WEBVTT - BP EVP of Sustainability Giulia Chierchia on Net-Zero Ambitions

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dana Perkins, and you're listening Switched on the B

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and F podcast. Today we have an external guest on

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the show, Julia Kerkia, and she is the executive vice

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>president of Strategy and Sustainability at BP. She talks to

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>me today about the energy transition from an energy company perspective.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Last year, BP announced a net zero target for the company,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>which was organized into five points net zero across BPS

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>operations on an absolute basis by twenty fifty or sooner.

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Net zero on carbon in VP's oil and gas production

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on an absolute basis by twenty fifty or sooner. A

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent cut in the carbon intensity of products VP

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>cells by twenty or sooner, installation of methane measurement at

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>all of vps major oil and gas processing sites by

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>three and to reduce methane intensity of their operations by

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and lastly, to increase the proportion of investment into non

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas businesses over time. In order to accomplish

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>these aims, a few new teams were formed, including a

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>strategy and sustainability team that has led by Julia. So

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>today we speak with Julia about BP and why she

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>thinks they are well positioned to achieve this important target,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>her views on some of the most discussed technologies in

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition, and a little bit about her and

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>how she came to find herself last year in this

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>newly formed role. B and e F research on the

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>energy transition can be found on the Bloomberg terminal at

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>benof go, on b NF dot com or the BENF

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mobile app. As a quick reminder, we do not provide

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>investment of strategy advice, and you can hear a more

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>complete disclaimer at the end of the show. And now

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>let's speak with Julia about the energy transition. Julia, thank

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much. It's really good to have you on

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the show today to talk about the future of the

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>energy transition and oil and gas industry. Thank you very

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. It's a pleasure to be here.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to start with your story and what original

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>drew you into the oil and gas industry, and then

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>how you ended up at BP, because you've spent most

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of your career working in the consulting with a number

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of different stakeholders. So let's start maybe by telling you

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about myself and how I actually

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>ended up joining BP. So I think there's like redefining

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>things in my life. I think the first one is

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm half a town in half Belgium, grew up from

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>London and then we moved to Italy from then Spain

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>bustl Spain. So I think change is really something which

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is ingrained in my d NA since I was a child.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The second thing I would say is, yeah, I had

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong role model and my father who always

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>told me to not confirm with my comfort zone, and

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>so challenge is also something that has always been in

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>my DEA. And the fat thing is I have too

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>little children thirteen year old natenniar old who are actually

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>quite demanding in their questions on the energy transition. And

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember this if I moment when I was working

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in McKinsey where we're looking at potential temperature pathways linked

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>to a potential energy transition paths and there was this

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>businessess usual case which took us to a pathway of

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>more than three degrees by and I literally thought, well

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, my children will be in their fifties. And

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think that has actually contributed over time to

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>build this significant sense of purpose. And yeah, I spent

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years in McKinsey. I left the firm as a

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>senior partner. I was leading the global downtre more than

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>gas practice, working quite extensively with clients to actually shape

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. And I loved it, and I think I

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot of around how do you actually structure

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>complex topics. But when VP approached me end of twenty

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and Bernard approached me, I jumped on it, and

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk about and I I said, I like change.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a brutal change, and there was even more

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of a change because then COVID actually hit immediately after

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>me joining, you know, and then I views one of

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the biggest challenges that one can think about in terms

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of our generation and probably the next generation to come.

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And I was a huge privilege in terms of sense

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of purpose to actually have the ability to help contribute

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to shaping the PAS gen journey through the energy transition.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, those are the reasons why I decided to

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>join the oil and gas industry and then VP very specifically,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I was immediately bought into the new purpose re imagined

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>energy for people on the planet, which was at the

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>time being shaped the ambition. And then as I was

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>talking to the two the leadership team, just that the

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>buying from everybody on the willingness to actually embark on

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>this What is it about BP that you think differentiates

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>them in this space, and that it's it's quite progressive

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to say that you're that you think that an oil

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and gas firm is the exact right place to be

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in looking at decarbonization and the energy transition. I actually

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>think that if we want to play a critical role

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>getting to the Paris Alignment and decarbonizing energy systems, we

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>need to work with energy companies. I think that's the

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>first element, which is you can't just decarbonize energy systems

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>by working with green companies. But if we really want

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to the Paris Alignment, we need to actually

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>support companies such as OURS, which you know, energy plus

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>industry plus transport represents so many percent of global emissions.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So we need to really work with companies such as

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>BP and other willing gas companies to actually help them

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>decarbonize and go along that journey. So I don't see

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>joining your company such as VP and annointing gas company

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>which is committed to actually decarbonizing as a progressive journey.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually very much aligned towards the ambition

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and the purpose in terms of what is unique about VP.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>When I actually had my first conversations with Bernard at

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the time when I was actually considering joining, Bernard had

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>already embarked on a series of multiple conversations with multiple

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>types of stakeholders, from institutional stakeholders e g. Government stakeholders,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with investors across the world, and with you know less

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>hope your stakeholders such as NGOs and some of the

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>most challenging in GEO. So there was a whole process

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of listening which was going on, and that process of

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>listening actually very much shaped his perspective and also the

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>lt S perspective, the leadership team's perspective. So what I

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually struck by was the super strong alignment within

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the whole leadership team and within the company itself on

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this ambition to transition. You know, at the end of

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the day, if you're actually working in an oil and

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>gas company and you're delivering energy to the world, you

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>also want to feel good about what you're doing. And

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in equivocably, we are delivering energy to the world, and

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the frame of the energy transition, we have the

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>capabilities and the skills to continue doing so through the

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>energy transition and UH and towards the low Carbonwell, what

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of things have been done in order to drive

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a culture shift within the organization and to really rally

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>around the net zero target or did it just really

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>happen very organically at all levels of the business. Well,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there were several initiatives, right. It all started

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with the announcement when Bernard started on February twelve of

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the new purpose like re imagine energy for people on

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the planet, the ambition and the aims the net the

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>reins that was thereafter, if you wish, underpinned by the

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy which was actually announced on August fourth and then

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>detailed in September. It was also accompanied by a full

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>reorganization of BP, which we call reinvent BP, which is

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>really targeted towards moving away from the upstream downstream model

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to an organizational model which aligns to the energy transition.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Right with business lines which are production and operations. Were

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>focused on our hydrocarbons businesses. Business line on gas and

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>low common which is really the growth engine in terms

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of low carbon customers and products, which is really focusing

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on the growth engine around customers and then you know

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>enablers in terms of trading in terms of digital and

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>region cities and solutions or integrators as we call them.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>What that did was it really reframe the organization towards

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>alignment with the strategy. So it was really all the

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>building blocks that came together in terms of ambition, in

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of integrated strategy, in terms of organization supporting it,

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and then a lot of communication around cascading the story

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and implications for all of the different people in the organization.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you are in production and operations business, yes

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we might be in the world worth was we are

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>reducing production by but you are literally funding the energy transition.

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So it really is a game of and we need

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you to deliver today to be able to actually transition

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the company. So you have a fundamental role to play.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, the growth engines need to deliver.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>So we really did an exercise of cascading if that

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>strategy into what does it mean for the different parts

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of the organization. So about a decade ago, BP was

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really pushing the limits in terms of a focus on

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sustainability with the Beyond Petroleum kind of ambitions and campaign,

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and since then specifically focusing on kind of the renewable

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>assets that PP had. Many of them were sold off

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and we went through this period where that was really

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not a favorable part of the industry for the business

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to be in. Now it seems like there's a look

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at renewables again. And my question in this really is

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>do you think that in order for an oil and

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>gas for him to transition into an energy company, do

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you think that a large percentage of the revenues can

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>actually come from renewables or is that not the right

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>way to look at how the company is going to

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>look to change and grow and diversify. There is no

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>one size, fit soul strategy in terms of oil and

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>gas companies decarbonizing. We've seen companies, for example, in the US,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>actually focusing very heavily on carbon capture. We've seen other

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>companies actually focusing more heavily on retail power to consumers.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Our answer is one where we do see low carbon

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>technologies altogether having to play a critical role in the

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. And I'm talking about really multiple technologies coming

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to play. So we have technologies which today, like renewables,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are proven and are extremely cost competitive, and the challenge

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of how do you accelerate the deployment of

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>those technologies and rollouts, which talking about moving from one

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty gigawatts of added capacity in the recent

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>years to something like three hundred and fifty or five

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty and a well below two debrecent erra

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>on one point five degresoner. We have other technologies that

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>are proven but need to be scaled up, and this

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is for example, hydrogen or carbon capture. We have technologies

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>which are more at a pilot level but might have

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a very critical role to play, for example in the

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>carbonizing aviation, such as synthetic fuels or refuels, and then

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they still have fossil fuels of having to actually bridge

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition and in particular, as an example, gas

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>having to provide that firm capacity as renewables come in.

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So we don't see this as do you need to

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>invest in renewables to the sake of renewables. I think

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it really is a multi technology strategy where one of

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the critical advantages that are companies such as US can

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>actually bring is the integration of all those different technologies

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to provide firm capacity in terms of energy and low

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>corbon energy. So I don't think this is a renewables

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>only play, but we definitely see in a world where

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>renewables actually get to accounts to proximately sixty of power

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>generation by renewables have a critical role to play, and

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they can integrate into hydrogen, they can integrate with gas

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to provide that firm capacity. So it's really around that

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>integration and which these technologies that are still I mean

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you're mentioning hydrogen and ccs and synthetic fuels, I mean

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>very much on the edge in that they're quite expensive

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to deploy at this point in time. Which of these

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>did you say you're most excited about and why From

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a technology standpoint, I'm really excited about this notion of

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>multiple technologies and the integration across multiple technologies because if

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, you know, with renewable penetration increasing significantly,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a challenge in terms of how do I

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>provide flexibility and stability to assist and batteries can provide

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it intra day, I need gas to back that or

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen as it actually acceleerates to provide the flexible capacity.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's really the first thing ANCE is really excited

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about the integration of those technologies. We are therefore so

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>extremely excited about the renewable acceleration. We are very excited

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about hydrogen as a potential technology. Hydrogen could, as I

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was saying, get to account for approximately of primary energy

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fifty. We're talking about increasing from seventy million

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>tons per annum today in terms of hydrogen production to

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially in a one point five degree scenario six hundred

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>or north of six hundred and fifty. And that will

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have to be clean, be it blue or be it green.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>So I think that is an area in which we

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are very excited. We see obviously a need to abate

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost of hydrogen as we look towards twenty thirties

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in a world where today blue hydrogen is more expensive

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>than gray hydrogen and green hydrogen is more expective than blue,

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and we expected to be the case for until probably

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>limit the early thirties. So we will require support to

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>accelerate hydrogen. But we think hydrogen will be a critical

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>element to decarbonize hard to eight sectors. In that same line,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I think CCS has a critical role to play. We

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>see five point five gigatons of c O two emissions

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of c O two to be captured through CCS and

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and at zero scenario d I a just release a

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>scenario which talks to seven point six gigatons of c

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>O two and then at zero scenario. So CCS we

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think has a critical role to play, and it also

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>allows to actually half the cost of the energy transition

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as we try to align with the Paris Agreement. And

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it obviously has a critical role to play in terms

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of blue hydrogen. I think other technologies such as sim

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>fuels E fields have a role to play. They are

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>less mature and need to be proven if you wish,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of in terms of adoption, and I think

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they will take a bit longer in terms of adoption.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So looking at these technologies, you did mention that some

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of them some forms of hydrogen or more expensive than

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>others and even more more still, so this requires investment

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and reinvestment into the business and into technologies and R

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and D. What has been the reception by the investment

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>community and really those shareholders looking at BP saying you know,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm not getting the same dividend payments that I

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was getting in the past, and you know, yeah, really,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what has been the response regarding bps net zero future.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the response has been very positive. It's

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>been very positive across eholders, so it's been very positive

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for our own employees who very much embarked on the

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>new purpose and the new strategy. It's been very positive

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if you think about external stakeholders and end us, and

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of investors, we had a very

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>positive response on the strategic direction and at the same

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>time and acknowledgements that the focus now is very much

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>an execution and I think that's what we've been focused on.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And the dialogue with investors is very much one of

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ongoing dialogue with individual investors such as well as UM

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Climate Action one hundred plus and yeah, just

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>continuing to show those proof points, continuing to drive transparency

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and to some extent help our investors come with us

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on the journey. And this is also the reason why

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this year we've actually changed our disclosures to actually align

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>also are disclosures to the new strategy, so that we

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>can actually help investors understand the value in the different

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>elements of the strategy. Well, and this might be dry

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for many people, but really if you're looking at this,

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the different frameworks are important, and the disclosure element is

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>how you communicate with the investment community. I really want

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to know which frameworks you find to be most of

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>lable and really give the most accurate view of what's

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>actually happening. It is indeed an area in which we

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>see quite a multitude of initiatives. So I think when

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>when you try to answer that question, the way we

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>actually tack on it is what are we trying to

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>achieve in terms of in terms of disclosures and metrics

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we try to answer that question. I think the first

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>element is very much transparency, so that we can create

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>understanding for the investors not only of the risks associated

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with a potential company and its transition strategy, but also

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities it actually is exposed to, as well as

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>comparability across companies. So if those are the two objectives,

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>then you get into okay, so what do those disclosures

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>actually need to have? And I think they need to

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be simple, yet not too simple, because I do acknowledge

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that only in gas industry has a very complex value

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>chain and there is a risk of ultra simplification, and

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they need to be as much as possible standardized. And

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>so when we look at disclosures. We very much favor

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>disclosures which obviously have a very strong element on in

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of carbon and by common we definitely include scope

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>PREE because in our industry very specifically it represents eight

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>total emissions and forward looking carbon metrics, so not only

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your own track record and position today,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know what are you actually himing to or

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>targeting too. We're looking for disclosures which include financial lead

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>indicators which give an indication of how you're actually aiming

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to transition the company, such as, for instance, what's your

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>share of topics into low carbon versus Orno gas. And

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for disclosures which actually also allow us to

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>showcase some of the qualitative elements such as governance, board composition, incentives,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>efforts in terms of advocacy, so we're collaborating with many

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>different initiatives. I would call out TCFD, I would call

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>out obviously SASPY, the I I G C C SO

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>nanzero standard for Ordan gas companies, which we've worked very

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>extensively with to try and actually shape what those forward

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>looking metrics could actually apply for, in particular for the

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>oorin gas industry, and this year we will start also

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>disclosing along CDP. So disclosure speaks to everyone in the

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>community is really looking to better understand what's actually going

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>on in terms of how you're going to get there

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and and where you are in the process. And you know,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was asking about the traditional investors who maybe

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>aren't keen on reinvestment, there's the other side, there's the

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>E s G investors who are or even a step further,

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the activist investors. And we've seen this recently with Excen

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>where they ended up giving multiple board seats after substantial

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>pressure from activist investors to take it a step further.

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>And what areas are you getting pressure from E s

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>G investors to do more that you know you think

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>might be an interesting place to discover in the future

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe BP is not yet ready for. We are

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>very much engaging with s G investors and non E

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>s G investors by the way, as we navigate through

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition, and I would say the dialogue is

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a very rich dialogue which has also allowed us to

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>progress and progress together with our investors. So as an example,

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in ten we actually got a joint resolution with Climate

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Action one hundred plus, which was a resolution on precisely

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and transparency. So I think that engagement is actually

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>extremely helpful because we value the challenge, right, We value

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the challenge and the ability to actually, you know, take

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a step back, think through do we have all the

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>elements embedded within what we're aiming to do. And it

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was very much at the core towards one the new ambition,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the net zero aims, as well as a strategy that

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we actually announced. So we're actually very much looking forward

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to continue that engagement with individual investors as well as

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 1>with organizations such as Climate Action one hundred PLUSS as

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we continue to execute on the strategy. Now for a

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>very short break, stay with us, So switching tracks a

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit. We started off talking about you and then

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we went straight into the business. Let's go back to

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you and your role within the business. And clearly you

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>know a lot in regard to you have a lot

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, that's the right way to phrase it. You

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to say in regard to the different

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>frameworks the company is looking at in your strategy. And

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in a role that is new for VP, is

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it not, And could you talk to us a little

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about what that role was designed to accomplish and

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and how you see it fitting within the organization. It

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is indeed a new role and a new organization. It

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>was created within the frame of the reorganization of BP

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is one of the integrators and what we did create

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that role. The role is basically the strategy and sustainability

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>organization of the group. Is we very much concentrated within

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that organization, the group strategy, so we no longer really

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have beyond operational strategy of strategy teams within the different

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>businesses and the same is true for sustainability. So we

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were aiming for two things. I think the first thing

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was really to bring together strategy and sustainability and policy

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>living to that. The reason being that as we navigate

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>through the energy transition and by the way, even more

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>after and the COVID pandemic, the two are very much

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>coming together and a sustainable strategy as a strategy which

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>is resilient for the future. So the first objective was

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>to bring the two together. The second one was very

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>much one of actually creating this central BP Strategy and

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Sustainability team which would actually basically help the different businesses

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and organizations to craft the strategy which would actually take

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>us through the energy transition and deliver on the aims

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>which were announced by Bernard. Really optimizing for the group

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>was breaking a little bit of maybe the upstream downstream

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>silo that could have been present in the past. So

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it's really an organization which is focused on working with

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>all the different businesses and obviously finance and the and

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the functions to actually craft what's the optimal path. And

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that optimal path is really an optimal path in terms

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of delivering on the aims, the purpose and the ambition,

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but also delivering a performance today and our shareholder investor

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>value proposition. So you joined, then there was a global pandemic,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and how has that changed how you are getting your

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>job done and maybe even just the scope of the role,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because surely you know the things that you were setting

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out initially to do have in some way it's probably

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>been modified by this. I joined, indeed, and then the

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>global pandemic hit, and you know, what I thought was

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>made a pretty interesting challenge became even more of a

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>challenge because creating an organization and the strategy when you're

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>working remotely and you do not know necessarily the team

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is not something which is the easiest task that one

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>could actually lay out. It is actually quite incredible how

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the organization of raw has adapted to the remote working

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and how incredibly efficient we have been in terms of

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>actually really moving into virtual and driving the reorganization design

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and driving the strategy. I think what we've done through

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is actually the detailed design of the organization

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and that has slightly morphed as we were going through

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the detailed design, but it would have been the same

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>vel without pandemic. I think what the pandemic actually did

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do is that through the pandemic, I think we have

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>witnessed an acceleration at these in terms of momentum and

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>intense in terms of energy transition. And so what the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>pandemic had it actually done is it has one confirmed

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the strategy that we were shaping, and two helps us

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>on board the organization on the strategy and on the

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>need to actually re reorganize along the new structure. So

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you're actually fairly hopeful, and recently we

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>looked well. So some forecasts are showing that we may

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>reach that one point five degree C before pre industrial

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>levels that that International Planel on Climate Change really put.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Is this line in the sand regarding where that we

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to start to see some more catastrophic

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>responses to climate Where do you have reasons to be

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hopeful within the oil and gas industry that we may

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to, you know, limit climate change to one

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>point five C when it looks like that year is

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>very very near. I think the challenge is indeed very big.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I am hopeful, and I'm hopeful

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>for several reasons. I'm hopeful, first of all, because I

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think the world is accelerating. It's celerating in terms of

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely society towards the energy transition, it is accelerating towards

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of regulatory frameworks, policy frameworks. I mean, let's

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>not you know, needless to mention the new new US

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>screen deal, the UK Turndpoint Plan, the EU production ambition,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and by twenty thirty China's common Neutrality. By the recent

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>announcements on call, so I think altogether we are seeing

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>an acceleration. We also seeing in acceleration as we discussed

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of investor focus on the energy transition, and

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing an acceleration in terms of companies. I think

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw one five hundred new companies commit to net zero.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing quite some momentum. The other reason why

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful is because I think we do have the

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>technologies right, and some of those technologies, as I was saying,

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>are really extremely competitive, such as renewables. Other need to

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be proven at gale. I think the fab reason I

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>am actually hopeful is that we are seeing tremendous growth.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>So if I look at the last ten years in

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of renewable penetration, we saw an average of sixty

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>giga what's added in terms of at IT capacity. In

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, we've already reached one hundred and

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty gigo what's and yes we need to ramp that

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>up to more than three hundred and five hundred and

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty in a well below two degrees or one point

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>five degrees scenario, but it is still significant acceleration. If

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at CCS, I think there are twenty six

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>projects ongoing operating in terms of CCS, and in the

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>last three years there's been thirty announcements, so almost as

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>many announcements in the last three years as we have

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>projects operating to date. At the same time, it is

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a challenging journey and I think a lot still needs

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen from a regulatory and policy standpoint to enable

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and accelerate the journey to mention a few We very

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>much believe in the need for global carbon economy system

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which can actually accelerate the transition and in link to

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that carbon border adjustment so that that actually becomes more

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>efficient and effective. We also need to have policy support

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for hard to abate sectors as a transition, and that

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can actually be either in the form of mandates or

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>other structures. But if you think about how to abate

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sectors av agency of cement, we will need to have

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>support in terms of policy to make that happen. The

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem will also need to support what we call greening

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>companies such as ours, as long as they're committed to transitioning,

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>both because we need those emissions to actually reduce, but

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>also just in terms of the sheer scale and size

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to actually drive the investment into the alternatives. So the

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>VP is not alone. I mean the oil majors are

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at this and then getting pressure from the investment community.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's so from the national oil companies that aren't getting

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that external pressure. In what ways is BP working directly

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with some of your competitors and other oil companies around

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, whether they be oil majors, r n ocs,

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on sharing best practices or trying to find a path

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>forward for these ambitions because to your point, the industry

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to need to move not just to BP.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We are working indeed across companies to actually try to

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>enable the transition. And that's a different level. So if

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I look at our fruts, clearly O g c I

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>plays a role. It plays a role in terms of

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge sharing and in particular around working among oil and

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>gas companies to really set the standards and the ambitions

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how do you actually develop hydrocarbons business

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>which are really low emissions hydrocarbons business. So the o

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>g c I is an example, has invested with nineteen

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>investments into projects to reduce methane emissions and projects to

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>reduce carbon dioxide emissions, into projects to to actually also

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>look into accelerating technology such as CCS egen at zero

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>tea side and also setting some of the ambitions right

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the methane intensity ambition of zero point to zero percent

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is one example. So I think there is a collective

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>industry effort in terms of actually within that focus trying

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to set those practices, standards and advanced solutions towards lower emissions.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned methane, which I think is really interesting

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much fixation on the carbon aspect that

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>methane has talked about so much less in many circles,

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but maybe not as much within the oil and gas

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>base or the energy companies. Do you think that methane

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>should be talked about more as a potent greenhouse gas

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>or is the balance about right? I think there is

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of focus on methane at please within

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the oilan gas industry and the energy sector. And yes,

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely are the called topic that we need

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to address, and it is one which we have actually

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>framed as one of our aims. So our aim for

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>within our net zero aims is very much around deploying

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>measurement in terms of methane in our operating sites by

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and they're naming to actually half our methane intensity.

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is actually something which is quite unique because

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>today methane emissions are calculated on an estimated basis, so

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>actually a shift from estimated basis to a measure the

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>basis is a very very strong commitment, but there is

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>significant collaboration within the industry. There is significant collaboration with

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>organizations such as e d F in terms of setting

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the standards on methane and advocating for mefane regulation, and

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there is quite a lot of also engagement

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 1>with regulators to support mefane regulation, both in Europe as

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>well as in a geography such as a US. One

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>potential strategy for a company in order to have their

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>company appear to be much more environmentally friendly is to

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>sell off their most polluting assets. What is to stop

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>companies from doing that? And where do you think there

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is a place for leadership in trying to make sure

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that that is you know, visible in the industry to

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the investors. I think divestments is, as we've shared, one

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of the critical elements actually of our strategy. The way

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we actually look at divestments as one of the critical

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>elements of the strategy is that divestments basically helps in

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>our case, advanced the world towards that zero. And the

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>reason for it is we're actually divesting assets and we

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are reinvesting the proceeds into creating a low carbons supply,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not divestment for the sacred divestments, it's really

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>divestments and reinvestment into low carbon supply, and so that

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>actually advances the world in the energy transition in the

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of actually bring in that capacity, that additional low

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>carbon capacity in solution online. And I think it also

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>enables bp TO itself to advance towards its Natzi ra

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>aim and position in the world, which is paris aligned

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.959
<v Speaker 1>in the future. The world is very much evolving towards

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>increasing transparency on emissions. So I don't really think there

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is a world where we can imagine that you know,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>buyers of potential divested assets will not be put on

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the you know, transparency requirements in terms of emissions reporting

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and emissions progress. And while divestments do not take assets

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>out of a system in terms of aidin gas production,

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps advance in the energy transition. I

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's also fair to say that if you look

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>at scenarios and you look at a well below two

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>degree scenario or one point five degree scenario, he's still

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>having tent of the primary energy mix, which is actually

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>linked to point in gas. So we will need to

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas production as we transition and the question

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is is really one of who's abist owner for the

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>assets in the frame of the individual strategies. Well, and

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>then the other question is for how long? So you

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>have this zero target? But where do you think the

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>inflection points are? Because there has been some discussion around

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that emissions today are much more impactful than

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>emissions in three years, five years, ten years. Where do

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you think the most important year is? Given that these

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are industries that take a long time to turn and

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to make these changes, so it can't be six months

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>from now. What do you think is the biggest inflection

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>point between now and we have very much shaped it

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with a short term, medium term and long term aim

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so very completely. You know, we have to look at

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on net zero names. We have five ames which are

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on getting BPT to net zero by sooner. Aim

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>one is very much around scope on and scope too

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>from our own operations. Aimed two as a carbon content

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of our oil and gas production. Aim free is around

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the intensity the carbon intensity of our marketing products. Aimed

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>for is a methane intensity, as we discussed and named

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>five as a lead indicator in terms of capets into

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>low carbon. For each of those we have set a target,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and we have set at twenty thirty am on the

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>way to the let's see your own for me in

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:35.919
<v Speaker 1>terms of reassuring investors, in terms of and other stakeholders,

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in terms of efforts and trajectories, but also just in

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of actually informing strategies, because a lot of the

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>decisions that make today will be required to actually frame

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>where you're trying to actually head to towards twenty and

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and towards. We believe that in that frame you

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 1>actually do need to have short term targets, medium term

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as we described them as being ten years, twenty thirty games,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and then the longer term objective. And I think that's

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>now there's debate, but I think it actually aligns quite well.

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Were for instance, when you look at some of the

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>potential initiatives, which are looking at a five year and

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen tents of fifteen year confering. So it's impossible

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about the future as a parent without thinking

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about your kids. So you talked about your two young children.

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got two of them as well. They've been probing,

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they've been asking you very pointed questions you said around

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the future and climate and in your role, what advice

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have you given them regarding where they should be looking

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, you know, maybe their future careers or

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>even education choices. Oh that's the tricky one. In full transparency,

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>my my children are actually looking into pretty different careers.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>So one of them wants to be a criminologist, the

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>other one wants to be a doctor. It's very it's

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty distant from anything loosely related to the energy

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>transition now, but I think they do indeed have pretty

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>probing questions. And the probing questions are literally around elements

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>such as what car are you driving and for the record,

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a car, Or how is recycling we

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>do actually contributing as an oil and gas company, what

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>are you doing right in terms of energy transition? And

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is actually fueled by both the personal interests,

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but what they hear and what they actually also engage

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on as activity at school. So I think that's another

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>reason to be hopeful, Dana, which is I think the

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>generations to follow are very very much focused in terms

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of energy transition, but also more generally sustainability also linked

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to just transition and other topics. I would certainly agree

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 1>with that. They definitely have grown up with this as

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 1>being a focus so a reason to be hopeful about

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. Well, Julia, thank you very much for sharing

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>your vision for the future and what's going on at

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>BP and then your personal journey with us here today.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for having me Dana. Today's episode

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of Switched On was edited by Rex Warner with Grace

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Stoke Media. Bloomberg Any App is a service provided by

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliate. This recording does not constitute,

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>nor should it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations,

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy.

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg an e F should not be considered as information

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes any representation

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>information contained in this recording, and any liability as a

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>result of this recording is expressly