WEBVTT - Teva CEO: We Have Capability To Distribute Vaccine In U.S.

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from ceo, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Tiva Pharmaceuticals reported earnings this morning.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>The stock is off about seven point four percent today's

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>trading eleven dollars and eighty six cents a share. But

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>here today the stock is not nearly Let's break down

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the earnings and the key issues facing Tiva Pharmaceuticals. We

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>do that today with Corese Schultz, CEO of Tiva Pharmarmaceuticals.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Cour thanks so much for joining us here. Let's kick

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it off, get right to it. Talk to us about

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>your earnings for the most recent period and your outlook

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for this year. Thanks Paul, great to be with you

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and Monny. I think the earnings report for the fourth

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>quarter is a really solid one, and I think the

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>whole report for twenty is also very solid. You could say,

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we had, of course, lots of operational challenges due to

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen pandemic pandemic, but in all manufacturing sites,

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in our whole logistical network, we managed to overcome it.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Basically serve the two on a million patients we serve

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>every day without Generics in a pretty steady way, and

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>supporting healthcare systems worldwide. At the same time, we managed

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>our cost well, so they were down for the third

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>year in a row. We managed to increase our earnings slightly,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>which was also positive. And then we continue to pay

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>down debt. And I'm shure you know by now over

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, I've been paying down the two

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars and we'll continue to do so in

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in this year and in the common years. So all

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in all, we've stabilized the business. Yes, core of favorable

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>credit markets for sure. I want to ask you about

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that more in a moment, But first, the vaccine distribution

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in Israel has been among the best in the world,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and you've obviously been very much part of that. How

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>does that continue and have you have you plans to

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>expand that internationally if you advice for other countries. So

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely correct that we are taking care of the

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>whole logistical side of the vaccination program in Israel. So

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>basically picking up the cargo from the cargo plane signated

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>our chio logistics center, repacking, ensuring freezing and cooling and distribution,

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>making sure it gets out to the four hundred vaccination

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>centers in Israel, and that it's the right amount that

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>gets to the right center at the right time. All

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>all of course to ensure that we have a maximum

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>utilization of the vaccines that Israel is receiving from FIFER

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and from Moderna at at the current important time. So

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we have great i'd say, insight into how that works

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, I would say the only country where we

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really have an operational capability to to help out in

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the same way would probably be in the U s

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>where we have the distributor company called and and we'll

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be more than happy to help out the distribution. We're

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>not currently law, but but who knows, maybe in the

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>common months there will be a role for us to

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>play there to secure fastness effective distribution of vaccines relevant locations.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So UH core Tiva is one of the Farmer Circle

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>companies that is being sued by the US as relates

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to the opioid crisis. Also, company is part of an

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>alleged drug fixing. Cartel talk to gives an update on

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>these legal issues, because I'm not reading some Wall Street research.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They do weigh on the stock. What's the latest, Yeah,

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So the latest on the opioid litigation is really that

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we more than a year ago agreed to a framework

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with the states and the plane of lawyers that represent

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the subdivision, so counties, citizen and so on, and unfortunately

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we have not sort of got across the finishing line

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have the framework settlement turned into firm settlements.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>We did this together with four other companies, the three

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>big distributors in Johnson and Johnson, and nobody has reached

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the point where, you know, everybody signs a firm settlement.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons is that we have fifty states involved,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we have fift planning lawyers, five companies, and even though

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>each company does their own settlement at the end of

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the day, it has just proven difficult to get everybody

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to sort of sit down and do the final details.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And it has not helped that the COVID nineteen pandemic

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>has delayed basically all trials, so all the trials that

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been trigger points by motivating people to get

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the framework into a firm settlement. All these trials have

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been delayed and they're still being delayed due to COVID nineteen,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so I'm very optimistic that the actual framework will be implemented.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>We are offering free generics box and for all states.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a key product in sort of treating overdose, so

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>basically reducing deaths from overdoses, which is a key concern

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, in the phase of the substance misuse among

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the American population. The other companies are basically offering cash

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that can be used to help get people off their

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>situation with substance abuse. So the only good solution for

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the American public is, of course, as this framework gets

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>into a firm settlement, and I hope this will happen.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm optimistic it will happen, but I'm a little doubtful

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about the timing, simply due to the fact that there

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is no legal pressure on the parties to get signed

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on the door line. So speak yeah, well, we'll definitely

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>continue to follow that one. Finally, Core, you talked about

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets. Obviously they're hugely favorable for likes of Tever.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, yields now lower than when they were still

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>rated investment grade by ratings agencies before it have it

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>became a fallen angel? Do you continue to just raise

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>raise money on the credit markets to pay down debt?

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So we only raised money, you could say, when we

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have to, because we're paying down debt out of our

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>operational cash throw as we go along. We did that

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>last year with roughly two billion. We're going to do

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this year with a bit more than two billions. And

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the next time where we really need to refinance, that

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is in two thousand twenty three, or that's the ditch

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>stack of two thousand twenty three, that's about around four billion.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>That's more than what we expect our operational cash flow

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>will be. So we will look like to do a

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>refinancing about a year from now, where we will look

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>at refinancing two thousand twenty three and potentially some of

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty five. All right, well we have to

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>say goodbye to you there, but thank you very much

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for giving us some of your time today earnings day

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and then always always such a busy day. That's Coral

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Schultze is a pharmaceuticals a CEO, joining us there after

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>an excellent earnings season. You know, coming off of those

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>march loads of last year, the sps of about seventy five,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of folks are starting to get worried

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>about a bubble. And when you see stories like the

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>game stop and all the spacks coming out, just adding

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to the concerns about are we a bubble? Uh? In

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this particularly in the equity markets. Let's chat about that

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with Jim Paulson. He's a chief investment strategist for the

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Louthhole Group. Joining us on the phone from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Jim,

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us again here again a

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary move off the march lows here. How are you

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>viewing the markets right here? Yeah, Paul, thanks for having

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>me today. Yeah, I am. I think that you know,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly a lot of the indicators, sentiment indicators and

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like have certainly come up a fair amount and should

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>could certainly bring in will bring sometime this year correction. Uh,

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we we could get at least one of those.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to come a little later, but

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very possible. But this this narrative that's

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>out there, it's gotten really strong. This the idea of

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the bubble major market mania bubble that's developing, it will

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>resolve the collapse like the dot com collapse. I think

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that's got really low probability. Um. Yes, we've we've come

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>up a lot from them March lows. But but if

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at over the last year, we might be

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>up fifteen over the last three years, I think we've

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>analyzed around thirteen. And during the last two years, for example,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of twenty four months, roughly this this SP five hundred

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>has suffered to cline in late eighteen and thirty four

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>percent decline last year. I just can't tell you another

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>period where we ended up in a bubble during the

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty after twenty four month period where we had two

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>really nasty our markets almost over the same time period.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And then if you look more broadly, Paul Um you

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>know Russell large value UH international markets have gone nowhere

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for the last three years. There's still roughly flat and

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>until November small caps hadn't moved higher. So I think

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's overblown, I really do. You know. One of the

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>things that presses me is talk about the Greenspan put well,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got a vaccine. Put how much you're going to

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sell this market off when you know that by faller

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>or so by the end of this year, there's pandemic

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna wind down a lot more. We've got a

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>policy put, We've got another trillion dollar stimulus for MEEF

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>package coming. It seems like every month, how much you're

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna sell off in the face of that, We've got

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>an earning revival put going on earn These estments are

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up every day, and we've gotta we've got a

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>bubble watch put. Can we really have a bubble when

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>so many are worried about it? I don't know. Those

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>are the things I throw out. I guess, for how

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>long can the federal Reserve and fiscals TOI met a

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>slash pandemic relief keep the demand coming for these companies.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you walk around any major city right now

0:09:52.400 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's absolutely it's terrifyingly bare well. The lonnie I,

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't know if we need a lot of

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>our stimulus. That one of the things that's greatly underestimated

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is that there's about a one year to two year

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>lag and historically between when stimulus is introduced and when

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it starts to really impact the economy. So we're going

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot of juice from what we started

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to introduce last year, let alone the new stuff we're

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>bringing now into the party. And at the end of

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the day, Um, the real issue is reopening and it's stimulus.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Can't really do that, but we're going to get that.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the biggest stimulus in the room isn't the

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy or monetary policy. It's a shot in the

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>arm because by you know, if you think that sentiments

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>too giddy right now in the investment markets, what's it

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like on VC day when we declare victory

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>over COVID in the fall and there's gonna be heard

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinated and they are free to roam again and

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>taking entertainment and social interaction demand. That will be spin.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people are going to feel a palatable route.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you should rethink this whole vaccine thing? Jim? What

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think? So? Jim? Where are you in terms

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of are you in this rotation play that's worked so

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>well for investors released since September? Kind of you know,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe on the margin, lightning up on the Apples and

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Amazons of the world and and looking for some

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of those cyclical names, maybe some of the small cap

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>names that in fact would and will benefit from a

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>reopening here. How do you feel about that? Where where

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are you? Yeah? I definitely, uh, we've been overweighted what

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I call broader marketplace or UH at least since the

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>middle last year or so. But you know, I would

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>include you know, small caps, cyclicals, UH value stocks, high

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>beta and international markets in that mix. I definitely want

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to be overweighted there, but I wouldn't exactly I be

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>their way to tack the new era. But I don't

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think I totally get out of it. I think it's

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to continue. It's gonna underperform, probably, but it's gonna

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>continue to participate, and it holds you up on bad days,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it really the cyclicals and those more

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>violably broader marketplace have greater volatility, and on those days,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if you own some new era, it's gonna hold you up.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So I own some of both. One of the things

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, Paul is that what I found consumer confidence

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is still very depressed. And Tavanni's point, you know, people

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>still feel pretty concerned about where we're at here. But

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>if we are going to get people vaccinated here, I

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>think consumer confidence is going to rally even more. And

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>what I found is a very close relationship between improvements

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in main street confidence and what happens to these broader

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>marketplaces like small caps and and I think there's still

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of that ahead of us when you

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>look ahead over the next year. Well, I'm looking forward

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to speaking to you throughout this whole process. No doubt

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a fascinating year. Thanks for joining today.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim Pulls in a CEE IO at the loose Hold Group.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>The second impeachment trial of former President Trump really gets

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>underway today. Let's get the latest with June Grasso, Bloomberg

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>News legal analyst, host of Bloomberg Law. You can hear

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>that weeknights at ten pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Joining us on the phone, June, talk to us a

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what we can expect from the actual

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>trial aspect here going forward. Well, what's going to happen

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>today is probably starting out the same as yesterday, which

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is there were going to be a video presentation of

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened during the riot, and you can expect that

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the house managers are going to lay out their case

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>in chronological order, so you're going to see a mix

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of talking and video, and they're hoping that this will

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of bring the senators back to that minute when

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they faced the crowd and proved to them that President

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump should be guilty of of inciting the crowd. Are

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely certain that the time has passed when we

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>might actually have witnesses as that decision come and gone

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point June, Well, the decision hasn't been made

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about witnesses, but the feeling is from all the reporting

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that there is probably not going to be any witnesses

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>because basically of the time factor, you have both sides

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting this to end quickly. The Democrats want Joe Biden

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get on with his agenda, and

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they also want to present a concise case unlike the

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>last time, and the Republicans just wanted to be over.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're going to be missing. The House

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>managers are going to be missing an element of their

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>case if they don't have witnesses, because we don't know

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>what president former President Trump's reactions to the riot are.

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We would have to hear that from witnesses, and also

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the delay he took in doing anything to stop it,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and that goes to his intent and connects him to

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the crowd. And that's the important part of their case

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and the hard part. They have to connect him to

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what happened. And that's bold, sorry jump in, but that's

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>what I find astonishing. So you can understand how Republicans

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>may not want witnesses, but I'm not quite sure why

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the House managers don't want witnesses so badly. I know,

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you join you say that it's the it's the Biden

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>agenda and so on, but you know, well, no, I

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely think that they should have some witnesses. I think

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're afraid that it will get into For example,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have a witness, then you have then the

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>other side is going to call a witness, so it

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>will drag it out. But I mean, look at Clinton's

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>impeachment trial, there were witnesses, and right now the Democrats

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are in control. There were no witnesses at the last

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>impeachment trial of Donald Trump because they are Publicans were

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in control and didn't want witnesses. So you know, from

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>my way of thinking, witnesses on at least one the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>issue of President Trump's intent would really go a long way.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But also maybe the Democrats the House managers are thinking, well,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing is going to get seventeen Republicans to vote with us,

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so why drag it out. It's hard to tell, June,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the Republican or the defendants defense

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact will be? What a good question, Paul, because

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't necessarily get an answer. Yes, I know. The

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>problem was, you know, yesterday what should have been a

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>day that was fairly easy for them because they could

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have made legal arguments, even though the legal arguments weren't strong.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>What we saw that and it sort of echoed what

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>their brief was. Their first brief was you know, filled

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with errors. There was a typo on the first page,

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was very disjointed. And so the defense yesterday

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>from Mr Caster, I mean, was rambling, almost nonsensical at times,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and with the second lawyers shown there were conflicting arguments.

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It was, you know, it was too soon to try

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. There wasn't enough procedure, he didn't have any time.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But then it was too late to try him because

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he was out of office, and there were factual mistakes

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about the timeline of impeachment. So I mean, I suppose

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what their best argument will be is what the hardest

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the House Manager's cases, which is proving that

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>connecting President Trump to the actual assault on the capital,

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is I mean, that's going to be tough.

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>If this for a criminal case, which it's not. I

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think you could prove that beyond a reasonable doubt

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of evidence they have. Now it's not

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a criminal trial, and the as we've seen before, the

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>senators can do whatever they want. But I think that

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that element is going to be something that the defense

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>can really focus on. You know President Trump speech, yes

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was heated, but he also said, which

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't played very much. What there was also a part

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of that speech, because I listened to the whole thing

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>where he said, let's go to the capitol, let's march peacefully.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>There was one there was one sentence about marching peaceful.

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>They could take that sentence and use that to make

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their case that he did not want them to storm

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the capitol. He had no idea that this was going

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And since there'll be no witnesses, most likely

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they may be able to make a good argument out

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of that. I mean, they have a case to make.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Very very briefly, do introducing some of these new videos

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>or anything. Does that help with state cases or d

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>A cases down the line in any way. Well, I

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>think that those videos are what the federal prosecutors and

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the FBI have been looking at to try to and

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they've been charging people based on those videos. I mean

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a charge and you'll see what the charges

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you see the video of that person doing

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>something like throwing, you know, breaking through barriers. So yes,

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>those videos are going to be used. And that's tough

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence to get by. It's very hard to say, for example, oh,

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I didn't take this out of I didn't steal anything

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 1>from the capital when there's a picture of you, you know,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>walking out with the podium of Jesse Pelosi. So I mean,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that is really tough to have it. I expect a

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of play deals and I think the fans are

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>going to try to flip a lot of people. June,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we have to leave it there, but thank you so much,

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course we'll be tuning into Bloomberg Law for

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>further updates. Kristin Bryant is a Bloomberg opinion columnists covering

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>industrial companies, also spacks and so much more. But he's

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>written a great column on Elon Musk's bitcoin bet. He

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>says it's a bean encounter as a nightmare. Chris, thanks

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>for joining. So the backstory is that Ellen decided to

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>put eight thirty billion dollars worth of Tesla's cash, not

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>his own cash, but Tesla's cash into bitcoin, and of

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>course we saw a variety of responses. So many of them,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine, were absolutely thrilled with this idea,

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, recommended other companies do the same. But

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what say you, was that advisable? M hm? So, to clarify,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a one and a half billion dollars of Tesla's cat

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>has gone into the bit climates is still an awful

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>lot in the context of Tesla's overall cash balance of

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about nineteen billion, and yes, obviously a very risky approach

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>given how volatile bitcoin is. But the point of my

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>column is to focus on on a rather geeky point,

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>which is how you account for bitcoin, because cryptocurrencies are

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>still so new that the accounting authorities haven't yet developed

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of real standards to how this is done, or

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>at least the ones that they have sort of imposed

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on on bitcoin is sort of pretty outdated, and the

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>accounting of the bitcoin is going to cause Tesla all

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kinds of problems, as I can explain. Um, the chief

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>problem is this, Essentially, if the price of bitcoin falls,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then Tesla will have to book an impairment that this

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>price goes back up again. It's not allowed to write

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>up the value of its bitcoin holding, so in a sense,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it can only lose Chris here. You know, as we've

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seen companies, obviously the line item on the balance sheet

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is cash and marketable securities. Bitcoin arguably is I guess

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a marketable security, but it's a very violatile one,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>as you point out in your column here. Um, so

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what is a company like Tesla going to do here?

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Because the marketer market on this thing is crazy given

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the volatility. So what do they do? Do they hedge it? Well,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. I think they didn't say anything

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about hedging. Would be very surprised if they hedge it.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously a lot of companies do hedge their

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>foreign currency exposure. But it seems to me like tesser

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Is is making an outright bet here on on the

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin. Um, what they're gonna have to do

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is is classify as an intangible asset on on the

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet rather than lump it in with their cash

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>holdings or as a financial investment. And as I say,

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>well that that might end up doing, unfortunately, is hurting

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Tadler's earnings because you might have an odd situation where

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say the price of bitcoin is sold by one third,

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which is historically you know, not unlikely, incredibly volatile acid

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>um Keadler having bought one and a half billion dollars work,

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>would have to book a five hundred million dollar lost

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>against its holdings that quarter, which obviously, you know, for

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a company that still isn't that profitable, would actually be

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>quite problematic. Now, of course, analysts would be able to

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the market price and say all that, actually

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the price of bitcoin is has now gone back up

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>again and and and so this is uh, you know,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>only a paper loss. Nevertheless, my point is that, um,

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of people were saying, oh, look,

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Tessler has bought bitcoin. Other companies are now going to

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>diversify their cash holdings and do something similar. I think,

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>unless these accounting rules are updated, a lot of companies

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>will be very uh you know, in this inclined to

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>do that because they don't want to have to explain

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to their investors every cause of well, you know, the

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>price has gone up and down and we're booking and

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>impairment and are lot you know, we're actually making losses

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's the profits due to our bitcoin investment. I

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of let's say, more mature companies

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>might find that problematic. Have you been able to speak

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with anybody who wonders allowed about what might happen? So

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we know that central banks have literally, you know, in

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the last little while, just begun to take things like

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies seriously, and you know what they might mean for

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the financial universe and so on. Is there a world

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in which regulators and accounting regulators do have a separate

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>category for cryptocurrencies? I mean, this morning, he must tweeted

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>out that he's buying Dodge. Now, well, I think it's

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>fanness that the accounting authority is recognized that this is

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a new world and that they do need to respond.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It's been on their radar for a few years now. Interestingly,

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Japan's accounting authorities I think are the most forward thinking here.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>They've already got a policy where essentially they allow companies

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to to mark to market the value of their holdings

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the international as of the i f r S rules,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which are used widely outside of UH the United States,

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they're a bit different, but they they're slightly more nuanced

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>than the US approach, So I think, yes, they are looking.

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But interestingly, the the US had an opportunity in October

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>when they find Financial Accounting Standards Board met to decide

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they were going to look at and going forward in

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of their technical agenda, and they declined to make

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies and item on that agenda suggesting and they don't

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>see it as a big parity, and it may well be,

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of course, but you know, Tesla remains an outlier. I

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>wrote about another company, micro Strategy, which had put you know,

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars into its UH into bitcoin, and they've

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>already seen you know, the price go up a lot

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and their share prices booming. But the same time they've

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>also had to book impairments already because the price is

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>so volatile. But apart from these two prominent outliers, and

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>also Squares invested a bit, you haven't yet seen a

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of other companies do this. And as I said,

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>given these accounting issues, until they're solved, maybe big way

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>so what do we has Tesla said Chris, kind of

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do with this investment. Do they

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>view it as an investment per se? Why did they

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>do this? Well, I mean the in the disclosures they

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>say it's a matter of diversifying their cash holdings. And

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I suppose you know, literally you because it said, well, okay,

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't get much return on on cash at the moment,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>so why not look for other opportunities. But of course

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody takes that, uh, you know literally

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in the center. Of course, there are far safer opportunities

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to diversify your cash holdings. I mean, this is is clearly,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bet on on bitcoin, and and one

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that's probably taken some of its investors by surprise. I

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>think there were some reporting out of the Times of

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>London this morning that some of the investors have said, well, look,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>we're happy for you to do this, but you know,

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>there should be some limit on how much you should

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to invest in in bitcoin, because you know,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Taysler until recently it was pretty cash strapped. Last year,

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>of course it went out and raised about twelve billion

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>from um investors. Now much more cash on the balance sheet,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of investors would be pretty

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>upset if they weren't spent it all on bitcoin, because

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>quite clearly the price can go up, but it can

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>also go down. Fascinating story, Chris, thanks for bringing it

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to us. Chris Bryant Calmness covering industrial companies for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>He's based in Berlin. Thanks for listening to the Boomberg

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Barney Quinn and Paul

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide Bloomberg Radio m