Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty and now he Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3: Baby Doon, thanks for being here. Coming up major gender
Speaker 3: Bend a madness update. First, though, to continue on what
Speaker 3: we were talking about last hour, played some audio of
Speaker 3: a teacher, Texas teacher named Darius Cooks who posted online
Speaker 3: and he's fighting back tears. He's teaching seniors in high school.
Speaker 3: They had an assignment where they just had to read
Speaker 3: two paragraphs and write a sentence about it. And he
Speaker 3: gave them like most of the sentence and then just say,
Speaker 3: just just finish the rest of it. The for words
Speaker 3: that need you know, need to be tacked on, just
Speaker 3: go ahead, and a lot of his students, many of
Speaker 3: the most of them, couldn't even complete a single sentence.
Speaker 4: Mister Cooks goes on, this is only.
Speaker 5: Day two, and I have fingures who simply cannot read and.
Speaker 4: Cannot write them.
Speaker 6: They cannot write, They can reason, they have the ability
Speaker 6: to defend their reasoning if it's talking to their homeboy,
Speaker 6: but applying that to a written text too paragraphs.
Speaker 4: And they couldn't do it.
Speaker 5: Our young black men, our young brown man, are young
Speaker 5: black girls, and our young girl.
Speaker 3: Oh god, oh boy. There are a lot of teachers
Speaker 3: who are heroes. They're my favorite people in the world.
Speaker 3: Love you teachers. As I've made clear many times, I've
Speaker 3: I've begun to hate teachers' unions, I mean more and more,
Speaker 3: and government schools because to a large extent, because of
Speaker 3: the iron Law of bureaucracy, which I paraphrase all the time.
Speaker 3: But I'm going to go back to Jerry Parnell's actually
Speaker 3: actual his words and picture how this applies to schools
Speaker 3: government schools. Parnell's Iron Law bureaucracy states that in any
Speaker 3: bureaucratic organization, there will be two kinds of people. First,
Speaker 3: there will be those who are devoted to the goals
Speaker 3: of the organization. Examples are dedicated classroom teachers in an
Speaker 3: educational bureaucracy, many of the engineers and launch technicians and
Speaker 3: scientists at NASA, for instance, or even some agricultural scientists
Speaker 3: and advisors in the former Soviet Union in their collective
Speaker 3: farming administration. They were devoted to the goals of we'll
Speaker 3: just stick to education, educating kids and giving them the
Speaker 3: tools to live a happy life. Okay, that's the first
Speaker 3: kind of people. Secondly, there will be those dedicated to
Speaker 3: the organization itself. Examples are the many of the administrators
Speaker 3: in the education system, many professors of education, teachers'.
Speaker 4: Union and officials, etc.
Speaker 3: The Iron Law Bureaucracy states that in every case, the
Speaker 3: second group will gain and keep control of the organization.
Speaker 3: It will write the rules and control promotions within the organizations.
Speaker 3: And what inevitably happens is that over time the organization
Speaker 3: will become more and more about protecting the organization and
Speaker 3: its own needs as opposed to the goal it originally
Speaker 3: was designed to fulfill. And we are absolutely seeing that
Speaker 3: in government schools. I don't think I don't think you
Speaker 3: could conceivably deny of it, deny it rather unless you
Speaker 3: are profiting from it.
Speaker 4: Anyway.
Speaker 3: You know, God bless mister Cooks. Oh you know, there's
Speaker 3: another story I want to get to. There's this program
Speaker 3: that Trump administration started that it has to do a
Speaker 3: school choice and if your governor opts in, there's a
Speaker 3: tax deduction for donations to a scholarship fund that kids
Speaker 3: up to like middle income, pretty good middle income can
Speaker 3: use to attend private schools, charter schools, alternate schools, that
Speaker 3: sort of thing, and anybody who's not involved in teachers
Speaker 3: union says, wow, this is a great opportunity. I mean,
Speaker 3: it's really really helping kids. And the stats are undeniable,
Speaker 3: just one hundred percent undeniable, that it really really helps kids,
Speaker 3: helps kids learn, especially kids who are not being served
Speaker 3: by government schools. There are quite a few states, including California,
Speaker 3: all blue states, all blue states, that have said no,
Speaker 3: we don't want this free federal government money that will
Speaker 3: help our kids, because the teachers unions told us we
Speaker 3: got to say no. And that's the only reason they're
Speaker 3: saying no. Even in your New York Times, your lefty
Speaker 3: publications have said, wow, this is a great opportunity. But
Speaker 3: the teachers unions owe to own the state house. In
Speaker 3: a lot of blue states, I think Wisconsin said no,
Speaker 3: California is saying no. There's a short list in New York. Actually,
Speaker 3: oh Illinois, which is also so mobbed up, said no.
Speaker 3: New York said hell, yes please, to Kathy Hochel's credit,
Speaker 3: a phrase you won't hear come out of my mouth
Speaker 3: very often.
Speaker 4: So they're taking the money.
Speaker 3: But plenty of states aren't merely in service to the teachers'
Speaker 3: unions at the expense of the children. That's all you
Speaker 3: need to know. I want to get to Michigan Democratic
Speaker 3: Senate nominee Abdul al Sayid dedicated Islammunist in a couple
Speaker 3: of minutes, and don't want to rush through it.
Speaker 4: Though.
Speaker 3: Oh here's some good news. I like this story. It
Speaker 3: starts with sadness, but doesn't end with it. So fellow
Speaker 3: by the name of Brett Bonner was a surfman.
Speaker 4: He is one of.
Speaker 3: The crews of Coastguard guys and gals in rescue boats
Speaker 3: who work and train in heavy crashing seas to save lives.
Speaker 3: They're called surfmen, and their work is among the most
Speaker 3: challenging and dangerous jobs in the service in the military. Remember,
Speaker 3: the Coastguard is part of our military, and by God,
Speaker 3: they deserve the respect that they're doue. But the surfmen
Speaker 3: take a beating from the ocean because they train, and
Speaker 3: they train, and then they do the rescue missions. And
Speaker 3: many veterans experience headaches, memory lapses, anxiety attacks, nightmares, mood swings,
Speaker 3: cognitive problems that are symptoms of brain injury. It's much
Speaker 3: like active duty other branches of the military. Folks who
Speaker 3: have traumatic brain injury. It's like NFL players. It's the
Speaker 3: same stuff, says the surfman named Aaron Harris. A twenty
Speaker 3: foot wave breaking on you is like being in a
Speaker 3: car crash. If you're out training in surf, that's like
Speaker 3: twenty car accidents a day, and the surfmen are alone. Essentially,
Speaker 3: the Coast Guard has no regular testing protocol for brain injuries.
Speaker 3: It delivers no formal briefings on the dangers of rounding waves.
Speaker 3: At the website it maintains on brain injuries is more
Speaker 3: than ten years old, and it's fairly useless. All right,
Speaker 3: Here's where it gets really sad than not so, said
Speaker 3: Brett Bonner was a surfman. He saved hundreds of lives
Speaker 3: in twenty one years of driving rescue boats. He then
Speaker 3: developed post traumatic stress disorder during his service and then
Speaker 3: his life. His life unraveled. He had all those brain
Speaker 3: symptoms we were just talking about until ordering it to
Speaker 3: drive through is overwhelming.
Speaker 4: He paranoid.
Speaker 3: He was sure his father in law, who lived next door,
Speaker 3: was out to get him. He punched him over a
Speaker 3: minor disagreement and in February of last year, he shot himself.
Speaker 3: His wife and four children saw it happen. Okay, He
Speaker 3: left no note. His brain had gone compmpletely bad on him.
Speaker 3: His oldest child, Kaylee, is now eighteen years old.
Speaker 4: What did she do.
Speaker 3: With her father's death? She did something absolutely remarkable. She
Speaker 3: wanted to understand what had happened to her dad and
Speaker 3: whether it had anything to do with his work in
Speaker 3: the Cruel and unrelenting surf So she decided to send
Speaker 3: questionnaires to as many surfmen as she could locate, and
Speaker 3: sent it out to many many surfmen. Asked thirty six
Speaker 3: questions about their time and their service and their health
Speaker 3: during and after it. This is an eighteen year old
Speaker 3: young woman who lost her dad. Nearly eighty active and
Speaker 3: retired surfmen responded in the vast majority of reported symptoms
Speaker 3: similar to her dad's. They had headache, sleeplessness, their sleeplessness,
Speaker 3: their memories were shot, anxiety stalked them. Their mood swings
Speaker 3: were hard and troubling, some were getting worse. There are
Speaker 3: all sorts of quotes. So he wrote up the results
Speaker 3: of her study. Is a senior high school research project
Speaker 3: it earned her an a by God, it ought to,
Speaker 3: and she is going to share her findings with the Coastguard.
Speaker 3: And it's in the early days, and where it goes
Speaker 3: from here is unclear. I hope Pete Hegsath and the
Speaker 3: right congress people and the right senators get hold of
Speaker 3: this and do the right thing. We need people doing
Speaker 3: this dangerous work, but we need to know everything we
Speaker 3: possibly can about it and what it does to the
Speaker 3: brave people who do it, and see how we can
Speaker 3: help them before, during, and after. So anyway, I'm telling
Speaker 3: you if I'm probably not the only one who's getting
Speaker 3: a little choked up. Eighteen year old Kaylee Bonner is
Speaker 3: an unbelievable American. It's terrible how she's suffered. But let's
Speaker 3: do the right thing. Buyer in fact, Hanson make a note.
Speaker 3: I'd like to reach out to Kaylee and see if
Speaker 3: we can can follow up with her. That's a beautiful
Speaker 3: thing from sadness. That's some real beauty and some real courage.
Speaker 3: Good for you, Kayley, much more to come stay with us.
Speaker 1: Just say it exists, but does it have a right to.
Speaker 7: I didn't say that. I just said the question of
Speaker 7: Israel's existence is not a question. I'm not I'm not
Speaker 7: gonna play this gotcha game about whether or not it
Speaker 7: has a right to exist. The question ultimately is about
Speaker 7: whether or not we want a politics that dignifies. We're
Speaker 7: not going to play the gotcha game. But you're not
Speaker 7: going to say you think Israel has a right.
Speaker 4: Well, well my question, you know, Casey.
Speaker 7: I think the question we all that ought to ask
Speaker 7: is does everybody have equal rights to peace, to Ignindians,
Speaker 7: health determination. That's Jewish, Israelis and Palestinians. And to me,
Speaker 7: the folks who should answer what the ultimate piece there
Speaker 7: looks like should be Jewish, Israelis and Palestinians. I want
Speaker 7: my tax dollars spent here in Michigan.
Speaker 4: Boy, that abdul l said is really clever. He is.
Speaker 3: Uh, he's a villain, but he's a good one. He's
Speaker 3: the Democratic nominee for these Senate of the United States
Speaker 3: of America, and he is an Islamist. He once declared
Speaker 3: his sacred obligation that's a quote, to follow Sharia law
Speaker 3: in every aspect of his life until he meets his
Speaker 3: maker on the day he dies, which would be fine
Speaker 3: if he just practiced Islam as a personal faith. Like
Speaker 3: you know, he's a Lutheran, he's a Catholic, he's a Muslim, whatever.
Speaker 4: But no, it's he.
Speaker 3: Means Islam as the law of the government and of
Speaker 3: life and everything.
Speaker 4: It covers everything in fundamentalist.
Speaker 3: Islam, he said, and I quote Ultimately, the question is
Speaker 3: when I die and stand before God and go through
Speaker 3: everything I did in my life, I don't want to
Speaker 3: say I did it the easy way instead of the
Speaker 3: Sharia compliant way, not because of fear, but because of
Speaker 3: obligation and Sharia or Islamic religious loss that strict rules
Speaker 3: for living that include harsh restrictions on women, and of
Speaker 3: course the chopping off hands and the rest of it.
Speaker 3: It's also it's a system of finance and government and
Speaker 3: how God and structured. I mean, for instance, you can't
Speaker 3: pay your earn interest, and folks get around that by
Speaker 3: getting special halal approved mortgages that essentially tack on to
Speaker 3: the principle what you would pay an interest anyway, but
Speaker 3: it's not called interest. So it seems a little odd
Speaker 3: to me. But al said has embraced his status as
Speaker 3: a Muslim man because the Muslim vote is significant in Michigan,
Speaker 3: it's the only reason he got elected, or he got nominated,
Speaker 3: I should say. But the progressive Democrat they call him
Speaker 3: in the Free Beacon, and I think he's pretending to
Speaker 3: be progressive. I think at his heart he's in is Lombist.
Speaker 3: It's always interesting when the Red Green alliance kind of
Speaker 3: melds together into I guess that would be brown and
Speaker 3: the Islamists are are touting leftism, you know, Marxism anyway.
Speaker 3: In October of twenty five, for example, l said told
Speaker 3: Religion News Service that his faith quote orientced me to
Speaker 3: try and be a better person and to treat all people,
Speaker 3: all people with dignity and humanity and respect. That's a
Speaker 3: beautiful thing. And if he was sincere, I would appreciate that.
Speaker 4: But he's bristled.
Speaker 3: When pressed on the topic of sharia law during his
Speaker 3: failed campaign from Michigan governor, he denied ever saying he
Speaker 3: was Sharia compliant during an interview with a with Laura Lumer,
Speaker 3: who's a strong critic of Islam, before cutting the interview
Speaker 3: short and scolding his staff or not stopping it sooner.
Speaker 3: She was just calling him on things he'd actually said
Speaker 3: on the record. He rejected allegations that he intended to
Speaker 3: subvert the constitution implement sharia law, but a documentary about
Speaker 3: his twenty eighteen gubernatorial bid shows him telling the filmmakers
Speaker 3: not to shoot a bookshelf in his home that contained
Speaker 3: the Quran, which is perfectly fine and controversial works about Islam,
Speaker 3: including cutting the Fuse, a twenty ten book that argued
Speaker 3: that suicidal terrorism is driven by foreign military occupation, not
Speaker 3: Islamic extremism. His private bookshelf, who he ordered them that
Speaker 3: he ordered them not to show, also contained a copy
Speaker 3: of a thematic commentary on the Koran written by Muslim
Speaker 3: Brotherhood member Sheik Muhammad al Gazzali, who said, quote, the
Speaker 3: refusal of implementation of Shariah is apostasy, which means it's
Speaker 3: a mortal sin against God. In Islam, Apostates and converts
Speaker 3: should be killed Fundamentalist Islam eh and this guy who
Speaker 3: wrote that book testified in defense of thirteen Islamic terrorists
Speaker 3: who had gunned down an Egyptian professor who called for
Speaker 3: what what would make it justifiable to murder a guy?
Speaker 3: And one of Alsaid's favorite authors justified that the Egyptian
Speaker 3: professor called for the operation of church and state in Egypt.
Speaker 3: Al Gazzali testified at the ninety three trial that the
Speaker 3: same professor was, without doubt an infidel, and so most
Speaker 3: Islamic scholars would agree that such apostates should be killed,
Speaker 3: but that he personally believes the professor should have received
Speaker 3: the life sentence instead. You're going to want to not
Speaker 3: get things, oh, l Sayed said to the documentary. Guys,
Speaker 3: you're gonna want to not get these things in the shot.
Speaker 3: We're trying to keep it secular. Okay, we're trying to
Speaker 3: keep this shot secular.
Speaker 4: Wow.
Speaker 3: Wow, Okay, keep an eye on the guy. We're onya
Speaker 3: speaking of radicalism. A really important and really encouraging gender
Speaker 3: bending madness update coming up in a couple of minutes.
Speaker 4: We'll get to that.
Speaker 3: The other funny part of l said is that he
Speaker 3: claims to be a socialist. He's got tens of thousands
Speaker 3: of dollars worth of watches, he owns property on three continents,
Speaker 3: he's a landlord in three different countries. He and his
Speaker 3: wife are filthy rich, but he wants socialism where he
Speaker 3: makes everybody else look like a socialist. Okay, pretty typical,
Speaker 3: martacam If you can't stay tuned, grab a podcast, Armstrong
Speaker 3: and Getty on demand.
Speaker 4: Are Strong and Getty.
Speaker 3: Glad you're here. Let's not waste any time. Let's get
Speaker 3: right to a gender bending Madness update.
Speaker 8: So I kept hearing about this thing called.
Speaker 2: The Loco.
Speaker 4: We're a brave world.
Speaker 3: Bridging a couple of topics, we begin our gender bending
Speaker 3: Madness update with Chase, who is a female high school
Speaker 3: teacher teaching advanced world history in New York City.
Speaker 4: Here's day one a class.
Speaker 5: My name is.
Speaker 8: Chase, and I am a bunch non binary high school teacher,
Speaker 8: and this is my plan for back.
Speaker 1: To school this year.
Speaker 8: The first thing I'm doing this year is I'm just
Speaker 8: going by Chase, no missus, mister or mix, like just Chase.
Speaker 8: And I did it last year and it went great
Speaker 8: and none of my students cared at all. None of
Speaker 8: the administration cared at all.
Speaker 4: The third thing.
Speaker 8: I'm doing this year is a pronoun lesson. I'm doing
Speaker 8: it day one. I just tell my students that I'm
Speaker 8: non binary. I use them pronouns, and what non binary
Speaker 8: means to me is that I'm not really.
Speaker 4: A boy or a girl.
Speaker 8: I'm kind of just doing my own thing. I am
Speaker 8: excited for back to school.
Speaker 3: And in previous segments we are discussing the tragedy that
Speaker 3: kids can't read and write and do math in school.
Speaker 3: Interrelated Sorry, Okay, so let's get on to the really
Speaker 3: important stuff.
Speaker 4: The Trump administration this week.
Speaker 3: Barred federal medicaid dollars from being used to fund cruel
Speaker 3: experiments on confused children. Now I'm going to read it
Speaker 3: from the New York Times. Administration barred federal medicaid dollars
Speaker 3: from being used to provide gender transition medication and surgery
Speaker 3: to transgender adolescents.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I never ever use the term gender transition because they
Speaker 3: mix the word gender and sex, which really are the
Speaker 3: same thing. They pretend they're not, except when it's convenient
Speaker 3: to pretend they are. And the idea that a confused
Speaker 3: twelve year old boy can become a confused twelve year
Speaker 3: old girl is ludicrous.
Speaker 4: They mentioned.
Speaker 3: The treatments are already banned in most Republican led states,
Speaker 3: which has been the topic of front international debate among
Speaker 3: health authorities. Not really, not anymore, just in the woke US.
Speaker 3: Europe has gone screaming in the other direction. They mentioned
Speaker 3: in the New York Times, most major medical societies in
Speaker 3: the US, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is
Speaker 3: utterly corrupt and has been captured by radical leftists, continue
Speaker 3: to support medical gender transition for young people who experienced
Speaker 3: mark distress over their gender identity. It's absolutely obscene and
Speaker 3: will be looked upon as a terrible, terrible thing in
Speaker 3: the very near future by virtually everybody. They mentioned that
Speaker 3: the Department of Health and Human Services and report last
Speaker 3: year concluded that the risk of gender transition treatments up
Speaker 3: a sex change experiments on children, which includes drugs that
Speaker 3: block puberty hormone therapies and in rare cases, rarer cases,
Speaker 3: surgeries outweigh any benefits. That's because they do according to
Speaker 3: every responsible study that's been done anywhere on Earth, and
Speaker 3: the report prioritized psychotherapy for adolescents who are so confused
Speaker 3: they want sex changes. Well, of course you're going to
Speaker 3: give them psychotherapy, and what's the last thing you're gonna
Speaker 3: do mutilate them for the rest of their lives. So
Speaker 3: let's build some evidence to support the arguments I'm making.
Speaker 3: And don't worry, We're gonna do a bit of a weave,
Speaker 3: but we're gonna get back to the thread.
Speaker 4: Trust me.
Speaker 3: This is a a tweet from a voter in Wisconsin
Speaker 3: who just before the primary the other day said he's
Speaker 3: a hard No. I think it's on Francesca Hong, because Hong,
Speaker 3: the super progressive DSA chick, voted against a bill that
Speaker 3: made it illegal for teachers to groom their students for
Speaker 3: sexual purposes. And it was all based on a thirty
Speaker 3: year old teacher who was messaging a thirteen year old
Speaker 3: every day for six months talking about how he wanted
Speaker 3: them to be together. She had a nice body, he
Speaker 3: was jealous when she talked to the other boys. He
Speaker 3: sent provocetive pictures of himself, and when the cops arrested
Speaker 3: him went to charge him, they realized nothing he did
Speaker 3: was actually illegal. He didn't make sexual contact contact and
Speaker 3: no obscene pictures were or explicit pictures were exchanged. But
Speaker 3: he was actively trying to groom a child for sex,
Speaker 3: and there was no law forbidding his contact his conduct.
Speaker 3: So in Wisconsin they came up with a law in
Speaker 3: the state Assembly, drafting a bipartisan bill that made her
Speaker 3: a felony to engage in any course of conduct clearly
Speaker 3: and obviously intended to seduce her Laura child into engaging
Speaker 3: in sexual acts, etc. Pasted one ninety three to six,
Speaker 3: and Hong was against it, one of the very few
Speaker 3: people who vote against it. They were all super progressives.
Speaker 3: A few months later, the first person was charged under
Speaker 3: the law. He was a thirty six year old man
Speaker 3: who met a developmentally disabled sixteen year old in a
Speaker 3: public park when she was thirteen. Specifically, she had down syndrome,
Speaker 3: and spent the next three years trying to manipulate her
Speaker 3: into running away from home so he could make her
Speaker 3: in his liveing sex life, that is, and he was
Speaker 3: charged with felonies and to recap Earlier this year, Hong
Speaker 3: was one of only six people to vote against that bill.
Speaker 3: Why in the world would you vote against that bill?
Speaker 4: Huh? Moving along.
Speaker 3: W path, which is going to come up again, is
Speaker 3: that World Health organism that has convinced so many people
Speaker 3: that if a kid is confused about their sex, you
Speaker 3: have to give them hormones or other drugs or surgeries.
Speaker 3: And they cited a couple of tiny studies that have
Speaker 3: been completely discredited over and over again, but they've kept
Speaker 3: on pushing it.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: At the heart of that organization is a philosophy from
Speaker 3: the sixties, especially about how all sexual practices are normal
Speaker 3: and including transgenderism and sex with children. And in fact
Speaker 3: there's a Norwegian bondage discipline sado masochism activist name a
Speaker 3: Savine Skid or Skide celebrated gay rights activists and other things.
Speaker 3: In Oslo, he lobbied the World Health Organation to remove
Speaker 3: various fetishes and sadomasochism and stuff from psychiatric diagnosis. And
Speaker 3: there he is in his dungeon arguing that that was
Speaker 3: it should not be seen as a problem, it was
Speaker 3: perfectly normal.
Speaker 4: And he and his cohort went on to found w PATH.
Speaker 3: And those guys defended NAMBLA, the North American Man Boy
Speaker 3: Love Association. They defended child porn. They were in favor
Speaker 3: of showing children porn and you know, similar stuff of
Speaker 3: that ilk and the next step in the uh oh.
Speaker 3: And the guy who coined the term cisgender was another
Speaker 3: one of this. Kabali's a German sexologist.
Speaker 4: He was.
Speaker 3: He also claimed there's nothing wrong with pedophilia. So the
Speaker 3: crowd that came up with gender bending anything goes sex
Speaker 3: with anybody, that they're also really in a pedophilia and
Speaker 3: that is why you are starting to hear on the
Speaker 3: fringes of the left the term minor attracted individuals. They're
Speaker 3: trying to get rid of the term pedophile, an usher
Speaker 3: in minor attracted individuals. They're trying to normalize sex with kids.
Speaker 3: And there is I have pages or receipts of these
Speaker 3: people and what they've said. We don't have time for it.
Speaker 3: You got to trust me, or I can retweet some
Speaker 3: of it that was on Twitter. Moving along though, to
Speaker 3: the wpath people, Wesley Yang writes about this a lot right.
Speaker 3: It was always a desperate con It was never real,
Speaker 3: it was never true. Well informed people have understood this
Speaker 3: for more than a decade. But now the institution upon
Speaker 3: which the charade of scientific authority across American institutions relying
Speaker 3: on is said so itself in court.
Speaker 4: It was a con order.
Speaker 3: It was a con orders of magnitude worse than Jason Arday,
Speaker 3: that's that Cambridge guy. Because it implicated nearly every organ
Speaker 3: of scientific and medical consensus in a conspiracy until the
Speaker 3: most brazen lie ever told by those institutions at the
Speaker 3: largest scale any such lie has ever been told. And
Speaker 3: because on the basis of this lie, tens of thousands
Speaker 3: of confused people, including children, were medically harmed in pursuit
Speaker 3: of a delusion that can never be true. And what
Speaker 3: he's talking about is that w Path has conceded in
Speaker 3: court that it's standards of care which has been quoted. Friends,
Speaker 3: because I've been in this space for a while looking
Speaker 3: into it. Their standards of care have been quoted many
Speaker 3: thousands of times in the New York Times, the Alphabet Networks, CNN,
Speaker 3: you know, everywhere, certainly in your woke politics.
Speaker 4: And the transcript from the court.
Speaker 3: Room talks about the statements made in this piece of
Speaker 3: evidence are opinion and not the conclusion of scientific research.
Speaker 3: W Path engages in this significant medical debate by publishing
Speaker 3: academic and clinical guidelines for healthcare providers for the vision
Speaker 3: of transgender healthcare. Plaintiffs acknowledge that there are parties on
Speaker 3: both sides of this medical debate, and w Path is
Speaker 3: on one side of the debate and provides guidelines blah
Speaker 3: blah blah transgender healthcare. The Supreme Court has recently Okay,
Speaker 3: so it's long, but it gets to we're expressing our
Speaker 3: opinion on the research that we have seen, and they
Speaker 3: are no longer even claiming that it is supportable, scientifically
Speaker 3: valid and peer reviewed research. They're just saying we saw
Speaker 3: it and we formed an opinion. It's a significance, kind
Speaker 3: of obscure and in the weeds, but a significant confession.
Speaker 3: And finally, this is an editorial by James Eller and
Speaker 3: the Wall Street Journal. Trump should act against Colorado's transgender
Speaker 3: subsidies because state funded counseling is encouraging children to try
Speaker 3: to change their sexual expression sex change experiments. Call a
Speaker 3: gender affirming care. If you must, I will not. But
Speaker 3: he writes the trial the child transgenderism craze has begun
Speaker 3: to receive largely thanks to legal, financial, and political pressure
Speaker 3: from the Trump administration. That is true, but I think
Speaker 3: it's also start to fade because it was a social
Speaker 3: contagion among adolescents, particularly adolescent girls, very much like anorexia
Speaker 3: in the eighties and nineties. It still exists, but in
Speaker 3: a fraction of the numbers it used to, as I
Speaker 3: show in a new report for Do No Harm. That's
Speaker 3: the association of medical professionals who have understood how sick
Speaker 3: this is and are fighting against it. State and federal
Speaker 3: taxpayers have long been co opted into encouraging boys and
Speaker 3: girls to try to become something they aren't and can
Speaker 3: never be. Through public funding for state education and healthcare programs,
Speaker 3: taxpayers are unwittingly complicit and physically harming vulnerable children, for instance, Colorado.
Speaker 4: The focus of his report.
Speaker 3: He says I spent the past year submitting open records
Speaker 3: requests to state agencies, universities, and youth health programs. Perhaps
Speaker 3: the most concerning thing I found is the state's Eyematter program,
Speaker 3: which uses taxpayer money to provide no cost mental health
Speaker 3: counseling for children. It's about eleven million dollars a year
Speaker 3: in federal money. Much of Imatter's work is unobjectionable, it's fine,
Speaker 3: But the four hundred and sixty nine gender affirming care
Speaker 3: therapy sessions it provided between twenty twenty one to twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four aren't. Forty six of those sessions involved children
Speaker 3: six to nine years old, and the sessions were provided
Speaker 3: to children five or younger and forty to children with
Speaker 3: special needs. And he just got the records through twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four. It's still active and state funded, meaning these
Speaker 3: numbers are probably much much higher. But the majority of
Speaker 3: these therapy sessions have the orientation that we are going
Speaker 3: to affirm what you say about gender identity. They make
Speaker 3: it clear that no parent or guardian consent is required,
Speaker 3: that this will be just between us, because sometimes you
Speaker 3: need to talk to someone else. And the orientation of
Speaker 3: the actual counseling is unmistakably pro this. So you've got
Speaker 3: federally funded counseling convincing confused children that yes, you are transgender,
Speaker 3: and the web of taxpayer money has gone un scene
Speaker 3: over or shadowed that he writes by more obviously egregious
Speaker 3: state laws. And it's continuing on and targeting confused little
Speaker 3: kids something that never existed.
Speaker 4: Just a few years ago.
Speaker 3: And now if you dare say this is wrong, you
Speaker 3: get a branded a transphobe or whatever. Got to keep
Speaker 3: fighting against this. It's all about the confused kids and
Speaker 3: the activists who are trying to twist their minds.
Speaker 4: It's a gender bending madness. Update.
Speaker 3: Jack is going to check in next we'll finish Strong
Speaker 3: Armstrong no time to lose. Final segment of the show,
Speaker 3: and we're joined by vacationing co host Jack Armstrong from
Speaker 3: somewhere in the frozen North, Jack, where are you?
Speaker 1: What's up the sea? Was angry that day. My friends,
Speaker 1: I am on a boat. I'm on a boat. We
Speaker 1: are on a boat. We're on a boat. Our van
Speaker 1: is on a boat to Vancouver Island. That's what we're doing.
Speaker 1: We're on a boat.
Speaker 4: Fantastic. What's the plan on Vancouver Island? Nature? Hangout? Hang
Speaker 4: out and.
Speaker 1: If nobody's ever been there, just hurt a for the
Speaker 1: first time, well regularly people after doing a Canadian accent
Speaker 1: attempting to you say a I only far was only
Speaker 1: a once, just a little bit of.
Speaker 3: Go wow, your connection is absolutely horrible. Sorry, you're the
Speaker 3: seafaring life is difficult and your connection is iffy. You've
Speaker 3: heard a I'm sure you've heard people say oot though, right.
Speaker 4: Yes, I've heard some boots. Yes, I'm I'm sorry, a
Speaker 4: couple of stories and hoots. No, a's yeah.
Speaker 3: My buddy Gordy the Canadian is definitely an oot guy
Speaker 3: and an occasional a guy, and he's a hockey player,
Speaker 3: so he wants to fight you a lot.
Speaker 4: But it's fine. So you'll be rejoining us on Monday, correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah, tomorrow, I will be a landlubber and I will
Speaker 1: be able to call into the show and I will
Speaker 1: have more time, so I will do that tomorrow morning.
Speaker 3: Excellent, Well that would be delightful. Meanwhile, you and the
Speaker 3: boys enjoy the vacation. Enjoy Vancouver Island. I just sailed
Speaker 3: past it on my cruise.
Speaker 4: I didn't get a chance to spend a ton of time,
Speaker 4: but it's it's.
Speaker 3: A beautiful place. Jack from Lord everybody wasn't that exciting? Oh?
Speaker 3: Is Jack still around? Having about participating final thoughts?
Speaker 4: Well, there's Jack Canner's Joe, It's time the show. Katie
Speaker 4: Green and Michael Langel looks Stabby the clown really a radio.
Speaker 4: So let's say their final thoughts.
Speaker 2: People where they have to go?
Speaker 3: Oh, here's your host for final thoughts. Me let's get
Speaker 3: a final thought from everybody on the crew. Michael lines
Speaker 3: Low lead us off.
Speaker 4: That's Unfortunately I had a little bit.
Speaker 3: I was gonna say, how you carry the show, Joe,
Speaker 3: and oh my gosh, I forgot that Jack was still
Speaker 3: on the line. But yeah, sorry, I always see the
Speaker 3: real talent, Katie. Katie Green has our final thought for us?
Speaker 3: What's what's on your mind?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 3: A little van turned three months yesterday and I have
Speaker 3: not had an in and out burger since I was pregnant.
Speaker 4: So I'm going to in and out.
Speaker 3: Today, go get it, enjoy that fantastic Jack from the Road.
Speaker 4: Do you have a final thought?
Speaker 3: He's not there. His final thought is have a great day, everybody,
Speaker 3: Greetings from Canada. My final thought is, yeah, it's been
Speaker 3: kind of interesting and weird and fun doing the solo
Speaker 3: version of the show, just like when I'm on vacation
Speaker 3: in Jack does it. We'll be back together soon enough.
Speaker 3: Thanks for either a putting up with it or be
Speaker 3: enjoying it.
Speaker 4: It's a chance to.
Speaker 3: Explore different ideas in different ways. But we'll be back
Speaker 3: to normal on Monday, and I'm looking forward to that
Speaker 3: for a couple of reasons, including the fact.
Speaker 4: That it's way easier.
Speaker 3: Armstrong and Getty wrapping up grueling four hour workday.
Speaker 4: So many people who thanks so a little time.
Speaker 3: Good Armstrong e geddy dot com for the outlining strums
Speaker 3: a note mail bag at armstrong e geddy dot.
Speaker 4: Com pick up some swag. We will see you later.
Speaker 4: God bless America. I'm Strong and Getti.
Speaker 2: Love the day.
Speaker 4: It's called an eclipse.
Speaker 2: It means it's time to party.
Speaker 4: You gotta embrace your retire mind. Compile yourself and make
Speaker 4: some time for it to is a lost lock though love,
Speaker 4: so she won't mind.
Speaker 2: It is live, Armstrong and Jenny