WEBVTT - Getting Semantical with Big Citrus

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Good Game with Sarah Spain, where we just

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>know all the young hoopers out there are practicing a

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>spin in fades so they can pull off a buzzer

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>beater like neco Ogumakay. It's Tuesday, August twenty sixth. Then

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on today's show, Big Citrus is jumping on to discuss

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the state of the WNBA MVP race, the behind the

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>scenes of how the voting process works, and how the

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>term MVP is even defined. Plus winning on your Home

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>green a thirty point return. How could we have forgotten

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that the sky is falling? It's all coming up right

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>after this welcome back slicays, here's what you need to

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>know today. Let's start with the WNBA and that aforementioned

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>buzzer beater. Neko ogum Makay led the Seattle Storm to

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>an eighty four eighty two win over the Washington Mystic

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night, scoring thirty points, including a career high six

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>three pointers and that last second clutch jumper to seal

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the win. French phenom Dominique Malonga also had a stellar night,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>coming off the bench to put up her fourth double

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>double of the season. The win was Seattle's fourth in

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>its last five games, a nice bounce back after they'd

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>suffered a six game skid. Continuing this hot streak could

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be crucial for the seventh place Storm heading into the

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>final stretch of the regular season. Meantime, the Mystics are

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting in tenth after losing four straight and seven of

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>their last ten. More WNBA Sunday night also saw the

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>highly anticipated return of the Minnesota Lynx's defeast A Collier,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>who had been out since August second, missing seven games

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>with an ankle injury. Collier wasted no time in her

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>return to the court, picking up her MVP campaign season

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with an eleven of sixteen shooting night for thirty two

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>points plus nine rebounds to lead the Links to a

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven to eighty four winner for the Indiana Fever.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll have plenty more to say on her return and

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the other WNBA MVP contenders later in the show. One

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>final w highlight, this one involving the newest member of

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the Good Game Hall of Fame, Page Beckers, and perhaps

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that honor we gave Beckers Jinxter because she saw one

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of her streaks and shortly after we recorded yesterday's episode,

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>during the Dallas Wings ninety to eighty one loss to

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Golden State Valkyrie. Sunday, Becker scored just nine points,

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>marking the first game of her pro career that she

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't score in double digits. Up until now, Beckers had

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>recorded at least ten or more points in her first

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty games as a pro, including, of course, last week's

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>rookie record forty four point contest. Still, becker streak ranks

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty high in WNBA history. Her thirty straight games marked

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the fourth longest stretch of double digit points to start

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a WNBA career, behind only Candae Parker with thirty two straight,

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Asia Wilson with thirty seven, and Cynthia Cooper with ninety two. Yes,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia Cooper recorded double digit points for ninety two straight games,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a streak that lasted from her WNBA debut in nineteen

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven until two thousand now. As we mentioned yesterday's show,

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Cooper already had a lot of pro basketball experience by

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the time she made her WNBA debut in the league's

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>inaugural season, but those ninety two games still marked the

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>longest double digit streak of all WNBA Pais players.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Regardless of years of experience. The great.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Simone Augustus is number two on that version of the list,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>having recorded eighty eight straight double digit games with the

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Lynx from six to eight. So while Becker's maybe

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>back to zero with the start of a career streak,

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we do have a feeling she'll start a new streak

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>very soon.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>To golf.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The LPGA's Canadian Women's Open wrapped up on Sunday in Ontario,

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>with Canadian player Brooke Henderson winning her first victory on

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>tour in more than two and a half years. Henderson

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>took the win by defeating Minji Lee by one stroke.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Henderson has won fourteen times in her LPGA career, but

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>her last win came back in January of twenty twenty three.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>She said after the tournament, quote, this year has not

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>gone very well up to this point, and it just

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>feels like this was meant to be. She added, Honestly,

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised I'm not crying right now because it just

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>means so much.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>End quote. There's nothing like winning at home to hockey.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>The pwatails Minnesota Frost has announced the hiring of Brienna

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Decker as an assistant coach to ken Clee. Decker a

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>three time Olympic medalist for Team USA, officially retired in

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three following a devastating leg injury at the

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two Beijing Winter Games. Earlier this summer, she

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was named the Hockey Hall of Fame's Class of twenty

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and will be officially.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Inducted in November.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>She spent the last few years as an assistant coach

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with both Team USA's U eighteen team and at famed

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>hockey prep school shatt At Saint Mary's. In a statement,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Decker said, quote, it's inspiring to be part of a

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>league that sets the standard for women's hockey and a

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>team that has been at the top of the league

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>two years in a row. I'm excited for what's ahead

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and proud to contribute to a culture of excellence.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>End quote.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Finally, some NWSL news, Sophia Fuerta is now the all

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>time assists leader in the NWSL, moving into first with

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>her thirty second career assist, a dish to Jordan Heidema

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Seattle Rains won one draw with the Houston

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Dash on Sunday.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And some more soccer.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>The Orlando Pride announced Monday that the team is loaning

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>two time World Cup winner Morgan Gatraw to Newcastle United

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>through the end of twenty twenty five. As part of

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the same release, Gatraw, a key member of the Pride

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Shield and Championship wins last season, announced her retirement from

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the NWSL. In an interview with The Athletic, which we'll

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>link to in the show notes, Gatra said she's excited

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for the challenge that will come with joining a new

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>team as Newcastle looks to get promoted from the second

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>tier of the Women's Super League.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I've always loved joining places that I could help make

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>better and where I could leave a lasting impact, and

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be no different hopefully end quote.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Selica's it's time to introduce a new segment called.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>God, Damn It, freaking Shit Mother for Blind.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>You may recall that in yesterday's episode, I started daydreaming

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about how easy Fud might end up with the Dallas

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Wings given their brutal record this year, or maybe the

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Wings might select Lauren Betts, leaving Asy available for my

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Sky, also not doing great this year.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Slice Alexa for bringing me back down

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to earth hard. She wrote, quote, I regret to inform

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you that the Links own Chicago's twenty twenty six first

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>round pick. I know it's absolutely ridiculous, but with an

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely stacked draft class, I'm sure there will be plenty

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of depth in the first round. But no way Aisy

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is dropping that big fan of the show so quick.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for all you do and for the great

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>lengths you go to ensuring the values of the show.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>A favorite episode of mine is the Marina Maybrey interview. Sincerely,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a longtime Dallas Wings fan who is hoping for Lauren

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Betts over Asy because our front court situation is dire.

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I am loyal till death to our current shooting guard.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>All up to.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Paisy, but not being an a Rique fan is homophobic,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and we all know love stories are better with a

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>little tension and angst.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Imagine a Paisy in the finals on different teams. End quote.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>You know what, Alexa, I swear.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I am preventing my brain from acknowledging the truth about

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that draft pick.

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>If y'all are blocking it out or never knew about it,

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>here's a refresher.

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Last season, the Sky made a deal with the Links

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to acquire the number seven overall pick in the twenty

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four draft in exchange for the number eight overall pick,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>a second round pick in twenty twenty five, and a

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first round pick swap in twenty twenty six. Then this

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>year they made a trade to acquire the number eleven

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>pick in the twenty twenty five draft, ceding the rights

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to that twenty twenty six pickswap instead giving Minnesota outright

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>ownership of their first rounder next year. This guy used

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all those moves to grab Angel Rees at seven in

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four and Hailey Benlitth at eleven in twenty

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. Good moves, but despite talent on the roster,

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they're still near the bottom of the standings, and now

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the links are poised to benefit. No matter how many

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>times I reminded of this, I still let myself daydream

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about this shitburger of a season paying off in the

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>form of an exciting young star joining my team at

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>fixing everything.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Instead the rich get richer. Damn, damn, damn. We got

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>to take a quick break. When we come back, it's

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>time for Big.

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Citrus Welcome back slices.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>It's time to reconvene. Big Citrus, get in here.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Alex and meish, what's up, Hey, y Let's talk some

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>WNBA MVP, and let's start with what the hell even

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is at MVP?

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Because I feel like this is.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The problem that we have in every sport anytime an

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>MVP conversation comes up. Is it the best player on

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the best team. Is it the player that means the

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>most to their team? Is it the best player on

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the best team who also wasn't recently named the MVP

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because we like to switch the rules around and tell

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you that you can't win it over and over to

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>even if you deserve it, Like, what the hell is

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>even an MVP?

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Mache Oh well, that's t okay, Clockett. That's t For

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 3>me personally, I've gravitated towards a combination of, like what

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 3>you just said, a player that a team would absolutely

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 3>fall apart without and a player who's just got the

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>most unbelievable stats. I think if you try to do

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>it one way, you're always going to run into an

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 3>issue where two people are well qualified because of the

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>same things.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>So for me, it's helpful to have two tiers.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, think about the name of the award

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>most valuable player, literally the most valuable player to any

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>particular team, and the more stat heavy people. I'm not

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 3>one of those people, but they can do the stats

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>on what makes a player valuable, like plus minus and

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 3>offensive rating and defensive rating and all that, and that

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>stuff matters. But I hear a lot of like the

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 3>best player on the best team approach, and I hear

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the person who would be most valuable

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>to any team you place them on, and those are

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 3>hard for me. Those are hard for me. I don't

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.599
<v Speaker 3>know if those agree with my logic. And at the

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 3>same time, it's really difficult because I feel like no

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>matter what approach you take, there's always going to be

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>some disagreement in discussion, Like we just have to concede

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 3>that point at the beginning.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Alex, do you use a different tier or set of

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>tiers to decide? Well.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 4>It's so funny because as I was preparing for this conversation,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I was reminiscing back on high school and my field

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 4>hockey coach didn't believe in MVP awards, and so every year,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 4>at like the annual False School Sports Assembly, when they

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 4>would award all the MVP trophies, it would go to

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 4>the field hockey team like literally just the team as

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 4>a whole, and so like in the school auditorium there

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 4>were just all these plaques where a year after year

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the field hockey MVP was just the team and.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>As a multi time field hockey MVP, that would have

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>pissed me the.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Hell off exactly because if you did the work, if

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>you did the work, you beout to give me my ward,

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 3>give me my war.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Was the most valuable as somebody that was never close

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 4>to being named MVPs like this seems right.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean me, I agree with what you said.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think for me, m VP has lost its

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>semantical meaning.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Semantical a word.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird thing to ask, I know, semantics, but

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>semantical anyway, it has lost its meaning to me in

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the sense of like nitpicking word by word. I think

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what it has come to mean across pretty much all

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sports is the best player. That's how we seem to

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about it, not who is the most valuable, because

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>we've seen players on teams who have other great players

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>who probably would step up, but they're still the best player.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Asia Wilson last season was probably one of the least debated.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Us of the m v P s in the w

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>n B a of late.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Because she just dominated and it was of course valuable

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>for her team, and also just the best player, who

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>had the best season, who scored the most points, who

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>did the best things. So yes, I think the tears

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can help in moments where it feels real head to head,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>where it's hard to decide.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 2>But ultimately, to me, it's sort of a little bit

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>of vibes. I mean a thousand percent.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Vib's definitely factor in there.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think that's how I kind of want

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 4>it to be, too, Like when we look back at

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 4>a previous season, so often we're not talking with the

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 4>same in the moment context, and so I kind of

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 4>want to know, Hey, whoever got MVP in twenty fifteen,

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 4>they were the best player that year. Yes, I don't

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 4>want to have to kind of take into account, oh

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 4>well but their team did this and that. Like, I

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 4>just want to know who was considered the best player

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 4>that year. So I appreciate that definition of it.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's possible to win MVP on a

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>bad team, but you have to be so frickin' good.

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why, but my brain goes to, like

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Ernie Banks, with the Cubs, who was like an MVP

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>on a team that didn't even make the playoffs. Easier

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in baseball, because your stats are so isolated and independent

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of all the other things that are going on in basketball,

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's almost impossible.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Like Paige Beckers mm hmm.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is most valuable on her team because like Ari

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>k has been in and out, that team blows and

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>she's still doing amazing things every night. But she's not

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the best player in the league. And it wouldn't tell

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the story of this season for Page Beckers to be

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the MVP.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's what makes it so hard for me.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I'm not advocating.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>For Paige to win MVP. Let me be clear.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, she's having a she's having a great season, great

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>rookie season. I don't think she's the MVP. But I

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 3>think what you're pointing out here is why this is

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>so difficult for me, because I love to make space

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 3>for those quote unquote underdog MVPs because there will be

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>every once in a blue moon, somebody who statistically blows

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 3>it out of the water and who frankly, like Alex,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>like you're saying, when you look back on the season,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>they are the best player, even though their team might

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 3>have gone five and twenty five or whatever the case

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>may be. And so I guess my point in saying

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>that is whatever tier, whatever calculus people use, I just

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>want to make sure that we're doing due diligence for

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>folks who aren't on the Minnesota leagues or aren't on

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean, top two teams in the league.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>It was interesting.

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I was trying to look back at some of the

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 4>coverage of Candice Parker's MVP season in two thousand and eight,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 4>when she was named both Rookie of the Year and

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 4>MVP in her first year in the league, because I

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 4>really wanted to figure out, like, were people just saying like,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 4>she's a really good rookie who's like good enough that

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 4>she deserves MVP. It speaks to maybe something of the

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 4>media coverage that I wasn't able to come across too

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 4>much that I don't want nuance and insight. So if

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 4>any slices out there have anything that you think could

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 4>shine a light on this for somebody that didn't pay

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 4>too much attention to the WNBA back in the day,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 4>I'd love to see it, because, yeah, it was one

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 4>of those things where I was like, Okay, what would

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Page have to do to be in the MVP conversation?

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 4>And part of me is like, I don't know how

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 4>much of it comes down to her and how much

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 4>of it just comes down to not having gotten drafted

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>to that team.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, somebody who fell in love with the WNBA around

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 3>that time, range CP three was different. If anybody's got

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 3>any issues, come hit my DMS we could talk about it.

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Please, Well, let's talk about who's a little different this year,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>because we are finally and belatedly really introducing Alyssa Thomas

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>into this conversation, and I'll fully admit that we're we're late.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is her style of play.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It is insanely efficient and she puts up crazy numbers,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really flashy in the same way or

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe as graceful as some of the players that we

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to lean towards when we're talking MVP. And also

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>new team, we took most of our time just being

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised that the Mercury were playing so well after the

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>retirement of Ben Tarassi the departure of Britney Grinery, were like, wait.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>What's happening?

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And then to be frank, we were also just really

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>focused on her relationship status and her being separated from

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Dewana Bonner and then reunited. And meanwhile she was like, Okay,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll just be over here just putting up crazy stats

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>every night. You let me know when you come around

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to the basketball side of things, and sorry, Alyssa, but

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we're here now.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>So really, what it.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Feels like to me is Asia Wilson, Nafisa Kyllier, and

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Alyssa Thomas. Is there anybody else that you think, within

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the last stretch of the season can make a true

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bid for this?

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh truly no, But I do think there are some people.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 3>There's always there's always benefits of being in that conversation, right,

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>whether it's talks for your next contract, whether you know

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff, your own personal legacy.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's important.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I do. Once again, you want to make space, yeah,

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>people in the converse, and I get that. I get that,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And you're right though, it is necessary to shout out

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the people who are on the perimeter, because to your point,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>if we don't sometimes put them in these articles, have

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>them in these conversations, people really miss I think Kelsey

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell is a great example of that someone who is

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not really in these conversations and always should be even

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>if she's not gonna win.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I definitely have Kelsey Mitchell in that bucket.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Also have Kelsey Plumb in that bucket. Both of them

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>are among the.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 3>League's top five scorers, both leading their team in scoring.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Both have carried their teams on their backs at different

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>points during this season. And again, why I don't think

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 3>this necessarily win. We got to give credit where credit

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>is due, man, because otherwise, what are folks on other teams?

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you're obviously playing to win, but individually, in

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>terms of your legacy, what else are you fighting for?

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Then? Ali Shagray, you could maybe argue Sabrina and Nascue

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with a team that's had John Quell out now Brianna

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>out and keeping them in the mix.

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>But I do think it's it's a three women race

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, And honestly, this is going to ruffle

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 3>some feathers following my logic, I got Asia and Alyssa

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 3>ahead of fee fian A, Lissa our neck and neck,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 3>their neck and neck.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, walk me through that.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 3>But if we're talking about what Asia Wilson has done again.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>This season, the.

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Las Vegas Aces were bad. Okay, we don't need to

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 3>sugarcoat that they were bad until two weeks ago. Pretty much,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Asia Wilson has been doing her damn thing the whole time, regardless.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Of what anybody else has done.

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 3>If we talk again about my approach of a player

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>that a team would actually fall apart without, imagine the

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Aces without Asia Wilson this season. Yeah, they're bottom five

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>in the league to me. And then for Alyssa the

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 3>reason why this is what you were alluding to earlier.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not flashy because she doesn't score a lot of points,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 3>because she's not putting up twenty points to night. And

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I've never been up a person or a player, frankly

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 3>who has been point centric. Because I love to pass

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 3>the ball, I love to rebound the ball, I love

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 3>to do all other shit, every defense everything. Okay, I

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 3>took charges, all right, I took charges and I talked

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot on Yeah.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Because you were too lazy to get out of the way,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and that counts for something. You didn't want to move

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>your feet on defense, either to get in position or

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>out of it.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>That's my key, okay, and it is what it is.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>But I put Alissa a little bit ahead of Fee

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 3>because and this is this is also probably controversial. Fij

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 3>just missed however many games, right, and Minnesota did perfectly

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 3>fine without her. They secured a number one spot in

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. Imagine again the Phoenix Murky without Alyssa Thomas

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 3>ooh a.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, And this is where the conversation comes down to

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is it the best player or is it the most valuable?

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Because to your point, so when Asia Wilson was not

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>putting her foot on the gas like she has been,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>She's got eighteen straight games in double figures right now,

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and she's hit at least thirty points eight times in

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that stretch. She is going off and during that time

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the team has gotten significantly better. Back on July tenth,

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they were out of a playoff spot, sitting at nine

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and eleven. We were all asking how you could have

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that much talent on one team and not win. And

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>then Asia sort of was like, all right, fine, let

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>me throw you all my back again. And now fifteen

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and three run ten game win streak, they would be

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the three seed if the season ended right now, right

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So she has basically figured out that she needs to

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>do more for them to win. Now, you could also

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>make an argument that she was on a team, she

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was playing and they weren't good, and we're gonna take

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 1>away credit for Nafisa Kalier being on a team and

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>then being good, Like we're gonna get her credit for

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>her not doing enough early and then turning it on later.

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Now, that's not what I'm saying. I'm not saying he

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 3>hasn't had an MVP caliber season. I'm saying she's just missed,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 3>however many games. And I think there's also something to

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 3>be said stat wise for somebody who shows up every night,

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 3>every night, every night. Again, not a disrespect to Fee,

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>it's just been the situation.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 4>But also in the game that Fee got injured, there

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 4>were questions about whether Cheryl Reefs should have even kept

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 4>her in the game because that was what end of

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the third It was like a fourth carter and they

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 4>were winning guy a lot.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I remember.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it was a couple of years ago when

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Asia didn't win MVP and Becky Hammond got mad being like, well,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm not keeping her in the game all the time,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm not patting her stats. If I was keeping

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 4>her in the game, then her stats would have been higher,

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 4>and so I think it leads to one of those conversations,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 4>like the sport of basketball is at such a stats

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 4>heavy conversation right now that sometimes folks aren't watching the game,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, Like that's why you'll never hear me be

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 4>like this is who deserves MVP. Like, I just don't

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 4>watch the game that way. I don't watch enough of

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the teams that way to be so confident in who

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 4>I I'm gonna pick. And so I think though means

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 4>to your point, like, we see both sides of that, right,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 4>if she hadn't been playing those final minutes to maybe

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 4>get those additional points, then who knows that she would

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 4>have even gotten injured.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 3>And that's tough because that's one of those things that

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 3>is not in her control or any player's control ever, right, Like,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 3>there are certain elements to the MVP conversation.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was gonna say, injuries in general, that's not

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in their control. And yes, of course, if somebody is

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>out for the majority of a season, but it's seven games.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 3>It's seven games, But it matters to me. It does

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 3>matter to me, And like you said earlier, there's also

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 3>a matter of vibes. I don't know what it is.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like AG's got a leg up. Okay now,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 3>but again, there are still, however many games left in

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>this season. We're coming towards the end a couple of

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 3>weeks now, But I don't know.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Let me just give you some stats to counter the vibes, okay.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Nafisa Collier's leading the league in scoring twenty three and

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a half points per game. She second in steals, fourth

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and block seven and field goal percentage night than rebounding.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>She's shooting almost thirty seven percent from beyond the arc

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and making about four or three pointers a game, so

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>she is deadly from anywhere on the court. She is

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous defensive player. She is insanely efficient. If she

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is able to finish the season, which she'll have to

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>up her three points, but if she can finish the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>season with fifty forty ninety, it would be unbelievable. There's

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>only three players in WNBA history to average at least

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty points while shooting at least fifty percent from the

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 1>field and at least thirty five percent from three with

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>at least one attempt per game, and she would be

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the fourth behind just Cheryl Swoopslow and Jackson and Brienna Stewart,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and each of those players won the MVB Trophy in

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the season that.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 2>They did that.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Again, it's a stat heavy argument because of the injury

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>stretch that makes it vibe bliss. Right now, she's one

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>game back in, but she was thirty plus points, nine

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>rebounds in her first game back, and get the feeling

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>she might go on a little tear here to try

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to get the vibes back on her side.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk for a minute about how this

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 4>award is even determined. So for folks who don't know,

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 4>there are basically a panel of sixty voters that are

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 4>selected from both regional and national media outlets that includes

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 4>writers and broadcasters. They rank five players, and then those

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 4>players are assigned values. And in the same way that

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 4>I think folks should be having conversations about elections in

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 4>their hometowns, about jerrymandering, about how all of those things

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.719
<v Speaker 4>are happening, whether they're using mail in ballots or go

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 4>into the polls, I want to have more of a

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>conversation about that in the WNBA. And I'm going to

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 4>point to the year twenty twenty three, and that was

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 4>a year that it was a super tight race between

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Brianna Stewart, Elisa Thomas, and Asia Wilson, and Stewie ended

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 4>up winning it because she got the most total points,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 4>but she didn't get the most first place votes.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 2>That was At.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 4>She didn't even get the most second place votes, that

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 4>was Asia. She didn't get the most third place votes again,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 4>that was At. But she just accumulated the largest total

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>number of points. In the way that the WNBA awards

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 4>these points is first place gets ten points, second place

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 4>gets seven, third place gets five, fourth place gets third,

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 4>fifth place gets one. To me, I want to know

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 4>how they came up with those, Like those values are

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of arbitrary and back in twenty twenty three, I

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 4>actually ended up crunching the numbers to see, like if

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 4>you were to award different points to those five ranks,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 4>would it alter the results? And I was shocked that

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 4>it didn't alter them more. But if you did award

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 4>first place more points, there did come a time where

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 4>At would have won it over Stewie that year. So

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't know necessarily, like what's the cracked option here?

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 4>I'd also be curious to see it with Like I

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 4>don't know a ranked choice option, like see how that

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 4>weighs out, so if somebody can get a super majority.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Because it just seems weird to me that Stewie could

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 4>win in a year when she still wasn't necessarily getting

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the most of any of those three categories, but not

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 4>saying she wasn't deserving. I just thought it was an

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 4>interesting little caveat on that win.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of elections could use some choice moving. Yeah,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I agree, Alex.

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that they have a pretty in depth system

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for figuring out how to a lot each you know.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Are we sure? I know? Are we? Are we assuming there?

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 2>You know what? I do?

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Assume the best far too often. It's it's useful for life,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>not always useful for business or otherwise. But yeah, I mean,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think it helps revenge voting and bias voting

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, and helps make it so that

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>someone who is consistently considered among the best by everyone

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is more likely to win, as opposed to like a

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people think someone and then a bunch of

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>people don't have them anywhere on the list. It's complicated.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, Alex. Maybe we should reach out

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to a representative for the WNBA and ask exactly how

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they came up with the point system.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I mean, I think.

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We're in for a really, really fun final stretch of

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the season where we're going to see these players who

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>are battling it out for MVP, and also see a

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of teams battling it out for the playoff spots.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And how will coaches factor in how long to play

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>their stars and blowout games if there's someone who might

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be in the mix for MVP, or will they prioritize

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>being healthy for the playoffs and sit them And will

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there be some tension between those top players and their

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 1>coaches about playing time when it comes to that. So

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>always worth keeping an eye and you'll always hear the

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>players afterwards say the most important thing to me is

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the title. You could keep your MVP. But deep down,

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we all know they want to be in there,

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to be getting those stats up, So it'll

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be fun to watch. If you want to read more

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>about the MVP Racelu Orlando wrote a good piece for

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>SI dot Com about and if you Saka, you're needing

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.479
<v Speaker 1>to fend off Asia in the tight race and had

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>some really good stats in there, and Shane Jackson wrote

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>one for WNBA dot com that also has a bunch

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the statistics around the players that are contending and odds.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>If any of y'all.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Want to dabble or become a degenerate and put your

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>entire life savings on the WNBA MVP, we wouldn't recommend it,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but go for it, all right. We got to take

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>another break, but we come back when a few turns

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>into a good game in real life.

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back slices.

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>We love that you're listening, but we want you to

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>get in the game every day too. So here's our

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>good game play of the day. You heard our MVP picks,

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>well at least betion mine. Now we want to hear yours.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>If you had to say which player would you vote for?

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Hit us up good game at wondermedianetwork dot com or

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.239
<v Speaker 1>leave us a voicemail at eight seven two two four

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty seventy and don't forget to subscribe, rate and review, y'all.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>It's easy.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Watch Serena Williams inducting Maria Sharpova into the International Tennis

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame, rating ten out of ten Feel Good

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Moments review Maria Sharpova's tennis career was sort of always

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>linked to Serena Williams. In fact, Cheripova's first of five

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Grand Slam victories was a Wimbledon win over Serena. But

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>she didn't enjoy being on the winging side of that

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>rivalry for very long, because Serena came out on top

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in their last eighteen meetings and twenty of twenty two

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>meetings overall. They were pitted against each other for Shripova's

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>entire career, So it was sort of a shock and

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to see Serena do the honors at the

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>International Tennis Hall of Fame ceremony in Newport, Rhode Island

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, said Serena.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>A few months ago, Maria texted me that she needed

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk. When I called her, she asked if I

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>would introduce her into the Hall of Fame. Before she

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 1>could even finish her question, I said yes loud, immediately,

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with my whole chest, because of course it's Maria.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 2>End quote. Serena continued quote.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Marie and I were once the fiercest of rivals. We

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>had our differences to the world. We looked miles and

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>miles apart, but the truth is we weren't. We wanted

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing at the exact same time, to

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>be the very best. That's what made our rivalry so

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>electric and so iconic.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 2>End quote.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>On her Instagram on Sunday, alongside photos of the two

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>former rivals embracing, Serena wrote quote, I'm probably the last

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>person you expected to see standing here tonight. Honestly, a

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>few years ago I would have said the same thing,

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But years after getting to know her better, we now

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>call each other friends, and when a friend calls, you answer.

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>This is women supporting each other and respecting each other's greatness.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations Maria Sharapova. It is my honor, as her former rival,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>her forever fan, and now her forever friend, to welcome

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Maria Sharapova into the International Tennis Hall of Fame.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>End quote. Beautiful. We love that.

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it's your turn, y'all Rate and review, scroll down,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>click five stars, tell us you love us, Thanks for listening.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>See you tomorrow. Good game, Maria and Serena. Good game,

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Mekka and the FISA you Semantakole?

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Are you a word? Talvey?

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Good Game with Sarah Spain is an iHeart women's sports

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment. You

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Production by Wonder Media Network.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Our producers are Alex Azzie and Misha Jones. Our executive

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>producers are Christina Everett, Jesse Katz, Jenny Kaplan and Emily Rutterer.

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Our editors are Emily Rutter, Britney Martinez, Grace Lynch and

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Gianna Palmer.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Our associate producer is Lucy Jones.

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Production assistance from Avery Loftus and I'm Your Host Sarah

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Spain