WEBVTT - Jonathan Karl & David Sirota

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 2>We're on vacation today, but that doesn't mean we don't

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>have a great show for you. The Lever's David Sirota

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>stuffs by to talk about his new book master Plan,

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>The Hidden Plot to legalize Corruption in America. But first

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk to ABC News Jonathan Carl and he's going

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>to tell us all about his new book, Retribution, Donald

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump and the campaign that changed America.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, Hole's politics. How are you, young Carl?

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Doing great? Thanks for having me on.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited, so talk to me about this book.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Look, as you know, and I never would have thought

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.959
<v Speaker 4>this would have been my destiny. But this is now

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 4>the fourth book I've written on the Trump era, starting

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 4>with when I was covering him the first time around,

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 4>and I wrote Front, wrote The Trump Show, and it

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>just keeps going. This, Molly, is the I think the

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 4>most important of the books I've written, and certainly it

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.319
<v Speaker 4>was the most challenging. This is the longest book, it's

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 4>the most heavily reported book, and I think it's you know,

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 4>it's called Retribution. I chose that name the day after

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump won in November last year. And I chose

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 4>it for a reason. And you see it playing out

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's kind of shocking. My favorite thing

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the campaign trail was where they'd be like, well,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't really want to exact retribution on your enemies,

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>and he'd be like, no.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>No, I do, I do.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean we probably figured that out when he did

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 4>his first official rally of the campaign in Waco, Texas.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 4>And at that rally, as you recall, he played on

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 4>the big screens behind the stage those huge jumbotron's images

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 4>of the January sixth attack on the Capitol, and of

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 4>course played the J six choir singing the national anthem.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would love you to just talk to us

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>about like, why, what we can learn from this? We

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>are watching retribution in real time, but what are the

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of lessons from this book?

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, there were two moments that really drove my desire

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 4>to do another one of these books. The first was

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>going to see Donald Trump on trial in New York

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 4>in that dingy one hundred Center Street courtroom where he

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>was forced to appear four days a week. Compelled to

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 4>be there, had to sit silently while people on the

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 4>stands said, you know, terrible things about him, embarrassing things

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 4>about him, Stormy Daniels testifying about Trump wanting to spanker

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>with a magazine with his face on the cover, and

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>also being there as Joe Biden dropped out of the race,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 4>it just occurred to me that we were watching a campaign,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 4>a presidential campaign unlike any other that we have ever

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 4>seen in American history. I mean, maybe you have to

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 4>go back to like nineteen twelve to find something remotely

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 4>as chaotic and unpredictable and also, in this case, something

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 4>so high stated. So I started, you know, obviously I'm

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 4>reporting day to day for ABC News, I'm doing my

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 4>day job. But as I'm doing it, I was coming

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 4>back to what I would want to try to tell

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 4>the larger story of what was really happening in this campaign,

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>with the benefit of a little bit of hindsight and

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>the time to do some more in depth reporting about

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 4>what was happening. And that's the product of this book.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's been frankly, it's been an working on.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 4>This has been an obsession of mine for over a year.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot that It tells you about how Donald

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Trump came back to power and what his intention was

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 4>from the start to do with that power, which is

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 4>in large part to get even at all of those

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 4>who he believes have wronged him.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>What does it end?

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know where it ends.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what all of us are thinking all

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Right Yeah, And I you know, I feel like I've

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 4>known Trump for more than thirty years. I've I've spent

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>so much of my professional life now, you know, cross

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm ling him. I can tell you a lot about

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Trump how it ends. I can't really tell you obviously,

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 4>you have all this talk now that he doesn't want

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 4>to leave the White House, the abandon talking about, you know,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 4>him running again in twenty twenty eight. Donald Trump's not

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 4>ruling out trying to I mean, constitution, what constitution? You know,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 4>staying in power. I don't really think that's where he's going.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 4>But here's the thing, Molly, how does he pass the baton?

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 4>At what point does he stand up and make it official?

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm out, I'm not running JD. It's yours, Marco, it's yours,

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 4>or you two get to fight it out and whoever else.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, RFK Junior r f K.

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Believe me, I don't know how that happens, because the

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 4>minute that happens, he becomes a lame duck and the

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 4>attention goes to somewhere else. I covered the Obama White House,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 4>and let me tell you, twenty fifteen twenty sixteen at

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 4>the Obama White House was often like a ghost town.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they were still doing things, but nobody was

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 4>paying any attention. You know, poor Josh Ernest, who was

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the press secretary at the time, would have these hour

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 4>and a half briefings. Hardly any of the regular correspondents

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 4>were in there covering them, and they weren't really making

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 4>any news because the attention was all on at first

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 4>Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton and the next you know

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 4>who would be the next president, and then of course

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>eventually Trump.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That is attention, right if he admits he's not running again,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the man behind the curtain, I

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that gone.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, what really drove the reporting in this

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>book is seeing how Donald Trump left office disgraced a

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 4>pria he was banished on social media. I mean, think

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 4>about that. He was banished on social media and most

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 4>of the major companies in this country announced that they

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 4>would not be donating money, not just not to Trump,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>but to anybody who was aligned with Trump in challenging

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 4>the twenty twenty election.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 3>He was gone. He was a pariah.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 4>This is why when Kevin McCarthy went to visit him

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 4>shortly after he left office, it was such a huge story.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, God, what's Kevin McCarthy doing. And you know,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 4>he managed to recapture the Republican Party in a way

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 4>that he had never captured it in the first place.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 4>This entirely, you know, he has this power, and you

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 4>know how he managed to do that, and how he

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>wants to use that power. I think points to a

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 4>very different second term than what we saw on Trump's

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 4>first term.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Did he ever call you?

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:26.799
<v Speaker 5>He does?

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>He calls me. I call him, I tell you.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 4>One of the strange things that I started to do

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>during the campaign was during the fall campaign, I would

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 4>sometimes call him every two or three days, and there

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 4>was a much higher percentage chance of him answering the

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 4>phone than say the deputy press secretary of the Kamala

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Harris campaign. Mostly it's me calling him, but there were occasions,

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 4>and there are occasions where where he calls me, and

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 4>it's a highly unusual thing.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to go.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Back to the sentence you just said that it's more

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>likely to get down Trump on the phone that it

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was to get the deputy press secretary of the Kamala

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Harris campaign on the phone, because I think that is

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>part of why come won.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there's any question. You know, we were

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 4>talking about Jeb Bush a moment ago. It actually kind

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 4>of brings back memories of Jeb Bush back when those

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 4>in those salad days, when he was the Republican front runner.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 4>He was very hard to get through too, and it

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 4>did precious few interviews. His campaign events were tightly choreographed,

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 4>just like Hillary Clinton's were, And certainly I think Kamala

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Harris did that even more so than those. I mean,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 4>when you think about her, she and I tracked. Keep

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>in mind that this book is about what happened to

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Biden and about and about Harris's quick rise and fall.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 4>And you know, Harris gives the sense that one hundred

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 4>and seven days she ran out of time, she didn't

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 4>have enough time. In fact, it was the reverse. In

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 4>fact what happened is she was strongest during those first say,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>thirty to forty days, and then tapered off. And part

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 4>of it was this intensely careful, precious few interviews, precious

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 4>few interactions with the press when Trump was out there

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 4>for everybody.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you do that, if you do very few interviews,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>then every minute you talk to anyone is scrutinized within

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>an inch of its life.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean you remember the first interview, which was

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 4>with Dana Bash, right, and it was she comes in,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 4>she effectively wins the nomination. You know, there's no convention yet,

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 4>but she's effectively won the nomination and does absolutely nothing.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 4>And for a period of a couple of weeks. The

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 4>best answer that I could get is that, you know,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 4>she was spending much of her time preparing for this

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 4>big first scene in an interview.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>When she disappeared its August. I remember in August thinking

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>where is she?

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is she not out there? And you know what's

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is that Hillary Clinton had a couple of

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks too in August where she's effectively disappeared. You'll remember

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Hillary's house, yeah, right, And maybe she was sick, maybe

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>she was not sick, but it didn't matter because if

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you create a vacuum, anyone who's around will fill it.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, to be entirely fair here, Harris had

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 4>a tremendous first couple of weeks.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Tremendous.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean it was people who had thought that she

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 4>didn't have what it takes or was going to be

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 4>a terrible candidate were like, wait a minute, where was

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 4>this Kamala Harris.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 3>She's good, She's got it down, so.

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh and then it was disappearing at least and then it.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Was disappearing, and that she does the CNN interview and

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 4>because to your point, she hasn't been doing interviews, not

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 4>just as a candidate, but really not even as vice president.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean it was not a strong interview.

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, and picked apart within an inch of It's like

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>because if you're Donald Trump and you're doing I mean,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>like I think about how much media Donald Trump does

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in a day when he's not calling journalists and you know,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean three four hours a day, I mean full

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>spray of this that a press conference, and then those

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like insane cabinet meetings that are televised, which are like

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know a little North Korea, but you still have

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a visual of the guy out there. And so you

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say something crazy, if you've said seven thousand other things

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>since then, it becomes sort of hard to keep trap.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's that, you know, it's that Bannon esque

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 4>flood the zone. You know, he may do five things

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 4>that are completely crazy and or you know, get would

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 4>get picked apart and get hit, but he does twenty

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 4>five other things, so you forget about those things he

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 4>just did. I mean, and it's as a journalist, you're

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>just you've got not just a fire hose coming at you,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 4>but you have ten fire hoses coming at you.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>By the way.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 4>Also, why to me it was so important to write

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 4>this book is to try to get a little bit

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>of a step back and what did we just go through?

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 4>What did we just live through? And to go through

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 4>and take the time and to pick apart the key

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 4>moments that brought us to this point in American history,

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 4>and to try to go back and see what was

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 4>really happening behind the scenes. That's what I tried to

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 4>do with this book.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a very different white House than Trump one

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>point zero, like, very different, different, priority is different, everything

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>different on fetteredness. So explain to me what you see

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as the sort of main players in this White House.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, the first thing that makes it entirely different is

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 4>he is actually trying to fundamentally change things. He's going

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 4>to have an impact on this country and by the way,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 4>also on the physical layout of the White House that

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 4>he never had in the first term. You don't say,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I mean the first term, all the chaos,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 4>all the attention, all that took place when he left office,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 4>he left office, it was ephemeral. There was not that

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 4>much of a lasting impact. That is not the case already,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 4>just you know, less than a year into this White House.

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 4>And the two other biggest factors are he comes in

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 4>with an agenda that was part of what he was

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 4>into last time, but it wasn't central really, which is

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to get back at the people that screwed him over

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 4>in his minds. I mean, he faced an election where

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 4>he was either going to maybe go to prison or

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 4>become the most powerful president that we have seen in

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 4>our lifetimes, thanks to a Supreme Court immunity decision, thanks

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 4>to a Congress that is entirely obsequious, and going to

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 4>do whatever he wants, the most powerful president of our lifetime.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 4>So he becomes that, and he's going to use that

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 4>power to get back at everybody that investigated him, that

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 4>attacked him, the Republicans who tried to rein him in.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 4>So not just this isn't just prosecutors and Democratic opponents

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 4>who impeached him or any of that. This is also

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 4>the Republicans that tried to rain him in enemies list.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 4>High on that enemy's list are people like well, Jim Comey.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised to see people like General Kelly

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 4>on that list, Mark Milly on that list, people who

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 4>served in his administration, Bill Barr. You had Bannon the

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 4>other day saying that Barr should go to prison, that

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Bill Barr should be prosecuted. Is talk about that?

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't want to think about that. How much

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bannon world talking to Trump World?

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't know about Bannon World or Trump World,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 4>but Bannon is talking to Trump absolutely?

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Wow, all right?

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 4>And there is absolutely a you know, a line there.

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 4>And also Bannon two things. One, he does have an

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 4>influence on Trump. He makes sure that his show he's

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 4>on for four hours.

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>A day on the war and better him than May.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 4>And when he has the key messages that he wants,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 4>they go to Natalie Harp Trump's assistant and they go

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 4>to Trump and Trump watches them and also.

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Natalie prints it out right.

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, these are video clips, so she she sets up

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 4>the video clips the human prins.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 4>But but I describe a scene in the book that

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.359
<v Speaker 4>is really kind of mind blowing that helps you understand

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 4>what happened when Zelensky came to the White House in

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 4>February and you had that big confrontation. Well, in advance

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 4>of that, there was a National Security meeting with Vance

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 4>heg Seth, Rubio, Waite, Coough, Besant, then the National Security

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Advisor Mike Waltz, and their meeting at the White House

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 4>with Trump and they're going over that minerals deal that

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 4>we're going to sign with the Ukraine, and Trump says,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 4>get Steve Bannon on the phone. Waltz calls Bannon. Anyway,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 4>they go back and forth. Bannon like puts Waltz to

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 4>h to voicemail. Then Trump calls Bannon himself on his

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 4>phone and Bannon takes the call and for the next

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 4>half hour, Bannon is basically lecturing the National Security team

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 4>on how they can't trust that punk Zelensky, which is

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>what Bannon calls him, and how if you give him

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 4>a you know, if you do a security he's gonna

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 4>want he's gonna want a natural resources deal. He's going

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 4>to want security guarantees. You cannot trust him, you cannot

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 4>do him. And that really Again, this has never been

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 4>reported before, but I think that that incident, and I've

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 4>talked to many people that were involved in that set

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 4>the stage for the confrontation with Zelenski. And that was Bannon.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 4>He's not in the White House, he's not on the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 4>National security team, but in that moment he had more

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 4>influence than the national security advisor of the Secretary of.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>State John Carl Thank you, Malli, I.

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Love talking to you. Thank you for having me on.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 2>David Sirota is the founder of The Lever, the screenplay

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 2>author of Don't Look Up, and the author of Master Planned,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>The Hidden Plot to Legalize Corruption in America.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fast Politics, Dave, Thank you, thanks for having me.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I have so many places I want to start because

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's so bad, but let's start with John Roberts, the

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>man who just wants to cut away our freedoms versus

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he wants to use a scalpel rather than a chainsaw,

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but he'll use a chainsaw if he needs to.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we're on the twenty year anniversary now of

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 6>John Roberts' takeover of the Supreme Court, which is that's

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 6>really how you make yourself feel old is to realize

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 6>it's been twenty years, and I think people have forgotten

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 6>what that few month period was like in two thousand

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 6>and five, where there was Sandra Day O'Connor and William

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 6>Rehnquist were suddenly out of the picture and John Roberts

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 6>and Sam Alito were installed very very quickly on that court.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 6>And soon after that, of course, came the Citizens United decision,

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 6>which transformed American politics almost overnight. I mean, our book

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 6>is about the master plan that conservatives hatched over fifty

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 6>years to deregulate the campaign finance system, kill off anti

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 6>corruption laws, anti bribery laws, and Citizens United was one

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 6>of the big obviously earning points, again engineered by John Roberts.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 5>And the thing that drives me crazy.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 6>And probably drives anyone crazy who remembers back in two

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 6>thousand and five was how he was presented as this reasonable,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 6>almost moderate candidate, and I remember distinctly sort of trying

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 6>to sound the alarm in the position that I was

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 6>in like, this guy is not some easy going moderate.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 6>This guy is a movement conservative. Arguably, I guess you'd

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 6>call him that. Maybe the second movement conservative put on

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 6>the court. I mean, you had Scalia, But this guy

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 6>was sort of groomed by the conservative movement to be

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 6>everything that he has come to be. And to my mind,

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 6>there are three priorities when you look at John Roberts' career, right,

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean to really understand John Roberts passions. There is

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 6>his passion to destroy and dismantle voting rights laws.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We really dosate the voting rights law.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 5>Really that he's been working on it forever.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 6>There is his passion to close the courthouse doors to

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 6>anyone who is inconvenient to political and corporate power. But

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 6>by that I mean his war on what's known as standing.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 6>You are not allowed in this court. We won't even

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 6>adjudicate your issue because you do not have standing. Again,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 6>that is a John Roberts passion. And then the other

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 6>John Roberts passion is equating and enshrining the connection between

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 6>money and free speech, the idea that money is a

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 6>constitutionally protected form of speech, which was started before John Robertson.

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, it feels like a Mitch McConnell.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Mitch McConnell, the Buckley case in the seventies. But

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 6>John Roberts really has taken that the Roberts Court has

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 6>to its logical extreme.

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>In John Roberts defense, he has very rich donors.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 5>I guess that is it. In his defense, I.

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Mean, these guys need of ation every once in a while.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And as Thomas has shown us, you know, those are

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>re's are expensive. I know.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 5>And the thing, the thing that kind of blows me away.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 6>Although the Court, as we traced in our book, is

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 6>is doing these rulings, deregulating.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 5>The campaign finance system.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 6>And narrowing the interpretation of anti bribery laws down the

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 6>to the point where.

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Last se ribes are they bribed?

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 5>No, they're protuities. Right.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 6>I have to say this out loud repeatedly because it's

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 6>almost like people won't believe it. In the last court term,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 6>there was a case about a local official who had

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 6>gotten a payment from a government contractor. After the local

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 6>official delivered the government contract to this contractor gotten a payment,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 6>and the court ruled that that was not a bribe,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 6>that was a so called legal critulaluit.

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a tip, right.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to follow that up for one second

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because it comes back in season two, which is Tom

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Holman is wept up in an FBI investigation where he

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is not the target, right, he just wanders in and

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>accepts a bag of fifty thousand dollars in cash, and

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they say this is the Biden Justice Department says, well,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we may not even be able to prosecute this because

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court just ruled that bribes aren't bribes.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's the world we are living in now.

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 6>And again, to underscore the point you alluded to, these

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 6>rulings are coming down at the very time that some

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 6>of these justices engineering them are accepting lavish gifts from

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 6>billionaires who have business in some cases before the.

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Court in all cases right, or they're connected to someone

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>who does right.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 5>While they are legalizing corruption.

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 6>They are effectively engaging in the kinds of practices without,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 6>by the way, disclosure. We only know about that because

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 6>of reporting. They weren't in Thomas's case, he didn't disclose it,

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 6>et cetera, et cetera. So they are in an undisclosed

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 6>way engaging in the kind of behavior that they are

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 6>issuing rulings legalizing I mean it's mind blowing, yes it is.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>And yet it is also very much exactly what you

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>think of when you think of these guys. Right. The

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that bothers me the most is the idea that

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>they are like, well, this is textualism.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Right, which is crazy to me. Right, I mean, that

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 5>doesn't make any sense.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 6>The idea that the founders in the Constitution kind of

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 6>legalized bribery or equated by the way money with speech,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 6>it's just severed from any textual reality. Frank, I'm not

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 6>a constitutional scholar here, but like the idea that money

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 6>is speech, the idea, by the way, that corporations have

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 6>constitutional rights is simply not in the Constitution at all.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 6>And the court used to distinguish between sort of corporate

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 6>speech and human speech. The Court used to distinguish between

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 6>actual human beings and corporate persons. That's all been thrown out,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 6>and we have to ask the question of why has

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 6>it been thrown out. It's because throwing it out provides

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 6>disproportionate political power to essentially conservatives who know that they

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 6>can't legislatively pass their unpopular agenda through democratic, small d

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 6>democratic institutions. In other words. I think this is a

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 6>missed point a lot like why is the conservative movement

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 6>doing it this way? Why do they want to legalize corruption,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 6>Why do they want to deregulate the campaign finance system.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 6>It's because if you realize that your agenda tax cuts

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 6>for the wealthy, et cetera, et cetera. If you realize

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 6>your agenda is wildly unpopular among voters who were supposed

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 6>to be in control of things in a democratic republic.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 6>If you realize it's unpopular, then you have to rig

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 6>the game to make sure that those policies can go

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 6>into effect, and that allow you to circumvent the democratic

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 6>institutions that would say no to those policies.

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. This court seems, especially the last

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>couple shadow dock at rulings we've seen, they have been

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>so blatantly partisan. It would be hard for me. And

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I am an optimist, a person who has lots of

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>friends who used to be in the federal society, for

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>whom they really want you to believe that Emmy is

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>smart and Kavanaugh has some kind of ethos. But everything

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I've seen over in this term especially has just been partisan.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 6>Hacker right, agreed, and now we've got a term coming

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 6>up talking about corruption, where jd Vance has quietly and

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 6>deliberately given the Supreme Court an opportunity to go even

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 6>beyond Citizens United and eliminate all of what's ever left

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 6>of campaign finance rules. It's incredible that this case hasn't

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 6>gotten more attention.

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>What's the case.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 6>It's about the NRSC, the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 6>versus the f V.

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 5>That's technically what it is.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Essentially, jd Vance went into court and said that a

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 6>prohibition or a limit on how much party committees can

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 6>coordinate their spending with candidates. He's arguing that's unconstitutional. Now

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 6>people hear that and they're like, oh, that's kind of esoteric.

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 6>That's kind of like, what does that really mean. The

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 6>point is it's a rule about how much donors can

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 6>pass through their money to candidates through a party. The

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 6>idea of the limits was to say you can't use

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 6>a party committee to get around campaign contribution limits.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 5>That's what's at issue here, right.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 6>The Supreme Court has long held up that super PACs

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 6>can spend what they want, but if you want to

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 6>give money directly to a candidate, there are limits there

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 6>because that can be a corrupting force. Vance's case is

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 6>designed to give the court a way to do away

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 6>with all of the remaining campaign finance limits, the remaining

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 6>limitations on donations. This would essentially take Citizens United and

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 6>put it on steroids at a time that polls tell

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 6>us the public across the political spectrum, by the way,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 6>the public hates Citizens United. And so you have Dvance

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 6>going into court at a moment when the public loathes

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 6>Citizens United and is giving the now six to three

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 6>court the chance to go way beyond Citizens United. And

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 6>I don't know what's going to come in this case,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 6>but I'm not feeling all that optimistic because get this,

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 6>the Biden administration was defending existing law. When Trump came in,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Trump's Department of Justice switched sides and says it is

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 6>refusing to defend the current law. And way it gets

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 6>even more crazy. So then the Supreme Court has to

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 6>appoint a lawyer to represent the FEC and they appoint

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 6>a former John Roberts clerk who was clerking for Roberts

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 6>during the original Citizens United decisions. So, in other words,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 6>the conservative movement has triangulated the entire case. They engineered

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 6>the case they have the Supreme Court, and a conservative

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 6>movement lawyer is now the defense lawyer for the existing law.

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about where we go next. There's

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>another case that's in front of the Supreme Court that

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think is sort of my favorite case of this

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>semester because it's the one where than the most conflicted,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and that is the tariff case. So you've got Coke

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Brothers versus Trump, and this is I think my favorite

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>case because this Supreme Court is so captured. It's a

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>captured institution period paragraph it's owned by wealthy conservative donors,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's also owned by Donald Trump. And here's a

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>case where the wealthy conservative donors want the tariffs gone

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>because the tariffs are terrible for business and make no sense.

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And Donald Trump wants ultimate power via the unitary executive theory.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>He is a god king and he can use these terriffs.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the thing that I think Trump loves

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so much about tariffs is that it is really an

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to pick winners and losers. You know, It's one

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to do crony capitalism with our economy, but he

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>can do crony capitalism now with other countries' economies. So

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>how do you think this goes down.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 6>It's a great question, and I agree with you. Trump

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 6>likes tariffs because it forces other countries. And by the way,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 6>big donors donor corporations to kiss his ring. There was

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 6>a study that we reported on at the lever from

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 6>the tariffs in the first term, in which it showed

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 6>that the companies that donated money to Trump and the

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 6>Republicans were more likely to get exemptions from the tariffs.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 5>In a sense, it's a corruption scheme. Now here's the thing.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 6>You're totally right to hone in on the fact that

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court, the conservative Supreme Court, is caught between

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 6>always wanting to do what big money wants and always

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 6>wanting to give Donald Trump, and not just Trump, but

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 6>give the executive branch, certainly their executive branch when it's

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 6>controlled by Republicans, always wanting to give the executive branch power.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>And also they don't want Trump to be mad at

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>them totally. I mean, like this is an entire culture

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of Americans who are scared of Trump's tweets exactly.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 6>So you've got these two conflicting forces. And what's really

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 6>interesting about the Supreme Court. Before we get to the

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 6>tariff stuff is to look at what they've done with

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 6>Trump's attempt to remove independent agency appointees the court. What's

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 6>really fascinating here is that the court has allowed Trump

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 6>to remove appointees at the agencies that are problematic to

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 6>corporate power, the FTC, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, but

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 6>they have not allowed Trump to remove a member of

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 6>the Federal Reserve.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Board because that would be bad for the markets exactly.

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 6>So what was fascinating was they somehow made up this

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 6>idea that the FTC commissioners are not independent, so they

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 6>can be thrown out ps they're annoying to corporations, but

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 6>nobody on the Federal Reserve Board aka Wall.

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 5>Streets Institution can be removed at all.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 6>So I wonder if they're going to try to creatively

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 6>do something visa VI tariffs where they sort of say

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 6>something like these specific tariffs are not allowed aka business

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't like them, we can get rid of them, but

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 6>the president.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 5>Still retains the power.

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 6>Like I wonder if they're going to try to find

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 6>some ridiculous middle ground in a binary situation.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Tariff sybey INDs but not batteries or something.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Something like that.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean I think you're totally right that it is

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 6>fascinating that they've built this machine and now the machine

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 6>is like sort of in a sense, at war with itself.

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is the one bright spot in this

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>whole fucking disaster, is that you see MAGA is so

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>drunk with power that they're coming after each other. I mean,

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal, the woke Wall Street Journal, perhaps

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you've heard of it, owned by Rupert Murdoch, had a

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>piece today about Laura Lumer targeting MAGA.

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Trump like was a story for like three hours.

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 6>But Trump going to war with Leonard Leo was like

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of blew my mind. And for those who don't,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 6>I know, Leonard Leo was the conservative activist.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>He's how we got here. Leonard Leo is how we

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have a court that rubber stamps everything Donald Trump wants

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to do.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Exactly So, Leonard Leo is the conservative activist who packs

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 6>the court. Over twenty twenty five years, Federalist Society guy,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 6>some of the Federalist Society judges at a certain point

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 6>once in a while sort of said hey, Trump, you

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 6>can't do this. Trump freaks out and essentially disavows. Leonard

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 6>Leo says he's like a bad guy.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Right. It's like I've used the example of the French

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Revolution dynamic.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 6>It feels like the Committee on Public Justice, right Like,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Robespierre's running the Committee on Public Justice and he's getting

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 6>his way. You know, they're doing the guillotine to everybody,

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 6>and then all of a sudden, it accelerates, it accelerates,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 6>and then Robespierre's head is in the guillotine, right like,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 6>metaphorically speaking, like the revolution quote unquote is sort of

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 6>accelerates so fast that it starts eating itself. And I

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 6>feel like that's what's happening right now. I don't know,

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 6>like we're in the abyss. I don't know where we

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 6>go from here.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting because I feel like we agree on

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things about how we got here, and

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like the many ways in which Democrats were unable to

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>bring a knife to a knife fight and brought a

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stuffed animal to a knife fight, and then we're like,

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just we're so disappointed by Republicans doing fascism. It does

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>strike me though, that all this energy they had saved

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>up for Dems and now Dems were like, we can't

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>legislate this, and so now they're using it on each other.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, look the story of the Democrats. Let's

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 6>go back to where we started, John Roberts twenty years ago.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm old enough to remember that lots and lots of

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Democrats voted to put John Roberts.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 5>On that court.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 6>And I remember back then, and I was a much

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 6>younger person. I was looking around being like what am

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 6>I missing here? Like why are they saying such nice

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 6>things about this person and helping the Republicans install him

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 6>on the court. And I don't think that's like a

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 6>historical anomaly. I think it was kind of emblematic of

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 6>this idea that the party and its leaders believed that

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 6>simply by adhering to so called norms, everything would at

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 6>a certain point revert back to normal. At this point, clearly,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 6>that calculation, if you can call it, that was wrong.

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 6>I do understand people say it wasn't that they were wrong,

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 6>it's that they were a lot of them.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Were complicit, right, I don't agree.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 5>Maybe not all of them were complicit.

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 6>I think the term doesn't necessarily mean you were sort

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 6>of deliberately in on it.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 5>It's that you were willing to tolerate it if you.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 6>Got to, For instance, keep your job in the Senate

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 6>or keep your job in Congress. You're not willing to

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 6>actually risk anything real to you yourself to stop this,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 6>That to me is a form of complicity. And I'm

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 6>asking the question now I think everyone should be as like,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 6>when are Democrats going to actually risk something? And by that,

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean when are they going to actually really put

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 6>themselves out there to risk their own political cares to actually,

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 6>in a real sense, try to stop this. We've seen

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 6>very very few efforts that rise to this level of

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 6>an emergency.

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to just say, because I've been

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>very hard on Democrats and everyone is mad at me,

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that the shutdown for them is a huge gamble and

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be for today getting people to talk

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about healthcare.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 5>Look, I hope you're right. I think it is.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 6>We haven't seen them do something like this in a

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 6>very long time, and I think it's better late than never.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 6>But I would just tell you this, they're not doing

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 6>that because they're nice. They're doing that because people are

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 6>mad at them. The latest pupole shows that more Democratic

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 6>voters are mad at their own party than we've seen

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 6>in a generation or two. So that anger even if

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 6>some of your listeners are like mad at you for

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 6>being mad at Democrats. That wressure is actually necessary to

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 6>get them to stand up.

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. And quite frankly, Chuck Schumer saw the

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>right on the wall and knew we had to do

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it from March. But let us give them a tiny

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of credit.

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 5>I agree.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 6>And the healthcare stuff is a disaster if it is

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 6>allowed to go into a fact like if those cuts happen,

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 6>I mean we're talking about doubling people's healthcare premiums. That

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 6>is something that I think is worth doing what they're doing.

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And Trump is not going to make the price of

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>eggs any cheaper.

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 5>No, He's making everything more expensive.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Dave Saroda, thank you, thanks for having me.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear the best

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>minds and politics make sense of all this chaos. If

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a friend

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and keep the conversation going. Thanks for listening.