WEBVTT - The YouTube Story Part Two

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Text with technology with tech Stuff from stuff works dot com.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I am your host,

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I am an executive producer here at how

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works and I love technology. And if you listened

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in our last episode, I talked about the founding of

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube back in two thousand five and really only got

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>up as far as two thousand seven. It really didn't

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>take long for me to get through a full episodes

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>worth of material, although to be fair, I did backtrack

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit to talk about the early days over at PayPal,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>because the founders of YouTube started at PayPal. But those

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>first two years of YouTube, we're incredibly important. Around that

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>same time YouTube emerged from beta, there were dozens of

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>other sites that were trying to become the home for

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>web streaming video. But YouTube's conversion tools made it really

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to upload files, meaning that the site can handle

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>several different file formats, and it took all the work

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of converting those into the format that YouTube was using

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to display them on the web all on its own,

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>so users didn't have to worry about having their video

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>forms files in a specific format. YouTube could accept just

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>about anything, or at least several of the major ones

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in that time. So YouTube became a big player in

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the space, ultimately becoming big enough for Google to swoop

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in and buy the company for the princely some of

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>one point six five billion dollars. Well by two thousand seven,

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Google owned the company and fun tidbit. The deal to

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>purchase YouTube was apparently done in the parking lot of

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a Denny's. That's according to Gideon You, who had worked

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at Yahoo before moving over to become YouTube's first chief

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>financial officer. Yeahoo had also been one of the early

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>suitors for YouTube, so imagine how different things would have

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>been if that deal had gone through. Now, one of

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube's three founders, Joe Ed Kareem, had left the company

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>by the time Google was acquiring it, the remaining to

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve Chen and Chad Hurley stayed on with YouTube. In fact,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Chad Hurley was the CEO of the company and remained

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>so until Steve Chen was YouTube's chief technology officer, and

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>both founders would stay with YouTube till now. One thing

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I left out of the last episode was that time

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Magazine had used YouTube's user interface design in its Person

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Year issue. Now you might remember this. That

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>was the year when you were named Person of the

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Year and and no, not not you specifically, but the

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you in the general sense. I think what the magazine

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was getting at was that user generated content was becoming

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a powerful force in the online world. Suddenly you had

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>platforms like YouTube that were able to give average people

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to make their voices heard to the war

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at large, and it suddenly seemed possible for a young

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>storyteller to bypass the traditional pitfall filled path of finding

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>success with a direct conduit to an audience. Of course,

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this was also in a time before hundreds of hours

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of content joined YouTube's platform every single minute, which made

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it increasingly difficult for any one piece of content to

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be discovered on the platform. But we'll talk about that

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>more later. In March two thousand seven, YouTube announced it

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>would honor the best user created videos on its site

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with a special awards ceremony, and they launched the YouTube

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Video Awards, with nominees curated by YouTube itself. Users had

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to vote on their favorites, but they couldn't

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just nominate anything. They could only vote on the ones

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that the company nominated. Categories included most Creative, most Inspirational,

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Best Series, Best Comedy, Musician of the Year, Best Commentary,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and Most Adorable Video Ever. Winners of those first awards

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>included Aska Ninja for Best Series and Okay Goes Video

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for Here It Goes Again for most creative That's the

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>video with all the treadmills. YouTube would hold a similar

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>awards event the following year, and then it just sort

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of quietly vanished after two thousand eight. YouTube would later

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>launch an award show specifically for music videos, and they

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>held that event in but mostly the company sat back

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and let numerous other organizations step in to take over

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the awards game. See also the Webbies, the stream E's,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>the Online Video Awards, and more. YouTube helped legitimize user

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>created content, and they turned it into an industry. Not

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>everything was worth putting money behind, but there were more

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>than a few creators who stuck struck a chord with

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>their respective audiences, and they got tons of views as

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a result and actually began to make a living once

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>YouTube allowed them to monetize those videos. Because in the

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>early days, just because you had a video that was

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>getting lots of traction didn't mean you were making any money.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't serve up and add against it for a

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>while until until YouTube started to create the partners program.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Early on, YouTube was working with larger outlets like established

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>media outlets, and gradually they began to also partner with

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>individuals and made two thousand seven, something truly historic happened.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Prankster's on four Chan, which some have described as the

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet equivalent of moss Eisley. In other words, it's a

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>hive of scum and villainy, began a meme that occasionally

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 1>still pops up today, more than a decade later, although

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not as frequent as it was and it's heyday.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>That meme was to drop a link to a specific

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube video, but you would claim it was showing something

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that would get a lot of point folks to to

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>click on the video. You you would make up something.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you would say it was supposed to be the

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>trailer to an anticipated video game. So, for example, in

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the early days, one of the claims was, oh, this

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>link will take you to a trailer for Grand Theft

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Auto four, Or you might say that it was a

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>video of a famous person in a compromising situation, but

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what the link actually sent you to was someone who

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>was there to let you know he's never gonna give

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you up. He's never gonna let you down, He's never

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>going to run around and hurt you. Yep. Made two

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, just two years after YouTube had even entered

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>into beta, we got the first rick roll. That's how

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>old that joke is. YouTube branched out beyond the United States.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand seven, the company launched its service in

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>nine countries, including the United Kingdom, and the company also

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>formed a partnership with E M I, which used to

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>be a thing. In fact, it used to be a

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>really big thing. E M I was a conglomerate, so

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a group of various record labels and collectively it

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>was the fourth largest record company in the world. E

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>M I was a powerful traditional media company back in

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven, and just a few years later it

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would find itself billions of dollars in debt, and ultimately

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it was sold off in various chunks to other companies

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like City Group, Vivendi's Universal Music Group, and as well

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as a business owned by Sony and a TV. But

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seven, this was a really big partnership.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>In July two thousand seven, YouTube gained even more mainstream

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>attention when it partnered with CNN to host a presidential debate.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Citizens in the United States were invited to submit video

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>questions for the debate, and the July debate was for

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>nominees in the US Democratic Party, so it was the

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Democratic hopefuls for the candidacy of president. The Republican presidential

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>debate also aired on YouTube, but that happened later in November.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The following year, two thousand eight, seven of the sixteen

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>presidential hopefuls had created videos for YouTube announcing their campaigns,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>so it was the beginning of the politically savvy recognizing

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube as a way of reaching out to their potential constituents.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>According to The Telegraph, YouTube began receiving ten hours worth

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of video every minute. Today that number is more like

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>four hundred hours uploaded every minute. It's literally impossible to

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>watch everything on YouTube because by the time you finished

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>watching even a short video, hundreds or even thousands of

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>other videos have joined the platform. Now, I mostly say

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this to get it out of the way, since otherwise

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this episode and the next one would have every other

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>fact be a boost in the number of hours uploaded

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>every minute. I'd say, well, by now it was forty

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>hours every minute or eighty hours every minute, and that

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>just gets tedious. I'll in some episodes with some other

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting statistics about YouTube usage, but for now, let's get

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the history of the company. Before are we

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>say goodbye to two thousand seven. I thought it might

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be fun to mention some of the videos that got

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the most traction that year, and I'll do this for

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the following years as well. At the tail end of

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the year, the first episode of Drunk History went up

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, and if you're not familiar with the concept,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>inebriated people, typically comedians, tried to relate some moment of

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>historical significance to the host of the show, and their

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>stories are inner cut with re enactments of that historical event,

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with characters lips sinking to the voiceover to comedic effect.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a pretty funny series. One infamous video that

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>went up that year was the Leave Brittany Alone video clip,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in which Chris Crocker tearfully admonished the press for hounding

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>his beloved Brittney Spears. Numerous parodies of his video would follow.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Will Ferrell got a lot of views with a sketch

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that went up on YouTube the Landlord Sketch, in which

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>he faced off against a very young, very tiny landlord

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>who took no crap. This was also the year that

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Meyer gave us the phrase don't taze me bro oh.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And in two thousand seven, we also learned about a

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>particular type of precipitation a k a. Chocolate rain thanks

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to Mr tezon Day. The video from that year which

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>has received the most views over time is I'm a

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Gummy Bear, which I had never heard of before, and

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>yet it is the most viewed video from two thousand

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>seven over time, not necessarily just within that year. It's

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a novelty song. Uh. It's received more than one billion

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>views at this point, although it took a long time

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for it to accrue that many. Oh. Also in two

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, before I finish, one other thing happened, a

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>baby named Charlie bit a kid's finger. In two thousand eight,

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube formed partnerships with big media companies like CBS, MGM,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and lions Gate in an effort to become more of

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a competitor in branded entertainment. YouTube was trying to compete

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>against a rising star in branded media online called Hulu.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Later on it would be Hulu and Netflix, and then

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>later still Hulu, Netflix and Amazon Video. The agreement allowed

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>these various studios to upload full length films or television

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>shows onto YouTube. They could serve the videos up alongside advertisements,

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>and the videos appeared in a category called shows that

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>would appear on the homepage, so you could just click

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on the show's tab and see the things that were

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>up for offer. This feature was originally only available in

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And when I say it was served

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>up against ads, a lot of those were static ads

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that were actually on the page on YouTube. They weren't

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>video ads incorporated into the video the way they are today.

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And this was really an attempt for YouTube to make

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>more revenue from its service. The company had found it

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>challenging to serve up ads against short videos, and it

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>found fuel to renatives to generating revenue. In fact, according

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to many sources, the cost of bandwidth and storing all

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>those videos in the first place was much more than

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the revenue generated by the company. It was a money

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>losing proposition. Some people even say that some of that

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was hidden from Google during the acquisition process in order

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and sweeten the deal as much as possible,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>although I've not seen anything to really back up those

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>claims with facts. Also in two thousand eight, YouTube was

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>awarded a Peabody Now the Peabody Awards, named after philanthropist

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>George Peabody, are meant to honor powerful and enlightening stories

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in media like television and radio. YouTube received a Peabody

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight because the site's design allowed users

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>around the world to upload video directly to the platform

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>bypassing other hurdles, and thus the Peabody Awards said that

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.479
<v Speaker 1>YouTube was promoting democracy by giving voices to the voiceless.

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Over the summer of two thousand eight, hardware manufacturers began

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate YouTube directly into their products. The Sony Bravia

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>television set released in June two thousand eight, had a

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>YouTube feature incorporated into it, giving Bravia owners the option

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch YouTube videos directly on their television sets. In July,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Tvo followed suit and built YouTube functionality into its digital

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>video recorders. In December two thousand eight, YouTube launched a

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>new landing page for high definition video. The company had

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>been rolling out HD video capabilities over the course of

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>about a month, and went live with this new landing

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>page in mid December. This change also meant that the

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>video players appearance was a little different. It was now

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in widescreen format. Of course, streaming video and HD means

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sending more data over the Internet, which also means more

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive bandwidth bills. The earliest implementation saw HD at seven

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty resolution. Later on the following year, in two thousand nine,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>YouTube would bump that up to ten a DP resolution.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So which videos were people watching in two thousand and eight,

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>While there was Star Wars? According to a three year old,

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a popular video in which an unspeakably adorable

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>little girl attempted to explain what Star Wars is all

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about and pretty much gets it right as far as

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned, people started watching a video channel featuring a

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>character called Fred Figglehorn, a high pitched, manic, little child

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>character played by not a little child person. His frantic

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>video struck a chord, and in the following year his

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.239
<v Speaker 1>channel would become the first to hit one million subscribers

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. I didn't really get the appeal because I

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>found it a little too manic and high pitched and crazy,

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm old. A video in which two people froze

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in place at New York City's Grand Central Station, got

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton of views, and it also helped push the

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>concept of flash mobs into the public consciousness, So you

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>have that to blame partially. Thankfully, we've mostly moved on

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>from that idea at this point, and those were the

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>big ones for two thousand and eight. Now I've got

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to say about these middle years of YouTube,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but before I jump into the next section, let's take

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to thank our sponsor. In early two

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, US President Barack Obama launched a YouTube channel.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks later, the Pope launched one. YouTube was

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>quickly becoming an outlet for leaders, celebrities, and others to

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>speak to a potentially large global audience, and it was

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a way to become related relatable to the average person,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>or at least the average person who was using YouTube.

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>In April two thousand nine, YouTube signed an agreement with

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Vivendi to create a music videos service called Vivo. Vivo

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>would distribute official music videos on YouTube in an effort

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to sidestep the piracy issues companies had encountered over the

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>last few years. So you can actually watch official music

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>videos in instead of seeing someone who had shot a

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>video off of their television or otherwise pirated the content

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and uploaded it under their own channel, and it gave

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>people an authorized source for that kind of content. According

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to Fast Company, YouTube was serving up more than one

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>billion video views per day by October two thousand nine,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but also according to various sources, at this point, YouTube

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>still had yet to turn a profit. Fast Company sites

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>analysts who estimated YouTube and earned about two hundred forty

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>million dollars from ad revenue in two thousand nine, which

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is a healthy chunk of change, no doubt about it,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But those same analysts said that YouTube's expenses in storing

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and streaming that video were probably closer to seven hundred

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, So spending seven hundred million to make two

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty million yikes. But don't worry, there's always money

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in the banana stand. Also in October two nine, the

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>British broadcast channel Channel four not part of the BBC,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but Channel four, signed a deal with YouTube that had

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the streaming service offering up full length episodes of Channel

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>four shows shortly after they aired on television. The deal

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>involved an undisclosed ad revenue sharing deal. And was set

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to last for three years. YouTube said it was the

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>first deal that saw a broadcaster engage in a comprehensive

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>catch up TV strategy on the platform, and the first

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>episodes found their way onto YouTube in early so catch

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>up TV. The concept is that you can see the

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.239
<v Speaker 1>episodes that you would have missed otherwise, maybe you were

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the house, you didn't have a DVR. It's

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty simple concept, but it was a big deal

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>for this to happen back in two thousand nine. It

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>actually set the stage for that happening on a grander

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>scale later on. Also included shows like Peep Show, which

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>stars Mitchell and Webb, two of my favorite comedians from England.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, so, some of the videos they got a

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of us in two thousand nine included Okay goes here,

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Here he goes again. Treadmill video. That one got a

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of us in two thousand nine, even though it

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>previously had had a debuted, but it was one that

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really struck a chord. It was one of those that

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of it was almost like a sleeper video that

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>took off a while after it had hit YouTube, and

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 1>it really set a bar for the band that they

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have surpassed a few times. Since then, they've become known

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for their very creative and sometimes heads scratching, lee complicated

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>music videos. Another popular one from two thousand nine was

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Susan Boyle on Britain's Got Talent. You might remember her

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>singing a song from Laby Zarabla that brought the house down.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We also got to enjoy the effects of anesthetic on

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a young kid in the video David after dentist. That

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>kid by this point as a teenager, and I wonder

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>if he still gets plagued by people saying how many

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>fingers do you have? They Avid? Another popular video featured

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple named Jill and Kevin, and they danced down

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the wedding aisle with their entire wedding party in a

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>choreographed number. They ended up inspiring tons of other videos

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and an episode of the Office. So, I mean, who

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>can ask for more? You get married and do the

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>way you take the aisle ends up becoming a plot

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>point for a hit sitcom. That's pretty impressive, So let's

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>move on up to two thousand ten. In January of

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that year, YouTube first began to offer up movies for

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>rent on its service. This put it into more direct

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>competition with services like Netflix, Hulu, and iTunes. YouTube began

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with movies that were getting buzz at the Sundance Film Festival,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>opening up the chance for people to see movies that

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they might not otherwise get a chance to see if

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get a wide theatrical release. The service would

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>gradually grow to include more mainstream films, and in fact,

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you can still do this today. You can rent films

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, although I find that a lot of people

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't aware of that. They just didn't even realize that

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that was a service that was available on YouTube. YouTube

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>implemented a site redesign in March, the first of several.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Really their goal was to try and keep visitors on

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube platform longer, because if you stay longer, you

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>watch more videos. Watching more videos meant generating more AD revenue.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>The redesign removed some clutter from the homepage, reducing the

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>number of links visible on the screen by half. There

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>were new playlist tools that were designed to help users

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>binge videos and hop around more easily, so they'd have

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fewer reasons to just bounce after watching a video, and

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube also simplified the way you would rank videos so

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you might not remember this, but back in the old

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>days at YouTube, you can actually give a video a

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>rank between one and five stars. But starting with that

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>red design, that was reduced to a simple like or dislike,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thumbs up or thumbs down. And YouTube's response, you know

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>why did they do this? They said that the vast

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>majority of ranks on YouTube videos were either five stars

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>or one star. People either said this is the best

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that's ever been uploaded to the Internet, or this

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>is a garbage fire of the video clip and no

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>one should ever watch it. There were very few in between,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and so Google said, well, everyone saying it's either five

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or one, let's just do thumbs up or thumbs down.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Make this simple. So that's what they did. That same

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>year saw Dan Savage launch a campaign to help teens

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in the l g t b Q community deal with

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>anxiety and depression, offering up advice and counsel for those

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>being bullied because of who they are. That was called

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the It Gets Better campaign and marked one of the

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>more visible and shared online campaigns up to that point.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube would also play a part in a larger online

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon tied to a real world conflict. This was the

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Arab Spring, which technically began at the very end of

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Most of the events of the Arab Spring would take

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>place throughout two thousand eleven uh from to two thousand twelve.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>These events were unfolding, with most of them again being

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eleven, but there were various protests and demonstrations

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in Arabic nations in the Middle East and North Africa

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>that we're all part of this Arab Spring. It began

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in Tunisia and spread from there as people throughout the

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>region began to resist what they saw as oppressive regimes.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Online platforms like YouTube served as an outlet for people

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 1>in those countries to tell their stories to the larger world.

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Others included Twitter and Facebook, which were really instrumental for

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that purpose. An event that shook things up at YouTube

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was Chad Hurley stepping down as CEO. The co founder

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the site had been in a leadership position since

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>before the Google acquisition. Hurley moved to a more supporting

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>advisory role and Solar Commander stepped in to become the

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>new CEO of the company. Now, Commander came from Google.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he was employee number nine over at Google.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He had graduated from Stanford university, and he had a

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>degree in biological sciences, which I admit is not exactly

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the field i'd expect for a tech company executive to possess.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure. I'd love to hear more about

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>his story to find out how he was pulled into

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Google and what his contributions were. I mean, I assume

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he also had a lot of education in other sciences

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to make him a very valuable addition to Google's team,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>especially to become employee number nine. The biological sciences doesn't

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>really jump to mind when I think of Google the

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>search engine. He would remain CEO of YouTube for a

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>few years. He would step down to take more of

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a senior vice president role with YouTube and Google in

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, but we'll talk more about that in

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>our next episode. Hurley co founded a clothing company called Halasca,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but stuck with YouTube for a while. Longer, and by

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a while, I mean less than a year, and I'll

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get to that in just a second. Toward the end

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of twenty ten, YouTube began to lift a restriction that

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>had been in place for several years, and that restriction

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was a time limit on video clips. You may not

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>remember this but originally users were limited to uploading clips

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there were ten minutes long or shorter. In July, YouTube

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 1>bump that up to fifteen minutes, but by the end

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of twenty ten, the company announced that, starting with a

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>selection of users, those time limits would be phased out gradually.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>It became clear that if you were a user in

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>good standing, if you had not had a history of

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>uploading copyrighted material to YouTube, that you would have those

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>restrictions lifted and you would be able to post videos

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of any length to YouTube. I remember, back in the

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>original days, you were seeing this because YouTube wanted to

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>prevent people from uploading entire television series or movies to

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the service. They wanted to limit the length of video

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>clips specifically to protect copyrighted material. And you may have

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>encountered older videos that slipped under that intellectual property radar,

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in which a show or a film was cut up

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>into ten minute chunks, so you'd see something like Back

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Future, Part one of ten, Part two of ten, etcetera, etcetera.

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not an ideal viewing experience. By the end of

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten, YouTube's algorithms were getting pretty good at detecting

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>pirated material and content creators had a larger array of

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>tools at their disposal to remove or essentially create uh

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>disincentives for unauthorized copies of their work. I could probably

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>do a full episode about that content I D system

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and how it works, but I'm gonna give

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you a quick overview here to kind of explain it. First,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>content creators would provide Google or YouTube really with files

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the content they wanted to search against on the platform.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>So let's make this simple with an example. Let's say

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a music label searching for instances of people uploading

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the latest song from a band like The Struts. So

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got this song from the Struts. You want to

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that there are no unauthorized instances of that

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>song up on YouTube. You provide the file to YouTube

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and say I want to search your database against all

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>videos and see if there are any hits. The file

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that you give YouTube is called a reference file. Google

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>puts all the reference files into a massive database filled

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with other reference files. Those files might be full length

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>pieces of content or snippets of longer pieces. And when

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>ever a user uploads a new file to YouTube, part

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of that uploading process involves comparing that content against the

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>database of reference files. So Google looks for matches between

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>audio and video elements in the uploaded pieces with anything

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the reference database. They have these algorithms that look

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>for matches between audio files in the reference section and

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what you've just uploaded, or even just elements of video

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that are common between the two. It's pretty phenomenal when

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you think of it as machine recognition of content. It

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>also looks for partial matches clips that could represent a

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hit but are not a one to one match and

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>might require further UH investigation to make sure that in fact,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>does represent a violation of copyright. So what happens then?

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>What happens when Google finds a match between a user

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>uploaded file and something that's in the reference database, Well,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that depends upon the copyright holder for the original reference file.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Copyright Holders have a few different options open to them.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>They can choose a setting that prompts you to to

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>block access to the uploaded video entirely and automatically. So

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>let's say that I upload that Struts song. UH. It

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>could be that the music label that represents the Struts

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>has set this so that anytime someone does that, it

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just automatically delists the video. No one can see it.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>It's as if I didn't upload anything at all. Or

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>they might choose to redirect monetization or enable monetization to

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>go to the copyright holder rather than to the user

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>who uploaded the file. So again, if I uploaded it

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and I said, hey, I want to be able to

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>monetize this file or this this video, maybe they would say, okay,

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you can monetize the video. It's just that all the

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>revenue is going to come to us, not to you,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's our content, not your content. Or they could

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>even choose to do nothing at all and allow the

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>video to stand as is. Some content creators see this

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of sharing community as a way of promoting material,

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and they don't see it as competing against their own content,

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so they don't worry about whether or not someone owns

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it when they upload it. And in any case, you

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>can even have it set so that you just get

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a notification whenever there is a match, and then you

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>decided on a case by case basis. You don't have

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to set your decision in advance and just walk away. Now,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>many people, including myself, have criticized the system for favoring

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>copyright holders too much over individual users. There are times

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>when it is perfectly legitimate to include someone else's content

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in a piece you are uploading to YouTube. For example,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if you want to create a video the critiques a

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>particular television show or film, and you're using clips to

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>illustrate your points, you could argue that that falls under

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the umbrella of fair use. You are commenting upon someone

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>else's work and effectively creating new work as a result,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's not that you are just presenting some and

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>else's copywritten material. You're using that as an example to

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>make a point. But fair use isn't a magic make

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>your video untouchable for free card. It's a legal protection,

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and it only comes into play if you actually have

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to defend your use of content in a court of law.

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Even then, the court decides whether or not your use

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of original content counts as fair use, and there's not

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>really any hard and fast rules to do that. It's

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>all subjective. So you might find one of your videos

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>taken down or demonetized, and at that point you can

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>appeal the decision, and then it goes into a somewhat

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mysterious arbitration process where someone has to decide whether or

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>not your video has its own merit, or if it

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>derives all its value from containing someone else's work in it,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of messy and it doesn't always come out

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in a way that you would expect now to be

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fair to YouTube. This process helps keep the company in business.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>If Google did not make a show that it is

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>proactive and removing infringing material, the company could be held

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>responsible for allowing people to pirate content that could lead

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to expensive and lengthy court cases, such as the one

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that was finally settled in two thousand and fourteen with

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube versus Viacom. So I do see all sides of

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this issue. It's just a tough call when there are

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>many cases of videos that seemed to have legitimate fair

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>use arguments getting pulled down, and there have been more

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>than a few cases of overzealous copyright holders taking down

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>videos that either they put up themselves so they're taking

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>down their own stuff, or their videos that didn't contain

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>any copyrighted protective material in them. So you might get

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a takedown notice from company and say, there's the thing

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in this video that infringes on any copyrights they own

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's all original, it has nothing to do with them.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that does happen, so it's far from perfect. All right,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the history of YouTube and the

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>videos that were really popular in One of those would

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be a video that helped launch a career into the

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>stratosphere and create a phenomenon. That would be Justin Bieber's

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Baby video. Now, Bieber had been uploading covers of various

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>songs to YouTube for a couple of years, at least

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and eight, and had sort of been

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>discovered by accident by a producer who signed Biber to

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a record deal. In January, Bieber's video for Baby off

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>his first album, hit YouTube and became an instant viral hit.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It would go on to hit one billion views, although

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it still was not the first video to hit a

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>billion views. It would just do that over time. In fact,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the first video to reach one billion views wouldn't come

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>out for another two years. But I'm not going to

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about that yet. After Baby success, the world was

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>plunged into a terrible plague called biber Fever. I appear

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the ones immune to it. I

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>promise I'll carry on for all of you. Other big

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>videos that year included the infamous Bed Intruders song Hidja Kids,

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Hidja Wife. The video saw Antoine Dodson's interview on a

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>local news station auto tuned into a song, which inspired

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a string of various auto tuned videos, including entire channels

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to editing videos and putting auto tuning behind them.

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It would also inspire the theme song for the Netflix

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>show The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. Later on, Old Spice launched

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>an advertising campaign in twenty ten that reveled in masculine

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>absurdity and started another trend of tongue in cheek advertising

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that spread to other companies like Duskies and Dollar Shave Club.

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We got the double Rainbow video in two and we

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>still really don't know what that means. Okay Go did

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>another music video that was really intricate and had some

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing nature to it. It was a Rube Goldberg

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>device and it was to the tune of this Too

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Shall Pass. They also did a second music video for

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that song featuring a marching band and Gilli suits. So

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>they just were really in a creative spirit at that time.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think still are, to be honest, they still come

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out with crazy videos. Was also when a Swedish YouTuber

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>called Beauty Pie launched his YouTube channel. He uploaded video

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>footage of various video games while providing odd commentary to them,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and over time became insanely popular, eventually becoming the highest

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>paid YouTuber on the platform and the YouTuber with the

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>most subscriptions. Later, he would run into serious trouble with

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sponsors and partnerships after posting videos containing everything from racial

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>slurs to Nazi imagery. Well, I've got a lot more

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about with YouTube until we get to the

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>next breaking point for the next episode. Before I jump

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>into this final segment, let's take a quick break to

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>thank our sponsors. In two thousand and eleven, YouTube introduced

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>its live feature, allowing users to broadcast live videos from

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a web camera or smartphone. Smartphones were well on their

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>way to transforming the online experience. More people were relying

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on their mobile devices to access the web and certain

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>types of content like video. We're more conducive to that,

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>though it took a little while for cellular networks to

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>get fast enough to really make it a good experience.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>These days, I think se of all traffic to YouTube

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 1>comes from mobile devices, so obviously transformative as far as

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the way we consume content off the Internet. The live

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>feature not only gave people the chance to broadcast any

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>mundane thought they might have to the world at large Twitter,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but also opened up the doors to user generated news coverage.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Anyone with a YouTube account and a compatible device could

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>stream video to the platform, giving the world a first

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and glimpse into events anywhere. Forget a surveillance state. Now

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we live in a world where in many places practically

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody has quick access to a camera and a live

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>feed to the world at large. That year, YouTube also

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>launched its own original channels. The company acquired the Next

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>New Networks, a programming distributor and aggregator. Next New Networks

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>was a company that partnered with content creators to give

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>them more visibility and give videos a better chance of

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>hooking and audience. YouTube was getting more serious about developing

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>programming channels and platform specific networks. This was a push

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to move away from one off successful viral videos and

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to build more sustainable channels that could earn views across

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a channel's worth of videos, not just depend upon lightning

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in a bottle. The company continued to redesign its home

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>page and interface in an effort to encourage even more

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.959
<v Speaker 1>time spent on the site. By the end of more

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>than three billion videos were being watched every day, and

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>while the site had started up in the good old

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>US of A, by two thousand eleven, more than seventy

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of all traffic came from outside the United States. They

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>were closing in on one billion active users, and they

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would hit that goal before too much longer. The site

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>had also created localized versions for twenty five different countries

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in forty three different languages. It was a juggernaut and

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it was only going to get bigger. In the spring

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand eleven, YouTube software engineer James Zearn gave

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a peek behind the curtain and explained that the vast

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>majority of YouTube's traffic focused on a relatively small number

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of videos. Specifically, he said thirty percent of the videos

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube demanded most of the traffic, with the remaining

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy remaining relatively unseen. Now that brought up some other questions,

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>such as how could YouTube turn a profit with such

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a business model, because if your company resources are earmarked

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to transcode and store videos, and sev of the videos

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you are using that effort on are never really being

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>watched only a really getting any traffic? How could you

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>make money off of advertising? One other thing that happened

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven was the launch of Google Plus,

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Google's attempt to create a social platform again to Facebook. Eventually,

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that platform would have a really big impact on YouTube,

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was not a positive one. But we'll learn

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>more about what happened in the following episode. Two thousand

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>eleven was also the year that the two remaining co

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.479
<v Speaker 1>founders at the company, Chad Hurley and Steve chen would

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>leave YouTube. Keep in mind that co founder number three,

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Joed Kareem, had left just after the Google acquisition. Right

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 1>around that time, the two of them founded a new

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>company called AVOs Systems a v O s. It was

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a startup incubator. In other words, they created a company

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 1>that could help other tiny startup companies get some momentum

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and grow. They would work together at AVOs until two

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fourteen, and at that point AVOs kind of

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>shed its incubator status and transformed into one of the

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>companies it had been developing, specifically a company called mixed Bit.

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>This was a mobile video platform and it was Chad

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Hurley's passion. Hurley became the head of Mixed Bit and

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Chen would depart. He would go on to join Google

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Ventures as an entrepreneur in residence. Sounds like a pretty

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sweet title in my mind. That marked the end of

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years of those two friends working together on the

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>same projects. So it was the end of an era.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But I know what you're asking, What were the really

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>big videos of two thousand eleven? Right, Well, the most

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>viewed video of that year was a bit of a

0:39:56.000 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>vanity projects, a music video of an original song featuring

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a young woman named Rebecca Black. And if that name

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ring a bell, then you may not be down

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with Friday. Two thousand eleven was when the song Friday

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hit YouTube and became a huge viral sensation. People loved

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>making fun of it, including Stephen Colbert, who performed a

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>moving rendition of the song on television. Personally, while I

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think the song is pretty much vapid and silly, and

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the video also very silly, it was a birthday present.

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>If my parents had had the money to give me

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a gift when I was a kid,

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you better believe I would have asked for it. I

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just lived in a or grew up in a in

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>an era where you didn't have to worry about your

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 1>goofy birthday wishes being broadcast to the world at large

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and then being held up as a thing of ridicule.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh that being said, it is it is remarkably bad.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Other videos that were popular in this time included one

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in which a a dog was being teased about food

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 1>like a sandwich. The video included a voice over to

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 1>give us the dog's reactions, which mostly involved being really

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>sad that the dog's owner claimed to not only have

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>either thrown away or eaten a lot of food, but

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>even gone so far as to give a sandwich to

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the cat. There's a cute video of twin babies having

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a babbling conversation with one another gets pretty intense. The

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>nan Cat debuted in two thousand eleven and infected our

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>brains with an Naan song along with rainbows and pop tarts.

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>There was a Volkswagen commercial featuring a kid using the

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Force Star Wars style that got a lot of views.

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And this brings me to the point where I mentioned

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>that YouTube is kind of remarkable because it's the place

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>where people will go and seek out commercials, whereas in

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly every other venue. You can imagine people go out

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of their way to try and avoid watching commercials. It's

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>an odd thing, but I guess it all is when

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you watch on your time versus when it's forced upon you.

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twelve, YouTube was getting four billion views

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>every day. Now you might wonder how that breaks down. Well,

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you break it down, it means that there are

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>forty six thousand, two hundred nine six views being generated

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:23.439
<v Speaker 1>every second. And that was also the year that first

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>saw the first video to hit one billion views, though,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>as I've mentioned already, some videos that had been up

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on the site for a few years would eventually hit

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that milestone as well. The video was, as I'm sure

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>most of you know, the music video for a Gongnam

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>style by the artist's side. Now, this was a real sensation,

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with tons of references and parodies to follow, But the

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>music video itself, it's just an incredibly absurd and surreal

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>series of scenes set to infectious music. It's a video

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of excess and silliness, and it played right into YouTube

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot for videos that have wide share. Herbal appeal

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of thing people would watch and then

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>immediately sent to their circle of friends. Who would then

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>watch it again and then would send it to their

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>circle of friends, and so on and so forth. Now,

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of CEO, Salar Kamanda said that the

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>third wave of mass media was breaking, and he identified

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the first two waves as the era of broadcast television

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the era of cable television. Now, he said,

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>was the era of online video, in which more niche

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>subjects would receive attention and promotion. So while we saw

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>cable channels pop up around focused subjects like food or

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>animals or science, these online videos could get even more

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>granular than that. They could cater to a smaller but

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>passionate viewer base. At least, that was the hope, and

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube put some money behind that prediction quite a bit

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of an In fact, YouTube partnered with content created years

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and formed about one hundred premium content channels. The company

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>poured around one hundred million dollars into that effort to

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>both form and promote those channels, followed by another two

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars later on in an investment in advertising

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and marketing courtesy of Google. Now, some of those channels

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 1>featured celebrities, some featured YouTubers who had become popular through

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>their own channels, and some were partnerships with existing companies.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 1>All of the channels received investment on some level from

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube to produce their shows. A few famous ones included

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>source fed, which was founded by Philip DeFranco and had

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of notable folks work there for a while.

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Eventually that would get adopted or or acquired really by

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Discovery Communications. There was Geek and Sundry, which is a

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>nerd culture channel helmed by actress Felicia Day and has

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>other people like Huil Wheaton in it. Um there's another

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>early launch. There were some nals that were part of

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the initial launch. They're still around and thriving. Geek and

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Sundry is one of those that was still around. Source

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Fed after it was acquired by Discovery Communications was eventually

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and effectively shut down and dissolved, kind of absorbed into

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the rest of Discovery Communications online digital efforts. Some of

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>those premium channels just sort of faded away without much

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>warning or lamentation. Now there's so much more to talk

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>about with YouTube, but I feel this is a good

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>place to end here. At sort of the beginning of twelve,

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>when the premium channels were first announced, In our next episode,

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna explore how Google made the decision to unite

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Google Plus log ins, how that move completely

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>backfired on the company, how the YouTube Kids app went

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>off the rails, and lots more weird stories about the

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>third most popular website in the world. So I hope

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you joined me for that. If you guys have suggestions

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for topics I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you should write me. My email address for the show

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com, or

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you can drop a line on Facebook or Twitter. The

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>handle of both of those is tech Stuff hs W.

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Let me know if there's a topic you want me

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to cover, or a guest you want me to have

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show, anything like that. Drop me a line

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and tell me. If you want to watch me record

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>these shows live, go to twitch dot tv slash tech Stuff.

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You'll find a schedule there. You can go over and

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>join and be part of the chat room and watch

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as I fumble my way through all of the history

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of technology from the dawn of time up until last Wednesday.

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's pretty exciting stuff. I look forward to

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing you there and I will talk to you again

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about YouTube really soon. For more on this and fathoms

0:46:50.280 --> 0:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of other topics, how staff works dot Com eight