Speaker 1: Hour two Sean Hannity Show told Free it is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one Sean, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. I mean, this was
Speaker 1: a spectacular day today for both Israel and the United States,
Speaker 1: and what they've been able to pull off today is remarkable.
Speaker 1: Israel striking Iranian leadership. They were there to choose Ali
Speaker 1: Hamani's successor. More than forty more senior Iranian officials leaders killed.
Speaker 1: Since you know, Operation Epic Fury began on Saturday and
Speaker 1: this was supposed to be the next generation, Israel leveled
Speaker 1: the building where the clerics gathered to select Iran's new
Speaker 1: supreme leader. Here to talk about the future of what
Speaker 1: Iran may look like. The president thinks this could go
Speaker 1: on four to five weeks. Ali Reza ja'far As the
Speaker 1: day is with us is the deputy director of the
Speaker 1: National Council of Resistance of Iran, and hue Hen Gobody
Speaker 1: is the spokesperson for the People's mo Den Organization of Iran.
Speaker 1: And welcome both of you to the program. I guess
Speaker 1: I'll start with you Ali Raza. Let me ask you,
Speaker 1: where do you see this going and do you see
Speaker 1: a new leadership emerging now that the clerics get taken
Speaker 1: out in massive numbers. This is now the second massive
Speaker 1: attack against the leadership.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much Sean for having me on your show.
Speaker 2: I fully agree with you that this regime must be
Speaker 2: brought down by the people of Iran, and they're not
Speaker 2: going to leave this scene now. In terms of the
Speaker 2: affid the death of Harmony, the process for choosing the
Speaker 2: next leader, I think in reality that's a much process
Speaker 2: because after the death of Harmony, this is really the
Speaker 2: end of the religious theocracies. This is the end of
Speaker 2: the regime. No matter who they're going to put in place,
Speaker 2: how much temporary oxygen is left for them, this era
Speaker 2: is over. The game is over now. The question is
Speaker 2: how would the change happen inside the country by the people,
Speaker 2: And I fully agree with you at the end of
Speaker 2: the day, it's those resistance forces on the ground we've
Speaker 2: been confronting the revolution guards that are going to determine
Speaker 2: the future of the country. Interestingly, just last week on Monday,
Speaker 2: five days before the Comedy is Death, the forces organized
Speaker 2: forces of the main RNI in opposition movement, the majority
Speaker 2: how the MEK launched a massive strike against the headquarters
Speaker 2: of the supremely their comedy inflicting heavy casualties on the
Speaker 2: Revolutionary Guards and one hundred members of the MEK were
Speaker 2: either killed or arrested, but another one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: managed to leave the country. And most importantly, the leader
Speaker 2: of the movement, the president of the ANCIRA, is a woman,
Speaker 2: missus Mariam Rajavi, who called for She announced the provisional
Speaker 2: government for the transitional period to transfer sovereignty from the
Speaker 2: repressive rulers of Iran to the elected representatives of the
Speaker 2: people of Iran. And she and her message made it
Speaker 2: very clear that when it comes to the armed forces
Speaker 2: to take sides with the people of Iran, when it
Speaker 2: comes to revolutionary Guards, because they've been heavily involved in
Speaker 2: keeping this system in power, they need to lay down
Speaker 2: their arms and surrender to the population now.
Speaker 1: Shue Hen Gobodi, I know you put out an ex
Speaker 1: post talking about Mariam Rajave and New Kingrid to describe
Speaker 1: this woman as the woman led resistance of the Iranian
Speaker 1: regime when they fear the most, and women in the
Speaker 1: political arena can be very potent transformational figures and of
Speaker 1: transformational force. He said, I know this firsthand from almost
Speaker 1: fifty years of challenging you know, in the challenging field
Speaker 1: of politics. Is this somebody a dark course that maybe
Speaker 1: the world doesn't know about now that could rise to power.
Speaker 3: Yes, Sean, First of all, thanks for having me in
Speaker 3: your show. Yes, definitely. You see, Madame Mariam Reggevi has
Speaker 3: been fighting, as you said, for almost more than fifty
Speaker 3: years against post the child's leadership and the Mullah's tyranney,
Speaker 3: and she has established a very viable alternative, the National
Speaker 3: Council of Resistance of Iran, in which sixty percent of
Speaker 3: the senior officials are women. And actually she has introduced
Speaker 3: a ten point plan for transferring sovereigny to the people
Speaker 3: of Iran, and that plan basically calls for separational government
Speaker 3: and religion, for gender equality, universal suffrage, and non nuclear
Speaker 3: run mutual amicable aiming the relationship for the rest of
Speaker 3: the world. And they telling me for thousand parliamentarians, including
Speaker 3: majority members of the US House of Representatives in a
Speaker 3: bipartisan way, have endorsed her plan. And she has also
Speaker 3: you know, has a very strong network of activists inside Iran.
Speaker 3: So in fact, she has been basically establishing the groundwork
Speaker 3: for the transitional period and a blueprint or roadmap for
Speaker 3: that time, so there will not be any chaos when
Speaker 3: the Mullas are out and Iranian people take control of
Speaker 3: the country that belongs to them first and foremost.
Speaker 1: Well, we do have to worry about holdovers, don't we.
Speaker 1: There are still probably remaining loyalists to the dead clerics
Speaker 1: and supreme leader. That probably will be problematic moving down
Speaker 1: the road.
Speaker 3: Now absolutely, yes, you have a very good observation there.
Speaker 3: But you see, when the history has shown us that
Speaker 3: when basically it becomes quite evident that the Mullas have
Speaker 3: reached the end of the road, and they are growing
Speaker 3: signs to that. As you know, the rats jump the
Speaker 3: ship and that has been the case in many many
Speaker 3: cases in the history, and I'm sure it will happen
Speaker 3: in Iran, and as Ali Reza said, we have airs
Speaker 3: on army. It will be on the side of the people.
Speaker 3: But the IRGC has to surrender to the people. But
Speaker 3: to your point in specific, there has an uptick of
Speaker 3: activities of the resistance units in the past couple of
Speaker 3: years and particularly the last few weeks, and they take
Speaker 3: on you know, the besiege, you know, Para military offices
Speaker 3: and a lot of the regime signs. So indeed, the
Speaker 3: Evenian people at the end of the day will overcome
Speaker 3: the IRGC and overwhelm them, and that's the only way
Speaker 3: that they can arrest the control of the country and
Speaker 3: a new day in Iran. So I totally agree with
Speaker 3: you that the key factor at the end of the
Speaker 3: day would be the Rnian people and the organized resistance
Speaker 3: who have to overwhelm IRGC, who still decides to be
Speaker 3: on the side of the Mulas and take the country
Speaker 3: back Ali Raza.
Speaker 1: They're not going to be able to do that with slingshots.
Speaker 1: At some point, the people that you know had taken
Speaker 1: to the streets and massive numbers that were slaughtered by
Speaker 1: the tens of thousands. You can't win a revolution with
Speaker 1: a sling shot. At some point they are going to
Speaker 1: need to be armed to take out the remaining loyalists
Speaker 1: that would exist.
Speaker 2: I agree with you, Sean, but the problem regarding Iran
Speaker 2: over the years has not been that the people didn't
Speaker 2: have arms. We had several problems. Number one, there was
Speaker 2: this policy of appeasement by the West that's constantly.
Speaker 1: It's a massive problem that they haven't been armed. That's why,
Speaker 1: you know, when Ali Hamane, you know, sent out the
Speaker 1: guards to quell the the people that were out there protesting.
Speaker 1: They were mowed down. They had no way to defend themselves.
Speaker 2: No, no, My point is that now this situation has
Speaker 2: changed and the people the resistance are armed. You know,
Speaker 2: I just mentioned about the massive You're.
Speaker 1: Saying that the majority of the resistance is armed, and
Speaker 1: if so, how have they been armed by the Curds.
Speaker 2: No, not the majority, but a good number from are
Speaker 2: actually armed. You know, you had two hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: of them attacking the headquarters of the Supreme Dealer. However,
Speaker 2: the once the momentum shifts, there is plenty of arms
Speaker 2: inny On. We had a lot of reports during the uprising,
Speaker 2: the process last month that people were number one, disarming
Speaker 2: the revolutionary guards, second attacking the places where they had
Speaker 2: their arm depot and ammunition, taking away arms from them.
Speaker 2: Plus adding to that, you have areas where you know,
Speaker 2: the minorities, the nationalities have easier access to arms. You
Speaker 2: mentioned the Kurdish region, there were you know, the border
Speaker 2: regions are probably more accessible to arms. So that's that's
Speaker 2: the life. I think once the momentum shifts, you will
Speaker 2: see how everyone is actually looking for it, and they'll
Speaker 2: find a way to do it. But the most important
Speaker 2: element is that you need to have an organization on
Speaker 2: the ground, and just the arms itself doesn't help you.
Speaker 2: The good news is that that organization does exist. You know,
Speaker 2: the main opposition movement the m K, which is the
Speaker 2: same movement that exposed all the major nuclear sides of Irana,
Speaker 2: and they have a history of fighting the regime over
Speaker 2: the years and they have tremendous organizational capabilities. They were,
Speaker 2: you know, they had an army, a powerful army, resistance
Speaker 2: army known as the National Liberation Army of Iran. They
Speaker 2: know how to fight the iatolas. The most important thing
Speaker 2: is the once the policy is shifted in favor of
Speaker 2: those who are standing up against the regime, that are
Speaker 2: you know, recognizing the legitimacy of those underground to fight
Speaker 2: the Vision Guards. You can see how much in space
Speaker 2: it creates for the younger generation to join for with
Speaker 2: the resistance. You needs to underground with the NEK to
Speaker 2: expand the networks. Even that during the uprising in January,
Speaker 2: we saw many evidences of that that a lot of
Speaker 2: the young people joined the organized force on the ground
Speaker 2: and even though the regime killed so many people, but
Speaker 2: they actually expanded the recruitment and there are more people
Speaker 2: on board with this movement than they were even two
Speaker 2: months ago. So that's the the you know, the the
Speaker 2: momentum shift that really changes everything.
Speaker 1: Schuhan, I would argue that the best thing that could
Speaker 1: probably happen is they overwhelm the remaining Revolutionary Guard forces
Speaker 1: and get into the munitions, cash and and take out
Speaker 1: as many of their weapons as possible. Do we have
Speaker 1: any indication about how many people remain loyal to the
Speaker 1: now dead regime that may be carrying out more murder
Speaker 1: of innocent p pulled the way they had been in
Speaker 1: the lead up to this conflict.
Speaker 3: Obviously I don't have an exact figure, but I think
Speaker 3: what you said, Sean makes a lot of sense that
Speaker 3: at one point what you said becomes inevitable, as we
Speaker 3: saw in the last days of people getting of the
Speaker 3: previous deicatortion. You've been around during the shots, this is
Speaker 3: exactly what happened. With the big difference at this time.
Speaker 3: This is much more organized and much more focused. And
Speaker 3: one indication is that as we witnessed in the fortieth
Speaker 3: ceremonies of those who were slain and thousands of one thousands,
Speaker 3: as you mentioned, is that this mood of rage and
Speaker 3: people waiting for the moment to take things in their
Speaker 3: own hands. And now this being more organized, obviously the
Speaker 3: tactics will be decided as the situation on the ground dictates.
Speaker 3: But as I mentioned, even in the past few days,
Speaker 3: despite you know what's going on, we have seen an
Speaker 3: uptick of activities of resistance units, you know, going after
Speaker 3: this pasiege, which is like the local militias controlling the
Speaker 3: areas taken over by the resistance series. So things are
Speaker 3: moving in that direction, and I'm sure at one point
Speaker 3: the power of the people who were much more organized
Speaker 3: around any kay would overwhelm a r DECI and over
Speaker 3: still hopes, you know, to clean on the Iotolo's rule.
Speaker 3: But that they projective is exactly the way you said it.
Speaker 1: Are they raiser? Where does love uh sit in this
Speaker 1: equation if at all?
Speaker 4: Well?
Speaker 2: The only connection of Alavi has to Iran, his father,
Speaker 2: the dictator that was deposed by a genuine popular revolution.
Speaker 2: Millions of people came to the streets over through that dictatorship.
Speaker 2: Why because Shaw had the sixty police of Arcs that
Speaker 2: put intellectuals in jail. Shah built the notorious event prison.
Speaker 2: He dissolved all of the political parties that were legion
Speaker 2: to him anyways and created one single party you called
Speaker 2: Rasais and asked everyone to either join that party or
Speaker 2: go to jail, or get your passport and leave the
Speaker 2: country for good. He was extremely corrupt and that really
Speaker 2: led to the revolution. So he is actually representing the
Speaker 2: past of Iran. No one is interested in that. Every
Speaker 2: time that he's interviewed and he's asked about his father,
Speaker 2: the rule of his father and grandfather, he says that, basically,
Speaker 2: that's a different narrative. I'm not going to talk about
Speaker 2: the past. I'm always about the future. He refuses to
Speaker 2: reject the dictatorship of the show. Second, we talk about
Speaker 2: the national minorities in Iran. You know about at least
Speaker 2: forty percent of the Irnian population or the Kourgs, the Valuchis,
Speaker 2: the Arabs, the azari Is, the lawyers and others. All
Speaker 2: of them were We haven'tly opposed to the path Avi
Speaker 2: dynasty that badly suppressed them. You know, there is a
Speaker 2: Residents show Muhammad Zaphandabi as bad as you know, the
Speaker 2: College theocracy and they're all opposed to it.
Speaker 1: Interesting, j Well, I want to see how this plays out.
Speaker 1: I mean, our hope is that there'll be a democratic Republican,
Speaker 1: a duly elected government, and people will be able to
Speaker 1: hear from various factions and hopefully choose a better path
Speaker 1: for their future. But that's going to have to happen
Speaker 1: from within. That's not going to be America that does it.
Speaker 1: That's not going to be any country in the region
Speaker 1: that does it. It's going to be up to the
Speaker 1: Iranian people what kind of future they want, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: And obviously there'll be some varying political factions that will
Speaker 1: be fighting for the hearts and minds of the people
Speaker 1: of Iran. I hope they choose wisely. This may be
Speaker 1: their only opportunity. Thank you both, appreciate it. Thank you
Speaker 1: Ali Rasa, Thank you Shuhn. We appreciate you both being
Speaker 1: one of us. Quick break right back, we'll continue on
Speaker 1: the other side. It was fascinating to get an inside
Speaker 1: glimpse into the negotiations, especially after Midnight Hammer and fourteen
Speaker 1: bunker buster bombs by Donald Trump taken out and obliterating
Speaker 1: Iran's nuclear sites. This after Israel, you know, wiped out
Speaker 1: their their nuclear scientists, wiped out their air defense systems,
Speaker 1: their ballistic missile systems. I mean, just absolutely decimated the country,
Speaker 1: both Israel and the US. In that first effort maneuvers,
Speaker 1: you know, they controlled the entire sky. This goes back
Speaker 1: to last June, and you know, and then the you
Speaker 1: would think the Iranians might have learned that they're they're
Speaker 1: just outmatched. They learned nothing. And here's Steve Whitkoff, Middle
Speaker 1: East envoy, describing in detail him and Jared Kushner meeting
Speaker 1: with the Iranians and saying, you can't have nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has been very clear, but they just cling
Speaker 1: to this notion. We're clinging to the notion that they could.
Speaker 1: Well how did that end up for them? Listen, the
Speaker 1: world's number one state sponsor of terror is getting dismantled
Speaker 1: right before a very high is history in the making.
Speaker 1: This is the very same regime that tried to assassinate
Speaker 1: President Trump, not once, but twice. They have now lost
Speaker 1: their supreme leader Ali Kameni and almost everyone else in
Speaker 1: his inner circle forty total. Trump told ABC quote, I
Speaker 1: got him before he got me. They tried twice. I
Speaker 1: got him first here with more on what led up
Speaker 1: to this operation Epic Fury. Our special envoy to the
Speaker 1: Middle East front of the program, Steve Wikoff, is with us.
Speaker 1: All Right, you're in the room with these negotiators, and
Speaker 1: I know you you are a deal maker. The President
Speaker 1: wanted a deal. You odd a lot of latitude in
Speaker 1: that room. Bring us inside that room.
Speaker 4: First of all, Sean, thanks, good night, good evening, and
Speaker 4: thanks for having me. So just to give you a
Speaker 4: little bit of a taste for how these three days
Speaker 4: of negotiations went. Three separate times, Jared and I opened
Speaker 4: up with the Iranian negotiators telling us they had the
Speaker 4: inalienable right to enrich all their nuclear fuel that they possessed.
Speaker 4: That's how they opened up. We of course responded that
Speaker 4: the President feels we have the inalienable right to stop
Speaker 4: you dead year tracks. They then went on to say
Speaker 4: that beyond the inalienable right to enrich, that that was
Speaker 4: going to be their starting point, and Jared and I
Speaker 4: just sort of looked at ourselves flum mixed, and said, well,
Speaker 4: we're really in for it now.
Speaker 1: Well let me get a little in the wheeze if
Speaker 1: we can. My understanding was you got to a point
Speaker 1: where you were discussing enriched uranium at much very low
Speaker 1: levels for civilian purposes, although I don't think they really
Speaker 1: need it, because they have all the energy they'd ever want.
Speaker 1: But did that come up? Was that offer made to them?
Speaker 4: We discussed with them ten years of no enrichment whatsoever,
Speaker 4: and we would pay for the fuel. And it was
Speaker 4: flatly rejected. And the presidents says for you that to
Speaker 4: have a good faith negotiation, pardon me.
Speaker 1: You're saying that we would give it to them, and
Speaker 1: they rejected it.
Speaker 4: They actually had that, and they rejected that, which told
Speaker 4: us at that very moment that they had no notion
Speaker 4: of doing anything other than retaining enrichment for the purpose
Speaker 4: of weaponizing.
Speaker 1: You made a statement last week and when I heard it,
Speaker 1: and I've known you for a long time and you
Speaker 1: are a friend, and when you made the statement that
Speaker 1: in fact, they may be a week away from possibly
Speaker 1: having capability at that moment, I interpreted that to mean
Speaker 1: it's go time, It's over. Was I wrong? Was that
Speaker 1: the moment that it was over?
Speaker 4: Well, I don't know if that exact moment it was over,
Speaker 4: but I know this. They have ten thousand roughly kilograms
Speaker 4: of fissionable material that's broken up into roughly four hundred
Speaker 4: and sixty kilograms of sixty percent enriched uranium, another thousand
Speaker 4: kilograms of twenty percent enriched uranium, and the balance is
Speaker 4: at three point sixty seven. They manufacture their own centrifuges
Speaker 4: to enrich this material, so there's almost no stopping them.
Speaker 4: They have an endless supply of it. The sixty percent
Speaker 4: materials SEAN can be brought to ninety percent that's weapon grade,
Speaker 4: weapons grade in roughly one week, maybe ten days at
Speaker 4: the outside. The twenty percent can be brought to weapons
Speaker 4: grade inside of three to four weeks. And let me
Speaker 4: say this, because I forgot this small little detail. In
Speaker 4: that first meeting, both the Iranian negotiators said to us directly,
Speaker 4: with no shame, that they controlled four hundred and sixty
Speaker 4: kilograms of sixty percent and they're aware that that could
Speaker 4: make eleven nuclear bombs. And that was the beginning of
Speaker 4: the negotiating stance. So they were proud of it. They
Speaker 4: were proud that they had evaded all sorts of oversight
Speaker 4: protocols to get to a place where they could deliver
Speaker 4: eleven nuclear bombs.
Speaker 1: What I wouldn't do to be a fly on the
Speaker 1: wall in that room, because Steve, you're a negotiator. You've
Speaker 1: run the most successful businesses, built some of the most
Speaker 1: beautiful golf courses. It defies all logic and reason for
Speaker 1: them to sit there as if Midnight hammered never happened
Speaker 1: and dictate to you that the one thing that President
Speaker 1: Trump insisted on, they can't get a nuclear weapon. They're
Speaker 1: going to go forward anyway. How stupid are they were?
Speaker 1: They they're done, They're gone.
Speaker 4: Now, well, well it was pretty silly, but they thought
Speaker 4: they could strong arm us. You know, President Trump sent
Speaker 4: me and Jared there to really determine on his behalf
Speaker 4: whether they were serious about doing a deal that that
Speaker 4: addressed his objectives, which are elimination of their of their
Speaker 4: missile program, elimination of their advocacy and support for proxies
Speaker 4: which is destabilizing the entire Middle East, elimination of their
Speaker 4: navy so we can have freedom of the seas and
Speaker 4: not be threatened with the shutdown of the Gulf of Hormus.
Speaker 4: And finally, no nuclear enrichment that can get them to
Speaker 4: weapons grade, which means no nuclear bomb. And we went
Speaker 4: in there and tried to make a fair deal with them,
Speaker 4: and it was it was It was very very clear
Speaker 4: that it was that it was going to be impossible,
Speaker 4: probably by the end of the second meeting, but we
Speaker 4: then went back for the third meeting just to give
Speaker 4: it the last college try, and of course they thought
Speaker 4: they wanted us to report positivity. It was it was
Speaker 4: not positive that meeting.
Speaker 1: Oh, Steve Woodcoff, I know you've been plying all over
Speaker 1: the globe, and you know at on your own dime.
Speaker 1: I think people do need to know that if you
Speaker 1: don't mind me telling people serving your country, serving the president,
Speaker 1: doing your best to bring peace to the world. They
Speaker 1: brought this action on themselves. You gave them every opportunity
Speaker 1: to take the exit ramp off. They decided not to.
Speaker 1: But we really appreciate you sharing all that with us.
Speaker 1: Steve Witcoff, Middle East m Boy, Thank you, sir. That
Speaker 1: was Steve Whitcoff, the Middle East don Boy describing the private,
Speaker 1: behind the scenes meetings, telling the Iranians, under no circumstances
Speaker 1: can they have nuclear weapons and they just flat out refused.
Speaker 1: This is after Operation Midnight Hammer, so they've they brought
Speaker 1: all of this on themselves. We'll get to your calls.
Speaker 1: Coming up next eight hundred nine poot one. Shawn is
Speaker 1: on number Also my interview with Prime Minister net and
Speaker 1: Yahoo coming up in mere moments. Let's get to our
Speaker 1: busy phones. Philip is in Texas, Philip, God bless Texas.
Speaker 1: How are you?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 1: We are glad you called?
Speaker 5: Oh, thank you very much, Sean big fan.
Speaker 1: What's going on? I appreciate it. What's happening?
Speaker 5: Oh? Also, I've got a couple of SIGs myself, so
Speaker 5: I agree with you there. It's kind of funny. I
Speaker 5: actually uh and live in Dallas, but in usin right
Speaker 5: now for to hear my father. But was at the
Speaker 5: on Saturday, the the Iranian protests against America and the Gallery.
Speaker 5: I drove by it. Unbelievable, people holding signs, screaming, yelling,
Speaker 5: down with America, down with Israel, down with Ice. Most
Speaker 5: almost all the women were in tight beads covered up,
Speaker 5: just you know, screaming and yelling. Then I went I
Speaker 5: went to Sundays stand with Iran's rally. I'm Jewish and
Speaker 5: there were Jewish people. There was the Christians, Catholics standing
Speaker 5: with Israel, staying with Iran. They had people screaming, thank
Speaker 5: you Donald Trump, thank you Bb you know, and you're
Speaker 5: sitting there looking at the overall people. I had a
Speaker 5: woman come up to me and say, you know what,
Speaker 5: for the first time, I don't have to say I'm Persian.
Speaker 5: I can say I'm a Ranient. And and the thing
Speaker 5: is for me was it was so funny. It was
Speaker 5: that you could see the difference. One was about death
Speaker 5: and destruction and misery and wanting to keep the Islamic
Speaker 5: regime and the you know, the Islamic ideology going. And
Speaker 5: then one was about freedom and love and taking care
Speaker 5: of the next step and prosperity. I mean, it was unbelievable.
Speaker 5: And I told it, you know, I was said, I
Speaker 5: have right now, my oldest nephew and his wife and
Speaker 5: my youngest niece are actually in Jerusalem. They can't get out.
Speaker 5: My sister's losing her mind.
Speaker 1: I can only say that the disparity that you see,
Speaker 1: but we will always have this disagreement. The radical left
Speaker 1: in this country, you know now they you know, you
Speaker 1: have Hakeem Jeffery suggesting that we're going to lose this
Speaker 1: conflict in Iran when all the evidence is to the contrary.
Speaker 1: You don't take anything for granted. You've got to finish
Speaker 1: the job. Then it's going to be in the hands
Speaker 1: of the Iranian people. They will choose their destiny. This
Speaker 1: is a party now that is against voter id and
Speaker 1: voter integrity.
Speaker 2: This is a.
Speaker 1: Party that wants open borders and sanctuary cities and states
Speaker 1: and amnesty. This is a party that wants defund dismantle
Speaker 1: of police departments and no bail laws. This is a
Speaker 1: party that wants to defund the Department of Homeland Security,
Speaker 1: which they're doing now. This is a party that is
Speaker 1: against energy independence. This is a party that voted for
Speaker 1: the largest tax increase in history rather than voting for
Speaker 1: the largest tax cut in history. So the competing visions
Speaker 1: that exist in this country exist around the world, and
Speaker 1: there are freedom loving people everywhere. I don't have any
Speaker 1: patients for people that don't understand, or refuse to understand,
Speaker 1: or have a political agenda, you know, or influencers likely
Speaker 1: being paid through some show company associated with some agenda
Speaker 1: that they are taking the most radical, extreme positions and
Speaker 1: they make no sense at all whatsoever. They don't understand
Speaker 1: or they don't want to understand, or they have an agenda.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure which it is, and I don't really care.
Speaker 1: But if you don't understand that the Iranians never being
Speaker 1: able to acquire nuclear weapons is a smart thing, then
Speaker 1: I have nothing to talk to you about, because I
Speaker 1: think you're dumb. I think you're an idiot. I think
Speaker 1: you're an imbecile. I think you are nai And I
Speaker 1: think that either you're being motivated by some agenda or
Speaker 1: you just choose to live in ignorance. It's sort of
Speaker 1: like the people in Iran and being slaughtered. Nobody protested
Speaker 1: on a college campus. You didn't hear any condemnation from
Speaker 1: the left, but they certainly condemned Israel even though forty
Speaker 1: the equivalent of forty thousand Israelis were killed. If they
Speaker 1: had the same population size as America on October seventh,
Speaker 1: if forty thousand Americans died here in the day, we
Speaker 1: would obliterate any country that did that to us. Rightly, so,
Speaker 1: and oh, they're committing genocide and college campuses, and you
Speaker 1: know the rise of anti Semitism around the world and
Speaker 1: in the punditry class, and I'm just sick and tired
Speaker 1: of all of it. I think there are a lot
Speaker 1: of ignorant people in this country, in this world, and
Speaker 1: the only way to prevent them from having any influences
Speaker 1: keep them out of power. They've got to be defeated.
Speaker 1: And Hanseh, I'll make my plea today that every one
Speaker 1: of you listening to my voice make a promise and
Speaker 1: pledge in your mind that you're going to vote in
Speaker 1: this midterm election because it's the most important one in
Speaker 1: your lifetime. That part I can tell you for sure. Anyway,
Speaker 1: my friend, I appreciate you eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one Sean if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program, all right, when we come back, News roundup,
Speaker 1: Information overload, hour, more of your calls, my interview with
Speaker 1: the Israeli Prime Minister Benjaminett, and Yahoo and much much more.
Speaker 1: We got a great Hannity nine Eastern tonight on Fox.
Speaker 1: As we continue