WEBVTT - Wealth Secrets Billionaires Don’t Want You to Know! | Peter Dunworth

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>What are the big problems that they're facing when it

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to building wealth.

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people think that guiding wealth is you know,

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the hot pot and kp Itzazy. Personally, from my experience,

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>it's the complaint.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Opposite when it comes to building wealth. I like to

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>call it the game of money, and you might imagine

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that people that have been playing a game a lot

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>longer than you probably have some tips and tricks and

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>strategies that they could use to probably beat you pretty quickly.

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So in the game of building wealth, you might imagine

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that the wealthy, the billionaires have access to tips and

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>tools and strategies that you don't know about. But there's

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>ways we can change that. So today I'm going to

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sit down with Peter Dunworth. He's the founder of the

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin Advisor, So he works with high net worth individuals

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>family offices to help them build generational wealth and incorporate

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin into that strategy. So, if you want to know

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the tips, tricks and strategies the high net worth individuals

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are using so you can win the game of money

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, pay attention in regards to preserving that wealth

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and then thinking about that wealth generationally. Who outright think

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's bad to leave wealth for your kids.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Now I completely disagree with Okay, you know, I look

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>at my responsibility to my family, to my legacy. Sadly,

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>there's no real out of the benchmarking society that we

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>have that's universally accepted other than how wealth are you out?

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a school board that everyone understands what the school

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>board is. There's no intangible around it. It's a number

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that you can look at. It's the only objective measure

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>we have of success.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 3>Peter, thanks for joining me today.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Pleasure to be here with you. Matt, thanks for having me.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what a great opportunity.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Just happened to be in my neighborhood and so swinging

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>by for an interview. So I'm excited about that. You know,

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of overlap on what we do talking

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about wealth just overall, which is a pretty big topic.

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So I want to dig into problems that high net

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>worth families individuals have, specifically around keeping wealth.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of attacks on keeping wealth.

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to keep it. It drains away from us.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Governments are trying to take it from us. So how

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>do we keep it? We talked briefly about some potential taxes.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into that how bigcoin can help

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>fix all of this, keep build wealth, keep from losing wealth,

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>build into the future. I want to think, since you're

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>international from Australia, sort of what Trump's announcement means to

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. And then I want to

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>go through some different strategies that high net worth individuals have.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully we have time for all that. So let's

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just frame it up here really quickly. So you work

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with high net worth individuals family offices. Family offices offices

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>typically would be you can define it for me, but

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>define what family offices are and define with me for us,

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what are the big problems that they're facing when it

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to building wealth.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Great question. Family offices in my definition of families who

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>have generated substantial little significant amounts of wealth that want

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to be managing those assets themselves.

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So what would that number be, Like, what's that threshold?

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>It can start at twenty five I would have thought,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and twenty five millions to billions of dollars twenty five

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>million or more. I think that's a starting point that

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can start looking at that. Under that

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>you're probably working with a multi family office where you're

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>leveraging off a number of other families to generate investment

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>ideas and returns and then leverage that in two further ideas.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 2>And from my experience, a lot of the families that

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>we work with, the number one issue that they've got

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>is keeping their wealth. The families that we work with

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>are not interested on a return on capital. They're interested

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>in a return of capital, meaning they're not focused on

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the percentage gains that they're making. They've made the pile,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>they've made their wealth. They want to make sure that

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>it's secure. So the first thing they look at when

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>it comes to any investment, whether it's real estate, whether

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it's stocks, properties, bonds, or even bitcoin, is they want

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that the ownership the custody is locked

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>down and they can't be subject to a number of

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>different attacks on that absolute base layer. So ensuring that

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you own what you think you own is probably the

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>first port of call that you need to look at,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and probably so something preliminary to that is what are

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the structures from a legal perspective that you have access

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>to to maximize the outcomes that you want to get

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>from the investments that you're putting that money into So

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it starts with the structures.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Then got it.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's an interesting way to think about it. And

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've often said, and this is unfortunately from

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a personal experience, that keeping money is a lot harder

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>than making it, which sounds crazy for most people who

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>haven't made money. But once you've made it, as I

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>found out the hard way of losing it all, keeping

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it is much harder. So and then the more you

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>have of it probably the bigger problem or challenge that

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes agreed.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is where a lot of people think, oh,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>it's so easy being wealthy, and to a certain extent,

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of problems that go away when

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>you're wealthy. But with great wealth comes great responsibility, and

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 2>there's a responsibility that's put on you to not only

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 2>maintain it, but to preserve it. And then the questions

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>around legacy start entering your mind, around how do I

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>preserve this for the people I love into the future.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of people think that gaining wealth is,

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, the hard part, and keeping it's easy. Personally,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>from my experience, it's the complete opposite. It's it's the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>keeping it that's the tough part.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into the generational wealth. That's something

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think about a lot. That's kind of the stage

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in right now, so I want to come

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to that.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 3>But before we get.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Into that, let's just talk through some of the major

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>asset classes that people can invest into. You mentioned real estate, bonds, bitcoin,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and Michael Saylor sort of laid out

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of some of the flaws in each one and

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>how they cost you money. But one of the biggest

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>problems is also taxes. So you were mentioning before we

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>started recording that in Australia they wanted to launch I

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>believe a tax on unrealized wealth at three percent I'm sorry,

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at three million correct.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>In our pension system. There's legislation going through on the

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>first of July that if nothing changes then that legislation

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>will go through first of July and they go into

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 2>tax at a right of thirty percent unrealized capital guiins

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>tax on pension balance over three million dollars. So if

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 2>you have a ten x return in bitcoin and you're

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 2>all in bitcoin with a three million dollar fund, you're

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>going to make twenty seven million dollars in a year.

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 2>They're going to send you a bill for eight point

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 2>one million dollars of unrealized tax gains. And now in

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 2>order to pay that bill, you're going to have to

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 2>sell down some bitcoin, and you're going to incur a

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 2>further eight hundred thousand realized capital gains tax to pay

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the bill. You pay nine million dollars on that gain,

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>even though and it's an oxymoron to say an unrealized

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 2>capital gain, because the very definition of capital gains means

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>that you've disposed of an asset. So they've just redefined

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the English language to suit an agenda that they want

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to take your assets before you've you've gone full circle

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>on the investment.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I want to dig into this and

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about it a little bit is because I think

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>both of you and I probably agree that whatever is

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>probably happening in the G seven, if you want to

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>call it the West Canada, Australia is probably a test

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>bed for what may be coming for the rest of

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. So if it's happening in Australia, it's probably

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>coming into Canada, it's probably come into Europe, and it's

0:06:58.839 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be come into the.

0:06:59.920 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 3>U at some level. So if we talk about this.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Now, you said it's in people's pension accounts, correct, So

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if I hold it in a personal account, if I

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>own the stocks or whatever assets personally, that's not subject

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to that.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Correct. So you can hold it in trust, company or

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 2>personal and it won't be subject to an unrealized capital

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 2>gains tax. I think for the moment, the way it

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>was proposed, it was ill thought out legislation that was proposed.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>No one really picked it up, no one really cared

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>about it. The feedback I've had from the industry is

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>that no one really cares about rich people getting tax more.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>But what they don't understand is the downstream consequences of that.

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>And anyone who's holding bitcoin in that pension system will

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>very quickly reach that three million dollar threshold and then

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll all be subject to the tag. So it's a

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 2>slow creep that has no indexation as well. So you're

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be suffering that regardless. And if we think

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>probably long lines similarly, from a hyperinflationary type event, or

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>at least an inflationary event, three million is not a

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of money. Yeah, we're going to be there in

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the next dickide.

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean the crazy thing with that to your point,

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not a lot of money, and because of the

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation when you think about I mean, here we are

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in this beach town in southern California, and I know

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>my neighbor across the street from me house is probably

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>worth I'm guessing four million, four and a half million dollars,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and he bought the house for three hundred and thirty

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars I believe in like around the early nineties,

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's twenty five years ago. So they bought the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>house for four hundred grand twenty years ago, and now

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's worth four and a half million. So basically, through

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the money printing, through the inflation, they've artificially pushed the

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>asset price up and then they do want to take money,

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>so you're actually worse off.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, This is the problem that that creditory event, which

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 2>is sort of pushes inflation, makes everyone feel like they're

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>wealthy and they're richer than they are. But the problem

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 2>is Yo Naiba, if he wants to monitize that in

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>any white hypo form other than debt, needs to sell

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>that asset. Pibwaeva taxes are revivable on it. Whatever's left,

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>he still has to find a home yeah, and guess what,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>everything else has gone up around him, so he'll probably

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>be buying an inferior asset. And this is where to me,

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin plays a huge part, particularly for those real estate investors,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 2>of diversifying a portfolio and adding in an asset that

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>they can understand or easily understand that is very similar

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and acts very similarly to real estate. But to me,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>it has a significant upside over and above what real

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 2>estate does, even with the leverage that you can get there.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, before we get into that though, we're just kind

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of sticking on this for a minute. I mean, why

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>would anybody keep money in a pension account. If that's

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the case, would everybody just close their pension accounts out

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and move them into other assets.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the problem is this is captive for anyone under

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 2>sixty two or sixty.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Five years of age.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>They're allowed to sell, they're not allowed to sell, well,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 2>they're allowed to sell their assets, but they're not allowed

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 2>to take the assets out of the pension system until

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>they reach what's called preservation age, which is around between

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>sixty and sixty five. Time we get there, they'll push

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 2>that to sixty five to seventy and it's kind of

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a hotel California for capital that can go in, but

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 2>unless you're retired, you can't take that money out.

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, is this only for government workers the captured pension

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>system or is it like private businesses?

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Also peed into that this is for everyone in Australia.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>But just the absolute duplicitous event that happens on this

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>is that most government pensions are not subject to this

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>tax because they have something different different called a defined

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>benefits scheme. So fortunately for the politicians who are making

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>decisions for the rest of us, their superannuation scheme or

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 2>pension scheme is not affected, so they will not suffer

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the tax consequences that everyone else will.

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Sure, it's what it always is.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Recently, I saw Larry Fink from Blackrock was over I

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>believe in India, and he was talking about how Blackrock

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to help these other countries build up capital markets.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So the US sort of has it unfair advantage because

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we have these capital markets that attracts all his capital.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But he wants these other countries like India that are

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>rapidly growing to us of capital markets and maybe try

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of bring them up. And he talked about

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the problem that India has because most people down their

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>own gold, so they keep it as jewelry and they

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>keep their wealth in that gold. And he talked about

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>in a roundabout way where basically India should sort of

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>make that illegal because they need all that wealth in

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the system, right, So that's kind of the point that

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>you're making. They want that money in the pension and

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>then they want to probably continue to raise that pension

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>age because they need that money to stay in there.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what Fink was saying. He's like, no, no,

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we need all that gold to go into the system

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>so we can have it. And he even did talk

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about the age at which you could withdraw it, but

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>even more specifically what he talked about was the way,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>meaning the schedule, the time, how much you could withdraw

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>at a certain time, because again, they want the money,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, with governments going broke, I mean, they're

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just going to be coming for everything.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>We just have to sort of expect that.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>And sadly, this is why I bring it up, and

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a cautionary tale because Australia is a test net

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the world when it comes to this.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>If there's very little pushback in Australia, then other governments

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>will look at that and think, well, the Australians did

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 2>knock up about it, why don't we test it, And

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 2>so it will just proliferate amongst those G seven countries

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 2>that you talk of.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just went to Australia for the first time.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I was down there just a couple months ago, and

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I grew up, you know whatever, watching Crocodile than the

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know Stever, when I just had this vision

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of these these Australians being these rugged and burly kind

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of kind of people, like that's not a knife, this

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is a knife, right, or the Foster's like this is

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>a beer or whatever it.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Is, right.

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, sure seems like the Australians are pushovers these days.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Sadly, I hate to say that, right.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 3>It all started when he gave up your guns.

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep, and I think there was it was an opportunity

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>time for the government to have that gun buy back

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and seizure of the guns, and Australia hasn't really pushed

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>back on that whatsoever. Gun liscense is very different to

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>what it is in the US. The US it is

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>a right. In Australia it's a privilege that the government

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>bestows on you if you meet the certain hurdles. You

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 2>need to go through all sorts of licensing and training

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 2>in order to get that. There are some exemptions for

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>farmers and the like who need that for maintenance of property.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's been a it's a very different culture in

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Australia to America, and I think there has been a

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>whittling away of that oka Australian who pushes back on

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>authority to say, hey, we don't want to deal with that,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>leave us alone, and probably highlighted by the reaction the

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 2>behavior around the vaccine mandates and lockdowns that we went through,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 2>which I think we're probably globally the most raconian out

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of anywhere. And I live in New South Wales or Sydney,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>south of US as Victoria which had arguably the world's

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>long well it did have the world's longest lockdown, and

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>so I had a lot of friends down there who know,

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>just walking in the street, they were stopped the police

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>decide what are you doing? Where are you going? You're

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>not allowed to be out and you've got to go home.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>It's like I'm walking the adult like. There was some

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I think some serious concerns rised, and I think we're

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 2>very quick to memory haul that and not not for

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>attention to it, Forget it never happened, and move on

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 2>until the next one.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Run sidetracked into this little conversation. But just for a minute,

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll get back to the generational wealth question I want

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to get to. But what's going on in Venezuela right now?

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is a perfect example of where things eventually

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>devolve too, right, and so in Venezuela, Now, did Maduro

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>win the election? Is was there some sort of a

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>coup that's going on? Like what's going on down there?

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, without getting into the facts, because we

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know the facts, but we do know that's facts.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Is like you have the.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Military opening fire on innocent civilians. We do know that

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a fact. Now we don't know the circumstances behind that.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And I saw I think I retweeted. I think it

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was Spike Cohen said that socialism is one of the

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>things that you can vote your way into, but you

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>got to shoot your way out.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Of strying's done. How many guns left? That's a problem

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>for ye try Yeah, in America, not so much.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, although Kamala Harris is already talking about trying to

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>change that as soon as you can, so we'll see.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>How that goes.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, let's get back to the top of a hand here.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So high net worth individuals they think more about preserving

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>wealth than acquiring because they've already made it, so how

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>do we keep it? They think about what types of

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>assets they could buy that they could keep that, taxes

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>being one thing that they have to navigate, but in

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>regards to preserving that wealth, and then thinking about that

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>wealth generationally. And as I said, this is something I've

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>been thinking a lot about because at the stage I'm

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at with my kids, I just went through setting up

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>trust structures. We went new trust structures and building like

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>family constitutions so that there's like a set of rules

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like a US Constitution around that wealth as it goes

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>down generationally. So that's sort of where my head's been.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And I've been sort of battling some people on Twitter

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's this whole seemingly movement or maybe it's just

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.119
<v Speaker 1>caught my attention of people. A lot of prominent bitcoinners,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>even who outright think it's bad to leave wealth for

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>your kids.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>They're entitled to their own opinions.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about it?

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I have, and I completely disagree with it. You know,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I look at my responsibility to my family, to my legacy,

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>not only to my children, but to know my lineage.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I need to honor their lineage and the sacrifices that

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>they've made to be as successful as I can be,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and then to ensure that not only AREM a success,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>but my children are success. And sadly, there's no real

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 2>other benchmark in society that we have that's universally accepted

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 2>other than how wealthy you are. It's a school board

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that everyone understands what the school board is. There's no

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>intangible around it. It's a number that you can look at.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the only objective measure we have of success.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not the only way to define success, but it's

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the universally accepted way of that.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I look at that and think, why would you want

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 2>to rob your children of the ability to leverage that

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>and further the legacy of everyone who's come before you,

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 2>And you think about all of the sacrifices that you

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 2>make as a bitcoiner. I personally look at my children,

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 2>I think I want them to go on and be

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>productive parts of society. And I think if they've got capital,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and I think it will be an indictment on myself

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and my skills as a parent if they don't make

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>a contribution to society. I want them to go on

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and do great things. And having access and access to

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>resources enables them to further the family legacy into the

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 2>future and become meaningful contributors to society.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I think of it.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two different ways. I think, you know,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>because we went into you know, from an equity based

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>system to a debt based monetary system sort of officially

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy one, severing the tays to God. In

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a debt based minetary system, we're basically stealing value from

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the future, yes, And so we're literally stealing value from

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>our you know, for our kids and grandkids, et cetera.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's like the direction of the world.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>But as a bitcoiner, I think about flipping that and like,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>our money should buy us more goods and services in

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the future, and we should be building value into the future,

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not stealing from it. And I've been sort of using

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>this analogy and this way to look at it as

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>like a blockchain where it's like, my life is proof

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of work, and I'm building a block and I want

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>my kids to be able to attach their block onto

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>my block, and my grandkids to attach the block onto

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a block, and to continue to build this like blockchain

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of life, and like why wouldn't we push value into

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the future as opposed to stealing it from the future.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I could see how people would say it's bad

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>for kids. I suppose if you raise bad kids. But

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that's more of you, not a symptom of the money, right, I.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Agree, And this is where money. You know, people say

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 2>money changes you. I don't think it does.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 3>It just.

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Exemplifies and expands on what your true nature is. If

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>you're a bad person, if you've got resources, you're going

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to do really bad things. If you're a good person

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 2>and want to make contributions and build out and help society,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 2>having more resources allows you to do that. I think

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>it's an internal struggle that's projected on to other people.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>It's always an internal struggle. And this is where for me,

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 2>you want to provide optionality, whether it's to your children,

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 2>to your clients, to anyone around you. Providing options and

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 2>then giving others the choice to make I want to

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>be in a position that they've got all the resources

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that they could ever possibly want, and then if they

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 2>decide that they want to make a contribution, their best

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 2>way to contribute to societies to make donations and give

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 2>the money away, then so be it. And to me,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and I was just talking about this with a group

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of tax attorneys across the country yesterday, that to me,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin represents the best generational asset to pass on because

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 2>not only is it going to be the lastest longing, sorry,

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the longest lasting, it's going to be the best performing.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 2>But there's a very curious thing that you can do

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 2>with bitcoin that you can do with no other asset,

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 2>and that is to your point about being able to

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 2>put assets into the future. You can timelock assets for

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>different generations, and so you can timelock bitcoin for different generations.

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's something I spend a lot of time thinking about.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 3>That. You might not.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Want your children to benefit from your bitcoin or all

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 2>of your bitcoin, and you want to leave bitcoin in

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 2>for further generations, out for your grandchildren or great grandchildren,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 2>great great great great grandchildren. All of a sudden, you

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>can timelock a portion of this asset today that's going

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>to continually grow into the future. That can only be

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 2>accessed to a future point in time, which is to

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 2>your point about the debt robbing from the future to

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 2>take now, that is the complete inverse to that. And

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 2>this is where I think Dave Bailey came up with

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 2>an innovative solution to pay off the US national debt

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>by buying a trillion dollars worth of bitcoin, timelocking it

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>for thirty or fifty years, and then have that as

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a way to pay off what's currently currently here.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Now, imagine the dump on the market in twenty or

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty years what that would look like though, So you

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just made a couple of big claims. So you said

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that big onin is the longest lasting, it's the best performing,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the ability to time lock it.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go through that.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So you said it's the longest lasting. So you talk

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about high neworth individuals thinking about saving their money in

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>bonds or real estate or businesses or whatever. You said,

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is the longest lasting. Break that down for us.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>It's ironic given it's only fifteen years old, right, and

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 2>that comes from years of studying this and you're probably

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of the same mind that you know, the more time

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>you spend looking at an asset or an investment, the

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 2>worse it gets. You find holes in it. Oh, this

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 2>could go wrong, that could go wrong. What have you.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I've spent close to twenty thousand hours now staring at

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin trying to poke holes in it, understand what I

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>don't understand, and I'm still an amateur even after that time.

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But from what I can see, I can't find any

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>holes with it. It gets better every time I look

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 2>at it. And this is where it's going to be

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 2>the longest lasting asset that we've got on many different layers. Firstly,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll outlast just about everything else in the world,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 2>whether it's stocks, bonds, properties, governments, society as a whole.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 2>That is the substrate of our structure moving forward. It's

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 2>just that that information isn't evenly distributed, so not too

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 2>many people understand that. If they did, we'd have bitcoin

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>in the millions or billions of dollars per value. When

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I talk about bitcoin being the longest lasting, all you

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>have to do is buy it and hold it, and

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>if you self custody it, that can last essentially for

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 2>ten hundred thousand years into the future, however long society

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>is going to last. However, I'm very doubtful that you

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 2>can achieve that same outcome with property or bonds or shares.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>You look at the average length of a company across

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 2>our countries, and if you include startups, the average length

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of the company would be about five years. No, most

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 2>businesses fail within five years. Now, if you're fortunate enough

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>to own a big company like one of the big

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>banks or insurance companies, they may be going now for

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 2>one hundred hundred and fifty years, but they are you know,

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the pointy point zero zero one of a percent of

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 2>companies that have ever been established. So do I have

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the skills to figure out what companies are going to

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 2>be around at that point in time in the future.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not. And this is where the whole idea of

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>index investing, which I disagree with, but it's been a

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>very palatable format for people to invest in. This is

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>why people invest in passive index funds because they don't

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 2>have to pick the winners. They just have to pick

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the exposure to whatever the market is going to be

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 2>at that point in time. Now, that's a great way

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>for preserving wealth, but you're not going to outperform anything,

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>You're just going to keep it stagnant, and over time

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 2>your wealth is going to deteriorate relative to the winners

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>who pick the best assets. So I look at that

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and think that's not going to make your wealth last long.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is where to me, bitcoin is a complete

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>anomaly because I believe bitcoin is our first risk free asset.

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not our volatility free asset. And there's a key

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 2>distinction between that. But if you're thinking in generational terms,

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 2>you can buy bitcoin and know that, Okay, you can

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>deal with a bad two or three years because you

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>know we're planning for thirty fifty eighty, one hundred, two

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>hundred years. In fact, we've got one client who's planning

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>for trying to have a two hundred year plan for

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>his legacy, and it revolves around his business and bitcoin

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>backing it and funding his vision for the future. Now,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>no other asset would I have confidence in to fund

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>a two hundred year plan With bitcoin, I certainly believe it.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Let's dig into that a little bit.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's the longest lasting Like obviously a house is

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to last that long. I mean, there

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are some that are a few several hundre years old,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that they have to be rebuilt and whatnot rate. So

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>obviously a car, you know, businesses most likely are not

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that long.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 3>So I get that.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>However, does that assume and that means that it's an

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>asset that you could just buy it and never touch

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it again for twnity years Because I could just sell

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>one property for another, I could rehab the property, I

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>could sell this business buy a different business, So I

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>could manage that well through real estate and businesses. But

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is more like a hands.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Off approach completely.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 3>And what I mean is that a big deal?

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 2>No? I think it's a huge deal because every time

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you transact, you're subjecting yourself to a number of different things. Firstly,

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 2>your personal judgment to outperform the market, that you're going

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to improve the capital allocation. Secondly, and a big one

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 2>is typically there's a tax consequence for every transaction that

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 2>you make, and if you're making multiple transactions in that

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>two hundred year period, you're going to be taxed multiple times.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at say, typical tax regime in

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 2>the US on capital gains would be circa thirty percent.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Now if you do that four times in one hundred years.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>That's only one transaction every fifty years, you're going to

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 2>end up with less than forty percent of the original

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 2>capital that you had.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's well, I mean, assuming the capital doesn't grow, yes,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but let's look.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 2>At it in bitcoin terms. If you bought and solid

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin four times and incurred that thirty percent fight four times,

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you'd have less than forty percent of the original bitcoin

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 2>that you started with.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You can think of that tax almost as volatility, right,

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So when when an asset draws down by thirty percent,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it has to make a sixty percent just to get

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>back to even So if you make that transaction, thirty

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>percent goes to taxes, Now that next transaction has to

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>go up by at least sixty percent just to get

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you back to where you were. Right. So that's sort

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of how that that volatility, if you want to call

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it that of the tax taxation will really draw down

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on your long term gains correct plus to your point,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I did like that, I mean, then that draws on

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>your own judgment. And so when you're thinking about two

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred years now, you're depending on the judgment of all

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>those errors down the line that they're going to make

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>good judgment, which is probably probably pretty hard to view. Okay,

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's the longest lasting meaning. I can set it

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and forget it. I'm not subject to all the different transactions,

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the subjection of people's interpretation of markets at that time

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatever. Then you said it's the best performing asset.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Now we certainly know factually it has been the best

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>performing asset in the world. Some people still think it's

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a magic Internet money. You said that pretty matter of factly.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So why do you think it's going to be continue

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the best performing asset in the world.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>On the most basic of premises, I believe in humanity,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and I think we will evolve, not to evolve. If

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 2>you believe that we are going to improve and our

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 2>lives are going to get better, then Bitcoin is going

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>to fundamentally accrue more value and grow into the future.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 2>If I look at all of the avenues of capital

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 2>and the places of capital where they are stored, and

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>how they move, how they are used, Bitcoin is an

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>insignificant market in relative terms to the bond market, stock market,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 2>property market. Look at with a deep understanding across all

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 2>of those asset classes and how that compares to bitcoin,

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and it will be a one way valve, there'll be

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 2>a drain of capital from each of those large assets

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 2>into bitcoin. And so what does that do at a

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>time when Bitcoin is becoming more and more scarce, so

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 2>there's less and less coins on exchange. Bitcoin will as

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 2>the market cap grows, we'll be able to access bigger

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and bigger capital pools. So you have larger capital pools

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to find less bitcoin. And I look at this

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.719
<v Speaker 2>and think, this capital appreciation in bitcoin hasn't yet started.

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people think, oh, well, it's been the

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>best over the last fifteen years, it can't go any further,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 2>but they fail to understand that there's a host of

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 2>reasons why this little asset cooled bitcoin that is inconsequential

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>in global terms, can take on an infinite infinite amount

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of capital. And to me, I look at the future

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>and think, there's no other asset that I want to

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 2>be holding other than bitcoin. If you want to capture

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that upside and bring this full circle to one of

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the points you made earlier, this is really one of

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the It's a real dichotomy because you have what people

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 2>think is a volatile asset, which is actually a risk

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 2>free asset when you understand it and it's the best

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>performing asset that you want to put in a portfolio

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 2>that is going to preserve your wealth. So a lot

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>of those things just do not marry up to what

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you would think is a sensible investment decision. And this

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 2>is where when people look at it without studying, I

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 2>think they suffer cognitive dissonance because a lot of those

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>things can't be true at the same time, and bitcoin

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 2>is the first time that those things are true.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a second, just real quick, to

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just give you a reminder. The reminder is take control

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of your bitcoin. Look, for the first time in history,

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a way to preserve our property, take custody

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of our property and protect it with no cost. You

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>can't do that with gold, you can't do it with

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>your stocks, and so we can do with bitcoin.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 3>And you should.

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Now don't store it on an app on your phone

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that can get half. What you want to do is

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>use a hardware device something like this treasure right here.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So basically your private key sits here. When you want

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to do a transaction, you plug it into your computer,

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sign the transaction. When you're done, you unplug it and

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>put it back into your safe. I've used Treasure for now,

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know six seven years, because I think it's

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the easiest one to use. I've tried, I think pretty

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>much all of them. And it's also open source so

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you can trust the code. And again it's easy. Why easy,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Because if it's too complex, it makes me think of

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>how many potential holes and risk there could be, not

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just in the device itself, but even in my own

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to secure it. So I want something fast, I

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>want something easy. I don't want something safe. That's why

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I use Treasure. And if you don't use Treasure, use something.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Please get your bitcoin off the exchange, use a hardware

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>device to secure your private key, and if you like Treasure,

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>check out the link down below. What do you think

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about somebody like Larry Fink who went on TV a

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago and said, hey, I I think

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin's a legit asset. Everyone should take another look

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at it for example, right, and we've seen many examples

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. Trump was just speaking about bitcoin and the

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>importance of bitcoin after a couple of years ago, seeing

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that he thought it was a scam and whatever rate

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are those people just changing their mind to jump on

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the bandwagon providing a lip service. Does Larry Fink, you know,

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to pump up his own book or do

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you think it's possible that people can actually do research

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and change their owner.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Larry has found something. I think Larry is

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 2>sincere in the interviews that you're referring to. I think

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 2>he has done an enormous amount of work that as

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>bitcoiners were not privy to, and I think he's got

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a huge amount like a huge team around him with

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 2>really smart people who are giving him arguably the best information.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Now Wall Street are full of really smart guys. But

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 2>if you look at Larry Fink's genesis story, you realize

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>that he wanted to token ask the world back in

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty and it started with residential mortgage backed securities.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Now I look at the work that he's doing with

0:31:55.360 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the ETF and there's an opportunity for Larry to, I believe,

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 2>create the world's greatest investment product, which he tried to

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 2>do with the residential mortgage backed securities. That was an

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>attempt to tokenize real estate or real estate globally. That

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 2>led to a catastrophic failure in the GFC because, as

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you and the prelude to that was you had the

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 2>investment banks wanting to monetize that product upfront and then

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>export the risk to main street and pension funds globally. Sadly,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>this led to a credit boom, This led to the GFC.

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 2>But what happened with that credit boom and GFC was

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 2>there was an insatiable demand from Wall Street to create

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>more products of that mortgage back security then on sell it, however,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and that meant that the main street lenders had to

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>go out the risk curve to find poorer and poorer

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 2>quality borrowers to fulfill that need. And this is what

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>led to the ninja lines and no income, no job

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 2>applicant line fabulous. We loved it until we didn't. And

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>this is the problem is that Wall Street monetized it

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and took all the profits and no risk, and they

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>exported all the risk. And then when the poor retail

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 2>borrower who couldn't afford a million dollar mortgage on the

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>salary of someone stacking shells led to the underpinning of

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and the cascading of values across the world. Now I

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 2>look at that and I think what happens if we

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 2>get a principal protected note and Larry starts issuing that

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 2>where he marries up a five year US treasury with bitcoin,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and so you get a capital guaranteed note where they

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 2>issue a ten billion dollar note. Eight billion goes into

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 2>a five year treasury. That five year treasury grows from

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 2>eight billion to ten billion in the five years, and

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 2>then they get to then invest two billion dollars into bitcoin.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>And that way, if you put in a million dollars,

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the worst result you can achieve in five years is

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>five is your million dollars back. But this gives an

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for Larry to effectively tokenize the world, and this

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is ultimately what he wants, and he can achieve that

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 2>with US backed US government BACKDT and coupling that to Bitcoin,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 2>both of which are risk free. And then that takes

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 2>all of the risk away from retail, retail investors, retail

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 2>moms and dads, and it puts it firmly and squarely

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 2>on the shoulders of the two risk free assets in

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the world that we've got, which is US government treasuries

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and bitcoin.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a small business owner, are you buried in all

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>types of work keeping you from the real thing that

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>makes you money. Well, that's where just works comes in.

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>They're the all in one platform that supports small business growth.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>You can get all.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Their tools that help with benefits like payroll and HR

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and compliance with transparent pricing. Now they help you hire

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>top talent internationally, internew markets, quickly scale international operations without

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the workload, and for every how.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Do I do it? Question?

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You can reach out to their expert staff from sole

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>proprietor or.

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 3>A team of twenty.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Just Works empowers all kinds of small businesses with real

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>human support. So visit justwors dot com slash podcast to

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and joined the thousands of small businesses that trust just

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Works to take care of payroll, benefits, compliance and more.

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Again that's Justworks dot com slash podcast.

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean when I listened to Larry Fink, he doesn't

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>just say, oh I like it, you should buy it.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>He gives the reasons, like the mechanisms, the supply demand mechanisms,

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>of why it makes sense, of what it protects you from,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of why it goes up. And so to me, that

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gives me like a level I think he shows demonstrates

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that he has a level of understanding about it, not

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just lip service. I think it's crazy for people to

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 1>think that you just can't change your mind. I mean,

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the smartest people in the world change their mind, probably

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the most right. I think a sign of intelligence is

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>how quickly you can change your mind based off of

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 1>new information that you've received.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 3>So it.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>It never ceases to amaze me. And I suppose this

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is an example of how closed minded some people are.

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, but he said that five years ago.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think credit to Larry. He has done a

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 2>great job in changing tackle that. I think it's very difficult.

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 2>One of the touring points he most recently made where

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I genuinely feel like he understands the problem. I haven't

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 2>heard him talking about debasement of the dollar now. He

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 2>talked about the devisement of the dollar in America. He

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 2>talked about the de basement of dollars around the world.

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 2>He clearly understands the problem of the money printing and

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 2>how bitcoin solves it. So hats off to Larry, like

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the smartest people in the world and arguably

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the greatest salesman.

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Now getting back to the question that kind of that

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>led into this, which was I was just asking sort

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>of you had made a statement that it's the best

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>performing asset, and so again I said it's the best.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 1>It has been the best performing. Let's think about the

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>forward projection of this. Michael Saylor laid out some math

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 1>which we're going to link to Michael Sailor's interview down

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the presentation down below at the Bitcoin Conference in twenty

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. It's certainly worth a watch. And Michael Saylor

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of laid out this twenty one year projection and

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he gave sort of three price models bear, bear, medium,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and bowl or whatever it was.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was pretty good.

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Certainly might be conservative on the barecase over aggressive on

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the ballcase. I don't know, you think maybe the math

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit off. Maybe where do you

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think the math is when you're looking at the projection?

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is where a lot of people get things wrong. Right, So,

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're investing your money, like I always tell people, like,

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you need to know what you're expecting when you get

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in right, Where do.

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 3>I think it can go over what time frame? What

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 3>are my risks? You have a plan for that.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you're advising your high net worth individuals on

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>buying bitcoin, where do you lay that out? How do

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>you project that out?

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 2>I think it comes down to a whiting to start with.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So you need to understand what the risk profile is,

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 2>to understand what they can and can't sleep with. So

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I urge any client to invest however much they can

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 2>invest without losing any sleep. Now, I typically start that

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 2>conversation at ten percent. For families, that's an inconsequential amount

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>of wealth. It's embarrassing if they lose it, but it

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 2>doesn't change anything in their life. It doesn't change where

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 2>the holiday, where the kids go to school, where they live.

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Nothing changes now.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Just real quick.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So ten percent, Now, I could put one hundred percent

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of my wealth in and have a ten percent stop loss.

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>It's only risking ten percent. Or I could put ten

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>percent of my wealth in and have a zero percent

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>stop loss. So I'm just curious on that because the

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>chance of Big one going to zero is highly unlikely.

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not even probable, right, It could draw

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>down fifty or seventy five percent. So if they put

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent in lost half of that, that's.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Kind of inconsequential.

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 2>I agree, And this is where it's a long game

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and people take a long time to understand it. Because

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 2>as simple as it is, twenty one million and that's

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 2>all I really need to understand. There are so many

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>other factors that they need to understand in order to

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 2>get comfortable with putting in additional capital. We like clients

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to hold the underlying because we think that's going to

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 2>create the greatest optionality moving forward. And we try and

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 2>veer away from ETFs and the rest of it, because

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 2>if you want maximum optionality, you want to hold the underlying. Now,

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>a ten percent allocation drops fifty percent. I always tell

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 2>my clients, now, whatever you put in and you make

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 2>that initial purchase, just be sure to understand that this

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 2>could drop fifty percent tomorrow, and then I'm going to

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 2>come back and ask you for another ten percent to

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 2>put in the next day when it's dropped fifty percent,

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>so we can dollar cost average into it now on

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 2>a new investment. I haven't met a client yet who says,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 2>you know what, that's a great idea, here's my money,

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 2>let's do it. It takes a long time. It's takes

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of education to get a client comfortable with

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 2>a serious allocation. By serious, I mean anything over five percent.

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really good point that I'll just hit

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on for a second. I want to get back to

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the price predictions. But just hit on that for a second,

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>which is for these high net worth individuals, family offices

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and institutions to make a move, it doesn't happen quickly. Yeah,

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>there's big numbers, there's a lot of information they have

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to take in, there's a lot of education they have

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>to overcome, and a lot of times there's a lot

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of decision makers that have to be involved in this, right,

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to hit that point. Wait, because

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, with what's happened in the ETFs and black Rock,

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know now President's talking about it, a lot

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of questions might be we'll WHI aren't more people buying then,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and I would say they are, or more specifically, they're

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>getting ready to correct. Just as an antidotal piece of information.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one, I went and spent the year

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in Puerto Rico. In Puerto Rico sort of this Galt's gulch,

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>where like all the rich people are moving over there, right,

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and my friends over there were some of the some

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>very very I'm not going to name drop them, but

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>very very influential, like hedge fund managers and like very

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:39.439
<v Speaker 1>very established investors, you know, billion dollar funds, et cetera.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>One of my probably best friends over there at the time.

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>He he doesn't believe in bitcoin.

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 3>He's a trader.

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a very well known name, super brilliant, like amazingly brilliant.

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And he bought bitcoin at like eighteen thousand in the fund,

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sold it at like forty five thousand, like crushed it

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for his fund, right, But he just is like, no,

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I just whatever, Like I kind of like Monaro makes

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.839
<v Speaker 1>sense because it's private, but like not Bitcoin whatever. He's

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>like to me, it's just a trading toy. That's always

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>been his approach to it. That being said, about a

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>month ago I talked to him and he's been out

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>since it was there in the forty five forty eight

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand range or whatever. About a month ago he said,

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is now the single largest position my fund has.

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Amazing And I said why.

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's not because all of a sudden he believes

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in it. He's a trader, he said. If you knew

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of billionaires that have called me and asked

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>me how they can get into this and secure it

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>for a long period of time because of the craziness

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in the world, you would understand

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>why I'm so bullish, and so I just say that

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 1>story just to say, like, we do have all these

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>people that are trying to get in to the point

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're making. Right, there's a lot of education have

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to overcome. It's coming. Would you say that's fair? Is

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of what you've seen in your own experience?

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And this is the only asset that is ex legal,

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's outside of the purview all the US government.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 2>It's beyond they touch. It's about the only thing that

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 2>can be other than physical gold and physical goal. We

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 2>all now has its on constraints.

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's get back to the price prediction. So

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Saylor sort of laid out this twenty one year

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>plan by twenty forty five, and it would have a

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>base case of thirteen million or sorry, let's start with

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a barecase of three million dollars per bitcoin, a base

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.399
<v Speaker 1>case of thirteen million dollars per bitcoin, and a bowl

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>case of forty nine million dollars per bitcoin. I thought,

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was thoughtful. He said that right now

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>currently bitcoins had a compoundent and a growth rate of

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 1>about one fifty but right now we're having about a

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent ar and he says, you know this,

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this decelerates fifty to forty five, thirty whatever and finally

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>stabilizes around twenty, which is about double what the S

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred is. Now, you've mentioned the scarcity

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>many times. Double the S and P five hundred like

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that seems super ultra conservative to me. But you think

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of those numbers are off just a little.

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think we all love Michael Saylor. I think

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 2>he's Bitcoin's greatest proponent.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 3>We're all lane, none of us know the future. We

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 2>That's true, But just if you look at his work

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 2>in there, one of his final comments in that speech was,

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 2>we have a thousand X from here now. The price

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 2>at sixty five thousand dollars on the day, give or take,

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 2>would mean where we've got a sixty five million dollar

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin coming, not a forty nine. So I think Michael

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.919
<v Speaker 2>would prefer to surprise to the upside as opposed to

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 2>put a big number out there. Not that forty nine

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 2>is not a big number. But I think there's a

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 2>host of things that I disagree with fundamentally there. And

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 2>if I look at this, and I think probably the

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 2>lynch pin for something going substantially higher than what he

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.280
<v Speaker 2>lays out is the fact that we haven't had someone

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 2>with a money printer being able to buy bitcoin yet,

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 2>no one has done that. When we have someone do that,

0:43:55.360 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 2>then that can dramatically shift that playing field for to

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the significant upside. When the US Federal Reserve decides to

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>buy some and can have the ability to hold their

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 2>finger down on the money printer, they can buy a

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 2>limitless amount and set the floor at ten million, one

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred million, whatever they want, and now all of a sudden,

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 2>we're in a completely new paradigm. So for me, it's

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 2>very difficult to argue with what Michael says, and I

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 2>think all of it's consistent and congruent thinking that I

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 2>agree with. The only X factor that changes it to

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the upside, not the downside, is a government with a

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 2>money printer that gets involved and says we're going to

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 2>set the floor.

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, I think that is maybe a little

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>bit baked into the cake in a sense, because you're

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's projected to capture seven percent of the

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>world's assets, and so if you think about it, I mean, really,

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we have this amount of assets, so I like to

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>think I laid out a case that there's like three

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>ways I would think about valueing bitcoin in the future.

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So like the venture capital method. So like uber told

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>took money from taxis and limos and vans, So if

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I got five percent from each of those, it's worth this, right,

0:44:57.880 --> 0:44:59.879
<v Speaker 1>And so then we can look at the total value

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin could be pulling from. So Michael Sailor laid out

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>with nine hundred trillion dollars in assets effectively, so we

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>get seven percent of that for example, Right, I think

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>if if a sovereign were to buy it, it would

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:17.919
<v Speaker 1>just get to that percentage of global assets faster. Right,

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I want to get back to that because of

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what Trump's announcement was. But I also think about it

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of not just if a government were

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to buy it, but the rate of debasement that we're

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>facing in the future. So Michael Howell, in my opinion,

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>probably the best in mapping out global liquidity flows. And

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just looking at what the FED balance

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sheet is, but the major central banks of the world.

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And you can see that the S and P five

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred is basically moving in lockstep with the global liquidity. Yes,

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so about twelve percent so it looks on paper you're

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>going up with your purchasing powers and growing. But bitcoin,

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>so gold has a one point four to nine sensitivity ratio.

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So for every ten percent in liquidity, gold goes up

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>by four teen percent a little bit better. But bitcoin

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>has an eight point nine times since to be so

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for every ten percent in liquidy, biccong goes up by

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent. So you could just look at to the point,

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess if the central banks use debt,

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>but that expansion of the monetary base, and all we

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have to do is look at the projections by the

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>government In the US, the Congressional Budget Office CBO tells

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>us what it's going to be by twenty fifty, right,

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and so that's one way to look at it. So

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not only could it capture seven percent of the world's assets,

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>but today they're at nine hundred trillion. Those assets could

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>be one point four quadrillion by the time it gets

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>set seven percent, and that's where it's probably undershot to

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the downside.

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 2>That's it. And this is where I look at things

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a little differently, in that if we look at the ultrawealthy,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 2>we look at Alon, we look at Jeff Bezos. They

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 2>store their wealth in the companies that they own because

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>they've got the most control over it. I believe that

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:57.879
<v Speaker 2>that has the most significant upside. They're not ninety nine

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 2>percent of their wealth would be stored in these assets

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 2>that they've built from the ground up. They're not spending

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent of their wealth perannum they would be

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 2>spending I would have thought zero point one of a

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 2>percent of the wealth parannum. That seems like a pretty

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 2>fair assessment what I look at. And this is where

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I think bitcoin completely redefines this is this gives everyone

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 2>on Earth. It democratizes assets, and it gives everyone the

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 2>ability to be a Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk and

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.800
<v Speaker 2>owned Tesla and Amazon themselves. It gives them a monetary

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 2>premium into the future that has no comparison in relative

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.399
<v Speaker 2>terms from an investment perspective. And when you look at

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 2>that and understand that price is determined at the margin,

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:44.360
<v Speaker 2>we can have so much more capital stored in bitcoin.

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.839
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be in percentage terms, we could see

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine percent of the world's wealth stored in bitcoin

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and only one percent is for real world assets. Because

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 2>people are going to want to have that premium of

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 2>being able to move their value forward into the future

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 2>for future person. So I'm probably the most bullish person

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to that because I understand the value

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of optionality into the future. And this is where bitcoin

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 2>is the only asset that has that fight chuck.

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Now, what's interesting with bitcoin is it started in

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the shadowy shadow supercoder world or whatever and sort of

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of spread to the people, right, a decentralized, bottom

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up approach, and so it was people, people people, and

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.839
<v Speaker 1>eventually it got to a government in l Salvador. But

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's like probably still the bottom of the government level. Right.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>They're one of the poorest countries in the world. We're

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the most dangerous county in the world. Now one of

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the safest. They're turning around. But to that perspective, kind

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of a bottom up phenomenon.

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and Bukeley, President Bukeley.

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>From L Salvador, has been around talking to a bunch

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of other government leaders, but other small government leaders about

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>doing something like this, and so again a bottom up approach.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I always thought the US would be sort of the

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>last move advantage out of any country because of they

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have the dollar, they have the most to lose. So

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to see two two of three presidential candidates come out

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and announced that they would have a strategic reserve, trying

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to bring it kind of on par with gold as

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>well as even if neither of them win. We also

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have Senator Loomis who put together a bill to do that.

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems that that switches from a bottom approach to

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a top down approach. I mean, back to game theory.

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>If the US announces this, then I think all the

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 1>other nations are sort of forced to react to that.

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Currently in the betting markets, Trump is favored to win

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>by fifty six percent, and if he wins, I think

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he would probably do it, Like why wouldn't he?

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's basically.

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Giving us, at this point, per the betting markets, at

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty six percent, odds that the US will adopt this

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and other nations will be forced to I guess that's

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the way I read it, And I'm curious what your

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>take is on that specifically, because we haven't really seen

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the price of bitcoin pump based off of that news.

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there is famal indecision in the USA voters

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 2>mind than what the betting markets predict. I think Kamala

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris is a much bigger threat than people are

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 2>making out. I think people are very dismissive of her,

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:13.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Republicans have got a huge amount

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 2>of work to do if they want to win this.

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not a lay down like they know well, they'll

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 2>have you believe that said, this puts an enormous amount

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:25.879
<v Speaker 2>of pressure on the rest of the world that they

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 2>need to act really, really quickly, and we could be

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 2>much closer to the suddenly part of the gradually then

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 2>suddenly than we realize because you have two of the

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 2>three presidential candidates making promises. I thought Robert F. Kennedy

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely brilliant. He showed a deep command and understanding

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin on a very deep level, and had some

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 2>great policies.

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 3>He really had a good script writer for.

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure, phenomenal yes, and he delivered it well. Trump, on

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, he made a promise that that's all

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 2>he needed to make. He said, Hey, I'm going to

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 2>make sure we don't sell the bitcoin, and what's ironic,

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 2>three days later US government sells thirty thousand bitcoin or

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever they've sold they've put to market. I want to

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 2>see a competition between the Dems and the Republicans, who

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 2>are the only two feasible candidates, and I want to

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 2>see them fight for bitcoin. I want to see who

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 2>can put together the most outrageous policy. But to me,

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.760
<v Speaker 2>what we saw in Nashville was enough to say, Okay, now,

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 2>anyone dismissing bitcoin as that magic Internet money sort of

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 2>really needs to have a look, go away, reassess, and

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:32.320
<v Speaker 2>realize that where at this we're standing at the forefront

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>of global adoption on a government level.

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one thing about these types of things,

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when they tease a new tax thing and then it

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes away. They sort of are like seeding

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the future almost, if you will rate decensitazos to the future.

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And so even if this doesn't go through right now,

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:52.239
<v Speaker 1>it's the direction in which we're going. And so if

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you're a long term thinker, you should certainly be paying

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 1>attention to these these signals right there. They're they're there,

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>we're going in this direction. And I would imagine that

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>even if Kamala wins, and even if the US doesn't

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>go this direction now, other nations are probably paying attention

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to go, well, maybe we should try to front run that,

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>would you say?

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.439
<v Speaker 2>So, it's the only logical thing to do. Yeah, there's

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>only one way to Like, you can't win by not playing.

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 2>You have to ender the field and you have to

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 2>stop playing otherwise you completely lose. So I look at

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 2>this and I think, effectively you've been gifted by the

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 2>US government or their proxies in RFK, Junior and Trump

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 2>an intent of what they are going to do. Yeah,

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 2>if I was any other country with a money printer,

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the finger would be on the button now and I

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 2>would be sating whatever.

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>It is just a money printer though, right so right

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>now we have like the rise of the bricks, and

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the bricks are deciding to recycle their profits their reserves

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>not in back into US treasuries, but instead of gold. Yeah,

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you got to save it something. And so like, well,

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't trust US treasury Moore, after you've took in

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Russia's or whatever, like you're debasing, We're not going to

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:56.360
<v Speaker 1>do that.

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 3>What is by gold?

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not to say a money printer, but

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like where do they say, and so they could certainly

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do that into bitcoin. Let's sort of transition this and

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who advises hang that worth individuals and families

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.399
<v Speaker 1>on how to get into this, just how can we

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>generally advise the arden. So Michael Sailor lead out sort

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of what do you call it? A normy strategy, a

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, a bitcoin maximalist strategy, and a double and

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 1>triple maxi strategy. So what would your normy, maximalist and

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>triple maxi strategies be that you would advise somebody on.

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:33.719
<v Speaker 2>It really comes down to a personal preference. But I

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 2>think you've got to start with an allocation that someone

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 2>is comfortable or willing to lose. Now, this is counterintuitive,

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 2>but people need to learn, and Bitcoin's made around for

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years. The belief that people will voluntarily learn about

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:53.399
<v Speaker 2>this new asset class and spend one hundred hours going

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 2>down the rabbit hole and figuring things out, I think

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:58.360
<v Speaker 2>is a complete furfee that is not going to happen.

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 2>What I would prefer to do as an advisor is

0:54:01.760 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 2>walk clients to the deep end, tell them to buy

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 2>ten percent, and literally push them in the deep end,

0:54:07.600 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and then ensure that there's a life raft, a stick,

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 2>something to pull them out and make sure that they're

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 2>not going to hurt themselves. Because once they're in the

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:17.799
<v Speaker 2>deep end and they're finding for their lives and trying

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to learn as much about it. They're incentivized now they

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 2>have skin in the game to actually go down that

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 2>rabbit hole and start learning about it. And once they

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 2>learn about it, they're going to apply more capital to it.

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think the more capital you can get someone

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 2>to allocate at the beginning, the bigger they're incentive to learn.

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 2>The faster they learn, the more bitcoin they'll end up having.

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 2>And so I think the saying from GG is the

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:44.319
<v Speaker 2>more you know, the more you buy. Yeah, And so

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in order to get them to that stage, though, you

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 2>just need to effectively create a safe sandbox or a

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 2>safe place for them to invest as much capital as

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:55.759
<v Speaker 2>they can where they're not going to get wrecked. They're

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 2>not going to pay tuition fees, they're not going to

0:54:57.480 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 2>get scammed out of bitcoin, they're not going to have

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:02.800
<v Speaker 2>someone Robert or altatively send it to the wrong address.

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 2>That is something that you can't do with more than

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 2>one or two percent of someone's capital. You can't have

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 2>an a tuition fee payable of more than two percent.

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 2>To me, is even one percent is unacceptable. But it's

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 2>a great lesson for the rest of your capital and

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>investment decisions moving forward. So I think and what we

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 2>try to do is create a safe framework for owning

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the underlying asset so that clients can put in fifty

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of their capital if they was so wish to,

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:33.879
<v Speaker 2>in a safe way that they're never going to lose

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:36.720
<v Speaker 2>their bitcoin, and to me, the preservation of their bitcoin,

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 2>and back to that thing that we talked about at

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the start, that the return of capital, not the return

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 2>on capital, is the most critical component. Having that custody

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 2>self custody down is arguably the most important thing you

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 2>can do when it comes to bitcoin.

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So what are the steps to that preservation of bitcoin

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the custody self custody that they need to be aware of.

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 2>I think you want to make sure that you have

0:55:57.440 --> 0:55:59.879
<v Speaker 2>got that in a way that removes every single point

0:55:59.880 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of failure, So you can't have a single point of

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 2>failure in your custody setup. To me, having a single SEK.

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people talk about, hey, let's buy a

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 2>hardware wallet, put all your bitcoin on that, and it's

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:15.759
<v Speaker 2>not your keys, not your cheese, so to speak to me,

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that represents a single point of failure because what happens

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 2>if something happens to that device, or alternatively, what happens

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.480
<v Speaker 2>if something happens to you, who is going to access that?

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So how we think about preserving that bitcoin is ensuring

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that we remove every single point of failure from everything

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.959
<v Speaker 2>in that client's bitcoin life. So that means ensuring there's

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 2>no single point of failure from themselves, no single point

0:56:37.320 --> 0:56:39.840
<v Speaker 2>of failure from us, no single point of failure from

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 2>their multi seak provider. We want to have multiple options

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 2>for everything in place. And one thing that I've had,

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess a very unique experience of is going through

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 2>three probates now with clients. We've been doing this for

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the family office side of things for the last eight years.

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 2>We've sadly had three of our clients pass away. But

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you and something I'm very proud of

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 2>that with the collaborative security protocol that we implemented for them,

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.840
<v Speaker 2>they were self custing, they had full control, full autonomy.

0:57:10.280 --> 0:57:12.919
<v Speaker 2>But when that day came that they were no longer here,

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 2>there was a seamless transition to their beneficiaries. And this

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 2>is where when you start storing significant amounts of wealth

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 2>in bitcoin, this becomes a significant issue that needs solving.

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:26.200
<v Speaker 2>And so the way we get round. That is to

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 2>have a collaborative security protocol. We hold one off the

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 2>three keys for the client. The client holds a key

0:57:32.840 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 2>and the multi sea provider holds a key, and then

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 2>couple that with advice, training and education around how to

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 2>actually move and use that bitcoin. And one of the

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 2>key pieces that I think is really important for anyone

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 2>with a bitcoin setup is to have an estate planned

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 2>protocol dedicated to the physical recovery if your bitcoin, because

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 2>if you don't have that in place, there's no legal recourse,

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:59.400
<v Speaker 2>there's no mandate, no legal decree that the government can

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 2>mandate the transfer of your bitcoin from the protocol to

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 2>your as So unless you have the pragmatic recovery of

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 2>your bitcoin lockdown, the legal framework for the recovery is

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit point.

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So collaborative custody. So instead of having one single key,

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I have three keys. Two of the three have to

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>be present to sign the transaction to move the bitcoin.

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But in a collaborative custody I don't keep all three keys.

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I only keep one of them, and I use other people,

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for example your company and another company to hold those keys.

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So then if I were to die or lose my key,

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the other two people have their keys correct, or

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if something happens to one of them, hopefully the other

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:40.920
<v Speaker 1>two parties have the keys correct. That's kind of the

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>way it works. And then if I were to die,

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 1>then my trust or whatever my will could then say, hey,

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>these two people need to sign the transaction to move

0:58:49.000 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin.

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Correct. And when you're dealing with large amounts of wealth,

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the beautiful thing about that setup is is that you

0:58:56.480 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 2>can create some very strong asset protection strategies. I know,

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 2>we're in the US and your legal system is out

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 2>of control when it comes to litigation. Having keys in

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 2>different jurisdictions gives you the strongest form of asset protection

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that you could ever have, because all of a sudden,

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 2>now there are multiple different legal jurisdictions that if someone

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 2>was to ever litigate you, they need to go to

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 2>different jurisdictions in order to access that coin. Are that

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.920
<v Speaker 2>key and ask that to sign a transaction to move

0:59:25.960 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the bitcoin to where it needs to be so for

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 2>me moving forward, And this is just one of the

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 2>other reasons why bitcoin is the ultimate asset when it

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 2>comes to intergenerational wealth. This is something that can't be

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 2>done with any other asset.

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, amazing.

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Peter, I think we've gone over a lot.

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That's some good information. I want to link down to

0:59:45.880 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>your services down below. If anybody wants to talk to

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you about that, Lintha, anything else that you should want

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to point attention to, or that you want to kind

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of close it out with.

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just an important time if you're not

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 2>in bitcoin, to get into bitcoin as quickly as possible.

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 2>We've got some exciting things that are to fruition, much

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of which we talked about today, And if you need

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 2>help getting getting started, reach out to the team. We'd

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>love to help great.

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for appreciate it.

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Mat