WEBVTT - Treasuries, ETFs, GE, and Private Credit (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Still, you know, we're

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about earnings, but let's be honest, the Fed has

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>really been moving this market is likely to continue to

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>do so for some time. So that means we have

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Ira Jersey. Whether we want to or not,

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk to Ira Jersey because he is

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the go to guy. He's the chief US interest rate

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. So Ira, you know, what do

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you expect from your Federal Reserve Here? The talk is

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of really ramped up on. Hey, we only need

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points this time. Yeah, I still think

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that they'll they'll do twenty five basis points and they'll

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>leave the door open to doing one or two more

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>um interest rate hikes. Remember, we don't get a summary

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of economic projections this time, so there won't be any

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>new Dot plot or anything like that. But but it

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>will be parsing very carefully j Powell's post meeting statement

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>next Wednesday, because um, you know, we want to get

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a hint of what their reaction function is based on

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>incoming data, Like will they potentially stop at the March meeting. Um,

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't think that they will, but um, but it's

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very close call thereafter, we think so. Um,

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And it will be very data dependent. So if if

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation keeps on the down trajectory that has been on

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in recent months, then you know, we might be very

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>close to nearing the end of interest rate tykes. Um,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a big if, right, because as China reopens and

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe seems to avoid a deep procession, there could be

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot more a lot more spending on commodities that

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>could push prices up and that could come through an inflation. Yeah,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that's true, man. You know, I think one of the

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the risks though, and one of the one

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of the key factors that's helping the inflationary environment right

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>now is is base effects. Right. So, so the spring

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of last year, when you saw the largest month on

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>month increases in a lot of prices and now you're

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>going to see some of those base effects roll off,

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>so you'll actually have, um, you know, somewhat of a

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>stabilization on a year on year perspective. UM. But but

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, like and and one of the things

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've often noted is, look, if if the Federal

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Reserve hikes to five percent, you know, plus or minus points,

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so let's say it's five percent UM then and and

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you wind up having the PC deflator more or less

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent, which seems like it's very likely going to

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>happen over the next couple of months. UM. Then really

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve will say, Okay, look, our job is

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not done, but we're we're just not cutting policy. And

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what's still amazing to me is that even though the

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Fed's been very consistent for the last six seven months,

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with almost every member saying, look, once we reach the peak,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to stay there for a long period of time,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the market still doesn't believe that. Right. The market is

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 1>still pricing in cuts that I don't want to sit

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>around with five percent inflation. I mean, base effect was

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the mantra that we heard at the beginning of twenty two,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and it still didn't slow inflation down that much. Right,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at year over year cp I, it

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>averaged seven percent in two thousand twenty one, it averaged

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>six and a half percent in twenty two. So let's

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>say we get down to five and a half percent

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three. I don't want to look forward to

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>five percent in four like, get it done. Well, that's

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's the reason why they're not going to be

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>cutting right, So I think, you know, the we we

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have to well, they they're not going to probably raise

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>much more than five and a half percent or five

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and a quarter um in part because the the some

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the underlying inflationary pressures are coming down. So you

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned things like commodities and and um uh and and

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>good prices, and good prices have already been falling, right,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So so I think we we throughout all of this,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we've actually missed the fact that core goods prices are

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>actually falling on a month a month basis. What's continuing

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to rise significantly is our services prices, and those are

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>driven in large part by by wages and wage games um.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the employment situation continues to be um, you know,

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>reasonably good. So so the federal Reserve will be pretty happy,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think to maintain interest rates this year. Look if Matt,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you're you know, you're right, And there

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is a large portion of the market that still thinks

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Federal Reserve is behind the curve and they

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>need to continue to hike well beyond five there's a

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>whole another part side of the market that's actually, you know,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly winning saying that hey, we're going to be in

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>a recession in the second half of the year, and

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because of that, the Fed is going to be cutting

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later before um uh, you know, and

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>even before year end. We we actually did a piece

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>yesterday looking at what options markets are pricing and option

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and even though the market is currently pricing for about

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>forty basis points of interest rate cuts by the end

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year, it's what the market is really pricing

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for is either one cut or four or five six cuts, right, So,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>so we're really pricing this bimodal distribution of of uh,

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but but all leaning toward cuts and not much more

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of hikes. So so, even though there were

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>some that are sympathetic to your view, Matt Well, um

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that most of the market is not and and that

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're priced for four cuts and which I personally thinks

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>won't happen. I just want them to take care of

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>inflation before we get into such a deepercession that my

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>boss isn't willing to give me a raise to keep

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>up with inflation. Right, this is a bad situation. And uh,

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been going on for too long already. And if

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they continue just to let it go on, it's going

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to get much worse. Because until now, wage gains have

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>almost kept up with inflation. They they still have been

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.679
<v Speaker 1>outpaced by inflation. But if you get into a situation

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>where inflation keeps smoldering and not only you know, we

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>see three m like starting to fire people, they're definitely

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not giving any raises. Now. You know the the FC

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>Central New Jersey tickets that cost me twenty dollars last

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>year and thirty dollars this year, that cost me forty

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>dollars next year. I'm not gonna be able to afford

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to go anymore. Well, and and that's one of the

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>reasons why, and that that the Federal Reserve, I think

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>is not is going to take away and see approach

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>once they once they reached the next couple of a

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of meetings and they reached that five percent level.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That not that that five percent levels any kind of

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>magic number, UM, but they they know that there is

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to see a slowdown in the in economic activity.

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>And usually slowdowns in economic activity are followed by UM,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>followed by slower price gains and and uh, and inflation

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>tends to come down. So that's the reason why I

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>think that the Fed is going to take a little

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a wait and see approach. And UM, you know,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>if if, certainly, if if inflation re accelerates in a

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>major way, UM, then the Federal Reserve at that point

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>would be able to hike more. But but I think,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking a pause and then trying to maintain

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rates at five five and a quarter percent is what

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they intend on doing, right And and look, my job

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>also met is not to not to tell them what

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to do and not to give my opinion, but trying

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to point out what they should be doing. What they

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>will do, and what I think that they will do

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is maintain interest rate. It's for the rest of this year,

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>probably into because if the employment situation is strong enough,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll have the ability to do that. That's what we

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>need though, someone to tell us what they will do.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to hear from me and Vince tell

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>them what they should do. Good stuff. We'll get to

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a soccer discussion at another time. IRA Jersey, Chief US

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. We wove in the soccer, Yeah, yeah,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we woven into a little bit f C United FC

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Central Jersey or something like that, Central Jersey or something

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like that Rayal Center, New Jersey, Real Central New Jersey.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, there we go. I have a buddy, uh,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>David Auerbach. He's a managing director at Armada E T

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>F Advisors and also a fellow Fish fan. Oh. We

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>actually went to see the New Year's Eve shows together,

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them ye at Madison Square. Wasn't it was amazing?

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>That's it. It was fantastic. But the funny thing is,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're sitting there and we had a suite, a

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of couple of c eats, um great view. The

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>light show is insane, and in the second set we

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>get into this deep, like spacey discussion about Mall Reads

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, you know what, in this entire stadium,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in all of MSG, nobody else is talking about Mall ranks.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, let's bring in David on the phone, joining

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>us out of Texas. UM great to have you on

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the program. David, Let's start by talking about the situation

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that that the real estate industry, or the residential real

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>estate industry funds itself in right now. We'll get to

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the malls later. But you run house h a U S,

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>which is an e t F and actively managed e

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>t F that invests in publicly traded reads. Talk to

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>me about the state of your industry. Well, good morning,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me back on the air, and of

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>course I'd rather talk about our fun experience. But you know,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, in the world of publicly traded reads, you know,

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we see really a lot of upside as you know,

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>after the ball told results, you know, a lot of

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the reats are coming out basically forecasting we're not going

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to have as great of a year and o Y

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>growth and you know, really crushed it like we did

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>last year, because last year was almost unprecedented for some

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>of the residential reeths. But these guys are still forecasting

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>growth and in the wake of rising interest rates and

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>rising inflation, we're focused on that end rental payment. We

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>call it the residential reat income ets because we say

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that the rent payment goes into your pocket as income

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in the form of dividends, and pretty much across the board,

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>these residential reeths have been raising their UH dividends over

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years through COVID. That's great for Paul, Paul,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>how good is you? You You love dividends stuff. So

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>has the residential real estate market, I mean, is it's

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>still adjusting to this higher mortgage rate environment. Has it steadied?

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>What are we seeing here? Yeah, it's definitely adjusting, there's

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. You know, some of the home

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sales numbers that have been coming out recently, though there's

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat kind of dated results, are showing somewhat of a

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>turnaround compared to what we had seen, you know, in

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the mid second mid second half of the year last year.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>I hate to use the term, and everybody kicks around

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that new normal. Look. Interested interest rates have gone from

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>zero to four and a half percent. Mortgage rates you know,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>went from like two to six three to six percent

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. We're in this six percent mortgage range right now,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I think people are accepting it. The problem

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, hey, I get this great job

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to move from Dallas, Texas to New York, and

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trading my two seven five mortgage for a six

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and change mortgage in New York. I'm you know, I'm

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>basically locked in. I'm kind of geographically constrained at that point.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And so from the rental payment from the rental side,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, unless you're in the market to go out

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and buy that house right now, you're really focused on

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>what's my end rent payment going to be next month?

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it going up ten percent or is it going

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>up a hundred percent? Well, and I mean so many

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't been able to buy have been and

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>put in that position. And in terms of the investment though, David,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for those listening who don't quite get the E t F,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, functionality, How does that work when when when

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you get paid dividends by the public reads you invest in.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>How does say Paul buys a share of house, how

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>does that come through to him? Uh, It's it's a

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>great question. And basically it's passed through directly to the

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>end shareholder. We pay a quarterly dividend and it's basically

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a culmination of the income received from our underlying constituents.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Our fund owns twenty five publicly traded reefs. Those are

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>comprised of apartment reads, single family rental reads, manufactured housing,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>senior housing. All these companies are reporting monthly and quarterly dividends.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>That adds up and that basically event goes into your

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pocket at the end of the day as a shareholder

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on the phone of the dividends. So it's just like

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>any other stuff. So Paul calls this guy at pain

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Weber or wherever and says around for a while and says,

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you just reinvest those dividends or they just cut him

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a check every quarter. That's right, right, And you know,

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>past seem probably more like a you know, day one

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood type of guy who is well ahead of there.

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But yes, that is correct. Again. Ets are publicly traded vehicles.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They trade just like stocks. Bid ask spreads trade during

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the market hours, you know, and we highlight that liquidity.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Matt, you and I talked about the private

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>versus public and what we've been seeing in some of

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the private resets out there, you know, talking about gaining redemptions,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>investors having a hard time pulling their money out. You know,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they're never going to be able to get out of

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this maze of you know, trying to capture their investment.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And so for us, we're highlighting the liquidity of publicly

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>traded reafs and ets. You want to put a million

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars into house, thank you very much. You can pull

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>out a million dollars of house very quickly, just as

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>well versus you may have a harder time at some

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of these private vehicles right now, So, David, talk about

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates up that six percent range, is the expectation

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, a lot of folks are saying if

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be cutting rates at the end of

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>this year early next year, So is that Are the

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>mortgage folks you talked to saying, hey, the mortgage rates

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>will come back down along with the Fed. Yes, the

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes. Mortgage rates staly traditionally do tend to

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>move hand in hand with interest rates. If we do

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>see that correction coming back in later in the back

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, yes, I would expect to see that. However,

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day though, until we really

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>see the mortgage rates go back from let's say six percent,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know, a more manageable level of four percent.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I still think we're gonna see, you know, some popsy

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>turbunus in the housing market. What does this? What are

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>these big changes? And I mean I don't know when's

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the last time the FED raised four fifty basis points

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in a year? Um? What do they do to e

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>t F s and net asset values? I mean, they're

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger divergences, right, how do those fix themselves? Well,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, for us again, we're looking for us at

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the residential reefs and focusing on the underlying constituents themselves.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I will highlight that many of these reefs took advantage

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>during COVID to re capitalized, you know, their balance sheets,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're able to lock in very long term debt

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>at a very attractive rates. So unfortunately, you know, I

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>can't control as I as I tell people, I can't

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>control my et F stock price. I can't control my

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>constituent stock price. All I can focus is on the narrative,

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>highlighting how well capitalized these companies are, and I focus

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on the fundamentals. And usually at the end of the day,

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>matters we talked about. I take, you know, pick your

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite Wall Street stock reets, Apple, Microsoft, whoever, take your

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>fore fait, your favorite company, and I try to boil

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it down to four bullet points. What do you want

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a good company to do well? At the end of

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the day, It's very simple. You want them to grow revenues,

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>grow profits, grow dividends, and grow guidance. And that's pretty

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>much what you have been seeing from the residential reads

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>across the board over the past year two years coming

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>out of COVID, and so from the fundamental perspective, the

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is, these guys are in a pretty solid

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>position right now. Let's just CLEI really touch on malls

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for a second, because I thought it was such a

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>cool conversation that we had um in an extended version

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of Tweezer. It wasn't It wasn't really tweezer. What what? What? What? What?

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>What is up with that business? Like? Can it ever

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>come back? Um? What do they need to do? And

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about it? Ecap Rates in the

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>mall sector have been going backwards down the number line.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>To throw another reference at you, and when we look

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>at some of the high quality properties versus you know

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you and I spent a lot of time talking about

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>American Dream and uh in fact. Bloomberg Opinion ran a

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>great piece yesterday talking about how mall landlords are spending

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>huge dollars to offer these exponential type experiences and indoor

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ski malls and the retail location as an example. And

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the question is if you if you build it, will

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they come? And you know, at the end of the day, Look,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>there is no place like the mall. I have fond

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>memories and going to the arcade, going to Mrs Fields

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Cookies and you know that was where we spent our weekends.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And I know it's a different generation, but the mall

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>guys are trying to reach out towards that next generation,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through e sports venus. I do see the

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>mall isn't going away. I think we're going to see

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>an evolution of the mall space. I'm looking forward to it.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. I hope they put in pickleball. Pickleball, you're

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a big pickleball fan. Yeah, all on and whatever the

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>latest fat is. David auerback Managing Director Armada E. T

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>F S giving us his thoughts on the residential real

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>estate market in their Residential reet Um Income et F

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>H A U S House. Uh So we'll see how

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that goes, but mortgage rates at six percent makes it

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>tough for some buyers. Now, let's talk about some industrial America,

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>agricultural equipment, turbine engines, all that kind of good stuff.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>We can do that with Karen Herbal Hall Hubal Heart.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>She covers all that industrial stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Karen lots to talk about. Let's start with one of

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>your all time faves. You've been following this company for decades, Ge,

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what do we learned today with their earnings and kind

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of what's their story going forward? Uh, well, you know,

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>um on just briefly on the fourth quarter, I guess, uh,

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there was positive surprises and negative surprises on aerospace. That

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was kind of in line power, which is a big

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>turnaround story. They did much better than expected on margins

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>um double digit margins, which they haven't done in four years. UM. However,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>they lost that in renewables, which is um uh you know,

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing issue for them. UM. As far as the outlook, uh,

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, again it's going to be driven by aerospace.

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>The outlook was lower than people expected on EPs spaces.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they're probably low bowling on air on aerospace,

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're giving themselves the room for problems again in renewables,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>although the long term out look is good for renewable,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>so we might want to talk about that a bit.

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So all right, let's talk about that, and let's talk

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>about the longer term outlook for General Electric for the stock.

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? What do you think? You know?

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is gonna be another wishy washy year because

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>A they've still got a spin off Power Power, the

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>energy business now called Veranova. That is a problem. It's

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>going to lose money again this year. They're gonna try

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to get it out the door in the spin in

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. So that's gonna be hovering over while

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we have the overlay of their ongoing business. Aerospace is

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have you know, over growth, uh you know, uh,

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, high double digit margins. And then the big

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>issue that came up in the quarter, it was probably

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>eight of the ten questions, was on what is free

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>cash we're gonna look like next year? Um? What is

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>look like? Okay, here we go, okay, um on that Okay,

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on that front, um, free cash. So it's gonna look

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>good for airspace, but renewables and and powers since they

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have it's a very long term business. When they get orders,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they have to disperse UM money up front on these

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>long term projects, and they're gonna pay out three to

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars in disbursements for projects in the renewable

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>busines this which is really going to significantly impact free

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. They are gonna have positive free cash flow,

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it will be up from this year, but there's a

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of uncertainty about the timing and magnitude of the

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>renewable up from payments. They will get that money back.

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But again, um, eight out of the ten questions were

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on how does free cash flow look next year? So

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what the focus is going to be

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on this, Karen. I like to look at, especially with

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>big behemoths like this. I like to look at a

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>comp screen CEMP on the Bloomberg. It automatically pulls up

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the stock over a five year window. And if I

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>pull up GE over a five year window, put them

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>up against Honeywell, Semens A, b B, what dogs, What

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a horrible, horrible investment it's been. Um, is it is

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that going to change? I mean, do I need to

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>start from square one, wipe out the last four years

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and and and start my comp screen from you know

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>yesterday or this month's yeah, you know once this you know,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the long term picture for GE Aerospace is

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>tremendous and that is gonna be GE core once everything

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>else is gone. Um their market leader in engine in

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in the commercial engine business. They have um, you know

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a good position in military as well, but the focus

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>will be commercial airspace. That recovery is still in very

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>early phases. It's got a long way to go. Um,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that business can probably plus margins. It's at eighteen percent. Now,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's story they're gonna when when they divest power the

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>problem business. I mean, um, you know, energy, the power business,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a high quality aerospace play and it's

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be a very interesting story. All right. One

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>other stock that has done almost as poorly as GE,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>well maybe even worse depending on the window you look,

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>UM is three M. I mean, over five years, three

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>M has managed to underperform g E. How do you

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you do worse than General Electric? But they've

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>done it. Why is it so bad? When you know

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>other company is like that create that build big equipment

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in America like Caterpillar and Deer have done so much better.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Three M has a huge overhang of UM litigation issues

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with UM T fast and or they have and also

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>an air plug UM litigation T FAST is that forever chemicals.

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's also affecting DuPont, etcetera. And that could be our

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>litigation guys say that could be dollar overhang on the

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>start for a while. Um they'll be they'll be litigating

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that for years and then they'll be paying it out

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.479
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time. They can't get out

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from under that cloud. On top of that, the operating

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>performance has been disappointing. So every you know, everywhere you look,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not been great news for three MS. So I

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>mean there's stock looks as bad as buyer. You know,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the German chemical companies. Three M went public I p O.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>January nineteen o one, just before the crash and just

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>before that, so that's when three M went public. So

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Karen pulling back the lens a little bit when they're

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>firing and they're are we going to see those are

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we gonna see those kind of headcount cuts at Caterpillar

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at Deer Uh? Well, first, I think that's a signal

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>um to the broad industrial sector because three M, with

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the breath of their product line in industrials and consumers,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they kind of are g d P and they're kind

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of signaling that. And they did see they have expectations

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of declines and organic growth in every business but healthcare

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>next year. So I think that's a signal to the

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>broader industrial sector. However, Deer and Caterpillar are driven have

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a very good outlook in the commodity markets and they

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>are really going to distinguish themselves in twenty three. Like

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, add equipment is going to be strong,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>mining is going to be strong. Uh you know, So

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that's why those docks are are are breaking away because

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>they're in a commodity cycle that uh is going to

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to be strong. So there your industrial agricultural companies

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've been talking about, what did they do in

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a recession? Because it clearly boy All that they're going

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to see it right away they probably have seen it.

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Do they cut people? Do they cut they shut plants?

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>What do your companies do? Well? You know, if if

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you're talking agg that's kind of a cycle of its own,

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, given what's gone gone on bring prices,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a good story there. Um. Chris Gilno covers that

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and can do that in more detail. But but on

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on the on Cat and Dear they're both in the

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>construction equipment business as well, and there will be some

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>minor hit to that business, but less than a normal

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>recession because all the money the government spending. So that's

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. They have the Infrastructure Bill, the Inflation

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Reduction ACTOM, the Infrastructure Bill, money is starting to flow.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Demand for that equipment is very very strong um and

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>then that will continue as the Inflation Reduction Act starts

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to contribute later in the year. So they've got a

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of wind behind their sales um in in the

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>construction side, and then the mining side looks good, and

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>then the agg side looks good, so that those two

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>companies that you've named, you know, have a very favorable album. Alright,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, coluber Heart. She follows all that industrial stuff

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>for that's medical America. That's it, dude. I mean, I reason,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know enough of this, enough of this Twitter junk,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, enough of this cloud service exactly exactly. Even

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a wheelbarrow I'd be happy with. You know, Yeah, you

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>got a Craftsman wheelbarrow. That's what you need, right, Well,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about Craftsman but you've got your own

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>brand loyalty and wheelbarrels. Does snap On make wheelbarrows? I

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>don't know Mac Tools and knows. That's Coluberhart from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.719
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of rough when you look under the foot

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of the of the dow of the s and P

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>five three M is the biggest loser in percentage terms,

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they're down five and a half percent. I wonder what

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they thought, you know, when they said we're gonna cut

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs and they started preparing the press release. Do we

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>buy these shares now because they're probably gonna pop tomorrow open.

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not a tech company. When the tech company's report

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>job layoffs, the stock goes up. When you're just up

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>playing old American industrial company, that's not People worry about demand, Hey,

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>worry about demand, all right. A lot of folks like

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about private equity, but we like talking about

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>private credit. That's been an asset class, just really getting

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of assets, a lot of attention over the

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 1>last several years. It's been a really good business, particular

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>when rates were lower. Now with the rates going higher,

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the outlook there for all things private credit? We

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome our good friend Randy Schwimmer, he's go ahead of

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>senior lending and senior managing director over there at Churchill

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. So, Radio, what does this asset class look like?

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>What is your outlook for private credit in a world

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that's no longer you know, zero percent interest rates? We'll

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>tell you if you liked private credit in two you

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna love it in because what's happening is essentially

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that happened then, Rates going up, inflation

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>coming down in the second half of the year, seemingly

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>continue in the first quarter. UM strong economy, strong economy,

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>yields up, so we're at practically record yields in terms

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of private credit for senior debt close to UM. Haven't

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seen that in a long long time, and it doesn't

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>look like that's going away because the FED looks like

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna stick around for a while. So what do

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you expect from the Fed? And how key is that too?

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>UM the asset class. What we know is that we

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really know where they're gonna end up because we

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have the data yet. They're taking it seems like

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a slower approach basis points. Looks like the outlook for

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the next hike. Um. What the FED members are saying is,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 1>let's see what the data brings. Let's get it up

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to four seventy five, which would be the next hike,

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get up to five percent and see what happens. Then

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the question is will we continue to see a strong

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>economy which is bedeviling the FED right now because they're

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to slow things down. They've started to take the

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>punch away from the punch bowl, away from the party,

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where they have to start turney lights on, dismissing the

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>dj you know, telling people to leave the room. That

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>would happen if you get up to a six percent

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>FED funds rate, which would really slow things down. Paul,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have you looked at con lately? Yes, I, thanks to you,

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I do. It's condition positive territory. It's it's looking good.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Are great. The economy seems to be humming along just fine,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that argues for a bigger push. How much

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>does it matter, Randy? I mean, when the FED peaks,

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is that a problem for private credit because it's been

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on fire as they've been raising rates. We'll think about

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that level of interest rates. So the typical so first

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>spread on senior credit right now six six on top

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of what let's say as a five to you know difference,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a five percent benchmark and at six percent, now you're

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>talking twelve percent cost twelve percent interest rates for senior debt.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that all of a sudden makes the calculus

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>tricky for private equity sponsors who are looking at their

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>equity investments and saying, well, I'm trying to get yield

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>on my equity, and now the senior dick guys are

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>costing me. You know, how does that? How does that

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>math work? So at some point that interest cost gets

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to be a real burden on these borrowers UM, and

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see interest coverage shrink. We never paid

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to that in one because interest was basically zero.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But now you're you're you've doubled interests, spreads and total costs.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Now the interest coverage is tightening, and particularly with the

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have nots in the economy. So you've been talking about industrials,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>which in many cases are the halves in this in

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this economy right now doing very well, but in some

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of the have nots, with retail, some retail businesses, UM energy,

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>some some heavy consumer facing businesses, those businesses are going

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a challenging time with higher interest rates. All right,

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So when a sponsor comes to you guys now with

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the deal, Um, are the covenants tighter? Are the you know,

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the leverage ration is different, the coverage races. Yeah, because

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>because because coverage is tighter than the amount of debt

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that they can put on these companies is smaller. So

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that's come down anywhere from half to a full turn

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of leverage, which is really good for investors because lower leverage,

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>lower risk, higher yield is better returns um. But from

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the issuer's perspective, it's going to be more costly. They're

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to watch their margins. So the businesses we

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like tend to be more high margin businesses, low capex,

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>more defensive like business services. So as you look at

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio right now, I presume presume your credit guys

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>are really shopping in their pencils saying, how is our

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>portfolio set up right now for rising interest rates? What

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe a recession kind of what are you seeing here? Well,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that our portfolio is constructed, it's mostly defensive

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>industries as I mentioned, with high free cash flow um ratios,

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the business is generally speaking and doing quite well.

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, for the third quarter. We don't have fourth

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter yet. Third quarter numbers for our portfolio, we call

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it the Griffin Index after after our mascot Churchill Griffin

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>UM is up in revenues and cash flow over twenty

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Now those include companies that are doing add on so

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>M and A is part of that. But these businesses

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are growing UM. To your point when you started about

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy, certainly in those areas that are more defensive,

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>those businesses are doing well. Our portfolio companies are doing well.

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be the case in general in when

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at the more business services arena UM. And

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's both the challenge and the opportunity that we have

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>because if our portfolio continues to perform, it means we

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>can continue to lend. So private equity firm comes to

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>us and says, hey, we got a deal. We look

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 1>at if it fits the kind of parameters that we

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like for these businesses. We have the capital to invest

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in and what is the deal flow like now you're

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing So we had a good January, good first part

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of January, some of its kind of leaked over from

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year UM. But the forward pipeline

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is slowed down, no question about it. What's helpful about

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>direct lending is that the ratio of deals that are

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>being done in the private credit space versus public is

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>now foward and one in favorite private because of long

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>term capital and the ability of folks like Churchill to

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>commit large dollars and get deals done typical term loan

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>from your typical deals like length. Yeah, so it's it's

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>basically five to seven years. Um. Now, they don't last

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for that long because these companies tend to get reefinancier bought.

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So the average you know, ten or is probably two

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half to three years. You guys are doing

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>small and mid size. Maybe these are companies that are

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>between you know, fifty million revenues five million revenues. That's

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not kk R type deal, is it? Whose sources? So

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>these are middle market private equity sponsors there. You know,

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we have two fifty that are in our stable that

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>come to us all the time, and you know we're

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.239
<v Speaker 1>top one of the top lenders in the space. All right,

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things I want to ask about your

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>business specifically, Um, you have a wildly popular newsletter to

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>lead Left Left, and I feel like that could also

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be um and and an indicator as to the interest

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in the asset. Right, So what's it looks like? Well,

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is we had an M and A webinar

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>last week. We had seven hundred registrants. You know, not

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>quite the Bloomberg radio audience for Paul and Matt, but

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but basically people going online and listening to what's going on.

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>The short story from five top middle market investment bankers

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>who came on this webinar to talk about business is

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a world of the haves and have nots. The

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>haves being the companies that we talked about earlier, the

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive businesses the have nots, or the businesses that are

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more retail focused, higher capex and so forth. For those

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have not so there's no bid. If you're a seller.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like if you you have a five dollar apartment,

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to get your five d thousand, somebody offers

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you four hundred. You know what, I'm gonna wait. So

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those sellers are waiting for the good businesses.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you have an apartment to people like

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a nice area in Manhattan, they say, you know what,

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you that five I don't even need financing.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I can close tomorrow. You're gonna sell that business. So

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the haves getting traded, the haves not have

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>nods not And the big factor now is the wait

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and see that we talked about with the Fed. What's

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fed gonna do, What's gonna happen with interest rates?

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And most importantly, what's gonna happen with valuations, Because for

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the haves, evaluations are okay, we we only have a minute.

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But I know one of the other questions, what's going

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen with the debt ceiling? We're gonna start talking

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about it every day and I'm already sick of it.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. But what do you what do you

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think about it? How does it impact Well, remember in

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>UM it was a big deal. I can't believe that

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was twelve years ago. UM, and you know the mark

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>public markets, we had a real strong reaction. We lost

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it a letter, we lost an A from the triple

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>A to a double A UM. And I think it

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>feels like government has become more fraught than it was then,

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and so it's gonna be a Can you believe government

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is more dysfunctional now than it was then. So here

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we are and we're gonna be all hopeful that a

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>resolution is in place. I know we have till I

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>guess June to figure it out. So I can't wait

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to listen and hear on Bloomberg Radio. All right, if

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I was coming out of the Chase credit program today

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like I did back in the day, I'd go work

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>for these guys. I think Private Church is a place

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to go. Absolutely some of your resume and green sending

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>my resume from one. I think I'm not even fifties,

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>so I'll come over. Experience matters, Thank you, all right.

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Randy Scharmmer, he's cohed of Senior Lending. He's a senior

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>managing director Churchill Asset Management. We love talking to Randy

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a because he's nearby and he can come to the studio.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a plus. But we like just talking about private credit.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a growing asset class and it's just where a

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of funds are going. Um it's where you know,

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you get some of these deals in the small midsize

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>space on the M and A side, and it's a

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>great capital structure these guys can put on you. We

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta get the lead left on the Bloomberg terminals where

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>we have to Oh, that would be a good idea.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you can go to lead Left dot com.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we can include it in your Bloomberg subscription. Yeah,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a look at that, all right. Randy Schremmer,

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Love talking about that stuff.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk our c suite conversation of the day. Let's

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:53.959
<v Speaker 1>talk online grocery shopping. We can do that with che Hwang,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of a box that is a

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange listed company the tickers b O

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 1>x D. Put that into your Bloomberg Professional terminal and

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>take a look at that. So Shae, thanks so much

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Inflation is kind of the topic

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of the day for all consumers. Um, and boy, I'll

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you the place I feel it the most. I

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>think is in the supermarket, is in the grocery store.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about how it's impacting your business. I

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wish I could say I was immune from it, but

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>as a consumer, I feel it as well. And it's

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>not just the topic of the day, but probably the

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>topic of the year as well. Um. You know, it's

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>been rampant throughout the industry first we had supply chain.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Now we just have general inflation, uh kind of problems.

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But overall, it's not an easy time being a consumer

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in those grocery aisles, in store or online. So what

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>um kind of experiences boxed offering consumers? And is it

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just consumers? I feel like you have a B to

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>B component as well. Yeah, absolutely so. Traditionally, um pre

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>covid O, our business was seventy beata see B two B.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So anyone who wants wholesale consumables delivered to their doorstep,

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 1>whether they live out in rural areas or they they're

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>in a city office, we can service them anywhere in

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the lower forty eight states. But why, what's what's the

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>unique selling point here? I mean, do I pick a

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>box of stuff? Do I put all the stuff I

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>want in my box? Um? Do you deliver it quickly?

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>What's what separates you from other online grocers? Yeah? I

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is yes to everything you just said.

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So we've built a business on allowing folks to build

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a basket of these goods. So the typical consumer buys

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>eight items and so we ship it to you generally

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in two days or less. Many folks get it overnight

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>direct your doorsteps, so you don't have to lug all

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this stuff all around and without a membership fee. You know.

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, because folks generally buy so many

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>items at once, we can admortise that shipping price for

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>individual items over that giant box that you get. So

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we actually offer pretty compelling prices compared to other online

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>folks when you compare the unit price. And if you

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>think about us not charging a membership so you talked

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to us about the membership fee aspect, what's the strategy there,

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>How does it compare against others membership fee? Right? Right? Right?

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to get a sense of kind

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of what's the strategy behind that and how that, you know,

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>comparis to your competitors. Yeah, so a lot of competitors

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>out there do charge a membership fee, uh, in order

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to shop, but we just decided not to do that.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look at other ways that we've

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>been able to lower prices, whether it's getting folks to

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>buy a lot in a single card as I just mentioned,

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>or partnering with manufacturers in order to get some advertising

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>on our site to subsidize those prices. Uh. You know,

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing a pretty good job. I think, and

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>consumers time and time and again come to Box, whether

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you're a business or consumer, not only for kind of

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the fast shipping, the ease of use, but also pretty

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>sharp pricing as as well. So I've was living in

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Berlin for the past few years, and over there, Uh,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you order online groceries, they get to you in like

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve minutes. Um. Guerrillas was one of the brands.

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Flicker Flinker was another one. Is how come that isn't

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>picking up here in the US? UM? I think it

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 1>had quite a brief kind of flash in the pan moment.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say probably a year ago. Um, at least

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>here in New York where I'm standing right now. You know,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>there were ads everywhere. UM. I think you know, for

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth. UM, it does have its place sometimes

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you just need something in the next ten minutes. But

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, I think your general bigger shops

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are probably taking place once a week, uh, and for

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the wholesale stuff maybe once every other week. UM. So

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the future really will be dominated by whoever

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>solves that end to end kind of experience. I I

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>need wholesale in a week, but I need Uh, something

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>an ingredient for my my recipe in thirty minutes, but

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I need my weekly shop in two hours right now.

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>As simple as that sounds, no one has that end

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to end, seamless experience, and I think that's what everyone

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in grocery is trying to chase. So how has your

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>business evolved during the pandemic over the last several years. Oh,

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's involved quite a bit. So I know, we

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just talked about B two B. So B two B.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean we saw major headwinds. Uh during the depth

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. You can imagine we serve at small do

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>medium sized offices, transportation companies. Um, those folks just weren't

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 1>ordering UM. But we're seeing that rocket back. So UM

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>B two B. If we're gonna talk numbers, hard numbers.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Through Q three of last year, it was up a

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>blended over fift So folks are really coming back and

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ordering more UM. And also all this technology that underpins

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>our whole business. We wrote it ourselves, whether it's the

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>middle where the automation hardware. We then extracted it and

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>now we began to license that technology to folks all

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>around the world. So we've evolved quite a bit throughout

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that time as well. So UM one of the very

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>successful pieces of UM grocery business are private labels, right,

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>UM shop Rate has bowl and basket Costco has Kirkland. UM.

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you what are you doing in in that uh?

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>In that regard at box. Yeah, you know, I love

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the question because you guys have covered it so much

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just the inflationary environment, how it affects

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, how how it affects businesses. You know, one

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I think UM hasn't been said

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>by by some of the previous guests that you guys

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have been on is actually how people behave in previous

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of recessionary or inflationary environments. And that's folks trading

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>up or trading down. So they generally trade down to

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar stores, hard discounters if they're looking for just a

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>better deal on a whole dollar basket UM, or they

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>trade up. So I'm sure you know, folks at Bloomberg

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Radio consume a lot of salts or water just like

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I do. And if that's the case, then you know,

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have the wherewithal, you're gonna buy that giant

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>hack instead of buying a single can every single day. Now,

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>once you go in the store, Um, you're also going

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to trade up sometimes or trade down, you know, uh,

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>depending on the price point for certain items. And a

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>way you can trade down in terms of price but

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not quality is private brand and private brand everyone out there,

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't tried, not only us, but our others

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>out there. This is not the generic brands of like

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago. There has been billions of dollars invested

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>into the manufacturing of these products, and their quality is

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>actually quite good these days. So I'm looking at the

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>f A function on the Bloomberg terminal, give me some um,

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and it shows me some of the forecasts out there

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>from Wall Street here doesn't show you, guys turning EPs

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>positive anytime soon. What's what's kind of your financial outlook?

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Has it released the profitability because that seems to be

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what the market really wants these days. Yeah, yeah, Um.

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>So we've been trying our best and and pulling in

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that profitability number. So in Q two, in our earnings

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 1>call last year, we told folks, hey, we get it. Um,

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we could do a better job on fully

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and profitability. We executed and as of our last earnings call. Um,

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just in one short quarter, we announced an eight eight

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>percent rise uh in um uh in gross profit over

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a five basis point rise and gross margin on our

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>retail business, and of course we have the software business,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>which is traditionally gross margin. And as we begin to

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>recognize some of that revenue, I think you're just see

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that flow through the p n L. So it's just

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 1>like every other technology company out there, we're really trying

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to rein in profitability and costs. All right, A good stuff.

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate that. Cha Huang, CEO and co founder of A

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Box that's online retailer uh the New York Stock Change

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.799
<v Speaker 1>symbols b o x D. At a banner day last

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.280
<v Speaker 1>week they got funding I think uh ten or twenty

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in funding and the shares went up. Um.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That was Monday. That was Monday. All right, good stuff.

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Not a bad day. Not a bad day. If you're

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder there. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple podcasts

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.879
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three pt on Fall Sweeney

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio