WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Null Ship

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb. We had a scheduling change with

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>an interview today, so we are going to run a

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>vault episode while we reschedule that. This is going to

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>be an episode that originally published eight eighteen, twenty twenty two.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It is on the idea of the null ship, the

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>principles of the vacuum airship. This is a pretty fun

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>one where we talked about futuristic materials in seventeenth century

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>flight concepts. So without further ado, let's dive right into

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the episode.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Wecome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe McCormick.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And in today's episode, we're going to be looking at

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a spectacular bit of hypothetical air travel that has intrigued

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>us for centuries. The vacuum airship or null ship as

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it referred and that's such a cool name

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>for something that I think I had a front loaded

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on this episode, but usually it's just referred to as

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum airship. And the basic principle, as we'll discuss

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>is pretty simple. Hydrogen, helium or hot air filled balloons

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>allow an airship to traverse the skies because these gases

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are lighter than the surrounding air. An even lighter gas

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is the absence of any gas at all, the vacuum.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>If one could create a vacuum chamber or bladder that

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was itself light enough, then this could be used to

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>provide lift for airships on Earth or even on other planets.

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's such an obvious extension of the idea

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>underlying balloon indirigibles all lighter than their flight craft. You

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>would have to assume that if you don't see things

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>like this being used all the time, there must be

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good reason, And I guess we'll get to

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>that in a little bit. But yeah, it's like an

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>obvious place to take the idea.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And so yeah, it's ultimately such a fascinating

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>topic because, yeah, there's the basic underlying science of it,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>The principles of it are pretty sound, there are material

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>challenges in place, but then the history of the concept

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting as well. Thus far, however, the main

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>place you'll see these vacuum airships deployed are going to

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be within the pages of science fiction and fantasy. And

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the main examples of this, and you'll see

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this widely cited, is a novel that was serialized between

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty nine and nineteen thirty by Edgar Reis Burroughs

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>titled Tarzan at the Earth's Core, not to be confused

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with At the Earth's Core, which was his ninth fourteen

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>novel that established the hollow Earth world of Pellucidar, which

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is this like it sounds, It's like a world within

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>our world. It has a race of intelligent and I

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think psychic Terasaar overlords called the Mahar or the Mahar,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and that novel prominently features a Subterarine. So we've actually

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that book on the show before in our episode

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>about Subdarenes, which is another sort of fantastic hypothetical means

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of traversing the natural environment. But this Tarzan at the

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Earth's Core, is a crossover novel which features Tarzan traveling

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to the inner world via a vacuum airship. And I

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>had to dive into this one a little bit. I

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>assume you haven't read this one either.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>No, I haven't read it. I do remember it was

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>mentioned in that earlier episode but also it just got

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 3>me thinking about, like, wait, where do all of these

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>science fiction books about a hollow earth with like a

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>different biosphere or some kind of archaic state. Where does

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>all that come from? Because this isn't the first one.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>This is in what nineteen twenty nine thirty, But like

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 3>as far back as the eighteen sixties you had Jules

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Vern with Journey to the Center of the Earth, which

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>is very similar concept. I don't think it has like

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 3>psychic pterosaurs, but it does have a hollow earth with

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 3>like essentially a mirror biosphere on the inside that has

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, it makes me think we should come back and

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>do a proper episode on the concept of the hollow earth.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You know why it wouldn't work a quiet individuals thought

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that it could have worked, and why it has you

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>know why it has captivated people's imagination for so long.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know of anything older than Jules Vern,

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>but there may be.

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So I had not read this book either. I think

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the only Edgar Reis Burrough's novel that I have read

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>is one called The Monster Men, which Memory serves is largely.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems very inspired by the Eye in an island

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of Doctor Moreau, but it was pretty fun, as I

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>remember it, and so I went ahead and dove into

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>this one, and I was reading through it trying to

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>find some good examples of them talking about vacuum airships.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think I wasted a good like twenty twenty

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>five minutes just scanning through the book trying to do

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>some searches. And then I realized that I was looking

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>at the wrong one. I was looking at the Earth's

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Core instead of Tarzan at the Earth's Core. But I

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>switched to the correct book, and they talk about the

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>vacuum airship a lot in that one. So I can't

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just find like the one spot where they're talking about it.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a frequent topic of conversation. But I do want

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to read just a fragment here from it where they

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 1>touch on it. So this is Edgar Reisburrough's from Tarzan

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Earth's Core again from nineteen twenty nine and

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty. The greatest risk that we would have to

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>face would be a possible inability to return to the

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>outer crust owing to the depletion of our helium gas

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that might be made necessary by the maneuvering of the ship.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But that is only the same chance of life or

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>death that every explorer and scientific investigator must be willing

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to assume in the prosecution of his labors. If it

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>were but possible to build a whole sufficiently light and

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>at the same time sufficiently strong to withstand atmospheric pressure,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we could dispense with both the dangerous hydrogen gas and

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the rare and expensive helium gas, and have the assurance

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the utmost safety and maximum of buoyancy in a

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>ship supported entirely by vacuum tanks. Perhaps even that is possible,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>said Tarzan, who was now evincing increasing interest in Gridley's proposition.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>The American shook his head. It may be possible someday,

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, but not at present with any known material.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Any receptacle having sufficient strength to withstand the atmospheric pressure

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>upon a vacuum would have a weight far too great

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.119
<v Speaker 1>for the vacuum to lift.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so, first of all, I am definitely picturing this

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 3>as the Christoff Lambert Tarzan from Graystoke. This has got

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to be it, right.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, the gentleman Tarzan here mild spoiler for the book.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they figure it out. I believe some sort of

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>rare element or metal is introduced that it makes the

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>impossible possible, because otherwise, how are you going to get

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Tarzan to the Inner Earth to battle psychic terosaurs.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's funny how this Psychic Terosaur book does

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>correctly diagnose some of the problems with existing lighter than

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>air craft. So one problem is needing to have continued

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>access to your lighter than air gas so that you

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>can refill the balloon or the tank do because there's

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 3>always going to be some kind of leakage or potentially

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>even damage that would allow the gas to escape. You'd

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 3>have to have a way to get more helium in there.

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>If it's helium. Of course, if it's hydrogen, you run

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 3>into a whole raft of other problems, as one can

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 3>see with the history of the hinden Burgens of forth,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>hydrogen very flammable and having the same fixed access problems

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 3>as helium. But yeah, with a vacuum like you don't

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 3>need to carry vacuum around with you. All you would

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.239
<v Speaker 3>need to do is find a way to pump out

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 3>to the chamber.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you can see why it's such an attractive option,

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and this passage kind of encapsulates all that I was

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>looking around. Two, I noticed that it's been noted that

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at least two other authors that we've mentioned on the

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>show before have also employed vacuum airship principles. Peter Watts

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>makes use of them in his Rifters books as a

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>means of enabling flying machines. I'd totally forgotten about this,

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and then Ian M. Banks invoked them in at least

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>three different novels, including at least one that I definitely read.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But I also don't remember mention of them. I guess

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I just wasn't My mind wasn't as open to the

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of vacuum airships when I was reading these books.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've also read that they factor into Neil Stevens

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>since The Diamond Age, which I have not read, but

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I've heard good things about.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 3>So wait a minute, I actually know almost nothing about Tarzan.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Where all does Tarzan go? Is he like the Leprechaun

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>or like he goes to space? He goes to the ocean,

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 3>he goes to the Hollow Earth? Does does he go

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>to Las Vegas at some point? What are all his adventures?

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, Joe, there are twenty four Tarzan novels by by

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Edgar W Reis Burroughs, so you know he ultimately gets around.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I have not read any of them, but you can

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>just when you start scanning the titles, you realize that

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he maybe starts running out of jungle and he has

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to has to go to lost Empires in the Earth's

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>core and a city of gold Forbidden City. Looks like

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>he may join the Foreign Legion at one point, so

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's got to get out there and travel

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>around and explore the outer world. But I think generally speaking,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he's always going to battle or befriends some sort of

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a large animal.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for correcting my tarzan ignorance. Now I know,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 3>all right, But I guess before we go any further

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>exploring the history of proposals for vacuum airships, it would

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 3>be worth briefly explaining the underlying reasoning, and that is

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that whether you're talking about a lighter than air gas

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 3>inside a balloon or a rigid chamber containing a vacuum,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the physics phenomenon that would cause this balloon or chamber

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 3>to fly is what's known as Archimedes principle, named after

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the ancient Greek inventor and mathematician, And I think the

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 3>core idea you really need to understand in order to

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 3>grasp archimedes principle at a gut level is the idea

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 3>of fluid displacement. Fluid displacement so a few extreme experimental

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>conditions aside. Basically, if you are on Earth, you are

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 3>submerged within a fluid. So if you're a barracuda or

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 3>a jellyfish, that fluid is going to be water. If

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>you are a human standing in line at burger king,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 3>that fluid is the atmosphere. Both gases and liquids are

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 3>fluids because they both flow to fill containing environments. And

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>when you occupy space within a mass of either kind

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>of fluid, whether it's liquid or gas, you are taking

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 3>up space that this fluid would otherwise fill, would otherwise

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>rush in to fill, So in other words, you are

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 3>displacing gas or liquid. The inside about physics that Archimedes

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 3>had is that objects submerged within a fluid are pushed upward,

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>meaning in the opposite direction of gravity, by a force

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 3>that is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>by that object. And this is why boats float. I mean,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 3>humans have been making boats for a long time, but

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it took us a while to figure out what is

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>the exact physics principle governing the floatation of boats. So

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 3>a boat, for example, may have a steel hull, and

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 3>steel is very dense, so you would think that a

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 3>steel boat should sink, right, I remember wondering about this

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>when I was a little kid. How does metal sink?

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>So how does a metal boat float? A metal boat

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 3>floats because the hull of the boat displaces a lot

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 3>of water, an amount of water that is as heavy

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 3>as the boat itself. So when a boat gets launched

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 3>out into the ocean, it sinks down in the water

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 3>until the amount of water it displaces is the same

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>as the weight of the boat overall. And then after

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 3>it reaches this equilibrium, it's held up on the surface

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 3>of the water by that buoyancy, that force pushing upward

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>on the boat equivalent to the weight of the water

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>it displaces. And this, of course is also why a

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>ship sinks when water leaks into its hull. It's water

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>that is denser than air filling that void that was

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 3>otherwise filled with air. So a kind of weird, but

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I think accurate way to think of a ship on

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the ocean is a rigid balloon filled with air. Now,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the same principles that apply in water also hold true

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>in the fluid of the atmosphere. There is a force

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 3>pushing up on an object that is equivalent to the

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>weight of the air that that object displaces. Now, for

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 3>most objects around us, the atmospheric buoyancy is negligible because

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 3>objects are way more dense than the atmosphere that they're displacing.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Though technically it is true that your body has a

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>measurable buoyancy within the air, it's not enough to make

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 3>you float up off the ground because human bodies are

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty massive. But based on some rough calculations I looked up,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 3>it seems like it's probably a fraction of a pound

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>at sea level for the typical range of human body weights.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 3>One estimate I saw was that it's like zero point

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 3>two pounds for one hundred and seventy pound adult. So,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>how can you change an object in order to take

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>advantage of that atmospheric buoyancy and make it float up

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 3>in the atmosphere like a boat floats on the water. Well,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 3>as demonstrated by balloons and dirigibles, what you can do

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 3>is make that object take up a lot of space,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 3>mostly with material that is lighter than the atmosphere itself,

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 3>which is usually going to be a lighter than air

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 3>gas like hydrogen or helium. But of course it could

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 3>also be a chamber that has no gas in it

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 3>at all, nothing in it at all, which would be

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the lightest possible way of taking up space. Now here's

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 3>a weird fact. I was just wondering about which of

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the fundamental forces actually causes the force of buoyancy. Where

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 3>is that force pushing up on a boat or pushing

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 3>up on a balloon coming from? Counterintuitively, that force originates

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>with gravity, which is kind of strange because the force

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 3>of buoyancy is going in the opposite direction of gravity, Right,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Why would gravity cause something to rise up from the

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 3>ground instead of sinking down. But you have to think

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>about a sort of chain of causes here. So whether

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about the atmosphere or the ocean, gravity is

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>pulling all that fluid toward the Earth's center of mass.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>It's pulling all the water or the gas down. So

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 3>gravity is the cause of air pressure and water pressure,

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and it is the downward pressure of the surrounding fluid

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 3>that causes buoyant objects within that fluid to rise. To

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>use some kind of approximate and anthropomorphic terms, when a

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>balloon floats, it's because the heavier gas of the atmosphere

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 3>around it is all rushing down to get to the surface,

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and it has to push the balloon out of the

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 3>way to get there, and it can push the balloon

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 3>out of the way because the balloon is less dense

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 3>than it is.

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like if asking, well, hey, why if

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to get to the TV section of the

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>big box store on Black Friday. If everybody's trying to

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>get there, then why is the four Why am I

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>being pushed out of the store? Yeah?

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Because everybody else is pushing harder than you are.

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 3>But to come to real world proposals for vacuum airships,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>one thing I was shocked about was how far back

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 3>this idea goes. I would have imagined it was something

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 3>dreamed up in the nineteenth century.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was very much the same. But then I

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>started looking into it, and sure enough, the roots go

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the seventeenth century. So our

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>story here begins with an Italian Jesuit priest by the

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>name of Francesco Lana de Terzi, who lived sixteen thirty

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one through sixteen eighty seven, sometimes called the father of aeronautics.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>His groundbreaking book from sixteen seventy, titled pro Dromo de

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>l'arte mastre, was apparently the first to discuss the possibility

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of human flight via mathematical calculations and an understanding of physics.

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>These were no mere lost speculations either. This was a

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>work that was translated and then circulated throughout Europe, and

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>subsequent advancements in ballooning, for example, are often directly linked

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to this work, namely thinking of the Montegaffier brothers a

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>flight in seventeen eighty three, which was an unmanned balloon

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>flight lasting about ten minutes. Now, want to stress we're

0:16:55.200 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>largely talking with the Western and European sphere of exploration here.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>If you get into say Eastern accounts, there are some

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>older accounts of possible you know, unmanned hot air balloon

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>experimentation in China for example, going back to I think

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like the third century see wow, but again unmanned. Now,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 1>in this particular book, Lana covered many subjects, and I

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was reading about this in a paper titled the Jessuwit

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Contribution to Written Art Technological Sources in the seventeenth and

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth centuries by Karina Gramatki from twenty sixteen. Apparently, the

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>topics include invention itself, drawing, design, pigments, chemistry, medicine, arithmetic,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the production of telescopes, microscopes, and finally aeronautics.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 3>Pick a lane.

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was an age where, yeah, if you

0:17:55.560 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>were into stuff, you were into everything. Yeah, So of

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>particular interest to Lana here though, were recent advancements in

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the creation of the vacuum pump. This had, of course

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>been a continuation of suction pump technology. The idea of

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum pump. The first vacuum pump was invented in

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sixteen fifty by the German scientist Auto von Gerriki and

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>subsequently experimented on by others. Oh.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've talked about Auto von Gerriki before in I

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 3>think in an episode that we did about atmospheric pressure,

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>specifically reference to his experiments with the so called Magdeburg hemispheres,

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 3>which was a really interesting experiment that took place in

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the sixteen fifties, I believe, And it's been while since

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 3>we talked about it, so I may be forgetting some

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>of the details, but basically, from what I recall, they

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 3>took two brass hemispheres half spheres, and then greased the

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 3>edges of them with lard and then pressed them together

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>and then used the invent of the air pump to

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 3>remove air from inside these two hemispheres, creating a vacuum within,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 3>of course, a partial vacuum. You know, they're not going

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to get every single molecule out, but yeah, getting most

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>of the gas out of them. And then they hooked

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 3>these hemispheres up to horses and had the horses pull

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 3>in opposite directions to try to pull them apart, and

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't. Like that, even horses could not separate them.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 3>What they were demonstrating there was how heavy the atmosphere is.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 3>That when you take all of the atmosphere out of

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the inside of these two half spheres, you create such

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 3>a disequilibrium that the you know, the atmosphere is essentially

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 3>reaching down and clutching these two things and pressing them

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 3>together so that even great force cannot pull them apart.

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are a couple of papers on this topic

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that I was reading from New Scientists actually, like I

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>was kind of getting the impression that maybe the editor

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at New Scientists is like pounding the desk that I

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>need more vacuum airship stories. But one of them was

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand and nine by Paul Collins, titled The

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Rise and Fall of the Metal Airship, which is ultimately

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about metal airships in general and not just the vacuum

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>airship concept. But he mentions this experiment, writing quote, Otto

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>von Gerriki had drawn together small copper hemispheres with such

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a strong vacuum that teams of horses could not pull

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>them apart. But you mentioned some other things of note here.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Collins also writes that the concept of a vacuum airship

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>appears in a German interplanetary travelogue of seventeen forty four,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>envisioning trips to Mars. So another example of something ultimately

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>far earlier than I would have had guessed it. If

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I was to guess, well, when were people first thinking

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about vacuum airships in the atmosphere of Mars, I would

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not have gone with the mid seventeen hundreds. Right now

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is a brief detour. I want to touch on another

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that Collins mentions here to get to the title

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of his paper. There actually was eventually a metal non

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>vacuum airship, and this was in eighteen ninety seven. The

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>first one was a thirty eight meter airship designed by

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>David Schwartz and helped into the sky by the Prussian

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Airship Battalion, and it was It was blimp shaped, but

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>its skin was riveted aluminum plates, and it traveled about

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>six kilometers total before it stopped. They put the brakes

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>on and it caused the thing to crumble due to

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>its rigid construction. But the advantage of a fully functional

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>metal airship would be speed, though, so the idea didn't

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>go completely away, and in nineteen twenty nine, good Year's

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>original airship designer Ralph Ubson quote formed the Metal Clad

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Airship Corporation to build an aluminum clad helium airship, the

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>ZMC two for the US Navy. Although notoriously difficult to handle,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote ten Bubble as it was dubbed, could

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>reach a speed of one hundred kilometers an hour and

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>it put in twenty two one hundred flight hours before

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it was decommissioned in nineteen forty one, and that was

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it for metal airships that was the last one that

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>took to the skies here on Earth. And yeah, that

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was the Detroit ZMC two Angel. I include a picture

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of it here for you. If one was looking at

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you might not guess that what you're looking at is

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a metal structure, aluminum clad helium airship.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 3>That I mean, if I've ever seen a tin bubble,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>that is the ten bubble. But to clarify again the

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 3>actual examples we've just been talking about that people got

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 3>up in the air flying, even if they were even

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 3>if they failed early on, these were not vacuum airships.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 3>These were airships that you even though they had rigid

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 3>outer hulls, they did use some form of gas inside.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, So ultimately, as we'll discuss, the vacuum airship

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is still a concept that individuals are still chasing today. Now,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 1>coming back to Lana's book here, another important connection here

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>would be to Robert Boyle's work proving that air has weight. Essentially,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>it was proven that all of the atmosphere could be

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>mechanically drawn out of a volume. Maybe the nature didn't

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>abhor a vacuum quite as much as previously supposed. And

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Lina is taking the next step by speculating one exciting

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>way that such a vacuum could be made to work

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for us. So what Lna does here is he basically

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>applies what was known at the time regarding the nature

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of air, vacuum and cylinders to devise a means by

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>which first vacuum spheres would be made that would float

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>up through the air, and secondly that with enough vacuum

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you could also float a vessel. So he proposed a

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>vessel consisting of a basket with a sail and rudder,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>held aloft by four large twenty five foot spheres made

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of thin copper sheeting and bound together by rigging. This

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was of course, never actually built, but there have been

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>various illustrations of what this would have looked like. I

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>included one here for you, Joe.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>It looks positively whimsical. Why does it have an ore?

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess that's some kind of rudder.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yeah, this is some sort of rudder device to

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>steer it.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Though it really does look like a paddle for the air.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Now again, Now again, Lana was a very serious individual,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>so he's not just dreaming here. He's applying what was

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>known about the atmosphere and current understanding of physics, and

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so he was serious about the underlying principles at work here.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So he discusses not only how this concept might work,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but he also gets into some of the objections to it.

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>For instance, do you might ask, well, wouldn't this just

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>float up into outer space until the people aboard died

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and it would just be completely uncontrollable. Well, he describes

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>how controlling the air vacuum levels would allow you to

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>make adjustments and keep yourself from just floating up to

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>heights altitudes beyond which you had intention of traveling to.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, I guess the fear is that, you know,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.239
<v Speaker 3>if the vacuum is potent enough that it would just

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>float you up to the top of the atmosp sphere

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 3>and you'd sit on it like a boat floats on

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 3>top of the water. Now, of course, you have to

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.719
<v Speaker 3>remember that even the wa a vacuum chamber would have

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 3>buoyancy within the atmosphere. It also, again, there is weight,

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, there is weight made up of the shell

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>surrounding the chamber and the boat and all that, So

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 3>that would counterbalance that to some extent. But then also, yeah,

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the other thing is that you could control altitude just

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>by allowing some amount of gas back into these partial

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 3>vacuum chambers, and then so that would help you sink

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 3>back down and then if you want to float up again,

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 3>you would once again pump that gas out.

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, the big problem here, of course, is the

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>notion of containing that vacuum. The big question would be

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it crush the copper spheres that are containing that

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>vacuum or you know, that are allowing the whole system

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to supposedly float to begin with. And the correct answer

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we know now is yes, it would have just crushed

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>those spheres. But at the time Lana contended that no,

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the perfect shape of the sphere would hold

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to the equal pressure of the vacuum within it. Again,

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we know now this wouldn't work, but his hypothesis was

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that it could possibly function.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, I guess here you're getting into the idea

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 3>of a balancing act, right, so that you can of

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 3>course create a pretty pretty strong vacuum within a sealed

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 3>chamber without the weight of the atmosphere crushing it, just

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, turning smashing that chamber like a tin can.

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>But in order to do that, you have to make

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the outsides of the chamber pretty darn strong, and in

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 3>order to make them that strong, you have to add

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 3>more and more weight to the chamber, thus counteracting the

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>buoyancy effect of the vacuum within.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, So you're chasing the buoyancy here, and can you

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>achieve it without adding so much metal that you lose

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>any buoyancy you might be seeking after? And can you

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>make the materials thin enough without just causing it to

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>collapse anyway? And this will remain important when we get

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>into subsequent attempts to make this hypothesis and or a reality.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But here's another little bit of interesting, ultimately speculation by

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Lana on the use of aerial technology, because he ends

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>up concluding in the book that God would never allow

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>such a vessel to actually be built, as it could

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>then be used to attack cities and towns from above,

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and that there would be absolutely no stopping such vessels.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>So you know, God would just shut that down. It

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would be like a tower of Babbel situation.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, this theological prediction must have been very well vindicated

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 3>then when later people came along, I think Leibniz was

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 3>one of them, showing that like no materials we know

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 3>about are strong enough to make this work.

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but again, this idea of aerial dominance seat that

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>would be possible in a military situation, to a large

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>extent line was correct here about just how devastating this

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>would be because, of course, during World War One, Zeppelin

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>served as the world's first long range bombers, though their

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>dominance would be short lived due to their weakness versus

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>interceptor aircraft. But aerial bombardment would indeed be a defining

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>factor of warfare from the twentieth century onward.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the invention of air power, I guess I would

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>say airpower, along with like long range artillery, completely changed

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 3>war in the twentieth century.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, on that note, let's move to the next chapter

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in our history of the vacuum airship or our pursuit

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of the vacuum airship, because this will take us to

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteenth century right up until the dawn of

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century. Because there was at least one spirited

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>individual who thought, yes, the vacuum airship can work, it

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>will work, and that is one author Debas Set and

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this is detailed in Balloons to Jets, A Century of

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Aeronautics in Illinois eighteen fifty five through nineteen fifty five

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>by one Howard L. Scame Horn so author debasit here

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was a Chicago doctor who quote designed an electorally powered

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>vacum balloon which he intended to use for transporting passengers

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and freight over vast distances at high speeds. And this

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is described as an air tight tube cone shaped at

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>either end, and it was going to be made of

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thin steel sheets and it would stay aloft when all

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of the air had been pumped out of it. And

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>again it would be used for high speed transportation of

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>passengers and freight, presumably from Chicago two other important cities.

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you can create that without the atmosphere

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 3>crushing it, good on you. But I am doubtful.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And so at this point you might think, okay,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Chicago doctor daydreaming about his airships. Well, no, he went

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a step further. The good doctor actually organized a company

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with three associates, the Aerial Navigation Company of Chicago, and

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they raised one hundred and thirty thousand dollars at the

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>time through the sale of stock to construct one of

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the ships. So already it's sounding a bit more like

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate effort now, right, And there's more when they

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hadn't produced anything with these funds. They turned to Congress

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for more funds and funding. Bills were introduced in both

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>houses of Congress by then a representative Ransom W. Dunham

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, and there was apparently some traction or momentum here,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but both bills failed to pass.

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Why does this sound like something that should be associated

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 3>with the Chicago World's Fair.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, I was thinking of the same thing, you know,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and I guess to a certain extent, we are talking about,

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the same sort of you know,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>futuristic technological optimistic ideas that were circulating at the time.

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have the technology, but we can do this.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>We can make these airships of reality and they're going

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentally change the way we travel and the way

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we move cargos. This is great, Let's do it. Let's

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>get the funding. Okay, well, maybe we need a little

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>more funding. Let's get Congress on the Horn.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really it sounds like there should be a

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 3>chapter about the fact humorship and devil in the White City.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, Skamehorn writes that the fight for the Chicago

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Void Vessel here went on for a good twenty years

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>up until the dawn of the new century with the

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>debasit trying in vain to raise enough money to build

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one of these ships, all the while dealing with scientific

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>critics that he just insisted would be proved wrong if

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they would just let him build one. He was like, look,

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just fund it, Just let me build one, and then

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll see, you'll see that this is possible. But it

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the real nail in the coffin was that

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>one of a couple of leading US aeronautical authorities of

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the time, Octave Cheneu and Albery Francis Zahm, quote publicly

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>denounced and mathematically prove the fallacy of the vacuum principle.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, I don't know the basis of the fallacy they're

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about there, but I would have to assume that

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 3>again it's going to be it's going to be rooted

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 3>in the lack of a material strong enough and light

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 3>enough to create this kind of vacuum shell. That if

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>you're going to create a rigid shell to contain a vacuum,

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 3>the atmosphere is always going to crush it unless you

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 3>make it so thick and so heavy that it that

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 3>it again outdoes the buoyancy effect of the vacuum and

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 3>makes it unable to fly.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, I mean that has always been and still

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is largely the Achilles heel of the whole concept. By

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, that same book also reveals that during this

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>same time period there was at least one other Illinois

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>based inventor trying to raise funds for an airship. It

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a vacuum airship, but still airships were very much

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on the brain. And it does sound like, yeah, that

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the people of the White City at the time were

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sharing some of the same dreams for what the future

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of air travel looked like.

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 3>What if HH Holmes, instead of operating like a murder hotel,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 3>had operated a murder airship.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>God, a good movie, pitch, We haven't had a I

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think we've had a good airship movie recently. Right,

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it could be like a haunted airship or a murder airship.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't think of one. I think of that scene

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 3>in Indiana Jones in the Last carse that's about it.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, there was. There was another one.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 3>When he punches the Nazi out of the window no ticket.

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, there's a and that had some some

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>very neat scenes with the Zeppelin. There there was also

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a movie called Zeppelin that had Michael Yorck in it.

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>This would have come out in nineteen seventy one, and

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing bits of this. I don't think I've

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>watched it in its entirety, but I remember catching bits

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of it on like America Movie Classics or something, and

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>him being impressed by some of the scenes of people

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>aboard these these airships. All right, well, let's take things

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>into the twenty first century. Another New Scientist article. Again,

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>New Scientist is your go to place for articles about

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>vacuum airships. Noted science writer Philip Ball discussed in a

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>New Scientist article titled flying on Empty from twenty nineteen,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and as Ball discusses, yeah, this idea has never quite

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>gone away, in part because if it could be pulled

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>off again, you don't need hot air or flammable hydrogen

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or precious helium to keep the ship afloat. It's not

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>about pump putting something in. It's about just taking atmosphere out.

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you could only figure out the materials problem,

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>then you know the world is your oyster.

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 3>And again, the materials problem is designing an outer shell

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 3>that would be strong enough to withstand the atmospheric pressure

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 3>trying to crush it in, but also light enough to

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 3>stay afloat right.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as we get into the modern era,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we're in this age of special nanomaterials and new ways

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of looking at how these materials can be put together.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>And of course this has led to a number of

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>ideas that haven't been possible yet. We've been able to

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>look to the future and say, well, what might we

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to do if we can just create something

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that's strong and flexible enough, you know, space elevators can

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>become a reality then, as well as things potentially like

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum airship. And so Ball mentions an individual by

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the name of Ben Jenett, who at the time of

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>publication was working on his doctorate at the Massachusetts Institute

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of Technologies Center for Bits and Atoms, and Genet devised

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the use of lightweight quote unquote lattice materials to make

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the shell of a vacuum ship possible. So Ball points

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>out that Genet calculated that even with currently available materials,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a shell with a thickness one tenth of the radius

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the sphere it contains would be able to withstand

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the air pressure without buckling, and this would then have

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be covered with a thin, impermeable skin. Genet's idea

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>would also involve creating the vacuum at a higher altitude,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was interesting where air pressure is lower

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and so you would have some I think what it

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was discussed here is solar powered hot air would be

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>used to allow the vessel to rise up to that

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>initial altitude, and then you would begin the vacuum process

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>when it's easier to pull that off, and then you

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>would have a theoretical operating altitude of something like twenty

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand meters or sixty five six hundred and sixteen feet.

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so that makes sense. Up at a higher altitude,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 3>the air pressure is going to be reduced, which means

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 3>there's less crushing force on the outside of the chamber.

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, that's my understanding here. So Ball points out

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the Gendit and his collaborators here were in at least

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in perhaps still are in contact with Boeings Aurora

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Flight Sciences on the concept, and then an Italian company

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>called oh Boot was also looking into vacuum ship ideas.

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Ball reported that while most of the emphasis was on

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>shipping with these modern concepts, the idea of at least

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>some level of human travel wasn't beyond possibilities as well,

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 1>at least for short jaunts. And again you come back

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to this sort of the romanticism of airships. I can

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:10.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine where this would be the case.

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, one thing you mentioned that operating altitude you said,

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty thousand meters or like sixty five thousand feet, is

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 3>well above the normal operating altitude of fixed wing aircraft.

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 3>So I wonder what does it look like once you

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 3>get up that high? Are you starting to get into

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 3>like looking at seeing the curve of the Earth territory?

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it sounds like a situation where you could easily

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>get into this area where you're pretty selling the tickets

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 1>to celebrities and so forth, kind of like we've seen

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with these other high altitude flight near space travel scenarios.

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. It'd be interesting to see where

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>things go in the decades ahead, But I wouldn't be

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised at all to see one of these concepts sort

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of come to fruition in at least in that scenario.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But I know when it happens, I'll be able to

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>turned a new scientist to read an article.

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 3>About it for all your nullship needs.

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 3>So one thing I looked into is that vacuum airships

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 3>have also been proposed in various ways for exploring other planets,

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 3>particularly Mars. I think there have been a few ideas

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 3>along these lines, but the main one I was reading

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 3>about was linked to a U T. Austin aerospace engineering

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 3>professor named John Paul Clark, who I think until just

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 3>recently was here in town at Georgia Tech. But Clark

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 3>and colleagues submitted a paper that I saw published under

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts Program or in IAC. This

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 3>was a Phase one proposal called Evacuated Airship for Mars missions.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 3>And I was reading about this in another summary that

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Clark had prepared that's hosted on the NASA website, and

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 3>he makes some interesting points. One funny thing is that

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 3>advanced project briefs like this always have the obligatory section

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 3>where they rag on whatever technology we're currently using. So

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>this one takes a few good wax. At ground based

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 3>rovers on Mars, it's like you know, rover with wheels.

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 3>You can fall in a ditch, you can get stuck,

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, and it's got limited line of sight, can't

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 3>see over mountains. Theres a lot of problems with ground

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 3>based rovers. You know what would be better a rover

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that could fly, But of course it's going to be

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 3>very hard to fly on Mars. And here's where a

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>vacuum airship could come in. Obviously, a vacuum airship would

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 3>be useful in planetary explorations for some of the same

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 3>reasons it would be useful on Earth. You get the

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 3>general transportation efficiency benefits of air travel without having to

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 3>rely on a fixed supply of low density gas like

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 3>hydrogen or helium. To keep a vacuum airship afloat, you

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 3>don't need a supply of gas. Technically, all you need

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 3>is power like electricity to operate a pump that will

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 3>continuously evacuate gas particles from the inner void. Now, Clark

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 3>points out that there is a good reason what we've

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 3>never developed a vacuum airship for use on Earth. It's

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 3>the same reason we've been talking about already. There is

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 3>no homogeneous material yet discovered that is strong enough to

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 3>be completely evacuated and withstand the crushing pressure of Earth's atmosphere,

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 3>at least not without the structure becoming too heavy to float.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Earth's air is cruel to vacuum airships. But Clark argues that,

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 3>based on his team's calculations, not only is this not

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 3>true on Mars, the atmosphere of Mars is kind of

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 3>an ideal environment for a vacuum airship. Now this immediately

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 3>went against my intuitions, because before I really reasoned it

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 3>through and read the argument here, I would have thought, well, okay,

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 3>the atmosphere of Mars is much less dense than Earth's atmosphere.

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 3>The average surface density is something like zero points zero

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>two kilograms per cubic meter. Compare that to Earth's, which

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 3>is more like one point two kilograms per cubic meter.

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 3>So Earth's is a couple of orders of magnitude greater

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 3>in density than the Martian atmosphere. Martian atmosphere is very thin,

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 3>and of course a balloon floats by having contents that

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 3>are less dense than the atmosphere. So in an atmosphere

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 3>with lower basically in a thinner atmosphere, I would have

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 3>assumed it's got to be harder for a balloon to float.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 3>But here is where I would have been wrong. Of Course,

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 3>a vacuum is always less dense than even a very

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 3>thin atmosphere, so if it can be contained and it

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 3>displaces more atmosphere than the weight of the craft itself

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 3>than the weight of the shell and the payload, it

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 3>will float. The real benefit of Martian atmosphere is in

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 3>its pressure to density ratio, so the main constituent of

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 3>Martian air is carbon dioxide. Unlike on Earth, which has

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 3>mainly nitrogen and oxygen. At a molecular level, carbon dioxide

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 3>is dense than nitrogen and oxygen, and the cold temperatures

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 3>on Mars also help make that CO two even denser.

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 3>You're probably familiar with the idea that hot gas expands,

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 3>cold gas contracts, and yet at the same time, a

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 3>cool advantage of Mars is that there is far less

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 3>atmospheric pressure pressing on the outer shell of the airship,

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 3>so you should be able to construct a vacuum envelope

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 3>that can stand up to the weight of the atmosphere

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 3>on Mars without buckling, using a design that is still

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 3>light enough to float. To read a section from the

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 3>NIAC paper quote, Mars having the most suitable atmosphere for

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the vacuum airship is quite remarkable since the Martian atmosphere

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 3>is a severe detriment to all other flight vehicle designs.

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 3>So you know, you try to do like a fixed

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 3>wing aircraft on Mars, that's going to be really hard.

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Continuing the quote, the Martian atmosphere is comprised almost entirely

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of carbon dioxide, so vehicles cannot use typical combustion fuels,

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 3>which require an atmospheric oxidizer. Glider, plane and helicopter designs

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 3>are all hindered by the atmosphere of Mars due to

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 3>the low Renolds number and relatively low density. Additionally, the

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 3>vacuum airship provides benefit over other airship designs and super

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:23.280
<v Speaker 3>pressure balloons because of the inherent robustness of the design. Moreover,

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 3>if damage is sustained, the vacuum airship can land be

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 3>repaired and then re evacuate to resume operation, whereas another

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 3>airship would need to be refilled with a lighter than

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 3>air gas. Therefore, the evacuated airship design thrives in an

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 3>environment where most other aircraft are added disadvantage, and in

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 3>this paper, Clark and colleagues claim to have already modeled

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the design that should be able to carry a payload

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 3>of five hundred kilograms in Martian air, and that weight

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 3>they say could be increased with further design improvements.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So the argument here is that not only is it

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation where to make to make our vacuum airship

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>dreams possible, we must go to Mars, it's instead, no,

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes this the concept, that makes this the design

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that makes the most sense on Mars if we're gonna

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have anything flying around.

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's their argument. And I don't know if this

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 3>has ever made it beyond this phase one or phase

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 3>two proposal level, So I'm not aware of any evidence

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 3>that this is actually like being developed for Mars missions.

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.720
<v Speaker 3>But at least the initial case they make is really interesting,

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and I wonder if anybody's going anywhere else with it,

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'm certainly intrigued. So Earth, with its thick atmosphere,

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 3>may well hate vacuum airships. It may just forever crush them.

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Maybe there's no way we could really design one that

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 3>would feasibly work on Earth, but Mars may be a

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 3>completely different story. That thinner atmosphere may be just the

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 3>place to make this dream a reality.

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, this all brings to mind a previous

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>episode of the show that we did titled Airships over Venus,

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>which discusses the hypothetical use of airships in the oppera

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere of Venus, at least for unmanned craft, but also

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in some of the more extreme and fantastic concepts that

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have been discussed in some of the literature. The idea

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that you could potentially have a human being travel to

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the upper atmosphere of Venus and be inside a specially

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>designed airship.

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the ideas for crude aircrafts there

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 3>is literally that you could have the crew inside the

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 3>balloon because in the Venusian atmosphere, breathable air floats.

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, looking around, I noticed that there have been

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>some papers that have come out speculating about the use

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of vacuum airships in the Venusian atmosphere, the upper atmosphere.

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like there at least are some individuals

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>out there who are thinking about taking the vacuum concept

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to the upper atmosphere of Venus as well.

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 3>You just hope it doesn't sink. Talk about heavy crushing atmospheres.

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, the Venusian atmosphere ultimately is an atmosphere that

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>crushes everything all right. Well, on that note, we're going

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and close out this episode, but we'd

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there if you have

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on vacuum airships or just airships in general, some

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of these concepts we've discussed regarding the atmospheres of other worlds.

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Everything's fair game, right in, let us know what you think.

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.720
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. As always. Core episodes

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the podcast We Found,

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed Core

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, Listener mail on Monday's short

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>form Artifact or Monster Fact on Wednesdays, and on Fridays,

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 1>we do Weird How Cinema. That is our time to

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>set aside most serious concerns and just talk about a

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>strange film.

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:46.879
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 3>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 3>say hello, you can email us at contact that Stuff

0:46:56.680 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Stuffed to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts, from iHeart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.