WEBVTT - Employers Must Be Flexible or Face Worker 'Revolt': Deloitte

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, we do have

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this economy gradually reopening, and the discussion is shifting more

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and more about how people will come back to work.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Will they come back to the office, is to what degree,

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>under what schedule? Lots of different models out there being discussed.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Erica Volini, Gloomal, Global Human Capital leader at Deloitte, joins

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Phoenix. Erica, thanks so much

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I'd love to get your thoughts about

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what your clients are telling you about how they plan

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring their employees back to work as this economy

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>gradually reopens. Thanks that. I think the keyword is flexibility.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>UM employers are thinking very carefully about how to set

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a flex way of working. We're seeing this across the board. UM.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>The question is the degree of flexibility that's going to

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>be offered, whether it's a finite you can come back,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know you work from home X number of days

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a week, or whether it's going to be ultimate flexibility,

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>do your job as you think it's best to do it.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think are the questions that are out there. But

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely a recognition that workers want more choice

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how they do their work, um, and

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>where they do their work. I'd love to be in

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix to tell you the truth, Erica. Do you see

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>so many people talked about at least a move to Florida,

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>going down to Texas, to Arizona, to California. Do you

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>see big business hubs actually spreading out a little bit?

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a recognition that geography, especially in a

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>world of more remote work, becomes less critical. Right. Office

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>proximity is not a defining factor in terms of whether

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you can get a job. I think we're seeing migration

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to other other areas, um for sure. But there are

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>tax implications, UM. There are benefit implications right that employers

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>have to work through, and I think we're gonna see

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that over the next few months lash years as employers

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out exactly how much flexibility they want

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to give. But the benefit is huge. Think about the

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to tap into labor markets that have historically not

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>been available to these organizations. UH, fresh labor pools UM

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>individuals who want to be reskilled and retrained and be

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>able to enter into the to the workforce in different

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>types of jobs. So I think we will see UM

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>much more flexibility in organizations saying you don't have to

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be geographically close to where the office is. What are

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you hearing from employee ease erica? Are they going to

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>revolt if they're told to come back into the office after,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve plus months of working from home. I

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>think revolts is a strong word, and I don't think

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's necessarily just about can I work from home or

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>can't I. I think what workers are going to say

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is you need to be caring for me. You need

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to focus on my well being. You know, our global

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Human Capital Trends report at Deloitte is showing us that

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>well being is the number one trend. UM. Workers are

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>expressing they need their well being cared for. UM. They

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>need to know they have flexibility to deal with what

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they have in their lives, and so what they're asking

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for from employers is understand my needs and give me

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the ability to flex as I need to to be

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>able to make those meet those needs and also be

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>productive at work. And I think what we've learned in

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the past year is that is possible. Um, you know,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with the right um leadership, with the right programs and

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>pray placed, the right policies, and frankly, with a degree

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of trust and empowerment for workers. And I think that's

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the main theme we're hearing from workers right now. What

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think we're gonna see in terms of female employees?

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, I've heard so many stories about bankers,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>women who are paid a lot, and they were forced

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to decide between childcare and going into work. They chose

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>childcare and gave up those big paychecks. I myself just

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>had a baby. My wife took a year off to

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>take care of the kid. I took a month um

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm lazy. Her job is so much harder than mine. Um,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna see big changes there? We just saw

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Volvo USA, for example, getting twenty four weeks two men

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or women when they have a baby. I think so.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have a two and a half year old,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:54.559
<v Speaker 1>so I completely understand being a working woman. Listen, I think, um,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kamala Harris called it a crisis, the number

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of women that are leaving the economy. I think it

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is organizations recognize that having a diverse workforce is critical

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to innovation and creativity. So I think employers are gonna

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>lean in. I think it's going to be in the

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>form of, you know, we're going to take a closer

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>look at childcare, at benefits, giving that level of flexibility.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I also think we're going to see and have seen

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>deliberate efforts by organizations to hire women UM and to

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>create programs to hire women into positions to make sure

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>UM that we are getting that kind of equity in

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the workplace. So that's absolutely going to be UM an

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>uptick in what we're seeing. What we have to realize

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is it's not just about hiring though, it's also about

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>reskilling and retraining. You know, UM, the majority of employers

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are staying their biggest issue is having the right workers

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>with the right set of skills and capabilities to be

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>able to do the jobs of the future. And we're

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going to need to see massive investments in reskilling and

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>retraining to be able to make all of this happen.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think that can't be lost. As I look

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>at the you know, Biden's latest plan, I see a

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars for worker training. Is that enough? Um?

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, do we need to invest more? What's the

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>role of organizations playing? And that? I think those are

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>all big questions that need to be answered. So it's interesting, Erica.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the beginning of this pandemic, we heard

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>from some of the technology companies that said, okay, folks,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to leave Silicon Valley and work remotely

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, from Boise, Idaho or something, we're gonna

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have to adjust your compensation for the different costs of living.

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>What are we seeing from corporate America as they think

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>about a remote workforce. Absolutely, I mean geographic pay differentials

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think are a hot topic right now. I think

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we will, on the whole start to see adjustments. If

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>people are living in lower cost locations, their pay will

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be adjusted accordingly to reflect costs of living. And I

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't accept that, Erica, You know what, because no, you

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you gotta pay me what I'm worth. Don't worry about

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>where I live. If I'm del ever ring, then I

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>want the money. You know, it doesn't matter if I

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>am in Sun Valley or in Silicon Valley. UM, I've

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>been hearing this for a while, and I hope they

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I hope they pushed back a little. I think this

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be This is going to be the debate

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>UM that's to be had, and you know, we're seeing

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>organizations on both sides of defense around this. Again. I

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think it comes down to UM. You know, the ability

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to tap into talent UM. I think it's going to

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>come down to UM, how critical it is for that

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>employee to be able to come in and collaborate with

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>their teammates, and how that's going to be done to

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>drive the work that they're doing. UM. And then to

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>your point, it's going to come down to fairness and

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and how to help employees get the best out of

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>their lives right. And these are all factors that are

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>going to go into this debate. I don't think there

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is an easy answer to any of this. I think

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a debate that's being had at every C

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>suite and every board level right now. Erica, do you

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have any have you seen any companies that just said

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>screw it, we're going back of the way it was.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Everybody in the office I mean, certainly we've seen a

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of CEOs from the major banks that come out

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and say, we think you need to come back to

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the office. But I think that's going to be the exception,

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not the rule. UM. I think most employers are saying,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen flexibility work. UM, we know we need to

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on well being. I go back to that point

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think it can't be understated, and I think

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they know this is what workers are asking for. But

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we have to keep in mind also that it's going

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>to be hybrid. You know, seventy percent of employers that

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we surveyed said they're going to go back to some

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>type of hybrid model. I don't think the majority of

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>employers are going to be all in on site or

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>all remote, right. Those extremes don't work because that's not

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what we've learned during pandemic. What we've learned is we

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>need flexibility and choice, we need trust and empowerment. That

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't need managers looking at a worker every single

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>minute of every single day to make sure they're producing.

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That productivity can still be gained in a remote work environment.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what we've learned. And so the question is how

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>do we start to embrace that flexibility and craft policies

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that allow for that level of flexibility and empowerment for

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the worker. I think that's where we're talking about the revolt, right.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>It's are you going to force me to do things

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in this one way or are you going to trust

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that I have the ability to still produce the output

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>without being managed every minute of every day. And I

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's the major shift that we're seeing right now.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, Bob Prince said he thinks the US is

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in a new environment of state capitalism. I live in Berlin.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We have thirteen months of parental leave, we have seven

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, seven weeks of vacation. This is all enforced

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>by the state. Do you think the state is gonna

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>bring new regulations to how we work in the US?

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know. Um, I'm not sure it's

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the case. I think um. I think we will see

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>um different entities, communities, organizations, possibly at the state level

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to do what they need to do to attract

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>people to where they live. I think that's going to

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>be the big factor, right. I mean, these states want

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>people to move there, they want the talent to be there,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not unreasonable to think that they'll start

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>putting in policies to be able to attract workers, and

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that's going to start to influence the government at

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a federal level. I mean, that's that's ultimately I think

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>would be beneficial to everyone. Erica, really important to get

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>your perspective. Really appreciate you joining us today. Erika Volini

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is the global human capital leader at Deloitte. Let's take

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a look at the global oil market. Brent crude is

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>up about seven tenths of one percent todays of barrel

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty three dollars nineteen cents a barrel. Here, that says

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus is meeting today, and the headlines coming out

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal leading with pet plus agrees to

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>gradually increase output over the next three months. Let's get

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what that means for these energy markets.

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>We turn to our expert, and that its Dr ellen Wald,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>president of Transversal Consulting and also a Bloomberg Opinion contributor.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Ellen thanks so much for joining us here. What are

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the highlights that takeaways from what you're hearing

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the OPEQUE plus meeting today. Yeah, This

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is UH kind of an interesting plot twist, you could say,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because going into the meeting, it seemed like everyone UH

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and including even UH from the Saudi Oil Minister, seemed

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be focused on rolling over the current production rates

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>UH and not really UM having much guidance. But it's

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>emerged that it seems that the group is interested in

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>doing a gradual increase of production. They're looking at increasing

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>total production UH three hundred and fifty thousand barrels a

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>day in May and then again in June, and then

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>an even larger jump in July. But what's even more

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that Saudi Arabia is also indicating that UH

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it is it's it's currently holding an extra million barrels

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a day off the market, that it's going to start

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>putting that back on the market at the same time,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>also in a gradual sense, so we're really actually looking

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>at it not an insignificant amount of oil coming back

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>online in May, June and July. I think what's really

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>notable though, is that OPEC is actually giving a guidance

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for for the next three months of what it plans

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to do, and recently they're really only be making decisions

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on a month by month basis. I think this will

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful also for U S. Crewde producers which

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have kind of been left in the dark as to

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in terms of the big national producers

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have the US, Well, first of all, why aren't we

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing prices fall? Well, I think it's not all that

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>much oil that they're they're putting back on the market

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to UH and they kind of telegraphed this a little bit.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>We did see Brent kind of go up and down

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit as the meeting was going on and weeks

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>were coming out. UM, but I think that in general,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the global economic news is more positive these days,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and so we're not seeing Brent react so much to

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the Opeque meeting. So in terms of the U. S.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Shale producers, have they been disciplined and what does the

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>what does the output look like? From them? Well, that's

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because production is really stabilized in the US

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>around the ten point nine to eleven million barrel per

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>day rate, and that's down from last year where they

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>were producing thirty million barrels a day, and a lot

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>of producers it's interesting. They responded to a survey from

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Fed saying that they are very hesitant to

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>put out to increase production, to drill more wells, even

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>though at at w t I right now is around

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars barrel, they could very profitably do so, but

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they're very hesitant. Both the constant kind of going back

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and forth from OPEC is giving the pause, but also

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of concern about the Biden administration where

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going with these regulations on federal leasing and and

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>so forth, and that that's really causing a lot of

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>hesitancy among them and not really wanting to band production

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>even though they could profitably do so. So I'm just

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at Brent crude. You know, recently I got up

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to around seventy two barrel, we've now pulled back to

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty three. Is that a function of maybe European reopening,

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, slower than maybe the market initially anticipated. Gives

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of what's driving the market right now, Well,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the market has recently really been kind of fluctuating, going

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>up and down a lot, and I do think that, um,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a pullback. I think Brent kind of overdid

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>itself and so there was a pullback in positioning h

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and so really the sixty three range stars barrel is

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>probably a better place for it than into the mid seventies.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But absolutely the information from Europe about further lockdowns and

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>travel restrictions is definitely having a damper on prices, though

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a positive information coming out from the United

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>States in terms of travel, uh that really should offset this.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you. You wrote a book Saudi inc.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And you studied UM Middle East, Middle East Energy, and

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Middle East History, Prince, and you taught Middle East UM

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>history as well at Jacksonville. What do you think about

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration's approach to the kingdom. Will it change? Well,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very interesting because they're calling it a reset,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but really, if you look at what they're doing, it's

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>not all that different from what the previous administration did.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not all that different from from Trump's approach. They

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't taking a particularly different approach with Saudi Arabia. UM.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, both Trump and the Biden administrations have been

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>very specific about wanting to say, deal with the King

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi Arabia as opposed to the Crown Prince of

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia, which definitely, UM, you know that that's that's

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>very similar. I don't really see a whole lot of difference,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>other than very specifically in terms of the weaponry that

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was being sold that was being used in the Yemen

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>more so so, I think there are some minor differences,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but in general, they really do seem to be staying

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the course. But they won't will they speak with the

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>king instead of MBS. I think that was intimated well.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>The Trump administration had the same the same line actually

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>almost to the exact same uh wording that they that

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump would say, you know, I spoke to the king,

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to to King Salmon. I think, um, you know, they

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>will have to deal with NBS at some point, but

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a very strong desire to deal

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with the guy on top. All right, Ellen, I'm excited

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to dig into your book. So it was great that

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we had you on as well. Ellen wald Um, she

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote Saudi Inc. And she's a senior fellow at the

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Council, President of Transversal Consulting. Now, let's bring in

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Timothy fire as the chairman of the Manufacturing Business Survey

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Institute for Supply Management and tim the US

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>manufact xturing expansion was the fastest we've seen since three

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>um was this expected, this kind of rebound, Well, you know,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>what a fantastic report. I don't think I expected anything

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this strong. I mean, the last time we saw p

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>my number this strong, I was just starting my career

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago. So a really good number. Had seven

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>or seven of the ten sub indectis all set modern

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>day records, if not all time records. So I really

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>led by the demand side new orders records. Since June

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>four we had customer inventories that we're all time records,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the lowest level ever, empty shells everywhere we had, and

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>we ended up with the backlog at record lows at

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the sixty seven point five. So demand is kind of

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>leading the way here, and manufacturing is leading the country

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out of this, you know, this bad situation. You know

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>it's all systems go. We ended the quarter really well, Yeah,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this is extraordinary. I like your comment him about manufacturing

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>leading the way. We that's certainly been the case here.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Is this a case of um our economy gearing up

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for what is expected to be a real reopening as

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>we progress that the year, is this kind of priming

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the pump for expected demand? Well, you know we talked

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>last year in the April May time from about a

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>v Shape recovery. Manufacturing absolutely saw the shape recovery. We

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>shut down in in April May, and we bounced back

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in July and we're fully running by August. So and

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we've continued to climb out since then. And it's it's pure,

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's demand driven. We're still constrained by labor, not only

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had our paneless companies, but out their suppliers. We've got

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>transportation constraints because of all the confusion and the expected

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>phrase that has to occur to keep factories running. But

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're into a pure demand driven expansion here

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>where I don't really see any end in sight. And

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>even when the new order levels start to ease, we've

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>got to refill all this inventory. I mean, we have

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>customer inventories way low, our own inventories are way low,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and we got a bunch of backplot we have to

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>burn off. So Q two looks really good. Two three,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I would say this time, how difficult is it can be?

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Too catch up? I saw that um Ford has been

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>idling some plants that make the F one fifty. My

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>heart kind of skipped to beat there. Um They have

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a chip shortage that we all know about. But I mean,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>this is a product that people depend on. How much

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of a problem is it. Well, I think you're really

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta take your hats off with the manufacting people across

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the country. They're really struggling. They're working very hard. This

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is not an easy job, is blocking intact? When every

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>minute of the day new things keep popping up, it's

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like whack them all. You to show up the next morning,

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you fix the problem. The next day, there's another problem

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue for probably another four to six months.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And they do a great job at it, so product

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>continues to flow. I mean, we've gotten that customer inventory

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>down way too low, But the manufacturing people are out

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there trying to get you what you need and they're

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good at it. So just be a little patient, absolutely, Tim,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and talk to us about the uh the transportation we've

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>we've we've seen lots of stories about ports, backs up,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>backup at ports, rail traffic kind of sitting idle, uh,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>containers going back empty. Gives just give us a sense

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of kind of the transportation infrastructure and how that's impacting

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>manufactured leaving canals aside. Yes, yeah right, yeah, I'll leave

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this so that's the European problem pripparently not a US problem,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but generally, when the manufacturing economy starts to heat up,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you see it first in transportation, and the reason is

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the factories need need product, but they can't wait a

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>week for the product to show up in a full truck,

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>so they tell the transporter go and pick up a

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>half a truck. Well, that really means need to trucks

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for one delivery, and then it's just kind of compounds

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>from there. Since the month of November, we've had increasing

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>comments about transportation difficulties. We're now running somewhere around my

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>general comments are transportation related, and they're up from last month,

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so we definitely have not peaked yet. It's going to

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>continue into April, probably into May. The indications on the

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>port issue. Initially we're around May or June. Now it's

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>looking like maybe Midsummer. But that's all good. It's all

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's all means that we have supply chain constraints because

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we have an abnormal amount of demand. That's all positive.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>What kind of pricing comments are you getting inflation? Well,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>we only had half a percent of our entire panel

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that said prices were down half, so that's that's like

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>zero and this is like the third month of that,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>so we you know, we have some of them are

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>reporting same. The steel prices continue to grow. The plastics,

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>all the petro chemical and plastics areas really impacted by

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the weather that hit the Gulf coast back in February

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>March about eighteen or some of my general comments were

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>weather related back to that event, because it was so

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>severe on the equipment of machinery that, uh, it takes

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>a little while to repair. So prices are gonna continue

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to go up. Aluminiums skyrocketing, copper, brass, name things. As

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>long as there's demand continuing, you're gonna see ramatul imput

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>prices go up. To Hey, Tim, thanks so much for

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really interesting report this month showing just extraordinary

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>strength coming out of the United States manufacturing sector, continuing

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to strength that we've seen them belows of last year.

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Timp Fury, chairman of the Manufacturing Business Survey for the

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Institute for Supply Management based in Miami, Florida, and matt

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It really is amazing how how resilient, uh, the United

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>States manufacturing base has been. Now let's get out to

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Fryer She's a Bloomberg technology reporter who has been

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>doing a deep dive into the misinformation spreading across social media,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>specifically Facebook in regards to vaccine. Sarah you Um have interviewed,

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, one woman who doesn't believe in vaccine induced

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>her immunity. Does she get this from Facebook? She gets

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this from from Instagram, which is of course owned by Facebook.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>What happens here is people fall into the personalization that

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram provide them. If you start looking into this.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Woman started out looking into holistic medicine alternative treatment. She

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>felt um bullied by her doctors during a cancer treatment

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and was looking for another way to stay healthy. Suddenly

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>she's getting this information about vaccines that's not really information

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's it's fearing her wrong. And a lot

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>of the people who are telling her, oh, you just

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>need to take this, you know, holistic healing method or

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>detox in this method, or um you try these techniques.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>They're selling supplements, they're selling essential oils, they're selling um,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, wellness retreats, and so she's she's not really

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>getting vinemit information from doctors, and we're seeing that happen

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot on Facebook. It's more about the fear um.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>The kind of messages that spread on Facebook are the

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ones that that make people comments and share. That's what

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>tells the New Street algorithm that it's a serious post

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that more people should see. And so these lies about

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, particularly lies that are targeting women, which we

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>can talk about in a second, are are just unable

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to be chanced down by the company. Yeah, that's kind

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of where I wanted to ghost Sarah. You know, it's

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of what we're hearing from Facebook here. But first,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>let's why are women being targeted here? Well, it just

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>goes to a history of the anti vaccination movement. It

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>has always been about scaring women out of giving shots

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>on time or at all, to their their newborns and

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>their young children. So this is this is a demographic

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that is already the subject to information from anti vactors,

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and with the COVID nineteen vaccination movement, it's strategic on

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>their part. They see that as an adjacent, vulnerable, vulnerable

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>group and they are telling women that the shot will

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>affect their fertility um that there's there's some psych protein

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fider Madorna vaccines that connects to the same

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of protein that creates a human placenta, and therefore

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they were to take it their bodies and becomes confusing,

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is just not true. And in many doctors,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>including five or even itself has put out a statement.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But that scientific explanation of why that's not true. Um,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you filled with with explanations of and we know acid change.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>That just simply doesn't go viral on Facebook the way

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>that that fear does. So much easier to share a

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>personal story of fear than to share something that's based

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in real science. So the concern is one of First

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights. I guess from Mark Zuckerberg's perspective, right, people

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>should be able to say what they want, and I

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>guess whether it's true or not. Um. But then if

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you have an algorithm aiming lies at people who are susceptible,

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that becomes something that the government should worry about. Well,

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let's looks clear up, there is no

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>such thing as the First amountment on Facebook face because

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not a government as diusy, they don't have any any

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>guarantee for you in terms of the First Amenment of

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>free speech. Second of all, well, but but Zuckerberg seems

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to want to stick to the principles of the constitution.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>He wants to. But but that's also convenient for Facebook

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because that means they don't have to do as much

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>leading as content and they don't have to take as

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>much responsibility for for it. Um. What happens on Facebook

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is is that this this content, it's not treated neutral

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>e by the algorithm. You know, it hands off approach

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to what happens on Facebook needs the algorithm is in charge,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and the algorithm is always going to spread that which

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>generates more engagement, more shares, the things that Facebook needs

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for its own future. They want more revenue, they want

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>more engagement, and so so that is the natural, unblenished

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>version of Facebook. And the rest is enforcements beyond that,

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like who should be a banned where should we put

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>labels about what might be fault um. But the core

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the product that designs the product is really what

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is that an issue here? And if you we talked

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to doctors who are trying to become more social media friendly,

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>using Instagram, using Facebook, um, even using Twitter and TikTok

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to try to spread information that's a little bit more palatable,

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more shareable. UM. More buzzy, but it

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>simply isn't reaching the communities that have already built this personalization.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has automatically built personalization for them around what kinds

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of people they listened to, so they're not really getting

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>these these good abouts of information into that into that

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>normal experience. So it's really a tough situation. Yeah, it's

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>very difficult. This is something that Facebook and its users

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>have been dealing with for a long time about many topics,

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but this one is very very uh interesting, potentially dangerous.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Fryer, thank you so much for joining us. Sarah's

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>technology reporter for Bloomberg, Um, you know, covering Facebook and

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>as she wrote a great book on Instagram, I recommend that.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So she's really really in deep with all things that's

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>going on at Facebook. And again, as we try to

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>get these vaccine out there, one of the concerns that

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we've heard from many experts from the Johns Hopkins University

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in other places is vaccine hesitancy uh is going to

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>become more and more of an issue, and social media

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>certain playing a role there. Thanks for listening to the

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with Apple podcasts, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Pet On

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Ball Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio