some reason that's also tied into Julia Roberts when

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>tinker Bell becomes big and kisses um Peter pan Um.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I also found that weirdly hot as a child. As

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a child, it was wish fulfilment because like I I

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure maybe like Peter Pan, I loved growing. I

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>mean it's so it's like, you know, obviously promedic, but

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like as a kid, I love the cartoon Peter Pan

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And like I as a kid who was kind of

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>love crazy, like like the idea of romancing tinker Bell,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like that was like wish fulfilm. And I think even

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>as a kid. So maybe we can go into my

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>best friend's wedding. I maybe you can induct me into

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this movie. So okay, here's let me give a sort

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of um a brief synopsis of My Best Friend's Wedding.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>UM So, My Best Friend's Wedding is a romantic comedy film.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It's about Julia Roberts plays a food critic who I

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>forgot that she it's very important to the plot. Uh

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>not really, it's very important to her character. So she

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>plays a food critic who has this old friend from

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>college and they made a pact that if they reached

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>some arbitrary age, which now in my mid thirties looking

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>back on it is like so young. It's like twenty

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>nine or thirty years old. If they got that old

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and never got married, they would marry each other. And

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>so Julia Roberts when she gets this call from her

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>old friend, is like, oh he he's like remembering the

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>bet and like there's still something between us. But actually

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what he has to tell her is that he's getting

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>married to a like twenty two year old who is

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>played by Cameron Diaz, one of her best roles in

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, And Julia Roberts decides that that's her man,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and she's going to go break up their wedding, and

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>she spoiler alert kind of does and then kind of doesn't.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>They do still get married, but I think this is

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a radical rom com, especially for the time. In several ways,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Julia Roberts's character is very obviously the villain of this story.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>She is a bad person. She does bad things all

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout the movie. She tries to get Dermott mulroney fired

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>from his job so that or or she tries to

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like come but so Cameron Diaz. His parents dad is

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like really rich and has offered um the Germott Maroney

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a job, and like Julia Roberts tries to like just

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>like get between them, and she very she like is

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the villain. She goes into this with the purpose of

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>breaking up their marriage and like, yes, she is the

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>protagonist of the film. But she's not a good person,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>and I think this movie makes that very clear. And

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't get well, she doesn't get the traditional rom

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>com happy ending that we are familiar with, because I

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think in a softer movie, the the romantic lead would

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>break up with his girlfriend who would be like a

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>shrew or like some kind of horrible person. But Cameron

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is genuinely like you root for her to yeah, oh yeah,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>she is like she is so magnetic and um, so

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>funny and so vulnerable and beautiful, and you understand why

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy has fallen in love with her, and you

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>also understand why him and Julia would never work out. Yeah,

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, Julia is kind of a

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect anti hero, like Julia coming in saying like it's me, hi,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm the problem. But like also like um, and when

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about like the Julia cinematic universe and the

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>roles she adopts, like she in xis kind of permeable

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>likability And I obviously hate that term, but like in

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in this era of rom comes right like film exects

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>like are like women need to be likable, like we

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>need likable characters, likable blah blah blah, and like using

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the word like likability as critique for like a character

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is so like it actually has it just like doesn't

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>make sense as a critique and usually it's like thinly

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>veiled misogyny or like whatever. But Julia does embody this

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like quintessential likability so that even when she's doing the

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>most deplorable things, you can't help but like love her character. Yes,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>well what I think she has is and this I

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>really think is the thesis of this episode is that

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Julia Roberts is one of our last movie stars exactly,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and that is what she has. It's it's not just likability,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>it's she has star quality. Julia Roberts from an era

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of movie stars that does not exist anymore. I don't

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>have them next to Angelina Jolie and you know, all

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>those classic A listers. And there is a reason not

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to get to ahead of ourselves. Why her movie Ticket

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to Paradise with George Clooney, which whatever you want to

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>say about it, was a huge box office success purely

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the two star quality of the leads. What

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what Julia Roberts has, going back to our drag race

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation earlier, is charisma, uniqueness, nerv and talent. Actually say

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that she is the star package. And that's why something

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like my best Friend's Wedding, where I think if she

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>had been played by a different actress who didn't have

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that real world connotation of being a movie star, of

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>being America's sweetheart, people would have been against her and

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would have seen the way the movie ends as her

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like getting her come up and rather than the ending

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>actually being in credibly sweet and pretty radical for the time,

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>because the way the movie ends is that you know,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this man that she's been trying to get marries this

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>woman and she is left alone at the reception and

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>her gay best friend comes and dances with her, and

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like this very beautiful, like um instance of you know,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like a chosen family moment in a straight asked nineties

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>rob car Yeah, and her as a movie starts. So

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're basically saying is like if the kind of

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood actress Pipeline was drag race, this current generation of stars,

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Emma Roberts so to speak, are giving Marsha.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the Emma Roberts. I'm saying, Emma, Emma

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Roberts is giving Marcia Marsha. Marcia, and Julia's giving mystress.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Julia is giving mistress. I would not. I would not

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>in anyways. Um I yeah, No, I tend to agree

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think there's a there's a genisiqua about

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like what Julia and people like Julia can do that

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>just like can't be done as much anymore. Well, because

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you think about a lot of her early roles and like,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>even though she became known as a rom com queen,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>her early roles were very sort of non traditional and

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>were the things that maybe would lead to an actress

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>usually getting pigeonholed, because like her first movie, if you

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>look at her filmography, what is it her first well,

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean not her first movie, but like one of

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>her one of her big break performances was Pretty Woman,

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in which she played a hooker. Yeah. And and I

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think in that in that same vein like the women

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that Julia tends to play are women that are, even

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>though she's dropped dead, gorgeous like that must be said,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>women who are off the beaten path, women who are

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>emotionally complex, women who will not be beholden to their

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, romantic um you know, co lead or whatever.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Like she has this autonomy, this gumption, I think, um,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of like you know, laughy sexy resilience. Well,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean not even sexy as the iconic we smile

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is iconic, you know what. I think the thing with

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Julia is is that something that she does which I

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>think we don't like in other actors, which is that

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>she cannot disappear into a role. You always know, you

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>always know that you're watching Julia Roberts. But with where

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>with with other actors, that would be a negative with her.

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's additive because you are so aware of who she

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is and she is such a magnanimous, like um vivacious,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>vibrant presence. I r l that she brings that to

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>every role she plays, and she like fills it up.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So even though she's not doing some like fucking method

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>work where she's disappearing into a role and like making

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>herself look ugly, you wouldn't want her to do that

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>because that ineffable Julia Roberts thing that she brings is

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>why we love her and why we want to watch

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it over and over again. Her playing different versions of

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the same woman, which is just herself. That's what makes

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>her a star. And you know, I don't want to

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Oceans franchise, but it is why in

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Oceans I think twelve or whatever, it's so genius that

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Julia Roberts. And did you see Oceans twelve. There's this

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>scene where she does she plays, you know, just a

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>woman she plays, you know, she's a character in this franchise,

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's a scene where she pretends to be Julia Roberts,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>and that and the fact that she can't disappear into

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a role makes that element of the plot so doubly

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>triply funny. Yes, it's so. I thought it was so good.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But I also haven't watched Oceans in a really long time,

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how I would think about it now. Well,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's also why she was kind of the only person

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>in who could play her role in notting Hill. I've

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>never seen. Okay, So I rewatched notting Hill recently for

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time since when I originally saw it. Um,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>which was like when it first came out, and it's

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>not a good movie. And I and you used to

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>used to love it, right, No I did not. Oh,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought you had told me to watch it before.

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I like, I really love Richard Curtis, who

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is the writer director behind Four Weddings in a Funeral

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And like a lot of Grant's films, Um, notting Hill.

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a very good movie having rewatched

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it recently. But Notting Hill is about this bumbling English

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>guy played by Hugh Grant also doing this like Hugh Grant,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like is the male Julia Roberts. You know, he plays

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the version of himself in all these movies and you

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>think Andrew okay, okay, continue, So he is this like

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bumbling English guy who owns a travel bookstore, which is

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing that used to exist when you could not

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>only own a physical bookstore, but one that only sold

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>one particular type of books. And it wasn't like why

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy romance um And one day and erstwhile movie

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>star played by Julia Roberts stumbles into the bookstore. They well,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>actually they stumble into each other. He pours coffee over her,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>takes her back to his apartment, and they fuck like

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately and then have this little love affair. And the

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>only reason that movie works is because it's Julia Roberts.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, oh, I believe that this isn't that

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the biggest movie star in the world, because

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>she's being played by the biggest movie star in the world. Well,

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Julia can push emotional steaks in any movie, right, It's

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, It's so I maybe haven't watched enough Hugh

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Grant movies. I really feel like George Looney is like

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the male Julia Roberts, because I think Hugh Grant gives

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a little more like kind of like mumblecore, kind of

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Emma Thompson kind of like I don't know, I mean, yeah,

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're not thinking about it's not because George Clooney

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>was a TV star on e Er then. Really the

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest movies he ever made were the Oceans movies, and

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>those were like his big crossover moment. Hugh Grant was

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the king of rom consent. He played the same version

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of every character and all these rom coms, and he

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>ruled the nine in the same way that Julia Roberts did.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's why, in a lot of ways, them coming

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>together in notting Hill was the perfect marriage of the

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>thing he did, which was star in all of these

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>British romantic comedies that were like very smart, very quick,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>uh like a little sad um, and then the thing

0:16:56.120 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that she did, which was be the big Hollywood agastar,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like with the iconic head of hair and

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>smile and laugh, and it was like on paper, the

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect marriage of those things in the movie does work

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because of them, it's just not a very good movie

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and not a very good performance of hers um. I

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>think also because she's not playing exactly the kind of

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>actress she was. She's playing like a serious actress rather

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>than Julia Roberts. It's like not as maybe complex or

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just not as Julia or something. There's also

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a scene where there's she goes to dinner with him

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and his friends and they're sitting around the table a table,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>all talking about why they deserve the last brownie and

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the way that they win the game is like they

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>say how awful their life is, and like they all

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tell their like sob stories. Um, Hugh grant sister who

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>uses a wheelchair like says something about how she like

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can't have a baby or something, and then it comes

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>around to Julie rob She's like, well, I got all

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you gaged because I'm famous and like my ex boyfriends

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>sell our stories to the tablets blah blah blah. And

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh no, baby, this is you actually still

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty nice life. And it is kind of

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>funny because they're all like are like, okay, whatever, it's

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not that bad, you know. It's like when you think

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>about like Julia Rolls and those like this era of

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>rom coms forget forgive me. I don't actually know all

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of the chronology, but like it's kind of like Aaron

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Brockovich like to me stands out in a sea of

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Julia roles because it is romantic. It is part rom com,

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's illegal drama where and she is the beating

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>heart and like primary character, you know, like she pushed.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean that Aaron Brockovich is probably top ten for me.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I've only seen it once. What I will say from

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what I remember is that I actually think that Julia's character, well,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously Aaron Brockovitch was a real person, but

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the way Julia plays her, it's very similar to Vivian,

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the character she played in Pretty Woman, which is the

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, like down on her luck, can't

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>get any can't get anything right, can't get any luck. Yeah,

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>woman who like is used to being seen only as

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a sexual object obviously, and like it's in a much

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more like obvious way and Pretty Woman because she's playing

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a sex worker, but it is something that she like

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>as her career progressed inn do a lot, which was

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>play like one of the people. Yeah, And in the

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of I guess sexiness of Julia Roberts that we're

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about in something like Aaron Brockovich or Pretty Woman,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>her sexiness is like I hate using this word because

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it sounds so loaded, but it's like non threatening. Does

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that even make sense. No, I get what you mean

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>because even in so this like she's not sexy and

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that blonde bob you know what I mean? Like, well, yeah,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>because there's the scene in Pretty and listen, pretty Woman

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect I I love Pretty Woman so much.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>The first time I ever um went out um in

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>women's clothing. I won't say like drag because like that's

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not what it was. Um. The first time it was

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>for Halloween my freshman year of college. I was Julia

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>robertson Pretty Woman in the blonde wig. Like that's because

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to me that was like she was the tannacle of

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>feminine of like feminine beauty. To me, does that look

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>even though she looks so much better when she takes

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the wig off, But that scene where she goes to

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the hotel with Richard Gere and she like gives him

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a blowjob where she's wearing that wig, it's like she's

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>not sexy, and I actually she give him a blowing

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in that way. Yeah, she literally puts a pillow down

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on the floor and sits at his knees, And like,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the point of the movie, is she

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is not sexy. They're trying to communicate as much as

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>possible that this is someone who shouldn't be a sex worker, because, like,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's obviously problematic because she's like quote unquote

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>better than that, and there's a lot of like like

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it was, yes, it was literally it was made in

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, but it's pretty transgressive for a romantic comedy

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of that time to have the leading lady beat excuse me,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to have the leading lady be a sex worker. But then,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the one scene that I do think is actually sexy

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in that movie is when she um Richard Gear has

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gone down to the bar in the hotel to play

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the piano, and Julie Roberts comes down in a bathrobe

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and Richard Gear asks all the guys who work at

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the tell to leave the room, and he lifts her

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>up onto the piano and like opens the robe and

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like puts his head in her stomach and like presses

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>her down into So it's so hot. So that's such

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>a good scene. I'm so erotic. It's erotic. Yeah, And

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>and I god, I can't believe you've only seen aer

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Brock of wch once. I honestly feel like we could

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>do a whole episode on erin. But you know we

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would have to bring Hunter Harris. I was just so

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about to say, like we we I wish we could,

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, pull out our Hunter Harris phone like allah,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>like power Puff Girls like Hunter get here right now,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, because Hunter Hunter is you know, a noted

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a scholar of Aaron brockoviciology. Um, but that movie is

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think encapsulates everything that Aaron Aaron, everything that juliacy

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>she disappeared into shell. Um. No, everything that you know

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Julia does best in a movie which is like have

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this insurmountable gumption and and and create this engine with

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>her face a own um and her hair, yes, and

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>her hair and all of course Julia Roberts is the

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>story of hair and her boobs as as Phoebe just

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>chimed in to say, yeah, um but yeah, I I

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>oh god, that movie Rose We have to rewatch because

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a stunning film, amazingly written, great legal drama. Um.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever have you ever in your own life

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>how an Aaron Rockovich moment where you were fighting some

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of bizarre legal drama, any sort of like did

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you ever like go to get into housing law, you know,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>were you over squatting? Did you ever have to in

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>your name change or something like that. I was thinking

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about changing my name, but I don't want to know.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Changing my name was actually like a very smooth process.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It was really easy, and it does involve a lot

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of bureaucracy, but like it's actually the closest I came

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>was when I went to get my name changed. So

0:23:54.720 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a requirement that you are supposed to publish

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>your name change in a newspaper. And actually, like this

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 1>is this is some t All the dolls in New

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>York do it in the Irish Times because it's like

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest way you can do it. So it's just

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>funny for me to think that there's this like small

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Irish newspaper that literally only exists so trans people get

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>published their their like name changes and it's just like

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>full of dead names. Oh my god. But when I

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>when I went to um City Court to do this,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>what I said to the judge was I asked to

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have that requirement waived because at the time I was

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 1>still a journalist, And what I said was, look, you know,

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like my name is out online and is connected with

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>my dead name, so like they're kind of already exists

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>this public record. And also if something were to be published,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it might have like harmful consequences for me, just because

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I am like on a very minor scale, like a

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>public figure or whatever. Did they and the judge did

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>waive the requirement so I didn't have to get it published.

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So I did kind of have an Aaron Brockovitch moment.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I love. UM. I was mulling actually on my own

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>question and I can't I'll just I'll be extremely vague

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the tea, but I can't actually like

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fully talk about it. I somewhat recently, UM got a

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>service done. And this very recently UM went to go

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>do something, UM, who was highly recommended get a service

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>done by from someone who came recommended by a lot

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of my friends. And this service was um botched for

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better word, and UM it was. It

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was very very difficult to go through because I actually,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't believe in in our legal system

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and I hate bureaucracy, and I also think that like

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>suing people is like white people behavior, and so I

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just had to like go to this girl and be hey, UM,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened is not okay. And these are all the

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>ramifications that it now has on my life months out

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>from this experience. And I don't believe in suing people,

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but I do believe injustice. And I need X, Y

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and Z paid for. And I got five thousand dollars.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You did, I got five thousand dollars. Yes, I did.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I got five thousand dollars. And I let me tell you,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I had to send some email length texts in order

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to get it, but I got it and um um

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>no through Zel And so there was there was a

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>written agreement, you know, there was some kind of you know,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there was some kind of Aaron Brockovichian elements. So I

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>felt very proud of myself though, and I also and

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I also did it in a way that was not cruel, right,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Like I I said to this person, I was like, hey, like,

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't wish ill on you. I'm not trying to

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like malign your business like I you know, I just

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>one like to be well and I want my stuff

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>taken care of. So this is what it's going to cost.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Here is And I literally sent the invoice of all

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I needed to pay for in

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>order to fix what had happened. Um yeah, good for you.

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the only the only difference between our stories

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Brockovich is that she was doing this to

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>help other people. We were doing it to help myself. Yes,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was the beauty. It's such a it's a

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>very satisfying ending. I won't spoil it if you've never

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>seen Aeron Brockovich. But if you have never seen Aeron Rockovich,

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very old movie, you can spoil it. I well,

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>you can probably guess that she wins in the end,

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, come on, that movie is perfect. We have

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to rewatch as And it also is tied to the

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Real Housewives franchise because Erica Gardy's husband is the Aeron

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Brockovich lawyer. Yes, oh my fucking god. I always forget

0:27:50.800 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that movies that are not very good. I watched Love recently. Girl,

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have you when was the last time you watched that movie?

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I watched it once, like very long after, in theater.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I did not see it in theaters. I was not

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the Eat, Pray, Love craze. I was the

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>only thing I remember about it is that the food

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>looked very good. I was basic mama, so I read

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the book when it came out, like I studied Italian

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>diva like I went to Italy and I sat in

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the exact booth that Julia Roberts sits in in the

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.719
<v Speaker 1>best pizza place in Naples, and I took a picture

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of me laughing like Julia Roberts. You know, it's probably

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>still on my Facebook. Um. I loved the Prey Love

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is on the movie, you know, was like Ryan Murrafeed

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But like I forgotten Viola Davis. Isn't that movie. I

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>totally forgot what the funk? And this is what that

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>movie gave us is um dog Days are over by Florence.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The machine was used in the trailer and that is

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of the reason why Florence blew up in the

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>way she did. What really? Wow, I actually didn't know that.

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And this was also which was the year of James Franco,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and James Franco was in that movie. And god, that

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>movie just was not very good. But I do that said,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I do want to watch. I do want Ryan Murphy

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to direct more films. Ryan Murphy doesn't need to be

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>doing anything else, anything more than what he's already doing. No,

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you should do films instead of TV, because

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that a contained story is his strong suit.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think like you know series, like they always get

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>away from him because he's usually not even like working

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>across them. Um, have you ever you pray loved? What

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was your bolly? Was it Berlin? Have I ever eat

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pray loved slash? What it? That really just means is like,

0:29:55.880 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have you ever like I mean, like flown internationally with

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a kind of um vague existential slash romantic driven like life? Um? Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I I guess I would say that, you know, like, um,

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the first summer I spent in Berlin, I know, but

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it was it was more of a um it was

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a snort dance fuck that yeah mine? Okay. I I

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>studied abroad in London, and I'm very sorry for that sentence.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Um I and that was probably my e pray love.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But mine was not wait what did you say, snort

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>snort dance fuck, snort dance fuck. Mine was not snort

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>dance fuck. It was more like eat eat social anxiety

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like it. But you but you went for an academic purpose,

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't actually think that fulfills the requirement. Love

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is like you're abandoning your life to do something that

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is purely for pleasure. So let me embellish I did

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>abandon my life. I was at a university at Indiana

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that I hated. I had chased my friend there, and

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I you know, hated studying there. I wanted to get

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>out as as soon as humanly possible and not spend

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>any more time in Indiana. I was sick of most

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of my friends. I was sick of the curriculum, and

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like I had to un enrolled from my

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like university in order to take this like research class

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>at University College London that wasn't even like you know,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>endorsed by like my my school. And so I really

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>did go out of my way to like have like

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a kind of find myself moment. And this was also

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>very important probably for you as well as pre iPhone.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's a way more like I mean, this is

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>probably I mean I don't know if this was for

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you because of the drugs, but like there's so much

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>more um stuff going on inside of you when you

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have an iPhone, Like there's so much more inner

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>You have so much more of an inner life. You're

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking so much more about yourself and your interiority. I mean,

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing the most drugs, I still had

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>not oh okay, um so, but to that effect, when

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I did study abroad in London, I was is traveling

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>every single weekend by myself. So I went to Italy

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.479
<v Speaker 1>by myself, I went to France by myself. I went

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to all these different countries, book festivals, a Robin concert,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like all this different stuff, searching on my own for

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like the meaning of life, you know, like I was looking.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't even looking for love. I was looking for

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for meaning out of my life, which is like, even

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>though this E pray love is not very good, it

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is why I pray love was like such a mega thing,

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is because it was able to tap into this like

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>white womanhood that I unfortunately was very adjacent to, um

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>where and it's like all these there's a whole class

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>silver hair. Yes, no, no, no no, actually this is pre

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>silver hair. But I had self died a strip of

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>my bangs with bleach and so and I have black hair,

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>so it was like straw yellow. Yeah. So, but that

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I did have a straw yellow strip in a very

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>long Rihanna esque bang because it was inspired by Rihanna

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and her hair at the time. Um but yeah, that

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was my that was my prey love. So if you

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>were going to do and Eat Pray Love. Now what

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>would it be? Where would you go? Very good question. Um,

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>my instinct is maybe to say Mexico. I would love

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to do a Mexico tour because I haven't properly explored

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different cities throughout Mexico that all of

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>my friends say are like cultural hot spots and nightlife

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>hot spots that I'm like always you know, been adjacent to,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have like followed artists and creators on Instagram that you

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>know makes stuff there. I feel like I have another

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>one that maybe will come to me. What would what

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>would you say? Well, so I actually was thinking of

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>going to Italy. I like was literally looking into booking

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a trip to Italy next month. I haven't I need

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to get off this continent international have not. I have

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not traveled internationally since pre covid Um, and I've never

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>been to Italy. I've spent a lot of time in

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Europe and I have almost gone to Italy a couple

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of times, but I always said I didn't want to

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>go just for a couple of days. I really wanted

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to do like a big Italy trip. But I actually

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>think my Eat Pray Love is also a mom and

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>me a moment. I need to go to Greece. Oh,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Greece would be really good. Oh I could see that

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for you. Like I just want to go um and

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>forget all my responsibilities and I just want to like

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>go travel and eat and fuck and see ruins and

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 1>art and go swimming in the Aegean Ce and like

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever. You know, I've never been to Berlin.

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe I should. Maybe Berlin it is my eat

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>pray love. Yeah, but okay, this is what this. The

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is why I don't think that can be and

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>eat prey love for you is because you will still

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>find a way to turn that into an approximation of

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>your life. Here. You will still find, you will find friends,

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you will network, you will check your email, you will

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>see all these caustle. I'll be there and probably the

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 1>same week that a bunch of drag friends are there.

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I I think for you to do a true e

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>pray love, you need to go somewhere where you don't

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>know anyone and just figure it out. I agree, And

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you should throw your iPhone into the ocean. I'm not

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do that, because then how would I go

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok and find, you know, like the best place

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to go for dinner or whatever. Um, okay, so zooming

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>out of this Julia convo, like what is what is

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Julia now? Like I feel like she's among these celebrities

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that are in press junkets being like there are no

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>more stars anymore, like when Jennifer Aniston said in that

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a lower intervition that there and like I said before,

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason why Ticket to Paradise, which we will

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>saw wasn't very good but still was a huge, huge

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>commercial hit, because those are the last movie stars. Like

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>can you name one, like a new IFH celebrity who

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>is a movie star? No? You can't. Well, I just

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I mean, I I think there are tons

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of um new celebrities that are, yes, but but a

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>celebrity is different than a movie star. I do think

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>that there are people that come into this generation of

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>movies and yeah, I would absolutely say they are movie stars,

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're not going to be movie stars like Julie

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Roberts ever again. And I think that that's part of

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Like I think it's like I personally like mourn this

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>era of movie stars, but also know that like pop

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 1>culture written large, especially in movies is always shifting into

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of it can reference the past, but

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's never gonna go backwards. And so what I'm kind

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about, and maybe you can like noodle on

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>it with me, is like, if we can never get

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Julia Roberts again, because we can't, like what, who are

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the new people that inhabit the same um spaces as

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Julia that make us feel the way Julia makes us

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>feel on screen, Like I'm trying to think of, like, well,

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it's also about a business thing, because the thing about

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the movie star is that like why they exist and

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>why they're they don't exist anymore, is a movie star

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>as someone who can sell them a movie purely by

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>being in it. That's why Ticket to Paradise was such

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge success, not because I had like an interesting

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>premise or a good trailer or anything. It was Julia

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Roberts was in it, Cluney was in it. People were

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>buying tickets, That's it. So that's why I think, like

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the closest thing we have to a movie star now

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>who's like currently making movies would be someone like the

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>rock I don't know, not interesting, not even like if

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about, like what are the biggest movies now

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Marvel movies. None of the people in them are movie stars,

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you were not like what movies outside of Thor is

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Helm's worth making or Paul Rudd. They are not

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>selling movies on their name alone. They're part of a machine.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>We're actually them as people are secondary to the characters

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they're playing. Like I would argue that the famous person

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is not Chris Hemsworth, it's Thor and he is part

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of a machine. Even someone like Chris Evans, who like yes,

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>has done things like knives out like he is famous

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>because of his proximity to the franchises he stars in. Yeah,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the Rock. I think the Rock, and like

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this like Marvel Universe thing is like totally accurate. I

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>also think that maybe in a different version of this idea,

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the stars that could maybe do

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>something that Julia does are the ones that are like

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as not online as possible. And I think that honestly,

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is stupid, but like Timothy shelle may

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>or like or like Florence Welch, Florence Welch, Florence Pew

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>are like I mean, now that she's had that, don't

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>worry Darling Junkett. It's like that the mysticism has gone now,

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but like Florence Pugh could have been that girl, you know,

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like they're are just that are classically like there. Maybe

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to say, because I don't really know

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>if what I'm saying is accurate, but it's like there's

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a kind of attention to acting and everything they do

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and a focus on the acting that you know protects

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>them because they're not on social that much, and so

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we're able to bring our opinion of how much we

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>love this celebrity, like a Timothy. It's like I'm going

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to go see a Timothy movie no matter what. That's

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily true, but there are a lot of people

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>where that is true for them. That's kind of maybe it.

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I do. I do think someone like

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Timothy is the closest thing we have to a contemporary

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 1>movie star. But I do think you're right and that

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>social media um keeps us from being able to abstruct

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the person from the persona and or or maybe there

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is a lack of I mean, it's funny because we

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>were talking about this in our episode with Harry Enough.

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>There is a lack of mystery around these celebrities. And

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why we don't have the movie star

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of at all, because Julia in her heyday felt larger

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>than life in a way that celebrities simply aren't now.

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And but even though Julia was a huge tabloid figure,

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>but her she only existed to us either in the

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>films we were seeing, or on the red carpets, on

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the cover of magazines, or in the tabloids where we

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>were getting the most sensationalized parts of her personal life,

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like Aloe Vera, which I think I told you about

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast before. Okay, so this is I mean,

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like very juicy um celebrity celebrity tabloid gossip. So Julia

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Roberts um fell in love with this guy who was married.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he was maybe like a director, like worked

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>on a film or something that she worked on, and

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he was married to this woman named Vera, and Vera

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>would not divorce him. And so Julia Roberts went out

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in public wearing a T shirt that she had made

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>herself on which she wrote a low She wrote al Vera.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But it was like she was saying a low Verra,

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like like Vera was a low person or it was

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>just like it was like stupid, but it was also

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh my god, Like Julia Roberts is kind

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of a mean person. There actually, how are several stories

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:39.479
<v Speaker 1>about her having like run ins with the paparazzi where

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>she has told them off and like, which we won't entertain. Yeah,

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's not being that's not being mean, Like

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, I'm sure like being Julia Roberts comes with

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so much and the way she's hounded by the press

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and has been for almost her entire adult life, like

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>will never be able to understand that. But what I'm

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.439
<v Speaker 1>saying is that Julia Roberts is not someone who ever

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>gave unfiltered access to her life in the way that

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>celebrities kind of have to do now, and so because

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of that, I think that turned her into a bigger

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and more mysterious and more magnetic figure that was like

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>so separate from us in a way that celebrities now

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>like think they need to be super connected to their fans,

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they do, But you know, Timothy Shalamay, who

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is I do think you're right, like the closest thing

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we have currently to and sendea, but like they still

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>are they have social media and Mary there maybe not

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>very online, but because they're definitely I think Zindia is

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>an elusive Timothy is elusive, but they're definitely online. They're

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely online, I mean, and they're social media like truly

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>only exists as a way to promote their projects. But

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there's still something where like you you can reply to

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>one of Timothy's instagrams. He's never going to see it,

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>but you can still do it. And like you can

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get Julia Roberts would never you could never get you.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't. You can't engage with her. That is that

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is it. It's you. I mean, it's not even that

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it would ruin it. It's like you. It's not possible.

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not, it never has been, it never will be.

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>You were, you will. The closest you could ever come

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to Julia Roberts is like if you went to the

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>premiere of one of her movies and stood on the

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>side of a barricade and watched her walk and screamed her.

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the closest you would ever get. Timothy Sham I've

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>hugged him twice, Okay, say that you always say that

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>because I have and I will and I will continue,

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I will get a third hug in, and when it happens,

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll whisper in his ear. This is the third time

0:43:49.560 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we've thought slide intowards MS and tell us what your

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite Julia Roberts role movie is. UM, who's your favorite

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>movie star? Do you think there are contemporary movie stars?

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>We want to hear your opinions. UM, let us know

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>At Like a Virgin, Please rate and review us on

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and Apple podcasts. It really helps us out. My

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>name's Rose Damn You. You You can find me anywhere online

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at Rose Damn You. And my name is Fran You

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>can find me at friend, squish Goo any where you like.

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Like a Virgin is an iHeart Radio Production are producers

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Phoebe Unter, with support from Lindsay Hoffman and Nikki Etre.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Until next week, Our Revoir Virgins