Speaker 1: This is a Jesse Kelly Show, The Jesse Kelly Show.
Speaker 1: Let's have some fun on a Thursday, a magnificent Thursday,
Speaker 1: where we learned a whole lot of things, while things
Speaker 1: you really mostly already knew about. What the FBI was
Speaker 1: doing on January sixth, Yes, we'll talk about that tonight.
Speaker 1: In fact, I have former FBI special Agent Steve Friend
Speaker 1: joining us a half hour from now to discuss that
Speaker 1: the drone stuff, it's not going away. Apparently it's getting
Speaker 1: even deeper. We'll discuss it. Joe Biden gave clemency to
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of people, including some Chinese pedophiles and
Speaker 1: Chinese spies. What's going on there? And of course we
Speaker 1: have asked doctor Jesse questions all over the place, from Democrats,
Speaker 1: love for slave labor, what is the why do I
Speaker 1: care so much about birth rates of a country? All
Speaker 1: that can we take out? Should we take out the
Speaker 1: cartails in Mexico? And so much more coming up tonight
Speaker 1: on the world famous Jesse Kelly Show. Now, before we
Speaker 1: get to the questions, and before we get to the
Speaker 1: FBI stuff, and before we get to all of those things,
Speaker 1: I'm going to touch on this for just a moment
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden. Joe Biden set a record. He woke
Speaker 1: up this morning and he granted clemency to nearly fifteen
Speaker 1: hundred people in one day. It had never been done before.
Speaker 1: It's the most ever in a day. And of course
Speaker 1: presidents giving clemency, giving pardons, commuting sentences at the end
Speaker 1: of their presidency is always something that has weappens, and
Speaker 1: it's always a source of controversy because for the most
Speaker 1: part this is not universal. But for the most part,
Speaker 1: these people are guilty. They've been tried, convicted, and guilty. Obviously,
Speaker 1: there have been some people wrongfully in prison have been
Speaker 1: sprung out, but for the most part they're guilty. Now
Speaker 1: that begs the question, why would you grant them clemency?
Speaker 1: Why would you hand them something? And the answer is
Speaker 1: usually not hard to find if you're willing to be
Speaker 1: honest with yourself. Republicans and Democrats both do this. Trump
Speaker 1: will make Trump because he was the one before Biden.
Speaker 1: Trump at the end of his first four years, he
Speaker 1: would do things like he'd pardon rappers at the end,
Speaker 1: and a lot of Trump's base was angry at him
Speaker 1: about that. Why are you pardoning rappers and not the
Speaker 1: January sixth political protesters. Well, it's no secret at all
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump has had a lifetime of working with
Speaker 1: black people. It's no secret at all that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is horrified by the fact that he's been painted as
Speaker 1: a racist, when in reality he's just not who he
Speaker 1: is at all. Doesn't care about that, and so Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has overcompensated to the max to try to prove
Speaker 1: that he is not that. What a better way to
Speaker 1: do that at the end of your term than find
Speaker 1: some popular rapper in prison and spring him loose. Trump
Speaker 1: is out there springing loose people close to Jared Kushner
Speaker 1: at the end. Not hard to figure out why that's
Speaker 1: your son in law. Again, it's always icky, right, There's
Speaker 1: always a reason, and it's always icky, but it's always understandable.
Speaker 1: We woke up this morning and we found a mister
Speaker 1: Shanlinjin got clemency from Joe Biden. Okay, well, why what
Speaker 1: did he do? He had more child pornography in his
Speaker 1: possession than I can possibly lay out for you now.
Speaker 1: And I wish to god I had not read into
Speaker 1: the details of what he had before the show. Not
Speaker 1: as if there's an okay, version of child pornography. But
Speaker 1: oh gosh, I'm just I feel sick to my stomach already.
Speaker 1: The things this guy had were some of the most
Speaker 1: horrific things you can possibly imagine. Now he's also Chinese.
Speaker 1: In fact, there were a few of these. Look at
Speaker 1: this one Jan jhunju conspiracy to commit economic espionage, trade
Speaker 1: secret theft. That's interesting, Xi Chao Huan. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: any of these, right, I'm sorry. I only speak American
Speaker 1: conspiracy to defraud the United States, impersonating agents of foreign governments,
Speaker 1: shandling jin. Of course, possession of child pornography. You can
Speaker 1: go down the list. Why Well, we've had this talk
Speaker 1: when it comes to Joe Biden before, but let's have
Speaker 1: it again. There is a reason background checks for critical positions,
Speaker 1: both in government and outside of government. There's a reason
Speaker 1: they're done. I've told you the story before about a
Speaker 1: friend of mine who was going into border patrol. He
Speaker 1: was going into law enforcement. This is years and years
Speaker 1: and years ago, and he warned me that I would
Speaker 1: be interviewed because I He put me down as a
Speaker 1: reference someone who knew him, and they showed up. I
Speaker 1: was working construction. They showed up and pulled me aside.
Speaker 1: I'd go into this conference room, and I thought it
Speaker 1: was just going to be something along the lines of, Hey,
Speaker 1: does your buddy have you ever seen him commit a crime?
Speaker 1: You have a drug problem? Something that they know, normal
Speaker 1: basic stuff. But this guy who sat me down, he
Speaker 1: would ask me things, uncomfortable things, things that didn't want
Speaker 1: to answer. About my buddy's wife, Hey, have you ever
Speaker 1: seen her drunk? Of course I have seen her drunk before.
Speaker 1: We'd been to sports bars as couples watching football games
Speaker 1: and things like that. But I'm a very private person,
Speaker 1: especially when it comes to my friends and their information.
Speaker 1: I'm not comfortable. Hey, have you ever seen them have
Speaker 1: an argument? Well, I've known them for years, of course
Speaker 1: I seen. Why would you ask me these things? Because
Speaker 1: anything in your personal life that isn't all the way
Speaker 1: buttoned up, and really that's all of us, isn't that you,
Speaker 1: it's me. But anything in your personal life that isn't
Speaker 1: all the way buttoned up can be used as blackmail
Speaker 1: by evil entities. They've had Border patrol guys busted many
Speaker 1: of them for accepting bribes from cartels, bribes in the
Speaker 1: form of money, women, other things. They've had border patrol
Speaker 1: guys who've been blackmailed after receiving those things. Blackmail is very,
Speaker 1: very real. Now let's talk about China. China is obviously
Speaker 1: famously this biometric security state, meaning everywhere you go when
Speaker 1: you're in urban China. A lot of China's rural, remember,
Speaker 1: but if you're an urban China, they are tracking your
Speaker 1: every move. It is facial recognition software. If you pop
Speaker 1: in the gas station and buy a pack of smokes,
Speaker 1: they know it. If you walk up the street and
Speaker 1: get some wantons, they know it. You checked into the Hilton,
Speaker 1: they know it. And that's for normal people. That gets
Speaker 1: turned up about a thousand notches if you're a important person,
Speaker 1: meaning someone in or around government or even someone in
Speaker 1: major corporate America. So if I'm an FBI agent and
Speaker 1: I go to the Beijing, They're going to really be
Speaker 1: following me. If I'm the CEO of Nike and I
Speaker 1: visit Beijing, they're going to really be following me. If
Speaker 1: I am the son of a major US politician, they're
Speaker 1: going to follow me. And when I say follow me,
Speaker 1: I mean when I make a phone call, they're going
Speaker 1: to listen. When I'm in my hotel room. If I
Speaker 1: happen to pick my nose in the bathroom mirror, they
Speaker 1: are going to have it on videotape. Why is China
Speaker 1: so famous for this kind of data collection on important
Speaker 1: people who visit Because China understands blackmail as one of
Speaker 1: the most powerful things in the history of the world
Speaker 1: as far as political power goes. It doesn't hurt to
Speaker 1: have a little file on the CEO of Nike showing
Speaker 1: that he doesn't wash his hands after he goes boop.
Speaker 1: You never know when that may be advantageous. Now, think
Speaker 1: about Hunter Biden, and think about the things you already
Speaker 1: know about Hunter Biden, from the laptop and the trials
Speaker 1: and everything from the drugs and the women and the businesses.
Speaker 1: Think about what you know now picture this. You know
Speaker 1: what you know about Hunter Biden from one laptop that
Speaker 1: that moron forgot at a computer repair shop. Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: visited China a lot. What do you think Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: did after dark in China? If you had to guess,
Speaker 1: think he was attending church services and then going home
Speaker 1: and going to sleep at nine. I'm sure you don't
Speaker 1: have to work very hard to use your imagination. What
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden would be doing in China. Now, how much
Speaker 1: of that do you think China has on videotape? It's
Speaker 1: a lot. The President of the United States of America
Speaker 1: has been blackmailed for the entirety of his time in office.
Speaker 1: It's just inevitable. It's obvious. We don't have a media
Speaker 1: so this won't be talked about, it reported on. But
Speaker 1: China has vast quantities of blackmail material on the bidens.
Speaker 1: You woke up today wondering why a bunch of Chinese
Speaker 1: guys got clemency. Someone made a phone call. That's why. Hey, Joe,
Speaker 1: h I'd hate for this little video to come out.
Speaker 1: Hunter had a good time back in December of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: You want to see the video, Joe. No no, no, no,
Speaker 1: no no no no, Yeah, Joe, we have some spies
Speaker 1: we'd like let out of prison. Thanks appreciate it. Click.
Speaker 1: That's how that stuff works.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about a little bit more drone stuff. Do
Speaker 1: some questions. We have to get to this DOJ report
Speaker 1: about the FBI on January sixth. Let's also discuss helping
Speaker 1: out the people on the ground in Israel. Clay Travis
Speaker 1: is actually over there as we speak right now, seeing
Speaker 1: how things are on the ground, seeing what it's like
Speaker 1: to live, to make a life in a war zone
Speaker 1: where people around you once you're dead. And unbelievably things
Speaker 1: have actually gotten worse now. An Isis al Qaeda collaboration
Speaker 1: has just taken over Syria right there on your border.
Speaker 1: Somehow things have gotten even harder for these people, and
Speaker 1: they ask for our help. The International Fellowship of Christians
Speaker 1: and Jews asks for our help to help them. You
Speaker 1: want to see what they do, go to support IFCJ
Speaker 1: dot org and learn more, make a gift, or you
Speaker 1: can call them eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJ.
Speaker 1: We'll be back. You're listening to the Jesse Kelly Show.
Speaker 1: You're welcome. It is the Jesse Kelly Show. On and
Speaker 1: ask doctor Jesse Thursday, because i won't be here tomorrow.
Speaker 1: But don't worry. I'm not taking off for Christmas yet.
Speaker 1: I'll be back on Monday. I just have a thing
Speaker 1: I need to go do. I'll tell you about it
Speaker 1: on Mondays. It's a work thing, but I have a
Speaker 1: thing Tomorrow. We have former special agent FBI special Agent
Speaker 1: Steve Friend, friend of the show. He's going to join
Speaker 1: us about ten minutes from now to talk about this
Speaker 1: DOJ Inspector General report. FBI had twenty six confidential human
Speaker 1: sources at the Capitol on January sixth. So we'll break
Speaker 1: some of that down with Steve see what he thinks
Speaker 1: about it. But let's get a little bit of an update,
Speaker 1: shall we on the drone stuff. The drone stuff is
Speaker 1: not going away. These drones are still appearing all over
Speaker 1: New Jersey. There are reports from other states. And you remember,
Speaker 1: you remember we've had Jeff Fan Drew, Congressman Van Drew
Speaker 1: of New Jersey. He was saying it's Iran.
Speaker 3: They've got a mother Tran launched a mothership probably about
Speaker 3: a month ago that contains these drones. That mothership is
Speaker 3: off I'm gonna tell you the deal. It's off the
Speaker 3: east coast of the United States of America. They've launched drones.
Speaker 3: Is everything that we can see or hear. And again,
Speaker 3: these are from high sources. I don't say this lightly. Now,
Speaker 3: you know, we know there was a probability it could
Speaker 3: have been our own government. We know it's not our
Speaker 3: own government because they would have.
Speaker 4: Let us know.
Speaker 3: It could have been some really glorified hobbyist or hobbyists
Speaker 3: that we're doing something unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I'd probably push back on Jeff Van Drew on we
Speaker 1: know it's not our own government, because they'd probably let
Speaker 1: us know our government spends its time lying to us
Speaker 1: twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. So
Speaker 1: I probably pushed back on that. But really really high
Speaker 1: up important people are also not getting answers. You see,
Speaker 1: the DoD came out yessay said that there is not
Speaker 1: any truth to that there is no Iranian ship off
Speaker 1: the coast of the United States, and there's no so
Speaker 1: called mothership launching drones towards the United States. Senator Tom
Speaker 1: Cotton is a really, really, really big deal, especially in
Speaker 1: military circles. Senator Tom Cotton can't seem to get answers.
Speaker 4: I I can tell you the answers that you're not
Speaker 4: getting in public are the same answers that we're not
Speaker 4: getting in private. It is just one more example of
Speaker 4: how the Biden administration doesn't impose accountability, doesn't point to
Speaker 4: a single official or agency and say you're in charge here.
Speaker 1: John Kirby, he had to make a statement today about you.
Speaker 5: You have no evidence at this time that the reported
Speaker 5: drone sightings pose a national security or a public safety threat,
Speaker 5: or have a foreign nexus. The Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 5: and the FBI are investigating these sightings, and they're working
Speaker 5: closely with state and local law enforcement to provide resources
Speaker 5: using numerous detection methods to better understand their origin. Using
Speaker 5: very sophisticated electronic detection technologies provided by federal authorities, we
Speaker 5: have not been able to, and neither have state or
Speaker 5: local law enforcement of authorities, corroborate any of the reported
Speaker 5: visual sightings. To the contrary, upon review of available imagery,
Speaker 5: it appears that many of the reported sightings are actually
Speaker 5: manned aircraft that are being operated lawfully. The United States
Speaker 5: Coast Guard is providing support to the state of New
Speaker 5: Jersey and has confirmed that there is no evidence of
Speaker 5: any foreign based involvement from coastal vessels.
Speaker 1: Right now, I'm going to play something else. It sounds unrelated,
Speaker 1: but it's not. This was a little report on Fox News.
Speaker 1: Remember Ryan Routh that loser would be assassin who tried
Speaker 1: to shoot Donald Trump on the golf course down in Florida.
Speaker 1: Remember how he was discovered one hole ahead by the
Speaker 1: Secret Service and there were shots fired. Fox News had
Speaker 1: an interesting little tidbit about that encounter today or their report.
Speaker 6: The Secret Service agent who spotted Ryan Ruth and the
Speaker 6: bushes outside Trump's golf course was only five feet away
Speaker 6: when he opened fire and missed him, not once, not twice,
Speaker 6: six times. He missed them six times from five feet
Speaker 6: How does a trained agent who passed the firearms test
Speaker 6: missed a target away five feet away.
Speaker 1: Our government does lie about everything all the time. That's true.
Speaker 1: These are very, very very corrupt people, of course. But
Speaker 1: one of the things about all communist regimes in history,
Speaker 1: one of the most startling things. In fact, one of
Speaker 1: the things that really brought down the Soviet Union. It
Speaker 1: wasn't necessarily the atrocities. It wasn't necessarily this scandal or
Speaker 1: that scandal, although Chernoble was. Really it was really the
Speaker 1: straw that broke the camel's back. One of the things
Speaker 1: that brings down communist regimes every time they go down
Speaker 1: is the idiocy, because they have loyalty to everything except merit.
Speaker 1: It's all that matters is protecting the party, protecting communism,
Speaker 1: protecting the scam. And when that happens, you can and
Speaker 1: will eventually destroy the capabilities, the abilities of everything you
Speaker 1: take over. You see, having a military that's proficient is
Speaker 1: not something that lasts forever. It has to be trained,
Speaker 1: it has to be maintained. Having an FBI that knows
Speaker 1: what they're doing doesn't just last. It doesn't just happen
Speaker 1: when you get an FBI badge. Know how, We've talked
Speaker 1: forever about the death of everything. That That's what DEI is.
Speaker 1: That's what the obsession with diversity is the death of everything.
Speaker 1: I call it repeatedly, and this is why I call
Speaker 1: it that. The second you stop focusing on abilities, on merit,
Speaker 1: on accomplishment, and you shift your focus, you will destroy
Speaker 1: whatever you have taken over. On a long enough timeline,
Speaker 1: you will. How do we still not know? It's been
Speaker 1: days of this, How do we still not know? Maybe
Speaker 1: it's us, Maybe it's corrupt, Maybe it's Iran. Maybe our
Speaker 1: entire government is run by morons. Uncomfortable as that may be,
Speaker 1: that's oftentimes the case. All right, let's talk to Steve
Speaker 1: Friend about this. DOJ Inspector General Report today. First time
Speaker 1: talk to you about putting your money where your morals are.
Speaker 1: Where do you send cell phone money? Every month? You
Speaker 1: have a cell phone? Everyone does If you're a family,
Speaker 1: probably have multiple we have four lines, I get it.
Speaker 1: Where does that money go? Every month? Do you pay
Speaker 1: a quar operation? Who hate you? Did you see? You
Speaker 1: see what Google did? Google rolled out a big tranny
Speaker 1: Ann's so try this winter jinas?
Speaker 4: Is not it?
Speaker 7: Especially when I have so many holiday looks to pull off?
Speaker 1: Thankfully?
Speaker 2: I know?
Speaker 1: Just yeah, that's a dude in a dress pretending to
Speaker 1: be a woman. Do you send money every month to
Speaker 1: companies like that? Pure Talk doesn't do that with your money.
Speaker 1: When pure Talk gives back, they give back to veterans.
Speaker 1: Pure Talk's so patriotic. They hire American citizens, hire Americans
Speaker 1: right here in America. When you switch your cell phone service,
Speaker 1: not only is it easy and fast and you save money,
Speaker 1: you get to speak with an American. Pick up your
Speaker 1: phone dial pound two five zero and say, Jesse Kelly
Speaker 1: switch to pure Talk. Steve Friend, former FBI agent joins us.
Speaker 1: Feeling a little stocky, Follow like and subscribe on social
Speaker 1: at Jesse Kelly DC. It is the Jess Kelly Show
Speaker 1: on a Thursday. Remember you can email the show if
Speaker 1: you want Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. Now we
Speaker 1: all woke up today and there was a DOJ Inspector
Speaker 1: General report out. This is from my buddy Greg Price
Speaker 1: breaking the FBI had twenty six confidential human sources at
Speaker 1: the Capitol on January sixth, including four who entered the
Speaker 1: Capitol building in thirteen who entered the restricted area around
Speaker 1: the Capitol, according to the just released DJ Inspector General reporter.
Speaker 1: But they're also saying there were no FBI agents there,
Speaker 1: And there is, of course a distinction, But I thought
Speaker 1: maybe it would be better if you heard it from
Speaker 1: an actual FBI agent instead of a moron like me
Speaker 1: joining me now my friend former FBI special agent, which
Speaker 1: is really freaking cool. I should note, Steve friend. Okay, Steve,
Speaker 1: what's the difference between a confidential human source or informant
Speaker 1: and an FBI agent. People are confused what happened that day?
Speaker 2: Oh, there's some very loyally language in there. And you
Speaker 2: would expect nothing different from the Inspector General who decided
Speaker 2: that they were the government investigating the government, and the
Speaker 2: government did nothing wrong, big surprise. But a confidentially human
Speaker 2: source is the snitch. It's an informant. It's someone who's
Speaker 2: not a W two employee of the FBI. They provide information.
Speaker 2: They're paid for being productive i e. Getting fresh meat
Speaker 2: for the FBI to entrap in their terrorist plots. The
Speaker 2: undercover employee, again is very loyally because in actual position
Speaker 2: within the FBI for special agents, the acronym is UCE
Speaker 2: Undercover employee, and there's also the online undercover, which is
Speaker 2: the OCEE Online covert employee. Now they're very specific with
Speaker 2: that language in this report because they're saying that there
Speaker 2: were no official UCE undercover employees there. They don't say
Speaker 2: anything about the fact that there could have been agents though,
Speaker 2: who are dressed in playing clothes, just have that official designation.
Speaker 1: Okay, now that I need you to explain to me, Steve,
Speaker 1: at least conceptually, how something like that would work. Okay,
Speaker 1: they say there were no designated FBI guys there, So
Speaker 1: does an FBI guy there just put on his best
Speaker 1: khakis and go there on his own? Is he directed
Speaker 1: off the books because they know they don't like how
Speaker 1: it looks. I wasn't there, and I don't know, and
Speaker 1: I don't want to do conspiracy theories. What would it
Speaker 1: look like? How would would explain it to me?
Speaker 2: Well, what an actual undercover employee a UCE has to
Speaker 2: go through a rigorous training program to get that designation,
Speaker 2: and if you want to use one within the FBI,
Speaker 2: you actually have to put in a request and they
Speaker 2: send them over to you and you kind of fill
Speaker 2: them in on how you want them to serve in
Speaker 2: your case. So that is from what they're reporting in
Speaker 2: the SOIG report, seems like they didn't have that there,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't say that they couldn't have actually had
Speaker 2: an operation, an official operation going on where an FBI
Speaker 2: agent he just went there, and they could have gone
Speaker 2: there on their own, and there were people there on
Speaker 2: their own just to actually support Donald Trump. But there
Speaker 2: could have been working agents there on cases who just
Speaker 2: were not official undercover employees than the FBI, but they
Speaker 2: were serving in a plane closed capacity to report and observe.
Speaker 2: And look, there's actually a good reason to be there.
Speaker 2: It's a large gathering of people. It would be a
Speaker 2: really bad security left to not have law enforcement present there,
Speaker 2: because you want people to be safe to exercise their
Speaker 2: for Amendment rights and if there's any trouble makers there,
Speaker 2: then you would have that element there as well. So
Speaker 2: I think it's pretty laughable that they wouldn't have had
Speaker 2: any sort of plane clothes component there, But the very
Speaker 2: specific reference to uce undercover employee, I think is the
Speaker 2: FBI try to evade actual accountability.
Speaker 1: Okay, speaking with former special agent at the FBI, Steve Friend. Okay, Steve,
Speaker 1: Now the twenty six confidential human sources. Again, we're all
Speaker 1: learning a lot from you right now. Well, that sounds
Speaker 1: like a lot, but I don't know that that's a
Speaker 1: lot for a crowd of that size. When you saw
Speaker 1: there were twenty six where you shocked, is that a lot?
Speaker 1: Is that kind of the norm? What are they doing there?
Speaker 2: Well, competition or human sources are not w two. They're
Speaker 2: paid for being productive. A lot of times they will
Speaker 2: infiltrate organizations or groups or just a bunch of guys
Speaker 2: have a signal chat and they'll sort of provoke them
Speaker 2: to do something. So twenty six of them going in,
Speaker 2: that stands to me that that's probably a low estimate
Speaker 2: for the amount of people that were there. And I
Speaker 2: think that their willingness to go in to the capitol
Speaker 2: sure sort of gives away the game of the FBI's
Speaker 2: playbook because they will find vulnerable people, people who are
Speaker 2: idiots or emotionally disturbed, maybe financially indigent, and then they
Speaker 2: will get them to agree to do things that they
Speaker 2: are not predisposed to do. And the other thing to
Speaker 2: remember is informants work independently, so you will have theoretically
Speaker 2: a group of people that might have multiple informants, and
Speaker 2: one of them tries to broke and then that sort
Speaker 2: of gets the ball rolling, and then another one will
Speaker 2: build off of it, and they will independently be doing
Speaker 2: it and working off each other, and then in effect,
Speaker 2: you could have multiple informants driving a group of people
Speaker 2: to do something that they are no way predisposed or
Speaker 2: capable of doing. And I think that that's really one
Speaker 2: of the elements that got overlooked that day. And then
Speaker 2: the last thing is there are informants who work for
Speaker 2: agencies that are not the FBI. One in particular that
Speaker 2: I'm picking of is the Department of Homeland Security. The
Speaker 2: Government of Homeland Security has ten times the budget of
Speaker 2: the FBI. They use informants in very much the same way.
Speaker 2: They don't actually have the same restraints of the FBI
Speaker 2: with being the Attorney General guide for domestic investigations, the
Speaker 2: Best Investigations Operations Guide, because those fall underneath the Department
Speaker 2: of Justice. Now the Homeland Security Element could have been
Speaker 2: there doing the exact same thing. This was just a
Speaker 2: very specific report as a Britain to the FBI.
Speaker 1: Okay, So I can't help as I'm listening to this
Speaker 1: and I'm going through this report today, Steve, I can't
Speaker 1: help but think about what happened in Michigan. We talk
Speaker 1: about it all the time on the show. Everyone listenings
Speaker 1: well aware of the FBI's planning, coordination, and everything else
Speaker 1: of a kidnap an assassination plot that they ended up
Speaker 1: kind of getting outed for during the trial process there.
Speaker 1: So it really seemed from the outside like something the
Speaker 1: FBI did and then tried to bust people for. To
Speaker 1: your when it comes to January sixth, do you believe
Speaker 1: that's what we're dealing with here? I don't want to
Speaker 1: speak out of turn. Does it look like that to you?
Speaker 2: It does to me, And I think that that's not
Speaker 2: just a one off for this one or even the
Speaker 2: Wolverine Watchman case for Michigan, which parothetically I was involved
Speaker 2: with as a swat operator and we were misinformed about
Speaker 2: how that case was going on. That's another story though,
Speaker 2: But what the FBI's playbook does, where they find these
Speaker 2: vulnerable people and the trap them is in excess of
Speaker 2: ninety percent of their terrorism cases. At this point. The
Speaker 2: playbook has remained the same for a quarter of a century.
Speaker 2: It's just the profile of the individuals they're going after
Speaker 2: has differed. So in the early two thousands, it was
Speaker 2: homegrown violent extremists, and you have the Liberty City seven,
Speaker 2: who is still the greatest Al Qaeda arrest in the
Speaker 2: history of the FBI, yet none of their members were
Speaker 2: actually affiliated with Al Qaeda, and that evolved into domestic
Speaker 2: violent extremism. Those were moms at school boards and people
Speaker 2: who had a Betsy Ross flag on their T shirt
Speaker 2: and militia violent extremists with a low proclivity for violence,
Speaker 2: meaning they had no problimity for violence, but low sounds better.
Speaker 2: And now the most recent evolution is anti government, anti
Speaker 2: authority violent extremism, which is associated with January sixth, But
Speaker 2: the FBI actually defines as Americans with a perception of
Speaker 2: government overreach or negligence. That's all that's required for them
Speaker 2: to open an assessment of you as a potential domestic terrorist,
Speaker 2: and then they find them most vulnerable and get them
Speaker 2: to agree to go do a terrorism which they never
Speaker 2: would have done but for the involvement of the.
Speaker 1: FBI, Steve, is all this legal? How are they allowed
Speaker 1: to do this?
Speaker 2: Well? The Patriot Act, thank you very much Congress for
Speaker 2: passing that through, gave the FBI the ability to open
Speaker 2: an assessment which is effectively an investigation of an American
Speaker 2: for inarticulable purpose, no probable cause, no allegations, and it
Speaker 2: doesn't even require a supervisor to approve. They can open
Speaker 2: that up and then keep it open. And then you
Speaker 2: combine that with the mission creep, and then with the
Speaker 2: fact that the FBI has the quota system that it
Speaker 2: does for the appetite for these terrorism cases is vastly
Speaker 2: outstripping the supply of them, and they are just manufacturing
Speaker 2: these cases so that they can get their bonuses to
Speaker 2: their bosses or in the area of thirty to fifty
Speaker 2: thousand dollars a year, which is why January sixth was
Speaker 2: the biggest case in the FBI was a complete boondoggle
Speaker 2: from the beginning, and they've had it going for now
Speaker 2: four fiscal years.
Speaker 1: Good grief, Steve, you are the man, my brother, Steve friend,
Speaker 1: former FBI special agent. He is. I feel so much
Speaker 1: smarter now, And like always, I'm gonna steal Steve's comments
Speaker 1: and ideas and I'm going to pass them off as
Speaker 1: my own. Over the next few days, I'm going to
Speaker 1: sound so smart in front of other people. And I
Speaker 1: already sound smarter than everyone else because of all the
Speaker 1: chalk I'm on. Anyway, once you start a male vitality stack,
Speaker 1: your mind just simply works better than others. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that I'm superior to the people around me, but
Speaker 1: I'm also not not saying that. You see, once your
Speaker 1: tea levels go up, your mind works better. Right now,
Speaker 1: your mood's down, it's because your te levels are low.
Speaker 1: Your energy's down. It's because your tea levels are low.
Speaker 1: You're having a hard time focusing at work at home,
Speaker 1: it's because your tea levels are low. Get your te
Speaker 1: levels jacked back up and you feel like a million bucks. Agam,
Speaker 1: you want to feel like a million bucks all the time.
Speaker 1: See HQ dot com Natural Herbal Supplements huge discount on
Speaker 1: subscriptions for the month of December with the promo code
Speaker 1: jesse Chuck dot Com promo code jesse Go Lift that fog.
Speaker 1: We'll be back fighting for your freedom every day. The
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly Show. It is The Jesse Kelly Show on
Speaker 1: a Thursday. Reminding you if you missed any part of
Speaker 1: the show, you can download the whole thing on iHeart, Spotify, iTunes.
Speaker 1: FBI had twenty six confidential human sources at the Capitol
Speaker 1: on January sixth. Four even entered the building, thirteen entered
Speaker 1: the restricted area, which makes this little flashback to Christopher
Speaker 1: Rayce testimony doesn't sound that good.
Speaker 7: If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol
Speaker 7: on January sixth was part of some operation orchestrated by
Speaker 7: FBI sources and or agency, answer is emphatically saying no.
Speaker 7: No is saying not violence orchestrated by NBI sources.
Speaker 1: So let's just be frank about this, and then we're
Speaker 1: going to move off this and get on to ask
Speaker 1: doctor Jesse's stuff and other things. Communists have always sought
Speaker 1: to find a way to justify using government power against
Speaker 1: their political opponents. Always, always, always, always, always, they always
Speaker 1: do it, and amazingly, they generally follow the exact same playbook.
Speaker 1: Lenin did it, Stalin did it? Now did it? Polepot
Speaker 1: did it? In East Germany. They did it. America's Democrats
Speaker 1: have been doing it for years. What they've done is
Speaker 1: they seek out their political opponents and then they try
Speaker 1: using a bunch of different tactics, crooked job jes, law
Speaker 1: enforcement agencies, and other things. They've tried to find a
Speaker 1: way to make their political opposition threats to national security,
Speaker 1: dangers to national security. They've always done it. Stalin was
Speaker 1: always looking for saboteurs and Polish spies, and that that's
Speaker 1: how it was always justified one hundred percent of the time.
Speaker 1: And so because the Communists took over all the institutions,
Speaker 1: the FBI being one of them, they sought to do
Speaker 1: exactly what they've done. That is turn being a republican
Speaker 1: opposing Democrats. That has turned that into being a potential
Speaker 1: domestic terrorist. And so they have done things like they've
Speaker 1: done in Michigan. What they did in Michigan, Steve Friend
Speaker 1: just talk about it. That was real. Go read about
Speaker 1: the trial. What they did. There's a reason a lot
Speaker 1: of those guys got off scott free. The FBI did
Speaker 1: the whole thing. And not only did they do it,
Speaker 1: they announced it right before the election to make us
Speaker 1: look like domestic terrorists. There's a reason they convened the
Speaker 1: counter Terrorism Division to talk about school board moms who
Speaker 1: didn't want their kids learning about how to be a
Speaker 1: trammy in the fifth grade. Why would the FBI do that?
Speaker 1: Why would they meet to figure out what's terrorist threat label?
Speaker 1: Why would they if they did, Why would they send
Speaker 1: a bunch of confidential informants into a January sixth crowd
Speaker 1: to instigate a riot? Why would they do it? Why?
Speaker 1: Because it furthers the narrative. It furthers the goal of
Speaker 1: them being able to use state power against their political enemies.
Speaker 1: They don't want to just defeat you at the ballot box,
Speaker 1: as they just found out. Sometimes they can't do that.
Speaker 1: Sometimes they're not popular. Sometimes it doesn't work that way.
Speaker 1: When they look at the military, look at all those guns.
Speaker 1: When they look at the FBI badges and guns and authority, CIA, dhs,
Speaker 1: they do not see instruments to protect a country. That's
Speaker 1: not how communists think. They look at all of these
Speaker 1: things and they think, how can I how can I
Speaker 1: take all those guns and point them at my political opponents,
Speaker 1: thus giving me power forever. That's of course why they
Speaker 1: did what they did. In Michigan. That's why they did
Speaker 1: what they did with the school board bombs. That's why
Speaker 1: they did what I believe they did on January sixth.
Speaker 1: They wanted an incident to justify a year's long campaign
Speaker 1: where these terrorists arrested our people and threw them in cages.
Speaker 1: Of course, hunting down domestic terrorists. Of course, it's for
Speaker 1: national security reasons, like every communist has done in the
Speaker 1: history of mankind. That's why I believe what I believe,
Speaker 1: and I always will. All right, let's get to some
Speaker 1: ass doctor Jesse questions. Jesse, the mouse traps aren't that expensive.
Speaker 1: You need to triple the number of mouse traps you
Speaker 1: were using and put two or three along each wall
Speaker 1: in the corner of the room where you're seeing them.
Speaker 1: Then you can put peanut butter on each mouse trap.
Speaker 1: But the trick is to put dog food in the
Speaker 1: very corner, so the mice have to work around four
Speaker 1: or five or even six traps to get to the
Speaker 1: dog food. I even sprinkled the dog food on the traps. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: I read this email and it filled me with a
Speaker 1: great deal of concern. If I'm being honest with you,
Speaker 1: because remember I told you the mice got into the pantry.
Speaker 1: We keep our food in the pantry. You know what
Speaker 1: else we keep in the pantry. We keep the dog
Speaker 1: food in the pantry. You know what else we keep
Speaker 1: in the pantry with our food and the dog food.
Speaker 1: We keep rough greens in the pantry with the dog food.
Speaker 1: What if the reason the mouse carried off the trap.
Speaker 1: What if the reason we haven't caught a mouse is
Speaker 1: they've gotten so much nutrition from rough greens we're now
Speaker 1: dealing with super mice. Is it's possible? What if we
Speaker 1: have introduced these mice to so much, so many vitamins
Speaker 1: and minerals and probiotics from rough greens that were used
Speaker 1: to giving fred What if now we've created a super
Speaker 1: breed of mice by accident. Doctor Dennis Black is gonna
Speaker 1: have to own that. Sure, he he's helping dogs and
Speaker 1: cats live longer with his incredible natural herbal supplements that
Speaker 1: he sprinkles on their food. But what if it also
Speaker 1: creates super mice? I don't know. Probably is do you
Speaker 1: want a free Jumpstart trialbag for your dog or the
Speaker 1: mice that live in your home? Eight three three three
Speaker 1: three my dog? Or you can go to roughgreens dot
Speaker 1: com slash Jesse highly highly recommend it. Okay, now, before
Speaker 1: we get to the other, ask doctor Jesse questions. I
Speaker 1: wanted to touch on this because it's something that comes
Speaker 1: up a lot, and it's something we've talked about before,
Speaker 1: but I want to make sure we're always understanding exactly
Speaker 1: what we're dealing with. Jasmine Crockett is that hag commie
Speaker 1: witch congresswoman from from the Dallas area. She's one to
Speaker 1: always screaming out out white people this and others. Just
Speaker 1: just a clown, just a big clown idiot, and she's
Speaker 1: out there complaining about the media.
Speaker 8: Well, Kristen, no disrespect to you. I think you do
Speaker 8: great work. But the reality is that those that tune
Speaker 8: in to are traditional news sources, they absolutely went for us.
Speaker 8: And we know that the standards that you have to
Speaker 8: live by as an actual journalist are completely different from
Speaker 8: other platforms, and so we know that we were winning
Speaker 8: for those that were tuning into the traditional news sources.
Speaker 8: But when it came down to people getting their news
Speaker 8: from places that really aren't even news sources, they were
Speaker 8: going for Donald Trump by nineteen points. And that is
Speaker 8: exactly why we lost the reality is that we're going
Speaker 8: to have to play in spaces that we've never had
Speaker 8: to play and make sure that we're communicating in all ways. Unfortunately,
Speaker 8: we can't just rely on the mainstream media to get
Speaker 8: our message across.
Speaker 1: Just wanted to remind you again that when the communist
Speaker 1: complains about media bias, he's actually being very honest. I'll
Speaker 1: explain what I mean in a moment.